BA (Hons.) GRAPHIC DESIGN

PEER FEEDBACK

PROGRESS CRIT

Number of Brief presented j ls the Final Major project blog accessibleYel

Is the written documentation presentedclear and comolete. lu ls the Final Major project blog labeled

clearlvya

Is there sufficient actual work presentedfor the time available

Yu ls the Final Major project blog up to dateand reflective of the work presented YA

ls there sufficient evidence of planningand oroanization presented Yu

ls there sufficient work presented on thebloq *)

Please answer yes or no to the above questions

Comment on the breadth of appropriate research presented. ls there sufficient evidence of a rangeof primary and secondary source material?Strengths

{.le;eurln wdtat .il;/r ,l,lucor"o

W% co+fer^r k duw,

\YdfuL - "hto awbe,vt lo -b-qntd . fr),l,lufr,o; n 0 gar,,,sut,'a'-.

i,/ u tl,*n,/rt,k 'ftvv"'X Lu

N{ttntl-ed,

Areas for Improvement

'l*-Nla

Comment on the breadth of practical and conceptual development and idea generation. To whatextent has the research informed a breadth on initial concepts and ideas and have these beenthoroughly explored.Strengths Areas for lmprovement

,l^).\'rrv yu eu**', Tulnaps yt4uth'\

lrr/4 a:4 b+,L^a,bVur*Jriol .? (awcL .rrnot rle,/,"^.

Comment on actual or intended products and proposals presented. To what extent has the creativepotential of each brief been exploited in terms of product, range and distribution?Strengths

qftW^l\y,,r^t"a4 ; ,nblorni ,l /,"// w(/u.l,a,l',^yr"u^M, /nui ii sn'clny" tttArJ

Areas for lmprovement

,l^lw:^:d n ',tLi!., 4[ cei t1^ q-/

Comment on the clarity with which the work has been presented. To what extent does theorganization of visual and written material help communicate the content and intendeddevelopment of the briefs presented.Strengths

caleol il,'ilL - tlJ tt^uarlnvlrr:Ua" "pttU,*d -w>+Lc)&: Y't{t*d -<*<>t-tu

f

Areas for lmprovement

Wry'%

Additional Comments

Actions Required