+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

Date post: 07-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: marianne
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    1/21

      merican Philological ssociation

    The Politics of Aristophanes' WaspsAuthor(s): David KonstanSource: Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), Vol. 115 (1985), pp. 27-46Published by: The Johns Hopkins University PressStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/284188 .

    Accessed: 27/09/2014 16:31

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

     .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of 

    content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

     .

     American Philological Association and The Johns Hopkins University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to

    digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-).

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhuphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/284188?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/284188?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    2/21

    TransactionsftheAmerican

    hilological

    ssociation

    15

    1985)

    27-46

    THE

    POLITICS

    OF ARISTOPHANES' WASPS

    DAVID

    KONSTAN

    Wesleyan

    niversity

    Mypurposenthispaper s to showhowAristophanes'

    Wasps

    is politi-

    cal.

    I

    shall

    rgue

    hat

    he

    complex

    f

    traits

    y

    which

    he

    major

    harac-

    ters nd the chorus re

    constructed,

    nd which

    nables

    he

    movement

    of the

    plot, xpresses

    specific

    olitical

    onception

    f

    the role of

    the

    courts

    n

    Athens. shall not seek

    to

    determine,

    n the first

    nstance,

    whether hance

    okes or

    remarks

    may

    betray

    he

    author's

    wn

    voice

    or

    opinions.

    Rather, propose

    o show that

    political

    r

    ideological

    perspective

    n

    the court

    ystem

    s

    implicit

    n the basic

    narrativend

    dramatictrategies-whatmaybe called the deep structure-ofhe

    Wasps.

    It

    has

    frequently

    een observed

    hat he

    Wasps

    falls nto wo

    parts.

    The

    initial

    ction s built n

    a

    straightforwarday upon

    the

    formula

    of containment:ll else

    having

    failed,

    Bdelycleon

    as

    locked his

    fa-

    ther n

    the house and

    placed slaves to

    guardhim, while

    Philocleon

    makesvarious

    ttempts

    o

    escape.1

    The

    situation

    ends

    tself

    o

    farce,

    which

    Aristophanes

    arieswith

    horal

    ong and

    theformal

    ebate

    of

    the

    agon. The

    containment

    atterns

    a

    vehicle

    for the

    characteriza-

    tionof Philocleon nd his son. Philocleon's assionfor the courts-

    to

    beginwith

    him-is

    represented

    s

    something uite

    differentrom

    the

    motivation f

    any

    other

    comic

    protagonistn

    Aristophanes.

    hi-

    locleon s

    introducedo

    the

    audience s

    sufferingrom

    strange

    is-

    ease

    (noson

    allokoton

    nosei,

    71), a

    descriptionhat s

    fixed

    by repe-

    tition; oward he

    end of

    the play though

    n

    another

    ontext)he

    is

    called

    downright

    ad

    (manias arche, 1486).2 The idea

    of sickness

    r

    insanitys reinforced

    y the

    suggestion

    t

    thevery

    beginning f the

    playthat hebeingwithinhehouse is somekindofdangerous eastor monster

    knodalon,

    4). As forthe natureof

    Philocleon's

    esire,

    I

    Citationsf the

    Waspsare

    according

    o thetext f

    DouglasM.

    MacDowell,

    d.,Aris-

    tophanes

    Wasps

    Oxford

    971),

    unless

    therwise

    ndicated. n

    this

    kind f

    ack-in-the-box

    farce,

    ee

    MacDowell d vv.

    139-229, .

    149.

    2

    In

    addition o

    the

    passages

    oted n

    the

    text, f.,

    n

    disease:

    7, 80,

    87, 114,

    651; on

    madness: 44.

    See

    also K.

    J.

    Dover,

    Aristophanic

    omedy

    Berkeley

    972) 127;

    Lutz

    Lenz,

    Komik

    nd

    Kritikn

    Aristophanes'

    Wespen',

    Hermes

    108

    1980)

    39-40.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    3/21

    28 David Konstan

    it

    is described s

    a

    form

    f

    er6s,

    he

    strongest

    erm n Greekfor

    n

    obstinate nd unruly assion (89, 753),

    and the

    term

    philliast is

    coined o name t (88). It is clearwhatAristophaness depictingere:

    an

    obsession.

    Among he surviving lays f Aristophanes,hen, he

    Waspspre-

    sentsuswith unique nstance

    f

    a type

    o whichwe can

    anachronisti-

    cally pply heRenaissanceabelof a humor.3t may

    be worth eflecting

    that hehumor ad a special unctionn a kind f

    comedy

    hat

    was

    self-

    consciouslyatirical, or t is by its satirical pirit, believe,thatthe

    Wasps, nd two otherAristophanicomedieswritten

    bout the same

    time s the Wasps

    Knights,

    24; Clouds, 23), are set off rom

    what

    we

    may allthe utopian omedies.4t is the narrowingle-mindednessf a

    passion hatmarks hehumor.

    A

    desire orpeace and plenty,

    r

    for he

    restorationf civicand poeticdecorum, s in the Frogs,however n-

    tense,willnot yield

    humor

    nless t is represented

    s a pureobses-

    sion,detached,n the ast nalysis, rom he

    acknowledgedublic

    alue

    of

    ts goal. Aristophanesrdinarilyhose not to make uch motives he

    subject

    f

    his comedy. hathe did so in respect o

    a

    passion

    or

    he aw

    courts s an indicationf his ntentions.5

    3

    In

    English

    enaissance

    omedy,

    he

    figure f

    the humor s examined

    xhaustively

    n

    Ben

    Jonson'sveryMan in

    His

    Humour

    1598),

    andEvery

    Man Out of His Humour

    1599);

    comedies f humours

    re

    those

    in

    which

    achcharacter

    s

    a

    type

    ominated

    y

    ruling

    passion r

    obsession,

    Michael

    Jamieson,

    Introduction,

    en

    Jonson: Three

    Comedies

    (Harmondsworth

    966)

    10.

    Jonson

    abelled

    isearly lays,

    n which he

    ype

    f

    the

    humor

    wasparamount,

    comical

    atires.

    4

    Broadly peaking,

    classify

    s

    utopian

    omedies

    he

    Acharnians,

    Peace, Birds,

    Lysi-

    strata,

    Ecclesiazusae,

    ndFrogs.For

    the dea, ee Jean

    Claude Carriere,

    e

    Carnaval et la

    politique:

    ne

    introduction

    la

    comedie

    recque,

    Annales itteraires

    e

    l'universitee Besan-

    con212 (Paris1979)85-110;Paul Handel,

    ormen ndDarstellungsweisennderaristopha-

    nischen

    Komodie

    (Heidelberg

    963) 226-27;

    Karl

    Reinhardt,

    Aristophanes

    nd

    Athen,

    Europaische

    evue

    14 (1938)

    754-67

    =

    Tradition ndGeist:

    Gesammelte

    ssays

    zur

    Dichtung

    (Gdttingen

    960)

    257-73,esp.

    263-65;

    F.

    Richter,

    ie Frische und

    der

    Typ

    der

    aristopha-

    nischen

    omodie

    Diss.

    Frankfurt

    933).

    5 In

    differentays,

    rnst-Richard

    chwinge,

    Kritik

    nd

    Komik:

    Gedanken

    u

    Aris-

    tophanes'

    Wespen, nDialogos: Fur

    Harald

    Patzer um65.

    Geburtstag,

    dd.

    Justus obet,

    Rudiger

    eimbach, nd Ada

    B.

    Neschke-Hentschke

    Wiesbaden 975)

    35-47,

    and Klaus-

    Dietrich

    och,Kritischedee

    and

    Komisches

    Thema:

    Untersuchungenur

    Dramaturgie nd

    zum

    Ethosder

    Aristophanischen

    omodie

    Bremen 965)

    74-79

    =

    Jahrbuches

    er

    Wittheit

    u

    Bremen

    (1965)118-23,have raised hequestionf therelationshipetween hecritical

    or

    satirical

    hrustf

    Aristophanic

    rama,

    nd

    the

    utonomous

    omic

    lementsn

    the

    plays.

    Schwinge, ith

    pecial

    referenceo

    the Wasps,

    locates

    the

    division

    etween he

    two

    moods

    or momentsn

    the

    structuref the

    play,

    which

    roceeds, y

    way

    of

    a

    paratragic

    conversionn

    the part

    f

    Philocleon, rom

    political

    ritique f

    the ury

    ystem o

    the

    exemplificationf a

    bomolochusype, ow

    reduced o an isolated

    nd

    purely rivate

    ig-

    ure. The

    crucial

    hift ccurs

    n the agon;

    after

    hat,

    delycleonan

    indulge

    is father's

    passion,

    ow

    reduced o a

    Privattick, ith he

    mock-trialn

    his own

    home

    see esp.

    pp.

    41-42).

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    4/21

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    5/21

    30

    David

    Konstan

    has

    kidnapped

    rather

    s a lovesick

    youth

    with stern

    ather

    alks

    n

    much ater

    omedies. 9

    Ifyou'llbe nicetomenow, s soon asmy on'sdead 'll redeem

    you

    from

    our

    wner, iglet,

    nd

    have

    you

    as

    a

    concubine. s

    it

    is, I

    don't

    have control ver

    my

    own

    money;

    'm

    young,

    you

    see,

    and

    hedged

    n

    prettytrictly.

    t's

    my

    on who

    keeps

    n

    eye

    on

    me,

    and

    he's

    a

    hardman

    and a real

    kinflintnto

    he

    bargain.

    That's

    whyhe's so

    afraid

    'll

    go

    [to]

    the

    bad;

    I'm

    the

    only

    ather

    he'sgot.

    Philocleon

    akeshis

    dependent

    egal

    status

    s

    license o

    behavechild-

    ishly.

    onventionally,

    t

    s

    adults

    who

    have

    a

    responsible

    osition

    n

    the

    community,nd arethus xpectednd nclinedorepresentnd defend

    its

    norms.

    oung

    men,

    who follow

    esire

    n

    despite

    f

    aw,

    are

    not

    yet

    full

    members f

    society,

    nd

    are,

    accordingly,

    ess

    nhibited

    y

    tsrules.

    In

    New

    Comedy,where uch

    youths

    lourish,

    t s

    presupposed

    hat

    hey

    some

    day

    will be.

    This

    temporal

    ector,

    by

    which

    the

    young

    must

    mature nd

    assume

    their

    roper tation

    n

    the

    community,

    onditions

    the

    nature f

    the

    tension

    etween

    athers

    nd

    sons, and

    renders

    os-

    siblethe

    anticipated

    esolution

    f

    the comic

    ension,

    which

    s

    expressed

    as a reconciliationetween enerations.ons are,in the final nalysis,

    heirs,

    who

    will,

    t the

    right

    ime,

    ome

    into

    their

    patrimony,

    patri-

    mony hat

    ncludes

    nd

    rests

    ponthe

    rightsnd

    duties fthe

    ocialized

    adult.

    Philocleon, n

    contrasto

    this

    new

    comic

    pattern,

    as no

    public

    status

    o

    grow

    nto

    save

    thatof

    retired

    entleman f

    leisure,

    without

    responsibilityn

    the

    political

    ommunity.

    his

    s, I

    imagine,

    mong

    he

    reasons

    why

    he

    play nds

    in

    an

    antinomian

    oment

    ather

    han

    n a

    resolutionhat

    ffirms

    he

    social

    order.

    t also

    puts nto

    question

    ny

    interpretationf the play, uchas Whitman's,hatmakes ts theme

    education, or

    education hould

    mean

    preparationor

    responsibility.'0

    When

    the

    young

    iscipline

    he

    old, t s

    not a

    matter

    f

    moral

    progress

    but

    change

    f

    social

    order.

    We

    may

    observe

    hat

    he

    nstancesn

    New

    Comedy

    f

    an

    errant

    enex,

    s in

    Plautus'

    Asinaria,

    asina,

    or

    Merca-

    tor, re

    not

    really

    nalogous

    o

    the

    Wasps, or

    here he

    amorous

    lder

    is

    restored

    ohis

    proper

    tation,

    ndin

    eachcase,

    significantly,

    here s

    a

    wife o

    act n oco

    arentis.

    As a juror,however, hilocleon etains n important easure fsocial uthority,

    nd,from

    ne point

    f

    view,

    his

    son's

    efforts

    o

    dissoci-

    9

    Dover

    (above,

    note 2)

    122;

    the

    translation

    f

    verses 1351-59

    that

    follows

    s

    Dover's.

    W.

    J.

    M.

    Starkie,

    The

    Wasps

    of

    Aristophanes

    London

    1897),

    quotes

    the

    scholiast d

    1355:

    dis

    paides

    hoi

    gerontes.

    10

    Whitman

    (above,

    note

    7) 144

    followed

    by

    Vaio

    (below, note

    23) 335

    and

    Lenz

    (above,

    note

    2)

    32-43,

    who

    develops

    the

    theme

    most

    fully.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    6/21

    The

    Politics f

    Aristophanes'Wasps 31

    ate

    himfrom he

    courtsmay

    be construeds an

    attempt

    o make

    Philo-

    cleon's

    retirement

    omplete

    nd

    consistent.

    owever

    generous

    Bdely-

    cleon'sintentiono support isfathermay be, itwhollybolishes he

    old man's

    ndependence,

    nd

    Philocleon

    s clearthat

    he

    does

    not

    want

    that. Dramatically,

    here

    s

    an

    implicitogic

    at

    work,

    ccording

    o

    which

    Philocleon, aving ivenup

    the

    power

    ver his

    own

    household

    and

    surrendered

    o the dominion

    f his

    son,

    becomes ike an

    adoles-

    cent,wilful

    nd subject

    o an

    arbitraryassion,

    nd

    this

    very

    haracter-

    ization orroborates

    he

    sense

    that

    Philocleon

    s

    unfit o

    perform

    he

    responsible utiesofa

    juror.This

    logic

    has its roots

    n

    the

    deological

    premisehat hecity-state

    s

    an

    association

    f

    heads

    of

    household,

    hose

    who are, n Greekterms, yrioiver their ikos, ndthat, ccordingly,

    old

    men

    who

    have

    relinquished

    uthority

    n

    domestic ffairs re no

    longer uited

    o

    preside

    ver

    affairs

    f

    state.

    Much of what

    eems

    silly

    or

    corruptn

    the

    pleasures hatPhilocleon erives t

    court

    nvolves

    childish

    esirefor

    flattery548-630)

    that

    ransparentlyetrays

    he

    pa-

    thetic elf-importancef the weak and

    helpless. delycleon

    ill

    expose

    his

    father's retensions

    s

    a

    servile ependency

    pon

    Cleon and other

    demagogues,

    ut

    t

    s importanto

    recognize

    hathis

    plan

    for hilocleon

    offers imonly change fmasters,t least until hecomedy akes

    newdirection

    n

    the

    concludingpisodes.12

    Of

    course,Bdelycleonoes

    not think o

    suggest

    hatyoungermen,

    or

    legally

    esponsible ouseholders,

    hould

    take over

    the role

    of

    di-

    casts.13 s a

    number

    f

    critics

    ave

    pointed ut,

    Bdelycleon

    oes not

    expose

    the

    faults

    r

    inadequacies

    f

    thecourt

    ystem

    n

    order

    o recom-

    mend

    remedies, ome

    of

    which,given

    the

    arguments e

    employs,

    mightwellrun counter o

    views

    that

    may be plausibly

    ttributedo

    Aristophanes imself,

    s in thematter f pay for

    urors.14

    hus, who

    willreplace he old urorsonceBdelycleonersuades hem o retire s

    no

    concern

    f

    his.

    Within

    he play,

    which

    o

    some extent ndoubtedly

    reflects

    he socialreality,he courts

    re treated s

    an oldman's forum.

    As such,

    however,

    hey re also representeds

    an

    institutionf the

    relatively

    owerless,

    powerlessnesshat s

    symbolized y a waning

    vigor f

    bodyand mind,but which

    lso

    correspondso an outmoded

    way of

    life characteristic,o

    Aristophanes

    uggests, f a generation

    whose ime

    has

    nassed_

    11

    Bdelycleon's

    ntentions:

    36-40,

    1004-6, cf.

    478-79,

    506,

    720-24;

    Philocleon's

    e.

    fusal:

    41,cf.

    612-18.

    12

    Cf.

    784-85,

    where

    hilocleon

    onsents o

    receiving is

    wages

    misthon)rom

    is son

    On the

    Athenian

    ttitude

    oward

    ages,

    ee G. E. M.

    de Ste.

    Croix,The

    Class

    Struggle

    the

    Ancient reek

    WorldIthaca,

    N.Y.

    1981)

    182-91; on

    surrenderf

    kyriotes,ee

    Mac-

    Dowell d

    613.

    13

    Cf.

    Dover

    above,

    note

    2) 128.

    14

    See

    Lenz

    (above,

    note2) 25

    for

    urther

    iscussion.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    7/21

    32

    David

    Konstan

    This

    opposition

    f

    generations,

    n

    a

    sense that

    s socialrather

    han

    personal

    r

    archetypal,

    s

    presented

    hroughontrasting

    raits f

    charac-

    ter.While t is only n thecase of Philocleonhathis commitmento

    the

    courts s

    represented

    s

    an

    addiction

    r full-blownbsession

    we

    shall

    consider

    he

    reasons

    for this

    presently),

    e shares the

    uror's

    temperamentith he old men

    who

    make

    up

    the chorus

    f the

    Wasps.

    Their ld-fashionedastofmind

    s indicated

    y

    a

    preference

    or

    Phryni-

    chus,

    nd

    for raditionalrt

    forms

    n

    general,

    s

    well s

    by

    their

    isposi-

    tion to reminisce bout

    campaigns

    n

    the Persianwar-Aristophanes'

    benchmarkor

    he good

    old

    days-and

    other

    arly

    ampaigns.15

    ut the

    testy ombativenessf

    Philocleon nd the

    chorus,

    heir

    proudanger

    whicil s so intimidatingo those who must plead their ase before

    them,

    nd a

    rough-and-ready

    thic

    hat

    an condone rankishhefts

    nd

    candidly elfish ehaviorwith

    no

    seeming wareness f the threat

    t

    might ose

    to civic

    olidarity,re also

    signs

    f

    theancient ode or

    style.

    A

    proper

    nderstandingf these traits

    will put the

    character f the

    jurors

    n

    a new

    perspective

    nd

    dispel ertain

    misapprehensions

    oncern-

    ingPhilocleon's ature s

    well.

    Certainlyhe most

    noticeable

    eature

    n

    the temperamentf

    the

    dicasts s theirharp emper.he term rge,which ike heEnglishword

    temper

    was moreor less obsolete n

    the sense of

    temperamentnd

    normallyonnoted

    nger,

    s

    applied

    o

    them dozen

    times

    r

    so,

    along

    withvarious

    ynonymous

    xpressionsike

    chole

    bile ), menos,

    nd

    thymos.'6ords r prefixes

    enoting

    cerbity,oughness. r plain

    rasci-

    bility estify

    o their

    arsh

    pirit,s do

    images fknitted rows,

    ooking

    daggers

    literallymustard,

    ardama),ating ne's

    heart ut,

    barking

    outcries,ndnettles.'7

    may ppear o be

    belaboringheobvious:

    mong

    15

    Phrynichusthetragedian):19-20,269-72,1490,1524 on 1490, ee E. K. Borth-

    wick,

    The

    Dances

    of

    Philocleonnd

    the

    Sons

    of

    Carcinusn

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps,

    CQ

    n.s.

    18

    [19681

    4-45);

    traditionalrt

    forms:

    18-19,

    1479-81.

    Campaigns:

    f.

    236,

    where

    the

    ction

    t

    Byzantium

    resumably

    vokes

    he

    Great

    War,

    specially

    n

    ight

    f

    Xanthias'

    image f

    Persian ttackn

    11-12; cf.

    lso 355,

    the

    ubjugation

    f

    Naxos,

    which

    ccurred

    somewhereround

    70

    B.c.;

    439, where hilocleon

    aments is

    defeat t the

    hands

    f

    barbarians

    his laves re the

    mmediate

    eference,

    ut

    suspect

    here

    s an

    implicit

    istor-

    ical

    allusion s

    well);

    the

    referenceo

    Athens'

    ole n

    repelling

    he

    barbarians

    t

    1077-

    1101;

    note lso

    the

    pun

    on

    the

    great

    ing

    t

    1124,

    Philocleon's

    uspicion

    f

    Persian

    ttire

    in

    1136-38,

    nd

    Bdelycleon's

    eferenceo

    Marathon

    n

    711.

    16

    Orge includingormsftheverb,orgizo): 23,243,404,424,425,431, 560,574,

    646,

    727,

    883,

    1083;

    chole:

    03; menos:

    24; thymos:

    67,648.

    17

    OXys:

    226

    and 407, of

    the

    wasps'

    ting;

    ompounded ith

    hymos:

    06,

    455,

    501;

    with

    kardia,

    30; cf.

    lso

    471,

    1082,

    1105,

    1367;drimys:

    46,

    277.

    Toughness:

    rinodes,

    83,cf.

    877;

    dyskolia:

    82, 942,

    1105; cf. 1356.

    Knitted

    brows:

    655;

    blepont6n

    ardama,

    455; con-

    suming neself:

    83-87,

    tc.;

    barkingries:

    98,

    226,

    415,

    1311,

    f.

    596

    of

    Cleon;

    nettles:

    884. n

    general,ee the

    hapter

    n

    La

    col&e,

    in

    Jean

    aillardat,

    es

    mages

    'Aristophane:

    Etudes

    e

    langue t de

    style

    Paris

    1962)

    esp.

    pp.

    194-220; as

    Taillardat

    otes

    p.

    211,

    note

    1), the

    Wasps

    urnishes

    particularly

    arge

    umber

    f

    llustrationsn

    this

    ategory.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    8/21

    The Politics f Aristophanes'

    Wasps

    33

    thefaults hat

    Aristophanesastigates

    n the

    urors

    s an

    uncompromis-

    ing

    severityhat akes

    delight

    n

    the

    sufferings

    f

    defendantsnd cares

    nothing orthe usticeof their ause. But thiswaspish ispositiono

    anger s

    not n

    abstractmoral

    law,

    or

    may

    t

    be

    reduced

    ntirely

    o

    an

    old

    man's

    crotchetiness.or

    there s

    also

    an admirable

    spect

    o

    orge,

    high-spirited

    apacity

    or

    ndignation

    hat as

    something

    f

    a

    hero's

    pride

    about

    t

    and compared

    ithwhich

    n

    accommodatingood

    nature ould

    be

    a feeble nd

    contemptiblehing.

    hus

    Aristophanes

    oasts

    f

    having

    an

    anger

    ike

    that f

    Hercules hathas

    enabled

    himfromhe

    beginning

    of

    hiscareer o stand

    p againsterious pponents

    ikeCleonrather

    han

    prostitutingis

    muse

    n

    pettyibes; MacDowell

    ightlylossesorge

    here

    as spirit r courage.18ristophanes adethesameclaim n thesame

    words year ater

    n the parabasisf the Peace,

    where gain he

    proper

    significancef orge

    s,

    as Platnauer

    ominents,

    not

    anger,'

    but

    spirit,'

    'courage'. 9

    his

    s

    the

    kind

    f

    anger

    nd

    sharpness

    ithwhich

    he

    old

    dicasts, hewing

    heir

    ips and stingingway,fought

    he

    Persians rom

    their and

    1082-90),

    and it s

    this.

    ame sharp

    nd irritable

    pirit

    hich,

    as

    they aunt, hey

    arry

    nto he

    ourtroom

    1104-5).

    t

    s as

    though,

    n

    the

    parabasis,

    ristophanes

    ere

    doing reprise f the

    vocabulary

    elat-

    ingto wrath,norder o reveal ts ntimateonnection ith hevirtues

    of

    the

    age

    of

    Marathon.

    he

    complementf

    this

    proud

    age

    s

    fearless-

    ness,

    s the

    old men

    ay 1091).

    Slaves

    nd

    demagogues

    re

    afraidn the

    Wasps 427, 715); Philocleon's

    rowningrgument

    n

    defense f

    the

    juror's ife

    s that

    veryone,

    ven

    his

    own

    on, fears im,buthe

    himself

    woulddie didhe

    fear isson (628-30).20

    Recognizing

    hat he urors' nger s part f a

    style f behavior

    hat

    summons

    up an old-fashioned,

    ugged

    pontaneity

    nd

    individualism

    may lso help

    us to

    understandhevery rominent

    ole that heft

    lays

    in the Wasps.References o stealing ccurnearlywenty imes n the

    course

    f

    the

    play.21

    over

    ncludesheftn

    a

    kind f formal

    ndictment

    of

    the characterf

    Philocleon, ndhe confesses

    imself

    astonished t

    the

    hidden

    trengthf antinomianentiment

    hichhis sympathy

    nd

    affectionor he

    old reprobate

    mply.22over tentativelyuggests

    hat

    the

    sickness r

    insanity fPhilocleon's esirefor

    ury-service ay

    be

    18

    HLrakleous

    rgen,

    1030;

    MacDowell d

    ioc.

    19Peace, v. 752;

    M. Platnauer,

    ristophaneseace

    (Oxford 964)ad loc. Cf.also

    Ly-

    sistrata

    550

    and

    1113

    orgontas),

    with

    Rogers' omment n

    the

    atter erse:

    the

    word

    conveys o

    idea

    of

    anger,

    Benjamin

    ickley

    ogers, he

    Lysistrata

    f

    Aristophanes

    Lon-

    don

    1911).

    20

    The

    ambivalent

    ature fthe

    wasps'

    ggressiveness

    s

    broughtut

    clearlynd

    cogently

    by

    Lenz

    (above,

    note

    2) 42-43.

    21

    Verses

    57,

    238,

    354,

    357, 363,

    449,

    554,

    556,

    759, 928,

    933, 953,

    958,

    1101,

    1200-1201,

    227,1345,

    1369,

    1447.

    22

    Dover

    above,

    note

    2)

    126-27.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    9/21

    34

    David

    Konstan

    Aristophanes'

    ignal

    hat

    his

    offenses

    re n

    quite

    nother

    ategory

    rom

    the

    bravado f other

    omic

    heroes uch as

    Dicaeopolis

    r

    Trygaeus

    n

    the Acharnians nd the

    Peace.23

    Philocleonndeed

    eminisces

    istfully

    bout

    he

    days

    whenhe

    could

    make

    way

    with

    ome small

    pits,

    while

    now,

    s

    he

    adds,

    he is

    watched

    likea

    ferret

    hat

    has stolen he

    meat

    356-64).

    But the

    recollection

    s

    inspired y

    the

    chorus,

    who

    themselves

    hink ack

    fondly pon

    their

    youth

    whenthey tolea

    mixing

    owl

    236-38).

    Philocleon

    eminds

    is

    slave of

    his

    kindness

    whenhe

    caught

    im

    stealing

    rapes 448-50:

    the

    joke

    there s

    that

    e

    gave

    him

    good

    beating),

    nd

    claims hat

    is

    bravest

    exploit

    was

    the theft f

    some

    vine-poles

    1200-1201).

    He

    caps

    off

    hese

    achievementsycarryingff he flute irlfrom hedrinkingartyo

    which

    his

    son

    had

    invited

    him

    (1345,

    1369). But

    such

    escapades re

    clearly

    egarded, t

    least

    by

    the

    older

    generation,

    s

    proper

    o

    young

    men-in

    the

    scene

    with

    he

    flute

    irl,

    Philocleon

    hinks

    f

    himself

    s

    again

    youthful,

    s

    we

    have

    seen.

    Bdelycleon,y

    comparison,

    eems

    pre-

    maturely

    traitlaced.

    heir

    ndulgent

    ttitude

    oward

    etty

    xpropriations,

    which

    hey ook

    upon

    s

    signs f

    a

    mettlesome

    emper,

    oes

    not

    prevent

    either

    hilocleon r

    the

    chorus rom

    eeling

    utrage t

    thekind

    f

    theft

    that esultsn arge calesocial nequities,ncethey ecome ware f t.

    Thus,after

    hilocleon

    s

    persuaded y

    his

    sonthat

    Cleonhas

    systemati-

    cally

    defrauded he

    dicasts,he

    would

    ike

    the

    chanceto

    condemn he

    man

    (758-59).

    The

    chorus s

    similarly

    esentful

    t the

    thought

    hat

    young nd

    unscrupulous en

    have

    cheated

    hem ut of

    thefruits

    f

    the

    empire

    cquired

    by their

    abors

    1098-1101), and

    they re

    quitepre-

    pared

    o

    attack

    aches

    for

    llegal

    ccumulationf

    wealth

    240-44).

    And

    yet, t

    the

    ame

    time,

    hilocleon,y

    his

    own

    admission,

    s

    receptive

    o

    an

    appeal

    for

    ympathyy

    an

    embezzler

    f

    state

    funds n

    the

    grounds

    thathe himselfmust t sometime rotherhaveshaved bitoff rom

    provisions

    orhis

    unit

    when

    he was

    in

    charge

    f

    mess

    funds

    553-57).

    Here,

    perhaps, s

    the

    nub

    of the

    ssue: not

    that

    Philocleon r

    the

    old

    jurors

    re

    scoundrels, ut

    that

    heir

    rank

    cceptance f

    the

    mpulse

    o

    takewhat

    ne

    can

    get s no

    longer n

    adequate

    thic n a

    society

    where

    a

    developed

    tate

    machinerynd

    the

    financial

    esources

    f an

    empire

    are

    a

    basis

    of

    real

    class

    power

    or

    hose

    who can

    control

    hem.24

    ithin

    23

    Ibid.,127.On the motif f theft, ee also JohnVaio, Aristophanes' asps:The

    Relevance of

    the

    Final

    Scenes,

    GRBS 12

    (1971)

    343.

    As a

    caution

    against

    too

    high-

    minded

    condemnation

    f

    stealingn

    comedy,

    we

    may

    note

    that

    heft,

    articularly

    f

    food,

    eems

    to

    have

    been a

    feature

    f

    certain

    ultic

    ractices,

    nd

    that

    here

    may

    have

    been

    ertain

    esturesnd

    dances n

    Old

    Comedy

    hat

    epresented

    uch

    theft;ee

    Lillian .

    Lawler,

    The

    Dance

    of

    the

    Ancient

    Greek

    Theater

    Iowa

    City

    1974)

    79-80.

    24

    It

    is

    true

    hat

    Bdelycleon,

    n

    exasperation,

    alls

    his

    father

    oneros

    192-93,

    214;

    cf.

    243)

    and

    even

    miarotatos

    397);

    also,

    the

    old

    man

    comically

    onfesses

    o

    an

    urge

    for

    mischief

    kakon,

    22,

    340;

    cf.

    168).

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    10/21

    The Politics f

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps

    35

    the

    deology rojectedy

    the

    play,

    he

    old men

    represent way

    of

    life

    thatreceives

    certain

    ostalgic

    espect

    ut is

    fundamentally

    nsuited

    to the position f political owerwhich heirrole as dicasts onfers

    upon

    them,

    nder

    ocial onditions

    hat

    hey

    annot

    learlyomprehend

    or

    control.

    Having grown

    up

    at a

    time

    when therewas

    no

    thought

    for hetoricr

    sycophancy1094-97), they

    re

    now

    easy prey

    or

    dem-

    agogues.

    I

    am inclined lso to read

    Philocleon's tatementhat

    s a

    young

    man he

    could,

    when on

    campaign,

    un

    away

    with

    mpunity357-59),

    not

    as a mark

    f

    cowardice,

    s

    Dover

    charges,

    ut

    rather

    s

    an

    indica-

    tion that

    disposition

    o

    go

    where

    one

    pleased

    was not

    incompatible

    withthe interests f the group n former imes,when no one was

    postedto

    guarddiscipline.

    am not fora

    moment

    uggesting,

    o

    be

    sure,

    hat

    o sublime

    harmony

    etween

    rivate

    esires

    nd

    communal

    needs actually btained

    t

    the timeof

    the Persian

    nvasion,

    nly

    that

    the

    mage

    of

    such

    a

    harmony as available nd effective

    n

    setting

    ff

    perceived

    ensions

    n

    Aristophanes'

    wn

    society.

    Within he world f

    the

    play,

    t

    anyrate, here s

    no hint

    hat

    Philocleon's

    militaryeport-

    ment

    s

    anything

    ike

    Cleonymus',

    who

    is accused

    of

    abandoning is

    shieldnbattle15-27,822-23).25

    There

    s

    a

    way,

    hen, n which hilocleon

    nd the urors

    tandnot

    for

    ntinomianismr

    someabstract

    tateof nature ut

    for

    n

    anterior

    social

    order,

    however

    dealized nd

    even

    falsified

    t

    mayhave come to

    be.

    The reversal fnarrative

    aradigm

    ywhich

    young

    man

    disciplines

    an

    old does notwhollynvert

    he

    values that onventionally

    ttach o

    senes nd

    adulescentes,herebyhe

    eldergeneration

    s theguardian f

    tradition

    hile heyoungers

    moved o

    passionateransgressions.ris-

    tophanes'

    atterns

    a

    complex ne, n which

    hilocleon,

    owevernfan-

    tile, also representsn ethic and a tradition hich re nevertheless

    contained

    r reduced

    ythe ction f theplay.

    If

    urors n the Wasps re seen

    as aged and

    old-fashioned,hey lso,

    with he

    kindofoverdetermination

    hat s

    characteristicf all ideologi-

    cally harged

    iterature,epresent

    he socialclass

    of poorfree itizens.26

    25

    Compare

    lso

    the

    uninhibited

    ttitude f

    the old

    men toward

    ex

    and

    pleasure

    n

    general,

    s

    indicated y

    theuses

    of

    thewords

    hedone r

    hedomai,

    .g. 272,

    510-12, 605,

    641,

    1534, 1667;

    cf. 1006.

    Elizabeth

    arter as

    suggested o

    me

    that his

    spect f

    the

    characterfPhilocleonmaybecompared ith hetricksterype epresentedyOdysseus,

    as

    opposed

    o

    the

    ragicmodel

    f

    Achillean

    eroism.

    26

    For

    the

    theoretical

    resuppositionshat re

    guidingmy

    conception f

    the

    complex

    determinationf

    thecharacter

    f the

    chorus,

    hilocleon,nd

    other

    igures

    n

    the

    Wasps,

    see

    Pierre

    Macherey,

    Theory f

    Literary

    roduction,

    ransl.

    Geoffrey all

    (London

    1978):

    Whatbegs

    to

    be

    explainedn

    the work

    s

    not that

    alse

    implicity

    hich

    erives

    from he

    apparent

    nity f

    ts

    meaning,

    ut the

    presence

    f a

    relation,

    r an

    opposition,

    between

    lements f the

    exposition

    r

    levelsof the

    composition,

    hosedisparities hich

    point

    o a

    conflictf

    meaning....

    The

    book s

    not he

    xtensionf

    meaning;

    t s

    gener-

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    11/21

    36

    David

    Konstan

    The

    dialogueduring

    he

    parodos

    between he

    chorus nd their

    young

    sons

    who lead them n makes

    their tation

    bundantly

    vident:

    hey

    worryboutwastingampoil (251-53), consider riedfigs n extrava-

    gance,

    consume heir

    meager

    uror'spay

    on

    barley

    nd

    firewood,

    nd

    are

    at a

    loss how

    to

    provide inner

    hould he courtnot

    sit

    that

    day.27

    Mention f weather

    eads,

    as

    though

    y reflex,

    o

    thoughts

    f

    crops

    (264-65), which

    uggests

    hat

    hey

    re

    farmers. ut in

    the

    main

    they

    think f

    themselvesimply

    s

    the

    poor toispenesin,

    63;

    cf.

    703),

    and

    Bdelycleon

    an

    even compare hem

    o olive

    pickers,

    hat

    s to

    say,day

    laborers r hiredhands,the

    most despised

    formof

    labor,

    for

    their

    dependency pon

    wages

    712).

    Consistent

    ith

    heir

    overty,

    hey

    ee

    therich s their aturalntagonists,nstantlyuspecting delycleonf

    collusionwith he

    class

    of

    wealthy

    itizens

    ubject

    o

    liturgies

    or

    the

    rigging

    f ships

    whenthey earnwhyhe

    is

    confiningis father 342-

    43).28 In a similarvein,

    Philocleon sees

    among the great merits

    of ury

    duty he

    opportunity

    f

    contemninghe rich, nd

    his change f

    gear t

    theend of the

    play,whenhe

    has givenup servingn

    thecourts,marks

    him as

    having oinedthe

    wealthy

    et.29 he

    chorus's

    repeated

    harge

    that

    Bdelycleon

    s

    aspiring

    o

    tyranny

    n

    attackinghe

    urors s

    a

    political

    expression f their ense of social identityast in the contemporary

    formula f

    class

    conflict.30

    delycleon

    ffectively

    idicules

    he

    accusation

    byobserving

    hat

    veryvegetable

    ealer

    creams

    yranny

    f

    one shops

    nextdoor

    488-507),but the

    point,

    houghwitty,eveals nly

    hat he

    chorus

    s mistakenbout

    Bdelycleon's

    ersonal

    motives,which, e says,

    are

    to

    provide

    or

    his father's

    omfort

    503-6). Aristophanes

    hereby

    geniallyinesses he

    fact

    hat

    hedicasts, s poor

    people, ee

    the courts

    as

    a

    bulwark f their

    emocracy. his

    rousing fthe chorus's

    political

    apprehensions,

    nly

    to

    dissolvethem

    through comic

    turnof argu-

    ment,san artfulvasion fthe ocial ssue.

    ated

    from

    he

    incompatibility

    f

    several

    meanings,

    he

    strongest

    ond

    by

    which t

    is

    attachedo

    reality,

    n a

    tense nd

    ever-renewed

    onfrontation

    79-80).

    27

    Verses

    293-316; cf.

    1112-13,

    where heir

    roud emeanor

    oes not

    conceal

    he

    fact

    that

    heymake

    heir

    iving

    n

    the

    ourts.

    28

    For

    the

    reading

    Jcwz,ee

    MacDowell

    d 343;

    Bentley's

    onjecture

    E'WV,

    roposed

    independently

    y

    Fridericus

    enricus

    othe,

    d.,

    Aristophanis

    omoediae,

    ol. 2

    (Leipzig

    18452)

    d

    355-56,

    remainsttractive.

    29

    Contemningherich: 75-76, f.626; change fgear:1168,1171,1309.Ad 1309, f.

    lulius

    Richter,

    d.,

    Aristophanis

    espae

    Berlin

    858), nd

    Vaio

    (above,note

    23)

    340.

    30

    417,

    464-70,474,

    487; cf.

    342-45,

    411-14.

    MacDowell,

    whose

    ommentaryn

    this

    s

    on

    other

    oints

    haracteristically

    epoliticizes

    ristophanes'

    rgument,

    emarks

    d

    345

    on

    the

    tendency

    n

    Athens

    uring he

    Peloponnesian ar

    o

    accuse

    political

    pponent

    f

    'conspiracy'r

    tyranny' ith

    ittle

    r

    no

    ustification,nd

    cites

    selection

    f

    passages;

    but he

    harges

    f

    tyranny

    nd

    conspiracy

    ere

    haracteristically

    evelled

    y

    representatives

    of

    the

    demos

    gainst

    ligarchical

    roups; ee

    Robert

    Alexander

    eil, ed.,

    The

    Knights

    f

    Aristophanes

    Cambridge

    901)ad

    235-36,

    Richterd 417.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    12/21

    The

    Politics f

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps

    37

    Bdelycleon's

    ilial

    nterest, y whichthe chorus's

    suspicions

    re

    deflated, oints

    o

    a

    fundamental

    nconsistency

    n thecharacterization

    f

    the urors, kindoffissuren the text hat s a mark f ts deological

    burden.3

    or

    all

    Philocleon's

    xemplary

    tatus s

    spokesman

    or

    the

    jurors'wayoflife nd

    most

    crid

    oul

    among

    hem

    277),

    he

    alone

    is

    not

    dependent

    pon

    the courts

    or

    his

    living.

    or

    him, ury

    ervice

    s

    merely personal

    assion.

    His

    fanatical

    evotion

    o the

    uror's

    ife

    may

    be

    represented

    s an

    obsession

    r

    humor

    recisely

    ecause nother

    nd,

    by

    universal

    onsent,

    more comfortableife s

    open

    to

    him.32 hilo-

    cleon's bond with

    hechorus

    s

    primarily

    entimental,ased

    on

    their

    common ge

    andshared

    xperiences

    f an

    earlier

    nd

    idealizedmoment

    in Athenian istory.33ractically,owever, e is the retired ead ofa

    relativelypulent

    ousehold

    nd has access,

    through is

    son's connec-

    tions, t

    least,

    to

    circles f

    considerablenfluencen the

    state.The

    dicast's ife s at

    odds

    with

    hilocleon's

    ocial

    lass.

    By

    a

    sleight

    f hand

    that

    s

    proper

    o

    comedy, hilocleon's onver-

    sion from he

    rigors

    f

    the courts o the

    easy

    ife hat

    his

    son

    promises

    carries he

    chorus

    with

    t,

    eventhough or

    hem

    here s no

    possibility

    of a

    comparablehange

    n

    circumstances.

    heyregard

    he

    agonbetween

    Philocleonnd Bdelycleon s a debateon ultimateocial ssues,upon

    the

    outcome

    f which

    heir wn fatewill

    depend.34

    he

    debate tself

    s

    cleverly ast

    as

    an

    argumentbout

    power:

    Bdelycleon ets

    the

    terms,

    and

    Philocleon

    ises to the

    challenge

    515-19). Philocleon

    makes

    his

    case

    essentially

    n

    the

    deference

    hown o urorsby

    men of

    allclasses,

    but

    above

    all

    by

    the rich

    nd

    powerful

    553-58,575,

    592-602); as an

    afterthoughte

    adds the

    domestic

    ndependence

    hathe

    derives rom

    his uror's

    pay 605-18).

    Philocleon's

    rgument ests

    n his

    identifica-

    tion

    with he

    common eople.35

    delycleon'snswer

    s that

    he urors'

    authority, hich hey egards royal 546,549, cf.587) andeven god-

    like 571,

    619), is

    illusory,ecause

    thepay

    that hey eceive

    epresents

    only

    small

    fractionf

    the state's

    revenues

    656-718). To

    the

    extent

    31

    Concerninghe

    relationship

    etween

    issures,

    uts,

    or

    inconsistenciesn

    a

    text nd

    ideology,

    he

    clearest

    xposition

    know s that f

    James

    .

    Kavanagh,

    'Marks

    of

    Weak-

    ness':

    deology,

    cience,

    nd

    Textual

    riticism,

    raxis

    (1981)

    23-38.

    must

    mphasize

    that uch

    fissuresre

    not

    to

    be

    taken s

    faults r

    signs

    f

    bad

    craftsmanship;

    n

    the

    con-

    trary,

    hey re

    the

    places t which

    rt

    eveals ts

    perations.

    32

    Cf.1453-73; tmaynowbeseen how hecharacterizationfPhilocleons a humors

    bound

    p

    with

    Aristophanes'

    trategy

    or

    esolving

    henarrative

    ensionn the

    Wasps:

    t

    s

    the ign f

    Philocleon's

    solation

    rom

    he

    horus f

    dicasts.

    33

    Philocleon's

    astes, or

    xample

    is

    uspicionf

    wine

    nd

    citharas

    1253,

    989; cf.

    959),

    reflect

    imultaneously

    n

    old-fashioned

    thic

    nd a

    class

    hostility

    oward

    ristocraticym-

    posia.

    The

    complex

    eference

    f such

    ignifiers

    nables he

    ross-characterization

    f

    Philo-

    cleon.

    34

    Cf.

    535, peri

    t6n

    hapant6n;

    lso518,

    540-47.

    35

    Cf.

    593,

    tou

    plethous; 94,

    t6idemoi.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    13/21

    38

    David

    Konstan

    that

    Philocleon's

    assion

    for the courts

    s

    a

    reflex f

    pure

    egotism,

    Bdelycleon's

    rguments

    telling,

    eaving

    side

    the

    silly

    conomics

    f

    his

    calculations.36s an address o classinterests, oreover, delycleon's

    rhetoric

    s

    effective

    n

    two

    ways:

    t

    undermines

    he

    confidencef

    the

    jurors

    n

    the

    men

    they

    have taken o be

    their

    eaders,

    nd it

    suggests,

    by ts

    display

    f

    mathematical

    omputations-however

    ubious he

    rea-

    soning

    mayreally

    e-that the

    strong

    nd

    spontaneous

    motions

    f

    the

    old

    men

    cannot

    protecthem

    gainst

    he wiles of

    modern

    oliticians.

    Throughout

    hilocleon's

    resentation,

    delycleon

    ad

    been

    taking

    otes

    with

    stentatious

    eliberateness

    529,

    538, 559,

    576), and

    his

    emphasis

    on careful

    alculation

    656;

    cf.

    745)

    exhibits

    hesort

    f

    mind

    neededto

    reckonwith hedemagogues.37hus,persuaded f thefutilityftheir

    judicial

    owers, he

    chorus

    wholeheartedly

    ndorse

    Bdelycleon's ffero

    support is

    father,

    nd

    go

    so

    far

    s

    to

    wish

    they

    had a

    relativewho

    could

    offeruch

    advice

    731-32),

    not

    pausing

    o

    reflecthat

    etirement

    from

    ury

    servicewill not

    solve

    the problem f

    their

    poverty.

    ater,

    when

    they

    observethe

    conveniences

    f

    Philocleon's

    rivate ourt

    t

    home,

    they

    prayApollo

    to

    grant

    hem ll

    respite rom

    wandering,

    nd

    conclude

    hat

    Bdelycleon

    s the

    best

    friend

    he

    common

    eople

    have n

    hisgeneration869-73,887-90). Indeed, fterheagontheclassstatus

    of

    the

    chorus s

    quietlylided

    n

    favor f

    their

    dentification

    s

    genuine

    Athenians

    f

    theold

    stripe

    1060-1121).

    Logically,

    s Lutz

    Lenz has

    observed,

    he

    chorus

    might

    ave

    re-

    spondedto

    Bdelycleon's

    rgument

    y

    demandingn

    increase n

    the

    juror's

    daily

    ee;

    at

    all

    events, hey

    might ave

    contemplated

    sing

    heir

    legal

    role

    to

    control

    arge-scale

    eculation.38

    t

    was

    surely

    not

    beyond

    Aristophanes

    o have

    staged he

    idea of

    all

    Athenians

    ivingn

    luxury

    off

    tate

    ncome

    n

    one of

    his

    utopian

    omedies

    compare, or

    xample,

    theEcclesiazusaer the Wealth),ndXenophonwasto propose ome-

    thing f

    thesort n all

    seriousnessn

    the

    middle

    f

    the

    followingen-

    tury

    Poroi).39 iven

    Aristophanes'

    enerally

    ritical

    ttitude

    oward he

    courts,

    owever,

    t

    s safe

    o

    saythat

    he

    would

    not

    have

    ooked o

    them

    for

    an

    instrument

    f

    utopian

    eform.40

    n

    the

    Wasps, he

    overdeter-

    36

    On

    the

    leight f hand n

    Bdelycleon's

    rgument,

    ee the

    sensible

    emarks

    f

    Dover

    (above,

    note

    ),

    129-30.

    37

    Note

    also

    Philocleon's

    nstinctive

    ssociation

    f

    writing

    ith

    doing

    harm,

    60-61;

    AdolphRoemer, Studien u AristophanesnddenaltenErkldrernesselben,Part

    1

    (Leipzig

    1902)

    104-5,

    sserts

    hat

    here s

    a

    reference

    ere

    o

    ogographers.

    38

    See

    Lenz

    (above,

    note

    2) 25.

    39

    On

    the

    Wealth,

    ee

    David

    Konstan

    nd

    Matthew

    illon,

    The

    Ideology

    f

    Aristopha-

    nes'

    Wealth,

    JP102

    1981)

    371-94;

    on

    the

    Poroi,

    M.

    M.

    Austin

    nd

    P.

    Vidal-Naquet,

    Economic

    nd

    Social

    Historyf

    Ancient

    reece,

    ransl.

    M. M.

    Austin

    Berkeley

    1977)

    316-19.

    40

    For

    passages

    n

    which

    Aristophanes

    n

    one

    way or

    another

    mocks

    he

    courts,

    ee

    G. E.

    M.

    de

    Ste.

    Croix,

    The

    Origins f

    the

    Peloponnesian

    War

    (Ithaca,

    N.Y.

    1972)

    362,

    notes , 10.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    14/21

    The

    Politics f

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps 39

    mined

    status

    of

    the

    chorus-the

    conflation

    f class

    and

    generational

    characteristics-enablessemantic lide

    by

    which

    problem

    f

    class

    tensions illusorilyesolved ytheprospectfcomfortableetirement,

    even

    though

    his

    possibility

    an be realized

    yonly

    one

    of the

    urors,

    namelyPhilocleon. he

    Wasps

    thus

    raises

    the

    issue of

    class

    only

    to

    conjure

    t

    awayby

    an

    image

    f

    ndividual

    ithdrawal.

    Under

    he

    post-Pericleanthenian

    emocracy,owever,

    uch ndi-

    vidualwithdrawal

    tself ad

    a

    political

    spect.Donald

    Lateiner

    as re-

    cently ointed

    ut that

    Aristophanes

    nd

    Euripides

    represent

    n

    impor-

    tant,

    f

    controversial,isinclination

    or

    politics

    hat

    s

    clearly

    vident

    y

    thebeginning

    f

    the

    Peloponnesian

    War. 4

    Most richmen,

    Lateiner

    notes, rarely nown s activedemocrats, ind t useful o assert his

    quiet

    ackof

    nvolvement

    5). Lateiner

    uotes

    from

    speech

    f

    Lysias

    (19.55): For

    I

    have reached

    the

    age of thirty

    ithout ver

    having

    talked

    back

    to

    my

    father.

    No citizen

    has

    ever

    haled

    me

    into court.

    Although ur

    house

    neighbors

    n

    the Agora,

    have

    never ven

    been

    seen near he

    aw court

    r

    the

    Council's

    hall

    before

    his uit

    fell

    n

    me

    (7).

    The

    reasons for

    this

    superior

    modesty

    re again

    best

    given in

    Lateiner's wn

    words:

    The

    democratizationf

    Athens, he

    relaxation

    of traditionalocial and politicalonstraints,he emergence f a new

    class

    of

    politicians-all

    movements

    ependent

    o

    some

    degreeon

    the

    growth,

    uccess,

    nd

    revenues

    fthe

    Athenian

    mpire-encouraged

    retreatythe

    socially nd

    economically

    dvantaged

    lassfromhe

    world

    of

    politics

    nd

    political

    manoeuvringn

    the

    courts....

    As the

    men of

    traditional

    tatus

    were

    deprived f

    their

    monopoly f

    political

    ower,

    they ame to

    devalue

    political

    articipation. 42

    he lower

    lasses,

    n the

    contrary,erceived

    hecourts

    s a

    bulwarkf

    popular

    ights, nd

    not

    onlybecause the

    verypoor

    or

    decrepit

    might

    upplement

    heir iveli-

    hoodbythedicast's eeofthree bolsa day.The chorus n the Wasps

    instinctively

    egard

    critic f

    the

    urysystem

    ike

    Bdelycleon

    s an

    enemy

    f

    the

    people.43

    he

    chorus's

    pprobationf

    Philocleon's

    with-

    drawal rom

    he

    courts,which

    resentstselfs

    the

    cure tohis

    personal

    obsession,

    s on

    thesocial

    evel

    an

    endorsement

    f a class

    alternativen

    political

    tyle.

    Insofar s

    the

    chorus

    vokes

    time f natural

    olidarity,hen

    here

    was no

    need of

    courts,

    here s a

    specious

    dentityf

    nterests,

    r at least

    ofpoint fview,betweenheold urors ndBdelycleon,nhisadvocacy

    41

    Donald

    Lateiner,

    'The

    Man

    Who

    Does

    Not

    Meddle n

    Politics':

    Topos n

    Lysias,

    CW 76

    (1982) 4.

    42

    Lateiner

    above,

    note

    41)

    11;

    see

    also

    W.

    R.

    Connor,

    The

    New

    Politicians

    f

    Fifth-

    Century

    thens

    Princeton

    971)

    175-94,

    nd

    Donald

    Lateiner,

    An

    Analysis f

    Lysias'

    Political

    efense

    peeches, RSA 11

    1981)

    151-52,

    158.

    43

    Cf.

    473,

    misodemos;11,

    misopolis;

    ontrast,

    fter

    he

    chorus as

    been

    persuaded

    y

    Bdelycleon's

    rguments,

    on

    demon

    hilountos

    88-89,

    and

    philopatrian

    465.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    15/21

    40 David

    Konstan

    of

    withdrawalrom

    udicial

    ctivities.

    hat

    is

    to

    say,

    the

    genteel

    lass

    could

    cloak ts

    withdrawalrom

    ublic

    ife nd

    encounters

    t law

    in

    an

    idealizedmemory f a timebefore he law, representingheir lass

    attitude

    s a

    gesture

    f

    pristine

    ocial

    harmony.

    emocratic

    itigiousness

    could

    be seen as

    the

    opposite

    oth

    of

    early

    ommunality

    nd of

    aristo-

    cratic

    loofness,

    ll the

    more

    asily

    o

    the

    extent

    hat

    he

    upper

    lasses

    succeeded

    n

    casting

    hemselvess

    the

    bearers

    f

    traditional

    ays.

    The

    difference

    ies,

    of

    course,

    n

    thecombative

    ignificance

    f

    the ristocratic

    denigration

    f the

    courts,

    nd manifests

    tself

    n

    Bdelycleon's

    masteryf

    forensichetoric.

    delycleon

    as

    no

    choice

    but

    to

    enter nto

    contest f

    persuasionn

    order

    o reveal he

    dangers

    nherentn

    persuasion

    tself;

    e

    mustprovehimselfuperioro Cleonand his sort t their wngame.

    What

    distinguishes

    delycleon

    rom

    opular

    emagoguess the

    rational-

    ity

    that s

    assigned o

    his

    discourse y

    the

    terms f the

    play,

    which

    indeed

    nnouncestself

    s a

    little

    rgumenthat

    as udgment. 44

    In the

    parabasis,

    Aristophanes

    ssociates

    his own

    good

    udgment

    with

    is

    refusal o

    submit o

    pressure

    rom ny

    ource

    1027). The

    word

    for

    ubmit

    r obey

    s of

    course he

    middle

    orm f

    theverb

    meaning o

    persuade; he

    chorus

    mployst

    twice

    f

    Philocleon,

    s they

    ncourage

    himtoyield o theargumentslogoi) ofhis son (729, 747). The idea

    that

    hechorus

    nd even

    Philocleon

    an

    recognize

    he

    betterrgument

    should

    anction

    heir ole

    as

    dicasts,

    avethat

    Bdelycleon's

    easonings

    designed o

    subvert

    heir

    ommitmento

    the

    ury ystem.

    here

    s an

    ambivalence

    ere

    concerning

    ersuasion

    s a

    forcefor

    good

    and evil

    that

    s

    reminiscent

    f

    the

    Clouds,

    ndwhich

    hreatens

    ltimately

    o call

    into

    question

    he

    authorityf

    reason tself.45

    hile

    Aristophanes

    oes

    not,

    to

    be sure,

    deconstructis own

    discoursen so

    radical fashion,

    there

    s perhaps

    sign

    n thetext

    of

    thefailure f

    confidencen an

    authorizingogic rrationalityn thefact hat ne ofthewords ignify-

    ing

    persuasion, ywhich

    hilocleonhe

    father

    cknowledges

    is

    submis-

    sion

    to

    his

    son

    (anapeitho,

    84), is

    employed

    lso in

    the sense of

    sub-

    orn

    (101;

    cf.

    278).46

    44

    Logidion

    nomen

    chon,64;

    see

    Kenneth

    Reckford,

    Catharsis

    nd Dream-Inter-

    pretation

    n

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps,

    TAPA 107

    (1977)

    291, 299,

    for

    discussion f

    this

    phrase.

    45

    Note

    he

    lmost

    magical

    ffectn

    the

    horus f

    Philocleon's

    rgument,

    36-41.

    46

    The ideaofdeconstruction,ndthe rreducibilityfambiguousrcontradictoryerms,

    I

    take of

    course

    from

    he

    work f

    Jacques

    errida;

    brief,

    ccessible

    ummaryf

    his

    methodss

    Jonathan

    uller,

    Jacques

    errida,

    n John

    turrock,

    d.,

    Structuralism

    nd

    Since: From

    Levi-Strauss o

    Derrida

    (Oxford

    1979).

    See also Jonathan

    Culler,

    On

    Decon-

    struction:

    heory nd

    Criticism

    fter

    tructuralism

    Ithaca, N.Y.

    1982),

    esp.

    180-225,

    for a

    more

    xtended

    reatment.

    should

    make t

    clear,

    however,

    hatmine

    s a

    political

    ppro-

    priationf

    Derrida's

    pproach,

    nasmuch

    s I

    hold

    the

    source

    f

    the

    tension

    round

    he

    concept f

    persuasiono

    ie n

    the

    lass

    onflictver

    ontrol f the

    means f

    persuasion,

    struggle

    hich,

    n

    ts

    very

    ature,

    must esort

    o

    disguise.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    16/21

    The Politics

    f

    Aristophanes'Wasps 41

    When

    Bdelycleon

    erceives hathis

    argumentsn

    the

    agon,

    which

    s

    itself

    kind

    of

    triai,

    ave convinced is father ut stillnot

    freed

    him

    from ispassion orurying,eproposesostage trial thome,with

    farcical

    ock-up

    f court

    araphernalia.

    his

    ntroduces

    brilliantit

    of

    comic

    nvention,

    n

    which

    dog s

    accused

    f

    stealing piece

    of

    Sicilian

    cheese.

    The scene has

    multiple unctions

    ithin

    he

    play.

    t

    is

    a

    satirical

    enactmentf the

    prejudice nd

    irresponsibility

    f

    Athenian

    urors,

    s

    Aristophanesaw

    them;47with

    transparent

    llegory,

    t

    caricatures

    dispute

    etween leon

    and

    Laches,

    a

    general

    lose

    to

    the

    conservative

    leaderNicias,

    argely

    o

    the

    advantage

    f

    the

    atter;

    t

    serves second

    and decisivedefeat

    o

    Philocleonwhen

    he

    is

    tricked nto

    voting

    or

    acquittal ya switchn balloturns-an unpardonableiolation f his

    principles

    hatbreakshis

    will.48

    We

    may observe lso that t

    achieves

    Bdelycleon's riginal

    bject

    of

    confining is father t

    home,

    a

    point

    emphasized

    y

    the

    contrast

    etween he

    adverbs here

    (enthade,

    65),

    that

    s,

    in

    the

    house,

    and

    there

    ekeise, 65;

    ekei,767,

    770),

    in

    the

    actual ourt.49he entire

    onceit s such of a trial t

    home

    s thus he-

    matically

    ignificant,

    or

    while t allows

    Philocleon

    while

    onger o

    exercise

    his

    mania n a

    harmless

    way,

    and

    gives

    him

    a

    taste

    of

    the

    comforts is son can provide,t also dissociates hilocleon rom he

    collective

    spect

    f the

    ury ystem

    hich

    s

    fundamental

    o its

    nature s

    an

    institutionf the

    democracy,nd,

    in

    effect,

    tomizes

    nd domes-

    ticates

    he

    urors.50

    he

    reduction

    f

    public

    ife to

    the

    scope

    of

    the

    individual

    ousehold

    ealizes

    he kindof

    privatization

    ffected

    y the

    class

    of

    which

    delycleons a

    symbol,

    style vailable n

    an exemplary

    wayto the

    well-to-do.he

    ideological

    quation f

    household nd city-

    state,

    which

    n

    the

    utopian

    plays

    ike

    the

    Ecclesiazusae

    ouldbe ex-

    ploited o

    express

    he

    essentially

    ommunal

    dentityf the

    citizen

    ody,

    isheredeployedodissolve hecivic olidaritymbodied nthe udiciary

    institutions

    f

    the

    populace nto

    the

    autarkyelt nd

    enjoyed ypeople

    of

    means,

    nd

    part

    f

    the deal to

    which ll classes

    aspired.

    hilocleon

    even

    alludes

    o an

    oracle

    ccording

    o

    which

    veryone ill

    have his

    own

    little ourtwithin

    is gate

    799-804), a

    comment hich,

    ddressed

    s it

    47

    MacDowell

    above,note

    1)

    249 with

    pparent

    redence

    n

    the

    charge. t

    is

    interesting

    to

    observe,

    lthoughhere

    s

    no

    need

    o

    document,

    ow

    frequently

    he

    harge

    f

    rrespon-

    sibility

    gainst

    Athenian

    urors

    s

    accepted

    mong ommentatorss

    valid.

    For a

    rare

    nd

    salutaryeminderf theanti-democraticias of oursources, ee A. H. M. Jones, The

    Athenian

    emocracy

    nd ts

    Critics,

    ambridge istorical

    ournal

    (1953)

    1-26

    =

    Athe-

    nian

    Democracy

    Oxford

    975)

    41-72.

    48

    Verses

    99-1002,

    008; f.

    973-74.

    On

    the

    metaphorical

    ensity

    f the

    cene,

    ee also

    Newiger

    above,note

    18) 130.

    49

    The

    contrasting

    articles

    re noted

    y

    MacDowell

    d 765.

    50

    This point

    s

    brought

    ut

    verywell

    by

    Schwinge

    above,

    note

    5) 41-42;

    cf. lso

    Whit-

    man

    above,

    note

    7)

    155:

    Formerly,

    s

    a

    judge

    Philocleon

    ad been

    part

    f

    society,

    ot,

    as

    he

    thought,

    hemain

    riving

    ear,

    ut nly

    cog; still,

    part.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    17/21

    42

    David

    Konstan

    seems

    to

    theaudience

    Bdelycleon

    as dashed nside he house

    and

    the

    chorus s not

    engaged

    n the

    action t

    this

    point)

    and not

    especially

    wittynitself,erhaps efersoorparodies omeprophecyncirculation

    just

    then.51

    or

    Philocleon,

    he

    idea

    of

    the commonwealth

    as

    been

    reduced

    to the

    individual,

    hat

    s,

    himself,

    lone

    (cf.

    toi

    koinoi

    ',

    emoi, 17).

    If

    it is correct o

    see

    a

    political

    r

    social

    meaning

    n

    Philocleon's

    addiction

    o jury

    service-Bdelycleon

    imself efers

    o

    it

    as

    a

    disease

    inveteraten the

    city

    651)-and to read

    the

    household rial s a

    figure

    for

    the

    domestication

    f

    a

    popular

    emocratic

    nstitution

    nd

    the

    con-

    tractionf civic

    onsciousness,

    t

    least

    mong

    he

    upper

    lasses,

    o the

    perimeterf thehouseholdwalls, hen hevictoryfBdelycleon'social

    ideals

    s

    already

    mplicit

    n

    the

    trial

    cene itself.We

    may

    accordingly

    construe he trick f

    the

    voting rns

    by

    which

    Bdelycleon

    etermines

    theverdict

    s

    an

    emblem f

    his

    new

    power.

    He

    has his fathert

    home,

    where

    he

    wants

    him;

    as

    actual

    master

    f the

    house,

    he is

    in

    control

    there; hecourt

    s such

    s

    powerless,

    nd

    Bdelycleons in a

    position

    o

    decide the

    acquittal

    f

    Laches.

    Philocleon's

    reakdown,

    nd

    the

    final

    cure of

    his

    ury

    mania,

    re,from

    socialpoint

    fview,

    imply y

    way

    ofacknowledginghisnewstate faffairs. hat smore, heconversion

    of

    class

    allegiance

    mplied n

    Philocleon'snd

    the

    chorus's

    withdrawal

    from

    he

    public

    nd

    collective

    ole of

    urors

    ignals

    he

    transition

    o

    the

    final

    cenes

    of

    the

    play,

    n

    which

    delycleon

    ntroduces

    is fathernto

    vulgar

    ravestyf

    aristocratic

    ocial

    ife.

    In a

    paper

    n

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps

    ubtitled

    The

    Relevance f

    the

    Final

    Scenes,

    John

    Vaio

    sets

    out

    several

    motifs

    hat

    ink

    what

    he

    identifiess

    the

    firstnd

    second

    parts f

    the

    play,

    hat s,

    the

    sections

    before

    nd after

    he great

    parabasis,

    whichhe

    informally

    abels the

    dicastic nd symposiac arts f theplay. 52 aio indicates owrefer-

    ences

    to

    costume,

    manners,

    iddles

    ndwine,

    music nd

    dance

    generate

    a

    contrastver

    theplay

    between

    he

    humble

    ives

    of

    urors

    nd the

    symposia o

    which a

    larger art

    of

    the

    social

    lifeof

    the

    nobles

    was

    devoted. 53n

    the

    opening

    cene,for

    xample,

    hilocleon's

    assion or

    jurying

    s

    opposed to

    infatuations

    ith

    gambling,

    easting,

    ospitality,

    and

    drinking

    hat

    re

    the

    characteristic

    ices

    of

    the

    gentleman

    lass,

    nd

    Vaio

    suggests

    hat he

    nitial

    ialogue

    etween

    delycleon's

    laves,

    who

    poseriddlesndaredrowsy ith rink,maybe seenas a servileym-

    posium

    n

    which

    ne

    of

    the

    participants

    pes

    the

    practices

    f

    his bet-

    51

    MacDowell

    ad 799

    thinks

    t

    is

    wholly

    nvented

    by

    Aristophanes,

    n

    this

    following

    he

    scholia,

    which also

    suggest that

    Philocleon

    is

    here

    speaking

    to

    himself;

    o,

    for

    example,

    W.

    C.

    Green,

    Aristophanes:

    he

    Wasps

    Cambridge

    1868)

    ad

    loc.

    52

    Vaio

    (above,

    note

    23),

    335,

    note

    1,

    and

    342.

    53

    Vaio, p.

    339,

    quoting

    Victor

    Ehrenberg,

    The

    People

    of

    Aristophanes,

    Sociology

    f

    Old

    Attic

    omedy

    New

    York

    19612) 102.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    18/21

    The

    Politics f Aristophanes'Wasps

    43

    ters. 54

    homas Banks

    has sharpened

    he

    contrast:The lawcourt

    nd

    the

    symposium,

    n the

    evel

    of

    plot,

    learly epresent

    pposingways f

    life, heaffirms,dding hat each s an institution,social onvention,

    and

    therefore

    creatureof nomos. 55

    Banks

    maintains

    hat

    both

    insti-

    tutions rovide means

    for

    settling isputes ;both,

    he

    says,

    have

    their stablished

    rocedures, hough

    he courts

    re of

    course

    public

    structures,

    with

    formallyegislated

    ules,

    while

    ymposia

    re

    private

    and governed y

    etiquette; oth,

    n

    short,

    have

    a

    common

    basis,

    which s socialform.56

    anks oncludes

    hat hilocleons alienated rom

    both,

    nd

    stands

    s

    a

    symbol

    f nature r

    physis gainst

    ll

    claimsof

    nomos

    r

    convention

    p. 84).

    But the

    distancing

    f

    Philocleon

    rom he

    communal ndsocialessence of the awcourtss nota merefunction

    of

    Philocleon's

    rrepressibleharacter, is role as natural

    man,

    in

    Jeffreyenderson's hrase.57

    ather,

    t

    is predicatedn

    the

    real

    social

    distinction

    etweenPhilocleon

    nd the

    urors

    of

    the

    chorus,

    nd is

    engineered

    y Bdelycleon

    n

    such

    a

    wayas

    to

    command

    he

    assent

    of

    the

    chorus tself. hilocleons pried

    oose from he

    courts, nd ifAris-

    tophanes

    hen

    turns

    o

    satirizinghe

    entertainmentsf the nouveaux

    riches, his s

    in

    largemeasure means f

    exposing he

    social nferiority

    ofCleon and hisfriends, ho arenamed mong he ymposiasts1219-

    21).58Wealth nd influencelone do

    not confer he

    status f gentle-

    man.59

    The caricaturef the

    drinking

    arty oes scoresome hitsagainst

    aristocraticbuses, such

    as an

    ostentatiousffectationfforeigntyles,

    including hat

    of

    the

    Spartans1136-66), and an

    inclinationo treat

    lower

    lasscitizens

    n a

    violent r

    contemptuous anner.

    he charge f

    hybris,assault,

    s

    levelled four

    times at the inebriated hilocleon

    (1303,

    1319, 1418,

    1441). In part, his poofon upper

    lass arrogance

    54

    Vaio,

    p. 338.

    On

    the

    meaning

    of

    chreston,

    0, as

    well-born,

    see

    Vaio, p.

    339

    and

    note

    23, who

    convincingly

    efutes

    MacDowell's

    suggestion

    hat the

    term

    s

    socially neu-

    tral. After

    verse 76,

    there

    appears

    to

    be a

    lacuna,

    in which

    another

    vice

    beginningwith

    philo-

    was

    mentioned.

    For a

    recent

    conjecture, see

    David

    Sider,

    Aristophanes

    Wasps

    74-77:

    The

    Missing

    Vice,

    CP 70

    (1975)

    125-26

    (philarchos).

    55

    Thomas

    R.

    Banks,

    The

    Ephemeral,

    the

    Perennial,

    nd the

    Structure f

    Aristophanes'

    Wasps, CB 56

    (1980) 82.

    56

    Banks, pp. 82-83.

    57

    Banks, . 83; Jeffreyenderson, heMaculateMuse:Obsceneanguagen Attic om-

    edy New

    Haven

    1975)

    79.

    Cf.

    also Whitman

    above,

    note

    7)

    157.

    58

    The

    mention

    ater

    1301-2)

    of

    other,

    more

    conservative

    articipantsn the

    symposium

    widens the

    scope

    of the

    satire.

    This

    produces a

    certain

    ppearance

    of

    even

    handedness n

    the

    play,

    which

    has

    sometimes

    been

    applauded

    as

    a sign

    that

    Aristophanes

    was

    above

    partisanship.

    59

    Cf.

    kalos

    kagathos,

    256; also

    Ste.

    Croix

    (above,

    note 40)

    371-76 for

    full

    discussion

    of

    kalokagathia

    with

    relevant

    bibliography,

    nd pp.

    358-59 on

    Aristophanes'

    use

    of

    political

    and

    moral

    terminology.

    This content downloaded from 157.92.4.12 on Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:31:12 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • 8/19/2019 1985 - Konstan, D. - The Politics of Aristophanes' Wasps

    19/21

    44

    David

    Konstan

    answers

    o the

    earlier

    ritique

    f the

    democratic

    ourts,

    hough

    t

    is

    decidedly

    eaker nsofars it s

    a

    former

    icast

    himself ho

    s the

    most

    egregious ffender.t falls o Bdelycleono offerompensationo an

    outraged ccuser

    1419-20),

    who

    professes

    respectable

    istaste

    or

    lawsuits

    1426). Philocleonmust

    again

    be hustled

    ff nto

    his

    house,

    while

    hechorus

    ings

    n

    amusing

    nterlude

    n the wonderful

    ransfor-

    mation n

    his character

    1450-73).

    There

    eems

    ittle

    eason

    o

    take

    his

    song,

    as MacDowell

    does,

    as an

    earnest

    omment n

    Philokleon's

    probable

    evelopmentn

    years o

    come. 60

    t

    simply

    marks

    he

    end of

    his

    jurying

    ays,

    as

    Philocleon

    himself as

    testified

    1335-40),

    his

    lawlessness

    onstituting

    he final

    reach

    with hecourt

    ystem.

    he

    gay

    finale fthedancingontest1497) sublates hilocleon's runken sca-

    pades

    onto

    the

    planeof

    the

    Dionysian,

    nd all

    tensions

    vaporate

    n

    the

    general

    ilarity.61

    G. E.

    M.

    de Ste.

    Croix

    has

    argued

    igorously

    hat

    Aristophanes

    as

    politically

    conservative

    n

    the

    moldof

    Cimon, nd that he

    usedmany

    of

    his

    plays,

    even

    while

    they

    of

    course

    remained

    rimarily

    omedies,

    s

    vehicles or

    he

    expression f

    serious

    olitical

    iews. 62

    With

    espect

    o

    the

    Athenian

    ury-courts,e

    suggests

    hat

    Aristophanesaw

    the

    whole

    system s a form fpopular yranny,nd [was]out to discreditt by

    ridicule

    362).

    I

    agree.

    have,

    however,

    dvanced he

    discussion,

    believe,

    from

    he

    citation f

    scenes

    and

    comments

    hat

    re

    derogatory

    toward he

    courts

    excellently

    ummarizedy

    Ste.

    Croix)to

    an

    analysis

    of

    how

    Aristophanes'

    deological

    tance

    onditionshe

    nner

    tructure

    f

    the

    play. n

    particular,

    have

    attempted

    o

    show

    how

    the

    conflation

    f

    thematically


Recommended