+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: peiro10
View: 226 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 64

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    1/64

    Monday 15th March 2010 a.m.

    [email protected]

    Pierre Bonnal

    Professor and head of the Business Administration DepartmentHaute cole de gestion de Genve

    Costing Workshop for Future Neutrino Facilities

    Project Cost ManagementWhats all about ?

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    2/64

    Agenda for this morning

    Review best practices

    related to project costing ;

    Evaluate their suitability for the costing

    of future neutrino facilities.

    2

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    3/64

    Best practices

    PMBoK

    3

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    4/64

    Best practices

    Typology of projects

    4

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    5/64

    Best practices

    Project Life Cycle

    5

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    6/64

    Process #1

    Cost Estimating

    6

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    7/64

    Question #1Which costs to consider ?

    7

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    8/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which costs to consider ?

    8

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    9/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which costs to consider ?

    Only chargeable costs must be considered !(marginal approach or differential approach)

    cash flows that are distorded (suppressed or modified)

    cash flows that are generated by the project.

    Cash flowsof the project

    Cash flows

    of the organizationwith the project

    Cash flows

    of the organizationwithout the project

    Past or irrecoverable costs NO !Whatever the decision, they will exists !

    Renunciation costs YES!The renunciation to a project can cut out the organizationof possible incomes.

    Unquantifiable costs NO !In some contexts, projects do not generate incomes, but benefits.

    9

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    10/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which costs to consider ? Marginal costs !

    10

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    11/64

    Question #2

    Which resources to consider ?

    11

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    12/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which resources to consider ?

    12

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    13/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which resources to consider ? Marginal approach !

    13

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    14/64

    Cost Estimating

    Which resources to consider ? PM approach !

    14

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    15/64

    Question #3

    How to estimate ?

    15

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    16/64

    Cost Estimating

    How to estimate ?

    16

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    17/64

    Estimating approach #1

    Intuitive approach

    17

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    18/64

    Estimating approach #2

    Global approach

    18

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    19/64

    Cost Estimating

    Global approach

    19

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    20/64

    Cost Estimating

    Global approach | Local search

    20

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    21/64

    Cost Estimating

    Global approach | Neighbourhood search

    21

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    22/64

    Cost Estimating

    Global approach | Neighbourhood search

    Linear regressions on various sizing parameters.

    So-called Chilton law for total cost :

    Cost a p Size q b andCost

    Costref

    Size

    Sizeref

    r

    0.3 0.7s

    a and b from tables.

    So-called Freiman principle :

    Cost a bk

    Size 1

    1{

    k

    k : a coefficient depicting the complexity of the project (2 k 10)a and b from tables.

    Distance weighing.

    22

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    23/64

    Cost Estimating

    Global approach | Full search

    23

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    24/64

    Cost Estimating

    24

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    25/64

    Cost Estimating

    Costnow Costpast

    n

    i 1

    i

    EIi now

    EIi past

    Where :

    i weighing coefficients so that : n

    i

    1i 1

    EIi t appropriate economical indices.

    25

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    26/64

    Cost Estimating

    26

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    27/64

    Cost Estimating

    Resources for indices and coefficients

    www.bfs.admin.ch (Swiss Federal Ofce for Statistics)

    www.statistics.gov.uk (UK Ofce for National Statistics)

    indicepro.insee.fr (French National Institute for Statistics)

    BOPS/BOCCRF (Bulletin Ofciel de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la Rpression des Fraudes)

    www.bls.gov (US Bureau of Labor Statistics)

    www.che.com/pci (Chemical Eng. magazines Plant Cost Index)

    www.marshallswift.com (Marchall & Swift cost index)

    www.ogj.com (Oil & Gas Journals Nelson-Farrar Cost Index)www.costdataonline.com(Richardson Construction Estimating Standards).

    27

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    28/64

    Cost Estimating

    28

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    29/64

    Cost Estimating

    29

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    30/64

    30

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    31/64

    31

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    32/64

    Estimating approach #3

    Modular approach

    32

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    33/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches

    Project cost as a function of several sizing parameters :

    Cost fp p1,p2, . . . ,pn q

    p1,p2, . . . ,pn : sizing parameters.

    Software :

    TruePlanning [PRICE System] (www.pricesystems.com)

    Cost+ [3f] (www.3f-fr.com)

    COCOMO for IT projects (csse.usc.edu).

    Handbook :

    ISPA (International Society of Parametric Analysts)Parametric Estimating Handbook www.ispa-cost.org.

    33

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    34/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches | COCOMO (IT projects)

    34

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    35/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches | COCOMO (IT projects)

    35

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    36/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches | COCOMO (IT projects)

    36

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    37/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches | COCOMO (IT projects)

    37

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    38/64

    Cost Estimating

    Modular approaches | COCOMO (IT projects)

    38

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    39/64

    Estimating approach #4

    Detailed approach

    39

    C t E ti ti

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    40/64

    Cost Estimating

    Detailed approaches

    How to proceed so that no itemis forgotten ?

    40

    C t E ti ti

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    41/64

    Cost Estimating

    Detailed approaches

    41

    C t E ti ti

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    42/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach to WBS making

    42

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    43/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach to WBS making

    43

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    44/64

    Cost Estimating

    44

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    45/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach to WBS making

    Several software :

    SEER-DFM [Golorath] (www.golorath.com)

    DFMA [Boothroyd Dewhurst Inc.] (www.dfma.com)

    45

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    46/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach | SEER-DFM

    46

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    47/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach | DFMA

    47

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    48/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach | DFMA

    48

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    49/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach to WBS making

    49

    Cost Estimating

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    50/64

    Cost Estimating

    Analytical approach to WBS making

    50

    Project Life Cycle

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    51/64

    j y

    51

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    52/64

    Process #2

    Project Evaluation

    52

    Project Evaluation

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    53/64

    j

    53

    Project Evaluation

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    54/64

    Net Present Value

    NPV

    n

    t 0

    i PCi p tq

    p1

    i

    q

    t

    n

    t 1

    i OIi p tq

    p1

    i

    q

    t

    n

    t 1

    i OCi p tq

    p1

    i

    q

    t

    DC&SOp

    nq

    p1

    i

    q

    n

    Where :

    i PCi p tq project costs investment (end of period t)

    i OIi p tq operating incomes (end of period t)

    i OCi p tq operating costs (end of period t)

    DC&SOp

    nq

    dism. costs and selling out (end of period n)

    54

    Project Evaluation

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    55/64

    Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

    alternatives (potential actions)

    evaluation (judgements)

    weighing coefficients

    criteria

    55

    Project Life Cycle

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    56/64

    56

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    57/64

    Process #3

    Cost Budgeting

    57

    Cost Budgeting

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    58/64

    58

    Cost Budgeting

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    59/64

    59

    Cost Budgeting

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    60/64

    60

    Project Life Cycle

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    61/64

    61

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    62/64

    Process #4

    Cost Control

    62

    Cost Control

    $ EACEAC

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    63/64

    t

    $

    tR

    PlannedValue PV(t)PV(t)

    BAC

    ActualCosts AC(t)AC(t)

    Earned ValueEV(t)= BAC%(tR)EV(t)= BAC%(tR)

    EACtEACt

    63

  • 8/3/2019 2010-03-15 10015 1.0 show

    64/64

    Thank you.

    64


Recommended