Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | annice-octavia-wilson |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06
Year
No of POs
1030212052
1773319159
PO Volume Growth
Invoice/PO Comparison
PO Volume – 19,159PO Volume – 19,159 PO Volume – 19,159PO Volume – 19,159 Invoice Volume – 76,091Invoice Volume – 76,091 Invoice Volume – 76,091Invoice Volume – 76,091
PO Value – £7,075,243PO Value – £7,075,243 PO Value – £7,075,243PO Value – £7,075,243 Invoice Value – £79,097,563Invoice Value – £79,097,563 Invoice Value – £79,097,563Invoice Value – £79,097,563
Electronic Procurement
Tender via OJEU 12 July 2005 Closing date 31 August 2005 22 downloaded documents 15 completed PQQ 6 invited to submit full ITT 4 invited for full evaluation
Schema
“SUPC Marketplace”
Suppliers
ConsortiumCatalogues
1.
2.
1. Buyers can source
Internally on Marketplace Content
3
2.Marketplace can
punch-out direct to Supplier Hosted
Catalogues
3.Marketplace can
punch-out direct to Consortium Catalogues
All orders are transmitted via the Marketplace to the
appropriate supplier via Email, Fax or
Text Message
P2P Model
FMS e-procurement
Module
Punch-in Model
Purchase Order Workflow is completed within
Marketplace Purchase to Pay functionality
Purchase Order Workflow is completed within the Authorities appropriate
Financial System
Potential Savings ProcHE savings measured at £44/PO
Equals approx £775,000 on current
PO volumes
Buying by Category rather than by
Supplier will reduce “maverick” buying
Overall savings will be considerably
higher