+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: ukies-l
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    1/18

    Air Separation Unitfor Oxy-Coal Combustion

    ys ems

    -

    Richard Dubettier

    Nicolas Perrin

    Air Li uide

    1st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus

    September 9, 2009

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    2/18

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    3/18

    ASU optimized for oxycombustion

    From todays most efficient ASUs

    than 100 years but is stil l improving& the worlds largest ASUs

    ISAB IGCC (2x 1800 tpd O2)O eration since 1999

    Sasol Train 15 (4200 tpd O2 MSL)O erat ion since 2003 co order in 2007

    to a new specific design foroxycombustion

    ...with additional power reductionthrough cycle integration

    31st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09 .3

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    4/18

    130

    ASU optimized for oxycombustion

    110

    120

    enditure

    90

    100

    capitale

    x

    70

    80

    No

    rmalize

    60

    120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280

    Specifi c energy of separation (kWh/t)

    20% improvement has already been achieved todayin specific energy consumption

    41st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    5/18

    Integration : process simulation

    FG Cleaning & Recycle

    Performance

    Boiler

    eam

    Turbine

    Cycle

    Pulverizer

    51st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

    ASU

    .5

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    6/18

    Net Plant Efficiency Comparison

    CO2 capture from pulverized coal plants is possible with

    50.0

    without CCS with CCS

    Babcock & Wilcox /

    Air Liquide 2008

    results

    penalty ofonly ~6 percentage pts

    39.4

    33.632.1

    39.4

    35.0

    40.0

    45.0

    %(

    HHV

    )

    . .

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    Efficiency

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    NetPlant

    0.0SC PC

    Air-Fired

    SC PC

    Air-Fi redIGCC Avg SC PC

    Oxy-Fired

    B&W / AL

    SC PC

    Oxy-Fired

    IGCC Avg

    Amines

    TECHNOLOGY

    61st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09 .6

    SP PC = Super Critical Pulverized Coal IGCC = Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle

    Data from DOE/NETL reports and B&W Air Liquide studies (2007 2008)

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    7/18

    Cycle analysis

    , .can be achieved today with the following results :

    MW Ese ASU

    (kWh/t)Gross power from steam 724.1

    ross power or .

    Gross power for CO2 CPU 62.4

    ,miscellaneous

    .

    Sub-total Auxiliary load 174.1

    Net plant power 550.0

    71st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    8/18

    Gross/Net power consumption of ASU

    Adiabatic compression

    Oxygen preheating to approx. 150 C

    Gain : 5.6 MWNet power of ASU: 70.2 MW (i.e. Esep = 145 kWh/t)

    Another benefit of oxycombustion is to decreasethe flue as flow and therefore the heat lossesassociated with the flue gas condenser ; this gainhas been evaluated at 8.1 MW for a 550 MWe net

    lant

    Therefore the net penalty associated with the

    81st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

    .

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    9/18

    Further ASU improvements

    Specific energy reduction

    Capital expenditure reduction

    Advanced cryogenic ASU concept

    91st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    10/18

    Specific energy reduction

    Additional power savings with new processcycles

    ur er re uc on w e eve opmen o new

    technologies

    A further gain of 10 % is targeted for 2015

    200 kWh/t Specific

    160 kWh/t145 kWh/t

    without heat

    integration

    101st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    11/18

    MW MW Delta

    Specif ic energy reduction

    2008study

    2015target

    Gross power from steam 724.1 729.8 +0.8%

    Gross power for ASU 75.8 68.2 -10%

    Gross power for CO2 CPU 62.4 56.2 -10%

    Primary, FD & ID fans &miscellaneous

    35.9 37.3 +3.9%

    Sub-total Auxiliary load 174.1 161.7 -8%

    Net plant power 550.0 568.1 +3.3%

    HHV efficiency 33.6% 34.7% +1.1pt

    Net power of ASU with heat integration is targeted at 130kWh/t

    CO2 capture from pulverized coal plants is expected to

    111st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

    achieve only 4.7 percentage pts penalty

    With USC cycle (700C), the HHV efficiency could beabove 40%

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    12/18

    Capital expenditure reduction

    been launched on the ASU for oxycombustionwith a target of -20%

    121st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    13/18

    Advanced ASU concept

    high pressure instead of atmospheric pressure

    350CAir

    11 bar abs

    Adiabatic compression

    Hot nitrogenASU

    330C5 bar abs

    Hot oxygen

    131st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    14/18

    Advanced ASU concept

    a dual Rankine (steam) / Brayton (N2) cycle

    Boiler Steam turbine

    Nitrogen

    Nitrogen out 620C or higher

    aNitrogen turbine

    BFW+

    141st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

    Oxygen

    at 330C Air compressor

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    15/18

    Advanced ASU concept

    Lower s ecific ener of se aration : a rox. -15 % i.e.110 kWh/t

    Lower CAPEX for the Air Separation Unit : higher

    size (up to 7500 t/d)Compressor and turbine offer has to be developed

    g pressure cyc e a rea y emonstrate or application

    Puertollano S ain Yokohama Ja an

    Most efficient

    ASU in the world

    151st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    16/18

    Conclusions

    Oxycombustion is today the most efficient route forCCS

    Further improvements in the Air Separation Unit arearge e o n erm o ower consump on an

    Capital expenditure reduction

    Advanced cryogenic Air Separation Unit concept is apotential breakthrough for the oxycombustion route

    161st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    17/18

    Acknowledgement

    a coc cox or

    heat integration studies

    Contacts

    - . .

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • 7/27/2019 1st IEA GHG Oxyfuel Conf ASU 090909_final

    18/18

    Specif ic energy of separation : definition

    Power required to produce 1 metric ton of pure oxygen contained in agaseous oxygen stream at a given oxygen purity at atmosphericpressure (101325 Pa) under ISO conditions (15C, RH 60%)

    , ,

    Heat of regeneration of driers (steam, natural gas or electrical) notincluded

    Power consumption of cooling system (CW pumps, fans,) not

    included

    Specific energy of production = Specific energy of separation +specific energy of compression

    Specific energy of compression 0.1xQ(Nm3/h)xlog10(PGOX/PATM)1 t/h of GOX 1000 / 1.427637 700 Nm3/h

    For 1.4 bar abs : 10 kWh/t of pure O2

    181st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus 09/09/09


Recommended