+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley...

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley...

Date post: 03-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities Page 1 of 40 August 2018 What is this document? The County created this matrix to enable residents to better understand how the County updated the current Community Plan goals and policies as well as where they will be found or addressed in the future: Policy Plan: the location for updated goals and policies that apply to unincorporated areas Implementation Plan: the location for actions to be undertaken by the County to implement the Countywide Plan Community Action Guide: the location for actions to be undertaken by community members, in coordination with the County Development Code: detailed standards or regulations that are already addressed in the Development Code or can be considered in the upcoming Development Code update Other: those issues, goals, policies, or actions that have already been accomplished, are outdated, or are no longer a community priority 2007/2013 Community Plans In 2007, in conjunction with an overall revision to the County’s General Plan, the County adopted 13 Community Plans to guide future growth and development in select unincorporated communities while maintaining their distinct character and sense of identity. A fourteenth Community Plan was adopted in 2013 for the Oak Hills Community. These 14 Community Plans contain goals and policies that augment the County’s overall General Plan and attempt to address unique issues and concerns facing each community. Proposed changes Consolidation of Community Goals and Policies. The 2007 General Plan, including the 14 Community Plans, contains over 400 goals and 1,700 policies (over 250 goals and 1,000 policies in the Community Plans alone). This is an incredibly large number of goals and policies to review—for members of the public, County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects, improvements, and other changes. The large number of goals and policies also creates potential problems when trying to maintain consistency between and avoid redundancy among the General Plan and Community Plans. Accordingly, the County is proposing to update and consolidate goals and policies from both the overall 2007 General Plan and the 2007/2013 Community Plans into a single source of policy direction called the County Policy Plan. Transition from Community Plans to Community Action Guides. As part of the Countywide Plan preparation, the County took a fresh look at the purpose, functionality, and cost implications of Community Plans. The County was able to eliminate a substantial amount of redundancy and resolve consistency issues by consolidating all goals and policies into one Policy Plan. The County was also able to expand the application of key goals and policies beyond singular communities to help guide multiple communities and regions. However, the County determined that it does not have the financial resources to implement many of the policies in the current Community Plans without potentially compromising existing local and regional levels of service. The updated goals and policies guide and improve the county while remaining fiscally sustainable. In addition to updated goals and policies, the County prepared draft Community Plans containing hundreds of grass-roots tools, actions, and strategies—shaped by over two years of public outreach. Public feedback led to the renaming of the documents from “Community Plans” to “Community Action Guides”, which more accurately reflects their purpose and content. The Community Action Guides also include updated information on each community’s background, character, issues, values, and aspirations provided by the community. Thoughts or questions? Please contact the County at [email protected] or in person at upcoming Regional Meetings.
Transcript
Page 1: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities

Page 1 of 40 August 2018

What is this document? The County created this matrix to enable residents to better understand how the County updated the current Community Plan goals and policies as well as where they will be found or addressed in the future:

Policy Plan: the location for updated goals and policies that apply to unincorporated areas

Implementation Plan: the location for actions to be undertaken by the County to implement the Countywide Plan

Community Action Guide: the location for actions to be undertaken by community members, in coordination with the County

Development Code: detailed standards or regulations that are already addressed in the Development Code or can be considered in the upcoming Development Code update

Other: those issues, goals, policies, or actions that have already been accomplished, are outdated, or are no longer a community priority

2007/2013 Community Plans In 2007, in conjunction with an overall revision to the County’s General Plan, the County adopted 13 Community Plans to guide future growth and development in select unincorporated communities while maintaining their distinct character and sense of identity. A fourteenth Community Plan was adopted in 2013 for the Oak Hills Community. These 14 Community Plans contain goals and policies that augment the County’s overall General Plan and attempt to address unique issues and concerns facing each community.

Proposed changes Consolidation of Community Goals and Policies. The 2007 General Plan, including the 14 Community Plans, contains over 400 goals and 1,700 policies (over 250 goals and 1,000 policies in the Community Plans alone). This is an incredibly large number of goals and policies to review—for members of the public, County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects, improvements, and other changes. The large number of goals and policies also creates potential problems when trying to maintain consistency between and avoid redundancy among the General Plan and Community Plans.

Accordingly, the County is proposing to update and consolidate goals and policies from both the overall 2007 General Plan and the 2007/2013 Community Plans into a single source of policy direction called the County Policy Plan.

Transition from Community Plans to Community Action Guides. As part of the Countywide Plan preparation, the County took a fresh look at the purpose, functionality, and cost implications of Community Plans. The County was able to eliminate a substantial amount of redundancy and resolve consistency issues by consolidating all goals and policies into one Policy Plan. The County was also able to expand the application of key goals and policies beyond singular communities to help guide multiple communities and regions.

However, the County determined that it does not have the financial resources to implement many of the policies in the current Community Plans without potentially compromising existing local and regional levels of service. The updated goals and policies guide and improve the county while remaining fiscally sustainable.

In addition to updated goals and policies, the County prepared draft Community Plans containing hundreds of grass-roots tools, actions, and strategies—shaped by over two years of public outreach. Public feedback led to the renaming of the documents from “Community Plans” to “Community Action Guides”, which more accurately reflects their purpose and content. The Community Action Guides also include updated information on each community’s background, character, issues, values, and aspirations provided by the community.

Thoughts or questions? Please contact the County at [email protected] or in person at upcoming Regional Meetings.

Page 2: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 2 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes LAND USE

Goal LU 1 Retain the existing mountain character of the community. PP

CAG

Goal LU-4 Community design. Preservation and enhancement of unique community identities and their relationship with the natural environment.

Focus statement A. Improve the quality of our built environment to enhance community health, safety, neighborhood character, and the image of business corridors.

LU 1.1 Require strict adherence to the Land Use Policy Map unless proposed changes are clearly demonstrated to be consistent with the community character.

PP Policy LU-4.5 Community identity. We require that new development be consistent with and reinforce the physical and historical character and identity of our unincorporated communities, as well as the values and aspirations expressed in Community Action Guides.

LU 1.2 In recognition of the community’s desire to preserve the alpine character and protect the area’s natural resources, projects that propose to increase the density of residential land uses or provide additional commercial land use districts or zones within the plan area should only be considered if the following findings can be made:

A. That the change will be consistent with the community character. In determining consistency, the entire General Plan and all elements of the community plan shall be reviewed.

B. That the change is compatible with surrounding uses, and will provide for a logical transition in the plan area’s development. One way to accomplish this is to incorporate planned development concepts in the design of projects proposed in the area.

C. That the change shall not degrade the level of services provided in the area, and that there is adequate infrastructure to serve the additional development that could occur as a result of the change. Densities should not be increased unless there are existing or assured services and infrastructure, including but not limited to water, wastewater, circulation, police, and fire, to accommodate the increased densities.

PP Policy LU-2.1 Compatibility with existing uses. We require that new development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts on existing conforming uses and adjacent neighborhoods. We also require that new residential developments are located, scaled, buffered, and designed so as to not hinder the viability and continuity of existing conforming nonresidential development.

Policy LU-2.2 Compatibility with planned uses. We required that new residential development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts both on and from adjacent areas designated for nonresidential land uses.

Policy LU-1.4 Funding and financing mechanisms. We require the establishment of community facility districts, lighting and landscaping maintenance districts, and other types of funding and financing mechanisms for new development when the County determines that it may be necessary to maintain fiscal sustainability. We prefer the expansion of existing districts to the establishment of new districts.

Policy LU-1.5 Development impact fees. We require payment of development impact fees to ensure that all new development pays its fair share of public infrastructure.

LU 1.3 Regulate the density of development in sloping hillside areas in order to reduce fire hazards, prevent erosion, and to preserve the forest character of the region.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.5 Hillside preservation. We require that new development in sloping hillside areas preserve the natural character of the surrounding environment and does not further exacerbate natural hazards or erosion.

Page 3: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 3 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes One method this can be accomplished by is requiring adherence to the following hillside development standards required by the Fire Safety Overlay:

A) Residential density: the density of development for any tentative parcel map or tentative tract map in sloping hillside areas shall be in accordance with the following criteria:

i. One to four (1-4) dwelling units per gross acre on slopes of zero to less than fifteen percent (0-<15%)

ii. Two (2) dwelling units per gross acre on slopes of fifteen to less than 30 percent (15 - <30%)

iii. One (1) dwelling unit per three (3) gross acres on slopes of greater than thirty percent (30%) gradient

B) When twenty-five percent (25%) or more of a subdivision project site involving five (5) or more lots is located on natural slopes greater than thirty percent (30%), the subdivision application shall be submitted concurrently with a Planned Development application to evaluate appropriate project design in consideration of topographic limitations of the site. This provision shall not apply if all of the areas on the site with natural ungraded slopes over thirty percent (30%) are permanently restricted from structural development

Policy LU-4.4 Natural topography in the Mountain Region. We require new development in the Mountain region to retain natural topography and minimize grading unless it is necessary to reduce exposure to natural hazards.

See County Development Code, Section 82.13.050, General Development Standards, of the Fire Safety Overlay, residential slope density standards.

LU 1.4 Establish locational criteria for the Multiple Family Residential (RM) district or zone to areas that are:

A) In closer proximity to commercial areas;

B) Adjacent to a mountain secondary or greater width roadway;

C) Where adequate circulation exists;

D) Where services are available or assured;

E) Where average slopes are relatively flat;

F) Where compliance with fire safety standards can be met

PP

DC

Policy H-1.2 Concurrent infrastructure. We support the integrated planning and provision of appropriate infrastructure (including water, sewer, and roadways) concurrent with and as a condition of residential development to create more livable communities.

Policy H-1.3 Quality multiple-family standards. We enforce multiple-family residential development standards, amenity requirements, and other regulations to ensure the development of quality rental and homeownership opportunities for residents.

Policy PP-3.7 Fire safe design. We require new development in the Fire Safety Overlay to comply with additional site design, building, and access standards to provide enhanced resistance to fire hazards.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

Page 4: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 4 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

LU 1.5 All architecture and outside facades of commercial structures shall be in keeping with the mountain character. Natural woods and masonry shall be used as much as practicable, and shall be reviewed for conformance during the Land Use Services Conditional Use Permit approval process.

PP Policy LU-4.1 Context-sensitive design in the Mountain/Desert regions. We require new development to employ site and building design techniques and use building materials that reflect the natural mountain or desert environment and preserve scenic resources.

LU 1.6 Ensure that development standards for retail buildings and single family homes result in building sizes that are limited of a size and scale that is compatible with existing development and the character of the Mountain Region. Establish three dimensional envelopes to ensure compatibility.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.1 Compatibility with existing uses. We require that new development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts on existing conforming uses and adjacent neighborhoods. We also require that new residential developments are located, scaled, buffered, and designed so as to not hinder the viability and continuity of existing conforming nonresidential development.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

LU 1.7 Encourage infill development on existing vacant lots where the full range of public services and infrastructure are available. Allow for any additional development only where infrastructure and public services can adequately meet the demand of the new development.

PP Policy LU-1.2 Infill development. We prefer new development to take place on existing vacant and underutilized lots where public services and infrastructure are available.

LU 1.8 The boundaries following shorelines of any lakes within the plan area shall be construed to follow the mean high water line of such lake. In the event of change in the mean high water line, the boundary shall be construed as moving with the actual mean high water line where fill rights have been granted and an appropriate environmental review completed and Conditional Use Permit granted for such area of fill.

PP Policy Map HZ-4 Flood Hazards. See mapped flood hazard areas across the county.

Policy HZ-1.1 New subdivisions in environmental hazard areas. We require all lots and parcels created through new subdivisions to have sufficient buildable area outside of the following environmental hazard areas:

− Flood: 100-year flood zone, dam/basin inundation area − Geologic: Alquist Priolo earthquake fault zone; County-identified fault zone;

rockfall/debris-flow hazard area, existing and County-identified landslide area

Policy HZ-1.2 New development in environmental hazard areas. We require all new development to be located outside of the environmental hazard areas listed below. For any lot or parcel that does not have sufficient buildable area outside of such hazard areas, we require adequate mitigation, including designs that allow occupants to shelter in place and to have sufficient time to evacuate during times of extreme weather and natural disasters. − Flood: 100-year flood zone, dam/basin inundation area

− Geologic: Alquist Priolo earthquake fault zone; County-identified fault zone; rockfall/debris-flow hazard area, medium or high liquefaction area (low to high and

Page 5: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 5 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes localized), existing and County-identified landslide area, moderate to high landslide susceptibility area)

− Fire: high or very high fire hazard severity zone

Policy HZ-1.3 Floodplain mapping. We require any new lots or subdivisions partially in, and any new development partially or entirely in 100-year flood zones or 100-year flood awareness areas to provide detail floodplain mapping for 100- and 200-year storm events as part of the development approval process.

Policy HZ-1.4 500-year flood zone. We may collaborate with property owners in the Valley region to establish funding and financing mechanisms to mitigate flood hazards in identified 500-year flood zones.

LU 1.9 Encourage the preparation of a policy relative to the ultimate build out of Bear Valley.

PP Policy LU-1.1 Growth. We support growth and development that is fiscally sustainable for the County. We accommodate growth in the unincorporated county when it benefits existing communities, provides a regional housing option for rural lifestyles, or supports the regional economy.

Goal LU 2 Provide opportunities for commercial and industrial development within the region that is compatible with the forest and mountain character and meets the needs of local residents and visitors.

PP

CAG

Goal LU-2 Land use mix and compatibility. An arrangement of land uses that balances the lifestyle of existing residents, the needs of future generations, opportunities for commercial and industrial development, and the value of the natural environment.

Focus Statement C. Build human capital and promote enterprise, with a focus on environmentally friendly businesses, to strengthen the local economy and provide opportunities for residents and families to be self-reliant.

LU 2.1 Concentrate future commercial development within existing commercial nodes, centralized areas, or neighborhood centers that are designed with the mountain character in mind to avoid strip commercial development along roads.

PP Policy LU-2.10 Unincorporated commercial development. We intend that new commercial development in the unincorporated areas serve unincorporated residential areas, tourists, and/or freeway travelers. We encourage new commercial development to be concentrated to enhance pedestrian circulation and reduce vehicular congestion and vehicle miles traveled, with new development directed into existing centralized areas when possible.

Policy LU-2.11 Office and Industrial development in the Mountain/Desert regions. We allow new office and industrial uses in unincorporated Mountain/Desert regions in order to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the unincorporated areas.

Policy LU-1.2 Infill development. We prefer new development to take place on existing vacant and underutilized lots where public services and infrastructure are available.

Page 6: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 6 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

LU 2.2 The County shall develop site design standards for commercial development within the region to ensure that architectural detailing and signage are compatible with the character of the mountain region, and to ensure that sites are designed to be more pedestrian-friendly, provide adequate parking, and buffers between commercial and adjacent residential uses.

PP

DC

Policy LU-4.1 Context-sensitive design in the Mountain/Desert regions. We require new development to employ site and building design techniques and use building materials that reflect the natural mountain or desert environment and preserve scenic resources.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

LU 2.3 Ensure that all commercial and industrial development that is adjacent to residential uses is adequately buffered by utilizing transitional land uses and/or design features such as enhanced setbacks and landscaping and/or other screening materials.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.1 Compatibility with existing uses. We require that new development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts on existing conforming uses and adjacent neighborhoods. We also require that new residential developments are located, scaled, buffered, and designed so as to not hinder the viability and continuity of existing conforming nonresidential development.

Policy LU-2.2 Compatibility with planned uses. We required that new residential development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts both on and from adjacent areas designated for nonresidential land uses.

Policy LU-2.10 Unincorporated commercial development. We intend that new commercial development in the unincorporated areas serve unincorporated residential areas, tourists, and/or freeway travelers. We encourage new commercial development to be concentrated to enhance pedestrian circulation and reduce vehicular congestion and vehicle miles traveled, with new development directed into existing centralized areas when possible.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

LU 2.4 Through the Land Use Service Conditional Use Permit process, all new commercial sites shall be reviewed to ensure that the site is large enough to accommodate required parking and access.

DC See County Development Code, Chapter 82.05, Commercial Land Use Zoning Districts and Chapter 85.06 Conditional Use Permit/Minor Use Permit.

LU 2.5 Limit future industrial and service commercial development to that necessary to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the mountain communities and limited export of manufactured goods, and does not adversely impact the mountain environment.

PP Policy LU-2.10 Unincorporated commercial development. We intend that new commercial development in the unincorporated areas serve unincorporated residential areas, tourists, and/or freeway travelers. We encourage new commercial development to be concentrated to enhance pedestrian circulation and reduce vehicular congestion and vehicle miles traveled, with new development directed into existing centralized areas when possible.

Page 7: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 7 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Policy LU-2.11 Office and Industrial development in the Mountain/Desert regions. We allow new office and industrial uses in unincorporated Mountain/Desert regions in order to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the unincorporated areas.

LU 2.6 Industrial land uses shall be located in areas where industrial uses will best serve the needs of the community and will have a minimum adverse effect upon surrounding property with minimal disturbance to the mountain environment and the total community. This can be accomplished by:

A) Only permitting those industrial uses within the Community Industrial (IC) land use district or zone that can adequately control all sources of pollution, including noise, water, and air quality concerns.

B) Fully screening all open storage activities with fencing and indigenous landscaping, and limit open storage to the rear 75 percent of any parcel. c) Requiring the architecture and appearance of all buildings to be compatible with the mountain character; natural wood and masonry shall be used.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.1 Compatibility with existing uses. We require that new development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts on existing conforming uses and adjacent neighborhoods. We also require that new residential developments are located, scaled, buffered, and designed so as to not hinder the viability and continuity of existing conforming nonresidential development.

Policy LU-2.2 Compatibility with planned uses. We required that new residential development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts both on and from adjacent areas designated for nonresidential land uses.

Policy LU-2.11 Office and Industrial development in the Mountain/Desert regions. We allow new office and industrial uses in unincorporated Mountain/Desert regions in order to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the unincorporated areas.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

LU 2.7 Establish additional Service Commercial (CS) Land Use Zoning Districts or zones to allow for needed support services such as contractors, storage and repair facilities.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.11 Office and Industrial development in the Mountain/Desert regions. We allow new office and industrial uses in unincorporated Mountain/Desert regions in order to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the unincorporated areas.

After the Policy Plan is adopted, the County will update the Development Code and Zoning Map for consistency with the Countywide Plan. Input provided during the Community workshops on zoning changes and overlays will be considered as a Development Code amendment.

Note: The County’s current Land Use District (LUD) system serves as its Zoning and General Plan map (aka one-map system). The County is proposing to transition to a two-map system that retains the current LUD system as Zoning Districts, and introduces a second land use mapping system in the Policy Plan that groups the current LUDs into simplified categories or Land Use Categories (LUCs).

The Policy Plan includes one Commercial LUC that communicates and governs the long-term intent for land use. The Commercial LUC is implemented by a number of LUDs in

Page 8: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 8 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes the County Development Code: Service Commercial, General Commercial, Highway Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, Office Commercial, and Rural Commercial.

LU 2.8 Establish local design standards that provide for an historic, rustic western architectural theme including standards for materials, colors, and architectural styles and treatments for the commercial area in Fawnskin.

PP

CAG

Policy LU-4.1 Context-sensitive design in the Mountain/Desert regions. We require new development to employ site and building design techniques and use building materials that reflect the natural mountain or desert environment and preserve scenic resources.

Action Statement A4. Adopt development standards and public infrastructure in commercial areas appropriate for a rural mountain community.

Action Statement A5. Establish and implement a façade and sign improvement program for existing and future businesses.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

LU 2.9 Encourage the addition of commercial and light industrial zoning designations at suitable locations throughout Bear Valley to provide for land uses essential to the needs of both local mountain residents as well as to visitors. Because of the general lack of suitable property for industrial development, accept property from the U.S. Forest Service which is in the area of the Big Bear Transfer Station, that will be designated as Community Industrial (IC).

PP Policy LU-2.11 Office and industrial development in the Mountain/Desert regions. We allow new office and industrial uses in unincorporated Mountain/Desert regions in order to meet the service, employment, and support needs of the unincorporated areas.

Policy LU-2.14 Contiguous land administration. We support the consolidation of disconnected land areas under public ownership or administration to increase financial and environmental value, streamline the management of land and resources, and establish more complete and effective transition areas or buffers. Such consolidation may include transfer of title of property among public entities and the purchase or swapping of private property voluntarily sold when the consolidation is fiscally neutral or beneficial to the County.

Goal LU 3 Develop and adopt specific policies and an effective implementation program to abate and avoid excessive noise exposures in the Bear Valley Community Plan area by meeting the noise standards as required in the County General Plan or in the Bear Valley Community Plan, whichever is more stringent.

PP

DC

Goal HZ-2 Human generated hazards. People and the natural environment protected from exposure to hazardous materials, excessive noise, and other human-generated hazards.

See County Development Code Section 83.01.080, Noise.

LU 3.1 Establish development standards and/or conditions of approval in order to adequately address any potential noise, traffic, hours of operation, and aesthetics impacts.

DC The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

Note: Project-specific environmental impacts, including traffic, noise, and aesthetic impacts, are analyzed according to the California Environmental Quality Act and/or the National Environmental Policy Act.

CIRCULATION

Page 9: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 9 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

Goal CI 1 Ensure a safe and effective transportation system that provides adequate traffic movement while preserving the mountain character of the community.

PP

CAG

Goal TM-2 Road design standards. Roads designed and built to standards in the unincorporated areas that reflect the rural, suburban, and urban context as well as the regional (valley, mountain, and desert) context.

Focus Statement B. Reduce traffic congestion by improving transit services, roadways and recreational networks for pedestrians and bicyclists, and transit riders.

CI 1.1 The County shall ensure that all new development proposals do not degrade Levels of Service (LOS) on State Routes and Major Arterials below LOS C during non-peak hours or below LOS D during peak-hours in the Mountain Region.

PP Policy TM-1.1 Roadway level of service (LOS). We require our roadways to be built to achieve the following minimum level of service standards during peak commute periods (typically 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM on a weekday):

- LOS D in the Valley Region

- LOS C in the Mountain Region - LOS C in the North and East Desert Regions

Policy TM-1.2 LOS exemptions. We may accept reduced levels of service (compared to Policy TM-1.1) when one or more of the following conditions exist:

- Insufficient right of way exists to implement the improvement and right of way acquisition is infeasible.

- Substantial impacts of improvement on the environment are considered unacceptable.

- The improvement would conflict with the aesthetic quality and heritage of a designated scenic highway, scenic route, or local community character.

- The improvement degrades safety for cyclists and pedestrians on bicycle and pedestrian prioritized routes.

CI 1.2 Establish a circulation system within the plan area that is consistent with adopted land use patterns, provides adequate connections to regional transportation facilities and provides access control, traffic system management and other improvements in keeping with the mountain character and scenic sensitivity of the plan area.

PP

CAG

Policy TM-2.1 Context sensitive approach. We maintain and periodically update required roadway cross sections that prioritize multi-modal systems inside mobility focus areas (based on community context), and vehicular capacity on roadways outside of mobility focus areas (based on regional context).

Policy TM-2.2 Roadway improvements. We require roadway improvements that reinforce the character of the area, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, street lighting, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. We require fewer improvements in rural areas and more improvements in urbanized areas, consistent with the Development Code. Additional standards may be required in municipal spheres of influence

Page 10: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 10 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Policy TM-2.5 Context-based features. When making road improvements, we provide feasible, context-based transportation features such as:

- Chain installation and inspection areas in the Mountain Region

- Limited on-street parking areas to serve snow-plow or emergency services

- Passing lanes in rural areas - Vista areas along scenic routes

Policy TM-2.6 Access control. We promote shared/central access points for direct access to roads in unincorporated areas to minimize vehicle conflict points and improve safety, especially access points for commercial uses on adjacent properties.

Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

CI 1.3 Design roads to follow natural contours, avoid grid pattern streets, minimize cuts and fills and, minimize disturbance of natural resources and trees wherever possible.

PP Policy TM-2.1 Context sensitive approach. We maintain and periodically update required roadway cross sections that prioritize multi-modal systems inside mobility focus areas (based on community context), and vehicular capacity on roadways outside of mobility focus areas (based on regional context).

CI 1.4 Preservation and protection of sensitive habitats shall have priority over road location, relocation, or realignment, when other practical alternatives are available.

PP Policy TM-1.2 LOS exemptions. We may accept reduced levels of service (compared to Policy TM-1.1) when one or more of the following conditions exist: - Insufficient right of way exists to implement the improvement and right of way

acquisition is infeasible.

- Substantial impacts of improvement on the environment are considered unacceptable.

- The improvement would conflict with the aesthetic quality and heritage of a designated scenic highway, scenic route, or local community character.

Page 11: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 11 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

- The improvement degrades safety for cyclists and pedestrians on bicycle and pedestrian prioritized routes.

CI 1.5 Work with local and State agencies to ensure that transportation system improvements are made to SR-18 and SR-38 where transportation facilities are operating at or near full capacity. The County and State agencies shall identify existing and future deficiencies, such as the need for alternate routes, widening existing roads, providing turn lanes, and considering weekend traffic volumes in traffic analysis.

PP

CAG

Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

CI 1.6 Minimize the traffic load on mountain major highways and mountain secondary highways by requiring projects to minimize direct access to these main circulation roads, and encourage shared driveways for industrial and commercial uses on adjacent properties to promote use of the main circulation roads as throughways.

PP Policy TM-2.6 Access control. We promote shared/central access points for direct access to roads in unincorporated areas to minimize vehicle conflict points and improve safety, especially access points for commercial uses on adjacent properties.

CI 1.7 Preserve the status of County Scenic Routes and ensure protection of their natural features through the following methods:

A. Require compliance with the provisions of the Open Space Overlay.

B. Support hillside preservation regulations that will include standards for hillside development to control densities, allowable cut and fill heights, soil and slope stability, grading and blending of contours, structural relationships, building foundations, and the like.

PP

DC

Policy Map NR-3. Scenic Routes and Highways. State Route 38 between Baldwin Lane (in Big Bear City/Sugarloaf) and South Fork Campground (just east of the Santa Ana River South Fork) is designated by Caltrans as a State Scenic Highway. Other portions of State Routes 38 and 18 are identified by Caltrans as eligible State Scenic Highways.

Policy TM-2.5 Context-based features. When making road improvements, we provide feasible, context-based transportation features such as:

- Chain installation and inspection areas in the Mountain Region

- Limited on-street parking areas to serve snow-plow or emergency services

- Passing lanes in rural areas - Vista areas along scenic routes

See Development Code Chapter 82.19 Open Space Overlay and Chapter 83.08 Hillside Grading Standards.

Page 12: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 12 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 1.8 Seek State support and assistance for the designation of State Highway 18 as an official State Scenic Route.

X No community input was received during the Community outreach process that identified State Scenic Highway designation as a local priority. However, the community may choose to add an Action Statement to their Community Plan / Action Guide and move forward towards scenic highway designation themselves. An example is the volunteers working towards scenic highway designation for State Route 247. (http://www.scenichighway247.com/)

CI 1.9 Require a traffic impact analysis report to identify impacts and mitigation measures for projects that may result in potentially significant impacts and limit new construction which would require significant improvements to the existing road system in order to handle project ingress, egress and traffic volumes until such time that the required improvements are completed. Significant improvements include anything other than additional turn lanes, transition lanes and stop signs.

PP Policy TM-2.3 Concurrent improvements. We require new development to mitigate project transportation impacts no later than prior to occupancy of the development to ensure transportation improvements are delivered concurrent with future development.

Note: The County maintains Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, including thresholds for requirements of traffic studies. Project-specific environmental impacts, including traffic, are analyzed according to the California Environmental Quality Act and/or the National Environmental Policy Act.

CI 1.10 Protect rights-of-way and limit access by carefully locating driveways, intersecting streets, providing adequate turning movement, storage areas, and applying current state-of-the-art traffic engineering to fully utilize the limited vehicular design capacity of mountain roads.

PP

DC

Policy TM-2.5 Context-based features. When making road improvements, we provide feasible, context-based transportation features such as:

- Chain installation and inspection areas in the Mountain Region

- Limited on-street parking areas to serve snow-plow or emergency services - Passing lanes in rural areas

- Vista areas along scenic routes

Policy TM-2.6 Access control. We promote shared/central access points for direct access to roads in unincorporated areas to minimize vehicle conflict points and improve safety, especially access points for commercial uses on adjacent properties.

The County Development Code addresses site design and operational standards.

CI 1.11 All new subdivisions shall have either public or private paved County standard roads with assured provisions for road maintenance and snow plowing. Require all private roads to be maintained by a property owners association. This may include keeping the roadways passable through maintenance, snow removal and enforcement of the no parking within minimum access roadway.

PP Policy TM-1.5 Unpaved roadways. The County does not accept new unpaved roads into the County Maintained Road System, and we require all-weather treatment for all unpaved roads.

Policy TM-1.6 Upgrading unpaved roads. We support the paving of unpaved roads when funding is contributed through a local area funding and financing mechanism.

Policy TM-1.7 Paved roads. For any new development for which paved roads are required, we require the developer to construct the roads and we require the

Page 13: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 13 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes establishment of a special funding and financing mechanism to pay for roadway operation, maintenance, and set-aside reserves.

CI 1.12 Designate Fox Farm Road as a Mountain Major Highway. X A Mountain Major Highway designation was not deemed necessary based on a traffic model conducted for the Countywide Plan.

CI 1.13 Designate Division Drive between SR 18 and SR 38, and State Lane as Mountain Secondary Highways.

X A Mountain Secondary Highway designation was not deemed necessary based on a traffic model conducted for the Countywide Plan.

CI 1.14 Designate the following roadways as Mountain Collectors:

A. Woodland Drive

B. Hatchery Drive

C. Willow Lane south of State Lane

D. Maple Lane south of Barton Lane

E. Barton Lane west of Maple Lane

F. Sawmill Drive

G. Shore Drive

H. Maltby Boulevard

I. Aeroplane Lane/Valley Blvd./Country Club Blvd. Between Division Drive and Paradise Way

J. Sherwood Blvd. Between Division Drive and Pineview Drive

K. Mojave Blvd. Between SR-18 and Paradise Way

X The following roads are not in the County Maintained Road System (CMRS): Woodland Drive and Maple Lane. The Controlled/Limited Access Collector designation was not deemed necessary for any of the roads listed in CP 1.14 based on a traffic model conducted for the Countywide Plan.

CI 1.15 Pursue the extension of Fox Farm Road from McAlister east to Sugarloaf (Baldwin Lane) and tie into SR-38 as an alternate route.

A. Propose an 80 foot right-of-way with 4 travel lanes (Mountain Major Highway)

B. Connecting streets proposed for connecting to Fox Farm Road extension are: Sugarpine, Hillendale, Woodbridge, Pinon, Sugarloaf or Rainbow, and Adams/Shore.

CAG Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the

Page 14: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 14 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

Note: An extension of Fox Farm Road was not deemed necessary based on a traffic model conducted for the Countywide Plan.

CI 1.16 Work with Caltrans to address any development on Big Bear Blvd (SR-18 and SR-38) within 300 feet of the following intersections, to require that a detailed analysis be made to determine additional right-of-way and roadway widths that should be provided for additional intersection capacity.

A. Division Drive

B. Hillendale Drive

C. Aeroplane Blvd.

D. Pinon Drive

E. Greenway Drive

F. Paradise Way

G. Shore Drive

H. Maple Lane

I. Shay Road

J. Big Tree

K. Baldwin Lane at SR-38

L. State Lane/Mitchell at SR-38

CAG Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

CI 1.17 Require a 26 foot paved way for public road and 24 foot paved way for private road as minimum improvements, and require dedications where applicable, as conditions of approval on all discretionary actions.

DC See County Development Code Chapter 83.12, Road System Design Standards.

Ci 1.18 Work with Caltrans to investigate and pursue realignment alternatives for Big Bear Blvd (SR-18) between Pine View Drive and Aeroplane Blvd. (i.e. “Deadman’s Curve”).

PP

CAG

Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

Page 15: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 15 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

CI 1.19 Work with Caltrans to improve circulation for the purposes of reducing traffic congestion on roadways listed in Community Plan. Achieve this by the following:

A. Require dedications for an ultimate 80 foot wide roadway as entitlements are given, establish corresponding building setbacks and standard County road improvement participation agreements.

B. Defer full improvements (4 travel lanes, curbs, gutter, paving) until traffic volumes approach a Level of Service “C” during afternoon peak hours, after the following interim improvements have been installed.

C. Until such time as full-width improvements are necessary, make other interim traffic management improvements including, but not limited to:

i. Signalization of key intersections as traffic warrants (Division Dr., Hillendale Dr., Pinon Dr., Big Tree Dr., Paradise Way, Shore Dr., Greenspot Rd.)

ii. Terminate non-essential intersecting streets and utilize abandoned right-of-ways for parking, open space/mini-parks, bus bays, and the like; or vacate.

iii. Utilize adjacent, parallel streets as outer highways/frontage roads

(Sherwood/Mojave and Aeroplane/Country Club) to provide alternative routes and controlled access to Big Bear Blvd.

PP

CAG

Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

Page 16: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 16 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes a. Require 30 foot half width dedication along commercial frontage of streets specified in action (iii) above.

b. Require 20½ foot width dedication along residential frontage of streets specified in (iii) above.

c. Provide 40 feet paving width for streets in (iii) above."

CI 1.20 Seek Federal Aide Highway and State funds to finance or off-set improvements to State facilities mentioned in the previous policies; or to off-set and reduce transportation fees.

PP Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

CI 1.21 Work with Caltrans and other parties to develop a phased, coordinated, and interconnected signal system along roadways listed in Community Plan.

PP Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

CI 1.22 Development of any roadways to 4-lane width standards shall be in accordance with the standard County practice that all development be required to dedicate master plan right-of- way and master plan improvements, other than individual small lots. Deferral agreements for road improvements shall be granted, as determined by Land Management, on all small development.

DC See County Development Code Chapter 83.12, Road System Design Standards.

CI 1.23 In recognition of the possible need to restrict left hand turns at certain locations along some roadways as part of an overall transportation management strategy, the County shall coordinate with Caltrans to consider the installation of left hand turn pockets where unacceptable queuing interferes with traffic flow. If this proves infeasible, the County will coordinate with Caltrans to impose other left hand turn restrictions as required to maintain acceptable traffic flow during periods when queuing is a problem.

PP

DC

Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

See County Development Code Chapter 83.12, Road System Design Standards.

CI 1.24 In recognition of the potential need to control parking at certain locations along certain roadways as part of an overall transportation management strategy, the County shall coordinate parking controls with Caltrans as future traffic flow requirements along these roads dictate.

PP Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

Policy TM-2.5 Context-based features. When making road improvements, we provide feasible, context-based transportation features such as:

- Chain installation and inspection areas in the Mountain Region

Page 17: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 17 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes - Limited on-street parking areas to serve snow-plow or emergency services

- Passing lanes in rural areas - Vista areas along scenic routes

Goal CI 2 Ensure safe and efficient non-motorized traffic circulation within the community.

PP

CAG

Policy Map TM-3. Mobility Focus Areas. The central area in Big Bear City is identified as a focus area for mobility improvements.

Goal TM-4 Complete streets, transit, and active transportation. On- and off-street improvements that provide functional alternatives to private car usage and promote active transportation in mobility focus areas.

Focus Statement B. Reduce traffic congestion by improving transit services, roadways and recreational networks for pedestrians and bicyclists, and transit riders.

CI 2.1 Research the feasibility of using excess right-of-way not needed for road construction for pedestrian and bicycle trails. Encourage the development of bicycle and pedestrian paths on portions of scenic mountain roads adjacent to residential and commercial developments.

PP

CAG

Policy TM-4.8 Local bicycle and pedestrian networks. We support local bike and pedestrian facilities that serve unincorporated areas, connect to facilities in adjacent incorporated areas, and connect to regional trails. We prioritize bicycle and pedestrian network improvements that provide safe and continuous pedestrian and bicycle access to mobility focus areas, schools, parks, and major transit stops.

Action Statement B2. Advocate for implementation of the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan in collaboration with partners such as the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino Public Works, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation, and the Southern California Mountains Foundation and under the leadership of the Big Bear Valley Trails Coordinator.

CI 2.2 Provide pedestrian improvements in commercial activity centers to enhance safety, provide a high quality visitor experience, enhance the mountain character of the area and reduce the need for vehicular travel.

PP Policy TM-3.2 Trip reduction strategies. We support the implementation of transportation demand management techniques, mixed use strategies, and the placement of development in proximity to job and activity centers to reduce the number and length of vehicular trips.

Policy TM-4.11 Parking areas. We require publicly accessible parking areas to ensure that pedestrians and bicyclists can safely access the site and onsite businesses from the public right-of-way.

CI 2.4 Encourage the addition of bicycle routes whenever existing state highways are widened or significant length of highways are improved.

PP Policy TM-4.3 Funding. We partner with SBCTA, Caltrans, and local agencies to fund active transportation systems in the county.

Page 18: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 18 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 2.5 Coordinate with the City of Big Bear Lake, Bear Valley Recreation and Park District and the United States Forest Service in the development of a Bike Route Master Plan to create valley-wide bicycle routes.

CAG Focus Statement B2. Advocate for implementation of the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan in collaboration with partners such as the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino Public Works, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation, and the Southern California Mountains Foundation and under the leadership of the Big Bear Valley Trails Coordinator.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

Goal CI 3 Protect the designed vehicular capacity of all mountain roads.

PP Goal TM-1 Roadway capacity. Unincorporated areas served by roads with capacity that is adequate for residents, businesses, tourists, and emergency services.

CI 3.1 Prohibit on-street parking where it reduces highway design capacity and limits snow plowing effectiveness.

PP Policy TM-2.5 Context-based features. When making road improvements, we provide feasible, context-based transportation features such as:

- Chain installation and inspection areas in the Mountain Region

- Limited on-street parking areas to serve snow-plow or emergency services

- Passing lanes in rural areas

- Vista areas along scenic routes

CI 3.2 Limit and control the location and extent of all land uses which generate increased levels of traffic beyond the designed capacity of the existing and planned highways.

PP Policy TM-1.1 Roadway level of service (LOS). We require our roadways to be built to achieve the following minimum level of service standards during peak commute periods (typically 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM on a weekday):

- LOS D in the Valley Region - LOS C in the Mountain Region

- LOS C in the North and East Desert Regions

Policy TM-1.2 LOS exemptions. We may accept reduced levels of service (compared to Policy TM-1.1) when one or more of the following conditions exist:

- Insufficient right of way exists to implement the improvement and right of way acquisition is infeasible.

- Substantial impacts of improvement on the environment are considered unacceptable.

- The improvement would conflict with the aesthetic quality and heritage of a designated scenic highway, scenic route, or local community character.

- The improvement degrades safety for cyclists and pedestrians on bicycle and pedestrian prioritized routes.

Page 19: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 19 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

Goal CI 4 Promote alternative modes of transportation. PP Goal TM-4 Complete streets, transit, and active transportation. On- and off-street improvements that provide functional alternatives to private car usage and promote active transportation in mobility focus areas.

CI 4.1 In coordination with the community, define the existing and future transportation needs as they may relate to transit for residents, employees and visitors in the mountain region. When transportation needs are defined conduct a feasibility study to determine the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of instituting alternative transportation recommendations. A potential transportation alternative may include shuttle services from residential neighborhoods to recreational areas and major commercial centers.

CAG

Action Statement B1. Advocate for improved transportation options and reduced automobile traffic through Big Bear City on State Route 18 and State Route 38, which become congested with tourist traffic during peak holiday weekends and seasons. Solutions should be integrated with valley-wide and regional strategies and may include transit improvements, shuttle services, streetscape improvements (including pedestrian and bicycle facilities), marketing, or transportation access guides implemented in coordination with Mountain Transit, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the City of Big Bear Lake, the California Department of Transportation, the Big Bear Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, and/or other relevant organizations.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

CI 4.2 Evaluate additional service needs that could be provided by the Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority (MARTA) through coordination with MARTA, the County and residents of the mountain communities and encourage the use of alternative fuel vehicles.

PP Policy TM-4.4 Transit access for residents in unincorporated areas. We support and work with local transit agencies to generate a public transportation system, with fixed routes and on-demand service, that provide residents of unincorporated areas with access to jobs, public services, shopping, and entertainment throughout the county.

Policy TM-4.5 Transit access to job centers and tourist destinations. We support and work with local transit agencies to generate public transportation systems that provide access to job centers and reduce congestion in tourist destinations in unincorporated areas.

CI 4.3 Support improvement and utilization of the Bear City Airport in a manner consistent with public health and safety considerations and sound land use planning and development

PP Policy TM-6.4 Airport land use compatibility. We require new development in unincorporated areas to be consistent with applicable airport master plans, airport safety review areas, and military air installation compatible use zones. We may support new development in the influence area of County airports only when they are consistent with applicable airport master plans.

Goal CI 5 Ensure adequate water sources and associated infrastructure to serve the needs of existing and future water users in the Bear Valley Community Plan area.

PP Goal IU-1 Water supply. Water supply and infrastructure are sufficient for the needs of residents and businesses and resilient to drought.

Page 20: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 20 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 5.1 Through the development review process, permit new development only when adequate water supply exists or can be assured.

PP Policy IU-1.1 Water supply. We require that new development be connected to a public water system or a County-approved well to ensure a clean and resilient supply of potable water, even during cases of prolonged drought.

Policy H-1.2 Concurrent infrastructure. We support the integrated planning and provision of appropriate infrastructure (including water, sewer, and roadways) concurrent with and as a condition of residential development to create more livable communities.

CI 5.2 Support programs to use reclaimed water from mountain sewage systems to offset local water supplies when such reclamation is consistent with public health and environmental standards.

PP Policy IU-1.3 Recycled water. We promote the use of recycled water for landscaping, groundwater recharge, direct potable reuse, and other applicable uses in order to supplement groundwater supplies.

Policy IU-1.4 Greywater. We support the use of greywater systems for non-potable purposes.

CI 5.3 Support efforts to continue to improve cooperation and communication among water providers in addressing water related issues.

PP Policy IU-1.8 Groundwater management coordination. We collaborate with watermasters, groundwater sustainability agencies, water purveyors, and other government agencies to ensure groundwater basins are being sustainably managed. We discourage new development when it would create or aggravate groundwater overdraft conditions, land subsidence, or other “undesirable results” as defined in the California Water Code. We require safe yields for groundwater sources covered by the Desert Groundwater Management Ordinance.

CI 5.4 Support conjunctive use of the area’s water supplies. PP Policy IU-1.11 Water storage and conveyance. We assist in development of additional water storage and conveyance facilities to create a resilient regional water supply system, when it is cost effective for County-owned water and stormwater systems.

CI 5.5 Encourage the preparation of an infrastructure capacity study by the appropriate public or private agency(ies) relative to the ability of that agency to provide its particular service to the residents of Bear Valley.

X Note: The Local Agency Formation Commission for San Bernardino County conducts mandatory water service reviews. The most recent review was published in 2017.

CI 5.6 Any projects which propose the commercial extraction and exportation of native groundwater shall be required to prepare a thorough hydrogeological investigation as analyzed in an Environmental Impact Report. The County will not support the extraction and exportation of native groundwater for commercial

PP NR-2.1 Coordination on water quality. We collaborate with the state, regional water quality control boards, watermasters, water purveyors, and government agencies at all levels to ensure a safe supply of drinking water and a healthy environment.

Page 21: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 21 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes purposes in any situation that results in significant impacts to the environment.

NR-2.2 Water management plans. We support the development, update, and implementation of ground and surface water quality management plans emphasizing the protection of water quality from point and non-point source pollution.

Note: Project-specific environmental impacts are analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and/or the National Environmental Policy Act.

Goal CI 6 Encourage and promote water conservation PP Goal IU-1 Water supply. Water supply and infrastructure are sufficient for the needs of residents and businesses and resilient to drought.

CI 6.1 Support conservation and efficient water use in an effort to minimize the need for new water sources.

PP Policy IU-1.9 Water conservation. We encourage water conserving site design and the use of water conserving fixtures, and advocate for the adoption and implementation of water conservation strategies by water service agencies. For existing County-owned facilities, we incorporate design elements, building materials, fixtures, and landscaping that reduce water consumption, as funding is available.

CI 6.2 In coordination with local water providers, provide education for voluntary water conservation. Plan and implement educational programs and events promoting water conservation.

PP Policy IU-1.9 Water conservation. We encourage water conserving site design and the use of water conserving fixtures, and advocate for the adoption and implementation of water conservation strategies by water service agencies. For existing County-owned facilities, we incorporate design elements, building materials, fixtures, and landscaping that reduce water consumption, as funding is available.

Note: The City of Big Bear Lake Department of Water and Power offers water conservation public outreach and educational services throughout the area.

CI 6.3 Promote the use of native low water use vegetation, especially drought tolerant plants in landscaping and discourage inappropriate use of vegetation unsuited to the mountain climate.

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

CI 6.4 Minimize the use of turf grass. DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

CI 6.5 Promote use of water efficient irrigation practices for all landscaped areas.

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

CI 6.6 Regulate the extent and amount of impervious surfaces coverage.

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

Page 22: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 22 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 6.7 Require landscaping plans to meet the requirements of a local water purveyor if said purveyor has adopted specific landscaping guidelines within its service areas.

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

Goal CI 7 Maintain and enhance the quality of lakes, streams and underground water supplies.

PP Goal NR-2 Water quality. Clean and safe water for human consumption and the natural environment.

CI 7.1 Require the timely hookup to sewers for any development within a Sanitation District and currently adjacent to existing lines, through notification by the district and referrals, when development is proposed.

PP

DC

Policy H-1.2 Concurrent infrastructure. We support the integrated planning and provision of appropriate infrastructure (including water, sewer, and roadways) concurrent with and as a condition of residential development to create more livable communities.

All development requiring sewers include review by the Environmental Health Services. Sewer requirements are also part of the Conditions of Approval.

CI 7.2 In areas where sewer service is not available, the use of individual septic disposal systems shall not be allowed unless it can first be demonstrated that adequate lot size, slope and suitable soil conditions exist for installation of septic disposal systems.

PP Policy IU-2.1 Minimum parcel size. We require new lots smaller than one-half acre to be served by a sewer system. We may require sewer service for larger lot sizes depending on local soil and groundwater conditions, and the County’s Local Area Management Program.

CI 7.3 Alternating leachfields shall be installed in order to alleviate potential health and water quality problems resulting from failing leachfields to which repair equipment has no access, or on lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, or where leachfield area slope is 30 percent or greater.

DC See County Development Code Chapter 83.09, Infrastructure Improvement Standards.

Note: The County also establishes standards through the Local Area Management Program.

CI 7.4 Require Best Management practices to be contained in all erosion control plans.

PP

DC

Policy LU-2.5 Hillside preservation. We require that new development in sloping hillside areas preserve the natural character of the surrounding environment and does not further exacerbate natural hazards or erosion.

Policy M/H-1.1 Site design. We regulate the density, mass, and height of residential development in hillside areas in order to reduce fire hazards, prevent erosion, preserve natural viewsheds, and maintain the forest character of the Mountain Region.

See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards; 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards; 85.11.030, Erosion Control Plan and Inspection Required; and 88.02.050, Wind-Borne Soil Erosion.

Page 23: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 23 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 7.5 Support the Groundwater Recharge and Recycling Project which the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency (BBARWA) is undertaking to ensure an adequate water supply for the Bear Valley

PP Policy IU-1.8 Groundwater management coordination. We collaborate with watermasters, groundwater sustainability agencies, water purveyors, and other government agencies to ensure groundwater basins are being sustainably managed. We discourage new development when it would create or aggravate groundwater overdraft conditions, land subsidence, or other “undesirable results” as defined in the California Water Code. We require safe yields for groundwater sources covered by the Desert Groundwater Management Ordinance.

Policy IU-2.3 Shared wastewater facilities for recycled water. We encourage an expansion of recycled water agreements between wastewater entities to share and/or create connections between wastewater systems to expand the use of recycled water.

Policy NR-2.1 Coordination of water quality. We collaborate with the state, regional water quality control boards, watermasters, water purveyors, and government agencies at all levels to ensure a safe supply of drinking water and a healthy environment.

Goal CI 8 Develop an efficient and economical solid waste collection, reclamation and disposal system to serve the Bear Valley community.

PP Goal IU-4 Solid waste. Adequate regional landfill capacity that provides for the safe disposal of solid waste, and efficient waste diversion and collection for unincorporated areas.

CI 8.1 Manage operational procedures to improve and take precautionary measures against groundwater and surface water pollution from the local solid waste disposal site.

DC The County Development Code addresses solid waste disposal operational standards.

CI 8.2 Promote recovery and recycling of usable materials from solid waste.

PP Policy IU-4.3 Waste diversion. We shall meet or exceed state waste diversion requirements, augment future landfill capacity, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and use of natural resources through the reduction, reuse, or recycling of solid waste.

CI 8.3 Coordinate and cooperate with responsible and affected agencies and the local communities in developing a long-range solution to solid waste collection and disposal in Bear Valley. Ensure that any long-range solution considers the worst case scenario demands of the population during weekends and holidays.

CAG Action Statement A2. Establish a community cleanup program in collaboration with community service organizations, local schools, and Big Bear Disposal to assist with large item trash pickup at least two times per year.

Goal CI 9 Encourage the development of educational facilities for postsecondary education.

PP Policy HW-2 Education. A common culture that values education and lifelong learning and a populace with the education to participate and compete in the global economy.

Page 24: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 24 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CI 9.1 Support local efforts to establish an on-site community college campus within the Big Bear Valley.

X Note: This was not identified as a community priority during the 2016/2017 community outreach.

CONSERVATION

Goal CO 1 Preserve the unique environmental features of Bear Valley including native wildlife, vegetation, and scenic vistas.

PP Goal NR-4 Scenic resources. Scenic resources that highlight the natural environment and reinforce the identity of local communities and the county.

Goal NR 5-Biological resources. An interconnected landscape of open spaces and habitat areas that promotes biodiversity and healthy ecosystems, both for their intrinsic value and for the value placed on them by residents and visitors.

CO 1.1 Provide for the grouping or clustering of residential buildings where this will maximize the opportunity to preserve significant natural resources, natural beauty or open space without generally increasing the intensity of development otherwise possible.

PP Policy NR-3.2 Residential clustering. We allow residential development to cluster housing units in order to reduce the consumption of undeveloped land, maximize the amount of open space, preserve natural resources, conform to natural topography/grade, and/or reduce exposure of structures to natural hazards.

CO 1.2 Continue to identify and protect unique habitats supporting rare and endangered species by applying the Biotic Resources Overlay.

DC See Development Code Chapter 82.11, Biotic Resources Overlay.

CO 1.3 Establish habitat "banks" as mitigation for loss of isolated resources.

PP Policy NR-5.6 Mitigation banking. We support the proactive assemblage of lands to protect biological resources and facilitate development through private or public mitigation banking. We require public and private conservation lands or mitigation banks to ensure that easement and fee title agreements provide funding methods sufficient to manage the land in perpetuity.

CO 1.4 Encourage donation or exchange or lands with sensitive biota resources within designated target areas to non-profit environmental organizations or responsible agencies (USFS, County, Nature Conservancy, etc.) and advise developers/owners of tax advantages and marketing value of conservation easements, donations, etc.

PP Policy NR-3.4 Land exchange. We coordinate with state and federal agencies to exchange publicly owned lands in order to provide additional areas for open space, recreation, and resource protection. We also request the right of first refusal on publicly owned lands made available for purchase to the public.

CO 1.5 Utilize an Open Space designation for target areas of public and private open space which by its location and natural resources values is suited for conservation purposes only.

PP Policy NR-3.1 Open space preservation. We regulate land use and coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to preserve open space areas that protect natural resources, function as a buffer against natural hazards or between land uses, serve as a

Page 25: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 25 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes recreation or tourist destination, or are central to the identity of an unincorporated community.

CO 1.6 Allow no more than 2 dwelling units per gross acre in “Known Day Use Area” eagle habitat (as shown on the Biological Resources Overlay Map) and up to 4 dwelling units per gross acre in “Potential Day Use Areas” eagle habitat.

PP Policy NR-5.7 Development review, entitlement, and mitigation. We comply with state and federal regulations regarding protected species of animals and vegetation through the development review, entitlement, and environmental clearance processes.

Note: Project-specific impacts are analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and/or National Environmental Policy Act.

CO 1.7 Construction and other building-related activities shall be restricted from December 1 through April 1 within “Known Day Use Area” eagle habitat.

PP Policy NR-5.7 Development review, entitlement, and mitigation. We comply with state and federal regulations regarding protected species of animals and vegetation through the development review, entitlement, and environmental clearance processes.

Note: Project-specific impacts are analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and/or National Environmental Policy Act.

CO 1.8 The following areas are recognized as important open space areas that provide for wildlife movement and other important linkage values. Projects shall be designed to minimize impacts to these corridors.

a. Shay Meadow Open Space Area

b. Big Bear Lake Watershed Open Space Area

c. Holcomb Valley Open Space Area

d. Baldwin Lake Open Space Area

e. Pacific Crest Trail

PP

CAG

Policy NR-5.1 Coordinated habitat planning. We participate in landscape-scale habitat conservation planning and coordinate with existing or proposed habitat conservation and natural resource management plans for private and public lands to increase certainty for both the conservation of species, habitats, wildlife corridors, and other important biological resources and functions and for land development and infrastructure permitting.

Policy NR-5.2 Capacity for resource protection and management. We coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to seek funding and other resources to protect, restore, and maintain open space, habitat, and wildlife corridors for threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species.

Policy NR-5.7 Development review, entitlement, and mitigation. We comply with state and federal regulations regarding protected species of animals and vegetation through the development review, entitlement, and environmental clearance processes.

Action Statement D2. Establish a resource conservation program to designate open space resources, establish a dedicated funding source, and actively promote open space protection through land acquisition, conservation easements, mitigation monitoring, volunteer support, and other similar tools.

Note: Project-specific impacts are analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and/or National Environmental Policy Act.

Page 26: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 26 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CO 1.9 Consider design, construction and maintenance techniques in the County Flood Control District system, where technically and economically feasible, which allow the growth of habitat and the use of the flood control system by wildlife.

PP Policy IU-3.4 Natural floodways. We retain existing natural floodways and watercourses on County-controlled floodways, including natural channel bottoms, unless hardening and channelization is the only feasible way to manage flood risk. On floodways not controlled by the County, we encourage the retention of natural floodways and watercourses. Our priority is to reduce flood risk, but we also strive to protect wildlife corridors, prevent loss of critical habitat, and improve the amount and quality of surface water and groundwater resources.

Goal CO 2 Maintain the health and vigor of the forest environment. PP Goal NR-5 Biological resources. An interconnected landscape of open spaces and habitat areas that promotes biodiversity and healthy ecosystems, both for their intrinsic value and for the value placed on them by residents and visitors.

CO 2.1 Work collaboratively with the California Department of Forestry, the Natural Resource Conservation District and Fire Warden (CDF) and the U.S. Forest Service to implement a long-term Forest Health Restoration and Maintenance Program that will restore fire resiliency, increase safety, and provide community and forest sustainability.

PP Policy NR-5.1 Coordinated habitat planning. We participate in landscape-scale habitat conservation planning and coordinate with existing or proposed habitat conservation and natural resource management plans for private and public lands to increase certainty for both the conservation of species, habitats, wildlife corridors, and other important biological resources and functions and for land development and infrastructure permitting.

CO 2.2 Work with the local Fire Safe Council and Fire agencies in the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP) for the mountain communities. As part of this effort, a study shall be prepared to determine appropriate forest management techniques and identify any necessary modifications to the County’s Tree Preservation Ordinance to ensure the long term health of the forest.

DC The County Development Code addresses tree preservation in Section 83.10.080(b)(1), with the requirement of a forest conservation plan and insect infestation prevention program, and in Chapter 88.01, Plant Protection and Management.

Note: The Big Bear Valley CWPP was prepared in 2006 and can be found online at: http://www.sbcounty.gov/calmast/sbc/html/cwpp.asp

CO 2.3 Require the re-vegetation of any graded surface with suitable native drought and fire resistant planting to minimize erosion.

PP

DC

Policy LU-4.4 Natural topography in the Mountain region. We require new development in the Mountain region to retain natural topography and minimize grading unless it is necessary to reduce exposure to natural hazards.

Policy PP-3.7 Fire safe design. We require new development in the Fire Safety Overlay to comply with additional site design, building, and access standards to provide enhanced resistance to fire hazards.

Policy LU-4.2 Fire-adapted communities. We require new development in high or very high fire hazard severity zones to apply fire-resistant design techniques, including fuel modification areas, fire resistant landscaping, and fire-resistant building materials.

Page 27: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 27 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes See County Development Code Chapter 88.01, Plant Protection and Management.

CO 2.4 Establish a parking provision for the purpose of saving healthy trees in parking areas by giving parking credit for areas containing specimen trees.

DC The County Development Code addresses parking and loading requirements.

CO 2.5 Require an approved landscape plan as part of the location and development plan review and approval process for all proposed residential tracts, commercial and industrial projects.

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

Goal CO 3 Enhance and maintain the quality of water from lakes, their tributaries, and underground water supplies

PP Goal NR-2 Water Quality. Clean and safe water for human consumption and the natural environment.

CO 3.1 Require the hook-up to sewers of any properties currently adjacent to lines within the Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency (BBARWA) district through notification by the BBARWA district.

PP

DC

Policy H-1.2 Concurrent infrastructure. We support the integrated planning and provision of appropriate infrastructure (including water, sewer, and roadways) concurrent with and as a condition of residential development to create more livable communities.

All development requiring sewers include review by the Environmental Health Services. Sewer requirements are also part of the Conditions of Approval.

CO 3.2 Enforce grading and landscaping standards to reduce soil erosion.

PP

DC

Policy LU-4.4 Natural topography in the Mountain region. We require new development in the Mountain region to retain natural topography and minimize grading unless it is necessary to reduce exposure to natural hazards.

See County Development Code Chapter 83.08, Hillside Grading Standards.

CO 3.3 Ensure that the County Development Code incorporates appropriate construction activity control measures to prevent run-off.

DC Policy NR-2.5 Stormwater discharge. We ensure compliance with the County’s Municipal Stormwater NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Permit by requiring new development and significant redevelopment to protect the quality of water and drainage systems through site design, source controls, stormwater treatment, runoff reduction measures, best management practices, low impact development strategies, and technological advances. For existing development, we monitor businesses and coordinate with municipalities.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

CO 3.4 Require as part of the review for all projects specific provisions to minimize the runoff of surface water and establish

DC See County Development Code Sections 83.10.070, Landscaping Standards, and 83.10.080, Regional Landscaping Standards.

Page 28: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 28 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes controls for soil erosion and sedimentation. These provisions shall include:

A. Through the development review process, require replanting of ground cover in denuded areas with vegetation, either indigenous to the area or compatible with the climate and soil characteristics of the community.

B. When development occurs, provide for the retention of natural drainage channels and capacity of the site where feasible.

C. When feasible, require developers through the development review process to maintain existing percolation and surface water runoff rate by discouraging the paving of large surface areas.

Goal CO 4 Streambeds shall be protected from encroachment or development that detracts from their natural beauty.

PP Goal NR-4 Scenic resources. Scenic resources that highlight the natural environment and reinforce the identity of local communities and the county.

Goal NR-5 Biological resources. An interconnected landscape of open spaces and habitat areas that promotes biodiversity and healthy ecosystems, both for their intrinsic value and for the value placed on them by residents and visitors.

CO 4.1 Utilize open space and drainage easements as well as clustering of new development as stream preservation tools.

PP Policy NR-3.1 Open space preservation. We regulate land use and coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to preserve open space areas that protect natural resources, function as a buffer against natural hazards or between land uses, serve as a recreation or tourist destination, or are central to the identity of an unincorporated community.

Policy NR-3.2 Residential clustering. We allow residential development to cluster housing units in order to reduce the consumption of undeveloped land, maximize the amount of open space, preserve natural resources, conform to natural topography/grade, and/or reduce exposure of structures to natural hazards

CO 4.2 Require naturalistic drainage improvements where modifications to the natural streamway are required.

PP Policy IU-3.4 Natural floodways. We retain existing natural floodways and watercourses on County-controlled floodways, including natural channel bottoms, unless hardening and channelization is the only feasible way to manage flood risk. On floodways not controlled by the County, we encourage the retention of natural floodways and watercourses. Our priority is to reduce flood risk, but we also strive to protect wildlife corridors, prevent loss of critical habitat, and improve the amount and quality of surface water and groundwater resources.

Page 29: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 29 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CO 4.3 Prohibit exposed concrete drainage structures. Acceptable designs include combinations of earthen landscaped swales, rock rip-rap lined channels or rock-lined concrete channels. Property owners must provide for the maintenance of underground drainage structures.

DC See County Development Code Chapter 83.08, Hillside Grading Standards.

CO 4.4 Streams shall not be placed in underground structures in any residential, Neighborhood Commercial or Institutional Land Use Zoning District or zone.

DC The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

CO 4.5 Natural drainage courses shall not be occupied or obstructed PP Policy IU-3.4 Natural floodways. We retain existing natural floodways and watercourses on County-controlled floodways, including natural channel bottoms, unless hardening and channelization is the only feasible way to manage flood risk. On floodways not controlled by the County, we encourage the retention of natural floodways and watercourses. Our priority is to reduce flood risk, but we also strive to protect wildlife corridors, prevent loss of critical habitat, and improve the amount and quality of surface water and groundwater resources.

Goal CO 5 Preserve the significant historical sites and structures which contribute to the unique character of the Community Plan area.

PP Goal CH-2 Historic and prehistoric resources. Historic, prehistoric, archaeological, and paleontological resources that are protected and preserved for their cultural importance to local communities as well as their research and educational potential.

CO 5.1 Identify and inventory local historic sites and structures; seek input from the local historical society and local committees.

PP Policy CH-2.1 National and state historic resources. We encourage the preservation of historic and prehistoric sites and structures of state or national significance in accordance with the Secretary of Interior Standards for Historic Rehabilitation.

Policy CH-2.2 Local historic resources. We encourage property owners to maintain the historic integrity of resources on their property by (listed in order of preference): preservation, adaptive reuse, or memorialization.

CO 5.2 Utilize the Cultural Resources Preservation (CP) Overlay in developing future land use districts or zones and the formulation and evaluation of the plan amendments and development proposals.

DC See County Development Code, Chapter 82.12, Cultural Resources Preservation Overlay.

Page 30: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 30 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

CO 5.3 Establish economic incentives for resource protection through the development of cultural property contracts between the County and private landowners to provide tax relief.

PP Policy CH-2.4 Partnerships. We encourage partnerships to champion and financially support the preservation and restoration of historic sites, structures, and districts.

CO 5.4 Establish funding mechanisms for historic preservation through State and Federal grant programs, private trusts, local tours and publications which explain the history of these facilities.

PP Policy CH-2.4 Partnerships. We encourage partnerships to champion and financially support the preservation and restoration of historic sites, structures, and districts.

CO 5.5 Encourage cooperation of public agencies with land use plan authority or charged with the responsibility to protect cultural resources and private conservation organizations toward development of regional protection plans (land exchanges, mitigation banks).

PP Policy CH-2.4 Partnerships. We encourage partnerships to champion and financially support the preservation and restoration of historic sites, structures, and districts.

Policy CH-2.5 Public awareness and education. We increase public awareness and conduct education efforts about the unique historic, natural, tribal, and cultural resources in San Bernardino County through the County Museum and in collaboration with other entities and organizations.

OPEN SPACE

Goal OS 1 Ensure the preservation and proper management of National Forest lands within the Bear Valley Community Plan area.

PP

Goal NR-3 Open space, parks, and recreation. A system of well-planned and maintained parks, trails, and open space that provides recreation opportunities for residents, attracts visitors from across the region and around the country, and preserves the natural environment.

Goal NR-5 Biological resources. An interconnected landscape of open spaces and habitat areas that promotes biodiversity and healthy ecosystems, both for their intrinsic value and for the value placed on them by residents and visitors.

OS 1.1 Encourage the exchange of properties between the Forest Service and private property owners to create better Forest Service boundary management.

PP Policy NR-3.3 Management of designated areas. We coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to sustainably manage and conserve land within or adjacent to locally-, state-, or federally-designated open space or resource conservation areas.

Policy NR-3.4 Land exchange. We coordinate with state and federal agencies to exchange publicly owned lands in order to provide additional areas for open space, recreation, and resource protection. We also request the right of first refusal on publicly owned lands made available for purchase to the public.

Policy LU-2.14 Contiguous land administration. We support the consolidation of disconnected land areas under public ownership or administration to increase financial and environmental value, streamline the management of land and resources, and establish more complete and effective transition areas or buffers. Such consolidation

Page 31: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 31 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes may include transfer of title of property among public entities and the purchase or swapping of private property voluntarily sold when the consolidation is fiscally neutral or beneficial to the County.

OS 1.2 Work with USFS to explore land exchange opportunities that would provide additional areas for open space, recreational opportunities and watershed protection and involve the community and the County at the earliest stage of land exchanges. The County encourages the USFS to establish a procedure to identify appropriate land exchange opportunities to acquire land for community amenities.

PP Policy NR-3.4 Land exchange. We coordinate with state and federal agencies to exchange publicly owned lands in order to provide additional areas for open space, recreation, and resource protection. We also request the right of first refusal on publicly owned lands made available for purchase to the public.

OS 1.3 Work with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to designate more areas for recreational activities, such as snow play areas, campgrounds, etc.

PP Policy NR-3.1 Open space preservation. We regulate land use and coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to preserve open space areas that protect natural resources, function as a buffer against natural hazards or between land uses, serve as a recreation or tourist destination, or are central to the identity of an unincorporated community.

Policy NR-3.3 Management of designated areas. We coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to sustainably manage and conserve land within or adjacent to locally-, state-, or federally-designated open space or resource conservation areas.

OS 1.4 Work with the U.S. Forest Service to ensure that plans and special use permits on National Forest lands within or affecting the plan area are compatible with the Bear Valley Community Plan.

PP Policy NR-5.1 Coordinated habitat planning. We participate in landscape-scale habitat conservation planning and coordinate with existing or proposed habitat conservation and natural resource management plans for private and public lands to increase certainty for both the conservation of species, habitats, wildlife corridors, and other important biological resources and functions and for land development and infrastructure permitting.

Policy NR-5.2 Capacity for resource protection and management. We coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to seek funding and other resources to protect, restore, and maintain open space, habitat, and wildlife corridors for threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species.

Goal OS 2 Develop parks and recreation facilities to meet the recreational needs of the community and visitors.

PP Goal NR-3 Open space, parks, and recreation. A system of well-planned and maintained parks, trails, and open space that provides recreation opportunities for residents, attracts visitors from across the region and around the country, and preserves the natural environment.

Page 32: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 32 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

OS 2.1 In coordination with the community, establish priorities and identify opportunities for park development and establish a park and recreation plan for the Bear Valley community.

PP

CAG

Policy NR-3.9 Local parks, trails, and recreation. We support the provision of local and community parks, trails, and recreational programs and facilities in unincorporated areas when a locally-approved funding and financing mechanism is established to pay for acquisition, construction, maintenance, and operations.

Action Statement D2. Establish a resource conservation program to designate open space resources, establish a dedicated funding source, and actively promote open space protection through land acquisition, conservation easements, mitigation monitoring, volunteer support, and other similar tools.

OS 2.2 Encourage the development of recreational facilities within community parks such as, swimming pools, athletic facilities and community centers.

PP Policy NR-3.9 Local parks, trails, and recreation. We support the provision of local and community parks, trails, and recreational programs and facilities in unincorporated areas when a locally-approved funding and financing mechanism is established to pay for acquisition, construction, maintenance, and operations.

OS 2.3 Encourage use of National Forest lands to satisfy the needs of public recreation in the mountain region.

PP Policy NR-3.6 Regional park land. We coordinate with other jurisdictions and agencies to provide regional park land. We prioritize the maintenance and improvement of existing County parks and trails over their expansion or creation of new facilities.

Policy NR-3.10 Joint use facilities. We promote the creation of joint use facilities for local parks and recreation programs through coordination with the County Flood Control District, local school districts, utilities, and other public agencies.

Goal OS 3 Establish a community-wide trail system. PP

CAG

Policy NR-3.9 Local parks, trails, and recreation. We support the provision of local and community parks, trails, and recreational programs and facilities in unincorporated areas when a locally-approved funding and financing mechanism is established to pay for acquisition, construction, maintenance, and operations.

Action statement B2. Advocate for implementation of the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan in collaboration with partners such as the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino Public Works, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation, and the Southern California Mountains Foundation and under the leadership of the Big Bear Valley Trails Coordinator.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

OS 3.1 Support coordination between the community, U.S. Forest Service and the San Bernardino County Trails and Greenways Committee in their effort to develop and maintain a system of public

PP Policy RC-3.8 Regional trail system. We coordinate with incorporated jurisdictions, state and federal agencies, and other regional and not-for-profit entities to maintain and improve a regional trail system. We prioritize the maintenance and improvement of the

Page 33: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 33 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes trails for hiking, bicycling and horseback riding. Particular attention shall be given to providing connections with the local trail system, recreational and commercial areas.

Santa Ana River Trail, followed by the creation of trails in unincorporated areas that connect to existing trails in incorporated areas and to state- and federally-maintained trails.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

OS 3.2 Establish a plan for the development of a local multi-purpose (pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian) trail system within the plan area. The plan shall incorporate the following recommendations:

A. Where feasible pursue opportunities to separate pedestrian/bicycle/equestrian traffic from motorized vehicle traffic.

B. Where desired by the local community, establish a system of equestrian trails and facilities, and where appropriate, in individual neighborhoods.

C. Provide trail heads that link regional trails and those on National Forest System lands to those in recreational areas, residential areas, neighborhood trail systems and commercial nodes.

CAG Action Statement B2. Advocate for implementation of the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan in collaboration with partners such as the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino Public Works, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation, and the Southern California Mountains Foundation and under the leadership of the Big Bear Valley Trails Coordinator.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

OS 3.3 When an approved trails plan is developed, require dedication of trail easements as a condition of approval for all development projects consisting of 5 or more residential lots to facilitate community-wide pedestrian accessibility and to capitalize on recreation opportunities within the plan area. The trail easement shall allow unobstructed trail access and provide connections to off site trails.

CAG

DC

Action statement B2. Advocate for implementation of the Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Master Plan in collaboration with partners such as the City of Big Bear Lake, County of San Bernardino Public Works, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation, and the Southern California Mountains Foundation and under the leadership of the Big Bear Valley Trails Coordinator.

Note: See the 2014 Big Bear Valley Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Master Plan.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

OS 3.4 Review site plans to determine if residential and commercial uses are designed for pedestrian use. Future developments shall contain an internal system linking residential areas, recreational facilities, the National Forest and commercial activity centers.

PP

DC

Policy TM-4.8 Local bicycle and pedestrian networks. We support local bike and pedestrian facilities that serve unincorporated areas, connect to facilities in adjacent incorporated areas, and connect to regional trails. We prioritize bicycle and pedestrian network improvements that provide safe and continuous pedestrian and bicycle access to mobility focus areas, schools, parks, and major transit stops.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

OS 3.5 Support the improvement and extension of United States Forest Service (USFS) trails.

PP Policy RC-3.8 Regional trail system. We coordinate with incorporated jurisdictions, state and federal agencies, and other regional and not-for-profit entities to maintain and

Page 34: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 34 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes A. Protect and maintain the Pacific Crest Trail.

B. Encourage the USFS to maintain existing trails and to develop new hiking and biking trails.

improve a regional trail system. We prioritize the maintenance and improvement of the Santa Ana River Trail, followed by the creation of trails in unincorporated areas that connect to existing trails in incorporated areas and to state- and federally-maintained trails.

Goal OS 4 Ensure protection of lakes within the plan area and their role in meeting the recreation needs of locals and visitors.

PP Goal NR-3 Open space, parks, and recreation. A system of well-planned and maintained parks, trails, and open space that provides recreation opportunities for residents, attracts visitors from across the region and around the country, and preserves the natural environment.

OS 4.1 Encourage continuing environmentally sound development of the existing marinas and boat landings to meet the recreational needs of residents and visitors.

CAG Action Statement D2. Establish a resource conservation program to designate open space resources, establish a dedicated funding source, and actively promote open space protection through land acquisition, conservation easements, mitigation monitoring, volunteer support, and other similar tools.

OS 4.2 Provide for the necessary appurtenant uses of fueling, servicing boats and motors, and sale and rental of marina and fishing supplies, storage and necessary related accessory facilities.

DC The County Development Code addresses specific permitted use standards.

OS 4.3 Protect access to Big Bear Lake from the north shore. CAG

DC

Action Statement D2. Establish a resource conservation program to designate open space resources, establish a dedicated funding source, and actively promote open space protection through land acquisition, conservation easements, mitigation monitoring, volunteer support, and other similar tools.

See County Development Code, Section 87.06.030(d), Public access to public resources.

OS 4.4 The marina symbol designation shall be considered consistent with Commercial Land Use districts and the following marinas and boat landings shall be designated with the Marina symbol:

A. Leonard’s landing, Duane R. Boyer Public Boat Launch (West launch ramp), Cluster Pines campground, the Lighthouse RV park and Campground, Big Bear North, Carol Morrison Public Boat Launch (East launch ramp) and Dana Point Park.

X Note: Public marinas are in designated Floodways. Commercial activities directly related to the marina are allowed.

Goal OS 5 Improve and preserve open space corridors throughout the plan area.

PP Goal NR-3 Open space, parks, and recreation. A system of well-planned and maintained parks, trails, and open space that provides recreation opportunities for residents,

Page 35: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 35 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes attracts visitors from across the region and around the country, and preserves the natural environment.

OS 5.1 Where possible, require that open space areas set aside within individual developments be contiguous to natural areas adjacent to the site. Isolated open space areas within development shall be specifically discouraged, but may be accepted if no adjacent open space areas are available.

PP

DC

Policy NR-3.2 Residential clustering. We allow residential development to cluster housing units in order to reduce the consumption of undeveloped land, maximize the amount of open space, preserve natural resources, conform to natural topography/grade, and/or reduce exposure of structures to natural hazards.

Policy NR-3.5 Private conservation efforts. We support nongovernmental organizations and private entities who purchase, own, maintain, and expand areas for conservation and preservation. We also support the voluntary transition of privately held lands within a larger boundary designated by the state or federal government for open space and resource conservation to public ownership.

The County Development Code addresses site design and standards.

OS 5.2 Use open space corridors to link natural areas. PP Policy NR-3.1 Open space preservation. We regulate land use and coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to preserve open space areas that protect natural resources, function as a buffer against natural hazards or between land uses, serve as a recreation or tourist destination, or are central to the identity of an unincorporated community.

Policy NR-3.5 Private conservation efforts. We support nongovernmental organizations and private entities who purchase, own, maintain, and expand areas for conservation and preservation. We also support the voluntary transition of privately held lands within a larger boundary designated by the state or federal government for open space and resource conservation to public ownership.

Policy NR-5.1 Coordinated habitat planning. We participate in landscape-scale habitat conservation planning and coordinate with existing or proposed habitat conservation and natural resource management plans for private and public lands to increase certainty for both the conservation of species, habitats, wildlife corridors, and other important biological resources and functions and for land development and infrastructure permitting.

Policy NR-5.2 Capacity for resource protection and management. We coordinate with public and nongovernmental agencies to seek funding and other resources to protect, restore, and maintain open space, habitat, and wildlife corridors for threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species.

SAFETY

Page 36: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 36 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

Goal S 1 Provide adequate fire safety measures to protect residents of the plan area.

PP Goal PP-3 Fire and emergency medical. Reduced risk of death, injury, property damage, and economic loss due to fires and other natural disasters, accidents, and medical incidents through prompt and capable emergency response.

Goal PP-4 Emergency preparedness and recovery. A reduced risk of and impact from injury, loss of life, property damage, and economic and social disruption resulting from emergencies, natural disasters, and potential changes in climate.

S 1.1 Ensure that all new development complies with applicable provisions of the Fire Safety Overlay.

PP

DC

Policy PP-3.4 Fire prevention services. We proactively mitigate or reduce the negative effects of fire, hazardous materials release, and structural collapse by implementing the California Fire Code, adopted with County amendments.

Policy PP-3.7 Fire safe design. We require new development in the Fire Safety Overlay to comply with additional site design, building, and access standards to provide enhanced resistance to fire hazards.

Policy LU-4.2 Fire-adapted communities. We require new development in high or very high fire hazard severity zones to apply fire-resistant design techniques, including fuel modification areas, fire resistant landscaping, and fire-resistant building materials.

See County Development Code Chapter 82.13, Fire Safety (FS) Overlay.

S 1.2 Work with the community and appropriate local Fire Protection agencies to ensure that there is continued evaluation and consideration of the fire protection and fire service needs of the community commensurate with population growth.

PP Policy PP-3.8 Fire-adapted communities. We inform and prepare our residents and businesses to collaboratively plan and take action to more safely coexist with the risk of wildfires.

Policy PP-3.10 Community outreach. We engage with local schools, community groups, and businesses to increase awareness of fire risk, prevention, and evacuation.

Policy PP-3.12 Fire protection and emergency medical resource allocation. We use fire and emergency services data analysis and professional expertise to allocate resources, reduce fire risks, and improve emergency response.

S 1.3 Work with the local Fire Safe Council and Fire agencies in the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP) for the mountain communities. As part of this effort, a study shall be prepared to determine appropriate forest management techniques and identify any necessary modifications to the County’s Tree Preservation Ordinance to ensure the long term health of the forest.

IP

DC

Implementation Plan: County Fire will coordinate with other entities through the Mountain Area Safety Taskforce to update CWPPs.

The County Development Code addresses tree preservation in Section 83.10.080(b)(1), with the requirement of a forest conservation plan and insect infestation prevention program, and in Chapter 88.01, Plant Protection and Management.

Page 37: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 37 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Note: The Big Bear Valley CWPP was prepared in 2006 and can be found online at: http://www.sbcounty.gov/calmast/sbc/html/cwpp.asp

Goal S 2 Ensure that emergency evacuation routes will adequately evacuate all residents and visitors in the event of a natural disaster.

PP Goal PP-4 Emergency preparedness and recovery. A reduced risk of and impact from injury, loss of life, property damage, and economic and social disruption resulting from emergencies, natural disasters, and potential changes in climate.

S 2.1 Work with the Public Works Department and Caltrans to ensure that an adequate road system and proper access are provided to ensure safe and efficient evacuation for residents and visitors of the mountain communities.

PP Policy PP-4.4 Emergency shelters and routes. We identify and publicize emergency shelters and sign and control evacuation routes for use during emergencies.

Policy TM-1.4 Freeways and highways. We coordinate with Caltrans and regional transportation agencies and support the use of state, federal, and other agency funds to improve freeways and highways.

Policy TM-1.9 Emergency access. When considering new roadway improvement proposals for the CIP or RTP, we consider the provision of adequate emergency access routes along with capacity expansion in unincorporated areas. Among access route improvements, we prioritize those that contribute some funding through a local area funding and financing mechanism.

S 2.2 Work with the various fire agencies, the Fire Safe Councils, Caltrans, the United States Forest Service and the community to ensure the development of an effective fuel break system.

PP

DC

Policy PP-3.4 Fire prevention services. We proactively mitigate or reduce the negative effects of fire, hazardous materials release, and structural collapse by implementing the California Fire Code, adopted with County amendments.

Policy PP-3.7 Fire safe design. We require new development in the Fire Safety Overlay to comply with additional site design, building, and access standards to provide enhanced resistance to fire hazards.

Policy LU-4.2 Fire-adapted communities. We require new development in high or very high fire hazard severity zones to apply fire-resistant design techniques, including fuel modification areas, fire resistant landscaping, and fire-resistant building materials.

See County Development Code Chapter 82.13, Fire Safety (FS) Overlay.

Goal S 3 Support and coordinate disaster planning with affected agencies and organizations.

PP Goal PP-4 Emergency Preparedness and Recovery. A reduced risk of and impact from injury, loss of life, property damage, and economic and social disruption resulting from emergencies, natural disasters, and potential changes in climate.

Page 38: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 38 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

S 3.1 Work with local, state, federal and other agencies involved in disaster preparedness.

PP Policy PP-4.1 Emergency management plans. We maintain, update, and adopt the Emergency Operations Plan, Continuity of Operations Plan, and the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Policy PP-4.3 Automatic and mutual aid. We participate in agreements for automatic and mutual aid with other local, state, federal, and nongovernmental emergency service providers to improve protection services and emergency response throughout the county.

S 3.2 Provide an emergency response system that is both efficient and economical

PP Policy PP-3.1 Fire and emergency medical services. We maintain a sufficient number and distribution of fire stations, up-to-date equipment, and fully-trained staff to respond effectively to emergencies.

Policy PP-3.2 Fire District. We support the expansion of the Fire District to serve additional incorporated jurisdictions, and the use of special funding and financing mechanisms to augment Fire District revenues to improve service and coverage.

Policy PP-3.3 Search and rescue. We maintain up-to-date equipment and fully-trained staff to provide urban search and rescue and swift water rescue emergency response.

Policy PP-3.12 Fire protection and emergency medical resource allocation. We use fire and emergency services data analysis and professional expertise to allocate resources, reduce fire risks, and improve emergency response.

Policy PP-3.13 Periodic needs assessment. We periodically assess our facility, equipment, and staffing needs and use the assessment to allocate funding resources in the annual budget and capital improvement program.

Policy PP-4.3 Automatic and mutual aid. We participate in agreements for automatic and mutual aid with other local, state, federal, and nongovernmental emergency service providers to improve protection services and emergency response throughout the county.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Goal ED 1 Promote economic development that is compatible with the mountain character of the Bear Valley community.

CAG Focus Statement C. Build human capital and promote enterprise, with a focus on environmentally friendly businesses, to strengthen the local economy and provide opportunities for residents and families to be self-reliant.

Focus Statement D. Become a destination renowned for culture, environment, health, and well-being for people of all ages and abilities.

Page 39: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 39 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes

ED 1.1 Encourage development and business activities that capitalize on the amenities and recreational activities contained within the National Forest and offered by the mountain communities including skiing, biking, fishing, hiking and camping.

CAG Action Statement C2. Establish entrepreneurship, business training, and career development programs in partnership with local colleges and universities that empower locals to grow careers or businesses related to the Big Bear Valley economy such as outdoor recreation, high altitude training, health, wellness, and rehabilitation services, environmental science, and natural resource extraction and management.

Action Statement D3. Promote family- and eco-friendly tourism that educates people about our natural surroundings, dark skies, and quiet nature.

Action Statement D4. Enhance existing and create new cultural attractions for diverse groups of people with programs like Shakespeare in the Forest, a vaquero/cowboy festival, mining tours, and similar events.

ED 1.2 Support commercial development that is of a size and scale that complements the natural setting, is compatible with surrounding development, and enhances the alpine character.

PP Policy LU-2.1 Compatibility with existing uses. We require that new development is located, scaled, buffered, and designed to minimize negative impacts on existing conforming uses and adjacent neighborhoods. We also require that new residential developments are located, scaled, buffered, and designed so as to not hinder the viability and continuity of existing conforming nonresidential development.

Policy LU-4.1 Context-sensitive design in the Mountain/Desert regions. We require new development to employ site and building design techniques and use building materials that reflect the natural mountain or desert environment and preserve scenic resources.

Policy LU-4.5 Community identity. We require that new development be consistent with and reinforce the physical and historical character and identity of our unincorporated communities, as well as the values and aspirations expressed in Community Action Guides.

ED 1.3 Support specific planning for downtown Fawnskin with an emphasis on improving parking and circulation, enhancing the pedestrian experience and improving the design of buildings and sites to be compatible with the character of the community.

PP

DC

Policy TM-4.2 Complete streets improvements. We evaluate the feasibility of installing elements of complete street improvements when planning roadway improvements in mobility focus areas, and we require new development to contribute to complete street improvements in mobility focus areas.

The County Development Code update is considering an overlay over the village area to assist in Economic Development.

ED 1.4 Work with the County Economic Development Agency to pursue appropriate grant funding to assist in economic development activities.

PP

CAG

Policy ED-3.2 Business assistance. We collaborate with economic development service providers to offer training and other assistance to existing businesses and business startups countywide.

Page 40: 2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley ...countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CWP...County staff, and decision makers—when evaluating potential projects,

2007 Community Plan Goals and Policies Matrix Bear Valley Communities PP: Policy Plan IP: Implementation Plan CAG: Community Action Guide DC: Development Code X: Other: accomplished / outdated / no longer a community priority

Page 40 of 40 August 2018

2007 Community Plan Policy Ref Notes Action Statement C2. Establish entrepreneurship, business training, and career development programs in partnership with local colleges and universities that empower locals to grow careers or businesses related to the Big Bear Valley economy such as outdoor recreation, high altitude training, health, wellness, and rehabilitation services, environmental science, and natural resource extraction and management.

Action Statement C4. Collaborate with the local chambers and County EDA to establish a valley-wide economic development initiative that links emerging entrepreneurs with mentors and potential investors and fosters new business development.

ED 1.5 In order to maintain the tourist-based economy of the Bear Valley, encourage the development of opportunities to provide affordable housing for service industry employees.

PP Policy H-1.1 Appropriate range of housing. We encourage the production and location of a range of housing types, densities, and affordability levels in a manner that recognizes the unique characteristics, issues, and opportunities for each community.

Policy H-4.2 Rental assistance. We support the provision of rental assistance to qualified extremely low, very low, and low income households and special needs households served by the County Housing Authority, Department of Behavioral Health, and other County entities.

Policy H-4.3 Homeowner assistance. We support the expansion of homeownership opportunities and preservation by offering financial assistance when available, working in collaboration with partners to increase funding, and supporting foreclosure prevention programs.

Policy H-4.5 Nonprofit partnerships. We continue to form and strengthen partnerships with nonprofit organizations, public agencies, community-based organizations, and housing developers in order to increase housing opportunities for very low and low income and special needs households.


Recommended