+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate...

2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate...

Date post: 10-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
25
5/29/2015 1 2015 Joint PIE / BUDGET Meeting May 28, 2015 Reflection & Recommendations / May 8, 2014 Recommendations Recommendations Responsible Parties and Committees 1. Use the new Student Equity, Access, and Completion Committee to identify ways to improve Scorecard measures. Investigate the possibility of awarding certificates without requiring an application. Student Equity Access & Completion Committee Dean of Admissions & Records 1. Research causes for low completion and transfer. Research course coding to see if courses have the correct CTE codes. Research the barriers to awarding certificates Office of Research & Planning 1. Research course coding to see if courses have the correct CTE codes. Academic Affairs 1. Institutionalize the connection of cohort programs with campus as a whole. Senate 1. Identify colleges that have improved the basic skills progression rates and find out the strategies they used to make the improvement. Office of Research & Planning Senate 1. Create a process to identify and evaluate non-contractual reassigned time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about Scorecard metrics college-wide, for example at Academic Senate, Divisional Council, Division meetings, SEAC, Fall flex day, Spring summit. Office of Research & Planning Student Equity Access & Completion Committee Senate 5/29/2015 2
Transcript
Page 1: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

1

2015 Joint PIE / BUDGET

Meeting

May 28, 2015

Reflection & Recommendations /May 8, 2014 Recommendations

Recommendations Responsible Parties and Committees

1. Use the new Student Equity, Access, and Completion Committee to identify ways to improve Scorecard measures. Investigate the possibility of awarding certificates without

requiring an application.

Student Equity Access & Completion CommitteeDean of Admissions & Records

1. Research causes for low completion and transfer. Research course coding to see if courses have the correct CTE

codes. Research the barriers to awarding certificates

Office of Research & Planning

1. Research course coding to see if courses have the correct CTE codes. Academic Affairs

1. Institutionalize the connection of cohort programs with campus as a whole. Senate

1. Identify colleges that have improved the basic skills progression rates and find out the strategies they used to make the improvement.

Office of Research & PlanningSenate

1. Create a process to identify and evaluate non-contractual reassigned time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase.

SenatePlanning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee

1. Extend the discussion about Scorecard metrics college-wide, for example at Academic Senate, Divisional Council, Division meetings, SEAC, Fall flex day, Spring summit.

Office of Research & PlanningStudent Equity Access & Completion CommitteeSenate

5/29/2015 2

Page 2: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

2

Accountability RequirementsAccountability Instrument Source

Institution Set Standards ACCJC (2013)

Scorecard State (2014)

Equity Plan State (2014)

IEPI State (2015)

District Strategic Plan & Metrics District

Educational Master Plan & Metrics College (2014)

ISLOs ACCJC

Program Review ACCJC

5/29/2015 3

Evaluating Effectiveness / 2015

• Financial Resources / FTES

• Strategic Plans• District Strategic Plan• Educational Master Plan

• Standards and Targets• IEPI (Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative)

• Institution Set Standards

• Institutional Learning Outcomes

5/29/2015 4

Page 3: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

3

Financial Re$ources& FTES

5/29/2015 5

Expenditure, Ending Balance, FTES

Expenditure EndingBalance

FTES Generated

FTES Funded

FY 2008 (6/30/08) $32,458,367 $582,074 7,265 7,226

FY 2009 (6/30/09) $33,259,717 - $596,119 8,209 7,334

FY 2010 (6/30/10) $29,970,701 $163,257 7,541 7,061

FY 2011 (6/30/11) $29,117,025 $1,864,130 7,674 7,212

FY 2012 (6/30/12) $28,965,067 $1,691,474 6,781 6,685

FY 2013 (6/30/13) $29,746,486 $2,422,660 6,774 6,747

FY 2014 (6/30/14) $33,198,144 $1,359,536 6,999 6,899FY 2015 (estimated

as of April 2015) $34,371,787 $232,266 7,227 7,225

5/29/2015 6

Page 4: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

4

Expenditure, Ending Balance, FTES

7,265

8,209

7,541 7,674

6,781 6,774 6,999 7,227

7,226 7,3347,061 7,212

6,685 6,747 6,8997,225

$32,458,367 $33,259,717

$29,970,701 $29,117,025

$28,965,067

$29,746,486

$33,198,144 $34,371,787

$582,074 ($596,119) $163,257 

$1,864,130  $1,691,474  $2,422,660 $1,359,536 

$232,266 

($5,000,000)

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

$20,000,000

$25,000,000

$30,000,000

$35,000,000

$40,000,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

ACTUALFY 2008

(6/30/08)

ACTUALFY 2009

(6/30/09)

ACTUALFY 2010

(6/30/10)

ACTUALFY 2011

(6/30/11)

ACTUALFY 2012

(6/30/12)

ACTUALFY 2013

(6/30/13)

ACTUALFY 2014

(6/30/14)

ESTIMATEDFY 2015

(as of April2015)

En

din

g B

alance

/ Exp

en

diture

Full-

Time

Equi

vale

nt S

tud

ents

(FTE

S)

FTES Generated FTES Funded Expenditure Ending Balance

5/29/2015 7

Bond Fund Highlights

5/29/2015 8

Source: Facilities Committee Budget Report, 5/20/2015, Excerpts

Page 5: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

5

Bond Funds Overview

95/29/2015

Completed Projects

105/29/2015

Page 6: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

6

Funds Reallocated to These Projects

115/29/2015

StrategicPlans

5/29/2015 12

Page 7: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

7

Strategic Plans

WestEducational Master Plan

District Strategic

Plan

5/29/2015 13

Strategic Plans / AlignmentDistrict Strategic Plan Goal

Goal 1Access and Preparation for Success

Goal 2Teaching andLearning for Success

Goal 3Organizational Effectiveness

Goal 4Resources and Collaboration

WESTEducational Master Plan Goal

Strategic Direction 3Programs and Services Responsive to Student Needs

Strategic Direction 1Dedication to Learning

Strategic Direction 2Culture of Continuous Improvement

StrategicDirection 4Collaboration, Engagement, and Respect

Strategic Direction 2Culture of Continuous Improvement

StrategicDirection 5Connections with Communities

5/29/2015 14

Page 8: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

8

Strategic Plans / AlignmentDistrict Strategic Plan Goal

Goal 1Access and Preparation for Success

Goal 2Teaching andLearning for Success

Goal 3Organizational Effectiveness

Goal 4Resources and Collaboration

WESTEducational Master Plan Goal

Strategic Direction 3Programs and Services Responsive to Student Needs

Strategic Direction 1Dedication to Learning

Strategic Direction 2Culture of Continuous Improvement

StrategicDirection 4Collaboration, Engagement, and Respect

Strategic Direction 2Culture of Continuous Improvement

StrategicDirection 5Connections with Communities

5/29/2015 15

District Strategic Plan MetricsGoal 1 / Access & Preparation for Success

Objective / Measure District WEST WESTThree Year Change

1.1.2 / Eligible students receiving Pell Grant 71% 63% -1%

1.2.1 / New students completing English Assessment in 1st term or before

73% 70% +8%

1.2.1 / New students completing Math Assessment in 1st term or before

75% 72% +8%

1.3.1 / New students completing one English and Math class in 1st year 19% 18% -1%

1.3.2 / Persistence, Fall to Spring 87% 84% +3%1.3.2 / Persistence, Fall to Fall 75% 70% +6%

5/29/2015 16

Page 9: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

9

District Strategic Plan MetricsGoal 2 / Teaching & Learning for Success

Objective / Measure District WEST WESTThree Year Change

2.2.1 / New students completing 30 units in 3 years 62% 52% +1%

2.2.1 / New students completing 60 units in 3 years 29% 19% 0%

2.2.2 / New students successfullycompleting English 101 & Math 125 in 3 years

26% 16% +3%

2.2.2 / New students successfully completing English 101 & Math 125 in 6 years

33% 19% +2%

2.2.3 / Completion rate in 3 years 13% 11% -4%2.2.3 / Completion rate in 6 years 33% 30% +2%

5/29/2015 18

Targets&

Standards5/29/2015 20

Page 10: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

10

Targets & Standards

Institution Set Standards

…the identified level of performance determined by the

institution to be acceptable…

…a measure the institution can and does use in assessing both institutional and programmatic performance in these areas…

5/29/2015 21

Targets & Standards

I E P IInstitutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative

…a framework of indicators designed to measure the ongoing condition of a community college’s operational environment in the following areas:

(1) Accreditation status.(2) Fiscal viability.(3) Student performance and outcomes.(4) Programmatic compliance with state and federal guidelines.

5/29/2015 22

Page 11: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

11

Targets & Standards

• Institution Set StandardsStandard we hold ourselves to not fall below

– If we fall below, we must examine & take action

PIE Committee recommended standards to College Council after examining trend data

• IEPIAspirational targets we strive toward

Four percentage-point increase in six years, recommended by PIE, approved by College Council

We (The College) set the standards & targets

5/29/2015 23

Targets & Standards2013-2014 3-year Average Target/Standard

Inst

itutio

n Se

t St

anda

rds

. Successful Course Completion Rate 62.4% 62.8% 60% Standards

. # Students Earning Degrees (Unduplicated) 329 370 330

. # Students Earning Certificates (Unduplicated) 203 184 116

. All Awards (Degrees & Certificates, Undup.) 561 524 445

. Transfers to 4-year institutions (UC / CSU) 202 196 175

Inst

itutio

nal E

ffect

iven

ess P

artn

ersh

ip

Initi

ativ

e (IE

PI)

Scor

ecar

d

. Completion Rate / College-Prepared 68% 64.9% 69%

Targets(for 2015-2016)

. Completion Rate / Unprepared for College 32.5% 33% 34%

. Completion Rate / Overall 37.8% 38% 39%

. Remedial Rate / Math 18.7% 19.1% 20%

. Remedial Rate / English 31.9% 32.6% 33%

. Remedial Rate / ESL 22.1% 24.9% 23%

. Career Technical Education Rate 40% 38.6% 41%

Dat

amar

t . Successful Course Completion 61.2% 61.2% 63%. # Students Earning Degrees 426 400 430. # Students Earning Certificates 266 245 277. # Students who Transfer to 4-year institutions 267 302 270

5/29/2015 24

Page 12: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

12

Institution Set StandardsSuccessful Course Completion Rates

63.0%62.3%

59.8%

61.5% 61.5% 62.1% 61.9%62.7% 63.1% 63.2%

62.0%63.1%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%Su

cces

sful

Cou

rse

Com

plet

ion

Rate

s

Standard: 60%

5/29/2015 25

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

Assoc. Degree 360 349 313 325 341 397 342 325 392 331 389Certificate 110 75 67 90 86 105 110 172 133 217 203Undup Awards ** 459 412 368 402 413 487 434 484 496 515 561

360 349313 325

341

397

342325

392

331

389

11075 67

90 86105 110

172

133

217 203

459

412

368402 413

487

434

484 496515

561

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Undu

plic

ated

Stu

dent

Cou

nt

Institution Set StandardsDegrees & Certificates Awarded

Standard: 330 Degrees

Standard: 116 Certs.

Standard: 445 Awards

5/29/2015 26

Page 13: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

13

89-90

90-91

91-92

92-93

93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

11-12

12-13

13-14

UC/ CSU 257 289 230 246 258 273 264 261 283 245 243 232 222 212 216 236 255 232 240 248 177 192 212 174 202ISP & OOS 45 57 74 84 105 107 127 147 158 162 151 145 178 171 150 103 65

257

289

230246

258273 264 261

283

245 243232

222212 216

236255

232 240 248

177192

212

174

202

4557

7484

105 107127

147158 162

151 145

178 171150

103

65

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Tran

sfer

Cou

nt

Institution Set StandardsTransfers

to Campuses of UC and CSU, In-State Private (ISP), and Out of State (OOS) Colleges and Universities

Standard175 Transfers to UC and CSU, Annually

5/29/2015 27

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014City 61.7% 61.3% 62.4% 65.7% 65.2%East 68.0% 68.1% 68.8% 72.6% 71.8%Harbor 64.9% 64.1% 64.8% 67.4% 66.1%Mission 63.4% 64.5% 65.5% 69.2% 66.0%Pierce 67.7% 67.7% 67.7% 69.8% 69.4%Southwest 56.1% 58.8% 59.7% 63.4% 61.4%Trade 63.5% 65.4% 66.6% 69.2% 68.7%Valley 66.1% 66.4% 67.3% 69.8% 69.3%West 58.3% 57.5% 59.4% 63.2% 63.2%

58.3% 57.5%59.4%

63.2% 63.2%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

Com

plet

ion

Rate

-O

vera

ll

IEPI / WestCourse Success Rate

5/29/2015 28

6-year Target: 66%

1-yearTarget: 64%

Page 14: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

14

IEPI / District ComparisonCourse Success Rate

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014City 61.7% 61.3% 62.4% 65.7% 65.2%East 68.0% 68.1% 68.8% 72.6% 71.8%Harbor 64.9% 64.1% 64.8% 67.4% 66.1%Mission 63.4% 64.5% 65.5% 69.2% 66.0%Pierce 67.7% 67.7% 67.7% 69.8% 69.4%Southwest 56.1% 58.8% 59.7% 63.4% 61.4%Trade 63.5% 65.4% 66.6% 69.2% 68.7%Valley 66.1% 66.4% 67.3% 69.8% 69.3%West 58.3% 57.5% 59.4% 63.2% 63.2%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%C

ompl

etio

n Ra

te -

Ove

rall

5/29/2015 29

6-year Target: 66%

1-yearTarget: 64%

IEPI / WestScorecard Completion Rate

Overall (All Students in Cohort)

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 38.2% 37.1% 37.2% 39.5% 33.9%East 42.1% 40.9% 42.4% 41.9% 38.1%Harbor 43.6% 41.3% 45.1% 40.1% 38.5%Mission 38.3% 37.3% 35.0% 33.3% 34.7%Pierce 49.9% 53.3% 53.1% 50.9% 47.8%Southwest 31.6% 32.3% 35.5% 31.4% 31.1%Trade 29.0% 32.5% 33.1% 32.7% 30.0%Valley 44.0% 43.9% 42.3% 42.5% 42.1%West 39.7% 36.0% 39.2% 37.1% 37.8%

39.7%36.0%

39.2% 37.1% 37.8%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

Com

plet

ion

Rate

-O

vera

ll

5/29/2015 30

6-year Target: 42%

1-yearTarget: 39%

Page 15: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

15

IEPI / District ComparisonScorecard Completion Rate

Overall (All Students in Cohort)

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 38.2% 37.1% 37.2% 39.5% 33.9%East 42.1% 40.9% 42.4% 41.9% 38.1%Harbor 43.6% 41.3% 45.1% 40.1% 38.5%Mission 38.3% 37.3% 35.0% 33.3% 34.7%Pierce 49.9% 53.3% 53.1% 50.9% 47.8%Southwest 31.6% 32.3% 35.5% 31.4% 31.1%Trade 29.0% 32.5% 33.1% 32.7% 30.0%Valley 44.0% 43.9% 42.3% 42.5% 42.1%West 39.7% 36.0% 39.2% 37.1% 37.8%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%C

ompl

etio

n Ra

te -

Ove

rall

5/29/2015 31

6-year Target: 42%

1-yearTarget: 39%

IEPI / WestScorecard Completion RateCollege Prepared Students

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 66.3% 58.7% 63.5% 68.1% 59.3%East 72.0% 70.1% 72.7% 69.9% 65.4%Harbor 73.7% 65.3% 71.0% 70.4% 53.5%Mission 69.4% 64.4% 74.5% 63.2% 60.2%Pierce 77.7% 79.5% 80.0% 75.9% 73.7%Southwest 68.6% 63.0% 81.9% 66.7% 63.3%Trade 80.0% 66.7% 73.8% 70.2% 67.9%Valley 68.9% 71.4% 70.1% 69.7% 64.9%West 67.5% 68.1% 63.4% 63.4% 68.0%

67.5% 68.1%63.4% 63.4%

68.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

Com

plet

ion

Rate

–C

olle

ge P

repa

red

5/29/2015 32

6-year Target: 72%

1-yearTarget: 69%

Page 16: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

16

IEPI / District ComparisonScorecard Completion RateCollege Prepared Students

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 66.3% 58.7% 63.5% 68.1% 59.3%East 72.0% 70.1% 72.7% 69.9% 65.4%Harbor 73.7% 65.3% 71.0% 70.4% 53.5%Mission 69.4% 64.4% 74.5% 63.2% 60.2%Pierce 77.7% 79.5% 80.0% 75.9% 73.7%Southwest 68.6% 63.0% 81.9% 66.7% 63.3%Trade 80.0% 66.7% 73.8% 70.2% 67.9%Valley 68.9% 71.4% 70.1% 69.7% 64.9%West 67.5% 68.1% 63.4% 63.4% 68.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%C

ompl

etio

n Ra

te –

Col

lege

Pre

pare

d

5/29/2015 33

6-year Target: 72%

1-yearTarget: 69%

IEPI / WestScorecard Completion Rate

Unprepared Students

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 34.4% 33.7% 33.2% 35.9% 31.3%East 38.4% 37.2% 38.1% 38.1% 35.2%Harbor 35.6% 35.0% 37.6% 33.2% 35.1%Mission 33.6% 34.1% 30.4% 30.6% 32.2%Pierce 43.0% 46.5% 45.6% 45.2% 41.5%Southwest 29.6% 30.4% 30.5% 28.9% 29.0%Trade 27.5% 31.2% 30.7% 29.0% 27.4%Valley 37.5% 37.0% 35.4% 35.8% 35.9%West 35.6% 29.6% 34.4% 32.0% 32.5%

35.6%

29.6%34.4%

32.0% 32.5%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

Rem

edia

l Pro

gres

s Ra

te -

Mat

h

5/29/2015 34

6-year Target: 37%

1-yearTarget: 34%

Page 17: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

17

IEPI / District ComparisonScorecard Completion Rate

Unprepared Students

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 34.4% 33.7% 33.2% 35.9% 31.3%East 38.4% 37.2% 38.1% 38.1% 35.2%Harbor 35.6% 35.0% 37.6% 33.2% 35.1%Mission 33.6% 34.1% 30.4% 30.6% 32.2%Pierce 43.0% 46.5% 45.6% 45.2% 41.5%Southwest 29.6% 30.4% 30.5% 28.9% 29.0%Trade 27.5% 31.2% 30.7% 29.0% 27.4%Valley 37.5% 37.0% 35.4% 35.8% 35.9%West 35.6% 29.6% 34.4% 32.0% 32.5%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%Re

med

ial P

rogr

ess

Rate

-M

ath

5/29/2015 35

6-year Target: 37%

1-yearTarget: 34%

IEPI / WestRemedial Progress Rate

Math

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 21.1% 21.9% 23.4% 24.3% 24.2%East 28.8% 28.1% 29.8% 32.7% 37.9%Harbor 37.4% 42.4% 36.8% 38.6% 37.7%Mission 21.5% 24.3% 26.4% 28.7% 29.0%Pierce 29.9% 32.5% 34.5% 37.1% 35.8%Southwest 18.5% 14.3% 15.6% 14.2% 14.9%Trade 8.1% 8.9% 9.7% 7.5% 7.9%Valley 23.5% 24.6% 23.9% 26.5% 26.4%West 17.2% 14.7% 19.1% 19.4% 18.7%

17.2%14.7%

19.1% 19.4% 18.7%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Rem

edia

l Pro

gres

s Ra

te -

Mat

h

5/29/2015 36

6-year Target: 23%

1-yearTarget: 20%

Page 18: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

18

IEPI / District ComparisonRemedial Progress Rate

Math

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 21.1% 21.9% 23.4% 24.3% 24.2%East 28.8% 28.1% 29.8% 32.7% 37.9%Harbor 37.4% 42.4% 36.8% 38.6% 37.7%Mission 21.5% 24.3% 26.4% 28.7% 29.0%Pierce 29.9% 32.5% 34.5% 37.1% 35.8%Southwest 18.5% 14.3% 15.6% 14.2% 14.9%Trade 8.1% 8.9% 9.7% 7.5% 7.9%Valley 23.5% 24.6% 23.9% 26.5% 26.4%West 17.2% 14.7% 19.1% 19.4% 18.7%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%Re

med

ial P

rogr

ess

Rate

-M

ath

5/29/2015 37

6-year Target: 23%

1-yearTarget: 20%

IEPI / WestRemedial Progress Rate

English

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 36.0% 34.2% 36.6% 39.2% 36.9%East 40.2% 44.9% 44.8% 44.3% 42.0%Harbor 39.7% 40.6% 39.3% 36.2% 39.6%Mission 32.7% 30.3% 31.7% 38.0% 31.4%Pierce 45.5% 50.4% 50.0% 51.1% 50.5%Southwest 23.9% 22.1% 24.0% 25.5% 22.1%Trade 21.4% 19.8% 20.3% 21.4% 19.3%Valley 38.7% 38.8% 39.5% 41.5% 40.0%West 31.2% 28.9% 31.3% 34.5% 31.9%

31.2%28.9%

31.3%34.5%

31.9%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

Rem

edia

l Pro

gres

s Ra

te -

Engl

ish

5/29/2015 38

6-year Target: 36%

1-yearTarget: 33%

Page 19: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

19

IEPI / District ComparisonRemedial Progress Rate

English

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 36.0% 34.2% 36.6% 39.2% 36.9%East 40.2% 44.9% 44.8% 44.3% 42.0%Harbor 39.7% 40.6% 39.3% 36.2% 39.6%Mission 32.7% 30.3% 31.7% 38.0% 31.4%Pierce 45.5% 50.4% 50.0% 51.1% 50.5%Southwest 23.9% 22.1% 24.0% 25.5% 22.1%Trade 21.4% 19.8% 20.3% 21.4% 19.3%Valley 38.7% 38.8% 39.5% 41.5% 40.0%West 31.2% 28.9% 31.3% 34.5% 31.9%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%Re

med

ial P

rogr

ess

Rate

-En

glish

5/29/2015 39

6-year Target: 36%

1-yearTarget: 33%

IEPI / WestCTE Completion Rate

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 45.6% 44.9% 45.0% 46.0% 44.0%East 43.0% 45.1% 46.5% 48.1% 48.7%Harbor 61.4% 60.6% 60.1% 57.8% 57.4%Mission 43.8% 44.7% 46.2% 44.8% 51.5%Pierce 57.0% 53.2% 55.7% 51.3% 48.9%Southwest 55.7% 53.9% 55.6% 57.1% 55.0%Trade 44.9% 43.2% 41.7% 39.3% 38.9%Valley 56.0% 53.7% 54.8% 57.1% 53.0%West 48.9% 39.1% 38.7% 37.1% 40.0%

48.9%

39.1% 38.7% 37.1%40.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

CTE

Com

plet

ion

Rate

5/29/2015 42

6-year Target: 44%

1-yearTarget: 41%

Page 20: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

20

IEPI / District ComparisonCTE Completion Rate

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009City 45.6% 44.9% 45.0% 46.0% 44.0%East 43.0% 45.1% 46.5% 48.1% 48.7%Harbor 61.4% 60.6% 60.1% 57.8% 57.4%Mission 43.8% 44.7% 46.2% 44.8% 51.5%Pierce 57.0% 53.2% 55.7% 51.3% 48.9%Southwest 55.7% 53.9% 55.6% 57.1% 55.0%Trade 44.9% 43.2% 41.7% 39.3% 38.9%Valley 56.0% 53.7% 54.8% 57.1% 53.0%West 48.9% 39.1% 38.7% 37.1% 40.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%C

TE C

ompl

etio

n Ra

te

5/29/2015 43

6-year Target: 44%

1-yearTarget: 41%

InstitutionStudent Learning

Outcomes

5/29/2015 44

Page 21: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

21

Institution Student Learning Outcomes

45

A.Critical Thinking: Analyze problems by differentiating fact from opinions, using evidence, and using sound reasoning to specify multiple solutions and their consequences.

B. Communication: Effectively communicate thought in a clear, well-organized manner to persuade, inform, and convey ideas in academic, work, family and community settings.

C.Quantitative Reasoning: Identify, analyze, and solve problems that are quantitative in nature.

D. Self-awareness/Interpersonal Skills: Apply self-assessment and reflection strategies to interpersonal, work, community, career, and educational pathways.

E. Civic Responsibility: Apply the principles of civility to situations in the contexts of work, family, community and the global world.

5/29/2015

Institution Student Learning Outcomes

46

F. Technical Competence: Utilize the appropriate technology effectively for informational, academic, personal, and professional needs. Use competent technique in a musical performance.

G.Cultural Diversity: Respectfully engage with other cultures in an effort to understand them.

H. Ethics: Practice and demonstrate standards of personal and professional integrity, honesty and fairness; apply ethical principles in submission of all college work.

I. Aesthetics: Use multiple modes of inquiry and approaches to experience and to engage with the arts and nature; develop and express personal creative visions throughout all aspects of one's life.5/29/2015

Page 22: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

22

ILOs / Districtwide Student Survey

47

B. Communication

G. Cultural Diversity

B. CommunicationA. Critical Thinking

C. Quantitative ReasoningF. Technical Competence

D. Self-AwarenessG. Cultural Diversity

E. Civic Responsibility

ILOs / Districtwide Student Survey

48

Page 23: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

23

ILOs / Districtwide Student Survey

49

ILOs / Districtwide Student SurveyPositive ILO Response by Number of Units Completed (Fall 2014)

50

Page 24: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

24

Reflections & Recommendations

5/29/2015 51

May 28, 2015 RecommendationsRecommendations Responsible Parties and Committees

5/29/2015 52

Page 25: 2015 Joint Meeting Presentation -final · time, such as FPIP chair and ILO Poster Showcase. Senate Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Committee 1. Extend the discussion about

5/29/2015

25

fin5/29/2015 53


Recommended