+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the...

15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the...

Date post: 09-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
23
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
Transcript
Page 1: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu

15.351 Managing Innovation and EntrepreneurshipSpring 2008

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

Page 2: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

15. 351 Managing Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Fiona MurrayMIT Sloan School of Management

Spring 2008

Market Dynamics & Competitive Implications

Page 3: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

AGENDA

Motivation for today’s material: Why it is important to assess market-driven dynamics & why it is hard.

Market S-CurvesDefining market dynamicsMapping market dynamicsManaging market dynamics

Competition – interaction of market & technology dynamics

Page 4: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Typical analyses fail to examine the dynamics of technology & market factors

A more robust opportunity assessment is clear about the dynamics of the proposed technology & that of competitors & the proposed market & that of competitors

THIS IS HARD – WHY?Market assessment , dynamics & choices

Technology assessment, dynamics & choices

Technologies

Markets

Page 5: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Can we forecast the dynamics of market change?

Hard because:Predicting the futureHard to get dataRequires expert knowledge (across domains)Blind spots when considering others’ response

But….Wealth of historical dataCustomers to talk toRobust heuristics – market S curve

Harder or easier than technical change?

Page 6: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Consider the case of hybrid corn...

The states that tended to adopt earlier were those with the highest economic return (in terms of yields). Within each state, adoption followed an S-shaped pattern

1932 `34 `36 `38 1940 `42 `44 `46 `48 `52 `54 `561950

Years

Perc

ent

010

20

40

60

80

100

IowaWisconsin

Kentucky Texas

Alabama

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 7: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

The same basic shape and pattern is observed across a variety of technologies, such as electric motors...

Hall, 2004

100%90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960

Year

Shar

e of

hor

sepo

wer

Diffusion of Electric Motors in U.S. Manufacturing

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 8: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

And Television, Washing Machines, VCRs, and the Internet!

Year1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 20000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Shar

e (%

)

VCR

Washing machine

Refrigerator

Telephone

Diffusion of major innovations in the United States

Electric service

Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.

Page 9: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Understanding market dynamics:The Market S-Curve

Extentof Diffusion

Time

Saturation

Nerd Sidebar:

The Diffusion S-curve is the single most commonly accepted finding in the social sciencesThe Take-Off

Inflection Point

Page 10: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market

Technology S-Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

Market S- Curve

What is the relationship between these two curves? Under what circumstances do the S-Curve and the market diffusion curve look the same? How does diffusion depend upon differences in the technology vs. differences in customers?

Page 11: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.)

Null hypothesis. Vaccine development for example: technology changes immediate adoption

Technology S-Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

Market Diffusion Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

Page 12: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.)

Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Technology S-Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

Market Diffusion Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

What factors can explain this kind of diffusion pattern?

Nerd Sidebar:

The Diffusion S-curve is the single most commonly accepted finding in the social sciences

Page 13: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Contagion in Action:1927 Orteig Prize & the Spirit of St. Louis

• 1919 Raymond Orteig puts up a $25,000 challenge to fly New York Paris

• 9 Teams register to compete and spent $400,000 to win the prize

• The underdog, 25 year old Charles Lindberg wins the prize!

• Within 18 months of his flight:

• Passenger traffic increased 30x

• # of aircraft increased 4x

• Aviation stocks soar

Page 14: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.)

Typical situation. Different types of customers – Rogers on segmentation

Technology S-Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

Market Diffusion Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

What factors can explain this kind of diffusion pattern?

Nerd Sidebar:

The Diffusion S-curve is the single most commonly accepted finding in the social sciences

Page 15: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Factors that influence diffusion:

Progressive development of complimentary assets and complimentary productsClassic externalitiesWord of mouthProcess improvementsVintage effects (e.g. machine tools)Supply constraintsDevelopment of new uses for the same productGeneral shift in the needs of the population (lifestyle effects)Progressive development of skillsPricing strategies Market diffusion curve can be the discriminatory pricing curve

Page 16: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Understanding market dynamics:Basic segmentation (Rogers)

CumulativeAdoption

Time

Innovators

EarlyAdopters

EarlyMajority

LateMajority

Laggards

Different categories of adopters differ by, for example,social, economic status -- particularly resources, affinity for risk,knowledge, interest in the product

Page 17: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Mapping the evolution of the technology and the market (cont.)

Technology S-Curve

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

Market S- Curve

But what if the technology is changing as well?This scenario maps most closely to Moore although he never explicitly says so….

Page 18: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

The Standard Market Lifecycle of Technology Adoption (Moore 1989)

AdoptionRate

Time

Innovators

EarlyAdopters

EarlyMajority

LateMajority

Laggards

The S-Shaped Diffusion Curve Results from the existence of distinct adopter categories, who tend to purchase at a different point in the overall technology life cycle. Achieving diffusion over the life cycle depends on offering distinct value propositions to each customer grouping. The “demand curve” is changing over time!

Page 19: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Diffusion Patterns are the result of a Distribution of Adopter Types

Characteristics of buyers Characteristics of tech

Slow performance, bugs, no docs, gaps in functionality

Accept tech risk, bugs & fixes, pilot project, milestones, risky; customization, PoC vs. vision

Measurable & reliable technology; standardized; quality, infrastructure, support

Simple, plug & play; preassembled

Adopter Group

Innovators

Early Adopters

EarlyMajority

LateMajority

Laggards

Techies - Technology for technology’s sake; tolerant of bugs; low ability/willingness to pay; lead users

Visionaries - Seeking advantage through new technology; demands customization and close contact; willing to pay!

Pragmatists - Evolution rather than revolution; requires documentation and effective references; more cost-sensitive

Conservatives - seeking demonstrated ROI; looks forsimilar references; evolution; cost sensitiveLuddites - low “WTP”; commoditytechnology

Page 20: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

TechnologyStatic Changes

Same

•CONTAIGON•Information effect•WOM•Externalities• These factors influence diffusion in al four quadrants

• CHANGING SHAPE OF CONTAIGON• Diffusion depends on the rate of technology change & its impact on customer needsCustomers

Different

•ROGERS•Price sensitivity•Reference information•Skills• Diffusion depends on the number of customer segments

•MOORE• Diffusion depends both on the number of customer segments and on the rate of technology change –differentiation is key here

Putting technology dynamics & market dynamics together

Page 21: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Lecture wrap up

Value is created when new technology is matched to customer needBut customer needs change: as the technology evolves existing customers develop new needs, and in addition the technology may appeal to new kinds of customers, with new kinds of needsUnderstanding the structure of customer needs may be particularly important as it provides insight into the source of new opportunities

Page 22: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

ImplicationsThe transition across technology & market S-Curves is a complex challenge for any organization

At a point in time, advantage in technology-intensive industries depends on…

Satisfying Key Customer Segments (Exploiting the Mkt. S-Curve)Organizing Around the Technology (Exploiting the Tech. S-Curve)

=> BUT advantage over time depends on transitioning between S-Curves

Page 23: 15.351 Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring ......Disentangling the evolution of the technology & the market (cont.) Typical situation. Bass diffusion curve => contagion

Class 3 – BIG case studyCase: Focuses on how BIG organizes and manages its creative process to allow for repeated innovation in toys.

Key Decision: Focus your attention on the ways in which BIG manages the creative concept development process and the idea triage process. Does this seem like the optimal process? Is this a process you are familiar with?

Additional Assignment: watch the IDEO video (if you have not done so recently!!) and compare to BIG: http://www.ideo.com/media/nightline.asp


Recommended