Date post: | 16-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | magnus-lyons |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2014 Tech Meeting
Dan Fiser
2
Crop: Potatoes Location: Stockton Ca Dates: – Harvesting: July 2,2014
Objective: Evaluation of Intracept
Treatments:
#1) GSP
#2) GSP + 1 pt on seed piece
#3) GSP + 1pt on seed + 1pt foliar at tuber initiation
#4) GSP + 1 pt foliar at tuber initiation
Summary - The addition of Intracept at planting or at hooking or both did not improve overallnumber of tubers or total yield. However , Intracept treatments increased the number of Class “A” tubers which are the most valuable. Additionally the foliar application of Intracept at hooking reduced the number of low value class “C” tubers
Bakers A B C0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Size Class Distribution
Grower StandardPlantingFoliarPlanting + Foliar
# Tu
bers
Grower Standard
Planting Foliar Planting + Foliar4445464748495051525354
# Tubers per Sample
# Tubers
3
Trial : Intracept Crop: potatoes
Harvest Fruit Sugar Content
Grower Standard Planting Foliar Planting + Foliar4.8
5
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
6.4
Mean Harvest Weight
lb
Treatment and Rep
# tube
rsWeight
(lb)Weight
per tuber (lb)
1 - 1 66 8.42 0.12761 – 2 67 6.54 0.09761 – 3 41 5.06 0.12341 – 4 34 4.9 0.1441Trt 1 mean 52 6.23 0.12322 – 1 62 6.1 0.09842 – 2 44 5.86 0.13322 – 3 52 4.9 0.09422 – 4 53 5.36 0.1011Trt 2 mean 52.7
5 5.55 0.1067
3 – 1 39 4.46 0.11443 – 2 46 5.54 0.12043 – 3 47 5.08 0.10813 – 4 58 6.54 0.1128Trt 3 mean 47.5 5.41 0.11394 – 1 48 6.52 0.13584 – 2 58 7.46 0.12864 – 3 40 5.32 0.13304 - 4 46 5.48 0.1191Trt 4 mean 48 6.195 0.1291
4
Crop: Potatoes Location: Stockton Ca Dates: – Harvesting: July 2,2014
Objective: Evaluation of Intracept
Treatments:
#1) GSP
#2) GSP + 1 pt on seed piece
#3) GSP + 1pt on seed + 1pt foliar at tuber initiation
#4) GSP + 1 pt foliar at tuber initiation
Summary - The addition of Intracept at planting or at hooking or both did not improve overallnumber of tubers or total yield. However , Intracept treatments increased the number of Class “A” tubers which are the most valuable. Additionally the foliar application of Intracept at hooking reduced the number of low value class “C” tubers
5
Crop: Cotton Location: Tulare Lake Basin Dates(If applicable): – Harvesting: – First pick only
Objective: Evaluation of Brandt Smart Trio® on cotton
Treatments: 1 qt Brandt Smart Trio +– 4-28-14 – 32oz Honcho + Intrepid– 6-12-14– Wrangler + Steward
Brandt Smart Trio Results are within the 95% confidence level ,however the treated replications on average yielded higher than the untreated.
Grower Standard
Smart Trio
1780 1785 1790 1795 1800 1805 1810 1815
1792.5
1809
lb/acre
*Yield (lbs Lint/Acre) Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 5 Rep 6 Rep 7 Rep 8 Average
Smart Trio 1832 1793 1850 1756 1802 1828 1854 1758 1809Untreated 1791 1800 1791 1743 1791 1806 1823 1795 1793
Steric K on Navel Oranges
Cooperator- Gar Tootelian, Dennis McFarlin
Applied thru micro sprinklers : 10 gpa 8-29-2014 10 gpa 9-12-2014 Pre treat tissue samples taken 8-27-
2014
Dec 2014Tech meeting 6
Treatments #1) East Rep #2) West rep #3) GSP no additional K
Note : CAN 17 applied to all treatments
Steric K in Navel Oranges
Treatment Area
% Nitrogen % Phosphate % PotashPre-app Post-app Change Pre-app Post-app Change Pre-app Post-app Chang
eSteric K - East 2.94 2.97 +0.03 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.97 0.99 +0.02Steric K - West 2.76 2.82 +0.06 0.13 0.14 +0.01 1.46 1.25 -0.21Grower Stand. 2.74 2.67 -0.07 0.13 0.13 0.00 1.40 1.22 -0.18
Dec 20142014 tech mtg 7
Treatment Area PPM Zn PPM Mn PPM B % Ca % Mg PPM Fe PPM CuSteric K - East 89 47 145 5.1 0.45 114 23Steric K - West 92 48 166 5.29 0.42 127 20Grower Stand. 93 46 171 4.67 0.39 122 20
N-P-K Tissue Sample ResultsSecondary and Micronutrient Tissue Sample Results, Post-Application
Treatments may have contributed to an increased uptake of N & Ca
8
Crop: Oranges Location: Orange Cove CA Dates – Harvesting: November, 2104
Objective: Steric K on Navel Oranges
Treatments:
#1) GSP
#2) Rep #1 West
#3) Rep #2 East
Steric Avg
Steric East
Steric West
Grower Standard
11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14
12.61
12.31
12.91
13.79
Harvest Fruit Sugar Content
Deg Brix
Steric Avg
Steric K East
Steric K West
Grower Standard
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
48.53
51.00
46.06
45.63
Harvest Fruit Weight
lb/100 fruit
Treatments show a positive effect on fruit size which may have contributed to a Diluted sugar content.
Thank you
www.brandt.co