of 16
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
1/16
journal of
M O L E C U L A R
LIQUI S
E L S E V I E R
Journal of M olecular Liquids 92 (2001) 201-216
www.elsevier.nl/locate/molliq
M o l e c u l a r D y n a m i c s s i m u l a t i o n a n d X - r a y
d i ff ra c ti on s t u d i e s o f e t h y l e n e c a r b o n a t e p r o p y l e n e
c a r b o n a t e a n d d i m e t h y l c a r b o n a t e i n l i q u i d p h a s e
J e a n - C h r i s t o p h e S o e t e n s
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie Moldculaire UMR CNRS-Universitd Bordeaux I n°5803
351 cours de la Libdration 33405 Talence Cedex France
C l a u d e M i l l o t , B e r n a r d M a i g r e t
Laboratoire de Chimie thdorique UMR CNRS-Universitd Henri-Poincard-Nancy I
n ° 7 5 6 5 ,
Boulevard des Aiguillettes BP 239 5~506 Vandoeuvre-lds-Nancy Cedex France
I m r e B a k 6
Central Research Institute for Chemistry Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1025 Budapest Hungary
M o l e c u l a r D y n a m i c s s i m u l a t i o n s o f p u r e e t h y l e n e c a r b o n a t e , p r o p y l e n e c a r b o n a t e a n d d i m e t h y l
c a r b o n a t e h a v e b e e n c a r r i e d o u t a t d i f f er e n t t e m p e r a t u r e s i n t h e l i q u id p h a s e . T h e a l l a t o m
O P L S p a r a m e t e r s a r e u s e d t o d e s c r i b e v a n d e r W a a i s i n t e r a c ti o n s a n d t h e a t o m i c c h a r g e s a r e
ob ta ined f rom a b in i t i o 6 -31G** SC F ca l cu la t ion s . For t he f l ex ib le mod e l s , va r ious fo r ce f ie lds
h a v e b e e n t e s t e d a n d c f f g l h a s b e e n c h o s e n t o d e s c r i b e i n t r a m o l e c u l a r i n te r a c t i o n s . T h e r m o d y -
n a m i c a l a n d d y n a m i c a l p r o p e r t i e s a r e r e p o r t e d a n d a r e a s o n a b l e a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e a v a i l a b l e
e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a i s o b se r v e d . S i m u l a t e d s t r u c t u r e o f e t h y l e n e c a r b o n a t e a n d p r o p y l e n e ca r -
b o n a t e a t 3 2 3 a n d 4 73 K a r e c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l o n e d e t e r m i n e d a t t h e s a m e
t e m p e r a t u r e s u s in g X - r a y d i ff ra c ti o n e x p e r im e n t .
© 2001 E lsevier Science B.V. A ll fights reserved.
1 I n t r o d u c t i o n
E t h y le n e ca r b o n a t e ( E C : 1 , 3 - d i o x o l a n e - 2 - o n e ) , p r o p y l en e c a r b o n a t e ( P C : 4 - m e t h y l -
- 1 , 3 - d i o x o l a n e - 2 - o n e ) a n d d im e t h y l c a r b o n a t e ( D M C ) ( f i gu re 1 ) a r e t h r ee m o le c u le s
o f g r e a t t e c h n o l o g i c a l i m p o r t a n c e b e c a u s e o f t h e i r u s e a s p o l a r a p r o t i c s o l v e n t s i n t h e
e l e c t r o l y t e o f l i t h i u m s e c o n d a r y b a t t e r i e s . S o m e p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e s e c o m p o u n d s
a r e g i v e n i n t a b l e 1 . E x p e r i m e n t a l l y , i t i s k n o w n t h a t m i x t u r e s E C / L i C I O 4 o r E C / L i B F 4
a l lo w e ff ic ie n t r e v e r s i b i li t y p r o p e r t i e s . I t h a s a l s o b ee n o b s e r v e d t h a t m i x i n g E C a n d P C
i n t h e e l e c t r o l y t e im p r o v e s t h e b a t t e r y c y c l a b i l i t y [ 1 ]. O f c o ur s e, t h e n u m e r o u s p h y s i c a l
a n d c h e m i c a l p r o c e ss e s o c c u r i n g in b a t t e r i e s a r e q u i t e c o m p l i c a t e d a n d i t d o e s n o t s e e m
p o s s ib l e t o s t u d y a l l o f t h e m s i m u lt a n e ou s l y. F o r e x a m p l e , t h e c h a r g e - d i s c h a r g e
0167-7322/01/ - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. A ll fights reserved.
PII S0167-7322(01) 00192-1
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
2/16
202
1 1
[
oS \o
\ \
H 1 ~ H H a H 3
H~ H3 H ~ C ~ . - . . H 5
H4 H
H5
H i
Figu re 1 : S t ruc tu r e o f EC ( l ef t ), PC (midd l e ) and D M C ( r igh t ) mo lecu l e s and de f in i ti on
o f t h e a t o m i c l a b e l s u s e d in t h e r e s t o f t h e p a p e r . D M C i s p r e s en t e d i n a t r a n s - t r a n s
con fo rma t ion .
cyc le involves d isso lu t ion and depo s i t ion o f l i th ium thro ug h a f ilm (obta in ed f i om re-
duc t i on o f t he so lven t ) a cco rd ing t o a dend r i t i c g rowth . Th e fu ll und e r s t and ing o f t he
e l ec t rochemica l p roces s occu r ing i n t he ba t t e ry wou ld r equ i r e t o s t udy t he anode , t he
ca thode , t he e l ec t ro ly t e and t he i r i n t e r f ace s . I n t h i s work , we focus on a l e s s amb i t i ous
t a sk . We desc r ibe an e f fo r t t o ge t r e a sonab l e i n t e r ac t i on po t en t i a l s f o r t he t h r ee ca rbon -
a t e s , and p r e sen t expe r im en ta l s tud i e s o f t he l iqu id s t ruc tu r e ( fo r EC and P C) ob t a ined
b y X - r a y d i ff ra c ti o n . M o l e c u la r D y n a m i c s ( M D ) s i m u l a t i o n s o f L i B F4 i n E C , P C a n d
DMC have been r epo r t ed e l s ewhe re [2 ] . Ab in i t i o c a l cu l a t i ons on t he monomers a r e u sed
to l oca t e t he s t a t i ona ry po in t s on t he po t en t i a l ene rgy su r f ace , t o de t e rmine t he i r r e l a t i ve
ene rg ie s and t o f it pa r t i a l a t om ic cha rges. Th e o the r in t e r ac t i on po t en t i a l pa r am e te r s
(Lenna rd - Jones ) and i n t r amo lecu l a r f o rce f ie ld s a r e t aken f rom the l i t e r a tu r e .
In s ec ti on 2 , we r epo r t t he r e su l ts o f X - r a y d i f f rac t i on expe r ime n t s . I n s ec t ion 3 , we f ir s t
p r e sen t t he r e su l t s o f ab i n i t io c a l cu l a t ions on t he m onom ers and we desc r ibe t he i n t e r -
a n d i n t r a m o l e c u l a r p o t e n t i a l s , t h e n t h e r m o d y n a m i c a l a n d d y n a m i c a l r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d
f rom MD s imu la t i ons a r e p r e sen t ed . F ina l l y i n s ec t ion 4 , s imu la t i ons r e su l t s conce rn ing
t h e s t r u c t u r e a r e p r e s e n t e d a n d c o m p a r e d w i t h e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d b y X - r a y
d i f f r ac t i on fo r EC and PC.
Tab le 1 : Som e mo lecu l a r and l i qu id phase p ro pe r t i e s o f t he t h r ee so lven t s A t em pe r a tu r e
dep end ance of the l iqu id den s i ty for EC and PC can be foun d in re fe rences [3] and [4] .
D a t a f rom R e f [5] excep t ( a ) : R e f [6] ( vapo r i za t i on en tha lp ie s a t t he bo i l ing po in t ) and
(b ) : Re f [7 ] ( vapo r i za t i on en tha lp i e s a t 293 K) .
E C P C D M C
M /g.m o1-1 88.06 102.09 90.08
m p /° C 36 .4 -48.8 0 .5
b p /° C 248.0 242.0 90.5
p /g . cm -3 1 .3214 39 °C) 1.204 7 2o °C) 1.0694 (20 °C)
eo 89.78 (40 °C ) 66.14 (20 °C ) 3.09 (25 °C )
A H va p/k ca l.m o1 -1 12.2 (a) 11.9 (a) 8.9 (b)
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
3/16
203
2 E x p e r i m e n t a l X r a y d i ff ra c ti on s t u d i e s r e s u lt s
A n a l y s i s p r o c e d u r e s
T h e X - r a y d i f f ra c t i o n e x p e r i m e n t s w e r e c a r ri e d o u t a t 3 2 3 K w i t h a S e if e rt 0 - 0 d i ff ra c -
t o m e t e r u s i n g t r a n s m i s s i o n g e o m e t r y w i t h M o K a r a d i a t i o n (A = 0 .7 1 1 fl,). T h e o b s e r v e d
r a n g e o f s c a t t e r i n g a n g l e ( 2 0) w a s b e t w e e n 0 . 6 ° a n d 1 1 0 ° , w h i c h c o r r e s p o n d s t o a Q r a n g e
f r o m 0 . 1 / ~ - 1 t o 1 4. 5 ~ - 1 , w h e r e Q is t h e s c a t t e r i n g v a r i a b l e (Q - - ~ s i n 0 ) . T i m e s r e q u ir e d
t o a c c u m u l a t e 1 2 00 0 0 c o u n t s a t e a c h a n g l e w e r e re g i s te r e d . T h e o b s e r v e d i n t e n s i t ie s w e r e
c o r r e c t e d fo r b a c k g r o u n d , a b s o r p t i o n , i n c o h e r e n t s c a t t e r i n g a n d a n o m a l o u s s c a t t e r i n g u s -
i n g t h e s t a n d a r d m e t h o d s , a n d n o r m a l i z e d t o t h e s c a t t e r i n g o f i n d i v i d u a l a t o m s u s i n g t h e
K r o g h - M o e m e t h o d [ 8] . D e t a i ls o f t h e d i f f ra c t o m e t e r a n d t h e g e n e r a l m e t h o d o f m e a s u r e -
m e n t a n d d a t a t r e a t m e n t w e r e d e s c r i b e d e ls e w h e r e [9 , 1 0]. T h e e x p e r i m e n t a l s t r u c t u r e
f u n c t i o n s I ( Q ) a r e d e f i n e d a s :
I (Q ) = I a ~ ( Q ) - ~ ~ x ~ f ] ( Q ) / ( x~ f~ ( Q )) 2 (1 )
1
w h e r e I ab s ( Q ) i s t h e n o r m a l i z e d i n t e n s i t y , x ~ is t h e a t o m i c f i 'a c t i o n a n d f a ( Q ) i s t h e
s c a t t e r i n g l e n g t h o f a t o m t y p e a . T h e e x p e r i m e n t a l t o t a l p a i r c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c ti o n G ( r )
w a s c a l c u l a te d a s a F o u r i e r t r a n s f o r m o f t h e Q . I ( Q ) f u n c t i o n
G ( I ' ) = 1 + 2 - ~ p r Q I ( Q ) s i n ( Q r ) d r ( 2)
w h e r e p i s t h e m o l e c u l a r n u m b e r d e n s it y . T h e e x p e r i m e n t a l s t r u c t u r e f u n c t i o n s a n d t h e
r e l a t e d p a i r c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n s o f E C a n d P C a r e sh o w n i n f ig u r e s 2 a n d 3 r e s p e c t i v e l y .
S t r u c t u r e a n a l y s i s a n d r e s u l t s
I n a t t e m p t s t o r e v e a l t h e s t r u c t u r e o f m o l e c u l a r li q u id s , t h e s t r u c t u r e f u n c t i o n i s o f t en
c o n s i d e r e d a s a s u m o f t h e i n t r a m o l e c u l a r a n d t h e i n t e r m o l e c u l a r t e r m s .
I (Q ) = I in t ra(Q) + I in ter (Q) (3)
T h e I i~ t ra ( Q ) c a n b e e x p r e s s e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g f o r m
I i~ t ra (Q ) = i ~ x i x f i (Q ) f j (Q ) s in (Q r i j ) l ~ O 2
Q r ij e x p ( - 2 ~ - ' ) / (~ -~ x i f i ( Q ) ) 2
4 )
w h e r e r ij i s t h e d i s t a n c e b e t w e e n a t o m s i a n d j i n t h e m o l e c u l e a n d lij c h a r a c t e r i z e s i t s
t h e r m a l f l u c t u a t i o n . I n o u r a n a l y s i s , w e a s s u m e d t h a t Iin te r(Q ) v a n i s h e s a t 6 h - I a n d
t h e v a l u e s o f r ij a n d lij a r e d e t e r m i n e d t o f i t t h e f u n c t i o n o f I in t ra ( Q ) t o t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l
s t r u c t u r e f u n c t i o n i n t h e r a n g e f r o m 6 / ~ - 1 t o 1 4. 5 ~ - 1 .
T h e s h a p e o f t h e t h e o r e t i c a l Q . I ( Q ) f u n c t i o n s o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e b e s t f i t, w i th t h e e x p e r -
i m e n t a l f u n c t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n fi g u re 2. A s t h e f i rs t s t e p t h e s t r u c t u r a l p a r a m e t e r s f o r
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
4/16
204
.0 i i i i i
6.0 -/ ' , ,
5.0 ;
4 .0
3 .0
0 ~ 2.0 / ' , , , , ,
1 o
0.0
-1 .0
-2 .0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
Q (A -1)
F i g u r e 2: E x p e r i m e n t a l t o t a l s t r u c t u r e f u n c t i o n s s o li d l in e ) f o r E C a n d P C o b t a i n e d f r o m
X - r a y d i f f ra c t i o n e x p e r i m e n t a t 3 2 3 K . I n d a s h e d l in e , f i tt e d s t r u c t u r e f u n c t i o n s in t h e
r a n g e f r o m 6 t o 1 4.5 /~ - 1 t o d e t e r m in e rij a n d lij p a r a m e te r s .
5.0
4.0
3.0
2 .0
1.0
0 .0
E C
i | i
2.0 4 .0 6 .0
P C
0.0 8.0 10.0
r (A)
F i g u r e 3: E x p e r i m e n t a l t o t a l p a i r c o r r e la t i o n f u n c t i o n s f o r E C a n d P C o b t a i n e d f r o m
X - r a y d i ff r ac t io n e x p e ri m e n t a t 3 2 3 K .
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
5/16
205
t h e s k e l e t o n o f E C w e r e r e fi n e d u s in g t h e l e a s t s q u a r e s m e t h o d . T h e f in a l p a r a m e t e r s a r e
s h o w n i n t a b l e 2 b y c o m p a r i n g w i t h t h o s e f ro m a b i n i t i o c a l c u l a t i o n s a n d X - r a y d i ff ra c -
t i o n r e s u l ts . T h e a g r e e m e n t i s f a i r l y g o o d . I n t h e s e c o n d s t e p f o r t h e P C w e f i x ed t h e
p a r a m e t e r s c o m m o n t o E C a n d P C a n d f i t t e d th e n e w r ij a n d lij p a r a m e t e r s i n v o lv i n g t h e
m e t h y l g r o u p . T h e p a r a m e t e r s a r e s h o w n i n t a b l e 3 .
T a b l e 2 : I n t r a m o l e c u l a r d i s t a n c e s r ii ( /~ ) a n d t h e r m a l f l u c t u a t i o n s lij (A ) i n E C .
a b i n it io X - r a y
rl) rij lij
C1 - O1 1 .190 1 .20 0 .09
C1 - 02 1 .362 1 .34 0 .12
02 - C2 1 .428 1 .46 0 .13
C2 - C2 1 .520 1 .52 0 .11
O1 - 02 2 .23 2 .18 0 .10
O1 - C2 3 .28 3 .42 0 .20
C2 - O3 2 .29 2 .37 0 .17
C1 - C2 2 .25 2 .28 0 .16
O 2 - O s 2 .1 8 2 . 19 0 .1 5
T a b l e 3: I n t r a m o l e c u l a r d i s t a n c e s r ij ( /k ) a n d t h e r m a l f l u c t u a t i o n s i ij ( A ) i n P C .
a b i n it io X - r a y
rq rij lij
C4 - 03 2 .41 2 .49 0 .21
C4 - C2 2 .57 2 .48 0 .24
C4 - O2 3 .58 3 .57 0 .28
C4 - C1 3 .48 3 .37 0 .25
C4 - O1 4 .53 4 .53 0 .21
3 C o m p u t e r s i m u l a t i o n s
3 1 D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e p o t e n t i a l e n e r g y f u n c t io n s
A b i n i t i o c a l c u l a t i o n s o n m o n o m e r s
H i g h l e v e l a b i n i t i o c a l c u l a t i o n s h a v e b e e n d o n e a t M P 2 / 6 - 3 1 1 G * * l e v e l f o r E C a n d P C
a n d M P 2 / 6 - 3 1 G * * / / R H F / 6 - 3 1 G * * l ev e l f or D M C . T h e m o s t i n t e r e s t in g s t ru c t u r a l p r o p -
e r t y o f E C a n d P C m o l e c u l es i s t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f t h e n o n - p l a n a r i t y o f t h e i r ri ng . E x -
p e r i m e n t a l l y , o n l y t h e s t r u c t u r e o f E C m o l e c u l e h a s b e e n d e t e r m i n e d i n c r y s t a l p h a s e .
M a t i a s e t a l [ 1 1 ] a n d B r o w n [ 1 2] r e p o r t a C 2 s y m m e t r y f or E C w i t h a d i h e d r a l a n g l e
0 2 - C 2 - C a - O ~ o f 2 4. 8 ° a n d 2 7.1 ° r e s p e c t i v e l y . A n o t h e r e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t f i o m
A l o n s o e t a l [ 13 ] p r e d i c t a r i n g i n v e rs i o n o f E C t h r o u g h t h e p l a n a r r i n g o f C 2 , s y m m e t r y
w i t h a b a r r i e r o f 0 . 6 7 k ca l .m o 1 - 1 . F r o m o u r a b i n i t i o c a l c u l a t i o n , t h e C 2 c o n f o r m e r w i t h
t h e d i h e d r a l a n g l e e q u a l t o 2 9 .5 ° is m o r e s t a b l e t h a n t h e C 2~ o n e b y 1 .1 8 k c a l . m o l - k
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
6/16
206
No experimental da ta are available for the structure of PC. Due to the presence of the
methyl group, the two twisted minima corresponding to the ring inversion are not anymore
exactly equivalent, nevertheless our ab initio calculations predict a very small energy dif-
ference of 0.04 kcal.mo1-1. The barrier height for ring inversion is equal to 1.29 kcal.mol-1
at this level of theory.
The potential surface of DMC presents two impor tant minima, the tran s- tr ans con-
former with C2v symmetry (figure 1) which is the lowest energy structure and the
trans-cis conformer with Cs symmetry, which can be obtained from the previous one
by rotating one methyl 180° around the C1-O3 (or C2-O2) bond. We found at ab ini-
tio MP2/6-31G* *//RHF /6-31G ** level that the trans -ci s conformer is 3.15 kcal.mol -I
higher in energy than the trans-trans conformer, and the barrier energy height between
both conformers is 10.33 kcal.mo1-1. All these results are gathered in tables 4- 6.
Table 4: Some geometrical and energetical parameters of EC molecule in the minimum
energy structure obtained with different force fields, ab initio MP2/6-311G** calculation
and comparison with experimental results. AE is the barrier height from the minimun
energy structure to the planar st ructure, a Ref. [11], b Ref. [13]
EC
AMBER CVFF CFF91 ab initio exp.
bonds/A
angles/°
dihedral/°
O,-C1 1.227 1 . 2 2 9 1 . 1 9 4 1.190 1.203 *
C1-O2 1.368 1. 38 1 1. 37 2 1. 3 62 1.342
Cl-O3 1.368 1.3 81 1. 37 2 1. 36 2 1.342
02-C2 1.428 1.427 1 .4 22 1 . 4 2 8 1.457
O3-C3 1.428 1.427 1. 42 2 1 . 4 2 8 1.457
C2-Ca 1.517 1. 51 0 1.517 1 . 5 2 0 1.522
O1-Cl-O2 124.0 12 4. 4 12 2. 8 12 4 .9 124.2
O~-C1-O3 112.0 11 1. 2 11 4. 4 11 0 .2 111.7
C1-O2-C2 105.1 10 7. 8 10 4. 9 10 8. 3 108.7
C1-03-C3 105.1 1 0 7 . 8 1 0 4 . 9 108.3 108.7a
02-C2-C3 101.2 1 0 4 . 4 104.0 102.1 102.2 a
O2-C2-C3-Oa 38.5 21.0 28.4 29.5 24.8
Cl-O2-C2-C3 -31 .4 -17 .2 -2 2.7 -24 .9 -21.3
C1 03 C3 C 2
-31.4 -17.2 -22.7 -24.9 -21.3
02-C1-03-Ca 12.9 7.0 9.4 10.3 9.0
AE/kcal.mo1-1 4.72 0.27 0.57 1.18 0.67 b
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
7/16
207
Table 5: Some geometrical and energetical parameters of PC molecule in the minimum
energy structure obtained with different force fields, ab initio MP2/6-311G** calculation
and c©m,~ai~so~ w'~h~ ex, ei)men~a~ resu~s, ~ ~s ~)e ~DaH]e~)o~g:~ ~n)r~ ~o~ zi)~ )m v~
energy structure to the planar structure. AE' is the energy difference between both
minima related by the ring inversion.
bonds/A
a n g l e s °
dihedral/°
PC
AMBER CVFF CFF91 ab initio
O~-C~ 1.227 1 . 2 2 9 1.194 1.190
C~-O~ 1.368 1. 38 1 1 . 37 3 1.362
C~-O3 1.368 1. 38 2 1 .3 71 1.361
O2-C~ 1.427 1.430 1 . 4 2 2 1.427
O~-C3 1.429 1. 43 6 1 .4 29 1.435
C2-Ca 1.519 1 . 5 1 2 1.517 1.521
Cs-C4 1.531 1. 52 4 1. 54 0 1.509
O~-C1-O2 123.9 1 2 4 . 5 1 2 2 . 9 124.8
O2-C~-O3 112.0 1 11 . 1 1 1 4 . 2 110.2
C~-O2-C2 105.1 1 0 7 . 6 104.0 108.2
C~-O~-C3 105.3 1 0 7 . 6 104.7 108.8
O~-C~-C3 101.3 1 0 4 . 2 103.7 102.9
C~-C3-C4 116.5 1 1 5 . 6 1 1 3 . 9 115.3
O~-C2-Cs-Oa -38 .5 -24.1 32.9 28.3
Cl O2 C2 C3 31.6 19.9 -26. 8 -23. 7
C~-O3-Cz-C2 31.3 19 .8 -25.8 -24 .1
O2-Ct-O3-Ca -12. 8 -8 .2 11.4 9.8
AE/kcal.mol -~ 5.04 0.71 1.49 1.29
AE'/kcal.mol-~ 1.00 - 0.48 0.04
n t r a m o l e c u l a r
potent ia l
literature: A~I B~I IS] , C~I~yII6 and CFF9 II I7 i8]. Each force field has been tested
by optimizing the par ticular structures discussed in part 2.1. The results for optimum
Conce~i~g EC, ¢b,e A~ ,~l, , f~c ¢ ii~{d p~edi~'~s ~ ~oo ~is~ed molecule, with a dihedral
angle O2 - C2 - C3 - O3 of 38.5 degrees versus 24.8 degrees from experiment and an im-
portant energy difference with the planar structure, 4.72 kcal.mo1-1 to be compared with
the experimental value of 0,67 kcakmo]-l. With CvF~', the same dihedral ~ngle is 21.0 de-
grees and ~be b~rr}ere~ergy rson}y {).27 kcaLmo~ ~. C~'1~31 seems to be the more accurate
force field, predicting a dihedral angle 02 - C2 - C3 - 03 equal to 28.4 degrees and an
energy difference between the C2 structure and the planar structure equal 0.57 kcal.mol -~.
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
8/16
208
T a b l e 6: G e o m e t r i c a l a n d e n e r g e t i c a l p a r a m e t e r s o f t h e D M C m o l e c u l e i n t h e l o w e st
e n e r g y s t r u c t u r e ( t r a n s - t r a n s o f C 2~ s y m m e t r y ) o b t a i n e d w i t h v a r i o u s fo r c e f ie l d s, a b
i n i t io ( M P 2 / 6 - 3 1 G * * / / R H F / 6 - 3 1 G * * ) c a l c u l a t io n s a n d e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u lt s . A E i s t h e
e n e rg y b a r r i e r fr o m t h e t r a n s - t r a n s g l o b a l m i n i m u m t o t h e t r a n s - c i s m i n i m u m a l o n g th e
r o t a t i o n o f t h e d i h e d r a l a n g l e C2 - 0 2 - C l - O 3. A E ' is t h e e n e r g y d i ff e r e n ce b e t w e e n
t h e t r a n s - t r a n s a n d t r a n s - c i s m i n i m a . ~ R e f . [1 4].
D M C
A M B E R C V F F C F F 9 1 a b i n i t io e x p . ~
b o n d / A
a n g l e s / °
O~-C~ 1.234 1 .240 1 .206 1 .190 1 .203
C~-O2 1.374 1 .380 1 .358 1 .313 1 .443
O~-C2 1 .426 1 .422 1 .435 1 .417 1 .423
C~-H~ 1.090 1 .105 1 .098 1 .079 1 .100
C2-H~ 1.093 1 .107 1 .099 1 .081 1 .100
O~-C~-O~ 122.8 125.1 124 .2 125 .4 -
02 -C ~-0 3 114 .4 109 .9 111 .6 109 .2 107 .0
C~-O~-Cu 113.8 118.8 117.2 116.4 114.5
O2-C2-H~ 108.3 110.4 10 6.2 105.6 111.0
O~-C~-H~ 111.3 111.8 1 11.5 110.6 111.0
A E / k c a l . m o 1 - 1 - - 8 . 6 6 1 0 .3 3
A E ' / k e a l . m o l - ~ 2 .2 2 3 .4 7 3 .3 2 3 .1 5
F o r t h e P C m o l e c u le , t h e A M B E R a n d C V F F f o rc e fi e ld s f a il t o r e p r o d u c e t h e g e o m e t r y
o f t h e m i n i m u m e n e r g y s t r u c t u r e a n d C v F F p r e d i c t s o n l y o n e m i n i m u m . A s f o r E C ,
t ~ b l e 5 ) o f 0 . 48 k c e .l .m o l ~ , e .n e n e r g y b ~ r r i e ~ f~ o m t h e e . b s o lu t e m i n i m a t o t h e p ~ a n a r
s t r~ c t cc r e o f L 4 9 k c a L m a l - ~ a a d a d i he d ~ a~ a a g l e O ~ - C ~ - C ¢ - 0 ¢ o f ~ . ~ d e ~ r e e s I o
b e ~ p a z v d w ~ t b t l~ e ~ b ~n~t~o
p r v d ~ c t i o n s , ¢ ff } . 2 9 k c a I. rr ~ o } - r
~ n d 2 8 . 3 d e g r e e s '
r e s p e c t ? r e l y .
G e o m e t r y o p t i m i z a t i o n o f t h e D M C m o l e c u l e u s i n g t h e t h r e e f o rc e fi e ld s l e a d s to t h e
t r a n s - t r a n s c o n f or m e r a s t h e g lo b a l m i n i m u m . O n l y C F F 9 1 f i n ds t h e t r a n s - c i s c on -
f o r m e r t o b e a l s o a m i n i m u m . M o r e o v e r , a s c a n b e s e e n i n f i g u re 4 , t h i s f or c e f ie ld
r e p r o d u c e s r e a s o n a b l y w e ll t h e a b i n i t i o e n e r g y v a r ia t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i th t h e t r a n s - t r a n s
t h e b e s t t h e s t r u c t u r a l a n d e n e r g e t i c a l f e a t u r e s o f t h e t h r e e m o l e c u l e s , t h is f o r c e f ie ld h a s
b e e n c h o s en t o b e u s e d i n M o l e c u l a r D y n a m i c s s i m u l a t i o n s
T o e x a m i n e in m o r e d e t a i l s t h e r i n g i nv e r si o n p r o c e s s in E C a n d P C , w e h a v e p e r f o r m e d
4~..rz .?/2 , z,~ ~.f.F2~m[d ~Jmz~ /Jr. z a~ ,r~,~,~t~.~~ ~.z ..P~ ¢'~¢~J~d~ ~ ~:P,~4(~@ ~. ~u ~,h~e~ ae~p o f
Q . 3 c a d e k e C e ~ ' {~ ~ a c o e d ¢ ( 4 . T b : e d a g ~c ¢~ ¢c s( ac¢ ~ . ~ h e d e s c r i b e d (~ y ~ ~ ~ ( 9 ~ ¢ ~ e r i n g
c o o r d i n a t e s w h i c h c h a r ac t e r i z e s t h e d e v i a t i o n o f a t o m i c p o s i t i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o a m e a n
p l a n e [ 1 9 , 2 0 ] . A c c o r d i n g t o t h i s f o r m a l i s m , t h e g e o m e t r y o f a f i v e - m e m b e r e d r i n g is
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
9/16
209
v
[.r.)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
÷
i I I i I I I i i i
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Dihedral angle C2-O2-C1-O1 degrees )
Figure 4: Rota tiona l energy barri er of DMC vs. dihedral angle C2 - O2 - Ct - O1. Solid
line : CFF91 force field; + : ab ini tio MP2/6-31G**/ /RHF /6-31G** results.
• , . , . , ; . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . : . . - , - " , . , , . : . . ,
. . \ ~ • . . . . , , . / / :
, ' : ' l - * - ' - • ' . . : '
. . : . . . . / . ; . . . . - - . . . . . . . . .
: : , . . . : , , ~ , ,
• 5 f < : ; - ' . - : - ' : N : . ~ .
, . , . g . , , : , ' ~ , , , , ; ' , ¢ . ~ ,
• .~..~,:,., .,,,;*,~ ;
I I I
- 0 .10 0 .00 0 .10
q . c o s p h i )
• . . ', . ~' , ': ' , . * , : * . t 7
~ ' i ' . . . . / /
J / / , , ; , , , , , ~ . ~ '. . .,
. : . . / . - . : - ~ . .
- . - . . .
- ~
. . ' .
, : . ~ i : ~ % ' , ' . ' .
, , ~ . ¢ . ~ ,
,*...'/;
. . . . ~ . . ~ \ * . ..
: / . / , ' : ' , " " , ; : ' d " : ;
• .~t ', ,:,,.:/.Z
I
- 0 .20 - 0 .10 0 .00 0 .10 0 .20
q . c o s p h i )
0 . 5 0
0 . 4 0
0 . 3 0
0 . 2 0
0 . 1 0
0 .0 0 q . s i n p h i )
-0 .10
- 0 .20
- 0 .30
- 0 .40
0 .20
0 . 5 0
0 . 4 0
0 . 3 0
0 . 2 0
0 . 1 0
00000q. s in ph i )
-0 .20
-0 .30
- 0 .40
Figure 5: Prob abil ity dist ribut ion maps of puckering coordinates for EC top) and PC
bott om) obta ine d from MD simulat ions of one molecule at 323 K usi ng the CFF91 force
field.
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
10/16
210
d e s c r ib e d b y j u s t o n e a m p l i t u d e q a n d o n e p h a s e c o o r d i n a t e ¢ . F r o m t h e M D s i m u l a ti o n s ,
w e h a v e c o m p u t e d t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n f u n c t i o n q , ¢ ) a n d t h e t w o i so d e n s i ty m a p s a r e gi v en
in fi g u r e 5 in a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n q . s i n ¢ ) vs . q . c o s ¢ ) . T h e s e m a p s c l e a rl y s h o w t h a t E C a n d
P C a r e n o t p s e u d o r o t a t o r y m o l e c u l e s , a n d u n d e r g o t h e r i n g i n v e r s i o n t h r o u g h a p l a n a r
o r v e r y n e a r l y p l a n a r f o r P C ) r i n g s t r u c t u r e . I n t h is f ig u re , t h e t w o s y m m e t r i c a l m i n i m a
f o r E C a t t h e c o o r d in a t e s 0 , + 0 .2 7) c o r r e s p o n d t o q = 0 .2 7 A a n d ¢ = : t: 9 0 d e g r e e s a n d
t h e c o n f o r m e r w i t h p l a n a r r i n g is a t t h e c o o r d i n a t e s 0 ,0 ). F o r P C , t h e a b s o l u t e m i n i m a
is a t t h e c o o r d i n a t e 0 , - 0 . 3 1 ) w h i c h c o r r e s p o n d s t o q = - 0 . 3 1 A a n d ¢ = 8 9 d e g re e s.
I n t e r m o l e c u l a r
p ot e n t i l
T h e i n t e r a ct i o n e n e r g y m o d e l c o n si st s o f t h e L e n n a r d - J o n e s a n d c h a r g e - c h a r g e e le c-
t r o s t a t i c i n t e r a c t i o n . T h e t o t a l i n t e r a c t i o n e n e r g y o f t h e s y s t e m i s w r i t t e n a s a s u m o f
i n t e r a c t io n E q . 5 ) b e t w e e n a t o m s a o n m o l e c u le I a n d a t o m s / 3 o n m o l e c u l e J w h i c h a r e
s e p a r a t e d b y t h e d i s t a n c e ra ~ , w i th g e o m e t r i c m ix in g r u l e s E q . 6 )
E _ z (
5)
6)
~ = ~ a s , e ~ ,Z =
T h e v a l u es f o r a a n d e a r e t a k e n f r o m C a r l s o n e t a l . [ 21 ]. T h e a to m ic c h a r g e s h a v e
b e e n o b t a in e d f r o m a b i n i t io 6 - 3 1G * * c a l c u l a t i o n , b y f i t t i n g t h e m o le c u l a r e l e c t r o s t a t i c
p o t e n t i a l o f t h e l o w e s t e n e r g y s t r u c t u r e u s i n g t h e p r o g r a m G R I D [2 2 ]. T h e d i p o l e m o m e n t s
r e c a l c u l a t e d f r o m th e c h a r g e d i s t r i b u t i o n s a r e 6 .0 1 , 6 . 1 5 , 0 . 2 8 a n d 4 .1 1 d e b y e f o r E C , P C ,
t r a n s - t r a n s D M C a n d t r a n s - c i s D M C r es p ec ti ve ly . F o r E C a n d P C , t h es e va lu e s a r e
l a r g e r t h a n t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l o n e s m e a s u r e d i n t h e g a s p h a s e [ 1 3] b y a b o u t 0 . 7 d e b y e, b u t
t h e u s e o f a n e n h a n c e d d i p o l e in c o n d e n s e d p h a s e t e n d s t o c o r r e c t t h e a b s e n c e o f e x p li c it
i n d u c t i o n t e r m . T h e i n t e r m o l e c u l a r p o t e n t ia l p a r a m e t e r s a r e g a t h e r e d i n t a b l e 7 .
3 2
M o l e c u l a r D y n a m i c s s i m u l a t i o n s
T h e M D s i m u l a t io n s a r e ca r r ie d o u t i n t h e N E V e n s e m b le . T h e s y s t e m s a r e c o m p o s e d
o f 2 16 m o le c u l e s i n a c u b i c b o x w i th p e r io d i c b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s . F o r l iq u id P C , w e
u s e a r a c e m i c m i x t u r e o f e n a n t i o m e r s . T h e b o n d l e n g t h s a r e k e p t f r o z en u s i n g t h e R a t t l e
a lg o r i th m [ 2 3 ] a n d t h e t im e s t e p i s 1 .0 f s. T h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e s e a p p r o x im a t io n w i th r e-
s p e c t t o t h e f u l l f l ex ib le f o r c e f ie ld s p r e v io u s ly d e s c r ib e d h a v e b e e n c h e c k e d t h r o u g h M D
s im u la t i o n s o n l i q u id E C, a n d n o s i g n i f ic a n t d if f e re n c e s h a v e b e e n o b s e r v e d . T h e i n t e r -
a c t i o n s a re t r u n c a t e d b e y o n d a m o l e c u l a r) c u t - o f f d i s t a n c e e q u a l t o h a l f t h e b o x l e n g t h
a n d l o n g r a n g e d e l e c t r o s t a t i c i n t e r a c t i o n s a r e t a k e n i n to a c c o u n t u s in g t h e r e a c t i o n f i e l d
t e c h n iq u e [ 2 4 , 2 5, 26 ] w i th t h e d i e l e c t r ic c o n s t a n t o f t h e s u r r o u n d in g c o n t i n u u m s e t t o
o c . D a t a a r e c o l l e c t e d d u r in g 7 5 p s f o l l o w in g a n e q u i l i b r a t i o n p e r io d . F o r e a c h t e m p e r a -
tu r e , t h e b o x s i ze is a d ju s t e d t o c o r r e s p o n d t o t h e e x p e r im e n ta l v a lu e o f t h e l i q u id d e n si t y .
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
11/16
2
Tab le 7 : van de r W aa l s pa r am e te r s an d cha rges o f t he i n t e rm o lecu l a r po t en t i a l f o r EC,
PC and D M C molecu l es . T he l abe l s o f a tom s a r e de fined in f i gu re 1 .
Molecu l e s A tom
a a e c q ~
typ e ( ]~) (kca l .mo1-1) (e )
EC O1 2 .96 0 .210 -0 . 64 52
C1 3.75 0.105 1.0996
02-3 3 .00 0 .170 -0 .4 68 4
C2-3 3.50 0.066 0.0330
H1-4 2.50 0.030 0.1041
P C
O1 2 .96 0 .210 -0 . 63 78
C1 3.75 0.105 1.0489
02 3 .00 0 .170 -0 . 45 09
03 3 .00 0 .170 -0 . 41 20
C2 3 .50 0 .066 -0 . 00 40
C3 3.50 0.066 0.0832
Ca 3 .50 0 .066 -0 .32 64
H~ s 2.50 0.030 0.1165
D M O1 2 .96 0 .210 -0 . 67 74
C1 3.75 0.105 1.0864
02-3 3 .00 0 .170 -0 .4 47 8
C2-3 3 .50 0 .066 -0 .1 56 1
H t-6 2.50 0.030 0.1331
Th e d i ffu s ion coe ff ic i en t is ob t a ined f rom the cen t e r o f mass ve loc i t y au toco r r e l a t i on func -
tion [27].
l f
= ~ < v ( 0 ) . v ( t ) > d t (7 )
Th e o r i en t a t i ona l c o r r e l a t i on times r l and r2 o f t he z an d x ax i s (O l - C~ and C2 - C3
bonds r e spec t i ve ly ) have been co mp u ted f rom an ex ponen t i a l f i t t ing o f t he l ong t ime be -
hav io r o f t he r eo r i en t a t i ona l au toco r r e l a t i on func t i ons P l (u ( 0 ) . u ( t ) ) and P 2 (u (0 ) . u ( t ) ) ,
whe re u ( t ) i s a un i t vec to r a long an ax i s and P I a Legendre po lynomia l .
A l l t he m o lecu l a r dyn am ics r e su l ts a r e p r e sen t ed i n t ab l e s 8 and 9 . Th e t o t a l p o t en t i a ]
e n e r gy c a n b e c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l h e a t o f v a p o r i z a t i o n A H ~ p a t t h e c o rr e -
s p o n d i n g t e m p e r a t u r e . U n f o r t u n a t el y , w e kn o w o n ly t h is p r o p e r t y f o r l iq u id E C a n d P C
a t t he bo i l i ng po in t : t he dens i t i e s o f t he l i qu ids a r e no t known a t t he se t em pe , a tu r e s .
A n a c c u r a t e c o m p a r i s o n b e tw e e n t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l a n d s i m u l a t e d h e a t s o f v a p o r i z a ti o n i s
thus not po ss ib le . At 473 K , we found a pote nt ia l en ergy of 14 .25 and 13 .09 kca l.mo1-1
which co r r e sponds a pp rox im a te ly t o 15 .2 and 14 .0 kcal .mo1-1 fo r t he h ea t o f vapo r i za t i on
a t t h i s t em pe r a tu r e s fo r EC and P C r e spect i vely . A c rude ex t r apo l a t i on ( in t he le as1
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
12/16
212
s q u a r e s e n s e) o f o u r r e s u lt s t o t h e b o i l in g p o i n t t e m p e r a t u r e s l e a d s to a n e r r o r o n t h e
h e a t o f v a p o r i z a t i o n o f a b o u t 1 0 - 1 5 % .
T o o u r k n o w l e d g e t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l d i f f u s io n c o e f fi c ie n t o f t h e s e l i q u i d c a r b o n a t e h a s
n o t b e e n p u b l i s h e d . A n ' e x p e r i m e n t a l ' e s t i m a t e o f t h e d i f f u s io n c o e f fi c ie n t f o r E C a n d
P C h a v e be e n d e t e r m i n e d f r o m t h e i r e x p e ri m e n t a l v is c o si ti es t h r o u g h t h e W i l k e - C h a n g
fo rmula [28 ] :
D A B - -- - l ' 1 7 1 0 - 6 ( T ) ( ( ~ M B ) l / 2
~ B V ~ : 6 8 )
i n w h i c h D A B is t h e d i f f u s i o n c o e f fi c i e n t o f a s o l u t e A i n a s o l v e n t B ( m 2 . s - 1 ) , M u t h e
m o l e c u l a r m a s s o f t h e s o l v e n t , T t h e t e m p e r a t u r e , # B t h e v i s c o s i t y o f t h e s o l v e n t ( P a . s ) ,
V A t h e m o l e c u l a r v o l u m e o f t h e s o l u t e ( m a . k m o 1 - 1 ) a n d ~b a n a s s o c i a t i o n p a r a m e t e r ( 1. 5 in
o u r c a s e ) . T h i s r e l a t i o n h a s p r o v e d t o b e r e l a t i v e l y p r e c i s e f o r a l a r g e n u m b e r o f s y s t e m s .
B y M D s i m u l a t i o n , w e h a v e f o u n d a d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c ie n t o f 0 . 7 0 a n d 0 . 5 0 1 0 - 9 m 2 . s - 1 f o r
E C a n d P C r e s p e c ti v e l y , v a l ue s w h i c h a r e in r e a s o n a b l e a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e e s t i m a t e d
' e x p e r i m e n t a l ' o n e ( 0 .8 0 a n d 0 . 56 1 0 - 9 m 2 . s - 1 ) .
T a b l e 8: R e s u l t s o f t h e m o l e c u l a r d y n a m i c s s i m u l a t i o n s o f l iq u i d E C a n d D M C . < # >
i s t h e a v e r a g e m o l e c u l a r d i p o l e m o m e n t . R e s u l t s l a b e l l e d (a ) h a v e b e e n o b t a i n e d f i 'o m
e q u a t i o n 8 .
E C P C D M C
T / K 3 2 3 .1 5 4 7 3 . 1 5 2 9 8 . 1 5 3 2 3 . 1 5 4 7 3 . 1 5 2 9 8 .1 5
p / g . cm -3 1 .3084 1 .1439 1 .1951 1 .3084 1 .1439 1 .0694
< E pot > / k c a l . m o 1 - 1 - 1 6 . 9 6 - 1 4 . 2 5 - 1 7 . 1 7 - 1 6 . 4 1 - 1 3 . 0 9 - 1 2 . 2 5
< Eel > / k c a i . m o 1 - 1 - 7 . 3 0 - 6 . 3 1 - 6 . 4 3 - 6 . 2 0 - 5 . 1 4 - 3 . 3 7
< E L j > / k c a l . m o l - I - 9 . 6 6 - 7 . 9 4 - 1 0 .7 4 - 1 0 .2 1 - 7 . 9 5 - 8 .8 8
< # > / d e b y e 6 . 0 2 6 . 10 6 . 2 7 6 . 3 0 6 .3 1 1 .2 9
< P r es s ur e > / 1 0 S P a 69 2 - 6 1 5 - 4 8 8 - 5 2 3 - 6 5 9 - 1 6 9
< i d e a l p a r t > 4 0 5 5 26 2 6 9 3 0 8 4 1 3 3 1 3
< v i r ia l p a r t > 286 - 1 1 4 1 - 7 5 8 - 8 3 1 - 1 0 7 2 - 4 8 2
Di f fus ion coef f i c i en t 0 .70 2 .98 0 .50 1 .10 3 .48 1 .43
D /1 0 -9 m2.s -1 0 .80 (a) _ 0 .56 (a) - _ _
%(1)/ps 14.2 2.1 26.2 16.5 2.9
r~(2)/ps 10.2 1.3 10.6 6.2 1.7
% 0) /ps 32 .8 5 .2 60 .2 34 .1 7 .1
~-(2) /ps 14.3 2 .0 21.9 11.9 2 .7
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
13/16
213
4 Comparisonbetw een experim ental and sim ulated
s ~ r u t u r e s
Some
a t o m - a ~ o m
raffta)
f f t s ~ f tb u ( t o ~ ~ u n c f t o n s a r e p r es en ~ ;e c~ m ~ g u r e
~
Y~e g~ve .'/~ts'~
three fun ction s for each l iquid car bo nat e go~o~ r), go~c~ r) an d gc~c~ r)) , a t 323 and 473
K fo r EC and P C which a re the t empera tu re s used in the expe r imen t s.
g
1.6
1: ~ ~ ~
0.8
0.4
0.0
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
6 6 i :
.2 ~ ~5 1.2
0.8 ~ 0.8
0.4 0.4
0.0 0.0
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 2.0 4.0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0
1.6
0.8
0.4
0.0
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
1 6 1 6
1 2 ~ ~ 1 2
0.8 7 ~ 0.8
0.4 0.4
0.0 0.0
2.0 4,0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
1.6
1.2
U
0.8
0.4
0.0
2.0
U
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
2.0
1.6
~ 2
0.8
0.4
0.0
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 2.0
4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
R ( Angstroms R ( Angstroms R ( Angstroms)
Figure 6: Some in te rmoleeu la r a t om -a to m rad ia l d i s t r ibu t ion func t ions fo r liqu id EC
lef t co lum n) an d PC mid dle colum n) obta ine d a t 323 K solid l ine) and 473 K da .~hed
line) and for l i q u i d D M C r ight column} obta ine d a t 2 9 8 K .
The to ta | in te rmoieca laT s t ruc ture funct ions I in ter (Q/ can be obta ined f rom the MD s im-
u la t i ons a c c o r d i n g ~ o :
r °° 2sin (Q.r )
I i . t ~ , Q ) =
4 r P ] o
r ~ G i . , ~ r ) - 1 ) d r 9 )
of the lpa~fdl ~n~ermd~ecdlar ra~xdI ~lst~ibuOon ]unc~io ns:
a
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
14/16
214
and w~a is t he ave r age s ca t t e r i ng s t r eng th ove r a l l measu red p o in t s de sc r i bed in t he
ana ly s i s p rocedu re s :
1 (2 -
a~e)f~ Q)f~ Q)
(11)
w~e = -N ~ g . f . Q))2
points
The expe r imen ta l i n t e rmo lecu l a r s t r uc tu r e f unc t i ons have been ob t a ined f rom equa t i ons 3
and 4 and a r e com pared w i th t he ones ca l cu l a t ed f rom the p r e sen t M D s im u la t i on i n f igu re
7 . Th e co r r e spond ing pa i r co r r e la t i on func t i ons a r e shown in f igu re 8 . Th e com par i son
o f t he s imu la t ed and expe r im en ta l i n t e rmo lecu l a r s t r uc tu r e f unc t i ons show a ve ry good
ag reem en t i n t he pos i t i on o f t he p eaks and j u s t an excess o f s t r uc tu r e i s obse rved a round
1.5 A -1.
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
,-, 2.0
1.0
• o.o
C,, -1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
0.0
~ _ _ PC
2.0 4 .0 6 .0 8 .0 1 0 .0 1 2 .0 14 .0
Q (A l)
F igu re 7 : T o t a l i n t e rmo lecu l a r s t r uc tu r e f unc t ions fo r l iqu id EC and P C ob t a ined f l'om
molecu l a r dynamics s imu la t i ons ( so l i d l i ne ) a t 323 K and compar i son w i th expe r imen ta l
X - r a y r e s u l t s ( + ) .
2.5
~ . EC
2 . 0 . . . . . . .
1.5 Z
0
0.5
0.0
- 0 . 5 . . . . . .
0 .0 2 .0 4 .0 6 .0 8 .0 1 0 .0 1 2 .0 14 .0
r (A)
F igu re 8 : To t a l i n t e rmo lecu l a r pa i r co r r e l a t i on func t i ons fo r l i qu id EC and PC ob t a ined
f rom molecu l a r dynamics s imu la t i ons ( so l i d l i ne ) a t 323 K and compar i son w i th expe r i -
me n ta l X - r a y r e su l t s ( da shed line) .
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
15/16
215
C o n c l u s i o n
Thi s w or k de sc ri be s t he m ode l l i ng o f th r ee l i qu i d ca r bona t e s u s i ng Mol ecu l a r D ynam i cs
s i m u l a ti ons and r ea sonab l e si m p l e po t en ti a l s , w h i ch a r e am ong t he m o s t pop u l a r so l ven t s
used i n e l ec t r o ly t e s o f l i th i um ba t t e r ie s , n am e l y e t hy l ene ca r bona t e , p r opy l ene ca r bona t e
and d i m e t hy l c a r bona t e . Th e i n t e r m ol ecu l a r pa r t o f t he i n t e r ac t i on po t en t i a l cons is ts
of Le nnard -Jone s param eters an d ab in i t io poten t ia l der ived charges. T he f l ex ib il i ty of
t he m o l ecu l e s , pa r t i cu l a r l y i m por t an t f o r t he d i m e t hy l c a r bona t e i s t ak i ng i n t o accoun t
t h r ough t he u se o f t he i n t r am ol ecu l a r pa r t o f t he CF F91 f o r ce f ie ld . Th e d i f f e ren t pa r t
o f t he m ode l have been t e s t ed on m onom er p r ope r ti e s , th r ough com par i sons w i t h expe r i-
menta l resu l t s and ab in i t io ca lcula t ions , and on l iquid phase proper t i es us ing Molecular
D yn am i cs s i m u l a ti ons . Com par i sons w i t h p r ed i c ti ons f rom Mol ecu l a r D ynam i cs s im u l a -
t ions a re sa t i s fac tory .
6 A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s
Th e f i nanc i al suppor t o f t he D R ET ( Pa r is ) ( Con t r ac t n ° 93 - 25 65A ) is g r ea t ly acknow l-
edged . We t ha nk a lso t he CN U SC ( Mont pe l li e r) fo r t he a l l oca t i on o f com pu t e r t i m e on an
I BM SP2 pa r a l l e l com pu t e r . O n o f u s ( I .B) w as supp or t ed by H ung a r i an O T K A T019308
and F029738.
R e f e r e n c e s
[1] D. Au rbach, Y . Gofer , B. -Z. M. , and C. Aped, J . Elec t roan a l . Chem . 339 (1992) 451.
[2] J . C. Soetens, C. Mii lot , and B. Maigret , J . Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 1055.
[3] W. Watanabe and R. M. Fuoss, J . Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1956) 527.
[4] M . -G. Flore nt ino and T. R. A r turo , J . Ch em. E nd. D ata 29 (1984) 204.
[5] Ha ndbo ok of Chem istry and Physics vo l. 77 h Ed i t i on , C RC Pr e s s, Boka R a t on ,
Florida, 1996.
[6] M. S. Newman and R. A. Martele , J . Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 2733.
[7] E. E. Walker , J . appl . Chem. 2 (1952) 470.
[8] Krogh-Moe, J . Acta Cryst . 9 (1956) 951.
[9] Y. Tamura, E. Spohr, K. Heinzinger , G. P~i ink~s, and I . Bak5, Ber . Bunsenges. Phys,
Chem. 96 (1992) 147.
[10] I . BakS, G. P~l ink£s, and K. Heinzinger , Z. Naturforsch. 49a (1994) 967.
[11] P. M . M atias , G. A. Jeffrey, L. M. W ing ert , a nd J . R . Rub le, J . M ol . Stru( t .
(Theochem) 184 (1989) 247.
8/9/2019 2001, Soetens, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and X-ray Diffraction Studies of Ethylene Carbonate, Propylene Car…
16/16
216
[12] C. J. Brown, A cta Crys t . 7 1954) 92.
[13] J. L. Aionso, A. D. Esposti , D. G. Lister, and P. Palmieri , J. Chem. Soc. , Faraday
Tran s 2 82 1986) 337.
[14] F. G. M ijlhoff, J. Mol. St ruc t. Theochem ) 36 1977) 334.
[15] S. J. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, D. T. Nguyen, and D. A. Case, J. Comp. Chem. 7
1986) 230.
[16] P. D aub er-O sgu thor pe, V. A. Ro berts, J. Wolff, M. Gen est , and A . T. H agler, Pro-
teins: Struc t . Func t. Ge net. 4 1988) 31.
[17] J . R. M aple, T . S. Th atch er, U. Diner, and A. T. Hagler, Chem ical Design Au tom a-
tion News 5 9 1990) 10.
[18] H. Sun, S. J. M umby, J. R. M aple, and A. T. Hagler, J. Am . Chem . Soc . 116 1994)
2978.
[19] J. E. Kilp atrick, K. S. Pitze r, and R . Spitzer, J. C hem . Soc . 1947 ) 2483.
[20] D. Crem er an d J. A . Pople, J. A m. Chem . Soc. 97 1975) 1358.
[21] H. A. Carlson, T. B. Nguyen, M. Orozco, and W. L. Jorgensen, J. Comp. Chem. 14
1993) 1240.
[22] C. Chipot and J. G. ~,ngy~n, GrtlO Version 3.0: Point Multipoles Derived From
Molecular Electrostatic Properties
QC PE n ° 66 5, 1994.
[23] H. C. Andersen , J. Co m pu t. Phys. 52 1983) 24.
[24] J. A. Bark er and R. O. Wa tts, M oi. Ph ys. 26 1973) 789.
[25] M. N eum ann , J. Che m. Phys . 82 1985) 5663.
[26] M. Ne um ann , J. Che m. Phys . 85 1986) 1567.
[27] M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids Oxford Science
Publications, 1987.
[28] R. S. Bro dke y and H . C. Hershey, Transport Phenomena McGraw-Hil l In te rn a t iona l
Edit ion, 1988.