+ All Categories
Home > Business > 2011 Workforce Trends Study

2011 Workforce Trends Study

Date post: 09-May-2015
Category:
Upload: seamless-workforce
View: 3,374 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
An Annual Workforce Trends Study commissioned by Yoh reveals a fundamental transformation in the way business leaders build and manage their workforce.
31
How the recession has changed today’s workforce Workforce Composition Transformation
Transcript
Page 1: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

How the recession has changed today’s workforce

Workforce Composition Transformation

Page 2: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Contents

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 3: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Respondent Profile

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 4: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Proudct Manufacturing

Other

Health Care

Banking/Financial Services

Consumer Products

High Tech

Professional Services

Aerospace & Defense

TelecommunicationsLife Science Media/Entertainment Federal Government

Respondent Profile

Annual Revenue: > $750M

Disciplines: Business LeadershipProcurement Human Resources

Nonemployees: 5% to 20%

Industries: High TechConsumer ProductsFinancial ServicesHealth CareLife SciencesProduct ManufacturingTelecomProfessional ServicesMedia / EntertainmentPublic Sector

Page 5: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Increased Contract Labor Dependency

Greater Investment Post Recovery Poor

Alignment

Increased Risk & Poor

Collaboration

80%Levels

Remain or Increase

85%Report

Increased Use

2011 Workforce Trends StudyWorkforce Composition and Management Transformation

Page 6: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 7: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Remained the same

Increased by a small percentage

Increased by over 5%

Decreased by a small percentage

Decreased by over 5%

Dramatic Dependency on Non-Employees

88.5%

Since September of 2008 88.5% report the size of their non-employee workforce has either stayed the same or INCREASED

Page 8: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Utilization of ‘non-employees’ either decreases or introduces NO management complexity

Benefits of Non-employee Workforce

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

No changeDecreases labor related expense

Increases labor related expense

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

No ChangeDecreases Mgt.

ComplexityIncreases Mgt.

Complexity

88.5% Overall labor related expense decreases or remains consistent with increased use of ‘non-employees’

83.5%

DECREASED management COMPLEXITY and labor

related EXPENSES create incentive to expand the ‘non-

employee’ segment of the workforce

Page 9: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 10: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Recovery Yields Transformed Workforce

Reported Non-employee use stays the same or increases Reported decrease dependency on non-employees0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Strong economic recovery will see continued use and INCREASES in the non-employee workforce

80%

Stays at current level

Small increase

Increase > 5%

Page 11: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Increased Focus on ‘Non-employees’

Investments in non-employee Processes No investment in non-employee processes0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Increased Employee Engagement

Vendor Consolidation

Improved Employee Communication

Include ‘Non-employees’ on All

Teams

Significant INVESTMENTS are being made to improve the management and effectiveness of the ‘non-employee’ segment of the workforce.

63%

Page 12: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 13: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Consumer: Non-employee Decision Priorities

Posses

s ab

ove a

vera

ge sk

ill o

r a s

pecifi

c an

d uniq

ue sk

ill s

et

Can a

gree

upon spec

ific

serv

ice

leve

l req

uirem

ents

Afford

abili

ty

Potentia

l to b

ecom

e an

indis

pensi

ble c

ontributo

r to th

e te

am

Flexi

bility

to e

nd the

rela

tionsh

ip a

s busi

ness

conditi

ons ch

ange

Previ

ous w

orkin

g rel

atio

nship

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Most Important Average Importance Least Important

Page 14: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Organization: Non-employee Decision Priorities

Posses

s ab

ove a

vera

ge sk

ill o

r a s

pecifi

c an

d uniq

ue sk

ill s

et

Afford

abili

ty

Can a

gree

upon spec

ific

serv

ice

leve

l req

uirem

ents

Potentia

l to b

ecom

e an

indis

pensi

ble c

ontributo

r to th

e te

am

Flexi

bility

to e

nd the

rela

tionsh

ip a

s busi

ness

conditi

ons ch

ange

Previ

ous w

orkin

g rel

atio

nship

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Most Important Average Importance Least Important

Page 15: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Misalignment

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 16: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Consumer Organization

Quality CostAvailability Availability

Cost Longevity

Longevity Flexibility

Flexibility QualityRelationship Relationship

Cost centric decision making minimizes quality, and the value, impact and integration of the non-employee segment of the workforce.

MisalignmentOrganizational and Business Priorities

Page 17: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Cost

Inab

ility

to fi

nd the

right t

alen

t

Qual

ity o

f pro

ject

exe

cutio

n

Accounta

bility

of n

on-em

ploye

es

Indep

enden

t contra

ctor c

omplia

nce

Co-em

ploym

ent r

isk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Cost is the overwhelming concern over contracted labor use

Accountability and Risk currently not given top priority

MisalignmentAccountability and Risk Exposure

Page 18: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Human Resources

Hiring managers / Project managers

Sourcing / Procurement

Finance -5%

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

Influence over introducing contracted labor into the workforce rests with hiring managers and is shared with human resources

MisalignmentPoorly integrated collaboration

Page 19: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Procurement Business Leadership

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

ProcurementControlsBusiness Controls

STARTLING indicator of continued lack of control over efficient acquisition of contracted labor.

MisalignmentLoose Supply Chain Control

Page 20: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Human Resources Procurment

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

Stays at current level

Small increase

Increase > 5%Workforce planning appears to be poorly aligned with operational planning

MisalignmentWorkforce Plans vs. Operational Plans

Page 21: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Increased Employee Engagement

Vendor Consolidation

Improved Employee Communication

Include ‘Non-employees’ on All

Teams

63%

vendor consolidation

engagement

improved communications

Add more

make no changes

0% 15% 30% 45%

While investments are being made they appear to be isolated and outweighed by inaction

MisalignmentIsolated process investments

Page 22: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Procurement BusinessLeadership

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

No changeDecreases labor related expense

Increases labor related expense

88.5% Overall labor related expense decreases or remains consistent with increased use of ‘non-employees’

The business does not have expectation of cost savings when using contacted labor – an opportunity for procurement to assist

MisalignmentPoorly Identified Expectations

Page 23: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Recommendations

Respondent Profile

Increased Dependency on Contract Labor

Post Recovery Forecast & Investments

Contract Labor Decision Criteria

Misalignment

Recommendations

Page 24: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipContract definition Workforce plan alignment Contract labor inventory

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 25: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipEffective and easy processes Suggest contract labor use ID Process Circumvention

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 26: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration

Define Shared Accountability

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipCost to value metrics Job description consistency Communicate change in needs

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 27: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration

Evaluate Supply ChainDefine Shared

Accountability

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipSummarize engaged suppliers Provide quality metrics Performance report history

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 28: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration

Map Out Processes

Define Shared Accountability

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Evaluate Supply Chain

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipID acceptable flexibility Identify ‘best-use’ scenarios Adopt process suggestions

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 29: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration Risk

MitigationStrategies

Map Out Processes

Define Shared Accountability

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Evaluate Supply Chain

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipIndemnity education Compliance checklist Communicate risk expectations

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 30: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

Workforce Composition

Analysis

Evaluate Integration

Educated and Enable

Risk MitigationStrategies

Map Out Processes

Define Shared Accountability

Call CenterPMO/Resource ManagementR&D Applications Support

Evaluate Supply Chain

Procurement Human Resources Business LeadershipQuarterly Business Reviews

RecommendationsAligning Procurement, Human Resources, Business Leadership

Page 31: 2011 Workforce Trends Study

How the recession has changed today’s workforce

Joel Capperellawww.twitter.com/joelcapperellawww.seamlessworkforce.com

Workforce Composition Transformation


Recommended