Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | meghan-ryan |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 3 times |
2chapter
Business Essentials, 7th EditionEbert/Griffin
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Instructor Lecture PowerPointsPowerPoint Presentation prepared by Carol Vollmer Pope Alverno College
Ethics and Social Responsibilty in the Workplace
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Ethics
Beliefs about right and wrong
Social Responsibility
Obligation of a business to contribute
to society
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 4
UNIVERSAL ETHICAL STANDARDS
Developed by Character Counts, a nonpartisan
organization of educators, community leaders, and
ethicists.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 5
ETHICS AND THE INDIVIDUAL
A. Framework for Ethical DecisionsA. Do you understand the
dimensions of the problem?B. Who would benefit? Who would
suffer?C. Are the alternative solutions
legal? Are they fair?D. Does your decision make you
comfortable?E. Could you defend your decision
on the nightly news?
Individual Values and Codes
• Sources of Personal Codes of Ethics– Childhood responses to adult behavior– Influence of peers– Experiences in adulthood– Developed morals and values
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Personal Ethics• Simple Steps in Applying Ethical Judgments
Is the action legal?Does it comply with our values?If you do it, will you feel bad?How will it look in the newspaper?If you know it's wrong, don't do it!If you're not sure, ask.Keep asking until you get an answer.
Assessing Ethical Behavior• Ethical Norms and the Issues They Entail
– Utility: Does a particular act optimize the benefits to those who are affected by it? Do all relevant parties receive “fair” benefits?
– Rights: Does the act respect the rights of all individuals involved?
– Justice: Is the act consistent with what’s fair?
– Caring: Is the act consistent with people’s responsibilities to each other?
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Company Practices and Business Ethics
• Encouraging Ethical Behavior Involves:
– Adopting written codes of conduct and establishing clear ethical positions for the conduct of business
– Having top management demonstrate its support of ethical standards
– Instituting programs to provide periodic ethics training
– Establishing ethical hotlines for reporting and discussing unethical behavior and activities
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 10
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Responsibility to Whom? Stakeholders are any
groups that have a stake –
or a personal interest - in the
performance and actions
of an organization.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 11
RESPONSIBILITY TO……
EMPLOYEES
INVESTORS
COMMUNITY
ENVIRONMENT
CUSTOMERS
Creating Jobs that Work
Sustainable Development
Value, Honesty and Communication
Fair Stewardship and Full Disclosure
Business and the Greater Good
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 12
RESPONSIBILITY TO EMPLOYEES: CREATING JOBS THAT WORK
A. Meet Legal StandardsB. Workplace SafetyC. Minimum Wage/Overtime
RequirementsD. Value EmployeesE. Provide Work/Life Balance
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 13
DOES IT PAY TO PAY MORE?
Costco Wal-Mart’sSam’s Club
Average hourly wage $15.97 $11.52
Annual health costs per worker $5,735 $3,500
Covered by health plan 82% 47%
Employee turnover 6%/yr 21%/yr
Labor and overhead costs 9.8% of sales 17% of sales
Profits per employee $13,647 $11,039
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 14
RESPONSIBILITY TO CUSTOMERS
CONSUMERISM:
• The Right to Be Safe
• The Right to Be Informed
• The Right to Choose
• The Right to be Heard
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 15
ROTTEN APPLE?
Planned Obsolescence –
Deliberately designing products to fail in order to shorten
the time between consumer repurchases
APPLE COMPUTERS:
• iPods had irreplaceable battery.
• Batteries died after 18 months.
• Customers were encouraged to purchase new iPods
• Two customers posted high profile protest movies online.
• APPLE announced replacement program.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 16
RESPONSIBILITY TO INVESTORS
A. Legal RequirementsA. Sarbanes-Oxley
B. Responsible use of Corporate DollarsA. Honesty
C. Is Optimism or Pessimism Socially Responsible?
FAIR STEWARDSHIP AND FULL DISCLOSURE
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 17
RESPONSIBILITY TO COMMUNITY
Corporate Philanthropy - business donations to
nonprofit groups, including both money and time.
Corporate Responsibility - The actions of the business
rather than donations of money and time.
Cause-related Marketing – partnerships between businesses
and nonprofit organizations, designed to spike sales for the
company and raise money for the nonprofit.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 18
RESPONSIBILITY TO ENVIRONMENT
Green Marketing – marketing environmental products and practices
to gain a competitive edge.
© 2009 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning 19
RESPONSIBILITY TO ENVIRONMENT
A. Responsibility to environment is a part of responsibility to community
A. Reducing the amount of trash is more important than recycling
A. Although consumers support green marketing, they may not be willing to sacrifice quality
Implementing Social Responsibility (SR) Programs
• Arguments Against SR– The cost of SR threatens profits.– Business has too much control over which SR issues would
be addressed and how SR issues would be addressed.– Business lacks expertise in SR matters.
• Arguments for SR– SR should take precedence over profits.– Corporations as citizens should help others.– Corporations have the resources to help.– Corporations should solve problems they create.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Approaches to Social Responsibility
• Obstructionist Stance– A company does as little as possible and may attempt to
deny or cover up violations• Defensive Stance
– A company does everything required of it legally but no more
• Accommodative Stance– A company meets its legal and ethical requirements and
also goes further in certain cases• Proactive Stance
– A company actively seeks to contribute to the well-being of groups and individuals in its social environment
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
FIGURE 2.4: Spectrum of Approaches to Corporate Social Responsibility
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Managing Social Responsibility Programs
1. Social responsibility must start at the top and be considered as a factor in strategic planning.
2. A committee of top managers must develop a plan detailing the level of management support.
3. One executive must be put in charge of the firm’s agenda.
4. The organization must conduct occasional social audits—systematic analyses of its success in using funds earmarked for its social responsibility goals.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Social Responsibility and the Small Business
• Large Business versus Small Business Responses to Ethical Issues
– Differences are primarily differences of scale
– More issues are questions of individual ethics
• Ethics and social responsibility are decisions faced by all managers in all organizations, regardless of rank or size
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Key Terms
accommodative stance business ethics collusion consumerism defensive stance ethical behavior ethics insider trading managerial ethics obstructionist stance organizational stakeholders
proactive stance social audit social responsibility unethical behavior whistleblower
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.