1
SR 710 North StudyAll Communities Convening Meeting No. 2 – July 18, 20, and 23, 2013
1
1
1 1
Agenda
Study Processy
Alternatives Update
Environmental Studies Update
2
2
SR 710 North Study Schedule
3
Purpose and Need Statement
The purpose of the proposed action is to effectively and efficiently accommodate regional and local north-south travel demands in the study area of the western San Gabriel Valley and east/northeast Los Angeles, including the following considerations:
Improve the efficiency of the existing regional freeway and
4
transit networks;
Reduce congestion on local arterials adversely affected due to accommodating regional traffic volumes;
Minimize environmental impacts related to mobile sources
3
Study Area Map
5
Alternatives Being Studied
1. No Build2. TSM/TDM 3. BRT (with TSM/TDM and bus feeder service) 4. LRT (with TSM/TDM and bus feeder service) 5. Freeway TunnelA – Freeway with TSM/TDM* (dual bore tunnel)
6
B – Freeway with TSM/TDM and tolls* (single and dual bore tunnel)
C – Freeway with TSM/TDM and Express Bus through the tunnel* (single and dual bore tunnel)
*With and without trucks studied for each
4
Alternatives Design Refinements
Improve mobility and reduce congestion p y g
Optimize performance
Reduce ROW and environmental impacts
Reduce construction costs
Minimize community impacts
7
Minimize community impacts
Alternatives Refinement Process
TransportationTransportation
Stakeholders
EnvironmentalEnvironmental
TransportationModeling and
Analysis
TransportationModeling and
Analysis
PreliminaryPreliminary
88
EnvironmentalStudies and
Documentation
EnvironmentalStudies and
Documentation
yEngineering
and TechnicalReports
yEngineering
and TechnicalReports
5
Alternatives Update
9
No Build Alternative
Includes planned improvements p pcontained in the 2012 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)
Provides the baseline against which all of the build alternatives are compared
10
the build alternatives are compared
6
Build Alternatives
All Alternatives– Goal: Improve performance from AA Phase
Meet with cities and stakeholders
Refine alternative to minimize impacts while optimizing performance
Develop preliminary engineering plans
Collect data for technical studies
11
Collect data for technical studies
Prepare Draft Project Report (Caltrans) and Draft Preliminary Engineering Report (Metro)
TSM/TDM Alternative
Collected additional traffic data
Conducted field observations
Continue to refine elements of TSM/TDM alternative
12
7
TSM/TDM AlternativeTransit RefinementLocal Street and Intersection Improvements
- 27 intersection improvements27 intersection improvements- 7 local street improvements- Modify Fair Oaks and SR 110 interchange-Extend St. John from Del Mar to California-Valley to Mission connector
ITS ImprovementsActive Transportation
-Expanded peak period bus service
1313
-Pedestrian and bike facility enhancements to support access to transit facilities-Coordinating with local agencies
San Gabriel Valley Signal Forum Measures
-Signal synchronization-Signal optimization-Transit signal priority
BRT Alternative
Improve speed and reliability, comfort and i f th BRT t k/ i li tconvenience for the BRT trunk/spine alignment
Provide rail-like service
Improve access and connectivity to the regional transit system
Reduce potential effects to on-street parking
14
Improve quality of BRT stations
8
BRT Alternative
Refinements to peak-period-only bus lanes y
Develop concept for bus feeder service
Develop 3 typical station concepts
Exploring new fare collection technologies for reducing delays at bus stops
15
delays at bus stops
BRT Alternative – Multi-Modal Concept
16
BRT Alternative includes: BRT trunk line arterial and station improvements, reduced headways, new bus
feeder service and enhanced connecting bus services, active transportation, ITS, local street and intersection
improvements in the TSM/TDM Alternative
9
LRT Alternative
Continue preliminary design of structures, including t ltunnel
Develop fire life safety, ventilation, and fault crossing details
Identify feeder service (same for BRT): South to Riverside and Orange County Metrolink lines
East and south through SGV to El Monte Bus Station
17
West to North Hollywood using route of LADOT 549
North to JPL using existing Metro and municipal services
El Sol Shuttle to ELAC
Identify potential haul destination for excavated material
LRT Alternative
Continue to develop:
• Aerial structure conceptsAerial structure concepts
• Tunnel design detail
• Power needs for TBM
• Construction staging
Portal now south of Valley
Grade-separated maintenance yard over V ll
18
Valley
Shifted approach to Fillmore
Construct median on Mednik w/in ROW for LRT columns
10
LRT Alternative – Multi-Modal Concept
19
LRT Alternative includes: LRT Main line, new bus feeder service and enhanced connecting bus service, active transportation, ITS, local street and intersection
improvements in the TSM/TDM Alternative
Freeway Tunnel Alternative
Continue to coordinate with fire marshal, CHP, and first responders
Continue to develop tunnel and tunnel system design
Identify potential haul destination for excavated material
20
11
Freeway Tunnel
Continue to develop:W ll b id d i• Walls, bridges, drainage
• Tunnel design detail
• Power needs for TBM
• Construction staging
Developing O&M building and landscaping concepts
Providing turnaround area for
21
gCHP enforcement
Verifying if access can be provided to St. John Avenue and Pasadena Avenue
Freeway Tunnel with Express Bus –Multi-Modal Concept
22
Freeway Tunnel Alternative with Express Bus includes: new bus feeder service and enhanced connecting bus
service, active transportation, ITS, local street and intersection improvements in the TSM/TDM Alternative
12
LRT and Freeway Tunnel Design Considerations
Key factors for tunnel design:y gSoil conditions
Ground water condition
Seismicity
Fault hazard
23
Tunnel Boring Machines –LRT and Freeway Tunnels
Pressurized face Tunnel Boring M hi (TBM)Machine (TBM)
Adaptable to variable soil conditions
Pressurized-face operationsControls face stability in soil and
24
weak rock
Minimizes loss of ground and surface settlement
Prevents groundwater inflows into tunnel
13
LRT Tunnel Configuration
25
Freeway Tunnel Configurations
D l BDual Bore(Four lanes northbound
and southbound)
26
Single Bore(Two lanes northbound
and southbound)
26
14
Tunnel Systems Consideration
Lightingg g Communications Surveillance Ventilation Air Monitoring Aid Stations
27
Aid Stations Emergency Egress/
Refuge Public Address/Radio
Rebroadcast
Ventilation and Fire, Life, and Safety Considerations
Design Considerations for LRT Tunnel: Exhaust and supply fans located at stations are
used for ventilation
An exhaust duct at the platform is designated to extract smoke close to the fire position
Design Considerations for Freeway Tunnel: A t l d ti
28
Accounts normal and emergency operations
No intermediate exhaust stacks required
Reduce emissions by air-scrubbing at portal areas
15
Environmental Studies Update
29
Environmental Study Documentation
30
16
Environmental Study Steps
Prepare draft technical studies p
Caltrans/Metro review of draft studies
Prepare final studies for Caltrans/Metro approval
Approved technical studies used to
31
prepare Draft EIR/EIS
Presentation of key findings
Key Technical Efforts Underway
Establishing profiles for each community
Assessing properties for eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places
32
Identifying key vantage points for visual simulation
17
Key Technical Efforts Underway
Identifying sensitive receptors for evaluation in air quality and noise analyses
Conducting field surveys for biological/wetland
33
resources
Next Steps
Evaluate performance of build alternatives using 2012 RTP model
Continue to refine alternatives
Continue with Technical Studies
Continue with Preliminary Engineering
Prepare draft EIR/EIS document
34
Prepare draft EIR/EIS document
18
SR 710 North Study Schedule
35
Thank You
36