+ All Categories
Home > Environment > 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

Date post: 28-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: massrecycle-
View: 155 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
the U.S. electronics stewardship movement and where massachusetts fits waneta trabert product stewardship institute March 29, 2016
Transcript
Page 1: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

the U.S. electronics stewardship movement

andwhere massachusetts fits

waneta trabertproduct stewardship institute

March 29, 2016

Page 2: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

2

EPR law trends in the U.S. since 2000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Nu

mb

er

of

Law

s

Year

Page 3: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

EPR laws + bills in the northeast

3

CT MA ME NH NJ NY RI VT

Auto Switches Law Law Law Bill* Law Law

Batteries (Rechargeable) Bill Law Law Law Bill Law

Batteries (Single Use or All)Bill*

(all batteries)

Bill* (all batteries)

Bill* (single use)

Law (single use)

Carpet Bill Bill

Electronics Law Bill* Law Law Law Law Law

Fluorescent Lamps Law Law Bill* Bill* Law

Mattresses Law Law

PackagingBill*

(study)Bill* Bill

Paint Law Bill* Law Bill Bill* Bill* Law Law

Pharmaceuticals Law Bill Bill Bill Bill*

Thermostats Law Law Law Law Law Law Law

Tires Bill* Bill*

* = EPR bill introduced in 2015-2016other bills introduced 2008-2014 Source: Product Stewardship Institute, 2016

Page 4: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

4

Cumulative EPR Policies Worldwide

worldwideEPR adoption

369programs

worldwide

24%of worldwide programs (90) in the US as of

2013

2013

Source: OECD, 2013

Page 5: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

5

EPR laws in the U.S. – 2000

Page 6: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

6

EPR laws in the U.S. – 2016

Page 7: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

e-scrap recycling

laws in the US

2

Page 8: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

Po

un

ds

colle

cte

d p

er

cap

ita

pounds of e-scrap collected per capita by state, 2014

law performance

Note: This chart presents available data on program performance, but does not provide an “apples to apples” comparison as the covered products and entities (e.g., residents, businesses, schools, etc.) vary from state to state.

8

Source: ERCC, 2016

*2013 data

Page 9: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

benefits of state e-scrap laws

$ $ $

95

Page 10: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

implementation challenges

106

Page 11: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

recent news

11

Page 12: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

MA electronics bills

• S386 – sponsored by Senator Pacheco

• H756 – sponsored by Representative Smizik

12

Page 13: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

PSI’s electronics work• spoke with officials to better understand what

creates stable programs

• developed model policy elements document

• working with state product stewardship councils

• NY and IL

• preliminary work in MA

13

Page 14: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

key stable program traits

14

Page 15: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

take action

15

• work with MassRecycle & MA PSC • organize & engage at the state level• contact state reps

Page 16: 2016 R3 Waneta Trabert

16

thank

you!

waneta trabertassociate for policy + programs

[email protected]


Recommended