2015 TransportationImprovement Program
Houma Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization Version 11
Prepared by:
South Central Planning and Development Commission
5058 West Main StreetHouma, LA 70360
P.O. Box 1870Gray, LA 70359
http://www.scpdc.orghttp://www.htmpo.org
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
i
ContentsRecord of Adoption and Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Transportation Improvement Program for 2015-2019 .......... 1
Joint Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
HTMPO Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Policy Committee: ................................................................. 4Technical Advisory Committee: ............................................ 4
Introduction to Metropolitan Transportation Plan-ning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) ....................... 6
The Programming of Federal-Aid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7MAP-21 Programs ................................................................ 8Public Transportation ............................................................ 8MAP-21 Planning Requirements .......................................... 9
Relevant Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Progress from Prior TIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Improvement Cost Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Transportation Improvement Program . . . . . . . . . 13FFY 2014 - 2015 (Oct. 2014-Sept. 2015) ........................... 14FFY 2015 - 2016 (Oct. 2015-Sept. 2016) ........................... 16FFY 2016 - 2017 (Oct. 2016-Sept. 2017) ........................... 18FFY 2017 - 2018 (Oct. 2017-Sept. 2018) ........................... 20FFY 2018 - 2019 (Oct. 2018-Sept. 2019) ........................... 22FFY 2019 - 2020 (Oct. 2019-Sept. 2020) ........................... 24FFY 2020 - 2021 (Oct. 2020 - Sept. 2021) ......................... 26
Transportation Improvement Program . . . . . . . . . 29FFY 2014 - 2015 (Oct. 2014 - Sept. 2015) ......................... 30FFY 2015 - 2016 (Oct. 2015 - Sept. 2016) ......................... 31FFY 2016 - 2017 (Oct. 2016 - Sept. 2017) ......................... 32FFY 2017 - 2018 (Oct. 2017 - Sept. 2018) ......................... 33FFY 2018 - 2019 (Oct. 2018 - Sept. 2019) ......................... 34FFY 2019 - 2020 (Oct. 2019 - Sept. 2020) ......................... 35FFY 2020 - 2021 (Oct. 2020 - Sept. 2021) ......................... 36
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
ii
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
1
Record of Adoption and AmendmentsTransportation Improvement Program for 2015-2019
The preparation of this document was financed through grants from and disseminated under the sponsorship of the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administra-tion of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.
Record of Adoption and Amendments:October 22, 2014 – TIP Adopted by HTMPO Policy
CommitteeNovember 3, 2014 - Administrative modification: Move
Country Drive Widening construction to FFY 2015. Separated Acadian Road Roundabout Utility Relocation and Right-of-Way acquisition phases.
April 9, 2015 - Administrative modification: Increase Ledet Street Sidewalks cost estimates from $200,000 to $269.628.
April 13, 2015 - Amended to include LA 20 Widening in Lafourche Parish (Thibodaux) and Airport Road Connector and Bridge in Lafourche.
October 22, 2015 - Amended to include the environmental and engineering phases for the Civic Center sidewalks, LA 24 side-walk rehabilitation, and the Prospect Street sidewalk projects.
Nov. 1, 2015 - Administrative modification moving H.009320 Acadian Road Roundabout right-of-way and utility phasing from FFY 2015 to FFY 2016.
January 26, 2016 - Amendment adding construction phase for H.011516 US/ 90 at LA 182 for $250,000, NHPP. Accepted 2016 transit grant applications for local service providers, including operations assistance and a new Greyhound service.
April 12, 2016 - Administrative Modification to include final FY 16-17 requested transit grant funding amounts.
May 11, 2016 - Administrative Modification to clarify Good Earth Transit’s FY 15-16 Program of Projects.
July 28, 2016 - Amended to include funding for H.009742 Audubon-Cardinal Bike Ped Paths at $31,500, STP<2000.
July 28, 2016 - Administrative modification to increase the cost estimate of H.012291 City of Thibodaux Overlay projects to $1,200,000, STP<200K.
July 28, 2016 - Administrative modification move the Right-of-Way and Utility phases of H.009320 Acadian Road Roundabout to FY 17 amd construction to FY 18. Moved Civic Center Roundabout Stage 0, LA 1 Corridor Study, Matthews/Raceland Study, Roundabout Feasibility Study, and Local AM Plan-Terre-bonne to FY 17. Moved Civic Center Roundabout Engineering and Environmental phases to FY 18 and Right-of-Way phase to FY 19. Removed all phases of Acadian Road West project.
September 28, 2016 - Administrative modification to change
the timing of the Thibodaux Overlays (H.012291) from FFY 2016 to FFY 2017.
October 5, 2016 - Administrative modification to change the timing of engineering phases of H.012337 Prospect Blvd Side-walks, H.012338 Civic Center Sidewalks and H.012339 LA 24 Sidewalk Rehab from FFY 2016 to FFY 2017.
October 27, 2016 - Amended to removes LA 1 Corridor Study and Mathews Area Small Area Study. Added LA 1 Central Lafourche Multiuse Path.
January, 26, 2017 - Amended to include feasibility phases for H.011962 and H.011986 for $350,000 each STPFLEX in FFY 2017.
March 30, 2017 - Administrative modification to include the project number and correct name for H.012859 Civic Center Blvd. @ Valhi Blvd. Study and to reduce estimate cost from $20,000 to $10,500.
April 27, 2017 - Amended to include projects recommended at the December 2016 and March 2017 TAC meetings and to update some language regarding committee membership due to recent elections. Updated Good Earth Transit’s FFY 16, 17, and 18 POP.
July 18, 2017 - Administrative modification changing the authorization dates for LA 24 Sidewalk Rehabilitation, Civic Center Sidewalks, and Prospect Street Sidewalks from FY 2017 from FY 2018.
July 27, 2017 - Amended to included Downtown Thibodaux Sidewalk Rehabilitation design and construction phases.
Oct. 26, 2017 - Amended to include Bayou Blue Sidewalks Stage 0 and various Napoleonville Sidewalk phases. Administra-tive changes to various project names (clarification), and funding years.
Jan. 25, 2018 - Amended to include Bayou Blue Pontoon Br Electric Winches contruction in FFY 18, $400,000 STPFlex.
HTMPO MembershipHouma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization
Membership• Member Jurisdictions:• Assumption Parish• City of Thibodaux• Lafourche Parish• Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government• Town of Lockport• Village of Napoleonville• Louisiana Department of Transportation and Develop-
mentEx Officio Members:• Federal Highway Administration• Federal Transit AdministrationStaff:
South Central Planning & Development Commission
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
2
Joint CertificationJoint Certification of the Metropolitan Planning Process for the Houma-Thibodaux Urbanized Area
The State of Louisiana and the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization hereby certify that the transportation plan-ning process is addressing the major issues facing the Houma-Thibodaux Urbanized Area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of:
23 U.S.C. 134, 49 U.S.C. 5303
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and 49 CFR part 21;
49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity;
Section 1101(b) of the MAP-21 and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects;
23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts;
The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38;
The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities.
___________________________________________
Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development
___________________________________________
Mr. Dirk Guidry, Chairman Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization
April 27, 2017
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
3
Insert Resolution Here
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
4
HTMPO CommitteesThe Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) is a consortium of governments responsible, in coopera-tion with the State, for the transportation planning process for the Houma-Thibodaux Urbanized Area. The MPO is comprised of two committees: the Policy Committee (PC), and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The Policy Committee is the official decision making body, and the TAC advises the Policy Committee on technical matters of projects, plans, and programs.
Policy Committee:The Policy Committee serves as the official decision making
body for the MPO. The Policy Committee oversees how federal transportation dollars are spent in the transportation study area as shown in Map 1. The Policy Committee’s responsibilities include the review and approval of all plans, programs, and projects. It is comprised of elected officials from region within the MPO’s study area.
The Policy Committee is composed of twelve voting members and one non-voting member.
Voting Members:
• Mr. Dirk Guidry, MPO Policy Committee Chairman – TPCG, Council member
• Mr. Tommy Eschette, MPO Vice Chair – City of Thibodaux, Mayor
• Mr. Ron Animashaun – Village of Napoleonville, Mayor
• Mr. James Cantrelle – Lafourche Parish, Parish President
• Mr. Paul Champagne – Town of Lockport, Mayor
• Mr. Gordon Dove – TPCG, Parish President
• Ms. Christa Duplantis-Prather, TPCG, Council member
• Mr. Al Marmande – TPCG, Council member
• Mr. Chris Morvant – LA Dept. and Transportation & Development, District 02 Administrator
• Ms. Luci Sposito – Lafourche Parish, Council Member
• Mr. Martin Triche, - Assumption Parish, Police Jury President
• Ms. Arlanda Williams – TPCG, Council member
Non-Voting Member:
• Mr. Brandon Buckner (non-voting member) – FHWA, Transportation Planner
Technical Advisory Committee:The Technical Advisory Committee reviews plans, programs,
projects, studies, and reports and provides the Policy Committee with recommendations concerning them. The TAC is represented by all agencies involved in the transportation planning process. Participants on the TAC include municipalities, parishes, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, the Federal Highway and Transit Administration and other selected transportation interests.
Members:
• Assumption Parish, Parish Manager / Public Works Director
• City of Thibodaux, Grants Director
• City of Thibodaux, Public Works Director
• Federal Highway Administration
• LADOTD, Area Engineer, Dist. 61
• LADOTD, Maintenance Engineer, Dist. 02
• LADOTD, Office of Planning and Programming
• LADOTD, Public Transportation Administrator
• LADOTD, Traffic Engineer, Dist. 02
• Lafourche Parish, Chamber of Commerce
• Lafourche Parish, Grants Director
• Lafourche Parish, Planning Department
• Lafourche Parish, Public Works Director
• Terrebonne Economic Development Authority
• Terrebonne Parish, Chamber of Commerce
• Terrebonne Parish, Engineering Department
• Terrebonne Parish, Planning & Zoning Director
• Terrebonne Parish, Public Transit Manager
• Terrebonne Parish, Public Works Director
• Terrebonne Parish, Roads and Bridges Division, Opera-tions Manager
• Town of Lockport, Mayor
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
5
Map 1: Planning Area
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
6
Introduction to Metropolitan Transportation PlanningMetropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
MPOs, or Metropolitan Planning Organizations, are organi-zations designated by the federal government to be responsible for long-term urban transportation planning efforts. In other words, eligibility to spend federal money on transportation proj-ects in certain local municipalities depends upon a functioning MPO. MPOs may be formed in areas with a population of at least 50,000 and meeting the minimum population density as defined by the Bureau of Census. They are created by an agree-ment between the Governor and local governments representing at least 75% of the population in an urban area. Typically, they are a consortium of governments and other bodies, such as transit agencies and citizen groups working together to carry out a cooperative, comprehensive, and continuous metropolitan trans-portation planning process.
The Transportation Planning Objective
The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962 was the first piece of federal legislation to mandate urban transportation planning as a condition for receiving federal funds in metropolitan areas. The act stated:
“It is in the national interest to encourage and promote the devel-opment of transportation systems embracing various modes of transportation in a manner which will efficiently maximize mobility of people and goods within and throughout urbanized areas and minimize transportation related fuel consumption and air pollution.”
There are two significant features of the act. First, the act called for a planning process in urban areas rather than cities, setting the scale at the regional level. Second, the act called for the plan-ning process to be conducted cooperatively with state and local communities.
Products of the Transportation Planning Process
The key role of the MPO is the creation of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a long-range planning document, and the creation of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), a project programming document.
The Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)
The current Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Transportation Plan was adopted in 2010. The purpose of that plan is to develop both long-range and short-range strategies that lead to the devel-opment of an integrated, intermodal transportation system. That system, in turn, facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods.
The principle result of the plan is a prioritized list of improve-ments divided into three stages of implementation. The first stage of projects forms the basis for the development of the Transporta-
tion Improvement Program.
The MTP must be multimodal, maintain a 20-year planning horizon, and be updated every five years. In addition, the plan must be fiscally constrained, including only those projects for which funding can be expected from reasonable estimated sources.
� Factors considered in development of the current MTP are:
• Support Economic Vitality• Increase Accessibility and Mobility• Protect the Environment• Enhance Modal Integration• Promote Efficient System Management• Preserve the Existing Transportation System• Increase Safety• Increase Transportation Security• Purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a staged, multiyear program of projects proposed for funding by federal, state, and local sources within the Houma-Thibodaux Metro-politan Area. The TIP was develop by the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization in cooperation with Terre-bonne Parish Consolidated Government, the City of Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish and the Louisiana Department of Transpor-tation and Development in accordance with the metropolitan planning requirements set forth in the federal highway spending bill, MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century).
The TIP identifies roadway and transit projects programmed for construction within the next five years that implement the goals and objectives identified in the Houma-Thibodaux Metro-politan Area Transportation Plan.
Procedures to Amend or Administratively Modify the Trans-portation Improvement Programs
The following procedures are applicable for processing amend-ments or modifications to the TIP. In accordance with the provisions of 23 CFR 450.216(b), the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) shall be developed in cooperation with the MPO designated for a metropolitan area. Each TIP shall be included, without change, in the STIP, directly or by reference, after approval of the TIP by the MPO and the Governor.
While every effort has been made to develop this document using the latest information available at the time, it is recognized that there are uncertainties in the development of projects, right-of-way acquisition, relocation of utilities, acquisition of permits, costs, funding availability, etc. Therefore, the Policy Committee has no objection to phases of projects moving within the TIP or STIP as necessitated by the situation, and gives its approval to the MPO staff to make those necessary administrative modifications without action by the Policy Committee. Staff has been directed to keep Policy Committee members informed of upcoming
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
7
administrative modifications.
An Administrative Modification is a minor revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP that includes minor changes to the project, project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, redemonstration of fiscal constraint, or conformity determination (in nonattainment and maintenance areas).
Administrative Modification thresholds include:
• Revisions to a project description without changing the project scope or which do not conflict with the pertinent environmental document;
• Minor changes to the project scope, project phase cost applying to right-of-way acquisitions, utility relocation, engi-neering, or constructions. These funding changes are limited to $600,000 for projects less than $3,000,000 and 20% for projects greater than $3,000,000;
• Minor changes in funding sources of previously included projects that do not effect fiscal constrain of the STIP or the ability to complete the project as initially described;
• Minor changes to the project scope, project phase initiation dates as long as the project stays within the approved TIP time frame and does not affect fiscal constraint or the ability to complete the project as initially described;
• A change in the project implementing agency;• A split or a combination of individually listed projects; as
long as cost, schedule, and scope remain unchanged;• The addition or deletion of projects from grouped project
(line item) listings as long as the line item total funding amounts stay within the above guidelines.
Each MPO approved administrative modification shall be published online separately from TIP amendments and be forwarded to LA DOTD’s Transportation Planning Section and Public Transportation Section for approval on behalf of the Governor. Any instance in which a LA DOTD project affected by an administrative modification that is located within the plan-ning boundaries of the MPO, the MPO must first generate and/or accept the administrative modification in the TIP. Once approved by the MPO, the LA DOTD, on behalf of the Governor, can incorporate the administrative modification into the STIP. LA DOTD will immediately notify the MPO, FHWA, and FTA of any approved administrative modification(s).
An Amendment is a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan plan, TIP, or STIP that involves a major change to a project, including the addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project or project phase initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or design scope. Changes to projects that are included only for informational purposes do not require an amendment. An amendment is a revision that requires public review and comment, redemonstration of fiscal constraint, and/or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and main-tenance areas).
If a project affected by an amendment is located within the planning boundaries of the MPO, it must first be amended in the TIP before it can be amended in the STIP. Once approved by LA DOTD, on behalf of the Governor, the amendment will be incorporated into the STIP. LA DOTD will immediately notify the MPO, FHWA, and FTA of any approved amendment(s).
TIP Objectives
The TIP for the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Area was developed with the following local objectives:
• To identify transportation improvement projects as a result of a comprehensive, cooperative, and continuing regional transportation planning process.
• To identify the priorities by the Houma-Thibodaux Metro-politan Planning Organization, local governments and public transportation providers for transportation improvements.
• To use realistic, current estimates of costs for transportation improvement projects, balanced by reasonable estimates of available revenues.
• To demonstrate that energy, air quality, cost and mobility considerations are addressed in regional transportation plan-ning and programming of projects.
• To develop the TIP consistent with the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan in accordance with guidelines established in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users.
TIP Requirements
While federal legislation dictates that the Transportation Improvement Program must cover at least four years. The TIP may be updated annually, but must be updated at least every four years.
The TIP must be financially reasonable or “constrained,” with estimates of the total cost for programmed projects balanced against the revenues reasonably expected during the TIP period. The TIP includes both federally and non-federally funded proj-ects. Inclusion of a project in the TIP is a condition for federal funding but does not guarantee it. Non-federally funded projects are included in the TIP for informational purposes in order to provide a more comprehensive picture of how the transportation capital and operating funds are spent in the region.
The TIP must be approved by the MPO and the Governor. Once approved, the TIP becomes, without modification, part of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
The Programming of Federal-AidUnlike most federal programs, highway funding does not
depend upon the annual appropriations act for the authority to commit federal funds to a program or project. Such funding is traditionally authorized in a multi-year transportation autho-rization act, which establishes a maximum level of federal transportation funding per fiscal year. However, the establishment of this level of funding, which is referred to as an authorization, is
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
8
only the first step in the process.
Once the authorization level has been established, the United States Department of Transportation annually allocates such funding among states based upon various federal formulas. This allocation is referred to as an apportionment. This amount, or an estimate thereof, is the basis for the development of transporta-tion improvement programs and MPO financial plans. This is not the end of the process, however, because the annual apportion-ment rarely represents the actual amount of federal funds which can be committed by a state.
Typically, an amount less than the apportionment is actually available, due to the imposition of obligation authority. Obliga-tion authority constitutes a federally imposed limitation on the spending of apportioned funds in a given fiscal year. This limi-tation may be imposed in a multi-year authorization act, in the annual Appropriations Act, or in both, in which case the most recent enactment controls. Obligation authority is typically less than a state’s apportionment; nevertheless, as mentioned earlier, because of scheduling requirements, a state’s apportionment is the basis for the development of TIPs.
There are two important distinctions between apportionment and obligation authority. First, apportionment is allocated on a per-program basis, while obligation authority is generally allo-cated as a lump sum. Also, unused apportionment carries forward into successive fiscal years, but unused obligation authority does not. Unused apportionment that is carried forward is referred to as an unobligated balance. Although a state’s unobligated balance can be used to increase the federal-aid programmed within a particular funding category in a given year, it cannot be used to increase the total amount of a state’s highway apportionment.
Federal regulations require states to “provide MPO’s with esti-mates of Federal and State funds which the MPOs shall utilize in developing financial plans.”
MAP-21 ProgramsMoving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21)
became law on July 6, 2019 (Public Law 112-141). It authorized highway, transit, and other surface transportation programs for federal fiscal years 2012 through 2014. MAP-21, while not signif-icantly altering total funding, consolidates many of the programs started under the previous authorization acts: SAFETEA-LU, ISTEA, and TEA-21. For the purpose of this document, the core programs are:
The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
CMAQ is a funding source for use in meeting the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Eligible activities include transit improve-ments, transportation demand management, and conversion of public fleets to cleaner fuels. CMAQ funding is available for use in areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Stan-dards (nonattainment areas) and in former nonattainment areas that are currently in compliance (maintenance areas). Funds are distributed to states based upon a formula that considers popula-tion and severity of pollution. A State may transfer up to 50%
of its increase in CMAQ funds to other federal transportation programs; however, such funds must still be used in nonattain-ment and maintenance areas.
The Houma-Thibodaux MPO area is currently designated as an attainment area and is not eligible for CMAQ funds.
The Surface Transportation Program (STP)
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Authorizes Federal-aid funding to achieve significant reduc-tion in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads or publicly owned bicycle and pedestrian pathways or trails. States are required to have a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and certify that it has met its railway-highway crossing and infrastruc-ture safety needs.
Transportation Alternative Program (TAP)
MAP-21 establishes a new program to provide for a variety of alternative transportation projects, including many that were previously eligible activities under separately funded programs. The TAP replaces the funding from pre-MAP-21 programs including Transportation Enhancements, Recreational Trails, Safe Routes to School, and several other discretionary programs, wrap-ping them into a single funding source.
Public TransportationSimilar to the highway program, MAP-21 maintains the
nation’s commitment to the primary public transportation programs established in previous transportation acts. The prin-ciple programs are:
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facili-ties.
Section 5309 Fixed-Guideway Capital Investment Grants
Provides grants for new and expanded rail, bus rapid transit, and ferry systems that reflect local priorities to improve trans-portation options in key corridors. This program defines a new category of eligible projects, known as core capacity projects, which expand capacity by at least 10% in existing fixed-guideway transit corridors that are already at or above capacity today, or are expected to be at or above capacity within five years. The program also includes provisions for streamlining aspects of the New Starts process to increase efficiency and reduce the time required to meet critical milestones.
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
9
Section 5309 Flexible Funding Programs
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets estab-lished in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS. This is a new program under MAP-21.
The STP provides funding that may be used by States and localities for a wide range of projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance of surface transportation, including highway, transit, intercity bus, bicycle and pedestrian projects.
The TAP program consolidates funding from FHWA’s former Transportation Enhancements, Recreational Trails, and Safe Routes to School programs.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services.
MAP-21 Planning RequirementsMAP-21 preserves most aspects of the previous legislation.
However, changes to the MPO planning process are required. These changes must be reflected in the Metropolitan Transporta-tion Plan (MTP) and Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP).
Relevant DocumentsHouma Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan
• LADOTD Project Number: 736-55-0004• Federal Aid Project Number: SPR-010 (019)The project is a major revision to the master transportation plan
for the Houma Urbanized Area. The study assesses the current state of the area’s transportation system, estimates future needs and resources, and provides a detailed program for preserving and expanding the system for a 25-year period.
The project includes a computer model (Travel Demand Model) to simulate traffic conditions for the current transporta-tion system and test potential projects to determine a project’s future effect (volume) upon the system.
The travel demand model will incorporates demographic infor-mation from the 2000 U.S. Census. The study was adopted by the Houma-Thibodaux MPO Policy committee May 2004. The study was conducted by Neel-Schaffer, Inc. of Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Louisiana Statewide Transportation Plan
The Louisiana Department of Transportation completed a major revision to the State’s long range master plan for all trans-
portation modes. The study analyzed the State’s infrastructure and the document provides a vast amount of statistics to describe the use and condition of the various modes. The plan pres-ents recommended improvements based upon several revenue scenarios. The update began in mid 2000 and a final report was completed December 2003.
Transit Sidewalk Improvement Plan
Prepared for the Good Earth Transit System by South Central Planning & Development Commission, the study documents current infrastructure available for patrons of the Good Earth Transit System which operates throughout the Houma-Thibodaux Urbanized Area. The system evaluates available sidewalks and provides a prioritized list of suggested sidewalk and other pedes-trian improvements to increase ease of use and volume of transit service.
Hurricane Evacuation Corridor Study (U .S . 90 to the Gramercy Wallace Bridge-Interstate-10)
• LADOTD Project Number: 700-99-0132 Feasibility study to develop and evaluate alternatives to connect
the “Bayou Region” with major hurricane evacuation routes by the construction of a new major controlled access highway from the Gramercy Wallace Bridge and U.S. Hwy. 90. Project is commonly referred to as the “North-South Corridor” project.
Replacement of Houma Tunnel Stage 0 Feasibility Study, October 2009
• LADOTD Project Number: 700-55-0118
Report documenting the need to provide an additional crossing of the Intracoastal Waterway to improve safety conditions and traffic capacity. The document was prepared by Shread-Kurken-dall & Associates, Inc. in conjunction with Urban Systems, Inc. and was completed in October 2009.
Houma ITS Deployment Plan, June 2003
• LADOTD Project Number: 700-99-0235
• Federal Aid Project Number: ITS-9922 (001)
The plan documents the need for and staged deployment of ITS resources within the city of Houma. The document was prepared by PB Farradyne and was completed in June 2003.
State of Louisiana Strategic Highway Safety Plan, September 2006
Prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. The document outlines the state’s vision, goals, and performance measures as dealing with improving the safety on Louisiana state highways.
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
10
South Central Regional Transportation Safety Plan, October 2011
Prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. The document outlines the south central’s regional vision, goals, and performance measures as dealing with improving the safety on Louisiana state highways. It addresses four areas emphasis: alcohol, seatbelts, young drivers, and infrastructure and operations.
Progress from Prior TIPThe following are the significant projects from the prior edition
of the Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program which have been let for construction or completed.
• Hollywood Road Widening Right of Way Acquisition • Hollywood Road Widening Utility Relocation• St. Anne Bridge Replacement• ITS Network Extension• Country Drive Widening Right of Way Acquisition
Improvement Cost EstimatesThe Houma-Thibodaux MPO, with assistance from Neel-
Schaffer, Inc., uses historical data to estimate future costs for projects proposed in this document. The estimates were prepared in consultation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. The results are an average cost per improve-ment type as listed below. All numbers are listed in 2008 dollars and reflect projects constructed in Lake Charles, Lafayette, Baton Rouge, and Houma.
Improvement: Average Cost: Per:New 4 Lane Freeway $15,500,000 MileNew 2 Lane Roadway $2,250,000 MileNew 4 Lane Arterial $4,250,000 MileInterstate Widening $8,000,000 MileInterstate Rehab $900,000 MileArterial Widening $4,000,000 MileOne Way Couplet $3,500,000 MileCenter Turn Lane $1,750,000 MileReconstruction $2,250,000 MileOverlay $400,000 MileITS $450,000 MileIntersection Improvement $750,000 EachNew Interchange $22,000,000 EachUnderpass $12,000,000 EachRR Overpass $5,800,000 Each
The averages are general guidelines to estimate future improve-ment costs. Further refinement to a project’s estimated cost may be made through a detailed engineering study.
Glossary of TermsApportionment—Federal-aid funds appropriated to each state
over a multi-year period as a result of an act of Congress. Current funding is authorized by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) which became law on August 10, 2005 (Public Law 109-59).
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): The average number of vehicles passing a given point on a roadway in a 24-hour day.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA): Legislation that identifies mobile sources as a major source of pollution and calls for stringent new requirements in metropolitan areas and states where attainment of the NAAQS is contested.
Environmental Assessment (EA): Class III action under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. It is a concise public document that provides sufficient evidence for determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or to determine a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Federal agency created in the Environmental Protection Act of 1970 which is responsible for enforcing, monitoring, and maintaining Federal environmental laws.
Federal Aid Urbanized Area: An area which contains at least 50,000 people and has sufficient population density to be classified as urban by the Federal Highway Administration.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): An administrative division of the U.S. Department of Transportation respon-sible for roadway projects throughout the country.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA): Another branch of the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for mass transportation projects throughout the country.
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA): A major piece of Federal legislation that imple-ments broad changes in the way transportation decisions are made. ISTEA emphasizes diversity and balance of modes and the preservation of existing systems. It imposes a series of environmental, social and energy factors that must be consid-ered in planning, programming, and selection of projects. ISTEA increased the responsibility of the MPO.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS): The development or application of technology to improve the efficiency and safety of surface transportation systems.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ): State of Louisiana Agency with jurisdiction over environ-mental regulation.
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD): State of Louisiana agency with jurisdiction over transportation.
Level of Service: A measure of highway congestion ranging from free flow of traffic to forced flow on a scale of A to F.
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
11
Metropolitan Area: An area with a population of at least 50,000 as defined by the Bureau of Census.
Metropolitan Boundaries: The area represented by the existing urbanized area and the contiguous area forecasted to be urbanized in a 20 year horizon for the region. The area may include the entire Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) as designated by the Bureau of Census or another area as agreed upon by the governor and the MPO.
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): An organization designated by the Governor under provisions of the 1973 Federal-Aid Highway Act and units of local government which represent 75% of the affected population to carry out the transportation planning process as required in Section 134 of Title 23 of the United States Code as amended by ISTEA and TEA 21. The MPO shares responsibility with the State for developing long and short range transportation plans and programs. The MPO provides a forum for discus-sion and consensus on issues which transcend jurisdictional boundaries.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Federal standards that set allowable concentrations and exposure limits for various pollutants. The standards are developed by the Environmental Protection Agency in response to the requirements of the Clean Air Act and subsequent amend-ments.
National Environmental Policy Act (1969) (NEPA): Requires environmental impact considerations to be included in project planning along with technical and economic concerns to ensure balanced decision-making occurs in the total public interest.
Nonattainment Area: A geographic region of the United States that has been designated as not complying with the NAAQS by the EPA.
Obligation Authority: Each year during the budget process, Congress sets limits on the amount of Federal Apportion-ment that can be expended for projects. Usually it is less than amounts apportioned. Obligation Authority covers most of the funding categories established by SAFETEA-LU.
Ozone (O3): A secondary pollutant formed when hydrocar-bons and oxides of nitrogen combine in sunlight. The ozone is associated with smog and haze conditions. Although the ozone in the upper atmosphere protects us from harmful ultraviolet sunlight, ground level ozone produces and unhealthy environment in which to live.
Right-of-Way—Land (ROW): usually in public ownership, through which a roadway passes, including the area for shoul-ders, sidewalks, and other cross section elements.
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU): The most recent transportation act signed by the President on August 10, 2005. SAFETEA-LU provides guaranteed funding for high-ways, highway safety, and public transportation in the amount of $244.1 billion.
State Implementation Plan (SIP): A plan showing how the State will meet air quality standards as required by 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments. Included are traffic control measures to reduce emissions from automobiles, a major contributor to carbon monoxide and photochemical oxidant pollution.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP): A five year program of highway and transit projects for the state. It is a compilation of projects utilizing various federal and State funding programs, and includes highway projects on the state, city, and county highway systems, as well as projects in the national parks, national forests, and Indian reservations.
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21): The transportation act signed June, 1998. TEA-21 primarily continued the methods and procedures of transportation planning as established under ISTEA. TEA-21 enhanced and increased funding for many of ISTEA Federal-Aid funding programs.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): A eight year capital improvements program of highway and transit proj-ects including operational and low cost projects to increase efficiency of the existing transportation network as well as capital intensive alternatives prescribed in the Long Range Transportation Plan.
Transportation Plan: A plan of recommended highway and transit facilities improvements to meet the immediate as well as the 20-year planning horizon to determine the transporta-tion needs of the area. The Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan has both a Short and Long Range element.
United States Department of Transportation (USDOT): Includes FAA, FHWA, and FTA among others.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): Total motor vehicles miles trav-eled.
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
12
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
13
Transportation Improvement Program
Highway Element
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
14
20
15
FFY
2014
-201
5 (O
ct . 2
014
- Sep
t . 20
15)1
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
H.0
0735
1C
ount
ry D
rive W
iden
ing
Phas
e AC
onstr
uctio
n $
4,50
0,00
0 $
450,
000.
00
STP<
200K
2h.
0110
05Tr
avel
Dem
and
Man
agem
ent
Plan
ning
$10
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
3Le
det S
treet
Sid
ewalk
Con
struc
tion
$26
9,62
8 $
26,9
63
SR2S
4h.
0014
91LA
20
Wid
enin
gC
onstr
uctio
n $
6,50
0,00
0 $
650,
000
HSI
PPEN
5h.
0014
91LA
20
Wid
enin
gC
onstr
uctio
n $
5,50
0,00
0 $
550,
000
STP<
200K
6L.
0000
44D
istric
t Mai
nten
ance
- Ope
ratio
nsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
STPF
lex
7L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
8L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
9L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
10L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
11L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
12L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
13L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
.00
STPF
lex, S
TPRR
14L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
15L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
16L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amR
ight
of W
ay $
10,0
00
HRR
R
17L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
18L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
19L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
20L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
21L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
22L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
23L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
24L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
25L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
26L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
27L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
15
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce28
L.00
0073
Urg
ent B
ridge
Rep
air/R
epla
cemen
tCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
29L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
30L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
31L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
32L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
33L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
34L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
35L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
4-20
15 $
22,5
59,6
28
$2,
235,
163
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
16
20
15
FFY
2015
-201
6 (O
ct . 2
015
- Sep
t . 20
16)1
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
H.0
0974
2A
cadi
a Rd:
Aud
ubon
-Car
dina
l Ped
Pat
hsC
onstr
uctio
n $
204
$20
TA
P<20
0K2
H.0
0974
2A
cadi
a Rd:
Aud
ubon
-Car
dina
l Ped
Pat
hsC
onstr
uctio
n $
31,5
00
$3,
150
STP<
200K
3A
irpor
t Con
nect
or R
oad
and
Brid
geE
ngin
eerin
g $
4,00
0,00
0 Lo
cal
4L.
0000
44D
istric
t Mai
nten
ance
- Ope
ratio
nsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
STPF
lex
5L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
6L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
7L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
8L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
9L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
10L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
11L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
ST
PFlex
, STP
RR
12L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
13L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
14L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amR
ight
of W
ay $
10,0
00
HRR
R
15L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
16L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
17L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
18L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
19L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
20L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
21L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
22L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
23L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
24L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
25L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
26L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
27L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
17
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce28
L.00
0081
Vario
us D
EMO
Pro
jects
RW/U
tility
$25
,000
D
EMO
29L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
5-20
16 $
9,72
1,70
4 $
561,
370
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
18
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
H.0
0932
0A
cadi
an R
oad
Rou
ndab
out
Rig
ht-o
f-Way
$30
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K2
H.0
0932
0A
cadi
an R
oad
Rou
ndab
out
Util
ity R
eloca
tion
$10
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K3
H.0
1229
1Th
ibod
aux
Ove
rlays
Asp
halt
Ove
rlay
$1,
200,
000
$12
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K4
H.0
1285
9C
ivic
Cen
ter B
lvd.
@ V
alhi B
lvd.
Stu
dySt
age 0
$10
,500
ST
P<20
0K5
Airp
ort C
onne
ctor
Roa
d an
d Br
idge
Rig
ht-o
f-Way
$1,
000,
000
Loca
l6
Airp
ort C
onne
ctor
Roa
d an
d Br
idge
Con
struc
tion
$30
,960
,000
$
3,09
6,00
0 Lo
cal
7H
.011
962
LA 1
, 308
: CO
C &
Bay
ou L
af M
B R
ehab
(HBI
)Fe
asib
ility
$35
0,00
0 ST
PFLE
X8
H.0
1198
6LA
58:
Bayo
u Te
rrebo
nne M
B R
ehab
(HBI
)Fe
asib
ility
$35
0,00
0 ST
PFLE
X9
L.00
0044
Dist
rict M
aint
enan
ce - O
pera
tions
Cons
truc
tion
$25
,000
$
2,50
0 ST
PFlex
10L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
11L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
12L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
13L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
14L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
15L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
16L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
ST
PFlex
, STP
RR
17L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
18L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
19L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amR
ight
of W
ay $
10,0
00
HRR
R
20L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
21L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
22L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
23L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
24L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
25L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
26L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
27L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
28L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
FFY
2016
-201
7 (O
ct . 2
016
- Sep
t . 20
17)1
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
19
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce29
L.00
0074
Brid
ge P
reve
ntiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
30L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
31L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
32L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
33L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
34L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
6-20
17 $
39,9
60,5
00
$3,
774,
200
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
20
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
Loca
l Acc
ess M
anag
emen
t Plan
- Pa
rishw
ide (
Terre
bonn
e)Pl
anni
ng $
250,
000
STP<
200K
2R
ound
abou
t Fea
sibilt
ity S
tudy
Plan
ning
$10
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K3
LA 1
Cen
tral L
afou
rche
Mul
tiuse
Pat
hE
ng/E
nv $
500,
000
STP<
200K
4D
ownt
own
Thib
odau
x Si
dewa
lk R
ehab
Des
ign
$19
,320
ST
P<20
0K5
H.0
0932
0A
cadi
an R
oad
Rou
ndab
out
Con
struc
tion
$1,
570,
000
$15
7,00
0 H
SIP
6H
.012
338
Civ
ic C
ente
r Sid
ewalk
sD
esig
n $
47,0
00
STP<
200K
7H
.012
339
LA 2
4 Si
dewa
lk R
ehab
ilita
tion
Des
ign
$95
,000
ST
P<20
0K8
H.0
1233
7Pr
ospe
ct S
treet
Sid
ewalk
sD
esig
n $
42,0
00
STP<
200K
9H
.011
516
US
90 @
LA
182
Con
struc
tion
$25
0,00
0 $
25,0
00
NH
PP10
Civ
ic C
ente
r Rou
ndab
out
Eng
inee
ring
$15
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K11
Civ
ic C
ente
r Rou
ndab
out
Env
ironm
enta
l $
150,
000
STP<
200K
12Ba
you
Blue
Sid
ewalk
s Fea
sibili
ty S
tudy
Stag
e 0 $
20,0
00
STP<
200K
13H
.013
244
Bayo
u Bl
ue P
onto
on B
r Elec
trica
l Win
ches
Con
struc
tion
$40
0,00
0 $
40,0
00
STPF
lex14
L.00
0044
Dist
rict M
aint
enan
ce - O
pera
tions
Cons
truc
tion
$25
,000
$
2,50
0 ST
PFlex
15L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
16L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
17L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
18L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
19L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
20L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
21L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
ST
PFlex
, STP
RR
22L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
23L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
24L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amR
ight
of W
ay $
10,0
00
HRR
R
25L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
26L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
27L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
28L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
FFY
2017
-201
8 (O
ct . 2
017
- Sep
t . 20
18)1
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
21
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce29
L.00
0061
Safe
Rou
tes to
Sch
ools
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$25
,000
$
2,50
0 SR
2S
30L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
31L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
32L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
33L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
34L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
35L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
36L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
38L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
39L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
40L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
7-20
18 $
8,88
3,32
0 $
740,
200
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
22
20
15
For i
nfor
mat
ional
pur
poses
only.
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
H.0
1233
8C
ivic
Cen
ter S
idew
alks
Con
struc
tion
$35
0,00
0 $
35,0
00
STP<
200K
2H
.012
339
LA 2
4 Si
dewa
lk R
ehab
ilita
tion
Con
struc
tion
$1,
000,
000
$10
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K3
H.0
1233
7Pr
ospe
ct S
treet
Sid
ewalk
sC
onstr
uctio
n $
250,
000
$25
,000
ST
P<20
0K4
H.0
1327
2 La
rose
Mul
ti-U
se P
ath
Des
ign/
PE $
30,0
00
STP<
200K
5H
.013
269
Aud
ubon
Ave
Ovl
y: L
A 1
to T
erre
bonn
e P/L
Des
ign/
PE $
69,3
20
STP<
200K
6H
.013
270
LA 2
0 O
vly:
Per
cy B
rown
Rd
– Ja
ckso
n St
Des
ign/
PE $
123,
700
STP<
200K
7C
ivic
Cen
ter R
ound
abou
tRO
W $
150,
000
STP<
200K
8C
anal
Stre
et B
ridge
Rep
lacem
ent
Des
ign/
PE $
584,
000
STP<
200K
9C
anal
Stre
et B
ridge
Rep
lacem
ent
Env
ironm
enta
l $
32,0
00
STP<
200K
10C
hack
bay
Side
walk
Rep
air a
nd P
ed Im
prov
emen
tsD
esig
n/PE
$7,
500
STP<
200K
11C
ut O
ff Si
dewa
lk R
epai
r and
Impr
ovem
ents
Des
ign/
PE $
10,0
00
STP<
200K
12R
acela
nd S
idew
alk R
epai
r and
Impr
ovem
ents
Des
ign/
PE $
10,0
00
STP<
200K
13Va
lhi M
ulti-
use S
idew
alk P
ath
Des
ign/
PE $
99,7
00
STP<
200K
14Ba
you
Blue
Sid
ewalk
sD
esig
n/PE
$37
,378
ST
P<20
0K15
Nap
oleo
nvill
e Sid
ewalk
s - W
ashi
ngto
n St
reet
Des
ign/
PE $
7,97
6 ST
P<20
0K16
Lock
port
Com
mun
ity C
ente
r Saf
ety
Impr
ovem
ents
and
Pede
stria
n U
pgra
des
Des
ign/
PE $
45,0
00
STP<
200K
17D
ownt
own
Thib
odau
x Si
dewa
lk R
ehab
Con
struc
tion
$19
3,20
0 $
19,3
20
STP<
200K
18L.
0000
44D
istric
t Mai
nten
ance
- Ope
ratio
nsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
STPF
lex
19L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
20L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
21L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
22L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
23L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
24L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
25L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
ST
PFlex
, STP
RR
26L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
27L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
FFY
2018
-201
9 (O
ct . 2
018
- Sep
t . 20
19)1
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
23
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce28
L.00
0060
Loca
l Roa
ds S
afety
Pro
gram
Rig
ht of
Way
$10
,000
H
RRR
29L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
30L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
31L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
32L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
33L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
34L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
35L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
36L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
37L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
38L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
39L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
40L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
41L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
42L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
43L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
8-20
19 $
8,68
9,77
4 $
737,
520
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
24
20
15
For i
nfor
mat
ional
pur
poses
only.
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
H.0
1327
2 La
rose
Mul
ti-U
se P
ath
Env
ironm
enta
l $
15,0
00
STP<
200K
2H
.013
269
Aud
ubon
Ave
Ovl
y: L
A 1
to T
erre
bonn
e P/L
Con
struc
tion
$46
9,38
0 $
46,9
38
STP<
200K
3H
.013
270
LA 2
0 O
vly:
Per
cy B
rown
Rd
– Ja
ckso
n St
Con
struc
tion
$98
7,75
0 $
98,7
75
STP<
200K
4C
anal
Stre
et B
ridge
Rep
lacem
ent
ROW
$11
0,00
0 ST
P<20
0K5
Cha
ckba
y Si
dewa
lk R
epai
r and
Ped
Impr
ovem
ents
Con
struc
tion
$37
,620
$
3,76
2 ST
P<20
0K6
Cut
Off
Side
walk
Rep
air a
nd Im
prov
emen
tsC
onstr
uctio
n $
46,4
50
$4,
645
STP<
200K
7C
entra
l Laf
ourc
he L
A 1
Mul
ti-U
se T
rail
Phas
e I, M
at-
thew
s to
Lock
port
Con
struc
tion
$14
1,50
0 $
14,1
50
STP<
200K
8C
entra
l Laf
ourc
he L
A 1
Mul
ti-U
se T
rail
Phas
e II,
Rac
e-lan
d to
Mat
thew
sC
onstr
uctio
n $
213,
115
$21
,312
ST
P<20
0K
9R
acela
nd S
idew
alk R
epai
r and
Impr
ovem
ents
Con
struc
tion
$45
,810
$
4,58
1 ST
P<20
0K10
Valh
i Mul
ti-us
e Sid
ewalk
Pat
h, P
hase
IC
onstr
uctio
n $
465,
608
$46
,561
ST
P<20
0K11
Valh
i Mul
ti-us
e Sid
ewalk
Pat
h, P
hase
IIC
onstr
uctio
n $
507,
412
$50
,741
ST
P<20
0K12
Bayo
u Bl
ue S
idew
alks
ROW
$83
,160
ST
P<20
0K13
Nap
oleo
nvill
e Sid
ewalk
s - W
ashi
ngto
n St
reet
Con
struc
tion
$79
,757
$
7,97
6 ST
P<20
0K14
Nap
oleo
nvill
e Sid
ewalk
s - D
r. M
artin
Lut
her K
ing,
ph. 1
Des
ign
$9,
634
STP<
200K
15Lo
ckpo
rt C
omm
unity
Cen
ter S
afet
y Im
prov
emen
ts an
d Pe
destr
ian
Upg
rade
s E
nviro
nmen
tal
$25
,000
ST
P<20
0K
16L.
0000
44D
istric
t Mai
nten
ance
- Ope
ratio
nsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
STPF
lex
17L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
18L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
19L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
20L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
21L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
22L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
23L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
ST
PFlex
, STP
RR
24L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
25L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
FFY
2019
-202
0 (O
ct . 2
019
- Sep
t . 20
20)1
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
25
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce26
L.00
0060
Loca
l Roa
ds S
afety
Pro
gram
Rig
ht of
Way
$10
,000
H
RRR
27L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
28L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
29L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
30L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
31L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
32L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
33L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
34L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
35L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
36L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
37L.
0000
75Br
idge
Pai
ntin
g Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$2,
000
$20
0 ST
PFlex
38L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
39L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
40L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
41L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
201
9-20
20 $
8,92
7,19
7 $
857,
640
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
26
20
15
For i
nfor
mat
ional
pur
poses
only.
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
Airp
ort C
onne
ctor
Roa
d an
d Br
idge
Con
struc
tion
$30
,960
,000
$
3,09
6,00
0 Lo
cal
2Ba
you
Blue
Sid
ewalk
sC
onstr
uctio
n $
124,
592
$12
,459
.2
STP<
200K
3H
.013
272
Laro
se M
ulti-
Use
Pat
hC
onstr
uctio
n $
145,
000
$14
,500
.0
STP<
200K
4Lo
ckpo
rt C
omm
unity
Cen
ter S
afet
y Im
prov
emen
ts an
d Pe
destr
ian
Upg
rade
sC
onstr
uctio
n $
220,
000
$22
,000
.0
STP<
200K
5N
apol
eonv
ille S
idew
alks -
Dr.
Mar
tin L
uthe
r Kin
g, ph
. 1C
onstr
uctio
n $
96,3
44
$9,
634.
4 ST
P<20
0K6
Nap
oleo
nvill
e Sid
ewalk
s - D
r. M
artin
Lut
her K
ing,
ph. 2
Des
ign
$9,
634
STP<
200K
7L.
0000
44D
istric
t Mai
nten
ance
- Ope
ratio
nsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
STPF
lex
8L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
TAP<
200K
9L.
0000
46M
isc T
rans
porta
tion
Alter
nativ
es Pr
ojects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 TA
P<20
0K
10L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Desi
gn $
10,0
00
RTP
11L.
0000
47M
isc N
ation
al T
rails
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 RT
P
12L.
0000
53St
atew
ide O
verla
y Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$4,
000,
000
$40
0,00
0 ST
PFlex
, NH
S, H
SIP
13L.
0000
54R
oad
Prev
entiv
e Mai
nten
ance
Prog
ram
Cons
truc
tion
$60
0,00
0 $
60,0
00
IM, N
HS,
STP
Flex
14L.
0000
55R
ailro
ad C
rossi
ng Im
prov
emen
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
200,
000
$20
,000
.00
STPF
lex, S
TPRR
15L.
0000
56M
isc H
azar
d El
imin
ation
Pro
jects
Cons
truc
tion
$5,
000
$50
0 H
SIP
16L.
0000
59Sa
fety P
rojec
tsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
H
SIP
17L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amR
ight
of W
ay $
10,0
00
HRR
R
18L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amU
tiliti
es $
10,0
00
HRR
R
19L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amD
esign
$10
,000
H
RRR
20L.
0000
60Lo
cal R
oads
Saf
ety P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
30,0
00
$3,
000
HRR
R
21L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mD
esign
$8,
000
SR2S
22L.
0000
61Sa
fe R
outes
to S
choo
ls Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
25,0
00
$2,
500
SR2S
23L.
0000
65IT
S Sy
stem
(Sta
tewid
e)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
100,
000
$10
,000
N
HS,
IM
24L.
0000
66R
oadw
ay F
loodi
ng/D
rain
age P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
STPF
lex
25L.
0000
72M
ovea
ble B
ridge
Pro
gram
(Elec
/Mech
)Co
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
STPF
lex, F
BR-O
N/O
FF
26L.
0000
73U
rgen
t Brid
ge R
epai
r/Rep
lacem
ent
Cons
truc
tion
$75
,000
$
7,50
0 FB
R-O
N/O
FF
27L.
0000
74Br
idge
Pre
vent
ive M
aint
enan
ce Pr
ogra
mCo
nstr
uctio
n $
75,0
00
$7,
500
FBR
-ON
/OFF
FFY
2020
-202
1 (O
ct . 2
020
- Sep
t . 20
21)1
All
STP<
200K
Pro
jects
requ
ire an
80/
20 sp
lit b
etwe
en F
eder
al an
d Lo
cal d
ollar
s
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
27
20
15
Proj
ect #
Nam
e - L
imits
or L
ocat
ion
Phas
eEs
timat
eC
ontin
genc
y (10
%)
Fund
ing
Sour
ce28
L.00
0075
Brid
ge P
aint
ing P
rogr
amCo
nstr
uctio
n $
2,00
0 $
200
STPF
lex
29L.
0000
78O
ff-Sy
stem
Brid
ge R
epla
cemen
t Pro
gram
Cons
truc
tion
$10
0,00
0 $
10,0
00
FBRO
FF
30L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsD
esign
$25
,000
D
EMO
31L.
0000
81Va
rious
DEM
O P
rojec
tsRW
/Util
ity $
25,0
00
DEM
O
32L.
0008
2M
isc. S
tatew
ide T
CSP
Proje
ctsCo
nstr
uctio
n $
10,0
00
$1,
000
FLH
Sub-
Tota
l FFY
202
0-20
21 $
37,2
45,5
71
$3,
712,
794
Transportation Improvement Program 2015
28
2015 Transportation Improvement Program
29
Transportation Improvement Program
Transit Element
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
30
20
15
FFY
2014
- 20
15 (O
ct . 2
014
- Sep
t . 20
15)
Line
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
LA90
Xho
uma1
5G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,5
59,1
30.2
1 $7
79,5
65.1
1 $7
79,5
65.1
1 Se
ctio
n 53
072
LA90
Xho
uma1
5G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Plan
ning
Ass
istan
cePl
anni
ng 8
0/20
$112
,398
.94
$89,
919.
15
$22,
479.
79
Sect
ion
5307
3LA
90X
houm
a15
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l Ass
istan
ce
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$548
,057
.51
$438
,446
.01
$109
,611
.50
Sect
ion
5307
4Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
39,1
12.8
9 $1
11,2
90.3
1 $2
7,82
2.58
Se
ctio
n 53
105
Terre
bone
ARC
, Cap
ital R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$253
,881
.02
$203
,104
.82
$50,
776.
20
Sect
ion
5310
6La
four
che C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
36,5
90.8
8 $1
09,2
72.7
0 $2
7,31
8.18
Se
ctio
n 53
107
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$117
,052
.92
$93,
642.
33
$23,
410.
58
Sect
ion
5310
8Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n D
istric
t No.
1 of
Laf
ourc
he -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$4
6,37
0.96
$3
7,09
6.77
$9
,274
.19
Sect
ion
5310
9A
ssum
ptio
n A
RC -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$4
6,37
0.96
$3
7,09
6.77
$9
,274
.19
Sect
ion
5310
10A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$46,
370.
96
$37,
096.
77
$9,2
74.1
9 Se
ctio
n 53
11To
tal F
FY 2
014-
2015
$2,9
58,9
66 .2
9 $1
,899
,433
.97
$1,0
59,5
32 .3
2
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
31
20
15
FFY
2015
- 20
16 (O
ct . 2
015
- Sep
t . 20
16)
Line
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
LA90
Xho
uma1
6G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,3
06,1
09
$653
,055
$6
53,0
55
Sect
ion
5307
2LA
90X
houm
a16
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an P
lanni
ng A
ssist
ance
Plan
ning
80/
20$1
63,8
19
$131
,056
$3
2,76
4 Se
ctio
n 53
073
LA90
Xho
uma1
6G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Cap
ital A
ssist
ance
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$670
,208
$5
36,1
66
$134
,042
Se
ctio
n 53
074
Prev
enta
tive M
aint
enan
ceCa
pita
l 80/
20$5
70,2
08
$456
,166
$1
14,0
42
Secti
on 5
307
5Pa
sseng
er In
form
ation
Sys
temCa
pita
l 80/
20$1
00,0
00
$80,
000
$20,
000
Secti
on 5
307
6Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
43,2
86.2
8$1
14,6
29.0
2 $2
8,65
7.26
Se
ctio
n 53
107
Terre
bone
ARC
, Cap
ital R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$261
,497
.45
$209
,197
.96
$52,
299.
49
Sect
ion
5310
8La
four
che C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
40,6
88.6
0$1
12,5
50.8
8 $2
8,13
7.72
Se
ctio
n 53
109
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$120
,564
.50
$96,
451.
60
$24,
112.
90
Sect
ion
5310
10Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n D
istric
t No.
1 of
Laf
ourc
he -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$4
7,76
2.09
$38,
209.
67
$9,5
52.4
2 Se
ctio
n 53
1011
Ass
umpt
ion
ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$47,
762.
09$3
8,20
9.67
$9
,552
.42
Sect
ion
5310
12A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$47,
762.
09$3
8,20
9.67
$9
,552
.42
Sect
ion
5311
Tota
l FFY
201
5-20
16$2
,949
,459
.10
$1,9
67,7
35 .4
7 $9
81,7
25 .6
3
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
32
20
15
FFY
2016
- 20
17 (O
ct . 2
016
- Sep
t . 20
17)
Line
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
LA90
Xho
uma1
7G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g R
egul
ar A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,
098,
888
$54
9,44
4 $
549,
444
Sect
ion
5307
2LA
90X
houm
a17
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an P
lanni
ng A
ssist
ance
Plan
ning
80/
20 $
182,
852
$14
6,28
2 $
36,5
70
Sect
ion
5307
3LA
90X
houm
a17
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l Op
Ast
(Mai
nten
ance
)C
apita
l 80/
20 $
685,
503
$54
8,40
2 $
137,
101
Sect
ion
5307
4A
ssum
ptio
n A
RC -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$4
9,19
5 $3
9,35
6 $9
,839
Se
ctio
n 53
105
Ass
umpt
ion
CO
A -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$3
9,30
8 $3
1,44
6 $7
,862
Se
ctio
n 53
116
Ass
umpt
ion
CO
A -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$268
,495
$1
34,2
48
$134
,248
Se
ctio
n 53
117
Gre
yhou
nd -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,8
05,5
19
$902
,760
$
- Se
ctio
n 53
108
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$39,
308
$31,
446
$7,8
62
Sect
ion
5310
9La
four
che A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$146
,300
$7
3,15
0 $7
3,15
0 Se
ctio
n 53
1010
Lafo
urch
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$109
,836
$8
7,86
9 $2
1,96
7 Se
ctio
n 53
10
11Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n D
istric
t No.
1 of
Laf
ourc
he -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
9,65
4 $1
5,72
3 $3
,931
Se
ctio
n 53
1012
Terre
bone
ARC
- C
apita
l Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$2
69,3
42
$215
,474
$5
3,86
8 Se
ctio
n 53
1013
Terre
bonn
e ARC
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0$2
69,3
42
$134
,671
$1
34,6
71
Sect
ion
5310
14Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20$1
47,5
85
$118
,068
$2
9,51
7 Se
ctio
n 53
1015
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0$3
75,4
43
$187
,722
$1
87,7
22
Sect
ion
5310
16Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$325
,708
$1
62,8
54
$162
,854
Se
ctio
n 53
11To
tal F
FY 2
016-
2017
$6,
219,
795
$3,
522,
369
$1,
794,
666
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
33
20
15
FFY
2017
- 20
18 (O
ct . 2
017
- Sep
t . 20
18)
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
LA90
Xho
uma1
8G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g R
egul
ar A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,
131,
855
$56
5,92
7 $
565,
927
Sect
ion
5307
2LA
90X
houm
a18
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an P
lanni
ng A
ssist
ance
Plan
ning
80/
20 $
188,
338
$15
0,67
0 $
37,6
68
Sect
ion
5307
3LA
90X
houm
a18
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
(M
aint
enan
ce)
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$70
6,06
8 $
564,
854
$14
1,21
4 Se
ctio
n 53
074
LA90
Xho
uma1
8G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
386,
417
$30
9,13
4 $
77,2
83
Sect
ion
5307
5A
ssum
ptio
n A
RC -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
50,6
71
$40
,537
$
10,1
34
Sect
ion
5310
6A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$40
,487
$
32,3
90
$8,
097
Sect
ion
5311
7A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
276,
550
$13
8,27
5 $
138,
275
Sect
ion
5311
8G
reyh
ound
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
1,85
9,68
5 $
929,
842
$92
9,84
2 Se
ctio
n 53
109
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$40
,487
$
32,3
90
$8,
097
Sect
ion
5310
10La
four
che A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$15
0,68
9 $
75,3
45
$75
,345
Se
ctio
n 53
1011
Lafo
urch
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$11
3,13
1 $
90,5
05
$22
,626
Se
ctio
n 53
10
12Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n D
istric
t No.
1 of
Laf
ourc
he -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
20,2
44
$16
,195
$
4,04
9 Se
ctio
n 53
1013
Terre
bone
ARC
- C
apita
l Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
277,
423
$22
1,93
8 $
55,4
85
Sect
ion
5310
14Te
rrebo
nne A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$27
7,42
3 $
138,
711
$13
8,71
1 Se
ctio
n 53
1015
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$15
2,01
2 $
121,
610
$30
,402
Se
ctio
n 53
1016
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
386,
706
$19
3,35
3 $
193,
353
Sect
ion
5310
17Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$33
5,47
9 $
167,
740
$16
7,74
0 Se
ctio
n 53
11To
tal F
FY 2
017-
2018
$6,
393,
664
$3,
789,
415
$2,
604,
249
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
34
20
15
For i
nfor
mat
ional
pur
poses
only.
FFY
2018
- 20
19 (O
ct . 2
018
- Sep
t . 20
19)
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce1
LA90
Xho
uma1
9G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g R
egul
ar A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,
165,
810
$58
2,90
5 $
582,
905
Sect
ion
5307
2LA
90X
houm
a19
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an P
lanni
ng A
ssist
ance
Plan
ning
80/
20 $
193,
988
$15
5,19
0 $
38,7
98
Sect
ion
5307
3LA
90X
houm
a19
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
(M
aint
enan
ce)
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$72
7,25
0 $
581,
800
$14
5,45
0 Se
ctio
n 53
07
4LA
90X
houm
a19
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$1,
000,
000
$80
0,00
0 $
200,
000
Sect
ion
5307
5A
ssum
ptio
n A
RC -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
52,1
91
$41
,753
$
10,4
38
Sect
ion
5310
6A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$41
,702
$
33,3
61
$8,
340
Sect
ion
5311
7A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
284,
846
$14
2,42
3 $
142,
423
Sect
ion
5311
8G
reyh
ound
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
1,91
5,47
5 $
957,
738
$95
7,73
8 Se
ctio
n 53
109
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$41
,702
$
33,3
61
$8,
340
Sect
ion
5310
10La
four
che A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$15
5,21
0 $
77,6
05
$77
,605
Se
ctio
n 53
1011
Lafo
urch
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$11
6,52
5 $
93,2
20
$23
,305
Se
ctio
n 53
1012
Spec
ial E
duca
tion
Dist
rict N
o. 1
of L
afou
rche
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$20
,851
$
16,6
81
$4,
170
Sect
ion
5310
13Te
rrebo
ne A
RC -
Cap
ital R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$28
5,74
5 $
228,
596
$57
,149
Se
ctio
n 53
1014
Terre
bonn
e ARC
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
285,
745
$14
2,87
3 $
142,
873
Sect
ion
5310
15Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
156,
573
$12
5,25
8 $
31,3
15
Sect
ion
5310
16Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$39
8,30
7 $
199,
154
$19
9,15
4 Se
ctio
n 53
1017
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
345,
544
$17
2,77
2 $
172,
772
Sect
ion
5311
Tota
l FFY
201
8-20
19 $
7,18
7,46
4 $
4,38
4,69
0 $
2,80
2,77
4
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
prov
emen
t Pro
gram
35
20
15
For i
nfor
mat
ional
pur
poses
only.
FFY
2019
- 20
20 (O
ct . 2
019
- Sep
t . 20
20)
Proj
ect N
umbe
rPr
ojec
t Nam
ePh
ase
Tota
l Cos
t Fe
dera
l Fun
dsLo
cal S
hare
Fund
ing
Sour
ce01
LA90
Xho
uma2
0G
ood
Ear
th T
rans
it - U
rban
Ope
ratin
g R
egul
ar A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$1,
165,
810
$58
2,90
5 $
582,
905
Sect
ion
5307
02LA
90X
houm
a20
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an P
lanni
ng A
ssist
ance
Plan
ning
80/
20 $
193,
988
$15
5,19
0 $
38,7
98
Sect
ion
5307
03LA
90X
houm
a20
Goo
d E
arth
Tra
nsit
- Urb
an C
apita
l Op
Ast
(Mai
nten
ance
)C
apita
l 80/
20 $
727,
250
$58
1,80
0 $
145,
450
Sect
ion
5307
04A
ssum
ptio
n A
RC -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
53,7
57
$43
,005
$
10,7
51
Sect
ion
5310
05A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$42
,953
$
34,3
62
$8,
591
Sect
ion
5311
06A
ssum
ptio
n C
OA
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
293,
392
$14
6,69
6 $
146,
696
Sect
ion
5311
07G
reyh
ound
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
1,97
2,93
9 $
986,
470
$98
6,47
0 Se
ctio
n 53
1008
Lafo
urch
e ARC
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$42
,953
$
34,3
62
$8,
591
Sect
ion
5310
09La
four
che A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$15
9,86
6 $
79,9
33
$79
,933
Se
ctio
n 53
1010
Lafo
urch
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$12
0,02
1 $
96,0
17
$24
,004
Se
ctio
n 53
10
11Sp
ecia
l Edu
catio
n D
istric
t No.
1 of
Laf
ourc
he -
Cap
ital,
Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
21,4
76
$17
,181
$
4,29
5 Se
ctio
n 53
1012
Terre
bone
ARC
- C
apita
l Rol
ling
Stoc
kC
apita
l 80/
20 $
294,
318
$23
5,45
4 $
58,8
64
Sect
ion
5310
13Te
rrebo
nne A
RC -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$29
4,31
8 $
147,
159
$14
7,15
9 Se
ctio
n 53
1014
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- C
apita
l, R
ollin
g St
ock
Cap
ital 8
0/20
$16
1,27
0 $
129,
016
$32
,254
Se
ctio
n 53
1015
Terre
bonn
e Cou
ncil
on A
ging
- O
pera
ting
Ass
istan
ceO
pera
ting
50/5
0 $
410,
257
$20
5,12
8 $
205,
128
Sect
ion
5310
16Te
rrebo
nne C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng -
Ope
ratin
g A
ssist
ance
Ope
ratin
g 50
/50
$35
5,91
0 $
177,
955
$17
7,95
5 Se
ctio
n 53
11To
tal F
FY 2
019-
2020
$6,
310,
477
$3,
652,
634
$2,
657,
843