Date post: | 08-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | vinayvpalekar |
View: | 4 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Bangalore, Tuesday
April 2, 2013, Pages 26
www.deccanherald.com
Vol 66 No 92 4.00 B
Ashish Tripathi
NEW DELHI: The SupremeCourt on Monday dismissedSwiss drugmaker Novartis’bid to acquire patent for itscancer drug ‘Glivec’, in a de-cision which would give amajor boost to Indian phar-ma companies sellingcheaper generic for cancertreatment.
A bench of Justices AftabAlam and Ranjana Prakash De-sai said patent sought for theproduct, the beta crystallineform of ‘Imatinib Mesylate’(generic), failed in both the“tests of invention andpatentability” as mandated un-der different clauses of thePatent Act.
The bench said, “No materi-al has been offered to indicatethat the beta crystalline formof ‘Imatinib Mesylate’ will pro-duce an enhanced or superiorefficacy (therapeutic) on mo-lecular basis than what couldbe achieved with Imatinib freebase in vivo animal model.”
The treatment cost for whatwas known as “wonder drug”came about Rs 1.20 lakh permonth for a patient while thesame for Indian generic was
ranging something between Rs8,000 and 10,000.
The company claimed thatthe beta crystalline form of achemical compound, called‘Imatinib Mesylate’, is a thera-peutic drug for chronic myeloidleukemia and certain kinds oftumours. The drug was mar-keted under the names“Glivec” or “Gleevec”.
The verdict by the apex courtended long-drawn legal battlewaged by the Novartis AG
which had first filed a patentappeal patent for ‘Imatinib Me-sylate’ in beta crystalline format the Chennai Patent Officeon July 17, 1998, claiming ad-ditional beneficial properties inthe drug.
“The submission is unac-ceptable both in law and onfacts,” Justice Alam, who wrotethe judgment on behalf ofbench, said, rejecting the pleathat the new form was an in-vention and carried enhanced
therapeutic value. “Now, whenall the pharmacological prop-erties of beta crystalline formof ‘Imatinib Mesylate’ areequally possessed by Imatinibin free base form or its salt,where is the question of thesubject product having any en-hanced efficacy over the knownsubstance of which it is a newform,” the bench asked.» Novartis, Page 8Related report, Pages 8, 15Edit: Landmark verdict, P10
SC dismisses Novartisbid for patent on ‘Glivec’Order to boost Indian cos selling cheaper cancer drug
NEW DELHI: Four hundredkilometres above the earth,Indian origin Nasa astronautSunita Williams missed someof her favourite things...earlymorning sea breeze caressingher face, the kiss of raindropson her skin...and her pet dogstoo.
What she missed most wasthe daily tryst with nature, on-board the International SpaceStation, an artificial and habit-able satellite which becameher home for 11 long months.The satellite has been circlingthe earth for more than 12years.
“I missed the morningwinds in your face. The feel ofsand in the toe while walkingon the beach with my dogs(Gorby, the Terrier, and Bailey,the Labrador). I missed theanimals more than my hus-band with whom I could com-municate from space,” shelaughed, at an interaction withschool children at the Nation-al Science Centre in Delhi onMonday.
The 47-year-old space-woman, who spent 322 daysin the ISS in two instalments
in 2006-07 and 2012, is on avisit to India covering Mum-bai, Kolkata and her ancestralvillage in the Mehsana districtof Gujarat.
On her desire to experiencenature while in space,Williams recalled how sheonce itched to get drenchedin the rain after seeing a bigrain cloud hovering over Mex-ico and how breathtaking washer first view of the earth fromspace.
Quizzed on her Indian con-
These are my favourite thingsmissed in space, says Sunita
New high
nection, the astronaut con-fessed to have carried a copyof the Bhagvat Gita, a figurineof Lord Ganesha and samosaswith her to space. “I haveGaneshas all over my houseand you cannot simply getover with Indian food,” shesaid.
She would not be flying any-time soon as she had to live onearth for some years to get ridof the cosmic radiation shewas exposed to while in space.» Sunita, Page 8
Nasa astronaut Sunita Williams interacts with students andteachers at the NSC in New Delhi on Monday. PTI
Petrol price cut by 111 paiseState-run Indian Oil Corpora-tion (IOC) on Monday re-duced the retail selling pricesof petrol by 111 paise per litrewith effect from midnightMonday. Petrol will now costRs 67.29 a litre as against theexisting Rs 68.31 in Delhi. InBangalore, it will be Rs 73.94.Details on Page 8
Senior priest foundmurdered in CityA senior Christian priest wasfound murdered at a seminaryat Malleswaram on Mondaymorning, DHNS reports fromBangalore. The body of Fr K JThomas, 64, the rector of StPeter’s Pontifical Seminary,was lying in a pool of blood in-side a room near his office-cum-residence.Details on Page 3
4 arrested in BSPleader murder caseFour people, including two sus-pected shooters, were arrestedin connection with the murderof Bahujan Samaj Party leaderDeepak Bhardwaj on Monday,but those who hired the themare yet to be nabbed, DHNS re-ports from New Delhi.Details on Page 8
In brief
NEW DELHI: Notwithstand-ing a hefty penalty imposedon it by the CompetitionCommission of India forabusing its “dominant” posi-tion to promote its commer-cial interests in the IndianPremier League (IPL), theBoard of Control for Cricketin India (BCCI) has seeming-ly continued with its mo-nopolistic financial prac-tices.
On the eve of the IPL VI sea-son, the BCCI, in a fresh noteaddressed to media housesacross the country on March
29, asked them to desist fromany activity that could amountto using any IPL logo or con-tent in a way that might bedeemed to be a commercially-driven activity.
Restrains print mediaA newspaper, for instance, can-not use a third party to adver-tise on a news page dedicatedto IPL coverage, or, no com-mercial logo can go along witha syndicated column, or ascore-card sponsored by an ad-vertiser, etc.
Stating that the BCCI en-joyed exclusive rights in theseregards, the BCCI note statedthat “it fully intends to and willenforce its rights against theunlicensed commercial utili-sation by third parties of theIPL, names, IPL marks andIPL proprietary content in
contravention of the rightsgranted by the BCCI-IPL to itssponsors.” It stated that theprint media was allowed toutilise the official logo only for“journalistic, news reportingand non-commercial purpos-es.”
The note was sent out byCopyright Integrity Advisory(India) Pvt Ltd on behalf of theBCCI-IPL.
It may be recalled, on Feb-ruary 8, the commission, on acomplaint from a cricket fan inDelhi, had held that the “BCCIhas abused its dominant posi-tion in contravention of Section4(2) (C)” of the CompetitionAct, 2002.
In its elaborate order, thecommission had held that theBCCI, as a legitimate regulatorof the game of cricket in India,was extending its monopoly
regulatory powers in organis-ing IPL, which is a private pro-fessional league.
In effect, the apex cricketbody was using its monopolyregulatory powers for protect-ing its own commercial inter-ests, it had said.
“The situation where theregulator is also the economicbeneficiary leading to role over-laps is definitely a competitionconcern,” the commission hadconcluded.
Imposing a hefty penalty ofRs 52.24 crore on the BCCI,the commission had, in its or-der, directed it, among others,to “cease and desist from usingits regulatory powers in anyway in the process of consider-ing and deciding any matter re-lating to its commercial activi-ties.”DH News Service
BCCI seeks to extend IPL monopolyDisregardsrecentcompetitionpanel order
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revival of hopes
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
■ Swiss firm Novartis hadchallenged Chennai-based patentoffice 2006 decision.
■ Had the firm won the case,Indian companies would have tostop making generic version ofthe blood-cancer drug
■ Verdict good for poor patients,say doctors
■ Novartis says it will not investin research and developmentin India
■ Section 3(d) of patent law onlyfor genuine inventions, says SC
Anand Grover, a lawyer for the Cancer Patients AidAssociation, who led the legal fight against Novartisin New Delhi on Monday. AP
Ministry wantsdope test on
VijenderSouth Koreavows ‘strong’ retaliation to North P13
Wheretime standsstill...
P9
FROM GRASSROOTS TO GALAXIES
Spectrum