Date post: | 09-May-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | seamless-workforce |
View: | 3,374 times |
Download: | 1 times |
How the recession has changed today’s workforce
Workforce Composition Transformation
Contents
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Respondent Profile
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Proudct Manufacturing
Other
Health Care
Banking/Financial Services
Consumer Products
High Tech
Professional Services
Aerospace & Defense
TelecommunicationsLife Science Media/Entertainment Federal Government
Respondent Profile
Annual Revenue: > $750M
Disciplines: Business LeadershipProcurement Human Resources
Nonemployees: 5% to 20%
Industries: High TechConsumer ProductsFinancial ServicesHealth CareLife SciencesProduct ManufacturingTelecomProfessional ServicesMedia / EntertainmentPublic Sector
Increased Contract Labor Dependency
Greater Investment Post Recovery Poor
Alignment
Increased Risk & Poor
Collaboration
80%Levels
Remain or Increase
85%Report
Increased Use
2011 Workforce Trends StudyWorkforce Composition and Management Transformation
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Remained the same
Increased by a small percentage
Increased by over 5%
Decreased by a small percentage
Decreased by over 5%
Dramatic Dependency on Non-Employees
88.5%
Since September of 2008 88.5% report the size of their non-employee workforce has either stayed the same or INCREASED
Utilization of ‘non-employees’ either decreases or introduces NO management complexity
Benefits of Non-employee Workforce
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
No changeDecreases labor related expense
Increases labor related expense
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
No ChangeDecreases Mgt.
ComplexityIncreases Mgt.
Complexity
88.5% Overall labor related expense decreases or remains consistent with increased use of ‘non-employees’
83.5%
DECREASED management COMPLEXITY and labor
related EXPENSES create incentive to expand the ‘non-
employee’ segment of the workforce
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Recovery Yields Transformed Workforce
Reported Non-employee use stays the same or increases Reported decrease dependency on non-employees0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Strong economic recovery will see continued use and INCREASES in the non-employee workforce
80%
Stays at current level
Small increase
Increase > 5%
Increased Focus on ‘Non-employees’
Investments in non-employee Processes No investment in non-employee processes0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Increased Employee Engagement
Vendor Consolidation
Improved Employee Communication
Include ‘Non-employees’ on All
Teams
Significant INVESTMENTS are being made to improve the management and effectiveness of the ‘non-employee’ segment of the workforce.
63%
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Consumer: Non-employee Decision Priorities
Posses
s ab
ove a
vera
ge sk
ill o
r a s
pecifi
c an
d uniq
ue sk
ill s
et
Can a
gree
upon spec
ific
serv
ice
leve
l req
uirem
ents
Afford
abili
ty
Potentia
l to b
ecom
e an
indis
pensi
ble c
ontributo
r to th
e te
am
Flexi
bility
to e
nd the
rela
tionsh
ip a
s busi
ness
conditi
ons ch
ange
Previ
ous w
orkin
g rel
atio
nship
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Most Important Average Importance Least Important
Organization: Non-employee Decision Priorities
Posses
s ab
ove a
vera
ge sk
ill o
r a s
pecifi
c an
d uniq
ue sk
ill s
et
Afford
abili
ty
Can a
gree
upon spec
ific
serv
ice
leve
l req
uirem
ents
Potentia
l to b
ecom
e an
indis
pensi
ble c
ontributo
r to th
e te
am
Flexi
bility
to e
nd the
rela
tionsh
ip a
s busi
ness
conditi
ons ch
ange
Previ
ous w
orkin
g rel
atio
nship
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Most Important Average Importance Least Important
Misalignment
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Consumer Organization
Quality CostAvailability Availability
Cost Longevity
Longevity Flexibility
Flexibility QualityRelationship Relationship
Cost centric decision making minimizes quality, and the value, impact and integration of the non-employee segment of the workforce.
MisalignmentOrganizational and Business Priorities
Cost
Inab
ility
to fi
nd the
right t
alen
t
Qual
ity o
f pro
ject
exe
cutio
n
Accounta
bility
of n
on-em
ploye
es
Indep
enden
t contra
ctor c
omplia
nce
Co-em
ploym
ent r
isk
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Cost is the overwhelming concern over contracted labor use
Accountability and Risk currently not given top priority
MisalignmentAccountability and Risk Exposure
Human Resources
Hiring managers / Project managers
Sourcing / Procurement
Finance -5%
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
Influence over introducing contracted labor into the workforce rests with hiring managers and is shared with human resources
MisalignmentPoorly integrated collaboration
Procurement Business Leadership
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
ProcurementControlsBusiness Controls
STARTLING indicator of continued lack of control over efficient acquisition of contracted labor.
MisalignmentLoose Supply Chain Control
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Human Resources Procurment
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Stays at current level
Small increase
Increase > 5%Workforce planning appears to be poorly aligned with operational planning
MisalignmentWorkforce Plans vs. Operational Plans
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Increased Employee Engagement
Vendor Consolidation
Improved Employee Communication
Include ‘Non-employees’ on All
Teams
63%
vendor consolidation
engagement
improved communications
Add more
make no changes
0% 15% 30% 45%
While investments are being made they appear to be isolated and outweighed by inaction
MisalignmentIsolated process investments
Procurement BusinessLeadership
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
No changeDecreases labor related expense
Increases labor related expense
88.5% Overall labor related expense decreases or remains consistent with increased use of ‘non-employees’
The business does not have expectation of cost savings when using contacted labor – an opportunity for procurement to assist
MisalignmentPoorly Identified Expectations
Recommendations
Respondent Profile
Increased Dependency on Contract Labor
Post Recovery Forecast & Investments
Contract Labor Decision Criteria
Misalignment
Recommendations
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipContract definition Workforce plan alignment Contract labor inventory
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipEffective and easy processes Suggest contract labor use ID Process Circumvention
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration
Define Shared Accountability
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipCost to value metrics Job description consistency Communicate change in needs
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration
Evaluate Supply ChainDefine Shared
Accountability
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipSummarize engaged suppliers Provide quality metrics Performance report history
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration
Map Out Processes
Define Shared Accountability
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Evaluate Supply Chain
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipID acceptable flexibility Identify ‘best-use’ scenarios Adopt process suggestions
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration Risk
MitigationStrategies
Map Out Processes
Define Shared Accountability
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Evaluate Supply Chain
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipIndemnity education Compliance checklist Communicate risk expectations
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
Workforce Composition
Analysis
Evaluate Integration
Educated and Enable
Risk MitigationStrategies
Map Out Processes
Define Shared Accountability
Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support
Evaluate Supply Chain
Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipQuarterly Business Reviews
RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership
How the recession has changed today’s workforce
Joel Capperellawww.twitter.com/joelcapperellawww.seamlessworkforce.com
Workforce Composition Transformation