2006-07 Fiscal Year - Department of Public...

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health

Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

Annual Review of Adult Participants in Alcohol and Drug Programs

Contracted by the Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Prepared by Planning Division

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

Annual Review of Adult Participants in Alcohol and Drug Programs Contracted by the

Alcohol and Drug Program Administration 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Executive Summary

Introduction The 11th Annual Review is a comprehensive descriptive report on the adult participants who received various types of treatment/recovery services from alcohol and drug programs contracted with the Los Angeles County Alcohol and Drug Program Administration (ADPA) during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year. Most of the of information and statistics presented in the Annual Review are based on participant admission and discharge information collected through ADPA’s Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System (LACPRS). LACPRS is an ongoing, standardized, computer-supported system sustained by a close working relationship between ADPA and contracted alcohol and drug program providers. The 2006-07 Annual Review is composed of the following five chapters:

Chapter 1 provides statistical information on participants in ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment/recovery programs over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). This includes program admission, participant demographic, primary drug problem, and treatment outcome statistics.

Chapter 2 describes treatment services by division and program type. For each program

type, a description of participants who were served in the 2006-07 Fiscal Year is provided along with key trend statistics that occurred over five fiscal years, 2002-03 to 2006-07.

Chapter 3 provides admission, participant, and outcome trend statistics by special

programs designed to serve the following special populations: criminal justice defendants, homeless individuals, needle users, persons with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems, pregnant and parenting women, and public assistance recipients.

Chapter 4 provides participant-related demographic statistics for each of the 163

community-based agencies contracted with ADPA to provide alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year.

Chapter 5 is composed of statistical “Fact Sheets” which cover key Los Angeles County

alcohol and drug-related indicators and outcomes.

-i-

ADPA-Funded Alcohol and Drug Treatment/Recovery Program Admissions During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, ADPA contracted with 163 community-based agencies that provided the following types of alcohol and drug treatment programs in Los Angeles County.

Table 1 - Type and Number of Treatment Programs, 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Non-Residential Programs Number Residential Programs Number Day Care 58 Residential Detoxification 4 Narcotic Treatment Detoxification 3 Residential Services 91 Narcotic Treatment Maintenance 27 Outpatient Counseling 227

During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 163 ADPA contracted community-based agencies provided treatment/recovery services to a total of 45,459 participants who accounted

for 56,411 program admissions

Table 2 shows the number of annual participants and program admissions from 2002-03 to 2006-07 fiscal years. Over the five fiscal years, the annual number of admissions to programs increased by 19.6% and the individual participants increased by 19.5%.

Table 2 - Total Number of Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year

Treatment/Recovery Programs

Fiscal Year Admissions Participants

2002-03 47,148 38,052

2003-04 57,911 45,048

2004-05 58,964 47,519

2005-06 56,016 44,853

2006-07 56,411 45,459

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

Treatment/Recovery admissions to programs increased by 19.6% over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07)

-ii-

Participant Characteristics Participant demographics have remained relatively constant over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, most of the treatment/recovery program participants were male (64.7%); Hispanic/Latino (35.7%), White (29.0%), or Black/African American (26.3%); between 25 and 44 years of age (54.3%); had 9 to 12 years of education (76.1%); and unemployed (67.5%). Methamphetamine (29.8%) was the most frequently reported primary drug problem followed by cocaine/crack (22.1%) and alcohol (20.4%). Participant Discharge Status Participants with “Positive Compliance” are those who completed treatment or left before completing treatment with satisfactory progress. Over half of the program participants had positive treatment outcomes four out of five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). The five year-year average for positive treatment compliance was 53.5%.

Three out of five fiscal years,

methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem

Over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), an average of 53.5% of the participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at program discharge. They

successfully complied with their individualized treatment plans.

Treatment Services by Division and Program Type Program participant characteristics were relatively similar across program types. Regardless of program type, the majority of participants were male, between 25 and 44 years of age, had 9 to 12 years of education, and were unemployed. Most participants were Hispanic/Latino, White, or Black/African American. The notable exceptions for the 2006-07 Fiscal Year were:

• Of the six program types, only day care programs provided services primarily to female participants (77.7%).

• Narcotic treatment programs served the largest proportion of older program

participants. Among the narcotic treatment programs (detoxification and maintenance), over half of the participants were between 45 and 64 years of age, 62.7% and 56.1%, respectively.

Narcotic Treatment Programs served the largest proportion of older adult participants, 45 to 64 years of age.

-iii-

Treatment Services by Division and Program Type - Continued

• Methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for three program types; day care (40.9%), outpatient counseling (32.1%), and residential services (36.0%). Over 90.0% of participants in narcotic treatment programs reported heroin as their primary drug problem. These results are expected since, by design, narcotic treatment programs provide services to individuals addicted to heroin or other morphine-like drugs. Heroin (41.6%) also ranked as the number one drug problem for participants who received residential detoxification services.

Table 3 shows positive treatment compliance by program type for the 2006-07 Fiscal Year. Positive outcomes varied among program types. However, residential programs had higher percentages of positive compliance. The majority of participants in outpatient counseling (50.7%), residential detoxification (77.3%), and residential services (68.6%) complied with their treatment plans.

Table 3 – Positive Treatment Compliance 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Positive Compliance

Program Type Discharges Number Percent

Non-Residential

Day Care 1,037 505 48.7

NTP – Detoxification 389 119 30.6

NTP – Maintenance 541 155 28.7

Outpatient Counseling 14,947 7,578 50.7

Residential

Detoxification 4,491 3,473 77.3

Residential Services 9,113 6,247 68.6

Overall 30,518 18,077 59.2

The majority of participants in outpatient counseling (50.7%), residential detoxification (77.3%), and residential services (68.6%)

had positive treatment outcomes. Special Populations

ADPA-contracted treatment/recovery programs address specific needs of certain populations such as criminal justice defendants, homeless individuals, needle users, persons with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems, pregnant and parenting women, and public assistance recipients.

-iv-

Special Populations - Continued Table 4 provides a summary of the special populations who received services during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year.

Table 4 – 2006-07 Fiscal Year Special Population Admissions and Participants

Special Population Admissions Participants Target Group

CalWORKs’ Recipients 2,194 1,945 CalWORKs’ (welfare reform) recipients with alcohol/drug problems

Co-Occurring Disorders 13,932 11,791 Individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems

Drug Court Defendants 2,418 2,018 Non-violent drug offenders

Female Offenders Project 102 97 Female inmates from California Institute for Women in Frontera

General Relief Recipients 3,178 2,945 General Relief (indigent adults) recipients with alcohol/drug problems

Homeless Individuals 11,126 9,819 Individuals living on the street or in an emergency shelter due to lack of financial resources or community ties

Needle Users 8,514 6,696 Intravenous drug users

Perinatal Services Network 1,499 1,388 Pregnant and parenting women and their children

Pregnant Women 1,071 980 Pregnant women

Prison Parolee Network 643 560 Male and female offenders, paroled to Los Angeles County

Proposition 36 Defendants 17,721 14,245 Non-violent drug offenders

Salient findings regarding special population outcomes are:

Over the five fiscal years, methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids’ (CalWORKs) participants. With the exception of 2006-07, methamphetamine prominence has grown annually from 29.2% in 2002-03 to 45.5% IN 2005-06.

The average percent of CalWORKs participants with positive treatment compliance for the five

fiscal years was 52.7%. More specifically, over five fiscal years, 3,211 of the 6,089 CalWORKs recipients discharged from alcohol and drug treatment/recovery programs successfully complied with their treatment plans.

Admissions for participants with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems more

than doubled over five fiscal years; 6,407 in 2002-03 to 13,932 in 2006-07. During the five-year period, alcohol was the most prominent drug abused by participants with co-occurring disorders. Each fiscal year, more than half of the participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status.

Over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the majority of drug court participants reported

cocaine/crack or methamphetamine as their primary substance abuse problem. Each of the past five fiscal years, the majority (66.0 - 71.0%) of the drug court program participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status.

In 2006-07, methamphetamine (44.3%) and cocaine/crack (37.1%) were the most frequently

reported drug problems for female offender participants. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 44.9% of the participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status.

-v-

Special Populations - Continued

Alcohol was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for general relief participants for

the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05). In 2005-06 and 2006-07 fiscal years, methamphetamine was the number one drug problem for general relief recipients. Methamphetamine use has increased from 21.1% in 2002-03 to 31.6% in 2006-07.

A total of 50,290 homeless participants have been admitted to ADPA-funded alcohol and drug

treatment/recovery programs over the last five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). The percent of homeless participants reporting mental health concerns has increased slightly over the five-year period, from 16.2% in 2002-03 to 24.8% in 2006-07.

In 2006-07, the most prominent drug problems reported by homeless participants were

methamphetamine (30.1%), cocaine/crack (28.7%), and alcohol (19.2%). Each fiscal year, the majority (56.4% to 63.1%) of homeless participants successfully complied with their treatment plan.

Each fiscal year, heroin was the primary drug problem for the majority (68.3 – 75.9%) of needle

users. Over the five fiscal years, 52.6% of needle users left treatment with a positive compliance status.

For each fiscal year, the majority (64.6% to 79.7%) of perinatal participants received services

from a day care program. With the exception of 2002-03, methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for perinatal participants.

During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 6.1% (980 of 16,028) of female participants reported being

pregnant at the time of admission. Each fiscal year, methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for pregnant women. Methamphetamine use increased from 32.9% in 2002-03 to 48.6% in 2006-07.

In 2006-07, over one-third (37.0%) of the Prison Parolee Network participants reported

methamphetamine as their primary drug problem. Methamphetamine use has grown from 22.0% in 2002-03 to 37.0% in 2006-07.

Over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the number of Proposition 36 program

admissions increased by 72.9%. Each fiscal year, methamphetamine ranked as the number one drug problem. In 2006-07, half (50.6%) of Proposition 36 participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status.

-vi-

Table of Contents

-vii-

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. i Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapters 1 Los Angeles County (LAC) Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program 2

Table 1.1 Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year (FY) ............................................... 2

Table 1.2 Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY................................................ 3

Table 1.3 Program Participant Demographics by FY.......................................................................... 4

Table 1.4 Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ............................................................. 5

Table 1.5 Program Participant Discharge Status by FY...................................................................... 6

2 LAC Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program by Division and Program Type 7

Table 2.1 Admissions by Division and Program Type, 2006-07 FY.................................................... 8

Table 2.2 Number of Non-Residential Admissions by Program Type and FY.................................... 8

Table 2.3 Number of Residential Admissions by Program Type and FY............................................ 9

Table 2.4 Day Care Program Participant Demographics, 2006-07 FY............................................... 10

Table 2.5 Day Care Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY............................................. 11

Table 2.6 Day Care Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ..................................................... 11

Table 2.7 Narcotic Treatment Program (NTP) Detoxification Participant Demographics,

2006-07 FY.......................................................................................................................... 12

Table 2.8 NTP Detoxification Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ............................................. 13

Table 2.9 NTP Detoxification Participant Discharge Status by FY ..................................................... 13

Table 2.10 NTP Maintenance Participant Demographics, 2006-07 FY ................................................ 14

Table 2.11 NTP Maintenance Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY........................................... 15

Table 2.12 NTP Maintenance Participant Discharge Status by FY ...................................................... 15

Table 2.13 Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Demographics, 2006-07 FY .......................... 16

Table 2.14 Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ........................ 17

Table 2.15 Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Discharge Status by FY................................. 17

Table 2.16 Residential Detoxification Program Participant Demographics, 2006-07 FY...................... 18

Table 2.17 Residential Detoxification Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY.................... 19

Table 2.18 Residential Detoxification Program Participant Discharge Status by FY............................ 19 Table 2.19 Residential Services Program Participant Demographics, 2006-07 FY ............................. 20

Table 2.20 Residential Services Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ........................... 21

Table 2.21 Residential Services Program Participant Discharge Status by FY.................................... 21

Table of Contents

-viii-

3 LAC Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program Special Populations 22

Table 3.1 Total Number of CalWORKS Program Admissions and Participants by FY....................... 23

Table 3.2 CalWORKs Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY ............................ 24

Table 3.3 CalWORKs Program Participant Demographics by FY ...................................................... 25

Table 3.4 CalWORKs Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY.......................................... 26

Table 3.5 CalWORKs Program Participant Discharge Status by FY .................................................. 26

Table 3.6 Total Number of Co-Occurring Disorder Program Admissions and Participants by FY ..... 28

Table 3.7 Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY .......... 28

Table 3.8 Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Demographics by FY .................................... 29

Table 3.9 Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ........................ 30

Table 3.10 Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ................................ 30

Table 3.11 Total Number of Drug Court Program Admissions and Participants by FY ........................ 31

Table 3.12 Drug Court Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY............................. 32

Table 3.13 Drug Court Program Participant Demographics by FY ....................................................... 33

Table 3.14 Drug Court Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY........................................... 34

Table 3.15 Drug Court Program Participant Discharge Status by FY................................................... 34

Table 3.16 Total Number of Female Offender Program Admissions and Participants by FY............... 35

Table 3.17 Female Offender Program Participants Admissions by Program Type and FY.................. 36

Table 3.18 Female Offender Program Participant Demographics by FY.............................................. 36

Table 3.19 Female Offender Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ................................. 37

Table 3.20 Female Offender Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ......................................... 37

Table 3.21 Total Number of General Relief Program Admissions and Participants by FY................... 38

Table 3.22 General Relief Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY ....................... 39

Table 3.23 General Relief Program Participant Demographics by FY.................................................. 40

Table 3.24 General Relief Program Participant Primary Problem by FY.............................................. 41

Table 3.25 General Relief Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ............................................. 41

Table 3.26 Total Number of Homeless Program Admissions and Participants by FY.......................... 43

Table 3.27 Homeless Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY .............................. 43

Table 3.28 Homeless Program Participant Demographics by FY......................................................... 44

Table 3.29 Homeless Program Participant Primary Drug Program by FY............................................ 45

Table 3.30 Homeless Program Participant Discharge Status by FY .................................................... 45

Table 3.31 Total Number of Needle User Program Admissions and Participants by FY...................... 47

Table 3.32 Needle User Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY .......................... 47

Table 3.33 Needle User Program Participant Demographics by FY..................................................... 48

Table 3.34 Needle User Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ........................................ 49

Table of Contents

-ix-

Chapter 3 – Continued Table 3.35 Needle User Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ................................................ 49

Table 3.36 Total Number of Perinatal Program Admissions and Participants by FY ........................... 50

Table 3.37 Perinatal Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY ................................ 51

Table 3.38 Perinatal Program Participant Demographics by FY .......................................................... 52

Table 3.39 Perinatal Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY.............................................. 53

Table 3.40 Perinatal Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ...................................................... 53

Table 3.41 Total Number of Pregnant Program Admissions and Participants by FY ........................... 55

Table 3.42 Pregnant Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY................................ 55

Table 3.43 Pregnant Program Participant Demographics by FY .......................................................... 56

Table 3.44 Pregnant Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY.............................................. 57

Table 3.45 Pregnant Program Participant Discharge Status by FY...................................................... 57

Table 3.46 Total Number of Prison Parolee Network (PPN) Program Admissions and

Participants by FY ............................................................................................................... 58

Table 3.47 PPN Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY ....................................... 59

Table 3.48 PPN Program Participant Demographics by FY ................................................................. 60

Table 3.49 PPN Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY..................................................... 61

Table 3.50 PPN Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ............................................................. 61

Table 3.51 Total Number of Proposition 36 Program Admissions and Participants by FY................... 62

Table 3.52 Proposition 36 Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and FY ....................... 63

Table 3.53 Proposition 36 Program Participant Demographics by FY.................................................. 64

Table 3.54 Proposition 36 Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by FY ..................................... 65

Table 3.55 Proposition 36 Program Participant Discharge Status by FY ............................................. 65

4 LAC Participant Statistics by Agency 66

Table 4.0 Number of Program Participants and Admissions by Agency, 2006-07 FY ....................... 67

Table 4.1 A Home for Us, Foundation................................................................................................. 71

Table 4.2 A New Serentity .................................................................................................................. 72

Table 4.3 Able Family Support, Inc. .................................................................................................... 73

Table 4.4 Addiction Research and Treatment, Inc.............................................................................. 74

Table 4.5 Aegis Medical System, Inc. ................................................................................................. 75

Table 4.6 Alcoholism Center for Women, Inc...................................................................................... 76

Table 4.7 Alcoholism Council of Antelope Valley/NCA....................................................................... 77

Table 4.8 AltaMed ............................................................................................................................... 78

Table 4.9 American Asian Pacific Ministries, Inc. ............................................................................... 79

Table of Contents

-x-

Chapter 4 – Continued

Table 4.10 American Drug Recovery Program, Inc. ............................................................................. 80

Table 4.11 American Drug Treatment Program, Inc. ............................................................................ 81

Table 4.12 American Health and Education Clinics.............................................................................. 82

Table 4.13 American Indian Changing Spirits....................................................................................... 83

Table 4.14 Antelope Valley Rehabilitation Centers............................................................................... 84

Table 4.15 Apex Foundation ................................................................................................................. 85

Table 4.16 Arms of Grace Humanitarian Service.................................................................................. 86

Table 4.17 Asian American Drug Abuse Program, Inc ......................................................................... 87

Table 4.18 Atlantic Recovery Services.................................................................................................. 88

Table 4.19 Avalon – Carver Community Health Center ........................................................................ 89

Table 4.20 BAART Behavioral Health Services, Inc. ............................................................................ 90

Table 4.21 Be Well Now Institute .......................................................................................................... 91

Table 4.22 Beacon House Association of San Pedro (The) ................................................................. 92

Table 4.23 Behavioral Health Services, Inc. ......................................................................................... 93

Table 4.24 Bernie’s Lil Women Center.................................................................................................. 94

Table 4.25 Bienvenidos Children’s Center, Inc ..................................................................................... 95

Table 4.26 Blessed Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Research Program, Inc. ................................... 96

Table 4.27 California Drug Consultants, Inc. ........................................................................................ 97

Table 4.28 California Drug Treatment Program, Inc. ............................................................................ 98

Table 4.29 California Graduate Institute ............................................................................................... 99

Table 4.30 California Hispanic Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Inc. .................................... 100

Table 4.31 California People Counseling Center .................................................................................. 101

Table 4.32 Cambodian Association of America .................................................................................... 102

Table 4.33 Canon Human Services, Inc. .............................................................................................. 103

Table 4.34 Caring Residential Care, Inc. .............................................................................................. 104

Table 4.35 Casa de Las Amigas ........................................................................................................... 105

Table 4.36 Center for Hope, Inc. (The) ................................................................................................. 106

Table 4.37 Chabad of California, Inc..................................................................................................... 107

Table 4.38 Changing Steps................................................................................................................... 108

Table 4.39 Children’s Institute International.......................................................................................... 109

Table 4.40 Circle of Friends Outpatient Services, Inc........................................................................... 110

Table 4.41 Circle of Help Foundation.................................................................................................... 111

Table 4.42 City of Compton................................................................................................................... 112

Table 4.43 City of Long Beach, A Municipal Corporation ..................................................................... 113

Table 4.44 City of Pasadena ................................................................................................................. 114

Table of Contents

-xi-


Table 4.45 CLARE Foundation, Inc....................................................................................................... 115

Table 4.46 Clinica Monsenor Oscar A. Romero.................................................................................... 116

Table 4.47 Community Alcohol and Drug Treatment ............................................................................ 117

Table 4.48 Cri-Help, Inc ........................................................................................................................ 118

Table 4.49 Crossroads Skills Development, Inc. .................................................................................. 119

Table 4.50 Cultural Bridges Treatment Center ..................................................................................... 120

Table 4.51 Dare U to Care Outreach Ministry……………………………………………………………… 121

Table 4.52 Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service ........................................................................................... 122

Table 4.53 Do It Now Foundation.......................................................................................................... 123

Table 4.54 Driver Safety Schools, Inc. .................................................................................................. 124

Table 4.55 El Centro del Pueblo ........................................................................................................... 125

Table 4.56 El Proyecto del Barrio.......................................................................................................... 126

Table 4.57 Epidaurus ............................................................................................................................ 127

Table 4.58 Family Service of Long Beach ............................................................................................ 128

Table 4.59 Found, Inc. .......................................................................................................................... 129

Table 4.60 Fred Brown’s Recovery Services, Inc. ................................................................................ 130

Table 4.61 Glorious Manor, Inc. II ......................................................................................................... 131

Table 4.62 Goretti Health Services, Inc. .............................................................................................. 132

Table 4.63 Grandview Foundation, Inc. ................................................................................................ 133

Table 4.64 Guidance Health Services, Inc............................................................................................ 134

Table 4.65 Help the People Foundation................................................................................................ 135

Table 4.66 His Sheltering Arms, Inc...................................................................................................... 136

Table 4.67 Hollywood Recovery Treatment Center .............................................................................. 137

Table 4.68 House of Hope Foundation, Inc .......................................................................................... 138

Table 4.69 I-ADARP, Inc ....................................................................................................................... 139

Table 4.70 Immaculate Care Center, Inc. ............................................................................................. 140

Table 4.71 Independence Community Treatment Clinic ....................................................................... 141

Table 4.72 Interconnection Center, Inc. ................................................................................................ 142

Table 4.73 Jeff Grand Clinic, Inc. .......................................................................................................... 143

Table 4.74 JMO – International Skills Developers ................................................................................ 144

Table 4.75 Joint Efforts, Inc................................................................................................................... 145

Table 4.76 LA. South Health Services, Inc ........................................................................................... 146

Table 4.77 La Clinica del Pueblo, Inc.................................................................................................... 147

Table 4.78 Lavelle Youth Homes .......................................................................................................... 148

Table 4.79 Laws Support Center........................................................................................................... 149

Table of Contents

-xii-


Table 4.80 Little House ......................................................................................................................... 150

Table 4.81 Live Again Recovery Home, Inc.......................................................................................... 151

Table 4.82 Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center ................... 152

Table 4.83 Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse.............................................................. 153

Table 4.84 Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Service Center ................................................ 154

Table 4.85 Los Angeles New Life Center, Inc....................................................................................... 155

Table 4.86 Mary-Lind Foundation ........................................................................................................ 156

Table 4.87 Maternity House, LLC.......................................................................................................... 157

Table 4.88 Matrix Institute on Addictions .............................................................................................. 158

Table 4.89 MELA Counseling Services Center, Inc. ............................................................................. 159

Table 4.90 Mid Valley Recovery Service, Inc. ...................................................................................... 160

Table 4.91 Mini Twelve Step House, Inc............................................................................................... 161

Table 4.92 MJB Transitional Recovery, Inc .......................................................................................... 162

Table 4.93 Mount Sinai Health Center, Inc ........................................................................................... 163

Table 4.94 NCADD of East San Gabriel & Pomona Valleys, Inc.......................................................... 164

Table 4.95 NCADD – Long Beach Area................................................................................................ 165

Table 4.96 NCADD of the San Fernando Valley................................................................................... 166

Table 4.97 Ness Counseling Center, Incorporated (The) ..................................................................... 167

Table 4.98 New Beginnings Recovery Treatment Center, Inc.............................................................. 168

Table 4.99 New Directions .................................................................................................................... 169

Table 4.100 New Hope Health Services, Inc .......................................................................................... 170

Table 4.101 New Horizons Housing and Independent Living ................................................................. 171

Table 4.102 New Resource Institute: DBA Clear Path............................................................................ 172

Table 4.103 New Way Foundations, Inc ................................................................................................. 173

Table 4.104 Noble Heart Services Inc..................................................................................................... 174

Table 4.105 Okuli Eagle’s Nest Foundation, Inc. .................................................................................... 175

Table 4.106 Options – A Child Care and Human Services Agency........................................................ 176

Table 4.107 Our Homes by Anita, Inc ..................................................................................................... 177

Table 4.108 Outreach Health Services, Inc ............................................................................................ 178

Table 4.109 Pacific Clinics ...................................................................................................................... 179

Table 4.110 Pajo Corporation (The)........................................................................................................ 180

Table 4.111 Palm House, Inc. ................................................................................................................. 181

Table 4.112 Palm Residential Care Facility (The)................................................................................... 182

Table 4.113 Pasadena Recovery Center, Inc. ........................................................................................ 183

Table 4.114 Pavillion Healthcare Services, Inc....................................................................................... 184

Table of Contents

-xiii-


Table 4.115 People Coordinated Services of Southern California.......................................................... 185

Table 4.116 People in Progress, Inc. ...................................................................................................... 186

Table 4.117 Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc .................................................................................. 187

Table 4.118 Plaza Community Center .................................................................................................... 188

Table 4.119 Pomona Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center, Inc. .............................................................. 189

Table 4.120 Pomona Community Crisis Center, Inc ............................................................................... 190

Table 4.121 Pride Health Services, Inc................................................................................................... 191

Table 4.122 Principles, Inc. ..................................................................................................................... 192

Table 4.123 Prototypes ........................................................................................................................... 193

Table 4.124 R.A.P. Community Recovery Services................................................................................ 194

Table 4.125 Remah Health Services, Inc................................................................................................ 195

Table 4.126 Reseda Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Inc .............................................................. 196

Table 4.127 R.I.G.H.T. Program ............................................................................................................. 197

Table 4.128 Roy’s National Health Services, Inc. ................................................................................... 198

Table 4.129 Salvation Army, A California Corporation............................................................................ 199

Table 4.130 Santa Anita Family Services ............................................................................................... 200

Table 4.131 Shields for Families, Inc. ..................................................................................................... 201

Table 4.132 Social Model Recovery Systems, Inc.................................................................................. 202

Table 4.133 South Bay Alcoholism Services, DBA NCADD of the South Bay ....................................... 203

Table 4.134 South Bay Human Services Coalition ................................................................................. 204

Table 4.135 Southern California Alcohol and Drug Program, Inc ........................................................... 205

Table 4.136 Special Service for Groups ................................................................................................. 206

Table 4.137 SPIRTT Family Services, Inc. ............................................................................................. 207

Table 4.138 Stepping Stones Home....................................................................................................... 208

Table 4.139 Substance Abuse Foundation of Long Beach Inc............................................................... 209

Table 4.140 Sunrise Community Counseling Center .............................................................................. 210

Table 4.141 Tarzana Treatment Center .................................................................................................. 211

Table 4.142 T.E.A.M. One Stop .............................................................................................................. 212

Table 4.143 Total Family Support Clinic ................................................................................................. 213

Table 4.144 Transcultural Health Development, Inc ............................................................................... 214

Table 4.145 Trinity Plus Healthcare Services, Inc. ................................................................................. 215

Table 4.146 Twin Town Corporation ....................................................................................................... 216

Table 4.147 Ubenete Charity, Inc............................................................................................................ 217

Table 4.148 United American Indian Involvement, Inc............................................................................ 218

Table 4.149 United States Veterans Initiative, Inc. ................................................................................. 219

Table of Contents

-xiv-


Table 4.150 United Women in Transition................................................................................................ 220

Table 4.151 URDC Human Services Corporation................................................................................... 221

Table 4.152 U – Turn Alcohol and Drug Education Program, Inc........................................................... 222

Table 4.153 Van Ness Recovery House ................................................................................................. 223

Table 4.154 Verdugo Mental Health Center............................................................................................ 224

Table 4.155 Volunteers of Africa ............................................................................................................. 225

Table 4.156 Volunteers of America of Los Angeles ................................................................................ 226

Table 4.157 Walden House, Inc. ............................................................................................................. 227

Table 4.158 Watts Healthcare Corporation............................................................................................. 228

Table 4.159 We Can Help Foundation.................................................................................................... 229

Table 4.160 Western Pacific Med Corp................................................................................................... 230

Table 4.161 Wilshire Treatment Center, Inc. .......................................................................................... 231

Table 4.162 Wings of Refuge.................................................................................................................. 232

Table 4.163 Winky’s Treatment Center................................................................................................... 233

5 LAC Alcohol and Drug Statistical Fact Sheets 234

Fact Sheet 5.1 LAC Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 1995 to 2007 ........................................... 235

Fact Sheet 5.2 Homeless Program Participant Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY................................. 236

Fact Sheet 5.3 Program Participant Arrest Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY ....................................... 237

Fact Sheet 5.4 Program Participant Days in Jail Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY .............................. 238

Fact Sheet 5.5 Program Participant Days in Prison Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY.......................... 239

Fact Sheet 5.6 Program Participant Physical Health Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY........................ 240

Fact Sheet 5.7 Program Participant Days in Hospital Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY....................... 241

Fact Sheet 5.8 Program Participant Emergency Room Visits Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY .......... 242

Fact Sheet 5.9 Program Participant Days in Psychiatric Facility Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY...... 243

Fact Sheet 5.10 Program Participant Use of Prescribed Medication for Mental Health-Related Needs

Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY................................................................................... 244

Fact Sheet 5.11 Program Participants Outpatient Emergency Services for Mental Health-Related Needs

Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY................................................................................... 245

Fact Sheet 5.12 Program Participant Employment Outcome Statistics, 2006-07 FY............................. 246

Fact Sheet 5.13a Program Participants Diagnosed with Tuberculosis at Program Admission and

Discharge, 2006-07 FY................................................................................................. 247

Table of Contents

-xv-


Fact Sheet 5.13b Program Participants Diagnosed with Hepatitis C at Program Admission and

Discharge, 2006-07 FY................................................................................................. 247

Fact Sheet 5.13c Program Participants Diagnosed with Sexually Transmitted Infection at Program

Admission and Discharge, 2006-07 FY ........................................................................ 247

Fact Sheet 5.14a Program Participants Tested for HIV/AIDS Prior to Program Admission and Discharge,

2006-07 FY ................................................................................................................... 248

Fact Sheet 5.14b Program Participants Who Received HIV/AIDS Test Results Prior to Program

Admission and Discharge, 2006-07 FY ........................................................................ 248

Fact Sheet 5.15 Program Participants Length of Enrollment by Non-Residential Program

Type and FY ................................................................................................................. 249

Fact Sheet 5.16 Program Participants Length of Stay by Residential Program Type and FY ............... 250

Fact Sheet 5.17 LAC Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program Summary Statistics by FY ....................... 251

Fact Sheet 5.18 Program Participant Demographics by Gender, 2006-07 FY....................................... 252

Fact Sheet 5.19 Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity, 2006-07 FY............................ 253

Fact Sheet 5.20 Male Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity, 2006-07 FY................... 254

Fact Sheet 5.21 Female Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity, 2006-07 FY............... 255

Introduction The 11th Annual Review is a comprehensive description of adult participants who received alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year. Adult treatment services are traditional ADPA-contracted residential and non-residential alcohol and drug treatment/recovery program services (day care, detoxification, outpatient, and residential) provided to individuals who are 18 years of age and older.

The 2006-07 Annual Review is composed of the following five chapters:

Chapter 1 provides statistical information on participants in ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment/recovery programs over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07).

Chapter 2 describes treatment services by division and program type. For each program

type, a description of participants who were served in the 2006-07 Fiscal Year is provided along with key trend statistics that occurred over five fiscal years, 2002-03 to 2006-07.

Chapter 3 provides admission, participant, and outcome trend statistics for special populations.

Chapter 4 provides participant-related demographics for each of the 163 community-based

agencies contracted with ADPA during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year.

Chapter 5 is composed of statistical “Fact Sheets” which cover key Los Angeles County alcohol and drug-related indicators and outcomes.

The majority of the information found in the Annual Review is based on participant admission and discharge data collected through ADPA’s Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System (LACPRS). LACPRS is an ongoing, standardized, computer-supported system sustained by a close working relationship between ADPA and contracted alcohol and drug program providers. For the purposes of this report, participant and program admission are defined, as follows:

(1) A participant is an individual who is admitted and becomes actively engaged in an alcohol or drug treatment program.

(2) A program admission is a treatment event that starts when the program admits the participant.

The Annual Review includes all adult participants who received services in ADPA-contracted treatment/recovery programs. This review does not include information on participants who received substance abuse services at facilities operated by federal agencies in Los Angeles County (e.g., the Veterans Administration), crisis intervention facilities (e.g., hospital emergency departments), private entities, and other publicly funded non-ADPA contracted programs. The Annual Review does not include information on ADPA-contracted youth/adolescent and prevention programs. Acknowledgments: Special thanks are extended to program providers for their submission of information to ADPA. Without their cooperation and support, the information necessary for the preparation of the Annual Review would not have been possible.

-1-

CChhaapptteerr 11 –– LLAACC AAllccoohhooll aanndd DDrruugg TTrreeaattmmeenntt PPrrooggrraamm

-2-

Introduction Alcohol and Drug Program Administration (ADPA) contracted with community-based agencies to provide a range of treatment and recovery services to County residents with alcohol and other drug problems. Consistent with federal, State, and County reporting requirements, each time an individual enters or departs from a treatment program, standardized admission or discharge information is collected. Since a participant may be admitted to more than one program during a fiscal year, or return to the same program more than once, the number of participant program admissions can be greater than the number of individual participants.

LAC Program Admission and Participant Trends

Table 1.1 shows the number of annual participants and program admissions from 2002-03 to 2006-07 fiscal years. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment programs provided services to a total of 45,459 participants who accounted for 56,411 treatment/recovery program admissions. Over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the number of program admissions increased by 19.6% and individual participants increased by 19.5%.

Table 1.1 – Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 47,148 38,052

2003-04 57,911 45,048

2004-05 58,964 47,519

2005-06 56,016 44,853

2006-07 56,411 45,459


CChhaapptteerr 11

-3-

LAC Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 1.2 shows the type of programs that provided alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services to participants over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). During the five-year period, most participants received services from an outpatient counseling program. More than half of the participants were admitted to an outpatient counseling program during the last three fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07). For each fiscal year, approximately 1 out of every 4 admission was to a residential service program. Day care program admissions remained constant; the five-year average was 3.5%. A slight decline in admissions to residential detoxification programs occurred from the first to the third fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05), then remained steady at 8.0% for the remaining two fiscal years (2005-06 and 2006-07). With the exception of 2003-04, there has been a downward trend in the percent of admissions (4.9 - 0.7%) to narcotic treatment detoxification programs. Over the five fiscal years, narcotic treatment maintenance programs accounted for approximately 4.0% to 6.0% of the admissions.

Table 1.2 - Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year1

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Program Type # % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 1,858 3.9 1,971 3.4 1,941 3.3 1,909 3.4 1,933 3.4

Narcotic Treatment Detoxification 2,303 4.9 5,216 9.0 1,553 2.6 706 1.3 367 0.7

Narcotic Treatment Maintenance 1,794 3.8 3,658 6.3 3,834 6.5 2,425 4.3 2,844 5.0

Outpatient Counseling 22,797 48.4 27,756 47.9 31,733 53.8 31,254 55.8 33,501 59.4

Residential Detoxification 5,235 11.1 5,495 9.5 5,161 8.8 4,504 8.0 4,486 8.0

Residential Services 13,161 27.9 13,815 23.9 14,742 25.0 15,218 27.2 13,280 23.5

Total 47,148 100.0 57,911 100.0 58,964 100.0 56,016 100.0 56,411 100.0


1 Percents found in this table and subsequent tables do not always sum to 100% due to rounding.

CChhaapptteerr 11

-4-

LAC Program Participant Demographic Trends

Table 1.3 shows the demographics for program participants over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). Participant characteristics have remained relatively constant during this period. The majority of participants were male (64.7 - 66.4%); between 25 and 44 years of age (54.3 - 63.3%); had 9 to 12 years of education (74.9 - 78.8%); and unemployed (67.5 - 82.8%). Most participants were Hispanic/Latino (34.2 - 36.1%), White (29.0 - 32.0%), or Black/African American (25.4 - 28.9%).

Table 1.3 – Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 47,148 100.0 57,911 100.0 58,964 100.0 56,016 100.0 56,411 100.0

Participants 38,052 100.0 45,048 100.0 47,519 100.0 44,853 100.0 45,459 100.0

Gender

Male 25,112 66.0 29,909 66.4 31,240 65.7 29,319 65.4 29,431 64.7 Female 12,940 34.0 15,139 33.6 16,279 34.3 15,534 34.6 16,028 35.3

Race/Ethnicity

White 11,523 30.3 14,403 32.0 14,686 30.9 13,363 29.8 13,169 29.0 Black/African American 10,997 28.9 11,890 26.4 12,108 25.5 11,377 25.4 11,970 26.3 Hispanic/Latino 13,112 34.5 16,116 35.8 17,146 36.1 15,328 34.2 16,222 35.7 Native American 430 1.1 499 1.1 556 1.2 552 1.2 554 1.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 714 1.9 909 2.0 1,244 2.6 1,299 2.9 1,477 3.2 Other 1,276 3.4 1,231 2.7 1,779 3.7 2,934 6.5 2,067 4.5

Age

18 – 20 1,376 3.6 1,394 3.1 2,787 5.9 1,781 4.0 2,507 5.5 21 – 24 4,011 10.5 4,603 10.2 4,953 10.4 5,143 11.5 4,797 10.6 25 – 44 24,079 63.3 27,231 60.4 27,173 57.2 25,807 57.5 24,697 54.3 45 – 64 8,377 22.0 11,478 25.5 12,230 25.7 11,627 25.9 12,801 28.2 65 – Over 209 0.5 342 0.8 376 0.8 495 1.1 657 1.4

Education

None 260 0.7 247 0.5 449 0.9 1,008 2.2 1,126 2.5 1 – 8 years 2,003 5.3 2,331 5.2 1,311 2.8 2,201 4.9 2,289 5.0 9 – 12 years 29,854 78.5 35,515 78.8 35,589 74.9 33,832 75.4 34,615 76.1 13 or more years 5,935 15.6 6,955 15.4 10,170 21.4 7,812 17.4 7,429 16.3

Employment Status

Employed 6,550 17.2 8,983 19.9 9,578 20.2 8,775 19.6 8,925 19.6 Unemployed 31,502 82.8 36,065 80.1 34,513 72.6 30,675 68.4 30,673 67.5 Not in the labor force 3,428 7.2 5,403 12.0 5,861 12.9


CChhaapptteerr 11

-5-

LAC Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends The primary drug problems reported by program participants over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07) are shown in Table 1.4. Each of the five fiscal years, approximately 1 out of 5 participant reported alcohol as their primary drug problem. Heroin use fluctuated annually during the five-year period, ranging from a high of 20.2% in 2003-04 to a low of 12.7% in 2006-07. In 2002-03, cocaine/crack was the most frequently reported primary drug problem. Both cocaine/crack and methamphetamine ranked as the most prominent primary drug problems reported by participants in 2003-04. Beginning with the 2004-05 Fiscal Year, methamphetamine surpassed cocaine/crack and became the most frequently reported participant primary drug problem. One notable change in participant’s reported primary drug problems over the first four fiscal years has been the steady increase in methamphetamine use; from 21.4% in 2002-03 to 30.8% in 2005-06. An interruption in the upward trend in methamphetamine users was seen in 2006-07 Fiscal Year. The percent of participants reporting methamphetamine as their primary drug problem in 2006-07 was 29.8%; this is 1.0% lower than the prior fiscal year (2005-06). During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, most methamphetamine users were Hispanic/Latino (50.1%) or White (35.0%) with an average age of 32.1 years. Methamphetamine users had the highest percent (33.1%) of female participants.

Table 1.4 – Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Primary Drug Problem

# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 8,120 21.3 9,158 20.3 9,331 19.6 8,847 19.7 9,295 20.4

Cocaine/Crack 9,927 26.1 10,290 22.8 10,619 22.3 10,296 23.0 10,031 22.1

Heroin 6,651 17.5 9,119 20.2 8,093 17.0 5,879 13.1 5,765 12.7

Marijuana/Hashish 3,244 8.5 3,985 8.8 4,987 10.5 4,511 10.1 5,166 11.4

Methamphetamine 8,155 21.4 10,260 22.8 12,449 26.2 13,818 30.8 13,544 29.8

Other 1,955 5.1 2,236 5.0 2,040 4.3 1,502 3.3 1,658 3.6

Total 38,052 100.0 45,048 100.0 47,519 100.0 44,853 100.0 45,459 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 11

-6-

LAC Program Participant Discharge Status Trends Table 1.5 shows treatment compliance over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). Participants with “Positive Compliance” are those who completed treatment or left before completing treatment with satisfactory progress. “Negative Compliance” refers to those participants who left before completing treatment with unsatisfactory progress. In four out of the five fiscal years, the majority of program participants had positive treatment outcomes. During the 2003-04 Fiscal Year, slightly less than half (49.4%) of the participants had positive treatment outcomes. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 53.5% During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 51.9% of 12,441 participants, who departed from programs with a negative compliance assessment, were in treatment for less than 30 days. This outcome is consistent with current literature which states that better or positive outcomes are associated with longer treatment duration.

Table 1.5 – Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Participant Discharge Status

# % # % # % # % # %

Number of Discharges 33,764 100.0 37,951 100.0 28,207 100.0 29,507 100.0 30,518 100.0

Positive Compliance 17,448 51.7 18,741 49.4 14,997 53.2 16,006 54.2 18,077 59.2

Completed Treatment 8,487 25.1 9,294 24.5 9,124 32.3 10,704 36.3 12,688 41.6

Left - Satisfactory 8,961 26.5 9,447 24.9 5,873 20.8 5,302 18.0 5,389 17.7

Negative Compliance 16,316 48.3 19,210 50.6 13,210 46.8 13,501 45.8 12,441 40.8

Left – Unsatisfactory 16,316 48.3 19,210 50.6 13,210 46.8 13,501 45.8 12,441 40.8


Chapter 2 – LAC Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program by Division And Program Type

-7-

Introduction Chapter 2 provides a description of participants in alcohol and drug treatment/recovery program by division and program type. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 163 community-based agencies operated a total of 410 treatment programs at 330 different facility sites located throughout Los Angeles County. Alcohol and drug treatment/recovery programs are classified as either non-residential or residential and as one of the following six program types: Non-Residential – Participants reside outside of the program facility while receiving treatment/recovery

services.

• Day Care Programs provide counseling and recovery services to persons who have drug and/or alcohol-related problems. The primary purpose of these services is to provide a planned treatment program in a social setting structured to maximize recovery and rehabilitation of participants. Services include individual and group counseling sessions, alcohol and drug education classes, health and fitness activities, and social/recreational activities. The services are usually available a minimum of six hours per day, six days per week.

• Narcotic Treatment Detoxification Programs administer or furnish methadone and/or levo-alpha-

acetylmethadol (LAAM) in decreasing doses, for a period not to exceed 21 days, to assist an individuals’ withdrawal from dependency on heroin or other morphine-like drugs. Services include intakes and physical examinations, casework services, individualized treatment plans, body fluid tests, coordination of additional services with other agencies, and referrals to other resources.

• Narcotic Treatment Maintenance Programs administer methadone/LAAM, at relatively stable dosage

levels for a period in excess of 21 days, as an oral substitute narcotic drug. The treatment protocol is accompanied by ancillary social and medical services for individuals 18 years of age or older who have a history of two or more years of dependence on heroin or other morphine-like drugs and two or more failures in alternative treatment programs. Services include intakes and assessments, body fluid tests, group and family counseling sessions, crisis intervention sessions, coordinating additional services with other agencies, and participant follow-ups.

• Outpatient Counseling Programs provide crisis intervention, counseling, and participant referral services

to individuals affected by alcohol and/or drug-related problems. Services include screenings and assessments, development of treatment plans, individual and group counseling sessions, mutual self-help groups, coordination of services with other agencies, and referral to other resources. Outpatient counseling is designed to provide an alcohol and drug-free structured environment that encourages and supports a participant’s effort to improve his/her level of functioning.

Residential – Participants reside in a drug-free program facility, operating on a 24-hour per day basis,

receiving food and shelter as part of the treatment/recovery service. • Residential Detoxification Services provide care and treatment for persons suffering from alcohol and/or

drug withdrawal symptoms in a non-medical setting. These services are generally offered as preparation for entry into a treatment and recovery program, therefore, medical and psychological supports are provided. Services include physical examination and medical history, medication as needed, recidivism counseling, referrals to other resources, and after care planning.

• Residential Services provides a 24-hour live-in, drug-free treatment environment for persons with drug

and/or alcohol-related problems. Participants are involved in no less than six hours of planned treatment activities per day under the supervision of trained staff. Services include intakes and assessments, room and meals, crisis intervention sessions, individual and group counseling sessions, mutual self-help group discussions, and social/recreational activities.

Chapter 2

-8-

Admissions by Division and Program Type As shown in Table 2.1, a total of 56,411 participant program admissions were reported during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year. Approximately two-thirds of the reported participant admissions were to non-residential programs.

Table 2.1- Admissions by Division and Program Type 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Admissions

Division/Program Type Number Percent

Non-Residential Division 38,645 68.5

Day Care – 1,933 (5.0%)

Narcotic Treatment Detoxification – 367 (0.9%)

Narcotic Treatment Maintenance – 2,844 (7.4%)

Outpatient Counseling – 33,501 (86.7%)

Residential Division 17,766 31.5

Detoxification – 4,486 (25.3%)

Residential Services – 13,280 (74.7%)

Total 56,411 100.0


Non-Residential Program Admission Trends Table 2.2 shows non-residential program admission trends over five fiscal years, 2002-03 to 2006-07. Overall, the number of non-residential program admissions increased from a low of 28,752 in 2002-03 to a high of 38,645 in 2006-07. Outpatient counseling programs accounted for the majority of non-residential admissions each fiscal year. Over the five fiscal years, outpatient counseling admissions increased by 47.0%, while day care admissions increased by 4.0%. Narcotic treatment detoxification program admissions doubled from 2002-03 to 2003-04 (2,303 to 5,216), with significant decreases in annual admissions each of the following fiscal years (1,553, 706, and 367). Narcotic treatment maintenance program admissions have fluctuated over the five fiscal years, ranging from a low of 1,794 in one year to a high of 3,834 in another fiscal year.

Table 2.2 - Number of Non-Residential Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

Non-Residential Admissions

Fiscal Year Day Care NTP

Detoxification NTP

Maintenance Outpatient Total

2002-03 1,858 2,303 1,794 22,797 28,752

2003-04 1,971 5,216 3,658 27,756 38,601

2004-05 1,941 1,553 3,834 31,733 39,061

2005-06 1,909 706 2,425 31,254 36,294

2006-07 1,933 367 2,844 33,501 38,645


Chapter 2

-9-

Residential Program Admission Trends Table 2.3 shows five fiscal years of participant admission trends for residential programs. During the five-year time period, annual residential program admissions fluctuated between a low of 17,766 (2006-07) and a high of 19,903 (2004-05). Each fiscal year, the majority (73.8%) of residential participant admissions were to long-term residential treatment programs. Approximately 25.0% or 1 out of every 4 of the annual participant admission was to a short-term, residential detoxification program. During the first two fiscal years , 2002-03 and 2003-04, there was a small increase in the number of annual participant admissions to residential detoxification programs followed by a decrease in the number of annual admissions each of the following three fiscal years.

Table 2.3 - Number of Residential Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

Residential Admissions

Fiscal Year Detoxification Residential Total

2002-03 5,235 13,161 18,396

2003-04 5,495 13,815 19,310

2004-05 5,161 14,742 19,903

2005-06 4,504 15,218 19,722

2006-07 4,486 13,280 17,766


Chapter 2

-10-

Day Care Program Participant Demographics During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 1,824 unique participants accounted for 1,933 admissions to day care programs; 104 (5.7%) of these participants had two or more admissions. According to Table 2.4, several key day care program participant findings are:

• 77.7% were female; • 57.1% were between 25 and 44 years of age; • most were Hispanic/Latino (36.0%) or Black/African American (32.9%); and • 40.9% reported methamphetamine as their primary drug problem.

Table 2.4 – Day Care Program Participant Demographics 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Demographics Number Percent

Admissions 1,933 100.0

Participants 1,824 100.0

Gender

Male 406 22.3 Female 1,418 77.7

Race/Ethnicity

White 400 21.9 Black/African American 600 32.9 Hispanic/Latino 657 36.0 Native American 22 1.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 61 3.3 Other 84 4.6

Age

18 – 20 295 16.2 21 – 24 296 16.2 25 – 44 1,042 57.1 45 – 64 188 10.3 65 – Over 3 0.2

Education

None 21 1.2 1 – 8 years 104 5.7 9 – 12 years 1,476 80.9 13 or more years 223 12.2

Employment Status

Employed 162 8.9 Unemployed 1,304 71.5 Not in the labor force 358 19.6

Primary Drug Problem

Alcohol 254 13.9 Cocaine/Crack 338 18.5 Heroin 38 2.1 Marijuana/Hashish 416 22.8 Methamphetamine 746 40.9 Other 32 1.8


Chapter 2

-11-

Day Care Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 2.5 shows that with the exception of 2002-03 Fiscal Year, methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for day care program participants. Over the last three fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07), approximately 4 out of 10 participants reported methamphetamine as their primary drug problem. Conversely, there has been a steady decrease in the percentage of participants who reported cocaine/crack as their primary drug problem. Cocaine/crack as a primary drug dropped from 35.0% in 2002-03 to 18.5% in 2006-07. Also, during the five-year period, the percentage of marijuana/hashish users almost doubled, from 12.0% in 2002-03 to 22.8% in 2006-07.

Table 2.5 – Day Care Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Primary Drug Problem # % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 253 14.5 248 13.4 212 12.1 228 13.0 254 13.9

Cocaine/Crack 610 35.0 560 30.3 480 27.4 417 23.7 338 18.5

Heroin 87 5.0 79 4.3 60 3.4 47 2.7 38 2.1

Marijuana/Hashish 210 12.0 244 13.2 274 15.6 299 17.0 416 22.8

Methamphetamine 477 27.3 642 34.7 670 38.2 725 41.2 746 40.9

Other 108 6.2 77 4.2 59 3.4 43 2.4 32 1.8

Total 1,745 100.0 1,850 100.0 1,755 100.0 1,759 100.0 1,824 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Day Care Program Participant Discharge Status Trends Table 2.6 shows that during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 48.7% of day care program participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at discharge; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. The five fiscal year positive treatment compliance average was 40.1%.

Table 2.6 – Day Care Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Participant Discharge Status # % # % # % # % # %

Number of Discharges 1,231 100.0 1,272 100.0 764 100.0 905 100.0 1,037 100.0

Positive Compliance 501 40.7 450 35.4 276 36.1 360 39.8 505 48.7

Completed Treatment 157 12.8 158 12.4 116 15.2 188 20.8 272 26.2

Left – Satisfactory 344 27.9 292 23.0 160 20.9 172 19.0 233 22.5

Negative Compliance 730 59.3 822 64.6 488 63.9 545 60.2 532 51.3

Left – Unsatisfactory 730 59.3 822 64.6 488 63.9 545 60.2 532 51.3


Chapter 2

-12-

Narcotic Treatment Detoxification Program Participant Demographics As shown in Table 2.7, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 308 participants accounted for 367 admissions to narcotic treatment detoxification programs; 50 (16.2%) of these participants had two or more admissions. According to statistical findings:

• 68.8% were male; • 62.7% were between 45 and 64 years of age; • the majority of participants were Hispanic/Latino (57.5%); and • 97.7% of the participants reported heroin as their primary drug problem.

Table 2.7 – Narcotic Treatment Program (NTP) Detoxification Participant Demographics

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 367 100.0

Participants 308 100.0

Gender

Male 212 68.8 Female 96 31.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 1.6 21 – 24 10 3.2 25 – 44 93 30.2 45 – 64 193 62.7 65 – Over 7 2.3

Education

None 1 0.3 1 – 8 years 14 4.5 9 – 12 years 254 82.5 13 or more years 39 12.7

Employment Status

Employed 14 4.5 Unemployed 257 83.4 Not in the labor force 37 12.0


Heroin 301 97.7 Non-Prescription Methadone 0 0.0 Other Opiates and Synthetics 6 1.9 OxyContin 1 0.3


Chapter 2

-13-

NTP Detoxification Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Narcotic treatment programs, by design, provide methadone/LAAM services to participants who have heroin or other morphine-like primary drug problems. As anticipated, each fiscal year almost all participants in narcotic treatment detoxification programs reported heroin (94.5 - 98.4%) as their primary drug problem (Table 2.8).

Table 2.8 – NTP Detoxification Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Heroin 1,579 98.4 3,235 96.1 1,269 94.5 569 95.3 301 97.7

Non-Prescription Methadone 0 0.0 2 0.1 4 0.3 1 0.2 0 0.0

Other Opiates and Synthetics 25 1.6 131 3.9 70 5.2 27 4.5 6 1.9

OxyContin 1 0.3

Total 1,604 100.0 3,368 100.0 1,343 100.0 597 100.0 308 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System NTP Detoxification Participant Discharge Status Trends As shown in Table 2.9, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 30.6% of the narcotic treatment detoxification program participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at discharge; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. The percent of participants discharged with a positive compliance status increased from 43.8% in 2003-04 to 50.6% in 2005-06. However, in 2006-07, positive treatment compliance dropped to 30.6%. The five-year positive treatment compliance average was 43.3%.

Table 2.9 – NTP Detoxification Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Number of Discharges 2,115 100.0 4,493 100.0 1,101 100.0 543 100.0 389 100.0

Positive Compliance 928 43.9 1,970 43.8 522 47.4 275 50.6 119 30.6


Left – Satisfactory 506 23.9 1,269 28.2 280 25.4 106 19.5 52 13.4

Negative Compliance 1,187 56.1 2,523 56.2 579 52.6 268 49.4 270 69.4

Left – Unsatisfactory 1,187 56.1 2,523 56.2 579 52.6 268 49.4 270 69.4


Chapter 2

-14-

Narcotic Treatment Maintenance Program Participant Demographics According to Table 2.10, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 2,491 participants accounted for 2,844 admissions to narcotic treatment maintenance programs; 288 (11.6%) of these participants had two or more admissions. According to statistical findings:

• 63.3% were male; • 56.1% were between 45 and 64 years of age; • most participants were Hispanic/Latino (38.2%) or White (34.5%); and • 92.3% of the participants reported heroin as their primary drug problem.

Table 2.10 – NTP Maintenance Participant Demographics 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 1,578 63.3 Female 913 36.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 0.5 21 – 24 51 2.0 25 – 44 884 35.5 45 – 64 1,398 56.1 65 – Over 145 5.8

Education


Employment Status



Heroin 2,298 92.3 Non-Prescription Methadone 14 0.6 Other Opiates and Synthetics 173 6.9 OxyContin 6 0.2


Chapter 2

-15-

NTP Maintenance Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Narcotic treatment programs, by design, provide methadone/LAAM services to participants who have heroin or other morphine-like primary drug problems. Each fiscal year, 9 out of 10 participants in narcotic treatment maintenance programs reported heroin as their primary drug problem (Tables 2.11).

Table 2.11 – NTP Maintenance Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Heroin 1,425 92.2 3,006 94.4 3,274 93.4 1,909 92.9 2,298 92.3

Non-Prescription Methadone 1 0.1 3 0.1 22 0.6 11 0.5 14 0.6

Other Opiates and Synthetics 119 7.7 174 5.5 208 5.9 136 6.6 173 6.6

OxyContin 6 0.2

Total 1,545 100.0 3,183 100.0 3,504 100.0 2,056 100.0 2,491 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System NTP Maintenance Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 2.12, in 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 28.7% of the narcotic treatment maintenance program participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at discharge; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. Among narcotic treatment maintenance participants, the highest positive treatment compliance assessment was in 2002-03 at 38.0%. The five-year positive treatment compliance average was 28.4%.

Table 2.12 – NTP Maintenance Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07


Number of Discharges 977 100.0 1,669 100.0 700 100.0 630 100.0 541 100.0




Negative Compliance 606 62.0 1,212 72.6 525 75.0 485 77.0 386 71.3

Left – Unsatisfactory 606 62.0 1,212 72.6 525 75.0 485 77.0 386 71.3


Chapter 2

-16-

Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Demographics Table 2.13 shows that during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 29,262 participants accounted for 33,501 admissions to outpatient counseling programs; 3,629 (12.4%) of these participants had two or more admissions. Several key statistics in Table 2.13 are:

• 66.1% were male; • 54.8% were between 25 and 44 years of age; • most were Hispanic/Latino (37.1%), Black/African American (27.6%) or White (25.9%); and • methamphetamine (32.1%), cocaine/crack (24.1%), and alcohol (21.9%) were the primary

drug problems reported by outpatient counseling participants.

Table 2.13 – Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Demographics

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 19,340 66.1 Female 9,922 33.9

Race/Ethnicity

White 7,579 25.9 Black/African American 8,078 27.6 Hispanic/Latino 10,870 37.1 Native American 282 1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 1,082 3.7 Other 1,371 4.7

Age

18 – 20 1,637 5.6 21 – 24 3,176 10.9 25 – 44 16,034 54.8 45 – 64 7,958 27.2 65 – Over 457 1.6

Education

None 865 3.0 1 – 8 years 1,595 5.5 9 – 12 years 22,617 77.3 13 or more years 4,185 14.3

Employment Status

Employed 7,633 26.1 Unemployed 17,778 60.8 Not in the labor force 3,851 13.2


Alcohol 6,398 21.9 Cocaine/Crack 7,043 24.1 Heroin 1,288 4.4 Marijuana/Hashish 4,299 14.7 Methamphetamine 9,407 32.1 Other 827 2.8


Chapter 2

-17-

Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends According to Table 2.14, most outpatient counseling program participants reported alcohol, cocaine/crack, or methamphetamine as their primary drug problem each fiscal year. Since 2003-04 Fiscal Year, methamphetamine has been the most frequently reported primary drug problem for outpatient counseling participants. From 2002-03 to 2005-06, the percentage of methamphetamine users increased each year (25.2 - 33.1%). Between 2005-06 and 2006-07 fiscal years, the percentage of participants reporting methamphetamine as their primary problem remained relatively constant (33.1% and 32.1%, respectively). Alcohol and marijuana were the other prominently reported primary problems.

Table 2.14 – Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 4,652 22.3 5,746 23.2 6,110 22.5 5,782 21.2 6,398 21.9

Cocaine/Crack 6,016 28.9 6,473 26.1 6,632 24.4 6,674 24.5 7,043 24.1

Heroin 1,294 6.2 1,366 5.5 1,410 5.2 1,358 5.0 1,288 4.4

Marijuana/Hashish 2,614 12.5 3,233 13.1 4,090 15.0 3,676 13.5 4,299 14.7


Other 1,008 4.8 1,200 4.8 1,023 3.8 752 2.8 827 2.8

Total 20,831 100.0 24,765 100.0 27,188 100.0 27,280 100.0 29,262 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 2.15, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 50.7% of participants in outpatient counseling programs were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. The five-year positive treatment compliance average was 43.2%.

Table 2.15 – Outpatient Counseling Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %




Left – Satisfactory 3,188 22.2 2,981 19.6 2,203 17.8 2,336 17.3 2,396 16.0




Chapter 2

-18-

Residential Detoxification Program Participant Demographics As shown in Table 2.16, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 3,895 participants accounted for 4,486 admissions to residential detoxification programs; 458 (11.8%) of these participants had two or more admissions. The following are key statistical findings:

• 71.5% were male; • 54.6% were between 25 and 44 years of age; • most participants were White (47.4%) or Hispanic/Latino (37.7%); and • heroin (41.6%) and alcohol (25.8%) were the most frequently reported primary drug

problems.

Table 2.16 – Residential Detoxification Program Participant Demographics

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 2,786 71.5 Female 1,109 28.5

Race/Ethnicity

White 1,846 47.4 Black/African American 303 7.8 Hispanic/Latino 1,469 37.7 Native American 56 1.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 66 1.7 Other 155 4.0

Age

18 – 20 124 3.2 21 – 24 289 7.4 25 – 44 2,127 54.6 45 – 64 1,324 34.0 65 – Over 31 0.8

Education

None 22 0.6 1 – 8 years 142 3.6 9 – 12 years 2,653 68.1 13 or more years 1,078 27.7

Employment Status



Alcohol 1,006 25.8 Cocaine/Crack 244 6.3 Heroin 1,622 41.6 Marijuana/Hashish 37 0.9 Methamphetamine 495 12.7 Other 491 12.6


Chapter 2

-19-

Residential Detoxification Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends As shown in Table 2.17, for each of the five fiscal years, heroin was the most frequently reported primary drug problem. Alcohol was the second prominent primary drug problem reported by program participants. Over the five-year period (2002-03 to 2006-07), the percent of participants reporting methamphetamine use as their primary drug problem almost doubled (7.7 - 12.7%).

Table 2.17 – Residential Detoxification Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 1,036 23.2 1,075 23.2 1,061 23.7 960 24.2 1,006 25.8

Cocaine/Crack 391 8.8 349 7.5 459 10.2 295 7.4 244 6.3

Heroin 2,180 48.9 2,178 46.9 1,917 42.8 1,722 43.3 1,622 41.6



Other 486 10.9 555 12.0 431 9.6 407 10.2 491 12.6

Total 4,462 100.0 4,641 100.0 4,483 100.0 3,973 100.0 3,895 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Residential Detoxification Program Participant Discharge Status Trends Table 2.18 shows that during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 77.3% of the residential detoxification program participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at discharge; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. The five-year positive treatment compliance average was 74.2%.

Table 2.18 – Residential Detoxification Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07





Left - Satisfactory 1,909 37.7 1,818 34.6 898 19.3 401 9.4 406 9.0

Negative Compliance 1,503 29.7 1,589 30.3 1,200 25.8 881 20.7 1,018 22.7

Left - Unsatisfactory 1,503 29.7 1,589 30.3 1,200 25.8 881 20.7 1,018 22.7


Chapter 2

-20-

Residential Services Program Participant Demographics Table 2.19 shows that during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 11,871 participants accounted for 13,280 admissions to residential services programs; 1,236 (10.4%) of these participants had two or more admissions. According to statistical findings:

• 64.4% were male; • 58.3% were between 25 and 44 years of age; • most participants admitted to residential services were White (34.2%), Hispanic/Latino

(29.2%), or Black/African American (28.9%); and • most residential services program participants reported methamphetamine (36.0%) or

cocaine/crack (28.5%) as their primary drug problem.

Table 2.19 – Residential Services Program

Participant Demographics 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 7,649 64.4 Female 4,222 35.6

Race/Ethnicity

White 4,055 34.2 Black/African American 3,426 28.9 Hispanic/Latino 3,471 29.2 Native American 206 1.7 Asian/Pacific Islander 300 2.5 Other 413 3.5

Age

18 – 20 594 5.0 21 – 24 1,451 12.2 25 – 44 6,922 58.3 45 – 64 2,867 24.2 65 – Over 37 0.3

Education


Employment Status

Employed 618 5.2 Unemployed 9,745 82.1 Not in the labor force 1,508 12.7


Alcohol 2,215 18.7 Cocaine/Crack 3,382 28.5 Heroin 1,060 8.9 Marijuana/Hashish 651 5.5 Methamphetamine 4,277 36.0 Other 286 2.4


Chapter 2

-21-

Residential Services Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 2.20 shows that for three out of five fiscal years, methamphetamine was the primary drug problem for a third of the residential services program participants. The percent of participants reporting methamphetamine as their primary drug problem increased from 24.6% in 2002-03 to 36.4% in 2005-06 and then remained stable for the last fiscal year (2006-07). Approximately 5.0% of the participants reported marijuana as their primary drug problem each fiscal year. Over the five fiscal years, there was a slight decrease (10.5 - 8.9%) in participants reporting heroin as their primary problem. The percent of residential services program participants reporting alcohol as their primary drug problem decreased from 24.0% in 2002-03 to 18.8% in 2004-05 and then stayed constant for the two remaining fiscal years (2005-06 and 2006-07).

Table 2.20 – Residential Services Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Primary Drug Problem # % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 2,774 24.0 2,695 22.2 2,281 18.8 2,507 18.4 2,215 18.7

Cocaine/Crack 3,803 32.9 3,792 31.2 3,615 29.8 3,938 28.8 3,382 28.5

Heroin 1,217 10.5 1,269 10.4 1,186 9.8 1,239 9.1 1,060 8.9



Other 406 3.5 412 3.4 333 2.7 312 2.3 286 2.4

Total 11,575 100.0 12,146 100.0 12,135 100.0 13,661 100.0 11,871 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Residential Services Program Participant Discharge Status Trends Table 2.21 shows that during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 68.6% of the residential services program participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status; they were successful in complying with their treatment plan. Each fiscal year the majority of residential services program participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment at discharge. The five-year positive treatment compliance average was 63.4%.

Table 2.21 – Residential Services Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %








CChhaapptteerr 33 –– LLAACC AAllccoohhooll aanndd DDrruugg TTrreeaattmmeenntt PPrrooggrraamm SSppeecciiaall PPooppuullaattiioonnss

-22-

Introduction Special populations described in this chapter include criminal justice defendants, homeless individuals, needle users, persons with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems, pregnant and parenting women, and public assistance recipients. Trend statistics covering program admissions, participant demographics, reported primary drug problems, and treatment outcomes are provided for each special population. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, the following special populations received alcohol and/or drug treatment/recovery services.

California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids’ Recipients

Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorders

Drug Court Defendants

Female Offenders Project

General Relief Recipients

Homeless Individuals

Needle Users

Perinatal Services Network

Pregnant Women

Prison Parolee Network

Proposition 36 Defendants

CChhaapptteerr 33

-23-

California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids’ Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Under the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, adults receiving cash assistance through Temporary Aid to Needy Families [(TANF), which replaced Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program] have an 18 to 24 month limit on aid, during which time they have to engage in a set number of hours of work or work-related activity. There is a five-year lifetime limit on aid as well. When California adopted TANF, the State Legislature voted to rename California's welfare reform program California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs). Under the CalWORKs program, counties may provide additional supportive services to participants including mental health, domestic violence, and substance abuse treatment. These services are designed to remove potential barriers for participants trying to obtain and retain employment. Participants are pre-screened by Department of Public Social Services staff during CalWORKs intake to determine if there is a possible substance abuse problem. Participants identified with a possible alcohol or other drug problems are referred to ADPA-contracted Community Assessment Services Centers (CASC) for a clinical assessment. Participants identified with alcohol or other drug problems by CASC are encouraged to participate in a treatment and recovery program. ADPA's network of alcohol and other drug treatment/recovery programs provide services for CalWORKs’ recipients. Participation in these supportive services is considered a part of the welfare-to-work plan. The time spent in substance abuse treatment and recovery services normally satisfies the participant's weekly program requirement for work or job training and related activities. CalWORKs Admissions and Participants Trends

Table 3.1 shows that CalWORKs’ admissions increased by 32.5% over the first four fiscal years (2002-03 to 2005-06) and then slightly decreased in 2006-07. The number of participants followed a similar pattern as admissions. Over the five fiscal years, admissions and participants increased by 25.0% and 23.3%, respectively. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 1,945 participants accounted for the 2,194 CalWORKs’ admissions; 196 (10.1%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.1 - Total Number of CalWORKs Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 1,755 1,578

2003-04 1,757 1,593

2004-05 2,207 1,876

2005-06 2,325 2,049

2006-07 2,194 1,945


CChhaapptteerr 33

-24-

CalWORKs Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.2 shows the type of programs that provided alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services to CalWORKs’ participants over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). During this period, outpatient counseling programs had the highest (41.1 – 51.4%) percent of CalWORKs participant admissions. Residential service admissions ranged from 24.0% in 2006-07 to 33.1% in 2003-04. In 2006-07, about 10.0% of CalWORKs’ participants were admitted to a residential detoxification program compared to a 5.5% average for the previous four fiscal years (2002-03 to 2005-06). Admissions to day care programs averaged 17.0% in the five fiscal years.

Table 3.2 - CalWORKs Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 336 19.1 344 19.6 367 16.6 377 16.2 301 13.7

NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 9 0.5 3 0.1 8 0.3 0 0.0

NTP Maintenance 20 1.1 15 0.9 19 0.9 14 0.6 24 1.1

Outpatient Counseling 810 46.2 722 41.1 968 43.9 1,099 47.3 1,127 51.4

Residential Detoxification 103 5.9 85 4.8 124 5.6 129 5.5 215 9.8

Residential Services 486 27.7 582 33.1 726 32.9 698 30.0 527 24.0

Total 1,755 100.0 1,757 100.0 2,207 100.0 2,325 100.0 2,194 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System CalWORKs Program Participant Demographic Trends In Table 3.3, the majority of CalWORKs’ participants were female (80.5 - 85.7%), between 25 and 44 years of age (67.9 - 76.9%), completed 9 to 12 years of education (78.0 - 85.2%), and unemployed (74.2 - 95.0%). Most CalWORKs’ participants were Black/African American (24.4 - 34.7%), Hispanic/ Latino (35.2 - 44.3%), or White (21.5 - 25.2%). One-fourth of CalWORKs’ participants were homeless.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-25-

CalWORKs Program Participant Demographic Trends - Continued

Table 3.3 – CalWORKs Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 1,755 100.0 1,757 100.0 2,207 100.0 2,325 100.0 2,194 100.0

Participants 1,578 100.0 1,593 100.0 1,876 100.0 2,049 100.0 1,945 100.0

Gender

Male 308 19.5 228 14.3 273 14.6 314 15.3 360 18.5 Female 1,270 80.5 1,365 85.7 1,603 85.4 1,735 84.7 1,585 81.5

Race/Ethnicity

White 371 23.5 402 25.2 450 24.0 487 23.8 418 21.5 Black/African American 547 34.7 535 33.6 533 28.4 500 24.4 487 25.0 Hispanic/Latino 582 36.9 561 35.2 744 39.7 824 40.2 861 44.3 Native American 19 1.2 27 1.7 24 1.3 36 1.8 29 1.5 Asian/Pacific Islander 29 1.8 40 2.5 56 3.0 68 3.3 69 3.5 Other 30 1.9 28 1.8 69 3.7 134 6.5 81 4.2

Age

18 – 20 63 4.0 66 4.1 68 3.6 80 3.9 97 5.0 21 – 24 176 11.2 238 14.9 293 15.6 394 19.2 337 17.3 25 – 44 1,213 76.9 1,176 73.8 1,358 72.4 1,409 68.8 1,321 67.9 45 – 64 125 7.9 111 7.0 154 8.2 166 8.1 188 9.7 65 – Over 1 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.1

Education

None 8 0.5 6 0.4 11 0.6 21 1.0 23 1.2 1 – 8 years 93 5.9 80 5.0 41 2.2 103 5.0 97 5.0 9 – 12 years 1,323 83.8 1,358 85.2 1,463 78.0 1,665 81.3 1,570 80.7 13 or more years 154 9.8 149 9.4 361 19.2 260 12.7 255 13.1

Employment Status

Employed 101 6.4 80 5.0 112 6.0 163 8.0 139 7.1 Unemployed 1,477 93.6 1,513 95.0 1,533 81.7 1,520 74.2 1,479 76.0 Not in the labor force 231 12.3 366 17.9 327 16.8

Homeless

Yes 349 22.1 355 22.3 483 25.7 509 24.8 470 24.2 No 1,229 77.9 1,238 77.7 1,393 74.3 1,540 75.2 1,475 75.8


CChhaapptteerr 33

-26-

CalWORKs Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for CalWORKs’ participants as seen in Table 3.4. With the exception of 2006-07, methamphetamine prominence has grown annually from 29.2% in 2002-03 to 45.5% in 2005-06. Cocaine/crack use declined from 27.9% in 2002-03 to 15.0% in 2006-07. Between 2002-03 and 2003-04, approximately 20.0% of CalWORKs’ participants reported alcohol as their primary drug problem. Moreover, in the remaining fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07), the percent of alcohol use dropped to approximately 16.0%. There was a steady increase (10.3 - 14.8%) in participants reporting marijuana use during the five-year period.

Table 3.4 - CalWORKs Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 323 20.5 307 19.3 309 16.5 320 15.6 316 16.2

Cocaine/Crack 440 27.9 375 23.5 380 20.3 340 16.6 291 15.0

Heroin 97 6.1 84 5.3 100 5.3 97 4.7 144 7.4



Other 95 6.0 98 6.2 72 3.8 74 3.6 72 3.7

Total 1,578 100.0 1,593 100.0 1,876 100.0 2,049 100.0 1,945 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System CalWORKs Program Participant Discharge Status Trends During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 57.0% of the CalWORKs’ participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status (Table 3.5). With the exception of 2003-04, in each fiscal year, the majority of CalWORKs’ participants had positive treatment outcomes. The five-year average for positive participant treatment compliance was 52.7%.

Table 3.5 - CalWORKs Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %




Left - Satisfactory 342 25.5 256 22.2 244 22.3 271 21.7 234 18.6


Left - Unsatisfactory 633 47.3 606 52.6 511 46.8 587 47.0 541 43.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-27-

Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Individuals with co-occurring disorders have mental illness and substance abuse problems. Based on findings by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), it is estimated that five million United States adults have a serious mental illness and a co-occurring substance use disorder (SAMHSA, 2006). In Los Angeles County, 24.7% of the adult alcohol and drug admissions in 2006-07 Fiscal Year had chronic mental health problems or disabilities. The following salient points regarding individuals with co-occurring disorders are based on national and local statistics: Office of Applied Studies – The Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) Report (April 9, 2004)

• In 2001, nationally, males accounted for 56.0% and females 44.0% of the admissions for individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse problems. In Los Angeles County, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, the percentages of male (56.4%) and female (43.6%) participants were the same as what was reported nationally.

• The DASIS Report (2001) shows that nationally Whites (74.0%) constituted the majority of

admissions identified for individuals with co-occurring disorders, followed by Blacks (15.0%) and Hispanic/Latinos (7.0%). In Los Angeles County, however, Whites comprised only 38.9% of participants with co-occurring disorders in 2006-07, 31.0% Blacks and 21.0% Hispanic/Latinos.

• Nationally (2001), alcohol was more likely to be the reported primary substance of abuse for admissions (45.0%) of individuals with co-occurring disorders. Opiates (21.0%), cocaine (11.0%), and marijuana (13.0%) were less likely to be the primary substances of abuse. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, in Los Angeles County, one-third (32.7%) of participants reported alcohol followed by cocaine/crack (23.6%) and methamphetamine (19.1%). During this same period, heroin (10.8%) and marijuana/hashish (9.3%) were less likely to be substances of abuse for participants identified with co-occurring disorders.

• In 2001, about 60.0% of national admissions for individuals with co-occurring disorders were to ambulatory/non-residential settings. Residential/rehabilitative settings accounted for 22.0% of the admissions and the remaining admissions were detoxification services (19.0%). In Los Angeles County, the majority (70.8%) of admissions for participants with co-occurring disorders were to a non-residential program, day care (3.3%), narcotic treatment detoxification and maintenance (4.3%), and outpatient counseling (63.2%). Residential services’ programs accounted for 22.1% of the admissions and 7.1% were to residential detoxification programs.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-28-

Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Admissions and Participant Trends For individuals with co-occurring disorders, the number of admissions and participants steady increased each fiscal year (Table 3.6). Over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the number of admissions and participants more than doubled. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, there were 11,791 participants which accounted for 13,932 admissions to alcohol and drug treatment programs; 1,684 (14.3%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.6 - Total Number of Co-Occurring Disorder Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year

Treatment/Recovery Programs Fiscal Year

Admissions Participants

2002-03 6,407 5,672

2003-04 7,598 6,651

2004-05 10,057 8,618

2005-06 12,263 10,395

2006-07 13,932 11,791

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.7 shows that over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07) the number of admissions to outpatient counseling programs increased each fiscal year. In 2006-07, the majority (63.2%) of participants with co-occurring disorders received services from an outpatient counseling program. Admissions to residential services ranged from a 28.8% in 2002-03 to 22.1% in 2006-07. Over the five-year period, the percent of admissions to residential detoxification programs declined from 14.5% to 7.1%.

Table 3.7 – Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 407 6.4 341 4.5 428 4.3 425 3.5 459 3.3


NTP Maintenance 195 3.0 276 3.6 410 4.1 421 3.4 512 3.7


Residential Detoxification 927 14.5 1,164 15.3 1,188 11.8 1,039 8.5 994 7.1


Total 6,407 100.0 7,598 100.0 10,057 100.0 12,263 100.0 13,932 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-29-

Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Program Participant Demographic Trends Table 3.8 shows that the demographics for participants with co-occurring disorders remained relatively stable over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). The majority of participants were male (56.3 - 56.4%), unemployed (70.7 - 93.9%), and reported between 9 to 12 years of education (70.5 -75.8%). Most participants were White (38.9 - 43.7%), Black/African American (30.0 - 32.2%), or Hispanic/Latino (19.3 - 21.0%). The percent of participants with co-occurring disorders who reported being homeless decreased from 29.1% in 2002-03 to 20.5% in 2006-07.

Table 3.8 – Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 6,407 100.0 7,598 100.0 10,057 100.0 12,263 100.0 13,932 100.0

Participants 5,672 100.0 6,651 100.0 8,618 100.0 10,395 100.0 11,791 100.0

Gender

Male 3,135 55.3 3,724 56.0 4,842 56.2 5,859 56.4 6,655 56.4 Female 2,537 44.7 2,927 44.0 3,776 43.8 4,536 43.6 5,136 43.6

Race/Ethnicity

White 2,434 42.9 2,909 43.7 3,544 41.1 4,102 39.5 4,585 38.9 Black/African American 1,828 32.2 1,970 29.6 2,627 30.5 3,122 30.0 3,657 31.0 Hispanic/Latino 1,095 19.3 1,390 20.9 1,802 20.9 2,138 20.6 2,476 21.0 Native American 86 1.5 113 1.7 154 1.8 156 1.5 173 1.5 Asian/Pacific Islander 88 1.6 121 1.8 227 2.6 298 2.9 390 3.3 Other 141 2.5 148 2.2 264 3.1 579 5.6 510 4.3

Age

18 – 20 113 2.0 110 1.7 243 2.8 253 2.4 346 2.9 21 – 24 405 7.1 469 7.1 642 7.4 782 7.5 820 7.0 25 – 44 3,487 61.5 3,935 59.2 4,836 56.1 5,536 53.3 5,791 49.1 45 – 64 1,645 29.0 2,102 31.6 2,832 32.9 3,662 35.2 4,573 38.8 65 – Over 22 0.4 35 0.5 65 0.8 162 1.6 261 2.2

Education

None 29 0.5 25 0.4 72 0.8 223 2.1 241 2.0 1 – 8 years 292 5.1 306 4.6 186 2.2 497 4.8 670 5.7 9 – 12 years 4,190 73.9 5,044 75.8 6,072 70.5 7,544 72.6 8,624 73.1 13 or more years 1,161 20.5 1,276 19.2 2,288 26.5 2,131 20.5 2,256 19.1

Employment Status

Employed 347 6.1 496 7.5 668 7.8 755 7.3 865 7.3 Unemployed 5,325 93.9 6,155 92.5 6,687 77.6 7,554 72.7 8,342 70.7 Not in the labor force 1,263 14.7 2,086 20.1 2,584 21.9

Homeless

Yes 1,648 29.1 1,601 24.1 2,057 23.9 2,398 23.1 2,422 20.5 No 4,024 70.9 5,050 75.9 6,561 76.1 7,997 76.9 9,369 79.5


CChhaapptteerr 33

-30-

Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Over the five fiscal years, alcohol was the most prominent drug abused by participants with co-occurring disorders (Table 3.9). Cocaine/crack was the second most frequently reported drug problem for participants with co-occurring disorders; with a five-year average of 24.7%. There were relatively constant patterns of abuse for heroin (10.8 - 15.4%), marijuana (7.0 - 9.3%), and methamphetamine (15.9 - 21.3%) during this five-year period.

Table 3.9 – Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 1,627 28.7 1,838 27.6 2,368 27.5 3,049 29.3 3,854 32.7

Cocaine/Crack 1,484 26.2 1,616 24.3 2,138 24.8 2,546 24.5 2,779 23.6

Heroin 873 15.4 1,133 17.0 1,285 14.9 1,289 12.4 1,278 10.8

Marijuana/Hashish 399 7.0 484 7.3 666 7.7 833 8.0 1,100 9.3

Methamphetamine 901 15.9 1,134 17.1 1,669 19.4 2,215 21.3 2,253 19.1

Other 388 6.8 446 6.7 492 5.7 463 4.5 527 4.5

Total 5,672 100.0 6,651 100.0 8,618 100.0 10,395 100.0 11,791 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Co-Occurring (Mental Illness and Substance Abuse) Disorder Program Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 3.10, for each of the five fiscal years, more than half of the participants identified with co-occurring disorders were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 55.6%.

Table 3.10 – Co-Occurring Disorder Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07







Left - Unsatisfactory 2,050 45.3 2,330 47.1 2,092 44.2 2,914 45.2 2,743 40.1


CChhaapptteerr 33

-31-

Drug Court Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Drug Court is a full or part-time court that has specifically been designated and staffed to supervise non-violent drug defendants who have been referred to a comprehensive and judicially monitored program of drug treatment and rehabilitation services. First established in Los Angeles in 1994, there are currently 13 operational adult Drug Courts located throughout the County. The Drug Court Judge heads a non-adversarial team of court officers (defense attorneys, prosecution attorneys, and treatment counselors) designated to support the participant’s recovery through intensive supervision, drug treatment services, frequent drug testing, and court appearances. The goals of drug court programs are to:

• reduce drug usage and recidivism;

• provide court supervised treatment; and

• offer the capability to integrate drug treatment with other rehabilitation services to promote long-term recovery and reduce social costs.

Drug Court Admissions and Participants Trends Table 3.11 shows that the number of program admissions and participants decreased from 2002-03 to 2004-05 (16.0% and 19.0%, respectively). In 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 2,018 program participants accounted for 2,418 admissions; 335 (16.6%) of these participants had two or more admissions. Drug court admissions represent 4.3% (2,418 out of 56,411) of all admissions to County-funded alcohol and drug treatment programs.

Table 3.11 - Total Number of Drug Court Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 2,396 2,024

2003-04 2,063 1,697

2004-05 2,013 1,639

2005-06 2,317 1,886

2006-07 2,418 2,018


CChhaapptteerr 33

-32-

Drug Court Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.12 indicates that the majority of drug court admissions (53.1 - 71.5%) were to outpatient counseling services. Admissions to residential services rose in 2003-04 followed by a steady decline each of the three remaining fiscal years.

Table 3.12 – Drug Court Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %



Total 2,396 100.0 2,063 100.0 2,013 100.0 2,317 100.0 2,418 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Drug Court Program Participant Demographic Trends Table 3.13 shows the demographics for drug court participants remained fairly constant over the five fiscal years. According to statistical findings for 2006-07 Fiscal Year:

• 72.4% were male • 61.7% were between 25 and 44 years of age • 45.4% were Hispanic/Latino, 20.9% were White, and 26.3% were Black/African American • 73.2% were employed • 11.7% were homeless

CChhaapptteerr 33

-33-

Drug Court Program Participant Demographic Trends – Continued

Table 3.13 – Drug Court Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 2,396 100.0 2,063 100.0 2,013 100.0 2,317 100.0 2,418 100.0

Participants 2,024 100.0 1,697 100.0 1,639 100.0 1,886 100.0 2,018 100.0

Gender

Male 1,454 71.8 1,197 70.5 1,174 71.6 1,360 72.1 1,462 72.4 Female 570 28.2 500 29.5 465 28.4 526 27.9 556 27.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 77 3.8 62 3.7 85 5.2 88 4.7 87 4.3 21 – 24 252 12.5 217 12.8 215 13.1 251 13.3 224 11.1 25 – 44 1,349 66.7 1,078 63.5 1,050 64.1 1,163 61.7 1,246 61.7 45 – 64 345 17.0 336 19.8 284 17.3 378 20.0 452 22.4 65 – Over 1 0.0 4 0.2 5 0.3 6 0.3 9 0.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 467 23.1 475 28.0 300 18.3 247 13.1 237 11.7 No 1,557 76.9 1,222 72.0 1,339 81.7 1,639 86.9 1,781 88.3


CChhaapptteerr 33

-34-

Drug Court Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 3.14 shows that methamphetamine surpassed cocaine/crack as the most frequently reported primary drug problem for drug court participants in 2005-06. The percent of participants reporting methamphetamine use increased from 25.0% in 2002-03 to 42.6% in 2005-06 and then remained constant in 2005-06. During the five fiscal years, alcohol (4.2 - 6.2%), heroin (10.1 - 12.7%), and marijuana/hashish (4.8 - 5.9%) use remained fairly stable.

Table 3.14 – Drug Court Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 126 6.2 86 5.1 72 4.4 79 4.2 100 5.0

Cocaine/Crack 959 47.4 815 48.0 644 39.3 678 35.9 738 36.6

Heroin 258 12.7 203 12.0 169 10.3 195 10.3 204 10.1



Other 59 2.9 48 2.8 36 2.2 29 1.5 31 1.5

Total 2,024 100.0 1,697 100.0 1,639 100.0 1,886 100.0 2,018 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Drug Court Program Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 3.15, the majority (66.0 – 72.4%) of drug court participants received a positive treatment compliance assessment each of the five fiscal years. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 69.1%.

Table 3.15 – Drug Court Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %


Positive Compliance 1,143 68.6 825 67.7 735 70.9 801 66.0 942 72.4




Left – Unsatisfactory 524 31.4 394 32.3 301 29.1 412 34.0 359 27.6


CChhaapptteerr 33

-35-

Female Offender Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs The Female Offender Program (FOTP) represents a joint effort by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP), and ADPA. This project was first implemented during the 1992-93 Fiscal Year. FOTP provides community residential alcohol and drug treatment and recovery services to women parolees in four counties – Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino. Primary referrals are female parolees graduated from the California Institute of Women (CIW) in-prison Forever Free Drug Program and women on community parole. Female inmates from the CIW in Frontera, who are paroled to Los Angeles County, voluntarily participate in community-based residential alcohol and drug treatment/recovery for up to six months. The program objectives are:

• Provide up to six months of residential drug treatment services to each parolee who has graduated from the CIW in-prison Forever Free Drug Program and women on community parole.

• Improve female parolee treatment outcomes as evidenced by fewer drug-related revocations

and related criminal violations.

• Support the parolee’s reintegration into society by encouraging a clean and sober lifestyle.

• Reduce State General Fund costs for incarceration and parole supervision. Female Offender Admissions and Participants Trends Table 3.16 shows that the number of admissions fluctuated over the five fiscal years, ranging from a low of 89 in 2003-04 to a high of 111 in 2004-05. The number of female offender participants has seen only minimal fluctuations during this five-year period. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 97 participants accounted for 102 admissions; 5 (5.2%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.16 - Total Number of Female Offender Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 92 87

2003-04 89 83

2004-05 111 96

2005-06 106 98

2006-07 102 97


CChhaapptteerr 33

-36-

Female Offender Program Participant Admissions by Program Type As shown in Table 3.17, female offenders participated in residential services’ programs. The residential setting offers a more structured drug-free environment to assist with the parolees’ transition back into the community.

Table 3.17 – Female Offender Program Participants Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %


Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Female Offender Program Participant Demographic Trends As shown in Table 3.18, during the five fiscal years, the majority of female offenders were between 25 and 44 years of age (69.4 - 74.7%) and completed 9 to 12 years of education (71.4 - 83.1%). Most female offenders were White (26.0 - 42.3%), Black/African American (23.7 - 47.1%), or Hispanic/Latina (17.2 -31.6%). With the exception of 2005-06 Fiscal Year, over half of the female offender participants were homeless at the time of admission.

Table 3.18 – Female Offender Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 92 100.0 89 100.0 111 100.0 106 100.0 102 100.0

Participants 87 100.0 83 100.0 96 100.0 98 100.0 97 100.0

Race/Ethnicity

White 29 33.3 27 32.5 25 26.0 26 26.5 41 42.3 Black/African American 41 47.1 36 43.4 42 43.8 29 29.6 23 23.7 Hispanic/Latina 15 17.2 17 20.5 22 22.9 31 31.6 26 26.8 Native American 1 1.1 0 0.0 6 6.3 5 5.1 1 1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.0 2 2.1 Other 1 1.1 3 3.6 1 1.0 6 6.1 4 4.1

Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.0 0 0.0 21 – 24 3 3.4 2 2.4 6 6.3 8 8.2 14 14.4 25 – 44 65 74.7 60 72.3 70 72.9 68 69.4 72 74.2 45 – 64 19 21.8 21 25.3 20 20.8 21 21.4 11 11.3 65 – Over 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Education

None 0 0.0 1 1.2 1 1.0 0 0.0 1 1.0 1 – 8 years 4 4.6 2 2.4 2 2.1 7 7.1 8 8.2 9 – 12 years 64 73.6 69 83.1 74 77.1 70 71.4 76 78.4 13 or more years 19 21.8 11 13.3 19 19.8 21 21.4 12 12.4

Employment Status

Employed 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 Unemployed 87 100.0 83 100.0 84 87.5 88 89.8 87 89.7 Not in the labor force 12 12.5 9 9.2 9 9.3

Homeless

Yes 50 57.5 48 57.8 54 56.3 47 48.0 50 51.5 No 37 42.5 35 42.2 42 43.8 51 52.0 47 48.5


CChhaapptteerr 33

-37-

Female Offender Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 3.19 shows that most female offenders reported either methamphetamine or cocaine/crack as their primary drug problem during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year. Until 2006-07, cocaine/crack was the most frequently reported drug problem. Cocaine/crack use declined from 50.6% in 2002-03 to 37.1% in 2006-07. Conversely, methamphetamine prominence increased from 17.2% in 2002-03 to 44.3% in 2006-07. Over the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05), heroin was the primary drug problem for approximately 16.0% to 17.0% of female offenders. In 2005-06 and 2006-07, heroin users declined to 11.2% and 9.3%, respectively.

Table 3.19 – Female Offender Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 8 9.2 12 14.5 6 6.3 10 10.2 2 2.1

Cocaine/Crack 44 50.6 39 47.0 46 47.9 39 39.8 36 37.1

Heroin 14 16.1 14 16.9 16 16.7 11 11.2 9 9.3



Other 6 6.9 4 4.8 0 0.0 1 1.0 0 0.0

Total 87 100.0 83 100.0 96 100.0 98 100.0 97 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Female Offender Program Participant Discharge Status Trends

According to Table 3.20, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 44.9% of the female offender participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 54.0%.

Table 3.20 – Female Offender Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Number of Discharges 74 100.0 72 100.0 64 100.0 60 100.0 69 100.0







CChhaapptteerr 33

-38-

General Relief Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Existing State law (California Welfare and Institutions Code section 17000 et.seq) requires counties to maintain a general assistance program for indigent persons. Indigent persons are defined as adults, 18 years of age and older, who have no source of income or means of providing for their basic needs such as food, shelter, and clothing. In Los Angeles County, this program is known as General Relief. Effective November 1997, all adult applicants applying for General Relief are required, as a condition for eligibility, to be screened during their intake interview to determine if there is a reasonable suspicion that he or she may have a substance abuse problem. These individuals are referred to an ADPA-contracted Community Assessment Services Center (CASC) for a professional evaluation, and, if appropriate, for urinalysis screening. Participants assessed and identified with alcohol or other drug problems are required to participate in a substance abuse treatment/recovery program in order to continue to receive General Relief benefits. General Relief Admissions and Participants Trends As seen in Table 3.21, from 2002-03 to 2003-04 fiscal years, admissions increased by 56.9% (3,560 to 5,584). However, this was followed by a decrease in admissions from 4,315 in 2004-05 to 3,178 in 2006-07. The number of General Relief participants followed a similar pattern. Over the five fiscal years, admissions decreased by 10.7% and participants by 13.8%. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 2,945 participants accounted for 3,178 admissions; 205 (7.0%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.21 - Total Number of General Relief Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 3,560 3,417

2003-04 5,584 5,260

2004-05 4,315 3,882

2005-06 3,921 3,637

2006-07 3,178 2,945


CChhaapptteerr 33

-39-

General Relief Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.22 shows that the majority of General Relief participants received services from an outpatient counseling program (59.4 - 67.7%). Approximately, 3 out of 10 General Relief participants were admitted to residential services each fiscal year.

Table 3.22 – General Relief Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 34 1.0 79 1.4 3 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0


NTP Maintenance 40 1.1 10 0.2 5 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0



Residential Services 952 26.7 1,627 29.1 1,506 34.9 1,272 32.4 897 28.2

Total 3,560 100.0 5,584 100.0 4,315 100.0 3,921 100.0 3,178 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System General Relief Program Participant Demographic Trends Table 3.23 shows the demographics for General Relief participants over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). The majority of participants were male (63.2 - 70.6%), between 25 and 44 years of age (57.6 - 63.0%), completed 9 to 12 years of education (77.4 - 80.9%), and unemployed (81.9 - 90.8%). General Relief participants were mostly Hispanic/Latino (37.1 - 41.2%), Black/African-American (24.8 - 31.3%), or White (23.2 - 26.4%). Over the first two fiscal years (2002-03 to 2003-04), 3 out of every 10 participants reported being homeless and 4 out of 10 were homeless for the remaining fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07).

CChhaapptteerr 33

-40-

General Relief Program Participant Demographic Trends – Continued

Table 3.23 – General Relief Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 3,560 100.0 5,584 100.0 4,315 100.0 3,921 100.0 3,178 100.0

Participants 3,417 100.0 5,260 100.0 3,882 100.0 3,637 100.0 2,945 100.0

Gender

Male 2,413 70.6 3,518 66.9 2,511 64.7 2,298 63.2 1,870 63.5 Female 1,004 29.4 1,742 33.1 1,371 35.3 1,339 36.8 1,075 36.5

Race/Ethnicity

White 822 24.1 1,221 23.2 946 24.4 877 24.1 777 26.4 Black/African American 1,037 30.3 1,645 31.3 1,117 28.8 987 27.1 729 24.8 Hispanic/Latino 1,306 38.2 2,072 39.4 1,558 40.1 1,351 37.1 1,214 41.2 Native American 65 1.9 81 1.5 51 1.3 47 1.3 34 1.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 51 1.5 107 2.0 85 2.2 99 2.7 73 2.5 Other 136 4.0 134 2.5 125 3.2 276 7.6 118 4.0

Age

18 – 20 152 4.4 201 3.8 172 4.4 167 4.6 118 4.0 21 – 24 324 9.5 504 9.6 381 9.8 406 11.2 306 10.4 25 – 44 2,153 63.0 3,264 62.1 2,297 59.2 2,120 58.3 1,697 57.6 45 – 64 787 23.0 1,276 24.3 1,027 26.5 942 25.9 824 28.0 65 – Over 1 0.0 15 0.3 5 0.1 2 0.1 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1,078 31.5 1,671 31.8 1,534 39.5 1,443 39.7 1,199 40.7 No 2,339 68.5 3,589 68.2 2,348 60.5 2,194 60.3 1,746 59.3


CChhaapptteerr 33

-41-

General Relief Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 3.24 shows that in 2002-03, alcohol (29.4%), cocaine/crack (23.8%), and methamphetamine (21.1%) were the most frequently reported drug problems for General Relief participants. In spite of the downward trend for alcohol use, it remained the most frequently reported substance of abuse for the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05). In 2005-06, methamphetamine became the number one drug problem reported by General Relief participants. Over the five fiscal years, methamphetamine use increased each fiscal year, from 21.1% in 2002-03 to 31.6% in 2006-07. General Relief participants reporting heroin as their primary drug problem has remained constant over the five-year period, averaging 11.0%. Approximately 20.0% to 24.0% of the General Relief participants reported cocaine/crack as their primary problem each of the five fiscal years.

Table 3.24 – General Relief Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 1,004 29.4 1,469 27.9 1,090 28.1 883 24.3 684 23.2

Cocaine/Crack 813 23.8 1,274 24.2 820 21.1 738 20.3 604 20.5

Heroin 408 11.9 443 8.4 456 11.7 428 11.8 324 11.0


Methamphetamine 721 21.1 1,312 24.9 974 25.1 1,105 30.4 931 31.6

Other 111 3.2 166 3.2 103 2.7 86 2.4 70 2.4

Total 3,417 100.0 5,260 100.0 3,882 100.0 3,637 100.0 2,945 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System General Relief Program Participant Discharge Status Trends

In 2006-07, almost half (48.7%) of the General Relief participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 46.2%.

Table 3.25 – General Relief Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %


Positive Compliance 1,055 43.0 1,517 42.0 1,131 48.4 1,091 48.8 935 48.7



Negative Compliance 1,397 57.0 2,097 58.0 1,208 51.6 1,143 51.2 985 51.3

Left - Unsatisfactory 1,397 57.0 2,097 58.0 1,208 51.6 1,143 51.2 985 51.3


CChhaapptteerr 33

-42-

Homeless Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs A “homeless person” is defined as someone who is living on the street or in an emergency shelter, or who would be living on the street or in an emergency shelter without supportive housing assistance. According to the 2007 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count, there are an estimated 73,702 homeless people on any given day in the County of Los Angeles (Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority). A homeless individual is more likely to have disabling conditions such as physical or mental disability, depression, alcohol and/or drug use, or chronic health problems. A total of 50,290 homeless participants have been admitted to ADPA-funded alcohol and drug treatment programs over the last five fiscal years, 2002-03 to 2006-07. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, homeless participants were served in 315 of 410 (76.8%) of the ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment programs. They received such services as crisis intervention, screenings and assessments, individualized treatment plans, individual and group counseling sessions, and referrals. The following salient points regarding homeless program participants are based on national and local statistical findings.

• Nationally, according to The Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) Report prepared in 2006 by the Office of Applied Studies, homeless participants comprised 13.0% of all admissions to public-funded substance abuse treatment facilities in 2004. Over each of the last five fiscal years, homeless participants in Los Angeles County comprised from 19.7% to 24.8% of all admissions to ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment admissions.

• The DASIS Report shows that nationally the majority (77.0%) of homeless admissions are to

residential detoxification (56.0%) and residential services (21.0%). In Los Angeles County, 72.7% to 76.8% of homeless participants received services from a residential program during the five fiscal years.

• Nationally and locally, homeless admissions to treatment were older than those who were not

homeless. According to the DASIS Report, nationally the average age of the homeless alcohol and drug admissions was 39. In Los Angeles County, the average age for homeless program participants over the last five fiscal years was 38.

• Nationally, males constituted 78.0% of homeless admissions. In Los Angeles County, male

participants ranged from 62.5% to 65.6% (2002-03 to 2006-07).

• Nationally, alcohol was the primary substance of abuse for more than half (52.0%) of homeless program admissions, followed by opiates (21.0%) and cocaine (17.0%). In Los Angeles County, the three most prominent primary drug problems reported during the 2002-03 Fiscal Year were cocaine/crack (32.0%), alcohol (24.9%), and methamphetamine (19.1%). By 2006-07 Fiscal Year, the order of these three changed to methamphetamine (30.1%), cocaine/crack (28.7%), and alcohol (19.2%).

• According to SAMHSA’s Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), in 2004 females comprised

22.0% of the reported homeless admissions nationally. Around the same time period in Los Angeles County, females comprised 35.2% of the homeless participants admitted to ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug programs. The percent of female participants who were homeless in Los Angeles County was 13.2% higher than what was reported nationally. Note that in Los Angeles County during the last five fiscal years, 34.4% to 37.5% of the homeless program participants were female.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-43-

Homeless Admissions and Participant Trends Over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the number of homeless admissions ranged from a low of 11,126 in 2006-07 to a high of 11,990 in 2004-05 (Table 3.26). During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 9,819 participants accounted for 11,126 admissions to alcohol and drug treatment programs; 1,111 (11.3%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.26 - Total Number of Homeless Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 11,687 9,825

2003-04 11,856 10,031

2004-05 11,990 10,106

2005-06 11,882 10,509

2006-07 11,126 9,819

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Homeless Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.27 shows that in each fiscal year, approximately 6 out of every 10 participants received treatment from a residential services program. From 2002-03 to 2004-05, residential detoxification programs accounted for 13.7% to 16.2% of the admissions for homeless participants and then dropped to 9.9% for the two remaining fiscal years. Admissions to outpatient counseling programs ranged from 17.9% to 26.2% during this five-year period.

Table 3.27 - Homeless Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 228 2.0 253 2.1 295 2.5 307 2.6 265 2.4


NTP Maintenance 36 0.3 68 0.6 108 0.9 134 1.1 167 1.5




Total 11,687 100.0 11,856 100.0 11,990 100.0 11,882 100.0 11,126 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-44-

Homeless Program Participant Demographic Trends According to Table 3.28, during the last five fiscal years, most of the homeless participants were male (62.5 -65.6%), between 25 and 44 years of age (57.6 - 65.4%), unemployed (80.5 - 96.8%), and most were White (31.9 - 34.8%), Black/African American (30.8 - 36.8%), or Hispanic/Latino (24.9 - 28.9%). The percent of homeless with mental health concerns increased slightly, from 16.2% in 2002-03 to 24.8% in 2006-07.

Table 3.28 - Homeless Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 11,687 100.0 11,856 100.0 11,990 100.0 11,882 100.0 11,126 100.0

Percent of Total Program Admissions 24.8 20.5 20.3 21.2 19.7

Participants 9,825 100.0 10,031 100.0 10,106 100.0 10,509 100.0 9,819 100.0

Percent of Total Program Participants 25.8 22.3 21.3 23.4 21.6

Gender

Male 6,138 62.5 6,478 64.6 6,552 64.8 6,894 65.6 6,317 64.3 Female 3,687 37.5 3,553 35.4 3,554 35.2 3,615 34.4 3,502 35.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 294 3.0 230 2.3 296 2.9 355 3.4 326 3.3 21 – 24 839 8.5 852 8.5 837 8.3 977 9.3 860 8.8 25 – 44 6,427 65.4 6,287 62.7 6,204 61.4 6,287 59.8 5,652 57.6 45 – 64 2,239 22.8 2,628 26.2 2,730 27.0 2,841 27.0 2,931 29.9 65 – Over 26 0.3 34 0.3 39 0.4 49 0.5 50 0.5

Education


Employment Status

Employed 310 3.2 382 3.8 451 4.5 517 4.9 484 4.9 Unemployed 9,515 96.8 9,649 96.2 8,666 85.8 8,456 80.5 8,085 82.3 Not in the labor force 989 9.8 1,536 14.6 1,250 12.7

Mental Health Concerns

Yes 1,589 16.2 1,516 15.1 2,053 20.3 2,445 23.3 2,436 24.8 No 8,236 83.8 8,515 84.9 8,053 79.7 8,064 76.7 7,383 75.2


CChhaapptteerr 33

-45-

Homeless Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends In the 2002-03 Fiscal Year, cocaine/crack (32.0%) was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for homeless program participants (Table 3.29). By 2005-06, cocaine/crack had been replaced as the number one primary drug problem by methamphetamine (30.7%). Between 2002-03 and 2003-04, alcohol was the primary drug problem for 1 out of every 4 homeless participant compared to 1 out of every 5 for the remaining three fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07). Over the five fiscal years, homeless participants reporting heroin use remained relatively constant, ranging from 17.2% in 2003-04 to 12.9% in 2006-07.

Table 3.29 - Homeless Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 2,450 24.9 2,405 24.0 2,093 20.7 1,998 19.0 1,888 19.2

Cocaine/Crack 3,143 32.0 2,857 28.5 2,838 28.1 3,028 28.8 2,816 28.7

Heroin 1,578 16.1 1,724 17.2 1,619 16.0 1,385 13.2 1,265 12.9



Other 306 3.1 312 3.1 281 2.8 213 2.0 221 2.3

Total 9,825 100.0 10,031 100.0 10,106 100.0 10,509 100.0 9,819 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Homeless Program Participant Discharge Status Trends Table 3.30 shows that each fiscal year the majority (56.4 - 63.1%) of homeless program participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 60.1%.

Table 3.30 - Homeless Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07









CChhaapptteerr 33

-46-

Needle User Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Needle users carry an increased risk of blood-borne infections, including HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C, through the sharing of syringes and other injection paraphernalia. According to a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there is an estimated one million active injection drug users in the United States (May 2002). Salient findings from national and local sources on needle user program admissions and participants are as follows: Office of Applied Studies – The Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) Report (September 23, 2005)

• In 2003, there were 237,000 admissions reported to the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) for which the primary or secondary drug of abuse was injected (13.0% of all admissions). Over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), Los Angeles County needle user program admissions comprised from 15.1% to 27.4% of all admissions to ADPA-funded alcohol and drug treatment programs.

• Heroin and other opiates accounted for 77.0% of all national admissions involving injection

drug use. The other most commonly reported injected drugs were stimulants (16.0%) and cocaine (6.0%). Similarly, in Los Angeles County alcohol and drug programs reported heroin as the primary problem for 71.9% (five-year average) of needle user program participants. Locally, methamphetamine (13.0 - 19.6%) was the second most prominent drug of abuse among needle users during the five fiscal years.

• National admissions involving injection drug users (IDU) were predominantly among Whites

(65.2%), followed by Hispanics/Latinos (18.6%) and Blacks/African Americans (12.3%). During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, similar patterns may be discerned in Los Angeles County IDU admissions although the racial/ethnic breakdown differs: White (41.1%), Hispanic/Latino (38.6%), and Black/African American (13.1%).

Needle User Program Admissions and Participant Trends Table 3.31 shows that the program admissions for needle users decreased by 26.9% over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). With the exception of a sharp increase of 36.3% from 2002-03 to 2003-04, admissions steady declined each fiscal year. The number of program participants followed a similar pattern as admissions, decreasing by 21.6% over the five-year period.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-47-

Needle User Program Admissions and Participant Trends – Continued During the 2005-06 Fiscal Year, 6,696 participants accounted for 8,514 admissions; 1,289 (19.3%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.31 - Total Number of Needle User Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 11,640 8,537

2003-04 15,867 10,793

2004-05 11,921 9,387

2005-06 9,134 7,088

2006-07 8,514 6,696

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Needle User Program Admissions by Program Type Table 3.32 describes the patterns of utilization of alcohol and drug program services by needle users during five fiscal years. Over the last four fiscal years, there was a large decrease in the percent of admissions to NTP detoxification programs; from 28.5% in 2003-04 to 3.9% in 2006-07. NTP maintenance admissions fluctuated during the five-year period, ranging from a low of 13.1% in 2002-03 to a high of 26.8% in 2006-07. Admissions to outpatient counseling (16.1 - 22.3%) and residential detoxification (18.3 - 24.4%) programs remained relatively constant during the five fiscal years.

Table 3.32 - Needle User Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 201 1.7 161 1.0 123 1.0 100 1.1 93 1.1

NTP Detoxification 2,164 18.6 4,525 28.5 1,265 10.6 625 6.8 336 3.9

NTP Maintenance 1,530 13.1 3,136 19.8 3,175 26.6 1,955 21.4 2,285 26.8




Total 11,640 100.0 15,867 100.0 11,921 100.0 9,134 100.0 8,514 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-48-

Needle User Program Participant Demographic Trends There were no noteworthy differences in the demographic characteristics of needle user admissions over five fiscal years by gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, employment, and homeless status. According to 2006-07 statistical findings on needle user program participants:

• 68.6% were male • 51.0% were between 25 and 44 years of age • 41.1% were White, 38.6% were Hispanic/Latino, and 13.1% were Black/African American • 76.2% were unemployed • 24.6% were homeless

Table 3.33 – Needle User Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Demographics # % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 11,640 100.0 15,867 100.0 11,921 100.0 9,134 100.0 8,514 100.0

Percent of Total Program Admissions 24.7 27.4 20.2 16.3 15.1

Participants 8,537 100.0 10,793 100.0 9,387 100.0 7,088 100.0 6,696 100.0

Percent of Total Program Participants 22.4 24.0 19.8 15.8 14.7

Gender

Male 5,858 68.6 7,424 68.8 6,340 67.5 4,945 69.8 4,591 68.6 Female 2,679 31.4 3,369 31.2 3,047 32.5 2,143 30.2 2,105 31.4

Race/Ethnicity

White 3,367 39.4 4,402 40.8 3,998 42.6 2,913 41.1 2,754 41.1 Black/African American 1,256 14.7 1,414 13.1 1,174 12.5 889 12.5 876 13.1 Hispanic/Latino 3,492 40.9 4,430 41.0 3,596 38.3 2,649 37.4 2,582 38.6 Native American 100 1.2 146 1.4 130 1.4 92 1.3 96 1.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 85 1.0 122 1.1 210 2.2 135 1.9 121 1.8 Other 237 2.8 279 2.6 279 3.0 410 5.8 267 4.0

Age

18 – 20 116 1.4 118 1.1 133 1.4 98 1.4 141 2.1 21 – 24 488 5.7 584 5.4 492 5.2 443 6.3 396 5.9 25 – 44 5,044 59.1 5,953 55.2 4,994 53.2 3,823 53.9 3,418 51.0 45 – 64 2,813 33.0 4,016 37.2 3,638 38.8 2,614 36.9 2,610 39.0 65 – Over 76 0.9 122 1.1 130 1.4 110 1.6 131 2.0

Education


Employment Status

Employed 903 10.6 1,804 16.7 1,519 16.2 879 12.4 887 13.2 Unemployed 7,634 89.4 8,989 83.3 7,227 77.0 5,323 75.1 5,104 76.2 Not in the labor force 641 6.8 886 12.5 705 10.5

Homeless

Yes 2,203 25.8 2,308 21.4 2,189 23.3 1,817 25.6 1,645 24.6 No 6,334 74.2 8,485 78.6 7,198 76.7 5,271 74.4 5,051 75.4


CChhaapptteerr 33

-49-

Needle User Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends For five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), heroin was the primary drug problem for the majority of needle users. Alcohol, cocaine/crack, and marijuana use remained stable throughout this period as the primary drug problem among needle users. During the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05), the percent of needle users who reported methamphetamine as their primary drug remained constant (13.0 - 14.9%) and then slightly increased over the two remaining fiscal years.

Table 3.34 – Needle User Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 416 4.9 395 3.7 353 3.8 275 3.9 217 3.2

Cocaine/Crack 469 5.5 486 4.5 415 4.4 374 5.3 300 4.5

Heroin 6,096 71.4 8,193 75.9 6,930 73.8 4,839 68.3 4,682 69.9



Other 260 3.0 229 2.1 209 2.2 138 1.9 127 1.9

Total 8,537 100.0 10,793 100.0 9,387 100.0 7,088 100.0 6,696 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Needle User Program Participant Discharge Status Trends

According to Table 3.35, with the exception of 2003-04, each fiscal year more than half of the needle users were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment assessment was 52.6%.

Table 3.35 - Needle User Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %




Left - Satisfactory 2,721 29.4 3,267 28.0 1,394 21.8 896 16.3 843 16.4




CChhaapptteerr 33

-50-

Perinatal Services Network Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs The Office of Perinatal Substance Abuse oversees a statewide network of approximately 300 public-funded perinatal alcohol and other drug treatment programs that annually serve over 38,000 pregnant and parenting women, plus their children. In the Los Angeles County, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, ADPA contracted with 38 community-based agencies that provide 51 perinatal programs which served 1,388 women. The Perinatal Services Network provides:

• Programs that empower women to achieve and maintain clean and sober living, deliver healthy infants, strengthen family units, and lead productive lives.

• Perinatal services are designed to be gender specific and culturally relevant.

• Treatment and recovery options include: long-term residential treatment, day care services,

outpatient counseling, narcotic replacement therapy, case management services, transitional housing, and sobering living services.

In addition, perinatal treatment programs address the following women specific issues:

♦ cooperative child care ♦ transportation ♦ parenting skills building ♦ health education ♦ child development education ♦ linkages to medical, HIV/TB testing and counseling, education, and vocational services

Perinatal Admissions and Participants Trends Table 3.36 shows that over the five fiscal years perinatal admissions dropped to 1,231 in 2004-05, then rose to 1,499 in 2006-07. The number of participants followed a similar pattern of decreases and increases over the five fiscal years. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 1,388 participants accounted for 1,499 admissions; 106 (7.6%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.36 - Total Number of Perinatal Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 1,259 1,172

2003-04 1,432 1,327

2004-05 1,231 1,129

2005-06 1,326 1,240

2006-07 1,499 1,388


CChhaapptteerr 33

-51-

Perinatal Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.37 shows that in each fiscal year, the majority (64.6 - 79.7%) of perinatal services were provided in day care program facilities. Day care services are non-residential programs which provide planned treatment services in a social setting structured to maximize recovery and rehabilitation of participants. Services include individual and group counseling sessions, alcohol and drug education classes, health and fitness activities, and social/recreational activities. Program participants must attend scheduled, formalized services at least three hours per day, three times per week. The services are usually available a minimum of six hours per day, six days per week. Admissions to outpatient counseling (12.6 - 20.2%) and residential service (7.5 - 16.6%) programs remained relatively constant. During the five-year period, residential detoxification, narcotic treatment detoxification, and narcotic maintenance programs accounted for only 1.2% (78 out of 6,747) of the total perinatal admissions.

Table 3.37 - Perinatal Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 813 64.6 948 66.2 818 66.5 1,057 79.7 1,041 69.4


NTP Maintenance 33 2.6 12 0.8 5 0.4 2 0.2 2 0.1

Outpatient Counseling 205 16.3 226 15.8 249 20.2 167 12.6 303 20.2



Total 1,259 100.0 1,432 100.0 1,231 100.0 1,326 100.0 1,499 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Perinatal Program Participant Demographic Trends As shown in Table 3.38, the demographics for perinatal participants remained relatively constant over five fiscal years. The majority of participants were between 25 and 44 years of age (64.0 - 72.4%), completed 9 to 12 years of education (74.8 - 81.5%), and unemployed (74.8 - 92.5%). Most perinatal participants were Hispanic/Latina (27.8 - 41.5%), Black/African American (31.1 - 45.6%), or White (19.9 - 23.0%). Each fiscal year, approximately 20.0% of perinatal participants were homeless at admission. The percent of pregnant participants ranged from a low of 11.5% in 2005-06 to a high of 19.9% in 2006-07.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-52-

Perinatal Program Participant Demographic Trends - Continued

Table 3.38 – Perinatal Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 1,259 100.0 1,432 100.0 1,231 100.0 1,326 100.0 1,499 100.0

Participants 1,172 100.0 1,327 100.0 1,129 100.0 1,240 100.0 1,388 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 42 3.6 67 5.0 71 6.3 79 6.4 116 8.4 21 – 24 194 16.6 203 15.3 193 17.1 214 17.3 292 21.0 25 – 44 830 70.8 961 72.4 788 69.8 838 67.6 888 64.0 45 – 64 106 9.0 96 7.2 77 6.8 109 8.8 92 6.6 65 – Over 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Education

None 1 0.1 1 0.1 13 1.2 11 0.9 18 1.3 1 – 8 years 70 6.0 81 6.1 28 2.5 71 5.7 79 5.7 9 – 12 years 917 78.2 1,082 81.5 844 74.8 964 77.7 1,121 80.8 13 or more years 184 15.7 163 12.3 244 21.6 194 15.6 170 12.2

Employment Status

Employed 94 8.0 99 7.5 95 8.4 111 9.0 112 8.1 Unemployed 1,078 92.0 1,228 92.5 872 77.2 928 74.8 1,057 76.2 Not in the labor force 162 14.3 201 16.2 219 15.8

Homeless

Yes 219 18.7 249 18.8 235 20.8 261 21.0 313 22.6 No 953 81.3 1,078 81.2 894 79.2 979 79.0 1,075 77.4

Pregnant

Yes 189 16.1 238 17.9 219 19.4 142 11.5 276 19.9 No 983 83.9 1,089 82.1 892 79.0 1,055 85.1 1,070 77.1 Not sure/don’t know 18 1.6 43 3.5 42 3.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-53-

Perinatal Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends According to Table 3.39, in 2002-03, cocaine/crack was the most prominent primary drug problem reported by perinatal program participants. Cocaine/crack use declined each fiscal year, from 36.1% in 2002-03 to 18.2% in 2006-07. The prominence of methamphetamine use has increased from 27.0% in 2002-03 to 45.3% in 2006-07. During the five fiscal years, alcohol use remained fairly constant (12.7 - 14.4%). Marijuana as a primary drug problem increased from 11.5% in 2002-03 to 18.2% in 2006-07.

Table 3.39 – Perinatal Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 169 14.4 187 14.1 143 12.7 177 14.3 197 14.2

Cocaine/Crack 423 36.1 428 32.3 286 25.3 269 21.7 253 18.2

Heroin 71 6.1 45 3.4 36 3.2 32 2.6 23 1.7



Other 58 4.9 63 4.7 29 2.6 27 2.2 33 2.4

Total 1,172 100.0 1,327 100.0 1,129 100.0 1,240 100.0 1,388 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Perinatal Program Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 3.40, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 47.8% of the perinatal participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive compliance assessment was 42.6%.

Table 3.40 – Perinatal Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07









CChhaapptteerr 33

-54-

Pregnant Women Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs Substance use during pregnancy continues to be an ongoing concern because of the risks that illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco use pose to the mother, siblings, and unborn children. In 2004, the California Maternal and Infant Health Assessment estimated that 100,000 infants are born prenatally exposed to alcohol, and an estimated 20,000 to 60,000 are born prenatally exposed to illicit drugs. The following are some State and local statistics regarding pregnant women who participated in public-funded substance abuse programs.

• During 2006, 4,507 (5.9%) of the 76,204 women admitted to treatment in California were pregnant at the time of admission (Office of Applied Research and Analysis - California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs). The percent of pregnant women in treatment were similar for both Los Angeles County and California alcohol and drug treatment programs. In Los Angeles County, during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 980 (6.1%) of the 16,028 women program participants were pregnant at admission (Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System).

• Among pregnant women admitted to treatment in California, methamphetamine was the

primary drug of abuse at 59% followed by marijuana at 14%, alcohol at 9%, and heroin at 8%. Locally, in Los Angeles County (2006-07 Fiscal Year), most pregnant women reported methamphetamine (48.6%), marijuana (17.3%), cocaine/crack (13.7%), alcohol (11.8%), or heroin (5.9%) as their primary substance of abuse.

Below are additional Los Angeles County statistics regarding pregnant women who received alcohol and drug treatment services during the 2006-07 Fiscal Year.

• In Los Angeles County, 349 (35.3%) of the 980 pregnant women reported using illicit drugs in the past month. Pregnant women using illicit drugs were most likely to be Hispanic/Latina (37.2%), Black/African-American (31.2%), or White (22.4%). The average age was 27.5 years.

• At program admission, 7.0% of pregnant women reported drinking alcohol in the past month.

Pregnant Admissions and Participant Trends Table 3.41 shows that over the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05), the number of admissions for pregnant women increased by 33.3%. A slight decline (7.7%) was seen in 2005-06, followed by a 3.1% increase in 2006-07. The number of participants followed a similar pattern as admissions. Over the five fiscal years, admissions and participants increased by 26.7% and 28.3%, respectively.

CChhaapptteerr 33

-55-

Pregnant Admissions and Participant Trends – Continued During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 980 participants accounted for 1,071 admissions; 80 (8.2%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.41 - Total Number of Pregnant Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 845 764

2003-04 923 837

2004-05 1,226 1,099

2005-06 1,039 947

2006-07 1,071 980

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Pregnant Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Over the last three fiscal years (2004-05 to 2006-07), every 4 out 10 pregnant women received services from an outpatient counseling program. Admissions to residential service programs remained relatively constant; the five-year average was 31.8%. Day care services ranged from a low of 16.8% in 2006-07 to a high of 24.7% in 2002-03.

Table 3.42 - Pregnant Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 209 24.7 210 22.8 230 18.8 196 18.9 180 16.8


NTP Maintenance 28 3.3 45 4.9 63 5.1 38 3.7 39 3.6




Total 845 100.0 923 100.0 1,226 100.0 1,039 100.0 1,071 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 33

-56-

Pregnant Program Participant Demographic Trends Table 3.43 shows the participant demographics for pregnant women over five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). The majority of pregnant women completed 9 to 12 years of education (76.3 - 82.5%) and reported being unemployed (76.2 - 93.1%). Most pregnant participants were Hispanic/Latina (35.2 -41.2%), Black/African American (25.6 - 35.2%), or White (22.6 - 28.6%). The majority of pregnant women were between 25 and 44 years of age (57.6 - 70.2%). The percent of pregnant women who reported being homeless, ranged from 28.6% in 2005-06 to 35.1% in 2002-03.

Table 3.43 - Pregnant Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 845 100.0 923 100.0 1,226 100.0 1,039 100.0 1,071 100.0

Participants 764 100.0 837 100.0 1,099 100.0 947 100.0 980 100.0

Race/Ethnicity

White 188 24.6 239 28.6 298 27.1 244 25.8 221 22.6 Black/African American 269 35.2 264 31.5 281 25.6 245 25.9 271 27.7 Hispanic/Latina 269 35.2 302 36.1 435 39.6 362 38.2 404 41.2 Native American 9 1.2 9 1.1 17 1.5 14 1.5 7 0.7 Asian/Pacific Islander 11 1.4 8 1.0 19 1.7 22 2.3 24 2.4 Other 18 2.4 15 1.8 49 4.5 60 6.3 53 5.4

Age

18 – 20 49 6.4 35 4.2 77 7.0 90 9.5 131 13.4 21 – 24 165 21.6 190 22.7 257 23.4 255 26.9 255 26.0 25 – 44 536 70.2 582 69.5 726 66.1 578 61.0 564 57.6 45 – 64 14 1.8 30 3.6 39 3.5 24 2.5 30 3.1 65 – Over 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 268 35.1 243 29.0 292 26.6 271 28.6 264 26.9 No 496 64.9 594 71.0 807 73.4 676 71.4 716 73.1


CChhaapptteerr 33

-57-

Pregnant Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends Table 3.44 shows that methamphetamine was the most frequently reported primary drug problem for pregnant women during the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). Methamphetamine use among pregnant women steadily increased from 32.9% in 2002-03 to 48.6% in 2006-07. There was a downward trend in pregnant women reporting cocaine/crack use over the five fiscal years. In 2002-03, 29.5% of pregnant women reported cocaine/crack use compared to 13.7% in 2006-07. During the five-year period, there was a slight decline in the use of heroin by pregnant women (9.3 - 5.9%). The percent of pregnant women reporting marijuana/hashish use increased from 10.3% in 2003-04 to 17.3% in 2006-07.

Table 3.44 - Pregnant Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 96 12.6 102 12.2 108 9.8 107 11.3 116 11.8

Cocaine/Crack 225 29.5 211 25.2 253 23.0 166 17.5 134 13.7

Heroin 71 9.3 82 9.8 87 7.9 57 6.0 58 5.9



Other 38 5.0 32 3.8 34 3.1 21 2.2 26 2.7

Total 764 100.0 837 100.0 1,099 100.0 947 100.0 980 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Pregnant Program Participant Discharge Status Trends According to Table 3.45, over the first three fiscal years (2002-03 to 2004-05) positive treatment compliance remained relatively constant (47.3% and 46.2%) for pregnant participants. For the two remaining fiscal years (2005-06 and 2006-07), over half of the pregnant participants had a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance was 49.4%.

Table 3.45 - Pregnant Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %








CChhaapptteerr 33

-58-

Prison Parolee Services Network Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs The Prison Parolee Network (PPN) is the result of a collaborative effort of the California Department of Corrections, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, and ADPA. Male and female offenders, paroled to Los Angeles County, voluntarily participate in an ADPA-contracted alcohol and drug treatment/recovery program for up to six months. Treatment includes residential, outpatient, and alcohol/drug-free living center services. PPN’s program objectives are:

• to place parolees in appropriate alcohol and other drug treatment and recovery programs either from the community parole systems or immediately upon release from prison custody;

• improve parole outcomes as evidenced by fewer drug-related revocations and related criminal

violations, and to reintegrate parolees into society and encourage a clean and sober lifestyle; and

• reduce State General Fund costs for incarceration and parole supervision.

PPN Admissions and Participants Trends Table 3.46 shows that over the first four fiscal years, the number of admissions increased from 676 to 799 (18.2%). In 2006-07, this upward trend ended and admissions dropped to 643, a 19.5% decrease. The number of participants followed this same pattern; ranging from a high of 731 in 2005-06 to a low of 560 in 2006-07. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 560 participants accounted for 643 admissions; 71 (12.7%) of these participants had two or more admissions.

Table 3.46 - Total Number of PPN Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year



2002-03 676 591

2003-04 708 606

2004-05 733 654

2005-06 799 731

2006-07 643 560


CChhaapptteerr 33

-59-

PPN Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.47 shows that most PPN program participants received services from either an outpatient counseling program or residential services. Since 2004-05, the majority (55.1 - 56.2%) of participants were admitted to an outpatient counseling program. During the five fiscal years, 42.6% to 47.6% of participants received treatment from a residential services program.

Table 3.47 – PPN Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 6 0.9 11 1.6 0 0.0 4 0.5 3 0.5




Total 676 100.0 708 100.0 733 100.0 799 100.0 643 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System PPN Program Participant Demographic Trends Table 3.48 shows that the demographic characteristics for PPN participants remained stable over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07). According to 2006-07 statistical findings:

• 87.1% were male • 68.4% were between 25 and 44 years of age • 40.5% were Hispanic/Latino, 31.1% were Black/African-American, and 22.0% were White • 70.2% were unemployed • 36.6% were homeless

CChhaapptteerr 33

-60-

• PPN Program Participant Demographic Trends – Continued

Table 3.48 – PPN Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 676 100.0 708 100.0 733 100.0 799 100.0 643 100.0

Participants 591 100.0 606 100.0 654 100.0 731 100.0 560 100.0

Gender

Male 528 89.3 522 86.1 561 85.8 623 85.2 488 87.1 Female 63 10.7 84 13.9 93 14.2 108 14.8 72 12.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 0.5 2 0.3 6 0.9 7 1.0 3 0.5 21 – 24 26 4.4 29 4.8 29 4.4 37 5.1 34 6.1 25 – 44 445 75.3 433 71.5 459 70.2 515 70.5 383 68.4 45 – 64 117 19.8 141 23.3 160 24.5 168 23.0 139 24.8 65 – Over 0 0.0 1 0.2 0 0.0 4 0.5 1 0.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 171 28.9 203 33.5 242 37.0 280 38.3 205 36.6 No 420 71.1 403 66.5 412 63.0 451 61.7 355 63.4


CChhaapptteerr 33

-61-

PPN Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends According to Table 3.49, during the 2006-07, methamphetamine (37.0%) and cocaine/crack (28.4%) were the two most frequently reported primary drug problems for PPN participants. Methamphetamine use has grown in each of five years from 22.0% in 2002-03 to 37.0% in 2006-07. In 2002-03, heroin use was reported for 1 out of 5 PPN participant. For the remaining fiscal years (2003-04 to 2006-07), there was a slight decline in heroin use (15.7 – 14.3%).

Table 3.49 – PPN Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 68 11.5 79 13.0 76 11.6 101 13.8 66 11.8

Cocaine/Crack 224 37.9 219 36.1 212 32.4 207 28.3 159 28.4

Heroin 137 23.2 95 15.7 102 15.6 106 14.5 80 14.3



Other 12 2.0 17 2.8 14 2.1 15 2.1 5 0.9

Total 591 100.0 606 100.0 654 100.0 731 100.0 560 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System PPN Program Participant Discharge Status Trends

According to Table 3.50, 59.4% of the participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status during the 2005-06 Fiscal Year. The five-year average for positive treatment compliance status was 51.9%.

Table 3.50 – PPN Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %








CChhaapptteerr 33

-62-

Proposition 36 Participants in ADPA-Contracted Alcohol and Drug Treatment Programs The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) of 2000, more commonly known as Proposition 36, amended existing drug sentencing laws to require that adult criminal defendants who are convicted of a non-violent drug offense, be placed in drug treatment as a condition of probation, instead of incarceration. Drug treatment, in lieu of incarceration, is also required for State parolees convicted of non-violent drug offenses or who commit drug-related parole violations. Vocational training, family counseling, literacy training, health, mental health, and other services are also provided. Proposition 36 allowed for dismissal of charges upon successful completion of treatment. Proposition 36 was designed to:

• Preserve jail and prison cells for serious and violent offenders;

• Enhance public safety by reducing drug-related crime; and

• Improve public health by reducing drug abuse through proven and effective treatment strategies.

The successful implementation and ongoing operation of Proposition 36 in Los Angeles County was made possible because of the coordinated collaboration and constant communication among the Court, ADPA, District Attorney’s Office, Probation Department, Public Defender’s Office, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Community Assessment Services Centers, and community-based treatment providers. Proposition 36 Admissions and Participants Trends Table 3.51 shows that each fiscal year there was a steady increase in the number of Proposition 36 admissions and participants. Over the five fiscal years (2002-03 to 2006-07), the number of program admissions and participants increased by 72.9% and 65.8%, respectively. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, 14,245 participants accounted for 17,721 admissions; 2,693 (18.9%) of these participants had two or more admissions

Table 3.51 - Total Number of Proposition 36 Program Admissions and Participants by Fiscal Year


Fiscal day Admissions Participants

2002-03 10,252 8,590

2003-04 13,517 11,313

2004-05 15,595 12,655

2005-06 17,252 13,720

2006-07 17,721 14,245

/Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

CChhaapptteerr 33

-63-

Proposition 36 Program Participant Admissions by Program Type Table 3.52 shows the frequency distribution of Proposition 36 admissions by program type and fiscal year. The majority of admissions were to outpatient counseling programs, 76.1% to 79.3% during the five fiscal years. Admissions to residential services programs ranged from 14.7% to 18.3%.

Table 3.52 – Proposition 36 Program Participant Admissions by Program Type and Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Program Type

# % # % # % # % # %

Day Care 408 4.0 458 3.4 365 2.3 312 1.8 355 2.0


NTP Maintenance 5 0.0 26 0.2 60 0.4 86 0.5 114 0.6




Total 10,252 100.0 13,517 100.0 15,595 100.0 17,252 100.0 17,721 100.0


Proposition 36 Program Participant Demographic Trends The characteristics of Proposition 36 participants have remained stable over the five fiscal years. According to 2006-07 Fiscal Year statistical findings:

• 77.7% were male • 59.2% were between 25 and 44 years of age • 40.7% were Hispanic/Latino, 25.4% were White, and 24.0% were Black/African American • 32.6% were employed • 14.4% were homeless

CChhaapptteerr 33

-64-

Proposition 36 Program Participant Demographic Trends - Continued

Table 3.53 – Proposition 36 Program Participant Demographics by Fiscal Year

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 Demographics

# % # % # % # % # %

Admissions 10,252 100.0 13,517 100.0 15,595 100.0 17,252 100.0 17,721 100.0

Participants 8,590 100.0 11,313 100.0 12,655 100.0 13,720 100.0 14,245 100.0

Gender

Male 6,675 77.7 8,675 76.7 9,705 76.7 10,636 77.5 11,070 77.7 Female 1,915 22.3 2,638 23.3 2,950 23.3 3,084 22.5 3,175 22.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 223 2.6 367 3.2 413 3.3 538 3.9 505 3.5 21 – 24 1,071 12.5 1,280 11.3 1,516 12.0 1,691 12.3 1,716 12.0 25 – 44 5,720 66.6 7,226 63.9 7,749 61.2 8,205 59.8 8,428 59.2 45 – 64 1,547 18.0 2,396 21.2 2,935 23.2 3,225 23.5 3,531 24.8 65 – Over 29 0.3 44 0.4 42 0.3 61 0.4 65 0.5

Education


Employment Status

Employed 2,406 28.0 3,257 28.8 3,806 30.1 4,351 31.7 4,650 32.6 Unemployed 6,184 72.0 8,056 71.2 8,194 64.7 8,216 59.9 8,316 58.4 Not in the labor force 655 5.2 1,153 8.4 1,279 9.0

Homeless

Yes 1,013 11.8 1,432 12.7 1,774 14.0 2,083 15.2 2,052 14.4 No 7,577 88.2 9,881 87.3 10,881 86.0 11,637 84.8 12,193 85.6


CChhaapptteerr 33

-65-

Proposition 36 Program Participant Primary Drug Problem Trends As shown in Table 3.54, over the five fiscal years, methamphetamine ranked as the number one drug problem for Proposition 36 participants. Methamphetamine use increased each fiscal year, from 36.1% in 2002-03 to 43.0% in 2006-07. During the five-year period, cocaine/crack continued to be the primary drug problem for nearly every 3 out of 10 participants. Alcohol (7.6 - 10.4%), heroin (7.3 - 8.7%), and marijuana (9.9 - 11.2%) use remained relatively stable during the five fiscal years.

Table 3.54 – Proposition 36 Program Participant Primary Drug Problem by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %

Alcohol 877 10.2 1,172 10.4 1,117 8.8 1,108 8.1 1,088 7.6

Cocaine/Crack 2,697 31.4 3,395 30.0 3,822 30.2 4,023 29.3 4,095 28.7

Heroin 726 8.5 978 8.6 1,102 8.7 1,105 8.1 1,038 7.3

Marijuana/Hashish 850 9.9 1,168 10.3 1,341 10.6 1,456 10.6 1,597 11.2


Other 335 3.9 432 3.8 395 3.1 305 2.2 303 2.1

Total 8,590 100.0 11,313 100.0 12,655 100.0 13,720 100.0 14,245 100.0

Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System Proposition 36 Program Participant Discharge Status Trends

According to Table 3.55, in 2006-07, half (50.6%) of the Proposition 36 participants were discharged with a positive treatment compliance status. The five-year average was positive treatment compliance was 43.2%.

Table 3.55 – Proposition 36 Program Participant Discharge Status by Fiscal Year


# % # % # % # % # %








CChhaapptteerr 44 –– LLAACC PPaarrttiicciippaanntt SSttaattiissttiiccss bbyy AAggeennccyy

-66-

Introduction Alcohol and Drug Program Administration (ADPA) contracted with community-based agencies to provide a comprehensive array of alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services to County residents with alcohol and/or other drug problems. During the 2006-07 Fiscal Year, ADPA contracted with 163 agencies that provided treatment/recovery services to 50,817 participants. Note a participant can receive treatment/recovery services from more than one agency during the fiscal year. Therefore, the number of participants shown in this chapter is greater than the number of participants shown in Chapter 1. The vast majority of the contracted agencies provide alcohol and drug treatment/recovery services to both male and female participants. Of the 163 agencies, 12 served only female participants and 7 served only male participants. Listed below are these gender–specific agencies along with the agency’s total number of participants, supervisorial district (SD), and service planning area (SPA):

List of Agencies Serving Only Female Participants

No Agency Name Total Participants SD SPA

1 Alcoholism Center for Women 198 1 4 – Metro

2 Casa de Las Amigas 84 5 3 – San Gabriel

3 Dare U To Care Outreach Ministry 27 2 6 – South

4 His Sheltering Arms 178 2 6 – South

5 House of Hope Foundation 90 4 8 – South Bay

6 Interconnection Center 38 2 6 – South

7 Little House 127 4 7 – East Los Angeles Biomedical Institute at 8 Harbor -UCLA Medical Center 66 2 8 – South Bay

9 Maternity House, LLC 43 5 2 – San Fernando

10 Stepping Stones Home 110 1 & 5 3 – San Gabriel

11 United Women in Transition 10 2 6 – South

12 URDC Human Services Corporation 183 5 3 – San Gabriel

List of Agencies Serving Only Male Participants

No. Agency Name Total Participants SD SPA

1 American Indian Changing Spirits 58 4 8 – South Bay

2 Beacon House 117 4 8 – South Bay

3 Chabad of California 105 3 4 – Metro

4 Live Again Recovery Home 93 5 2 – San Fernando

5 New Directions, Inc. 61 3 5 – West

6 New Way Foundation 147 5 2 – San Fernando

7 Palm House 61 4 8 – South Bay

CChhaapptteerr 44

-67-

Table 4.0 lists each agency alphabetically and shows the number of participants and admissions reported during the fiscal year. Participant demographics are provided for each of the 163 agencies (Tables 4.1 through 4.163.

Table 4.0 – Number of Program Participants and Admissions by Agency, 2006-07 Fiscal Year

Table No. Agency Name Total Participants Total Admissions

4.1 A Home for Us, Foundation* 101 103 4.2 A New Serenity* 44 44 4.3 Able Family Support, Inc. 71 75

4.4 Addiction Research and Treatment, Inc. 1,012 1,161 4.5 Aegis Medical System, Inc. 491 522 4.6 Alcoholism Center for Women, Inc. 198 215

4.7 Alcoholism Council of Antelope Valley/NCA 575 596 4.8 AltaMed 267 299 4.9 American Asian Pacific Ministries, Inc. 259 270

4.10 American Drug Recovery Program, Inc.* 6 6 4.11 American Drug Treatment Program, Inc.* 9 9 4.12 American Health and Education Clinics* 31 33

4.13 American Indian Changing Spirits 58 62 4.14 Antelope Valley Rehabilitation Centers 3,324 3,423 4.15 Apex Foundation 155 156

4.16 Arms of Grace Humanitarian Services 42 42 4.17 Asian American Drug Abuse Program, Inc. 721 791 4.18 Atlantic Recovery Services 722 770

4.19 Avalon-Carver Community Health Center 396 439 4.20 BAART Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 165 195 4.21 Be Well Now Institute* 14 14

4.22 Beacon House Association of San Pedro (The) 117 140 4.23 Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 3,925 4,497 4.24 Bernie’s Lil Women Center 28 28

4.25 Bienvenidos Children’s Center, Inc. 71 71 4.26 Blessed Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Research Program, Inc. 80 80 4.27 California Drug Consultants, Inc. 151 161

4.28 California Drug Treatment Program, Inc. 41 43 4.29 California Graduate Institute 20 23 4.30 California Hispanic Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Inc. 1,246 1,346

4.31 California People Counseling Center* 152 153 4.32 Cambodian Association of America 41 43 4.33 Canon Human Services, Inc. 406 448

4.34 Caring Residential Care, Inc. 110 111 4.35 Casa de Las Amigas 84 98 4.36 Center for Hope, Inc. (The)* 62 62

4.37 Chabad of California, Inc. 105 110 4.38 Changing Steps 196 210 4.39 Children’s Institute International 44 50

4.40 Circle of Friends Outpatient Services, Inc. 830 927 4.41 Circle of Help Foundation 373 418 4.42 City of Compton 149 152

4.43 City of Long Beach, A Municipal Corporation 353 382 4.44 City of Pasadena 63 68 4.45 CLARE Foundation, Inc. 864 932

4.46 Clinica Monsenor Oscar A. Romero 154 160 4.47 Community Alcohol and Drug Treatment 323 336 4.48 Cri-Help, Inc. 605 678

4.49 Crossroads Skills Development, Inc.* 56 56 4.50 Cultural Bridges Treatment Center 169 172 4.51 Dare U to Care Outreach Ministry 27 27

*New Agency

CChhaapptteerr 44

-68-



4.52 Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service 474 502 4.53 Do It Now Foundation 202 212 4.54 Driver Safety Schools, Inc. 194 215

4.55 El Centro del Pueblo 55 57 4.56 El Proyecto del Barrio 651 706 4.57 Epidaurus 34 34

4.58 Family Service of Long Beach 266 270 4.59 Found, Inc. 716 851 4.60 Fred Brown’s Recovery Services, Inc. 21 21

4.61 Glorious Manor, Inc. II* 121 121 4.62 Goretti Health Services, Inc. 31 32 4.63 Grandview Foundation, Inc. 177 180

4.64 Guidance Health Services, Inc. 26 26 4.65 Help the People Foundation 15 15 4.66 His Sheltering Arms, Inc. 178 189

4.67 Hollywood Recovery Treatment Center* 14 16 4.68 House of Hope Foundation, Inc. 90 102 4.69 I-ADARP, Inc. 138 140

4.70 Immaculate Care Center, Inc.* 81 81 4.71 Independence Community Treatment Clinic 262 284 4.72 Interconnection Center, Inc. 38 39

4.73 Jeff Grand Clinic, Inc. 200 236 4.74 JMO – International Skills Developers* 13 13 4.75 Joint Efforts, Inc. 132 144

4.76 L.A. South Health Services, Inc.* 36 36 4.77 La Clinica del Pueblo, Inc. 160 168 4.78 Lavelle Youth Homes* 49 49

4.79 Laws Support Center 217 228 4.80 Little House 127 135 4.81 Live Again Recovery Home, Inc. 93 104

4.82 Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 66 68 4.83 Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse 755 790 4.84 Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Service Center 59 59

4.85 Los Angeles New Life Center, Inc. 20 20 4.86 Mary-Lind Foundation 220 220 4.87 Maternity House, LLC 43 49

4.88 Matrix Institute on Addictions 369 395 4.89 MELA Counseling Services Center, Inc. 337 366 4.90 Mid Valley Recovery Services, Inc. 555 601

4.91 Mini Twelve Step House, Inc. 340 397 4.92 MJB Transitional Recovery, Inc. 4 4 4.93 Mount Sinai Health Center, Inc. 43 43

4.94 NCADD of East San Gabriel & Pomona Valleys, Inc. 842 916 4.95 NCADD – Long Beach Area 529 584 4.96 NCADD of the San Fernando Valley 890 983

4.97 Ness Counseling Center, Incorporated (The) 322 371 4.98 New Beginnings Recovery Treatment Center, Inc. 524 565 4.99 New Directions, Inc. 61 67

4.100 New Hope Health Services, Inc. 374 385 4.101 New Horizons Housing and Independent Living* 53 54 4.102 New Resource Institute: DBA Clear Path* 30 30

4.103 New Way Foundation, Inc. 147 149 4.104 Noble Heart Services, Inc. 141 142 4.105 Okuli Eagle’s Nest Foundation, Inc.* 40 40

*New Agency

CChhaapptteerr 44

-69-



4.106 Options – A Child Care and Human Services Agency 205 217 4.107 Our Homes by Anita, Inc.* 39 39 4.108 Outreach Health Services, Inc. 138 138

4.109 Pacific Clinics 270 306 4.110 Pajo Corporation (The) 51 54 4.111 Palm House, Inc. 61 65

4.112 Palm Residential Care Facility (The) 21 21 4.113 Pasadena Recovery Center, Inc. 120 126 4.114 Pavillion Healthcare Services, Inc.* 79 79

4.115 People Coordinated Services of Southern California 906 1,001 4.116 People in Progress, Inc. 118 123 4.117 Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. 250 274

4.118 Plaza Community Center 427 453 4.119 Pomona Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center, Inc. 182 184 4.120 Pomona Community Crisis Center, Inc. 139 140

4.121 Pride Health Services, Inc. 284 297 4.122 Principles, Inc. 1,420 1,663 4.123 Prototypes 734 808

4.124 R.A.P. Community Recovery Services 110 110 4.125 Remah Health Services, Inc* 9 9 4.126 Reseda Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Inc. 108 121

4.127 R.I.G.H.T. Program* 71 71 4.128 Roy’s National Health Services, Inc. 152 152 4.129 Salvation Army, A California Corporation 279 316

4.130 Santa Anita Family Services 266 272 4.131 Shields for Families, Inc. 662 714 4.132 Social Model Recovery Systems, Inc. 380 391

4.133 South Bay Alcoholism Services, DBA NCADD of the South Bay 236 247 4.134 South Bay Human Services Coalition 279 292 4.135 Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs, Inc. 1,503 1,691

4.136 Special Service for Groups 247 268 4.137 SPIRITT Family Services, Inc. 727 753 4.138 Stepping Stones Home 110 126

4.139 Substance Abuse Foundation of Long Beach, Inc. 576 650 4.140 Sunrise Community Counseling Center 273 313 4.141 Tarzana Treatment Center 4,699 6,204

4.142 T.E.A.M. One Stop 215 217 4.143 Total Family Support Clinic 847 994 4.144 Transcultural Health Development, Inc. 108 118

4.145 Trinity Plus Healthcare Services, Inc.* 45 45 4.146 Twin Town Corporation 35 37 4.147 Ubenete Charity, Inc.* 35 35

4.148 United American Indian Involvement, Inc. 55 55 4.149 United States Veterans Initiative, Inc. 10 11 4.150 United Women in Transition 10 10

4.151 URDC Human Services Corporation 183 234 4.152 U-Turn Alcohol and Drug Education Program, Inc. 61 61 4.153 Van Ness Recovery House 163 166

4.154 Verdugo Mental Health Center 161 176 4.155 Volunteer of Africa* 11 11 4.156 Volunteers of America of Los Angeles 355 439

4.157 Walden House, Inc. 38 39 4.158 Watts Healthcare Corporation 486 534 4.159 We Can Help Foundation 277 294

* New Agency Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

CChhaapptteerr 44

-70-



4.160 Western Pacific Med Corp. 421 445 4.161 Wilshire Treatment Center, Inc. 29 31 4.162 Wings of Refuge 22 22 4.163 Winky’s Treatment Center* 38 38

TOTAL 50,817 56,411

* New Agency

CChhaapptteerr 44

-71-

Table 4.1 – A Home for Us, Foundation* 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 69 68.3 Female 32 31.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 5.9 21 – 24 1 1.0 25 – 44 39 38.6 45 – 64 52 51.5 65 – Over 3 3.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 101 100.0



Admissions by Program Type

Day Care Program 0 0.0 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 0 0.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 103 100.0 Residential Detoxification Services 0 0.0 Residential Services 0 0.0

*New Agency Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

CChhaapptteerr 44

-72-

Table 4.2 – A New Serenity* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 44 100.0


Gender

Male 16 36.4 Female 28 63.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 4 9.1 21 – 24 11 25.0 25 – 44 17 38.6 45 – 64 11 25.0 65 – Over 1 2.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 5 11.4 No 39 88.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-73-

Table 4.3 – Able Family Support, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 75 100.0


Gender

Male 45 63.4 Female 26 36.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 5 7.0 25 – 44 33 46.5 45 – 64 33 46.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 4.2 No 68 95.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-74-

Table 4.4 – Addiction Research and Treatment, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 651 64.3 Female 361 35.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 0.2 21 – 24 22 2.2 25 – 44 328 32.4 45 – 64 602 59.5 65 – Over 58 5.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 35 3.5 No 977 96.5




Day Care Program 0 0.0 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 1,161 100.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 0 0.0 Residential Detoxification Services 0 0.0 Residential Services 0 0.0


CChhaapptteerr 44

-75-

Table 4.5 – Aegis Medical System, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 302 61.5 Female 189 38.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 0.4 21 – 24 13 2.6 25 – 44 204 41.5 45 – 64 251 51.1 65 – Over 21 4.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 39 7.9 No 452 92.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-76-

Table 4.6 – Alcoholism Center for Women, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 198 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 7 3.5 21 – 24 14 7.1 25 – 44 111 56.1 45 – 64 66 33.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 67 33.8 No 131 66.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-77-

Table 4.7 – Alcoholism Council of Antelope Valley/NCA

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 394 68.5 Female 181 31.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 31 5.4 21 – 24 86 15.0 25 – 44 348 60.5 45 – 64 110 19.1 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 32 5.6 No 543 94.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-78-

Table 4.8 – AltaMed 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 175 65.5 Female 92 34.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 0.7 21 – 24 6 2.2 25 – 44 93 34.8 45 – 64 158 59.2 65 – Over 8 3.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 56 21.0 No 211 79.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-79-

Table 4.9 – American Asian Pacific Ministries, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 210 81.1 Female 49 18.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 3.5 21 – 24 33 12.7 25 – 44 176 68.0 45 – 64 41 15.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 13 5.0 No 246 95.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-80-

Table 4.10 – American Drug Recovery Program, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 6 100.0


Gender

Male 2 33.3 Female 4 66.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 33.3 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 2 33.3 45 – 64 2 33.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 6 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-81-

Table 4.11 – American Drug Treatment Program, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 9 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 100.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 0 0.0 45 – 64 0 0.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 11.1 No 8 88.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-82-

Table 4.12 – American Health and Education Clinics* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 33 100.0


Gender

Male 15 48.4 Female 16 51.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 48.4 21 – 24 5 16.1 25 – 44 9 29.0 45 – 64 2 6.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 31 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-83-

Table 4.13 – American Indian Changing Spirits 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 62 100.0


Gender

Male 58 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 8.6 21 – 24 6 10.3 25 – 44 31 53.4 45 – 64 16 27.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 44 75.9 No 14 24.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-84-

Table 4.14 – Antelope Valley Rehabilitation Centers 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 2,748 82.7 Female 576 17.3

Race/Ethnicity

White 1,444 43.4 Black/African American 796 23.9 Hispanic/Latino 859 25.8 Native American 45 1.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 69 2.1 Other 111 3.3

Age

18 – 20 175 5.3 21 – 24 406 12.2 25 – 44 1,915 57.6 45 – 64 817 24.6 65 – Over 11 0.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1,450 43.6 No 1,874 56.4


Alcohol 929 27.9 Cocaine/Crack 756 22.7 Heroin 227 6.8 Marijuana/Hashish 201 6.0 Methamphetamine 1,137 34.2 Other 74 2.2


Day Care Program 0 0.0 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 0 0.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 213 6.2 Residential Detoxification Services 0 0.0 Residential Services 3,210 93.8


CChhaapptteerr 44

-85-

Table 4.15 – Apex Foundation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 113 72.9 Female 42 27.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 6 3.9 25 – 44 50 32.3 45 – 64 91 58.7 65 – Over 8 5.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 0.6 No 154 99.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-86-

Table 4.16 – Arms of Grace Humanitarian Services 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 42 100.0


Gender

Male 8 19.0 Female 34 81.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 19.0 21 – 24 6 14.3 25 – 44 21 50.0 45 – 64 6 14.3 65 – Over 1 2.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 7.1 No 39 92.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-87-

Table 4.17 – Asian American Drug Abuse Program, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 388 53.8 Female 333 46.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 42 5.8 21 – 24 69 9.6 25 – 44 415 57.6 45 – 64 191 26.5 65 – Over 4 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 75 10.4 No 646 89.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-88-

Table 4.18 – Atlantic Recovery Services 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 577 79.9 Female 145 20.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 214 29.6 21 – 24 94 13.0 25 – 44 324 44.9 45 – 64 90 12.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 31 4.3 No 691 95.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-89-

Table 4.19 – Avalon-Carver Community Health Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 286 72.2 Female 110 27.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 16 4.0 21 – 24 39 9.8 25 – 44 193 48.7 45 – 64 142 35.9 65 – Over 6 1.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 37 9.3 No 359 90.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-90-

Table 4.20 – BAART Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 113 68.5 Female 52 31.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 1.8 21 – 24 6 3.6 25 – 44 40 24.2 45 – 64 110 66.7 65 – Over 6 3.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 22 13.3 No 143 86.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-91-

Table 4.21 – Be Well Now Institute* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 14 100.0


Gender

Male 4 28.6 Female 10 71.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 3 21.4 45 – 64 10 71.4 65 – Over 1 7.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 6 42.9 No 8 57.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-92-

Table 4.22 – Beacon House Association of San Pedro (The) 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 117 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 5.1 21 – 24 14 12.0 25 – 44 67 57.3 45 – 64 30 25.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 115 98.3 No 2 1.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-93-

Table 4.23 – Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 2,839 72.3 Female 1,086 27.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 148 3.8 21 – 24 360 9.2 25 – 44 2,281 58.1 45 – 64 1,119 28.5 65 – Over 17 0.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 739 18.8 No 3,186 81.2


Alcohol 671 17.1 Cocaine/Crack 694 17.7 Heroin 1,139 29.0 Marijuana/Hashish 265 6.8 Methamphetamine 962 24.5 Other 194 4.9


Day Care Program 0 0.0 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 0 0.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 1,786 39.7 Residential Detoxification Services 1,924 42.8 Residential Services 787 17.5


CChhaapptteerr 44

-94-

Table 4.24 – Bernie’s Lil Women Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 28 100.0


Gender

Male 4 14.3 Female 24 85.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 17.9 21 – 24 7 25.0 25 – 44 11 39.3 45 – 64 5 17.9 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 23 82.1 No 5 17.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-95-

Table 4.25 – Bienvenidos Children’s Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 71 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 14.1 21 – 24 19 26.8 25 – 44 38 53.5 45 – 64 4 5.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 4.2 No 68 95.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-96-

Table 4.26 – Blessed Drug and Alcohol Treatment and Research Program, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 80 100.0


Gender

Male 44 55.0 Female 36 45.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 16.3 21 – 24 8 10.0 25 – 44 35 43.8 45 – 64 23 28.8 65 – Over 1 1.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 80 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-97-

Table 4.27 – California Drug Consultants, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 142 94.0 Female 9 6.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 6.6 21 – 24 21 13.9 25 – 44 86 57.0 45 – 64 32 21.2 65 – Over 2 1.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 13 8.6 No 138 91.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-98-

Table 4.28 – California Drug Treatment Program, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 43 100.0


Gender

Male 22 53.7 Female 19 46.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 7 17.1 21 – 24 6 14.6 25 – 44 19 46.3 45 – 64 9 22.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 41 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-99-

Table 4.29 – California Graduate Institute 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 23 100.0


Gender

Male 14 70.0 Female 6 30.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 5.0 21 – 24 1 5.0 25 – 44 14 70.0 45 – 64 4 20.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 20 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-100-

Table 4.30 – California Hispanic Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 904 72.6 Female 342 27.4

Race/Ethnicity

White 80 6.4 Black/African American 24 1.9 Hispanic/Latino 1,005 80.7 Native American 6 0.5 Asian/Pacific Islander 46 3.7 Other 85 6.8

Age

18 – 20 60 4.8 21 – 24 173 13.9 25 – 44 833 66.9 45 – 64 179 14.4 65 – Over 1 0.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 159 12.8 No 1,087 87.2




Day Care Program 0 0.0 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 0 0.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 1,254 93.2 Residential Detoxification Services 0 0.0 Residential Services 92 6.8


CChhaapptteerr 44

-101-

Table 4.31 – California People Counseling Center* 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 102 67.1 Female 50 32.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 1.3 21 – 24 6 3.9 25 – 44 67 44.1 45 – 64 76 50.0 65 – Over 1 0.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 152 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-102-

Table 4.32 – Cambodian Association of America 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 43 100.0


Gender

Male 28 68.3 Female 13 31.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.4 21 – 24 5 12.2 25 – 44 21 51.2 45 – 64 14 34.1 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 4 9.8 No 37 90.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-103-

Table 4.33 – Canon Human Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 359 88.4 Female 47 11.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 20 4.9 21 – 24 51 12.6 25 – 44 186 45.8 45 – 64 143 35.2 65 – Over 6 1.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 72 17.7 No 334 82.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-104-

Table 4.34 – Caring Residential Care, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 46 41.8 Female 64 58.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 2.7 21 – 24 7 6.4 25 – 44 43 39.1 45 – 64 49 44.5 65 – Over 8 7.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 7.3 No 102 92.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-105-

Table 4.35 – Casa de Las Amigas 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 98 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 84 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 7 8.3 21 – 24 9 10.7 25 – 44 52 61.9 45 – 64 16 19.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 21 25.0 No 63 75.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-106-

Table 4.36 – Center for Hope, Inc. (The)* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 62 100.0


Gender

Male 9 14.5 Female 53 85.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 23 37.1 21 – 24 6 9.7 25 – 44 27 43.5 45 – 64 6 9.7 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 29 46.8 No 33 53.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-107-

Table 4.37 – Chabad of California, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 105 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 11 10.5 21 – 24 14 13.3 25 – 44 64 61.0 45 – 64 16 15.2 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 23 21.9 No 82 78.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-108-

Table 4.38 – Changing Steps 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 139 70.9 Female 57 29.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 4.6 21 – 24 9 4.6 25 – 44 71 36.2 45 – 64 97 49.5 65 – Over 10 5.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 27 13.8 No 169 86.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-109-

Table 4.39 – Children’s Institute International 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 50 100.0


Gender

Male 11 25.0 Female 33 75.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.3 21 – 24 8 18.2 25 – 44 30 68.2 45 – 64 5 11.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 15.9 No 37 84.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-110-

Table 4.40 – Circle of Friends Outpatient Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 554 66.7 Female 276 33.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 4 0.5 21 – 24 15 1.8 25 – 44 257 31.0 45 – 64 495 59.6 65 – Over 59 7.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 6 0.7 No 824 99.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-111-

Table 4.41 – Circle of Help Foundation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 219 58.7 Female 154 41.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 21 5.6 21 – 24 19 5.1 25 – 44 150 40.2 45 – 64 168 45.0 65 – Over 15 4.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 1.9 No 366 98.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-112-

Table 4.42 – City of Compton 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 101 67.8 Female 48 32.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 10.1 21 – 24 20 13.4 25 – 44 74 49.7 45 – 64 40 26.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 5.4 No 141 94.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-113-

Table 4.43 – City of Long Beach, A Municipal Corporation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 262 74.2 Female 91 25.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 4.2 21 – 24 40 11.3 25 – 44 226 64.0 45 – 64 70 19.8 65 – Over 2 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 11 3.1 No 342 96.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-114-

Table 4.44 – City of Pasadena 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 68 100.0


Gender

Male 34 54.0 Female 29 46.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 9.5 21 – 24 5 7.9 25 – 44 40 63.5 45 – 64 12 19.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 12.7 No 55 87.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-115-

Table 4.45 – CLARE Foundation, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 625 72.3 Female 239 27.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 23 2.7 21 – 24 56 6.5 25 – 44 529 61.2 45 – 64 252 29.2 65 – Over 4 0.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 660 76.4 No 204 23.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-116-

Table 4.46 – Clinica Monsenor Oscar A. Romero 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 75 48.7 Female 79 51.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 5.2 21 – 24 19 12.3 25 – 44 102 66.2 45 – 64 25 16.2 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 19 12.3 No 135 87.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-117-

Table 4.47 – Community Alcohol and Drug Treatment* 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 192 59.4 Female 131 40.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 2.5 21 – 24 7 2.2 25 – 44 86 26.6 45 – 64 157 48.6 65 – Over 65 20.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 0.9 No 320 99.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-118-

Table 4.48 – Cri-Help, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 389 64.3 Female 216 35.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 29 4.8 21 – 24 85 14.0 25 – 44 359 59.3 45 – 64 132 21.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 200 33.1 No 405 66.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-119-

Table 4.49 – Crossroads Skills Development, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 56 100.0


Gender

Male 23 41.1 Female 33 58.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 10.7 21 – 24 5 8.9 25 – 44 13 23.2 45 – 64 28 50.0 65 – Over 4 7.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 1.8 No 55 98.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-120-

Table 4.50 – Cultural Bridges Treatment Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 91 53.8 Female 78 46.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 3.0 21 – 24 10 5.9 25 – 44 68 40.2 45 – 64 80 47.3 65 – Over 6 3.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 1.2 No 167 98.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-121-

Table 4.51 – Dare U to Care Outreach Ministry 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 27 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 27 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 1 3.7 25 – 44 16 59.3 45 – 64 10 37.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 18 66.7 No 9 33.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-122-

Table 4.52– Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 252 53.2 Female 222 46.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 20 4.2 21 – 24 72 15.2 25 – 44 264 55.7 45 – 64 115 24.3 65 – Over 3 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 114 24.1 No 360 75.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-123-

Table 4.53 – Do It Now Foundation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 165 81.7 Female 37 18.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 1.0 21 – 24 16 7.9 25 – 44 129 63.9 45 – 64 53 26.2 65 – Over 2 1.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 62 30.7 No 140 69.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-124-

Table 4.54 – Driver Safety Schools, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 169 87.1 Female 25 12.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 4.6 21 – 24 29 14.9 25 – 44 120 61.9 45 – 64 35 18.0 65 – Over 1 0.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 14 7.2 No 180 92.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-125-

Table 4.55 – El Centro del Pueblo 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 57 100.0


Gender

Male 35 63.6 Female 20 36.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 5.5 21 – 24 7 12.7 25 – 44 36 65.5 45 – 64 9 16.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 13 23.6 No 42 76.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-126-

Table 4.56 – El Proyecto del Barrio 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 371 57.0 Female 280 43.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 45 6.9 21 – 24 115 17.7 25 – 44 400 61.4 45 – 64 91 14.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 28 4.3 No 623 95.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-127-

Table 4.57 – Epidaurus 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 34 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 1 2.9 25 – 44 23 67.6 45 – 64 10 29.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 22 64.7 No 12 35.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-128-

Table 4.58 – Family Service of Long Beach 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 201 75.6 Female 65 24.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 3.4 21 – 24 30 11.3 25 – 44 149 56.0 45 – 64 76 28.6 65 – Over 2 0.8

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 30 11.3 No 236 88.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-129-

Table 4.59 – Found, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 546 76.3 Female 170 23.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 0.7 21 – 24 31 4.3 25 – 44 332 46.4 45 – 64 333 46.5 65 – Over 15 2.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 125 17.5 No 591 82.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-130-

Table 4.60 – Fred Brown’s Recovery Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 21 100.0


Gender

Male 18 85.7 Female 3 14.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 4.8 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 13 61.9 45 – 64 7 33.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 19 90.5 No 2 9.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-131-

Table 4.61 – Glorious Manor, Inc. II* 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 53 43.8 Female 68 56.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 6.6 21 – 24 5 4.1 25 – 44 42 34.7 45 – 64 57 47.1 65 – Over 9 7.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 17 14.0 No 104 86.0





*New Agency0 Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

CChhaapptteerr 44

-132-

Table 4.62 – Goretti Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 32 100.0


Gender

Male 20 64.5 Female 11 35.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 4 12.9 21 – 24 1 3.2 25 – 44 10 32.3 45 – 64 15 48.4 65 – Over 1 3.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 31 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-133-

Table 4.63 – Grandview Foundation, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 173 97.7 Female 4 2.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 7.3 21 – 24 25 14.1 25 – 44 116 65.5 45 – 64 23 13.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 54 30.5 No 123 69.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-134-

Table 4.64 – Guidance Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 26 100.0


Gender

Male 13 50.0 Female 13 50.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 57.7 21 – 24 1 3.8 25 – 44 6 23.1 45 – 64 4 15.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 26 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-135-

Table 4.65 – Help the People Foundation 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 15 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 4 26.7 25 – 44 9 60.0 45 – 64 2 13.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 15 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-136-

Table 4.66 – His Sheltering Arms, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 178 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 3.4 21 – 24 21 11.8 25 – 44 105 59.0 45 – 64 46 25.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 104 58.4 No 74 41.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-137-

Table 4.67 – Hollywood Recovery Treatment Center* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 16 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 4 28.6 45 – 64 10 71.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 14 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-138-

Table 4.68 – House of Hope Foundation, Inc.

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 90 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 8.9 21 – 24 9 10.0 25 – 44 54 60.0 45 – 64 19 21.1 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 15 16.7 No 75 83.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-139-

Table 4.69– I-ADARP, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 69 50.0 Female 69 50.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 14 10.1 21 – 24 17 12.3 25 – 44 95 68.8 45 – 64 12 8.7 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 22 15.9 No 116 84.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-140-

Table 4.70 – Immaculate Care Center, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 81 100.0


Gender

Male 34 42.0 Female 47 58.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 24 29.6 21 – 24 8 9.9 25 – 44 19 23.5 45 – 64 30 37.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 8.6 No 74 91.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-141-

Table 4.71 – Independence Community Treatment Clinic

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 156 59.5 Female 106 40.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 52 19.8 21 – 24 16 6.1 25 – 44 74 28.2 45 – 64 90 34.4 65 – Over 30 11.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 4 1.5 No 258 98.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-142-

Table 4.72 – Interconnection Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 39 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 38 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 7.9 21 – 24 8 21.1 25 – 44 26 68.4 45 – 64 1 2.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 38 100.0 No 0 0.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-143-

Table 4.73 – Jeff Grand Clinic, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 138 69.0 Female 62 31.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 40 20.0 45 – 64 138 69.0 65 – Over 22 11.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 13 6.5 No 187 93.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-144-

Table 4.74 – JMO – International Skills Developers* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 13 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 3 23.1 45 – 64 10 76.9 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 13 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-145-

Table 4.75 – Joint Efforts, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 63 47.7 Female 69 52.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 4.5 21 – 24 17 12.9 25 – 44 80 60.6 45 – 64 29 22.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 18 13.6 No 114 86.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-146-

Table 4.76 – L.A. South Health Services, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 36 100.0


Gender

Male 11 30.6 Female 25 69.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 8.3 21 – 24 2 5.6 25 – 44 18 50.0 45 – 64 11 30.6 65 – Over 2 5.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 36 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-147-

Table 4.77 – La Clinica del Pueblo, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 128 80.0 Female 32 20.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 4 2.5 21 – 24 15 9.4 25 – 44 93 58.1 45 – 64 47 29.4 65 – Over 1 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 9 5.6 No 151 94.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-148-

Table 4.78 – Lavelle Youth Homes* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 49 100.0


Gender

Male 34 69.4 Female 15 30.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 6.1 21 – 24 1 2.0 25 – 44 19 38.8 45 – 64 22 44.9 65 – Over 4 8.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 49 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-149-

Table 4.79 – Laws Support Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 163 75.1 Female 54 24.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 2.8 21 – 24 15 6.9 25 – 44 93 42.9 45 – 64 98 45.2 65 – Over 5 2.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 28 12.9 No 189 87.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-150-

Table 4.80 – Little House 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 127 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 7.9 21 – 24 13 10.2 25 – 44 83 65.4 45 – 64 21 16.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 53 41.7 No 74 58.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-151-

Table 4.81 – Live Again Recovery Home, Inc.

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 93 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 10.8 21 – 24 14 15.1 25 – 44 59 63.4 45 – 64 10 10.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 8.6 No 85 91.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-152-

Table 4.82 – Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 68 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 66 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 7.6 21 – 24 17 25.8 25 – 44 43 65.2 45 – 64 1 1.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 11 16.7 No 55 83.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-153-

Table 4.83 – Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 491 65.0 Female 264 35.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 34 4.5 21 – 24 94 12.5 25 – 44 464 61.5 45 – 64 162 21.5 65 – Over 1 0.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 249 33.0 No 506 67.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-154-

Table 4.84 – Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Service Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 59 100.0


Gender

Male 45 76.3 Female 14 23.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 1.7 21 – 24 6 10.2 25 – 44 42 71.2 45 – 64 10 16.9 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 1.7 No 58 98.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-155-

Table 4.85 – Los Angeles New Life Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 20 100.0


Gender

Male 14 70.0 Female 6 30.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 2 10.0 25 – 44 9 45.0 45 – 64 9 45.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 20 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-156-

Table 4.86 – Mary-Lind Foundation

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 179 81.4 Female 41 18.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 2.7 21 – 24 22 10.0 25 – 44 130 59.1 45 – 64 62 28.2 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 175 79.5 No 45 20.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-157-

Table 4.87 – Maternity House, LLC 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 49 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 43 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 11.6 21 – 24 9 20.9 25 – 44 29 67.4 45 – 64 0 0.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 28 65.1 No 15 34.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-158-

Table 4.88 – Matrix Institute on Addictions

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 255 69.1 Female 114 30.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 11 3.0 21 – 24 27 7.3 25 – 44 191 51.8 45 – 64 135 36.6 65 – Over 5 1.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 21 5.7 No 348 94.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-159-

Table 4.89 – MELA Counseling Services Center, Inc.

2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 195 57.9 Female 142 42.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 48 14.2 21 – 24 62 18.4 25 – 44 179 53.1 45 – 64 48 14.2 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 30 8.9 No 307 91.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-160-

Table 4.90– Mid Valley Recovery Service, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 351 63.2 Female 204 36.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 28 5.0 21 – 24 86 15.5 25 – 44 358 64.5 45 – 64 83 15.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 118 21.3 No 437 78.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-161-

Table 4.91 – Mini Twelve Step House, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 112 32.9 Female 228 67.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 2.6 21 – 24 35 10.3 25 – 44 209 61.5 45 – 64 87 25.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 164 48.2 No 176 51.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-162-

Table 4.92 MJB Transitional Recovery, Inc 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 4 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 1 25.0 25 – 44 2 50.0 45 – 64 1 25.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 4 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-163-

Table 4.93 – Mount Sinai Health Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 43 100.0


Gender

Male 23 53.5 Female 20 46.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 30.2 21 – 24 2 4.7 25 – 44 16 37.2 45 – 64 12 27.9 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 4.7 No 41 95.3





Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System0

CChhaapptteerr 44

-164-

Table 4.94 – NCADD of East San Gabriel & Pomona Valleys, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 493 58.6 Female 349 41.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 79 9.4 21 – 24 131 15.6 25 – 44 515 61.2 45 – 64 116 13.8 65 – Over 1 0.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 39 4.6 No 803 95.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-165-

Table 4.95 – NCADD – Long Beach Area 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 255 48.2 Female 274 51.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 16 3.0 21 – 24 67 12.7 25 – 44 300 56.7 45 – 64 144 27.2 65 – Over 2 0.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 88 16.6 No 441 83.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-166-

Table 4.96 – NCADD of the San Fernando Valley 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 646 72.6 Female 244 27.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 40 4.5 21 – 24 132 14.8 25 – 44 535 60.1 45 – 64 181 20.3 65 – Over 2 0.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 62 7.0 No 828 93.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-167-

Table 4.97 – Ness Counseling Center, Incorporated (The) 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 230 71.4 Female 92 28.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 0.6 21 – 24 9 2.8 25 – 44 134 41.6 45 – 64 145 45.0 65 – Over 32 9.9

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 6 1.9 No 316 98.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-168-

Table 4.98 – New Beginnings Recovery Treatment Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 293 55.9 Female 231 44.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 47 9.0 21 – 24 31 5.9 25 – 44 216 41.2 45 – 64 222 42.4 65 – Over 8 1.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 17 3.2 No 507 96.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-169-

Table 4.99 – New Directions 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 67 100.0


Gender

Male 61 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 1 1.6 25 – 44 14 23.0 45 – 64 46 75.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 42 68.9 No 19 31.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-170-

Table 4.100 – New Hope Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 213 57.0 Female 161 43.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 17 4.5 21 – 24 32 8.6 25 – 44 248 66.3 45 – 64 77 20.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 1.9 No 367 98.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-171-

Table 4.101 – New Horizons Housing and Independent Living* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 54 100.0


Gender

Male 35 66.0 Female 18 34.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 3 5.7 25 – 44 33 62.3 45 – 64 16 30.2 65 – Over 1 1.9

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 3.8 No 51 96.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-172-

Table 4.102 – New Resource Institute: DBA Clear Path* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 30 100.0


Gender

Male 20 66.7 Female 10 33.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 10.0 21 – 24 1 3.3 25 – 44 7 23.3 45 – 64 16 53.3 65 – Over 3 10.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 5 16.7 No 25 83.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-173-

Table 4.103 – New Way Foundation, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 147 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 11 7.5 21 – 24 25 17.0 25 – 44 83 56.5 45 – 64 28 19.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 144 98.0 No 3 2.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-174-

Table 4.104 – Noble Heart Services Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 57 40.4 Female 84 59.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 11 7.8 21 – 24 7 5.0 25 – 44 75 53.2 45 – 64 46 32.6 65 – Over 2 1.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 5 3.5 No 136 96.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-175-

Table 4.105 – Okuli Eagle’s Nest Foundation, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 40 100.0


Gender

Male 34 85.0 Female 6 15.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 14 35.0 45 – 64 26 65.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 40 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-176-

Table 4.106 – Options – A Child Care and Human Services Agency 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 131 63.9 Female 74 36.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 11 5.4 21 – 24 34 16.6 25 – 44 135 65.9 45 – 64 25 12.2 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 3.9 No 197 96.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-177-

Table 4.107 – Our Homes by Anita, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 39 100.0


Gender

Male 24 61.5 Female 15 38.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.6 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 9 23.1 45 – 64 28 71.8 65 – Over 1 2.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 5.1 No 37 94.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-178-

Table 4.108 – Outreach Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 50 36.2 Female 88 63.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 24 17.4 21 – 24 7 5.1 25 – 44 48 34.8 45 – 64 54 39.1 65 – Over 5 3.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 28 20.3 No 110 79.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-179-

Table 4.109 – Pacific Clinics 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 118 43.7 Female 152 56.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 24 8.9 21 – 24 27 10.0 25 – 44 139 51.5 45 – 64 80 29.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 19 7.0 No 251 93.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-180-

Table 4.110 – Pajo Corporation (The) 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 54 100.0


Gender

Male 40 78.4 Female 11 21.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 12 23.5 45 – 64 32 62.7 65 – Over 7 13.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 3.9 No 49 96.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-181-

Table 4.111 – Palm House, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 65 100.0


Gender

Male 61 100.0 Female 0 0.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 3.3 21 – 24 6 9.8 25 – 44 32 52.5 45 – 64 21 34.4 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 60 98.4 No 1 1.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-182-

Table 4.112 – Palm Residential Care Facility (The) 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 21 100.0


Gender

Male 12 57.1 Female 9 42.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 2 9.5 25 – 44 9 42.9 45 – 64 10 47.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 16 76.2 No 5 23.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-183-

Table 4.113 – Pasadena Recovery Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 75 62.5 Female 45 37.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 5.0 21 – 24 13 10.8 25 – 44 68 56.7 45 – 64 33 27.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 5.8 No 113 94.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-184-

Table 6.114 – Pavillion Healthcare Services, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 79 100.0


Gender

Male 36 45.6 Female 43 54.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 14 17.7 21 – 24 5 6.3 25 – 44 25 31.6 45 – 64 31 39.2 65 – Over 4 5.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 1.3 No 78 98.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-185-

Table 4.115 – People Coordinated Services of Southern California 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 660 72.8 Female 246 27.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 20 2.2 21 – 24 81 8.9 25 – 44 450 49.7 45 – 64 350 38.6 65 – Over 5 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 164 18.1 No 742 81.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-186-

Table 4.116 – People in Progress, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 106 89.8 Female 12 10.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 2.5 21 – 24 19 16.1 25 – 44 73 61.9 45 – 64 23 19.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 49 41.5 No 69 58.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-187-

Table 4.117 – Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 164 65.6 Female 86 34.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 12 4.8 21 – 24 32 12.8 25 – 44 154 61.6 45 – 64 52 20.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 81 32.4 No 169 67.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-188-

Table 4.118 – Plaza Community Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 272 63.7 Female 155 36.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 23 5.4 21 – 24 79 18.5 25 – 44 275 64.4 45 – 64 48 11.2 65 – Over 2 0.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 59 13.8 No 368 86.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-189-

Table 4.119 – Pomona Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 129 70.9 Female 53 29.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 8.2 21 – 24 24 13.2 25 – 44 115 63.2 45 – 64 26 14.3 65 – Over 2 1.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 17 9.3 No 165 90.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-190-

Table 4.120 – Pomona Community Crisis Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 98 70.5 Female 41 29.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 6.5 21 – 24 28 20.1 25 – 44 78 56.1 45 – 64 24 17.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 10 7.2 No 129 92.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-191-

Table 4.121 – Pride Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 155 54.6 Female 129 45.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 4 1.4 21 – 24 25 8.8 25 – 44 166 58.5 45 – 64 85 29.9 65 – Over 4 1.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 16 5.6 No 268 94.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-192-

Table 4.122 – Principles, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 984 69.3 Female 436 30.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 63 4.4 21 – 24 165 11.6 25 – 44 867 61.1 45 – 64 318 22.4 65 – Over 7 0.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 270 19.0 No 1,150 81.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-193-

Table 4.123 – Prototypes 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 204 27.8 Female 530 72.2

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 47 6.4 21 – 24 126 17.2 25 – 44 456 62.1 45 – 64 105 14.3 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 248 33.8 No 486 66.2






CChhaapptteerr 44

-194-

Table 4.124 – R.A.P. Community Recovery Services 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 96 87.3 Female 14 12.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 8.2 21 – 24 18 16.4 25 – 44 69 62.7 45 – 64 14 12.7 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 5 4.5 No 105 95.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-195-

Table 4.125 – Remah Health Services, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 9 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 55.6 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 4 44.4 45 – 64 0 0.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 9 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-196-

Table 4.126 – Reseda Substance Abuse Treatment Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 27 25.0 Female 81 75.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 12.0 21 – 24 22 20.4 25 – 44 60 55.6 45 – 64 13 12.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 11 10.2 No 97 89.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-197-

Table 4.127 – R.I.G.H.T. Program* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 71 100.0


Gender

Male 31 43.7 Female 40 56.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 5 7.0 21 – 24 3 4.2 25 – 44 27 38.0 45 – 64 32 45.1 65 – Over 4 5.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 1.4 No 70 98.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-198-

Table 4.128 – Roy’s National Health Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 48 31.6 Female 104 68.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 12 7.9 21 – 24 4 2.6 25 – 44 77 50.7 45 – 64 55 36.2 65 – Over 4 2.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 1.3 No 150 98.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-199-

Table 4.129 – Salvation Army, A California Corporation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 247 88.5 Female 32 11.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 3.6 21 – 24 29 10.4 25 – 44 137 49.1 45 – 64 101 36.2 65 – Over 2 0.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 128 45.9 No 151 54.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-200-

Table 4.130 – Santa Anita Family Services 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 205 77.1 Female 61 22.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 4.9 21 – 24 37 13.9 25 – 44 185 69.5 45 – 64 31 11.7 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 15 5.6 No 251 94.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-201-

Table 4.131 – Shields for Families, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 328 49.5 Female 334 50.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 32 4.8 21 – 24 66 10.0 25 – 44 413 62.4 45 – 64 150 22.7 65 – Over 1 0.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 137 20.7 No 525 79.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-202-

Table 4.132 – Social Model Recovery Systems, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 290 76.3 Female 90 23.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 20 5.3 21 – 24 55 14.5 25 – 44 223 58.7 45 – 64 82 21.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 33 8.7 No 347 91.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-203-

Table 4.133 – South Bay Alcoholism Services, DBA NCADD of the South Bay 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 106 44.9 Female 130 55.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 13 5.5 21 – 24 32 13.6 25 – 44 145 61.4 45 – 64 46 19.5 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 73 30.9 No 163 69.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-204-

Table 4.134 – South Bay Human Services Coalition 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 205 73.5 Female 74 26.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 2.9 21 – 24 42 15.1 25 – 44 159 57.0 45 – 64 70 25.1 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 37 13.3 No 242 86.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-205-

Table 4.135 – Southern California Alcohol and Drug Program, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 1,086 72.3 Female 417 27.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 140 9.3 21 – 24 225 15.0 25 – 44 937 62.3 45 – 64 198 13.2 65 – Over 3 0.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 571 38.0 No 932 62.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-206-

Table 4.136 – Special Service for Groups 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 180 72.9 Female 67 27.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 4.0 21 – 24 24 9.7 25 – 44 151 61.1 45 – 64 59 23.9 65 – Over 3 1.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 8 3.2 No 239 96.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-207-

Table 4.137 – SPIRITT Family Services, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 563 77.4 Female 164 22.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 26 3.6 21 – 24 104 14.3 25 – 44 452 62.2 45 – 64 145 19.9 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 136 18.7 No 591 81.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-208-

Table 4.138 – Stepping Stones Home 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 110 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 7 6.4 21 – 24 19 17.3 25 – 44 69 62.7 45 – 64 15 13.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 41 37.3 No 69 62.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-209-

Table 4.139 – Substance Abuse Foundation of Long Beach, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 330 57.3 Female 246 42.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 25 4.3 21 – 24 70 12.2 25 – 44 337 58.5 45 – 64 142 24.7 65 – Over 2 0.3

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 249 43.2 No 327 56.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-210-

Table 4.140 – Sunrise Community Counseling Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 214 78.4 Female 59 21.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 2.9 21 – 24 28 10.3 25 – 44 139 50.9 45 – 64 94 34.4 65 – Over 4 1.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 38 13.9 No 235 86.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-211-

Table 4.141 – Tarzana Treatment Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 2,665 56.7 Female 2,034 43.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 252 5.4 21 – 24 554 11.8 25 – 44 2,712 57.7 45 – 64 1,147 24.4 65 – Over 34 0.7

Education


Employment Status

Employed 1,190 25.3 Unemployed 3,168 67.4 Not in the labor force 341 7.3

Homeless

Yes 566 12.0 No 4,133 88.0


Alcohol 1,041 22.2 Cocaine/Crack 681 14.5 Heroin 764 16.3 Marijuana/Hashish 389 8.3 Methamphetamine 1,362 29.0 Other 462 9.8


Day Care Program 534 8.6 NTP Detoxification 0 0.0 NTP Maintenance 0 0.0 Outpatient Counseling Program 2,330 37.6 Residential Detoxification Services 2,188 35.3 Residential Services 1,152 18.6


CChhaapptteerr 44

-212-

Table 4.142 – T.E.A.M. One Stop 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 132 61.4 Female 83 38.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 10 4.7 25 – 44 110 51.2 45 – 64 89 41.4 65 – Over 6 2.8

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 1.4 No 212 98.6






CChhaapptteerr 44

-213-

Table 4.143 – Total Family Support Clinic 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 543 64.1 Female 304 35.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 31 3.7 21 – 24 39 4.6 25 – 44 340 40.1 45 – 64 393 46.4 65 – Over 44 5.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 0.8 No 840 99.2





CChhaapptteerr 44

-214-

Table 4.144 – Transcultural Health Development, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 64 59.3 Female 44 40.7

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 3 2.8 25 – 44 37 34.3 45 – 64 61 56.5 65 – Over 7 6.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 10 9.3 No 98 90.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-215-

Table 4.145 – Trinity Plus Healthcare Services, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 45 100.0


Gender

Male 23 51.1 Female 22 48.9

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 10 22.2 45 – 64 33 73.3 65 – Over 2 4.4

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 45 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-216-

Table 4.146 – Twin Town Corporation 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 37 100.0


Gender

Male 28 80.0 Female 7 20.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.9 21 – 24 6 17.1 25 – 44 18 51.4 45 – 64 10 28.6 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 2 5.7 No 33 94.3






CChhaapptteerr 44

-217-

Table 4.147 – Ubenete Charity, Inc.* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 35 100.0


Gender

Male 18 51.4 Female 17 48.6

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 5.7 21 – 24 2 5.7 25 – 44 3 8.6 45 – 64 26 74.3 65 – Over 2 5.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 2.9 No 34 97.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-218-

Table 4.148 – United American Indian Involvement, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 55 100.0


Gender

Male 39 70.9 Female 16 29.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 7 12.7 25 – 44 30 54.5 45 – 64 17 30.9 65 – Over 1 1.8

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 11 20.0 No 44 80.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-219-

Table 4.149 – United States Veterans Initiative, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 11 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 10 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 6 60.0 45 – 64 4 40.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 9 90.0 No 1 10.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-220-

Table 4.150 – United Women in Transition 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 10 100.0


Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 10 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 2 20.0 25 – 44 3 30.0 45 – 64 5 50.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 4 40.0 No 6 60.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-221-

Table 4.151 – URDC Human Services Corporation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 0 0.0 Female 183 100.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 8 4.4 21 – 24 30 16.4 25 – 44 112 61.2 45 – 64 32 17.5 65 – Over 1 0.5

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 50 27.3 No 133 72.7






CChhaapptteerr 44

-222-

Table 4.152 – U – Turn Alcohol and Drug Education Program, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 61 100.0


Gender

Male 40 65.6 Female 21 34.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 12 19.7 21 – 24 11 18.0 25 – 44 29 47.5 45 – 64 8 13.1 65 – Over 1 1.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 3 4.9 No 58 95.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-223-

Table 4.153 – Van Ness Recovery House 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 128 78.5 Female 35 21.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 6 3.7 21 – 24 25 15.3 25 – 44 106 65.0 45 – 64 26 16.0 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 153 93.9 No 10 6.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-224-

Table 4.154 – Verdugo Mental Health Center 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 120 74.5 Female 41 25.5

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 10 6.2 21 – 24 18 11.2 25 – 44 108 67.1 45 – 64 24 14.9 65 – Over 1 0.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 10 6.2 No 151 93.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-225-

Table 4.155 – Volunteer of Africa* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 11 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity

White 0 0.0 Black/African American 11 100.0 Hispanic/Latino 0 0.0 Native American 0 0.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0.0 Other 0.0

Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 3 27.3 45 – 64 7 63.6 65 – Over 1 9.1

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 10 90.9 No 1 9.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-226-

Table 4.156 – Volunteers of America of Los Angeles 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 248 69.9 Female 107 30.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 2 0.6 21 – 24 13 3.7 25 – 44 191 53.8 45 – 64 143 40.3 65 – Over 6 1.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 337 94.9 No 18 5.1






CChhaapptteerr 44

-227-

Table 4.157 – Walden House, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 39 100.0


Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.6 21 – 24 0 0.0 25 – 44 23 60.5 45 – 64 14 36.8 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 16 42.1 No 22 57.9






CChhaapptteerr 44

-228-

Table 4.158 – Watts Healthcare Corporation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 273 56.2 Female 213 43.8

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 15 3.1 21 – 24 41 8.4 25 – 44 280 57.6 45 – 64 149 30.7 65 – Over 1 0.2

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 147 30.2 No 339 69.8






CChhaapptteerr 44

-229-

Table 4.159 – We Can Help Foundation 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 191 69.0 Female 86 31.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 3 1.1 21 – 24 2 0.7 25 – 44 92 33.2 45 – 64 153 55.2 65 – Over 27 9.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 7 2.5 No 270 97.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-230-

Table 4.160 – Western Pacific Med Corp. 2006-07 Fiscal Year




Gender

Male 255 60.6 Female 166 39.4

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 9 2.1 21 – 24 10 2.4 25 – 44 195 46.3 45 – 64 192 45.6 65 – Over 15 3.6

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 15 3.6 No 406 96.4






CChhaapptteerr 44

-231-

Table 4.161 – Wilshire Treatment Center, Inc. 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 31 100.0


Gender

Male 22 75.9 Female 7 24.1

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 1 3.4 25 – 44 14 48.3 45 – 64 8 27.6 65 – Over 6 20.7

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 0 0.0 No 29 100.0






CChhaapptteerr 44

-232-

Table 4.162 – Wings of Refuge* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 22 100.0


Gender

Male 5 22.7 Female 17 77.3

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 0 0.0 21 – 24 3 13.6 25 – 44 17 77.3 45 – 64 2 9.1 65 – Over 0 0.0

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 4.5 No 21 95.5






CChhaapptteerr 44

-233-

Table 4.163 – Winky’s Treatment Center* 2006-07 Fiscal Year


Admissions 38 100.0


Gender

Male 19 50.0 Female 19 50.0

Race/Ethnicity


Age

18 – 20 1 2.6 21 – 24 3 7.9 25 – 44 13 34.2 45 – 64 18 47.4 65 – Over 3 7.9

Education


Employment Status


Homeless

Yes 1 2.6 No 37 97.4






CChhaapptteerr 55 –– LLAACC AAllccoohhooll aanndd DDrruugg SSttaattiissttiiccaall FFaacctt SShheeeettss

-234-

Introduction Chapter 5 is a composition of statistical “Fact Sheets” which provide information on key Los Angeles County alcohol and drug indicators and treatment outcomes. Alcohol and drug indicators are specific items used to measure and monitor AOD-related activities, issues, and problems. These indicators may include risk factors and consequences associated with alcohol and drug use. Treatment outcomes cover participants’ criminal justice involvement, mental and physical health status, employment, and living conditions. Statistical Fact Sheet 5.1 provides alcohol and drug-related indicators over twelve years; 1995 to 2006, for Los Angeles County. The indicators are as follows:

• Alcohol and Drug-related Deaths (Public Health – Data Collection, Health Assessment and Epidemiology).

• AIDS and IV Drug AIDS Cases (HIV/AIDS Surveillance Summary Reports)

• Hepatitis – Type B (Acute Communicable Disease Program)

• Alcohol and Drug-related Hospital Discharges (California Office of Statewide Health Planning and

Development)

• Alcohol and Drug-related Arrests (California Department of Justice)

• Alcohol-related Traffic Accidents (California Highway Patrol)

• Drug and Alcohol Admissions (Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System) Fact Sheets 5.2 to 5.12 provide outcome statistics on homeless status, criminal justice involvement, physical health-related problems, mental health-related needs, and employment. Also, included are statistics for communicable diseases, sexually transmitted infections, participants tested for HIV/AIDS, and participants who received their HIV/AIDS test results. Other useful statistics such as length of enrollment/stay and participant demographics are available.

CChhaapptteerr 55

-235-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.1 Los Angeles County Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 1995 to 2007

INDICATORS 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Health

Alcohol-Related Deaths1 1,017 1,039 1,044 1,036 924 1,005 922 923 966 939 NA NA Drug-Related Deaths2 783 820 673 713 793 693 663 836 863 815 NA NA

AIDS Cases3 3,472 2,789 2,169 1,936 1,817 1,748 1,683 1,832 1,610 1,372+ 1,212+ 1,049+ IV Drug Use AIDS Cases4 265 240 205 147 118 134 139 130 81 91+ 82+ 60+ Hepatitis (Type B)5 231 247 109 92 66 65 44 32 73 72 57 62

Hospital

Alcohol-Related Discharges 10,232* 31,614 32,247 34,109 33,435 34,546 31,824 45,856 45,964 46,671 47,886 49,335 Drug-Related Discharges 8,595** 30,944 31,428 31,344 30,904 32,666 34,821 39,601 42,889 44,779 48,425 47,167

Criminal Justice

Adult Drug Related-Arrests6 67,148 67,781 71,782 67,052 58,836 54,280 56,129 57,361 66,249 71,384 74,628 NA Adult Alcohol-Related Arrests7 78,362 83,429 79,200 73,502 67,909 61,809 56,078 57,053 58,713 55,187 55,818 NA

Juvenile Drug Related-Arrests8 6,008 6,453 7,156 6,631 6,219 5,829 6,104 5,856 5,542 5,680 5.575 NA Juvenile Alcohol-Related Arrests9 1,183 1,353 1,389 1,338 1,221 912 855 920 929 845 733 NA

Alcohol-Related Traffic Accidents

Alcohol-Involved Accidents 6,546 6,295 5,419 5,090 4,911 5,266 5,380 5,242 5,280 5,235 5,236 NA Injury Accidents 6,348 6,104 5,213 4,920 4,712 5,043 5,155 5,034 5,045 4,998 4,996 NA Fatal Accidents 198 191 206 170 199 223 225 208 235 237 240 NA

Persons in Alcohol-Involved Accidents 10,327 9,974 8,480 7,862 7,549 8,051 8,300 7,945 7,973 8,005 7,752 NA Injured 10,101 9,759 8,253 7,672 7,328 7,811 8,051 7,711 7,702 7,746 7,487 NA Killed 226 215 227 190 221 240 249 234 271 259 265 NA

ADPA-Funded Alcohol and Drug Treatment 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Drug Admissions by Primary Problem

Heroin 9,794 10,465 10,928 11,150 12,583 12,297 10,696 9,639 14,466 10,604 8,084 7,726 Cocaine 7,747 8,825 9,024 10,873 11,359 11,964 11,894 12,295 12,872 13,479 13,167 12,872 Methamphetamine 3,129 3,858 4,599 4,714 5,202 6,013 8,216 10,938 14,073 17,265 19,383 18,181 Marijuana/Hashish 2,160 2,994 3,285 3,892 4,426 5,543 7,086 8,722 10,015 11,352 12,275 13,950 Other Drugs 1,464 1,488 1,296 1,298 1,497 1,800 2,207 2,620 3,173 2,694 2,181 2,369

Total Drug Admissions 24,294 27,630 29,132 31,927 35,067 37,617 40,099 44,214 54,599 55,394

55,090

55,098 Number Injecting Drugs 9,787 10,465 10,800 11,083 12,356 12,146 10,604 9,681 13,676 10,287 8,067 7,624 Total Alcohol Admissions 9,958 11,855 11,252 12,511 12,399 11,853 11,264 11,600 13,212 13,391 13,210 13,694

1,2Alcohol and drug-related death data, beginning in 1999, were based on the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health - Data Collection, Health Assessment and Epidemiology).

3,4Statistics on AIDS and IVDU AIDS cases presented in this report were obtained from The Los Angeles County HIV/AIDS Surveillance Summary Reports.

5Hepatitis B statistics from 1995 to 2006 were obtained from Los Angeles County Acute Communicable Disease Program.

6,7,8,9Alcohol and drug-related arrest statistics were recalculated using data from the California Department of Justice website.

*Alcohol-related hospital discharge data for 1995 did not include the expanded alcohol diagnoses (Source: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development).

**Drug-related hospital discharge data for 1995 did not include the expanded drug diagnoses (Source: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development).

†AIDS and IVDU AIDS 2004, 2005 and 2006 data are provisional due to reporting delay.

CChhaapptteerr 55

-236-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.2 Homeless Program Participant Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Homeless Status at Discharge

No Change (Remained Homeless)

Reduction (No Longer Homeless)

Program Type

Participant Homeless

at Admission

Number Percent Number Percent

Day Care 137 62 45.3 75 54.7

NTP Detoxification 65 24 36.9 41 63.1

NTP Maintenance 40 20 50.0 20 50.0

Outpatient Counseling 1,358 621 45.7 737 54.3

Residential Detoxification 1,115 876 78.6 239 21.4

Residential Services 4,577 2,655 58.0 1,922 42.0

Total 7,292 4,258 58.4 3,034 41.6


CChhaapptteerr 55

-237-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.3 Program Participant Arrest Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Arrest Status

Number Percent

Times Arrested

at Admission

Times Arrested

at Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Arrests 283 97.3 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 8 2.7 7 3 4 57.1 Reduction Total 291 100.0

Residential Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Arrests 4,167 93.7 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 278 6.3 1,690 1,042 648 38.3 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care


Greater than 29 Program Days No Arrests 728 93.5 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 51 6.5 74 8 66 89.2 Reduction Total 779 100.0

NTP Maintenance


Greater than 29 Program Days No Arrests 317 92.4 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 26 7.6 17 12 5 29.4 Reduction Total 343 100.0

Outpatient Counseling

Less than 30 Program Days No Arrests 3,207 83.3 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 642 6.7 818 334 484 59.2 Reduction Total 3,849 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Arrests 9,977 86.9 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 1,498 13.1 2,084 601 1,483 71.2 Reduction Total 11,475 100.0

Residential Services

Less than 30 Program Days No Arrests 2,837 85.2 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 494 14.8 713 228 485 68.0 Reduction Total 3,331 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Arrests 5,200 84.4 0 0 0 0.0 Arrests 963 15.6 1,374 80 1,294 94.2 Reduction Total 6,163 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-238-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.4 Program Participant Days in Jail Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Jail Status

Number Percent

Jail Days at Admission

Jail Days at Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Jail Days 286 95.3 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 14 4.7 71 10 61 85.9 Reduction Total 300 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Jail Days 4,197 94.4 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 248 5.6 1,659 1,019 640 38.6 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care


Greater than 29 Program Days No Jail Days 716 91.6 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 66 8.4 643 115 528 82.1 Reduction Total 782 100.0

NTP Maintenance


Greater than 29 Program Days No Jail Days 327 94.0 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 21 6.0 95 212 117 123.2 Increase Total 348 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Jail Days 3,130 80.6 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 753 19.4 8,047 2,584 5,463 67.9 Reduction Total 3,883 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Jail Days 9,508 83.0 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 1,942 17.0 24,225 4,045 20,180 83.3 Reduction Total 11,450 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Jail Days 2,548 76.4 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 789 23.6 13,414 9,635 3,779 28.2 Reduction Total 3,337 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Jail Days 4,512 73.2 0 0 0 0.0 Jail Days 1,655 26.8 32,134 8,939 23,195 72.2 Reduction Total 6,167 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-239-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.5 Program Participant Days in Prison Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Prison Status

Number Percent

Prison Days at Admission

Prison Days at Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Prison Days 383 99.0 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 4 1.0 5 2 3 60.0 Reduction Total 387 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Prison Days 4,411 99.2 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 34 0.8 381 235 146 38.3 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care

Less than 30 Program Days No Prison Days 272 99.6 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 1 0.4 14 0 14 100.0 Reduction Total 273 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Prison Days 792 99.4 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 5 0.6 34 0 34 100.0 Reduction Total 797 100.0

NTP Maintenance

Less than 30 Program Days No Prison Days 149 100.0 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 Not Applicable Total 149 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Prison Days 421 99.3 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 3 0.7 6 1 5 83.3 Reduction Total 424 100.0



Greater than 29 Program Days No Prison Days 11,620 98.7 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 156 1.3 967 219 748 77.4 Reduction Total 11,776 100.0



Greater than 29 Program Days No Prison Days 6,002 97.1 0 0 0 0.0 Prison Days 181 2.9 2,886 69 2,817 97.6 Reduction Total 6,183 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-240-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.6 Program Participant Physical Health Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Physical Health

Status Number Percent

Health Problem Days at Admission

Health Problem Days at Discharge

Difference Percent Change

Outcome Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 102 72.3 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 39 27.7 1,031 859 172 16.7 Reduction Total 141 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 3,869 87.0 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 576 13.0 6,379 3,287 3,092 48.5 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care

Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 201 76.7 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 61 23.3 598 404 194 32.4 Reduction Total 262 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Health Problem Days 578 78.2 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 161 21.8 1,413 1,026 387 27.4 Reduction Total 739 100.0

NTP Maintenance

Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 90 88.2 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 12 11.8 237 88 149 62.9 Reduction Total 102 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Health Problem Days 183 67.3 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 89 32.7 1,649 1,363 286 17.3 Reduction Total 272 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 3,075 85.6 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 517 14.4 6,654 4,078 2,576 38.7 Reduction Total 3,592 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Health Problem Days 9,362 85.6 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 1,572 14.4 17,191 9,951 7,240 42.1 Reduction Total 10,934 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Health Problem Days 2,634 80.4 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 642 19.6 5,217 4,626 591 11.3 Reduction Total 3,276 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Health Problem Days 4,887 79.7 0 0 0 0.0 Health Problem Days 1,241 20.3 9,029 5,095 3,934 43.6 Reduction Total 6,128 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-241-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.7 Program Participant Days in Hospital Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Hospital Status

Number Percent

Hospital Days at Admission

Hospital Days at Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 272 93.5 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 19 6.5 66 6 60 90.9 Reduction Total 291 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 4,212 94.8 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 233 5.2 799 294 505 63.2 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care

Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 247 91.5 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 23 8.5 21 44 23 109.5 Increase Total 270 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Hospital Days 729 93.2 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 53 6.8 135 70 65 48.1 Reduction Total 782 100.0

NTP Maintenance

Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 124 97.6 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 3 2.4 8 1 7 87.5 Reduction Total 127 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Hospital Days 323 91.5 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 30 8.5 173 174 1 0.6 Increase Total 353 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 3,752 96.6 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 133 3.4 461 171 290 62.9 Reduction Total 3,885 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Hospital Days 10,910 96.0 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 457 4.0 1,270 755 515 40.6 Reduction Total 11,367 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Hospital Days 3,073 92.1 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 263 7.9 1,199 703 496 41.4 Reduction Total 3,336 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Hospital Days 5,733 93.0 0 0 0 0.0 Hospital Days 433 7.0 1,835 337 1,498 81.6 Reduction Total 6,166 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-242-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.8 Program Participant Emergency Room (ER) Visits Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/ER Status

Number Percent

ER Visits at Admission

ER Visits at Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No ER Visits 133 95.0 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 7 5.0 16 1 15 93.8 Reduction Total 140 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No ER Visits 3,824 86.0 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 621 14.0 3,199 1,330 1,869 58.4 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care


Greater than 29 Program Days No ER Visits 648 87.7 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 91 12.3 137 66 71 51.8 Reduction Total 739 100.0

NTP Maintenance


Greater than 29 Program Days No ER Visits 237 88.1 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 32 11.9 37 22 15 40.5 Reduction Total 269 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No ER Visits 3,322 92.9 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 253 7.1 331 188 143 43.2 Reduction Total 3,575 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No ER Visits 10,114 92.8 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 790 7.2 903 524 379 42.0 Reduction Total 10,904 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No ER Visits 2,743 83.8 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 531 16.2 815 552 263 32.3 Reduction Total 3,274 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No ER Visits 5,259 85.8 0 0 0 0.0 ER Visits 868 14.2 1,262 627 635 50.3 Reduction Total 6,127 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-243-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.9 Program Participant Days in Psychiatric Facility Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Psychiatric Facility


Psychiatric Days at

Admission

Psychiatric Days at

Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 135 96.4 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 5 3.6 2 4 2 100.0 Increase Total 140 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 4,368 98.3 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 77 1.7 302 139 163 54.0 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care

Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 256 97.7 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 6 2.3 38 18 20 52.6 Reduction Total 262 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 725 98.1 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 14 1.9 59 9 50 84.7 Reduction Total 739 100.0

NTP Maintenance

Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 96 95.0 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 5 5.0 34 3 31 91.2 Reduction Total 101 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 262 97.0 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 8 3.0 22 7 15 68.2 Reduction Total 270 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 3,489 97.5 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 91 2.5 328 153 175 53.4 Reduction Total 3,580 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 10,630 97.3 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 290 2.7 1,108 573 535 48.3 Reduction Total 10,920 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 3,045 93.0 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 229 7.0 1,173 733 440 37.5 Reduction Total 3,274 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Days in Psychiatric Facility 5,858 95.6 0 0 0 0.0 Days in Psychiatric Facility 270 4.4 2,034 505 1,529 75.2 Reduction Total 6,128 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-244-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.10 Program Participant Use of Prescribed Medication for Mental Health-Related Needs Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/Mental Health

Medication Status Number Percent

Medication at

Admission

Medication at

Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 105 86.8 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 16 13.2 15 13 2 13.3 Reduction Total 121 100.0



Day Care


Greater than 29 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 549 82.8 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 114 17.2 99 82 17 17.2 Reduction Total 663 100.0

NTP Maintenance


Greater than 29 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 207 85.2 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 36 14.8 25 27 2 8.0 Increase Total 243 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 2,693 85.4 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 460 14.6 418 321 97 23.2 Reduction Total 3,153 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 7,777 79.4 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 2,012 20.6 1,767 1,522 245 13.9 Reduction Total 9,789 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 2,568 81.8 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 573 18.2 464 480 16 3.4 Increase Total 3,141 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No Mental Health Medication 4,824 80.2 0 0 0 0.0 Mental Health Medication 1,190 19.8 787 1,025 238 30.2 Increase Total 6,014 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-245-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.11 Program Participant Outpatient Emergency (OE) Services for Mental Health-Related Needs Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes Program Type/OE Mental Health


Mental Health Services at Admission

Mental Health Services at Discharge

Difference Percent Change

Outcome Status

NTP Detoxification

Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 138 98.6 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 2 1.4 0 2 2 200.0 Increase Total 140 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 4,256 95.7 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 189 4.3 3,051 1,432 1,619 53.1 Reduction Total 4,445 100.0

Day Care

Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 249 95.0 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 13 5.0 75 38 37 49.3 Reduction Total 262 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 707 95.8 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 31 4.2 37 36 1 2.7 Reduction Total 738 100.0

NTP Maintenance

Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 96 95.0 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 5 5.0 37 3 34 91.9 Reduction Total 101 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 250 92.9 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 19 7.1 102 42 60 58.8 Reduction Total 269 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 3,410 95.4 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 164 4.6 514 258 256 49.8 Reduction Total 3,574 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 10,342 94.8 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 566 5.2 1,145 936 209 18.3 Reduction Total 10,908 100.0


Less than 30 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 2,995 91.5 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 278 8.5 803 429 374 46.6 Reduction Total 3,273 100.0

Greater than 29 Program Days No OE Mental Health Services 5,685 92.8 0 0 0 0.0 OE Mental Health Services 442 7.2 1,224 607 617 50.4 Reduction Total 6,127 100.0


CChhaapptteerr 55

-246-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.12 Program Participant Employment Outcome Statistics

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Employment Status Program Type/Employment Status

At Admission At Discharge Difference Percent

Change Outcome

Status

Day Care

Total Episodes = 759

Positive Employment Activity* 109 110 1 0.9 Increase

Unemployed – Looking for Work 302 180 122 40.4 Reduction

Unemployed – Not Seeking Work 348 469 121 34.8 Increase

NTP Maintenance

Total Episodes = 258


Unemployed – Looking for Work 71 62 9 12.7 Reduction

Unemployed – Not Seeking Work 165 170 5 3.0 Increase


Total Episodes = 12,710

Positive Employment Activity* 4,269 5,404 1,135 26.6 Increase

Unemployed – Looking for Work 4,453 3,194 1,259 28.3 Reduction

Unemployed – Not Seeking Work 3,988 4,112 124 3.1 Increase


Total Episodes = 8,068


Unemployed – Looking for Work 1,574 2,863 1,289 81.9 Increase

Unemployed – Not Seeking Work 5,990 4,307 1,683 28.1 Reduction

*Positive employment activities include either full-time or part time employment. Source: Los Angeles County Participant Reporting System

CChhaapptteerr 55

-247-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.13a Program Participants Diagnosed with Tuberculosis (TB) at Program Admission and Discharge

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Participant Episodes AOD Program Participant Group

Number Percent

TB at Admission

TB at Discharge

Total TB Cases

Percent With TB

Non-Residential Participant

Less than 30 Program Days 4,837 27.0 139 26 165 3.4 Greater than 29 Program Days 13,049 73.0 326 74 400 3.1 Total 17,886 100.0 465 100 565 3.2

Residential Participant



Statistical Fact Sheet 5.13b Program Participants Diagnosed with Hepatitis C at Program Admission and Discharge

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Number Percent

Hepatitis C at Admission

Hepatitis C at Discharge

Total Hepatitis C

Cases

Percent with

Hepatitis C


Less than 30 Program Days 4,837 27.0 384 16 400 8.3 Greater than 29 Program Days 13,049 73.0 628 67 695 5.3 Total 17,886 100.0 1,012 83 1,095 6.1


Less than 30 Program Days 7,808 55.6 695 25 720 9.2 Greater than 29 Program Days 6,243 44.4 428 48 476 7.6 Total 14,051 100.0 1,123 73 1,196 8.5


Statistical Fact Sheet 5.13c Program Participants Diagnosed with Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) at Program Admission and Discharge

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Number Percent

STI at Admission

STI at Discharge

Total STI Cases

Percent with a STI






CChhaapptteerr 55

-248-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.14a Program Participants Tested for HIV/AIDS Prior to Program Admission and Discharge

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Number Percent

Tested Prior to

Admission

Tested Prior to

Discharge

Total Tested

Percent Tested


Less than 30 Program Days 5,373 32.2 3,127 83 3,210 59.7 Greater than 29 Program Days 11,318 67.8 5,847 948 6,795 60.0 Total 16,691 100.0 8,974 1,031 10,005 59.9


Less than 30 Program Days 8,231 56.5 5,793 178 5,971 72.5 Greater than 29 Program Days 6,209 43.5 3,789 759 4,548 71.9 Total 14,559 100.0 9,582 937 10,519 72.2


Statistical Fact Sheet 5.14b Program Participants Who Received HIV/AIDS Test Results Prior to Program Admission and Discharge

2006-07 Fiscal Year


Number Percent

Received Results Prior to Admission

Received Results Prior to Discharge

Total with

Results

Percent with

Results






CChhaapptteerr 55

-249-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.15 Program Participants Length of Enrollment (LOE) by Non-Residential Program Type and Fiscal Year

Program Type/LOE Statistics 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY

Day Care

Number of Program Sites 31 25 25 30 41 Number of Participant Episodes 1,196 1,233 768 910 1,038

LOE Statistics – Days

Mean 121.2 98.7 109.3 125.7 131.1 Median 63 65 50 71 80 Mode 485 31 485 485 485

Standard Deviation 129.6 102.3 131.0 123.3 127.3 Min 1 1 1 1 1 Max 485 365 485 485 485


Number of Program Sites 133 151 165 163 199 Number of Participant Episodes 13,971 14,798 12,091 13,514 14,986


Mean 123.9 112.1 124.4 138.2 160.9 Median 77 76 75 85 105 Mode 545 28 21 545 545


NTP Detoxification

Number of Program Sites 11 19 18 8 8 Number of Participant Episodes 2,095 4,362 1,136 541 387


Mean 15.8 14.0 16.2 15.3 16.4 Median 18 16 19 18 18 Mode 20 20 21 20 20


NTP Maintenance

Number of Program Sites 24 21 23 21 24 Number of Participant Episodes 967 1,649 706 661 565

LOE Statistics - Days

Mean 244.0 161.9 120.6 147.4 183.8 Median 126 93 66 81 119 Mode 730 15 7 20 730



CChhaapptteerr 55

-250-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.16 Program Participants Length of Stay (LOS) by Residential Program Type and Fiscal Year

Program Type/LOS Statistics 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY



LOS Statistics – Days

Mean 7.4 7.1 7.8 7.5 7.3 Median 7 7 7 7 7 Mode 8 8 8 8 7




LOS Statistics – Days

Mean 66.3 65.2 72.0 72.0 75.3 Median 38 37 54 52 58 Mode 90 90 90 90 90



CChhaapptteerr 55

-251-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.17 LAC Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program Summary Statistics by Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year Admissions/Participants

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Admissions 47,148 57,911 58,964 56,016 56,411

Non-Residential Admissions 28,752 38,601 39,061 36,294 38,645

Residential Admissions 18,396 19,310 19,903 19,722 17,766

Participants 38,052 45,048 47,519 44,853 45,459

Male Participants 25,112 29,909 31,240 29,319 29,431

Female Participants 12,940 15,139 16,279 15,534 16,028

CalWORKs Recipients 1,578 1,593 1,876 2,049 1,945

Co-Occurring Disorders 5,672 6,651 8,618 10,395 11,791

Drug Court Participants 2,024 1,697 1,639 1,886 2,018

Female Offenders 87 83 96 98 97

General Relief Recipients 3,417 5,260 3,882 3,637 2,945

Homeless Participants 9,825 10,031 10,106 10,509 9,819

Needle Users 8,537 10,793 9,387 7,088 6,696

Perinatal Program Participants 1,172 1,327 1,129 1,240 1,388

Pregnant Women 764 837 1,099 947 980

Prison Parolee Network 591 606 654 731 560

Proposition 36 Participants 8,590 11,313 12,655 13,720 14,245


CChhaapptteerr 55

-252-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.18 Program Participant Demographics by Gender

2006-07 Fiscal Year

Male Female Total Demographics

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Admissions 36,331 100.0 20,080 100.0 56,411 100.0

Participants 29,431 100.0 16,028 100.0 45,459 100.0

Race/Ethnicity

White 8,418 28.6 4,751 29.6 13,169 29.0 Black/African American 7,429 25.2 4,541 28.3 11,970 26.3 Hispanic/Latino 10,912 37.1 5,310 33.1 16,222 35.7 Native American 321 1.1 233 1.5 554 1.2 Asian/Pacific Islander 1,005 3.4 472 2.9 1,477 3.2 Other 1,346 4.6 721 4.5 2,067 4.5

Age

18 – 20 1,567 5.3 940 5.9 2,507 5.5 21 – 24 2,888 9.8 1,909 11.9 4,797 10.6 25 – 44 15,589 53.0 9,108 56.8 24,697 54.3 45 – 64 8,926 30.3 3,875 24.2 12,801 28.2 65 – Over 461 1.6 196 1.2 657 1.4

Education

None 746 2.5 380 2.4 1,126 2.5 1 – 8 years 1,489 5.1 800 5.0 2,289 5.0 9 – 12 years 22,458 76.3 12,157 75.8 34,615 76.1 13 or more years 4,738 16.1 2,691 16.8 7,429 16.3

Employment Status

Employed 7,061 24.0 1,864 11.6 8,925 19.6 Unemployed 18,978 64.5 11,695 73.0 30,673 67.5 Not in the labor force 3,392 11.5 2,469 15.4 5,861 12.9


Alcohol 6,063 20.6 3,232 20.2 9,295 20.4 Cocaine/Crack 6,646 22.6 3,385 21.1 10,031 22.1 Heroin 4,023 13.7 1,742 10.9 5,765 12.7 Marijuana/Hashish 3,543 12.0 1,623 10.1 5,166 11.4 Methamphetamine 8,243 28.0 5,301 33.1 13,544 29.8 Other 913 3.1 745 4.6 1,658 3.6


Day Care 418 1.2 1,515 7.5 1,933 3.4 NTP Detoxification 255 0.7 112 0.6 367 0.7 NTP Maintenance 1,787 4.9 1,057 5.3 2,844 5.0 Outpatient Counseling 22,191 61.1 11,310 56.3 33,501 59.4 Residential Detoxification 3,213 8.8 1,273 6.3 4,486 8.0 Residential Services 8,467 23.3 4,813 24.0 13,280 23.5


CChhaapptteerr 55

-253-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.19 Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity

2006-07 Fiscal Year

White Black/African American Hispanic/Latino Native American Asian/Pacific

Islander Other Total Demographics

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Admissions 17,047 100.0 15,154 100.0 19,674 100.0 639 100.0 1,681 100.0 2,216 100.0 56,411 100.0

Participants 13,169 100.0 11,970 100.0 16,222 100.0 554 100.0 1,477 100.0 2,067 100.0 45,459 100.0

Gender

Male 8,418 63.9 7,429 62.1 10,912 67.3 321 57.9 1,005 68.0 1,346 65.1 29,431 64.7 Female 4,751 36.1 4,541 37.9 5,310 32.7 233 42.1 472 32.0 721 34.9 16,028 35.3

Age

18 – 20 531 4.0 503 4.2 1,225 7.6 25 4.5 90 6.1 133 6.4 2,507 5.5 21 – 24 1,166 8.9 701 5.9 2,351 14.5 50 9.0 245 16.6 284 13.7 4,797 10.6 25 – 44 7,094 53.9 5,482 45.8 9,748 60.1 313 56.5 871 59.0 1,189 57.5 24,697 54.3 45 – 64 4,127 31.3 5,048 42.2 2,782 17.1 157 28.3 264 17.9 423 20.5 12,801 28.2 65 Over 251 1.9 236 2.0 116 0.7 9 1.6 7 0.5 38 1.8 657 1.4

Education

None 271 2.1 354 3.0 378 2.3 11 2.0 49 3.3 63 3.0 1,126 2.5 1 – 8 years 412 3.1 353 2.9 1,324 8.2 26 4.7 63 4.3 111 5.4 2,289 5.0 9 – 12 years 9,346 71.0 9,282 77.5 12,929 79.7 431 77.8 1,069 72.4 1,558 75.4 34,615 76.1 13 or more years 3,140 23.8 1,981 16.5 1,591 9.8 86 15.5 296 20.0 335 16.2 7,429 16.3

Employment Status

Employed 2,696 20.5 1,242 10.4 4,071 25.1 77 13.9 344 23.3 495 23.9 8,925 19.6 Unemployed 8,727 66.3 8,814 73.6 10,508 64.8 387 69.9 928 62.8 1,309 63.3 30,673 67.5 Not in the labor force 1,746 13.3 1,914 16.0 1,643 10.1 90 16.2 205 13.9 263 12.7 5,861 12.9


Alcohol 3,259 24.7 2,586 21.6 2,572 15.9 169 30.5 312 21.1 397 19.2 9,295 20.4 Cocaine/Crack 1,386 10.5 5,712 47.7 2,264 14.0 83 15.0 217 14.7 369 17.9 10,031 22.1 Heroin 2,111 16.0 798 6.7 2,396 14.8 70 12.6 115 7.8 275 13.3 5,765 12.7 Marijuana/Hashish 951 7.2 1,970 16.5 1,803 11.1 51 9.2 158 10.7 233 11.3 5,166 11.4 Methamphetamine 4,737 36.0 523 4.4 6,786 41.8 163 29.4 636 43.1 699 33.8 13,544 29.8 Other 725 5.5 381 3.2 401 2.5 18 3.2 39 2.6 94 4.5 1,658 3.6


CChhaapptteerr 55

-254-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.20 Male Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity

2006-07 Fiscal Year

White Black/African American Hispanic/Latino Native American Asian/Pacific



Admissions 10,744 100.0 9,344 100.0 13,283 100.0 363 100.0 1,155 100.0 1,442 100.0 36,331 100.0

Participants 8,418 100.0 7,429 100.0 10,912 100.0 321 100.0 1,005 100.0 1,346 100.0 29,431 100.0

Age

18 – 20 340 4.0 285 3.8 776 7.1 17 5.3 69 6.9 80 5.9 1,567 5.3 21 – 24 680 8.1 371 5.0 1,478 13.5 25 7.8 159 15.8 175 13.0 2,888 9.8 25 – 44 4,416 52.5 3,132 42.2 6,485 59.4 180 56.1 607 60.4 769 57.1 15,589 53.0 45 – 64 2,836 33.7 3,458 46.5 2,077 19.0 94 29.3 168 16.7 293 21.8 8,926 30.3 65 Over 146 1.7 183 2.5 96 0.9 5 1.6 2 0.2 29 2.2 461 1.6

Education

None 170 2.0 225 3.0 264 2.4 9 2.8 36 3.6 42 3.1 746 2.5 1 – 8 years 234 2.8 232 3.1 905 8.3 13 4.0 39 3.9 66 4.9 1,489 5.1 9 – 12 years 6,049 71.9 5,698 76.7 8,698 79.7 248 77.3 728 72.4 1,037 77.0 22,458 76.3 13 or more years 1,965 23.3 1,274 17.1 1,045 9.6 51 15.9 202 20.1 201 14.9 4,738 16.1

Employment Status

Employed 2,025 24.1 906 12.2 3,408 31.2 51 15.9 282 28.1 389 28.9 7,061 24.0 Unemployed 5,398 64.1 5,315 71.5 6,626 60.7 214 66.7 613 61.0 812 60.3 18,978 64.5 Not in the labor force 995 11.8 1,208 16.3 878 8.0 56 17.4 110 10.9 145 10.8 3,392 11.5


Alcohol 2,126 25.3 1,564 21.1 1,796 16.5 122 38.0 198 19.7 257 19.1 6,063 20.6 Cocaine/Crack 901 10.7 3,583 48.2 1,701 15.6 48 15.0 157 15.6 256 19.0 6,646 22.6 Heroin 1,402 16.7 537 7.2 1,768 16.2 41 12.8 73 7.3 202 15.0 4,023 13.7 Marijuana/Hashish 693 8.2 1,176 15.8 1,364 12.5 31 9.7 119 11.8 160 11.9 3,543 12.0 Methamphetamine 2,901 34.5 352 4.7 4,072 37.3 73 22.7 432 43.0 413 30.7 8,243 28.0 Other 395 4.7 217 2.9 211 1.9 6 1.9 26 2.6 58 4.3 913 3.1


CChhaapptteerr 55

-255-

Statistical Fact Sheet 5.21 Female Program Participant Demographics by Race/Ethnicity

2006-07 Fiscal Year

White Black/African American Hispanic/Latina Native American Asian/Pacific



Admissions 6,303 100.0 5,810 100.0 6,391 100.0 276 100.0 526 100.0 774 100.0 20,080 100.0

Participants 4,751 100.0 4,541 100.0 5,310 100.0 233 100.0 472 100.0 721 100.0 16,028 100.0

Age

18 – 20 191 4.0 218 4.8 449 8.5 8 3.4 21 4.4 53 7.4 940 5.9 21 – 24 486 10.2 330 7.3 873 16.4 25 10.7 86 18.2 109 15.1 1,909 11.9 25 – 44 2,678 56.4 2,350 51.8 3,263 61.5 133 57.1 264 55.9 420 58.3 9,108 56.8 45 – 64 1,291 27.2 1,590 35.0 705 13.3 63 27.0 96 20.3 130 18.0 3,875 24.2 65 Over 105 2.2 53 1.2 20 0.4 4 1.7 5 1.1 9 1.2 196 1.2

Education

None 101 2.1 129 2.8 114 2.1 2 0.9 13 2.8 21 2.9 380 2.4 1 – 8 years 178 3.7 121 2.7 419 7.9 13 5.6 24 5.1 45 6.2 800 5.0 9 – 12 years 3,297 69.4 3,584 78.9 4,231 79.7 183 78.5 341 72.2 521 72.3 12,157 75.8 13 or more years 1,175 24.7 707 15.6 546 10.3 35 15.0 94 19.9 134 18.6 2,691 16.8

Employment Status

Employed 671 14.1 336 7.4 663 12.5 26 11.2 62 13.1 106 14.7 1,864 11.6 Unemployed 3,329 70.1 3,499 77.1 3,882 73.1 173 74.2 315 66.7 497 68.9 11,695 73.0 Not in the labor force 751 15.8 706 15.5 765 14.4 34 14.6 95 20.1 118 16.4 2,469 15.4


Alcohol 1,133 23.8 1,022 22.5 776 14.6 47 20.2 114 24.2 140 19.4 3,232 20.2 Cocaine/Crack 485 10.2 2,129 46.9 563 10.6 35 15.0 60 12.7 113 15.7 3,385 21.1 Heroin 709 14.9 261 5.7 628 11.8 29 12.4 42 8.9 73 10.1 1,742 10.9 Marijuana/Hashish 258 5.4 794 17.5 439 8.3 20 8.6 39 8.3 73 10.1 1,623 10.1 Methamphetamine 1,836 38.6 171 3.8 2,714 51.1 90 38.6 204 43.2 286 39.7 5,301 33.1 Other 330 6.9 164 3.6 190 3.6 12 5.2 13 2.8 36 5.0 745 4.6


Date post:	24-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

2006-07 Fiscal Year - Department of Public...

Documents