+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2 Web survey: Fieldwork dates December 15...

2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2 Web survey: Fieldwork dates December 15...

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ira-price
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
2005 Design Outsourcing Study
Transcript
Page 1: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

2005 Design Outsourcing Study

Page 2: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

22

Web survey: Fieldwork dates

December 15th - December 31st, 2005

303 usable responses (confidence interval +/- 5.5%)

Sample frame: EE Times and Electronics Supply & Manufacturing

readers Management positions Involved with making design outsourcing decisions

Methodology

Page 3: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

33

Experience with Design Outsourcing

Three to less than five years

21%

Two to less than three years

15%

One to less than two years

10%Within past year

16%

Ten or more years16%

Five to less than ten years

22%

2. For how long has your company outsourced at least a portion of its design activity?2. For how long has your company outsourced at least a portion of its design activity?

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 191

Mean = 4.7 years

Mean = 4.7 years

Page 4: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

44

Locations of 3rd party design firms

2a. What are the locations of the 3rd parties to which you outsource design? 2a. What are the locations of the 3rd parties to which you outsource design?

18%

10%

8%

6%

3%

18%

23%

31%

80%United States

China/Taiwan

India

Canada

Western Europe

Other Asian countries (other thanChina/Taiwan and India)

Eastern Europe

Mexico

South America/Latin America

Net by Geography

Americas: 84%

Asia: 47%

Europe: 23%

Net by Geography

Americas: 84%

Asia: 47%

Europe: 23%

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource

to a 3rd party) = 190

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource

to a 3rd party) = 190

Page 5: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

55

Proportion of designs outsourcedCurrent vs. prospective

3a. What proportion of your company’s total number of design projects in the past 12 months included some design outsourcing?

3b. In two years, what proportion of your company’s total number of design projects will include some design outsourcing?

3a. What proportion of your company’s total number of design projects in the past 12 months included some design outsourcing?

3b. In two years, what proportion of your company’s total number of design projects will include some design outsourcing?

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 187

48%41%

52%59%

In two yearsPast 12 months

Mean = 37%Mean = 37% Mean = 43%Mean = 43%

30% or less30% or less

More than 30%

More than 30%

Page 6: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

66

Projection of design outsourcing activity in next two years

Decrease11%

Stay the same34%

Increase55%

12. In the next two years, the proportion of design work that is outsourced from the proportion your company now outsources will...

12. In the next two years, the proportion of design work that is outsourced from the proportion your company now outsources will...

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 190

Page 7: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

77

Design activities outsourced

3c. Does your company outsource…3c. Does your company outsource…

29%

40%

55%

60%Software design

Board level design

Chip level design

Entire system design (includingenclosure/case, display, software,

hardware, etc.)

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 191

Page 8: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

88

Chip level design activities outsourced

4a. Which of the following chip level design activities does your firm outsource?4a. Which of the following chip level design activities does your firm outsource?

50%

46%

46%

38%

37%

37%

37%

29%

15%

58%

61%

61%

62%Logic verification

Physical chip design

Synthesis and analysis

RTL design

Analog/mixed-signal/RF circuit designChip extraction, analysis and design rule

checkingPackage design

Analog/RF verification

Architectural design

Design testing

Firmware or software design

Firmware or software verification

Defining requirements

N (Those who currently outsource chip level design activities to a 3rd party) = 76

Page 9: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

99

3rd party design firmsChip level design

4c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource chip level design?

4c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource chip level design?

20%

1%

32%

32%

45%

65%Design consultancies

Fabless semiconductor vendors

Foundries

Original design manufacturers(ODMs)

EMS providers

Other

N (Those who currently outsource chip level design activities to a 3rd party) = 76

Page 10: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1010

Board level design activities outsourced

5a. Which of the following board level design activities does your firm outsource ?5a. Which of the following board level design activities does your firm outsource ?

40%

34%

32%

27%

26%

19%

45%

47%

62%

82%PC board layout

Board level circuit design

Firmware or software design

Design for manufacturability/test

Design verification

Component evaluation and selection

Power and thermal analysis

Firmware or software verification

Managing bill of materials

System verification

N (Those who currently outsource board level design activities to a 3rd party) = 103

Page 11: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1111

3rd party design firmsBoard level design

5c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource board level design?

5c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource board level design?

9%

3%

10%

26%

32%

78%Design consultancies

Original design manufacturers(ODMs)

EMS providers

Foundries

Fabless semiconductor vendors

Other

N (Those who currently outsource board level design activities to a 3rd party) = 103

Page 12: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1212

Software design activities outsourced

6a. Which of the following software design activities does your firm outsource? 6a. Which of the following software design activities does your firm outsource?

29%

33%

47%

49%

77%High level coding and debug

Software verification

Assembly and hardware-dependentcoding and debug

Real time operating systemoperation and selection

Architectural design

N (Those who currently outsource software design activities to a 3rd party) = 112

Page 13: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1313

3rd party design firmsSoftware design

6c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource software design?

6c. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource software design?

5%

7%

6%

14%

23%

86%Design consultancies

Original design manufacturers(ODMs)

EMS providers

Fabless semiconductor vendors

Foundries

Other

N (Those who currently outsource software design activities to a 3rd party) = 110

Page 14: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1414

3rd party design firmsSystems design

7. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource entire system design?

7. To which types of 3rd parties does your firm typically outsource entire system design?

8%

6%

14%

14%

53%

57%Design consultancies

Original design manufacturers(ODMs)

EMS providers

Foundries

Fabless semiconductor vendors

Other

N (Those who currently outsource entire system design to a 3rd party) = 110

Page 15: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1515

Evaluations of outsourcing

8. What has been the impact of design outsourcing for your company? What has been your evaluation of

your firm's decision to outsource design activities?

8. What has been the impact of design outsourcing for your company? What has been your evaluation of

your firm's decision to outsource design activities?

51%

54%

53%

46%

60%

31%

32%

27%

23%

31%

28%

34%

41%

28%

33%

24%

20%

20%

18%

18%

13%

13%

12%

57%

53%

44%

36%Project risk

Communication with 3rd partyoutsourcer

Total development cost

Total time of project

Compliance with design requirements

Overall time to market

Reduction of our firm’s own headcount

Unit cost of product

Quality of 3rd parties’ design tools

Very positive + Somewhat positive Neutral Very negative + Somewhat negative

N = Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party

Page 16: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1616

Impact of design outsourcingAsset or liability?

Net liability21%

Net asset79%

9a. Overall, would you say that design outsourcing has been a net asset for your company, or a net liability?

9a. Overall, would you say that design outsourcing has been a net asset for your company, or a net liability?

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 190

Page 17: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1717

Problems encountered during design outsourcing

10. What problems have you encountered in outsourcing design activities? 10. What problems have you encountered in outsourcing design activities?

30%

22%

21%

6%

31%

46%

59%

65%Project took longer than we first

thoughtCommunication problems with 3rd

party

Higher total costs than anticipated

3rd party lacked managementability

3rd party lacked key designresources

3rd party lacked design skills

Project failed to meet requirements

Other

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 166

Page 18: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1818

3rd party locationMost positive experience vs. most negative experience

11a. As you think about your most positive design outsourcing experience, where was the 3rd party located?

11a. As you think about your most positive design outsourcing experience, where was the 3rd party located?

4%

3%

3%

1%

1%

49%

16%

2%

15%

6%

6%

3%

2%

1%

6%

6%

7%

70%United States

India

Canada

China/Taiwan

Western Europe (including UK)

Asia other than China/India

Eastern Europe

Mexico

South America / Latin America (Otherthan Mexico)

Other

Most Positive Experience

Most Negative Experience

Positive

Americas 77%

Asia 16%

Europe 8%

Positive

Americas 77%

Asia 16%

Europe 8%

N (Those who currently outsource or plan to outsource to a 3rd party) = 180

Negative

54%

37%

9%

Negative

54%

37%

9%

11b. As you think about your most negative design outsourcing experience, where was the 3rd party located?

11b. As you think about your most negative design outsourcing experience, where was the 3rd party located?

Page 19: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

1919

Attitudes toward outsourced design projects

13. Please tell us whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly with each of the following statements. Our design

projects…

13. Please tell us whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly with each of the following statements. Our design

projects…

69%

54%

44%

43%

75%

77%

77%

83%Receive a great deal of attention from

senior managementRequire the close collaboration ofhardware and software designers

Will be sold in a market that is very costsensitive

Represent “state of the art” or “leadingedge” technology

Generally have a very short time tomarket window

Are meant to be part of a high-volumeproduct

Are primarily focused on cost-savingsfor existing designs

Are generally simple revisions to anexisting design

‘Agree Strongly’ + ‘Agree

Somewhat’ responses

‘Agree Strongly’ + ‘Agree

Somewhat’ responses

N = All respondents

Our design projects…Our design projects…

Page 20: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

2020

Views on design outsourcing

13. Please tell us whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly with each of the following statements.

13. Please tell us whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat or disagree strongly with each of the following statements.

35%

33%

45%

51%

53%

61%Gives us access to design

resources that we can’t otherwiseafford

Has allowed us to meet our time tomarket requirements

Is far more difficult than we firstimagined

Gives us entrée into new orregional markets

Gives us the ability to handle“green” or environmental issues

Is generally targeted at our matureproducts

‘Agree Strongly’ + ‘Agree

Somewhat’ responses

‘Agree Strongly’ + ‘Agree

Somewhat’ responses

N = All respondents

Design outsourcing…Design outsourcing…

Page 21: 2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.

Design Outsourcing Study

2121

%Director/Senior Management 36Principal Engineer 10

Department Head 9

Technical Director 9Manufacturing & Production Manager 8

Group Leader 7

Vice President of Engineering 4Buyer/Purchasing 3

Chief Engineer 3Sales/Marketing 2Section Head 2

Consultant 1Research Director 1Other 5

Respondent characteristics

Job TitleJob

Title

Company TypeCompany Type %

OEM or Systems Company 33

Original Design Manufacturer (ODM) 19

Design Consultant / Design Services Company

12

EMS Provider/Contract Manufacturer 8

Fabless IC Company 8

IC or Integrated Device Manufacturer 5

Semiconductor IP Company 3

Foundry 2

Other 10

Company SizeCompany Size

%United States 96Canada 4

Current Location

Current Location

%Less than $10 million 40$10 to $49.9 million 17

$50 to $99.9 million 8

$100 to $499.9 million 13$500 to $999.9 million 4

$1 to $2.9 billion 4

$3 to $4.9 billion 1$5 to $7.49 billion 3

$7.5 billion or more 6Don’t know 4

Median = $19.8 million

%

Americas 97

United States 93

Canada 9

Mexico 2

South America/Latin America (other than Mexico)

2

Europe 18

Western Europe (including UK) 15

Eastern Europe 5

Asia 18

China/Taiwan 11

India 7

Other than China/India 7

Internal Design Center

Location

Internal Design Center

Location

Proportion annual sales volume represents sales outside North America

Proportion annual sales volume represents sales outside North America

Proportion manufacturing done outside North America

Proportion manufacturing done outside North America

Median = $20 million

Median = $5 million


Recommended