0
Well ID Well Type
5S-HJ1 Obs.Well
5S-KMJ Recovery Well
5S-KM1 Jni/Obs. Well
5S-KM2 lni/Obs. Well
M-UKM1 Jni/Obs. Well KPW-1A lni/Obs. Well
5S-KM4 Obs. Well
KMU-1 Obs. Well
M-M1 Obs. Well
5S-N1 Obs. Well
2012 Composile KUA Horizon S.Spot Tesling Los! Creek ISR, LLC April2013
0 Table 3-1. Well Information, Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing
Easting, Northing, Cased Completion NAD83 NAD83
GL Elev TOC Elev Drilled TD Depth Zone
(feet) (feetl (ftamsl) (ft amsll (ft bgs)
(ft bgs)
HJ Horizon 2,214,013.36 595,593.04 6,945.32 6,945.83 480 460
KM Horizon 2,213,985.84 595,579.11 6,945.34 6,945.87 540 520 KM Horizon 2,213,950.03 595,640.32 6,945.65 6,946.20 540 525 KM Horizon 2,214,046.09 595,609.82 6,945.68 6,946.02 540 520 KM Horizon 2,214,016.65 595,516.07 6,944.03 6,945.22 550 520 KM Horizon 2,213,927.10 595,549.83 6,945.49 6,947.58 540 520 KM Horizon 2,213,954.65 595,562.81 6,944.89 6,945.59 540 520
L Horizon 2.214,011.07 595,543.24 6,944.61 6,946.00 740 650
M Horizon 2,213,988.52 595,525.89 6,943.94 6,945.82 780 750
N Horizon 2,213,940.21 595,615.33 6,945.55 6,946.29 900 850
Page 1 of6
0
Casing Screen 1 Total
ID Interval Screen
(In) (ft bgs) Length (feet)
4.5 460-480 20
4.5 520-540 20
4.5 525-545 20 4.5 520-540 20
4.5 520-540 20
5 519-539 20
4.5 520-540 20
4.5 650-675 25
4.5 750-770 20
4.5 850-870 20
Pe/rolek
Table 4-1. Monitoring Equipment Layout, Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing
Well Completion Zone Well Type Monitoring Equipment •
5S-HJ1 HJ Horizon Observation l evelTROll - 30 psi
5S-KM3 KM Horizon Pumpin!l LevelTROLL - 100 OSI 5S-KM1 KM Horizon Observation/Injection LevelTROLL - 30 psi 5S-KM2 KM Horizon Observation/Injection LevelTROLL - 30 psi M-UKM1 KM Horizon Observation/Injection LevelTROLL - 30 osi KPW-1A KM Horizon Observation/Injection levelTROLL - 30 psi 5S-KM4 KM Horizon Observation LevelTROLL - 30 psi
KMU-1 L Horizon Observation LevelTROLL - 30 psi
M-M1 M Horizon Observation LevelTROLL - 30 psi
5S-N1 N Horizon Observation LevelTROLL - 30 psi
Notes: • - Monitoring frequency for all dataloggers during the Extraction Test was 1-minute intervals; during the
1njection/Extraction Testing frequency was logarithmic.
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spol Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013 Page 2 of 6 Pe/rolek
0
0
0
0
interval Total Time Time Totalizer T1 Rate
Date/Time (min) (min) 1 (gal) (gpm)
10/5/12 14:00 0 0 0 0 10/5/12 14:15 15 15 413 29 10/5/12 14:35 35 20 969 28 10/5/12 14:52 52 17 1,507 29 10/5/12 15:25 85 33 2.417 29
10/6/12 13:59 1439 1354 40,846 28 10/6/12 14:42 1482 43 42,098 29 10/6/12 17:32 1652 170 47,007 29 1017/12 11:32 2732 1080 80,175 29 10/8/12 7:03 3903 1171 112,387 29 10/8/12 14:15 4335 432 124,916 29 10/8/12 16:02 4442 107 128,021 29 10/8/1216 30 4470 28 128,841 29 10/8/1216 31 4471 1 128,852 29
5S-KM3 Extraction Test
T2 Cumulative Averaae Rate before rate bump at 1,439 minutes
T1 Cumulative Averacie Rate before rate bump at 1.439 minutes
Combined average rale, 0 to 1.439 minules
T2 Cumulative Average Rale, after 1,439 min to end of tesl
T1 Cumulalive AveraQe Rale after 1,439 min to end of test
Combined average rate, 1,439 minutes to end oftest
Combined Average Rate, Entire Test
Tolal Minutes
Notes:
t't. Table 6-1. Pumping Rate Data,
5S-KM3 Extraction Test
5S-KM3 Extraction Test mterva1 mterva1
Totalizer T2 Rate Gallons, Gallons, Calculated 2 (gal) (gpm) T1 T2 Rate, T1
0 0 0 0 0 400 28 413 400 28 951 27 556 551 28
1,466 28 538 515 32 2,550 28 910 1,084 28
39,796 27 38,429 37,246 28 41,019 28 1,252 1,223 29 45,815 28 4,909 4 ,796 29 78,234 28 33,168 32,419 31 109,728 28 32,212 31,494 28 121,987 28 12,529 12,259 29 125,008 28 3,105 3.021 29 125,815 28 820 807 29 125,826 28 11 11 11
27.7 ICIPm
28.4 l9Pm
28.0 loom
28.4 loom
29.0 loom
28.7 laom
28.5 lmm1
4,471 min
Totalizers 1 & 2 • 1 5" turbine flow meter (Turbines lncorporaled, FW Series)
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-SpotTesling Lost Creek ISR, LLC Apnl 2013 Page 3 of6
()
Calculated Rate, T2 Notes
0 BEGIN Test, 5S-KM3 27 28 30
33 Flow from pumping well increased slightly from 28
28 lo 29 on T1 . 28 28 30
27
28 28 29 11 Pump was turned off at 16:31 on 10/8/2012
Pelrolek
Table 6-2. Observed Drawdown at Shut-In, 5S-KM3 Extraction Test
Well Monitored Zone
5S-KM3 KM Horizon, Pumping Well
5S-KM1 KM Horizon 5S-KM2 KM Horizon
5S-KM4 KM Horizon KPW-1A KM Horizon
M-UKM1 KM Horizon
KMU-1 L Horizon
M-M1 M Horizon
5S-HJ1 HJ Horizon
5S-N1 N Horizon
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Distance from Pumping Well (ft)
-71 68
35 66
70
44
53
31
58
Page4 of6
0 Ext. Test Drawdown
at Shut-in (ft)
116.2 29.4
37.2 30.3
23.2
61.2
6.1
1.1
0.1 (No Response)
-0.1 (No Response)
0
0 Pelrolek
0 Table 1-3. Pumping and lnJecllon Rate Dahl, lnjectlonlElltracUon Tnls
Dole., limo
Sllrt"""'atToatSI 10/19/2012 11 00 10/1912012 11:32 10/1912012 13 55 10/1912012 18:30 10/20/2012 7.45 10/20/2012 8:30
10/20/2012 11 ·oo
Encl kll/Eal THt '1 To&al Tirnt fmlnJ • I
End"""'"''"' '1 I Tolll Ealnelltd Volume, 'lvora .. of Tollllnra 111&11 •
Start lnlll'al THI 12 10/20/2012 12,20 10/20/2012 1715 10/21/2012 8 10
10/21/2012 14 20 10/22/2012 8 33
10/22/2012 14 24 10/2312012 740
10/23/2012 11 05
End ln""·t THI 12 I Total Tlffll •nNn• • I
End lnilEat Tnl 92 I Tatal Elllracled Volume, Avora.,. of Tolllllera l11&1l •
2012~ Kl.Ml ttanmn$-&,iocf"'""' f.JHIIIC.NIII IS.A. U,C ..... :IOI)
Elapaad limo Cmln)
0 32
t75 450
1.245 1.290 1,440
1,440
15,750
1520 1 815 2.710 3080 4 173 4.524 5560 5765
4,
97.529
5S-t1Ml Eatnelion Woll, Totallnr 1
MCII T1Calc, Totalnr, T1 lna ... nl Raia T1111111 Rala{gpm) 1gpm)
0 00 00 370 109 116
1919 108 108 4,868 10.7 107
13,318 106 106 13.804 114 108 15.540 115 116
~S-tlMl IEall ·-Cale. Raia Tl laaml'I 10.,
17281 223 218 23839 22.2 222 43 727 22.2 222 51.955 22.2 222 76.223 22.2 222 84.025 222 122
107,070 222 222 111.567 222 219
58-KMl IEall ,Mte, 1 22.
55-tlMl Elllraellon Wtll, T""'llnr 2
GPI T2Calc. Totallzer, T2 T21nal.'lnl Rale
111111 ftllelgpm) IIIPffll
0 00 0.0 383 11.2 12.0
1970 11.1 11.1 5.005 110 11.0
13 711 10 9 11.0 14.215 118 11.2 15960 11.8 116
SS-t1Ml1Eall A•• Cak:. Rall T2 laam\a I 11.1
17 790 229 229 24,548 229 229 45.044 229 229 53,525 229 229 78.543 229 22.9 86.590 229 229
110.308 22.9 229 114990 229 220
5S-KM3 •Eat• 1aya 1...a!E. Rite, TZ 11NMn1• I
0 0
55-tlM2 lnloctian Woll M.UKM1 lnloellon Wtll 5S-t1M1 kl'-'""' Wtll -~~-·· ---· SSKM-2 Cale. M.UKM1 Cale. 5SKM,1 SSKM-1 SSKM·Z kllUnLRale Rale M.UKMt lnal.'lnL Rale Rate 55KM,I lnll.'lnl Raia Cak:. Rall Tatallnr 1gpm) IIIPffll Tollllnr [gpm) (gpml Tallllur IIIPffll 1gpm) ·-
0 00 00 0 00 0.0 0 00 00 129 39 0 t27 38 40 128 39 4.0 679 38 38 669 38 38 679 38 3.9
1721 38 38 1698 37 37 173t 3.9 38 4 711 37 38 4,619 36 37 4.717 3.8 J.eru..--1u.1KUt.55..fO.lt&~••DIJlfflNCft 4883 40 38 4795 40 39 4.960 4.0 38 5472 40 39 5 3119 40 40 5.548 4.0 39
58-tlMZIWI M.UKM1 llnll 5S-KMt llnll Ava. C.k:. lnl. Ra• 1nn,n1 •I l .l Ava. Cale. ""· Ralll •I 3.7 '11111. Calc. lnl. Rale IDDml •I 3.1 s.u ... U-uK111 andlurettalH,b
$5-«.Ll:1 MCI 5S-KIQ b -.,.,1 11ec ,2
6477 125 126 5399 00 0.0 6550 124 125 10140 125 124 5399 00 0.0 10,229 125 125 21.251 12 5 12 4 5399 00 0.0 21 ,409 125 1B 25,860 12.5 t25 5.399 0.0 0.0 26,024 125 12.5 39424 12 5 124 5.399 0.0 00 39.648 125 12.5 43 788 125 124 5.3119 00 00 44 029 125 125 56.650 125 12.4 5.399 00 00 56.948 124 125 59181 12.5 12.3 5.399 00 00 59,494 125 124 stu-ftal .. 1t.E...O~~Tn11
5S-kMZllnll M.UKM1 ffnll 5S-KM1 llnll 1a-.. C.tc. Inf . Rlla HIPfflJ •1 u. 1~-. C..tc. ml. RIie 1ftftll'll1 •I O.• ,.-.Cale.In!. Rale •-• •I ,,.,,
..... s ... P6blJ/6k
0 Table 7-1. Analytical RD, 5S-KM3 Exlraction Test
Hantush.Jacob Transmissivity
Well Well Type (ft2/d) Storativitv
5S-KM3 Pumping Well - KM Horizon - -5S-KM1 Observation Well - KM Horizon 115 1.2E-04
5S-KM2 Observation Well - KM Horizon 97 4.7E-05
5S-KM4 Observation Well - KM Horizon 131 3.3E-04
KPW-1A Observation Well - KM Horizon 132 3.5E-04
M-UKM1 Observation Well - KM Horizon 80 1.3E-06*
Average 111 2.1E-04
* - S Values for M-UKM1 not included in average calculation.
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013 Page 6 of6
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d)
-1.0
0.8
1.1
1.1
0.7
1.0
Pelrolek
Lost Creek Permit Area
Lost Creek ISR, LLCProject Area
Datum: NAD 83
Projection: Wyoming State Plane West Central
Lost Creek ISR, LLC
Figure 1-1
Project Location Map
Lost Creek ISR Project
By: KRS Checked: HPD
Ratio Scale = 1 : 720,000
MILES
0 5 10 15 20
Proposed Resource Area 3
18 17
Mine Unit O
neD
U
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
Lost Creek F
ault
5-Spot Test Area
Coordinate System: NAD 83 WY SPWC
HJMP-105
HJMP-108
HJMP-109HJMU-109
HJMU-110
HJT-101
HJT-102
HJT-103
HJT-104
LC17M
LC20M
LC24M
M-104
M-109
M-111M-113
M-114
M-115
M-117M-119
M-121
M-123
M-125 M-127
MP-101
MP-102
MP-103MP-104
MP-108MP-111
MP-113
MU-101
MU-102
MU-103
MU-104
MU-106
MU-107
MU-109
MU-110
MU-112
MU-113
UKMO-101
UKMO-103
UKMP-101
UKMP-103
UKMU-103
KMU-4
KMU-1
KMU-2
KMP-1
KMP-2
KMU-3
KMP-4
KMP-5
KPW-1A
KPW-2
M-UKM1
M-L1M-M2
M-M1
M-M3
M-L2
M-N1
M-KM1
M-M5
M-KM2
M-L4 M-M4
M-L3 M-M7
M-L5
M-M8
5S-KM1
5S-KM2
5S-KM3
5S-KM4 5S-HJ1
5S-N1
KMP-3A
M-M6A
M-KM3A
M-103A
594,
000
FT59
5,00
0 FT
596,
000
FT
596,000 FT
597,
000
FT
597,000 FT
598,
000
FT
598,000 FT
599,
000
FT
599,000 FT2,209,000 FT
2,209,000 FT
2,210,000 FT
2,210,000 FT
2,211,000 FT
2,211,000 FT
2,212,000 FT
2,212,000 FT
2,213,000 FT
2,213,000 FT
2,214,000 FT
2,214,000 FT
2,215,000 FT
2,215,000 FT
2,216,000 FT
2,216,000 FT
2,217,000 FT 2,218,000 FT
Lost Creek, ISR, LLC
Figure 1-2
Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing
5-Spot Test Location Map
WELL SYMBOLSHJ HorizonKM HorizonL HorizonM HorizonN Horizon
By: KRS Checked: AAP
Ratio Scale = 1 : 7,200
FEET
0 600
WC
KMU-1Observation
KPW-1AInjector
M-UKM1Injector
M-M1Observation
5S-KM1Injector
5S-KM2Injector
5S-KM3Producer
5S-KM4Observation
5S-HJ1Observation
5S-N1Observation
595,
450
F T59
5,47
5 F T
595,
500
F T595,500 F T
595,
525
F T595,525 F T
595,
550
F T595,550 F T
595,
575
F T595,575 F T
595,
600
F T595,600 F T
595,
625
F T595,625 F T
595,
650
F T595,650 F T
2,213,925 FT
2,213,925 FT
2,213,950 FT
2,213,950 FT
2,213,975 FT
2,213,975 FT
2,214,000 FT
2,214,000 FT
2,214,025 FT
2,214,025 FT
2,214,050 FT
Lost Creek, ISR, LLC
Figure 1-3
Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing
5-Spot Test Layout
WELL SYMBOLSHJ HorizonKM HorizonL HorizonM HorizonN Horizon
By: KRS Checked: AAP
FEET
0 25
FIGURE 2-1
Issued For: 5ST
Lost Creek Stratigraphic Section
Drawn By: KRS
I
Drawing Number: 5ST_Figure_2-1.pdf
Scale: Attached
ssued/ Revised: 04.22.13
Lost Creek Permit Area
Lost Creek ISR, LLCLittleton, Colorado, USA
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-1. KM Horizon Production Zone of the Composite KLM Horizon, Water Levels vs. Pumping Well5S-KM3 Extraction Test
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
10/0
4/12
10/0
5/12
10/0
6/12
10/0
7/12
10/0
8/12
10/0
9/12
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Pum
ping
Wel
l, D
epth
to W
ater
[fee
t]
5S-KM4 5S-KM1 KPW-1A MUKM-1 5S-KM2 5S-KM3
KPW-1A
5S-KM1
5S-KM45S-KM2
M-UKM1
5S-KM3
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-2. L and M Horizons of the Composite KLM Horizon, Water Levels vs. Pumping Well5S-KM3 Extraction Test
192
194
196
198
200
202
204
206
208
10/0
4/12
10/0
5/12
10/0
6/12
10/0
7/12
10/0
8/12
10/0
9/12
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Pum
ping
Wel
l, D
epth
to W
ater
[fee
t]
KMU-1 M-M1 5S-KM3
KMU-1
5S-KM3
M-M1
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-3. Overlying HJ Horizon Water Level vs. Pumping Well5S-KM3 Extraction Test
171.0
171.5
172.0
172.5
173.0
173.5
174.0
174.5
175.0
10/0
4/12
10/0
5/12
10/0
6/12
10/0
7/12
10/0
8/12
10/0
9/12
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Pum
ping
Wel
l, D
epth
to W
ater
[fee
t]
5S-HJ1 5S-KM3
5S-HJ1
5S-KM3
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-4. N Horizon Water Level vs. Pumping Well5S-KM3 Extraction Test
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
10/0
4/12
10/0
5/12
10/0
6/12
10/0
7/12
10/0
8/12
10/0
9/12
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Pum
ping
Wel
l, D
epth
to W
ater
[fee
t]
5S-N1 5S-KM3
5S-N1
5S-KM3
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-5. KM Horizon Production Zone of the Composite KLM Horizon, Pre-Test Background Monitoring Prior to Injection/Extraction Testing
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
10/1
2/12
10/1
3/12
10/1
4/12
10/1
5/12
10/1
6/12
10/1
7/12
10/1
8/12
10/1
9/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
5S-KM4 5S-KM1 KPW-1A MUKM-1 5S-KM2 5S-KM3
KPW-1A5S-KM1
5S-KM4
5S-KM2M-UKM1
5S-KM3
Shut-in of Extraction Teston 10/08/2013
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-6. L and M Horizons of the Composite KLM Horizon, Pre-Test Background Monitoring Prior to Injection/Extraction Testing
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
10/1
2/12
10/1
3/12
10/1
4/12
10/1
5/12
10/1
6/12
10/1
7/12
10/1
8/12
10/1
9/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
KMU-1 M-M1
KMU-1
M-M1
Shut-in of Extraction Teston 10/08/2013
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-7. Overlying HJ Horizon Pre-Test Background Monitoring Prior to Injection/Extraction Testing
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
10/1
2/12
10/1
3/12
10/1
4/12
10/1
5/12
10/1
6/12
10/1
7/12
10/1
8/12
10/1
9/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
5S-HJ1
Shut-in of Extraction Teston 10/08/2013
5S-HJ1
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-8. N Horizon Pre-Test Background Monitoring Prior to Injection/Extraction Testing
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
10/1
0/12
10/1
1/12
10/1
2/12
10/1
3/12
10/1
4/12
10/1
5/12
10/1
6/12
10/1
7/12
10/1
8/12
10/1
9/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
5S-N1
Shut-in of Extraction Teston 10/08/2013
5S-N1
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-9. KM Horizon Production Zone of the Composite KLM Horizon, Water Levels vs. Pumping Well, Injection Wells 5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, and Observation Well 5S-KM4
105
115
125
135
145
155
165
175
185
195
20510/18/12 10/19/12 10/20/12 10/21/12 10/22/12 10/23/12 10/24/12 10/25/12 10/26/12 10/27/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
Dep
th to
Wat
er, E
xtra
ctor
5S-
KM
3 [fe
et]
5S-KM1 5S-KM2 5S-KM4 5S-KM3
Initial test attempt, all injectors on
Test #1: 3 injectors5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, MUKM-1 at ~4 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~11 gpm
Test #2: 2 injectors5S-KM1 and 5S-KM2 at ~12.5 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~22.5 gpm
END TESTING
5S-KM1
5S-KM2
5S-KM1
5S-KM2
5S-KM4
5S-KM4
5S-KM1
5S-KM2
5S-KM3
5S-KM3
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-10. KM Horizon Production Zone of the Composite KLM Horizon, Water Levels vs. Pumping Well, Injection Wells KPW-1A and M-UKM1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
22010/18/12 10/19/12 10/20/12 10/21/12 10/22/12 10/23/12 10/24/12 10/25/12 10/26/12 10/27/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
Dep
th to
Wat
er, E
xtra
ctor
5S-
KM
3 [fe
et]
KPW-1A M-UKM1 5S-KM3
Initial test attempt, all injectors on END TESTING
M-UKM1
KPW-1A
5S-KM3
5S-KM3
M-UKM1
M-UKM1
KPW-1A
Test #1: 3 injectors5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, MUKM-1 at ~4 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~11 gpm
Test #2: 2 injectors5S-KM1 and 5S-KM2 at ~12.5 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~22.5 gpm
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-11. L and M Horizons of the Composite KLM Horizon, Water Levels vs. Pumping Well
195.0
196.0
197.0
198.0
199.0
200.0
201.0
202.0
203.0
204.0
205.010/18/12 10/19/12 10/20/12 10/21/12 10/22/12 10/23/12 10/24/12 10/25/12 10/26/12 10/27/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
Dep
th to
Wat
er, E
xtra
ctor
5S-
KM
3 [fe
et]
KMU-1 M-M1 5S-KM3
Initial test attempt, all injectors on
END TESTINGKMU-1
5S-KM3
5S-KM3
M-M1
Test #1: 3 injectors5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, MUKM-1 at ~4 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~11 gpm
Test #2: 2 injectors5S-KM1 and 5S-KM2 at ~12.5 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~22.5 gpm
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-12. Overlying HJ Horizon Water Levels vs. Pumping Well
172.0
172.2
172.4
172.6
172.8
173.0
173.2
173.4
173.6
173.8
174.010/18/12 10/19/12 10/20/12 10/21/12 10/22/12 10/23/12 10/24/12 10/25/12 10/26/12 10/27/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
Dep
th to
Wat
er, E
xtra
ctor
5S-
KM
3 [fe
et]
5S-HJ1 5S-KM3
Initial test attempt, all injectors on END TESTING
5S-HJ1
5S-KM3
5S-KM3
Test #1: 3 injectors5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, MUKM-1 at ~4 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~11 gpm
Test #2: 2 injectors5S-KM1 and 5S-KM2 at ~12.5 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~22.5 gpm
2012 Composite KLM Horizon 5-Spot Testing Lost Creek ISR, LLC April 2013
Figure 6-13. N Horizon Water Levels vs. Pumping Well
209.0
209.2
209.4
209.6
209.8
210.0
210.2
210.4
210.6
210.8
211.010/18/12 10/19/12 10/20/12 10/21/12 10/22/12 10/23/12 10/24/12 10/25/12 10/26/12 10/27/12
Dep
th to
Wat
er [f
eet]
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
Dep
th to
Wat
er, E
xtra
ctor
5S-
KM
3 [fe
et]
5S-N1 5S-KM3
Initial test attempt, all injectors on END TESTING
5S-N1
5S-KM3
5S-KM3
Test #1: 3 injectors5S-KM1, 5S-KM2, MUKM-1 at ~4 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~11 gpm
Test #2: 2 injectors5S-KM1 and 5S-KM2 at ~12.5 gpm each; 5S-KM3 pumping at ~22.5 gpm
Fig 1-1_ProjLocUntitled
5ST_Figure_1-25ST_Figure_1-35ST_Figure_2-1Ext Test_Figs 6-1 to 6-4Background Figs_6-5 to 6-8Inj-Ext_Figs 6-9 to 6-13
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages false /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth 8 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /FlateEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages false /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 450 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages false /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth 8 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /FlateEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages false /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 450 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages false /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth 8 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /FlateEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages false /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 450 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice