+ All Categories

20115

Date post: 07-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: rebecca-buckley
View: 42 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
42
UL11/0081 D01 Page 1 of 8 This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 279 0091 ZA BSc degrees and Diplomas for Graduates in Economics, Management, Finance and the Social Sciences, the Diplomas in Economics and Social Sciences and Access Route for External Students Financial Reporting Wednesday, 18 May 2011 : 2.30pm to 5.45pm Candidates should answer FOUR of the following SEVEN questions. All questions carry equal marks. Workings should be submitted for all questions requiring calculations. Any necessary assumptions introduced in answering a question are to be stated. Extracts from compound interest tables are given after the final question on this paper. 8-column accounting paper is provided at the end of this question paper. If used, it must be detached and fastened securely inside the answer book. A calculator may be used when answering questions on this paper and it must comply in all respects with the specification given with your Admission Notice. The make and type of machine must be clearly stated on the front cover of the answer book. © University of London 2011 PLEASE TURN OVER
Transcript
Page 1: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 1 of 8

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 279 0091 ZA

BSc degrees and Diplomas for Graduates in Economics, Management, Finance and the

Social Sciences, the Diplomas in Economics and Social Sciences and Access Route for

External Students

Financial Reporting

Wednesday, 18 May 2011 : 2.30pm to 5.45pm

Candidates should answer FOUR of the following SEVEN questions. All questions carry

equal marks.

Workings should be submitted for all questions requiring calculations. Any necessary

assumptions introduced in answering a question are to be stated.

Extracts from compound interest tables are given after the final question on this paper.

8-column accounting paper is provided at the end of this question paper. If used, it must be

detached and fastened securely inside the answer book.

A calculator may be used when answering questions on this paper and it must comply in all

respects with the specification given with your Admission Notice. The make and type of

machine must be clearly stated on the front cover of the answer book.

© University of London 2011 PLEASE TURN OVER

Page 2: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 2 of 8

1. The statements of financial position (balance sheets) for Ear Ltd, Mouth Ltd and Nose Ltd as at 31

December 2010 are given as follows:

Statements of Financial Position as at

31 December 2010

Ear

Ltd

Mouth

Ltd

Nose

Ltd

£ £ £

Non-current asset (land) 860,000 260,000 300,000

Investment 380,000

Inventories 140,000 40,000 50,000

Trade Receivables 8,000 30,000 60,000

Dividend receivable from group companies 12,000

Inter-company loans receivable from Mouth Ltd 90,000

Inter-company loans receivable from Nose Ltd 30,000

Cash 130,000 60,000 30,000

1,650,000 390,000 440,000

Share capital (£1 nominal value) 600,000 100,000 200,000

Retained profits 260,000 210,000 160,000

Revaluation reserve 30,000

Trade payables 730,000 30,000 10,000

Inter-company loans payable to Ear Ltd 40,000 20,000

Dividend payable 60,000 10,000 20,000

1,650,000 390,000 440,000

Ear Ltd acquired 70% of Mouth Ltd for £290,000 on 1 January 2006 when Mouth Ltd‟s share

capital and reserves stood at £190,000. At this date the fair value of Mouth Ltd's non-current assets

was £280,000 but they were recorded at their historical cost of £260,000. Mouth Ltd has not

incorporated this revaluation in its books.

Ear Ltd acquired 25% of Nose Ltd for £70,000 on 1 January 2007. At this date the fair value of

Nose Ltd's non-current assets was £300,000 and Nose Ltd incorporated this revaluation into its

accounts. The share capital and reserves on 1 January 2007 of Nose Ltd, including the revaluation

reserve, stood at £250,000.

Question continues on following page

Page 3: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 3 of 8

No changes to the share capital of Mouth Ltd and Nose Ltd have occurred since their acquisition by

Ear Ltd.

At the year end, all group companies declare a dividend of 10p per share. These dividends have

been accounted for correctly.

Ear Ltd's inventory figure includes £10,000 of inventory which had been bought from Mouth Ltd.

Mouth Ltd had paid £2,000 for these goods. Ear Ltd‟s inventory figure also includes £15,000 of

inventory which has been bought from Nose Ltd. Nose Ltd had paid £5,000 for these goods.

Goodwill is to be capitalised. Impairment of £50,000 is seen against the value of the goodwill of

Mouth Ltd in 2010.

Required

(a) Define a subsidiary and an associate company. Outline the differences in how such

companies are accounted for. (6 marks)

(b) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for Ear Ltd as at 31 December

2010. (19 marks)

2. Company M owns a manufacturing plant that cost £750,000 on 1 January 2009. The plant has a

useful economic life of five years from this date and it is used to manufactures a product called

the spike. There is no second hand market for the plant except as scrap and it is estimated that at

the end of its useful life, or at any other time, it will cost £30,000 net of scrap proceeds, to

dismantle and remove it. Annual operating costs are £300,000. The plant requires an overhaul

costing £22,500 during the third year of its life. It produces a constant annual output, all of

which can be sold, with an annual selling value of £600,000.

During February 2010, a new model of the plant used to manufacture the spike is brought out.

The directors of the company now intend to replace the existing spike plant with the new plant at

the end of the existing plant‟s life. The new plant costs £825,000 and has a six year useful life at

the end of which its scrap value is expected to be £15,000. It incurs constant annual operating

costs of £270,000 and produces a constant annual output, all of which can be sold, with a selling

value £22,500 per annum higher than the output of the existing plant. When the new plant is

installed for the first time the company will incur one off costs of £37,500 adapting the building

housing the new plant.

Any replacement plant together with the cost of adapting the building would be paid for at the

time of replacement. All other cashflows occur at the end of the years concerned. The

company‟s cost of capital is 10% per annum.

Required

(a) Define deprival value and discuss the strengths and limitations of deprival value as the

basis of asset valuation in corporate financial reports (12 marks)

(b) Calculate the deprival value of the company‟s spike making plant as at 31 December 2010.

(13 marks)

Page 4: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 4 of 8

3. Bear Ltd started trading on 1 January 2010. The income statement and the statement of financial

position for the first year of trading are given below:

Income statement for 2010

£ £

Sales 1,350,000

Cost of sales:

Opening inventories 75,000

Purchases 900,000

Closing inventories (90,000)

(885,000)

Gross profit 465,000

Depreciation (42,000)

Other expenses (150,000)

Net profit 273,000

Statement of Financial Position

as at 31 December 2010

£

Non-current assets – plant and

machinery

1,296,000

Inventories 90,000

Other net current assets 387,000

Net assets 1,773,000

Share capital (£1 shares) 1,500,000

Retained earnings 273,000

Share capital and reserves 1,773,000

The price change indices for the year were identified as follows:

RPI Plant and

machinery

Inventories

(stock)

1 January 2010 100 100 100

30 June 2010 110 120 135

30 November 2010 115 130 140

31 December 2010 120 150 145

Closing inventory was acquired on 30 November 2010. All non-current assets and opening

inventory were acquired on the first day of trading. Sales and purchases accrue evenly

throughout the year.

Question continues on following page

Page 5: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 5 of 8

Required

(a) What are fully stabilised current value financial statements? Discuss the advantages and

limitations of fully stabilised current value financial statements. (7 marks)

(b) Prepare an income statement for Bear Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2010 and a

statement of financial position for Bear Ltd as at 31 December 2010 using current value

(replacement cost) accounting and using the financial capital maintenance concept. Base

depreciation on the year-end value of non-current assets. (9 marks)

(c) Calculate the real realised and the real unrealised holding gains and losses on inventory

and non-current assets that would appear in a set of fully stabilised current value accounts

stabilised in pounds (£) as at 31 December 2010. Where would these items be recorded in

the financial statements for 2010? (9 marks)

4. Rhymes Ltd enters into two lease transactions in 2010 as follows:

(1) An asset, asset A, which could be purchased outright for £102,004 is instead leased for

three years. The useful economic life of the asset is three years and at the end of this time,

the asset will have no residual value. Rhymes Ltd is responsible for all maintenance and

repairs and for all insurance costs for asset A. The lease for asset A provides for half-

yearly payments in advance of £20,000, the first payment being made on 1 January 2010.

(2) An asset, asset B, which could be purchased outright for £120,000 is leased for three years

for annual payments of £30,000 per annum payable in advance. The useful economic life

of asset B is eight years. At the end of the three years, Rhymes Ltd intends to return the

asset. Rhymes Ltd is not responsible for maintaining and insuring asset B.

Required

(a) What are operating and finance leases? How should they be accounted for?

(10 marks)

(b) Show how asset A and asset B would be accounted for by Rhymes Ltd in 2010 and 2011.

(15 marks)

5. Answer all parts of this question.

(a) XYZ plc is considering whether to (i) issue share capital of £200,000 (£1 nominal value

shares) or (ii) issue £100,000 (£1 nominal value shares) and raise £100,000 from a long

term loan with an interest rate of 15% per annum. The future is uncertain and if XYZ plc

has a good year, profit before interest and tax will be £100,000 but if it has a poor year,

profit before interest and tax will be £20,000. Calculate profit after tax and earnings per

share in both scenarios and comment on your results. Assume the tax rate is 35%.

(8 marks)

(b) Identify and discuss the factors that influence the determination of the functional currency

of an overseas subsidiary? (5 marks)

Question continues on following page

Page 6: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 6 of 8

(c) A company entered into a construction contract with the following information:

Date commenced 1 January2010

Expected completion date 31 December 2011

Final contract price £4,000,000

Costs to 31 December 2010 £1,200,000

Value of work certified to 31 December 2010 £1,240,000

Progress payments invoiced to 31 December 2010 £220,000

Estimated costs to completion £1,000,000

Required

Show how the construction contract would be accounted for in the financial statements for

the year ended 31 December 2010. (7 marks)

(d) Identify and discuss the differences to the financial statements if a company used the last

in first out (LIFO) method for valuing inventory instead of the first in first out (FIFO)

method for valuing inventory in times of rising prices? (5 marks)

6. Either

(a) What are “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties”? Discuss the

differences in the accounting treatment of “non-current tangible assets” and “investment

properties” and discuss how the different accounting treatments affect the financial

statements.

Or

(b) Why do we need a conceptual framework? Discuss the advantages and limitations of

conceptual frameworks.

7. Either

(a) Set out the definitions of well offness and measures of income suggested by Sir John Hicks

and evaluate their usefulness, implications and limitations for financial reporting.

Or

(b) Critically appraise both the traditional and economic arguments for and against accounting

regulation.

Page 7: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 7 of 8

Compound interest factors over n periods at rate i per period.

Table 1: Present value factors

To determine the present value of a single payment of 1 received „n‟ periods from the present at a

constant discount rate of x% per period

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 0.9070 0.8900 0.8734 0.8573 0.8417 0.8264 0.7972

3 0.8638 0.8396 0.8163 0.7938 0.7722 0.7513 0.7118

4 0.8227 0.7921 0.7629 0.7350 0.7084 0.6830 0.6355

5 0.7835 0.7473 0.7130 0.6806 0.6499 0.6209 0.5674

6 0.7462 0.7050 0.6663 0.6302 0.5963 0.5645 0.5066

7 0.7107 0.6651 0.6227 0.5835 0.5470 0.5132 0.4523

8 0.6768 0.6274 0.5820 0.5403 0.5019 0.4665 0.4039

9 0.6446 0.5919 0.5439 0.5002 0.4604 0.4241 0.3606

10 0.6139 0.5584 0.5083 0.4632 0.4224 0.3855 0.3220

11 0.5847 0.5268 0.4751 0.4289 0.3875 0.3505 0.2875

12 0.5568 0.4970 0.4440 0.3971 0.3555 0.3186 0.2567

13 0.5303 0.4688 0.4150 0.3677 0.3262 0.2897 0.2292

14 0.5051 0.4423 0.3878 0.3405 0.2992 0.2633 0.2046

15 0.4810 0.4173 0.3624 0.3152 0.2745 0.2394 0.1827

16 0.4581 0.3936 0.3387 0.2919 0.2519 0.2176 0.1631

17 0.4363 0.3714 0.3166 0.2703 0.2311 0.1978 0.1456

18 0.4155 0.3503 0.2959 0.2502 0.2120 0.1799 0.1300

19 0.3957 0.3305 0.2765 0.2317 0.1945 0.1635 0.1161

20 0.3769 0.3118 0.2584 0.2145 0.1784 0.1486 0.1037

Page 8: 20115

UL11/0081 D01 Page 8 of 8

Table 2: Cumulative present value factors (‘annuity factors’)

The table gives the present value of „n‟ annual payments of 1 received for the next „n‟ years with a

constant discount rate of x% per year. For example, with a discount rate of 8% and with six annual

payments of £1 the present value is £4.6229

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 1.8594 1.8334 1.8080 1.7833 1.7591 1.7355 1.6901

3 2.7232 2.6730 2.6243 2.5771 2.5313 2.4869 2.4018

4 3.5460 3.4651 3.3872 3.3121 3.2397 3.1699 3.0373

5 4.3295 4.2124 4.1002 3.9927 3.8897 3.7908 3.6048

6 5.0757 4.9173 4.7665 4.6229 4.4859 4.3553 4.1114

7 5.7864 5.5824 5.3893 5.2064 5.0330 4.8684 4.5638

8 6.4632 6.2098 5.9713 5.7466 5.5348 5.3349 4.9676

9 7.1078 6.8017 6.5152 6.2469 5.9952 5.7590 5.3282

10 7.7217 7.3601 7.0236 6.7101 6.4177 6.1446 5.6502

11 8.3064 7.8869 7.4987 7.1390 6.8052 6.4951 5.9377

12 8.8633 8.3838 7.9427 7.5361 7.1607 6.8137 6.1944

13 9.3936 8.8527 8.3577 7.9038 7.4869 7.1034 6.4235

14 9.8986 9.2950 8.7455 8.2442 7.7862 7.3667 6.6282

15 10.3797 9.7122 9.1079 8.5595 8.0607 7.6061 6.8109

16 10.8378 10.1059 9.4466 8.8514 8.3126 7.8237 6.9740

17 11.2741 10.4773 9.7632 9.1216 8.5436 8.0216 7.1196

18 11.6896 10.8276 10.0591 9.3719 8.7556 8.2014 7.2497

19 12.0853 11.1581 10.3356 9.6036 8.9501 8.3649 7.3658

20 12.4622 11.4699 10.5940 9.8181 9.1285 8.5136 7.4694

END OF PAPER

Page 9: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 1 of 8

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 279 0091 ZB

BSc degrees and Diplomas for Graduates in Economics, Management, Finance and the

Social Sciences, the Diplomas in Economics and Social Sciences and Access Route for

External Students

Financial Reporting

Wednesday, 18 May 2011 : 2.30pm to 5.45pm

Candidates should answer FOUR of the following SEVEN questions. All questions carry

equal marks.

Workings should be submitted for all questions requiring calculations. Any necessary

assumptions introduced in answering a question are to be stated.

Extracts from compound interest tables are given after the final question on this paper.

8-column accounting paper is provided at the end of this question paper. If used, it must be

detached and fastened securely inside the answer book.

A calculator may be used when answering questions on this paper and it must comply in all

respects with the specification given with your Admission Notice. The make and type of

machine must be clearly stated on the front cover of the answer book.

© University of London 2011

PLEASE TURN OVER PLEASE TURN OVER

Page 10: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 2 of 8

1. The income statements (profit and loss accounts) of Arm Plc, Leg Ltd and Toe Ltd for the year

ended 31 December 2010 are given as follows:

Arm Plc Leg Ltd Toe Ltd

Sales 1,000,000 400,000 200,000

Cost of sales (140,000) (100,000) (60,000)

Gross profit 860,000 300,000 140,000

Administration costs (189,500) (42,000) (35,000)

Distribution costs (104,000) (26,000) (10,000)

Dividends receivable 36,000

Profit before tax 602,500 232,000 95,000

Tax (200,000) (60,000) (20,000)

Profit after tax 402,500 172,000 75,000

Transfers to reserves (60,000) (30,000) (24,000)

Dividends payable (20,000) (10,000) (2,000)

Retained profit for the year 322,500 132,000 49,000

Retained profit brought

forward

1,600,000 600,000 400,000

Retained profit carried forward 1,922,500 732,000 449,000

Arm Plc acquired 60% of Leg Ltd on 1 January 2003 for £150,000 when Leg Ltd's retained profits

were £80,000. The share capital of Leg Ltd totalled £50,000 on 1 January 2003. There has been

no change in Leg Ltd‟d share capital since this date.

During 2010 Leg Ltd sold goods costing £4,000 to Arm Plc for £14,000. 20% of this inventory is

included in Arm Plc‟s inventory at the year end.

Arm Plc acquired 30% of Toe Ltd on 1 January 2005 for £200,000 when Toe Ltd‟s share capital

and reserves were £75,000. The share capital of Toe Ltd is made up of 20,000 shares of 50p each.

During 2010 Toe Ltd sold goods costing £6,000 to Arm Plc for £8,000. 50% of this inventory is

still in Arm Plc‟s inventory at the year end.

Goodwill is capitalised. Impairment of £5,000 was seen against the goodwill of Leg Ltd in 2008

and impairment of £10,000 was seen against the goodwill of Toe Ltd in 2010.

At the year end Arm Plc charges both Leg Ltd and Toe Ltd a management fee of 5% of turnover.

None of the companies have accounted for this management fee.

Required

(a) Define the following:

i. subsidiary companies

ii. non controlling interest (minority interest)

iii. goodwill and impairment (6 marks)

(b) Prepare the consolidated income statement (profit and loss account) for Arm Plc for the year

ended 31 December 2010. (19 marks)

Page 11: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 3 of 8

2. Company M owns a manufacturing plant that cost £2,000,000 on 1 January 2009. The plant has

a useful economic life of five years from this date and it is used to manufacture a product called

the spike. There is no second hand market for the plant except as scrap and it is estimated that at

the end of its useful life, or at any other time, it will cost £80,000 net of scrap proceeds, to

dismantle and remove it. Annual operating costs are £800,000. The plant requires an overhaul

costing £60,000 during the third year of its life. It produces a constant annual output, all of

which can be sold, with an annual selling value of £1,600,000.

During February 2010, a new model of the plant used to manufacture the spike is brought out.

The directors of the company now intend to replace the existing spike plant with the new plant at

the end of the existing plant‟s useful life. The new plant costs £2,200,000 and has a six year

useful life at the end of which its scrap value is expected to be £40,000. It incurs constant annul

operating costs of £720,000 and produces a constant annual output, all of which can be sold for

£60,000 per annum higher than the output of the existing plant. When the new plant is installed

for the first time the company will incur one off costs of £100,000 adapting the building housing

the new plant.

Any replacement plant together with the cost of adapting the building would be paid for at the

time of replacement. All other cashflows occur at the end of the years concerned. The

company‟s cost of capital is 10% per annum.

Required

(a) Define deprival value and discuss the strengths and limitations of deprival value as the

basis of asset valuation in corporate financial reports. (12 marks)

(b) Calculate the deprival value of the company‟s spike making plant at 31 December 2010.

(13 marks)

Page 12: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 4 of 8

3. Bear Ltd started trading on 1 January 2010. The income statement for the year ended 31

December 2010 and the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2010 are given as

follows:

Income statement for 2010

£ £

Sales 4,050,000

Cost of sales

Opening inventories 225,000

Purchases 2,700,000

Closing inventories (270,000)

(2,655,000)

Gross profit 1,395,000

Expenses (450,000)

Depreciation (126,000)

Net profit 819,000

Statement of financial position

as at 31 December 2010

£

Non-current assets - plant

and machinery

3,888,000

Inventories 270,000

Other net current assets 1,161,000

Net assets 5,319,000

Share capital (£1 shares) 4,500,000

Retained earnings 819,000

Share capital and reserves 5,319,000

The price change indices for the year were identified as follows:

RPI Plant and

machinery

Inventories

(stock)

1 January 2010 200 200 250

30 June 2010 220 240 270

30 November 2010 230 260 280

31 December 2010 240 300 290

Closing inventory was acquired on 30 November 2010. All non-current assets and opening

inventory were acquired on the first day of trading. Sales and purchases accrue evenly

throughout the year.

Question continues on following page

Page 13: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 5 of 8

Required

(a) Define fully stabilised current value accounts‟ and discuss their advantages and

limitations. (7 marks)

(b) Prepare an income statement for Bear Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2010 and a

statement of financial position for Bear Ltd as at 31 December 2010 using current value

(replacement cost) accounting and using the financial capital maintenance concept. Base

depreciation on the year-end value of non-current assets. (9 marks)

(c) Calculate the real realised and the real unrealised holding gains and losses on inventory

and non-current assets that would appear in a set of fully stabilised current value accounts,

stabilised in pounds (£) as at 31 December 2010. Where would these items be recorded in

the financial statements for 2010? (9 marks)

4. Rhymes Ltd enters into two lease transactions in 2010 as follows:

(1) An asset, asset A, which could be purchased outright for £319,770 is instead leased for

three years. The useful economic life of the asset is three years and at the end of this time,

the asset will have no residual value. Rhymes Ltd is responsible for all maintenance and

repairs and for all insurance costs for asset A. The lease for asset A provides for half-

yearly payments in advance of £60,000, the first payment being made on 1 January 2010.

(2) An asset, asset B, which could be purchased outright for £360,000 is leased for three years

for annual payments of £90,000 per annum payable in advance. The useful economic life

of asset B is eight years. At the end of the three years, Rhymes Ltd intends to return the

asset. Rhymes Ltd is not responsible for maintaining and insuring asset B.

Required

(a) What are operating and finance leases? How are they accounted for? (10 marks)

(b) Show how asset A and asset B should be accounted for by of Rhymes Ltd in 2010 and

2011. (15 marks)

5. Answer all parts of this question.

(a) What is share premium? Discuss the permissible uses for the share premium account.

(5 marks)

(b) XYZ plc is considering whether to (i) issue share capital of £400,000 (£1 nominal value shares) or (ii) issue £200,000 (£1 nominal value shares) and raise £200,000 from a long

term loan with an interest rate of 15% per annum. The future is uncertain and if XYZ plc

has a good year, profit before interest and tax will be £200,000 but if it has a poor year,

profit before interest and tax will be £40,000. Calculate profit after tax and earnings per

share in both scenarios and comment on your results. Assume the tax rate is 35%.

(8 marks)

Question continues on following page

Page 14: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 6 of 8

(c) Prior to IFRS, the pooling of interest method was permissible. Explain the criteria then

laid down for the use of the pooling of interest method and outline the reasons for the

banning of the method. (5 marks)

(d) Technology Ltd entered into the following research and development expenditure in 2010:

£

Research (pure and applied) £600,000

Development £700,000

The development costs relate to a project to develop a new product. The project is

expected to be successful, leading to a new product which will generate substantial

revenues for the company. The company has enough resources to fund the project. Staff

costs of £400,000 have been incurred on the project during 2010. In addition capital

expenditure of £300,000 has been incurred during 2010. The capital expenditure relates to

the acquisition of equipment for final tests on the product and is depreciated using the

straight line method. The equipment has a useful economic life of 3 years and is then

expected to have no residual value

Required

Show how the research and development costs will be treated in the financial statements of

Technology Ltd in 2010. (7 marks)

6. Either

(a) What are “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties”? Discuss the

differences in the accounting treatment of “non-current tangible assets” and “investment

properties” and discuss how the different accounting treatments affect the financial

statements.

Or

(b) Discus the reasons for initiating standard setting in the 1970‟s and assess the advantages

and limitations of standard setting in the UK.

7. Either

(a) Set out the definitions of well offness and measures of income suggested by Sir John Hicks

and evaluate their usefulness, implications and limitations for financial reporting.

Or

(b) Compare and contrast the different methods for translating the financial statements of

foreign subsidiaries. Discuss how the foreign exchange reserves arise under each method,

how they should be accounted for and the situations in which each of the methods should

be used.

Page 15: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 7 of 8

Compound interest factors over n periods at rate i per period.

Table 1: Present value factors

To determine the present value of a single payment of 1 received „n‟ periods from the present at a

constant discount rate of x% per period

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 0.9070 0.8900 0.8734 0.8573 0.8417 0.8264 0.7972

3 0.8638 0.8396 0.8163 0.7938 0.7722 0.7513 0.7118

4 0.8227 0.7921 0.7629 0.7350 0.7084 0.6830 0.6355

5 0.7835 0.7473 0.7130 0.6806 0.6499 0.6209 0.5674

6 0.7462 0.7050 0.6663 0.6302 0.5963 0.5645 0.5066

7 0.7107 0.6651 0.6227 0.5835 0.5470 0.5132 0.4523

8 0.6768 0.6274 0.5820 0.5403 0.5019 0.4665 0.4039

9 0.6446 0.5919 0.5439 0.5002 0.4604 0.4241 0.3606

10 0.6139 0.5584 0.5083 0.4632 0.4224 0.3855 0.3220

11 0.5847 0.5268 0.4751 0.4289 0.3875 0.3505 0.2875

12 0.5568 0.4970 0.4440 0.3971 0.3555 0.3186 0.2567

13 0.5303 0.4688 0.4150 0.3677 0.3262 0.2897 0.2292

14 0.5051 0.4423 0.3878 0.3405 0.2992 0.2633 0.2046

15 0.4810 0.4173 0.3624 0.3152 0.2745 0.2394 0.1827

16 0.4581 0.3936 0.3387 0.2919 0.2519 0.2176 0.1631

17 0.4363 0.3714 0.3166 0.2703 0.2311 0.1978 0.1456

18 0.4155 0.3503 0.2959 0.2502 0.2120 0.1799 0.1300

19 0.3957 0.3305 0.2765 0.2317 0.1945 0.1635 0.1161

20 0.3769 0.3118 0.2584 0.2145 0.1784 0.1486 0.1037

Page 16: 20115

UL11/0082 D01 Page 8 of 8

Table 2: Cumulative present value factors (‘annuity factors’)

The table gives the present value of „n‟ annual payments of 1 received for the next „n‟ years with a

constant discount rate of x% per year. For example, with a discount rate of 8% and with six annual

payments of £1 the present value is £4.6229

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 1.8594 1.8334 1.8080 1.7833 1.7591 1.7355 1.6901

3 2.7232 2.6730 2.6243 2.5771 2.5313 2.4869 2.4018

4 3.5460 3.4651 3.3872 3.3121 3.2397 3.1699 3.0373

5 4.3295 4.2124 4.1002 3.9927 3.8897 3.7908 3.6048

6 5.0757 4.9173 4.7665 4.6229 4.4859 4.3553 4.1114

7 5.7864 5.5824 5.3893 5.2064 5.0330 4.8684 4.5638

8 6.4632 6.2098 5.9713 5.7466 5.5348 5.3349 4.9676

9 7.1078 6.8017 6.5152 6.2469 5.9952 5.7590 5.3282

10 7.7217 7.3601 7.0236 6.7101 6.4177 6.1446 5.6502

11 8.3064 7.8869 7.4987 7.1390 6.8052 6.4951 5.9377

12 8.8633 8.3838 7.9427 7.5361 7.1607 6.8137 6.1944

13 9.3936 8.8527 8.3577 7.9038 7.4869 7.1034 6.4235

14 9.8986 9.2950 8.7455 8.2442 7.7862 7.3667 6.6282

15 10.3797 9.7122 9.1079 8.5595 8.0607 7.6061 6.8109

16 10.8378 10.1059 9.4466 8.8514 8.3126 7.8237 6.9740

17 11.2741 10.4773 9.7632 9.1216 8.5436 8.0216 7.1196

18 11.6896 10.8276 10.0591 9.3719 8.7556 8.2014 7.2497

19 12.0853 11.1581 10.3356 9.6036 8.9501 8.3649 7.3658

20 12.4622 11.4699 10.5940 9.8181 9.1285 8.5136 7.4694

END OF PAPER

Page 17: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

1

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

91 Financial reporting

Important note

This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the academic year 2010–11. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years, and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).

General remarks

Learning outcomesAt the end of this course, and having completed the Essential reading and activities, you should be able to:

• explain and apply a number of theoretical approaches to financial accounting

• record and analyse data

• prepare financial statements under alternative accounting conventions

• describe a number of regulatory issues relating to financial accounting

• critically evaluate theories and practices of, and other matters relating to, financial accounting.

What are the Examiners looking for?The exam paper contains seven questions, five of which combine numerical and written components and two of which are essay based. Each of the essay questions has a choice of two essays. The combined questions require candidates to prepare calculations on a variety of topics as well as showing a critical grasp of the theories underlying the techniques. To do well candidates need to be able both to explain and evaluate the theories and prepare a range of financial statements and calculations.

For quantitative parts of questions, Examiners are looking for accurate preparation of financial statements which follow generally accepted formats with clear headings and accurate application of accounting techniques to specific areas within financial reporting. Workings should always be provided clearly.

Written components of combined questions require clear and coherent explanations of theories, techniques and practices and critical evaluation of theories and practices.

Good answers to essay-based questions will be structured coherently and logically, include an introduction, a main body and conclusion and cover all parts of the essay question.

Typically an essay-based question will require an explanation of an issue within financial reporting and a critical analysis of the issue. Explanations should be clear and include a discussion of key definitions with examples if appropriate. The critical analysis should show critical awareness of both

Page 18: 20115

91 Financial reporting

2

sides of an argument or application of a theory or concept to financial reporting with an assessment of its appropriateness to financial reporting.

Planning your time in the examinationAll questions in the paper carry equal marks and equal time should be devoted to each question. It is important that candidates attempt four questions and all parts of each question they answer. Marks for each section are given to each section and should be used by candidates to guide their work and time allocation. Where questions are in parts, candidates should avoid excessively long answers to some parts and missing out other parts.

Key steps to improvementCandidates can improve performance by improving the presentation of their work, providing clear workings, answering the required number of questions and attempting all sections of a question. Often candidates seem to focus attention on the preparation of financial statements and the financial calculations without being able to explain, discuss and evaluate the theories and practices central to financial reporting.

Question spotting

Many candidates are disappointed to find that their examination performance is poorer than they expected. This can be due to a number of different reasons and the Examiners’ commentaries suggest ways of addressing common problems and improving your performance. We want to draw your attention to one particular failing – ‘question spotting’, that is, confining your examination preparation to a few question topics which have come up in past papers for the course. This can have very serious consequences.

We recognise that candidates may not cover all topics in the syllabus in the same depth, but you need to be aware that Examiners are free to set questions on any aspect of the syllabus. This means that you need to study enough of the syllabus to enable you to answer the required number of examination questions.

The syllabus can be found in the ‘course information sheet’ in the section of the VLE dedicated to this course. You should read the syllabus very carefully and ensure that you cover sufficient material in preparation for the examination.

Examiners will vary the topics and questions from year to year and may well set questions that have not appeared in past papers – every topic on the syllabus is a legitimate examination target. So although past papers can be helpful in revision, you cannot assume that topics or specific questions that have come up in past examinations will occur again.

If you rely on a question spotting strategy, it is likely you will find yourself in difficulties when you sit the examination paper. We strongly advise you not to adopt this strategy.

Page 19: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

1

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

91 Financial reporting – Zone A

Important note

This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the academic year 2010–11. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years, and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).

Format of the examination paper

Candidates should answer FOUR of the following SEVEN questions. All questions carry equal marks.

Workings should be submitted for all questions requiring calculations. Any necessary assumptions introduced in answering a question are to be stated Extracts from compound interest tables are given after the final question on this paper.

Eight-column accounting paper is provided at the end of this question paper. If used, it must be detached and fastened securely inside the answer book.

A calculator may be used when answering questions on this paper and it must comply in all respects with the specification given with your Admission Notice. The make and type of machine must be clearly stated on the front cover of the answer book.

Comments on specific questions

Question 1

The statements of financial position (balance sheets) for Ear Ltd, Mouth Ltd and Nose Ltd as at 31 December 2010 are given as follows:

Statements of Financial Position as at 31 December 2010

Ear Ltd. Mouth Ltd. Nose Ltd.

£ £ £

Non-current asset (land) 860,000 260,000 300,000

Investment 380,000

Inventories 140,000 40,000 50,000

Trade Receivables 8,000 30,000 60,000

Dividend receivable from group companies 12,000

Inter-company loans receivable from Mouth Ltd 90,000

Inter-company loans receivable from Nose Ltd 30,000

Cash 130,000 60,000 30,000

1,650,000 390,000 440,000

Page 20: 20115

91 Financial reporting

2

Share capital (£1 nominal value) 600,000 100,000 200,000

Retained profits 260,000 210,000 160,000

Revaluation reserve 30,000

Trade payables 730,000 30,000 10,000

Inter-company loans payable to Ear Ltd 40,000 20,000

Dividend payable 60,000 10,000 20,000

1,650,000 390,000 440,000

Ear Ltd acquired 70% of Mouth Ltd for £290,000 on 1 January 2006 when Mouth Ltd’s share capital and reserves stood at £190,000. At this date the fair value of Mouth Ltd’s non-current assets was £280,000 but they were recorded at their historical cost of £260,000. Mouth Ltd has not incorporated this revaluation in its books.

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 7.

International financial reporting, Chapter 24.

Approaching the question

This question requires a detailed knowledge of preparation of consolidated financial statements, in this case consolidated statements of financial position. Candidates should know what consolidated financial statements are, why they are prepared, what companies are included in consolidated financial statements and the definitions and explanation of key items included in consolidated financial statements. For the preparation of consolidated statements, candidates need to know the formats of these statements and be able to calculate the different components of the statements. It is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at figures included in the financial statements.

Part (a) full definitions of all terms are required and differences between how they should be accounted for should be clearly explained.

Part b

Solutions to Part b provided below with key workings

Workings

Non current assets 1,140,000 860,000 + 280,000

Investments 20,000 38,000 – 290,000 – 70,000

Goodwill 100,500

Investment in associate co 95,000 25% * 380,000

Inventories 172,000 140,000 + 40,000 – 8,000

Trade receivables 38,000

Interco receivables from nose 30,000

Dividends receivable from nose 5,000

Cash 240,000 130,000 + 60,000 + 50,000

Page 21: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

3

Net assets 1,840,500 1,840,500

Share capital 600,000

P+L reserves 320,900

NCI/Minority interests 96,600 30% * 322,000

Trade payables 760,000

Dividends payable 63,000

Capital, reserves and liabilities 1,840,500

Goodwill

Mouth = 290,000 – 70% (190,000 + 20,000) = 143,000

Nose = 70,000 – 25% (250,000) = 7,500

Impairment = 50,000

Reserves

Ear Mouth Nose

P+L 260,000 210,000 160,000

Purp (8,000) (10,000)

Revised P+L 260,000 202,000 150,000

Share cap 600,000 100,000 200,000

Revaln 20,000 30,000

Capital and reserves 860,000 322,000 380,000

Retained earnings = 260,000 + 70% (202,000 – 90,000) + 25% (150,000 – 20,000) – 50,000 = 260,000 + 78,400 + 32,500 – 50,000 = 320,900

Alternative presentations are acceptable (e.g. goodwill of a added to investment in a as follows or calculated as cost of investment + share of post acq reserves – impairment).

Question 2

Company M owns a manufacturing plant that cost £750,000 on 1 January 2009. The plant has a useful economic life of five years from this date and it is used to manufactures a product called the spike. There is no second hand market for the plant except as scrap and it is estimated that at the end of its useful life, or at any other time, it will cost £30,000 net of scrap proceeds, to dismantle and remove it. Annual operating costs are £300,000. The plant requires an overhaul costing £22,500 during the third year of its life. It produces a constant annual output, all of which can be sold, with an annual selling value of £600,000.

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 6.

International financial reporting, Chapters 5 and 6.

Approaching the question

This question covers both a discussion of deprival value and calculations relating to deprival value. Candidates should attempt both parts of the question and answer all the questions set. For the calculations, candidates need to be able to apply the concepts of deprival value to an example. It is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Page 22: 20115

91 Financial reporting

4

Part a

A good discussion of deprival value with examples together with the strengths and limitations of the concept is required. A discursive style should be used rather than bullet points.

Part b

Solutions with key workings are provided below.

Aec = (825,000 + 4.3553 * 270,000 – 0.5645 * 15,000)/4.3553 = 457,480.

Have budget

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014…

Op costs of old machine 300,000 300,000 300,000

Overhaul 22,500

Removal 30,000

New building work 37,500

AEC 457,480

Totals 0 322,500 300,000 367,500 457,480

Have not budget

Adapt building 37,500

Aec 457,480 457,480 457,480 457,480

Extra income (22,500) (22,500) (22,500)

Difference 37,500 112,480 134,980 67,480 0

Df 1 0.9091 0.8264 0.7513

Pv 37,500 102,256 111,547 50,698 0

Pv of difference = cost of replacing services of existing asset = £302,001 = = deprival value

Note Some figures may be included differently in the AEC and have or have not budgets and full credit is given for correct workings if different to the above.

Question 3

Bear Ltd started trading on 1 January 2010. The income statement and the statement of financial position for the first year of trading are given below:

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 5.

International financial reporting, Chapter 7.

Approaching the question

This question covers both a discussion of fully stabilised current value accounts and the preparation of current value financial statements and calculations for key components of fully stabilised financial statements. Candidates should attempt both parts of the question and answer all the questions set. For the calculations, it is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Page 23: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

5

Part a

For the discussion of fully stabilised current value financial statements, it is important that candidates discuss all parts of the question, provide clear explanations and examples and assess both the advantages and limitations of the concept in a discursive style. Bullet points should be avoided if possible.

Part b

Solutions for part b are provided below:

IS £

Sales 1,350,000 1,350,000

Cost of sales

Op invent 75,000 135/100 101,250

Purchases 900,000 900,000

Clo invent (90,000) 135/140 (86,786)

(885,000) (914,464)

GP 465,000 435,536

Exp (150,000) (150,000)

Depreciation (42,000) 150/100 (63,000)

profit 222,536

Nca – unrealised 648,000

Nca realised 21,000

Invent – unrealised 3,214

Invent – realised 29,464

Retained earnings 273,000 924,214

Balance sheet

Non current assets 1,296,000 150/100 1,944,000

Inventories 90,000 145/140 93,214

Other net current assets 387,000 387,000

Net assets 1,773,000 2,424,214

Share capital (£1 shares) 1,500,000 1,500,000

Retained earnings 273,000 924,214

Share capital and reserves

1,773,000 2,424,214

Page 24: 20115

91 Financial reporting

6

Part c

Solutions for Part c are given below.

Nca real unrealised 1,944,000 – 1,296,000 * 120/100 = 388,800

Nca real realised 63,000 – 42,000 * 120/100 =12,600

Inventory real realised 894,214 * 120/110 – 977,905 = 19,692

Inventory real unrealised 93,214 – 90,000 * 120/115 = (699)

Question 4

Rhymes Ltd enters into two lease transactions in 2010 as follows:

1. An asset, asset A, which could be purchased outright for £102,004 is instead leased for three years. The useful economic life of the asset is three years and at the end of this time, the asset will have no residual value. Rhymes Ltd is responsible for all maintenance and repairs and for all insurance costs for asset A. The lease for asset A provides for half-yearly payments in advance of £20,000, the first payment being made on 1 January 2010.

2. An asset, asset B, which could be purchased outright for £120,000 is leased for three years for annual payments of £30,000 per annum payable in advance. The useful economic life of asset B is eight years. At the end of the three years, Rhymes Ltd intends to return the asset. Rhymes Ltd is not responsible for maintaining and insuring asset B.

[For the full question, please refer to the examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 9.

International financial reporting, Chapter 12.

Approaching the question

The question covers both a discussion on operating and finance leases and calculations showing how these would be accounted for in financial statements. For the discussion of operating and finance leases, it is important that candidates discuss all parts of the question, provide clear explanations and examples and assess both the advantages and limitations of the concept in a discursive style. Bullet points should be avoided if possible.

For the calculations, it is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Part a

A discussion of the definition of operating and finance leases with examples is required with discussion of how these different leases are accounted for.

Part b

Solutions for Part b are given below.

Asset a

Recognition that it is finance lease and reasons

Rate implicit in the lease

102,004 = 20,000 + 20,000 a5]?

a5]? = 82,004/20,000

a5]? = 4.1002 which gives a rate of 7% from tables.

Page 25: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

7

Rental payments

Date Rental payment

Finance charge Reduction in obligation

Balance of obligation under finance lease

1.1.2010 102,004

1.1.2010 20,000 X 20,000 82,004

1.7.2010 20,000 5,740 14,260 67,744

1.1.2011 20,000 4,742 15,258 52,486

1.7.2011 20,000 3,674 16,326 36,160

1.1.2012 20,000 2,531 17,469 18,691

1.7.2012 20,000 1,308 18,692 0 Rounding difference

Income statement

2010 finance charge = 5,740 + accrual of 4,742 which relates to prior period

2011 finance charges = 3,674 + accrual of 2,531.

Sfp

Asset: non-current asset at 102,004 – with annual depreciation of 34,001.

2010 net book value = 68,003.

2011 net book value =34,002.

Liability

2010

Accrual of finance charge = 4,742

Lease obligation = 67,744 split between current of 31,584 and non current of 36,160

2011

Accrual of finance charge = 2,531.

Lease obligation = 36,160 (all current).

Asset B

State that it is an operating lease and give the reason why.

Lease payments in income statement = £30,000 in 2010 and 2011.

Question 5

Answer all parts of this question.

a. XYZ plc is considering whether to (i) issue share capital of £200,000 (£1 nominal value shares) or (ii) issue £100,000 (£1 nominal value shares) and raise £100,000 from a long term loan with an interest rate of 15% per annum. The future is uncertain and if XYZ plc has a good year, profit before interest and tax will be £100,000 but if it has a poor year, profit before interest and tax will be £20,000. Calculate profit after tax and earnings per share in both scenarios and comment on your results. Assume the tax rate is 35%. (8 marks)

b. Identify and discuss the factors that influence the determination of the functional currency of an overseas subsidiary? (5 marks)

[For the full question, please refer to the examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapters 8, 9, 11 and 14.

International financial reporting, Chapters 12, 15, 25, 26 and 27.

Page 26: 20115

91 Financial reporting

8

Approaching the question

This question covers the accounting treatment of several different items, some parts requiring discussion of concepts or key items in financial statements and some parts require calculations. All parts of the question should be attempted with clear workings provided of any required calculations. The marks given to each section are indicated and these should be used as a guide for how long candidates should spend on each section.

Solutions to Parts

Part a

Share capital Good Bad

PBIT 100,000 20,000

Tax (35,000) (7,000)

Pat 65,000 13,000

e/s 0.33 0.07

Share capital + debentures

PBIT 100,000 20,000

interest (15,000) (15,000)

PBT 85,000 5,000

Tax (29,750) (1,750)

Pat 55,250 3,250

e/s 0.55 0.03

Appropriate comments should be made for example relating to variability and risk.

Part b

Up to five factors that influence the functional currency should be discussed.

Part c

Under IAS 11

Profit on contract = 4,000,000 – 1,200,000 – 1,000,000 = £1,800,000

Attributable profit = 1,8000,000 * 1,240,000/4,000,000 = 31%

Income statement

Sales 1,240,000

Cost of sales 31% * 2,200,000 (682,000)

Profit 558,000

sfp = amounts recoverable = costs to date + recognised profit – progress payments = 1,200,000 + 558,000 – 220,000 = £1,538,000

under ssap 9

income statement same

balance sheet

Work in progress = £518,000

Debtors £1,020,000.

Part d

The definition of LIFO and FIFO should be given and the differences between the methods and the impact of the difference methods on the financial statements should be discussed clearly.

Page 27: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

9

Question 6

Either

a. What are “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties”? Discuss the differences in the accounting treatment of “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties” and discuss how the different accounting treatments affect the financial statements.

or

b. Why do we need a conceptual framework? Discuss the advantages and limitations of conceptual frameworks.

This question related to a key component of financial statements, that of non-current assets and investment properties. Candidates need to be able to discuss the definitions of these items, analyse and discuss professional accounting requirements in these areas, and provide appropriate examples. A comparison of different accounting treatments and their impact on financial statements is important and must be explicitly covered in the answer. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers should contain definitions of non-current tangible assets and investment properties and identify the different accounting treatments (depreciation, revaluations) possibly with a numerical example. The impact on the SFP and income statement needs to be discussed, again perhaps referring to a numerical example. Candidates may discuss the economic consequences of the different treatment.

Part a

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 9.

International financial reporting, Chapter 12.

Approaching the question

Good answers should contain definitions of non current tangible assets and investment properties and identify the different accounting treatments (depreciation, revaluations) possibly with a numerical example. The impact on the SFP and income statement needs to be discussed, again perhaps referring to a numerical example. Candidates may discuss the economic consequences of the different treatment.

Part b

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 2.

International financial reporting, Chapter 8.

Approaching the question

This question related to an important issue within financial reporting, that of the conceptual framework. Candidates need to be able to define conceptual frameworks and discuss advantages and limitations of conceptual frameworks. The question relates to standard setting in general and not to any specific accounting standard, but candidates may provide some examples of specific standards to illustrate their argument. However, candidates must not write exclusively about specific standards and not address the question set. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers would define a conceptual framework and perhaps briefly outline the main contents of a typical conceptual framework. Both the

Page 28: 20115

91 Financial reporting

10

advantages and disadvantages (see Chapter 2) should be discussed, with candidates assessing these advantages and disadvantages.

Question 7

Either

a. Set out the definitions of well offness and measures of income suggested by Sir John Hicks and evaluate their usefulness, implications and limitations for financial reporting.

or

b. Critically appraise both the traditional and economic arguments for and against accounting regulation.

Part a

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 3.

International financial reporting, Chapter 4.

Approaching the question

This question related to Hicks’s concepts of well-offness and income. Candidates need to be able to discuss and explain the concepts clearly using appropriate examples to illustrate their arguments. Equally important is the evaluation of the concepts in relation to financial reporting. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers would describe and give examples of the required definitions, possibly referring to a numerical example. All three aspects of usefulness, implications and limitations (see Chapter 3) need to be addressed with some assessment of the issues raised.

Part b

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 1.

International financial reporting, Chapter 1.

Approaching the question

This question related to accounting regulation in general rather to any specific regulations. Candidates need to be able to define accounting regulation illustrating this with suitable examples. Candidates need to be able to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of accounting regulation form different theoretical perspectives and relate this to issues seen within accounting regulation in practice. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers should define accounting regulation and perhaps outline the different types of regulation within accounting. Both traditional and economic arguments (for example, Beaver’s arguments) need to be discussed and assessed and arguments both for and against regulation need to be presented.

Page 29: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

11

Compound interest factors over n periods at rate i per period.To determine the present value of a single payment of 1 received ‘n’ periods from the present at a constant discount rate of x% per period

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 0.9070 0.8900 0.8734 0.8573 0.8417 0.8264 0.7972

3 0.8638 0.8396 0.8163 0.7938 0.7722 0.7513 0.7118

4 0.8227 0.7921 0.7629 0.7350 0.7084 0.6830 0.6355

5 0.7835 0.7473 0.7130 0.6806 0.6499 0.6209 0.5674

6 0.7462 0.7050 0.6663 0.6302 0.5963 0.5645 0.5066

7 0.7107 0.6651 0.6227 0.5835 0.5470 0.5132 0.4523

8 0.6768 0.6274 0.5820 0.5403 0.5019 0.4665 0.4039

9 0.6446 0.5919 0.5439 0.5002 0.4604 0.4241 0.3606

10 0.6139 0.5584 0.5083 0.4632 0.4224 0.3855 0.3220

11 0.5847 0.5268 0.4751 0.4289 0.3875 0.3505 0.2875

12 0.5568 0.4970 0.4440 0.3971 0.3555 0.3186 0.2567

13 0.5303 0.4688 0.4150 0.3677 0.3262 0.2897 0.2292

14 0.5051 0.4423 0.3878 0.3405 0.2992 0.2633 0.2046

15 0.4810 0.4173 0.3624 0.3152 0.2745 0.2394 0.1827

16 0.4581 0.3936 0.3387 0.2919 0.2519 0.2176 0.1631

17 0.4363 0.3714 0.3166 0.2703 0.2311 0.1978 0.1456

18 0.4155 0.3503 0.2959 0.2502 0.2120 0.1799 0.1300

19 0.3957 0.3305 0.2765 0.2317 0.1945 0.1635 0.1161

20 0.3769 0.3118 0.2584 0.2145 0.1784 0.1486 0.1037

Table 1: Present value factors

Page 30: 20115

91 Financial reporting

12

Table 2: Cumulative present value factors (‘annuity factors’)

The table gives the present value of ‘n’ annual payments of 1 received for the next ‘n’ years with a constant discount rate of x% per year. For example, with a discount rate of 8% and with six annual payments of £1 the present value is £4.6229

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 1.8594 1.8334 1.8080 1.7833 1.7591 1.7355 1.6901

3 2.7232 2.6730 2.6243 2.5771 2.5313 2.4869 2.4018

4 3.5460 3.4651 3.3872 3.3121 3.2397 3.1699 3.0373

5 4.3295 4.2124 4.1002 3.9927 3.8897 3.7908 3.6048

6 5.0757 4.9173 4.7665 4.6229 4.4859 4.3553 4.1114

7 5.7864 5.5824 5.3893 5.2064 5.0330 4.8684 4.5638

8 6.4632 6.2098 5.9713 5.7466 5.5348 5.3349 4.9676

9 7.1078 6.8017 6.5152 6.2469 5.9952 5.7590 5.3282

10 7.7217 7.3601 7.0236 6.7101 6.4177 6.1446 5.6502

11 8.3064 7.8869 7.4987 7.1390 6.8052 6.4951 5.9377

12 8.8633 8.3838 7.9427 7.5361 7.1607 6.8137 6.1944

13 9.3936 8.8527 8.3577 7.9038 7.4869 7.1034 6.4235

14 9.8986 9.2950 8.7455 8.2442 7.7862 7.3667 6.6282

15 10.3797 9.7122 9.1079 8.5595 8.0607 7.6061 6.8109

16 10.8378 10.1059 9.4466 8.8514 8.3126 7.8237 6.9740

17 11.2741 10.4773 9.7632 9.1216 8.5436 8.0216 7.1196

18 11.6896 10.8276 10.0591 9.3719 8.7556 8.2014 7.2497

19 12.0853 11.1581 10.3356 9.6036 8.9501 8.3649 7.3658

20 12.4622 11.4699 10.5940 9.8181 9.1285 8.5136 7.4694

Page 31: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

1

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

91 Financial reporting – Zone B

Important note

This commentary reflects the examination and assessment arrangements for this course in the academic year 2010–11. The format and structure of the examination may change in future years, and any such changes will be publicised on the virtual learning environment (VLE).

Format of the examination paper

Candidates should answer FOUR of the following SEVEN questions. All questions carry equal marks.

Workings should be submitted for all questions requiring calculations. Any necessary assumptions introduced in answering a question are to be stated. Extracts from compound interest tables are given after the final question on this paper.

Eight-column accounting paper is provided at the end of this question paper. If used, it must be detached and fastened securely inside the answer book.

A calculator may be used when answering questions on this paper and it must comply in all respects with the specification given with your Admission Notice. The make and type of machine must be clearly stated on the front cover of the answer book.

Comments on specific questions

Question 1

The income statements (profit and loss accounts) of Arm Plc, Leg Ltd and Toe Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2010 are given as follows:

Arm Plc Leg Ltd Toe Ltd

Sales 1,000,000 400,000 200,000

Cost of sales (140,000) (100,000) (60,000)

Gross profit 860,000 300,000 140,000

Administration costs (189,500) (42,000) (35,000)

Distributionistribution costs (104,000) (26,000) (10,000)

Dividends receivable 36,000

Profit before tax 602,500 232,000 95,000

Tax (200,000) (60,000) (20,000)

Profit after tax 402,500 172,000 75,000

Transfers to reserves (60,000) (30,000) (24,000)

Dividends payable (20,000) (10,000) (2,000)

Retained profit for the year 322,500 132,000 49,000

Retained profit brought forward 1,600,000 600,000 400,000

Retained profit carried forward 1,922,500 732,000 449,000

Page 32: 20115

91 Financial reporting

2

Arm Plc acquired 60% of Leg Ltd on 1 January 2003 for £150,000 when Leg Ltd’s retained profits were £80,000. The share capital of Leg Ltd totalled £50,000 on 1 January 2003. There has been no change in Leg Ltd’d share capital since this date.

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 7.

International financial reporting, Chapter 24.

Approaching the question

This question requires a detailed knowledge of preparation of consolidated financial statements, in this case consolidated income statements. Candidates should know what consolidated financial statements are, why they are prepared, what companies are included in consolidated financial statements and the definitions and explanation of key items included in consolidated financial statements. For the preparation of consolidated statements, candidates need to know the formats of these statements and be able to calculate the different components of the statements. It is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at figures included in the financial statements.

Part a

All definitions need to be discussed fully.

Part b

Solutions are provided below. All workings in £’000.

Sales (1,000 + 400 – 14) 1,386,000

Cost of sales (140 +100 – 14 + 2) (228,000)

Gross profit 1,158,000

Administration costs (189.5 + 42) (231,500)

Distribution costs (104 + 26) (130,000)

Investment income (36 – 6 – 0.6) 29,400

Management fee from a 10,000

Share of Associate’s earnings 0.3 * (95 – 1 – 10) 25,200

Goodwill (10,000)

Profit before tax 851,100

Tax 200 + 60 + 30% * (20) (266,000)

Profit after tax 585,100

NCI / Mint 40% (172 – 20 – 2) (60,000)

Transfer to reserves 60 + 0.6 * 30 + 0.3 * 24 (85,200)

Dividends payable (20,000)

Profit for the year 419,900

Retained profit brought forward 2,007,500

Retained profit carried forward 2,427,400

Workings

Ret Profit brought forward= 1,600 + 60% (600 – 80) + 30% (400 – 65)– 5 = 1,600 + 312 + 100.5 – 5 = 2,007.5

Page 33: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

3

Question 2

Company M owns a manufacturing plant that cost £2,000,000 on 1 January 2009. The plant has a useful economic life of five years from this date and it is used to manufacture a product called the spike. There is no second hand market for the plant except as scrap and it is estimated that at the end of its useful life, or at any other time, it will cost £80,000 net of scrap proceeds, to dismantle and remove it. Annual operating costs are £800,000. The plant requires an overhaul costing £60,000 during the third year of its life. It produces a constant annual output, all of which can be sold, with an annual selling value of £1,600,000.

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 6.

International financial reporting, Chapters 5 and 6.

Approaching the question

This question covers both a discussion of deprival value and calculations relating to deprival value. Candidates should attempt both parts of the question and answer all the questions set. For the calculations, candidates need to be able to apply the concepts of deprival value to an example. It is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Part a

For the discussion of deprival value, it is important that candidates discuss all parts of the question, provide clear explanations and examples and assess both the advantages and limitations of the concept in a discursive style. Bullet points should be avoided if possible.

Part b

Solutions to Part b are given below.

Aec = (2,200,000 + 4.3553 * 720,000 – 0.5645 * 40,000)/4.3553 = 1,219,947.

Have

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014…

Op. costs of old machine 800,000 800,000 800,000

Overhaul 60,000

Removal 80,000

New building work 100,000

AEC 1,219,947

Totals 0 860,000 800,000 980,000 1,219,947

Have not

Adapt building 100,000

Aec 1,219,947 1,219,947 1,219,947 1,219,947

Extra income (60,000) (60,000) (60,000)

Difference 100,000 299,947 359,947 179,947 0

Df 1 0.9091 0.8264 0.7513

Pv 100,000 272,682 297,460 135,194 0

Pv of difference = cost of replacing services of existing asset = £805,336 = deprival value.

Page 34: 20115

91 Financial reporting

4

Note: Some figures may be included differently in the AEC and have or have not budgets and full credit is given for correct workings if different to the above.

Question 3

Bear Ltd started trading on 1 January 2010. The income statement for the year ended 31 December 2010 and the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2010 are given as follows:

Income statement for 2010

£ £

Sales 4,050,000

Cost of sales

Opening inventories 225,000

Purchases 2,700,000

Closing inventories (270,000)

(2,655,000)

Gross profit 1,395,000

Expenses (450,000)

Depreciation (126,000)

Net profit 819,000 819,000

Statement of financial position as at 31 December 2010

£

Non-current assets – plant and machinery 3,888,000

Inventories 270,000

Other net current assets 1,161,000

Net assets 5,319,0005,319,000

Share capital (£1 shares) 4,500,000

Retained earnings 819,000

Share capital and reserves 5,319,000

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 5.

International financial reporting, Chapter 7.

Approaching the question

This question covers both a discussion of fully stabilised current value accounts and the preparation of current value financial statements and calculations for key components of fully stabilised financial statements. Candidates should attempt both parts of the question and answer all the questions set. For the calculations, it is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Part a

For the discussion of fully stabilised current value financial statements, it is important that candidates discuss all parts of the question, provide clear explanations and examples and assess both the advantages and limitations of the concept in a discursive style. Bullet points should be avoided if possible.

Page 35: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

5

Part b

Solutions to Part b are given below.

IS £Sales 4,050,000 4,050,000Cost of salesOp invent 225,000 270/250 243,000Purchases 2,700,000 2,700,000Clo invent (270,000) 270/280 (260,357)

(2,655,000) (2,682,643)GP 1,395,000 1,367,357

Exp (450,000) (450,000)Depreciation (126,000) 250/200 (189,000)

728,357Nca – unrealised 1,944,000Invent unrealised 9,642NCA – realised 63,000Invent – realised 27,643

Retained earnings 819,000 2,772,642

Balance sheet SFPNon-current assets 3,888,000 300/200 5832,000Inventories 270,000 290/280 279,642Other net current assets 1,161,000 1,161,000

Net assets 5319,000 7,272,642

Share capital (£1 shares) 4,500,000 4,500,000Retained earnings 819,000 2,772,642

Share capital and reserves 5,319,000 7,272,642

Part c

Nca real unrealised 5,832,000 – 3,888,000 * 120/100 = 1,166,400.

Nca real realised 189,000 – 126,000 * 120/100 = 37,800.

Invent real realised 2,682,643 * 120/110 – 2,933,716 = (7,196).

Invent real unrealised 279,642 – 270,000 * 120/115 = (2,097).

Page 36: 20115

91 Financial reporting

6

Question 4

Rhymes Ltd enters into two lease transactions in 2010 as follows:

1. An asset, asset A, which could be purchased outright for £319,770 is instead leased for three years. The useful economic life of the asset is three years and at the end of this time, the asset will have no residual value. Rhymes Ltd is responsible for all maintenance and repairs and for all insurance costs for asset A. The lease for asset A provides for half-yearly payments in advance of £60,000, the first payment being made on 1 January 2010.

2. An asset, asset B, which could be purchased outright for £360,000 is leased for three years for annual payments of £90,000 per annum payable in advance. The useful economic life of asset B is eight years. At the end of the three years, Rhymes Ltd intends to return the asset. Rhymes Ltd is not responsible for maintaining and insuring asset B.

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 9.

International financial reporting, Chapter 12.

Approaching the question

The question covers both a discussion on operating and finance leases and calculations showing how these would be accounted for in financial statements. For the discussion of operating and finance leases, it is important that candidates discuss all parts of the question, provide clear explanations and examples and assess both the advantages and limitations of the concept in a discursive style. Bullet points should be avoided if possible.

For the calculations, it is important that candidates show detailed workings of how they arrive at their answer.

Part a

A discussion of the definition of operating and finance leases with examples is required with discussion of how these different leases are accounted for.

Part b

Solutions for Part b are given below.

The answer requires a recognition that it is finance lease, and the reason for this.

Asset a

Rate implicit in the lease:

319,770 = 60,000 +60,000 a5]?

a5]? = 259,770/60,000

a5]? = 4.3295 which gives a rate of 5% from tables.

Page 37: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

7

Rental payments

Date Rental payment Finance charge Reduction in obligation Balance of obligation under finance lease

1.1.2010 319,770

1.1.2010 60,000 x 60,000 259,770

1.7.2010 60,000 12,989 47,011 212,759

1.1.2011 60,000 10,638 49,362 163,397

1.7.2011 60,000 8,170 51,830 111,567

1.1.2012 60,000 5,579 54,421 57,146

1.7.2012 60,000 2,857 57,143 0 Rounding difference

Income statement

2010 finance charge =12,989 + accrual of 10,638 which relates to prior period.

2011 finance charges = 8,170 + accrual of 5,579.

Sfp

Asset: non-current asset at 319,770, with annual depreciation of 106,590.

2010 net book value = 213,180.

2011 net book value =106,590.

Liability

2010

Accrual of finance charge = 10,638.

Lease obligation = 212,759.

Current = 101,192.

Non-current = 111, 567.

2011

Accrual of finance charge = 5,579.

Lease obligation = 111,567 – all current.

Asset B

Operating lease

Operating lease and reason why.

Lease payments in income statement = £90,000 in 2010 and 2011.

Page 38: 20115

91 Financial reporting

8

Question 5

Answer all parts of this question.

a. What is share premium? Discuss the permissible uses for the share premium account. (5 marks)

b. XYZ plc is considering whether to (i) issue share capital of £400,000 (£1 nominal value shares) or (ii) issue £200,000 (£1 nominal value shares) and raise £200,000 from a long term loan with an interest rate of 15% per annum. The future is uncertain and if XYZ plc has a good year, profit before interest and tax will be £200,000 but if it has a poor year, profit before interest and tax will be £40,000. Calculate profit after tax and earnings per share in both scenarios and comment on your results. Assume the tax rate is 35%. (8 marks)

[For the full question, please refer to the Examination paper.]

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapters 7, 10, 12 and 14.

International financial reporting, Chapters 13, 16, 18, 24, 26 and 27.

Approaching the question

This question covers the accounting treatment of several different items, some parts requiring discussion of concepts or key items in financial statements and some parts require calculations. All parts of the question should be attempted with clear workings provided of any required calculations. The marks given to each section are indicated and these should be used as a guide for how long candidates should spend on each section.

Solutions to parts

a. Definition of share premium and its uses should be fully discussed.

b.

Share capital Good Bad

PBIT 200,000 40,000

Tax (70,000) (14,000)

Pat 130,000 26,000

e/s 0.325 0.065

Share capital + debentures

PBIT 200,000 40,000

Interest (30,000) (30,000)

PBT 170,000 10,000

Tax (59,500) (3,500)

Pat 110,500 6,500

e/s 0.553 0.033

Appropriate comments should be made for example on variability and risk.

c. Both the criteria for merger accounting and the reasons for why it was banned need to be fully discussed.

d. Research will be written off to income statement as an expense.

Development project: Development will be capitalised and amortised if it meets criteria which this project appears to. Identify criteria.

Capitalise staff costs of £400,000 and depreciation of £100,000.

Page 39: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

9

Note: full marks were given if candidates assumed that the development costs were in addition to staff costs and capital expenditure.

Question 6

Either

a. What are “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties”? Discuss the differences in the accounting treatment of “non-current tangible assets” and “investment properties” and discuss how the different accounting treatments affect the financial statements.

Or

b. Discuss the reasons for initiating standard setting in the 1970’s and assess the advantages and limitations of standard setting in the UK.

Part a

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 9.

International financial reporting, Chapter 12.

Approaching the question

This question related to a key component of financial statements, that of non-current assets and investment properties. Candidates need to be able to discuss the definitions of these items, to analyse and discuss professional accounting requirements in these areas, and provide appropriate examples. A comparison of different accounting treatments and their impact on financial statements is important and must be explicitly covered in the answer. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers should contain definitions of non-current tangible assets and investment properties and identify the different accounting treatments (depreciation, revaluations) possibly with a numerical example. The impact on the SFP and income statement needs to be discussed, again perhaps referring to a numerical example. Candidates may discuss the economic consequences of the different treatment.

Part b

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 1.

International financial reporting, Chapter 1.

Approaching the question

This question related to an important issue within financial reporting, that of standard setting in the UK. Candidates need to be able to define standard setting and discuss advantage and limitations of standard setting, a topical subject in financial reporting. The question relates to standard setting in general and not to any specific accounting standard but candidates may provide some examples of specific standards to illustrate their argument. However, candidates must not write exclusively about specific standard and not address the question set. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers should outline the process of standard setting in the UK and may provide a definition of what an accounting standard is. Answers should discuss the reasons for standard setting (see Chapter 1) and discuss the advantages and disadvantage of standard setting. Candidates

Page 40: 20115

91 Financial reporting

10

may also discuss recent developments in standard setting in the UK and discuss the improvements and advantages and limitations of the recent developments.

Question 7

Either

a. Set out the definitions of well offness and measures of income suggested by Sir John Hicks and evaluate their usefulness, implications and limitations for financial reporting.

Or

b. Compare and contrast the different methods for translating the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries. Discuss how the foreign exchange reserves arise under each method, how they should be accounted for and the situations in which each of the methods should be used.

Part a

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 3.

International financial reporting, Chapter 4.

Approaching the question

This question related to Hicks’s concepts of well-offness and income. Candidates need to be able to discuss and explain the concepts clearly using appropriate examples to illustrate their arguments. Equally important is the evaluation of the concepts in relation to financial reporting. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers would describe and give examples of the required definitions, possibly referring to a numerical example. All three aspects of usefulness, implications and limitations (see Chapter 3) need to be addressed with some assessment of the issues raised.

Part b

Reading for the question

Subject guide, Chapter 8.

International financial reporting, Chapter 25.

Approaching the question

The question related to the topic of foreign exchange within financial reporting. Candidates need to be able to explain the accounting techniques, providing suitable examples to illustrate their answer. Candidates also need to be able to compare and contrast different techniques in this question, identify the key similarities and differences between the different techniques and explain and discuss the impact of different techniques on financial statements. A discursive style should be adopted, avoiding bullet points if possible.

Good answers should outline the temporal and closing rate methods and compare and contrast these methods, for example, the key exchange rates used, where the FX is accounted for, treatment of goodwill, etc., possibly referring to a numerical example. Candidates should describe the situations when the different methods should be used and identify the factors which indicate the functional currency and which method is required.

Page 41: 20115

Examiners’ commentaries 2011

11

Compound interest factors over n periods at rate i per period.

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 0.9070 0.8900 0.8734 0.8573 0.8417 0.8264 0.7972

3 0.8638 0.8396 0.8163 0.7938 0.7722 0.7513 0.7118

4 0.8227 0.7921 0.7629 0.7350 0.7084 0.6830 0.6355

5 0.7835 0.7473 0.7130 0.6806 0.6499 0.6209 0.5674

6 0.7462 0.7050 0.6663 0.6302 0.5963 0.5645 0.5066

7 0.7107 0.6651 0.6227 0.5835 0.5470 0.5132 0.4523

8 0.6768 0.6274 0.5820 0.5403 0.5019 0.4665 0.4039

9 0.6446 0.5919 0.5439 0.5002 0.4604 0.4241 0.3606

10 0.6139 0.5584 0.5083 0.4632 0.4224 0.3855 0.3220

11 0.5847 0.5268 0.4751 0.4289 0.3875 0.3505 0.2875

12 0.5568 0.4970 0.4440 0.3971 0.3555 0.3186 0.2567

13 0.5303 0.4688 0.4150 0.3677 0.3262 0.2897 0.2292

14 0.5051 0.4423 0.3878 0.3405 0.2992 0.2633 0.2046

15 0.4810 0.4173 0.3624 0.3152 0.2745 0.2394 0.1827

16 0.4581 0.3936 0.3387 0.2919 0.2519 0.2176 0.1631

17 0.4363 0.3714 0.3166 0.2703 0.2311 0.1978 0.1456

18 0.4155 0.3503 0.2959 0.2502 0.2120 0.1799 0.1300

19 0.3957 0.3305 0.2765 0.2317 0.1945 0.1635 0.1161

20 0.3769 0.3118 0.2584 0.2145 0.1784 0.1486 0.1037

Table 1: Present value factors

To determine the present value of a single payment of 1 received ‘n’ periods from the present at a constant discount rate of x% per period

Table 2: Cumulative present value factors (‘annuity factors’)

The table gives the present value of ‘n’ annual payments of 1 received for the next ‘n’ years with a constant discount rate of x% per year. For example, with a discount rate of 8% and with six annual payments of £1 the present value is £4.6229.

Periods 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 12%

1 0.9524 0.9434 0.9346 0.9259 0.9174 0.9091 0.8929

2 1.8594 1.8334 1.8080 1.7833 1.7591 1.7355 1.6901

3 2.7232 2.6730 2.6243 2.5771 2.5313 2.4869 2.4018

4 3.5460 3.4651 3.3872 3.3121 3.2397 3.1699 3.0373

5 4.3295 4.2124 4.1002 3.9927 3.8897 3.7908 3.6048

6 5.0757 4.9173 4.7665 4.6229 4.4859 4.3553 4.1114

7 5.7864 5.5824 5.3893 5.2064 5.0330 4.8684 4.5638

8 6.4632 6.2098 5.9713 5.7466 5.5348 5.3349 4.9676

9 7.1078 6.8017 6.5152 6.2469 5.9952 5.7590 5.3282

10 7.7217 7.3601 7.0236 6.7101 6.4177 6.1446 5.6502

11 8.3064 7.8869 7.4987 7.1390 6.8052 6.4951 5.9377

12 8.8633 8.3838 7.9427 7.5361 7.1607 6.8137 6.1944

13 9.3936 8.8527 8.3577 7.9038 7.4869 7.1034 6.4235

14 9.8986 9.2950 8.7455 8.2442 7.7862 7.3667 6.6282

15 10.3797 9.7122 9.1079 8.5595 8.0607 7.6061 6.8109

Page 42: 20115

91 Financial reporting

12

16 10.8378 10.1059 9.4466 8.8514 8.3126 7.8237 6.9740

17 11.2741 10.4773 9.7632 9.1216 8.5436 8.0216 7.1196

18 11.6896 10.8276 10.0591 9.3719 8.7556 8.2014 7.2497

19 12.0853 11.1581 10.3356 9.6036 8.9501 8.3649 7.3658

20 12.4622 11.4699 10.5940 9.8181 9.1285 8.5136 7.4694


Recommended