+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: norman-street
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Telecommunications SBC in Next Generation Networks Architectures
Popular Tags:
16
SBC in NGN Architectures Jonathan Cumming
Transcript
Page 1: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

SBC in NGN ArchitecturesJonathan Cumming

Page 2: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 2

SBC in NGN Architectures

• NGN Standardisation• 3GPP, ETSI, ITU, MSF

• Evolution of SBC in IMS architecture

• Deployment options

• Remaining areas for standardisation

Page 3: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 3

NGN Standardisation Process

• Many organisations defining Next Generation Network• Standards Bodies • Industry Forums

• Implementation Agreements

• Trials and Interop Events

Requirements

Standards

Page 4: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 4

3GPP – Third Generation Partnership Program

• Standardization body for GSM mobile

• Incorporated IMS in Release 5• Focused on 3G mobile phones

• Centrally managed• Bandwidth plentiful except in radio access network

• P-CSCF provides some SBC features on UNI• Access control• Enforces routing

• Release 7 (in development) adds more SBC features • Support for fixed-line and legacy equipment

• Non-IMS endpoints, e.g. PBX, Legacy Protocols• IPv4

• Topology hiding, NAT and Access control on NNI

Page 5: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 5

ETSI TISPAN

• Charged with developing new architecture for fixed telephony networks

• Adopted IMS as underlying architecture

• Extending/adapting IMS for requirements of fixed networks• TISPAN R1 requirements part of 3GPP Release 7

• Planned releases• R1 (2005) – Focused on DSL access

• R2 (2007) – Improved control of access resource usage

• R3 (2009) – Adds support for roaming (nomadicity)

Page 6: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 6

ITU-T

• Overarching architecture for NGN

• Coordinated by SG-13

• Working closely with ETSI, 3GPP and IETF

• Also concerned about “Internet” use• End-to-end QoS without central control, i.e. no SBC

Page 7: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 7

MSF

• Promotes deployment of open and interoperable equipment• Develops interoperability agreements reusing existing standards

where possible• Organizes interoperability events

• MSF Architecture is based on fixed-line carrier requirements• Bandwidth management within the core• Migration of legacy services• NAT

• Release 2 Architecture contains Session Border Gateway• Security• NAT• Access Control

• Release 3 (in progress) migrates to IMS-based core

Page 8: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 8

Evolution of SBC function

SIP

3GPPR5/6 3GPP

R7

MSFR2

MSFR3

P-CSCF provides

• Security

• Access Control

• Routing Control

IBCF adds

• Protocol Conversion

• Legacy Devices

• Peering Control

• IPv4 / NATIMS still lacks

• Core Bandwidth Management

• Explicit MPLS/VPN support

Internet

• No borders

SBG provides

• Security

• Access Control

• NAT

Migration to IMS core

Page 9: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 9

Proxy

ProxyProxy

Evolution of SBC in IMS Architecture

AS

UE UE

SBG-NE

IBCFIBCF

TrGW TrGW

SBG-NC

IETF SIP IMS R7

Proxy

GGSN

PDF

GGSN

IMS R5/6

P-CSCF

S-CSCFS-CSCF

P-CSCF

Page 10: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 10

Each architecture gives SBCs different names

• Network Edge

• Network Core

• Access (CPE) S-SBG-CE A-MCF Out of scope

D-SBG-CE A-MGF “

S-SBG-NE C-BCF P-CSCF

D-SBG-NE C-BGF GGSN / BAS / PDG

S-SBG-NC I-BCF IBCF

D-SBG-NC I-BGF TrGW

MSF R2 TISPAN R1 IMS

Page 11: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 11

Deployment options

• Some SBC function covered by IMS architecture

• Real SBCs may incorporate additional function• CAC (off-loading work from S-CSCF)

• Transcoding

• Gateway function – e.g. Protocol interworking

• Firewall and NAT traversal (where not handled by CPE)

• SBC function may be built into other devices• Routers providing media SBC function

• Softswitches incorporating all CSCF and SBC signaling functions

Page 12: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 12

Areas for further standardisation

• IMS assumes plentiful core network resources• SBC function needs interfaces to central Bandwidth Manager

S-CSCF

P-CSCF

UE

IBCF

TrGWGGSN

SBG-NE SBG-NC

BM

Page 13: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 13

Areas for further standardisation

IBCF

BM

TrGW

• Policy configuration• Complex and only partially standardised

Page 14: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 14

Summary

• Border Control is a requirement for carrier service

• An SBC is a device that provides the set of functions needed at the border

• These functions are now appearing in IMS and other standard architectures• This work is ongoing

• Competing pressures for features

• An SBC is not always a separate device• Parts of the function can be implemented by other devices:

edge routers, access network or softswitch

Page 15: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Copyright © 2006 Data Connection Limited • All Rights Reserved. 15

Data Connection (DCL)

• Software technology since 1981• Portable network protocols

• VoIP: SIP, MGCP, Megaco, SBC

• MPLS, VPNs, IP Routing, ATM

• Messaging / Directory / Conferencing

• MetaSwitch

• Private and consistently profitable• Effectively owned by employees

• People• ~20 recruits from ~3000 applications

• Attrition rate <3%0

50

100

150

200

250

300

81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03

Number of Employees

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

$M

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04

Revenue

Earnings

Revenue and Earnings

Page 16: 2006-04 MSF SBC2 DataConnection

Thank you for listeningJonathan Cumming

[email protected]


Recommended