2004 Debye Lecture 3C. B. Murray
Semiconductor NanocrystalsQuantum Dots Part 1
Basic Physics of Semiconductor Quantum DotsC. R. Kagan, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center,
Yorktown Heights, NY
Bulk Semiconductor
ConductionBand
ValenceBand
EnergyGap
Quantum DotLike a
Molecule
HighestOccupiedMolecularOrbital
LowestUnoccupiedMolecularOrbital
Quantum ConfinementLow Dimensional Structures
( ) ( )Cc EEE −∝ρ ( ) tconsEc tan=ρ ( )( )n
c EEE
−∝
1ρ ( ) ( )nc EEE −∝ δρ
Particle-in-a-Sphere
ais a spherical harmonic( )φθ ,m
lY
( ) ( ) ( )rYrkj
Crm
llnl φθφθ
,,, ,=Φ
is the lth order spherical Bessel function( )rkj lnl ,
ak ln
ln,
,α
=
2
2,
22,
2
, 22 ammk
Eo
ln
o
lnln
αηη==
solutions givehydrogen-like orbitals with
quantum numbersn (1, 2, 3 …)l (s, p, d …)
m size-dependence
0
∞
Pot
entia
l V
r
1s
2s
Discrete energy levels
The Quantum Dot is a Semiconductor
The Effective Mass Approximationparabolic conduction and valence bands
Direct Bandgap Semiconductor
E
Eg
k
( ) ( ) ( )rkirur nknk
ρρρρ⋅=Ψ exp
Bloch’s Theorem
with periodicity of crystal lattice
veff
vk m
kE2
22η−=
gceff
ck E
mkE +=
2
22ηn=conduction band
n=valence band
Free particles treatedby effective mass:
• describing graphically the curvature of the bands
• representing the potential presented by the lattice
Combining the Effective Mass Approximation with a Spherical Boundary Condition
Ehν
E
Eg
k
Single Particle (sp) Wavefunction
( ) ( ) ( )∑ ⋅=Ψk
nknksp rkiruCrρρρρ
exp(1)
linear combination of Bloch functions
Envelope Function Approximationvalid for rQD > lattice constant
which for QDs is given bythe “Particle-in-a-Sphere”
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rfrurkiCrur spnk
nknspρρρρρρ
00 exp =⋅=Ψ ∑(2)
assume unk has weak k-dependence
( ) ( )∑ −=i
innin rrCruρρρ
ϕ0(3)
linear combination of atomic orbitals withatomic wavefunctions ϕn (n= CB or VB)i=lattice sites
Coulomb Attraction
Bulk semiconductors, Coulomb attraction
creates bound excitons
e-h• e-
h•
Confinement Energy ∝ 1/a2
Coulomb Attraction ∝ 1/a
For small a:• Confinement Energy>Coulomb Attraction
electron and hole are treated independently• Coulomb interaction added as a correction
( ) coulombceff
Lnveff
Lngeehhehp E
mmaELnLnE eehh −
⎪⎭
⎪⎬⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨⎧
++=22
2
2,,
2ϕϕη
For 1Se pairs of states Ecoulomb=1.8e2/εa
Brus, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 2555 (1986).
Size Dependence of Electronic Structure
Ehν
E
Eg
k
Ehν
E
Eg
k
Decreasing Dot Diameter
p-orbitals form π-bonds with associated energy levels
with an energy separation in the visible
πGround
π*
HOMOHighest Occupied Molecular Orbital
LUMOLowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
Development of Electronic Structure Similar to Length Dependence in 1D polyenes
Example of alternating double/single bondπ-bond extends over many C atoms
Polyene’s with increasingchain length
Energy (eV)1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Abs
orba
nce
(arb
itrar
y un
its)
Energy (eV)1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Absorbance (arbitrary units)
17Å
150Å
17 Å
21 Å
29 Å
33 Å
45 Å
55 Å
72 Å
90 Å
150 Å
Size Dependent AbsorptionExample: CdSe
Semiconductor Materials
Range from 30 nm QDs to bulk crystal
Graph from H. Weller, Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 295 (2000).
Absorption Spectra of Semiconductor Nanocrystals
800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800
IR A
bsor
ptio
n (A
rb. U
nit)
Wavelength (nm)
3.5 nm
4.0 nm
5.0 nm
6.0 nm
8.0 nm
12 nm
7.0 nm
3.0 nm800 1200 1600 2000
IR A
bsor
ptio
n (A
rb. U
nit)
Wavelength (nm)800 1200 1600 2000 2400
IR A
bsor
ptio
n (A
rb. U
nit)
Wavelength (nm)
7.4 nm
8.5 nm5.2 nm
4.0 nm
3.0 nm8 nm
C. B. Murray, IBMO. Micic, A. Nozik, NREL
InP
PbSe PbS PbTe
HgS
NRL group
Core
Changing the Core
InAs
A. P. Alivisatos, UC Berkeley
Real Band Structure
Example: CdSe
E
Eg
k
Cd 5s orbitals2-fold degenerate at k=0
Se 4p orbitals6-fold degenerate at k=0Introduces splitting of bands
hh
lh
so
heavy hole
light hole
spin-orbit splitoff J=1/2
J=3/2∆so
∆cfcrystal field splitting
J = L + S where L=orbital angular momentumS=spin angular momentum
J good quantum number due to strong spin-orbit coupling
J=1/2
F=J+L where L=envelope angular momentumJ=Bloch-band edge angular momentum
Hole states labeled by nhLF [LF=L + (L+2)]Electron states labeled neLe
Size Evolution of Electronic States
D. J. Norris, M. G. Bawendi, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16338 (1996).
CdSe InAs
U. Banin et al., J. Chem. Phys. 109, 2306 (1998).
Low Band gap InAs modeling must alsoaccount for valence-
conduction band coupling
2S3/21Se
1S3/21Se1S3/21Se
1P3/21Pe
2S3/21Se
1P3/21Pe
Selection Rules
2ˆ he peP Ψ⋅Ψ=ρ
polarization vector of light
momentumoperator
acts only on unit cell portion of wavefunction
22ˆ hevc ffupeuP ⋅=ρ
hehe LLnnvc upeuP ,,2ˆ δδ⋅=
ρ
Overlap of the electron and hole wavefunctions within the QDs
Towards the Homogeneous Distribution: Photoluminescence and Photoluminescence Excitation
Wavelength (nm)
400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Abso
rban
ce (a
rbitr
ary
units
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Abs
orpt
ion
Wavelength
Lum
ines
cenc
e
Wavelength
10 K
Wavelength (nm)
600 650 700 750 800Lum
ines
cenc
e (a
rbitr
ary
units
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Photoluminescence“largest” QDS
Photoluminescence Excitation“smallest” QDS
10 K
Distribution in ensemble from size, structure, and environmental inhomogeneities
Fluorescence Line Narrowing and Photoluminescence Excitation
D. J. Norris, Al. L. Efros, M. Rosen, M. G. Bawendi, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16347 (1996)
Band Edge Exciton Structure
Splitting due to crystal field, non-spherical shape, and exchange interactions of quantum dots
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Diffraction Limited Spot
M. Nirmal, L. E. Brus, Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 407 (1999).
Fluorescence Intermittancy in CdSe QDs
QDs “blink” like molecules
On-period decreases with increasing illumination intensity
Off-period intensity independent
Excitation every 10-5 secRelaxation every 10-8 sec
But occasionallyTwo electron-hole pairs mayexist in a single QD
Auger ionizationProbability of photoionization/excitation 10-6
Neutralization time ~0.5 sec
Auger Ionization
Al. L. Efros, M. Rosen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 1110 (1997).
Consistent with single molecule spectroscopy and photodarkening observed in QD doped glasses
Single Dot Spectroscopy
Individual quantum dots
Single Quantum Dot Emission
Histogram of 513 43 Å QDs
Including all phonon lines
Spectral diffusion driven by environment
S. A. Empedocles, M. G. Bawendi, Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 389 (1999).
Metal Nanoparticles
MetalParticle-- -
-------
- ---
-------- -
Surface Plasmon Resonance
• dipolar, collective excitation between negatively charge free electrons and positively charged core
• energy depends on free electron density and dielectric surroundings
• resonance sharpens with increasing particle size as scattering distance to surface increases
Au nanoparticle absorption
Electronic Properties of Semiconductor and Metal Nanoparticles
Charge not completely solvatedas in infinite solid
ε
a
aC oεπε4=Nanoparticle capacitance
Charging Energy)(2
2
aCeEc =
Courtesy of C. T. Black, Thesis, Harvard U.
10 nm Al NC
Coulomb blockade atkBT<Ec
Structure from discrete electronic states of metal NC
STM Measurements on Single QDs
U. Banin et al. Nature 400, 542 (1999).
InAs QDs
Synthesis of monodisperse CdSe nanocrystals
...CdSePSe)(oct)Cd(CH 300323 +⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ →⎯+ °−− C,TOPTOPOHDA
UV-Vis and PL spectra of CdSe nanocrystals in growth at 300°C
400 600 800
abso
rban
ce, P
L in
tens
ity [a
.u.]
wavelength [nm]
add. inj.
add. inj.
200 min
120 min
60 min
12 min
0.5 min
TEM and HRTEM images of as-prepared CdSe nanocrystals.
D. V. Talapin, A. L. Rogach, A. Kornowski, M. Haase, H. Weller. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 207.
Wet Chemical Synthesis of PbSe Nanocrystals and Superlattices
oleic acid, Synthesis Pb(OAc)2 + R3PSe
R3P, T=150 C
PbSeR= octyl
Size SelectiveProcessing
Size selective precipitation in solvent/ non solvent pairs like hexane-methanol
Self Assembly Evaporation of the solvent
T. J. Watson Research Center
PbSe Nanocrystals and Nanowires
Nanocrystals:
1.5 – 10 nm diameters100 – 100 000 atoms
Conduction band
HOMO
LUMO
Valence band
bulk nanocrystals molecular clusters
PbSe Nanocrystal
Small Bandgap (0.28 eV, cf CdSe : 1.70 eV) ⇒ IR detector, IR diode Laser MaterialLarger Bohr Radius (PbSe 46 nm, CdSe 12nm) ⇒ Strong Confinement of Electron-Hole PairLarger Optical Nonlinearity, Thermoelectric Cooling (ZT = 1 : PbTe)Semiconducting, Solar Cells, Thermoelectric, Biological Application
PbSe Nanowire
Solution Phase Synthesis using the Nanoparticles as a Building BlockFormation of the Nanowires from the Self Assembling the ParticlesControlling the wire Properties by Changing the Size and Shape of the ParticlesSemiconducting device, Interconnect, Building Blocks for the Nanodevice
Seconds0 200 400 600 800 1000
Con
cent
ratio
n of
Pre
curs
ors
(arb
itrar
y un
its)
Nucleation Threshold
Staturation
Inje
ctio
nN
ucle
atio
n
Gro
wth
Fr
om S
olut
ion
Ostwald Ripening
Monodisperse Colloid Growth (La Mer)
A
Size selective processing:
M ajor D iam eter <002>
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nor
mal
ized
Cou
nts
0
20
40
60
80
100
M ajor D iam eter <002>
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nor
mal
ized
Cou
nts
0
20
40
60
80
100
M eOH
HexaneBuO H
Growth Solution
Size Selected
39Å M ajor D ia.σ =4.5%
37Å M ajor D ia.σ = 12%
A
B
C
Center to Center Distance R (arbitrary units)
Ene
rgy
(arb
itrar
y un
its)
Steric Repulsion (R-12
)
van der Waals (R-6
)Attraction
P=Se0=P
0=P0=P0=P
P=O
P=0
Se=P
0=P
0=P0=P
0=P0=PSe=P
0=P
P=0P=0
P=0P=0
P=0
P=0
P=0P=0
P=0
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\
/\/\/
\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\
/\/\/\
/\
\/\/\/\//\/
\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\/\/
\/\/\\/\
/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\ P=Se
0=P
0=P0=P0=P
P=O
P=0Se=P
0=P
0=P0=P
0=P0=PSe=P
0=P
P=0P=0
P=0P=0
P=0
P=0
P=0P=0
P=0
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\
/\/\/
\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
/\/\/\/\ /\/\
/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\
/\/\/\
/\
\/\/\/\//\/
\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/
\/
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\
/\/\/
\/\/\\/\
/\/\/
/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\r r
R
ab
c
d
Wavlength (nm)400 500 600 700 800
Abs
orba
nce
(arb
itrar
y un
its)
Wavelength (nm)400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance (arbitrary units)
A B
(a) 37Å+12%
(b) 39Å+8%
(c) 40Å+5%
(d) 42Å+<4%
(e) 39Å+11%
(f) 41Å+6%
(g) 45Å+<4%
Results of size selected Percipitation
PbSe nanowires1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
( f )
( g )
( e )
( d )
( c )
( b )
( a )
Abso
rban
ce (a
rbitr
ary
units
)
W a v e l e n g t h ( n m )
1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
2 9 8 K
7 7 K
Relative intensity
size: 4.0 nm
Wavelength (nm)
800 12001600200024002800
IR A
bsor
ptio
n (A
rb. U
nit)
Wavelength (nm)
3.5 nm
4.0 nm
5.0 nm
6.0 nm
8.0 nm
12 nm
7.0 nm
3.0 nm
PbSe Nanocrystals
Absorption and Photoluminescenceof PbSe Nanocrystals
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Con
finem
ent E
nerg
y (e
V)
Equivalent Radius (A)
Based on IR & TEM Calculated using Scherrer
Formula (XRD) PbSe in Phosphate Glass (1)
Effective Mass Approx.
50 nm 5 nm
10 nm50 nm
1 2 3 4 5 6
103
104
105
106
107
Experiment Sphere Particle D = 9.8 nm, Rg = 3.8 nm
(σ = 8 %)
Ref
lect
ed In
tens
ity (A
rb. U
int)
2θ (Degree)
1 2 3 4 5 6
103
104
105
106
107
Experiment Cubic Particle L = 10.5 nm, Rg = 5.25 nm
(σ = 10 %)
Ref
lect
ed In
tens
ity (A
rb. U
nit)
2θ (Degree)
Shape Change from Sphere to Cubic and SAXS in Polymer Matrix
T. J. Watson Research Center
K.-S. Cho, W. Gaschler
PbSe Quantum Cubes
20 30 40 50 60 70
Ref
lect
ed In
tens
ity (A
rb. U
nit)
2θ (Degree)
(111) (200) (220)(311)(222)
< 3 nm
4.3 nm
7.6 nm
8.3 nm
9.5 nm
13.2 nm
Sphere
Cube
(200)
> 16 nm
5.1 nm
20 25 30 35 40 45
(200)
(220)
inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
2Θ
20 25 30 35 40 45
(200)
(220)
inte
nsity
/ a.
u.
2Θ
32 34 36
Ref
lect
ed In
tens
ity (A
rb. U
nit)
2θ (Degree)
WAXS of 10 nm PbSe quantum cubes slowly deposited from toluene (top) and rapidly precipitated from methanol (bottom)
Shape evolution of PbSe Nanocrystals
100
111
Highly symmetric rock salt structure
Modeling of x-ray diffraction:
The Debye equation which is valid in the kinematical approximation is shown in equation 4.6 (8).
(4.6)Where I(q) is the scattered intensity , Io is the incident intensity, q is the scattering parameter [q = 4πsin(θ)/l] for X-rays of wavelength l diffracted through angle θ. The distance between atoms m and n is rmn . A discrete form of the Debye is shown in eguation (4.7)(9). (4.7)
where is the incident intensity, f(q) is the angle dependent scattering factor q is the scattering parameter[4πsin(θ)/λ] for X-rays of wavelength λ diffracted through angle θ. The sum is over all inter atomic distances, and ρ(rk) is the number of times a given interatomic distance rk occurs. Since the number of discreteinteratomic distances in an ordered structure grows much more slowly than the total number of distances, using the discrete form of the equation is significantly more efficient in the simulation of large crystallites(9).
I q I F Fqr
qrmnm nm n
m n
( )sin( ),
,
= ∑∑0
( ) ( )I q I f qq
rr
qrok
kk
( ) ( ) sin= ∑2 ρ
Modeling NP Shape
2θ
10 20 30 40 50 60
Sca
ttere
d In
tens
ity (a
rbitr
ary
units
)
Equivalent Diameter ~63Å
Spherical1:1
Prolate1.22
(a)
(b)
Modeling Stacking faults
Small angle X-ray Scattering SAXS
(4.8)
Where ρ and ρo are the electron density of the particle and the dispersing medium respectively. Io is the incident intensity and N is the number of particles. F(q) is the material form factor (the fourier transform of the shape of the scattering object) and is the origin of the oscillations observed. Thus for a spherical particle of radius R
(4.9)
(4.10)
I q I N F qo o( ) ( ) ( )= −ρ ρ 2 2
F q R qR qR qRqR
( ) [ sin( ) cos( )( )
]=−4
333
3π
I q I N R qR qR qRqRo o( ) [( ) [ sin( ) cos( )
( )]]= −
−ρ ρ π2 33
243
3
Combined SAXS and WAXS Modeling.
Qunatum cubes:Cubic 12 nm PbSe nanocrystals Assembling into a superlattice.
(100) (112)
(111) (101)
Self-assembled CdSe nanorod solids
20 µm20 µm
withcrossed
polarizers
withoutpolarizers
Optical micrograph of self-assembled CdSe nanorods (between crossed polarizers).
III-V semiconductor nanocrystals : InP
400 600 800
~8nm
<2nm
InP
abso
rban
ce, a
.u.
wavelength, nm
Size-dependent evolution of absorption spectra of InP colloidal quantum dots
...InPPSi])(CH[P)(octInCl 2601803333 +⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ →⎯+⋅ °−− CTOP,TOPO
PL quantum efficiency ~25-40%
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 12659.
etching agent
hν
) strong InP) weakprepared,-(as InP PLPL hTOPO,HF (, ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ →⎯ ν
CdSe/CdS quantum dot - quantum rods
CdSe coresCdSe/CdS
40 nm
CdSe/CdS
Cd:S=1:1 Cd:S=1:3
CdSe coresCdSe/CdS
40 nm
CdSe/CdS
Cd:S=1:1 Cd:S=1:3
CdSe CdS
0° 180°
||
⊥
⊥||
Luminescent II-VI nanocrystalsRoom temperature PL quantum efficiencies 50-70%
Colloidal solutions of CdSe/ZnS core-shell nanocrystals.
CdSe/CdS core-shell nanocrystals in a polymer matrix
Single particle luminescence of CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals