+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 13752189 Relativity

13752189 Relativity

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: jaja
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 60

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    1/60

    1

    Lynn Umbarger 04/28/2005

    Einsteins Theory of Special

    Relativity

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    2/60

    2

    Topics (46 slides)

    Einsteins Thought Experiments Reference Frames The State of Classical Physics in 1900 The Problem

    The Solution The Effects of the Solution Simultaneity Gamma Time Dilation Length Contraction

    The Lorentz Transformation The Addition of Velocities Relativistic Mass Mass and Energy General Relativity (13 additional slides, time permitting)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    3/60

    3

    Einsteins Thought Experiments

    At the turn of the 20th century Einstein asked thequestions:

    If I dropped a pebble from the window of a train

    carriage, I would see the stone accelerate toward themoving ground 4 ft. beneath my window in a straightline, then what would the person sitting on theembankment next to the tracks see? Would they not

    see it travel more than 4 ft. and in a parabolictrajectory? Whose right?

    If I ran at the speed of light and looked into a mirror at

    my face, would I see my reflection?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    4/60

    4

    What is a Reference Frame?

    A place to perform physical measurements

    Could be thought of as a grid-work of meter-rodsand clocks so that trajectories and timings can be

    performed Your reference frame always moves with you

    When someone or something is at rest relative toyou, then you are both in the same inertial

    reference frame When someone or something is not at rest relative

    to you, then they are in a different reference frame

    Reference frames in Special Relativity are said to beinertial because they are moving at constant

    velocity; no acceleration, no rotation.

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    5/60

    5

    The reference frame O is at rest to the referenceframe O which is in motion at a velocity of v and in

    the direction of the xaxis of both reference frames

    Not shown (yet) are the dimensions of time t and t

    What is a Reference Frame?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    6/60

    6

    The state of physics up to theturn of the 20th century

    Aristotle (349 BC) The universe was geocentric Everything moved on concentric spheres The Earth was a very special place

    Ptolemy (140 AD) added: The planets moved, at times, in tinyperfect circles to explain retrograde

    Copernicus (1543) The universe was heliocentric But everything moved in perfect circles

    Brahe/Kepler (c. 1600) The known planets were heliocentric The planets moved in ellipses The universe was not necessarily a perfect place

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    7/60

    7

    Galileo (c. 1630) The solar system was heliocentric (got him in trouble) It was a non-perfect universe (I.e. Sunspots, Jupiter had moons,

    Venus was actually a crescent)

    The natural state of motion is in a straight line until acted upon bya force (inertia) One cannot tell if they are at rest or if in non-accelerated motion There is no absolute rest frame of reference

    Newton (c. 1680)

    The laws of motion (mechanics) are the same for everyoneprovided that they are in uniform motion

    Absolute Rest and Absolute Motion are meaningless unless theyare relative to something (Galilean/Newtonian Relativity)

    He also implied with his rotating bucket experiment, that thereexisted a frame of reference at absolute rest

    The state of physics up to theturn of the 20th century

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    8/60

    8

    Maxwell (1860)

    Unifies electricity and magnetism intoElectromagnetism with 4 (beautiful) equations

    Electromagnetic waves move at the speed of light(effectively unifying optics with electromagnetism)

    The speed of light was at that time already known to bearound 186,00 miles per sec (~300,000 km/sec)

    But to what was the speed of light relative?

    The state of physics up to theturn of the 20th century

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    9/60

    9

    The ther (ether) was then proposed

    A flexible substance enough to penetrate everything, yetrigid enough to be a medium for the high speed of light

    How do we find the existence of the ether?

    In 1887, the Michaelson-Morley experiment had a null-result

    An explanation

    Lorentz proposed that space shrinks (or contracts) in thedirection of travel through the ether by a factor of:

    The state of physics up to theturn of the 20th century

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    10/60

    10

    The Problem(at the turn of the century)

    There may exist a reference frame atabsolute rest, relative to which, light is at a

    constant velocity of c

    If motion (mechanics) is relative toparticular reference frames, then why isnt

    light?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    11/60

    11

    The Problem(at the turn of the century)

    Newton, who created the Inertial Reference Frame(constant velocity), said it extended indefinitely,across the universe

    The only difference between two different inertialreference frames, would be a change in constantvelocity: Once you knew one inertial reference frame,then you knew them all

    Therefore, when one changes inertial referenceframes, one should measure a different velocity in thespeed of light

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    12/60

    12

    Dispense with the concept of an ether

    There are no reference frames at absolute rest

    Einsteins two 1905 postulates:

    All reference frames moving in uniform (non-accelerating),translational (non-rotating), motion; are perfectly valid forperforming all types of physics experiments, including

    experiments with light (optics)

    The speed of light is constant in any reference frame nomatter what its speed

    Einsteins solution in 1905(On The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    13/60

    13

    Einsteins solution in 1905(On The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies)

    Einstein didnt have a problem with the physicaldescriptions of matter and radiation (light)

    He did have an issue with how it was measured; inparticular he objected to the classical view of what weresimultaneous events, or Simultaneity

    Einsteins two postulates could be rewritten to say: All the laws of physics are the same in every inertial

    reference frame (positive statement) No test of the laws of physics can distinguish one inertial

    reference frame from another (negative statement)

    (As a consequence)

    The measured value for the speed of light must be thesame for all of observers

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    14/60

    14

    The Effects of Einsteins Solution

    Clocks run slower in the reference frame of amoving object relative to the clocks of areference frame at rest to the first

    Clocks slow to zero time as its referenceframe, relative to one at rest, approaches thethe speed of light

    The dimensions of an object shrinks (or

    contracts) in its direction of travel An object flattens to a plane as its reference

    frame, relative to one at rest, approaches thespeed of light

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    15/60

    15

    The Effects of Einsteins Solution

    Time and space are now variable depending onones velocity

    Time and space are now connected in a newmetric called: Space-Time

    Whereas space and time may vary, intervals of

    Space-Time are invariant (like light)

    The speed of light has become a cosmicconversion factor

    Si lt it

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    16/60

    16

    Simultaneity

    To the track-side observer in the middle of the top picture, bothlighting strikes occurred simultaneously

    To the observer on the middle of the train, in the middlepicture; the front lighting strike occurred first

    http://astro.physics.sc.edu/selfpacedunits/Unit56.html

    Si lt it

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    17/60

    17

    Simultaneity

    In fact, between the on-board observers and the track-sideobservers, there is a general disagreement as to what time thelighting strikes occurred

    Their clocks are now desynchronized as well

    http://astro.physics.sc.edu/selfpacedunits/Unit56.html

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    18/60

    18

    In order to properly measure something, one must do themeasurement at the same time

    Observers in the moving reference frame will not with agree

    the time, at which, the resting observers performed themeasurement

    This is because:

    Synchronization of clocks is frame dependent. Different

    inertial frame observers will disagree about propersynchronization

    Simultaneity is a frame dependent concept. Differentinertial frame observers will disagree about the simultaneity

    of events separated in space

    Simultaneity

    http://astro.physics.sc.edu/selfpacedunits/Unit56.html

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    19/60

    19

    The importance of the relativisticfactor (Gamma)

    Gamma appears as a velocity based variable

    throughout Special Relativity (recall Lorentz)

    It is the key mathematical solution for telling us by

    how much does time slow down (dilate) and spaceshrinks (contracts)

    =

    Gamma grows to infinity as the v approaches thespeed of light, and shrinks to unity when oneapproaches rest (see next slide)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    20/60

    20

    The importance of the relativisticfactor (Gamma)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    21/60

    21

    The Lorentz Transformation

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    22/60

    22

    When we are rest, we are actually traveling inthe time dimension at the speed of light

    When we divert that some of that speed overthe three dimensions of space, i.e. we go intomotion; then we travel through less time

    The amount that time slows is a factor of onesvelocity relative to a reference frame at rest

    How does the speed of lightaffect our experience with time?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    23/60

    23

    If t is the time in the moving reference

    frame, then the amount by which timeappears to dilate is t, shown by thefollowing formula:

    t=t/

    How does the speed of lightaffect our experience with time?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    24/60

    24

    When the two reference frames are restrelative to each other, their time dimensionsare parallel to each other and perpendiculartheir respective space dimensions (orthogonal)

    When one of the reference frames goes intomotion, it begins to rotate with respect thereference frame at rest while its timedimension must stay orthogonal to its spacedimensions

    This causes the measuring rods ends todesynchronize with the measuring rod at restcausing a visible foreshortening

    How does the speed of lightaffect our experience with space?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    25/60

    25

    If x is the length of a measuring rod inthe moving reference frame, then the

    amount by which length appears tocontract is x, shown by the followingformula:

    x=x/

    How does the speed of lightaffect our experience with space?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    26/60

    26

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time andSpace

    Space-Time Diagrams are a graphical tool to show the effects of

    the Lorentz Contraction on space and on time. These diagramsrepresent a frame of reference at rest, there is no motion yet.

    The vertical axis which is time, is labeled ct so that the speedof light can be shown as a 45-degree angle (slope=1)

    Only the x-axis is shown for simplicity; y and z are suppressed,so that all motion continues down the x-axis

    Th L t C t ti Ti d

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    27/60

    27

    Diagram A shows the original reference frame at rest(un-primed), and a new one in motion (primed)

    Try not to think of ct-axis and x-axis as contracting in towardthe c-line, but rather rotating about it.

    Say the that ct-axis is lifting off the slide towards you as thex-axis is rotating away from you beneath the plane of the slide

    Diagram B shows a faster moving frame of reference

    Rotated more about the c-line

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time andSpace

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    28/60

    28

    This is the Lorentz Transformation at work

    Say an event (A) like a pulse of light was heading away from

    the origin of both reference frames Diagram A shows how the un-primed frame would measure it

    Diagram B shows how the frame in motion would measure it

    Important to note: The ct and x-axis are still at right-angles to

    each other; so are the measurement lines out to Event A

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time andSpace

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    29/60

    29

    In both reference frames is one measuring rod atdifferent times and at rest with respect to its frame (itonly travels in the time dimension)

    Even though in B, the reference frame is in motion

    Note how the rod must always stay parallel to the x or

    x-axis

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time andSpace

    Th L t C t ti Ti d S

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    30/60

    30

    We wish to compare the length of the moving rod with the oneat rest at time ct1

    During this time both the right and left ends of the moving rodwill be seen at different times in the resting reference frame

    In B, we catch the moving rod at ct1 when its left end is

    aligned with the left end of the rod at rest

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    31/60

    31

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

    Because the observer at rest can only measure parallel to his x-axis at time ct, the extent of his measurement can only go tothe right ends trajectory path (Diagram A)

    He then measures from there straight down (or parallel to histime axis) to his x-axis (Diagram B)

    We now see the rod in motion as foreshortened

    h d

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    32/60

    32

    At ct2, a moment later, the moving rods rightend aligns with the resting rods right end

    But the moving rod is still foreshortened

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    33/60

    33

    The same measurement of time shows the aspects of Time

    Dilation Even though the clocks were synchronized at the start they

    continue to see each other as running slower because of therequirement to measure parallel to their own x-axises

    Ct3 sees ct2 as running slower and ct2 sees ct2 as running

    slower

    The Lorentz Contraction on Time and Space

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    34/60

    34

    On board an all-glass bus moving at .75c, a(strong) person throws a ball from the back ofthe bus towards the front at a velocity of .75c

    relative to the bus How fast would this ball appear to go relative

    to an observer at the bus stop (at rest)?

    Would they see it travel at 1.5c?

    No, actually they would see it move at 24/25c(or .96c)

    In fact, no matter how fast the bus or the ballwas traveling, you will never see an object hitor exceed the speed of light

    The Addition of Velocities

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    35/60

    35

    Because of the addition of relativisticvelocities, you can only approach the speed oflight

    Einstein used the following formula to describethis effect; if v1 was the velocity of the busand v2 was the velocity of the ball on board,then V would be the observed velocity:

    V=

    The Addition of Velocities

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    36/60

    36

    The reason for what the resting observer saw:

    The observer would see a foreshortened bus

    The clocks at the back and front of the bus would beobserved as very much out of synch with each other,

    and more importantly, out synch with the observers

    The observer would never agree, given the above

    conditions, that the ball was traveling as fast as theperson that threw it believed it was going

    The Addition of Velocities

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    37/60

    37

    Heres the space-time diagram representationof the addition of velocities

    The Addition of Velocities

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    38/60

    38

    Say two cars of identical mass, each travelingat .75c, hit each other head on

    According to the classical laws of theconservation of momentum and energy, thewreckage would come to a complete halt infront of an Observer A

    A

    Relative Mass(Einstein runs into trouble)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    39/60

    39

    Now say an Observer B was traveling along with theleft-vehicle (in its inertial rest frame)

    He would see the right-vehicle coming at him at a speed

    of .96c (Addition of Velocities) At the moment of impact one would assume that

    Observer B would see the wreckage go by at half theclosing speed of the two vehicles, or at .48c

    AB

    Relative Mass(Einstein runs into trouble)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    40/60

    40

    How could Observer B pass the wreckage at .48c and yet

    pass Observer A at .75c when Observer A was at rest to

    the wreckage?

    Was Einsteins addition of velocities wrong, or was

    classical physics off (again) at relativistic speeds?

    A B

    Relative Mass(Einstein runs into trouble)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    41/60

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    42/60

    42

    How about using Gamma again?

    Einstein use the equation: m= m

    (m = relativistic mass, m = resting mass)

    And the right-vehicle then had enough mass to push the

    wreckage passed Observer B at .75c

    Although this appears to only be an observational

    phenomena, it is actually a measurable fact in particle-

    colliders with hi h s eed electrons

    AB

    Relative Mass(Gamma to the rescue!)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    43/60

    43

    Mass and Energy

    But where did the extra mass comefrom?

    Einstein assumed it came from thekinetic energy (KE) that the right-vehicle had gained

    Kinetic energy was related to therelativistic mass minus the restingmass, or: KE = m - m

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    44/60

    44

    KE = m - m

    KE is measured in units of joules or

    kilograms times a meter per secondsquared

    But seconds (time) and meters (length)

    get varied at relativistic speeds Use the speed of light c, as a

    conversion factor to get rid of these

    units

    Mass and Energy

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    45/60

    45

    Mass and Energy

    KE = (m - m)c

    But when an object is at rest, it must

    also have a resting energy E, and norelativistic mass m, or:

    E = mc

    2

    2

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    46/60

    46

    End of Special Relativity

    Other effects of Special Relativity Relativistic Energy

    Energy gains at higher velocities

    Relativistic Momentum Momentum gains at higher velocities

    Relativistic Aberration How the surrounding star field would appear at higher velocities

    Causality

    Cause precedes effect as a function of the speed of light

    Light Cones Tool used to show causality and the limit of c

    Minkowski Space A mathematical trick to make space-time coordinate manipulation a little

    easier

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    47/60

    47

    General RelativityThe Motivation

    Einstein sought to extend Special Relativity to phenomenaincluding acceleration

    He wondered if he could modify Newtonian gravity to fit into SR

    But Newtonian gravity was (instantaneous) action-at-a-distanceand it was a force

    And Galileo (and before) understood gravity to accelerate alldifferent masses at the same rate (Universality of Free Fall(UFF) 32 ft./sec sec)

    Einstein thought if F=ma, and a is a constant when m varies,

    then how can F vary identically with m in the case of gravity? Is it really that smart

    Is it really that fast, exceeding the speed of light? Newton said if the Sun were to disappear in an instant, the

    Earth would immediately fly (tangent) out of its orbit

    Is gravity really a classical force?

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    48/60

    48

    General RelativityThe Equivalence Principle

    In 1908 Einstein had another break through via one of his thoughtexperiments:

    Gravitational mass, the property of an object that couples it with agravitational field, and Inertial mass, the property of an object thathinders its acceleration, were identical to each other

    A reference frame in free fall was indistinguishable from areference frame in the void of outer space (or in the absence of agravitational field)

    A reference frame, in the void of outer space, being accelerated

    up, was indistinguishable from a reference frame at rest on thesurface of the Earth

    We can no longer tell the difference between being at rest or beingaccelerated

    Einsteins new reference frames were now safe from effects of

    acceleration and/or gravity (but they were no longer inertial and theyhad to be small)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    49/60

    49

    General RelativityIdentifying the Gravitational Field

    Next step was to identify the gravitational field through fieldequations (but not as a force)

    Since acceleration was motion, and motion affects time and

    space, so must gravity affect time and space In 1912 Einstein realized the the Lorentz Transformation will

    not apply to this generalized setting

    He also realized that the gravitational field equations werebound to be non-linear and that the Equivalence Principlewould only hold locally

    He said: If all accelerated systems are equivalent, thenEuclidean geometry cannot hold up in all of them

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    50/60

    50

    General RelativityEinstein Revisits Geometry

    With the help of his good friend Grossman,Einstein researches the works of: GaussTheory of surface geometry

    Reimann - Manifold geometry

    Ricci, Levi-CevitaTensor calculus and differentialgeometry

    ChristoffelCovariant differentiation or

    coordinate-free differential calculus Einstein realized that the foundations (and

    newly developed aspects) of geometry have aphysical significance (in the theory of gravity)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    51/60

    51

    General RelativitySpace-Time is Curved

    The paths of free-bodies define what we mean bystraight in 4-dimensional space-time

    And if the observed free-bodies deviate from a

    constant velocity, it must mean that space-time itself,in that locality, is non-linear or curved

    In any and every locally Lorentz (inertial) frame, thelaws of SR must hold true

    The only things which can define the geometricstructure of space-time are the paths of free-bodies(the Earth or an apple)

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    52/60

    52

    General RelativityThe Consequences

    Euclidean inertial reference frames are abandoned

    Only a locally-inertial coordinate system for extremelysmall, tangent pieces of flat space-time (Minkowski)

    can survive as a reference frame Reference frames are now in a free-fall

    Objects in a free-fall follow straight lines in 4-dspace-time known as Geodesics

    In fact, the shortest distance between two events inspace-time is a geodesic, regardless of how curvedthe space-time is in between these two events

    All measurements are done from these lines, but onlyfor small distances from them

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    53/60

    53

    General RelativityUnderstanding Geodesics

    A geodesic is the straightest line one can travel through space or across asurface

    However in one dimension lower, this straight line (or its shadow) canappear to be curved

    On curved or spherical surfaces, geodesics are part of a Great Circle

    An airliner that departs from San Francisco for Tokyo, heads northwestin a straight path to get there. When this path is traced-out on a 2-dmap of the Pacific Ocean (or manifold), it appears as an arc or curve

    When in an airliner heading west in a straight line through 3-d space,one can see its 2-d shadow deflect north and south across ridges and

    valleys on the surface of the Earth; the airliners 3-d path is a geodesic So to, does the Earth travel in a geodesic through 4-d space-time

    It appears to travel in a circle (or ellipse) in the lower 3-d space, but in4-d space-time it never completes a circuit because when it returns tothe same spot, one year in the time dimension has expired

    All free bodies (unforced) in space travel in geodesics

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    54/60

    54

    General RelativityTensors

    Lorentz Transformations can no longer be used

    In order to perform measurements now, one needs to paralleltransport vectors from free falling reference frames to otherreference frames, along geodesics

    Tensors are the tool of choice to perform these translations Tensors are mathematical machines that take in one or

    more vectors (say, tangent to an event in space-time) andput out one or more vectors at another event in space-time

    If during translation, the vector(s) gets stretched, re-

    directed or torsion is applied (twisted); then the tensor mustoutput this result (linearly) as: another vector, scalar, oreven another tensor

    If one pokes a toy gyroscope in a linear fashion (torque); thegyro will eventually re-align itself in a different orientation thanbefore. The new orientation is linearly related to the original

    one, but only a tensor can describe how it got there

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    55/60

    55

    General RelativityEinsteins Tensors

    Einsteins success in General Relativity was attributable to his use ofvarious tensors to describe his gravitational field equations. In addition tohis own, the Einstein Tensor, he used the following tensors:

    Riemann Curvature Tensor, which was made up of:

    Ricci Tensorwhich curls or curves up in the presence of energy/matter Weyl Tensor - which is similar to the the electromagnetic-field tensor and as a

    result, it can be used in the Maxwell equations as medium to propagategravity as a wave (at the speed of light) across the voids of space. Also, thistensor only curls locally in the presence of a spinning mass (frame-dragging)

    Stress-Energy (or Energy-Momentum) Tensor This tensor represents the source of gravity, the distribution and flow of

    energy and its momentum

    Metric Tensor Einsteins canvas on which these other tensors will interact. It is with this

    tensor that the measurements of distance (space-time intervals) and angles

    are performed. It also establishes boundary conditions which can be tricky.

    l l

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    56/60

    56

    General RelativityGravitational Field Equations

    Einsteins Gravitational Field Equation:

    The Ricci Tensor

    The Ricci Scalar (these two define curvature)

    The Metric Tensor Einsteins Cosmological Constant

    The Coupling Constant containing Newtons Gravitational Constant G

    The Stress-Energy Tensor (this defines matter)

    G l l i i

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    57/60

    57

    General RelativityGravitational Field Equations

    The left side of equation tells us how space-timecurves (is also the same as the Einstein Tensor)

    The right side tells us about the matter present

    (in other words)

    Matter (energy) tells space-time how much tocurve, and the curvature of space-time tellsmatter how to move

    G l R l i i

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    58/60

    58

    General RelativitySolutions to the Field Equations

    The Schwarzschild Solution: For concentrated mass, give the radius of a

    massive object as it becomes a black hole

    The Friedman Solution Gives the solution for a homogenous, isotropic

    universe which has an origin as well as a fate

    Gravitational Waves Gravitational waves are a prediction just like

    Maxwells field equations predictedelectromagnetic waves

    G l R l ti it

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    59/60

    59

    General RelativityOther Solutions and Proofs

    1. Mercurys perihelion rotates 43 every century

    2. Light at every frequency can be bent by gravity

    3. Gravitational red shift can occur

    4. Clocks run slower in a strong gravitational field

    5. Gravitational Mass and Inertial Mass are identical

    6. Black Holes exist

    7. Gravity has its own form of radiation

    8. Spinning bodies can rotate the space-time near them Frame-dragging

    9. Spinning bodies can create an electrical like attractionGravito-magnetism

    10. Space can stretch during the expansion of the universe

  • 8/13/2019 13752189 Relativity

    60/60

    Thank You

    Questions and Answers

    For a copy of this presentation, email:

    [email protected]


Recommended