Why Spin-Off?
• Spin-Offs are a source of significant market
outperformance for investors
• Spin-Offs often result in a higher aggregate
value for the constituent pieces
• Studies conducted by a range of researchers,
from Penn State to McKinsey have
documented that spin-offs, on average,
outperform market indexes
Spin-Offs Outperform S&P 500 Bloomberg Spin-Off Index up 9.1% Year-To-Date Versus 2.6% for S&P as of June 4, 2012
YTD 1-Year Life
BNSPIN^ Bberg US Spin-Off Index 280.9 9.1 -4.3 212.1 90.42
SPX^ S&P 500 INDEX 1278.04 2.6 -0.6 na 11830
ACCO ACCO BRANDS CORP 8.57 -11.2 7 5.5 0.97
AMCX AMC NETWORKS INC-A 37.08 -1.3 n/a -7 2.66
AOL AOL INC 27.11 79.5 31.9 15.3 2.54
BWC BABCOCK & WILCOX CO/THE 23.9 -1 13.6 3.2 2.83
CFN CAREFUSION CORP 24.01 -5.5 14.6 20.7 5.33
FAF FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL 15.7 24.5 3.5 12.2 1.67
FBHS FORTUNE BRANDS HOME & SECURI 21.13 24.1 n/a 71.8 3.37
HHC HOWARD HUGHES CORP/THE 57.9 31.1 20.8 56.9 2.2
HII HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIE 36.5 16.7 1.1 -12 1.81
MJN MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION CO 78.15 14.1 18.5 96 15.93
MMI MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS I 39.98 N/A N/A 20.7 12.14
MPC MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP 35.24 7.2 N/A -14.4 12.01
MSG MADISON SQUARE GARDEN CO-A 36.25 26.6 36.2 107.1 2.74
PSX PHILLIPS 66 29.92 N/A N/A -8.7 18.71
QEP QEP RESOURCES INC 25.32- -13.5 39.7 -13.2 4.52
TRIP TRIPADVISOR INC 41.02 62.7 N/A 48.2 5.51
WPX WPX ENERGY INC 14.1 -22.4 N/A -22.1 2.8
XLS EXELIS INC 9.75 9.7 N/A -14.3 1.82
XYL XYLEM INC 24.48 -4 N/A -6.9 4.54
Total Returns(%)*
Index Member@
Ticker Name Current Price Mrk Cap ($Bln)
Types Of Spin-Offs
Type of Spin-Off
Spin-Off
Carve-Out
Split-Off
Description Example
Parent firm distributes
shares of the spun-off
subsidiary to parent
shareholders
Cadbury Schweppes /
Dr. Pepper
Time Warner / AOL
Bristol-Myers / Mead
Johnson Nutrition
Citigroup / Primerica
Bristol-Myers / Mead
Johnson Nutrition
Sara Lee / Coach
Sell a portion or all shares of
subsidiary through an IPO in
the equity market
Parent company’s shareholders
are offered shares of a
subsidiary in exchange for the
parents’ shares (exchange offer)
Spin-Off
• A parent distributes the stock of a subsidiary in
the form of a dividend
• Following the distribution, the stockholders hold
stock of the parent and the stock of the company
that was spun off
• Two independent companies exist where before
there was only one
• A spin-off effectively removes the parent from
management and control of the subsidiary
• Pure spins are tax efficient
Carve-Out
• Parent company sells some or all of the stock of
a subsidiary to the public in an IPO
• The carve-out may pay a portion of the IPO
proceeds to its parent
• Parent companies sometimes link subsidiary
IPOs and Spin-Offs (two step spin)
• Parent would typically sell less than 20% Of
subsidiary to the public and then distribute the
balance of the stock to their shareholders in a
tax-free distribution (Example: Bristol-Myers
Squibb / Mead Johnson Nutrition)
Equity Carve-Outs Parent sells Equity in the New Firm to the Public (IPO) and creates a
New Publicly Traded Entity.
Parent65%Carve-Out in
an IPO10%
Subsidiary25%
Parent65%
Subsidiary35%
• A carve-out brings cash into the firm, whereas a pure spin-off does not.
• Carve-outs disperse assets and ownership in the assets to non-owners of
the original firm.
• Carve-outs are often an intermediate step before a full spin-off.
Split-Offs
• In a split-off, the investor must decide between the new company and the parent.
• Holders of the parent company stock must choose to continue owning stock in the parent or, instead, exchange some or all of the parent stock for stock in the spin-off.
• The parent offers its existing shareholders stock in the subsidiary in exchange for shares in the parent company.
• If the parent distributes 80% of the subsidiary stock, the split is tax-free. What’s more, in an effort to induce enough shareholders to swap stock, investors are offered shares in the subsidiary that are worth more than the shares being returned to the parent company. This offered “premium” explains why split-offs are often oversubscribed.
Selected Split-Off Transactions
Parent/Sub Date
Size
($mm)
% of
Parent
Shares
Repurcha
sed
Initial
Prem.
Closing
Prem.
Over
Sub.
Factor
Sub as %
of
Parent
Market
AT&T / AWE 5/21/01 $7.8 B 10% 7% 1% .87x 22%
Sara Lee / Coach 4/4/01 $998 M 5% 12.90% 6.90% 2.1x 6%
General Motors /
Hughes Electronics 5/19/00 $8.27 B 14% 17.70% 10.10% 3.9x 70%
DuPont / Conoco 8/6/99 $11.7 B 13% 17.90% 3.30% 2.4x 20%
Lockheed Martin /
Martin Marietta 10/18/96 $906 M 4% 17.50% 5.20% 5.4x 6%
Eli Lilly / Guidant 9/18/95 $1.55 B 6% 13.10% 8.80% 2.9x 9%
Drivers for Spin-Offs
Lack of synergy
De-conglomeration
Focus in core business
Legal / regulatory
Undervalued assets
Monetize value of
subsidiary
De-leverage balance
sheet
Riskiness of the
subsidiary
Avoid a takeover
Tax avoidance
Conflicts of interest
Successful Spins
• Easier for the markets to recognize underlying value
• Pursue compelling business opportunities
• Greater freedom to pursue new ventures, streamline production, and pare overhead
• Accountability and direct incentives (stock & options)
• Eliminates competitive disadvantages
• Greater access to capital
• Increase corporate focus for the spin-off and parent
Shift from Conglomeration to
Pure Play
• Era of conglomerate (1960s - 1980s)
- Firms diversify holdings to “smooth” earnings
- Market rewards empire building
• Conglomerates fall out of favor
- Focus on cost
- Difficult to value all businesses in diversified companies
- Market discounts conglomerate stocks
• Rise of the Pure Play (1990s - Current)
- Market rewards firms that concentrate on core business
- Competitive landscape pressures management to improve operating efficiency and clarify strategic decision making
Number of Completed U.S. Spin-Offs
by Year
19
27
21
34
27 27
18
23
33
28
31
41
36
44
66 66
39 41
21
35
27
31
34
29
20 20
27
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11