Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 40
2. Literature Review
Biswas et al., (2010) developed high performance liquid chromatography method for
determination of paracetamol, chlorzaxozone and diclofenac potassium. The
chromatographic method was standardized using a reverse phase C-18 column with UV
detector at 254 nm. Mobile phase consisted of methanol and (0.01M) monobasic sodium
phosphate (70:30) (pH was adjusted to 2.5 ± 0.2 using 10% orthophosphoric acid) and
the flow rate was 1 ml/min. The recovery values were between 99.65% and 101.20%.
The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection,
limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The method was
successfully applied for the determination of paracetamol, chlorzaxozone and diclofenac
potassium in marketed formulations 1
.
Freddy et al., (2010) carried out a simple, specific, accurate and economical isocratic
reverse phase liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for the determination of
paracetamol, acetyl salicylic acid, mefenamic acid and cetirizine dihydrochloride.
Separation was achieved with a Nucleodur, C–18 column having 250 x 4.6 mm i.d. with
5 μm particle size. Disodium hydrogen phosphate (pH-6.5) and acetonitrile (60:40 v⁄v)
was used as eluent at a constant flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. UV detection was performed at
220 nm. The retention times of acetyl salicylic acid, paracetamol, mefenamic acid and
cetirizine dihydrochloride were found to be 2.01 min, 2.92 min, 4.91 min and 10.2 min
respectively. The proposed method was validated and successfully used for estimation of
paracetamol, acetyl salicylic acid, mefenamic acid and cetirizine dihydrochloride in the
pharmaceutical dosage forms2.
Kasawar et al., (2010) developed and validated stability indicating RP-HPLC method
for simultaneous estimation of related substances of albuterol sulfate and ipratropium
bromide in nasal solution. Heat, acid, base, UV radiation and oxidation stress conditions
were applied to check the stability of combined dosage form. The chromatographic
conditions were optimized using an inertsil C-8 column with dimensions 250 mm x 4.6
mm, 5 µm. Mobile phase was consisted of solvent A (solution containing 2.5 g of
potassium di hydrogen phosphate and 2.87 gm of heptane-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt
per liter of water, adjusted to pH 4.0 with ortho phosphoric acid) and solvent B
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 41
(acetonitrile). Flow rate was maintained 1.0 ml min−1
. The analytes were detected and
quantified at 210 nm using photodiode array (PDA) detector3.
Kumudhavalli et al., (2010) developed a rapid, sensitive and specific RP-HPLC method
using UV detection for determination and quantification of pseudoephedrine
hydrochloride, cetirizine dihydrochloride and paracetamol and validated the same.
Optimization of chromatographic conditions was carried out on a pre-packed Crosmosil
C-8 (250x4.6 mm) column using filtered and degassed mixture of buffer and acetonitrile
in the ratio of 85:15 as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Effluent was
monitored at 215 nm. The method was validated in terms of linearity, precision,
accuracy, robustness, ruggedness and specificity4.
Nora et al., (2010) developed RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of
phenylephrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate using UV
spectrophotometry. A reversed-phase column and mobile phase of methanol : water :
acetonitrile (80:12:8 v/v/v/) at 0.9 ml/min flow rate was used to separate both drugs with
a UV detection at 270 nm. The limit of detection was found to be 0.142 and 0.342 μg/ml
for phenylephrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate. The limit of
quantification was noted to be 0.550 and 0.715μg/ml for phenylephrine hydrochloride
and chlorpheniramine maleate, respectively. Recovery values were between 99.79-
101.49%. They concluded that the proposed method was precise, accurate, selective and
rapid for the simultaneous determination of phenylephrine hydrochloride and
chlorpheniramine maleate. The results obtained using the proposed methods were
statistically analyzed5.
Fegade et al., (2009) carried out simultaneous estimation of paracetamol and piroxicam
in tablets. Separation was achieved on Eurosphere 100 C-18 as stationary phase. Mobile
phase was methanol: water (70:30). Detection wavelength was 227nm. Recovery values
were between 99.44 and 100.01%. The method was validated in terms of accuracy,
precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as
per ICH and USP guidelines. The method was successfully applied for the determination
of paracetamol and piroxicam in marketed formulations6.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 42
Godse et al., (2009) reported a reverse phase HPLC method for determination of
aceclofenac and paracetamol in tablet dosage form. An ODS C18 (Intersile 25 cm x 4.6
mm, 10μm) column was used as stationary phase. Mobile phase used was methanol:
water (70:30 v/v) at flow rate of 1mL/min. Linearity was observed in the concentration
range of 2-50μg/ml for aceclofenac and 5-50μg/ml for paracetamol. Recoveries values of
aceclofenac and paracetamol were 100.6% and 100.7% respectively. They concluded
that the proposed method was precise, accurate, selective and rapid for the simultaneous
determination of aceclofenac and paracetamol7.
Hadad et al., (2009) worked on development and validation of stability- indicating RP-
HPLC method for determination of paracetmol with dantrolene or/and cetirizine and
pseudoephidrine in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Stability indicating capability of the
method was demonstrated by adequate separation of these four analytes from all the
degradants peaks. A gradient mobile phase system consisting of acetonitrile and 50
mmol/lit sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 5 mmol/lit heptane sulfonic acid sodium salt
was used. Separation was achieved by HS C18 analytical column. Quantitation was
monitored on UV detector at 214 nm. The developed method was sensitive, accurate and
precise8.
Karthikeyan et al., (2009) developed HPLC method for the determination of
paracetamol, chlorzoxazone and aceclofenac in pharmaceutical formulation. Separation
was achieved by Phenomenex C18 column using a mixture of acetonitrile: 0.05 M
disodium hydrogen orthophosphate (65:35) (pH 3.0) as a mobile phase. UV detection
wavelength was 271 nm. The calibration curves were linear in the range of 20-100μg/ml
for paracetamol, chlorzoxazone and 4-20 μg/ml for aceclofenac. LOD was found to be
0.9μg/ml, 1.81μg/ml and 0.9μg/ml for paracetamol, chlorzoxazone and aceclofenac
respectively. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines9.
Louhaichi et al., (2009) determined pseudoephdrine, pheniramine, guaifenesin,
pyrilamine, chlorpheniramine and dextromethorphan in cough and cold medicines using
HPLC. The separation was achieved by Kromasil C18 column as a stationary phase.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 43
Mobile phase was methanol: di-hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 3.0) (45:55). The
analyses were performed at flow rate 1ml/min and detection wavelength was 220 nm.
Range was 5-60μg/ml for pseudoephdrine, pheniramine, chlorpheniramine and 50-
600μg/ml for pyrilamine, dextromethorphan. The recovery values were between 98.5
and 101.71%10
.
Raman et al., (2009) validated stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for famciclovir.
The method used Intersil ODS 3 V (250 x 4.6mm, 5μm) column as a stationary phase.
The mobile phase used was mixture of 0.01 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate
buffer (pH 3.0) and methanol (80:20). The degradation products were well resolved from
standard peak and its impurities. They concluded that famciclovir degraded significantly
in oxidative, acid and base conditions and mildly in hydrolytic conditions. The
developed method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines11
.
Bhatia et al., (2008) reported reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography
and spectrophotometric method for the estimation of ambroxol hydrochloride and
cetirizine hydrochloride in combined dosage form. The chromatographic methods were
optimized using a (HIQSIL) C-18 column with dimensions 250 X 4.6 mm, i.d. 10 µm
particle size, with UV detection at 229 nm. Mobile phase used was mixture of methanol,
acetonitrile and water at fixed ratio of 40:40:20 v/v. The linearity range was 5–55μg/ml
and 10–40μg/ml for ambroxol hydrochloride and cetirizine hydrochloride respectively.
The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection,
limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines 12
.
Crevar et al., (2008) carried out RP-HPLC analysis of caffeine, paracetamol and its
degradation product p-aminophenol. Mobile phase was consisted of methanol and
phosphate buffer (20:80 v/v). The flow rate was 1 mL/min at 230nm. Separation was
achieved using Zorbax Extend C-18 Column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm). The proposed
method was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and reproducible. The method was
validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The results obtained in
this study were precise, rapid and sensitive13
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 44
Karakus et al., (2008) developed and validated a rapid reverse phase high performance
liquid chromatography method for the determination of cetirizine or fexofenadine with
pseudoephedrine in binary pharmaceutical dosage forms. Separation was achieved by C-
18 column with mobile phase acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (60:40 v/v). The
wavelength was 230 nm. The recovery was more than 99%. The method was simple,
precise, rapid and reliable. The proposed method gave a good resolution between
cetirizine, fexofenadine and pseudoephedrine14
.
Nagappan et al., (2008) developed an RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of
ambroxol hydrochloride and loratidine in pharmaceutical formulation. The method was
carried out on a Phenomenex Gemini C18 (25 cm x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µ) column with a
mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile: 50 mM ammonium acetate (50:50 v/v) at a flow
rate of 1.0 ml/min. Detection was done at wavelength 255 nm. The method was
validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines15
.
Sawsan et al., (2008) reported simultaneous determination of phenylephrine
hydrochloride, guaifenesin, and chlorpheniramine maleate in cough syrup by gradient
liquid chromatography. Separation was achieved by C-8 column using 0.005 M heptane
sulfonic acid sodium salt (pH 3.4) and acetonitrile as a mobile phase by gradient elution
at different flow rates. The separated drugs were detected using UV detector at
wavelength 210 nm. The responses were linear in the concentration range of 30-
180μg/ml, 120-1800μg/ml and 10-60μg/ml for phenylephrine hydrochloride,
guaifenesin, and chlorpheniramine maleate respectively16
.
Shirkhedkar et al., (2008) carried out simultaneous determination of paracetamol and
piroxicam in tablets by HPLC combined with densitometry forms using a mixture of
n-dichloroethane, methanol and triethylamine (30:20:50 v/v) as mobile phase. The
wavelength was 284 nm with flow rate 1 mL/min. The developed HPLC method was
simple, precise, accurate and reproducible and can be used for simultaneous
determination of paracetamol and piroxicam in tablets17
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 45
Shaikh et al., (2008) carried out HPLC analysis for simultaneous estimation of
ambroxol hydrochloride and azithromycin in tablet dosage form. Chromatographic
separation was achieved on Xterra RP- 18 (250mm×4.6mm, 5µm) analytical column. A
mixture of acetonitrile: di potassium phosphate (30mM pH 9.0) in ratio 50:50, v/v at a
flow rate of 1.7 ml/min was used as mobile phase. The detection wavelength was 215
nm. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The
method was successfully applied for simultaneous determination of ambroxol
hydrochloride and azithromycin in marketed formulations18
.
Palabıyık et al., (2007) carried out HPLC analysis of phenylephrine hydrochloride,
paracetamol, chlorpheniramine maleate and dextromethorphan hydrobromide in
pharmaceutical preparations. The separation was achieved by C18 column using a
gradient mobile phase of acetonitrile: sodium perchlorate (pH 3, 0.01 M) at a flow rate
of 1.4 ml/min. Detection wavelength was 204 nm. LOQ for phenylephrine
hydrochloride, paracetamol, chlorpheniramine maleate and dextromethorphan
hydrobromide were 0.08μg/ml, 0.29μg/ml, 0.24μg/ml and 0.03 respectively. LOD for the
phenylephrine hydrochloride, paracetamol, chlorpheniramine maleate and
dextromethorphan hydrobromide was 0.03 μg/ml, 0.10μg/ml, 0.08μg/ml and 0.13μg/ml
respectively. The method was suitable for the determination of the four compounds in
sugar-coated tablet19
.
Bhavsar et al., (2006) estimated paracetamol and valdecoxib in combined dosage form
by RP-HPLC. Separation was achieved by Luna C18 column and methanol: phosphate
buffer (pH 3.5) (60: 40) as eluent. Detection wavelength was 242 nm. Etoricoxib was
used as an internal standard. Concentration range for paracetamol and valdecoxib was
25-150μg/ml and 1-6μg/ml respectively. The average recovery of paracetamol and
valdecoxib was 101.1% and 101.7% respectively. The method was validated in terms of
accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and
ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The developed method was accurate, precise and
selective20
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 46
Grossa et al., (2006) developed a simultaneous stability indicating, HPLC-DAD method
for determination of guaifenesin, methyl and propyl-parabens in cough syrup. The
isocratic separation and quantitation were achieved within 17 min on 150 mm column
with an ether-linked phenyl stationary phase and a hydrophilic end capping. The mobile
phase was consisted of eluent A: 10 mM aqueous phosphate buffer (pH 3.0) and
acetonitrile in ratio 25:75 (v/v) and eluent B as methanol. The eluent A and B were kept
in ratio 85:15 (v/v) with a flow rate 1ml min-1
. The detection of analytes was carried out
at dual wavelength as 254 and 276 nm. Heat, acid, base, UV radiation and oxidation
stress conditions were performed for stability of combined dosage form21
.
Kambia et al., (2006) determined stability and compatibility of paracetamol injection
with ketoprofen using HPLC. The mobile phase used was methanol and phosphate
buffer (65:35v/v) at 230 nm wavelength. The paracetamol and ketoprofen were
physically compatible and chemically stable upto 48 hrs at room temperature. The
method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit
of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines 22
.
Schieffer et al., (2006) developed a method for simultaneous estimation of
phenylepherine hydrochloride, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride and guaifenesin in
dosage forms by reverse phase paired-ion high performance liquid chromatography.
Heat, acid, base, UV radiation and oxidation stress conditions were applied to study the
stability of combined dosage form. The separation was carried out on a Waters
Bondapak C18 column (300 x 3.9 mm). The eluent was 5 mM hexanesulfonic acid
sodium salt in 1% glacial acetic acid and methanol in ratio of 80/20 (v/v). Wavelength
for detection of drugs was kept at 220 nm23
.
Selvan et al., (2006) reported simultaneous estimation of ambroxol,
phenylpropanolamine, levocetirizine and paracetamol in combined dosage forms by
reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. The separation was carried out
by Hichrom C18 column with mobile phase acetonitrile: buffer: triethylamine
(30:70:0.5). Detection was carried out at 238nm. Tadalafil was used as an internal
standard. The LOD values for levocetirizine, ambroxol, phenylpropanolamine and
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 47
paracetamol were 5ng/ml, 100ng/ml, 200ng/ml and 15ng/ml and LOQ were 15ng/ml,
100ng/ml, 200ng/ml and 15ng/ml respectively. The recovery values were between 99.58
and 100.00%24
.
Sun et al., (2006) reported simultaneous determination of acetaminophen, caffeine and
chlorpheniramine maleate in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Separation and quantitation
were achieved by C18 column. The mobile phase was methanol: phosphate buffer
(45:55), containing 0.1% triethylamine and pH was adjusted 3.6 with phosphoric acid.
All drugs were detected by UV detector at 260 nm. The recovery values were between
99.25% and 101.98%. The method was simple, sensitive and could be used in estimation
of commercially available formulation25
.
Tan et al., (2006) carried out simultaneous determination of pseudoephedrine and
cetirizine in human plasma using liquid-chromatography–ion trap spectrometry by
Hypersil C-18 column with methanol and 1mM ammonium acetate (65:35v/v) as mobile
phase at 230 nm by UV detector. Bio-analytical study was specific, sensitive, accurate
and precise. The method was robust and can be successfully applied to pharmacokinetics
study of pseudoephedrine and cetirizine in human plasma26
.
Olmo et al., (2005) developed new approaches with cyano columns for the separation of
acetaminophen, phenylephrine, chlorpheniramine and related compounds. Separation
was achieved by discovery cyanopropyl (SUPELCO) column. Mobile phase was
aqueous: organic solvent (95:5, v/v). The method was validated in terms of accuracy,
precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness.
Recovery values were observed between 102% and 108%27
.
Barbas et al., (2004) developed a stability indicating HPLC method for determination of
dextromethorphan and guaifenesin in cough syrup. Forced degradation study was also
carried out to check the stability of the syrup. Mobile phase used was phosphate buffer
(25 mM, pH 2.8) with triethylamine (TEA): acetonitrile (75:25, v/v). Stress conditions
like heat, acid, base, UV radiation and oxidations were applied to study the stability of
combined dosage form28
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 48
Ferrayolli et al., (2004) carried out validation of a chiral HPLC assay for (R)-salbutamol
sulfate. The method was validated in terms of specificity, robustness, linearity, precision
and accuracy. Under the chromatographic conditions of the method, known impurities
were separated from the active principle. Separation was achieved by 250mm × 4.6 mm
Chirobiotic T column (amphoteric glycopeptide teicoplanin bonded to a 5 µm silica gel).
A mixture with fixed ratio of acetonitrile, methanol, acetic acid, triethylamine in the ratio
60:40:0.3:0.2 (v/v/v/v) was used as mobile phase. Flow rate was kept at 1.5 ml min−1.
The drugs were monitored at 276 nm wavelength29
.
Marin et al., (2004) carried out LC/MS analysis for the degradation profiling of cough-
cold product under forced conditions. Heat, acid, base, UV radiation and oxidation stress
conditions were applied to study the stability of cough–cold products. Liquid
chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry was used to analyze the degraded
samples and obtain molecular weights information. Chromatographic analysis was
performed on a 5 µm particle, Discovery HS PEG column Supelco 15 cm x 0.46 cm at
35°C. Mobile phase was phosphate buffer 20 mM (pH 7.0) : acetonitrile 90:10 v/v. Flow
rate was 1.0 ml/ min with UV detection at 215 and 254 nm30
.
Basavaraj et al., (2003) reported HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of
paracetamol and cetirizine hydrochloride in tablet dosage form by C-18 column with
mobile phase acetonitrile and water (40:60 v/v). The UV detection wavelength was 230
nm. The retention time was 2.29, 3.5 and 5.88 minutes for paracetamol, cetirizine
hydrochloride and nimesulide, respectively. The % recovery was between 99.68 and
100.13. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The
proposed method was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and reproducible31
.
Garcia et al., (2003) developed HPLC method for determination of paracetamol,
phenylephrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate in capsule using HS PEG C-
18 column with mobile phase consisting of 20 mM phosphate buffer and acetonitrile
(65:35v/v). The UV detection was performed at 215 nm for all compounds. The method
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 49
was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The recovery values were
between 99.25% and 101.98%. The method was simple, sensitive and could be used in
estimation of commercially available formulations32
.
Goger et al., (2003) reported UV spectrophotometric and high performance liquid
chromatographic method for quantitative determination of ambroxol in tablet dosage
form. A reversed-phase C-18 column with mobile phase consisting of aqueous phosphate
(0.01 M), acetonitrile, glacial acetic acid (59:40:1, v/v/v) (pH 3.12) was used. UV
detection was done at 252 nm. The limit of detection was noted to be 0.278 and limit of
quantification was 0.705 μg/ml. Recovery was noted to be between 99.08 and 101.26%.
The method was evaluated for specificity, robustness, linearity, precision and accuracy33
.
Hood et al., (2003) carried out simultaneous analysis of codeine phosphate, ephedrine
HCl and chlorpheniramine maleate in cough syrup formulation. They used Eurosphere
100 C18 column as stationary phase. Mobile phase was methanol: water (70:30).
Detection wavelength was 227 nm. The method was validated in terms of accuracy,
precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as
per ICH guidelines. The method was applied for the analysis of these analytes in
commercially available tablets34
.
Kim et al., (2003) developed a simple method for determination of ambroxol in human
plasma using LC-MS/MS. The stationary phase was C-18 X-Terra MS column (2.1cm X
30 mm) with 3.5 µm particle size. The mobile phase was composed of 20 mM
ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile (pH 8.8). The flow rate was 2.50 ml/min. The
recovery values were between 100.35% and 101.28%. The method was validated in
terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness
and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The proposed method was simple, accurate,
economical, rapid and reproducible35
.
Nagaralli et al., (2003) worked on liquid chromatographic determination of cetirizine
hydrochloride and paracetamol in human plasma and pharmaceutical formulations.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 50
Separation was achieved by CLC C18 (5μ × 25cm×4.6mm i.d) column as a stationary
phase. Detection wavelength was 230 nm. The mobile phase was acetonitrile: water
(55:45 v/v). The linearity range was 0.715–55μg/ml and 0.55–39μg/ml for cetirizine and
paracetamol, respectively. The limits of detection were 0.248 and 0.208μg/ml and limits
of quantification were 0.550 and 0.715μg/ml for cetirizine and paracetamol respectively.
Recovery values were between 99.28 and 100.19%. The method was applied for the
analysis of these analytes in commercially available formulations36
.
Qi et al., (2003) carried out HPLC analysis of paracetamol, caffeine, chlorpheniramine
maleate and guaiacol glycerile ether in syrup by Diamonsil C-18 column with mobile
phase consisting of methanol and acetic acid (55:45v/v) at 215 nm. The retention times
were noted to be 4.8, 6.3, 7.5 and 9.5 minutes respectively for chlorpheniramine maleate,
paracetamol, caffeine and guaiacol glycerile ether. The recovery values were between
99.97% and 100.95%. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision,
linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH
guidelines.
The proposed method was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and
reproducible. The method was sensitive and could be used in estimation of commercially
available formulations37
.
Wang et al., (2003) developed HPLC method for analysis of paracetamol, caffeine and
chlorpheniramine maleate in tablet using C-18 column with mobile phase 5 mM aq.
solution of hexane sulfphonic acid, 10 mM tri ethyl amine and 1% acetic acid and
(20:30:30v/v) and detection at 223 nm. The proposed method was simple, accurate,
economical, rapid and reproducible. The limits of detection were 0.532, 0.765 and 0.534
μg/ml and limits of quantification were 0.987, 0.875 and 0.782 μg/ml for paracetamol,
caffeine and chlorpheniramine maleate, respectively. Recovery values were between
100.08 and 101.19%. The method was successfully applied for simultaneous
determination of paracetamol, caffeine and chlorpheniramine maleate in marketed
formulations38
.
Marın et al., (2002) developed a new HPLC method for quantification of
acetaminophen, phenylephrine and chlorpheniramine in pharmaceutical formulations,
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 51
capsules and sachets using C-18 column. The mobile phase was mixture of 40 mM
phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (75:25 v/v). The detection was monitored at 238 nm.
The method was precise and accurate for determining concentrations in the range 0.15 to
0.46 mg/ml for acetaminophen, 0.003 to 0.009 mg/ml for phenylephrine and 0.001 to
0.004 mg/ml for chlorpheniramine39
.
Panda et al., (2002) reported simultaneous analysis of phenylpropanolamine,
chlorpheniramine and bromhexine in syrup by derivative spectrophotometry. The
analysis was done on spherisord C8 (4.6 × 250MM, 5 µm) column. The mobile phase
was acetonitrile and sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate (75:25). The flow rate was 1.5
mL/min. The detection wavelength was 224 nm. The proposed method was simple,
accurate, economical, rapid and reproducible40
.
Qi et al., (2002) carried out simple HPLC method for simultaneous determination of
acetaminophen, caffeine and chlorpheniramine maleate in tablet formulations. The
mobile phase was composed of 20 mM ammonium acetate in 60% acetonitrile (pH 4.5)
at a flow rate 1.5 ml/min. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision,
linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH
guidelines. Linearity, accuracy and precision were found to be acceptable over the ranges
31.6-315.8μg/ml for acetaminophen, 9.5-94.6μg/ml for caffeine and 1.4- 13.8μg/ml for
chlorpheniramine maleate. Recovery values were between 98.3 and 101.5%41
.
Senyuva et al., (2002) developed and validated high-performance liquid
chromatographic method for determination of paracetamol, phenylephrine HCl, and
chlorpheniramine maleate in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Separation was achieved
using Bondapak CN RP analytical column (125 Å, 10 μm, 3.9 × 150 mm) as stationary
phase. The mobile phase was mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH 6.22,
78:22). LOD for phenylephrine and chlorpheniramine was 0.0325μg/ml, 0.0272μg/ml.
LOQ was 0.251μg/ml and 0.184 for phenylephrine and chlorpheniramine respectively.
The recovery values were between 98.0 and 99.73%. It was concluded that method was
reliable and reproducible for the determination of the active ingredients in pediatric
cough–cold syrups42
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 52
Takagaki et al., (2002) developed and validated simple and sensitive method for
determination of chlorpheniramine maleate in human plasma using liquid
chromatography–mass spectrometry. The mobile phase used was water and acetonitrile
(60:40v/v) and detection was done at 238 nm wavelength. The developed LC–MS–MS
method was convenient and sensitive. The method was validated in terms of accuracy,
precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as
per ICH guidelines. The method was applied for the analysis of these analytes in
commercially available formulations43
.
Heinanen et al., (2001) carried out HPLC analysis for quantification of ambroxol
hydrochloride and benzoic acid in syrup dosage form for stability evaluation.
Chromatographic conditions for the method included; stationary phase symmetry shield
RP C8, 5 mm, 250 mm X 4.6 mm, and mobile phase methanol : H3PO4 ( 8.5 mM pH 2.8
adjusted with triethyl amine) in ratio 40:60 (v/v) at 247 nm. The recovery values were
between 99.88% and 101.17%. The method was simple, sensitive and could be used in
estimation of commercially available formulations44
.
Kartal et al., (2001) carried out LC method for the analysis of paracetamol, caffeine and
codeine phosphate in pharmaceutical preparations. Separation was achieved using
Bondapack C8 column with flow rate 1.0 ml/min. The mobile phase composition was
phosphate buffer, methanol, acetonitrile, isopropyl alcohol in the ratio of 20/20/30/30
(v/v/v/v). Detection was carried out at 215 nm. Linearity ranges were 0.400-1500μg/ml,
0.075-0.90μg/ml and 0.300-30μg/ml for paracetamol, caffeine and codeine phosphate
respectively. While the limits of detection were 0.150, 0.023 and 0.10μg/ml. Limits of
quantification were 0.400, 0.075 and 0.300μg/ml for paracetamol, caffeine and codeine
phosphate, respectively. Recovery values were between 94.40 and 106.09%. Method
was validated in terms of linearity, reproducibility, specificity, sensitivity and
ruggedness45
.
Celma et al., (2000) carried out simultaneous determination of paracetamol and
chlorpheniramine in human plasma by liquid chromatography–tandem mass
spectrometry. The mobile phase was composed of water and acetonitrile at flow rate 1.2
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 53
ml/min. The limits of detection were 0.15, and 0.32 μg/ml and limits of quantification
were 0.76, and 0.98 μg/ml for paracetamol and chlorpheniramine, respectively. Recovery
values were between 99.40 and 101.09%. LC–MS–MS method was accurate, precise and
reliable for estimation of paracetamol and chlorpheniramine concentrations in human
plasma after oral administration46
.
Koundourellis et al., (2000) developed a high performance chromatographic method for
estimation of ambroxol in presence of different preservatives in pharmaceutical
preparations. The eluents were monitored by UV detector at 247 nm. The mobile phase
used was 0.05 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 3.45) with glacial acid and methanol in
ratio 30:70 (v/v). The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity,
limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH
guidelines.
The developed method was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and
reproducible47
.
Muszalska et al., (2000) worked on HPLC analysis of paracetamol, caffeine, ascorbic
acid and phenylephrine hydrochloride in tablet formulations using C-18 column with
mobile phase 0.015 phosphate buffer and methanol (65:35v/v) at 254 nm. The flow rate
was maintained at 1.2 ml/min. The method was simple, selective, rapid, accurate and
precise for simultaneous determination of these drugs. The recovery values were
between 99.25% and 101.98%. The method was simple, sensitive and could be used in
estimation of commercially available formulations48
.
Sahu et al., (2000) carried out spectrophotometric analysis for simultaneous
determination of chlorpheniramine maleate, phenylpropanolamine HCI and
dextromethorphan hydrobromide in syrup dosage forms. The wavelength maxima of
phenylpropanolamine and chlorpheniramine maleate and bromhexine hydrochloride in
0.1 N hydrochloric acid were found to be 257, 265 and 278nm respectively. The method
was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The drugs obeyed Beer’s
law in the concentration ranges of 200-600μg/ml, 10-32μg/ml and 50-160μg/ml for
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 54
phenylpropanolamine, chlorpheniramine and dextromethorphan respectively. The
recovery values were between 98.69% and 100.80%49
.
Stewart et al., (2000) carried out HPLC analysis for determination of guaifenesin with
selected medications on underivatized silica with an aqueous- organic mobile phase. The
separation and quantitation was achieved on a 25 cm underivatized silica column using a
mobile phase of (60:40 v/v) 6.25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 3.0) and acetonitrile at a
flow rate of 1 ml /min. UV detection of all analytes were done at 216 nm. The method
was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The developed method
was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and reproducible.50
.
Vasudevan et al., (2000) developed a liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous
estimation of phenylpropanolamine HCl, guaifenesin and diphenylpyraline HCl in syrup
dosage form. The stationary phase used was Shimpak® C8 column with mobile phase
acetonitrile, triethylamine buffer (pH adjusted to 3.5 using orthophosphoric acid; 0.5%),
in ratio 35:65 (v/v). The flow rate was maintained at 1.2 ml /min. Detection was carried
out at wavelength 210 nm. Recovery values were between 99.50 and 101.09%. The
method was successfully applied for simultaneous determination of
phenylpropanolamine HCl, guaifenesin and diphenylpyraline HCl in marketed
formulations51
.
Suzen et al., (1999) reported high performance liquid chromatographic method for
simultaneous estimation of guaifenesin and codeine phosphate in tablets. The separation
achieved on a Kromasil C-18 column. Isocratic mobile phase containing affixed ratio of
methanol–di hydrogen phosphate buffer at pH 3.0 (45:55, v/v) was used. The analysis
was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min-1
and detection wavelength was 220 nm. The
method was validated in terms of specificity, robustness, linearity, precision and
accuracy. The limits of detection were 0.33 and 0.41 μg/ml for guaifenesin and codeine
phosphate and limits of quantification were 0.550 and 0.715μg/ml for guaifenesin and
codeine phosphate, respectively. The recovery values were between 98.95% and
100.88%52
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 55
Erka et al., (1998) reported simultaneous high performance liquid chromatographic and
derivative ratio spectra spectrophotometry determination of chlorpheniramine maleate
and phenylephrine hydrochloride by Li-Chrosorb C-18 column with mobile phase
methanol and phosphate buffer (70:30 v/v). The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 ml /min.
Detection was carried out at wavelength 267nm. Recovery values were between 100.01
and 100.92%. The method was successfully applied for simultaneous determination of
chlorpheniramine maleate and phenylephrine hydrochloride in marketed formulations53
.
Basley et al., (1997) investigated degradation of salbutamol after gamma irradiation
using HPLC and ESR spectroscopy. The separation was carried out on a Waters -
Bondapak C-18 column (300 x 3.9 mm). The eluent was 5 mM hexane sulfonic acid
sodium salt in 1% glacial acetic acid (aqueous) and methanol in a ratio of 80/20 (v/v).
The UV detection wavelength was 220 nm and flow rate was 1 ml/min. The method was
validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH guidelines. The developed method
was simple, accurate, economical, rapid and reproducible 54
.
Barnal et al., (1996) compared a high performance liquid chromatography with
superficial fluid chromatography for determination of salbutamol sulphate and its
impurities in pharmaceutical formulations. For optimum separation of active
compounds, gradient elution using aqueous buffer pH 3.0 and acetonitrile was
undertaken. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness. The method was simple,
sensitive and could be used in estimation of commercially available formulations55
.
Yamato et al., (1996) carried out simultaneous determination of chlorpheniramine
maleate by high-performance liquid chromatography using tetra-n-butyl ammonium
phosphate as an ion-pair reagent. Separation was achieved by Capcell Pak C-8 column.
Isocratic mobile phase consisting of 50 mM KH2PO4, tetra-n-butyl ammonium
phosphate as an ion-pair reagent and methanol in the ratio of 80:2:18 v/v was used. The
UV detection was done at wavelength of 245 nm. The limit of detection was noted to be
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 56
0.31 μg/ml for chlorpheniramine maleate while the limit of quantification was 0.71
μg/ml. The method was simple and sensitive 56
.
Indrayanto et al., (1995) performed simultaneous assay of phenylpropanolamine HCl,
caffeine, paracetamol, glyceralguaiacolate and chlorpheniramine maleate in silabat
tablets using HPLC coupled with diode array detector. Analysis was carried out by
LiChrospher 100CN as stationary phase. Mobile phase was acetonitrile: tetrahydrofuan:
ion pair solution (7:6:87 v/v) (pH was adjusted at 3.3) at flow rate 1 ml/min. Detection
wavelengths were 265nm, 260nm, 298nm, 284nm and 310nm for phenylpropanolamine
HCl, chlorpheniramine maleate, caffeine, glyceralguaiacolate and paracetamol
respectively. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of
detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness. The recovery values were
between 98.5 and 101.5%57
.
Laine et al., (1995) carried out HPLC analysis to study decomposition of salbutamol in
aqueous solution. They attempted to demonstrate the effect of different buffer
concentration, buffer species, role of pH, and antioxidants on stability of formulation. A
Li-Chrosorb reverse phase C-18 column (125 × 4 mm i.d., particle size 5 µm) was used
as stationary phase. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile, sodium dihydrogen
phosphate (40 mM) and triethylamine (5.74 mM). The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min at
wavelength 220 nm. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity,
limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness. The developed
method could be used in estimation of commercially available formulations 58
.
Yamaguchi et al., (1994) carried out high-performance liquid chromatographic
determination of phenylephrine in human serum. Separation was achieved by Intersil
ODS C-18 column with fluorescence spectrometer. Mobile phase was potassium di-
hydrogen phosphate and methanol in the ratio of 60:40 (v/v). Linearity range was 5-
500ng/ml. The recovery values were between 88.0 and 95.5%. The method was applied
for the determination of phenylephrine in human serum after oral administration of
phenylephrine hydrochloride59
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 57
Shanawany et al., (1990) worked on HPLC analysis of paracetamol, caffeine, ascorbic
acid and phenylephrine hydrochloride in tablet formulation. Separation was achieved
using Eurosphere 100 C-18 column, in isocratic mode. Mobile phase was methanol:
water (70:30 v/v). The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 ml/min. The detection
wavelength was 227 nm. The method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision,
linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness as per ICH
guidelines. The developed method was simple, selective, rapid, accurate and precise. The
recovery values were between 100.11% and 101.33%60
.
Gupta et al., (1984) worked on quantitation of acetaminophen, chlorpheniramine
maleate, dextomethorphan HBr and phenylpropanolamine HCl in combination using
HPLC. The column Bondapak phenyl (30cm X 4mm i.d.) with three different mobile
phases was used for adequate separation of drugs at flow rate of 1 ml/min. Detection
wavelength was 256nm. Recovery values were between 98.7- 101.4%. The method was
validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, robustness and ruggedness. The developed method was simple, accurate,
economical, rapid and reproducible. The method was successfully applied for
simultaneous determination of acetaminophen, chlorpheniramine maleate,
dextomethorphan HBr and phenylpropanolamine HCl in marketed formulations61
.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 58
2.1. Research Envisaged
Pharmaceutical analysis plays a very significant role in quality control of pharmaceutical
products through a rigid check on raw materials, in process samples and finished
products. It is instrumental in ensuring the quality of pharmaceutical products and
requires development of methods with high degree of accuracy and precision. The
accuracy and precision depend upon the relative and absolute errors. Errors will be
minimized if the method is simple. Thus simplicity of the method can be indirectly
related to accuracy and precision. Therefore it is one of the prime considerations while
developing analytical method.
Literature survey revealed that as such no HPLC method has yet been reported
for simultaneous estimation of the drugs selected for the present study. The drugs
include Ambroxol hydrochloride, Cetirizine hydrochloride, Chlorpheniramine maleate,
Guaiphenesin, Paracetamol, Phenylephrine hydrochloride and Salbutamol sulphate.
The nonavailability of HPLC method for the analysis of the combination of
above mentioned drugs made it worth while to pursue the present research work. The
objective of the present work was to develop simple, accurate, precise and rapid stability
indicating analytical methods for simultaneous estimation of the selected drugs in
marketed dosage forms.
The developed method was also validated as per ICH guidelines. Assay
validation assures the accuracy and reliability of test results for drug identity,
strength, quality and purity. A validated analytical method is often employed for product
testing at various critical stages of a manufacturing to check and ensure whether the
manufacturing process does what it purports to do.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 59
2.2. Plan of Work
The work was carried out on the following lines;
Exhaustive literature survey
Selection of drug candidates
Method development
Procurement of drugs sample, chemicals and solvents
Selection of solvent system
Wavelength selection
Chromatographic conditions
(Column, mobile phase, pH, temperature, concentration range, modifier etc.)
Method validation with respect to parameters such as:
Linearity
Range
Specificity
Accuracy
Precision
Limit of detection
Limit of quantitation
Statistical validation
Estimation of selected drugs in marketed formulations
Stability studies
Compilation and submission of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 60
References
1. Biswas, R.; Madhav, A.; Basu, A. Simultaneous Estimation of Paracetamol,
Chlorzoxazone and Diclofenac Potassium in Pharmaceutical Formulation by a RP-HPLC
Method. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2010, 1(2), 22-32.
2. Freddy, H.H.; Vairal, L.D. Simultaneous Determination of Paracetamol, Acetyl Salicylic
Acid, Mefenamic Acid and Cetirizine Dihydrochloride in the Pharmaceutical Dosage
Form. E-J Chem. 2010, 7(1), 495-503.
3. Kasawar, G.B.; Farooqui, M. Development and Validation of a Stability Indicating RP-
HPLC Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Related Substances of Albuterol
Sulfate and Ipratropium Bromide in Nasal Solution. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010, 8(2),
76-81.
4. Kumudhavalli, M.V.; Saravanan, C.; Kumar, M.; Jayakar, B. Determination of
Psuedoephedrine Hydrochloride, Cetirizine Dihydrochloride and Paracetamol in
Uncoated Tablet by RP-HPLC Method. J Glob Pharm Tech. 2010, 2(4), 97-101.
5. Nora, H.A.S. Determination of Phenylephrine Hydrochloride and Chlorpheniramine
Maleate in Binary Mixture Using Chemometric-Assisted Spectrophotometric and High-
Performance Liquid Chromatographic-UV Methods. J Saud Chem Soc. 2010, 14(1), 15-
21.
6. Fegade, J.D.; Bhole, R.P.; Shaikh, I.; Patil, V.R. Simultaneous Estimation of
Paracetamol and Piroxicam in Tablet by RP-HPLC. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2009, 2, 184-
187.
7. Godse, V.P.; Deodhar, M.N.; Bhosale A.V.; Sonawane, R.A.; Sakpal, P.S.; Borkar,
D.D.; Bafana, Y.S. Reverse Phase HPLC Method for Determination of Aceclofenac and
Paracetamol in Tablet Dosage Form. J Res Chem. 2009, 2, 37-40.
8. Hadad, M.G.; Emara, S.; Mahmoud, M.W. Development and Validation of a Stability
Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of Paracetamol with Dantrolene or
Cetirizine and Pseudoephedrine in Two Pharmaceutical Dosage forms. Talanta. 2009,
79, 1360-1367.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 61
9. Karthikeyan, V.; Yuvaraj, G.; Vaidhya, L.; Nema, K.K. Simultaneous Estimation of
Paracetamol, Chlorzoxazone and Acelofenac in Pharmaceutical Formulation by HPLC
Method. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2009, 3, 457-460.
10. Louhaichi, M.R.; Jebali, S.; Loueslati, M.H.; Monser, L. Simultaneous Determination of
Pseudoephdrine, Pheniramine, Guaifenesin, Pyrilamine, Chlorpheniramine,
Dextromethorphan in Cough and Cold Medicines Using HPLC. Talanta. 2009, 78, 991-
997.
11. Raman, N.V.S.; Hari, K.A.; Prasad, A.V.S.; Reddy, K.R.; Rama, K. Development and
Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-LC Method for Famciclovir. J Pharm Biomed Ana.
2009, 30, 797-802.
12. Bhatia, N.M.; Ganbavale, S.K.; Bhaia M.S.; More, H.N.; Kokil, S.U. RP-HPLC and
Spectrophotometric Estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine
Hydrochloride in Combined Dosage Form. Ind J Pharm Sci. 2009, 71(2), 111-118.
13. Crevar, M.; Ivkovic, B.; Vladimirov, S.; Kuntic, V.; Vujic, Z. Statistical Optimization of
Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Analysis of Caffeine,
Paracetamol and Its Degradation Product P-aminophenol. Acta Chim Slov. 2008, 55,
665-669.
14. Karakus, S.; Kuc, I.; Uzel, U. Determination of Cetirizine or Fexofenadine with
Pseudoephedrine in Binary Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. J Pharm Biomed Ana.
2008, 46, 295-299.
15. Nagappan, K.V.; Meyyanathan, S.N.; Raja, R.B.; Reddy, S.; Birajdar, A.S.; Bhojraj, S.
A RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and
Loratidine in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Res J Pharm Tech. 2008, 1(4), 366-371.
16. Sawsan, M.A.; Samah, S.A.; Sehata, M.A.; Ali, N.M. Simultaneous Determination of
Phenylephrine Hydrochloride, Guaifenesin, and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Cough
Syrup by Gradient Liquid Chromatography. J AOAC I. 2008, 2(1), 129-134.
17. Shirkhedkar, M.S.; Abbas, S.S.; Shehata, A.A.; Nahed M.A. Simultaneous
Densitometric HPLC Analysis of Aceclofenac, Paracetamol and Chlorzoxazone in
Tablets. J AOAC Intel. 2008, 67, 452-458.
18. Shaikh, K.A.; Patil, S.D.; Devkhile, A.B. Development and Validation of Reversed-
Phase HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and
Azithromycin in Single Dosage Form. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008, 48(4), 1481-1486.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 62
19. Palabiyik, M.; Onur, F. The Simultaneous Determination of Phenylephrine
Hydrochloride, Paracetamol, Chlorpheniramine Maleate and Dextromethorphan
Hydrobromide in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Chromatogra. 2007, 66, 593-596.
20. Bhavsar, A.S.; Talele, G.S.; Fursule, R.A.; Surana, S.J. Simultaneous Estimation of
Paracetmol and Valdecoxib in Combined Dosage Form by RP-HPLC. Ind J Pharm Sci.
2006, 34, 675-680.
21. Grosa, G.; Grosso, E.D.; Russo, R.; Allegrone, G. Simultaneous, Stability Indicating,
HPLC-DAD Determination of Guaifenesin and Methyl and Propyl-parabens in Cough
Syrup. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006, 41, 798-803.
22. Kambia, K.N.; Luyckx, M.; Dine, T.; Gressier, B.; Brunet, C. Stability and
Compatibility of Paracetamol Injection Admixed with Ketoprofen. J Hosp Pharm. 2006,
4, 81-84.
23. Schieffer, G.W.; Hughes, D.E. Simultaneous Stability Indicating Determination of
Phenylephrine Hydrochloride, Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride and Guaifenesin in
Dosage Forms by Reverse Phase Paired-ion High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
J Pharm Sci. 2006, 72 (1), 55.
24. Selvan, S.P.; Gopinath . R.; Saravanan, S.V.; Gopal, N. Simultaneous Estimation of
Ambroxol, Phenylpropanolamine, Levocetirizine and Paracetamol in Combined Dosage
Forms by Reversed-Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Asian J Chem.
2006, 18, 2591-2596.
25. Sun, S.; Liu, G.; Wang, U. Simultaneous Determination of Acetaminophen, Caffeine and
Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Combined Dosage Forms. Chromatogra. 2006, 64, 719-
724.
26. Tan, R.Z.; Ouyang, S.D.; Zhou, S.L.; Wang, D.; Zhou, H.H. Sensitive Bioassay for the
Simultaneous Determination of Pseudoephedrine and Cetirizine in Human Plasma by
Liquid-Chromatography–Ion Trap Spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Ana. 2006, 42, 207-
212.
27. Olmo, B.; Garcıa, A.; Marin, A.; Barbas, C. New Approaches with Two Cyano Columns
to the Separation of Acetaminophen, Phenylephrine, Chlorpheniramine and Related
Compounds. J Chrom A. 2005, 817, 159-165.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 63
28. Barbas, C.; Galli, V.; High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of
Dextromethorphan, Guaifenesin and Benzoate in a Cough Syrup for Stability Testing. J
Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004, 10(8), 207-213.
29. Ferrayoli, C.; Halabi, A.; Palacio, M.; Dabbene, V.; Palacios S. Validation of a Chiral
HPLC Assay for (R)-Salbutamol Sulfate. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004, 10(9), 545-552.
30. Marin, A.; Garcia, A. Simultaneous Determination of Paracetamol, Phenylephrine and
Chlorpheniramine by RP-HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Ana. 2004, 10(9), 769-777.
31. Basavaraj, S.; Jaldappa, N.; Seetharamappa.; Babu, G.; Melwaki, B.M. Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of Cetirizine Hydrochloride and Paracetamol in Human
Plasma and Pharmaceutical Formulations. J Chrom B. 2003, 798, 49-55.
32. Garcia, A.; Ruperez, F.J.; Marin, A.A. Simultaneous HPLC Determination of
Paracetamol, Phenylephrine and Chlorpheniramine Maleate. J Chrom A., 2003, 785,
237-243.
33. Goger, N.Z.; Basan, H.; Dincer, Z. Quantitative Determination of Ambroxol in Tablet by
Derivative UV Spectrophotometric Method and HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003, 31,
867-872.
34. Hood, D.J.; Cheung, H.Y. Simultaneous Analysis of Codeine Phosphate, Ephedrine HCl
and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Cough Cold Syrup Formulation. J Pharm Biomed
Ana. 2003, 30, 1595-1599.
35. Kim, H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Han, S.B.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, K.R. Determination of Ambroxol in
Human Plasma Using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003, 32, 209-214.
36. Nagaralli, S.B.; Seetharamappa, J.; Gowda, G.B.; Melwanki, B.M. Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of Cetirizine Hydrochloride and Paracetamol in Human
Plasma and Pharmaceutical Formulations. J Chrom B. 2003, 798, 49-54.
37. Qi, L.M.; Wang, P.; Leng, L.J.; Fu, N.R. Simultaneous Determination of Paracetamol,
Caffeine, Chlorphenamine Maleate and Guaiacol Glyceryl Ether by HPLC Method.
Chromatogra. 2003, 56, 295-299.
38. Wang, X.; Zhang, L.Q.; Fenxi, Q. Simultaneous Determination of Paracetamol,
Caffeine, and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. J Chrom A.
2003, 31, 128-132.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 64
39. Marin, A.; Garcia, E.; Garcia, A.; Barbas, C. Simultaneous High Performance Liquid
Chromatography Determination of Paracetamol, Phenylephrine HCl, and
Chlorpheniramine Maleate. J Pharm Biomed Ana. 2002, 29, 701-707.
40. Panda, S.K.; Sharma, S.K.; Sahu, L.K. Simultaneous Analysis of Phenylpropanolamine,
Chlorpheniramine and Bromhexine in Syrup by Derivative Spectrophotometry. Ind J
Pharm Sci. 2002, 39, 540-546.
41. Qi, L.; Wang, X.; Leng, J.L.; Gu, R.N. HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination
of Acetaminophen, Caffeine and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Tablet Formulations.
Chromatogra. 2002, 56, 295-301.
42. Senyuva, H.; Ozden, T. Simultaneous High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Determination of Paracetamol, Phenylepherine HCl, and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. J Chrom Sci. 2002, 40, 97-100.
43. Takagaki, T.; Matsuda, M.; Mizuki, Y.; Terauchi, Y. Determination of
Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Human Plasma Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass
Spectrometry. J Chrom B. 2002, 776, 169-175.
44. Heinanen, M.; Barbas, C. Validation of an HPLC Method for the Quantification of
Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Benzoic Acid in Syrup as Pharmaceutical Form Stress
Test for Stability Evaluation. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001, 24, 1005-1012.
45. Kartal, M. LC Method for the Analysis of Paracetamol, Caffeine and Codeine Phosphate
in Pharmaceutical Preparations. J Pharm Biomed Ana. 2001, 26, 857-864.
46. Celma, C.; Allue, A.J.; Prunonosa, J.; Peraire, C.; Obach, R. Simultaneous
Determination of Paracetamol and Chlorpheniramine in Human Plasma by Liquid
Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J Chrom A. 2000, 870, 77-81.
47. Koundourellis, J.E.; Malliou, E.T.; Brousalli, T.A. High Performance Chromatographic
Method for Estimation of Ambroxol in Presence of Different Preservatives in
Pharmaceutical Preparations. J Pharm Biomed Anal., 2000, 23, 469-476.
48. Muszalska Z.M.; Nogowaka R. Analysis of Paracetamol, Caffeine, Ascorbic Acid and
Phenylephrine Hydrochloride in Tablet Formulation Using HPLC. M Chem Anal. 2000,
45, 825-831.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 65
49. Sahu, L.K.; Sharma, A.K. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Analysis of
Chlorpheniramine Maleate, Phenylpropanolamine HCl and Dextromethorphan
Hydrobromide in Syrups. Ind J Pharm Sci. 2000, 205-209.
50. Stewart, J.T.; Wilcox, M.L. HPLC Determination of Guaifenesin with Selected
Medication on Underivatized Silica with an Aqueous Organic Mobile Phase. J Pharm
Biomed Anal. 2000, 23(3), 909-915.
51. Vasudevan, S.; Ravishankar, S.; Sathiyanarayana, A.; Chandan, R.S. Simultaneous
Estimation of Phenylpropanolamine HCl, Guaiphenesin and Diphenylpyraline HCl in
Syrups by LC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000, 24(5), 25-31.
52. Suzen, S.; Akay, C.; Cevheroglu, S. Simultaneous Determination of Guaifenesin and
Codeine Phosphate in Tablet by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. II
Pharmaco 1999, 54,705-712.
53. Erka, N.; Kartal, N. Simultaneous High Performance Liquid Chromatographic and
Derivative Ratio Spectra Spectrophotometry Determination of Chlorpheniramine
Maleate and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride. Farmaco 1998, 53, 617-622.
54. Basley, J.P.; Duroux, J.L.; Bernard, M. The effect of Gamma Radiation on the
Degradation of Salbutamol. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1997, 15, 1137-1143.
55. Barnal, J.L.; Nozal, M.J.D.; Velasco, H.; Torbio, L. HPLC versus SFC for
Determination of Salbutamol Sulphate and Its Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. J Liq
Chrom Rel Tech. 1996, 19 (10), 1579-1585.
56. Yamato, S.; Nakajima, M.; Shimada, K. Simultaneous Determination of
Chlorpheniramine and Maleate by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Using
Tetra-n-butyl Ammonium Phosphate as an Ion-Pair Reagent. J Chrom A, 1996, 731,
346-350.
57. Indrayanto, G.; Adriani, A. Simultaneous Assay of Phenylpropanolamine
Hydrochloride, Caffeine, Paracetamol, Glycerylguaiacolate and Chlorpheniramine
Maleate in Silabat TM Tablet Using HPLC with Diode Array Detection. J Pharm
Biomed Ana. 1995, 13, 1555-1559.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shobhit University 66
58. Laine, L.M.; Purra, K.; Kahkonen, K.; Tarnmilehto, S. Decomposition of Salbutamol in
Aqueous Solutions, Effect of Buffer Species, pH, Buffer Concentration and
Antioxidants. Int J Pharm. 1995, 117, 189-195.
59. Yamaguchi, M.; Monji, H.; Yamashita, K.; Aoki, I.; Yashiki, T. Sensitive High-
Performance Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Chlorpheniramine in Human
Serum Using Column Switching. J Chrom B. 1994, 661, 168-172.
60. Shanawany, A.E.; Neugebaur, W.; Sadek, M.E.; Rucker, G. HPLC Analysis of
Paracetamol, Caffeine, Ascorbic acid and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride in Tablet
Formulation. Ind J Pharm Sci. 1990, 52(4), 182-186.
61. Gupta, V.D.; Heble, A.R. Quantitation of Acetaminophen, Chlorpheniramine Maleate,
Dextomethorphan Hydrobromide and Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride in
Combination Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Pharm Sci. 1984,
73(11), 1552-1556.