Date post: | 11-Feb-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sonakshi-mathur |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
EE 122:TCP Congestion Control Ion Stoica
TAs: Junda Liu, DK Moon, David Zats
http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee122/(Materials with thanks to Vern Paxson, Jennifer Rexford,
and colleagues at UC Berkeley)
2
Goals of Today’s Lecture
Principles of congestion control Learning that congestion is occurring Adapting to alleviate the congestion
TCP congestion control Additive-increase, multiplicative-decrease (AIMD) How to begin transmitting: Slow Start
3
What We Know
We know: How to process packets in a switch How to route packets in the network How to send packets reliably
We don’t know: How fast to send
4
It’s Not Just The Sender & Receiver
Flow control keeps one fast sender from overwhelming a slow receiver
Congestion control keeps a set of senders from overloading the network
Three congestion control problems: Adjusting to bottleneck bandwidth
Without any a priori knowledge Could be a Gbps link; could be a modem
Adjusting to variations in bandwidth Sharing bandwidth between flows
5
Congestion is Unavoidable Two packets arrive at the same time
The node can only transmit one … and either buffers or drops the other
If many packets arrive in a short period of time The node cannot keep up with the arriving traffic … and the buffer may eventually overflow
6
Congestion Collapse Definition: Increase in network load results in a decrease of
useful work done Due to:
Undelivered packets Packets consume resources and are dropped later in
network Spurious retransmissions of packets still in flight
Unnecessary retransmissions lead to more load! Pouring gasoline on a fire
Mid-1980s: Internet grinds to a halt Until Jacobson/Karels (Berkeley!) devise TCP congestion
control
7
View from a Single Flow Knee – point after which
Throughput increases very slowly
Delay increases quickly
Cliff – point after which Throughput starts to
decrease very fast to zero (congestion collapse)
Delay approaches infinity
Load
Load
Thro
ughp
utD
elay
knee cliff
congestioncollapse
packetloss
8
General Approaches
Send without care Many packet drops
(1) Reservations Pre-arrange bandwidth allocations Requires negotiation before sending packets Low utilization
(2) Pricing Don’t drop packets for the high-bidders Requires payment model
9
General Approaches (cont’d)
(3) Dynamic Adjustment Probe network to test level of congestion Speed up when no congestion Slow down when congestion Suboptimal, messy dynamics, simple to implement
All three techniques have their place But for generic Internet usage, dynamic adjustment is
the most appropriate Due to pricing structure, traffic characteristics, and
good citizenship
10
TCP Congestion Control
TCP connection has window Controls number of unacknowledged packets
Sending rate: ~Window/RTT
Vary window size to control sending rate
11
Sizing the Windows cwnd (Congestion Windows)
How many bytes can be sent without overflowing routers
Computed by congestion control algorithm
AdvertisedWindow How many bytes can be sent without
overflowing the sender Determined by the receiver
12
EffectiveWindow Limits how much data can be in transit Implemented as # of bytes Described as # packets (segments) in this
lecture
EffectiveWindow = MaxWindow – (LastByteSent – LastByteAcked)
MaxWindow = min(cwnd, AdvertisedWindow)
LastByteAckedLastByteSent
sequence number increases
MaxWindow
EffectiveWindow
13
Two Basic Components
Detecting congestion
Rate adjustment algorithm Depends on congestion or not Three subproblems within adjustment problem
Finding fixed bandwidth Adjusting to bandwidth variations Sharing bandwidth
14
Detecting Congestion Packet dropping is best sign of congestion
Delay-based methods are hard and risky
How do you detect packet drops? ACKs TCP uses ACKs to signal receipt of data ACK denotes last contiguous byte received
Actually, ACKs indicate next segment expected
Two signs of packet drops No ACK after certain time interval: time-out Several duplicate ACKs (ignore for now)
15
Rate Adjustment
Basic structure: Upon receipt of ACK (of new data): increase rate Upon detection of loss: decrease rate
But what increase/decrease functions should we use? Depends on what problem we are solving
16
Problem #1: Single Flow, Fixed BW
Want to get a first-order estimate of the available bandwidth Assume bandwidth is fixed Ignore presence of other flows
Want to start slow, but rapidly increase rate until packet drop occurs (“slow-start”)
Adjustment: cwnd initially set to 1 cwnd++ upon receipt of ACK
17
Slow-Start cwnd increases exponentially: cwnd doubles every
time a full cwnd of packets has been sent Each ACK releases two packets Slow-start is called “slow” because of starting point
segment 1cwnd = 1
cwnd = 2 segment 2segment 3
cwnd = 4 segment 4
segment 5segment 6segment 7
cwnd = 8
cwnd = 3
18
5 Minute Break
Questions Before We Proceed?
19
Problems with Slow-Start
Slow-start can result in many losses Roughly the size of cwnd ~ BW*RTT
Example: At some point, cwnd is enough to fill “pipe” After another RTT, cwnd is double its previous value All the excess packets are dropped!
Need a more gentle adjustment algorithm once have rough estimate of bandwidth
20
Problem #2: Single Flow, Varying BW
Want to be able to track available bandwidth, oscillating around its current value
Possible variations: (in terms of RTTs) Multiplicative increase or decrease: cwnd a*cwnd Additive increase or decrease: cwnd cwnd + b
Four alternatives: AIAD: gentle increase, gentle decrease AIMD: gentle increase, drastic decrease MIAD: drastic increase, gentle decrease (too many losses) MIMD: drastic increase and decrease
21
Problem #3: Multiple Flows
Want steady state to be “fair”
Many notions of fairness, but here all we require is that two identical flows end up with the same bandwidth
This eliminates MIMD and AIAD
AIMD is the only remaining solution!
22
Buffer and Window Dynamics
No congestion x increases by one packet/RTT every RTT Congestion decrease x by factor 2
A BC = 50 pkts/RTT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 28 55 82 109
136
163
190
217
244
271
298
325
352
379
406
433
460
487
Backlog in router (pkts)Congested if > 20
Rate (pkts/RTT)
x
23
AIMD Sharing DynamicsA Bx1
D E
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 28 55 82 109
136
163
190
217
244
271
298
325
352
379
406
433
460
487
No congestion rate increases by one packet/RTT every RTT Congestion decrease rate by factor 2
Rates equalize fair share
x2
24
AIAD Sharing Dynamics
A Bx1
D E No congestion x increases by one packet/RTT every RTT Congestion decrease x by 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 28 55 82 109
136
163
190
217
244
271
298
325
352
379
406
433
460
487
x2
25
Efficient Allocation: Challenges of Congestion Control Too slow
Fail to take advantage of available bandwidth underload
Too fast Overshoot knee overload,
high delay, loss Everyone’s doing it
May all under/over shoot large oscillations
Optimal: xi=Xgoal
Efficiency = 1 - distance from efficiency line
User 1: x1U
ser 2
: x2
Efficiencyline
2 user example
overload
underload
26
Example
User 1: x1
Use
r 2: x
2
fairnessline
efficiencyline
1
1
Total bandwidth 1
Inefficient: x1+x2=0.7
(0.2, 0.5)
Congested: x1+x2=1.2
(0.7, 0.5)
Efficient: x1+x2=1Not fair
(0.7, 0.3)
Efficient: x1+x2=1Fair
(0.5, 0.5)
27
MIAD
User 1: x1
Use
r 2: x
2
fairnessline
efficiencyline
(x1h,x2h)
(x1h-aD,x2h-aD)
(bI(x1h-aD), bI(x2h-aD)) Increase: x*bI
Decrease: x - aD
Does not converge to fairness
Does not converges to efficiency
28
AIAD
User 1: x1
Use
r 2: x
2
fairnessline
efficiencyline
(x1h,x2h)
(x1h-aD,x2h-aD)
(x1h-aD+aI),x2h-aD+aI)) Increase: x + aI
Decrease: x - aD
Does not converge to fairness
Does not converge to efficiency
29
MIMD
User 1: x1
Use
r 2: x
2
fairnessline
efficiencyline
(x1h,x2h)
(bdx1h,bdx2h)
(bIbDx1h,bIbDx2h)
Increase: x*bI
Decrease: x*bD
Does not converge to fairness
Converges to efficiency iff
101
D
I
bb
30
(bDx1h+aI,bDx2h+aI)
AIMD
User 1: x1
Use
r 2: x
2
fairnessline
efficiencyline
(x1h,x2h)
(bDx1h,bDx2h)
Increase: x+aD
Decrease: x*bD
Converges to fairness Converges to
efficiency Increments smaller
as fairness increases
31
Implementing AIMD
After each ACK Increment cwnd by 1/cwnd (cwnd += 1/cwnd) As a result, cwnd is increased by one only if all
segments in a cwnd have been acknowledged
But need to decide when to leave slow-start and enter AIMD Use ssthresh variable
32
Slow Start/AIMD PseudocodeInitially:
cwnd = 1;ssthresh = infinite;
New ack received:if (cwnd < ssthresh) /* Slow Start*/ cwnd = cwnd + 1;else /* Congestion Avoidance */ cwnd = cwnd + 1/cwnd;
Timeout:/* Multiplicative decrease */ssthresh = cwnd/2;cwnd = 1;
33
The big picture (with timeouts)
Time
cwnd
Timeout
SlowStart
AIMD
ssthresh
Timeout
SlowStart
SlowStart
AIMD
34
Summary Congestion is inevitable
Internet does not reserve resources in advance TCP actively tries to grab capacity
Congestion control critical for avoiding collapse AIMD: Additive Increase, Multiplicative Decrease Congestion detected via packet loss (fail-safe) Slow start to find initial sending rate & to restart after
timeout Next class
Advanced congestion control
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649