2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT€¦ · Administrative Extension as it expired in January 2015. It...

2016-2017

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

TO THE

SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

SARWQCB ORDER NO. R8-2010-0033 NPDES NO. CAS 618033

NOVEMBER 30, 2017

BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITIES OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY (SANTA ANA REGION)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT The District would like to thank the following agencies and their stormwater program representatives for supplying information used in the 2016-2017 Annual Report.

Beaumont Mr. Amer Jakher Calimesa Ms. Lori Askew Canyon Lake Mr. Ariel Hall Corona Mr. Jeff Potts Eastvale Mr. Joe Indrawan Hemet Mr. Daniel Cortese Jurupa Valley Mr. Bob Makowski Lake Elsinore Ms. Rita Thompson Menifee Mr. Jonathan Smith Moreno Valley Mr. Ahmad Ansari Norco Mr. Dan Cuthbertson Perris Mr. Michael Morales Riverside Mr. Michael Roberts Riverside County Ms. Claudia Steiding San Jacinto Mr. Rob Johnson

Special thanks to Ms. Charlene Warren for her assistance with compiling and assembling both the reporting information and the report itself.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... ES-1

INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... I-1

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................... 1-1

1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................... 1-1

Management Steering Committee ........................................................................................... 1-3

Technical Advisory Committee ............................................................................................... 1-5

Subcommittees ........................................................................................................................ 1-7

Implementation Agreement ................................................................................................... 1-14

2. FISCAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 2-1

Permittee Budgets And Expenditures ...................................................................................... 2-2

Area-Wide Programs ............................................................................................................... 2-3

Funding Sources ...................................................................................................................... 2-3

Santa Ana Watershed Benefit Assessment Area ............................................................... 2-3

County Service Area 152 .................................................................................................. 2-4

Street Sweeping Assessment............................................................................................. 2-4

Utility Charge ................................................................................................................... 2-5

General Fund / Other Revenues ........................................................................................ 2-5

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................ 3-1

3. LEGAL AUTHORITY .................................................................................................................. 3-1

4. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION........................................................... 4-1

Local Implementation Plan ..................................................................................................... 4-1

Drainage Area Management Plan ............................................................................................ 4-1

5. ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES ................................................................ 5-1

Actions to Investigate and Eliminate IC/ID ............................................................................ 5-1

Field Reconnaissance Activity ................................................................................................ 5-1

Results Database ...................................................................................................................... 5-1

Training ................................................................................................................................... 5-1

6. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ..................................................... 6-1

Inventory Database .................................................................................................................. 6-1

Inspector Training Requirements ............................................................................................ 6-2

7. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES ....................................................................... 7-1

Current Industrial and Commercial Facility Inspections ......................................................... 7-1

Compliance Assistance Program ............................................................................................. 7-1

Industrial/Commercial Facility Database ................................................................................ 7-3

Inspection Requirements ......................................................................................................... 7-3

Industrial/Commercial Facility Inspector Training ................................................................. 7-4

8. RESIDENTIAL ............................................................................................................................. 8-1

9. PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES ........................................................................... 9-1

MS4 Maintenance Program ..................................................................................................... 9-1

Fertilizer/Pesticide Applicator Training Requirements ........................................................... 9-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE


10. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ................................................................................................... 10-1

Water Quality Management Plan .......................................................................................... 10-1

Hydromodification ................................................................................................................ 10-8

11. MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT ................................................ UNDER SEPARATE COVER

12. PUBLIC EDUCATION and OUTREACH.................................................................................. 12-1

Program Overview ................................................................................................................ 12-1

Program Highlights ............................................................................................................... 12-1

BMP Outreach Activities for Santa Ana Pollutants of Concern ........................................... 12-2

13. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 13-1

14. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT & FUTURE SAR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS .............. 14-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS


LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 Attendance at NPDES Santa Ana MSC Meetings ................................................. 1-4

Table 1-2 Attendance at NPDES Santa Ana TAC Meetings ................................................. 1-6

Table 2-1 Permittee Budgets and Expenditures ..................................................................... 2-2

Table 2-2 Budgets and Expenditures – Area Wide Programs (Santa Ana Region) ............... 2-3

Table 3-1 Legal Authority/Enforcement ................................................................................ 3-2

Table 4-1 Program Implementation and Evaluation .............................................................. 4-2

Table 5-1 Illicit Connections/Illegal Discharges .................................................................... 5-2

Table 6-1 Construction Activities Summary Table ................................................................ 6-3

Table 7-1 Industrial Commercial Activities Summary Table ................................................ 7-6

Table 8-1 Residential.............................................................................................................. 8-2

Table 9-1 Permittee Facilities and Activities ......................................................................... 9-2

Table 10-1 Department Responsible for Conditions of Approval ......................................... 10-1

Table 10-2 Development Planning ......................................................................................... 10-2

Table 12-1 Public Education and Outreach .......................................................................... 12-13

Table 13-1 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program Effectiveness ................... 12-5

Table 13-2 Permittee Facilities and Activities Program Effectiveness .................................. 13-6

Table 13-3 Development Planning Program Effectiveness ................................................... 13-7

Table 13-4 Private Development Construction Activity Program Effectiveness .................. 13-8

Table 13-5 Industrial and Commercial Sources Program Effectiveness ................................ 13-9

Table 13-6 Residential Sources Program Effectiveness ....................................................... 13-10

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure I-1 Map of Permit Area ............................................................................................... I-7

Figure 1-1 Organizational Chart – Riverside County NPDES Municipal Stormwater

Permits .................................................................................................................. 1-2

LIST OF EXHIBIT

Exhibit A Riverside County Watershed Protection Program Dialogue ............................... 12-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS


APPENDICES

A – NPDES Meetings Management Steering Committee Technical Advisory Committee Southern California Monitoring Coalition California Stormwater Quality Association Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Middle Santa Ana River Task TMDL Task Force Public Education Committee

B – Training Attendance Sign-in sheets for District-sponsored Training

C – Household Hazardous Waste Collection Report

D – Hazardous Material Response Team Report

E – Public Education NPDES Complaints received by District Staff Riverside County Watershed Protection Public Outreach Program

F – Program Evaluation (Debris Removal) and MS4 Maps Debris Removed from MS4 MS4 Maps

G – Implementation Agreement

H - Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan Implementation Summary

I - Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan Implementation Summary

J - Permittee Reports

K - ICID Results Database

L - Compliance Surveys and Spreadsheets

M - June 2017 DAMP

P8/217699

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page ES-1

Executive Summary The Riverside County Watershed Protection Program (Program) is a cooperative municipal regulatory compliance initiative focused on the management of urban and stormwater runoff for the protection and enhancement of Riverside County's creeks, rivers, streams, and lakes. The Program partners comprise of the County of Riverside (County), incorporated cities in Riverside County, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) as well as the Coachella Valley Water District. The partners work together to develop effective and innovative programs aimed at improving water quality and managing stormwater runoff throughout their respective watersheds. The Program encompasses three different watersheds: Santa Ana Region, Santa Margarita Region and Whitewater River Region, each regulated by the Santa Ana, San Diego, and Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Boards, respectively. As a result, three different National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permits administered by the above-mentioned Regional Boards have been issued to the District, the County, and the incorporated cities (collectively, Permittees) that fall under each respective Regional Board jurisdiction. The main purpose of this report is to comply with the Santa Ana Region MS4 Permit by reporting on the status stormwater program activities undertaken by the Permittees from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. Descriptions of the various programmatic activities and an evaluation of their effectiveness are found in this report. Compliance activities include implementing Low Impact Development (LID) on a county-wide basis, public education outreach effort, conducting regulatory oversight of new construction and industrial and commercial facilities, municipal housekeeping, and environmental monitoring. Santa Ana Region Permittee accomplishments during the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 include:

The Watershed Action Plan (WAP) and its components, the Regional Database, the Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping and Report, and the Hydromodification Management Plan were approved by the Regional Board on April 20, 2017.

Continued participation in the Santa Ana "One Water One Watershed" (OWOW) planning process which focuses on establishing regional solutions for water problems within the Santa Ana Watershed and is intended to develop connections between all water interests. The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) is the administrator of OWOW planning process.

51 public education presentations made to 7,203 local elementary school students educating them on stormwater pollution prevention.

Continued implementation of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Template and Guidance documents for new development resulting in 3,909 acres of projects incorporating LID-based BMP's that are built and completed.

14,544 estimated total tons of waste removed by Permittee street sweeping and 7,372 total estimated tons of waste removed from Permittee open channels.

Investigation of 865 illicit connections and/or illegal discharges.

No appeals of local water quality ordinances were incurred indicating the continued

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page ES-2

effectives of the Permittees' local legal authority for program implementation.

Continued implementation of the bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program for the Middle Santa Ana River (Reach 3) and the nutrient TMDL program for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore.

Continued active participation in the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) and Stormwater Monitoring Coalition (SMC).

Completion of the dry weather monitoring programs, including the dry weather MS4 outfall and receiving water programs, IDDE program, and SMC bioassessment program were all completed.

Completion of wet weather sampling at all MS4 outfalls and receiving water stations. A key factor contributing to the monitoring success was that it was an average rainfall year, whereas, prior years had been below average, and that improvements to the field protocols have been effective.

Bacterial indicators remain a regional pollutant of concern. Although nitrogen-nutrients have previously been identified as a regional pollutant of concern, nitrogen-nutrients were not found to be in exceedance of applicable WQO's during the 2016-2017 monitoring year. Dissolved copper exceedances were measured at all of the MS4 outfall stations and the Perris Valley Channel receiving water station during wet weather. Where statistically significant trends could be identified, as found for wet weather data from two outfalls, the concentrations of dissolved copper appear to be decreasing with time. The monitoring results and assessments are provided in detail in Section 11. The Permittees assess program effectiveness using (1) the recommendations and findings arising from regulatory audits; (2) metrics based on the CASQA Effectiveness Assessment Guidance document that helps to correlate program compliance activities with their potential to enhance water quality; and (3) findings from analyses of the dry and wet weather monitoring data. Arising from this assessment, the Permittees anticipate there being a focus in FY 2017-2018 on the application of Geographical Information Systems (GIS)-based applications to improve data management and better enable program effectiveness assessment at both the regional and jurisdictional scales. A notable challenge that the Permittees are anticipating in FY 2017-2018 is the formulation of a new Fifth-Term MS4 Permit with the likely inclusion of new mandates, notably the State Trash Amendments and a requirement for development of a watershed management approach.

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION Page I-3

Introduction The Riverside County Watershed Protection Program (Program) is a cooperative municipal regulatory compliance initiative focused on the management of urban and stormwater runoff for the protection and enhancement of Riverside County's creeks, rivers, streams, and lakes. The primary objective of the Program is to fulfill the commitment of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the District), County of Riverside and the cities of Riverside County (collectively, "Permittees"), to develop and implement a program that satisfies the requirements of an area-wide municipal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit, specifically, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Santa Ana Regional Board) Order R8-2010-0033. The MS4 Permit was issued an Administrative Extension as it expired in January 2015. It is anticipated that the permit negotiations for the draft permit will resume in late FY 2017-2018. The purpose of this document is to comply with the requirement for an annual submittal of a progress report. This report discusses the Permittees’ NPDES Permit compliance activities over the period July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. It includes a description of all activities that were conducted during the reporting period and an assessment of program effectiveness. These compliance activities include countywide implementation of Low Impact Development (LID) and hydromodification control strategies as part of local land development regulation, delivery of a public education and outreach campaign and regulatory oversight of construction activities, municipal infrastructure management and the built environment. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND REPORTING FORMAT The current MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to report on the progress and status of their stormwater program activities in an annual report. This Annual Report is intended to comply with that requirement and also chronicle and evaluate the Program’s contribution to the protection and enhancement of Riverside County’s creeks, rivers, streams, and lakes. Consequently, this report:

Describes all activities that were conducted during the reporting period to comply with the MS4 Permit;

Assesses program effectiveness; and

Identifies areas of future program development which may involve either enhanced implementation or new program initiatives.

This annual report reflects the content of the program's principal planning document, which is the (DAMP). The DAMP comprises policy and program guidance and jurisdiction specific Local Implementation Plans (LIPs). Accordingly, this report comprises:

A countywide unified assessment (this Annual Progress Report); and

Jurisdictional assessments completed separately by each Permittee (individual reports

INTRODUCTION


prepared by each Permittee are found in Appendix J.) Summary tables appear throughout this report that summarize the information pertaining to the various program activities implemented by the Permittees. While the District aggregates the information presented in the summary tables, the information is provided by each of the individual Permittees. For additional information regarding any individual Permittee's program, the readers of this report should refer to that Permittee's reporting forms provided in Appendix J – Permittee Reports. The remainder of this report reviews the Permittees' accomplishments over the course of the reporting period and presents the status of the Permittees' ongoing efforts and planned activities to implement their respective municipal stormwater programs and comply with the provisions of the 2010 MS4 Permit. BACKGROUND The Program addresses the impacts to creeks, rivers, streams, and coastal waters that can arise from the imprint of urban development on the landscape. Urbanization creates rooftops, driveways, roads and parking lots which (1) increase the timing and volume of rainfall runoff (compared to pre-development conditions) and (2) provide a source of pollutants that are flushed or leached by rainfall runoff or dry weather runoff into surface water systems. The environmental consequences of these impacts can be loss or impairment of aquatic beneficial uses due to:

Water quality degradation from increased loadings of sediment, nutrients, metals hydrocarbons, pesticides, and bacteria;

Stream channel instability and habitat loss from increased severity and frequency of runoff events; loss of groundwater recharge; and

Increased water temperatures from solar energy absorption by urban surfaces and elimination of riparian shading.

CLEAN WATER ACT The 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act, subsequently known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), established the NPDES permitting program to regulate the discharge of pollutants to waterways. In 1987, Congress passed an Amendment to the CWA, the Water Quality Act, which brought stormwater discharges into the NPDES permitting program. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) subsequently promulgated stormwater regulations (40 CFR Parts 122, 123 and 124) on November 16, 1990, which established NPDES permit application requirements for municipal storm drain system operators and industrial dischargers of stormwater.

MUNICIPAL NPDES STORMWATER PERMITS

INTRODUCTION


In response to the stormwater regulations, the Permittees have obtained, renewed, and complied with NPDES stormwater permits from the Santa Ana Regional Board. Each permit renewal has required the Permittees to coordinate the development and implementation of a surface water (i.e., creeks, rivers, streams, and coastal waters) quality protection and management program to:

Effectively prohibit non-stormwater discharges into the storm sewers; and

Reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), using management practices, control techniques and system, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate for the control of such pollutants.

SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED Figure I-1shows a map of the Permit area that includes the Principal Permittee (District) and the Permittees' jurisdictional areas within the Santa Ana Region that pertains to Riverside County. Land use types are also displayed in this figure.


FIGURE I-1. MAP OF PERMIT AREA

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Page 1-1 Section 1 – Program Organization

1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION The 2010 MS4 Permit was adopted on January 29, 2010 by the Santa Ana Regional Board whom designates the District as the Principal Permittee. The County of Riverside, and the Cities of Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto and Wildomar are designated as Co-Permittees. Subsequently, during the adoption of the 2010 Santa Margarita MS4 Permit, the San Diego Regional Board and the Santa Ana Regional Board agreed to allow the cities of Murrieta and Wildomar to be wholly regulated under the San Diego Regional Board for the purposes of the MS4 Permit requirements, while Menifee would be wholly regulated under the Santa Ana Regional Board for the purposes of the MS4 Permit requirements. On June 7, 2013 the Santa Ana Regional Board adopted Order No. R8-2013-0024 amending Order No. R8-2010-0033, NPDES No. CAS 618033 to add the newly incorporated cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the list of Permittees. The Order also removed two cities, Murrieta and Wildomar, from the list of Permittees; and added all portions of

the City of Menifee under the Order, including those portions that are under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Board. In accordance with the San Diego MS4 Permit, Order No. R9-2010-0016, the Cities of Murrieta and Wildomar are required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Santa Ana MS4 Permit, Order R8-2010-0033, pertaining to implementation of the nutrient total maximum daily loads (TMDL) pertaining to Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Similarly, Order R8-2010-0033 requires the City of Menifee to comply with any TMDLs and associated MS4 Permit requirements issued by the San Diego Regional Board that includes the City of Menifee as a responsible party. The 2010 MS4 Permit expired in January 2015 and was issued an Administrative Extension until a new Fifth-Term MS4 Permit is issued to the Santa Ana Region Permittees. The responsibilities of the Principal Permittee and the Co-Permittees are defined in Section III of the Permit. Figure 1-1 illustrates the relationships between the regulatory agencies, the Principal Permittee, the Co-Permittees, and the other municipal stormwater permit areas in the County.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Section 1 – Program Organization Page 1-2

FIGURE 1-1. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART – RIVERSIDE COUNTY NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITS

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


MANAGEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE The Management Steering Committee (MSC) met twice during FY 2016-2017 and was facilitated through the Western Regional Council of Government's (WRCOG) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) which consists of the City Managers, Public Works Directors, and other essential Co-Permittee staff. The program updates provided to the MSC addresses urban runoff management policies for the Permit Area and coordinated the review and necessary revisions to the DAMP, Implementation Agreement, updates to the WQMP, updates regarding CBRP and CNRP implementation, and providing information regarding the Trash Amendments. In addition, the MSC facilitates coordination with other water quality management and monitoring programs, and responds to new legislative and regulatory initiatives. The meeting agendas and minutes are included in Appendix A. In addition, Table 1-1 provides the record of attendance for the MSC meetings. Specifically, at the January 19, 2017 WRCOG TAC meeting, the MSC received a presentation on the Federal Clean Water Act Stormwater Permit Program which included an update of the compliance programs and pollutant-waterbody specific programs. The presentation also included an update on the stormwater permit renewal status, potential issues with the permit renewal, and the Santa Margarita Region Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQIP) update. The MSC received a presentation on May 23, 2017 on the Federal Clean Water Act Stormwater Permit Program, which included an update of the compliance programs and waterbody-specific programs. The presentation also included an update on the renewal status of the three watershed permits, potential issues with the Santa Ana permit renewal, information on the challenge of the 303(d) listing proposed to the public with new pollutant concerns, and an update on the WAP approval.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


TABLE 1-1. ATTENDANCE AT NPDES SANTA ANA MSC MEETINGS

19-Jan-17 23-May-17

RCFC

County

X

Beaumont

X

Calimesa

Canyon Lake

Corona

Eastvale

Hemet

X

Jurupa Valley

X

Lake Elsinore

X

Menifee

Moreno Valley

X

Norco

X

Perris

Riverside

X

San Jacinto

Attended Meeting

X Did Not Attend

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consists of representatives formally appointed by each Permittee's City Manager or equivalent. The purpose of the TAC is to coordinate the implementation of the DAMP and overall MS4 Permit compliance program. The District chairs and provides staff support to the TAC. TAC meeting agendas and minutes are included in Appendix A.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Table 1-2. Attendance at FY 2016-2017 NPDES Santa Ana Technical Advisory Committee Meetings

28-Jul-16 25-Aug-16 22-Sep-16 27-Oct-16 26-Nov-16 7-Dec-16 26-Jan-17 23-Feb-17 23-Mar-17 27-Apr-17 25-May-17 22-Jun-17

RCFC DARK

County DARK X

Beaumont DARK

Calimesa X X DARK X

Canyon Lake DARK

Corona DARK

Eastvale X DARK X

Hemet DARK

Jurupa Valley X DARK X

Lake Elsinore DARK X

Menifee DARK

Moreno Valley DARK X

Norco X DARK X X

Perris X DARK X

Riverside X DARK

San Jacinto X DARK X

RWQCB Santa Ana

DARK X

Attended Meeting

X Did Not Attend

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


SUBCOMMITTEES

Public Education The Permittees have established an ongoing watershed based public education and outreach program known as the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program. The specific objectives of the public education program are included in Section 12.

Stormwater Monitoring Coalition (SMC) The District participates in the SMC on behalf of the Permittees. The SMC includes representatives from the Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Ana Regional Boards, and each of the Principal Permittees in southern California (i.e., the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura), and other interested municipalities. The overall goal for the SMC is to establish a southern California stormwater research and monitoring agenda that focuses on improving stormwater monitoring science, coordinating data collection efforts, and evaluating the effects of stormwater discharges to receiving waters specific to southern California. Copies of the SMC Annual Report for FY 2016-2017, as well as the meeting agendas and reports for SMC on-going projects are available online at http://socalsmc.org/.

TMDL Task Forces Riverside County Permittees within the MSAR Watershed (MSAR Permittees) participate in the MSAR Bacterial Indicator TMDL Task Force (MSAR TMDL Task Force). Riverside County Permittees within the San Jacinto River (SJR Permittees) Watershed participate in the LE/CL Nutrient TMDL Task Force. The purpose of the TMDL Task Forces is to facilitate a coordinated and cost-effective approach to comply with the MSAR Bacterial Indicator TMDL and LE/CL Nutrient TMDL. Activity reports that were completed by the MSAR TMDL Task Force are included in Appendix H and the LE/CL TMDL Task Force reports are in Appendix I. The District is currently working to identify feasible alternatives to help mitigate dry weather flows within Eastvale MDP Line D and Line E that will help address the MSAR TMDL. A geotechnical analysis was performed for Line E that identified a shallow groundwater table. The shallow groundwater depth potentially eliminates the ability for infiltration of dry weather flows. Alternatively, the District will look into potentially diverting dry weather flows to an existing sewer system or bioretention system to eliminate dry weather flows. The District is also looking into developing a multipurpose project at the existing Kansas Avenue Basin in the City of Riverside that could provide water conservation and quality improvements. Additional engineering analysis, budget limitations, environmental permitting and stakeholder partnerships need to be addressed prior to determining Eastvale Line D, Line E and Kansas Ave Basin projects.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


Stormwater Quality Task Force (SWQTF) The SWQSTF was created to review the recreational beneficial uses of the Santa Ana River Watershed. The goal of the SWQSTF is to effectively direct the limited funding sources allocated for TMDL compliance toward the activities that would result in the greatest measurable benefits. The SWQSTF and MSAR TMDL Task Force meetings are coordinated by SAWPA.

The District partnered with Western Municipal Water District (WMWD) to fund the expansion of their Arlington Desalter facility. The original project consists of construction of three recharge basins with a monitoring well at each location, an extraction well, and a raw water pipeline that connects the extraction well with the Arlington Desalter. After further analysis, it was determined that Victoria Basin (east of the intersection of Van Buren and Victoria Avenues) was the only feasible project site out of the three locations. WMWD completed the preliminary design report for Victoria Avenue Basin Project. The project will facilitate recharge of currently unused or underutilized local water resources, including stormwater and dry-weather flows. The project also received Proposition 84 grant funding, and is expected to incorporate multiple benefits, including increasing the sustainable yield of the Arlington Groundwater Basin, and decreasing pollutant loads (particularly bacteria) to the Santa Ana River.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Section 2 – Fiscal Analysis Page 2-1

2. FISCAL ANALYSIS The costs incurred by the Permittees implementing the Santa Ana Region DAMP fall into two broad categories:

Shared Costs: These are costs that fund activities that are principally performed by the District under the Implementation Agreement. These activities include overall stormwater program coordination; interagency agreements; partnering with CASQA; attending meetings of the Santa Ana Regional Board or State Board; and coordination of consultant studies, Permittee meetings, and training seminars.

Individual Permittee Costs for DAMP Implementation: These are costs incurred by each Permittee for implementing BMPs within its jurisdiction (drainage facility inspections for illicit connections, illegal discharges, drainage facility maintenance, drain inlet/catch basin stenciling, emergency spill response, street sweeping, litter control, public education, etc.).

PERMITTEE BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES

The Permittees' individual budgets for FY 2017-2018 and the reported expenditures for FY 2016-2017 are presented in each Permittee's individual Annual Report. A summary showing these expenditures reported by the Permittees is provided in Table 2-1.

TABLE 2-1. PERMITTEE BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES

AGENCY 2016-2017

EXPENDITURES2017-2018 BUDGET

POPULATION 1

Beaumont $410,000 $382,300 45,118

Calimesa $30,146 $48,750 8,289

Canyon Lake $171,458 $172,952 10,681

Corona $1,575,390 $1,769,114 164,659

Eastvale $125,435 $161,469 63,162

Hemet $930,586 $895,893 80,070

Jurupa Valley $264,000 $314,422 98,177

Lake Elsinore $178,080 $404,585 61,006

Menifee $323,100 $375,900 89,004

Moreno Valley $956,158 $1,367,617 205,383

Norco $85,814.03 $130,572 26,896

Perris $173,865 $370,057 73,722

Riverside $4,671,970 $5,327,268 324,696

San Jacinto $1,166,076 $1,390,454 47,656

County of Riverside $6,348,884 $511,985 364,413

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


AGENCY 2016-2017

EXPENDITURES2017-2018 BUDGET

POPULATION 1

RCFC&WCD $500,613.36 $2,754,778 N/A

TOTALS $17,911,575.39 $16,378,116.00 1,662,932 1 Source: State of California, Dept. of Finance, E-1 Population Estimates, and RCIT's Riverside County Progress Report. 3 Note that populations for the County include areas that may not be wholly within the Santa Ana Region. 4Represents county-wide expenditures.

AREA-WIDE PROGRAMS

The District provides financial support for several area-wide BMP programs including Hazardous Materials Emergency Spill Response (HazMat Team), Household Hazardous Waste Collection (HHW), and the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program (Public Education). In addition, the District implements the stormwater monitoring program on behalf of all Permittees. A table summarizing FY 2017-2018 budget and FY 2016-2017 expenditures for these activities is provided in Table 2-2, on the following page.

TABLE 2-2. BUDGETS AND EXPENDITURES – AREA WIDE PROGRAMS

(SANTA ANA REGION)

PROGRAM/ACTIVITY 2017-2018

Budget 2016-20171

Expenditures Consulting Services $276,000.00 $37,446.05 Public Education $324,170.00 $2,776.87

Water Quality Monitoring $415,500.00 $33,683.42

Regional Pollution Prevention $355,130.00 $57,568.18

Staff and Administration $1,383,978.00 $361,524.43

TOTAL $2,754,778.00 $492,998.95 1Expenditures estimated at the time of preparation of this Annual Report.

FUNDING SOURCES

The Permittees currently employ four distinct funding methods alone or in combination to finance their MS4 Permit compliance activities.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA The District established the Santa Ana Watershed Benefit Assessment Area (SAWBAA) in May 1991. SAWBAA revenues fund both area-wide or "umbrella" DAMP activities and the District's individual MS4 Permit compliance activities. The SAWBAA covers the "urbanized" portions of the Santa Ana River Watershed within Riverside County, including both incorporated (City) and unincorporated (County) areas. Property owners are assessed for the benefit derived from the development and

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


implementation of the DAMP activities supported or conducted by the District. Certain areas, e.g., the more rural and remote mountainous regions, were excluded from the SAWBAA since little or no urban runoff is generated in those areas. Undeveloped, vacant parcels and agricultural parcels are exempted from the benefit assessment. Assessments are calculated by the District and enrolled on the property tax bills generated by the County Tax Assessor's Office. The amount of the assessment is based on a parcel's proportionate contribution to urban runoff, which is a function of parcel size and its use. Since the SAWBAA is an area-wide revenue source, certain activities and programs that are considered of common and equal benefit to the entire area are financed, either wholly or in part, by the funds generated by the District's annual benefit assessment revenue. These area-wide activities include:

Monitoring Program (consolidated program for water quality monitoring);

HazMat Team – HazMat Response Team Annual Report provided as Appendix D;

ABOP/HHW Collection Program – Information regarding HHW collection events provided as Appendix C;

Riverside County Watershed Program (Public Education); and

Administrative/Program Management. COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 The County of Riverside formed County Service Area 152 (CSA 152) in December 1991 to provide funding for MS4 Permit compliance activities. Originally, the CSA 152 assessment was collected through property tax bills as an annual parcel charge in the unincorporated portions of the County. In FY 1993-1994, the County adopted the same methodology (proportional runoff) for assessment calculations used by the District. In FY 1995-1996, the County developed a modified assessment methodology and began using the Transportation and Land Management Agency's Geographic Information System (GIS) to perform the assessment calculations. Under the laws that govern CSAs, subareas may be established within the overall service area with different assessment rates set within each subarea. For example, the Cities of Corona, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Norco, Riverside, and San Jacinto elected to participate in CSA 152. Under the CSA 152 program, individual Cities determine their respective assessment rates and have broad discretion over how to allocate the funds. Several of these Cities also reported that they supplement their CSA 152 revenue with general fund and other sources of revenue.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT


STREET SWEEPING ASSESSMENT In response to the provisions of Proposition 218, the County restructured its CSA 152 funding program as a voter-approved street sweeping assessment in certain unincorporated areas. At the same time, the County has allowed the participating Cities to continue their previously existing CSA 152 assessments to go relatively unchanged. UTILITY CHARGE The City of Hemet funds a portion of its NPDES program activities through a utility charge. The charge is collected via the monthly utility bills issued by the City of Hemet, the Lake Hemet Water District, or Eastern Municipal Water District according to the respective service areas within the city. In addition, the City of Hemet reports using gas tax, general fund, and other revenues to support certain stormwater management activities. GENERAL FUND / OTHER REVENUES The remaining Permittees utilize general fund revenue to finance their NPDES activities. Several of the Permittees currently rely on their general fund to finance their DAMP activities. In November 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 ("The Right to Vote on Taxes Initiatives") amending Article XIII of the State Constitution.1 Proposition 218 produced changes to some of the Permittees' historic funding sources and still looms as a potential threat to others. For example, the County dropped CSA 152 fees in unincorporated areas over concerns regarding compliance with Proposition 218 provisions. As with other municipal programs, the level of funding available for DAMP activities depends largely on the public's willingness to provide financial resources. In general, funds available for DAMP programs have become increasingly scarce as sources of municipal revenues have declined for many local agencies. The provisions of Proposition 218, requiring voter approval of new taxes and assessments, have significantly diminished the prospects for developing new or alternative funding sources.

1 The Proposition 218 amendments require voter approval of any new taxes, fees, assessments, etc. In addition, certain existing taxes and assessments were subject to the Initiative's voter approval requirements. "Special Taxes", as defined by the Initiative, requires a 2/3rds majority vote while other types of assessments may only require a simple majority. In addition, voter approval is required to raise any existing special tax or assessment rates by the Initiative, and require a 2/3rds majority while other types of assessments may only require a simple majority. In addition, voter approval is required to raise any existing special tax or assessment rates.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 3 – Legal Authority Page 3-1

3. LEGAL AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT Provision No. VIII of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to maintain adequate legal authority to control the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 from urban runoff and enforce those authorities. Provision No. VIII.F of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to annually review their stormwater ordinances and their ordinance enforcement practices to assess their effectiveness in prohibiting the discharges listed in the MS4 Permit. A summary of each Permittee's application of its legal authority, as reported to the District, is presented in Table 3-1, which details the investigation of 865 complaints regarding illicit connections and illegal discharges. Since there have been no appeals of an enforcement action, local legal authority is currently considered to be effective.

Table 3-1 – Legal Authority


LEGAL AUTHORITY/ENFORCEMENT 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT Provision Nos. VIII.B, XI.A.2, and XVI.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a summary of enforcement actions against violators of their stormwater codes and ordinances.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont

Incident Date Violation Pollutants/

Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

9/16/16 Full oil container left outdoors Oil/ quantity unknown Verbal warning and education

Used oil container has been cleaned.

10/31/16 Oil container left outdoors Oil/ quantity unknown Verbal warning and education

Containment/protection for outdoor oil containers provided.

12/7/16 Stormwater interceptor has not been maintained

Oil & grease/

quantity unknown

Verbal warning and education

Interceptor maintenance provided.

1/4/17 Discharge of construction wastewater into City Storm Drain

Sediment/ quantity unknown


Additional BMPs placed on Construction site


Sediment/ quantity unknown


Segregate construction runoff from municipal stormwater


Wash water/quantity unknown

Notice of

Corrective action

Additional BMPs placed on Construction site

2/10/17 Stormwater interceptor has not been maintained

Oil & grease/

quantity unknown

Verbal and written warning

Interceptor maintenance provided.

Calimesa


Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

5/15/2017 1 Mud, Silt Debris

Notice of Violation

Resolved

5/15/2017 1 Mud, Silt, Debris

Notice of Violation

In Enforcement

Canyon Lake

Incident Date

Violation Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s) Disposition

7/5/16

Spill/ Release of Fuel at rental docks unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

7/18/16

Sewage Spill near vacant lot West San Joaquin

unknown Citations Issued, also referred to CA

Waterboard

EVMWD Vactor truck, samplings

taken of lake waters



7/18/16 Spill release of oil East Port Launch

Ramps 1 Quart Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

7/22/16

oil spill from CR&R truck 1 gallon

No Action Taken, self cleaned and

reported

CR&R Soil/ Absorbents

8/9/16 Fuel Release from boat Holiday Harbor

Main launch ramp 1/2 gallon Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

8/26/16

Antifreeze Release 1 gallon Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents 10/7/16 Contaminated car washing waters unknown Written Warning removed

10/10/16

motor oil, gas and antifreeze approx. 3

gallons Written Warning sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

10/27/16

Bioxide Spill unknown Citation Issued sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

10/29/16

fuel spill/ release 1/2 Quart Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

9/6/16

Motor Oil gas and antifreeze 1 Quart Written Warning sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

11/1/16

fuel spill/ release 1/4 Quart Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

11/8/16

Release of motor oil unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

11/8/16

drips of oil/ POA boat unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

11/9/16

drips of oil/ POA boat unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

11/20/16

fuel spill/ release unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

11/20/16

motor oil, gas and antifreeze unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

11/22/16

Release Gas & oil unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

12/6/16

Release of motor oil unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

12/8/17

Engine coolant 1 gallon Written Warning sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

12/12/16

hydraulic fluids 16 oz Written Warning sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent



12/19/16

pool plaster runoff 16 oz Citation Issued sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

12/27/16

car washing water unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

1/6/17 car washing water unknown Written Warning dissipated

1/27/17

cement mixed w lake waters 25 gallons Citation Issued sand bags/ dry granular absorbent

2/23/17 Runoff unknown Written Warning dissipated

4/25/17

Release Oil unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

5/10/17

Sewage spill unknown Written Warning EVMWD Vactor

truck & staff

5/12/17

Sewage spill unknown Written Warning EVMWD Vactor truck & staff

5/15/17

Release Oil unknown Written Warning sand bags/ dry

granular absorbent

5/30/17

Cement or Grout unknown Citation Issued EVMWD Vactor truck & staff

6/1/17

Sewage spill unknown Written Warning EVMWD Vactor

truck & staff

6/6/17 Release of motor oil/ Jeep into lake at main launch 6 Quarts Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

6/17/17 Spill unleaded gas sinking boat private docks 1 quart Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

6/24/17

Paint runoff unknown Citation Issued Evaporate prior to response

7/5/16

Spill/ Release of Fuel at rental docks unknown Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso

rbents

7/18/16

Sewage Spill near vacant lot West San Joaquin

unknown Citation Issued, Referred to CA Waterboard for

prosecution

EVMWD Vactor truck, samplings

taken of lake waters

7/18/16 Spill release of oil East Port Launch

Ramps 1 Quart Written Warning Booms/Mats/Abso rbents

7/22/16

oil spill from CR&R truck 1 gallon Written Warning CR&R Soil/

Absorbents

Corona Incident Date Violation Pollutants/

Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition



SEE ATTACHED SUMMARY- ATTACHMENT ‘E’

Eastvale

Incident Date

Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

7/18/2016 Washed into street gutter Cement Warning given and clean up Nothing entered storm drain and debris was swept and vacuumed up

7/25/2016 Liquid waste leaking from yard into gutter and catch basin

Wash water from paint brushes

Warning given and clean up completed

Minimal amount of paint wash water ran into CB, everything else was dammed off and cleaned up

8/1/2016 Wash water from trash enclosure flowing directly towards an onsite catch basin

Dirty water from trash enclosure

Warning given and clean up completed

Enclosure and parking lot mopped up and vacuumed

9/13/2016 Washed into street gutter and small amount entered storm drain

Cement Warning given and clean up completed

Minimal amount of cement wash water ran into CB, everything else was dammed off and cleaned up

3/28/2017 Fluid leaked into street from work truck

Hydraulic Fluid Warning given and clean up completed

No water entered storm drain or catch basin/ street cleaned of leaked hydraulic fluid

6/7/2017 Oil leaking form vehicle in Street Oil Warning given and clean up completed

No oil entered storm drain/catch basin, was cleaned before

5/30/2017 Construction materials being dumped in parking lot of Goodman entering storm drain and detention basin

Paint, drywall Warning given and clean up completed

All water entered into the developer owned Water Quality Management Basin

5/3/2017 Concrete washed into street Cement Warning given and clean up completed

Worker was compliant and had his crew clean up the gutters and vacuum up dirty water



2/23/2017 Oil leaking from vehicle in street Oil Warning given and clean up completed

Resident cleaned up excess oil and removed vehicle

3/2/2017 Oil leaking from vehicle in street Oil Warning given and clean up completed

Resident cleaned up excess oil and removed vehicle

Hemet

Incident Date

Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

1/18/2017 Illicit discharges of carpet cleaning detergent into the storm drain system.

Carpet cleaning detergent Verbal and written warning: Customer was given educational materials along with Storm Water Ordinance Violation.

Owner said valve on truck was broken, which caused discharge. City maintenance crews cleaned up discharge before it entered into storm drain system.

2/14/2017 Visible chemical/oil staining; Oil runoff from work bays into storm drain inlet.

Oil Verbal and written warning: Customer was given educational materials and encouraged to change house-keeping habits. Customer was also given a Storm Water Ordinance Violation.

Management was encouraged to change house-keeping habits and stop any washing of bays. Dry methods were encouraged.

4/11/2017 Illicit discharges of grease into storm drain system.

Grease Verbal and written warning: Customer was given educational materials and encouraged to increase the frequency of maintenance on grease trap. Customer was also given a Storm Water Ordinance Violation.

Grease in gutter was cleaned up by Roto-Rooter. Grease trap was also cleaned. EMWD completed an inspection of the facility to ensure they were within compliance for grease storage and disposal.

Jurupa Valley


Quantity

Enforcement

Action(s)

Disposition

7/5/2016 NPDES inspector visited the site after being notified that mud was found along the Bridal Path Circle. The inspector could not make contact with the resident of the home after multiple attempts. Maintenance crews from the city went to the location to clean up the mud from the street. 2012-07 A complaint came that the resident at the location drained their pool to the back drainage area. The draining of the pool caused the erosion of the soil and mud was on the street of Bridal Path. The city allows for draining of non chlorinated pools but does not allow for sediment to be discharged. City Maintenance crews cleaned the mud on Bridal Path. No proof could be found to determine that the resident did cause the erosion. Closed



7/27/2016 Public Works staff notified NPDES inspector that a discharge was occurring at the elementary school. Immediately after notification, the NPDES inspector followed up and inspete dthe site. He met with the principal after discovering the discharge and the principal had the residue removed.

2012-07 Visible black gluish like liquid was seen leaving a drain outlet from the schol and discharing onto the sidewalk. The principal identified it as floor stripper that was being used on the floors. The inspector discussed with the principal regarding allowable dischagres. He referenced the oridnace regarding water quality and the principal called to have the floor stripper removed. City Inspector visited the facility on 7/28/16 to follow up on spill and ensure everything was cleaned properly. All items were taken care of and the city used this as a educational oppurtuinty for staff. Closed

8/2/2016 JCSD contacted the City regarding a sewere overflow from the Pedley Villeage commercial units. JCSD stopped the overflow from the sanitary sewer and notified that overflow discharged from the facilitily limits to the curb and gutter. Public works Manager called Double Barrel to clean the gutters of all residue and remove any sewage waste that remained. 2012-07 Sewage was dischagred from the facilitiy onto the curb and gutter in the City Right of Way. Double barrel removed all remains of waste on the gutter and cleaned the gutter of all remains. The City will send letter to property owner for damages and violation. Closed

Lake Elsinore

Incident Date

Violation Pollutants/Qty Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

7/24/2016 Report of paint poured into catch basin.

Less than 5 gallons Police report filed against suspected violator SW Addressing Systems. Unable to locate contact name/address through City records or online.

Closed.

8/24/2016 Oil spill in gutter Motor oil/Not measurable Spoke with resident, educated on cleanup and stormwater pollution – watched while they cleaned up discharge

Closed

8/30/2016 Report of ‘chemical’ poured into street Unknown/Not measurable Observed discharge – unable to determine residential source. Placed educational door hanger on all area homes.

Closed

11/8/2016 Report of vehicle dripping oil Motor oil/Not measurable Visited area several times; finally observed discharge. Spoke with resident, educated on stormwater and cleanup.

Closed

11/17/2016 Report of vehicle dripping oil Motor oil/Not measurable Confirmed discharge; spoke with owner – advised of stormwater pollution, cleanup and prevention. Observed cleanup/prevention method.

Closed

11/22/2016 Report of vehicle dripping oil Motor oil/Not measurable Confirmed discharge -unable to determine source – no vehicle present or leaking on numerous visits. Left educational door hangers throughout neighborhood.

Closed

1/5/2017 Report of vehicle oil in driveway Motor oil/Not measurable Confirmed discharge – no one home; left NOV at site w/ educational materials

Closed



1/27/2017 Report of vehicle dripping oil Motor oil/Not measurable Confirmed discharge – spoke with owner- provided educational material on stormwater & cleanup.

Closed

4/2/2017 Report of big rig dripping oil n/a “Old” staining on street; no new discharge or vehicle.

Closed

4/11/2017 Inadequate WQ Facilities N/A Observed ‘pit’ dug in dirt to capture and infiltrate wash water from commercial business. Advised to discontinue and install adequate facilities. Provided business name for clarifier system; educational materials. Observed new facility.

Closed

5/23/2017 Report of vehicle discharge w/ white substance on street

Motor oil, absorbent / Not measurable

Observed vehicle fluid w/ absorbent on it in the street. Spoke with homeowner to clean up, not leave overnight. Provided educational material.

Closed

Menifee

Incident Date


7/11/16

NPDES 15.01.040

Pool filter backwash observed draining onto the surface of the ground.

Riverside County EHSworked with the HOA manager to submit acceptable drainage plans.

Closed

7/19/16

NPDES

15.01.040 Property reported to have excess manure.

City issued a Public Worksrequest to investigate the discharge. Site was clean at time of inspection and manure was being properly disposed.

Closed (PW)

7/19/16

NPDES 15.01.040

Property reported to have boars contributing to feces running off the property.

City issued a Public Worksrequest to investigate the discharge. Boars were removed from property in March 2017.

Closed (PW)

4/11/17

NPDES 15.01.040

Garden hose reported discharging pool water to RCFC concrete channel behind the property.

RCFC staff visited the site and spoke with homeowner regarding requirements for draining pools.

Closed (PW)

Moreno Valley See Attachment B

Norco Incident

Date Violation Pollutants/Quantity Enforcement Action(s) Disposition

Perris Incident Date


Lake Elsinore



02/21/17 CE17-114

Illegal Dumping (non-toxic liquid) Cleanup, sampling Complied/closed

02/25/17 CE17-50

Prohibited discharge (water) Unfounded Closed

01/24/17 CE 17-48

Sewage discharge Unfounded Closed

01/12/17 CE 17-29

Outside Oil and Debris Storage Notice of Violation Pending

01/11/17 CE 17-16

Illegal discharge (Mud) Notice of Violation Complied/closed

12/21/16 CE 16-1354

Motor Oil Leakage Notice of Violation Complied/closed

11/01/16 CE 16-1274


10/25/16 CE 16-1264

Irrigation Run off Verbal warning Complied/closed

09/23/16 CE 16-1102

Outside debris storage Notice of Violation Complied/closed

9/15/16 CE 16-1082


8/26/16 CE 16-1014

Illegal Dumping (Vehicle fluids) Inspection / lack of evidence

Closed

Perris



Riverside

Enforcement actions from industrial, commercial, and construction inspections are summarized in the inspection summary reports attached. All other enforcement actions can be found in the following table:

Enforcement Summary

Date Violation/Pollutant Enforcement Action Disposition 07/06/2016 Vacant/Neglected Properties Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/11/2016 Water Waste Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/11/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/13/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/19/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/20/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/22/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/25/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 07/29/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/01/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/02/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/02/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/02/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/03/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/03/2016 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/05/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/08/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/08/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/15/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/22/2016 Water Waste Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/23/2016 Public Nuisance Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/27/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/30/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 08/30/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/02/2016 Public Nuisance Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/06/2016 Vacant/Neglected Properties No violation observed Case closed 09/07/2016 Public Nuisance Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/13/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/13/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/14/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/15/2016 Water Waste Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/16/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/19/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/20/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/21/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/23/2016 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/27/2016 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/28/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 09/28/2016 Water Waste No violation observed Case closed 10/04/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed



10/08/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/11/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed

Date Violation/Pollutant Enforcement Action Disposition 10/11/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/11/2016 Water Waste No violation observed Case closed 10/11/2016 Vacant/Neglected Properties No violation observed Case closed 10/13/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/14/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/15/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/24/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/24/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 10/25/2016 Water Waste No violation observed Case closed 10/26/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/02/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/02/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/08/2016 Public Nuisance Verbal warning given Violation corrected/Case closed 11/14/2016 Building/Housing Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/17/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/18/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 11/21/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/06/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/06/2016 Public Nuisance Citation issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/07/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/19/2016 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/21/2016 Group Homes No violation observed Case closed 12/22/2016 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/23/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 12/28/2016 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 01/07/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 01/13/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 01/13/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 01/24/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 02/01/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 02/01/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 02/01/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 02/06/2017 NPDES Violation Notice issued Case still under investigation 02/10/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 02/13/2017 Sewage Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 03/10/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 03/16/2017 Miscellaneous Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 03/27/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 03/28/2017 Public Nuisance Citation issued Case still under investigation 03/31/2017 Inoperative Vehicle Citation issued Case still under investigation 04/03/2017 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/06/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed



04/12/2017 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/12/2017 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/13/2017 Public Nuisance Verbal warning given Violation corrected/Case closed 04/21/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/21/2017 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/24/2017 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 04/27/2017 Public Nuisance Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 05/02/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 05/05/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 05/16/2017 Miscellaneous Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed 05/31/2017 Water Waste No violation observed Case closed 06/05/2017 Water Waste Notice issued Case still under investigation 06/06/2017 NPDES Violation Notice issued Violation corrected/Case closed

Riverside County Please see Code Enforcement summary including database in Attachment “A”.

RCFC&WCD None – see attached complaint database.

San Jacinto None noted.




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT

PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.G of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to submit a certification statement, signed by its legal counsel, that the Permittee has obtained all necessary legal authority in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.26(d)(2)(i)(A-F) and to comply with the MS4 Permit through adoption of ordinances and/or municipal code modifications by January 29, 2012.

1. Certification. 2. Changes to status of stormwater ordinances, or other legal authorities for implementing the NPDES Permit changed during the reporting period.

YES NO

Beaumont The certification was previously provided. Beaumont is in the process of getting legal certification provided for 2017-2018 fiscal year.

X

Calimesa Reference attached copy; See Exhibit “A” X Canyon Lake Attachment #1 X

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘G’ X Eastvale See Attachment A X Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT A X

Jurupa Valley Certification is attached. X Lake Elsinore Exhibit C The City enacted and/or restated the following Ordinances and/or

passed Resolutions which provide support for the City’s NPDES program and stormwater ordinance: Ord 2016-1365 Adoption of 2016 California Building Standards Code. Provides for implementation of temporary sediment and erosion control measures. Ord. 2016-1354 Fishing in Lake Elsinore – prohibits cleaning of fish along shoreline or in water. Ord 2016-1353 Parks & Beaches – Strictly prohibits littering. Ord. 2016-1352 – Lake Use Regulations – Requires disposal of waste of any kind from vessels into an on-shore disposal facility. Additionally, the Watershed Action Plan (WAP) and associated documents were approved by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board on 4/20/2017, resulting in changes to the Drainage Area Management Plan at page 1-1, 6-5 and 6-6 to incorporate the WAP provisions. A copy of the changes to the DAMP is attached. Exhibit D



Menifee See Attachment A. X Moreno Valley See Attachment A X

Norco X Perris See Exhibit 4 X

Riverside See attached documents Enhancements and modifications of several codes within Section 14.12 of the Riverside Municipal Code.

Riverside County Please see attached. X RCFC&WCD See Attached Documents X

San Jacinto PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED WITH THE FY14-15 Annual Report.

X





PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4. Does your Permittee's Stormwater Ordinance prohibit: 1. Sewage, where a Co-Permittee operates a sewage collection system?

2. Wash water resulting from hosing or cleaning of gas stations, auto repair garages and other types of automobile service stations?

3. Discharges resulting from the cleaning, repair, or maintenance of equipment, machinery or facility, including motor vehicles, concrete mixing equipment, portable toilet servicing, etc.?

4. Wash water from mobile auto detailing and washing, steam and pressure cleaning, carpet/upholstery cleaning, pool cleaning, and other mobile commercial/industrial activities?

5. Water from cleaning of municipal, industrial, and commercial sites including parking lots, streets, sidewalks, driveways, patios, plazas, work yards and outdoor eating or drinking areas, etc.?

Beaumont YES YES YES YES YES

Calimesa NO YES YES YES YES

Canyon Lake YES YES YES YES YES

Corona YES YES YES YES YES

Eastvale YES YES YES YES YES

Hemet YES YES YES YES YES

Jurupa Valley NO YES YES YES YES

Lake Elsinore NO YES YES YES YES

Menifee NO YES YES YES YES

Moreno Valley NO YES YES YES YES

Norco YES YES YES YES YES

Perris YES YES YES YES YES

Riverside YES YES YES YES YES

Riverside County NO YES YES NO NO

RCFC&WCD NO NO NO NO NO

San Jacinto YES YES YES YES YES





PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4. Does your Permittee's Stormwater Ordinance prohibit: 6. Runoff from material storage areas or uncovered receptacles that contain chemicals, fuels, grease, oil, or other hazardous materials?

7. Discharges of runoff from the washing of hazardous materials from paved or unpaved areas.

8. Discharges of pool or fountain water containing chlorine, biocides, or other chemicals; pool filter backwash containing debris and chlorine?

9. Pet waste, yard waste, debris, sediment, etc.?

10. Restaurant or food processing facility wastes such as grease, floor mat and trash bin wash water, food waste?

Beaumont YES YES YES YES YES

Calimesa YES YES YES YES YES

Canyon Lake YES YES YES YES YES

Corona YES YES YES YES YES

Eastvale YES YES YES YES YES

Hemet YES YES YES YES YES

Jurupa Valley YES YES YES YES YES

Lake Elsinore YES YES YES YES YES

Menifee YES YES YES YES YES

Moreno Valley YES YES YES YES YES

Norco YES YES YES YES YES

Perris YES YES YES YES YES

Riverside YES YES YES YES YES

Riverside County YES NO YES YES YES

RCFC&WCD NO NO NO NO NO

San Jacinto YES YES YES YES YES





PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4. 11. Actions, if necessary, taken to satisfy these requirements.

Beaumont N/A

Calimesa The City of Calimesa does not own or operate a sewage collection system. Yucaipa Valley Water District is the owner of the system and is responsible for all operations and maintenance of their sewage collection system. However, the City does monitor all permitted connections and operations and has very good communications with YVWD.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona N/A

Eastvale N/A

Hemet N/A

Jurupa Valley Item 1 does not apply to the City because we do not operate a sewage collection system.

Lake Elsinore Item No. 1 – N/A as the City does not own or operate a sewage treatment facility.

Menifee The City does not own/operate the sewage collection system.

Moreno Valley Item No. 1—Not applicable to Moreno Valley, since we do not own/operate a POTW.

Norco N/A

Perris

On December 23, 2011 the City Attorney’s Office issued a certification letter (See attached Exhibit 4) indicating that the City of Perris’ current Ordinance #1194 (P.M.C. 14.22 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS) provides City staff with legal authority to enforce the provisions of NPDES Permit/Board Order R8-2010-0033. The current ordinance contains language that assisted developers with the transition date from the San Jacinto permit to the original version of the WQMP that provided for final sunset dates for approved final WQMP’s. . No change has occurred with the Ordinance. This task will be made a priority in the 2017-2018 reporting year. Any approved revisions will be forwarded to the Regional Water Board during the 2017-18 Annual Report.

Riverside N/A

Riverside County Question No. 1: The County does not own or operate a sewage treatment facility.

RCFC&WCD To ensure compliance with the requirements of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit, the District relies on the concept of Combined Legal Authority with the other Permittees of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit. Combined Legal Authority, which has been established through an Implementation Agreement with other MS4 Permittees, is described in the LIP.

San Jacinto --





PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.F requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing a review of their Stormwater Ordinances and their ordinance enforcement programs in prohibiting the following types of discharges to the MS4. 12. Evaluation of ordinance, ordinance enforcement practices with regard to prohibiting non-exempt, non-stormwater discharges to the MS4.

Beaumont Due to increased stormwater inspections this year, it was found that the City ordinance could be clarified. The ordinance is under current review with the City’s legal counsel. Any changes made to the City ordinance will be documented in the 2017-2018 fiscal year.

Calimesa At this time, all ordinances are current and effectively working. The City will revise, update and/or make any necessary revisions to ordinances to comply with future required implementation measures which will ensure proper enforcement authority. Continued public outreach and education will help in voluntary compliance.

Canyon Lake

After review of the City’s Ordinance, the City has found the Ordinance to be effective and is not experiencing any difficulty with enforcement. The City works with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) and the Property Owners Association (POA) to educate and publicize the procedure for residents who wish to drain pools and spas. Since all drains lead to the lake, the City does not allow any discharge into the street, even if the water is neutralized and meets pH levels set by the lake owner, EVMWD. In Cooperation with EVMWD, pamphlets are available at City Hall and have been distributed to the public about improper disposal of pool and spa water into storm drains (Attachment #2). The City currently implements this as one of our BMP measures. In addition to the public, Chapter 5 of the City’s Municipal Code requires that all businesses hold a business license issued by the City (Attachment #3). This application requires businesses involving NPDES compliance identify such on the Business License Application before any licenses are approved (Attachment #4). Every business is also required to acknowledge specific guidelines of the Municipal Code identifying mobile detailers (Attachment #5) and additional informational pamphlets outlining storm drain pollution prevention are mailed with each license (Attachment #6).

Corona

a) For the 2013-14 reporting year, Public Works Department updated the Storm Water Quality Ordinance in order to ensure it reflected the latest Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) provisions and definitions per the Permit. The updated Ordinance (No. 3164) was approved at the March 19, 2014 City Council meeting.

b) The MS4 Permit requires developing an inventory and mapping of our Outfalls in preparation for implementation of the revised Illicit Connection/Illicit Discharge (IC/ID) program incorporated into the County’s Consolidated Monitoring Program (CMP). Additionally, the IC/ID monitoring components require Permittees to develop a schedule to conduct and implement systematic investigations of Outfalls using field indicators to identify, track, and implement corrective measures for all illegal discharges. These activities have been completed within this permit term and documented in the 2014-15 report.

c) The City of Corona was a co-participant in the County Health Department administered “Compliance Assistance Program” and performed follow-up inspections on facilities with potential illicit discharges and ordinance violations. The CAP is no longer active effective December 31, 2014; however, the City continues with its inspection program adhering to the permit requirements.

d) The City of Corona has staff members devoted to providing prompt follow-up to telephone calls and complaints concerning illicit discharges and/or improper disposal of pollutants into storm drain facilities.

e) The City uses a SeeClickFix application (www.seeclickfix.com/corona) which enables community members (residents and businesses) to



report illegal dumping from an iPhone, Android, or a desktop browser. By taking a picture, describing the situation, and allowing the application to automatically log the phone’s GPS position, the request is sent to the correct City department to get each issue resolved fast and efficiently.

f) Maintenance Services, Department of Water and Power, Code Enforcement, Fire, and Public Works departments work together to respond to violation events. The NPDES Section follows up on all events to ensure proper notification and reporting requirements are followed as specified in the DAMP. Enforcement depends on the severity of the violation and may require immediate containment and clean up, verbal warnings, notices of violation, recovery of costs, and public education to the violator including handing out educational materials.

g) City field staff is trained on the City’s storm water ordinance and what constitutes a non-storm water discharge or illicit connection and how to report to their supervisors so that they can be investigated.

h) Staff may issue a Notice of Violation (NOV) specifically for NPDES Ordinance violations. The NOV form is tailored to identify the specific municipal code violation and written corrective action(s) required. It is a tri-ply form in which the violator acknowledges receipt of the correction. Thirteen NOVs were issued this reporting year; the sites were brought into compliance.

Eastvale

The City’s stormwater ordinance provides the City with the right-to-inspect any premises, grounds, facilities, or structures for which compliance is required by the ordinance (City Municipal Code, Section 14.12.100 - Attachment B). The City’s stormwater ordinance also provides the City with the authority to revoke and/or suspend a permit which has both been issued and conditioned for compliance with the stormwater ordinance or conditioned with the implementation of specific BMPs (City Municipal Code, Section 14.12.110 - Attachment B).

Hemet Continued efforts to reduce water waste per the requirements of a 2015 SWRCB Conservation Order minimized non-stormwater discharges during FY 2016-2017.

Jurupa Valley

The Ordinance has been highly effective in achieving compliance. We have successfully used it to prevent chlorinated pool discharges and discharge paint cleaning water. It has helped with the compliance with the WQMP requirements for development. Developers are advised that the Water Quality project guidelines are good for them as all development have to assist in treating runoff and the City has the authority to require compliance.



Lake Elsinore

1) The City’s Ordinance 14.08 “Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls” has been certified by the City Attorney as providing sufficient legal authority prohibit non-exempt, non-stormwater discharges and to bring a discharger into compliance in the event of an IC/ID. To date there have been no challenges to the City’s legal authority. 2) Through development, use and business license conditioning and public education City Ordinances are proactively enforced. In the event of a discharge, City Ordinances support staff in bringing the discharger into compliance. 3) City Public Works maintenance staff receive annual training on NPDES to aid in their identification and detection of potential IC/IDs during field maintenance or other routine activities. 5) Reactive enforcement comes into play when notice of a discharge is received by staff. Staff takes the opportunity to educate the discharger on stormwater pollution and provide direction for cleanup. The City’s enforcement procedures are outlined in the City’s Local Implementation Plan at Section 3.4. 6) Community Development, Public Works and Engineering Department Staff take an active role in responding and reporting IC/IDs. 7) The City contracts with a firm for inspection of applicable Commercial and Industrial Businesses in the City. 8) Through participation in the Technical Advisory Committee Public Education Committee, and dissemination of stormwater educational materials through City-wide publications, Co-Permittee booths at regional events, City sponsored Clean Extreme, HHW, and Pet Walk events event and through the business license program, the City takes a proactive approach to stormwater pollution education. No changes in procedures are recommended at this time. See Appendix B for a copy of the City’s applicable stormwater ordinances.

Menifee All of the above are addressed in the storm water ordinance, which has been effective in prohibiting non-exempt, non-stormwater discharges to the MS4. The City will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of its ordinance and address any necessary revisions if they are identified.

Moreno Valley

The Ordinance has overall been effective on prohibiting non-exempt, non-stormwater discharges to the MS4. As indicated above, the City’s enforcement practices ensure compliance.

Norco The City Ordinance appears to be effective based on available performance indicators.

Perris The City’s most recent NPDES Ordinance #1194 was adopted in 2006 and has been highly successful in addressing required permit elements. Several City departments have been committed to implementing Ordinance #1194 over the past eleven years.

Riverside The Riverside Municipal Code has enabled City departments to ensure that illegal discharges to the MS4 are prohibited. Various meetings and other communication throughout the year serve to provide assurances that the municipal code is effective and provides City staffs with a mechanism whereby they can enforce water quality provisions. The City of Riverside continually seeks ways to strengthen its ability to preserve water quality.

Riverside County

The County’s Stormwater Ordinance 754, in conjunction with other ordinances that relate to environmental protection, is supported by Ordinance 725 which establishes penalties and procedures for violation of Riverside County ordinances.

RCFC&WCD N/A. See attached compliant database found in Appendix K.

San Jacinto

The City of San Jacinto routinely reviews the applicable ordinances as it relates to effectiveness. As a result of these reviews, the City enacted ordinance 09-16 on May 21, 2009 that was based on the Metropolitan Water District’s model ordinance which prohibits excessive overspray and run-off of irrigation water. The combination of this ordinance with the City’s existing storm water requirements set forth in Chapter 13.44 of the City’s municipal code provides effective tools for the City to enforce its NPDES programs. In addition, the City adopted additional water conservation programs in response to the Governor’s Executive Orders. From May 2015 to May 2016, the City routinely reduced water consumption by approximately 30% when compared to 2013 water usage. The City is currently exploring the adoption of a budget based water rate structure to further encourage conservation activities, and to discourage excessive run-off.





PERMITTEE

Provision No. VIII.H of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to annually provide a report containing an evaluation of their implementation and enforcement response procedures in controlling IC/IDs.

Beaumont

Enforcement actions are described in the table above. Education is provided first to ensure that the public is aware of the prohibition of illegal discharges and illicit connection to the MS4. Any public education provided is recorded in the database as a verbal warning. Follow up inspections are conducted for industrial, commercial and construction sites. Any repeat issues are elevated to written warnings, and so on, as outlined in the City’s escalation procedures, until the issue is corrected.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa maintains adequate legal authority to control the discharge of pollutants into the MS4’s. The City enforces applicable municipal codes, ordinances and policies accordingly and as required during an IC/ID event. The City annually reviews its Storm Water Ordinances and enforcement programs prohibiting discharges to the MS4’s. The City is proactive with controlling IC/IDs and is prepared to take the appropriate enforcement action as required to gain proper compliance. Our goal is to provide public education with the intent of controlling the contribution of pollutants to the MS4s, stop pollutant discharge or threat of discharge and to require the use of BMP’s to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4s. We promote public educational outreach through speaking with community members, business and property owners, sharing information on the City’s website and handouts where appropriate.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has proactively coordinated with the Canyon Lake Property Owners Association’s Community Patrol, Marine Patrol, and City Special Enforcement Officers. EVMWD also monitors discharge sites and performs frequent periodic water quality testing. City staff takes every available opportunity to educate the public on proper construction practices, pool and spa drainage procedures and other MS4 related issues. Alum treatments were conducted in September 2013, February 2014, September 2014, May 2015, September 2015, May 2016, September 2016 and February 2017.

Corona

As mentioned above, the City utilizes various enforcement tools to bring sites into compliance with our NPDES Ordinance. Most compliance is achieved through verbal warnings issued at the time the violation is observed. Where a correction is required and the verbal warning has not been effective, the City will issue an NOV. Thirteen NOVs were issued this reporting year, which consequently brought the sites into compliance.

Eastvale Proper staff has been trained in spotting and tracking IC/ID incidents. No corrective actions were needed after evaluating the program. Staff will note and report and IC/ID situations to program manager for follow up and recording data.

Hemet The City of Hemet continues to document enforcement actions and provide educational materials to increase the awareness and understanding of the City Stormwater Ordinance in an effort to change behavior and reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4.

Jurupa Valley The City Maintenance Crews mitigate discharges from objects left in the public right-of-way by removal on a daily basis and also in response to citizen calls. Removal of these items reduce pollutants into the MS4. The City has also hired additional Public Works staff which will increase the program’s effectiveness in removal of pollutants.



Lake Elsinore

The City follows the enforcement procedures and guidelines outlined in the City’s Local Implementation Plan at Section 3.4 and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code at Chapter 1.16. Levels of enforcement in practical application begin with verbal education of the discharger and escalate up to imposition of citations/monetary penalties and criminal prosecution. All reports are responded to within 24 hours of receipt which reinforces the sense of urgency the City gives to the potential pollution to our Lake and/or streams. The City responded to, investigated and resolved 12 reports of illegal discharges. With all Fiscal Year 16/17 incidents resolved, it can be stated that the City’s enforcement program is very effective. The City focuses on voluntary compliance working with the discharger to resolution. The majority of the incidents are not active discharges and require education on cleanup and preventative measures. The City works with the non-active discharger towards compliance, escalating enforcement as needed. There were no cases of active discharge in FY 16/17. Exhibit E

Menifee

Public Works and Code Enforcement staff are trained on the storm water ordinance and on IC/ID response and reporting. The City implements various inspection programs to control IC/IDs, monitors major outfalls, responds to public complaints, and works with contracted maintenance staff to ensure that MS4 facilities are free of non-storm water discharges. All violations are investigated and responsible parties are notified of the City’s storm water requirements. All violations are tracked in a database which documents violation type, enforcement, and resolution status. Enforcement depends on the nature of the violation and may include the distribution of educational materials, verbal warnings, written warnings, Notices of Violation, or cost recovery for containment and clean-up. The City’s implementation and enforcement of the IC/ID program has been effective in 2016-17 and no corrective actions were recommended since the last reporting period. This year the City completed 53 full and 31 partial industrial and commercial business inspections, and no IC/IDs were either observed or reported during the inspection program. No IC/IDs were observed during the City’s annual municipal inspections at nine facilities. Additionally, no IC/IDs were detected during the 9 structural BMP inspections (which included both City-owned BMPs and privately owned BMPs) performed in 2016-17. No IC/IDs were reported to the City during catch basin cleaning in 2016-17. A total of four complaints reporting an illegal discharge to the storm drain system were received by the City in 2016-17. Attachment B is an IC/ID tracking spreadsheet.

Moreno Valley Pursuant to the most recent inspections of the City, no illegal connections were reported. The City receives daily reports for Underground Service Alert (USA) and staff reviews the reports to determine if any proposed excavations will affect city storm drains or channels. Staff then compares the reports to approved encroachment permits. If a permit was not authorized, a Stop Work Order is issued.

Norco Staff has reviewed Municipal Codes section 15.70.070 which covers IC/IDs and determined the section to be adequate.

Perris

The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor violations. The enforcement procedures have been deemed adequate. The City will continue to review the IDDE (Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination) Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments to consider additional methods intended to improve upon its enforcement response procedures. The City will make this an annual practice of review, and any changes the City deems useful will be incorporated into the City’s LIP. Areas of review will include: interdepartmental communication/coordination, timely compliance, third party inspection programs.

Riverside Existing enforcement response procedures appear to be effective. City staffs from the involved departments regularly discuss issues encountered in the field and appropriate enforcement responses. If new ideas or methods to improve City processes are identified, through such dialog then City acts accordingly to implement the necessary changes and improve the stormwater program.



Riverside County

The County Executive Office coordinates those IC/ID complaints received to various and appropriate county departments. Typically, complaints are received from several different sources throughout the county; citizens, county staff, District staff, city staff, Regional Board staff, and anonymous tips. Should hazardous materials be involved, the County will notify the Department of Environmental Health (DEH) for response. Additionally, the DEH has staff on-call 24/7 to respond to complaints and field investigations distributed by Cal EMA. If a complaint is nonhazardous, County Code Enforcement, potentially in conjunction with the Transportation Department Environmental Compliance staff will respond. This process is functioning effectively as the County has not experienced deficiencies in implementing enforcement response procedures in controlling IC/IDs.

RCFC&WCD

Prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit, planned connections are reviewed by District staff; staff provide prompt responses to inquiries and complaints from the public; maintenance crews report IC/IDs detected in facilities; as an additional measure, a patrol person inspects each accessible flood control facility annually, and where IC/IDs are detected, efforts to identify and address the source are initiated in cooperation with the Watershed Protection Division. All pipes are also inspected prior to acceptance for District maintenance to ensure that there are no illicit connections. Lastly, complaint calls are coordinated by the Water Quality Compliance Section of the Watershed Protection Division. A written log is maintained and each call is evaluated. Incidents located within Permittee (City or County) jurisdiction and within their respective MS4 right-of-way are referred to the appropriate agency. Incidents within District right-of-way are verified then appropriate response and notification actions are implemented, often in coordination with the local land use authority.

San Jacinto The City of San Jacinto has evaluated its enforcement and response procedures in controlling IC/IDs and has determined that they meet the requirements of the permit. No corrective actions are required at this time.




PERMITTEE

Provision No. XII.E.5 of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to adopt the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, or to prepare one that is "at least as effective" as the State Model by January 2010. Appendix 3, the Monitoring and Reporting Program required an Annual Effectiveness Evaluation with respect to water efficiency and water conservation goals

Beaumont The City has adopted the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Water conservation is tracked by the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa signed an agreement “MOU” on April 24, 2014 with all local agencies under State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2014-0038. Refer to Exhibit “Y”, establishing drought regulations targeting outdoor urban water use, mandating water conservation and prohibiting the wasteful outdoor use of drinking water. The City of Calimesa will adhere, monitor and enforce the prohibitions as referenced in Exhibit “Y” of this report. Also reference Exhibit “C”, Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 18.75 Water Conservation for Landscaping, which is in compliance with Government Code Section 65591.2 and 65595.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake adopted the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance in November of 2009 (Attachment #7). The City of Canyon Lake has evaluated the effectiveness of its Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance with respect to water efficiency and conservation goals, and found it to be effective.

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘H’

Eastvale

The City of Eastvale has adopted the County of Riverside’s Ordinance 859, with its ensuing amendments. In light of the Governor’s order on drought regulations the City is working close with the County and JCSD for amendments or changes to the current Ordinance. JCSD is responsible to prepare an Annual Effectiveness Evaluation as it is the lead agency on this issue. See Ordinance 859 (Attachment C) and JCSD Annual Report for more details.

Hemet

Since its adoption in April 2010, City of Hemet Landscaping and Irrigation Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 90, Article XLVIII) has required that applicants for all new development projects provide a compliance letter to the planning department, the public works department and the department of building and safety verifying that landscaping and the irrigation system have been installed in compliance with the approved landscape documentation package. In October 2014, the City of Hemet developed and implemented an improved notification system for addressing water waste based on our Water Conservation Plan. In January 2015, the Hemet City Council amended this Water Conservation Plan to meet SWRCB Emergency Regulations. The SWRCB issued a Conservation Order to the City of Hemet in August 2015 which required the City to implement a water rate structure to encourage conservation (which was done) and to reach out to commercial, industrial and institutional customers to implement additional conservation measures. During FY 2016-2017, Water Waste Notices were reduced to educational opportunities. The vast majority of these opportunities were issued to commercial businesses and multi-unit apartment complexes. Nearly all water waste was related to irrigation runoff. Business owners and managers have been cooperative in adjusting irrigation to avoid runoff and/or converting turf to xeriscaping.

Jurupa Valley Contractors are learning to use water efficient landscape and streetscape in their development such as those demonstrated by the State of California, Department of Water Resources, United States EPA, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in their demonstration project and Eastern Municipal Water District in their water efficient landscape irrigation systems.



Lake Elsinore

In FY 2015/16, the City dramatically cut back on the use of irrigation in its parks and removed landscaping from many of its street medians. As a result of this dramatic cut back, while the City’s water use dropped over 30% from the previous year, the functionality of its park playing fields suffered. In FY 16/17, the City increased its water use above FY 15/16, yet still below FY 14/15. Additionally, the City continues to require the design of its new park facilities to incorporate the use of artificial turf (where practical), drought tolerant plants and reclaimed water.

Menifee The City encourages water conservation and water efficiency and has adopted the County of Riverside’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

Moreno Valley

The City has been successful in implementing the water efficiency and water conservation goals as provided for in the Municipal Code. With the policy direction that has been provided due to the drought restrictions by Eastern Municipal Water District, any new landscapes will continue to be consistent with or exceed the City’s water efficiency goals. Since water budgets are required to be approved by developers, there has not really been push back from developers. The biggest challenge right now is to create aesthetically pleasing landscapes consistent with EMWD policy (e.g. no sod for new single-family tract homes).

Norco City of Norco ordinance “Water Efficient Landscaping” is included in the Municipal Code Chapter 18.55

Perris

Ordinance #1265, amended Section 19.70 Landscaping, of the Zoning Code to incorporate mandatory water conservation measures required by the State of California (AB 1881). The ordinance was adopted, signed and approved by the City Council of the City of Perris, as evidenced the City Clerk’s attestation, on January 12, 2010. Please find attached the signed Ordinance in lieu of the report to the Department of Water Resources (see attached Exhibit 6)

Riverside

The City proactively promotes water efficiency and water conservation goals. In 2010, the City adopted a locally developed Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. In addition, the City has adopted a water conservation ordinance that limits unreasonable uses of water and establishes a codified water conservation program. More information on the City’s efforts to promote water efficiency and water conservation goals can be found at: http://www.greenriverside.com/about-green-riverside/blue-riverside.

Riverside County This has been reported in previous annual reports. The County is in compliance with AB1881 and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements Ordinance (No. 859) is in effect.

RCFC&WCD The District is a Special District by act of the State Legislature and has no land use authority.

San Jacinto

The City of San Jacinto adopted a water conservation ordinance number 09-16 on May 21, 2009. The City continues to implement water conservation measures as required by the Governor’s Executive orders calling for a 25% reduction in water use and the Department of Water Resources mandated 32% reduction in municipal services. Water consumption within the City’s service area has continued to decline in response to both the Executive Order and the City’s on-going water conservation efforts. Under the mandatory water reduction requirements, the City reduced potable water consumption by an average of 30% between July 2015 and June 2016 when compared to 2013 consumption. Water usage continues to below average in during FY16-17.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 4 – Program Implementation and Evaluation Page 4-1

4. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION Provision No. IV.C of the 2010 MS4 Permit, requires the Permittees to evaluate their implemented urban runoff management programs to determine the need, if any, for revision to its LIP, and Provision Nos. VI.D.1.a.v-vii and VI.D.2.c require update of LIPs caused by changes to the DAMP, WQMP, Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake and Middle Santa Ana River TMDL studies. The DAMP is the Permittees' primary policy and planning document for municipal NPDES stormwater permit compliance. The DAMP's principal objective is to fulfill the Permittees' commitment to develop and implement a program that satisfies NPDES permit requirements. To address divergent permit requirements, while maintaining the synergistic cohesion of a countywide program, the DAMP includes LIPs. The LIPs enable each Permittee to implement a complex program within its jurisdiction while maintaining a single overarching policy document. A summary of the Permittees' evaluation of current program implementation is presented in Table 4-1. Significant actions in the reporting period include: Local Implementation Plan On June 30, 2017, the LIP template was updated to include language from the approved WAP and supporting documents.

Drainage Area Management Plan The DAMP was updated on June 30, 2017 to include the approval of the Watershed Action Plan and its supporting documents by the Regional Board on April 20, 2017. The updated DAMP is located in Appendix M.

Table 4-1- Program Implementation and Evaluation


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. IV.C of the Santa Ana Region NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit, Board Order No. R8-2010-0033 (Permit) requires the Permittees to evaluate the effectiveness of their Urban Runoff Management Programs to determine the need for revisions to its Local Implementation Plan (LIP).

PERMITTEE

Beaumont

The City evaluated the Urban Runoff Management Program (URMP) and found the need to completely revise its’ Local Implementation Plan (LIP). Due to new management and a new team of consultants, it was found that the old Program and LIP did not reflect the actions of the current team. As a result, the City has made it the responsibility of one of its Public Works employees to oversee the URMP with the assistance from consultants as needed.

Calimesa The Urban Runoff Management Program is operating effectively and therefore we do not have any revisions for this reporting period. We will continue to monitor the plan and will revise as needed or required. Reference Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 16.10 Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, which is attached as Exhibit “AA”. Included

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake has updated the LIP to reflect revisions to the DAMP and to ensure compliance with the current Permit. Canyon Lake’s LIP is current to date. See updated LIP for specifics.

Corona The City developed the LIP which was noted in the 2013-14 report, and was certified by the Public Works Director under direction from the City Manager by May 24, 2013. The City implemented departmental and personnel changes, and working to update the LIP for these changes.

Eastvale Upon evaluating the Urban Runoff Management Programs it is determined there is no need for revisions to the Local Implementation Plan (LIP). However, we will continue to monitor the Urban Runoff Management Programs and make changes to the LIP as needed.

Hemet There were no revisions made to the City of Hemet Stormwater Program Local Implementation Plan during FY 2016-2017.

Jurupa Valley No major changes for FY16-17



Lake Elsinore

City staff conducted a review of the following program components: Interagency Agreements, Fiscal Analysis, Legal Authority, MS4 Facility Inspections, IC/ID Program, IC/ID Database, Road Projects, Facilities and Activities, Watershed Action Plan, Hydromodification Management Plan. Based on that review the following is a summary of updates/revisions to the City’s LIP:

Updated 2.2 listing of receiving waters. Updated Engineering “Division” to Engineering Department throughout. Updated Table 3-2. Updated Section 3.9 “Notification” to include email. Updated Section 4.25 to include identification of the Consolidated Monitoring Program and responsibility for dry weather inspection

of facilities under the City’s jurisdiction. Updated Section 5.2 to stress importance of consistency of terminology. Updated Table 5-1 to reflect facilities within City. Updated Section 6.3 to reflect approval of the WAP. Updated Conditions of Approval to include the requirement to As Built WQMP’s. Updated 6.5.6 to include consistency of terminology in WQMP’s. Updated Section 6.5.10 to include summary of inspection requirements and requirement to as built the WQMP. Updated Section 13.5.1 and 13.5.2 to reflect approval of the WAP & HMP respectively. Updated Appendix B, B.1 Updated Appendix C, C.5 Updated Appendix D, D.2 Updated Appendix E, E.1

Updated Appendix F, F.1

Menifee

Most significantly, the LIP was updated to include the approval of the Watershed Action Plan during 2016/17. The City also updated its IC/ID and industrial and commercial business and municipal inspection program procedures by removing outdated attachments and incorporating a new business inspection form and new municipal inspection form. The most current information on the LE/CL TMDL was also incorporated. Other minor edits were made, including updates from the City’s participation in the Santa Margarita River WQIP and details on roles and responsibilities in the storm water program.

Moreno Valley Moreno Valley completed its LIP on October 1, 2013. Moreno Valley updated its LIP on January 30, 2014, November 6, 2015, July 5, 2016 and May 24, 2017. All updates were in compliance with the current 2010 MS4 Permit. Moreno Valley’s LIP is current to date. See updated LIP for specifics.

Norco Based on the available program overview parameters, the current state of the Urban Runoff Management Program is found to be effective.



Perris

On May 24, 2012 the Regional Board notified the Co-permittees that the Local Implementation Plan Template (herein LIP Template) was found to be acceptable with the incorporation of certain required revisions. The May 24, 2012 letter provided the required revisions, and noted that the LIP Template was thereby approved with the comments incorporated by reference therein (See attached Exhibit 1). The Principal Permittee submitted an acceptance letter of the required revisions (See attached Exhibit 2), and established the approval date of the LIP template as May 24, 2012, which establishes a deadline date of May 24, 2013 for all Co-permittees to complete and implement their Individual LIP’s. The City of Perris’2012/13 Annual Report included the LIP. The City met the deadlines established in Section IV, completing the LIP within twelve months of the Board approval of the LIP Template and has begun to implement all provisions of the Storm Water Program as noted in the new LIP. During the course of implementation of the Individual LIP, the City of Perris has incorporated certain portions of its Amended Storm Water Management Program dated August 8, 2006, updated for the previous NPDES Board Order #R8-2002-0011 into the Individual LIP created for NPDES Board Order No. R8-2010-0033, and will need to update certain portions of the LIP to reflect current conditions, for example State Permits may have changed, certain checklists have been updated, etc. However, the City of Perris’s new Individual LIP can be used to run the Program in the City of Perris and implement all the requirements found in NPDES Board Order No. R8-2010-0033. Appendix 3 of the new Santa Ana Region NPDES Permit #R8-2010-0033 provides a summary of the scheduled activities required by the new permit. The City of Perris has made progress with implementing each of the required activities, and will address the outstanding permit elements, including the following: Continue to provide regular updates of the City’s Storm Drain Facilities Map to principal permittee. In prior years although the City provided regular red-lined versions of the City Storm Drain Facilities Map, thereby keeping an up-to-date inventory of facilities, changes had not been entered into a GIS version of the Map. However, during FY ‘15-16, the City converted all existing electronic data of its flood control facilities into a GIS format, and updated its new GIS map to include new flood control facilities built during the reporting period. The new GIS version is dated September 11, 2017. The Regional Water Quality Control Board approved the new Water Quality Management Plan Guidance Document (herein new WQMP) (See attached Exhibit 3) for new and significant redevelopment on October 22, 2012. The City of Perris began transitioning current discretionary development projects to comply with the New WQMP before December 6, 2012, and full implementation of the requirements of the New WQMP have been in effect as of April 22, 2013. The City of Perris requires the implementation of the new WQMP including all LID and Hydromodification Management provisions required within the new WQMP Template guidelines; consistent with the highest and best use standard exemptions for LID requirements, and the HCOC exemptions. The City of Perris is continuing to review the WQMP program included in the City’s current LIP, to refine the description and materials as needed to address the requirements of the new WQMP, such as updates of checklists to address road projects and new and significant redevelopment. However, all of these requirements are being implemented by the City of Perris. On December 23, 2011 the City Attorney’s Office issued a certification letter (See attached Exhibit 4) indicating that the City of Perris’ current Ordinance #1194 (P.M.C. 14.22 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS) provides City staff with legal authority to enforce the provisions of the new NPDES Permit/Board Order R8-2010-0033. The current ordinance contains language that assisted developers with the transition date from the San Jacinto permit to the original version of the WQMP that provided for final sunset dates for approved final WQMP’s. . No change has occurred with the Ordinance. This task will be made a priority in the 2017-2018 reporting year. Any approved revisions will be forwarded to the Regional Water Board during the 2017-18 Annual Report.



The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor violations. The enforcement procedures have been deemed adequate. However, the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city “Outfall Areas” will need to be more thoroughly described in the City’s new individual LIP. During the current reporting period the City made substantial progress in documenting and monitoring outfall areas along the Perris Valley Storm Drain and the San Jacinto River. The City continued with its efforts to further refine the accuracy of its initial “Outfall Inventory” completed FY ‘14-15. The initial inventory identified 32 outfalls. During the 15-16 reporting period the City placed its inventory on a GIS map. (See attached Exhibit 18). During the 15-16 reporting period, the City determined that the Outfalls identified as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10, are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the City monitored all 32 “Outfall Areas” at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge reporting forms. For clarification, these three outfalls have been identified as RCFC &WCD outfalls on both the Outfall Inventory and on each of the illicit discharge monitoring forms. No sampling was required, nor was any further investigation required. During the FY 2016-17, the initial inventory was further refined for accuracy. The ownership of each outfall has been updated to reflect the true ownership, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, were inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional “Outfall Areas.” It has been determined that a total of 51 outfalls should be monitored. These inventories have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures are being established in the LIP. A concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge. Over the course of the next several months, the City plans to review the IDDE (Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination) Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments and to consider additional methods intended to improve upon its enforcement response procedures and major outfall monitoring program. The City has made this an annual practice of review, and any changes the City deems useful will be incorporated into the City’s new LIP. Areas of review will include: interdepartmental communication/coordination, timely compliance, third party inspection programs, sampling and follow-up requirements. During last year’s reporting period (FY’15-16) the City continued an Agreement with a Consulting Firm for inspections. After prioritizing the first set of “High,” “Medium, and “Low” Commercial and Industrial business, the City’s inspection firm completed the inspection of approximately 80 businesses. Under the City’s current LIP, the City of Perris prioritized the frequency of commercial and industrial business and construction site inspections according to: 1) the results of the City’s inspection program findings for industrial commercial facilities, 2) complaints received on any construction site or commercial/industrial facility, and 3) according to wet and dry season prioritization schedule set by construction inspectors for construction sites. The City of Perris has reviewed the LIP against the new requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES Permit and the City has determined that changes should be made to the City’s Inspection Program prioritization methodology. These changes are being incorporated into the City’s LIP. The City’s Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance currently provides Enforcement Officers with the authority to impose fines on mobile business’ who fail to provide adequate BMP’s for the protection of the City’s storm water conveyance system, and the City Officers are currently enforcing the provisions of the Ordinance. However, On May 4, 2012 the Co-Permittees modified DAMP Section 8 to describe more specific processes and procedures for regulating mobile business. The City’s LIP more fully describes the City’s procedures for regulating and enforcing mobile businesses, but will be updated with specific BMP’s and detailed procedures for notification for Mobile businesses in violation. The City of Perris currently implements a collection of programs (i.e. toxic and household waste collection, WQMP requirements, public



education campaigns, etc.) intended to reduce discharge of pollutants from residential activities, which are described in the City’s LIP. The new WQMP Exhibit D Transportation Project Guidance was developed to provide Co-permittees with standard design and post development BMP guidance to be incorporated into its municipal road projects. The City of Perris is continuing to review the WQMP program included in the City’s current LIP, to refine the description and materials as needed to address the requirements of the new WQMP, such as updates of checklists to address road projects and new and significant redevelopment. However, all of these requirements are being implemented by the City of Perris. New and significant redevelopments have been using the new WQMP, and addressing all requirements of the WQMP, since December 2012 with full implementation reached in April, 2013. As previously reported, the City completed several extensive inventories of the storm drain system for the purpose of developing RFP’s for cleaning and video services, or for retrofit of existing catch basins with Connector Pipe Screen Units (CPS) and refine grading of natural BMP’s. The purpose of installation of CPS units was to provide for full capture of trash and debris within the catch basins, and reduce the amount of pollutant laden sediment entering the storm drain system. The inventories included mechanical and natural Post-Construction BMP’s installed throughout the City’s Flood Control District #1 and Landscape Maintenance District #1 (FCD #1 & LMD #1). The Post construction BMP’s consist of catch basin insert filters, automatic retractable screens (ARS), connector pipe screens (CPS), underground hydrodynamic separators (end-of-the-line clean water filter units); and above ground detention basins, bioswales, and infiltration basins. These inventories have been documented in the following Work Specifications: FCD # 1.2007-08-02, FCD #1.2007-08-03, FCD #1-2010-11-01, FCD#1-2011-12-01, FCD#1-2011-12-02, LMD #1-2011-12-03, FCD #1-2012-13-01, and FCD #1-2013-14-05. The inventoried BMP’s were inspected and cleaned on either: 1) a six month semi-annual basis (screen and catch basins), 2) on an annual basis (pipe and hydrodynamic separators), 3) monthly basis (routine maintenance above ground natural bioswales, detention basins and infiltration basins), and 4) reconstruction/fine grading of detention basins, bioswales, infiltration trenches as needed or approximately every 2-5 years. The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its LIP, but plans to continue to refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures. As previously reported, the results of the CPS Retrofit Project, reported in 2014/2015’s annual report the City of Perris issued a new RFP for catch basin maintenance services for those FCD Benefit Zones retrofitted with CPS units (See FCD #1-2015-16-01). The new maintenance schedule increases the frequency of catch basin cleaning from twice a year to three times per year, for those catch basins retrofitted with CPS units. In addition, as a result of the retrofit project, the pipe cleaning contract originally authorized under FCD #1-2012-13-01 was modified to reduce cleaning of pipe from once a year, to every two years for those storm drain systems retrofitted with CPS units. The City’s LIP will be updated to reflect these maintenance changes and system descriptions. During the reporting period the City continued with its inventory of mechanical and natural Post-Construction BMP’s installed throughout the City’s Flood Control District #1, Landscape Maintenance District #1 and General Fund Areas (FCD #1, LMD #1, FCGF). The City issued two new Work Specifications including FCD #1-2017-18-01, for maintenance services of natural type BMPs, and FCD #1-2017-18-02 for video and maintenance services of pipe and other flood control facilities in existing General Fund Areas or newly constructed Flood Control District Areas. Services will occur at the same frequency as indicted in the preceding paragraphs. The City made an extensive inventory of all Post Construction BMP’s approved and/or installed for New Development and Significant Development as part of the CNRP data collection effort (Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan). The approved Post-Construction BMP’s were approved as part of the San Jacinto Interim Construction Permit SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and the Riverside County WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan). These plans provide Post-Construction BMP’s for a total of 2,661.80 treatment acres.



The Plans provide for certain maintenance and inspection schedules which are the responsibility of the Owner of the development, and in some cases by the City’s landscape and/or flood control maintenance districts. The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its LIP, but plans to continue to refine and more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures. The City of Perris’ LIP includes information on its current limited public outreach program, consisting of Channel 3 announcements, storm drain stencils, and handouts at public counters and events, and will refine, more fully describe the program, and make any changes necessary to comply with the New Permit requirements. The City of Perris LIP more fully describes its training requirements for staff.

Riverside The City of Riverside continues to implement its Urban Runoff Management Program as defined in the LIP. The City continually evaluates this program to ensure the protection of the storm drain system and local waterways. As opportunities for improvement are identified, the LIP will be updated to reflect any changes.

Riverside County

The County of Riverside does not have a centralized public works agency; the County Executive Office provides management and administrative oversight for County departmental NPDES program activities. This includes coordination of the following Departments: • Economic Development Agency/Facilities Management • Transportation Land Management Agency (TLMA), which includes: o Building and Safety o Code Enforcement o Planning o Transportation • Environmental Health • Parks District • Waste Management Department

RCFC&WCD The DAMP/LIP was updated on June 30, 2017 to include the approval of the Watershed Action Plan and its supporting documents.

San Jacinto The City has reviewed its Urban Runoff Management Programs and determined that they are adequate at this time. The City is currently exploring the feasibility of adopting a budget based water rate structure which will further encourage the reduction of water waste and runoff by using price signals to the customers.



PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision Nos. VI.D.1.a.v-vii and VI.D.2.c require update of LIPs caused by changes to the DAMP, WQMP, Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake and Middle Santa Ana River TMDL studies.

PERMITTEE.

Beaumont The LIP was updated to include the adoption of the Watershed Action Plan (WAP). The WAP was approved on April 20, 2017.

Calimesa The City continues to work on and develop its Local Implementation Plan _LIP template.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake has updated the LIP to reflect revisions to the DAMP and to ensure compliance with the current Permit.

Corona As noted above, the City of Corona’s LIP was adopted on May 24, 2013. The City implemented departmental and personnel changes, and working to update the LIP for these changes.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale has reviewed and worked on modifications to the LIP and have made changes, by adding Section 6.3 for the approval of the Watershed Action Plan (WAP). The City has updated the LIP based of the Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) updates and will continue to work closely with the County to make changes as needed.

Hemet Not applicable.


Lake Elsinore Updated Section 6.3 to reflect approval of the WAP. Updated Sections 13.5.1 and 13.5.2 to reflect approval of the WAP and HMP respectively.

Menifee As noted above, the LIP was updated to include the WAP approval. Additionally, the most current LE/CL TMDL progress was incorporated.

Moreno Valley The LIP was updated during the reporting period to reflect a change in the organizational chart, the construction site inspection form and the approval of the WAP.

Norco No updates to the program this reporting year.

Perris No changes to the LIP occurred during the reporting period, however, as indicated above several revisions will be required.

Riverside For FY2016-2017, no significant revisions were made to the LIP. Revisions to the LIP are currently in progress.

Riverside County

Development review, including WQMP review and approval, has predominantly shifted to the Transportation Department. This procedural change has provided for reduced plan check review time and better oversight for permit compliance. The County has also consolidated its inspection program for both public and private facilities. Presently, the Transportation Department now provides inspection services for all County Departments. The Transportation Department, therefore, takes the lead role in oversight and implementation of the various permit compliance programs.


San Jacinto None.



PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITSection XVII.A of the Permit requires that the Permittees will evaluate the effectiveness of the Urban Runoff management program described in the DAMP to determine the need for any revisions in order to reduce Pollutants in MS4 discharges consistent with the MEP standards consistent with the reporting requirements in Appendix 3, Section IV.B. Section XVII.B requires that the findings of this review and a schedule to address necessary revisions be provided.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont

The DAMP was evaluated in all aspects due to new management in the City. The program management is now conducted by City Staff as opposed to consultants. The City has also added staff to conduct inspections of illicit connections and illegal discharges. The LIP was updated to capture the staff changes and the roles and responsibilities associated with new staff. The City has developed an inventory of all post-construction BMPs within the City’s jurisdiction. TMDL implementation and the monitoring program will be evaluated in the 2017-2018 fiscal year.

Calimesa The City has not made any changes or revisions to the DAMP. Our MS4 discharges are consistent with the MEP. The City continues to review all aspects of the DAMP and will revise as needed or required.

Canyon Lake After the evaluation, the DAMP was updated in May 2017.

Corona

This reporting year, the City continued implementation of the Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan (CBRP) which focuses efforts on reduction or elimination of dry weather flow to the Receiving Waters in order to meet the dry season urban Waste Load Allocation in the Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial Indicator TMDL. Having completed the inventory, investigation, and mapping effort of all 101 Outfalls within City limits in July 2011, staff investigated 37 Outfalls in June 2014 for illicit discharges. The 37 Outfalls met the monitoring criteria as IC/ID violations were not detected.

The City continued implementation of the revised Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Urban Runoff per Permit section XII.D which includes requirements for LID BMPs. In 2014, a review of our Storm Water Quality ordinance indicated an update was necessary to incorporate the latest definitions and provisions of the newly approved WQMP guidance document. Staff updated the Storm Water Quality Ordinance in order to ensure it reflected the latest WQMP provisions and definitions per the Permit. As such, staff coordinated with legal counsel to prepare and incorporate the updates as well as other minor modifications to enhance the City’s ability to enforce the Permit. The updated Ordinance (No. 3164) was approved at the March 19, 2014 City Council meeting. The City also continued to maintain a post construction BMP database to track the operation and maintenance of the structural post construction BMPs per Permit section XII.K.

The industrial commercial facility and construction site inspections continued per the compliance schedules and assigned priorities defined in Permit Section XI. Compliance was documented in our Industrial/Commercial and Construction inspection databases. In addition, the mobile business notification program continued to be implemented per Permit Section XI.D.6.

This year staff investigated 92 incidences of spills and/ or potential illegal pollutant discharges to the storm drain system. Additionally, staff responded to 121 calls regarding drainage of swimming pools and spas. Outreach effort on proper drainage procedures is ongoing as the service is advertised on the City website; through educational materials distributed at City events; and through service request calls received by Department of Water and Power’s Customer Care Group. Enforcement to achieve compliance involved distributing educational materials, verbal warnings, and follow-up inspections. Lastly, staff issued 13 NOVs this reporting year which we have found to be an effective tool in bringing sites into compliance.

The City also continued its “Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life” Campaign, encouraging customers to implement the following measures: o No watering on Fridays



o 20 minutes maximum per station per watering day o Drip Irrigation: 90 minutes maximum per watering day o No watering between 10am and 8pm o No Watering for 48 hours after rainfall o Leaks and broken sprinklers must be fixed in a timely manner o Water cannot be allowed to runoff property o Washing hard surfaces is prohibited o Vehicles can only be watered using a bucket and hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle

The City has staff available to educate residents on how to address these measures and respond to any complaints. Additionally, the City has accelerated turf removal projects in City parkways and reclaimed water conversions. The increased efforts on water conservation will result in decreased dry weather runoff and therefore a reduction in potential pathogenic discharges from urban runoff into the Receiving Waters.

The City’s public outreach and education program continued this year, increasing public awareness through residential, commercial, and industrial outreach programs. These programs are being evaluated as part of the CBRP to determine if additional programs targeted at bacteria reduction are necessary.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale has reviewed and worked on modifications to the LIP and have made changes, by adding Section 6.3 for the approval of the Watershed Action Plan (WAP). The City has updated the LIP based of the Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) updates and will continue to work closely with the County to make changes as needed.

Hemet No revisions have been made during the 2016-2017 FY.


Lake Elsinore

The City’s review of the Urban Runoff management program as described in the DAMP did not identify any areas of non-compliance. It is the City’s determination that the program(s) outlined in the DAMP are sufficient to reduce pollutants in discharges to the MS4 to the MEP standard. (see Table 2) Over and above the Urban Runoff management program in the DAMP, the City has undertaken the following: Table 2

Activity Estimated Annual Cost/Benefit Addition of Recycled/ Reclaimed Water to the Lake $750,000.00 Cooperative submittal of environmental documentation to other agencies for the Agricultural Water Line to the Lake

Operation and Maintenance of Axial Flow Pumps $250,000.00 Operation of Floating Restroom Facilities on Lake $8,500.00 Providing Trash Bags to Boaters $6,850.00 Removal of Lake/Water Body Adjacent Encampments $15,000.00 Fishery Management – addition of sport fish to lake $25,000.00 Membership in the Canyon Lake/Lake Elsinore TMDL Task Force

$37,000.00

Recycled Tire Grant $39,000 2 Annual Free Citywide Cleanup Events 144 cy & 159.75 cy

Corona continued



Organization and funding of annual ‘Clean Extreme’ event within City.

Housing Permanent HHW Facility at Corporate Yard Implementation of the Clean LE program in conjunction with Riverside County & WRCOG

Free Bulky Item Trash Pickup (2) Annually for Residents Citywide Street Sweeping (2x monthly) Member of Task Force on Illegal Dumping/Littering Review and Conditioning of Special Events to Implement BMPs Placement of Dog Waste bags and containers at public park sites. Purchase and use of Surf Rake to remove trash & debris from beaches

$44,000

Menifee The City reviewed the effectiveness of the program during 2016-17 and determined that there was no need for revisions.

Moreno Valley

IV.B.2.(a)—The City has reviewed and evaluated its program and implementation of the various tasks. Funding currently exists for the program as addressed in the LIP. IV. B.2.(b)—The City utilizes Underground Service Alert to detect IC/ID to the MS4. During this reporting period no IC/IDs were detected through USA. See this report for additional IC/ID enforcement and metrics. IV.B.2.(c): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV.B.2.(d): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV.B.2(e): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV.B.2(f): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV.B.2(g): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV,B.2(h): See FY 2016/17 Monitoring Report provided by RCFCD. IV.B.2(i)—See Section 2 above. IV.B.2(j)—During this reporting period businesses were inspected per the Order’s metrics. Construction sites are inspected based upon the Order’s metrics. Eighty percent (80%) or greater of the City’s open channels, catch basins, and retention/detention basins were inspected, cleaned and maintained in compliance with the Order’s metrics. Publicly maintained streets are scheduled to be swept twice monthly. Thirty-three (33) extended detention basins and/or vegetated swales are publicly maintained by the City. Appropriate staff received NPDES training based upon the Order’s metrics. Facility Pollution Prevention Plans (FPPPs) were reviewed and Municipal Facilities were inspected. The City Manager or designated Representative attended the Management Steering Committee meetings per the Order’s metrics. The Storm Water Program Manager attended the NPDES TAC per the Order’s metrics. The City continued as an active participant in the LE/CL TMDL Task Force. The City participated in the continuing Alum Treatment application to Canyon Lake. The City will work with other stakeholders to address Fishery Management and Aeration of Lake Elsinore per the CNRP. The City continued to implement its IC/ID program. The City continued to maintain a database to track operation and maintenance of post-construction BMPs pursuant to this Order’s requirements. The database is updated annually. The City continued to file PRDs/NOIs/and NOTs pursuant to the CGP for its capital improvement projects. The City prepared a Storm Water Budget to comply with this Order. IV.B.2(k)—N/A IV.B.2(l)—See Appendix G of the Consolidated Annual Report.

Lake Elsinore continued



IV.B.2(m)—The ordinances have been reviewed for compliance with this Order, the DAMP, the WQMP, and the LIP. The City does enforce New Development/Significant Redevelopment Priority Projects to construct and maintain post-construction BMPs. Commercial and Industrial Businesses inspections are contracted by a consultant to perform, in compliance with this Order.

Norco Based on the available program overview parameters, the current state of the Urban Runoff Management Program is found to be effective.

Perris To date the Lead Permittee has coordinated the need for any revisions to the DAMP (I.e. WQMP revisions, LIP Template, Municipal Facility SSPPP Template, IC/ID Program, CNRP monitoring, etc.) with the individual Co-Permittees to complete the required tasks. This year the only change that occurred to the DAMP revolved around the approval of the regional Watershed Action Plan. (See attached Exhibit 16).

Riverside

The City of Riverside continues its sustained effort to implement the DAMP and LIP in the most effective manner possible. Throughout the fiscal year, City staffs from multiple departments have worked hard to ensure the protection of the storm drain system and local waterways. The departments and divisions coordinating and implementing these programs include:

Public Works-Engineering Design Museum

Public Works-Land Development City Attorney’s Office

Public Works-Construction Inspection General Services-Building Services

Public Works-Environmental Compliance General Services-Fleet Management

Public Works-Storm Drain Maintenance Development-Redevelopment

Public Works-Street Sweeping Public Utilities-Water Engineering

Public Works-Solid Waste Collection Public Utilities-Water Construction

Public Works-Landscape and Forestry Public Utilities-Water Operations

Community Development-Planning Public Utilities-Energy Delivery Engineering

Community Development-General Plan Public Utilities-Energy Delivery Operations

Community Development-Code Compliance Public Utilities-Call Center

Community Development-Building and Safety Fire-Training

Parks, Recreation and Community Services-Parks Planning Fire-Operations

Parks, Recreation and Community Services-Parks Maintenance Fire-Prevention

Parks, Recreation and Community Services-Recreation

The efforts of staff from each department combine to provide a multi-faceted stormwater program. Staffs continue to implement the new Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), LIP, CBRP, CNRP, and other plans and documents critical to the City’s stormwater program.

Riverside County No revisions necessary.

RCFC&WCD

New Development Continued development of the following Watershed Action Plan (WAP) Components: the Regional Geodatabase, Hydromodification

Susceptibility Mapping and Report, the Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), and the Retrofit Study. Per 2010 MS4 Permit requirements, a Watershed Action Plan (WAP) was developed and submitted by the Permittees to the Regional Board.

The WAP and its supporting documents were approved by the Regional Board on April 20, 2017. Upon approval, the DAMP and the LIP were updated to include language from the approved WAP and supporting documents.

The District will be incorporating language from the WAP and its supporting documents and updating the WQMP during FY 2017-2018. The WQMP training will be updated once the revisions are made to the WQMP guidance document.

Moreno Valley continued



Municipal Facilities and Activities The District’s corporate yard is inspected on an annual basis. Water Quality Monitoring Continued collection and analysis of water quality samples in accordance with the Permit's Monitoring and Reporting Program via the Consolidated

Monitoring Program (CMP) for water quality monitoring. Water quality samples are collected during dry and wet weather at MS4 outfalls and receiving water stations, and are analyzed for required constituents to ensure compliance with the 2010 MS4 Permit.

The CMP for water quality monitoring describes the monitoring efforts that will be implemented to comply with the County's three MS4 Permits. Specifically, the Santa Ana Region Monitoring Plan (CMP Volume IV) was updated in August 2012 to comply with the 2010 MS4 Permit. It is reviewed annually, and was updated July 2014, and again in November 2014 with minor errata to reflect current methods and improvements based on program information. Minor corrections were made to Water Quality Objective tables to reflect the Basin Plan update. The 2014 CMP updates are applicable to the 2016-2017 monitoring year. The CMP includes procedures for collection and analysis of water quality samples at Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems' (MS4) outfalls and receiving waters sites for a variety of constituents. The CMP also includes reference to other monitoring efforts for the LE/CL TMDL, MSAR TMDL development, Hydromodification Monitoring, LID Monitoring, and participation in the Regional Watershed Monitoring through membership with the Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition (SMC). These additional monitoring components and Special Studies have stand-alone work plans that have been developed and approved for these components independently of the CMP.

Continued participation in the SMC, a regional monitoring group comprised of Southern California Phase 1 Municipal NPDES Permit holders whose focus is developing effective, meaningful stormwater quality monitoring techniques.

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Continued participation in the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force. The Task Force is comprised of stakeholders regulated by

the Regional Board through the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL (LE/CL TMDL), which was adopted on December 17, 2004. The District also participates in another TMDL Task Force for the Reach 3 Santa Ana River Pathogen Indicator TMDL (MSAR TMDL), which was adopted on August 26, 2005. The purpose of both Task Forces is to implement joint requirements of the TMDLs, to address these impairments and implement the TMDLs. LE/CL Task Force agreement renewal was effective on July 1, 2017. The MSAR TMDL Task Force agreement renewal will become effective on December 1, 2017. The agreements for both Task Forces have a term of five (5) years.

The Permittees utilized the LE/CL TMDL Task Force to implement the approved Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan (CNRP) which includes an alum treatment project for Canyon Lake, as well as the continued funding and aeration of the Lake Elsinore Aeration and Mixing System. The services of a consultant (Amec Foster Wheeler) were secured to perform monitoring requirements of the LE/CL TMDL Phase 2 Compliance Monitoring Program. Please see Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Watershed Nutrient TMDL Monitoring 2016-2017 Annual Report (Appendix I) which summarizes the results of the LE/CL monitoring effort for the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

The Permittees utilized the MSAR TMDL Task Force Agreement to facilitate the hiring of a consultant to aid in the implementation of the Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan (CBRP) for those Permittees named in the TMDL within Riverside County. The CBRP was approved at the February 10, 2012 Regional Board meeting and is currently in the implementation phase. CDM Smith, Inc. was contracted to fulfill monitoring and surveillance requirements as well as conduct sampling for the MSAR TMDL. The Santa Ana River Watershed Bacteria Monitoring Program Annual Report 2016-2017 (Appendix H) summarizes the bacteria sampling efforts.

San Jacinto

Additional revisions to the LIP were anticipated in FY2015-16 as a result of potential approval of the WAP; however, the WAP was not approved by the Regional Board until FY16-17. Staff and the consultant have undertaken a revision of the LIP which we anticipate to be completed in FY17-18. A major effort to revise the LE/CL Bacteria TMDL was initiated by the LE/CL TMDL Task Force. Work is ongoing through FY16-17, with completion expected in January 2018. At such time, additional reviews of the LIP may be warranted.

RCFC&WCD


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 5 – Illicit Connections/Illegal Discharges Page 5-1

5. ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES Provision IX of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to prohibit IC/IDs to the MS4 through their stormwater ordinances.

Actions to Investigate and Eliminate IC/ID When a potential IC/ID has been identified during MS4 monitoring or receiving water monitoring, the District notifies the Permittee having jurisdiction so that they investigate in accordance with their LIP, and in general conformance with the guidance provided in the CMP, as appropriate. The Permittees' efforts to control IC/IDs during the reporting period are summarized in Table 5-1. There were no spills of materials meeting "reportable quantity" criteria. Field Reconnaissance Activity In addition to the IC/ID investigations during monitoring, the Permittee implemented a field reconnaissance activity to identify IC/IDs. The field reconnaissance focused on inspecting all major outfalls within its jurisdiction. This effort was required to be completed within the term of the MS4 Permit (i.e. by January 29, 2015). An update on this effort has been provided in database form. Results Database All sampling data collected as part of the IC/ID monitoring program, including incident response information are tracked individually by each Permittee and included in Appendix K. In compliance with the Permit (Sections III.A.1.m and IX.H), for the field reconnaissance effort, the District tracks and compiles information that is gathered and entered by the Permittees into an IC/ID database. The database will consist of a master spreadsheet that has been developed and formatted by the District. The master spreadsheet is included in Appendix K. Trash and Debris Table 5-1 includes information on trash and debris removal from the Permittees' drainage facilities. With implementation of the Trash Amendments commencing in FY 2017-18, future reporting regarding this element of the program, will focus on documenting "full capture device" installation. Training IC/ID and Safety Training is for the Santa Ana Region Permittees and meets the requirements outlined in Section IX.E of the SAR Permit, Volume 5: Santa Ana Region Monitoring Plan, and Appendix J of the Quality Assurance Project Plan. Permittee staff responsible for conducting IC/ID inspections receive annual training regarding the following topics:

Background on SAR Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)

IC/ID Program Components

Sampling Safety

Meter Calibration, Operation and Maintenance

Field Site Visit (hands-on sampling)



ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE

1. Number of IC/ID reports received:

2. Percent of IC/IDs sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow-up:

3. Number of IC/IDs sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow-up:

4. Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

5. Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement:

Beaumont 0 0 0 0 0

Calimesa 0 0 0 0 0

Canyon Lake 35 5 2 Education: 10%

Verbal: 0% Written: 90%

Education: 4 Verbal: 0 Written: 31

Corona 92 0

0 36% Verbal Warnings 7% Notice of Violation

4% City Abatement

33 Verbal Warnings 6 Notices of Violation 4 City Abatements

Eastvale 6 0 0 0 0

Hemet 3 0 0

100% - Notification Level 3 – Written Warning/Notice of Violation

Jurupa Valley 4 See permittee report 0 0

Lake Elsinore 12 0 0 100

Menifee 4 0 0 50 Verbal warnings: 2

Written warning: 1

Moreno Valley

119 N/A N/A 88 Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 4 Written warning: 37 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 50 Administrative compliance order: 13 Stop work order or cease and desist



order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 1 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Norco 7 See permittee report

Perris

11 0 0 73 1 Verbal/Complied Closed 6 Notice of Violation/Complied/Closed 1 Cleanup/Sampling/Complied/Closed

Riverside

710 total calls; 302 of which

were for IC/ID

0 0 30 Education and Information: 90 Citations (NOV) issued: 9 Notice (Written warning) issued: 79 Verbal Warnings given: 2

Riverside County

248 0 0 46.7 Education and information: 117 Written warning: 38 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 68 Administrative fine: 0, however, 7 citations were issued

RCFC&WCD 22 0 0 0 0

San Jacinto 0 0 0 0 0

TABLE 5-1 ILLICIT CONNECTIONS/ILLEGAL DISCHARGES




Provision No. IX.D and Provision No. IX.E of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and revise their IC/ID program to include a pro-active IDDE using the Guidance Manual for Illicit Discharge, Detection, and Elimination by the Center for Watershed Protection or any other equivalent program by July 29, 2011. Provision No. IX.G of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and evaluate their IC/ID program, including litter/trash BMPs, to determine if the program needs to be adjusted. The results of this review shall be reported in the Annual Report and include a description of the Permittees revised pro-active IDDE program, procedures and schedules.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont No update was made to the City’s IC/ID program.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa continues to enforce, operate and adhere to its IC/ID program, which incorporates the IDDE elements using the above referenced manual. The City’s IC/ID program continues to effectively work and therefore no revisions have been made during this reporting period. The City will continue to monitor the effectiveness of its IC/ID program and revise as necessary. The City continues to educate the public about illicit discharges and pollution prevention whenever possible and applicable. IC/ID detection is an item that is incorporated into all inspection programs.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake is proactive in ensuring compliance with the MS4 Permit IC/ID requirements and regularly reviews the Canyon Lake Municipal Code. The Canyon Lake Property Owner Association (POA) Community Patrol, Marine Patrol, the City of Canyon Lake Special Enforcement and Code Enforcement Officers perform visual inspections, monitor discharge sites, educate the public and perform periodic water quality tests. In order to comply with water quality regulations enforced by the State through the local Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force started using a state funded grant for Alum treatments, which began in September 2013. When alum is added to the lake, it binds immediately with the phosphorous and effectively removes the opportunity for algae to grow. With less algae in the water, light can penetrate deeper into the lake allowing plants to grow at the bottom while improving the overall health and water quality of the lake for the life of the fish. Applications have taken place in September 2013, February 2014, September 2014, May 2015, September 2015, May 2016, September 2016 and February 2017. The City continues to maintain signage on all City owned drains with “Only Rain Down the Drain” provided by Riverside County Flood Control. All applicable Ordinances in the Municipal Code are continually reviewed and updated for compliance. The City of Canyon Lake performs an annual cleanup of the community and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands. In addition, Special Enforcement Officers patrol daily remove trash and debris from within the community and on the BLM lands within our City limits. The passing of Urgency Ordinance 134U has led to a substantial decrease in trash and debris in the BLM lands. The City has reviewed the IC/ID program and found our litter/trash BMPs to be sufficient.

Corona

As noted in past annual reports, the City reviewed and revised its IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. City staff responsible for completing the IC/ID outfall investigations attended a half-day training seminar sponsored by the Principal Permittee wherein staff learned about proper sampling protocols and investigation techniques. The City also obtained a pH and Conductivity meter for use on future investigations. City staff completed IC/ID investigations in June of 2014.

Eastvale The City Inspectors or Code Enforcement Officers will note and report any IC/ID situations to the Program Manager for follow up actions and record purposes. The City also has public reporting software and will receive public notices about IC/ID events as well.



Hemet The annual review of the City of Hemet IC/ID program did not result in any revised procedures or schedules.

Jurupa Valley

The City of Jurupa Valley doesn’t have an IC/ID problem. Most of the IC/ID issues are handled by the water/sewer providers (mainly JCSD and RCSD.) The City of Jurupa Valley does has a litter, debris and trash control problem. The City has two waste providers Burrtec and Waste Management. They have liberal policies for pickup of large objects and trash accumulations. Despite that, the city continually picks up loads of sofas, beds, and other furniture, tires and trash from the public right-of-way. The City sends staff to any reports of dumping and illicit discharges to review situation and make a report.

Lake Elsinore

City is part of the Homeless Task Force and as a member has increased the level of enforcement in cleaning up homeless encampments. In FY 16/17, 107 cleanups were conducted, which equated to approximately 300 separate campsites. 135 tons of trash were removed. Additionally, the City has joined with Riverside County Watershed Protection and the Western Riverside Council of Governments in a pilot program “Clean LE” aimed at educating, engaging and inspiring residents and businesses to love where they live and work by keeping Lake Elsinore clean, beautiful and litter-free. More information can be found at the City’s Website: http://www.lake-elsinore.org/residents/clean-le City staff and Council Members continue to study the issues associated with illegal dumping and litter to seek possible solutions as part of the Lake Elsinore Task Force on Illegal Dumping and Litter.

Menifee The City reviewed the effectiveness of the program during 2016-17 and determined that there was no need for revisions.

Moreno Valley

The City Moreno Valley reviewed and revised its IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. IC/ID investigations are ongoing and due to be completed by the end of the Permit term.

Norco

The City has reviewed their IC/ID program to compare the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The IC/ID Program (with procedures and schedule) was incorporated into volume IV of the CMP. The City’s program will continue as it has in the past. All reports of possible illegal connections are investigated with enforcement actions taken as necessary. Routine maintenance and inspection are made and if any illegal connection is found, follow-up action/enforcement is taken.

Perris

The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. IC/ID investigations are ongoing and due to be completed by the end of the Permit term. The enforcement procedures for reported incidents have been deemed adequate. However, the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city “Outfall Areas” will need to be more thoroughly described in the City’s new individual LIP. During the 2016-17 year, the initial inventory that the City conducted was refined for accuracy, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, were inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional “Outfall Areas.” The City currently has identified and actively monitors 51 “Outfall Areas.” (Note that three of the areas PMP 7, 8 and 10 are RCFC&WCD Outfalls) Once the regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge.

Riverside

The City of Riverside reviewed and revised their IC/ID program to reflect the IDDE elements using the above referenced guidance manual. The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Board on May 31, 2011 by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012.

Riverside County All IC/ID observations from County Departments are reported to the Code Enforcement Department for investigation, follow-up, enforcement, documentation, and reporting.



RCFC&WCD

The proposed IC/ID program (including procedures and schedules) was incorporated into Volume IV of the CMP which was submitted to Santa Ana Regional Board staff on May 31, 2011 by the District on behalf of the Co-Permittees. The CMP was approved, with conditions, by the Santa Ana Regional Board in a letter dated March 26, 2012. Regional Board comments were addressed in the November 2012 Volume IV of the CMP draft. IC/ID investigations are ongoing throughout the Permit term.

San Jacinto No revision to procedures and schedules were necessary.




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITProvision No. IX.H of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to maintain and update a database summarizing IC/ID incident response (including IC/IDs detected as part of field monitoring activities).

PERMITTEE

Beaumont A copy of the 2016-2017 SAR IC/ID spreadsheet (Beaumont ICID Spreadsheet) is provided.

Calimesa See Exhibit “D” as referenced.

Canyon Lake Attachment #8

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘A’

Eastvale Attachment (H) - Annual Report IC and ID Spreadsheet for FY 16-17

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT B

Jurupa Valley City created an IC/ID spreadsheet that came online beginning of FY16/17 and is attached to the FY16/17 Annual Report.

Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT E

Menifee The SAR Permittee ICID spreadsheet template from 2014-15 field monitoring activities is attached as Attachment C. Additionally, Attachment B is an IC/ID 2016-17 tracking spreadsheet for third-party complaints and those IC/IDs associated with an inspection program with case details.

Moreno Valley See Attachment B

Norco See attached.

Perris

The Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city “Outfall Areas” will need to be more thoroughly described in the City’s new individual LIP. During the reporting period the City determined that the Outfalls identified as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10, are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the City monitored all 51 “Outfall Areas” at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge reporting forms. This inventory has been documented in the City’s Outfall inventory and attached hereto as Exhibit 18, and are also included in the IC/ID Inventory and Summary Exhibit 17. The summary lists no incidents of IC/ID to report. No sampling was required, nor was any further investigation required. During the 2016-17 period, the initial inventory have been refined for accuracy, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, were inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional “Outfall Areas.” Once regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge. At this time the City conducts monthly inspections of certain outfalls, open channels and swales in conjunction with quarterly cleaning of these channels. These outfall, channel and swale areas have been inventoried in the City’s bid document FCD #1-2016-17-01. The bid document indicates that quarterly inspections (5x per year) and cleaning occurred at these locations.

Riverside See attached IC/ID spreadsheet summarizing the City’s efforts to identify previously unknown IC/IDs. In addition, Table 2 in the Legal Authority/Enforcement section summarizes IC/ID incident responses.

Riverside County See attached database in attachment “A”

RCFC&WCD A PDF of the database is provided in Appendix K (NPDES Complaints).

San Jacinto City does not have staff levels to maintain database. Copies of IC/ID incident reports are filed with the Public Works Department manually.





Provision No. IX.J of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to assess their programs to eliminate the discharge of trash and debris to Waters of the U.S. to the MEP.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont 55.4 Calimesa 12

Canyon Lake 64

Corona 2.4 tons from catch basins 50 tons from debris basins & open channels 2,645 tons from street sweeping

Eastvale N/A - *Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District owns and manages MS4s within the City of Eastvale, except for pipes 36” and smaller, as well as inlets and catch basins, which are managed by the City. The City contracts with Riverside County for street maintenance and does not own any maintenance yard.

Hemet 12

Jurupa Valley 31 - The City cleaned 1,005 of its 1,038 catch basins during the 2016-2017 fiscal year. All the basins are located on our GIS system available in the field using tablets. Our program enables notes to be applied to each basin. The crew inputs approximate tonnage removed from every catch basin cleaned. Their approximate numbers are then verified using samples removed from the field back in the City Hall yard.

Lake Elsinore 3408.40 Tons (FY 16/17 Diversion Report – City-Services+Street Sweeping) EXHIBIT F

Menifee 38 tons (catch basin cleaning) Moreno Valley 1881

Norco 132

Perris 1120.334 – 103.334 tons of waste were removed from the City’s MS4 facilities, including catch basins, hydrodynamic separators, pipe and open channels. 1,017.00 tons of street sweeper waste was collected. Street sweeper covered 7,895 residential curb miles and 12,789 commercial curb miles.

Riverside 3,695 tons from Street Sweeping; 1055 cubic yards (estimate of 538 tons) from Drain Cleaning; Total 4,233 tons Riverside County 143.5

RCFC&WCD Debris: 1,815 tons; Sediment Removed: 38,171 cy; Trash Removed: 2.68 tons

San Jacinto 346.39 Tons of Street sweeping debris was collected. 400 tons of catch basin cleaning debris was collected.




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT Provision No. XVI.D of the MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to summarize all spill incidents involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117 and 302.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont No spill incidents were reported.

Calimesa The City of Calimesa received information on a paint spill within a parking lot. Incident Report is contained in Exhibit “D”.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake had no incidents with reportable quantities of hazardous waste during the fiscal year.

Corona See Attached report from Fire Department on all calls potentially involving Hazardous Waste (ATTACHMENT ‘F’).

Eastvale No spills during the 16/17 FY had reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste.

Hemet There were no spill incidents in 2016-2017 involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117 and 302.

Jurupa Valley None

Lake Elsinore None to report.

Menifee There were no spill incidents in 2016-17.

Moreno Valley There were no incidents during the reporting period.

Norco

Perris

The Code Enforcement staff issued notices of violation and citations for spills and other illegal activities. However, based upon the nature of the spill, and the quantities of the spills observed, it was not necessary to report the spill to the Riverside County Department of Hazardous Waste. The Code of Federal Regulations, found at 40 CFR Part 117.3, references the list of hazardous substances found in Table 302.4, then provides a summary of those substances in Table 117.3. Table 117.3 also provides the “Reportable Quantities” for each individual hazardous substance. The reportable quantities vary between 1 pound and 5,000 pounds depending on the substance.

Riverside No spill incidents involving reportable quantities of Hazardous Waste per 40CFR 117.

Riverside County Please see attachment B for Hazardous Waste Spill data. There were 118 spills recorded in the County of Riverside unincorporated areas during the reporting year.

RCFC&WCD See PDF of complaints database in Appendix E.

San Jacinto None reported.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 6 – Private Development Construction Activity Page 6-1

6. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Permittees require applicants to obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, categorize the project as a high, medium or low threat to water quality prior to the issuance of grading or construction permits and ensure that the erosion and sediment control plans that are approved include appropriate erosion and sediment control BMPs and that they are implemented through all phases of construction.

INVENTORY DATABASE In conformance with Provision No. XI.B.1 of the 2010 MS4 Permit, each Permittee continues to maintain and update an inventory database (or databases) of construction sites for which they have issued a building or grading permit. Projects are removed from the database when construction is complete and the project's building or grading permit is closed. An example of the inventory database is included in Appendix L. Permittee databases are included with the respective Permittee submittal section of this report under Appendix J. Provision XI.B.2 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to inspect all inventoried construction sites, document relevant site information and include it into the inventory database. In establishing priorities for inspection of construction sites, each Permittee shall also prioritize construction sites as high, medium, or low threat to receiving water quality. Provision XI.A.2 and XI.B.3 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires that each Permittee also conduct construction site inspections for compliance with its ordinances (grading, WQMP's, etc.) and local permits (building, grading, etc.). The Permittees shall document the number of inspections and actions taken then summarize and report on those actions annually. When conducting construction site inspections, the Permittees' construction site inspectors, at a minimum, address the following items:

For projects of one acre or more, verify that an NOI has been submitted via the State Board SMARTS system. Verification is typically made by reviewing a printed copy of the NOI showing the WDID number issued for the site. As Permittees become aware of changes in ownership, Permittees will notify Santa Ana Regional Board staff.

For projects of one acre or more, verify that a SWPPP is onsite.

Verification that the BMPs implemented onsite are effective for the appropriate phase of construction (preliminary stage, mass grading stage, streets and utilities stage, etc.). Confirm compliance with the Permittee's stormwater ordinance.

Check for poorly managed authorized non-stormwater discharges or evidence of unauthorized non-stormwater discharges that may be potential IC/IDs to a MS4.



An example construction site inspection form is located in Appendix L. Based on the inspection findings, the Permittees implement follow-up actions as necessary to comply with the requirements of the 2010 SAR MS4 Permit.

INSPECTOR TRAINING REQUIREMENTS Provision No. XV.C requires the Permittees to provide training to staff involved in inspecting construction sites. Permittee staff responsible for conducting construction site inspections receive annual training regarding the following topics:

The local jurisdiction's stormwater ordinance and other applicable local jurisdiction resolutions and codes;

The 2010 MS4 Permit;

The construction activity permits; and

The local jurisdiction's enforcement and compliance strategy/policy for construction sites.

This annual training for construction site inspectors is conducted prior to October 1st, the start of the rainy season. The Permittees ensure that newly-hired municipal staff or transferred municipal staff receive formal training within six months of beginning their inspection duties. A summary of the Permittees' efforts is provided in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1. Construction Activities


PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE



3. Percent of active construction sites subject to the Construction General Permit that discovered without coverage:

4.Number of active construction sites subject to the Construction General Permit that discovered without coverage:

5. Number of illegalconstruction sites are discovered (i.e. without building/grading permits):

6. Number of construction inspection staff that attended formal construction training:

Beaumont

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 80% Written warning:7% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 15 Verbal warning: 12 Written warning: 1 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 2 2



Calimesa

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 0% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):0 %


0 0 0 0

Canyon Lake



0 0 8 3



Corona

101 inspections were completed for this year’s reporting Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 26% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 1% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%


0 0 0 7



Eastvale

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 100% Written warning 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 56% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):0 %


0 0 0 1

Hemet

Education and information: 0% Verbal warning: 0% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: None Stop work order or cease and desist order: None Civil citation or injunction: None Administrative fine: None Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): None

0 None None 2



Jurupa Valley

Education and information: 60% Verbal warning: 40% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 1% Administrative compliance order: % Stop work order or cease and desist order: % Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%


1 1 1 3

Lake Elsinore

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 0.01% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0.006% Administrative compliance order:0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0.01% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0 %


0 0 1 1



Menifee

Education and information: as needed onsite% Verbal warning: 33% Written warning: 33% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):0%

Education and information: as needed onsite Verbal warning: 27 Written warning: 27 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0

City staff received informal

training by supervisors

Moreno Valley

Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor: 0


0 0 0 2



Norco

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 100% Written warning: N/A% Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A% Administrative compliance order: N/A% Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A% Civil citation or injunction: N/A% Administrative fine: N/A% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):N/A%

Education and information: 6 Verbal warning: 6 Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): N/A

0 0 0 1

Perris


Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 7 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 1



Riverside

7.6 Education and information:100% Verbal warning: 27.6% Written warning: 4.9% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0.3% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 2.6% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

7.6 Education and information: 308_ Verbal warning: 85 Written warning: 15 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 1 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 8 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 9

Riverside County


Education and information: 101 Verbal warning: 101 Written warning: 54 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 47 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):

1 2 0 22



RCFC&WCD

Education and information: N/A Verbal warning: N/A Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor) N/A

Education and information: N/A Verbal warning: N/A Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution(infraction or misdemeanor): N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A

San Jacinto

Education and information: 0% Verbal warning: 14% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes

Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 4 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance:0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 1



PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT Provision No. XI.A.1 of the Permit requires each Co-Permittee to maintain and update a database inventory of all active Construction Sites. Provision No. XI.A.2 of Permit requires submittal of this database with each Annual Report.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont Construction Site database (Beaumont - Construction Site Inspections_2016-2017) inventory is provided.

Calimesa See Exhibit “E” as referenced.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has no active sites over an acre with the exception of the following: In September 2016 through August 2017 illegal grading at 30891 Blackhorse caused runoff of silt, soil and debris. The property owner continued work after a “STOP WORK ORDER” was issued. The City of Canyon Lake responded several times before requesting assistance of Regional Water Quality Control Board representative, Michael Roth. Citations were issued and a grading permit was issued. City Staff has addressed illegal construction activities at properties on Appaloosa Court, Gray Fox, Bucktail, Pretty Doe, Sorrell and Blackhorse during the FY 2016-2017. All sites are given educational notices and written documentation, we do not exercise verbal warnings as standard practice due to the nature of our City infrastructure.

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘B’

Eastvale See Attachment D - Active Construction Site Inventory

Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT C

Jurupa Valley The database is provided herein.

Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT G

Menifee Attachment D – Construction Site Inventory 2016-17 provides an inventory of all active construction sites within the City. The City completed 81 full inspections of construction sites during 2016-17 and met the Permit-required inspection frequencies at all sites.

Moreno Valley See Attachment C

Norco The City is continuing to evaluate various options to move the current permit tracking system into an electronic based system that meets all of the demands and requirements of the City, including various other departments.

Perris Please see attached Exhibit 10 for a hardcopy of the database for construction sites.

Riverside See Attached Documents

Riverside County Please see Attachment C.

RCFC&WCD The District maintains an electronic database of active District-owned construction sites. However, the District does not issue grading or building permits for private construction activity. The District does, however, utilize the SWRCB’s SMARTS system for those projects that are deemed applicable.

San Jacinto Attached


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 7 – Industrial and Commercial Sources Page 7-1

7. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES Permittees conduct stormwater compliance surveys at targeted industrial and commercial facilities within their respective jurisdictions; some Permittees utilize existing inspection programs in order to achieve compliance with this requirement, others have elected to bring on additional staff or consultants. Each Permittee conducts follow-up inspections to ensure compliance with their respective stormwater ordinances at facilities where initial inspections identified deficiencies.

CURRENT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTIONS The Permittees have developed a program to identify compliance of industrial and commercial facilities with local stormwater ordinances and, where applicable, potential non-compliance with California's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges associated with Industrial Activities. Two main components of this existing program are the Permittees’ industrial and commercial facility inspections, which replaced the Compliance Assistance Program (CAP), and the local POTW pre-treatment inspection programs. PERMITTEES’ INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTION The Permittees began to implement measures to ensure the industrial and commercial facility inspections are conducted according to the MS4 Permit soon after the termination of the CAP. The inspections are performed by the Permittees, at frequencies mentioned in Provision No. XI.D. The Permittees’ industrial and commercial facility inspection involved a detailed stormwater compliance survey for:

Facilities that must secure a hazardous materials permit for storing, handling, or generating such materials; and

Retail food facilities.



The Permittees' industrial and commercial facility inspection includes educational outreach to the inspected facilities and completion of a detailed stormwater compliance survey. Completed survey forms are included into the respective municipality's database. The completed survey forms are prioritized and the respective municipality's representative identifies those surveys that indicate non-compliance to initiate a follow-up inspection. In conducting a facility inspection, if it appears that the facility may be required to have coverage under the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities and the facility operator indicated that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has not been filed, the inspector provides the facility operator with an informational sheet on the requirements of the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. Blank copies of the forms used by the Permittees when conducting these stormwater compliance surveys are included in Appendix L. The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to ensure that the stormwater compliance surveys of restaurants conducted, address, at a minimum:

Oil and grease disposal to verify that these wastes are not poured onto parking lots, streets, or adjacent catch basins;

Trash bin areas to verify that these areas are clean, the bin lids are closed, the bins are not used for liquid waste disposal, and wash water from the bins is not disposed into the MS4;

Parking lot, alley, sidewalk and street areas to verify that floor mats, filters and garbage containers are not washed in those areas and that no wash water is disposed of in those areas;

Parking lot areas to verify that they are cleaned by sweeping, not by hosing down, and that the facility operator uses dry methods for spill cleanup; and

Violations of the stormwater ordinance are enforced by the Permittee. These specific topics are addressed in questions 1-8 of the Food Facility Stormwater Compliance Survey Form included in Appendix L. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FACILITY DATABASE Provision No. XI.A.1 of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to continue to update its industrial and commercial facilities database, including facility information priority and inspection information. The database content may be Permittee specific, but contains minimum information that must be provided. Provision No. XI.A.2 requires a summary of the number of industrial and commercial facilities compliance surveys/inspections and the actions taken. A template spreadsheet was developed by the Permittees and is included in Appendix L.



Provision Nos. XI.C.1 and XI.D.3 requires each agency to prioritize and inspect all inventoried industrial and commercial facilities. Provision No. XI. requires each Permittee to develop an inventory of the following commercial facilities/companies within its jurisdiction:

Mobile automobile or other vehicle washing/detailing (base of operations);

Mobile carpet, drape or furniture cleaning (base of operations);

Mobile high pressure or steam cleaning (base of operations);

Mobile equipment washing/cleaning (base of operations);

Nurseries and greenhouses;

Landscape and hardscape installation (base of operations);

Other commercial facilities that the Permittee determines may contribute a significant pollutant load to the MS4;

Facilities that transport, store, or transfer pre-production plastic pellets;

Managed turf facilities (e.g., private golf courses, athletic fields, cemeteries, and private parks); and

Industrial facilities defined in Attachment 1 of the Industrial General Permit. Permittee databases are included with the respective Permittee submittal section of this report under Appendix J – Permittee Reports. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS Provision No. XI.C.1 requires each agency's industrial facility compliance surveys and inspections to address the following items:

Verification of the type (or types) of industrial and/or commercial activities and facility Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes;

Submittal of an NOI to comply with the General Industrial Permit, if applicable based upon the facility's SIC code;

Compliance with the Permittee's stormwater ordinance;

Observation for non-stormwater discharges, potential IC/IDs to the MS4;

Potential discharge of pollutants in urban runoff from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas;

Implementation and maintenance of appropriate or minimum BMPs;

Qualitative assessment of the effectiveness of the BMPs implemented; and

Education regarding stormwater pollution prevention.



The Permittees developed a template form to use during follow up site inspections. This form is included in Appendix L. A summary of the Permittees' efforts is provided in Table 7-1. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTOR TRAINING Provision No. XV.C of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to provide training to staff involved in conducting industrial facilities compliance surveys/inspections. Permittee staff responsible for conducting inspections, as part of the Permittee Industrial and Commercial Inspection Program or a wastewater pretreatment inspection program, receive annual training regarding the following topics:

Selection, implementation, and maintenance of appropriate or minimum BMPs for industrial or commercial facilities;

The Industrial General Permit and NOI requirements;

The Permittee's stormwater ordinance and other local jurisdiction resolutions and codes related to protection of water quality;

The 2010 MS4 Permit, the DAMP, and the LIP;

The local jurisdiction's enforcement and compliance strategy/policy for industrial and commercial facilities;

How to provide guidance to industrial and commercial facility operators on proper selection, implementation and maintenance of BMPs, and compliance with the requirements of the stormwater ordinance during site inspections; and

TMDL requirements and appropriate BMPs to mitigate the impacts of industrial and commercial facilities.

The Permittees ensure that newly hired municipal staff or transferred municipal staff receives informal training within six months of hire and formal training within one year of hire. When planning formal classroom training related to conducting inspections of industrial or commercial facilities, the Permittees will notify, and coordinate with Santa Ana Regional Board staff. Permittee staff responsible for conducting industrial or commercial facility inspections may also attend training sponsored by professional associations such as the American Society of Civil Engineers, American Public Works Association, CASQA, and other area-wide MS4 Permittees and entities.

Table 7-1 Industrial and Commercial Sources

Program Implementation Section 7 – Industrial and Commercial Sources Page 7-5

INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE



3. Percent of Industrial Facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage:

4. Number of activeIndustrial Facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage:

5. Number of new/undocumented Industrial/Commercial facilities added to database:

6. Number of applicable Industrial/Commercial facility inspection staff that attended formal Industrial/Commercial training:

Beaumont



0 0 98 2



Calimesa



0 0 42 1

Canyon Lake



N/A 0 There are no industrial facilities within the City.

1 3



Corona

1,110 inspections were completed for this year’s reporting Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 5% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0.27% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 1,110 Verbal warning: 52 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 3 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

12 137 209 2

Eastvale

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 81.25% Written warning: 5% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%


21 4 3 1



Hemet



40 8 1

Jurupa Valley

Education and information: 29% Verbal warning: 70 Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0.3% Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): N/A

Education and information: 100 Verbal warning: 350 Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: 4 Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): N/A

3 30 22 4



Lake Elsinore

Education and information: 84% Verbal warning: 02% Written warning: .02% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 84 Verbal warning: 2 Written warning: 2 Notice of violation or noncompliance: Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

.08% *notified may need coverage - contact Regional Board for

coverage.

7 21 3

Menifee

Education and information: as needed onsite% Verbal warning: 22.6% Written warning: 22.6% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: as needed onsite Verbal warning:12 Written warning: 12 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): __0___

1.8 1 16

1 (Note that

inspections are conducted by

D-Max Engineering,

Inc. Inspection staff are trained

in-house by D-Max

Engineering, Inc.)



Moreno Valley



72 34 130 2

Norco


Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance:0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 0



Perris


Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 7 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 2



Riverside

Education and information: 100% (verbal stormwater information and report) Verbal warning: 39.8% Written warning: 5.3% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 1,192 (verbal stormwater information and report) Verbal warning: 475 Written warning: 63 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

0 0 0 8



Riverside County



.5 5 0 12



RCFC&WCD

Education and information: N/A* Verbal warning: N/A Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: N/A Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): N/A * The District does not perform industrial/commercial inspections of private facilities.

Education and information: N/A Verbal warning: N/A Written warning: N/A Notice of violation or noncompliance: N/A Administrative compliance order: N/A Stop work order or cease and desist order: N/A Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: N/A Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A



San Jacinto

Education and information: % Verbal warning: 1% Written warning: 1% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 0 Verbal warning: 1 Written warning: 1 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): ___0__

0 0 0 1





Provision No. XI.A.1 of the Permit requires each Permittee to maintain and update a database inventory of all Industrial/Commercial Sites. Provision No. XI.A.2 of the Permit requires submittal of this database with each Annual Report.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont Industrial and Commercial Site database (Master Industrial-Commercial Facility Inspections) inventory is provided.

Calimesa See Exhibit “F” as referenced. Canyon Lake SEE ATTACHMENT #9 for Industrial and Commercial Inspection Report

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘C’

Eastvale See Attachment (E) – FY 2016-2017 Industrial/Commercial Inspections Hemet SEE ATTACHMENT D

Jurupa Valley The database is provided herein. Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT H

Menifee Attachment E – Industrial Commercial Facility Inventory_2016-17 provides an inventory of all industrial and commercial businesses within the City.

Moreno Valley See Attachment D. Norco See attached. Perris Please see attached Exhibit 11 for a hardcopy of the database inventory of all Industrial and Commercial Sites.

Riverside See Attached Documents Riverside County Please see Attachment D.

RCFC&WCD N/A San Jacinto Attached.




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT Provision No. XI.A.13 of the Permit requires each Permittee to monitor and annually evaluate and report adequacy of program coverage and enforcement response in complying with the Order where required inspections and/or enforcement is carried out on behalf of the Permittee by other agencies or departments, such as the County Department of Environmental Health, county and local fire departments, hazardous materials programs, code enforcement, industrial pretreatment, and building and safety.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont

The City has consultants that conduct inspections on behalf of the City. During the 2016-2017, the City has been able to add almost 100 commercial sites to its inspection database and the consultant was able to perform inspections on 100% of the commercial and industrial sites. However, a problem arose in respect to the City’s enforcement procedures. One facility owner denied entry to the inspectors and the consultants were unable to perform inspections. Rather than escalating the issue as defined in the LIP, the consultant contacted the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The City has reviewed its escalation procedures and replaced the consultant. No changes were made to the escalation procedures provided in the LIP.

Calimesa

The City of Calimesa’s Code Enforcement, Public Works Department as well as Citizens on Patrol are alert and proactive to constantly looking for and hazardous and/or environmental violations, which may impact the any State, County or City waterway. The Public Works Director takes immediate action with regards to any emergency and/or violations that may happen or exist and will, if necessary, contact the appropriate agency (County, State or Federal) to ensure that appropriate enforcement actions are taken.

Canyon Lake For fiscal year 2016/2017, the City of Canyon Lake had no inspections performed by Riverside County Department of Environmental health.

Corona

City’s NPDES staff takes the lead on enforcement issues related to our stormwater ordinance when referrals are made from other agencies such as County Department of Environmental Health, County Hazmat, and the Regional Board. NPDES staff also responds to referrals made from various City departments such as Fire, and Community Development regarding potential violations at industrial and commercial facilities. Once notification is received by NPDES staff, we typically follow up on all potential violations within two working days to ensure proper enforcement is taken per our ordinance and as described in the LIP. In instances when a potential violation is referred to us but that facility is not in our jurisdiction, we ensure the proper agency is notified and send notification via e-mail to the appropriate Permittee contact.

Eastvale

The City of Eastvale works closely with the County department of Environmental Health, fire departments, code enforcement, and building and safety. Once an issue is found, the responsible parties will be notified for follow up. The City has reviewed the program coverage and it was determined to be adequate. Enforcement efforts have increased during the 2016/2017 Fiscal Year, and the City has received more compliance from local businesses during this time.

Hemet The City of Hemet has an agreement with CASC Engineering and Consulting to provide permit-required stormwater program inspections for applicable commercial and industrial facilities in the City of Hemet. CASC began conducting inspections on behalf of the City of Hemet in September 2016.

Jurupa Valley Our police and fire are County services as well as Environmental Health. We enforce the provisions we are responsible for. We also have interdepartmental cooperation with our Building and Code Enforcement Divisions assisting anyway they can.

Lake Elsinore For FY 16/17, there was one instance where the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Waste section was advised of a potential IC/ID that the City was aware of; both agencies responded and the RCDEH deferred to the City for action.



Menifee

The City assumed full responsibility for the Industrial and Commercial Storm Water Inspection Program in 2014-15 and completed 53 full and 31 partial storm water inspections at select facilities this 2016-17 fiscal year. Storm water inspections conducted by the City resulted in a total of 12 cases that were recommended for follow-up. All of these cases were due to improper implementation of BMPs; there were zero observed IC/IDs. The City has already resolved the BMP deficiencies at all businesses that were recommended for follow-up.

Moreno Valley The City has contracted with an environmental consulting firm to conduct the commercial and industrial inspections as per the Order’s compliance schedule. A representative from this firm is available to follow-up until compliance is reached. Code Enforcement also can be notified if legal action is necessary.

Norco Based on the available information the program appears to be effective. Enforcement actions are rare, but when implemented do facilitate responsive actions from the party they are directed to.

Perris

The City of Perris maintains a record of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance, and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to and including court citation for misdemeanor violations. The City requested and received proposals from Private inspection companies to begin conducting Commercial and Industrial Inspections on behalf of the City. During the reporting period 2016-2017, 80 businesses, approximately 25% of the required listing of Low, Medium and High commercial and industrial business were inspected. Based on the first year inspections the original list was reprioritized based on the actual visit and in accordance with the methodology and the new requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES Permit. It is important to note that the first year’s list included all High and all medium business on the City’s entire list of commercial and industrial businesses, but did not include all “Low” priority businesses. The City’s entire list of Commercial and Industrial Business is 318, including all High, Medium and Low categories. “Low” business are only required to be inspected once every five years. Therefore, certain ‘Low” business are still categorized under the old prioritization methodology. These remaining “Low” business will be systematically inspected over the remaining permit term. As the remaining “Low” business are inspected, they will receive a new rating in accordance with the new methodology required by the new NPDES Permit. As indicated above, the City of Perris is currently reviewing the LIP against the new requirements found under Section XI of the new NPDES Permit, and the new City Inspection Program. The City has determined that changes should be made to the City’s Inspection Program prioritization methodology, as detailed in the City’s Current LIP. These changes will be incorporated into the City’s LIP.

Riverside

In FY 2016-2017 the City’s Environmental Compliance Section conducted 1,192 stormwater inspections at a variety of businesses. Each business includes a review of the facility, housekeeping or their BMP’s, and a general review of stormwater principles. Depending on the outcome of the inspection, appropriate action was taken to ensure the businesses complied with all City ordinances pertaining to stormwater. A detailed database is maintained and contains information about each facility. See attached documents for more information.

Riverside County N/A – All inspections and enforcement is carried out by County of Riverside Departments, Districts, Agencies, etc.

RCFC&WCD The District has one staff person dedicated to IC/ID inspections. The District does not perform industrial/commercial inspections of private facilities.

San Jacinto As a result of the discontinuance of the CAP program in December 2014, the City contracts with a third party consultant to conduct required inspections. The City’s inspection list was reviewed and High, Medium and Low Priority Commercial and Industrial facilities were inspected between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. A total of 115 commercial/industrial businesses were inspected during this period.



INDUSTRIAL ANDCOMMERCIAL SOURCES 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITProvision No. XI.D.6 of the Permit requires each Permittee to notify all mobile businesses based or operating within their jurisdiction concerning the minimum Source Control and Pollution Prevention BMPs that they must develop and implement.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont The City Public Works staff has notified the Planning Department to include outreach brochures in the annual permit renewal of all mobile businesses. Additional outreach brochures are available at City Hall front counter.

Calimesa The City of Calimesa has developed and implemented BMPs and minimum source controls for all new and existing mobile businesses that are operating within the City. All existing and new applicants receive BMP handouts at time of business license application or renewal.

Canyon Lake

Chapter 5 of the Canyon Lake Municipal Code requires that all businesses doing business within the City must obtain a business license with the City. The business license application requires businesses involving NPDES compliance to identify such on the application before any licenses are approved. Information on compliance with NPDES is sent to all businesses that have noted this on their application. Mobile Detailers are required to acknowledge specific guidelines of the City Municipal Code and are also required to sign a form that indicates they are aware of the NPDES rules and regulations.

Corona

1) NPDES staff adds new businesses to our industrial/commercial facilities database on a quarterly basis. This list of businesses is obtained from City business license applications. As businesses are added, they are categorized into a HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW priority based on their SIC and those businesses identified as mobile businesses with their base of operations in City are flagged in the database. Mobile businesses are assigned a HIGH priority initially and therefore will be inspected within one year of being added to the database. NPDES inspection staff visits these facilities and provide the owners with educational materials developed by the City specifically for mobile operators regarding the minimum BMPs that are required to be implemented. Staff discusses expectations to use these BMPs when operating in Corona and anywhere in Riverside County. 2) NPDES staff responds to complaints of mobile business operators discharging or potentially discharging non-stormwater into the MS4. The operators are provided the mobile business educational materials and are informed of the minimum BMPs to operate in City of Corona. If a business license has not been issued or if adequate BMPs cannot be implemented, the operators are told to immediately cease operations. 3) Within this permit term, NPDES staff proactively performed after-hour reconnaissance at commercial districts throughout the City to identify mobile operators in action and educate those that were found to be out of compliance. The same educational materials are provided and operators are informed of the minimum BMPs to operate in the City. Staff identified businesses that regularly clean trash enclosures and parking lot areas as more likely to operate late in the evening or early in the morning, therefore not within normal agency operating hours.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale provides public education information to mobile businesses during the business registration process. The city also actively sends out compliance notifications to existing mobile businesses as they are discovered to be working within the city.



Hemet

The City of Hemet has identified mobile businesses based within, or operating within our jurisdiction by the following methods: Internet search City of Hemet business license database Discovery of businesses operating within jurisdiction

Identified mobile businesses are provided with a copy of the City of Hemet Guidelines for Mobile Washing Businesses. (See example below)



Jurupa Valley

The City has a list of all registered business in the City and has continued to work on their mobile business program. . Letters were sent out to the mobile business regarding the required stormwater compliance inspection. During the 2016-2017 fiscal year, the City made a large effort to remove home businesses that did not require an inspection for stormwater compliance. These home businesses showed no sign of active outdoor activity or waste disposal related to their work. Mobile business that completed regular work at certain facilities were inspected to ensure they complied with the stromwater requirements. While inspectors complete inspection, they would monitor for mobile businesses actively working in the City’s jurisdiction. If mobile business are found, the inspector verifies the business has a business registration to complete work in the city. Then explain the stormwater compliance requirements for the mobile business. Mobile business found operating in the city without a business registration are sent to code enforcement.

Lake Elsinore

For FY 16/17, the City compiled a list of mobile businesses in the area using the City Business License Database, and Internet. The mobile businesses identified will be sent a letter advising them of the requirement to implement BMPs and educating them on stormwater pollution prevention. Additionally, the NPDES Coordinator routinely is notified by the Planning Division of new mobile businesses seeking a City Business License of the NPDES minimum BMPs and storm water pollution prevention. The NPDES Coordinator speaks with each and provides educational material specific to the minimum BMPs warranted by their business. Examples of City prepared handouts are provided in Appendix D

Menifee All mobile businesses currently operating in the City of Menifee receive storm water educational materials on the required source control and pollution prevention BMPs during the business registration/renewal process. Educational materials are also available at City Hall.

Moreno Valley

During previous reporting periods, the City of Moreno Valley utilized known business license information in order to identify all mobile businesses that were based or operating within its jurisdiction, and whose business practices were found to be potentially harmful to water quality. These Mobile Washing/Cleaning businesses were notified by letter, which included both education materials in both English and Spanish, explaining the minimum Source Control and Pollution Prevention BMPs that were appropriate for their type of operations. Businesses were also notified of the City’s requirement to routinely inspect their operations in order to verify compliance with local and regional water quality requirements as well as determine if appropriate BMPs were being implemented. This effort will be duplicated during the following reporting period.

Norco Educational materials are available at City Hall for businesses.

Perris

On May 4, 2012 the Co-Permittees modified DAMP Section 8 to describe more specific processes and procedures for regulating mobile businesses. The City reviewed the requirements of Section 8, as well as the BMP’s developed by the Co-Permittees for Mobile businesses, and more fully described its enforcement strategy in the City’s new Individual LIP. The City’s LIP more fully describes the City’s procedures for regulating and enforcing mobile businesses. The City continues to review its current limited public outreach program, consisting of Channel 3 announcements, storm drain stencils, and handouts at public counters and events to determine if the mobile business notification program must be modified to comply with the permit requirements.

Riverside The City administers a mobile business program whereby new mobile washers come to the Riverside Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) to demonstrate their process and recovery methods. As mobile washers are discovered, Environmental Compliance staff educates them on minimum Source Control and Pollution Prevention BMPs. Past efforts to notify all mobile washers is detailed in previous annual reports.

Riverside County

The Transportation Department staff and Code Enforcement Department staff handout NPDES Compliance literature specific for mobile business owners and operators at County counters and in the field.

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto City routinely reviews business license list on monthly basis and makes effort to communicate with those businesses that may be home based or mobile. Educational materials are provided as appropriate.

RESIDENTIAL

Program Implementation Section 8 – Residential Page 8-1

8. RESIDENTIAL Per Permit Provision XI.E, the Co-Permittees have developed and implemented their residential program consistent with the requirements of the Permit to help reduce the discharge of pollutants from residential activities to the MS4, consistent with the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) standard. The tables below include documentation of the evaluation of their individual residential program. The Permittees participate in regional activities to facilitate the proper disposal of used oil, toxic, and hazardous materials. When Permittees are conducting an inspection in response to a complaint and observe that a residence is non-compliant with the Permittee's Stormwater Ordinance, then they will begin enforcement procedures as appropriate.

Table 8-1. Residential


RESIDENTIAL2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

Santa Ana Region NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit

PERMITTEE

1. Gallons of used oil collected at collection events:

2. Total pounds collected at HHW/ABOP events:

3. Total number of participants at HHW/ABOP events:



Beaumont 366 43,841 329


Education and information: 1 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 0 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): ___0__

Calimesa 0 0 N/A





Canyon Lake 0 0

0 The City of

Canyon Lake does not have any permanent

Household Hazardous

Waste Sites. Our

residents are sent to the Lake Elsinore Site to

dispose of hazardous

waste.

Education and information: 48% Verbal warning: 27% Written warning: 25 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%


Corona 11,348 215,528 2,346





Eastvale N/A N/A N/A



Hemet 0 0 0





Jurupa Valley 0 0 0

Education and information: 100% Verbal warning: 0 % Written warning: 0 % Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0 % Administrative compliance order: 0 % Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 % Civil citation or injunction: 0 % Administrative fine: 0 % Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): %


Lake Elsinore 0

207,840 LBS See EXHIBIT I for amounts collected at

Lake Elsinore HHW Facility

unavailable See EXHIBIT I for participants at Lake Elsinore HHW Facility

Education and information: 92% Verbal warning: % Written warning: % Notice of violation or noncompliance: .08% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 12 Verbal warning: Written warning: Notice of violation or noncompliance: 1 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0



Menifee Principal Permittee

Principal Permittee

Principal Permittee



Moreno Valley 840 58,869 748





Norco N/A N/A N/A

Education and information: 0% Verbal warning: % Written warning: % Notice of violation or noncompliance: % Administrative compliance order: % Stop work order or cease and desist order: % Civil citation or injunction: % Administrative fine: % Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): %

Education and information: Verbal warning: Written warning: Notice of violation or noncompliance: Administrative compliance order: Stop work order or cease and desist order: Civil citation or injunction: Administrative fine: Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor):

Perris 310 545.2 N/A





Riverside

575 gallons of used oil; 224 used filters collected.

Total: 1990 tons: Bulky Waste – 1903 tons; E-Waste – 16 tons; Appliances – 45 tons; Tires: 26 tons

3,668



Riverside County 13,570 1,014,442 11,956

Education and information: 93% Verbal warning: 0% Written warning:29% Notice of violation or noncompliance:52% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 5% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0%

Education and information: 117 Verbal warning: 0 Written warning: 38 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 68 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction 7 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0 Please see Attachment A for supporting documentation.

RCFC&WCD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A



San Jacinto 0 0 0

Education and information: 0% Verbal warning: 0% Written warning: 0% Notice of violation or noncompliance: 0% Administrative compliance order: 0% Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0% Civil citation or injunction: 0% Administrative fine: 0% Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike




RESIDENTIAL2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE Provision No. XI.E.1 of the Permit requires each Permittee to develop and implement a Residential program to reduce the discharge of Pollutants from residential activities to the MS4, consistent with the MEP standard, by July 29, 2011.

Beaumont

The City’s Code Enforcement staff are trained to notice spills, illicit connections and other threats to water quality. Code Enforcement starts with education and information for the first violation of storm water quality ordinance and then will proceed to a verbal and written warning for the second violation. There are flyers attached with this report that are distributed to home and business owners with information on how to reduce discharge of pollutants and potential penalties.

Calimesa The City works closely with CR&R (City’s Franchise Solid Waste Hauler) who provides roll-off containers to the Public Works Department to provide for the ability to recycle the illegally dumped materials within the public right of way.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake’s Residential Program is proactive in both its educational and monitoring efforts. City Staff and Trained Code and Special Enforcements Officers educate residents on the proper ways to wash vehicles with runoff flowing into vegetation, application of lawn fertilizers and outdoor cleaning of tools and painting supplies. The City also performs proactive visual inspections and contacts EVMWD for water quality testing at discharge sites.

Corona

In addition to the County’s public outreach program, City of Corona’s Residential program consists of providing education materials on the BMPs for the activities that are most likely to occur by residents of our City. A. The County has developed BMP brochures targeting specific residential activities. The City distributes these brochures at various City

events, at City Hall, and as needed when following up on complaints at residences. B. The City’s NPDES website provides BMP information for various residential activities and provides links for further resources, including a

link to the County’s website where various BMP brochures can be downloaded. C. Within this permit term, the City distributed BMP information on swimming pool discharge procedures to water utility customers as bill

inserts in the water bill. D. Within this permit term, the City utilized the City’s Corona Connection magazine to publish articles with an NPDES message. This

magazine is distributed to Corona residences. E. Twice per year, the City distributes information on the dates and location of the two household hazardous waste events the City sponsors

that are held in the parking lot at City Hall. The City’s NPDES message is also reiterated through Corona Department of Water & Power’s “Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life” campaign in which residents are educated to reduce water use and thereby eliminate over-irrigation and any excess runoff leaving their property.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale employees and inspectors are trained properly to educate and catch any violations in the City’s Residential Program. The City also has in store and online public educations materials about pollution prevention, clean up, etc. that is readily available for residents.



Hemet

The City of Hemet distributes "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" Public Education Program Fact Sheets/Brochures/BMPs and other appropriate information to the residents at local events and from City offices in an effort to educate citizens about reducing the discharge of pollutants from activities in residential areas. The City of Hemet has also purchased a banner to be placed across State Route -74 in our downtown area. This banner encourages stormwater awareness. The City of Hemet promotes regional activities to facilitate the proper collection and management of used oil, toxic and hazardous materials, and other household wastes. This includes distribution of information regarding the dates and locations of temporary and permanent HHW and ABOP collection events and facilities and curbside or special collection sites managed by the City’s solid waste hauler CC&R and/or Riverside County. In addition, if during an inspection in response to a complaint, a City of Hemet Code Enforcement inspector observes that a residence is non-compliant with the City’s Stormwater Ordinance, enforcement procedures are undertaken, as appropriate, which normally includes the distribution of educational materials on reducing the discharge of pollutants.

Jurupa Valley

The City participates in the residential program by providing flyers at community events, including the “Only Rain Down the Storm Drain” flyers. The City has a contingency of horse owners and recommends the use of separate trash bins for horse manure. The City has a wide range of community meetings particularly the “Healthy Jurupa Valley” group. This group discusses healthy living, good diet, good care of their living space and good care of public space. They explain the duties of the City and how they benefit. The City has also sponsored cleanups along the Santa Ana River.

Lake Elsinore See Appendix G

Menifee

The City provides handouts that describe common residential BMPs, including proper pet waste disposal, lawn care, and swimming pool discharges at City Hall. Residents are encouraged to visit the Riverside County Watershed Protection website (http://www.rcwatershed.org/) to learn more about storm water pollution. Residents may also receive educational materials from the District or Watershed Protection Program during outreach activities, which are promoted by the City.

Moreno Valley Data to be provided by RCFC&WCD, as part of the overall NPDES program implementation services provided by them.

Norco

The City regularly promotes County programs and events related to storm water quality preservation. Focused educational materials are made available at City Hall for residents. Inspection staff respond to complaints and are watchful of issues that can be proactively addressed when in the field. Residential projects are monitored closely to ensure discharges of construction materials are prevented. Additionally, the City of Norco has several sections in the City Code that address the discharge of pollutants. 6.22 Public Nuisance Abatement 6.42 Municipal Refuse Collection Service 6.45 Manure management and Disposal 6.48 Public Dump Sites 6.60 Control of Flies 6.76 hog Ranches 6.84 Commercial Poultry 9.40 Refuse Abatement

Perris

The City of Perris currently implements a collection of programs (i.e. toxic and household waste collection, WQMP requirements, public education campaigns, etc.) (See attached Exhibit 12) intended to reduce discharge of pollutants from residential activities, which are described in the City’s approved SWMP. The City of Perris consolidated and more fully described its residential storm water program efforts in its new individual LIP.



Riverside

The City of Riverside has a multifaceted Residential program designed to educate and help residents maintain water quality. Several programs contribute to the program’s effectiveness including waste disposal events, pet waste control efforts, and public education. During FY 2016-17, the City continued implementation of the Adopt-a-Drain Program. Through this program, residents can help keep one of about 4,800 storm drains free of leaves, palm fronds, trash, and other debris. Information regarding the program and storm drains that have been adopted can be found at www.adoptadrainriverside.com. The City is also proactive in controlling litter and trash through a variety of programs. The City hosts monthly ‘Free Drop-off Days’ allowing residents to drop off residential trash, yard waste, tires, etc. Apart from these monthly opportunities, the City also hosts periodic ‘Clean Up Riverside’s Environment’ (CURE) events where residents are encouraged to bring bulky items and all manner of debris and waste to designated areas for proper disposal. These events provide residents with opportunities to dispose of trash, litter, and other debris in a manner that minimizes the impact on the environment. Another program involves the continued operation of solar-powered trash cans throughout the City. The trash cans are equipped with solar-powered compactors which can compress approximately 200 gallons of trash into a 40 to 60 pound cube. The cans are located in areas of the community which are prone to high volume foot traffic to encourage the proper disposal of wastes. The City also continues to manage a street sweeping program that resulted in the collection of over 3,695 tons of material in FY 2016-2017. The City is also actively seeking ways to educate residents and visitors about animal waste and bacteria control. While the City does not have significant areas with horses and other large animals as do some surrounding communities, it does have people walking and playing with dogs and other pets. The City continues to operate and maintain several pet waste bag dispensers in popular walking areas most notably along Victoria Ave. The dispensers act as a reminder of the importance of controlling animal waste and provide the public with a means to do their part.

Riverside County The County implements the Residential Program as detailed in the LIP, included as Attachment E.

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto

City conducts routine sweeping of residential areas on a twice per month basis. Sweeper operators are requested to notify the City staff in the event that they discover the discharge of pollutants from residential activities. In addition, Code Enforcement, Streets and Storm Drain staff routinely patrol residential areas during the course of workday, in order to assess any discharges. Finally, on-call staff with the Public Works Department will respond to after-hours reports of illegal discharge, abandoned bottles or drums and other items which may be left in the public right of way.



RESIDENTIAL 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE Provision No. XI.E.6 of the Permit requires each Permittee to evaluate its Residential program.

Beaumont

The City’s Code Enforcement staff are meeting with Public Works staff regularly to coordinate the shared responsibility of its Residential storm water program. In the 2016-2017 fiscal year, the City has doubled its number of inspectors out in the field. Furthermore, the City has increased the total pounds of waste collected at HHW/ABOP events by 35%. The City’s public education program has also expanded, which is summarized in the public education section of this report.

Calimesa See attached Exhibit “X” for the City of Calimesa Municipal Code Chapter 15.60 C & D Ordinance, also known as “Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste”.

Canyon Lake Code Enforcement Officer and Special Enforcement Officers evaluate the residential program regularly to ensure that violations are addressed. Our city staff meet monthly to review the residential program and proactively address needed compliance based on outfall and storm drain monitoring.

Corona

This fiscal year, the NPDES Section responded to 121 calls regarding drainage of swimming pools and spas. Outreach effort on proper drainage procedures is ongoing as the service is advertised on the City website; through educational materials distributed at City events; and through service request calls received by Department of Water and Power’s Customer Care Group. Prior to draining a pool, a resident must contact an inspector to sample the pool for residual chlorine and pH levels. Based on the sample results, visual inspection of the pool, and conditions downstream of the property, the inspector will recommend the resident drains either into the sanitary sewer or into the curb and gutter system leading to the municipal storm drain. Complaints from residents regarding other General Incident activities may be attributed to the residential outreach program. Once residents are aware of what is prohibited by the NPDES program, they are more likely to call and report neighbors whom they observe may be in violation. Another evaluation tool of the Residential program is tracking participation in events such as the HHW, and other events focused on environmental sustainability. An increasing number of participants would signal the effectiveness of the outreach. The City started tracking the number of participants at the HHW events held in City of Corona to see if there is a positive trend which we will continue to evaluate.

Eastvale The program has since then been evaluated and no change to the Residential Program was deemed necessary.

Hemet

A review of the current Residential Program indicates that the main objective of the program, to provide educational information to City residents to reduce the discharge of pollutants from residential activities, is being achieved. The City does this by offering brochures and promotional items at city events and at various city offices. The City also provides educational information on the Integrated Waste Management page of our website [http://www.cityofhemet.org/index.aspx?nid=93] The City of Hemet has a contract with CR&R for trash, recycling, and green waste services for residences within the city limits. The CR&R website offers information about the nearest Riverside County Collection Center, as well as information and rates on a new Residential HHW Curbside Collection Program. [http://www.crrwasteservices.com/cities/Hemet/residents/]

TABLE 8-1 RESIDENTIAL


Jurupa Valley City staff regularly makes contact with residents in an effort to continue and advance the water quality practices in the City of Jurupa Valley. Through this contact residents are educated and encouraged to take measures themselves to assist the City with its water quality responsibilities.

Lake Elsinore

The City’s residential program consists of a variety of activities geared to raise awareness of stormwater pollution and prevent pollutants from entering the MS4. Activities and programs include:

1) Participation in the Public Education Subcommittee of the MS4 Technical Advisory Committee 2) Educational Materials and Presentation by SGA on behalf of the City through the MS4 TAC to 4 City of Lake Elsinore

Garden/Home Improvement Stores and 778 students at Elsinore Valley Unified School District schools. 3) Speaking to youth tour groups, Community Center Day Camp, Boy Scouts, etc. at City Hall about stormwater pollution prevention. 4) Participation in City sponsored Pet Walk event through the handout of educational materials with over 106 participants. 5) Promotion and sponsorship of:

a. 11 Annual HHW Events in the City; b. Battery Recycling at the Senior Center c. Clean Extreme Event on Collier Avenue which brought over 500 citizen volunteers out to help clean an area of the City. d. Clean LE event on 6/27/2017 for removal of trash at various locations throughout the City. e. Application and award of Grant Program for Tire Recycling. f. Availability through Trash Service of 2 free bulky item curbside pickups per year

6) See-Click Fix Program for residents to report issues/IC/ID, etc. throughout the City. 7) Posting of No Dumping and No Littering signs throughout the City. 8) Implementation of the Task Force on Illegal Dumping and Litter. 9) Publication of Stormwater Pollution BMP information on the City’s Website at www.lake-elsinore.org 10) Posting of door hangers in residential areas where discharges have been reported. 11) Contract with Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District for Vector concerns. Publication of service mailed to area. 12) Ongoing postings of Clean LE, Clean Extreme, Lake advisories, etc. on Twitter, facebook and via email. 13) Staffing of a booth at a Chamber Mixer on October 20, 2016. 14) Mailing of 5394 Notices to vacant property owners advising of the requirement to remove excess vegetation and trash from their

property. 15) Formation of Clean LE in cooperation with Riverside County Watershed Protection and Western Riverside Council of

Governments. See Appendix G

Menifee Investigations and enforcement of residential storm water ordinance violations are addressed and evaluated through the City’s IC/ID program. This program relies on the public and staff to notify the City of a possible storm water violation, and those violations are tracked (See Attachment B). The City relies on the District to evaluate the overall effectiveness of its regional residential education efforts.

Moreno Valley The City implements the Residential Program as documented in the LIP per Section 13.8.

Norco City staff is continually evaluating the City's Residential program to ensure resources are directed to areas of need based on the specific demands of the City. Staff evaluates the source of reported or identified concerns raised throughout the City and continually looks to eliminate practices or situations in violation with the minimum water quality requirements.

TABLE 8-1 RESIDENTIAL


Perris

The City of Perris maintains records of household waste collected and resident participation levels of various residential programs, including household waste collection programs, and clean-up events. The City also maintains records of Final WQMP’s approved and BMP’s installed for new residential development throughout the City. In addition, the City of Perris maintains records of all enforcement actions taken against those suspected of violating the City’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance. The City of Perris continues to collect large amounts of household waste, debris, and bulky items through its waste programs and clean-up events; consistently continues to attract large numbers of residents at the clean-up events; and continues to issue a variety of correction notices up to an including court citations for misdemeanor violations. Finally, the City approves WQMP’s which require the use of site design, source control and treatment control BMP’s on residential projects. This demonstrates that the residential program in place appears to be working sufficiently well. The City of Perris has consolidated and more fully described its residential storm water program efforts in its new individual LIP.

Riverside

The City is continually searching for ways to educate residents and the public. As mentioned, the City continues to operate and maintain pet waste bag dispensers in key areas throughout the City. The City’s solar trash compactors remind residents of the importance of controlling trash and litter. The City continues to host Clean-Up Riverside’s Environment (CURE) events to provide residents with a clean and safe way to dispose of waste. Through continued education and proactive residential education and initiatives, the City expects continued success in its Residential Program.

Riverside County

As part of an ongoing evaluation to ensure the County’s LIP is current, the County’s evaluation occurs throughout the year as this particular part of the program is implemented. If deficiencies or changes are proposed in order to strengthen the Residential program, then the LIP will be updated to reflect this fact.

RCFC&WCD N/A – The District has no land-use authority and thus, does not have a residential program.

San Jacinto City believes residential program is adequate.


Program Implementation Section 9 – Permittee Facilities and Activities Page 9-1

9. PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES

MS4 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

Provision XI.C.2 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the Permittees to review and report MS4 maintenance procedures. The status of the Permittees' maintenance programs is also shown in Table 9-1.

FERTILIZER/PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Provision XIV.C.1 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires that each Permittee applicator and contractor maintain appropriate training, permits and certifications. Fertilizers are applied by certain Permittees on a limited basis. In these cases, Permittee staff either applies the fertilizer or supervise contract staff performing the application. If an application of pesticides results in a discharge to a Waters of the United States, then a separate NPDES permit will be required. Permittee staff who are licensed to apply pesticides are required by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) to meet continuing education standards. Licensing standards and procedures are established by the DPR and described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 3 (Food and Agriculture) and on the DPR website at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/license/liccert.htm. In addition, each Permittee may be subject to the additional conditions from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner for the application of Restricted Use pesticides. Implementation of BMPs to manage the application, storage and disposal of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers associated with Permittee facilities and activities are described in each Permittee Facility Pollution Prevention Plan.

Table 9-1. Permittee Facilities and Activities


PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE

1. Percent of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified:

2. Number of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified:

3. Percent of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions:

4. Number of annual facility inspections that require follow-up actions:

5. Average percentage of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed:

6. Number of follow-up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed:

Beaumont 0 0 100 5 0 0 Calimesa 100 3 0 0 0 0

Canyon Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corona 100 19 0 0 0 0 Eastvale 100 2 0 0 100 2

Hemet 100 5 0 0 100 0

Jurupa Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lake Elsinore 44 14 44 14 44 14 Menifee 100 9 0 0 N/A N/A

Moreno Valley 100 19 0 0 0 0 Norco N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Perris See Permittee Report

Riverside 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A

Riverside County 100%

11

0

0 0 0

RCFC&WCD 100 1 100% 1 100% 1 San Jacinto 100 8 0 0 0 0



PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE 7. Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee street sweeping:

8. Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee open channels:

9. Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee storm drain inlets:

Beaumont 111.4 tons 0 0

Calimesa 12 2 0.5

Canyon Lake 56 0 6

Corona 2,645 50 2.4

Eastvale 501 N/A 0

Hemet 985.83 3 9

Jurupa Valley 1,550 15 39

Lake Elsinore 912 506 Cubic Yards 6.43 Cubic Yards

Menifee 471 Principal Permittee 38

Moreno Valley 1760 108 13.76

Norco 17 None (open Channels Maintained by

RCFC&WCD) 132

Perris 1,017 4,285 99.049 tons (73.20 tons Pipe Jetting & Hydro Separators

(25.849 Catch Basin Cleaning)

Riverside 3,695 806 cubic yards (estimate of 411 tons) 249 cubic yards (estimate of 127 tons)

Riverside County

462.27 tons for Santa Ana River and 806.61

tons Countywide. Please see Attachment F and refer to the document titled

“Santa Ana River Watershed- Trans A” for additional

25 Please see Attachment F and refer to

document titled “Santa Ana River Watershed Trans - Attachment A” for

additional information on tonnage of waste removed from all facilities.

62 Please see Attachment F and refer to document titled “Santa Ana River Watershed Trans-Attachment A” for additional

information on tonnage of waste removed from all facilities.

RCFC&WCD N/A 1,815 N/A

San Jacinto 349 400 2.5



PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. III.B.2.g of the Permit requires each Permittee to update their MS4 facility maps annually.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont MS4 facility maps have been provided to David Barstad.

Calimesa The City has made no changes or revisions to its MS4 Facilities Map.

Canyon Lake Attachment #10

Corona This task is coordinated with the City’s Information Technology Department and the District’s GIS Coordinator.

Eastvale See Attachment F – MS4 Facility Map

Hemet There have been no changes to MS4 facilities in 2016-2017; as a result no updates were made to the City of Hemet MS4 facility maps.

Jurupa Valley A map of all catch basins located in the City is attached herein.

Lake Elsinore The City has contracted with Spicer & Associates for the updating of its MS4 GIS mapping annually. See Exhibit F and AppendixE

Menifee The City completed a MS4 and major outfalls GIS layer during the 2014-15 fiscal year. No updates were done during 2016-17. Mapping data have been provided to the District with the annual report submittal as requested.

Moreno Valley See Attachment E

Norco Maps to be sent to District Separately.

Perris

Please see the City’s current Storm Drain Facilities Map (See Attachment Exhibit 14). In prior years although the City provided regular red-lined versions of the City Storm Drain Facilities Map, thereby keeping an up-to-date inventory of facilities, changes had not been entered into a GIS version of the Map. However, during this reporting period (FY ‘15-16), the City converted all existing electronic data of its flood control facilities into a GIS format, and updated its new GIS map to include new flood control facilities built during the reporting period. The new GIS version is dated September 11, 2017

Riverside See attached documents

Riverside County

Update-to-date MS4 facility map was sent to the Flood Control District. The Flood Control District will submit the map to the Regional Board on behalf of the County.

RCFC&WCD The updated facilities maps are provided in Appendix F of the Annual Report.

San Jacinto No changes from previous year’s submission.





Provision No. XIV.A of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually review their activities and facilities to determine the need for revisions to Section 5 of the DAMP and their LIP.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont The LIP was updated to include the new staff and roles and responsibilities at the City. The City has not updated the facilities listed in the LIP but is in the process of maintaining all City owned facilities as outlined in the LIP.

Calimesa The City has made no revisions to the LIP as it pertains to our facilities. The City continues to annually review our activities and facilities to ensure compliance with the DAMP and LIP.

Canyon Lake There was no need for a revision to Section 5 of the DAMP or the LIP during the reporting year.

Corona The City developed the LIP which was noted in the 2013-14 report, and was certified by the Public Works Director under direction from the City Manager by May 24, 2013. The City implemented departmental and personnel changes, and working to update the LIP for these changes.

Eastvale The City contracts with the county to annually manage and maintain all MS4 facilities, including those pipelines under 36” in diameter and all catch basins. There is currently no need for revisions to Section 5 of the DAMP & LIP (update to match RCFC updates)

Hemet A review of municipal activities and facilities shows no need for revisions in corresponding sections of the City of Hemet Local Implementation Plan.

Jurupa Valley There are no revisions during this reporting period.

Lake Elsinore

Overall the City’s facilities have shown marked improvement over FY 15/16. The City has taken action to update and improved the facilities, as with the case of Rosetta Canyon Sports Park. Included with the upgrades are implementation of post construction BMPs. Permittee Projects – Project plans are reviewed by all Departments to ensure compliance with applicable federal, state and local requirements. WQMP’s are required for all projects that meet fall in a category on the WQMP Guidance Checklist and road projects are reviewed against the Transportation Road Project Guidance. Permittee Construction Activities – City projects are subject to General Construction Permit requirements as applicable reviewed by City Civil Engineers and inspected by City Engineering Department Inspectors for compliance. Operation and Maintenance of Permittee Facilities – MS4 facilities are inspected and maintained as needed annually by staff in the Public Works Department. Staff uses a manual system to track and log maintenance activity. Public Works Department Staff are on call and available to respond to emergency situations resulting from rain events, and Hazardous Waste Spills. The City maintains 32 facilities; these include parks, buildings and parking lots. The primary area of deficiency is in the use of uncovered trash containers. 44% of the City facilities fall under that deficiency. Training for Municipal Maintenance Employees – all Public Works Department employees receive NPDES annually through training provided by the City HR Department. Other training is provided on an as needed basis, that training includes pesticide application, hazardous material handling and NPDES. EXHIBIT L Based on the findings above, no revisions to the LIP are warranted at this time. Staff will be provided with the inspection reports to work on the BMP issues identified.

Menifee The City updated its LIP to include a new municipal inspection form in 2016-17.

Moreno Valley Staff reviewed the City’s activities and facilities and determined no revision to the LIP was necessary.

Norco No revisions found necessary.



Perris

Section 5 of the DAMP describes various Permittee Facilities and Activities. The Public Works Department, more particularly the Field Services Division, Special Districts Division, and Engineering Administration Division are responsible for implementing and maintaining the municipal activities and facilities. These Divisions provide a variety of services intended to provide pro-active maintenance of the City’s municipal storm drain system including inspection of outfalls, video and cleaning of pipe, catch basins, open channels, outfalls and Post Construction BMP’s. These Divisions are responsible for implementing the street sweeping program and clean-up of trash and debris from parks and City facilities. Finally they are also responsible for street and landscape maintenance, as well as various household waste collection and oil recycling programs. The City reviewed the requirements of Section 5, and more fully described any changes, if needed, to its municipal activities and facilities program in the City’s new Individual LIP.

Riverside The City continually evaluates its Facilities and Activities and seeks ways improve its programs. The LIP is currently in the process of being updated.

Riverside County

Transportation Department Facilities are inspected annually prior to the rainy season and all sites were found in compliance (with or without corrections) as per the MS4 Permit and the Riverside County DAMP. Annual inspections and maintenance are also conducted to all MS4 facilities. Please see Attachment F and refer to “Santa Ana River Watershed Trans-Attachment A” and “Santa Ana River Watershed Inspection and Maintenance Trans-Attachment B” for details.


San Jacinto During FY16-17, the City commenced an update of its LIP. This work is continuing into FY17-18.





Provision No. XIV.C of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually conduct inspections of its fixed facilities and field operations identified in Chapter 5 of the DAMP to ensure that they do not contribute Pollutants to receiving waters.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont City owned facilities are maintained on an as-needed basis and in compliance with the LIP, with 80% of the open channels, catch basins and detention/retention basins cleaned annually. All inspection and maintenance activities are performed by the City Community Services Department.

Calimesa The City does not have any pollutants going to any receiving waters. The City continues to ensure that it is in compliance with Chapter 5 of the DAMP.

Canyon Lake Canyon Lake City Code Enforcement and Special Enforcement Officers and Canyon Lake POA Community Patrol perform visual inspections, monitor discharge sites and contact EVMWD to perform periodic water quality testing.

Corona Annual facility inspections conducted this reporting year found the facilities to be in compliance.

Eastvale The City of Eastvale completed inspections of Fire Station #27 and Fire Station # 31. Upon completion of the inspections the current program was found to be adequate and had no need for updates.

Hemet

City employees at the Corporation Yard have continued to reduce use of hoses in favor of washing vehicles and equipment in the covered wash bay. Waste materials collected by street sweepers, green waste materials and incidental trash collected by public works crews are stored in outdoor bins, segregated by type of waste. These waste materials are usually covered unless materials are being added. The City recently relocated the electronic collection bin to further protect the conveyance system that runs into the corporation yard outlet. Fiber rolls are ready for deployment across the open ends of the bins in the case of rain. Employees have reduced the amount of waste materials tracked or blown outside the confines of the bins. Employees continue to implement BMPs around their individual work spaces. We are continuing to work with CASC Engineering to implement structural treatment control BMPs on the two primary discharge points for runoff from the Corporation Yard. An agreement for BMP design, specifications, and preparation of bid documents was signed on August 29, 2016. Work on this project has begun and is currently in the design process.

Jurupa Valley The City does not currently own any facilities. There is one facility that is rented by the City (City Hall). Through visual inspection and routine maintenance practices of general housekeeping procedures and proper material storage the Facility does not contribute or constitute a water quality threat.

Lake Elsinore See Appendix E

Menifee

The City of Menifee has eight public parks and one small temporary Public Works yard on its 2016-17 municipal inventory. All facilities were inspected for compliance with storm water requirements in June 2017. No IC/IDs were observed during these inspections, and no facilities were determined to be out of compliance or recommended for follow-up action. Corrective actions were communicated to City and contract staff to address any minor BMP deficiencies. Attachment F includes the municipal inspection forms.

Moreno Valley There were no significant issues or deficiencies observed during the inspections for this reporting year.

Norco No issues found.



Perris The City will continue to conduct the required facility assessments and update the Site Specific PPP as necessary, and report any updates to the Regional Board. This year there have been no revisions made to the approved Site Specific Pollution Prevention Plan (SSPPP).

Riverside In Fiscal Year 2016-2017, permittee facilities were frequented by various City staffs. On-site staff routinely inspect their facilities to ensure pollutants are prevented from entering receiving waters or if activities with a potential to discharge are being conducted, that appropriate BMPs are employed. In Fiscal Year 2016-2017, 168 fixed facility inspections were conducted.

Riverside County

Transportation Department owns and operates a total of 6 Yards in the Santa Ana River Watershed. See Attachment F document titled “Santa Ana River Watershed Transportation Department Facilities Trans-Attachment D” for details of the inspections. The Transportation Department owns and operates a total of 2,954 Inlets, 436 Outlets, 2,232 Culverts, 130 Soft Bottoms, 54 Hard Bottoms and 2 Basin in the Santa Ana River Watershed. See document titled “Santa Ana River Watershed Trans-Attachment A” and “Santa Ana River Watershed Inspection and Maintenance Trans-Attachment B” within Attachment F for details.

RCFC&WCD A total of 5,853 work hours were logged in the field assessing District Facilities. In addition, our maintenance staff logged the following waste removal numbers: Debris: 1,815 tons; Sediment Removed: 38,171 cy; Trash Removed: 2.68 tons

San Jacinto Staff focuses inspection efforts on the basins and pump systems located throughout the city. In addition, the city staff inspect the eight city facilities annually to ensure that all BMPs are in place and functional.





Provision No. XIV.D and XIV.E of the Permit requires each Permittee to annually review, update, and implement the individual clean out schedules and frequency for its MS4 facilities.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont The City Public Works staff will coordinate with the Community Service Department to ensure that all facilities are inspected on a set schedule versus on an as-needed basis.

Calimesa See Exhibit “J” for schedule.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake has reviewed the annual clean out schedules of the MS4 facilities and found them to be adequate in eliminating discharge to the MS4. The City has a contract with Downstream Services to clean the storm drains along Railroad Canyon Road 3 times per year. Street sweeping is performed monthly, or more often if needed, along Railroad Canyon Road. Street sweeping within the private community occurs twice a week.

Corona

Annual inspection is typical for the storm drain system, with more frequent schedules for facilities that pose greater threat to discharge pollutants into the Receiving Waters. Regular maintenance is conducted as a result of schedules and inspections. Cleaning frequency is based on the following priorities; Low: Low density residential areas, areas with no prior history of illegal dumping, problems and/or complaints Medium: Medium density residential areas, areas with modest amount of landscaping, collector streets, storm drain facilities with few complaints, problems or history of an isolated incident that occurred in the past with no visible reoccurring pattern, facilities that had significant types and amounts from past inspections or cleaning. High: High density residential, commercial and industrial area, areas with significant amount of landscaping, major arterial, primary and secondary streets, facilities that discharge directly to Receiving Waters and are classified under the Medium category above, facilities that have been found to contain significant amounts of toxic pollutant based on past inspection cleaning. Analysis of the data collected during facility cleanout identifies areas of higher priority and cleanout schedules are adjusted accordingly.

Eastvale The current schedule for the catch basin clean outs is found to be adequate. All other MS4 facilities (above 36”) are subject to the County’s clean out schedule.

Hemet City of Hemet maintenance staff continues to perform routine maintenance in MS4 facilities on an annual basis, including removal of trash and debris, vegetation, sediments, and repair of erosion damage. Frequency of clean out is dependent upon need, which is determined by ongoing facilities inspections.

Jurupa Valley The City of Jurupa Valley cleans a minimum of 830 of the 1038 catch basins located in the City annually in October of each year on a rotation basis. That work has recently finished for the 2016-2017 Fiscal Year.

Lake Elsinore Review of the MS4 Facility Maintenance and Operations procedure was discussed with the Supervisory Lead, Julian Perez. In discussing the program, it was agreed that the City should look for a new system for tracking; currently data is tracked manually. Research is still ongoing.

Menifee

Catch basins in the City are annually inspected and cleaned out prior to the rainy season. (Note that open channels and detention basins in the City are owned and maintained by RCFC&WCD.) The City contracts out catch basin maintenance and works with its contractor to verify that its MS4 facilities are appropriately maintained. During annual inspection and maintenance, the contractor inspects for visual evidence of IC/IDs, litter and/or debris accumulation, and other maintenance issues. No IC/IDs were reported in 2016-17. Those facilities where storage volume was found to be 25% or more full, or that were impaired by sediment or debris, were cleaned. Attachment G is the Catch Basin Cleaning Inventory for 2016-17.



Moreno Valley

For Publicly Owned Facilities Maintained by City: No changes were needed to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the inspection and clean out schedule for the City’s MS4 facilities including streams, ditches, storm sewers, and storage basins. The SOP is available in the Public Works Department Maintenance and Operations Division for review. The SOP will be made a part of the Local Implementation Plan (LIP). For Privately owned Facilities Maintained by City: Through contracts with Homeowners Associations, the City maintains 33 water quality basins/vegetated swales. The basins/swales are inspected at a minimum on a monthly basis and more frequently during the rainy season. Maintenance and cleanout schedules are per maintenance contract arrangements with the HOA and the City’s maintenance contractor. Staff routinely evaluates the cleaning frequency of these facilities to protect Receiving Water Quality consistent with the MEP standard.

Norco Clean out program coordinated with Riverside County. No recommendations to change the program frequency received by the City.

Perris

The Public Works Department Field Services Division, Special Districts Division and Engineering Administration Division provide a variety of services intended to provide pro-active maintenance of the City’s municipal facilities and activities. In order to achieve this objective, the department has instituted a street sweeping program. During the summer months, when water flows are rare, street right-of-way inspections are increased to once in a week in all commercial and residential areas. This will prevent accumulated trash, household debris, sediment, and other contaminants from entering catch basins, open channels, and other storm drain facilities. The Public Works Department Field Services Division, Special Districts Division, and Engineering Administration Division are responsible for conducting routine inspections of city storm drains, to insure that system does not become clogged or impaired by the accumulation of miscellaneous debris, and also ensures that sediments are removed on a routine basis to prevent pollutants from entering downstream waterways. This includes above ground inspection of catch basins, detention basins, open channels and box culverts. This also includes below ground inspection (i.e. video review) of underground pipe and box culverts, and photo documenting (i.e. manhole inspections) of hydrodynamic separators and catch basins. Due to an extensive retrofit of 12 Flood Control District Benefit Zones (BZ’s) with Connector Pipe Screens, intended to serve as full capture devices, the City has increased the frequency of catch basin cleaning for 289 Catch Basins (See Specifications FCD #1-2013-14-05). The City now cleans these particular catch basins three times per year instead of twice a year as reported in previous annual reports. Generally speaking cleanings occur in June, October and January. Since these “Full Capture” devices now remove pollutant laden sediment and trash on a more frequent basis, the amount of pollutants entering the hydrodynamic separators and storm drain pipe is also reduced. Therefore, pipe cleaning in these particular BZ’s has been reduced to a total of one cleaning every two years, instead of the annual pipe cleaning reported in previous annual reports. The frequency of Hydrodynamic separator cleaning remains the same: hydrodynamic separators are still cleaned once per year. The City’s LIP will be updated to reflect these maintenance changes and system descriptions, and the revisions will be provided to the Board in the next NPDES Annual Report. The maintenance schedule for the remaining storm drain system in place throughout the City remains the same. Based on available resources, the City has determined that it can manage a total of one inspection and cleaning of pipe (includes underground pipe & box culvert) and two inspections and cleanings of catch basins (includes catch basins, ARS screens, REM Filters) per year. Generally speaking, in January, or during the wet/rainy season, individual catch basins will be inspected for clogged and impaired filters, ARS Screens, CPS Screens, and accumulation of debris, and will be cleaned as required. The second cleaning of catch basins will follow at the beginning of the summer season, and is normally scheduled or completed by June. As for underground pipe, box culverts, any facility with standing water may indicate blocked pipe or storm drains, and will be cleaned or repaired accordingly. However, as this is usually not the case, routine cleaning of underground pipe, box culverts will be cleaned once a year on or before the beginning of the wet/rainy season, and is normally scheduled or completed by October. All underground facilities are video documented. As for above ground detention basins, bioswales, infiltration basins, sand filters, and other natural flood control or BMP facilities are inspected and cleaned on either: 1) monthly basis (routine maintenance above ground natural bioswales, detention basins and infiltration basins), and 2) reconstruction/fine grading of detention basins, bioswales, infiltration trenches as needed or approximately every 2-5 years, and 3) Certain Outfalls, Channels, Swales are inspected and cleaned 5x per year (refer to SPEC FCD #1-2016-17-01). The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its LIP, but plans to continue to refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures.



The City of Perris included its inventory and maintenance schedules in its new individual LIP, but plans to continue to refine and will more fully describe its inventory, inspection and maintenance procedures in the City’s new individual LIP. In addition to the facilities described in the preceding paragraphs, the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Monitoring Program for major city “Outfall Areas” will need to be more thoroughly described in the City’s new individual LIP. The City determined that the Outfalls identified as PMP 7, PMP 8, and PMP 10, are actually RCFC & WCD Outfalls. Despite the identification of these 3 outfalls as RCFC &WCD Outfalls, the City monitored all 51 “Outfall Areas” at least once, and the inspection was documented on the illicit discharge reporting forms. No sampling was required, nor was any further investigation required. During the reporting period, 2016-17, the initial inventory was refined for accuracy, and the remaining portions of the City, including along the San Jacinto River, will be inventoried for the purpose of identifying additional “Outfall Areas.” Once these inventories have been completed, and regular monitoring procedures have been established in the LIP, a concerted effort will be made by the City to more regularly conduct any required sampling, and by extension, the necessary follow-up and investigation into suspected illegal connections/illegal discharge.

Riverside

The City’s Storm Drain Maintenance Section provides frequent, routine maintenance of the storm drain system including cleaning of pipes, channels, basins, and outlets. The following table summarizes their activities for Fiscal Year 2016-2017:

Activity Amount Units

Storm Pipe Cleaned 24,617 Linear Feet

Channel/V-Ditch Cleaned 68,995 Linear Feet

Basins Cleaned 1,475

Debris Removed 442 Cubic Yards

Soil Removed 322 Cubic Yards

Concrete Channel Inspected 149,200 Linear Feet

Pipe Replaced 339 Linear Feet

Riverside County

The Transportation Department annually reviews and implements the individual clean out schedules and frequency for its MS4 facilities. The schedule and frequency of routine maintenance of the MS4 facilities are based on the assigned priority as follows: - “High” priority facilities will be inspected and maintained annually prior to the wet season and as often as needed prior to the wet season. - “Medium” priority facilities will be inspected biannually and as often as needed prior to the wet season. The Transportation Department cleans all MS4 facilities where the inspections reveal that storage of volume is about 25% full/above or if accumulated sediment or debris impairs the hydraulic capacity of the facility. In addition, at minimum, as per MS4 permit requirement, the Transportation Department inspects, cleans and maintains at least 80% of its MS4 facilities with 100% of its facilities in a two (2) year period.

RCFC&WCD District maintenance staff review and update their methodologies for performing maintenance on a case-by-case basis as the need arises for each individual facility that undergoes inspection. The District established a full-time position in FY 02-03 whose main job duty includes driving/inspecting all (100%) District MS4 facilities to evaluate current conditions on an annual basis.

San Jacinto Staff visually inspects the MS4 and inputs the need for MS4 clean-outs into the City’s work order system. Work is accomplished as each work order comes to the top of the list. No changes to the procedures were needed.



PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES

2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT

Provision No. XV.A of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to maintain a written and/or electronic record of stormwater training provided to its stormwater and related staff. Note: this is also a measurable metric.

PERMITTEE Please provide the number of Permittee facility and MS4 operators and maintenance staff that attended Municipal training.

Beaumont One

Calimesa See Exhibit “J” for schedule.

Canyon Lake The City of Canyon Lake is proactive in Municipal Training 3 staff members attended municipal training during FY 2016-17.

Corona Twenty-eight (28) Corona employees attended the following training this reporting year: 2-Industrial/Commercial Storm Water Compliance Inspection, 11-Municipal Activities, 7- Construction Activities, 1-Water Quality Management Plan, 5-Transportation Project Guidance, and 2-Illicit Connection/Illicit Discharge.

Eastvale See Attachment G - Training Records

Hemet A total of 23 City of Hemet maintenance staff attended Municipal training in FY 2016-2017.

Jurupa Valley 10

Lake Elsinore 22; EXHIBIT L

Menifee Inspections of municipal facilities were completed by D-MAX Engineering, Inc. D-MAX Engineering’s storm water compliance inspectors are trained in-house on municipal BMP requirements. The MS4 maintenance contractor is required to be trained and may be evaluated by the Public Works Department.

Moreno Valley This information will be provided by RFCD in the Consolidated Annual Report.

Norco The City’s public works inspector has attended training during the reporting year.

Perris See attached Exhibit 15

Riverside 4



Riverside County

RCFC&WCD 0

San Jacinto None this year.

Municipal Training

Date

Location Name of Training No. of

ParticipantsDepartment

4/18/2017 5/3/2017 5/4/2017 5/9/2017

5/11/2017 5/23/2017 5/24/2017

Designated by CASC Engineering and Consulting

NPDES Municipal Training

129 Riverside County Flood Control

Total: 129

PROGRAM IMPLEMENATION

Program Implementation Section 10 – Development Planning Page 10-1

10. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Water Quality Management Plan Section 2.3 of the existing Riverside County WQMP requires the Permittees to document their procedures for WQMP administration and include a description of departments with implementation responsibility. WQMP implementation procedures are contained in each agency's specific Annual Report (Appendix J). The Permittees have several departments involved in implementing and/or administering WQMP requirements. Table 10-1 (shown below) has been edited to reflect the current departments with primary and secondary responsibility for providing conditions of approval.

Table 10-1. Department Responsible for Conditions of Approval Permittee Primary Responsibility Secondary Responsibility

County of Riverside Transportation Department Flood Control and Water Conservation District

Beaumont Department of Public Works Planning Department

Calimesa Public Works Director City Engineer

Canyon Lake Margaret Monson N/A

Corona Public Works Department – Land Development Section

Public Works Department – NPDES Section

Eastvale Public Works Department N/A

Hemet Engineering Department Planning Department

Jurupa Valley Planning Engineering

Lake Elsinore Rita Thompson, Senior Engineering Technician

Dina Purvis, Senior Engineering Technician

Menifee Jonathan Smith Yolanda Macalalad

Moreno Valley Public Works Director/City Engineer Engineering Division Manager

Norco Planning Engineering

Perris City of Perris Engineering Administration City of Perris Engineering Department

Riverside Public Works Department Community Development Department

San Jacinto Development Services Contract City Engineer

TABLE 10-2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING


DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


PERMITTEE

1. Acres of Significant Redevelopment projects that incorporated LID-based BMPs that are built and completed:

2. Number of post-construction BMPS properly maintained and operated:

3. Number of applicable planning staff that attended WQMP training:

Beaumont 100 2 1

Calimesa 0 0 1 Canyon Lake 0 0 0

Corona 24 123 (31 Projects) 1 Eastvale 0 1 1

Hemet 3.9 18 2

Jurupa Valley 0 6 1 Lake Elsinore 0 164 1

Menifee About 916 Acres (See Attachment H) About 400

BMPs (See Attachment H) 1

Moreno Valley 2418 297 4 Norco 8.3 27 1

Perris 0 88 3

Riverside 40.1 acres 36 4 Riverside County 398.47 42 11 and 2 in-house training.

RCFC&WCD N/A N/A N/A San Jacinto 0 31 2




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITProvision No. XII.G.6 of the MS4 Permit requires each Permittee to provide a summary of waivers of LID (along with a short description of the Section XII.G.2 through XII.G.4 in-lieu program selected), Hydromodification and Treatment Control BMPs along with any water quality credit granted, in-lieu projects, or urban runoff fund contribution required.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont No waivers were issued during the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

Calimesa The City has had no development within the past fiscal year that would have required consideration of the LID.

Canyon Lake

In order to comply with water quality regulations enforced by the State through the local Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force began using a state-funded grant to begin alum water treatment in Canyon Lake in September 2013. When the alum is added to the lake, it binds immediately with the phosphorous and effectively removes the opportunity for algae to grow. With less algae in the water, light can penetrate deeper into the lake allowing plants to grow at the bottom while improving the overall health and water quality of the lake and fish life. The alum treatment was a series of 5 treatments that occurred from September 2013 to September 2015. Alum treatments now take place twice a year.

Corona N/A

Eastvale No LID waivers have been processed during the FY 2016-2017

Hemet No waivers of LID, Hydromodification and/or Treatment Control BMPs were requested or granted in 2016-2017. The City of Hemet does not grant water quality credit, does not allow in-lieu projects, and does not have an urban runoff fund.

Jurupa Valley None were issued.

Lake Elsinore No Waivers were issued during FY 2016/17

Menifee The City did not issue any LID waivers during 2016-17.

Moreno Valley None

Norco None

Perris N/A

Riverside None of the above occurred in FY 16-17

Riverside County None.

RCFC&WCD The District is a Special District by act of the State Legislature and has no land use authority.

San Jacinto None.




SANTA ANA REGION NPDES MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMITProvision No. XII.K.4 requires each Permittee to maintain a database to track the operation and maintenance of the structural post-construction BMPs installed after the adoption of the Order. This database must include: Type of BMP, watershed where it is located: date of certification: party responsible for maintenance and any problems identified during inspection including any vector or nuisance problems.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont Structural post-construction BMPs inventory database (Beaumont - Structural Post-Construction BMP O & M) is provided.

Calimesa The City has one Project to report during this reporting period. See Exhibit “U” as referenced.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona SEE ATTACHMENT ‘D’

Eastvale The City does not own or maintain any structural BMP’s. The City will have a new addition of Fire Station #31 with a detention basin that the City will be responsible for maintaining starting the 17/18 Fiscal Year. The City also has created a database for the monitoring of post-construction BMP’s maintained by developers or the HOA/POA.

Hemet See Attachment E

Jurupa Valley The database is provided herein.

Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT J

Menifee See Attachment H – Structural Post-Construction BMP Inventory_2016-17. The City conducted 9 full inspections of public and private structural BMPs in the 2016-17 fiscal year.

Moreno Valley See Attachment F

Norco SEE PERMITTEE REPORT

Perris

During previous reporting periods the City made an extensive inventory of all Post Construction BMP’s approved and/or installed for New Development and Significant Development as part of the CNRP data collection effort (Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan). The City continues to update the CNRP inventory with Post Construction BMP’s approved and/or constructed since 2010. This is a critical task, as the CNRP was intended to be implemented using an adaptive process that relies on new information for measuring results, updating the predictive models and re-fining the follow-on strategy The approved Post-Construction BMP’s were approved as part of the San Jacinto Interim Construction Permit SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and the Riverside County WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan). This data base was updated during FY ’16-’17 to include new BMP’s installed and maintained during the current reporting period. This data base was updated to include an additional 142.43 treatment acres during FY ’16-’17 and describes Post-Construction BMP’s for a new grand total of 2,661.80 treatment acres. The City of Perris included six (6) new developments on the data base required under Provision No. XII.K.4 (See attached Exhibit 9): 1) Popeye’s/Panda Express DPR 05-0343 Addendum, 2) Wendy’s DPR 05-0343 Addendum 3) Oakmont II DPR 07-07-0029 4) Food 4 Less Fueling DPR 13-01-0011 5) Perris Circle DPR 13-02-0005 6) Integra Pacific Warehouse DPR 14-02-0014. The acreage for these six developments totals 142.43 treatment acres. This acreage has been added to the inventory of Post-Construction BMP’s provided for the CNRP.

Riverside The total treatment acreage and number of “BMP’s Installed” noted in Question #2 of this section now reads 2,661.80 acres and 88, respectively.

Riverside County Please see attached database in Attachment G.

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto Staffing levels over the past several years have been reduced due to budget reductions and fiscal distress within the City. Staff levels have recently been stabilized and therefore the City will be developing a database of these in FY17-18.





Provision No. XII.K.6 requires each Permittee to provide a list of all structural post-construction BMPs that have been approved after the adoption of the order and contained in the database required in Provision No. XII.K.4.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont Structural post-construction BMPs inventory database (Beaumont - Structural Post-Construction BMP O & M) is provided.

Calimesa See Exhibit “U”.

Canyon Lake N/A

Corona

Structural post-construction BMPs that have been approved and are included in the database are: A. VEGETATED SWALES B. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION CHAMBERS C. PROPRIETARY BMP – STORM SEPARATOR (HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR) D. PROPRIETARY BMP – CONTECH URBAN BIOFILTER E. PROPRIETARY BMP – CATCH BASIN INSERTS F. PROPRIETARY BMP – JELLYFISH FILTRATION UNITS G. PROPRIETARY BMP – FILTERRA FILTRATION UNITS H. PROPRIETARY BMP – SMARTSPONGE FILTERS I. BIORETENTION AREAS J. WATER QUALITY INLET (OIL/GRIT SEPARATOR) K. EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN L. PROPRIETARY DEVICE – STORMTECH CHAMBERS M. PROPRIETARY DEVICE – MODULAR WETLAND SYSTEM

Eastvale The City does not own or maintain any structural BMP’s. The City will have a new addition of Fire Station #31 with a detention basin that the City will be responsible for maintaining starting the 17/18 Fiscal Year. The City also has created a database for the monitoring of post-construction BMP’s maintained by developers or the HOA/POA.

Hemet See Attachment E



Jurupa Valley

GP11-005 Jim's Plaza

GP11-015 Truck Sales

GP12-027 Park Mira Loma South -Phase II

GP12-028 Mission Plaza

GP12-029 Pro Auto Transport

GP12-035 O'Reilly Autoparts

GP12-037 Swift Transportation Company of AZ

GP12-038 Stratham Homes

GP13-001 Rancho Del Sol

GP13-002 Harvest Villages GP13-005 Mission Estates

GP13-008 3790 De Forest Circle

GP13-011 Wheelock

GP13-014 Professional Auto Transport- Phase II

GP13-015 3873 Pyrite St. Car Wash

GP13-016 Pedley Square Shopping Center

GP13-017 Pulte Homes

GP13-020 CV Communities

GP13-021 Harvest Villages - Phase II

GP13-025 Family Dollar Store

GP13-029 Coastline Acquisitions

GP13-030 Golden Solar LLC

GP14-011 Suddhavasa Buddhist Meditation Center

GP14-012 Mira Loma Commerce Center- Lot 35

GP14-013 Mira Loma Commerce Center- Lot 41

GP14-014 Frontier Communities

GP14-020 Stadium Self Storage

GP14-022 Frontier Communities

GP14-033 Galena Business Park

GP15-008 Arturo Leal

GP15-027 Farwest Industries

GP15-028 Legends Shopping Center

GP15-029 Loring Ranch

GP15-030 Galena Business Park

GP15-039 Vista Rio GP15-041 DR Horton

GP16-012 Fleetwood Commercial

GP16-014 Fleetwood Commercial

GP16-022 UPRR Auto Facility

GP16-025 ARCO Gas Station



Lake Elsinore EXHIBIT K

Menifee See Attachment H– Structural Post-Construction BMP Inventory_2016-17

Moreno Valley See Attachment F

Norco SEE PERMITTEE REPORT

Perris

The City of Perris included six (6) new developments on the data base required under Provision No. XII.K.4 (See attached Exhibit 9): 1) Popeye’s/Panda Express DPR 05-0343 Addendum, 2) Wendy’s DPR 05-0343 Addendum 3) Oakmont II DPR 07-07-0029 4) Food 4 Less Fueling DPR 13-01-0011 5) Perris Circle DPR 13-02-0005 and 6) Integra Pacific Warehouse DPR 14-02-0014. The acreage for these six developments totals 142.43 treatment acres. This acreage has been added to the inventory of Post-Construction BMP’s provided for the CNRP. The total treatment acreage and number of “BMP’s Installed” noted in Question #2 of this section now reads 2,661.80 acres and 88, respectively.

Riverside See attached document

Riverside County Please see attached database in Attachment G.

RCFC&WCD N/A

San Jacinto Staffing levels within the City are being increased and the City will be developing this list during the FY17-18 Permit term.



Hydromodification The Permittees, developed several programs that are required by the 2010 MS4 Permit, including the Santa Ana Region Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP), the Regional Geodatabase, and HMP Evaluation Program. The different programs assisted in preparing the WAP described in Section XII.B of the 2010 MS4 Permit. The Hydromodification Susceptibility Mapping delineated existing unarmored and soft-armored stream channels in the Permit Area that are vulnerable to hydromodification from new development and significant redevelopment projects. The Regional Geodatabase continues to be updated to include all of the latest information for watershed and hydrologic subarea(s), downstream receiving waters including hydromodification susceptibility and 303(d) listed pollutants, soil types, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) areas, flood hazard zones, District Master/Area Drainage Plans, and MS4 facilities. The WAP and its supporting documents were approved by the Regional Board on April 20, 2017. Upon approval, the DAMP and the LIP were updated to include language from the approved WAP and its supporting documents.

SECTION 11 MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT

UNDER SEPARATE COVER


Program Implementation Section 12 – Public Education and Outreach Page 12-1

12. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH This section provides an overview of watershed specific education activities conducted by the Permittees during the reporting period.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Riverside County NPDES Permittees have established an ongoing watershed based public education and outreach program known as the Only Rain Down the Storm Drain Program is transitioning. The program has undergone a re-branding effort with new logo and name; Riverside County Watershed Protection Program. The specific objectives of the public education program include:

Fostering a broad public awareness of water pollution concerns;

Increasing public acceptance of pollution prevention activities to curtail everyday human behaviors that contribute to water quality problems;

Educating/informing the general public, regulators and key local government, and state decision makers on urban runoff conditions in Riverside County; and

Promoting stewardship of local water resources in both English and Spanish.

The Riverside County Watershed Protection Program implements the public awareness objectives by focusing on three areas of pollutant reduction/prevention:

Public behavior;

Proper management of pollutants; and

Business specific education outreach.

In addition, when attempting to make use of the finite resources available for the public education program, the Permittees use these management goals to ensure that resources are used effectively:

Focusing on pollutants of concern specific to each watershed region;

Coordinating public education efforts with adjacent stormwater management programs and other related education programs to share resources, coordinate outreach efforts, and avoid costly duplication of effort; and

Adopting public education programs and objectives based on effectiveness analysis to address changing MS4 programs and objectives.

PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

Updating and revising brochures to capture the interest of key target audiences.

Updating the program website to cross promote key messages through other social media vehicles.

Refreshing the logo and branding of the program to compliment social media market.



BMP OUTREACH ACTIVITES FOR SANTA ANA POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN After each identified pollutant, specific BMP outreach activities are identified to address these different pollutants of concern. Sedimentation associated with urban development and land uses:

Construction, municipal, industrial/commercial, and new development training focusing on the need to address erosion control and sedimentation within the watershed;

County building inspectors distributed After the Storm brochures during site visits;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure;

Construction activities outreach materials to be available during the regularly scheduled Permittee employee training sessions;

Distribution of dust pans featuring the "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" message to promote the dry cleaning of driveways and impervious surfaces;

Distribution of shop cloths to promote cleanup of spills to help prevent them from discharging into the storm drain; and

Adult stormwater education presentations that include instruction on controlling erosion.

Nutrients associated with urban development and land uses:

The Agricultural Commissioner assists in the distribution of best management practices materials;

County Waste Management distributes and makes available at their composting workshops the After the Storm brochure;

Keep Our Water Clean, a video that focuses on proper use of fertilizers and avoiding excess runoff from sprinklers;

Includes specific section within municipal employee training that focuses on the need to address increased nutrients within the watershed;

Provides County's HHW flyer to incoming residents about safe disposal of hazardous waste and includes the 1-800 toll free number to report illegal disposal into the storm drain;

Distribution of the After the Storm brochure;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure;

Distribution of the Pet Waste What's the Scoop brochure; and

Distribution of the Tips for Horse Care brochure and flyer covering equestrian care and management.



Pathogens associated with urban development and land uses

Construction, municipal, industrial/commercial and new development training focusing on the need to address pathogen sources within the watershed;

Distribute pet waste information in pet stores, veterinarian clinics, kennels and pet grooming facilities;

Coordination with Riverside County Animal Control Department and private "no kill" pet shelters to distribute Pet Waste What's the Scoop and After the Storm brochures to families adopting pets at the shelters;

Distribution of the Landscape and Gardening brochure; and

Distribution of the Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System brochure.

In addition, the District has developed other outreach materials to focus on other pollutants and pollutant causing activities/businesses commonly associated with urban runoff.

24-hour Watershed-Wide Outreach Portals The Permittees maintain three 24-hour watershed wide portals to receive and distribute information regarding the "Riverside County Watershed Protection" program. These portals include a website, a 1.800.506.2555 toll free number, and an e-mail address.

Riverside County Watershed Protection Website The District operates a website that provides information on how to report illegal dumping, clogged storm drains, lack of curb markers, and provides information on upcoming activities and opportunities for public participation in program development and general information about urban runoff pollution prevention techniques. The website is located at: http://rcwatershed.org. There is also a link on the County's main page advocating reporting illegal storm drain disposal. Most of the District's outreach materials are on the public information webpage including brochures that have been scanned into electronic .pdf file formats and are available for download.

Stormwater Toll Free 1-800 Hotline A toll free 800 telephone number (1.800.506.2555) for reporting suspected stormwater pollution and obtaining pollution prevention information is mainatined. This call line links to Riverside County Environmental Health or Riverside County Waste Management to obtain household hazardous waste collection workshop dates and locations, or information on grass re-cycling and composting. The 24-hour toll free number also allows callers to report clogged catch basin inlets, illegal dumping, and other illicit discharge violations. In addition, the hotline allows people to order public education materials and/or request stormwater presentations for schools or community groups. The toll free number is widely publicized in all public education outreach materials and promotional items, listed in telephone directories, and registered in Riverside County 211, a non-profit community help line.



Callers reporting illicit discharges are directed to County Code Enforcement, who accepts the calls and then re-directs them to appropriate Permittee Code Enforcement departments. Calls for public education materials or presentations are routed to the District's front desk and then to the District's public education staff. The specific text to the hotline is included as Exhibit A. The provider of the toll free 800 number, Riverside County Information Technology, tracks the number of incoming calls. The number of toll free calls received and tracked from July 2016 through June 2017 was 526. E-mail The District also maintains an e-mail address that can be used to report illicit discharges or request stormwater related public information. The e-mail address is: [email protected].


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 12 – Public Education and Outreach Page 12-5

Exhibit A

DIALOGUE Program Coordination with other Stakeholders The Watershed Protection Program collaborates extensively to leverage and increase available resources. Partnerships have been established with local environmental groups, business organizations, cities, and public and private entities. These partnerships help maximize use of existing distribution outlets, events, programs, and materials. Impressions, attendance, and other measures of effectiveness relative to these programs are included in Appendix E of this Annual Report. To leverage education outreach resources and coordinate public education activities with other environmental programs, the Permittees closely coordinate and/or have existing partnerships with the following entities/organizations:

Santa Ana River Watershed Clean-Up Stakeholders Group The annual clean-up program continues with the support of the District, and includes Keep Riverside Clean and Beautiful and other community groups and agencies. This

RIVERSIDE COUNTY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM TOLL FREE 800 LINE DIALOGUE

Introduction - Part 1 Thank you for calling Riverside County's "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain Pollution Prevention" Hotline. If this is an emergency, hang up and immediately dial 911. (Please listen carefully to the following options before making your selection). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Instructional portion – Part 2

For abandoned drums, used motor oil or chemical dumping, call County Hazardous Materials @ 951-358-5055. For after-hours and weekend communications, press _1_ (Drops to 951-782-2973) changed from 951 358-5245 per HHW 11/30/09

For reporting other forms of illegal dumping, press __2__ (Drops to 1-888-782-6263)

For construction site runoff and discharges, press _3__ (Drops to 951-955-1400)

For street flooding issues, press _4__ (Drops to 951-955-6899)

For septic tank overflows, illicit connections, gray water or other types of discharges, press __5_ (Drops to 1-888-722-4234)

For Household Hazardous Waste disposal or other inquiries, call County Waste Management Press 6__ (Drops to 1-800-304-2226)

The County's "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" public education program, offers presentations to Riverside County residents, adults, schools, and community interest groups. To leave a message after hours, please press _7__ (Drops to 51200)

This line is sponsored by the Cities and County of Riverside's Watershed Protection Program. The Flood Control District is opened Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. For general information about District services, call 951-955-1200 during normal business hours.



collaboration of environmental partners support and encourage volunteers, and allies and groups, to gather for a day to remove trash and debris from the Santa Ana River that might otherwise flow downstream to the ocean.

The Watershed Protection Program also coordinates with the following City/County

departments to distribute appropriate stormwater education outreach materials:

o Cities/County/District Front Counters o County Waste Management o County Environmental Health Department o County Agriculture Department o County Executive Offices o County Code Enforcement o County Regional Parks o County Animal Control o County Economic Development Agency o County Assessor/Recorder's Office o County Fleet Services o County Human Resources o County/City Library Systems o County Department of Social Services o County Transportation and Land Management o County Sheriff o County Fair Housing Department o County Business License

The Watershed Protection Program also coordinates with the following state and/or local government or business entities to distribute public education information:

Western Riverside Council of Governments Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Orange County Watershed & Coastal Resources Division

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

South Coast Air Quality Management District

Santa Rosa Plateau Reserve

United States Bureau of Reclamation

Elsinore Valley Municipal Water

Rancho California Water District

Jurupa Community Service District

Habitat for Humanity in Riverside

Department of Water Resources Southern California District

Western Municipal Water District

Riverside Unified School District After School Programs



Fair Housing Council of Riverside

Eastern Municipal Water District

The Water Education Center in Hemet District

Metropolitan Water District

Lake Elsinore/San Jacinto Watershed Authority

General Community Outreach The Watershed Protection Program participates in various community events to ensure that our message is delivered to the largest possible municipal audience. These community events also provide an opportunity to survey attendees and assess their public knowledge of stormwater pollution prevention. In addition, the Watershed Protection Program has partnered with Riverside County Waste Management to ensure stormwater pollution prevention information is available at many HHW and ABOP collection centers and/or events held within each of Riverside County's principal watersheds (Santa Ana, Santa Margarita, and Whitewater). These events provide free disposal sites for common pollutants that can impair receiving waters. The program's urban runoff materials and promotional items are also distributed through community cleanup partnerships with Riverside County Code Enforcement Administration, whose undertaking is to achieve voluntary compliance in all phases of community revitalization. Staff works closely with the community improvement specialists, ensuring that residential stormwater pollution prevention material packets are on hand for distribution on inspection visits, complaint investigations, and at neighborhood or community presentations. When a complaint warranting an investigation is received, the information is entered into a database and then followed up with an NPDES staff inspection. Following the investigation, when appropriate, the inspector then canvasses the area with storm drain pollution prevention brochures, HHW collection schedules and/or door hangers.

Adult Outreach The Watershed Protection Program contracts with SGA to provide urban runoff educational presentations to the targeted audiences. SGA provides this outreach through workshops at major home improvement stores throughout Riverside County. These workshops include a handout that educates the store's employees about stormwater impacts that could occur from improper application of paint, pesticides, or fertilizers. Attendees at the workshop also receive watershed protection information and promotional items to help reinforce the stormwater protection message. The employees are then able to share with customers the proper use and disposal of products that are potential storm drain pollutants. Point of purchase displays, tear sheets, and counter displays have been installed at strategic locations to educate the public directly. Additional details can be found in the SGA Annual Report in Appendix E.



Outreach Tools Specific to Pollutants The Watershed Protection Program conducts a wide range of outreach activities focusing on reduction of certain pollutants in the receiving waters. These outreach activities focus on sources of those pollutants whether it is residential, business, municipal or some other state or federal source. Education materials explain how everyday activities of potential sources may contribute to the pollution of receiving waters, and encourage the sources to adopt alternative approaches to pollutant management that will lessen or eliminate pollution-causing activities. Program efforts include providing information on pollution prevention techniques and informing sources about the proper disposal of pollutants.

Brochures

After the Storm o Educate/inform on impacts from dumping pollutants into storm drainage systems o Educate on the clean-up and proper disposal of pet waste o Develop programs for landowners on erosion and sediment control practices

Landscaping and Gardening o Use for pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides

Tips for Horse Care o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal o Educate on the clean-up and proper disposal of pet waste

What's the Scoop (Pet Waste) o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal o Educate on the clean-up and proper disposal of pet waste

Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal

Automotive Maintenance and Car Care o Educate on impacts from gasoline, fuel oil, and oil and grease o Educate on the need to keep stormwater from contacting potential contaminants o Cover contaminants and prevent runoff through polluted areas

Outdoor Cleaning Activities and Professional Mobile Service Providers o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal o Educate on impacts from gasoline, fuel oil, and oil and grease o Cover contaminants and prevent runoff through polluted areas

Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain Maintenance o Educate/inform on impacts from littering and improper waste disposal

Food Service Industry o Educate on the need to keep stormwater from contacting potential contaminants o Cover contaminants and prevent runoff through polluted areas

Other Outreach Materials

In addition to the brochures mentioned above, the program utilizes other effective outreach materials such as: flyers, dust pans, shelf talkers, and tear sheets to foster interest in the Program.



Mailing Inserts The Watershed Protection program publicizes the dates and locations of HHW collection events through the use of mail inserts. Inserts are included in various utility bills and special notices. Cooperative Used Oil Program The WRCOG is responsible for administering the Used Oil Block Cycle Grant on behalf of 17 Cities within WRCOGs boundaries. These Cities include Banning, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar. The target audience is the do-it-yourselfers (DIYers). One of WRCOGs goals is to make it convenient for residents to recycle their used oil and to make it easy for them to find a certified center accepting used oil. In order for these centers to be certified, they need to apply for certification with the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). WRCOG contacts the non-certified centers to explain the program and hopefully interest them in becoming a certified used motor oil collection center. The goal is to see a significant decrease in the amount of illegally dumped motor oil through the addition of new certified centers within driving distance of the DIYer. WRCOG also provides secure oil containers on an as needed basis to the certified centers for distribution among DIYers at no cost to minimize the chance of spillage and a hazardous situation. Through WRCOG efforts including site visits, all certified centers in the County are in compliance to state and local mandates. The WRCOG program also includes public education. This includes hosting a booth at large venue events, conducting surveys to see how informed the local community is regarding used oil recycling, distributing brochures in both English and Spanish with information regarding used oil drop-off locations, curbside programs, and other local recycling programs. The program also maintains an English and Spanish 800 toll free number that can be used to get answers to any recycling question a resident may have regarding, "Where is the nearest Certified Center located?" and "Where can I find a used oil container?". The phone number is printed on all distributed materials including the oil containers. As mentioned, WRCOG provides brochures in Spanish, as Riverside County has a large Spanish-speaking population that needs to be reached. By educating this group with the right information concerning used oil recycling, WRCOG hopes an increase in used oil recycling will occur throughout their Riverside County jurisdiction.

Western Riverside County Clean Cities Program WRCOG created the Cleanest County in the West program to address issues relating to litter and illegal dumping. The program was designed to assist jurisdictions in meeting the 50% diversion goals mandated by the state legislature.



WRCOG also participates in large venue events to promote the use of alternative vehicle fuels. The Car Care for Clean Air program's objective is to increase public awareness regarding the benefits of proper vehicle maintenance. These events give staff an opportunity to assess how informed the local community is regarding recycling and allows us to distribute brochures and informational flyers that will assist people in finding the nearest recycling center.

Direct Business Outreach Activities Restaurants and businesses that handle hazardous wastes are inspected by the Permittees, for potential stormwater impacts from their activities. Each business is provided with educational information specific to their typical business activities. The County of Riverside requires all businesses in Riverside County to obtain a business license. Billing inserts were developed for the County's Transportation and Land Management Agency's Business License Division and included in all license renewal notices. New businesses receive stormwater education material that is affixed to their application. Our partnership with the County's Business License Division continues to be successful by providing direct outreach to business owners about behaviors that contribute to water quality problems. Direct outreach is made in the form of an insert that is issued to new business license applicants and inserted into annual renewal reminders. The insert includes information on the Only Rain Down the Storm Drain program and the toll free 800 number portal used for reporting illegal

Public Education Materials Examples of various public education materials the Permittees distribute are included in Appendix E.

TABLE 12-1 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH


PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH 2016-2017 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT


Provision No. XIII.J requires each Permittee to annually sponsor or staff an Urban Runoff table or booth at community, regional, and/or countywide events to distribute public information materials to the public.

PERMITTEE

Beaumont

In the fiscal year 2016-2017, Beaumont has developed and published a storm water webpage on its City website. Members of the public can access sstorm water resources online as well as have a one-click access to storm water brochures and permit documentation. In addition, the Community Service Department had extra information stocked at the City’s booth at the City’s Annual Cherry Festival in early June.

Calimesa The City provides handouts and information at the Building and Safety counter and City Hall public counter to contractors and developers, in addition to the public at large. Twice a year, the City participates at the local street faire at which City staff provide public outreach to include brochures, magnets, and other outreach material. The City also has information on the City’s website.

Canyon Lake

The City of Canyon Lake takes every opportunity to educate the public by having Code Enforcement Officers distribute informational pamphlets regarding several MS4 issues. The City of Canyon Lake ends out informational pamphlets to businesses who perform NPDES related Construction and these pamphlets are available at the City Hall office. During this FY 2016-2017, Canyon Lake Code Enforcement and Special Enforcement Departments staffed educational storm water runoff booths at 2 community events; Oktoberfest 10/2016 and Fiesta Days May 2017 providing pamphlets with dust pans, dog walking bags, pencils, rulers, and t-shorts provided by the Riverside County Department of Flood Control distribution to attendees.

Corona

1. Inner-coastal Watershed Cleanup Day, October 8, 2016 City staff organized this cleanup event held at the Auburndale Road crossing of Temescal Creek. Over 100 volunteers, mostly students from local middle and high schools, participated to remove approximately 7.5 tons of trash from the waterway. City staff assisted with the trash removal. Storm water educational materials were distributed to all event attendees.

2. City Hall Garden Festival, March 25, 2017 The Garden Festival was a water-use efficiency day to help the public learn that being California-Friendly is beautiful and water efficient. By walking through the garden while observing and learning about different plant materials, residents are able to apply similar landscapes at their homes and businesses. City of Corona staff distributed storm water educational materials to approximately 1,000 attendees at this event.

Eastvale In addition to working closely with County Public Education Program and efforts, the City also actively participates in public events such as holiday gatherings at parks, public/community meetings, public concerts, and more. The City hosts a booth at these events to raise public awareness of storm water pollution and pollution prevention.



Hemet

The City of Hemet Public Works Department participated in the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley Chamber of Commerce Business Expo on January 30, 2017. The event was held at the Golden Village Palms RV resort. Our both focus was stormwater pollution education and water conservation. Information and promotional items related to water conservation and storm water pollution prevention were provided to an estimated 600+ residents. Two public works employees were available to answer questions. The City of Hemet has also purchased a banner to promote stormwater pollution awareness. This banner has been placed across our busiest street in town where an estimated 34,000 vehicles pass daily. This banner will be displayed throughout the year. Currently, storm drain maintenance crews are installing “Only Rain in the Drain” markers on catch basin inlets throughout the city.



Jurupa Valley

The City provides public information materials at all City Council meetings, Healthy Jurupa Valley meetings and at community events held at City Hall. The City encourages attendance at City sponsored and other agency sponsored events involving waterway cleanups. The City has sponsored these events during this period. The City sponsored a Santa Ana River clean up event, coordinated by the Santa Ana River Trust in conjunction with other organizations. These events removed debris and litter from the riverbed and watershed. The City mailed a brief NPDES overview flyer to commercial and industrial businesses in the City. The City has developed an inspection program with registered businesses that provided free inspections the first year. These inspections provided assurance to the businesses that they are compliant with the NPDES/MS4 Permit and provided instructional materials. While completing inspections to commercial and industrial facilities, inspectors provide business with education material.

Lake Elsinore

The City staffed a booth at the City’s Annual Pet Walk. At the event, pet waste brochures, storm water brochures and pet waste dispenser w/ bags were provided. Contact information was also secured. 106 pet owners were in attendance with total attendance estimated at 200. City staff manned a booth at an October Chamber of Commerce Mixer, providing local businesses with information on stormwater pollution prevention. City co-sponsored an IGP Workshop for local businesses. City sent out 5,394 Rubbish and Weed Abatement Notices to vacant property owners.

Menifee The City contributes funds to the District’s Public Education Program through the Implementation Agreement and, therefore, plays a supportive role in all of the program’s outreach efforts.

Moreno Valley

The City hosts several events throughout the year. Pollution Prevention brochures and other outreach materials are given out at these events. Through the NPDES Implementation Agreement, Moreno Valley funds a part of the comprehensive Public Education Program. RCFC &WCD will provide the particulars to the locations and staffing of an Urban Runoff table or booth in the Consolidated Annual Report.

Norco The City partners with the County on these programs.



Perris

Please describe your Permittee's participation in sponsoring or staffing an Urban Runoff table or booth at community, regional, and/or countywide events to distribute public information materials to the public during FY 2016-2017. The City of Perris sponsors or participates in several events throughout the year, including, but not limited to the Citywide Clean-Up Day, Perris Live Well Health Fair, and the Southern California Farmer’s Fair. Among several goals of the events, one is to provide and receive information from the community (See Exhibit 13). Representatives for the City’s NPDES program typically man a booth and provide public information materials including: general NPDES information for residential, commercial/industrial, and constructions sites. Information specific to the San Jacinto Watershed was also provided to attendees along with NPDES-themed rulers, sponges, pens, pencils, crayons, shoe laces and dust pans. See Exhibit 13 for copies of the outreach materials provided at events. The following brochures and handouts were made available at the events: What You Should Know for General Construction & Site Supervision Did You Know…Your Facility May Need a Storm Water Permit? What You Should Know for The Food Industry What You Should Know for Outdoor Cleaning Activities & Professional Mobile Service Providers What You Should Know for Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain Maintenance What’s the Scoop? Tips for a Healthy Pet and Healthier Environment Stormwater Pollution and the Solutions What You Should Know About Industrial & Commercial Facilities What You Should Know About Automotive Maintenance &Car Care Tips for Horse Care Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank



Riverside

In FY 2016-17 the Environmental Compliance Section provided storm water and urban runoff information to the public at five community events as summarized below:

Date Event Name Representatives Hours

07/30/2016 National Kick Off 2 10

04/01/2017 Riverside Airport 25th Annual Air Show 5 30

05/27/2017 Arlington Business Association – 15th Annual Chili Cook-Off and Car Show

4 24

During these events, Environmental Compliance Inspectors distribute public education materials with environmentally focused messages including posters, hats, bracelets, pencils, pens, coloring books, fans, and more. Demonstrations using the diorama are also given to educate attendees. In addition to the regional programs, the City of Riverside performs other public education activities including displaying environmental messages on an electric billboard at the 91 freeway near University exit. The billboard can be seen from both east and west bound traffic and reaches an estimated 250,000 people daily. Examples of the images displayed are:

Riverside County

The County provides monetary support via the Implementation Agreement as well as storm water educational information at the County kiosks and TLMA permit processing centers. The County is also an active participant in countywide events such as county fairs and regional festivals. Code Enforcement Officers, Environmental Compliance Inspectors and other field staff carry educational brochures in their vehicles to hand out to the public as appropriate.

RCFC&WCD The District takes the lead role in attending community, regional, and countywide events for the public education program. See Appendix E for additional details.

San Jacinto City provides information during community events as appropriate including distribution of educational materials at the front counter of the City’s planning and building department.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 13 – Program Effectiveness Assessment Page 13-1

13. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT The Permittees assess the component programs to identify improvements to further effect the reduction of pollutants in urban runoff to the MEP while also supporting the responsible management and allocation of the public resources available to implement their programs. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of each Permittee's program can be found in the Permittee's individual Annual Report, located in Appendix J.

Evaluation of the DAMP includes short-term and long-term strategies. The long-term strategy for assessing effectiveness will focus on water quality data obtained as part of the CMP. Due to the inherent variability of urban runoff, years of monitoring data are necessary to identify statistically significant trends or draw conclusions on program effectiveness. Additionally, because (i) there are numerous program elements being implemented and revised concurrently, (ii) other environmental programs and regulations indirectly impact urban runoff, e.g., pesticide regulation, and (iii) numerous other climatological, man-made, and environmental changes occur within the watershed over time, the ability to identify specific cause-and-effect relationships between a specific program element and/or BMP and improvement in the quality of urban runoff is complicated, if not infeasible, in many cases.

The short-term strategy for assessing program effectiveness focuses on quantitative, indirect methods (that is, not directly based on the quality of urban runoff or receiving water quality) of assessment. Each year the District collects various metrics defined in the DAMP (as provided in the Annual Reporting Forms) to assist with program evaluation. As part of the ROWD, the Permittees will evaluate these metrics, including water quality data, in an effort to assess overall DAMP effectiveness. On an annual basis, the District will review the metrics to determine if any course corrections on existing BMPs are required. Permittees utilized the CASQA Guidance for developing these assessment measures at the following six outcome levels: The CASQA Effectiveness Levels are: Level 1 – Documenting activities. Level 1 Outcomes provide the program managers with direct feedback on whether the control measures are being developed and implemented as planned and on schedule. Level 1 Outcomes are assumed to be beneficial to water quality, reflect program implementation, and are not indicators of the impact of implementation on the environment. Level 2 – Raising awareness. Level 2 Outcomes provide program managers with feedback on how effective the control measures have been in raising awareness and changing attitudes of target audiences. Level 2 Outcomes are assumed to be beneficial to the environment as increased awareness and attitudinal changes provide the basis for behavioral change.



Level 3 – Changing behavior. By building on Level 2, Level 3 Outcomes provide program managers with feedback on how effective the program elements and control measures have been in motivating target audiences to change their behaviors and implement appropriate BMPs. At Level 3, control measures focus on providing information and incentives for target audiences to take action by changing behavior and implementing recommended BMPs. Both quantitative (i.e., statistically valid) and qualitative methods are used to measure behavior changes. Methods used to measure behavior changes include those used for Level 2 Outcomes as well as direct observation via site visits. Level 3 Outcomes may take the form of a percent and/or change in the percentage of the target audience demonstrating that a behavior change has occurred such as an increase in number of BMPs implemented and maintained at construction sites. Level 4 – Reducing loads from sources. Level 4 Outcomes provide program managers with feedback regarding reductions in the amounts of pollutants associated with specific sources resulting from the implementation or enhancement of a BMP. If a large enough portion of the target audience is moved to take action (Level 3), loads into the MS4 are prevented. At Level 4, programs collect data to allow estimation of loads from pollutant sources that are prevented from being either generated or discharged into the MS4.

Level 5 – Improving runoff quality. Level 5 Outcomes may be measured as reductions in one or more specific pollutants, and may reflect effectiveness at a variety of scales ranging from site-specific to programmatic. Over time, as loads are prevented from entering the MS4, urban runoff and discharge quality are expected to improve. At Level 5, baseline measurements of runoff quality should be measured to allow comparison. Multi-year data sets are needed to have any confidence in the measured change. Level 6 – Protecting receiving water quality. At Level 6, program managers will focus on outcomes such as compliance with water quality standards, protection of biological integrity, and beneficial use attainment. Regardless of the outcomes targeted, receiving water quality usually reflects more than the quality of MS4 discharges. Other influences may have a significant impact on receiving water quality, including sanitary sewer overflows, rising groundwater, agricultural and other non-point source discharges. Changes in receiving waters and the environment resulting from stormwater programs may only be seen over long periods of time that allow the cumulative impacts of multiple control measures and program elements to result in measurable change in water quality. The annual reporting forms utilized in this FY Annual Report contain the quantification of certain program elements based on the effectiveness assessment criteria in the DAMP. These are based upon the above CASQA effectiveness levels.



Overall Program Assessment

The information in the tables below summarize the metrics collected, the requirements of the 2010 MS4 Permit addressed by the metric, and their associated outcome levels. The data collected for each of the measureable metrics are identified in the tables for each program and are required per the DAMP (see DAMP Appendix M). Each measureable metric in the tables is reported in the SAR Annual Report and assessed periodically. However, in reviewing the individual Permittee reports, the degree of variance between the individual reports suggests significantly differing perspectives between the Permittees, including interpretations of needed data. The Permittees recommend to the Regional Board, the development of an alternative assessment. The effectiveness may be measured in terms of how successful the program has been in eliminating IC/IDs and/or reducing pollutant loads in urban storm water runoff, including summaries of Permittee actions to investigate and eliminate or permit IC/IDs and measures to reduce and/or eliminate the discharge of Pollutants, including trash and debris.

As described in Table 13-1 below, 865 IC/ID reports were received from the public and Permittee staff. Of these reported IC/IDs, two exceeded criteria that required follow-up and 137 notices of violations were issued. Based on these metrics, the Permittees shall work on improving the IC/ID program by enhancing record keeping through means of exploring a GIS database to store such information.

The SAR MS4 Permit requires that the Permittees effectively prohibit the discharge of non-exempted non-stormwater into their MS4 facilities.



Table 13-1: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metrics Collected Data CASQA Outcome Level

Number of IC/ID reports received (IX.A) 865 Level 1

Percentage of IC/IDs that were sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow‐up (IX.A).

See Permittee Report

Number of IC/IDs that were sampled that exceeded criteria and required follow‐up (IX.A).

2 Level 5

Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (IX.C)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (IX.C)

Education and information: 211 Verbal warning: 42 Written warning: 189 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 137 Administrative fine: 0

Level 3

Estimated volume of anthropogenic trash removed from Permittee MS4 facilities (tons) (IX.J)

15,854 tons Level 4



PERMITTEE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13- 2: Permittee Facilities and Activities Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metrics Collected Data CASQA

Outcome Level

Percent of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified (IV.B)


Number of Permittee facilities with appropriate BMPs identified (IV.B)

91 Level 2

Percent of annual facility inspections that require follow‐up actions (IV.C)


Number of annual facility inspections that require follow‐up actions (IV.C)

20 Level 3

Average percent of follow‐up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed (XIV.C)


Number of follow‐up actions identified in the previous year's Permittee facility inspections that were addressed (XIV.C)

17 Level 3

Estimated tons of Waste removed by Permittee street sweeping (XIV.D & XIV.E)

14,544 Level 4

Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee Open Channels (XIV.D & XIV.E)

7,372 Level 4

Estimated tons of Waste removed from Permittee storm drain inlets (XIV.D & XIV.E)

534 Level 4

The Permittee Facilities and Activities Program have been effective in promoting implementation of appropriate BMPs in Permittee facilities and ensuring that the BMPs are inspected and maintained. The program has also been effective in removing waste and properly disposing of waste from Permittee streets and MS4 facilities.



DEVELOPMENT PLANNING EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT Table 13-3: Development Planning Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metric Collected Data CASQA Outcome

Level

Number of acres of Significant Redevelopment projects that incorporated LID‐based BMPs that are built and completed (XII.D.2.a)

3909 Level 5

Number of applicable planning staff that attended WQMP training (XV)

38 Level 1

Number of post construction BMPs properly maintained and operated (XII.K.5)

1187 Level 3

Construction activity is increasing. As reflected in the table, the program is continuing to train Planning staff to ensure that new development and significant redevelopment projects are in compliance with the Development Planning Program. Also, the program has been maintaining and operating 1,187 post construction BMPs.



PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-4: Private Development Construction Activity Program Effectiveness


Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)

Education and information: 793 Verbal warning: 301 Written warning: 106 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 59 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 20 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 5

Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

Percent of active construction sites subject to Construction General Permit that are discovered without coverage ((XII.A.1)


Number of active construction sites subject to Construction General Permit that are discovered without coverage ((XII.A.1)

3 Level 2

Number of illegal construction sites that are discovered (i.e., without building/grading permits) (XI.B.3.a)

12 Level 3

Number of construction inspection staff that attended Construction training (XV)

55 Level 1

As reflected in Table 13-4, the Private Construction program has been effective in educating the development community of the requirement to obtain building and grading permits and to obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit. Also, the program has been effective in providing Construction training to Co-Permittee construction inspection staff, prior to the wet weather season, to ensure that private development projects are properly operated and maintained.



INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOURCES EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-5: Industrial and Commercial Sources Program Effectiveness


Percent of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)


Number of enforcement actions that reached each level of enforcement (XI.A.10)

Education and information: 3,463 Verbal warning: 978 Written warning: 251 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 33 Administrative compliance order: 0 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 0 Administrative fine: 0 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

Percent of active industrial sites subject to Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage (XI.A.4)


Number of active industrial sites subject to Industrial General Permit that are discovered without coverage (XI.A.4)

226 Level 2

Number of new/undocumented Industrial and Commercial facilities added to database (XI.C, XI.C.4)

526 Level 1

Number of applicable Industrial & Commercial Facility inspection staff that attended Industrial‐Commercial training (XV)

43 Level 1

The Permittees continue to implement an effective Industrial and Commercial Sources program. Inspection staff effectively communicated compliance expectations with facility operators, and no facility required a formal enforcement action. To promote continued effectiveness of this program, facility inspection staff receives training. To assist the Permittees with the requirements for Industrial and Commercial facilities, the training material is reviewed and updated as necessary.



RESIDENTIAL SOURCES EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

Table 13-6: Residential Sources Program Effectiveness

Measureable Metrics Collected Data CASQA Outcome

Level

Gallons of used oil collected at collection events (XI.E.3)

27,009 gallons Level 4

Total pounds collected at HHW/ABOP events (XI.E.3)

1,543,055 lbs Level 4

Total number of participants at HHW/ABOP events (XI.E.3)

19,043 Level 3

Percent of residences in Permittee jurisdiction subjected to enforcement beyond verbal/written warnings


Number of residences in Permittee jurisdiction subjected to enforcement beyond verbal/written warnings

Education and information: 282 Verbal Warning: 37 Written warning: 167 Notice of violation or noncompliance: 144 Administrative compliance order: 13 Stop work order or cease and desist order: 0 Civil citation or injunction: 8 Administrative fine: 4 Referral to the Environmental Crimes Strike Force for criminal prosecution (infraction or misdemeanor): 0

Level 3

The Residential Sources Program continues to be effective in promoting proper disposal of waste materials that may potentially impact receiving water quality. This is reflected in the amount of used oil and waste collected at HHW/ABOP events. One hundred and sixty-nine (169) residences in the Santa Ana Region required enforcement actions beyond verbal/written warnings during the 2016-2017 reporting year.



PUBLIC EDUCATION EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

The Santa Ana River Clean-Up event was a very successful public education event with over sixteen (16) tons of trash collected. Most of the material collected from the event is non-anthropogenic; trash does not appear to be a significant problem except at localized areas due to transient encampments. This event is categorized as a CASQA Effectiveness Level 3 as it is changing behavior.


PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Section 14 – Summary of Assessment & Future SAR Program Improvements Page 14-1

14. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT & FUTURE SAR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS The Program was established in 1990 as a regulatory compliance collaboration between the Santa Ana Region Permittees who own and maintain a drainage system infrastructure that discharges stormwater and urban runoff to tributary creeks, streams, and rivers as well as providing flood protection to the residents of Riverside County. Significant progress continues to be achieved in effectively managing urban runoff in the Santa Ana Watershed. Nonetheless, the Permittees continue to actively seek regional collaboration efforts and opportunities with other agencies to implement joint water resources focused projects that will enhance water quality. The Program continues to evolve to address constituents of concern identified by the monitoring efforts. Below is an overview of the types of exceedances found and how the Permittees are addressing them. Successes and Future Program Improvements will be summarized as well. Monitoring Results The 2016-2017 monitoring results and integrated assessment determined that bacterial indicators remain a regional pollutant of concern. Bacterial indicators are specifically being addressed by the implementation of the Regional Board Approved CBRP for the MSAR TMDL implementation and include watershed-wide monitoring by urban and agricultural dischargers. Although nitrogen-nutrients have previously been identified as a regional pollutant of concern, nitrogen-nutrients were not found to be in exceedance of applicable WQOs during the 2016-2017 monitoring year. The integrated analysis suggests that nitrogen-nutrients may not represent a regional pollutant of concern as historically believed. Nutrients may be a local water quality problem only. Targeted efforts, such as activities conducted by the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force, address nutrients on an impaired waterbody basis. Dissolved copper exceedances were measured at all of the MS4 outfall stations and the Perris Valley Channel receiving water station during wet weather. Where statistically significant trends could be identified, as found for wet weather data from two outfalls, the concentrations of dissolved copper are decreasing with time. Also the total hardness was observed to be considerably lower at MS4 outfall stations in comparison to receiving water stations, and lower hardness results in lower CTR WQOs. The problem of dissolved copper in urban runoff due to brake pad dust is being addressed statewide through the true source controls measures of California State Bill 346. Due to these efforts the Permittees anticipate continued reduction in concentrations in the future. The 2016-2017 results for the other pollutants of concern, pH and dissolved lead, were not found to be persistently exceeding WQOs or CTR WQOs. Total lead concentrations were associated with decreasing wet weather trends at two MS4 outfall stations, potentially suggesting that historical sources of lead are slowly being addressed over the period of record. Successes and Future Program Improvements



An outline of measures being taken by the Permittees for this reporting period and what future development for the Program entail are listed below. Municipal Activities

Continue providing guidance to Permittees for complying with the State Trash Amendments. Industrial and Commercial Sources

In the FY 2016-2017 reporting year, databases were raised as an issue when Permittees were audited by the Santa Ana Regional Board. In response to this audit, the District will research options and develop recommendations for a Geographical Information System (GIS) – based regional database to be used by the Permittees.

New Development

Research is underway to support development of recommendations for suitable plants and engineered soil to be used for bioretention basins. This research has been prompted by monitoring at the District’s LID retrofitted campus that shows that its LID features can be a “source” rather than “sink” of nitrogen in runoff.

The WQMP Guidance Document and the training module will be updated with language from the approved WAP and its supporting documents.

Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge

The Permittees shall work on improving the IC/ID program by enhancing record keeping through means of exploring a GIS database to store such information.

Monitoring The District pilot tested use of a new Geographic Information System (GIS) field data

collection tool called Survey123. The electronic interface allows field crews to record data quickly in the field and for other personnel to efficiently compile, review, filter, and analyze entries.

o The District will continue to refine and expand the capabilities of the Survey123 tool in subsequent monitoring years.

The District acquired a new database management system that will be used to compile monitoring data to improve efficiency of data management and quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures, data access, and assessment capability.

o Once KiWQM is fully integrated with all of the District’s historical data, staff will have the ability to create and edit customized graphs and reports, automate QA/QC checks, automate comparisons to water quality objectives, maintain laboratory quality control data within the database, maintain and import field collected via the Survey 123 application, utilize ESRI compatible mapping capabilities, and improve overall efficiency in data collection and processing.



The Permittees continue to seek out additional means to improve the monitoring program. Looking forward, recommended next steps to the SAR Monitoring Program are outlined in Section 11-7.0.

P8/217699

Date post:	19-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times