55
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
1. HSE Scorecard , IPC (Wells, Department) ,
Communication to staffx x x x x x x x
2. HSE Plan x x x x x x x x x x
3. MHSEV Lead by example, Verify action action plan,
effectivenessx x x x x
4. Rig/ Worksite Inspection Verify action action plan,effectiveness x x x x x x
5. Incident InvestigationPartcipation of management in incident
investigation
Participation of management in incident
investigationx x x x
6. HSEMS self-assessment (Wells Office HSE
Audit, Rig HSE Questionnaire)Championing HSE initiatives
Verify resources adequacy for HSE training
and promotionsx x x x x x x x x
7. KM1 Deep Dive Workshop x x x x x x x x
8. KM1 Causal Learning x x x x x x x x
9. SQM Audit, Meeting with Contractors, NCR Lead by example x x x x x
10. External HSE Meeting/ Conference/
Engagement
Sharing of meeting/ conference /
engagement salient points to othersx x x x x x x x
11. Hearts & Mind Training for WLT
& Middle Management
Verify process for identifying& changing of
behaviour is includedx
1.4 Manage HSE
Risks
Assets HSE Risk profiling and executive summary/key note
acknowledgement by the leaders
Leaders contribution in setting priority for risk mitigation
activities12. Wells HSE Champion 2014 - extract from
WLT packVerify action action plan,effectiveness x
13. Sharing of Lessons Learnt (worksite, dept
meeting)
Sharing and personnel message by
managementx x x x x x x x x
14. HSE Assurance Plan- Contractors
(Rig/ Technical, HSEMS) Resources for assurance x x x x x x
15. Wells HSE Committee Meeting
HSE matters high on meeting agenda, sharing
of incident lessons learnt; management
review process
x x
16. Wells LT Meeting
HSE matters high on meeting agenda, sharing
of incident lessons learnt, process for
resource identification, budget & manpower
for HSEMS implementation
x x
17. Wells International & Malaysia LT/ HSE
Committee Meeting MoM/ Pack
HSE matters high on meeting agenda, sharing
of inicdent lessons learntx x x
18. Wells Global Intervention & Services LT/
HSE Committee Meeting
HSE matters high on meeting agenda, sharing
of inicdent lessons learntx x
1.3 Informed
Involvement
1. Leaders set priority, develop and implement HSE
improvement plans to close the gaps.
2. Records on the appointment and directives to Element
Owner
1. Leaders are personally involved in the HSE MS Management
Review and assigned clear responsibilities and time frame for
the improvement efforts.
2. Leaders are championing HSE MS, elements and/or HSE
improvement initiatives.
3. Head of Region/Country appointment as MCF Champion and
record for their HSE leadership involvement.
1.1 Visibility
Evidence of Management involvement in HSE activities such as:
• Inspection / assurance.
• Site visits.
• Training / briefing / induction.
• Investigation.
• HSE self-assessment.
• HSE committee
• Attending HSE Meetings / conferences outside company.
• hampioning in HSE initiative
• Coverage and status of the KPI/ Score card/ Management
inspection
• Adequate and sufficient resources for HSE activities such as
training, promotional activities etc
• Evidence of lesson learnt being shared
1. HSE implementation and performance being actively
monitored at highest levels of organization e.g. Management
Committee
2. Leaders seek employee feedback on company’s commitment
to HSE through formal process such as survey.
3. Leaders champion in HSE benchmarking with international
recognized companies.
4. Adopt, share and promote industrial HSE best practices
1.2 Proactive in
target setting
1. Records on development on health, safety and environment
improvement objectives and targets for both leading and
lagging indicators.
2. Documented HSE target/commitment e.g. Letter of
Assurance.
1. HSE objectives and targets are cascaded to all staff through
individual performance contract / performance planning.
2. Records on MCF gap assessment and ntervention
1.5 Drive HSE
Culture
Assets HSE Risk profiling and executive summary/key note
acknowledgement by the leaders
Leaders contribution in setting priority for risk mitigation
activities
ELEMENT 1 : LEADERSHIP & COMMITMENT
Review of process of setting HSE objectives &
target; reactive, Proactive indicators, HSE KPI
to Management
Leaders involvement in KPI setting, HSE
performance monitoring & frequency
Participation of management
Participation of management Verify action action plan,effectiveness
Participation of management
Verify action action plan,effectiveness
Verify action action plan
19. Wells Contractor HSE Forum / Meeting x
20. Wells Incident Review Committee (WIRP) x
21. Wells - Contractor Senior Engagement
Session with DGx x
22. Well Control Steering Committee (WCSC) x
23. Benchmarking with international
recognized companies e.g. OGP, PSCs, etc.
(Company level).
HSE performance survey/ benchmarking
agains Int. operatorsx x x x x x
24. Wells Feedback (for rig visit)Constructive feedback on Rig Management,
Communication, Welfarex x x x x x x x x
25. Wells Operational Excellence 2015 _
Strategy BookDemonstrating continual improvement x x x x x x x x x
26. Wells Online (PRTVC, DROID, Wells Portal,
Wells HSE Portal, Wells IC, ECM, Elevate, P2P)Resources for information dissemnination Verify effectiveness x x x x x x x x x x x
27. MCF Aplicability to WellsIdentification of HSEMS gaps, MCF Champion
identification ad involvement Verify MCF items implementation x
28. Risk Profillig x x x x x x x x x
29. Drilling readiness Strategy, PRA, BCM, Rig
Move Assessment, Well Control Risk
Prevention, Stuck Pipe Risk Prevention,
Schedule & Cost Risk Prevention
x x x x x x x x x x
29. Wells Review Committee, Rig Move
Review Committeex x x x x x x x
30. POCS Survey results Constructive feedback on POCS survey Verify rewards and action plans x x
31. Rig ScorecardBenchmarking on overall rig performance
including HSEx x x x
32. HSE Rewards and Recognition ProgrammeResources for HSEMS implementation,
continual improvementVerify effectiveness x x x x x x x
33. Consequence Management for Non
Performing ContractorsRecords of rules violations, non compliance
Verify the visibility of requirements through
signage, instruction, information, training
& supervision
x x x x x x x
Management assurance that risk is prioritized
and effectively managed
Verify action plan
1.5 Drive HSE
Culture
Assets HSE Risk profiling and executive summary/key note
acknowledgement by the leaders
Leaders contribution in setting priority for risk mitigation
activities
Participation of management Verify action action plan,effectiveness
Verify action action plan,effectiveness
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
2.1 Content1. Employee’s’ survey/ feedback on HSE policies & HSE
Management system
1. List of SHE document/ procedures
2. Records for HSE procedures implementation and compliance
e.g. transport safety guidelines Drug & Alcohol Test abuse test
records
1. HSEMS self-assessment
(Wells Office HSE Audit, Rig HSE
Questionnaire) - Tier 1
Assurance done every year Verify action plan, effectiveness x x x x x x x x x
2.2 Dissemintaion
1. Evaluation of contents of the HSE policies
2. Records for HSE policies review 1. Records for HSE policies dissemination 2. HSE Policies
Commitment to prevent impacts on PEAR,
relevant to current/ future nature and scale
of activity, approved/ signed, (latest version,
multi lingual, availability, accesibility).
Evidence of dissemination - Wells Online
(Portal, HSE Portal, display at strageic areas,
in project/ rig relevant documents) , include
in induction
Display at site content easily
understandable, translated in local language,
interview with personnel on how policy is
relevant to day to day work
x x x x x x x x x
3. HSE Plan (Wells, Rig, Project)
Availability of improvement targets, aligned
with business and strategic objectives,
contractor HSE management
Verify action plan, effectiveness, verify
project HSEplan vs MCF requirementsx x x x x x
4. Wells Operational Excellence 2015 _
Strategy Book
Direction to control employees exposure to
HSE risk, aligned with PETRONAS policy &
corporate HSE objectives, consider legal,
technolgy challenges, emerging issues , key
stakeholder concerns
Verify action plan, effectiveness x x x x x x x x x
5. MCF Aplicability Assessment for Wells,
Implementation Records
Identification of HSEMS gaps, MCF Champion
identification ad involvement Verify MCF items implementation x
6 HSE Performance Report (to Business
Planning HSE Ops/ TG/ Upstream)
System in place to utilize HSE data for
improvement plans, long term hse
improvement strategies development and
incorporated in overall business plan
x x
7. Records for HRA, CHRA, Health
Surveillance, Fatigue Management, hearing
conservation program
x x x
8. D&A Testing & Records - AMRO
Appointment, Substance Misue Committee
(SMC), Random Testing
x x
9. HSE Campaign/ Programmes x x x x x x
10. Health Surveillance, Fatigue Management,
hearing conservation program records,
compliance status
x x
11. HSE Legal Database/ Register x
12. HSE Legal Coompliance Assurance/
Status/ Letters to Authorities in managing any
non compliances
x
ELEMENT 2 : POLICY & STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
HSE plan program meets MCF requirement,
each program monitired agains performance
indicatos,
2.4 HSE Plan &
2.5 HSE
programme and
Activities
1. HSE improvement plans incorporating resource
requirements, accountable parties, and target dates for
different departments / units are available.
2. The Departments / units’ HSE plans are aligned with the
overall company HSE Plan and Business Pan.
3. Evidence of communication of HSE objectives target and
plan.
4. Annual HSE Plan includes a comprehensive HSE related
fitness assessments e.g. FTW, D&A testing, Zeto Rule violations
1. L ong term HSE improvement strategies are incorporated
into the overall business plans.
2. Reporting and progress done by the Business Planning
department.
3. Company performance report.
4. Records for HRA, CHRA, Health Surveillance, Fatigue
Management, hearing conservation program
2.3 Strategic HSE
Objectives
1. HSE strategic objectives are part of business KPI and
consistent with PETRONAS where appropriate.
2. Regular Reviews conducted to monitor implementation plan.
1. Benchmarking and survey reports.
2. Records on development on health, safety and environment
improvement objectives and targets for both leading and
lagging indicators.
3. Records for MCF implementation strategy & supporting MOC
document in place where exceptions agreed upon any
mandatory requirement
Verify action plans, effectiveness
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
1. Wells/ Rig/ Project Organization Chart
(Manning level vs. approved position)R& R of employees clearly documented HSE R&R understood by personnel x x x x
2. Job Desrciption of Key Personnels- LT,
Critical Positions, HSE Positions, ARD, Non key
- any body by random
R& R of employees clearly documented ,
specific HSE roles
HSE R&R understood by personnel; interview
HSE critical position x x x x x x x x x x x
3. Wells HSE Management Rep (MR) Appointment of MR, HSEMS implementation
& maintained, recommends improvement, JDInterview MR x
4. Career Path / Capability Development for
Drilling staff, HSE; including Appriasal processLook for Symptoms of under-resourcing Review recruitment process x x
5. HSE Training Records ( HSE Personnel) -
Onboaring, LNI/LNAx
6. HSE Training Records (Drilling) - HSE
onboarding for L1, L2, ARDx
7. Wells HSE Training Matrix
Availability, Training validity, mandatory
competency, Postions are filled with
competent staff
x x
8. Wells HSE Competency Assurance for
critical position, List of HSE critical position
Review/ approved; have appropriate
experience, Postions are filled with
competent staff
Sample ofHSE critical positions, verify
effectiveness, interview HSE critical positionx x
9. Rig Crew Competency Assessment Look for Symptoms of under-resourcing Review recruitment, selection and placement
provessx x x x x
10. RACI - Driling Governance structire for HSE accountabilities Verify governance , effectiveness x x x x x x x x x x
11. HSE Advsiors (HSE Department)
HSE Org. Chat,availabiity of internal HSE
Advisors, Sample report of HSE advices,
verify carrying out of HSE advisor roles
(incident investigation, risk assesment) , clear
reporting line, adequacy of HSE staff
Interview with HSE Advisors x
12. HSE Performance Data Analysis Report
Solution options orovided through HSE
analysis from incident, assurance, KPI,
benchmaring. Promote and sharing of best
practices
Observation for continual improvement x x x
13. HSE CaseAll HSE critical system functions as per design
intent and objectives
No by pass of HSE critical systems, approved
overidingx x x x x
14. HSE Trainng Induction modules -
OnboardingHSE R& R included
Employee aware of their HSER&R , interview
random personnelx x x x x x x x x x x
15. Sample og Contractor PO, PR
HSE performance of contractors, Check HSE
requirement in PR/ PO, adequate SHE
technical info.
Equipment/ goods delivered meets HSE
tsandards, technical information in HSE
critical quipment (e.g. BOP, lifting gears)
x x x x x x
16. HSE Requirements in Contract x
1. Legal register and PETRONAS Technical Standard.
2. Assessment of the compliance.
3. Record of managing new and/or changes to legal
requirement.
4. Legal compliance audit and action plans to ensure
compliance.
1. Register of other requirement beyond Legal and PETRONAS
Technical Standard.
2. Records for annual review of legal register.
3.8 Legal,
Standards and
Other requirement
1. All positions are filled with competent staff.
2. Verification conducted to the incumbents against the
competency matrix; e.g. skill group matrix, POSS, CBA, HSE
training matrix.
3.Record of OMOC.
4. Leave schedule/rotas.
3.4 Resources
1. Record of resources assessment.
2. Resources succession planning.
3. Training matrix - supervisor training includes training on
stress management, motivation, etc.
4. Records on MCF element-wise resources requirement &
assignment of action parties.
1. Record of communication such as briefing and meeting with
public and authorities conducted.
2. External communication with external agencies in the event
of emergency is established and effectively implemented
3.7
Communication
Evidence of external communication and involvement in
committee etc.
ELEMENT 3 : ORGANIZATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, RESOURCES, STANDARDS & DOCUMENTS
Verify plan vs actual
Verify plan vs actual
3.1 Roles &
Responsibilities
1. Verification on understanding of HSE roles and
responsibilities.
2. Verification of HSE KPIs, standards, and competency
requirements are addressed.
1. Verification on understanding of Job Description for specific
HSE roles and responsibilities.
2. Records for appointment of AME, medical review officer
(MRO), Drug & Alcohol Testing Technician DATT), OHD, IH Staff
as applicable
1. Management of Contractor HSE procedure (in accordance to
PTS 18.0303) is implemented.
2. Contractor HSE plan is implemented and tracked
3. HSE non-compliance is defined in the contract and remedial
action plan/consequence management is included.
4. Evidence of Contractor HSE performance objectives and
targets are achieved
1. Management of Contractor HSE procedure (in accordance to
PTS 18.0303) is being reviewed and improved.
2. Contractor HSE MS is subject to Contractor Management
Review.
3. Evidence of engagement with contractor and the outcome
used for improvement of overall contractor management.
4. Work Completion Certificate includes Final evaluation and
Close-Out Report
3.6 Contractor &
Supplier
1. Tracking report and record of training program being
implemented.
2. Record of competencies assessment tracked and kept.
3. Relevant personnel been trained on all operating procedures
or instructions involving their activities/tasks.
4. Adequate budget allocation is made for training and
development.
3.5 CompetenceEvidence of compilation, analysis, and solution options on
competency gaps are for continual improvement.
1. HSE responsibilities are carried out by the line, e.g.
participation / leading JHAs, PHA, PASR, PSSR, CHRA, HAZOPs,
EIA, ESHIA, gas testing, HSE training conducted by line staff, etc.
2. Specialist role of HSE Advisor(s) has been carried out e.g.
facilitating incident investigations, CHRA, HAZOPS etc.
3. Verification of services from customers (line) on response
from HSE Advisors.
1. Compilation, analysis, and solution options are provided
based on incident investigation reports, assurance activities,
lessons learnt, HSE KPIs, benchmarking, etc.
2. Evidence of best practices shared, promoted, cascade and
implemented upon advice from HSE Advisors.
3.2 Management
Rep. &
3.3 HSE Advisors
17. ITB, Contracts Document, Contractor HSE
plan, HSE Interface/ Bridging documents
Adequate HSE Deliverables & controls to are
in place, HSE plan monitoring
Work execution as per contract/ HSE plan/
bridging documentx x x x x x x
18. Contractor Performance (CPE), Lesson
learnt, Well After Action Review
Sharing of lessons learnt wrt to contractor
performance
Lessons learnt implementation for future
wells/ rigsx x x x x x
19. HSE Communication- Bulletin, HSE Alerts,
Portal etc
Availaibilty of communication process
(internal)
- Records of external communications with
public and authority e.g. CIMAH, engagement
sessions with authority - DOSH,DOE,Marine
Dept,APMM etc.
- Evidence of an established and effective
communication with authority during
emergency e.g. notification to authority by
ECC, Availability of updated authority contact
no. for emergency
Verify effectiveness x x x x x x x x x x x
20. Legal Register , Legal compliance Auidt
Report
Availability of register, maintains the register
(new requirements)x x x x x x
21. Register of other requirrements Eg. IADC, IPIECA, ; register to be updated x x x x x x
22. List of HSE Standards, Procedure, Work
Instruction, HSEMS Manual
Availability, Document control procedure in
placeVerify accesibility and availability x x
3.9 Documentation
and Control -
HSEMS
1. Record of changes in HSE MS documentation.
2. HSEMS Manual and procedures are completed,
implemented, updated, and continually improved..
1. A system exists to review HSE MS Manual(s) and is updated
as required.
2. Evidence of continual improvement of document control
system such as online documentation.
Verify records of communication to required
parties (project, contractors), last update
status
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
1. Standard for Hazard Identifcation, HER,
Training Records
Availability Health - CHRa, HRA, Safety -
BOWTIES, JHA, QRA, HAZOP, Environment -
EIA , HER, EHSIA, Process safety risk
identifcation tools
x x x x x x x x
2. Risk Profillig Availability of updated risk profile x x x x x x x x x
3. List of risk assessment studies/ report Availability of reports, Linkages to MOC to
capture changes in placeVerify MOC findings updated to ER x x x
4. Risk Assessment Procedure x x
5. Risk Review Plan x
6. Risk Matrix x
7. List of Safe Operating Procedure - Wells
Mandatory Control Framework
Responsble parties assigned for control
measuered for identified risk Verify effectiveness x
8. Critical Activities Catalogue
KPI for maintenance of the controls defined.
Controls assigned to responsible parties,
reviewd and updated
Verify that the effectiveness of control
measures are monitored.x x x
4.3 Control
measures
1. KPIs for the maintenance of the controls are defined in
critical activities catalogue.
2. All controls assigned to responsible parties are described in
critical activities catalogue.
3. Monitoring report of the control measures.
Evidence on changes /review of the control measures.
4.4 Recovery
Measures
1. There exist a comprehensive hazards and effects register for
covering Health, Environment, Safety (Occupational & Process).
2. The hazard and effects register is a controlled document and
is accessible to all relevant parties for their use.
3. Risk assessment related studies / reports are available.
4. Team members’ participation are adequate and leaders are
skilled in the risk assessment technique.
1. Evidence of updating the hazard register as result of changes
on the process, services, products, facilities and incidences.
2. Linkages to MOC to capture hazard due to changes on the
process, services, products, facilities and incidences.
4.5 Statutory HSE
Risk Assessment
Requirement
Action items from the statutory report and the status of
compliance.
Evidence on revision of the HSE Case / CIMAH report / EIA/
CHRA.
1. There is a formal well documented change management
procedure for plant, process, organizational, and procedural
change.
2. There is a provision for updating the hazard and effects
register in the event of change.
3. Evidence exists where this has been practiced
Verify effectiveness, action plan
Guideline for selection of approriate
technique for risk profiling,particpation of
adequate skilled staff in risk identification
exercuise
Availability, correct application of risk
ranking, assurance on risk assessment
methods
ELEMENT 4 : HAZARDS & EFFECTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS
10. HSE Case Guideline, HSE Case report, Rig
Acceptance Framework
HSE case & Rig acceptance criteria
availability, system in place to review and
update the renmedial action plans, repotys
endorsed by management, competenct
personenl and accepted by authority,
equipment & people related certification
requirement included, peridioc review to
inlcude changes as per regulatory
requirement
Verify the availability/ update, verify
acceptance recrords, verify implementationx x x x x x x
1. There exist a comprehensive hazards and effects register for
covering Health, Environment, Safety (Occupational & Process).
2. The hazard and effects register is a controlled document and
is accessible to all relevant parties for their use.
3. Risk assessment related studies / reports are available.
4. Team members’ participation are adequate and leaders are
skilled in the risk assessment technique.
1. Evidence of updating the hazard register as result of changes
on the process, services, products, facilities and incidences.
2. Linkages to MOC to capture hazard due to changes on the
process, services, products, facilities and incidences
4.1 Identification
of Hazards and
Effects
1. Assessment ranking report.
2. Evidence of external assurance of the risk assessment
technique.
3. Evidence of benchmarking against other similar operations.
4. Evidence of cross checking with other studies, e.g. Safety
Case, QRA’s, etc.
5. Risk review conducted throughout the lifecycle of projects
e.g. conceptual (QRA, Facility Siting), design (HAZOP, HAZID,
QRA, LOPA, SIL), construction (PIR, HAZID, JSA), commissioning
(PSSR), operation (PHR, HAZOP), maintenance (FMEA) and
decommissioning (HAZID).
6. HAZOP study reviewed periodically, minimum every 5 years
interval, for all process facilities.
4.2 Assessment
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
5.1 Asset Integrity
1. Equipment file available to capture history e.g. maintenance
records, repair, change of service etc.
2. Specific Equipment Reliability Plan (SERP) available and
implemented.
3. Action plans arising from risk-based assessment (e.g. RBI,
IPF, ECA, Electrical equipment risk assessment) are being
implemented and tracked.
4. Use of appropriate tools (e.g. FMEA, What-if etc.) for failure
analysis and deficiency management (bad actor management).
5. List of MCF elements related procedures and plans, and
records for their effectiveness review status.
1. Actively seeking applying and improving best practices
through benchmarking with other similar industries.
2. Evidence of site being benchmarked on Asset Integrity
Management System.
Well Integrity and Rig Integrity Documents Verify completeness, implemenattionVerify implemention, action plan (from
assurance) x x x x
2. List of Procedures rand Work Instruction,
including Approved work instruction for
drilling Equipment.
Availability
3. Bridging Document
4. SISO
5.3 Management
Of Change
1. Compliance audit conducted on MOC process and findings
are addressed.
2. Action items arising from MOC process are tracked and
properly closed
- Risk Assessment conducted for all changes under MOC
(equipment, procedure, organization& people) are adequate
and action items incorporated in finalizing the changes.
- Pre-startup safety review carried out prior to system or
equipment start-up arising from change.
3. Change log/master register established and updated.
1. Interview of personnel at different level and department to
gauge understanding on application of MOC.
2. Evidence of revision on MOC procedure to include
benchmarking result and industry best practices. (e.g. online
system to facilitate MOC procedure and implementation).
5. MOC - Approved MOC procedures , MOC
related docs ( MOC forms, Risk Assessment ,
Tracking of MOC , Minutes of meeting ,
Training Records.,
MOC Procedure - Scope covers equipment,
org, people, procedure, changes are logged in
master register, deviations approved by
relevant TA
Verify MOC records x x x
5.4 Contingency
and Emergency
Planning
1. Competencies are defined and assured through appropriate
training and skill development, comprehensive tiered
emergency response planning in-line with PETRONAS
standards.
2. Drills include testing the coordination between sites are
carried out.
3. Training records to relevant personnel are available such as
Emergency Response Team (ERT), Emergency management
team (EMT) and Country Support Team (CST).
4. Tier 2 post mortem reports / status of action item.
1. Drills are conducted within the OPU and external agencies in
accordance to plan.
2. Post mortem of drills are carried with improvements
incorporated and checked.
3. Tier 3 post mortem reports / status of action item
6. Emergency Reponse / Crisis Management
related records - Drills, Exercise, Inicdent
Management Framework
Incident Command structure Verify plan, exercise effectiveness x x x x x x
ELEMENT 5 : PLANNING & PROCEDURES
Availability, consultation with TA/ SME
Verify implementation and effectiveness5.2 Procedure and
Work Instruction
1. System and arrangement for managing Procedures and
working instructions consistently implemented
2. Central Register of Procedures and working instructions is
available.
3. Validation process consistently applied in developing and
reviewing Procedures and working instructions.
4. Procedures and working instructions need assessment
revisited based on defined criteria e.g. fixed interval or based
1. Evidence of incorporation and enhancement of procedures
and work instructions through benchmarking.
2. Evidence of sharing and adoption of procedure and work
instruction by others.
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
ject
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
ing
HR
1. HSE Performance Report & Incident
Analysis
No of KPIs, Reactive & Proactive KPI, regularly
reviewed, linkage of analysis with
intervention programme
Verify measurement standards used x
2. HSE Plan HSE plan monitoring & frequency HSE plan monitoring & frequency x x x
3. HSE Records Maintained regularly Accessibility,availability x
4. Register of non conformance. Corrective
action status (HSERAI)Tracking system in place, peridocical review Verify effectiveness, records x x x x x x x
6.3 Non
Compliance and
Corrective/
Preventive Actions
1. Report of non-compliances
2. Record monitoring and tracking of action items resulting
from non-compliance.
Evidence of employees adequately assessing the other
alternatives whenever there is a potential need to deviate from
standards and procedures through interview and review of
reports.
5. Incident Reports & Register, HSE Alerts
(including Incident Management Framework)Findings shared, tracking system in place,
Verify incident reports, action plan , following
process flow / frameworkx x x x x x
6.4 Incident
Reporting and
Follow-Up
1. Incident report.
2. Investigation team training record.
3. Evidence of lesson learnt dissemination e.g. through
meetings, e-mail, and newsletters.
4. Tracking and monitoring record of action items.
1. Report on analysis of incidences and its link to intervention
programs.
2. Lessons learnt from external parties.
3. Review statistic to verify no recurrence of similar incidents
HSEMS LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 Relevent Evidences for Wells (2014, 2015) Doc Evaluation expectation Interview/ Site Visit expectation Rig
Pro
jec
t
HSE
WM
WIN
T
WIS
TES
RIS
K
WC
MA
Pla
nn
i
ng
HR
7.1 Assurance
1. Assurance plan.
2. External assurance reports.
3. Status of action items.
1. All MCF related documents & assurances per list next page
2. Assurance plan.
3. Assurance reports.
4. Status of action items.
5. Benchmarking report.
1. Wells Asurance Plan/ Schedule Availability Verify implementation, action plan x x x
2. Assurance Reports Availability Verify implementation, action plan x x x x x x
3. Auditor Training Records, Competency
RegisterNA NA
7.3 Contractor
Assurance
1. Contractors HSE assurance integrated with OPUs assurance
activities. Recommendations are documented and tracked to
closure.
2. Contractors’ assurance activities involved line personnel and
independent parties e.g. OPUs, certification bodies, regulatory
bodies and customers.
1. Contractor assurance findings are reviewed, analysed and
tabled at contract review forum and at Management Review.
2. Results of assurance activities are reflected in contractors’
performance.
3. Lesson learnt from contractors’ assurance activities
incorporated in future contract.
ELEMENT 6 : IMPLEMENTATION & MONITORING
ELEMENT 7 : ASSURANCE
7.2 Assessor
Competency
1. There is an assessor refresher training and competency
development plan.
2. Assessors continue to participate in internal assurances.
3. Assessors’ performance is being assured as part of system
assurance.
4. Development plan in place for new assessors.
5. MCF related assurance mapping and records for
implementation
1. Assessors competency recognized by other OPUs/bodies.
2. Assessors are recognized as critical function in the
organization and include in overall company training matrix.
1. Report on detailed analysis of HSE performance and
evidence of presentation to management are consistently
conducted.
2. HSE performance is being used as one of the criteria for
decision making e.g. intervention plans, contractor selection.
1. KPIs for implementation of HSE MS elements and procedures
are being used and included in employee appraisals.
2. Benchmarking report on HSE performance and targets are
regularly reviewed.
3. KPIs and targets are regularly reviewed and revised to
become more stringent for both leading and lagging.
6.1 Performance
Monitoring
1. HSE records are identified and retention periods determined.
2. HSE records are maintained, are traceable, and made
available as per procedure.
3. Verification of accessibility through interviews and
demonstration.
1. HSE records are maintained and available at all sites and
accessibility by all parties.
2. Verification of accessibility through interviews and
demonstration.
3. Records for MCF related procedures, implementation and
gap assessment as per document listed in Section 7.1
6.2 Records
1. Wells HSE Committee Meeting x x x
2. Wells LT Meeting x x x
ELEMENT 8 : MANAGEMENT REVIEW
8.1 Management
Review
1. Review have taken place and there are documented
record/evidence of Management Review carried out in
accordance to approved agenda and planned schedule.
2. Changes in risk exposure, stakeholders, the business
environment, and performance are included in the agenda of
the review, are analyzed and presented in Management review.
3. HSE Performance is trended and analyzed and present to
Management Review.
4. Action item from Management Review being tracked and
effectively closed.
5. Result of Management Review are being communicated.
6. Records for management review & intervention plan.
1. Evidence of integrated HSE objective and plan with company
business strategy.
2. Evidence of benchmarking result with other company use as
criteria in decision making.
3. Records for management review & intervention plan.
Reactive performance used as input to
modify HSEMS, HSE performance trend,
analysis, action tracking and effective closure
Verify implementation, effectiveness and
results communicated to stakeholders, action
plan
3
4
26
.
Hazard Top Event P E A R OR MAH
Hydrocarbons in formation Uncontrolled Release to
Surface B5 B3 B4 B5 H*B5
Yes
Personnel at Height >2m Fall from HeightC4 B1 C1 B4 H*
C4
No
Objects Overhead Loss of ControlB5 C2 B2 B3 H*
B5
Yes
Objects under Tension Loss of ControlC4 B3 C3 C3 H*
C4
No
Objects under Compression Loss of StabilityB5 B1 B5 D2 H*
B5
Yes
Equipment with Moving or
Rotating Parts
Caught byC4 C1 C1 B1 H*
C4
No
Using Hand Tools Loss of ControlD3 C1 C1 B1 H*
D3
No
Weather Conditions Loss of stabilityC4 B1 C2 B1 H
C4
No
Voltage > 50 V to 440 V in
cables
Loss of electrical insulationC4 B1 B3 B1 H*
C4
No
Voltage > 440 V Electrical ShockC4 B1 B3 B1 H*
C4
No
Manual material handling Loss of ControlD3 D1 D1 B3 H
D3
No
27
Safe System of Work (e.g. PTW, PPE program, Working on Roofs) 3 4
Legal/Regulatory Requirements (e.g. OSHA, FMA, AELA, etc.) 2 2
Activity / Task Risk Assessment 2 2
Incident Investigation 3 4
Compliance Auditing 2 3
Safety Critical Equipment 2 3
Management of Change 3 4
Management of Contractors & Suppliers 2 2
Emergency Planning & Response 2 2
Chemical Management 2 2
Behavioural Safety 2 2
Drilling Operation Pre-activity Safety Review e.g. Drill on Paper
Review, Drilling Readiness Assessment, etc.2 3
Managing Major Hazards 2 3
11
12
13
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
DSDESCRIPTOR DSV
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
