2015 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD

F I R S T S E S S I O N O F T H E 1 1 4 T H C O N G R E S S

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org

2015 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL

SCORECARD

LCV SCORECARD ADVISORY COMMITTEE *

LCV ISSUES & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE *

LCV BOARD OF DIRECTORS *

* Organizations are shown for identification purposes only

JOHN H. ADAMSNatural Resources Defense Council

PAUL AUSTINConservation Minnesota & Conservation Minnesota Voter Center

BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARYFriends of the Earth

THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERTThe Accord Group

THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, CHAIRCenter for American Progress

BRENDON CECHOVICWestern Conservation Foundation

CARRIE CLARKNorth Carolina League of Conservation Voters

MANNY DIAZLydecker Diaz

GEORGE T. FRAMPTON, JR.Covington & Burling, LLP

WADE GREENE, HONORARYRockefeller Family & Associates

RAMPA R. HORMELEnlyst Fund

JOHN HUNTING, HONORARYJohn Hunting & Associates

MICHAEL KIESCHNICKCREDO Mobile

MARK MAGAÑAGreenLatinos

PETE MAYSMITHConservation Colorado

WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARYThe McIntosh Foundation

WILLIAM H. MEADOWS IIIThe Wilderness Society

REUBEN MUNGERVision Ridge Partners, LLC

BILL ROBERTSCorridor Partners, LLC

LARRY ROCKEFELLERAmerican Conservation Association

THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, HONORARY CHAIRBarclays Capital

KERRY SCHUMANNWisconsin League of Conservation Voters

LAURA TURNER SEYDELTurner Foundation

TRIP VAN NOPPENEarthjustice

KATHLEEN WELCHCorridor Partners, LLC

REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOODHip Hop Caucus

BRENT BLACKWELDERFriends of the Earth

THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNERCenter for American Progress

DAVID GOLSTONNatural Resources Defense Council

RUTH HENNIGThe John Merck Fund

MARK MAGAÑAGreenLatinos

REUBEN MUNGERVision Ridge Partners, LLC

KERRY SCHUMANNWisconsin League of Conservation Voters

TRIP VAN NOPPENEarthjustice

CAROL ANDRESSEnvironmental Defense Fund

ANNA AURILIOEnvironment America

KRISTEN BRENGELNational Parks Conservation Association

ROBERT COWINUnion of Concerned Scientists

ROBERT DEWEYDefenders of Wildlife

MARTY HAYDENEarthjustice

ALLISON HAYSUnion of Concerned Scientists

CRAIG LASHERPopulation Action International

MELINDA PIERCESierra Club

ALAN ROWSOMEThe Wilderness Society

JOSHUA SAKSNational Wildlife Federation

ERIK SCHNEIDERNational Audubon Society

BEN SCHREIBERFriends of the Earth

CINDY SHOGANAlaska Wilderness League

SCOTT SLESINGERNatural Resources Defense Council

CONTENTS

1. ANALYSIS

Overview of the 1st Session of the 114th Congress 3

Voting Summary 6

2. SENATE SCORES

Vote Descriptions 10

Senate Votes 16

3. HOUSE SCORES

Vote Descriptions 28

House Votes 38

The nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has

published a National Environmental Scorecard every

Congress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders of

the environmental movement following the first Earth Day.

LCV works to turn environmental values into national, state and local

priorities.

This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objec-

tive, factual information about the most important environmental legis-

lation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members

of the first session of the 114th Congress. This Scorecard represents the

consensus of experts from about 20 respected environmental and con-

servation organizations who selected the key votes on which members of

Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most important issues

of the year, including energy, climate change, public health, public lands

and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The

votes included in this Scorecard presented members of Congress with a

real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environ-

mental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes

consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded

votes occurred.

Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their

time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to

our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Score-

card Advisory Committee for their valuable input.

Cover images from left to right and top to bottom: Flickr/Backbone Campaign (altered); Istock princess-dlaf; AP Images /Alex Brandon; Flickr/US Department of State(altered); Flickr/Sheila Sund (altered); © White House Photo / Alamy Stock Photo; Istock/ bjdlzx; LCV/Staff; Architect of the Capitol.

IMAGE FROM FLICKR/BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (ALTERED).

IMAGE FROM FLICKR/OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE (ALTERED).

1. AN

ALY

SIS

2015 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 3

2005 OVERVIEW 2015 OVERVIEW

Without a doubt, 2015 was a historic year for the environment and public health. To start with the

good news—and there is a lot of it—President Obama demonstrated incredible leadership on many

fronts, especially when it came to confronting the climate crisis. In August, he finalized the Clean Pow-

er Plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants—the single largest step our nation has ever taken

to address climate change. In September, he welcomed Pope Francis to Washington to deliver powerful

remarks on the moral imperative to act on climate change. In November, after Secretary of State John

Kerry found that the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline was not in our country’s national interest, Presi-

dent Obama rejected this dirty and dangerous pipeline once and for all. In December, thanks in large

part to the president’s commitment to addressing the climate crisis at home and abroad, nearly 200

countries came together in Paris to forge a truly game-changing international climate change agree-

ment. President Obama also finalized the Clean Water Rule to protect the drinking water that one in

three Americans rely on, designated six national monuments including California’s Berryessa Snow

Mountain and Nevada’s Basin and Range, finalized management plans that lay the groundwork for

protecting sagebrush habitat in eleven western states, began to address methane pollution from the oil

and gas sector and coal-mining on public lands, cancelled Arctic Ocean lease sales following Shell’s

abandonment of its drilling efforts, and so much more.

What makes all of this administrative progress not

just so impressive but also so necessary is that President

Obama accomplished it while simultaneously battling

the most anti-environmental Congress in our nation’s

history. While the extreme Republican leadership in the

U.S. House of Representatives has already been waging

war on the environment and public health for years, the

U.S. Senate, led by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-

NV), had served as a backstop against the vast majority

of these attacks and prevented them from ever reaching

the president’s desk. But as is often said, elections have

consequences, and that was thrown into sharp relief when

control of the Senate shifted to climate change denier

Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

Majority Leader McConnell wasted no time getting to

work on behalf of his polluter allies, making the Senate’s

very first order of business a bill to approve the Keystone

XL pipeline. Choosing to start the new Congress with this

harmful legislation was unfortunate; however, the debate

and amendments offered on the bill provided an opportu-

nity for senators to take a stand on climate change, clean

energy, clean water, public lands, wildlife and other im-

portant environmental issues. In fact, for only the second

time in LCV history, we issued a Special Edition Scorecard

4 scorecard.lcv.org | 2015 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV

for a single piece of legislation in February of 2015 as soon

as the Senate completed debate on the bill.

As it turned out, the Keystone debate was just the

opening salvo in Leader McConnell’s war on the environ-

ment, and over the course of the year the Senate cast an as-

tounding number of votes on the environment and public

health. Indeed, the 2015 National Environmental Score-

card includes 25 Senate votes, the second highest number

of Senate votes ever included (the record was 26 votes in

1977) and significantly more Senate votes than are typi-

cally included in the Scorecard, reflecting the breadth and

depth of attacks both on our cornerstone environmental

protections and on the Obama administration’s signifi-

cant progress.

While the Senate portion of the 2015 Scorecard is night

and day from the Senate Scorecards of the last several

years, the House portion looked all too similar to the

Scorecards of the last few years. For the fourth time in five

years, the House included an astounding 35 votes—once

again earning the dubious distinction of a tie for the larg-

est number of House votes ever included.

Both chambers seemingly left no environmental issue

untouched in 2015. Attacks on our cornerstone environ-

mental laws included the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water

Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endan-

gered Species Act, and the Antiquities Act. And despite

the fact that 2014 and 2015 were the two hottest years

on record and included a wave of climate-change-fueled

extreme weather events—including devastating droughts

in California, forest fires across the West, and toxic algae

blooms—far too many members of Congress continue to

deny the basic science of climate change and used every

legislative trick in the book to try to block the Clean Pow-

er Plan and other climate progress. There were also votes

to dramatically increase fossil fuel production at a time

when it is clearer than ever that we need to keep dirty fu-

els in the ground and under the ocean and accelerate our

transition to clean energy.

Fortunately, in virtually every instance, our allies in

Congress were able to block these nefarious bills and

amendments except for a couple of Congressional Re-

view Act resolutions of disapproval—an extreme and

rarely-utilized procedural maneuver—that only required

a simple majority vote in the Senate and thus passed the

Congress and were vetoed by President Obama. Not only

did environmental champions in Congress block an as-

tonishing array of attacks, they also spoke out more force-

fully than ever—whether on the House and Senate floor,

in their districts and states, or in the press—about the ur-

gent need to protect the environment and act on climate.

While there was very little actual legislating over the

course of the year, one exception was the year-end bud-

get and tax package, which was a real mixed bag for the

environment. LCV strongly opposed lifting the crude oil

export ban—a massive handout to Big Oil that incentiv-

izes drilling—but the package also included badly-needed

multi-year extensions of clean energy tax credits and a

short-term reauthorization of America’s best parks pro-

gram, the Land and Water Conservation Fund. As part

of the deal, more than 100 extreme anti-environmental

riders were also kept out of the bill.

As we begin 2016, the stakes have never been higher

when it comes to protecting the environment and public

health, but the opportunities have never been greater. We

commend the Obama administration and our allies in

Congress and will double down on our work with them

to ensure that the United States continues to lead the way

when it comes to combating the climate crisis, transition-

ing to a clean energy economy, and protecting our air, wa-

ter, lands, and wildlife. Onward!

1. AN

ALY

SIS


IMAGE FROM FLICKR/U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (ALTERED).


VOTING SUMMARY

2015 STATE AVERAGES

S EN ATE

HOUSE

STATE SENATE HOUSEAlabama 4 13 Alaska 2 6 Arizona 2 36 Arkansas 0 3 California 94 69 Colorado 50 40 Connecticut 100 96 Delaware 88 94 Florida 42 36 Georgia 0 23 Hawaii 98 94 Idaho 0 4 Illinois 70 51 Indiana 34 22 Iowa 2 26 Kansas 0 0 Kentucky 4 18 Louisiana 0 15 Maine 80 54 Maryland 96 81 Massachusetts 100 97 Michigan 100 37 Minnesota 100 47 Mississippi 0 22 Missouri 40 23 Montana 42 3 Nebraska 0 14 Nevada 8 26 New Hampshire 76 50 New Jersey 100 52 New Mexico 94 60 New York 100 69 North Carolina 4 24 North Dakota 20 0 Ohio 52 26 Oklahoma 2 4 Oregon 96 69 Pennsylvania 44 30 Rhode Island 100 99 South Carolina 6 14 South Dakota 2 3 Tennessee 14 21 Texas 0 24 Utah 2 1 Vermont 100 94 Virginia 84 28 Washington 96 58 West Virginia 22 5 Wisconsin 50 35 Wyoming 0 3

1. AN

ALY

SIS


Highest House Delegations:Rhode Island 99% · Massachusetts 97% · Connecticut 96% · Delaware 94% · Hawaii 94% · Vermont 94%

House Scores of 100:CALIFORNIA Huffman · McNerney · Pelosi · Honda · Eshoo · Brownley · Chu · Schiff · Sherman · Sánchez, Linda · Roybal-Allard · Takano · Hahn · Lowenthal · COLORADO DeGette · CONNECTICUT Esty · FLORIDA Grayson · Frankel · GEORGIA Johnson, H. · ILLINOIS Schakowsky · MAINE Pingree · MARYLAND Edwards · Van Hollen · MASSACHUSETTS McGovern · Kennedy · Clark, K. · MINNESOTA Ellison · NEW JERSEY Pallone · Watson Coleman · NEW YORK Velázquez · Jeffries · Clarke, Y. · Nadler · Serrano · Lowey · Tonko · NORTH CAROLINA Price, D. · PENNSYLVANIA Fattah · Boyle · RHODE ISLAND Langevin · TENNESSEE Cohen · VIRGINIA Scott, R. · WASHINGTON McDermott

Lowest House Delegations: Kansas 0% · North Dakota 0% · Utah 1% · Arkansas 3% · Montana 3% · South Dakota 3% · Wyoming 3% · Idaho 4% · Oklahoma 4% · West Virginia 5% · Alaska 6%

House Scores of 0:ALABAMA Byrne · Rogers · ARIZONA Salmon · Schweikert · CALIFORNIA LaMalfa · McClintock · Nunes · McCarthy · Knight · Royce · Issa · COLORADO Lamborn · FLORIDA Miller · Crenshaw · DeSantis · Mica · Bilirakis · Ross · Rooney · GEORGIA Carter, E.L. · Price, T. · Woodall · Scott, A. · Hice · Loudermilk · Allen · Graves, T. · ILLINOIS Hultgren · LaHood · Schock · INDIANA Walorski · Stutzman · Rokita · Messer · Young, T. · KANSAS Huelskamp · Jenkins, L. · Yoder · Pompeo · KENTUCKY Guthrie · Rogers, H. · Barr · LOUISIANA Scalise · Graves, G. · MICHIGAN Huizenga · Walberg · Miller, C. · MISSISSIPPI Kelly, T. · Palazzo · MISSOURI Wagner · Hartzler · Long · Smith, J. · NEVADA Hardy · NORTH CAROLINA Foxx · Walker · Rouzer · Hudson · Pittenger · McHenry · Holding · NORTH DAKOTA Cramer · OHIO Chabot · Wenstrup · Gibbs · PENNSYLVANIA Pitts · SOUTH CAROLINA Wilson, J. · Gowdy · TENNESSEE Roe · DesJarlais · Black · Blackburn · Fincher · TEXAS Poe · Johnson, S. · Ratcliffe · Hensarling · Culberson · Brady, K. · Conaway · Granger · Thornberry · Flores · Neugebauer · Olson · Hurd · Marchant · Williams · Carter, J. · Sessions, P. · Babin · UTAH Bishop, R. · Chaffetz · Love · VIRGINIA Rigell · Forbes · Hurt · Goodlatte · WASHINGTON McMorris Rodgers · WISCONSIN Ryan, P. · Grothman · Duffy · Ribble

2015 HOUSE HIGH AND LOW SCORES

Highest Senate Delegations:Connecticut 100% · Massachusetts 100% · Michigan 100% · Minnesota 100% · New Jersey 100% · New York 100% · Rhode Island 100% · Vermont 100%

Senate Scores of 100:CALIFORNIA Boxer · CONNECTICUT Blumenthal · Murphy · HAWAII Hirono · ILLINOIS Durbin · MAINE King · MASSACHUSETTS Markey · Warren · MICHIGAN Peters · Stabenow · MINNESOTA Franken · Klobuchar · NEW JERSEY Booker · Menendez · NEW YORK Gillibrand · Schumer · OREGON Merkley · RHODE ISLAND Reed · Whitehouse · VERMONT Leahy · Sanders · WISCONSIN Baldwin

Lowest Senate Delegations:Arkansas 0% · Georgia 0% · Idaho 0% · Kansas 0% · Louisiana 0% · Mississippi 0% · Nebraska 0% · Texas 0% · Wyoming 0%

Senate Scores of 0:

ALASKA Sullivan · ARIZONA Flake · ARKANSAS Boozman · Cotton · FLORIDA Rubio · GEORGIA Isakson · Perdue · IDAHO Crapo · Risch · INDIANA Coats · IOWA Ernst · KANSAS Moran · Roberts · KENTUCKY McConnell · LOUISIANA Cassidy · Vitter · MISSISSIPPI Cochran · Wicker · MONTANA Daines · NEBRASKA Fischer · Sasse · NORTH

DAKOTA Hoeven · OKLAHOMA Inhofe · PENNSYLVANIA Toomey · SOUTH CAROLINA Scott · SOUTH DAKOTA Rounds · TEXAS Cornyn · Cruz · UTAH Hatch · WISCONSIN Johnson · WYOMING Barrasso · Enzi

2015 SENATE HIGH AND LOW SCORES


RATING THE LEADERSHIP OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEES

PARTY LEADERS’ SCORES

* The Speaker of the House votes at his discretion.** Represenative Ryan replaced Representive Boehner as Speaker of the House on October 29, 2015.

SENATECOMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE

Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Roberts (MS) 0 Stabenow (MI) 100

Appropriations Cochran (AL) 0 Mikulski (MD) 96

Commerce, Science and Transportation Thune (SD) 4 Nelson (FL) 84

Energy and Natural Resources Murkowski (AK) 4 Cantwell (WA) 96

Environment and Public Works Inhofe (OK) 0 Boxer (CA) 94

SENATE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 2 RANKING MEMBERS 94

HOUSECOMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE

Agriculture Conaway (TX-11) 0 Peterson (MN-07) 14

Appropriations Rogers, Harold (KY-05) 0 Lowey (NY-17) 100

Energy and Commerce Upton (MI-06) 3 Pallone (NJ-06) 100

Natural Resources Bishop, Rob (UT-01) 3 Grijalva (AZ-03) 97

Science, Space, and Technology Smith, Lamar (TX-21) 3 Johnson, Eddie Bernice (TX-30) 89

Transportation and Infrastructure Shuster (PA-09) 3 DeFazio (OR-04) 91

HOUSE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 2 RANKING MEMBERS 82

SENATEDEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE

Reid (NV), Minority Leader N/A McConnell (KY), Majority Leader 0

Durbin (IL), Minority Whip 100 Cornyn (TX), Majority Whip 0

Schumer (NY), Conference Vice Chair 100 Thune (SD), Conference Chair 4

Murray (WA), Conference Secretary 96 Barrasso (WY), Policy Committee Chair 0

Blunt (MO), Conference Vice Chair 4

LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 99 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 2

HOUSEDEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE

Boehner* (OH-08), Speaker of the House N/A

Ryan** (WI-01), Speaker of the House 0

Pelosi (CA-12), Minority Leader 100 McCarthy, Kevin (CA-23), Majority Leader 0

Hoyer (MD-05), Minority Whip 89 Scalise, Steve (LA-01), Majority Whip 0

Clyburn (SC-06), Assistant Minority Leader 83 McMorris Rodgers (WA-05), Conference Chairman 0

Becerra (CA-34), Caucus Chairman 94 Messer (IN-06), Policy Committee Chairman 0

LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 92 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 0

2015 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 9IMAGE FROM FLICKR/U.S. FOREST SERVICE (ALTERED).


2015 SENATE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS

1. LIMITING ACCESS TO THE COURTSSenator Mike Lee (R-UT) offered an amendment to S. 1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would have a chilling effect on citizen enforcement of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), one of American’s most effective and important environmental laws that serves as a safety net for wildlife, fish and plants on the brink of extinction. By subjecting ESA lawsuits to the Equal Access to Justice Act’s below-market cap on legal fees, this amendment would make it more difficult for citizens from across the po-litical spectrum to obtain counsel and challenge illegal government actions. On January 21, the Senate rejected the Lee amendment by a vote of 54-45 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 7). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

2. ATTACK ON CLEAN AIR PROTECTIONSSenator Pat Toomey (R-PA) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would exempt power plant units that burn “coal refuse” or waste from complying with certain clean air and public health protections required under the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross State Air Pollu-tion Rule and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. Communities living downwind from these plants would suffer negative health consequences, ranging from asthma attacks to premature deaths, were these clean air exemptions to become law. On January 21, the Senate rejected the Toomey amendment by a vote of 54-45 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 9). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRON-

MENT VOTE.

3. CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCESenator Brian Schatz (D-HI) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which ex-presses the sense of Congress that climate change is real and that man-made pollution is a significant contributor to climate change. 2014 and 2015 were the two hottest years on record, and this amend-ment references the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other scientific institutions. On January 21, the Senate rejected the Schatz amendment by a vote of 50-49 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 12). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL VOTE.

4. PRIORITIZING DRILLING ON PUBLIC LANDSSenator Mike Lee (R-UT) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would expedite the applications to drill on America’s public lands and would limit the amount of public in-put in the decision-making process. Oil and gas companies now have more access to America’s public lands than they currently use and it makes no sense to limit public engagement. On January 22, the Senate rejected the Lee amendment by a vote of 51-47 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 17). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

5. FORCING TAR SANDS POLLUTERS TO PAY FOR SPILLSSenator Ron Wyden (D-OR) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would close a tax code loophole that exempts tar sands producers from paying into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Without this fix, taxpayers are on the hook to pay for tar sands spill clean-ups like the ongoing $1.2 billion effort in Kalamazoo, Michigan. On January 22, the Senate rejected the Wyden


amendment by a vote of 50-47 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 19). YES IS THE

PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

6. INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE ACTIONSenator Roy Blunt (R-MO) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which un-dermines the United States’ ability to encourage other countries to address climate change and would be a significant setback in the global fight against climate change. The Blunt amendment seeks to undermine the November 2014 U.S.-China announcement that demonstrated both countries’ commit-ment to tackling this challenge and builds momentum toward a global solution to the climate crisis. On January 22, the Senate rejected the Blunt amendment by a vote of 51-46 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 20). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

7. LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) EXPORTSSenator Ted Cruz (R-TX) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would undermine the Department of Energy’s role in approving applications to export liquefied natural gas (LNG). The Cruz amendment interferes with the department’s ability to consider LNG exports’ wide range of potential impacts, including negative impacts on American consumers, health, and the envi-ronment. On January 28, the Senate rejected the Cruz amendment by a vote of 53-45 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 34). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

8. PRAIRIE CHICKEN PROTECTIONSSenator Jerry Moran (R-KS) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would delist the lesser prairie chicken as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The Moran amendment subverts the science-based process the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service uses to determine the population viability of various species and removes protections deemed necessary for the prairie chicken’s survival. On January 28, the Senate rejected the Moran amendment by a vote of 54-44 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 35). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

9. NATIONAL MONUMENTSSenator Steve Daines (R-MT) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would express the sense of Congress that national monument designations on federal lands should require approval by the governor and state legislature. Although non-binding, this amendment under-mines the intent of the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law that 16 presidents of both parties have used to move swiftly in the face of threats and protect some of America’s most treasured places like the Grand Canyon and the Statue of Liberty. On January 28, the Senate rejected the Daines amendment by a vote of 50-47 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 37). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

10. CLEAN ENERGY TAX CREDITSSenator Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would express the sense of Congress that the Production Tax Credit should be renewed for five years. This tax incentive expired at the end of 2014 and is essential to the continued expansion of renewable


energy sources like wind, and would create jobs, reduce pollution, and increase our energy indepen-dence. On January 28, the Senate rejected the Heitkamp amendment by a vote of 47-51 (Senate roll call vote 40). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A five year extension and phase down of the Production Tax Credit was included in H.R. 2029, the FY16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18.

11. FRACKING DRINKING WATER LOOPHOLESenator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would close the “Halliburton Loophole,” a provision in the 2005 Energy Policy Act that exempted hydraulic fracturing (fracking) from regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Gillibrand amendment is an important first step in ensuring the fracking process is subject to all of our major environmental laws, in order to protect our health, communities, and environment. On January 28, the Senate rejected the Gillibrand amendment by a vote of 35-63 (Senate roll call vote 41). YES IS THE

PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

12. LAND & WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF)Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), America’s premier conservation program whose authorization expired on September 30, 2015. LWCF has been a 50-year conservation success story, improving open space and outdoor recreation opportunities for all Americans. The Burr amendment would also provide funds to increase access to public lands that may otherwise be inac-cessible. On January 29, the Senate rejected the Burr amendment by a vote of 59-39 (60 votes were needed for passage; Senate roll call vote 43). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A three year extension of the Land and Water Conservation Fund was included in H.R. 2029, the FY16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18.

13. RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY STANDARD (RES)Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) offered an amendment to S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would set a goal for the nation to get 25 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025. This policy builds on the proven success states have seen in setting similar policies and would help the United States lead in the global clean energy economy. A strong national renewable electricity standard would create jobs, protect consumers, and reduce pollution. On January 29, the Senate rejected the Udall amendment by a vote of 45-53 (Senate roll call vote 44). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

14 & 15. KEYSTONE XL TAR SANDS PIPELINE (KXL) & VETO OVERRIDESenator John Hoeven (R-ND) sponsored S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would automatically approve this dangerous pipeline, transporting the world’s dirtiest oil through the American heartland to an international shipping port on the Gulf Coast where it would be exported. Keystone XL would lead to a significant expansion of tar sands development, unleashing massive amounts of carbon pol-lution and threatening surrounding communities, ecosystems, and watersheds including the Ogallala aquifer, which provides drinking water for millions of Americans. Despite these threats, Keystone


XL would create just 35 permanent jobs and would not enhance American energy independence. S.1 would short circuit the federal approval process, eliminating the State Department’s ability to assess whether the pipeline is in the national interest, and diminishing the president’s authority to ultimately approve or reject the project. On January 29, the Senate approved S.1 by a vote of 62-36 (Senate roll call vote 49) NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. Following House passage of this bill, President Obama vetoed S. 1 on February 24. On March 4, the Senate failed to override the veto by a vote of 62-37 (67 votes needed for override; Senate roll call vote 68). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. On November 6, President Obama rejected TransCanada’s permit application to construct the Keystone XL pipeline, citing concerns about its climate impact.

16. SELLING OFF AMERICA’S PUBLIC LANDSSenate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) offered an amend-ment to S. Con. Res. 11, the Senate version of the FY16 budget, which would authorize the sale, transfer or exchange of federal lands, including wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, national forests, and national memorials to state and local governments. The Murkowski amendment would allow states to take control of some of our nation’s most cherished places and sell them off to private interests for oil and gas drilling, logging, mining, and other development. On March 26, the Senate approved the Murkowski amendment by a vote of 51-49 (Senate roll call vote 106). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT

VOTE. The Murkowski amendment was included in the final Budget Conference Report that was ap-proved by the House on April 30 and the Senate on May 5.

17. RESPONDING TO THE THREAT OF CLIMATE CHANGESenator Michael Bennet (D-CO) offered an amendment to S. Con. Res. 11, the Senate version of the FY16 budget, which would create a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to responding to the threat climate change poses to our economy and national security. The Bennet amendment encourages the adoption of clean energy, the increased use of energy efficiency, and a reduction in carbon emissions. On March 26, the Senate approved the Bennet amendment by a vote of 53-47 (Senate roll call vote 115). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Bennet amendment was not included in the final Budget Conference Report that was approved by the House on April 30 and the Senate on May 5.

18. UNDERMINING CRITICAL HABITATS FOR WILDLIFESenator Tom Cotton (R-AR) offered an amendment to S. Con. Res. 11, the Senate version of the FY16 budget, which would undermine the protection of imperiled plants and wildlife. The Cotton amend-ment would require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to examine the “cumulative” economic effects of a critical habitat designation, such as the effect on agriculture and business. The FWS already evaluates the total federal costs of a critical habitat designation and this amendment would drain agency resources that could be better used to further protections for wildlife and plants. On March 27, the Senate approved the Cotton amendment by a vote of 52-42 (Senate roll call vote 128). NO IS THE

PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Cotton amendment was included in the final Budget Conference Report that was approved by the House on April 30 and the Senate on May 5.


19. INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN TRADE AGREEMENTSSenator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) offered an amendment to H.R. 1314, the Trade Act of 2015, which would prohibit the application of “fast track” authority, which allows for expedited congressional approval of international trade deals for any agreement that includes a provision allowing investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). Investor-state dispute settlement is a mechanism that allows foreign corporations to challenge government policies and actions that companies claim harm their invest-ments or profits, and these challenges take place in front of private trade tribunals. The use of ISDS has increased rapidly in recent years, and many of these cases have involved challenges to environment and clean energy policies. On May 22, the Senate rejected the Warren amendment by a vote of 39-60 (Senate roll call vote 188). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

20. FAST TRACK OF TRADE AGREEMENTS Representative Patrick Meehan (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 1314, the Trade Act of 2015, which approves “fast track” trade promotion authority for international trade agreements. Fast track allows the ad-ministration to send already-signed international trade deals to Congress for an up or down vote with limited debate and no amendments, severely hampering Congress’ ability to ensure these agree-ments benefit communities and protect our environment. Given the scope of these massive agreements and their implications on environmental policies and protections around the world, Congress and the American public have a right to know what is in these deals before negotiations are finished. However, the fast track process established in H.R. 1314 severely lacks both accountability and transparency and does not result in the “race to the top” that is necessary to make real, enforceable progress on environ-mental and public health issues in these agreements. On May 22, the Senate passed H.R.1314 by a vote of 62-37 (Senate roll call vote 193). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama signed fast track authority into law on June 29.

21. CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCE EDUCATIONSenator Ed Markey (D-MA) offered an amendment to S. 1177, the Every Child Achieves Act of 2015, which would establish a K-12 climate change education grant program. Participating states would compete for grants in order to create climate change science and solutions curriculum, teacher train-ings, and to achieve sustainable building standards. On July 15, the Senate rejected the Markey amend-ment by a vote of 44-53 (Senate roll call vote 238). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

22. GUTTING CLEAN WATER PROTECTIONSSenator John Barrasso (R-WY) sponsored S. 1140, the Federal Water Quality Protection Act, a radical assault on the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Clean Water Rule, which protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of one in three Americans. S. 1140 would block implementation of the current Clean Water Rule and would require the agencies to re-propose another rule, forcing them to go back to the drawing board, repeating processes and soliciting input that they have already received, a waste of time and taxpayer money. In addition, this bill would also severely narrow and undermine the Clean Water Act itself by arbitrarily


defining which waterways deserve protection without any basis in science or recognition of the im-portant role of headwaters and seasonal and rain-dependent waters on downstream water quality. On November 3, the Senate rejected the motion to end debate and proceed to S. 1140 by a vote of 57-41 (60 votes were needed to invoke cloture; Senate roll call vote 295). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

23. EXTREME ASSAULT ON CLEAN WATER RULE (CRA)Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) sponsored S.J. Res. 22, the Congressional Review Act “Resolution of Disap-proval,” which would void the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engi-neers’ Clean Water Rule that protects the small streams and wetlands that feed into the drinking water of 117 million Americans. Not only would this obscure and radical measure vacate the current rule, it would also prohibit the agencies from developing any “substantially similar” rule in the future, keep-ing the unworkable status quo in place leaving our streams, wetlands, lakes, and rivers vulnerable to pollution for generations to come. On November 4, the Senate approved S.J. Res. 22 by a vote of 53-44 (Senate roll call vote 297). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 22 on January 20, 2016.

24. EXTREME ATTACK ON CARBON POLLUTION LIMITS FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS (CRA)Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) sponsored S.J. Res. 24, the Congressional Review Act “Reso-lution of Disapproval” that would permanently block the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan established the first national limits on carbon pollution from existing power plants—our nation’s single largest source of the pollution fueling climate change. S.J. Res. 24 is an extreme measure that would block the biggest step our country has ever taken to address climate change, threatening our health and our future. S.J. Res. 24 would also prohibit the EPA from ever developing “substantially similar” standards in the future. On November 17, the Senate approved S.J. Res. 24 by a vote of 52-46 (Senate roll call vote 306). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. Following its passage in the House, President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 24 on December 18.

25. EXTREME ATTACK ON CARBON POLLUTION LIMITS FOR NEW POWER PLANTS (CRA)Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) sponsored S.J. Res. 23, the Congressional Review Act “Resolution of Disapproval” that would block the Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon pollution standards for new and modified power plants. S.J. Res. 23 is an extreme measure that would permanently block these clean air protections, putting our health at risk and slowing our country’s transition to an economy powered by clean energy. On November 17, the Senate approved S.J. Res. 23 by a vote of 52-46 (Senate roll call vote 307). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. Following its passage in the House, President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 24 on December 18.


SENATE VOTES

KEY

a= Pro-environment action✘ = Anti-environment actioni= Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

ALABAMA

Sessions, J. (R) 4 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Shelby (R) 4 22 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ALASKA

Murkowski (R) 4 28 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Sullivan (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARIZONA

Flake (R) 0 22 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

McCain (R) 4 28 21 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARKANSAS

Boozman (R) 0 17 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Cotton (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CALIFORNIA

Boxer (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Feinstein (D) 88 89 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

COLORADO

Bennet (D) 84 83 87 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Gardner (R) 16 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CONNECTICUT

Blumenthal (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Murphy, C. (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

DELAWARE

Carper (D) 84 89 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

Coons (D) 92 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

FLORIDA

Nelson (D) 84 83 68 a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a

Rubio (R) 0 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

ALABAMA

Sessions, J. (R) 4 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Shelby (R) 4 22 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ALASKA

Murkowski (R) 4 28 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Sullivan (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARIZONA

Flake (R) 0 22 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

McCain (R) 4 28 21 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARKANSAS

Boozman (R) 0 17 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Cotton (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CALIFORNIA

Boxer (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Feinstein (D) 88 89 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

COLORADO

Bennet (D) 84 83 87 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Gardner (R) 16 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CONNECTICUT

Blumenthal (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Murphy, C. (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

DELAWARE

Carper (D) 84 89 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

Coons (D) 92 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

FLORIDA

Nelson (D) 84 83 68 a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a

Rubio (R) 0 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


SENATE VOTES

KEY


Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

GEORGIA

Isakson (R) 0 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Perdue (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

HAWAII

Hirono (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Schatz (D) 96 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

IDAHO

Crapo (R) 0 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Risch (R) 0 11 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ILLINOIS

Durbin (D) 100 94 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Kirk (R) 40 22 57 ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a

INDIANA

Coats (R) 0 11 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Donnelly (D) 68 67 56 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

IOWA

Ernst (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Grassley (R) 4 17 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KANSAS

Moran (R) 0 11 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Roberts (R) 0 11 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KENTUCKY

McConnell (R) 0 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Paul (R) 8 11 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

LOUISIANA

Cassidy (R) 0 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Vitter (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

GEORGIA

Isakson (R) 0 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Perdue (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

HAWAII

Hirono (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Schatz (D) 96 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

IDAHO

Crapo (R) 0 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Risch (R) 0 11 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ILLINOIS

Durbin (D) 100 94 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Kirk (R) 40 22 57 ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a

INDIANA

Coats (R) 0 11 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Donnelly (D) 68 67 56 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

IOWA

Ernst (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Grassley (R) 4 17 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KANSAS

Moran (R) 0 11 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Roberts (R) 0 11 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KENTUCKY

McConnell (R) 0 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Paul (R) 8 11 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

LOUISIANA

Cassidy (R) 0 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Vitter (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


SENATE VOTES

KEY


Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

MAINE

Collins (R) 60 50 65 ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a

King, A. (I) 100 89 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MARYLAND

Cardin (D) 96 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Mikulski (D) 96 89 85 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MASSACHUSETTS

Markey (D) 100 80 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Warren (D) 100 94 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MICHIGAN

Peters (D) 100 92 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Stabenow (D) 100 94 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MINNESOTA

Franken (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Klobuchar (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MISSISSIPPI

Cochran (R) 0 22 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Wicker (R) 0 22 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MISSOURI

Blunt (R) 4 17 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

McCaskill (D) 76 67 72 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a

MONTANA

Daines (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Tester (D) 84 83 86 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a

NEBRASKA

Fischer (R) 0 17 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Sasse (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

MAINE

Collins (R) 60 50 65 ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a

King, A. (I) 100 89 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MARYLAND

Cardin (D) 96 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Mikulski (D) 96 89 85 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MASSACHUSETTS

Markey (D) 100 80 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Warren (D) 100 94 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MICHIGAN

Peters (D) 100 92 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Stabenow (D) 100 94 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MINNESOTA

Franken (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Klobuchar (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MISSISSIPPI

Cochran (R) 0 22 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Wicker (R) 0 22 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MISSOURI

Blunt (R) 4 17 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

McCaskill (D) 76 67 72 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a

MONTANA

Daines (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Tester (D) 84 83 86 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a

NEBRASKA

Fischer (R) 0 17 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Sasse (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


SENATE VOTES

KEY


Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

NEVADA

Heller (R) 8 17 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Reid* (D) N/A 94 81 a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ayotte (R) 56 22 35 ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a

Shaheen (D) 96 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

NEW JERSEY

Booker (D) 100 80 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Menendez (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW MEXICO

Heinrich (D) 96 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Udall (D) 92 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW YORK

Gillibrand (D) 100 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Schumer (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NORTH CAROLINA

Burr (R) 4 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Tillis (R) 4 N/A 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH DAKOTA

Heitkamp (D) 40 61 49 a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Hoeven (R) 0 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OHIO

Brown, S. (D) 96 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Portman (R) 8 6 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Senator Reid missed a number of votes due to an injury and was not given a score for 2015.

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

NEVADA

Heller (R) 8 17 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Reid* (D) N/A 94 81 a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ayotte (R) 56 22 35 ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a

Shaheen (D) 96 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

NEW JERSEY

Booker (D) 100 80 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Menendez (D) 100 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW MEXICO

Heinrich (D) 96 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Udall (D) 92 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NEW YORK

Gillibrand (D) 100 89 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Schumer (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

NORTH CAROLINA

Burr (R) 4 11 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Tillis (R) 4 N/A 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH DAKOTA

Heitkamp (D) 40 61 49 a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Hoeven (R) 0 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OHIO

Brown, S. (D) 96 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Portman (R) 8 6 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


SENATE VOTES

KEY


Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

OKLAHOMA

Inhofe (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Lankford (R) 4 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OREGON

Merkley (D) 100 94 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Wyden (D) 92 94 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

PENNSYLVANIA

Casey (D) 88 78 89 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a

Toomey (R) 0 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

RHODE ISLAND

Reed (D) 100 89 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Whitehouse (D) 100 89 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

SOUTH CAROLINA

Graham, L. (R) 12 22 11 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Scott, T. (R) 0 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

SOUTH DAKOTA

Rounds (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Thune (R) 4 11 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TENNESSEE

Alexander (R) 24 28 20 ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Corker (R) 4 17 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TEXAS

Cornyn (R) 0 11 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Cruz (R) 0 11 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

UTAH

Hatch (R) 0 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Lee, M. (R) 4 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

OKLAHOMA

Inhofe (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Lankford (R) 4 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OREGON

Merkley (D) 100 94 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Wyden (D) 92 94 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

PENNSYLVANIA

Casey (D) 88 78 89 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a

Toomey (R) 0 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

RHODE ISLAND

Reed (D) 100 89 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Whitehouse (D) 100 89 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

SOUTH CAROLINA

Graham, L. (R) 12 22 11 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Scott, T. (R) 0 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

SOUTH DAKOTA

Rounds (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Thune (R) 4 11 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TENNESSEE

Alexander (R) 24 28 20 ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Corker (R) 4 17 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TEXAS

Cornyn (R) 0 11 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Cruz (R) 0 11 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

UTAH

Hatch (R) 0 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Lee, M. (R) 4 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


SENATE VOTES

KEY


Forc

ing

Tar S

ands

Pol

lute

rs to

Pay

for S

pills

Prio

ritiz

ing

Dril

ling

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Att

ack

on C

lean

Air

Prot

ectio

ns

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to th

e Co

urts

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f

VERMONT

Leahy (D) 100 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Sanders (I) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

VIRGINIA

Kaine (D) 88 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

Warner (D) 80 78 86 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

WASHINGTON

Cantwell (D) 96 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Murray (D) 96 83 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

WEST VIRGINIA

Capito (R) 4 5 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Manchin (D) 40 33 43 a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WISCONSIN

Baldwin (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Johnson, R. (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WYOMING

Barrasso (R) 0 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Enzi (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. S

EN

AT

E S

CO

RE

S


Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Inve

stor

-Sta

te D

ispu

te S

ettle

men

t in

Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al H

abita

t fo

r W

ildlif

e

Res

pond

ing

to t

he T

hrea

t of

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Selli

ng O

� A

mer

ica’

s Pu

blic

Lan

ds

1^ 1& 1* 1( 2)

Clea

n En

ergy

Tax

Cre

dits

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r New

Pow

er P

lant

s (C

RA

)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Exi

stin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er R

ule

(CR

A)

Gut

ting

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Scie

nce

Educ

atio

n

2! 2@ 2# 2$1) 2%

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Vet

o

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Sta

ndar

d (R

ES)

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd (

LWC

F)

Frac

king

Drin

king

Wat

er L

ooph

ole

1! 1@ 1# 1$ 1%

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Prai

rie C

hick

en P

rote

ctio

ns

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Inte

rnat

iona

l Clim

ate

Act

ion

G H I j

SENATE VOTES

VERMONT

Leahy (D) 100 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Sanders (I) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

VIRGINIA

Kaine (D) 88 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

Warner (D) 80 78 86 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

WASHINGTON

Cantwell (D) 96 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Murray (D) 96 83 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

WEST VIRGINIA

Capito (R) 4 5 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Manchin (D) 40 33 43 a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WISCONSIN

Baldwin (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

Johnson, R. (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WYOMING

Barrasso (R) 0 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Enzi (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


2015 HOUSE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS

1. ATTACK ON PUBLIC SAFEGUARDSRepresentative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) sponsored H.R. 185, the Regulatory Accountability Act of 2015, which is sweeping legislation that would cripple the rulemaking process by further empowering special interests to effectively stop federal agencies from moving forward with setting basic minimum protec-tions, such as those for Americans’ health and safety. It would override the requirements of twenty-five existing statutes, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and the Occupational Safety & Health Act. H.R. 185 would add more than 60 additional analyses to an already lengthy and complicated rulemaking process and expands judicial review, thus inviting increased litigation. On January 13, the House approved H.R. 185 by a vote of 250-175 (House roll call vote 28). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT

VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

2. LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) EXPORTSRepresentative Bill Johnson (R-OH) sponsored H.R. 351, the LNG Permitting Certainty and Trans-parency Act, which would expedite liquefied natural gas (LNG) export applications. H.R. 351 would rush the Department of Energy’s decision-making process, forcing a decision on a LNG application within 30 days of the conclusion of review under the National Environmental Policy Act or enactment of H.R. 351, whichever is last. Expediting this process jeopardizes our environment and the public interest while also incentivizing more hydraulic fracturing, a severely under-regulated process that is harming communities across the country and polluting our air and water. Additionally, the LNG pro-cess itself creates enormous greenhouse gas emissions through releases of methane, a potent climate pollutant, throughout the drilling process and the energy required for liquefaction and shipping. On January 28, the House approved H.R. 351 by a vote of 277-133 (House roll call vote 50). NO IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE. On January 28, the Senate rejected a similar amendment, sponsored by Senator Cruz, on LNG exports.

3. KEYSTONE XL TAR SANDS PIPELINE (KXL) Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) sponsored S.1, the Keystone XL Pipeline Act, which would automati-cally approve this dangerous pipeline, transporting the world’s dirtiest oil through the American heartland to an international shipping port on the Gulf Coast where it will be exported. Keystone XL would lead to a significant expansion of tar sands development, unleashing massive amounts of carbon pollution and threatening surrounding communities, ecosystems, and watersheds including the Ogallala aquifer, which provides drinking water for millions of Americans. S.1 would have short-circuited the federal approval process, eliminating the State Department’s ability to assess whether the pipeline is in the national interest, and diminishing the president’s authority to ultimately approve or reject the project. On January 29, the Senate approved S.1 by a vote of 62-36 (Senate roll call vote 49). On February 11, the House approved S.1 by a vote of 270-152 (House roll call vote 75). NO IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama vetoed the bill on February 24 and the Senate failed to override the veto on March 4. On November 6, President Obama rejected TransCanada’s permit application to construct the Keystone XL pipeline, citing concerns about its climate impact.


4. ATTACK ON SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITYRepresentative Frank Lucas (R-OK) sponsored H.R.1029, the EPA Science Advisory Board Reform Act of 2015, which would undermine the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Science Advisory Board to provide independent scientific advice to the agency. H.R. 1029 would undermine the integrity of the Science Advisory Board by allowing industry participation on the board and making it more difficult for subject experts to serve on the board. H.R. 1029 would also impose new burdens on the board that would delay necessary public health and environmental protections. On March 17, the House approved H.R.1029 by a vote of 236-181 (House roll call vote 121). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT


5. CLEAN ENERGY FUNDINGRepresentative Bradley Byrne (R-AL) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Energy and Water De-velopment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would eliminate all funding to the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). DOE-led clean energy programs have helped drive innovation in energy technologies while significantly reduc-ing the costs of these technologies. EERE supports critical solar, wind, efficiency, and clean vehicle programs that help create jobs, reduce pollution, and increase our energy security. On April 30, the House rejected the Byrne amendment by a vote of 139-282 (House roll call vote 199). NO IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

6. ATTACK ON CLEAN WATER PROTECTIONSRepresentative Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2028, the Energy and Water De-velopment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would undermine the Clean Water Act and jeopardize the waters Americans depend on for drinking, swimming, fishing, and flood pro-tection. The LaMalfa amendment would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers from enforcing provisions meant to provide oversight of discharges of dredged or fill material, expanding exemptions in a way that would encourage new wetland and stream destruc-tion. On May 1, the House approved the LaMalfa amendment by a vote of 239-174 (House roll call vote 212). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A modified version of the LaMalfa amendment was in-cluded in H.R. 2029, the FY 16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18.

7. ASSAULT ON CLEAN ENERGY & CLEAN WATERHouse Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee Chair Michael Simpson (R-ID) sponsored H.R. 2028, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which moves us backward on energy policy by slashing funding for renewable energy and energy efficiency while boosting funding for fossil fuels. Although the impacts of climate change are already being felt around the country, this bill’s report language attacks the government’s ability to assess the real costs of climate change impacts and the benefits of improving energy efficiency and limiting car-bon pollution. In addition, H.R. 2028 contains a number of damaging policy riders, including ones that would limit the Army Corps of Engineers’ ability to safeguard waters that feed into the public


drinking water systems of one in three Americans, as well as prevent the implementation of the Na-tional Ocean Policy, which would more efficiently coordinate the many government agencies involved in managing our ocean resources. On May 1, the House approved H.R. 2028 by a vote of 240-177 (House roll call vote 215). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 2029, the FY 16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18, included higher funding levels for renewable energy and energy efficiency and was largely free of damaging policy riders.

8. UNDERMINING CLEAN WATER PROTECTIONSRepresentative Bill Shuster (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 1732, the Regulatory Integrity Protection Act of 2015, which attempts to undermine the Clean Water Rule proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers. The Clean Water Rule will protect the small streams and wet-lands that contribute to the drinking water of one in three Americans from pollutions, but H.R. 1732 would stop the process in its tracks, withdrawing the proposed rule and delaying these long-overdue protections by forcing the agencies to unnecessarily repeat analysis and outreach they have already done. On May 12, the House approved H.R. 1732 by a vote of 261-155 (House roll call vote 219). NO

IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

9. PRAIRIE CHICKEN & BURYING BEETLE PROTECTIONS Representative Frank Lucas (R-OK) offered an amendment to H.R. 1735, the National Defense Autho-rization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, which would undermine the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by legis-latively delisting two protected species. The Lucas amendment would prohibit listing the lesser prairie chicken as a threatened or endangered species under the ESA until 2021 and de-list the American bury-ing beetle as a threatened or endangered species. On May 15, the House approved the Lucas amend-ment by a vote of 229-190 (House roll call vote 236). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Lucas amendment was not included in the Conference Report on the National Defense Authorization Act.

10. FISHERIES MANAGEMENTRepresentative Don Young (R-AK) sponsored H.R. 1335, the Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act, which would re-authorize the main law govern-ing the management of U.S. fisheries—known as the Magnuson-Stevens Act. H.R. 1335 undermines decades of successful fisheries management that has allowed the recovery of 37 commercially and recreationally important fish stocks, cut the number of overfished stocks by two-thirds since 2006, and improved fisheries-dependent economies across the country. H.R. 1335 would roll back protec-tions responsible for the Magnuson-Stevens Act’s proven success and undermine several other bedrock environmental laws including the Antiquities Act, Endangered Species Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and National Marine Sanctuaries Act. On June 1, the House approved H.R. 1335 by a vote of 225-152 (House roll call vote 267). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.


11. FAST TRACK OF TRADE AGREEMENTSRepresentative Patrick Meehan (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 1314, the Trade Act of 2015, which approves “fast track” trade promotion authority for international trade agreements. Fast track allows the ad-ministration to send already-signed international trade deals to Congress for an up or down vote with limited debate and no amendments, severely hampering Congress’ ability to ensure these agree-ments benefit communities and protect our environment. Given the scope of these massive agreements and their implications on environmental policies and protections around the world, Congress and the American public have a right to know what is in these deals before negotiations are finished. However, the fast track process established in H.R. 1314 severely lacks both accountability and transparency and does not result in the “race to the top” that is necessary to make real, enforceable progress on environ-mental and public health issues in these agreements. On June 12, the House approved H.R. 1314 by a vote of 219-211 (House roll call vote 362). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama signed fast track authority into law on June 29.

12. CARBON POLLUTION LIMITS FOR POWER PLANTS House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY) sponsored H.R. 2042, the Ratepayer Protection Act of 2015, which would undermine action on climate change and strikes at a central tenet of the Clean Air Act. H.R. 2042 would let governors simply opt-out of commonsense carbon pollution standards for power plants. It would also delay implementation of these critical stan-dards until all litigation is resolved, which could last until 2022. On June 24, the House approved H.R. 2042 by a vote of 247-180 (House roll call vote 384). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

13. STREAM BUFFER ZONEHouse Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would strike a provision preventing the Department of the Interior from revising regula-tions to better protect streams from mining waste. Prior to 2008, no surface mining could be permitted within 100 feet of a stream unless it would cause no adverse effect on water quality or quantity. The 2008 Stream Buffer Zone Rule essentially removed this buffer, allowing mining companies to dump rubble and waste, particularly from mountaintop removal mining, into valleys and streams, jeopardiz-ing the water resources and health of mining communities. On July 8, the House rejected the Grijalva amendment by a vote of 189-239 (House roll call vote 397). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

14. NATIONAL OCEAN POLICYRepresentative Niki Tsongas (D-MA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would have struck a damaging policy rider in the bill prohibiting federal agencies from coordinating with coastal states, the public, and other stakeholders on programs and plans to ensure the safe and productive use of our nation’s oceans and Great Lakes. The National Ocean Policy, which this amendment attempted to preserve, directs government agencies with differing mandates to work together to improve ocean health and also ensures that all competing interests—including conservationists, fishermen, scientists,


shipping companies, port managers, energy developers, and those who live and work in ocean com-munities—have a voice in creating solutions for the many problems facing our oceans. On July 8, the House rejected the Tsongas amendment by a vote of 191-238 (House roll call vote 398). YES IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

15. GRAZING ON PUBLIC LANDSHouse Natural Resource Committee Ranking Member Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would remove a damaging policy rider in the bill mandating that Bureau of Land Man-agement and Forest Service lands damaged by drought and wildfire be made available for grazing. The Grijalva amendment would have ensured that any new grazing permits sought on these damaged lands be reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act thereby ensuring public input and account-ability. On July 8, the House rejected the Grijalva amendment by a vote of 178-251 (House roll call vote 399). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

16. SOCIAL COST OF CARBON Representative Jared Polis (D-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the In-terior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would remove a rider from the underlying bill that would force federal agencies to turn a blind eye to the economic costs of climate change. Across the country, climate change already costs communities billions of dollars each year, and this anti-science rider would prevent the government from considering the costs of extreme weather and other climate change impacts or considering the savings from government actions to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon pollution. On July 8, the House rejected the Polis amend-ment by a vote of 186-243 (House roll call vote 400). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

17. SMOG POLLUTIONRepresentative Donna Edwards (D-MD) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would remove a rider from the bill preventing the Environmental Protection Agency from issuing updated ozone standards. Ozone—more commonly known as smog—is a dangerous pollutant that causes serious health prob-lems, including asthma attacks and premature death. Public health science demonstrates the need to update national smog standards to adequately protect our health, especially those of vulnerable populations like children. On July 8, the House rejected the Edwards amendment by a vote of 180-249 (House roll call vote 401). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

18. BLM FRACKING PROTECTIONSRepresentative Brenda Lawrence (D-MI) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would remove a dirty policy rider that prohibits the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from implementing its newly-fi-nalized hydraulic fracturing rule. This commonsense, modest rule updates BLM regulations regarding well integrity, wastewater management and chemical disclosure standards for the first time in 30 years,


helping to protect our environment and public health from the dangers posed by the fracking process. On July 8, the House rejected the Lawrence amendment by a vote of 179-250 (House Roll Call Vote 402). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

19. ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTIONSRepresentative Niki Tsongas (D-MA) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would strike harmful policy riders in the bill undermining the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Tsongas amendment removes language in the bill preventing the greater sage-grouse, northern long-eared bat, and the gray wolf from being protected under the ESA. On July 8, the House rejected the Tsongas amendment by a vote of 186-243 (House roll call vote 404). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

20. IVORY SALESHouse Natural Resource Committee Ranking Member Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would remove provisions from the bill that prohibit administrative rulemaking on the do-mestic sale or import of ivory imported into the United States. In order to crack down on ivory traffick-ing and end the African elephant poaching crisis, it is essential to curtail the commercial sale of ivory and prevent illegal ivory from being smuggled across our borders. On July 8, the House rejected the Grijalva amendment by a vote of 183-244 (House roll call vote 405). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

21. BIG OIL SUBSIDY ON PUBLIC LANDSRepresentative Steve Pearce (R-NM) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Inte-rior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would block any efforts to raise the royalty rates on oil and gas produced on onshore federal public lands. Oil companies pay a significantly lower royalty rate when drilling on public land, as compared to offshore or on state lands, which means a far lower return to taxpayers for the production of their natural resources. On July 8, the Pearce amendment was approved by a vote of 231-198 (House roll call vote 408). NO IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 2822 was pulled from the floor and the Pearce amendment was not included in H.R. 2029, the FY16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18.

22. NATIONAL MONUMENTSRepresentative Cresent Hardy (R-NV) offered an amendment to H.R. 2822, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016, which would undercut the president’s authority under the Antiquities Act to protect public lands as national monuments in seven western states. The Hardy amendment is an attack on America’s outdoor traditions and on a tool that Republican and Democratic presidents have used for over one hundred years to preserve important cultural, historic, and natural places. On July 8, the House approved the Hardy amendment by a vote of 222-206 (House roll call vote 409). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. H.R. 2822 was pulled from the floor and the Hardy amendment was not included in H.R. 2029, the FY16 spending deal, which President Obama signed into law on December 18.


23. LIMITING ACCESS TO THE COURTSRepresentative Jared Polis (D-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 2647, the Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2015, which would strike provisions in the bill that prohibit preliminary and similar injunctive relief, impose bonding requirements, and eliminate recovery of court costs and fees on lawsuits related to certain forest management projects covered by the bill. The elimination of the court’s authority to issue preliminary injunctions could result in the forest land in question being logged before a final ruling is reached, harming forests, wildlife habitat, drinking water supplies and local recreation econo-mies. Moreover, requiring plaintiffs to post bonds to cover all of the government’s projected legal costs, while also prohibiting plaintiff’s fee recovery, makes accessing the courts a “pay to play” system. This would essentially eliminate the ability of many individuals and organizations to challenge gov-ernment violations of the law with regards to certain forest activities. On July 9, the House rejected the Polis amendment by a vote of 181-247 (House roll call vote 427). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

24. FOREST MANAGEMENTRepresentative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) sponsored H.R. 2647, the Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2015, which would severely undermine sustainable forest management policies and roll back critical environmental safeguards for our nation’s forests. H.R. 2647 would allow large-scale timber projects to skip needed environmental reviews and expand shortcuts reserved for small, non-controversial for-est management practices. Additionally, H.R. 2647cuts the size of citizen advisory committees, reduces public participation during environmental review, and requires citizens to cover all legal costs before questioning an agency in court. On July 9, the House approved H.R. 2647 by a vote of 262-167 (House roll call vote 428). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

25. CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCESRepresentative David Valadao (R-CA) sponsored H.R. 2898, the Western Water and American Food Security Act of 2015, which would weaken the protections for fish, birds, and other wildlife in Califor-nia’s Bay-Delta. H.R. 2898 would undermine the Endangered Species Act, jeopardizing populations of salmon and other local fisheries, threaten the habitat of millions of birds by reducing funding sources and undermining the water rights of wildlife refuges, and put at risk thousands of jobs that rely on a healthy Bay-Delta. H.R. 2898 also includes provisions that would have ramifications across other western states, including reducing public input and review of water projects, reducing funding for the Bureau of Reclamation, and limiting states’ and the federal government’s ability to manage and pro-tect water resources. H.R. 2898 prioritizes the interests of large agribusinesses and uses California’s current low water supplies as an excuse to weaken federal and state environmental laws, when the real driver is the historic drought afflicting the state. On July 16, the House approved H.R. 2898 by a vote of 245-176 (House roll call vote 447). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

26.TOXIC COAL ASHRepresentative David McKinley (R-WV) sponsored H.R. 1734, the Improving Coal Combustion Re-siduals Regulation Act of 2015, which would permanently categorize coal ash as nonhazardous waste and gut the Environmental Protection Agency’s recently finalized coal ash rule. Every year more than


140 million tons of coal ash—the toxic byproduct of burning coal that is laden with arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals—are stored in more than 1,000 impoundments across the country, many of which have leached dangerous chemicals into water Americans count on. This bill would allow for the continued operation or construction of impoundments in aquifers. Coal ash impoundments have also been known to fail catastrophically, as exemplified by the dam failure at a Tennessee Valley Authority site in December 2008 that spilled more than one billion gallons of ash across 300 acres and by a spill that dumped more than 24 million gallons of waste into the Dan River in North Carolina in 2014. On July 22, the House approved H.R.1734 by a vote of 258-166 (House roll call vote 458). NO IS THE PRO-

ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

27. GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD LABELINGRepresentative Mike Pompeo (R-KS) sponsored H.R. 1599, the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015, which would deny consumers the right to know what is in their food and how it is grown. H.R. 1599 would prohibit states from being able to require labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food as well as rollback other state laws that help ensure consumers are not misled by in-accurate labeling on foods. The majority of Americans increasingly want to know more about where their food comes from, not less. But instead, this bill’s sweeping preemption of state and local author-ity is an attack on consumer choice and state efforts to protect human health and the environment. On July 23, the House approved H.R. 1599 by a vote of 275-150 (House roll call vote 462). NO IS THE

PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

28. SAFEGUARDS SHUTDOWNRepresentative Todd Young (R-IN) sponsored H.R. 427, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2015, which would delay or shut down the implementation of vital public health and environmental safeguards against polluters dumping toxins into our air and water. H.R. 427—which requires both houses of Congress to approve all significant new public protections before they take effect—is redundant and unnecessary, since federal agencies by in large exercise authority that Congress has delegated in authorizing legislation. H.R. 427 is a tool for polluters to scuttle new health and environmental safeguards, which would lead to more premature deaths, illnesses, and other serious health impacts. On July 28, the House approved H.R. 427 by a vote of 243-165 (House roll call vote 482). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

29. CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENCE & ADAPTATIONRepresentative Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) offered an amendment to H.R. 348, the Responsibly and Pro-fessionally Invigorating Development (RAPID) Act of 2015, which would prevent continued consider-ation or the selection of alternatives to projects submitted for review under the National Environmen-tal Policy Act that do not adequately address the risks of wildfires, flooding, or other extreme weather events fueled by climate change. The amendment would ensure that government-funded projects are resilient to climate change’s impacts. On September 25, the House rejected the Lowenthal amendment by a vote of 170-228 (House roll call vote 508). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.


30. ATTACKING PUBLIC INPUT & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWRepresentative Tom Marino (R-PA) sponsored H.R. 348, the Responsibly and Professionally Invigorat-ing Development (RAPID) Act of 2015, which would severely undermine the National Environmental Policy Act, compromising the quality of environmental reviews and interfering with the public’s right to provide input in the management of public resources. H.R. 348 would set arbitrary review dead-lines, restrict the range of project alternatives that federal agencies can consider, and jeopardizes the integrity of the decision-making process by allowing project sponsors to prepare environmental review documents, which is a conflict of interest. It also would prevent any consideration of the social cost of carbon, a critical tool for weighing the climate impact of proposed projects. On September 25, the House approved H.R. 348 by a vote of 233-170 (House roll call vote 518). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT


31. CRUDE OIL EXPORT BAN Representative Joe Barton (R-TX) sponsored H.R. 702, which would lift the United States’ 40-year-old ban on exporting crude oil. H.R. 702 would increase oil production by as much as 500,000 barrels per day, increasing the risk of drilling off our coasts, in the Arctic, and on our public lands. It would also increase carbon pollution while raising gas prices in the United States. On October 9, the House ap-proved H.R. 702 by a vote of 261-159 (House roll call vote 549). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation. The crude oil export ban was lifted as part of H.R. 2029, the FY16 spending deal which President Obama signed into law on December 18.

32. HARDROCK MININGRepresentative Mark Amodei (R-NV) sponsored H.R. 1937, the National Strategic and Critical Min-erals Production Act of 2015, which would effectively eliminate public review of hardrock mining ac-tivities on federally-managed public lands. The hardrock mining industry already enjoys free access to hardrock minerals on public lands and a lax regulatory framework under the woefully outdated 1872 Mining Law. H.R. 1937 would limit review of hardrock mining under the National Environmental Policy Act by shortening the time for public input and allowing the use of questionable and outdated data. It would also disenfranchise mining communities by limiting their capacity to hold mining com-panies accountable in the courts, thus jeopardizing their ability to protect their land, water, and health. On October 22, the House approved H.R. 1937 by a vote of 254-177 (House roll call vote 565). NO IS

THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.


33. EXTREME ATTACK ON CARBON POLLUTION LIMITS FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS (CRA)Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) sponsored S.J. Res. 24, the Congressional Review Act “Reso-lution of Disapproval” that would permanently block the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan established the first national limits on carbon pollution from existing power plants—our nation’s single largest source of the pollution fueling climate change. S.J. Res. 24 is an extreme measure that would block the biggest step our country has ever taken to address climate change, threatening our health and our future. S.J. Res. 24 would also prohibit the EPA from ever developing “substantially similar” standards in the future. Following its passage in the Senate, on December 1, the House approved S.J. Res. 24. by a vote of 242-180 (House roll call vote 650). NO IS THE

PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 24 on December 18.

34. EXTREME ATTACK ON CARBON POLLUTION LIMITS FOR NEW POWER PLANTS (CRA)Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) sponsored S.J. Res. 23, the Congressional Review Act “Resolution of Disapproval” that would block the Environmental Protection Agency’s carbon pollution standards for new and modified power plants. S.J. Res. 23 is an extreme measure that would permanently block these clean air protections, putting our health at risk and slowing our country’s transition to an economy powered by clean energy. Following its passage in the Senate, on December 1, the House approved S.J. Res. 23 by a vote of 235-188 (House roll call vote 651). NO IS THE PRO-ENVI-

RONMENT VOTE. President Obama vetoed S.J. Res. 23 on December 18.

35. FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY BILLHouse Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) sponsored H.R. 8, the North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2015, which would further entrench fossil fuel en-ergy while missing the chance to invest in a clean energy economy. H.R. 8 would accelerate the process for constructing pipelines through national parks and monuments, remove important protections for tribes and wildlife related to the construction of hydroelectric dams, and lock in dirty and expensive energy in permanent and inefficient market structures. H.R. 8 also contains an energy efficiency title that would increase energy consumption. On December 3, the House passed H.R. 8 by a vote of 249-174 (House roll call vote 672). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

ALABAMA1 Byrne (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Roby (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Rogers, M. (R) 0 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Aderholt (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brooks, M. (R) 9 3 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Palmer (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Sewell (D) 71 76 77 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a aALASKA

AL Young, Don (R) 6 3 9 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARIZONA

1 Kirkpatrick (D) 63 65 66 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘

2 McSally (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Grijalva (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Gosar (R) 3 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Salmon (R) 0 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Schweikert (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Gallego, R. (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Franks (R) 3 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Sinema (D) 60 81 73 ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘

ARKANSAS

1 Crawford (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Hill (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Womack (R) 3 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Westerman (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CALIFORNIA1 LaMalfa (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Huffman (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Garamendi (D) 91 86 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

ALABAMA1 Byrne (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Roby (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Rogers, M. (R) 0 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Aderholt (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brooks, M. (R) 9 3 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Palmer (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Sewell (D) 71 76 77 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a aALASKA

AL Young, Don (R) 6 3 9 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ARIZONA

1 Kirkpatrick (D) 63 65 66 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘

2 McSally (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Grijalva (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Gosar (R) 3 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Salmon (R) 0 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Schweikert (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Gallego, R. (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Franks (R) 3 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Sinema (D) 60 81 73 ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘

ARKANSAS

1 Crawford (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Hill (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Womack (R) 3 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Westerman (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CALIFORNIA1 LaMalfa (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Huffman (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Garamendi (D) 91 86 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

4 McClintock (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Thompson, M. (D) 91 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Matsui (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Bera (D) 86 90 89 a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a8 Cook (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 McNerney D 100 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Denham (R) 6 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 DeSaulnier (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a12 Pelosi (D) 100 90 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Lee, B. (D) 91 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Speier (D) 91 89 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 Swalwell (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 Costa (D) 43 35 47 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

17 Honda (D) 100 92 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Eshoo (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a19 Lofgren* (D) 66 95 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a20 Farr (D) 97 89 95 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Valadao (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Nunes (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 McCarthy (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

24 Capps (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a25 Knight (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Brownley (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a27 Chu (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a28 Schiff (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a29 Cárdenas (D) 94 92 93 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a30 Sherman (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

* Representative Lofgren missed a number of votes due to health reasons. She entered a statement into the Congressional record noting she would have voted pro-environment on all of the missed votes.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

4 McClintock (R) 0 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Thompson, M. (D) 91 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Matsui (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Bera (D) 86 90 89 a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a8 Cook (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 McNerney D 100 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Denham (R) 6 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 DeSaulnier (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a12 Pelosi (D) 100 90 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Lee, B. (D) 91 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Speier (D) 91 89 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 Swalwell (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 Costa (D) 43 35 47 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

17 Honda (D) 100 92 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Eshoo (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a19 Lofgren* (D) 66 95 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a20 Farr (D) 97 89 95 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Valadao (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Nunes (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 McCarthy (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

24 Capps (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a25 Knight (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Brownley (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a27 Chu (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a28 Schiff (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a29 Cárdenas (D) 94 92 93 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a30 Sherman (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

31 Aguilar (D) 94 N/A 94 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

32 Napolitano (D) 94 84 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a33 Lieu (D) 91 N/A 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a34 Becerra (D) 94 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a35 Torres (D) 91 N/A 91 a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a36 Ruiz (D) 94 87 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a37 Bass (D) 86 87 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a38 Sánchez, Linda (D) 100 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a39 Royce (R) 0 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

40 Roybal-Allard (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a41 Takano (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a42 Calvert (R) 3 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

43 Waters (D) 97 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a44 Hahn (D) 100 97 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a45 Walters (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

46 Sanchez, Loretta (D) 83 97 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

47 Lowenthal (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a48 Rohrabacher (R) 3 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

49 Issa (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

50 Hunter (R) 3 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

51 Vargas (D) 97 92 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a52 Peters, S. (D) 89 92 91 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a53 Davis, S. (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

COLORADO

1 DeGette (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Polis (D) 91 79 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Tipton (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Buck (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Lamborn (R) 0 6 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

31 Aguilar (D) 94 N/A 94 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

32 Napolitano (D) 94 84 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a33 Lieu (D) 91 N/A 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a34 Becerra (D) 94 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a35 Torres (D) 91 N/A 91 a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a36 Ruiz (D) 94 87 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a37 Bass (D) 86 87 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a38 Sánchez, Linda (D) 100 95 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a39 Royce (R) 0 5 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

40 Roybal-Allard (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a41 Takano (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a42 Calvert (R) 3 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

43 Waters (D) 97 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a44 Hahn (D) 100 97 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a45 Walters (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

46 Sanchez, Loretta (D) 83 97 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

47 Lowenthal (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a48 Rohrabacher (R) 3 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

49 Issa (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

50 Hunter (R) 3 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

51 Vargas (D) 97 92 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a52 Peters, S. (D) 89 92 91 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a53 Davis, S. (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

COLORADO

1 DeGette (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Polis (D) 91 79 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Tipton (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Buck (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Lamborn (R) 0 6 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

6 Coffman (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Perlmutter (D) 83 79 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a aCONNECTICUT

1 Larson, J. (D) 97 97 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Courtney (D) 97 94 96 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 DeLauro (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Himes (D) 89 95 94 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a5 Esty (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

DELAWARE

AL Carney (D) 94 84 90 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a aFLORIDA

1 Miller, J. (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Graham, G. (D) 69 N/A 69 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a ✘

3 Yoho (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Crenshaw (R) 0 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brown, C. (D) 97 90 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a6 DeSantis (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Mica (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Posey (R) 6 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Grayson (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Webster (R) 6 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Nugent (R) 6 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Bilirakis (R) 0 2 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Jolly (R) 6 12 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Castor (D) 91 90 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a15 Ross (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Buchanan (R) 17 5 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Rooney (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Murphy, P. (D) 86 76 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a19 Clawson (R) 3 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

6 Coffman (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Perlmutter (D) 83 79 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a aCONNECTICUT

1 Larson, J. (D) 97 97 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Courtney (D) 97 94 96 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 DeLauro (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Himes (D) 89 95 94 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a5 Esty (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

DELAWARE

AL Carney (D) 94 84 90 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a aFLORIDA

1 Miller, J. (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Graham, G. (D) 69 N/A 69 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a ✘

3 Yoho (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Crenshaw (R) 0 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brown, C. (D) 97 90 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a6 DeSantis (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Mica (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Posey (R) 6 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Grayson (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Webster (R) 6 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Nugent (R) 6 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Bilirakis (R) 0 2 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Jolly (R) 6 12 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Castor (D) 91 90 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a15 Ross (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Buchanan (R) 17 5 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Rooney (R) 0 2 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Murphy, P. (D) 86 76 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a19 Clawson (R) 3 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

20 Hastings (D) 97 90 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a21 Deutch* (D) 66 97 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a22 Frankel (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a23 Wasserman Schultz (D) 89 86 92 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a24 Wilson, F. (D) 97 92 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a25 Diaz-Balart (R) 3 3 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Curbelo (R) 23 N/A 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

27 Ros-Lehtinen (R) 14 5 33 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

GEORGIA1 Carter, E.L. (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Bishop, S. (D) 54 41 49 ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a3 Westmoreland, L. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Johnson, H. (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Lewis (D) 83 90 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Price, T. (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Woodall (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Scott, A. (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Collins, D. (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Hice (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Loudermilk (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Allen (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Scott, D. (D) 80 89 80 a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a14 Graves, T. (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

HAWAII

1 Takai (D) 89 N/A 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

2 Gabbard (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aIDAHO

1 Labrador (R) 6 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Simpson (R) 3 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Deutch missed a number of votes due to a family matter.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

20 Hastings (D) 97 90 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a21 Deutch* (D) 66 97 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a22 Frankel (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a23 Wasserman Schultz (D) 89 86 92 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a24 Wilson, F. (D) 97 92 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a25 Diaz-Balart (R) 3 3 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Curbelo (R) 23 N/A 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

27 Ros-Lehtinen (R) 14 5 33 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

GEORGIA1 Carter, E.L. (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Bishop, S. (D) 54 41 49 ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a3 Westmoreland, L. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Johnson, H. (D) 100 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Lewis (D) 83 90 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Price, T. (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Woodall (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Scott, A. (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Collins, D. (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Hice (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Loudermilk (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Allen (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Scott, D. (D) 80 89 80 a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a a a14 Graves, T. (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

HAWAII

1 Takai (D) 89 N/A 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

2 Gabbard (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aIDAHO

1 Labrador (R) 6 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Simpson (R) 3 2 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

ILLINOIS

1 Rush (D) 86 67 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Kelly, R. (D) 89 95 93 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a3 Lipinski (D) 86 87 88 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a4 Gutiérrez (D) 89 92 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Quigley (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Roskam (R) 6 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Davis, D. (D) 94 89 91 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a8 Duckworth* (D) 89 83 85 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a9 Schakowsky (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Dold (R) 37 N/A 45 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

11 Foster (D) 97 94 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a12 Bost (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Davis, R. (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Hultgren (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Shimkus (R) 3 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Kinzinger (R) 6 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Bustos (D) 86 79 82 a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a18 LaHood** (R) 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Schock** (R) 0 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

INDIANA

1 Visclosky (D) 94 90 79 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a2 Walorski (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Stutzman (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Rokita (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brooks, S. (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Messer (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Carson (D) 94 94 92 a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a* Representative Duckworth missed votes due to maternity leave. She entered a statement into the Congressional record noting she would have voted pro-environment on all of the

missed votes. ** Representative LaHood was sworn in on September 17, 2015 following the resignation of Representative Schock on March 31, 2015.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

ILLINOIS

1 Rush (D) 86 67 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Kelly, R. (D) 89 95 93 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a3 Lipinski (D) 86 87 88 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a4 Gutiérrez (D) 89 92 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Quigley (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Roskam (R) 6 5 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Davis, D. (D) 94 89 91 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a8 Duckworth* (D) 89 83 85 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a9 Schakowsky (D) 100 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Dold (R) 37 N/A 45 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

11 Foster (D) 97 94 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a12 Bost (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Davis, R. (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Hultgren (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Shimkus (R) 3 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Kinzinger (R) 6 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Bustos (D) 86 79 82 a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a18 LaHood** (R) 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Schock** (R) 0 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

INDIANA

1 Visclosky (D) 94 90 79 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a2 Walorski (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Stutzman (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Rokita (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brooks, S. (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Messer (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Carson (D) 94 94 92 a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

8 Bucshon (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Young, T. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

IOWA

1 Blum (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Loebsack (D) 94 84 87 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a3 Young, David (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 King, S. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KANSAS1 Huelskamp (R) 0 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Jenkins, L. (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Yoder (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Pompeo (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KENTUCKY

1 Whitfield (R) 6 8 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Guthrie (R) 0 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Yarmuth (D) 91 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Massie (R) 11 13 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a5 Rogers, H. (R) 0 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Barr (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

LOUISIANA1 Scalise (R) 0 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Richmond (D) 80 63 73 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a3 Boustany (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Fleming (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Abraham (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Graves, G. (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MAINE

1 Pingree (D) 100 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Poliquin (R) 9 N/A 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

8 Bucshon (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Young, T. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

IOWA

1 Blum (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Loebsack (D) 94 84 87 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a3 Young, David (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 King, S. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KANSAS1 Huelskamp (R) 0 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Jenkins, L. (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Yoder (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Pompeo (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KENTUCKY

1 Whitfield (R) 6 8 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Guthrie (R) 0 3 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Yarmuth (D) 91 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Massie (R) 11 13 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a5 Rogers, H. (R) 0 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Barr (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

LOUISIANA1 Scalise (R) 0 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Richmond (D) 80 63 73 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a3 Boustany (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Fleming (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Abraham (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Graves, G. (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MAINE

1 Pingree (D) 100 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Poliquin (R) 9 N/A 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

MARYLAND

1 Harris (R) 3 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Ruppersberger (D) 80 90 84 a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a

3 Sarbanes (D) 91 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Edwards (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Hoyer (D) 89 87 81 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Delaney (D) 89 90 90 a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Cummings (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Van Hollen (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MASSACHUSETTS

1 Neal (D) 97 95 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 McGovern (D) 100 95 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Tsongas (D) 94 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Kennedy (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Clark, K. (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Moulton (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Capuano (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Lynch (D) 91 97 94 a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Keating (D) 91 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MICHIGAN

1 Benishek (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Huizenga (R) 0 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Amash (R) 20 14 16 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 Moolenaar (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Kildee (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Upton (R) 3 5 27 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Walberg (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Bishop, M. (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Levin (D) 97 97 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

MARYLAND

1 Harris (R) 3 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Ruppersberger (D) 80 90 84 a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a

3 Sarbanes (D) 91 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Edwards (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Hoyer (D) 89 87 81 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Delaney (D) 89 90 90 a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Cummings (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Van Hollen (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MASSACHUSETTS

1 Neal (D) 97 95 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 McGovern (D) 100 95 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Tsongas (D) 94 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Kennedy (D) 100 97 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Clark, K. (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Moulton (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Capuano (D) 97 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Lynch (D) 91 97 94 a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Keating (D) 91 97 96 a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

MICHIGAN

1 Benishek (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Huizenga (R) 0 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Amash (R) 20 14 16 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 Moolenaar (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Kildee (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Upton (R) 3 5 27 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Walberg (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Bishop, M. (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Levin (D) 97 97 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

10 Miller, C. (R) 0 5 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Trott (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Dingell (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Conyers (D) 94 94 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Lawrence (D) 94 N/A 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a

MINNESOTA

1 Walz (D) 77 81 80 a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a2 Kline, J. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Paulsen (R) 9 10 16 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 McCollum (D) 91 90 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a5 Ellison (D) 100 92 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Emmer (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Peterson (D) 14 13 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Nolan (D) 80 83 82 a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a aMISSISSIPPI

1 Kelly, T.* (R) 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

1 Nunnelee* (R) N/A N/A 3 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

2 Thompson, B. (D) 86 86 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a3 Harper (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Palazzo (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MISSOURI

1 Clay (D) 86 89 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a2 Wagner (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Luetkemeyer (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hartzler (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Cleaver (D) 91 75 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a6 Graves, S. (R) 3 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Long (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Smith, J. (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Kelly was sworn in on June 2, 2015 after Representative Nunnelee passed away on February 6, 2015.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

10 Miller, C. (R) 0 5 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Trott (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Dingell (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Conyers (D) 94 94 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Lawrence (D) 94 N/A 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a

MINNESOTA

1 Walz (D) 77 81 80 a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a2 Kline, J. (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Paulsen (R) 9 10 16 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 McCollum (D) 91 90 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a5 Ellison (D) 100 92 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Emmer (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Peterson (D) 14 13 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Nolan (D) 80 83 82 a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a aMISSISSIPPI

1 Kelly, T.* (R) 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

1 Nunnelee* (R) N/A N/A 3 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

2 Thompson, B. (D) 86 86 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a3 Harper (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Palazzo (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

MISSOURI

1 Clay (D) 86 89 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a2 Wagner (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Luetkemeyer (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hartzler (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Cleaver (D) 91 75 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a6 Graves, S. (R) 3 6 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Long (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Smith, J. (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

MONTANA

AL Zinke (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEBRASKA

1 Fortenberry (R) 9 5 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Ashford (D) 31 N/A 31 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Smith, Adrian (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEVADA

1 Titus (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a2 Amodei (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Heck, J. (R) 6 10 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hardy (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEW HAMPSHIRE

1 Guinta (R) 6 N/A 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Kuster (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘

NEW JERSEY

1 Norcross (D) 91 75 90 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a2 LoBiondo (R) 23 32 58 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

3 MacArthur (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Smith, C. (R) 23 29 63 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Garrett (R) 3 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Pallone (D) 100 87 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Lance (R) 11 13 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Sires (D) 94 92 90 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a9 Pascrell (D) 97 97 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a10 Payne (D) 77 94 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

11 Frelinghuysen (R) 3 10 35 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Watson Coleman (D) 100 N/A 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

MONTANA

AL Zinke (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEBRASKA

1 Fortenberry (R) 9 5 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Ashford (D) 31 N/A 31 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Smith, Adrian (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEVADA

1 Titus (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a2 Amodei (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Heck, J. (R) 6 10 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hardy (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NEW HAMPSHIRE

1 Guinta (R) 6 N/A 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Kuster (D) 94 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘

NEW JERSEY

1 Norcross (D) 91 75 90 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a2 LoBiondo (R) 23 32 58 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

3 MacArthur (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Smith, C. (R) 23 29 63 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Garrett (R) 3 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Pallone (D) 100 87 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Lance (R) 11 13 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Sires (D) 94 92 90 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a9 Pascrell (D) 97 97 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a10 Payne (D) 77 94 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

11 Frelinghuysen (R) 3 10 35 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Watson Coleman (D) 100 N/A 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

NEW MEXICO

1 Lujan Grisham, M. (D) 80 87 85 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 Pearce (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Luján, B. (D) 94 92 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aNEW YORK

1 Zeldin (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 King, P. (R) 9 11 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Israel (D) 94 94 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Rice, K. (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Meeks (D) 89 89 88 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

6 Meng (D) 94 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Velázquez (D) 100 94 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Jeffries (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Clarke, Y. (D) 100 90 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Nadler (D) 100 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a11 Donovan* (R) 11 N/A 11 i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Maloney, C. (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Rangel (D) 91 78 82 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Crowley (D) 89 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 Serrano (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 Engel (D) 94 92 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a17 Lowey (D) 100 95 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Maloney, S. (D) 86 81 83 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a19 Gibson (R) 46 49 40 ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

20 Tonko (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Stefanik (R) 9 N/A 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Hanna (R) 26 11 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

23 Reed, T. (R) 6 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Donovan was sworn in on May 12, 2015 following the resignation of Michael Grimm on January 5, 2015.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

NEW MEXICO

1 Lujan Grisham, M. (D) 80 87 85 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 Pearce (R) 6 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Luján, B. (D) 94 92 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aNEW YORK

1 Zeldin (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 King, P. (R) 9 11 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Israel (D) 94 94 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Rice, K. (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Meeks (D) 89 89 88 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

6 Meng (D) 94 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 Velázquez (D) 100 94 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Jeffries (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Clarke, Y. (D) 100 90 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Nadler (D) 100 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a11 Donovan* (R) 11 N/A 11 i i i i i i i ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Maloney, C. (D) 97 94 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 Rangel (D) 91 78 82 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Crowley (D) 89 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 Serrano (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 Engel (D) 94 92 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a17 Lowey (D) 100 95 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Maloney, S. (D) 86 81 83 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a19 Gibson (R) 46 49 40 ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

20 Tonko (D) 100 95 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Stefanik (R) 9 N/A 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Hanna (R) 26 11 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘

23 Reed, T. (R) 6 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

24 Katko (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

25 Slaughter (D) 91 90 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a26 Higgins (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a27 Collins, C. (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH CAROLINA

1 Butterfield (D) 91 89 89 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a2 Ellmers (R) 6 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Jones (R) 17 17 22 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 Price, D. (D) 100 95 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Foxx (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Walker (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Rouzer (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Hudson (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Pittenger (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 McHenry (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Meadows (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Adams (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a13 Holding (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH DAKOTAAL Cramer (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OHIO1 Chabot (R) 0 5 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Wenstrup (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Beatty (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a4 Jordan (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Latta (R) 3 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Johnson, B. (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Gibbs, B. (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Boehner* (R) N/A N/A 2 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. i i i

9 Kaptur (D) 89 87 80 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a* Speaker Boehner resigned on October 31, 2015.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

24 Katko (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

25 Slaughter (D) 91 90 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a26 Higgins (D) 97 97 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a27 Collins, C. (R) 6 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH CAROLINA

1 Butterfield (D) 91 89 89 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a2 Ellmers (R) 6 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Jones (R) 17 17 22 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 Price, D. (D) 100 95 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Foxx (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Walker (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Rouzer (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Hudson (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Pittenger (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 McHenry (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Meadows (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Adams (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a13 Holding (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

NORTH DAKOTAAL Cramer (R) 0 2 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OHIO1 Chabot (R) 0 5 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Wenstrup (R) 0 5 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Beatty (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a4 Jordan (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Latta (R) 3 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Johnson, B. (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Gibbs, B. (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Boehner* (R) N/A N/A 2 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION. i i i

9 Kaptur (D) 89 87 80 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

10 Turner (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Fudge (D) 91 89 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a12 Tiberi (R) 3 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Ryan, T. (D) 91 89 90 ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a14 Joyce (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Stivers (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Renacci (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OKLAHOMA

1 Bridenstine (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Mullin (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Lucas (R) 3 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Cole (R) 3 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Russell (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OREGON

1 Bonamici (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Walden (R) 3 2 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Blumenauer (D) 97 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 DeFazio (D) 91 97 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a5 Schrader (D) 57 65 70 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘

PENNSYLVANIA

1 Brady, R. (D) 89 92 85 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Fattah (D) 100 87 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kelly (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Perry (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Thompson, G. (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Costello (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

7 Meehan (R) 14 6 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

8 Fitzpatrick (R) 23 27 40 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

10 Turner (R) 3 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Fudge (D) 91 89 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a12 Tiberi (R) 3 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Ryan, T. (D) 91 89 90 ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a14 Joyce (R) 6 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Stivers (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Renacci (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OKLAHOMA

1 Bridenstine (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Mullin (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Lucas (R) 3 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Cole (R) 3 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Russell (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

OREGON

1 Bonamici (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Walden (R) 3 2 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Blumenauer (D) 97 95 95 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 DeFazio (D) 91 97 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a5 Schrader (D) 57 65 70 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘

PENNSYLVANIA

1 Brady, R. (D) 89 92 85 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Fattah (D) 100 87 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kelly (R) 3 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Perry (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Thompson, G. (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Costello (R) 14 N/A 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

7 Meehan (R) 14 6 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

8 Fitzpatrick (R) 23 27 40 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

9 Shuster (R) 3 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Marino (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Barletta (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Rothfus (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Boyle (D) 100 N/A 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Doyle (D) 83 86 74 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a15 Dent (R) 6 3 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Pitts (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Cartwright (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Murphy, T. (R) 3 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

RHODE ISLAND

1 Cicilline (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Langevin (D) 100 90 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

SOUTH CAROLINA

1 Sanford (R) 6 8 26 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Wilson, J. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Duncan, Jeff (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Gowdy (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Mulvaney (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Clyburn (D) 83 86 83 a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a7 Rice, T. (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

SOUTH DAKOTA

AL Noem (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TENNESSEE1 Roe (R) 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Duncan, John (R) 6 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Fleischmann (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 DesJarlais (R) 0 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Cooper (D) 80 90 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

9 Shuster (R) 3 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Marino (R) 3 5 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Barletta (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Rothfus (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Boyle (D) 100 N/A 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 Doyle (D) 83 86 74 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a15 Dent (R) 6 3 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 Pitts (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Cartwright (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 Murphy, T. (R) 3 3 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

RHODE ISLAND

1 Cicilline (D) 97 95 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Langevin (D) 100 90 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

SOUTH CAROLINA

1 Sanford (R) 6 8 26 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Wilson, J. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Duncan, Jeff (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Gowdy (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Mulvaney (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Clyburn (D) 83 86 83 a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a7 Rice, T. (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

SOUTH DAKOTA

AL Noem (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

TENNESSEE1 Roe (R) 0 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Duncan, John (R) 6 5 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Fleischmann (R) 3 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 DesJarlais (R) 0 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Cooper (D) 80 90 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

6 Black (R) 0 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Blackburn (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Fincher (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Cohen (D) 100 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aTEXAS

1 Gohmert (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Poe (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Johnson, S. (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Ratcliffe (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hensarling (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Barton (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Culberson (R) 0 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Brady, K. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Green, A. (D) 86 81 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a10 McCaul (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Conaway (R) 0 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Granger (R) 0 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Thornberry (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Weber (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Hinojosa (D) 60 71 65 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a16 O'Rourke (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a17 Flores (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Jackson Lee (D) 86 84 78 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a19 Neugebauer (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

20 Castro (D) 97 94 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Smith, L. (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Olson (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 Hurd (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

24 Marchant (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 Williams (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Burgess (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

6 Black (R) 0 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Blackburn (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Fincher (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Cohen (D) 100 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aTEXAS

1 Gohmert (R) 3 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Poe (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Johnson, S. (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Ratcliffe (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hensarling (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Barton (R) 3 3 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Culberson (R) 0 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Brady, K. (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Green, A. (D) 86 81 80 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a10 McCaul (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Conaway (R) 0 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Granger (R) 0 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Thornberry (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Weber (R) 3 2 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Hinojosa (D) 60 71 65 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a16 O'Rourke (D) 94 97 96 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a17 Flores (R) 0 2 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Jackson Lee (D) 86 84 78 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a19 Neugebauer (R) 0 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

20 Castro (D) 97 94 95 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 Smith, L. (R) 3 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 Olson (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 Hurd (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

24 Marchant (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 Williams (R) 0 3 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Burgess (R) 3 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

27 Farenthold (R) 3 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

28 Cuellar (D) 20 30 44 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

29 Green, G. (D) 63 60 64 a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘

30 Johnson, E. (D) 89 92 84 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a31 Carter, J. (R) 0 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

32 Sessions, P. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

33 Veasey (D) 86 89 88 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a34 Vela (D) 80 59 66 a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a35 Doggett (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a36 Babin (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

UTAH1 Bishop, R. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Stewart (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Chaffetz (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Love (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

VERMONT

AL Welch (D) 94 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aVIRGINIA

1 Wittman (R) 3 3 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Rigell (R) 0 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Scott, R. (D) 100 95 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Forbes (R) 0 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hurt (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Goodlatte (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Brat (R) 3 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Beyer (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Griffith (R) 9 3 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Comstock (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Connolly (D) 94 95 96 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

27 Farenthold (R) 3 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

28 Cuellar (D) 20 30 44 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

29 Green, G. (D) 63 60 64 a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘

30 Johnson, E. (D) 89 92 84 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a31 Carter, J. (R) 0 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

32 Sessions, P. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

33 Veasey (D) 86 89 88 a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a34 Vela (D) 80 59 66 a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a35 Doggett (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a36 Babin (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

UTAH1 Bishop, R. (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Stewart (R) 3 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Chaffetz (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Love (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

VERMONT

AL Welch (D) 94 92 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aVIRGINIA

1 Wittman (R) 3 3 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Rigell (R) 0 5 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Scott, R. (D) 100 95 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Forbes (R) 0 3 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hurt (R) 0 5 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Goodlatte (R) 0 5 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Brat (R) 3 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Beyer (D) 97 N/A 97 a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 Griffith (R) 9 3 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Comstock (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Connolly (D) 94 95 96 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


HOUSE VOTES


LCV SCORES

% % %

20

15

113

th C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1#

Att

ack

on P

ublic

Saf

egua

rds

Liqu

efied

Nat

ural

Gas

(LN

G)

Expo

rts

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e (K

XL)

Att

ack

on S

cien

tific

Inte

grity

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ndin

g

Att

ack

on C

lean

Wat

er P

rote

ctio

ns

Ass

ault

on C

lean

Ene

rgy

& C

lean

Wat

erU

nder

min

ing

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

Prai

rie C

hick

en &

Bur

ying

Bee

tle P

rote

ctio

nsFi

sher

ies

Man

agem

ent

Fast

Tra

ck o

f Tra

de A

gree

men

ts

Car

bon

Pollu

tion

Lim

its fo

r Pow

er P

lant

sSt

ream

Bu�

er Z

one

WASHINGTON

1 DelBene (D) 94 92 93 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Larsen, R. (D) 94 90 90 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Herrera Beutler (R) 6 8 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Newhouse (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 McMorris Rodgers (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Kilmer (D) 94 87 90 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 McDermott (D) 100 97 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Reichert (R) 6 17 38 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Smith, Adam (D) 89 84 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Heck, D. (D) 97 95 96 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

WEST VIRGINIA

1 McKinley (R) 6 8 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Mooney (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Jenkins, E. (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WISCONSIN1 Ryan, P.* (R) 0 3 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ SPEAKER*

2 Pocan (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kind (D) 86 89 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Moore (D) 91 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a5 Sensenbrenner (R) 6 8 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Grothman (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Duffy (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Ribble (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WYOMING

AL Lummis (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Representative Ryan was elected to succeed John Boehner as Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives on October 29, 2015.

3. H

OU

SE

SC

OR

ES

HOUSE VOTES


2) 2! 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%2^ 2& 2* 2(1& 1* 1(

BLM

Fra

ckin

g Pr

otec

tions

Nat

iona

l Oce

an P

olic

y

Gra

zing

on

Publ

ic L

ands

Soci

al C

ost

of C

arbo

n

Smog

Pol

lutio

n

Lim

iting

Acc

ess

to t

he C

ourt

s

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es P

rote

ctio

ns

Ivor

y Sa

les

Big

Oil

Subs

idy

on P

ublic

Lan

ds

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Safe

guar

ds S

hutd

own

Fore

st M

anag

emen

t

Cal

iforn

ia W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Toxi

c C

oal A

sh

Gen

etic

ally

Mod

ified

Foo

d La

belin

g

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r Ex

istin

g Po

wer

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Extr

eme

Att

ack

on C

arbo

n Po

llutio

n Li

mits

fo

r N

ew P

ower

Pla

nts

(CR

A)

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Res

ilien

ce &

Ada

ptat

ion

Att

acki

ng P

ublic

Inpu

t &

En

viro

nmen

tal R

evie

wC

rude

Oil

Expo

rt B

an

Har

droc

k M

inin

g

Foss

il Fu

el E

nerg

y B

ill

1$ 1% 1^

WASHINGTON

1 DelBene (D) 94 92 93 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Larsen, R. (D) 94 90 90 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Herrera Beutler (R) 6 8 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Newhouse (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 McMorris Rodgers (R) 0 5 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Kilmer (D) 94 87 90 a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 McDermott (D) 100 97 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 Reichert (R) 6 17 38 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Smith, Adam (D) 89 84 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Heck, D. (D) 97 95 96 a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

WEST VIRGINIA

1 McKinley (R) 6 8 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Mooney (R) 3 N/A 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Jenkins, E. (R) 6 N/A 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WISCONSIN1 Ryan, P.* (R) 0 3 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ SPEAKER*

2 Pocan (D) 97 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kind (D) 86 89 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Moore (D) 91 94 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a5 Sensenbrenner (R) 6 8 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Grothman (R) 0 N/A 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Duffy (R) 0 2 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Ribble (R) 0 3 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

WYOMING

AL Lummis (R) 3 2 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HIS DISCRETION.

ADD MY VOICE TO AMERICA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MAJORITY

Please visit scorecard.lcv.org to view the National Environmental Scorecard

electronically, share it with friends and family, and learn more about how you can join

with other environmental activists around the country who are making their voices heard

from the statehouse to the White House.

To make an additional contribution to LCV to support our efforts to turn your

environmental values into national priorities, please use the enclosed envelope or visit

www.lcv.org/donate.

Sign up for LCV’s email updates at www.lcv.org.

Take action on a wide array of pressing environmental issues at www.lcv.org/act.

Thank you for being the voice for the environment.

This publication was designed and printed using 100% wind power and was printed on an alcohol-free press with soy-based inks on 100% recycled stock.

1920 L STREET, NW, SUITE 800 · WASHINGTON, DC 20036

PHONE: 202.785.8683 · WWW.LCV.ORG

OVER 40 YEARS OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ENVIRONMENTAL VOTES —

all at the push of a button. You can now easily see how every member of

Congress voted since the launch of LCV’s first Scorecard in 1971 as part of

our new interactive National Environmental Scorecard at scorecard.lcv.org.

www.youtube.com/lcv2008

www.facebook.com/LCVoters

www.twitter.com/LCVoters

www.instagram.com/LCVoters

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERSscorecard.lcv.org

Date post:	27-Oct-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

2015 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD

Documents