+ All Categories
Home > Education > 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Date post: 12-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: fondazione-giannino-bassetti
View: 654 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Piacenza, October 14, 2011 "Innovating Food, Innovating the Law" Conference ALBERTO ALEMANNO (École des hautes études commerciales de Paris, France) Regulating Emerging Risks: The case of nano-food applications and animal cloning in food production Video: http://vimeo.com/31450146
Popular Tags:
71
The Challenges of Nanofood and Animal Cloning Alberto Alemanno HEC Paris Innovating Food, Innovating the Law – International Conference Piacenza, October 14, 2011
Transcript
Page 1: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The Challenges of Nanofood and Animal

Cloning

Alberto AlemannoHEC Paris

Innovating Food, Innovating the Law – International Conference

Piacenza, October 14, 2011

Page 2: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

To provide you

with the ‘state of play’ of the ongoing debate

Page 3: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Nano-food

Page 4: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Food from cloned animals

Page 5: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno
Page 6: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

central to

Page 7: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

and to its theme

How ‘legal innovation’ may strike a balance btw

INNOVATION

&

PROTECTION

Page 8: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Both technologies

opportunities

&

(unknown) risks

Page 9: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Hence, need to promote innovation while attaining a high level of

protection

(typical rethoric surrounding technological innovation in EU

policy documents)

Page 10: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What kind of regulatory

approach to adopt ?

Page 11: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

the answer to this question depends on a variety of

factors, regulatory philosophies, competing

set of knowledge…

Page 12: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

real risks vs perceived risks

experts vs layman advice

regulatory humilty vs command&control

technocracy vs deliberate democracy

harm vs risk

paternalism vs ‘nudges’

Page 13: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

but is increasingly shaped by one

Page 14: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

salience

Page 15: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

saliencefuelled by social amplification of

risk, availability cascades and mental shortcuts

Page 16: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The ‘fear of the month’

Do cell phones cause brain cancer?

What about wi-fi? or MP3 players?

High doses of vitamins? Mercury in fish? GMOs? Nanotechnologies?

Page 17: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

How to decide whether (or not) to regulate ‘the fear

of the month’?

Page 18: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Rationality & Scientific Truth

Substantial equivalence with conventional food

Page 19: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Public Knowledge

FEAR about SAFETY CONCERNS about ANIMAL

WELFARE

Page 20: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What kind of regulatory

approach to adopt ?

Against this backdrop

Page 21: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno
Page 22: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Novel Food Regulation(258/97)

Food and food ingredients not used before May 15 1997

Page 23: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno
Page 24: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Extending the scope

« Novel food should therefore include foods derived from plants and animals, produced by non-traditional breeding techniques, and foods modified by new production processes, such as nanotechnology and nanoscience, which might have an impact on food ».

(Point 6 Preamble)

Page 25: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

FAILURE Spring 2011

Page 26: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Covered by existing (non-dedicated) regulations, such as REACH, NOVEL FOOD,

COSMETIC, etc.

yet

Page 27: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Let’s zoom in

Page 28: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The challenges

inherent to

Page 29: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Nano-food

Page 30: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What are Nanotechnologies?

Not new materials but smaller forms of familiar materials whose properties differ significantly from those at a larger scale.

The smaller the particle, the larger its surface area and reactivity.

Most definitions revolve around the study and control of phenomena and materials at length scales below 100 nm and quite often they make a comparison with a human hair, which is about 80,000 nm wide

1 nm = 1 billionth of a meter

Page 31: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What are Nanotechnologies?

Page 32: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Potential applications of nanotechnologies

Page 33: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What Makes Nano Different?

Manipulation of matter at the nanoscale to create new and unique materials and products

- Gold changes colour (it turns red)- Carbon nanostructures become strongest and stiffest

of currently existing materials- Copper becomes transparent

As well as the size as well as the conformation and form in the environment

YET CONTROVERSY upon DEFINITION because scientifically:-there is no scientific basis for drawing a line at any given size-nano subject to the same risk assessment paradigm (EFSA)-it may trigger labelling requirement-thus determining scope of regulation and future of technology

See EFSA Guidance Documents on Risk Assessment on Nanofood

Page 34: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The Science

Page 35: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The Scientific Challenge• If the smaller size may be advantageous, the nanoscale dimensions and consequently high surface area may lead to deleterious consequences, particularly in terms of their toxicity.

• This is particularly so in relation to engineered particles which are non-biodegradable/insoluble since they are not metabolised (so called particulate nanomaterials)

• Uncertainty about translocation in body

- Crossing of blood-brain barrier/Ability to enter cells

• Uncertainty about life-cycle effects

• Uncertainty about relevant physicochemical properties

Page 36: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

• The EU has decided to take an “integrated, safe and responsible approach” to the development of nanotechnologies since 2004. This includes:• reviewing and adapting EU laws (2008 Commission Communication – Regulatory Aspects of

Nanomaterials)

• monitoring safety issues• research programmes and funding• engaging in dialogue with national

authorities, stakeholders and citizens.

Regulatory Challenges

Page 37: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Consumer Information RegulationAdditional qualification:-Characterisation of internal nanostructures-Measure of surface to volume ratios

Page 38: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The industry perspective

Page 39: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Food from cloned animals

Page 40: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

1997

DOLLY

Page 41: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Animal Cloning in Europe

• European Public & Legal Debate on:• Whether• Under which conditionsfood produced using animal cloning should be allowed within the internal market

• In the affirmative,• Novel Food regulation?• Ad hoc/special legislation?

Page 42: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What is cloning? (I)

• Cloning is the creation of an organism that is a genetic copy of another.

• This means the two organisms share exactly the same DNA.

• Technique most commonly used is SCNT:

Somatic cell nucleus transfer (SCNT), which allows scientists to create genetic replicas (clones) from adult animals that share the same nuclear gene set as another organism

Page 43: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

What’s the link btw animal cloning and food?

• Cloning may be used to breed farm animals for food production

• The benefits of using animal cloning as a breeding technique consist in producing elite animals to be used in breeding

• The clones not used for food production, but their offsprings whose qualities might be:• Resistance to disease• Production of milk, quality of meat, etc

Page 44: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Public concerns(European Group of Ethics in Science and New

Technologies, 2008)

Page 45: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

The genesis of the cloning debate (II)

• According to the current EU Regulation, only food produced from clones is considered "novel food" as it is not produced via traditional breeding techniques. Therefore, such food falls under the scope of the Regulation on Novel foods, which is now under discussion at EU level.

• July 2008, EFSA released its Scientific Opinion

• September 2008, in a resolution it adopted, the European Parliament supported a total ban of cloning (622 MEPs vs 32).

• March 2009, new request to EFSA: statement

• In 2009, in order to have a broader view of the issue, the Council asked the Commission to present a report.

• At his EP's hearing earlier this year, Commissioner Dalli promised that the report would be delivered by the end of 2010.

Page 46: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Food from Cloned Animals

No specific regulation* for the time being

BUT

debate over whether

* Under proposed New Novel Food Regulation, food obtained directly from cloned animals is Novel Food, but not food obtained from progeny (because not the product of traditional breeding technique) subject to amendments

Page 47: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Consilium novel food

Page 48: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

EP Ad hoc legislation

• EP:

Outright ban, then – as final offer – mandatory labelling

Page 49: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Commission – October 18, 2010

« The Communication adopted today is a response to calls from the European Parliament and Member States to launch a specific EU policy on this sensitive issue. I believe that the temporary suspension constitutes a realistic and feasible solution to respond to the present welfare concerns ».  John Dalli, DG SANCO Commissioner

Page 50: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Commission position today

• Temporary suspension of:• the use of cloned farm animals and offsprings• The marketing of food from clones

• Establishment of a tracing system for imported genetic materials (semen; cloned embryos)

• Assessment of cloning technology in relation to food production and examines the relevant aspects of cloning in light of the existing legislative framework.

• It acknowledges the challenges posed by animal welfare issues and takes into consideration the ethical facet of cloning. It also notes that there is no scientific evidence confirming food safety concerns regarding foods obtained from cloned animals or their offspring.

• The communication examines cloning both in the Member States and in third countries. 

Page 51: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

impasse

Page 52: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

In the meantime

• As the debate unfolds, nanofood and cloned food are a reality

• Yet, little knowledge on what’s on the market

• Calls for • EU-wide registry for nano• More transparency on trade of genetic

material from cloned animals

Page 53: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

my claim

Signs of change

Page 54: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

-Calls for ad hoc regulations downplayed

no ad hoc regulation proposed/adopted, with the only exception of

on cloning in

Sign of change

Page 55: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

-Moderate/absence use of precautionary language

Sign of change

Page 56: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Precautionary Principle

Page 57: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

-‘Upstream public engagement’ within stakeholder consultation

not only used as a ‘legitimating technique’ operating within a ‘deficit model’ in which citizens are treated as being in need of education but as a ‘technology of humility’ capable of offsetting excessive reliance on science in areas of uncertainty (Jasanoff)

(especially in nano debate)

Sign of change

Page 58: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Governance of nanoexample of upstream public

engagement

Page 59: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

-Heightened awarnes of the social and cultural factors that drive risk assessment

Sign of change

Page 60: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

competing bodies

of knowledgePublic & Expert Rationalities demarcate

the boundaries of citizen participation

Page 61: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

- Attention to benefits vs risks

Sign of change

Page 62: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

vs vs Risks

more emphasis on virtues

Page 63: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

PUBLIC CONSULTATION ONTOWARDS A STRATEGIC NANOTECHNOLOGY ACTION PLAN 2010-2015

Page 64: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Risks vs Risks trade-offs

What are the risks of not embracing the technology?

Page 65: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

no longer

Page 66: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

That’s where the

stands today

Page 67: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

yet

it remains to be seen if these signs express

Page 68: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

fear to kill

Page 69: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

of a more humble, patient and reflexive

approach

Page 70: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Thank you for your attention!

comments welcome

at

[email protected]

Page 71: 19 - Innovating Food, Innovating the Law - Alberto Alemanno

Bibliography

Alemanno A., The Two Souls of European Risk Regulation – A Reply to Ragnar Lofstedt, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2/2011.

Alemanno A., Case annotation on the judgment of 22 December 2010, Court of Justice of the European Union, in Case C-79/09 Gowan Comércio Internacional e Serviços Lda v. Ministero della Salute, 48 Common Market Law Review 4 (2011).

Alemanno A., Public Perception of Food Safety Risks Under WTO Law: A Normative Perspective, forthcoming in Geert van Calster and Denise Prévost (eds), Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO (Edward Elgar, UK, 2012).


Recommended