1998 DRILL DUST SAMPLING STRIPPING & BULK SAMPLING … · proceedures: 1) A small sample (pill...

52K04SW2004 2.20107 KILGOUR LAKE 010

NELSON GRANITE LIMITED

1998 Drill Dust Sampling

Stripping and Bulk Sampling

Black Lake Property

Kilgour Lake Area

NTS:52K4SW

Kenora Mining Division

RECEIVEDFEB 2 1 2:~3

SEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE____

r. Z C- S fi t.'

/6, '2,00

52K04SW2004 2.20107 KILGOUR LAKE 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pa

Introduction.............................................. l

Location Access and Topography............................ l

Description of the Granite................................ 5

Drill Dust Sampling....................................... 5

Method........ . ................ . ... . . ... . . .. . ...... . . . . . . . 6

Sample Preparation........................................ 6

Obsevations............................................... 6

Results................................................... 10

Stripping and Bulk Sampling............................... 11

Equipment Used............................................ 11

Description of Sample Sites............................... 11

Results................................................... 21

Conclusions............................................... 23

Recommendations........................................... 24

LIST OF FIGURES

PageFig. l Location Map Black Lake Property.................. 2

Fig. 2 Claim Map......................................... 3

Fig. 3 Topography........................................ 4

Fig. 4 Sample Site 1..................................... 12

Fig. 5 Sample Site l Vertical X-Section A-B.............. 12

Fig. 6 Sample Site 2..................................... 13

Fig. 7 Sample Site 3..................................... 14

Fig. 8 Sample Site 4..................................... 15

Fig. 9 Sample Site 5..................................... 16

Fig. 10: Sample Site 6.................................... 17

Fig. 11: Sample Site 7.................................... 18

Fig. 12: Sample Site 8.................................... 19

Fig. 13: Location of Sample Sites......................... 20

— .IX '-

TABLES

Page Table 1: Drill Dust Sampling Unscreened Desliraed.......... 7

Table 2: Drill Dust Sampling Screened * 1mm. Size Fraction 8

Table 3: Correlation Screened vs Unscreened Samples....... 9

PLATES

Page Plate 1: Sample Site 1.................................... 11

Plate 2: Sample Site 2.................................... 13








APPENDICIES

Explanation of the Rock-Colour Chart

Drill Dust Sampling - Colour Interpretation Map

Statement of Expenditures

Summary of Expenditures

Employees Names S Addresses

Introduction

In October of 1998 Nelson Granite Limited carried out a

drill dust sampling program followed by stripping and bulk sampling

on mining claim K-1149879 in the Kilgour Lake Area, Kenora Mining

Division. Drill dust was collected from 70 percussion drill holes

and differences in colour were determined using a Munsell Rock-

Colour Chart.

The advantages of drill dust sampling over other conventional

sampling methods are:

1) Material can be sampled below the area affected by weathering.

Surface sampling using a sledge hammer is seldom successful in

getting unweathered material.

2) Drill dust sampling is a faster and more cost effective method

than core drilling in areas where there are variations in colour

and a large number of holes are required to determine colour changes,

The main disadvantage is that textural changes and streaking

cannot be observed.

Stripping and bulk sampling were carried out targeting mainly

the red granites encountered on the property. In total 8 sites -

were examined.

Location Access and Topography

The Black Lake Property, mining claim K-1149879 is located

33 kilometers north and 38.5 kilometers east of the city of Kenora.

Kenora K-1149879

UTM: 393500 mE Zone 15 UTM: 432000 mE Zone 15

5514000 mN 5547000 mN

Access to the property is via the Jones Road, a hard surfaced

secondary highway which passes directly through the property.

Fifty percent of the area of claim K-1149879 is bare granite

outcrop. The remainder is covered by thick Jackpine and spruce

regeneration and odd areas of mature standing timber. It is part

of larger area burnt over in 1980.

- 2 -

Fig, lLocation Map Black Lake Property

Black Lake Property

EnglishRiverRoad

Caution Lk. Rd

Scale 1:250,000

Lk. RD H++1

MNDM - Mining Claim Map Page l of l o -.

Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Mines and Minerals Division

G-2626 - KILGOUR LAKE AREA - KENORA Division

belp Zoom Toolshelp

Adjacent Ma

jZoom Level

Order Hard Copy Download Full Map help Scale image help

Order Form Download

help

Fig. 2

Claim Map

1149879 |

~~ OUARRY

APPLICATION

Back | MairLMenu | Mining Lands

:̂ f] OntarioThis site maintained by the Government of Ontario

Comments and feedback to: stc\c,bcnelcau'fl,ndm gp\,pri,ca

O Copyright 1998 Queen's.Printer.for;Ontario

This information is provided as a public service, but we cannot guarantee that the information is current or accurate. Readers should verify the information before acting on it.

imp.// ivz. / j. i jo.y/wiii-cgi/ciaimsmapcgi.uii zuuu-uz-uo

1:20000

Fig. 3

Topography

Black Lake Property Mining Claim K-1149879

Contour Interval 10 meters

_ er _

The claim is centered over a topographically high granite

structure. In the western part of the claim the granite dips

gently to the southwest. In the eastern part of the claim area

the granite drops steeply down 100 meters towards Black Lake

and a line of swamps south of it.

Description of the Granite

The granite is predominately porphyritic containing brown,

pink or red megacrysts in a grey, medium to coarse-grained matrix.

The megacrysts reach a maximum size of 4 centimeters and are

usually lath shaped, but may appear rounded depending on their

orientation. In most places megacrysts have a preferred orientation,

but this characteristic varies in intensity and grades locally

into areas of random crystal orientation. Also noted on the property

were areas having few megacrysts and the granite appears medium to

coarse grained.

In the northeast corner of the property the granite is quite

red. Here the proportion of megacrysts to matrix material is very

high. As the proportion of matrix material increases the colour

of the granite becomes less red.

In the southwest corner of the property the granite has a

predominant grey matrix and the material is somewhat similar to

that being quarried by Cold Spring Granite approximately 2 kilometers

to the north.

The colour of the granite is influenced by two things: 1) The

colour of the megacrysts gives the granite it's basic colour.

2) The proportion of matix material influences the shade.

Drill Dust Sampling

During quarry operations often the first indication of colour

change in the granite is noted by the drillers when they observe

colour changes in the drill dust. Experienced drillers can usually

predict the colour of the granite being drilled with a fair degree

of accuracy. When the drill dust is wet during rainy days the

colour differences are even more noticable.

- 6 -

Method

A series of 16 foot deep percussion drill holes were put down

in the granite outcrop at roughly 100 foot intervals. The work

was done using a self-propelled Tamrock Commando hydraulic rock drill.

Drill dust samples were collected from cuttings at a depth

interval between 10 and 16 feet. The rock drill is equipped with a

dust collector which collects dust during the drill cycle and dumps

the collected dust once drilling stops. Two lengths of drill steel

were used, a 10 foot and a 16 foot length. After the 10 foot length

was drilled the dust was allowed to dump on the ground. A pail was

used to collect the dust from the 10 to 16 foot interval. These

samples were bagged and labelled by drill hole number.

Sample Preparation

Each sample was prepared for colour analysis using two different

proceedures: 1) A small sample (pill bottle sized) of unscreened

dust was completely immersed in water, deslimed by shaking and running

water over the sample until the water became clear. 2) The remaining

drill dust was screened and the +1 mm. size fraction was retained,

put in clear glass pill bottles and covered with water (run until

clear).

Both groups of samples were then arranged in order of colour

from the darkest red through to the darkest grey. Using a Munsell

Rock-Colour Chart samples were grouped into colour ranges. Table

l lists sample numbers by colour range and positions within that

range for unscreened samples. Table 2 does the same for screened

samples. Table 3 gives the correlation between the two sample

preparation methods.

Observations

The screened +1 mm. samples gave the best indication of phenocryst

colour. This was probably due to differences in crushing characteristics

of the minerals with phenocryst material having a tendency to crush

to larger size particles. Unscreened samples gave a better indication

of the proportion of matrix material and therefore the shade.

- 7 -

DRILL DUST SAMPLING

Table 1

AGreyish Red10R 4/2

535652

SS#15435261162

Unscreened

BGreyish Greyish

10R 4/2 -

211917151213182016

Deslimed

CRed- Greyish Brown Brown

SYR 3/2 SYR 3/2

34581468373208716751284145405049630110

DBrownish Grey

SYR 4/1

2324703959276466464360444231650302552529302209

EOlive Grey5Y 4/1

36073304064838470561

Note: Samples listed in order from darkest red to darkest grey

- 8 -

DRILL DUST SAMPLING

Table 2 Screened + 1mm. Size Fraction

l 2 Dark Reddish Brown Pale Reddish Brown

to toModerate Reddish Brown Moderate Reddish Orange 10 R 3/4 - 10 R 4/6 10 R 5/4 - 10 R 6/6

Greyish Red

Greyish Red

SS#1 56 53

345419202611375949

506818673558172171097001

6312621315165152

454046144332

5 R 4/2 10 R 4/2

083960242810253641442366

4264223865025527

310629070430476148330503

Note: Samples listed in order from darkest red to darkest grey

- 9 -

DRILL DUST SAMPLING

Table 3 Correlation Screened vs Unscreened Samples

1-A 1-B 1-C 1-D 1-E

53 21 34 59 56 19 58 09

SS#1 17 68 70 54 18 37 35 20 71 26 67 11 50

4901

2-A 2-B 2-C 2-D 2-E

62 12 63 4652 13 51 43

15 4516 40

3214

3-A 3-B 3-C 3-D 3-E

28 39 3610 6041 2408 25

442366

4-A 4-B 4-C 4-D 4-E

42 3864 0622 0765 0402 4755 6127 4831 3329 053003

- 10 -

Results

An interpretation of the results of the drill dust sampling

is shown on the map appended to this report. The drill dust colours

as described in the Munsell Rock-Colour Charts are the basis for

the interpretation of the colour of the granite. The interpretation

is simplified by using the common industry colour distinctions red,

pink, brown and grey.

- 11 -

Stripping and Bulk Sampling

Stripping and Bulk Sampling was carried out on 8 different

sites on the Black Lake Property. The principal target was the

red megacrystic granite found in the eastern part of the property.

Although red granite is found elsewhere on the claim the reddest

colour occurs here and most of the sampling was directed toward this

area. Two sites were tested in the southwest corner of the claim.

At one of the two thick granite ledges are exposed affording an easy

chance to get a good sample.

Equipment Used

The equipment used for the stripping and bulk sampling included

a Cat 215 Backhoe and a Tamrock Commando hydraulic rock drill.

Explosives used included K-pipe charges, 50 grain detonating

cord and safety fuses. Hand tools consisted of plugs, feathers and

sledge hammer

Description of Sample Sites

Plate 1: Sample Site l

- 12 -

Fig. 4 Sanple Site l

Red Megacrystic Granite

Location

UTM: 432236 mE Zone 15 5546915 mN

LEGEND

Excavation Perimeter

Drill line

Vertical Joint

Scale 1:100

Fig. 5 Vertical X-Section A-B

O—J————

2 meters

1 .5 meters

v

4 meters

2 meters

B

..-

LEGEND

Black Streaks

Micro fractures

Scale 1:50

l 1

meters

- 13 -

Fig. 6 Sample Site 2

Predominant Grey Matrix(Poor looking granite with many cracks)

Location

UTM: 432239 raE Zone 15 5546948 mN

LEGEND

. . . . Drill l ine

Vertical Joint

•K*

1

1.5meters

Plate 2: Sample Site 2

Scale 1:100 l 3: —i f~f

meters

- 14 -


Red Megacrystic Granite (Black and red streaks) (microfractures)

Location

UTM: 432255 mE Zone 15 5546776 mN

Area Excavated

\ \

Scale 1:100


Ometers

- 15 -

Fig. 8Sample Site 4

Red Megacrystic Granite (odd red streak)

Location

UTM: 432344 mE Zone 15 5546808 raN

titt Drill Line

B.8 meters

Scale 1:100

l 3T- l U

O "2 4

meters


- 16 -

Fig. 9Sample Site 5

Red Megacrystic Granite w/ Grey Matrix (fractures at \ meter intervals) (horizontal to sub-horizontal) Depth of ledge 1.2 meters

LocationUTM: 432323 mE Zone 15

5546771 mN

LEGEND

Vertical Joint

Drill Line

Scale 1:100


J^fc-O 2

meters

- 17 -

Fig. 10S amgj. e Site 6

Megacrystic Granite Red S Brown Red S Black streaks Microfractures every 30 cms. Ledge l meter thick

Location

UTM: 432285 mE Zone 15 5546724 raN

5.7

Scale 1:100

l .3

meters


- 18 -


Pink-Red Megacrystic Granite Grey MatrixOdd grey streakMicrof racturesLedge thickness l meter

Loca t i on

UTM: 431663 mE 5546619 mN

LEGEND

Vertical Joint

Zone 15

DrillLine

Excavation Limit

Scale 1:100

2 4 meters


- 19 -

Fig. 12

Sample Site 8

Pink-Brown Megacrystic Granitepredominant grey matrixSome pink and grey streaksSome microfractures near ledge top

\

LocationUTM: 431652 mE Zone 15

5546558 mN

LEGEND

— — — Excavation Perimeter

.* *.. Drill Line

t7.3 meters B

1.5 meters

c

met

^

:ers

f A

\^ ————— - 7.3 meters - —————— ̂

Scale l:100

l 3f l———l ZfeEE'O *2

meters

B


Scale 1:5000

100 300

idometers

4 ost

#1 Post

K-1149879

•3 .5

• 6

18

#3 Post

#2 Post

t-1 o o

O Hi

CAIB3 3•a

coH-

tt W

H- 00

NJO

- 21 -

Results

Sample Site 1:

The stone here was a very dark red megacrystic granite of

exceptional good colour. Test quarrying revealed that there was

too many black streaks and microfractures.

Sample Site 2:

The stone at site 2 had a predominately grey matrix and the

general colour did not look good. There were many cracks in the

stone.

Sample Site 3;

The stone at site 3 was a red megacrystic granite that contained

both black and red streaks. Multi directional microfractures were

common here.

Sample Site 4;

The stone at site 4 was a red megacrystic granite with an odd

red streak. The formation here was very difficult to test quarry.

Sample Site 5:

The stone at site 5 was a red megacrystic granite with a grey

matrix. Phenocrysts were randomly orientated, 5 centimeters long,

lath shaped. This location had horizontal to sub-horizontal micro-

fractures spaced about every half meter.

Sample Site 6:

The stone at site 6 is two-toned having seperate areas of both

red and brown megacrysts in a grey matrix. The granite had red and

black streaks and microfractures occur about every 30 centimeters.

Plate 9 shows the kind of streaking and colour variation that is

found at this location.

- 22 -

Plate 9: Red Streaks

in granite Site 6

- 23 -

Sample Site 7;

The stone at site 7 is a pink to red megacrystic granite with

a grey matrix. The odd grey streak was observed here along with

microfractures.

Sample Site 8:

The stone at site 8 is a pink to brown megacrystic granite in

a grey matrix. Some grey and pink streaks were observed along with

some microfractures near the top of the ledge. Below this the

granite looked quite uniform and may present the best location for

quarrying. The ledge is 16 feet thick with wide spaced vertical

joints.

Conclusions

Drill dust sampling indicates that there is considerable

variations in colour on the property. Bulk sampling was not

successful in locating an area of quarryable red granite. Virtually

all sites tested had problems with streaking and microfractures.

All material test quarried was left on site with the exception of

l small red granite block. This block was shipped to the company's

monument plant for sawing. It was found to have many microfractures

and was discarded.

One area to show some promise was at sample site 8 where large

blocks (defect free) could be obtained. The colour of the stone

here is not exceptional and the amount of area covered by this

material is not known.

The central part of the deposit was not tested and there may yet

be possibilities of quarryable material found here. This area of

exposed granite is massive with no exposed ledges making test quarrying

of the material nearly impossible with the equipment used.

- 24 -

Recommendations

If further work is to be done on the property it should consist of diamond drilling to confirm colour and colour variations in the

central claim area. Ground penetrating radar surveys could give

useful information about structure. This would be helpful in any

future test quarry program.

APPENDICIES

ROCK-COLOR CHART

FIGURE 1. — Dimensions of the color solid. RGURE 2. — The purple section of the color solid After Judd and Kelly, Jour. Am. Pharm. Asaoc., vol. 27, no. 3. March 1938, with modifications.

C

Prepared byTHE ROCK-COLOR CHART COMMITTEE

representing the following organizationsE.N. GODDARD, Chairman

U.S. Geological SurveyPARKER D. TRASK

The Geological Society of AmericaRONALD K. DE FORD

American Association of Petroleum GeologistsOLAF N. ROVE

Society of Economic GeologistsJOSEPH T. SINGEWALD, JR. and R.M. OVERBECK

Association of American State Geologists1948

Distributed byGEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA

P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, Colorado 80301, U.S.A.

Reprinted 1951, 1963, 1970, 1975, 1979, 1980, 1984.

Printed in the Netherlands by Huyskes-Enschede .

EXPLANATION OF THE ROCK-COLOR CHART

This chart is designed primarily for field use, but nevertheless it indi cates the range of rock colors for all purposes. The mineralogist and the geologist working in the laboratory no doubt will feel the need of more colors and perhaps a different style of mounting. For their purpose, sim ilar color chips or large colored sheets that may be cut into any de sired size can be purchased from the Munsell Color Company, 2441 N. Calvert St., Baltimore 21218, Maryland. Additional color names for colors outside the range of rock colors can be found in U.S. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication SP 440, "Color, universal lan guage and dictionary of names," 184 p, (1976) available from the Su perintendent of Documents, Washington D.C. 20402.

The form and arrangement of the chart are based on the Munsell system, the most widely accepted system of color identification in use in the United States. This system is based on a color solid or approximate ly a color sphere, which has a neutral gray axis grading from white at the top to black at the bottom (see fig. 1). This property of lightness is called value. Around the circumference or equator of the solid are the 10 major hues shown in fig. l, each of which is divided into 10 number ed divisions, so that 5 marks the middle of a hue and 10 marks the boundary between one hue and the next. Thus any particular hue can be designated by a number and a letter such as 5R or 10YR. Any single vertical section through the neutral gray axis and a particular hue constitutes a color chart on which the colors grade in value from light at the top to dark at the bottom and in chroma (degree of saturation) from gray at the left to the most vivid colors at the right. Both value and chroma are numbered so any particular color can be given a numer ical designation representing hue, value, and chroma such as 5R 6/4 and 10YR 8/2. The rock colors have been placed on the charts in ap proximately their correct relative position according to the Munsell system, and the Munsell numerical designations have been placed un der the color names for the use of those who wish to make fine color

(Continued on back of last chart)

distinctions. Numerical designations of colors lying between the color chips on the chart can be interpolated, as for example, if the color of a rock lies half way between light red (5R 6/6) and moderate red (5R 4/6) it can be designated as 5R 5/6, or if it is nearer to light red, it can be de signated as 5R 5.5/6. In the same way hue and chroma can be interpola ted. The spacing of the color chips according to chroma has been slight ly modified in order that, if the geologist desires, he can cut each chart into two strips along the center black line and thus have most of the col or chips along the margins of the strips so that they can be closely com pared with the rock specimen. However, the chart is simpler to use when not cut into strips and some geologists will prefer to leave it un cut. All the grays or one chroma colors have been grouped together on the last page of the chart in order that they can be readily compared with one another.

The color names have been taken from the ISCC-NBS 1 system as described in U.S. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication SP440 as this system has been accepted by a large number of scientific organizations. According to this system each color name, such as pale purple, occupies a field or portion of space in the color solid (fig. 2), whereas a Munsell designation, such as 5 P 6/2 is represented by a point. Consequently a single color name may be represented by two or more differently colored chips, each having a different Munsell designa tion. The use of the Munsell system is recommended to geologists who find need for closer discrimination than is provided by the color names on the chart.

The Rock-color Chart Committee decided to adhere as closely as pos sible to the ISCC-NBS system of names, inasmuch as the system is al ready widely used by organizations interested in color. However, the ISCC-NBS Subcommittee on Color Names has tentatively adopted cer tain modifications in their system which will be incorporated in a new edition of the Bureau of Standards Research Paper RP 1239. These mo difications consist chiefly in substituting the adjective grayish for weak, the term dark grayish for dusky, and the term light grayish for pale. With respect to the last two terms, however, the ISCC-NBS Subcom-

1 Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau of Standards.

mittee provides for the use of the terms dusky arid pale as alternatives. The Rock-color Chart Committee, therefore, decided to substitute gray ish for weak, but to retain the terms dusky and pale as these tend to shorten several of the color names and to avoid the use of 4-word color names. The Rock-color Chart Committee has also made a few other mi-

-* - ' -.-. ^nor changes from the ISCC-NBS revised names, in order to eliminate as many duplications of names on the chart as possible, and in order to avoid awkward combinations such as grayish reddish brown and gray ish greenish yellow. However, the Committee has attempted to make these changes entirely consistent with the ISCC-NBS system.

It is hoped that these color names will eventually become familiar to all geologists, but it is realized that some geologists may prefer to use a different system of names. To them it is suggested that in published re ports, they follow each color name with the Munsell notation so that other geologists can readily refer to the right color on the chart. For a comparison of the Munsell and ISCC-NBS systems with other systems of color identification and color names, geologists are referred to NBS Special Publication SP 440.

The color chips are as permanent as it is possible to make them. However, it is considered advisable to protect the Rock-Color from bright sunlight and dampness as much as possible.

The chart is chiefly of value in describing the colors of medium-to fine-grained rocks but is also helpful in working with coarse-grained rocks. In describing very coarse-grained rocks, such as porphyritic gra nites, it is necessary to give the color of each mineral, and the chart is designed to cover the range of the chief rock-forming minerals such as feldspar, quartz, mica, and hornblende. If the rock is not too coarse- grained, a blending of the individual colors can be secured by spinning the specimen like a color disc or by looking at the rock from a short dis- - tance and thus getting a monotone which can be matched with the chips on the chart.

The number and range of colors on the Rock-color Chan are based on studies made by the Committee of more than 1300 selected rock specimens collected from the United States and Alaska. The colors of these rocks were plotted on Munsell charts and these charts served as a

basis for selecting the colors. The committee believes that the full range of rock colors is covered by the chart, except possibly for very rare rocks of high chroma. For most rock colors, the chart will serve for both wet and dry specimens. It was found by experiment that wetting the rock specimen merely decreases the value, that is, makes the speci men darker, but does not change the chroma. Accordingly, the Rock- color Chart Committee selected colors for the chart as far as possible in to the dark range in order to cover wet specimens as well as dry.

The Committee wishes to thank the many geologists throughout the country who contributed rock specimens and also those who contribu ted comments and suggestions. It also wishes to express its appreciation to Miss Dorothy Nickerson, of the United States Department of Agri culture, Mrs. B.R. Bellamy of the Munsell Color Co., and Dr. Deane B. Judd of the National Bureau of Standards for their wholehearted help and cooperation. The Committee hopes that the chart will attain wide usage among geologists and also that it will be useful to mineralogists, though the latterwfwHiave need of a much wider range of colors.

xv

Ontsrto Geological Survey MINES LIBRARY X

MAR' ^ 1986

RECEIVED

Careful checks of color designations were made prior to the 1979 and 1980 reprints of this chart by Douglas M. Klnney, Geologic Map Con sultant to the Geological Society of America, with the advice and assistance of Kenneth L. Kelly, National Bureau of Standards. Color corrections were made where necessary.

Statement of Expenditures

Type of Equipment Hours215 Cat Backhoe 98Tamrock Commando Drill 96

Cost l Hour*S 90/hour* 3 85/hour*

Total8,8208,160

Work Week

Oct. Oct.

5-8 l 98 13-17

* includes fuel and operator

Ray Hertz

Hrs. Kms

Total

4850

98

486493

979

Collin Wrighton

Hrs. Kms.

4848

96

333347

680

Consumables - Explosives - l case K-pipe charges............- l case detonating cord...........

- Drill steel l-10ft, l-16ft 26ft at SlO/ft.....- Drill bits 4 at $ 30/bit...... . ...............

Total

Supervision Carter Nelson 2 days at S2507day + Mileage 598 Kms

325375260120

. ,080

500

Work Week

SeptOct.Oct.Oct.Nov .Mar.Jan .Jan .Jan .Jan.Feb.Feb.

. 28 - Oc5-9/9820-24/9826-30/982-6/981-5/9910-14/0017-2124-28/0031-Feb.7-11/0014-18/00

t. 2/98

4/00

Total

George Zebruck

Mileage

Hrs

2416168

20248

2432404024

Kms

270268207-

17651-5251785276

276

Ray Hertz Collin Wrighton Carter Nelson George Zebruck

1281 Kms

Activity

Drill Loc. LayoutSample CollectionSample prep S MappingProcess SamplesProcess Samples 4- mappingInterp. MapReport

276 Hrs = 34.5 days x S200*= S 6,900*

^includes 25% burden

3538 Kms at S.30 = S1061

Expenditure Summary

Equipment Cost.........................................4 16,980

Consumables........................................... l,080

Supervision........................................... 500

Layout, Sampling, Sample Prep. Mapping Report......... 6,900

Mileage............................................... l,061

Total S 26,521

Employee Names S Addresses

Ray Hertz Hwy. 17 West Vermilion Bay, Ont POV 2VO

Collin Wrighton 446 3rd. St. South Kenora, Ontario P9N 1J1

George Zebruck RR#1 Airport Rd. Kenora, Ontario P9N 3W7

Carter Nelson P.O. Box 178 Vermilion Bay, Ont POV 2VO

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

Transaction Number (office use)

Assessment Files Research Imaging

rity of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the id to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder, ning Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

52K04SW2004 2.20107 KILGOUR LAKE 900Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240.

- Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name

Carter B NelsonAddress

P.O. Box 178

Vermilion Bay, Ontario POV 2VOName

Address

Client Number

175007Telephone Number

(807) 227-2650Fax Number

(807) 227-2722Client Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( s ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)

Physical: drilling, stripping, trenching and associated assays l | Rehabilitation

Work TypeDrill dust sampling Stripping - Bulk Sampling

KrtomSd* From 30 , 09 , 98 To 16,02 , 00Day j Month | Year Day | Month | Year

Global Positioning System Data (if available) Township/Area UTM: 432000 mE Zone 15 Kilgour Lake Area

5547000 mN M or G-Plan Number G-2626

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of , Work Claimed ft (f t ^^ 1

NTS Reference

Mining Division \X v\-tL-KC5 ^^l

Resident Geologist District *i{ fAlJtt CJL J

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

2 ,zv3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name

George R. ZebruckAddress

RR#1 Airport Rd. Kenora, ON. P9N 3W7Name

Address

Name

Address

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or

D. , f??rv . JP^VEDFEB 2 1 2D03

iVgent

i O T'L V i

Telephone Number (807) 548-4298

Fax Number (807) 548- 1584

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Telephone Number

Fax Number IFPFIVFniCv/d v C.LS

FEB l 1 ilHftl6EOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT

OfFICE

l, George R Zebruck_________ ' do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed, or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

Signature of Recorded or Agent Date

Feb. 16. 2000Agent's Address

______RRfl Airport Rd. Kenora ON.Telephone Number

(807) 548-4298Fax Number

(807) 548-1584

0241 (02196}

5. Work to be recorded and distributed.the mining land where work was performed,

Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link

mus, accompany this form. l,1.mlA.Mni1

Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

K-1149879

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

2

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.

526, 825

0

S 8, 892

S 26.521

v~\ f"".Him

F

3 26,521

Value of work applied to this claim.

N/A

324,000

S 4,000

S4.000

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

S24,000

0

0

0

l

^rsonpn^vJnUdiE B 2 1 ZU'OO

SA.OOO

J

0

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.

S2,825

0

S4,892

S22.521

$22,521

l George R. Zebruck , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Print Full Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to

the claim where the work was done.Signature of in Writing Date

February 16, 2000x f

6. Instructions for ng back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( s ) in the boxes below to show how

you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

Q 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

Q 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp

0241 (02/96)

2 .2 0 1 0 7Deemed Approved Date

Date Approved

Date Notification Sent

Total Value of Credit Approved

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

. oo/d-Statement of Expenditures

Type of Equipment Hours215 Cat Backhoe 98 Tamrock Commando Drill 96

* includes fuel and operator

Cost l Hour*S 90/hour* % 85/hour*

Total8,8208,160

Work Week

Oct. 5-8 l 98 Oct. 13-17

Ray Hertz

Hrs. Kms.

Total

4850

98

486493

979

Collin Wrighton

Hrs. Kms.

4848

96

333347

680

Consumables - Explosives - l case K-pipe charges.......- l case detonating cord......

- Drill steel 1-lOft, l-16ft 26ft at SlO/ft- Drill bits 4 at S 30/bit.................

Supervision Carter Nelson 2 days at + Mileage 598 Kms

Total , 080

$ 500

Work Week

Sept. 28 - Oct. 2/98Oct. 5-9/98Oct. 20-24/98Oct. 26-30/98Nov. 2-6/98Mar. 1-5/99Jan. 10-14/00Jan. 17-21Jan. 24-28/00Jan. 31-Feb. 4/00Feb. 7-11/00Feb. 14-18/00

Mileage

Total

Ray Hertz Collin Wrighton Carter Nelson George Zebruck

•̂C':'

George

Hrs

2416168

20248

2432404024

276

on

k

> n '

Zebruck

Kms

270268207-17651-5251785276

1281 Kms

979680598

1281

3538 Kms at

: '-"-j

Activity

Drill Loc. LayoutSample CollectionSample prep S MappingProcess SamplesProcess Samples + mappingInterp. MapReport

tttttttttt

276 Hrs - 34.5 days x S2QO*= S 6,900*

*includes 253, burden

s. so - RECORDEDFEB 2 1 :o:a

(jJ-00/0'000/7

Expenditure Summary

Equipment Cost.......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 16,980

Consumables.......................................

Supervision.......................................

Layout, Sampling, Sample Prep. Mapping Report.....

Mileage...........................................

Total

1,080500

6,9001,061

26,521

RECORDEDFEB 2 1 20SO

Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines Ontario

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road

March 23, 2000 6th FloorSudbury, Ontario

CARTER BRENT NELSON P3E6B5BOX 178-66 ARMSTRONG STREETVERMILION BAY, Ontario Telephone: (888) 415-9845POV-2VO Fax: (877)670-1555

Visit our website at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm

Dear Sir or Madam: Submission Number: 2.20107

Status Subject: Transaction Number(s): W0010.00017 Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact STEVE BENETEAU by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 14703

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2.20107

Date Correspondence Sent: March 23, 2000 Assessor:STEVE BENETEAU

Transaction NumberW0010.00017

Section:10 Physical PSTRIP 18 Other BULK

First Claim Number1149879

Township(s) l Area(s)KILGOUR LAKE

StatusApproval

Approval Date

March 23, 2000

Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Kenora, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):George R. Zebruck KENORA, ONTARIO

CARTER BRENT NELSON VERMILION BAY, Ontario

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 14703

DEADFISH LAKE AREA - G-2612 HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.OTHER ROADSTRAILSSURVEYED LINES

TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC.

W* rf 00"

r— 50" 07' JO

LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES LOT LINES PARCEL BOUNDARY MINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTSSUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLANRESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENTK i—-

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT SURFACE & MINING RIGHTS , SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

, MIMING RIGHTS ONLY LEASE, SURFACE * MINING RIGHTS

, SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY , MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ORDER-IN-COUNCIL RESERVATION

CANCELLED SAN D A GRAVEL

f NI6089

LAND USE PERMITS FOR COMMERCIAL TOURISM, OUTPOST CAM PSMOTE MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY C, 1913.

VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT, R.S.O. 197Q: CHAP. 3SO, SEC. S3: SUBS EC 1.

REFERENCES

MUUMG

SUHF4CE IWGWTS QW.

AI1O 9U*f**Cl!

SAMO AMD:

SEC.35 W-K-36/98 NOV.30/98 M&S 195150 . 35 Order No. O-K-1/99 13/01/99 M+S (Re-opened) 195150

^^^^^^ ,^^^^^^^ ____ _______

NOflTHOIN DEVELOP

DfflONAON THi LAMO*

INFORMATION OF THt

KILGOUR LAKEM, vi *am*isnt*nvi

K CHOW AMIMIM •IWISIQ*

KCMCMU1AM TITLIt/

K C HOU A

On tan otf 4B' M

DANIELS LAKE 6-261052K04SW2004 2.20107 KILGOUR LAKE

PPost'431700 m E 800

900 432000 m E100 200 300 432400 m E

Thick Jackpine Regeneration

Porphyritic Granite

Mining Claim

K-1149879Thick Jackpine Regeneration

Porphyritic Granite

Mature Spruce fi Pine

Porphyritic Granite

ISIELSOIM GSFIAIMIPorphyritic Granite

Mature Spruce l Pine

1-A Red Porphyritic Granite

Increase S Grey Matrix

Decrease S Red Phenocrysts

2-A Pink Porphyritic Granite

Thick Jackpine RegenerationScale 1:1000

Porphyritic Granite

linn inn ill UN III HIM III Illl II Illlll Hill Hill Hill Hill Hill Hill Hill Hill Hill

52K04SW2004 2.20107 KILGOUR LAKE

Drill Dust Sampling - Colour Interpretation

3-C Brown Porphyritic Granite

3-D

3-E

*1 ^ Post


Decrease X Brown Phenocrysts


Decrease S Pink Phenocrysts

4-D Porphyritic Granite w/Predominant Grey Matrix > 50*

4-E Porphyritic Granite w/Predominant Grey Matrix > 70*

G. Zebruck Mar.y99

*2Post

Date post:	25-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times