2011 Annual Report

on Donor Activities

Republika e KosovësRepublika Kosova - Republic of Kosovo

Qeveria –Vlada – GovernmentMinistria e Integrimit Evropian

Ministarstvo za Evropsku Integraciju/ Ministry of European Integration

May 2012

Content

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... .3

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................... .5

ODA BY DONOR............................................................................................................................... ..7

DONOR FRAGMENTATION .......................................................................................................... 10

ODA BY AID TYPE AND MODALITY .......................................................................................... 14

ODA BY MUNICIPALITY ................................................................................................................ 15

ODA BY DAC SECTOR .................................................................................................................... 17

ODA BY SECTOR WORKING GROUP.......................................................................................... 18

Rule of Law Sector Working Group ................................................................................................ 19

Education and Employment Sector Working Group.................................................................... 20

Agriculture and Rural Development Sector Working Group ..................................................... 21

Economy, Trade and Industry Sector Working Group ................................................................ 22

Public Finance Sector Working Group............................................................................................ 23

Transportation and Infrastructure Sector Working Group.......................................................... 24

Governance Sector Working Group ................................................................................................ 25

Environment Sector Working Group .............................................................................................. 26

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

INTRODUCTION The Government of Kosovo continued its work towards the vision for “a prosperous

and dignified European society for all citizens of Kosova” as stated in the Kosovo

Economic Development Plan approved on 18 April 2011. Part of this plan is to

produce annual GDP growth rate to 7-8% in the medium term. During 2011, the

Government worked toward this goal through further development of the

Government Programme 2011-2014, Mid-Term Expenditure Framework 2012-2014

(MTEF), the European Partnership Action Plan (EPAP), and other activities to

promote these goals.

2011 was another year of steady growth in Kosovo. The GDP grew by 5, 3%. The CPI

index recorded 7,4% inflation. The unemployment rate was estimated at 45, 4%. The

global economic and financial crisis has had a limited impact on Kosovo’s economy,

largely due to the relatively low levels of integration in the global economy1.

In 2011, Kosovo received €214, 6 million in Official Development Assistance (ODA).

This was a 16% decrease from 2010. Most donors decreased their disbursements

during the year and most sectors saw drops in aid flows. As most donors decreased

disbursements in 2011, the top donors from previous years remained the same. The

largest donor was the European Commission and the second largest donor was the

United States. These two donors accounted for 61% of the aid allocated in Kosovo

during 2011.

In 2011, the already low proportion of aid disbursed as loans decreased even further

compared to 2010 levels. 99, 9% of the funds disbursed were grants. Technical

assistance/technical cooperation remained the most popular aid modality, with a

sizeable proportion of aid coming in the form of project aid. In-kind aid as well as

budget support (in its various forms) remained very unpopular aid modalities in

2011, accounting for a combined total of 5% of aid disbursed.

1 World Bank, World Bank – Kosovo Partnership Program Snapshot, September 2011.

The major sectors in Kosovo, as during the previous years were Government and

Civil Society (€54.9 million) and Education (€23, 6 million). Funding to both of these

sectors dropped significantly from their 2010 levels (€87, 7 million and €50, 1 million,

respectively). The sector fragmentation of aid continued to increase from previous

levels. Fragmentation between donors also is a challenge; though there were some

improvements compared to 2010.

Most of the aid in 2011 was not directed to specific municipality (74%). When

considered in terms of population of beneficiary municipality, it becomes clear that

differences between the levels of aid allocated to municipalities can not be explained

simply by population size.

Another important step toward donor coordination mechanism in Kosovo was the

adoption of Regulation on Donor Coordination in June 2011. The aim of this

regulation is to increase the role of the Government of the Republic of Kosovo for the

coordination of the foreign aid, creating a system that ensures the effectiveness and

transparency between the activities f the Government of the Republic of Kosovo and

the Donor Community. The Regulation can be found at: https://www.amp-

mei.net/contentrepository/documentManager.do.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

METHODOLOGY This report reviews few features of the foreign aid committed and disbursed in the

Republic of Kosovo during 2011. The data are taken from the Aid Management

Platform (AMP) which is a project of the Ministry of European Integration, funded

by the European Union Office in Kosovo (EUOK) and implemented by Development

Gateway.

The AMP is designed to provide real-time information reported by the donors about

key components of official aid flows occurring in the country. As the report shows,

some of the key measures recorded in the AMP include commitments,

disbursements, sectors, locations, aid modalities and other project details.

The real-time nature of the AMP means that the time the data are downloaded will

affect the content of the report. The data included here were downloaded on 27 April

2012. The AMP reports all amounts in Euros using official donor exchange rates if

available or current market rates when no official exchange rate is provided.

The AMP Kosovo is intended promote transparency and coordination among the

major stakeholders in Kosovo including donors, Government of Kosovo officials, the

media, civil society and others. The latest data and reports on aid activities can be

found at: www.amp-mei.net.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

COUNTRY BACKGROUND

Kosovo is a low-middle income country with a population of 1,775 million.2 In 2011,

Kosovo’s GDP was €4,06 billion and GDP per capita was €2.594 The economy saw

growth rate of 5,3%. Despite this growth, the economy of Kosovo continues to face

significant political and economic challenges. Ethnic conflict in the 1990s culminated

in NATO intervention in 1999. After several years of being under UN control, the

Republic of Kosovo declared independence in 2008.

ODA has played a major role in the economic and political development of Kosovo.

In 2008, a donor conference was held in Brussels to discuss the future of the Republic

and its relations with donors. The Government of Kosovo (GoK) presented several

major objectives with respect to aid. Broadly, these objectives are to improve the

standard of living, reduce poverty and to move towards full membership in the

European Union.3 During the donor conference, donors agreed to coordinate their

aid, to develop ownership in government ministries, to promote aid effectiveness

and to support the stated GoK objectives.

Since 2008, ODA has played a central role in GoK operations and the Kosovan

economy. In 2011, ODA represented 27% of the central government’s budget and

4,6% of the GDP.4 This is a drop from 2010 when aid represented 32% of the donor

budget and 5% of GDP. The effectiveness and transparency of this aid will play a

significant role in the political and economic development of the government.

This report provides a brief overview of the donors involved, the types of aid they

are allocating and the ways in which they are disbursing aid. This report is not

2 Government of Kosovo, Draft Korniza Afatmesme e Shpensimeve 2013-2015. April 2012.

3 Republic of Kosovo, Principles on Aid Coordination, 11 July 2008. Retrieved May 1, 2012 http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/seerecon/kdc/poac.pdf.

4 Kosovo Agency of Statistics, 2011 Gross Domestic Product. Retrieved 1 May 2012. http://esk.rks-gov.net

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

intended to be comprehensive; it should be seen as starting point for further analysis

using the data and tools that are publicly available on the AMP website.

ODA BY DONOR

Table 1: 2011 Commitments and Disbursements by Donor Donor Group Commitments Disbursements Albania* € 122.032 € 11.375 Austria € 3.227.899 € 3.270.340 Belgium € 59.768 € 60.666 Bulgaria* € 74.711 € 75.832 Czech Republic* € 1.068.359 € 40.191 Denmark € 2.432.465 € 1.621.431 Estonia* € 186.282 € 374.782 European Commission € 104.080.918 € 83.628.529 Finland € 6.801.741 € 2.087.472 France € - € - Germany € 36.007.067 € 19.292.190 Greece* € 72.088 € 75.832 IOM* € 58.438 € - Italy € 1.504.903 € 2.967.180 Japan € 5.278.326 € 2.020.375 Luxembourg € 2.073.611 € 6.888.418 NATO* € 1.143.818 € 1.135.345 Norway € 16.439.543 € 14.803.163 Russian Federation* € 1.494.210 € 3.792 Sweden € 9.867.479 € 8.837.174 Switzerland € 8.142.675 € 7.724.469 The Global Fund € 497.664 € 1.003.821 The Netherlands € 1.459.618 € 1.493.014 Turkey* € 18.678 € 231.288 United Kingdom € 5.716.154 € 5.944.030 United Nations € 1.836.996 € 2.066.551 United States € 23.557.069 € 48.014.631 World Bank Group € 20.065.889 € 908.749 Grand Total € 253.288.398 € 214.580.638 * Amounts recorded are contributions to United Nations projects occurring in Kosovo.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Figure 1: Commitments and Disbursements 2008-2011 (in € millions)

Figure 2: 2011 Commitments by Donor

In 2011, donors committed € 253,3 million and disbursed € 214,6 million. In 2010,

total commitments were worth € 277,0 million and disbursements amounted to €

253,2 million. This amounts to a 16% drop in disbursements and a 9% drop in

commitments.

In 2011, 26 donors contributed aid to Kosovo through 42 donor agencies. The top

five donors contributed 81% of the aid disbursed. These donors were the European

Commission (€83,6 million), the United States (€49,4 million), Germany (€19,3

million), Norway (€14,8 million), and Sweden (€8,8 million). The European

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Commission (EC) contribution alone accounted for 39% of disbursements and the

United States contribution for 23%. The bottom thirteen donors contributed a total of

4% of the aid disbursed in 2011. In 2010, the five largest donors were the EC, the

United States, Norway, Germany and the World Bank. World Bank financing in 2011

(€903 thousand) dropped considerably from its 2010 level (€15,3 million).

Donor commitments were very different from donor disbursements in 2011. The

five largest donors with respect to commitments were the European Commission

(€104,1 million), Germany (€36,0 million), the United States (€24,3 million), the

World Bank (€20,1 million), and Norway (€16,4 million). In terms of commitments,

the amounts are slightly less concentrated in the top donors. The top five donors

accounted for 76% of the commitments in 2011.

Figure 3: 2011 Disbursements by Donor

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

DONOR FRAGMENTATION

Donor fragmentation was a challenge in 2011. 514 projects received disbursements

during the years. These projects were funded by 26 donor countries through 42

donor agencies to implement projects in 20 different sectors. These projects were

implemented by 241 different implementing agencies. The high volume of actors

working in a small country presents the likelihood of the strain on government

resources and high transaction costs. The rest of this section analyses the scope of

donor fragmentation in 2011.

The top 10 donor agencies accounted for 93% of the disbursements. The combine

total of the remaining 32 donor agencies accounted for only 7% of the 2011 totals.

Figure 4: 2011 Disbursements by Donor Agency

Many of these agencies contributed very small amounts of aid during 2011.

Transaction costs can be reduced when donor contributions are directed to pooled

funds or through multilateral organizations. In fact, nearly all of the smallest donors

in 2011 only contributed funds to projects being carried out by the United Nations.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

The Herfindahl index5 provides a method for measuring the level of fragmentation.

This index measures level of concentration in a portfolio. To calculate the Herfindahl

index, the proportion of the portfolio that fits into a category is calculated (i.e. a

donor’s share of the entire aid portfolio for the year). This proportion is then

squared. The summed total of these squared values for each category provides a

number between zero and one. A Herfindahl index of zero indicates high levels of

fragmentation and a score of one indicates no fragmentation.

Based on the 2011 disbursements from each donor, the national aid portfolio

received a Herfindahl index number of 0,220. This was an improvement from 2010

when the figure was 0,163. This indicates that the largest donors have increased their

share of the total disbursements. However, the Kosovo aid portfolio of 2011 is still

significantly more fragmented than in 2009 when it was 0,303.

While the fragmentation between donors provides some information, it may also be

useful to explore the fragmentation between different sectors. Using the Herfindahl

index will let us see the extent to which aid is focused on a few, rather than many

sectors. In 2009, the Herfindahl index was 0,212; in 2010, the figure was 0,184; and in

2011, the figure was 0,138. This indicates that donors are generally less focused on

the specific DAC sectors than they have been in previous years.

These figures must be taken with caution. Aid effectiveness is determined by far

more than just fragmentation. However, these measures of fragmentation give us a

good idea of how focused the aid portfolio is on specific goals.

Another dimension of fragmentation is the extent to which donors focus on multiple

sectors. Donors may tend to focus on more sectors than they can effectively operate

in. Generally, donors can be expected to be more effective when they specialize in a

few areas and allow other donors with other specifics to address other needs.

In Table 2, the Herfindahl index figures are calculated for each donor to measure the

extent to which their 2011 portfolio was fragmented between sectors. This measure

5 See Knack and Aminur (2007) Donor Fragmentation and Bureaucratic Quality in Aid Recipients, Journal of Development Economics 83(1):176-197.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

must be assessed with caution. Donors with very low disbursement levels can more

easily concentrate their efforts in a single sector than donors with large portfolios.

Among the top ten donors, the European Commission and UN seem to be relatively

fragmented. The United Kingdom seems to have relatively low levels of

fragmentation.

In addition to reducing sector fragmentation, donors can improve aid efficiency by

increasing the size of their projects.6 It is more efficient to manage several large

projects rather than many small projects. To assess the current state of aid in Kosovo

along this measure, the median project value for each donor has been reported in

table 2.

This measure and the Herfindahl index score provides some information about the

administrative burden of donor practices in Kosovo. There is considerable variability

among donors in this measure. Germany (€1.07 million) and the United States (€1.02

million) have particularly larger median values for their projects (more than twice as

large as the largest donor, the EC (€478 thousand). The median project size for all

donors (€236 thousand) exceeded the entire portfolio of seven donors in 2011.

6 See the Nancy Birdsall and Homi Kharas, 2nd Quality of Official Development Assistance. Center for Global Development, 2010. http://www.cgdev.org/section/topics/aid_effectiveness/quoda

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Table 2: Indicators of administrative efficiency by donor 2011 Donor Group Number

of sectors Number of projects

Disbursements (€ thousands)

Median disbursement per project (€ thousands)

Herfindahl score (0-1) 1=no fragmentation

European Commission

18 175 € 83.629 € 478 .1266

United States 11 47 € 48.015 € 1.022 .2072 Germany 7 18 € 19.292 € 1.072 .19 Norway 7 25 € 14.803 € 592 .3134 Sweden 7 20 € 8.837 € 442 .1950 Switzerland 9 21 € 7.724 € 368 .2682 Luxembourg 7 11 € 6.888 € 626 .2109 United Kingdom

3 25 € 5.944 € 238 .6468

Austria 7 14 € 3.270 € 234 .2591 Italy 5 7 € 2.967 € 424 .3228 Finland 8 20 € 2.087 € 104 .1603 United Nations

13 40 € 2.067 € 52 .1488

Japan 12 36 € 2.020 € 56 .4348 Denmark 3 5 € 1.621 € 324 .3553 The Netherlands

8 57 € 1.493 € 26 .2032

NATO* 1 2 € 1.135 € 568 1 The Global Fund

2 2 € 1.004 € 502 .5634

World Bank 1 1 € 909 € 909 1 Estonia* 3 3 € 375 € 125 .3803 Turkey* 2 2 € 231 € 116 .8495 Bulgaria* 1 1 € 76 € 76 1 Greece* 1 1 € 76 € 76 1 Belgium 1 1 € 61 € 61 1 Czech Republic*

1 1 € 40 € 40 1

Albania* 1 1 € 11 € 11 1 Russian Federation*

1 1 € 4 € 4 1

Median 4 9 € 1.821 € 236 1 * Amounts recorded are contributions to United Nations projects occurring in Kosovo.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

ODA BY AID TYPE AND MODALITY

Figure 5: Aid Type for 2011 Disbursements (in € millions)

Only 0,1% (€242 thousand) of the funds disbursed in 2011 were loans. This was a

significant decrease from 2010 when 2.4% (€6,033 million) of aid disbursed was

granted as loans. The remaining amounts were grants. There were no debt relief

programs in 2011.

Approximately 50% of the funds disbursed went to technical assistance/technical

cooperation (€106,70 million). This was a slight decrease from 2010 when (€108,17

million) was technical assistance/cooperation. The next largest type of aid type in

2011 was projects, amounting to 35% of the funds disbursed (€75,76 million). This

type of modality saw a major drop from 2010 when €117,18 million was spent

through this modality. The next largest group was capital investments (€27,72

million or 10%) which saw a slight increase from 2010. This was followed by general

(or direct) budget support (€5,2 million or 2%), in kind aid (€3,2 million or 1%) and

targeted or earmarked sector budget support (€1,3 million or 1%). General budget

support increased fivefold from 2010 to 2011. In kind aid was half as much as in 2010

and targeted or earmarked sector budget support was approximately equal from

2010 to 2011.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

ODA BY MUNICIPALITY

Figure 6: 2011 Disbursements by municipality (Lighter colors indicate higher amounts.)

The geographic allocation of aid and aid projects can have important political, social

and economic consequences. 76% of 2011 disbursements in Kosovo were not

targeted at any municipality in particular. Figure 6 indicates the geographic

allocation of the 24% of aid that did target a specific municipality. Municipalities

with lighter colors received higher levels of aid and dark regions have relatively

lower levels of aid.

The map indicates figures in terms of total amounts of Euros disbursed in areas.

However, to better understand the geographic allocation of aid, we have calculated

the per capita amounts received in each municipality. Using the preliminary results

of the 2011 Census of Kosovo, the per capita values for each municipality have been

calculated.7

7 The 2011 Census does not include complete data for Mitrovica (North Mitrovica, Zubin Potok, Zveçan, and Leposaviq. These municipalities have been excluded from the per capita analysis.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Disbursements amounts are highly volatile within these municipalities from year to

year. The five municipalities with the largest and the five municipalities with the

lowest per capita amounts in 2011 are included in Table 3. To indicate the amount of

variance from year to year, the per capita amounts for 2008-2010 have also been

included for those municipalities.

Table 3: Disbursements per capita by municipality 2008-2011 Municipality 2008 2009 2010 2011 Junik € 15,63 € 41,78 € 76,34 € 154,79 Novoberda € 9,66 € 14,79 € 83,39 € 134,57 Partesh € - € 4,18 € 46,20 € 134,34 Shterpce € 74,85 € 87,02 € 159,04 € 126,67 Hani I Elezit € 57,85 € 69,24 € 96,09 € 97,43 Kllokot € 25,45 € 36,03 € 75,69 € 95,75 Dragash € 3,00 € 11,68 € 51,63 € 65,25 Ranilluk € 17,15 € 24,29 € 49,73 € 64,54 Decan € 20,34 € 20,57 € 48,83 € 53,70 Mamusha € 140,85 € 44,02 € 50,38 € 51,12 Fushe Kosova € 0,31 € 18,51 € 60,10 € 48,76 Klina € 1,38 € 61,75 € 151,19 € 47,61 Malisheva € 30,89 € 47,21 € 56,26 € 45,74 Skenderaj € 34,85 € 46,11 € 52,33 € 41,84 Obiliq € - € 33,54 € 25,58 € 40,81 Suhareka € 9,67 € 12,13 € 8,93 € 32,05 Gracanica € 9,65 € 6,56 € 15,05 € 29,27 Peja € 3,84 € 11,56 € 44,21 € 26,71 Kacanik € 17,21 € 17,64 € 30,51 € 25,66 Lipjan € 2,71 € 17,70 € 26,64 € 24,55 Podujeva € - € 3,48 € 4,60 € 23,26 Prizren € 1,75 € 3,49 € 17,68 € 21,23 Gjakova € 2,69 € 8,73 € 21,63 € 19,26 Kamenica € 2,74 € 4,40 € 21,29 € 19,20 Gllogoc € 0,02 € 14,90 € 11,92 € 18,20 Prishtina € 2,62 € 5,48 € 21,69 € 16,83 Gjilan € 10,35 € 15,45 € 29,74 € 16,55 Vushtrria € 1,43 € 1,54 € 6,53 € 12,21 Rahovec € 0,37 € 7,78 € 10,66 € 11,84 Istog € 1,06 € 1,23 € 16,54 € 11,55 Ferizaj € 6,03 € 13,91 € 15,59 € 10,54 Vitia € 2,07 € 6,63 € 10,57 € 8,75 Shtime € 1,17 € 9,48 € 1,44 € 0,74 Median € 3,00 € 14,79 € 29,74 € 29,27

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

ODA BY DAC SECTOR Figure 7: ODA by DAC Sector (in € millions)

There are two different systems for classifying the sector focus of projects in the

AMP. The first relies on the coding system developed by the Development

Assistance Committee (DAC) at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and

Development. This system classifies aid into one of more than 20 major sectors. The

Figure 7 displays the distribution of disbursements in 2011 for Kosovo. The largest

sector, 150 – Government and Civil Society, received 28% (€54,9 million) of 2011

disbursements. The second largest sector is 110 - Education (11%; €23,6 million), then

140 - Water supply and sanitation (9%; €18,8 million), 311- Agriculture (8%; €16,9

million), and 230 – Energy generation and supply (8%, €16,6 million).

In 2010, the largest sector was 150 – Government and Civil Society (€87,8 million);

however, there was a significant drop in allocation to this sector in 2011. The second

largest sector; however, was 400 – Multisector/cross-cutting. In 2010, this sector

received €50,2 million which was nearly four times the amount to this sector in 2011.

The remaining top several sectors showed a slight decrease in funding from 2010 to

2011.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

ODA BY SECTOR WORKING GROUP Figure 8: ODA by Sector Working Group (2008-2011) (in € millions)

The second system for categorizing the sector allocation of aid in Kosovo is through

Sector Working Groups. These groups are one of the key components of Kosovo’s

aid management and coordination efforts, as described in the Regulation on Donor

Coordination.

Projects are categorized in one of eight categories. Regular meetings are held among

the major stakeholders in the government and donor community for each sector

working group. These meetings foster cooperation and focus efforts on the GoK

priorities. In the following pages, a profile for each sector working group is

presented drawing on data from 2011 actual disbursements.

The Education and Employment Sector Working Group was significantly smaller in

2011 than in 2010 (from €63,5 million to €27,5 million). The Rule of Law SWG also

saw a significant decrease in 2011 (from €45,3 million to €31,4 million). The

remaining SWG showed only relatively minor fluctuations from 2010 to 2011. The

following pages provide additional information about the donors active in each

SWG, as well as the municipalities in which each SWG was active and the aid

modalities for each sector. Finally, some details about the five largest projects in

terms of disbursements for each SWG during 2011.

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Rule of Law Sector Working Group Figure 9: Rule of Law disbursements by Donor

Disbursements by Municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated € 28.158.596 89% Mitrovica € 1.747.483 6% Prishtina € 588.820 2% Obiliq € 207.838 1% Rahovec € 143.607 0% Ferizaj € 143.607 0% Klina € 143.607 0% Other (8 municipalities) € 465.365 1%

Figure 10: Rule of Law disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary

Agency Total

IPA 2008 II - Construction of the Palace of Justice Compound in the framework of ''Upgrade of the Infrastructure in the Rule of Law Sector in Kosovo'' LOT 1

European Union Office

Ministry of Justice

€ 4.105.972

IPA 2011 - Support for the continued functioning of the International Civilian Office (ICO) in Kosovo

European Union Office

€ 3.990.000

Systems for Enforcing Agreement and Decision

USAID € 2.028.130

Justice Support Program USAID € 1.659.543 KOSOVO MODEL COURTS PROJECT - KJC/USAID

Norway € 1.147.584

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Education and Employment Sector Working Group Figure 10: Education & Employment disbursements by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated € 19.390.410 70% Malisheva € 1.590.746 6% Skenderaj € 1.589.256 6% Mitrovica € 1.212.297 5% North Mitrovica € 1.135.032 4% Prishtina € 613.856 2% Fushe Kosova € 282.726 1% Hani I Elezit € 263.368 1% Kamenica € 263.368 1% Other (8 municipalities € 633.649 2%

Figure 11: Education and Employment disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011

Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary Agency Total VET Equipment and Furniture for schools in Malishevo and Skenderaj

Norway € 2.300.100,00

European College Business Studies & Public Administration Mitrovica

SIDA - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology - Municipality of Mitrovica

€ 2.236.707,30

Basic Education Program USAID € 2.064.945,61 Kosovo Activity to Support Schools

USAID € 1.918.446,23

Capacity Development in the Basic Education Sector (CBDE), phase I

German Government

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

€ 1.230.000,00

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Agriculture and Rural Development Sector Working Group Figure 12: Agriculture & Rural Development by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated € 11.914.718 77% Suhareka € 985.536 7% Dragash € 773.843 5% Gjakova € 661.291 4% Ferizaj € 340.839 2% Fushe Kosova € 340.839 2% Decan € 208.142 1% Kamenica € 98.500 1% Klina € 77.112 1% Other (5 municipalities) € 21.000 0%

Figure 13: Agriculture & Rural Development disbursements By Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary Agency Total New Opportunities for Agriculture (NOA)

USAID € 1.886.726

IPA 2009 - Further Support to Sustainable Forestry Management

European Union Office

- Kosovo Forestry Agency - Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

€ 1.350.000

Horticulture Promotion in Kosovo Phase IV & V (2008-2012)

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark; SDC

Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development

€ 1.152.872

Rural Economic Development in Kosovo, Phase I

German Government

- Kosovo Chamber of Commerce - Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development - Ministry of Trade and Industry

€ 985.000

Integrated regional development in the municipality of Suhareka/Suva Reka in the sector of Agriculture

ADA Municipality of Suhareka € 887.036

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Economy, Trade and Industry Sector Working Group Figure 14: Economy, Trade & Industry by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated € 14.700.327 93% Mitrovica € 583.007 4% Zvecan € 243.194 1% Fushe Kosova € 85.210 0% Ferizaj € 85.210 0% Gjakova € 85.210 0% Dragash € 85.210 0%

Figure 15: Economy, Trade & Industry disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary Agency Total Business Enabling Environment Program

USAID € 3.536.846

Kosovo Private Enterprise Project

USAID € 2.897.130

IPA 2007 - EU Support for Business development in Kosovo through Turn Around Management (TAM)

European Union Office

Ministry of Trade and Industry

€ 1.341.722

IPA 2007 - SME Support through the Ministry of Trade and Industry in Kosovo

European Union Office

Ministry of Trade and Industry

€ 1.323.632

Kosovo - Support to Athene Prosjektledelse

Norway € 1.321.557

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Public Finance Sector Working Group Figure 16: Public Finance disbursements by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated € 11.287.128 99%

Mamusha € 38.688 0%

Prishtina € 38.688 0%

Podujeva € 38.688 0%

Figure 17: Public Finance disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary Agency Total Establishment of a Deposit Insurance Scheme BMZ nr. (2007 66 360)

German Government Central Bank of Republic of Kosovo

€ 4.500.000

Growth and Fiscal Stability Initiative Program

USAID € 1.453.664

Efficient and Sustainability Tax Administration of Kosovo

USAID € 1.174.850

Support to the Kosovo Population and Housing Census 2011

DfID € 1.169.453

Reform of Public Finance System in Kosovo, phase I

German Government Budget and Finance Committee

€ 835.000

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Transportation and Infrastructure Sector Working Group Figure 18: Transportation and Infrastructure by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated

€ 17.827.965 78%

Podujeva € 1.792.829 8% Mitrovica € 653.392 3% Klina € 470.094 2% Obiliq € 470.094 2% Zvecan € 161.776 1% Suhareka € 156.812 1% Zubin Potok € 156.812 1% Other (20 municipalities)

€ 1.037.199 5%

Figure 19: Transportation and Infrastructure disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor

Agency Beneficiary Agency Total

KEK Network and Supply Project USAID € 4.332.242 IPA 2009 - Support on Upgrading Power Transmission System to meet Energy Community Technincal Standards – Lot 1

European Union Office

- Ministry of Energy and Mining - Transmission System and Market Operator, JSC

€ 3.785.352

IPA 2008 - New construction and upgrade of 400 and 110 kV Overhead Transmission Lines - LOT 2

European Union Office

Ministry of Energy and Mining € 2.445.201

Advisory Services to Assist in Privatization of the Electricity Distribution Company in Kosovo Advisory Services to Assist in Privatization of the Electricity Distribution Company in Kosovo

USAID € 2.153.564

Construction of High Security Prison European Union Office

Ministry of Justice € 1.775.947

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Governance Sector Working Group Figure 20: Governance disbursements by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated

€ 23.000.555 87%

Lipjan € 597.959 2% Malisheva € 322.696 1% Kamenica € 304.729 1% Kacanik € 304.729 1% Gllogoc € 269.814 1% Kllokot € 241.968 1% Other (13 municipalities)

€ 1.429.452 5%

Figure 21: Governance disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor Agency Beneficiary Agency Total Growth and Fiscal Stability Initiative Program

USAID € 1.453.664

IPA 2008 & 2009 - EU Scholarship Scheme - Round VI

European Union Office

Ministry of European Integration

€ 1.410.369

IPA 2008 - EU/CoE Support to the Promotion of Cultural Diversity in Kosovo

European Union Office

Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports

€ 1.409.672

Political Processes and Parties Support Project

USAID € 1.376.767

Kosovo Assembly Support Program

USAID € 1.348.323

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s

Environment Sector Working Group Figure 22: Environment disbursements by Donor

Disbursements by municipality Municipality amount % Municipality Unallocated

€ 12.631.371 56%

Mitrovica € 1.966.389 9% Dragash € 1.289.019 6% Prishtina € 1.107.183 5% Gjakova € 952.552 4% Fushe Kosova € 796.438 4% Lipjan € 729.782 3% Gllogoc € 715.009 3% Other (15 municipalities)

€ 2.480.948 11%

Figure 23: Environment disbursements by Aid Modality

5 largest projects in 2011 Project Title Donor

Agency Beneficiary Agency Total

IPA 2007 - Municipal, Social and Economic Infrastructure Programme, Lot 3 - Design-Build Municipal Water and Sanitation Projects

European Union Office

- Municipality of Dragash - Municipality of Fushe Kosova - Municipality of Gjakova - Municipality of Junik - Municipality of Suhareka

€ 2.591.973

Water Supply and Sewerage South West Kosovo VI (Bmz Nr. 2004 65 880) and (BMZ nr. 2004 70 419)

German Government

- Regional Water Company Hidrodrini JSC, Peja - Regional Water Company Hidroregjioni Jugor JSC, Prizren - Regional Water Company Radoniqi JSC, Gjakove

€ 1.926.213

IPA 2008 - Extension of Water Treatment at Shipol, Mitrovica

European Union Office

€ 1.771.600

Kosovo Water Institutional Sector Reform Program

USAID € 1.730.382

Small Infrastructure for Water and Sanitation

USAID € 1.410.048

2011

Ann

ual R

epor

t on

Don

or A

ctiv

itie

s