+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: remedy
View: 24 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison. 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng. Baez Consulting, LLC May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
23
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng. Baez Consulting, LLC May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs
Transcript
Page 1: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3)

vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO):

A comparison

14th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference

Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.Baez Consulting, LLC

May 5-9, 2013Columbus, Ohio

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 2: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION

• Goals of:– MPO process– P3 process

• Stakeholders and Players

• Forecasting Process

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 3: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

GOALS OF THE MPO

AND P3 PROCESS

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 4: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

GOALS OF THE MPO PROCESS

• Identify transportation needs at the regional level:– Highways:

• Freeways, tollways, and major arterials– Transit:

• Bus, light rail, high speed, etc.– Freight– Bicycle and Pedestrian

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 5: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESS

• Deliver a infrastructure need identified in the MTP or other Plan– Highway, transit or other

• Forecasting for:– Public agency (MPO, DOT, Toll Agency)– Private entity (Concessionaire/Proposer;

Investor; Rating Agency; etc)

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 6: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESSWorking for a Public Agency

• Identify scope of the project• Identify Public Agency Equity:

– Revenue Positive:• Potential Cash Payment

– Revenue Neutral:• Maybe a small subsidy to attract investors

– Revenue Negative:• Re-size your project or bring additional public

equity

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 7: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

GOALS OF THE P3 PROCESSWorking for a Private Entity

• Proposing Team:– Optimize traffic and toll revenue to “win”. No

reward for “second place”.

• Investor/Rating Agency/Financial Advisor:– Due diligence:

• How much risk do I have?• Would I recover my investment?

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 8: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE MPO

AND P3 PROCESS

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 9: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE MPO PROCESS

MPO DOT

FHWA

TransitAgencies

Public Officials

General Public

FTA

Environ. Organizations

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 10: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

STAKEHOLDERS OF THE P3 PROCESS

InfrastructureDevelopers

Private Lenders

PensionFunds

RatingAgencies

TIFIAOffice Bankers

TechnologyCompanies

Lawyers, lawyers and lawyers

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 11: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

FORECASTING PROCESS

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 12: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

MPO PROCESSModeling

Land use

Model

Travel Deman

d

Micro-Simul.

Air Quality

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 13: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

MPO PROCESSTravel Demand

• Trip Generation

• Trip Distribution

• Mode Choice

• Multi-modal Assignment

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 14: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

MPO PROCESSValidation and Forecast

DataCollection

Validation Process

(Four-Steps; Regional)

ForecastTraffic

(20-25 years)

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 15: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

MPO PROCESSForecast

• Evaluation of modal alternatives• Once the MTP or MIS has been approved and

the project has been constructed:– Do we systematically compare forecasted traffic

versus actual traffic?– What are the consequences of missing the

forecast?

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 16: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSTravel Demand

• Very limited amount of time to complete the study

• Begin with the MPO Travel Demand Model (usually vehicle trip-tables)

• Data collection: traffic counts, speed/delay, OD, demographics, SP Surveys

• Disaggregation of trip tables, post-processing• Concentrating on assignment process

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 17: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSValidation and Forecast

DataCollection

Validation (Assignment; Corridor level)

ForecastTraffic

(>35 years)

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 18: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSForecast

What is the consequence

of under forecasting

or over forecasting?

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 19: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSForecast

• Client(s) will check your forecast versus actual traffic and revenue the day after the facility opens!!!!!!! Be Ready!!!

• Under-forecast consequence:– Leave money on the table, lose the proposal,

limit the scope of the project• Over-forecast consequence:

– Get a bigger project, bankrupt, liabilities, etc.

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 20: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSQuantification of Risk

• Sensitivity tests:– Demographics, facility utilization (diversion),

competing facilities, VOT, reliability, ramp-up; level of congestion

– Recessionary scenarios

– Phasing

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 21: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

P3 PROCESSSensitivity Tests (Examples)

• Demographic modifications (no-growth, growth reduction, postponing growth)

• Impact of gasoline price increases– Operational costs, land use

• Confidence in toll sensitivity curves– Pricing flexibility

• Impact of modifying Mobility Plan (competing routes)• Impact of the on-going recession• Revenue leakage• Toll rate increase implementation policy (base year,

frequency, percentage)

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 22: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

CONCLUSION

• Major differences:– MPO: Regional perspective– MPO: Comparison among alternatives– P3: Corridor perspective– P3: Many more players in the game– P3: More sensitivity tests– P3: Potential legal liabilities for the forecast

outcome

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs

Page 23: 14 th  TRB National Transportation  Planning Application Conference Gustavo A Baez, P.Eng.

Questions?

Gustavo [email protected]

214-864-9619

FORECASTING TRAFFIC AND TOLL REVENUE FOR P3 vs. MPOs


Recommended