Normal
Emergency
Lesotho Highlands Water Distribution
Lesotho Highlands Water Distribution
Phase 1A Project Cost R9.3 bil
Phase 1A Project Cost R9.3 bil
Infrastructure6%
Engineering6%
Environment5%
Royalties3%
Administration4%
Finance Charges
32%
Construction44%
R 13.9 BillionR 13.9 Billion
Phase 1B Project CostPhase 1B Project Cost
R 6.5 Billion Estimated Cost to R 6.5 Billion Estimated Cost to March 2003March 2003
Construction26%
Environment7%
Administration12%
Finance Charges
41%
Engineering7%
Infrastructure7%
Funding SourcesFunding Sources
Funding Sources
Forex Market
Local Market
Export Credit Loans
CommercialLoans
Bond market
Other Loans
Commercial Paper Programme
Phase 1A Sources of FundingPhase 1A Sources of Funding
Other R0.6 bn6%
Commercial Loans
R0.8 bn - 8%
Water Levies R1.7 bn - 18%
Local funding R3.3 bn - 34%
Export Credit Loans
R2.6 bn - 27%
DBSA R0.6 bn7%
R 9.6 BillionR 9.6 Billion
Phase 1B Sources of FundingPhase 1B Sources of Funding
R 6.5 BillionR 6.5 Billion
Local Funding82%
Commercial0%
Multi-lateral9%
Export Credit3%
DBSA6%
LHWP Liability Composition as at 31 January 2001R 14 Billion
DBSA6%
FOREIGN EXPORT CREDIT
12%
FOREIGN COMMERCIAL0%
LOCAL CAPITAL MARKET:WS01
27%LOCAL CAPITAL MARKET:WS02
17%
LOCAL CAPITAL MARKET:WS03
16%
LOCAL MONEY MARKET17%
EIB & WORLD BANK5%
Composition of LiabilitiesComposition of Liabilities
R 14 BillionR 14 Billion
Debt Maturity Profile & Liability Curve
Debt Maturity Profile & Liability Curve
Current
Forecast
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ran
d B
illion
s
WS02CPP
WS01
WS03WS04 & other
010203040506070809101112131415161718192021222324
March
LHWP: Water Flow and Cost Recovery Arrangements
LHWP: Water Flow and Cost Recovery Arrangements
Payment of Delivers LHWPlevy/tariff water
DWAF
Raw water Delivers raw water Tariff
WATERBOARDS
Purified water delivered
ENDUSER
OTHER LARGE
Raw water tariff
MUNICIPALITIES
CONSUMERS(Eskom, Sasol)
DWAF
WaterBoards
Local Authorities
EndUser
Other LargeUsers (Eskom,
Sasol,etc)
TCTA
Net Requirement vs Yield - Lowered DemandTiming of new schemes
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Yield : Existing system and LHWP Phase 1A+1B (2730 106m3/a)
TWP (467 106m3/a)
ORANGE (571 106m3/a)
Timing of New SchemesTiming of New Schemes
Lower DemandLower Demand
Comparison of Growth in Demand between 1997/98 and 2000
Comparison of Growth in Demand between 1997/98 and 2000
Period : 2000 - 2030Period : 2000 - 2030
Most Probable demand scenario
Low demand scenario
1997/98 2000
3.64 % 2.18 %
2.89 % 1.72 %
Saleable Water CurvesSaleable Water Curves
Comparison of Saleable Water Curves
500
1,500
2,500
3,500
4,500
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
2015
2018
2021
2024
2027
2030
2033
2036
2039
Mill
ion m
3
1997/98Low Sales
2000 MostProbableSales
2000LoweredSales
Vaal River Tariff - Lowered Demand - Year 2002 termsNo capitalisation, no smoothing tariff
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
Tari
ff
Existing Schemes LHWP1 Cap LHWP1 O&M Tugela Cap Orange Cap
25 Year Constant
35 Year Constant 30 Year Constant
Tariff Scenarios – Lower Demand
Tariff Scenarios – Lower Demand
Example of tariffExample of tariff
R 0.00
R 1.00
R 2.00
R 3.00
R 4.00
R 5.00
R 6.00
0-10kl 11-20kl 21-40kl >40kl
BLOCK
RA
ND
S
TCTA DWAF WATER BOARD MUNICIPALITY
Example of tariff (free water)Example of tariff (free water)
R -2.00
R -1.00
R 0.00
R 1.00
R 2.00
R 3.00
R 4.00
R 5.00
R 6.00
0-6kl 7-12kl 13-20kl 21-40kl >40kl
BLOCK
RA
ND
TCTA DWAF WATER BOARD MUNICIPALITY
RoyaltiesRoyalties
Constitutes of cost savings between LHWP and OVTS (70 m3/s scheme)
Sharing of benefit: 56 % Lesotho vs 44 % RSA
Lesotho: Royalties paidRSA: Lower cost of Project
RoyaltiesRoyalties
Fixed royalty = Capital cost saving(paid over 50 years)
Variable royalty = Lower O&M and electricity cost(based on volume of water delivered)