Date post: | 29-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | melvyn-simon |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2007 KYTC/KAHC2007 KYTC/KAHC
Information Exchange MeetingInformation Exchange Meeting
““Asphalt Materials”Asphalt Materials”
Allen H. MyersAllen H. Myers
Division of Materials, Asphalt BranchDivision of Materials, Asphalt Branch
March 16, 2007March 16, 2007
Kentucky CultureKentucky CultureWhich festival occurs annually in West Liberty?
Sorghum
Festival
Kentucky HistoryKentucky HistoryWhat is Kentucky’s oldest city?
Harrodsburg
What’s on the agenda for today?What’s on the agenda for today?
HMA selection warrants
Department’s HMA verification responsibilities
HMA Selection WarrantsHMA Selection Warrants• Changes for 2007
– Eliminate all 0.50-in. nominal-maximum surfaces
– Specify only 0.38-in. nominal-maximum surfaces
– Reduce lift thickness of Compaction Option A surface mixtures
– Revise minimum threshold for PG 76-22 from 3.0 million to 7.0 million ESALs
HMA Selection WarrantsHMA Selection Warrants• Revise all 0.50-in.
nominal-maximum surfaces to 0.38-in. size
• Combat permeability
• Sacrifice rut resistance?
• Research continues to reduce permeability of 0.50-in. surfaces
• Reduce number of bid items
Kentucky GeographyKentucky GeographyWhere is Pound Gap?
Near Jenkins, in Letcher County
Kentucky SportsKentucky SportsIn which city did the University of Kentucky
win the 1978 NCAA basketball title?
St. Louis,
Missouri
Department’s HMA VerificationDepartment’s HMA Verification• Subsection 402.03.03,
Department’s verification of contractor’s HMA acceptance test results, does not satisfy FHWA’s 23 CFR 637 requirement– Department’s verification
samples are not independent– Department does not perform
statistical comparison of contractor and Department data
Department’s HMA VerificationDepartment’s HMA Verification• Emphasize importance and usage of control charts
– Plot and evaluate all critical HMA properties– Plot both contractor’s acceptance and Department’s
verification test results– Analyze charts for trends
• Department results consistently above or below contractor’s results
• Contractor’s results different for sublots that Department verifies as compared to sublots that Department does not verify
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Test Number
Perc
en
t P
assin
g
Contractor's Data
Department's Data
Upper Limit
Low er Limit
Department’s HMA VerificationDepartment’s HMA Verification• Apply tolerances
comparing one Department test to average of three contractor tests for sublots not verified by Department
• Resolve any discrepancies according to Section 113
Department’s HMA VerificationDepartment’s HMA Verification
sp2 = [sc
2(nc-1)+sa2(na-1)]/(nc+na-
2)
t = (Xc-Xa)/[(sp2/nc
• “F and t” test comparison– For projects involving six
or more lots of any one bid item
– Compare one Department test to three contractor tests for sublots not verified by Department
Allen H. Myers
Division of Materials, Asphalt Branch
Phone: 502-564-3160
Fax: 502-564-7034 E-Mail: [email protected]
Thank You!Thank You!
2007 KYTC/KAHC2007 KYTC/KAHC
Information Exchange MeetingInformation Exchange Meeting
Kentucky HistoryKentucky HistoryAfter the Battle of Point Pleasant in 1774, which
group of Native Americans relinquished all claims to the new settlers of Kentucky?
The Shawnee