+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7...

2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7...

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: george-hodge
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
42
2009 2009 ITBS ITBS RESULTS RESULTS
Transcript
Page 1: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009 2009 ITBS ITBS

RESULTSRESULTS

Page 2: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Percent Proficient

75.5 77.1 75.1

70.3

77.4

65.4

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2009

74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3

State Performance Targets

Page 3: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY Comparing Percent Proficient

Cross Sectional

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 4: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY Comparing Percent Proficient--

Simple Cohort Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 5: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals

• In 2009-2010, Grade 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grade 7 full academic year students in 2008-2009.

Gr. 7

2008-200971.2

Gr. 8

2009-201065.4

Page 6: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Corrective Actions

If you teach 7th and 8th grade language arts, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of reading comprehension in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

Page 7: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

AYP Proficiency TrajectoriesReading Comprehension

2007-2010

11th Grade 79.3%

2009-2010 Annual Reading Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITED than Grade 11 full academic year students in 2008-2009.

Page 8: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72

ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Percent Proficient

79

91.8

75 74.777.3

61.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2009

State Performance Targets

Page 9: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS/ITED MathematicsFAY Comparing Percent Proficient

Cross Sectional

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 10: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS MathematicsFAY Comparing Percent Proficient

Simple Cohort Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 11: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009-2010 Annual Math Goals

• In 2009-2010, Grades 7 and 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS than full academic year students in Grades 6 and 7 in 2008-2009.

2008-2009

2009-2010

Grade 6 to

Grade 767.9 77.3

Grade 7 to

Grade 863.5 61.6

Page 12: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Corrective Actions

If you teach 7th and 8th grade math, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of mathematics in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

Page 13: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

AYP Proficiency TrajectoriesMathematics2007-2010

11th Grade 79.3%

2009-2010 Annual Math Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITED than full academic year students in Grade 11 in 2008-2009.

Page 14: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS ScienceFAY 2009 Percent Proficient

87.7

81.3 73 81.8 73.6

61.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2009

Page 15: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS ScienceFAY Comparing Percent Proficient

Cross Sectional

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 16: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS ScienceFAY Comparing Percent Proficient

Simple Cohort Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade

2007

2008

2009

Page 17: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient

70.5

60.8 59.1 60.6

50.1 45

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2009

74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3

State Performance Targets

Page 18: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rdgrade

4thgrade

5thgrade

6thgrade

7thgrade

8thGrade

Low SES

Non SES

Page 19: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals

• In 2009-2010, Grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grades 3,4, 6, and 7 full academic year Low SES students in 2008-2009.

2008-2009

2009-2010

Gr. 3- Gr. 4 63.0 60.8

Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.6 59.1

Gr. 6- Gr. 7 50.0 50.1

Gr. 7- Gr. 8 59.1 45.0

Page 20: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Corrective Actions

If you teach language arts in grades 3,4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat or Mrs. Koether. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of reading comprehension. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

**Check back to the 2008-2009 APR to see what was written for Grade 3 reading comprehension.

Page 21: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72

ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient

73.5

86.9

59

66.6

55.6

45

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2009

State Performance Targets

Page 22: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rdgrade

4thgrade

5thgrade

6thgrade

7thgrade

8thgrade

Low SES

Non SES

Page 23: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009-2010 Annual Math Goals

• In 2009-2010, Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS/ITED than full academic year students in grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 in 2008-2009.

2008-2009

2009-2010

Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.6 59.0

Gr. 5- Gr. 6 66.7 66.6

Gr. 6- Gr. 7 45.0 55.6

Gr. 7- Gr. 8 45.5 45.0

Gr. 10-

Gr. 1161.1 TBD

Page 24: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Corrective Actions

If you teach math in grades 4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of mathematics. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

Page 25: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Science2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

7th grade 8th grade

Low SES

Non SES

Page 26: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

2009-2010 Annual Science Goal

• In 2009-2010, Grade 8 Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the science subtest of the ITBS than Low SES students in Grade 7 in 2008-2009.

2008-2009

2009-2010

Gr.7 to

Gr.850.0 45.0

Page 27: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Corrective Actions

If you teach 7th or 8th grade science, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of science. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.

**Check back to see what was written in the 2008-2009 APR.

Page 28: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient

60

64 66.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

Males

Females

74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3

State Performance Targets

Page 29: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 Gender Proficiency Data

87.6

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd grade

Females

Males

State Trajectory for 4th grade is 76%

Page 30: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72

ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient

96.1

70.3 66.6 70.8

60 62.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

Males

Females

State Performance Targets

Page 31: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 Gender Proficiency Data

80.5

66.6

82.7

70.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

6th Grade 7th grade

Females

Males

Page 32: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Science2009 Gender Proficiency Data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

5th Grade 7th Grade

Females

Males

Page 33: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 IEP Proficiency Data

IEP Proficiency

Average percentage per reporting grade

12.7

N=51

Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per

reporting grade

85.5

N=278

Page 34: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

IEP

Not IEP

74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3

State Performance Targets

Page 35: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 IEP Proficiency Data

IEP Proficiency

Average percentage per reporting grade

39.4

N=51

Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per

reporting grade

85.0

N=278

Page 36: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72

ITBS MathematicsFAY 2008 Gender Percent Proficient

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

IEP

Not IEP

State Performance Targets

Page 37: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

FAY ITBS Science2009 IEP Proficiency Data

IEP Proficiency

Average percentage per reporting grade

49.65

N=51

Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per

reporting grade

82.32

N=278

Page 38: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results

for Reading ComprehensionCurrent Grade

LevelGrade Equivalent

from Last YearGrade Equivalent

2009-2010

2nd Grade NA 2.5

3rd Grade 2.6 3.4

4th Grade 3.2 4.1

5th Grade 4.0 4.5

6th Grade 5.3 6.2

7th Grade 6.1 7.0

8th Grade 6.6 7.4

Page 39: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results

for MathematicsCurrent Grade

LevelGrade Equivalent

from Last YearGrade Equivalent

2009-2010

2nd Grade NA 2.0

3rd Grade 1.9 3.1

4th Grade 3.3 4.4

5th Grade 4.0 4.8

6th Grade 5.4 6.5

7th Grade 6.1 7.3

8th Grade 6.5 7.0

Page 40: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results

for ScienceCurrent Grade

LevelGrade Equivalent

from Last YearGrade Equivalent

2009-2010

2nd Grade NA 1.9

3rd Grade 2.0 3.4

4th Grade 3.4 4.2

5th Grade 4.0 5.0

6th Grade 6.0 6.4

7th Grade 6.9 7.0

8th Grade 6.7 6.8

Page 41: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

HEART Data Website

https://heart.aea1.k12.ia.us

Page 42: 2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Past Data Presentations Online

Curriculum and Other Documents

www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us

http://www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us/School%20Website/curriculum/index.htm


Recommended