Date post: | 07-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | karthickkrishna |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 59
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
1/59
11-1 Inventory Management
William J. Stevenson
Production planning and control
Chapter 2: Inventory management
9th edition
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
2/59
11-2 Inventory Management
Types of Inventories Types of Inventories
• Raw materials & purchased parts• Partially completed goods called
work-in-process (WIP)
• Finished-goods inventories • (manufacturing firms) or merchandise (retai stores)
• Replacement parts, tools, & supplies
• Goods-in-transit to warehouses or customers
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
3/59
11-! Inventory Management
Functions of InventoryFunctions of Inventory
• To meet anticipated demand• To smooth production requirements
• To decouple operations
• To protect against stoc-outs
• To tae advantage o! order cycles
• To help hedge against price increases
• To permit operations
• To tae advantage o! quantity discounts
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
4/59
11-" Inventory Management
Objective of Inventory ControlObjective of Inventory Control
• To achieve satis!actory levels o! customerservice while eeping inventory costs within
reasona"le "ounds
• #evel o! customer service
• $osts o! ordering and carrying inventory
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
5/59
11-# Inventory Management
To "e e!!ective, management must have the !ollowing%• system to eep trac o! inventory on hand and on order
• relia"le !orecast o! demand
• 'nowledge o! lead times and its varia"ility
• Reasona"le estimates o!%
• nventory olding (carrying) costs
• *rdering costs
• +hortage costs
• classi!ication system !or inventory items
Eective Inventory ManagementEective Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
6/59
11-$ Inventory Management
Inventory Counting SystemsInventory Counting Systems
• Periodic %ystemPhysical count o! items made at periodic
intervals
• Perpetua (continua) Inventory %ystem +ystem that eeps trac
o! removals !rom inventory
continuously, thus
monitoring
current levels o!
each item
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
7/59
11-& Inventory Management
Inventory Counting Systems (Cont’!Inventory Counting Systems (Cont’!
Perpetual inventory system ranges betweenvery simple to very sophisticated such as:
• 'wo-in %ystem - Two containers o!
inventory reorder when the !irst is empty• niversa ar *ode (.$)- .ar code
printed on a la"el that has
in!ormation a"out the itemto which it is attached
0
214800 232087768
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
8/59
11-+ Inventory Management
• Lead time: time interval "etween ordering and receiving the order • Holding (carrying) costs: cost to carry an item in inventory !or a
length o! time, usually a year (heat, light, rent, security,deterioration, spoilage, "reaage, depreciation, opportunity cost,/,etc0,)
• Ordering costs: costs o! ordering and receiving inventory (shippingcost, cost o! preparing how much is needed, preparing invoices, costo! inspecting goods upon arrival !or quality and quantity, moving thegoods to temporary storage)
• Shortage costs: costs when demand e1ceeds supply (the opportunitycost o! not maing a sale, loss o! customer goodwill, late charges,the cost o! lost o! production or downtime)
"ey Inventory Terms"ey Inventory Terms
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
9/59
11-9 Inventory Management
Classi#cation systemClassi#cation system
• n important aspect o! inventory management is thatitems held in inventory are not o! equal importance interms o! dollar invested, pro!it potential, sales or usagevolume, or stocout penalties0 For instance, a producer o!electrical equipment might have electric generators, coils
o! wire, and miscellaneous nuts and "olts among itemscarried in inventory0 t would "e unrealistic to devoteequal attention to each o! these items0 nstead, a morereasona"le approach would allocate control e!!orts
according to the relative importance o! various items ininventory0 This approach is called A-B-C classificationapproach
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
10/59
11-1, Inventory Management
$%C Classi#cation System$%C Classi#cation System
$lassi!ying inventory according to some measureo! importance and allocating control e!!ortsaccordingly0
AA - very important
BB – moderate important
CC - least important
Figure 11.1
Annual$ value of items
AA
BB
CC
High
Low
Few Many
Number of Items
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
11/59
11-11 Inventory Management
$&%&C classi#cation approac'$&%&C classi#cation approac'• Example
The annual dollar value o! 23 items has "een calculated "ased on annual demand and unit
cost0 The annual dollar values were then arrayed !rom highest to lowest to simpli!yclassi!ication o! items0 t is reasona"le to classi!y the !irst two items as , the ne1t threeitems as . and the remainder are $ items0
tem n!m"er Ann!al #eman# $nit cost %ollar &al!e classification
8 1000 4000 4'000'000 A
( 3)00 700 2'730'000 A
3 1)00 (00 )(0'000 B
6 1000 )1( )1('000 B
1 2(00 330 82('000 B
4 1(00 100 1(0'000 C
12 400 300 120'000 C
1 (00 200 100'000 C
) 8000 10 80'000 C
2 1000 70 70'000 C
7 200 210 42'000 C
10 )000 2 18'000 C
total 10'000'000
11 12 I M
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
12/59
11-12 Inventory Management
Cycle CountingCycle Counting
• nother application o! the -.-$ classi!ication approach is as aguide to cycle counting, which is a physical count o! items ininventory0 *he p!rpose of c+cle co!ntin, is to re#!ce#iscrepancies "eteen the amo!nts in#icate# "+ in&entor+recor#s an# the act!al .!antities of in&entor+ on han#/
• The ey questions concerning cycle counting !or management are%
• ow much accuracy is needed4
• 5hen should cycle counting "e per!ormed4
• 5ho should do it4
/B/
*he American ro#!ction an# n&entor+ Control ociet+ ACrecommen#s the folloin, ,!i#elines for in&entor+ recor# acc!rac+:5 0/2 percent for A items' 5 1 percent for B items' an# 5 ( percent for
C items/
11 1! I M
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
13/59
11-1! Inventory Management
The question o! how much to order is !requently
determined "y using an 6conomic *rder 7uantity
(6*7) model0 6*7 models identi!y the optimal
order quantity "y minimi8ing the sum o! certain
annual costs that vary with order si8e0 Three ordersi8e models are descri"ed%
• The "asic economic order quantity model
• The economic production quantity model
• The quantity discount model
Economic Orer uantity MoelsEconomic Orer uantity Moels
11 1" I t M t
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
14/59
11-1" Inventory Management
Ass!mptions of E o#el
20 *nly one product is involved
30 nnual demand requirements are nown
90 :emand is even throughout the year
;0 #ead time does not vary
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
15/59
11-1# Inventory Management
EO Moel inventory cycleEO Moel inventory cycle
• The inventory cycle "egins with receipt o! an ordero! 7 units, which are withdrawn at a constant rateover time0 5hen the quantity on hand is >ustsu!!icient to satis!y demand during lead time, an
order !or 7 units is su"mitted to the supplier0.ecause it is assumed that "oth the usage rate andlead time don?t vary, the order will "e received atthe precise instant that the inventory on hand !alls
to 8ero0 Thus, orders are timed to avoid "othe1cess and stocouts (i0e0, running out o! stoc)0The !ollowing !igure illustrate this idea0
11 1$ I t M t
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
16/59
11-1$ Inventory Management
T'e Inventory Cycle T'e Inventory CycleFigure 11.2
Profile of Inventory Level Over ime
!uantityon han"
!
#eeiveor"er
Plaeor"er
#eeive or"er
Plaeor"er
#eeive or"er
Lea" time
#eor"er %oint
&sagerate
ime
11 1& Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
17/59
11-1& Inventory Management
Total Cost Total Cost
Annual
arryingost
Annual
or"eringostotal ost ' (
Q
2
H D
Q
S C ' (Where
Q !uantity to "e ordered
# holding cost per unit $carrying cost per unit%
& annual demand
S ordering $setup cost% per order
he total annual ost assoiate" with arrying an"
or"ering inventory when ! units are or"ere" eahtime is)
Note that * an"H must be in thesame units+ e,g,+
months+ years
11 1+ Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
18/59
11-1+ Inventory Management
Cost Minimi)ation *oalCost Minimi)ation *oal
Or"er !uantity-!.
he otal/Cost Curve is &/0ha%e"
Or"ering Costs
!O
A n n u a l C o s t
-o%timal or"er 1uantity.
'* -
. /
-% = +
3
Figure 11.'C
Hol"ingost
11 19 Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
19/59
11-19 Inventory Management
+eriving t'e EO+eriving t'e EO
sing calculus, we tae the derivative o! thetotal cost !unction and set the derivative
(slope) equal to 8ero and solve !or 70
Q 2&S
#
2$(nnual &emand%$)rder or Setup Cost%
(nnual #olding Cost)P*
Number of or"er %er year' *2!3
Length of or"er yle ' !3 2 *
4here !3 ' !OP
11 2, Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
20/59
11-2, Inventory Management
Minimum Total CostMinimum Total Cost
The total cost curve reaches its minimum where the
carrying and ordering costs are equal0 This minimum
cost can "e !ound "y su"stituting 7@ !or 7 in the Total
cost (T$) !ormula%
%
/ .
'*
@
@
3+=
11 21 Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
21/59
11-21 Inventory Management
EOEO
• 61ample
local distri"utor !or a national tire company e1pects to
sell appro1imately A=@@ steel-"elted radial tires o! a
certain si8e and tread design ne1t year0 nnual carrying
cost is B2= per tire, and ordering cost is BC
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
22/59
11-22 Inventory Management
EOEO
+olution
: E A=@@ tires per year
E B2= per unit per year
+ E BC< per order
a) 7@ E
") um"er o! order per year% :7@ E A=@@9@@ E 93 order c) #ength o! order cycle% 7@ : E 9@@A=@@ E293 o! a year ,
which is 293 (3DD days a year) E A wordays
9@@2=
C
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
23/59
11 2! Inventory Management
EOEO
+olution (cont0)
d) Tc E $arrying cost H *rdering cost
E (7@3) H (:7@) +
E (9@@3) 2= H (A=@@9@@) C< E 3;@@ H 3;@@
E B;D@@
11-2" Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
24/59
11 2" Inventory Management
• Production done in "atches or lots• $apacity to produce a part e1ceeds the part?s
usage or demand rate
• ssumptions o! 6P7 are similar to 6*7e1cept orders are received incrementally
during production
Economic ,rouction uantity (E,!Economic ,rouction uantity (E,!
11-2# Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
25/59
11 2# Inventory Management
• *nly one item is involved• nnual demand is nown
• sage rate is constant
• sage occurs continually, "ut production occurs periodically
• Production rate is constant
• #ead time does not vary
• o quantity discounts
Economic ,rouction uantity $ssumptionsEconomic ,rouction uantity $ssumptions
11-2$ Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
26/59
11 2$ Inventory Management
Economic -un Si)eEconomic -un Si)e
-
/%
.
p
p u@
3
= −
Where:
P production or delivery rate
+ usage rate
he 5onomi run si6e an be "etermine" by using the followingformula)
11-2& Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
27/59
11 2& Inventory Management
Economic run si)eEconomic run si)e
The minimum total cost is determined as !ollows%
T$ min E carrying cost H setup cost E % - /
. I
+
@
ma1
3
)(@ma1 u P P - I −=
u
-cyce @=
P
- 0un @=
,a-imum inventory
cycle length
run length
11-2+ Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
28/59
y g
E.ampleE.ample
• toy manu!acturer uses ;D@@@ ru""er wheels per year
!or its popular dump truc series0 The !irm maes itsown wheels, which it can produce at rate o! D@@ per
day0 The toy trucs are assem"led uni!ormly over the
entire year0 $arrying cost is B2 per wheel a year0 +etup
cost !or a production run o! wheels is B;
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
29/59
y g
SolutionSolution
: E ;D@@@ wheels per year
+ E B;<
E B2 per wheel per year
P E D@@ wheels per day
E ;D@@@ wheels per 3;@ days, or 3@@ wheels per day
a0 7@ E
a0 T$ min E carrying cost H setup cost E
3;@@3@@D@@
D@@
2
;
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
30/59
y g
Solution (cont/!Solution (cont/!
2D@@)3@@D@@(D@@
3;@@
)(
@
ma1 =−=−=
u P P
-
I
2D@@BA@@BA@@B;
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
31/59
y g
uantity iscount moeluantity iscount moel
• 7uantity discounts are price reductions !or large orders
o!!ered to customers to induce them to "uy in largequantities0 n this case the price per unit decreases asorder quantity increases0
• ! the quantity discounts are o!!ered, the "uyer must
weigh the potential "ene!its o! reduced purchase price and!ewer orders that will result !rom "uying in largequantities against the increase in carrying cost caused "yhigher average inventories0
• The "uyer?s goal with quantity discounts is to select theorder quantity that will minimi8e the total cost, where thetotal cost is the sum o! carrying cost, ordering cost, and
purchasing (i0e0, product) cost0
11-!2 Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
32/59
y g
Total Costs 0it' ,urc'asing Cost Total Costs 0it' ,urc'asing Cost
Annual
arryingost PurhasingostC ' (
Q
2
H D
Q
S C ' (
(
Annual
or"eringost
PD (
Where P is the unit price.
ecall that in the "asic /)Q model0 determination o order sie
doesn3t involve the purchasing cost. *he rationale or not
including unit price is that under the assumption o no !uantitydiscounts0 price per unit is the same or all order sie. *he
inclusion o the unit price in the total cost computation in that
case 4ould merely increase the total cost "y the amount P times
the demand $&%. See the ollo4ing graph.
11-!! Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
33/59
Total Costs 0it' ,+ Total Costs 0it' ,+
C o s t
5O!
C with P*
C without P*
P*
0 !uantity
A""ing Purhasing ost"oesn7t hange 5O!
Figure 11.5
11-!" Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
34/59
Total cost 0it' purc'asing cost Total cost 0it' purc'asing cost
• 5hen quantity discounts are o!!ered, there is a separate
-shaped total-cost curve !or each unit price0• .ecause the unit prices are all di!!erent, each curve is
raised "y a di!!erent amount% smaller unit price will raisethe total cost curve less than larger unit price0
• o one curve applies to the entire range o! quantitieseach curve applies to only a portion o! the curve0
• 6ach total cost curve has its own minimum0
• There are two general cases o! the quantity discountmodel%
20 the carrying cost is constant
30 the carrying cost is a percentage o! the purchase price0
11-!# Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
35/59
CostsCosts
OC
5O! !uantity
o t
a l C o s t
Ca
C
Cb*ereasing
Prie
CC a+b+
Figure 11.6 In this ase there is asingle minimum %oint8 all
urves will have theirminimum %oint at thesame 1uantity
11-!$ Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
36/59
Total Cost 0it' varying Carrying Costs Total Cost 0it' varying Carrying Costs
5hen carrying cost is e1pressed as a percentage o! the unit price, each curve will
have di!!erent minimum point0 *Ca*C"
*Cc
CCa
CC"
CCc
Cost
Quantity
)C
11-!& Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
37/59
EO 0'en carrying cost is constantEO 0'en carrying cost is constant
• 9or carr+in, costs that are constant' the proce#!re
is as follos:20 $ompute the common minimum point "y using the
"asic economic order quantity model0
30 *nly one o! the unit prices will have the minimum
point in its !easi"le range since the ranges do notoverlap0 denti!y that range%
a0 i! the !easi"le minimum point is on the lowest pricerange, that is the optimal order quantity0
"0 i! the !easi"le minimum point is any other range,compute the total cost !or the minimum point and !orthe price "reas o! all lower unit cost0 $ompare thetotal costs the quantity that yields the lowest cost is theoptimal order quantity0
11-!+ Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
38/59
E.ampleE.ample
the maintenance department o! a large hospital uses
a"out D2= cases o! liquid cleanser annually0
*rdering costs are B23, carrying costs are B; per
case a year, and the new price schedule indicates
that orders o! less than
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
39/59
SolutionSolution
• : E D2= cases per year, + E B23
E B; per case per year0• The price schedule is%
20 $ompute the common 6*7
6*7 E
30 The C@ cases can "e "ought at B2D per case "ecause C@ !alls in the
range o!
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
40/59
Solution (cont/!Solution (cont/!
• .ecause lower cost ranges e1ist, each must "e checed
against the minimum total cost generated "y C@ cases atB2D each0 n order to "uy at B2C per case, at least D@ casesmust "e purchased0 The total cost at D@ cases will "e%
T$D@ E (D@3) ; H (D2=D@)23 H 2C(D2=) E B2;,2
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
41/59
EO 0'en carrying cost is a percentage ofEO 0'en carrying cost is a percentage of
t'e unit pricet'e unit price• ;hen carr+in, cost are expresse# as a percenta,e of
price' #etermine the "est p!rchase .!antit+ ith thefolloin, proce#!re%
20 .eginning with the lowest unit price, compute theminimum points !or each price range until you !ind a
!easi"le minimum point (i0e0, until a minimum point !allsin the quantity range o! its price)0
30 ! the minimum point !or the lowest unit price is!easi"le, it is the optimal order quantity0 ! the minimum
point is not !easi"le in the lowest price range, comparethe total cost at the price "rea !or all lower prices withthe total cost o! the !easi"le minimum point0 Thequantity which yield the lowest total cost is the optimum
11-"2 Inventory Management
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
42/59
E.ampleE.ample
• +urge 6lectric uses ;@@@ toggle +witches a year0
+witches are priced as !ollows% 2 to ;AA, A@ cents
each
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
43/59
SolutionSolution
• : E ;@@@ switches per year, + E B9@ E @0; P
• Find the minimum point !or each price, starting with the lowest price, until you locate a!easi"le minimum point0
Iinimum point@0D@ E
Beca!se an or#er si
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
44/59
Solution (cont/!Solution (cont/!
• ow compute the total cost !or D;@, and compare it
to the total cost o! the minimum quantity necessary
to o"tain a price o! B@0D@ per switch
T$ E carrying cost H ordering cost H purchasing cost
E (73) H (:7)+ H P:T$D;@ E (D;@3) (@09;) H (;@@@D;@) (9@) H @0D
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
45/59
1'en to -eorer 0it' EO Orering1'en to -eorer 0it' EO Orering
• The 6*7 models answer the equation o! how much to order , "ut
not the question o! when to order 0 The latter is the !unction o!models that identi!y the reorder point (R*P) in terms o! a quantity%the reorder point occurs when the quantity on hand drops to
predetermined amount0
• That amount generally includes e1pected demand during lead time
and perhaps an e1tra cushion o! stoc , which serves to reduce the pro"a"ility o! e1periencing a stocout during lead time0
• n order to now when the reorder point has "een reached, a perpetual inventory is required0
• The goal o! ordering is to place an order when the amount o!inventory on hand is su!!icient to satis!y demand during the time ittaes to receive that order (i0e0, lead time)
11-"$ Inventory Management
' i ' i1' - i ' EO O i
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
46/59
1'en to -eorer 0it' EO Orering1'en to -eorer 0it' EO Orering
• Reorder Point - 5hen the quantity on hand o!an item drops to this amount, the item is
reordered
• Safety Stoc - +toc that is held in e1cess o!e1pected demand due to varia"le demand rate
andor lead time0
• Service Level - Pro"a"ility that demand will note1ceed supply during lead time0
11-"& Inventory Management
i f ' i+ t i t f t' - , i t
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
47/59
+eterminants of t'e -eorer ,oint+eterminants of t'e -eorer ,oint
•The rate o! demand (usually "ased on a !orecast)• The lead time
• :emand andor lead time varia"ility• +tocout ris (sa!ety stoc)
f the #eman# an# lea# time are "oth constant' thereor#er point is simpl+:
R*P E d 2 3T
1'ere4
5 eman rate (units per ay or 0ee6!3T 5 lea time in ays or 0ee6sNote that demand and lead time must beexpressed in the same time units.
11-"+ Inventory Management
1' 1' t
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
48/59
1'en to reorer1'en to reorer
• 5hen varia"ility is present in demand or lead time,
it creates the possi"ility that actual demand will
e1ceed e1pected demand0 $onsequently, it "ecomes
necessary to carry additional inventory, called
Jsa!ety stocK, to reduce the ris o! running out o!stoc during lead time0 The reorder point then
increases "y the amount o! the sa!ety stoc%
R*P E e1pected demand during lead time H sa!ety stoc*he folloin, ,raph shos ho safet+ stoc@ can re#!ce
the ris@ of stoc@ o!t #!rin, lea# time
11-"9 Inventory Management
S f t St 6S f t St 6
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
49/59
Safety Stoc6Safety Stoc6
L ime
59%ete" "eman""uring lea" time
Ma9imum %robable "eman""uring lea" time
#OP
! u a n t i t y
0afety sto:
Figure 11.12
Saety stoc7 reduces ris7 o
stoc7out during lead time
11-#, Inventory Management
S f t t 6S f t t 6
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
50/59
Safety stoc6Safety stoc6
• .ecause it cost money to hold sa!ety stoc, a manager must
care!ully weigh the cost o! carrying sa!ety stoc against thereduction in stocout ris it provides0
• The customer service level increases as the ris o! stocoutdecreases0
• The order cycle Jservice levelK can "e de!ined as the pro"a"ilitythat demand will not e1ceed supply during lead time0 This means aservice level A
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
51/59
-eorer point moels-eorer point moels
• There are many models that can "e used in cases when varia"ility
is present0 These models are%1/ *he expecte# #eman# #!rin, lea# time an# its stan#ar#
#e&iation are a&aila"le/ n this case the form!la is:
R*P E e1pected demand during lead time H Mσd#T5here%
M E num"er o! standard deviationsσd#T E the standard deviation o! lead time demand E sa!ety stoc
• This model assume that any varia"ility in demand rate or lead timecan "e adequately descri"ed "y a normal distri"ution, this is not astrict requirements the model provide appro1imate reorder pointseven where actual distri"utions depart !rom a normal distri"ution0
11-#2 Inventory Management
- , i t-eorer ,oint
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
52/59
-eorer ,oint-eorer ,oint
#is: of a sto:out
0ervie level
Probability of no sto:out
59%ete"
"eman" 0afetysto:
3 z
!uantity
6/sale
Figure 11.18
*he )P "ased on a normal
&istri"ution o lead time demand
11-#! Inventory Management
E lE l
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
53/59
E.ampleE.ample
• +uppose the manager o! a construction supply house
determined !rom historical records that demand !or sandduring lead time averages
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
54/59
solutionsolution
The e1pected lead time demand E
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
55/59
-O, Moels-O, Moels
30 ! only demand is varia"le, then σd#TE
and the reorder point is%
R*P E
5here%
d Eaverage daily or weely demand
σd E standard deviation o! demand per day or wee #T E lead time in days or wees
90 ! only lead time is varia"le, then σd#T Edσ#T, and then the reorder point is%
R*P E
5here%
d E daily or weely demand
#T E average lead time in days or wees
σ#T E standard deviation o! lead time in days or wees
σ d 1'
d 1' 2 1' d σ +×
1' 2d 1' d σ +×
11-#$ Inventory Management
-O, l-O, moels
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
56/59
-O, moels-O, moels
;0 ! "oth demand and lead time are varia"le, then
nd the reorder point is%
ote% each o! these models assume that demand and lead
time are independent
333
1' d d1' d 1' σ σ σ +=
333
' d d 1' 2 1' d 03P σ σ ++×=
11-#& Inventory Management
E.ampleE.ample
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
57/59
E.ampleE.ample
• restaurant uses an average o! ars o! a special
sauce each wee0 5eely usage o! sauce has a standarddeviation o! 9 >ars0 The manager is willing to accept no
more than a 2@ percent ris o! stocout during lead
time, which is two wees0 ssume the distri"ution o!
usage is normal0
a0 5hich o! the a"ove !ormulas is appropriate !or this
situation4 5hy4
"0 :etermine the value o! 84c0 :etermine the R*P4
11-#+ Inventory Management
SolutionSolution
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
58/59
SolutionSolution
d E arswee, #T E 3 wees, σd E 9 >arswee
ccepta"le ris E 2@ percent, so service level is @0A@
a0 .ecause only demand is varia"le ( i0e0, has a standard
deviation) the second model is appropriate0
"0 From appendi1 ., ta"le ., using a service level o! @0A@, you
o"tain 8 E 203D0
c0 R*P E
E
8/18/2019 157_25225_EA435_2013_1__2_1_CHAPTER_2 Inventory mangement (1)
59/59
CommentComment
• The logic o! the last three !ormulas !or the reorder
point is as !ollows%
20 The !irst part o! each !ormula is the e1pected
demand, which is the product o! daily (or weely)
demand and the num"er o! days (or wees) o! leadtime0
30 The second part o! the !ormula is 8 times the
standard deviation o! lead time demand, i0e0, thesa!ety stoc0