2018 RICAS & PSAT/SAT RESULTSRI STATE RESULTS VS NEWPORT RESULTS
3/7/2019 1
3/5/2019 2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State Average Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
20 2218
2623
31
44
47
5258
53
50
54
34
30
25 2421
25
1522
3 1 1 1 2 1 0
2018 RICAS ELA: Percentage & (Numbers) of Students at Each Performance Level
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
3/5/2019 3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
State Average Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
34
2625
22
27
16
22
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
2018 RICAS ELA:Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded
Expectations by Grade
3/5/2019 4
34
40
28
5
39
19
48
14
34
6
36
2423
30
15
2
28
12
44
8
23
2
25
13
0
10
20
30
40
50
State Average Female Male Students withDisabilities
Students withoutDisabilities
Low Income Non-Low Income Homeless Not Homeless English LanguageLearners
Non-ELL ELL Exited Yr1-Yr3
2018 RICAS ELA: Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded Expectations by Student Group
State
Newport
3/5/2019 5
34
15
44
18 18
24
43
29
23
10
42
7
13
29
38
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
State Average American Indian Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Pacific Islander White Two or More Races
2018 RICAS ELA: Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded Expectations by Race/Ethnicity
State
Newport
3/5/2019 6
40
3838
34
24
28
2625
22
27
16
22
0
10
20
30
40
50
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
2018 RICAS ELA Percent & (Numbers) of Student Who
Met/Exceeded Expectations: State vs. Newport
State Average
Newport Average
3/5/2019 7
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State Average Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
22
32 3235
19
33
23
50
43
55 51
64
44 62
25 21
13 14
27 22
15
2 40 0 1 1 0
2018 RICAS Mathematics: Percentage & (Numbers) of Students at Each Performance Level
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
3/5/2019 8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
State Average Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
2725
1314
28
23
15
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
2018 RICAS Mathematics:Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded Expectations by Grade
3/5/2019 9
27 2728
4
31
14
41
9
28
6
30
1819
21
17
2
23
9
42
10
20
3
22
00
10
20
30
40
50
State Average Female Male Students withDisabilities
Students withoutDisabilities
Low Income Non-Low Income Homeless Not Homeless English LanguageLearners
Non-ELL ELL Exited Yr1-Yr3
2018 RICAS Mathematics: Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded Expectations by Student Group
State
Newport
3/5/2019 10
27
10
42
1314
17
36
23
19
10
38
67
0
35
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
State Average American Indian Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Pacific Islander White Two or More Races
2018 RICAS Mathematics: Percent & (Numbers) of Students Who Met/Exceeded Expectations by Race/Ethnicity
State
Newport
3/5/2019 11
35
27 2725
27
23
25
1314
28
2322
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
2018 RICAS MathematicsPercent & (Numbers) of Students Who
Met/Exceeded Expectations: State vs. Newport
State Average
Newport Average
3/5/2019 12
98 99 99 99 99 9897 9799 99 99 99
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
2018 RICAS ELA/Literacy Participation Rates: State vs. Newport
State Participation Rate
Newport Participation Rate
3/5/2019 13
99 99 99 99 99 9897 9799 99 99 99
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
2018 RICAS Mathematics Participation Rates: State vs. Newport
State Participation Rate
Newport Participation Rate
3/5/2019 14
58
34
50
30
48
27
34
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PSAT's ELA Gr 10 PSAT's Math Gr 10 SAT's LEA Gr 11 SAT's Math Gr 11
2018 PSAT's & SAT'sPercent & (Numbers) of Student Who
Met/Exceeded Expectations: State vs. Newport
State Average
Newport Average
Newport School Accountability
Based on our achievement and growth scores, what is currently in place for school year 2019 and what are the solutions moving forward?
3/7/2019 15
Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development focus on improving student achievement.
Professional Development Design:
Teachers learn new material,
Teachers have time to practice new material,
Teachers have opportunities to share their new learning,
Teachers receive feedback from colleagues and coaches.
Expectation is that teachers are incorporating the professional development into their practice.Professional Development implementation is measured through observations and online reports. Instructional Rounds supports building administrators and staff to build a common understanding of effective learning and teaching.
3/7/2019 16
3 R’sRelationships,
Relevance & Rigor (HQ Learning)
3/7/2019 17
Relationships
Climate & Culture Open Circle (Pell, 3rd year, schoolwide implementation) 2nd Step (Thompson, implementation year) Restorative Practices (All Schools, Implementation year) Kingian Nonviolence (All Schools, 2nd year)
RelevanceIndividual Learning Plans (ILP) Career Cruising (Thompson & Rogers, pilot year)
3/7/2019 18
Rigor (High Quality Learning)Highlander Institute FUSE Fellows (Pell, Thompson & Rogers) Educators who understand the power of personalized education who provide individualized
support to fellow educatorsAchieve 3000 (Thompson & Rogers, implementation year) Delivers daily differentiated instruction for nonfiction reading and writing that are precisely
tailored to each student’s Lexile® reading levelSizer Teacher Center and Center for Secondary School Redesign (CSSR) consultancy. The Sizer Teacher Center at the F. W. Parker Charter Essential School provides professional
development for proficiency based instruction (PBI) and habits of work and learning (HOWL) The Center for Secondary School Redesign is a leading provider of groundbreaking technical
assistance to support policy and culture change at the school levels leading to a richer more personalized secondary school experience for all youth.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Professional Development (Pell & Thompson) East Bay Educational Collaborative (FOSS science kits) & Times 2 Institute (NGSX Pathway)
Understanding by Design (UbD) Units of Study development Framework to align curriculum with standards and assessment that leads to student
understanding and achievement
3/7/2019 19
Early Childhood
Fundations Professional Development – multi-sensory phonics program
K-2 Curriculum – also known as Boston Curriculum is an intentional center based inquiry curriculum
Math Field Test – Bridges and Ready Math researched through EdReports
3/7/2019 20
Curriculum Initiatives
3/7/2019 21
2019 2020 2021
ELA Boston Curriculum – 2 K Classes. Boston Curriculum – Add 6 K Classes. Expand Boston Curriculum to Grade 1.
Implement Fundations Grades K & 1. Implement Fundations Grade 2. Adopt ELA Grades 2-8.
Updating UbD Units of Study K-12.
High School Re-Design with Center for
Secondary School Redesign and the
Sizer Teacher Center.
Continue to align curriculum to common
core standards. Review ELA curriculum
2-8. Continue High School Re-Design.
Adopt new ELA program 2-8.
Math
Field test 2 new Math Curriculums K-5.
High School Re-Design with Center for
Secondary School Redesign and the
Sizer Teacher Center.
Adopt new Math Series K-5.
Continue High School Re-Design.Continue High Quality PD.
Science
3rd year NGSS Curriculum Adoption K-8.
Achieve 3000 implementation.
High School Re-Design with Center for
Secondary School Redesign and the
Sizer Teacher Center.
Curriculum & assessment review.
Continue Achieve 3000.
Continue High School Re-Design.
Curriculum & assessment review.
Review Achieve 3000.
Social
Studies
Update UbD Units of Study K-12. Achieve
3000 implementation.
High School Re-Design with Center for
Secondary School Redesign and the
Sizer Teacher Center.
Curriculum & assessment review.
Continue Achieve 3000.
Continue High School Re-Design.
Curriculum & assessment review.
Review Achieve 3000.
Stars Comparison of Like Districts:
3/7/2019 22
Elementary Middle High
East Providence
Newport
Warwick
West Warwick
Woonsocket
Star Rating Scale
3/7/2019 23
Star Rating
Achievement –
ELA & Math
(Max 8 Points)
Growth – ELA
& Math (Max 6
Points)
EL Proficiency
(Max 4 Points)
Graduation
Rate (Max 5
Points)
Exceeds
Expectations,
Absenteism &
Suspensions
(Max 15 Points)
# of Low
Performing
Sub-Groups
6-8 points
(3-4 per subject)
4-6 points
(2-3 per subject)3-4 points 4-5 points 12 – 15 points ** None
5-6 points
(2-4 per subject)2 points 10-11 points ** 1 sub-group
7-11 total points * 3 points 7-9 points **More than 1
sub-group
5-6 total points * 1 point 2 points 5 – 6 points **
2 points 2 points 1 point
*Blank rows indicate too few students to report. **Subgroups with 10-19 students are reported, but not included in accountability determinations.
Newport’s Star Rating Scale by Schools
3/7/2019 24
School Stars Achievement Growth EL Proficiency Graduation Rate
Exceeds
Expectations –
Absences –
Suspensions
# of Low
Performing Sub-
groups
PES 2 3 2 4 -
2
3
3 8 total
More than 1
subgroup
TMS 2 2 3 1 -
2
2
1 5 total
More than 1
subgroup
RHS 2 3 4 1 3
4
3
1 8 total
More than 1
subgroup
AchievementFive Year Goals for ELA & Math:
3/7/2019 25
ELA State Goal Index (68)
(Index) SY19 SY21 SY23
PES (44) 10% 10% 10%
TMS (38) 10% 10% 10%
RHS (41) 10% 10% 10%
MATH State Goal Index (40)
(Index) SY19 SY21 SY23
PES (37) 5% 10% 10%
TMS (37) 5% 10% 10%
RHS (30) 10% 10% 10%
Achievement Goals
3/7/2019 26
% # Index % # Index
Math Denominator 308 Math Denominator 308
Number students receive 1 31% 95 0.00 Number students receive 1 26% 80 0.00
Number students receive a 2 48% 149 49.17 Number students receive a 2 45% 140 46.20
Number students receive a 3 19% 58 58.00 Number students receive a 3 24% 73 73.00
Number students receive a 4 2% 6 6.00 Number students receive a 4 5% 15 15.00
Index 36.74 Index 43.57
% # Index % # Index
ELA Denominator 307 ELA Denominator 307
Number students receive 1 20% 61 0.00 Number students receive 1 10% 31 0.00
Number students receive a 2 54% 167 55.11 Number students receive a 2 52% 160 52.80
Number students receive a 3 25% 77 77.00 Number students receive a 3 35% 106 106.00
Number students receive a 4 1% 2 2.00 Number students receive a 4 3% 10 10.00
Index 43.68 Index 54.98
Acheivement 2018 Accountability Achievement Goals
Growth Goals
3/7/2019 27
% # Index % # Index
Math Denominator 138 Math Denominator 138
Low Growth 53% 73 0.000 Low Growth 45% 62 0.000
Typical Growth 30% 41 41.000 Typical Growth 36% 50 50.000
High Growth 17% 24 48.000 High Growth 19% 26 52.000
Index 0.645 Index 0.739
% # Index % # Index
ELA Denominator 135 ELA Denominator 135
Low Growth 46% 62 0.000 Low Growth 31% 42 0.000
Typical Growth 39% 52 52.000 Typical Growth 46% 62 62.000
High Growth 16% 21 42.000 High Growth 23% 31 62.000
Index 0.696 Index 0.919
Growth 2018 Accountability Growth Goals
English Language ArtsNext Steps: Increase Proficiency Index in Achievement and Growth
PES - Update Units of Study, Pilot writing program, Professional Development and Implementation of Fundations grades K and 1, Web based programs (Squiggle Park, Lexia) EL teachers teaching Fundations, Changing focus for reading teachers, Collaborative Classrooms, training para-educators in Fundations, FUSE blended learning work. Collaboration with SRU reading – require additional reading teachers.
TMS - revisit and update units of study, FUSE blended learning work, Achieve 3000
RHS - MTSS System, Use of Achieve3000 to address reading skills, Create support periods to address deficiencies (ELA Lab Class), Mass Insight Work to support Advanced Placement (AP) Students
3/7/2019 28
MathematicsNext Steps: Increase Proficiency Index in Achievement and Growth
PES - MTSS Math Work around Number Talks with Jenna Richards-Leads train teachers & Math Interventionists, Developing Professional Growth goals and creating new assessments around number sense, looking at new math series from Ed reports, implementing researched based online programs (Dreambox, Reflex).
TMS - MTSS work, Additional math time, Accelerated math in grades 6-8, new Common Core aligned math series (Sadlier), revisit and update units of study.
RHS - MTSS System, Add additional math support period for struggling students (Math Lab), Use of IXL to support students, Use Albert to support students within our Advanced Placement (AP) Math Courses.
3/7/2019 29
Special EducationNext Steps: Goal increase achievement and growth for students receiving special education supports
District Wide Recommendations:
• On-going professional development for School based coordinators regarding eligibility, evaluation & expenditures
• On-going program evaluation to determine efficiency & effectiveness
• Increase special education by one teacher at middle school & high school
• Increase co-teaching across levels
• Increase mental health supports by .5 at Thompson
3/7/2019 30
English LearnersNext Steps: Upon registering, a protocol has been established so that EL students are screened within 20 days of arriving at school. Protocol has been established for properly identifying students and adding him/her to the EL state census. Partnering with Rogers Williams University to establish a 1 year ESL Certification program.
PES - 124 students (3 full time teachers)
• added a long-term sub into a full-time position
TMS - 87 students (1.5 full time teachers)
• added a 0.5 EL teacher
• SY 2020 add additional 0.5 EL Teacher
• 1 full time teacher services grade 5 & 6, 0.5 teacher services grades 7 & 8
RHS - 72 students (1.5 full time teachers)
• added a 0.5 teacher, received approval for an EL curriculum, changed course development from ESL to ELD, using a new EL curriculum, double block will include English and ELD, translator to support students at the Dean’s Office
• SY 2020 add additional 0.5 EL Teacher
3/7/2019 31
Suspensions (Out of School)Next Steps: Goal to decrease secondary suspensions to 10% by 2021
PES - 2.3, (1.7%)* Social Emotional Learning (SEL) coordinator; School-wide implementation of Open Circle, Integrate Restorative Practices with Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS); Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) building based team and mini MTSS focus office discipline referrals; implementing SEL support for targeted students
TMS - 26.5, (16.5%)* In-House room to allow students chance to reset and complete work; new advisory program to help make personal connections and address SEL; beginning work on Restorative Discipline practices. In School Restriction (394 visits, 98 students, 16.39% have used the support multiple times)*
RHS - 17.3, (9.95%)* Use of Crew to create relationships, Restorative Practices, Use of In-School Restriction (225 visits, 136 students, 20.3% have used the support multiple times.)*
* As of March 5, 2019
3/7/2019 32
Attendance (Chronic Absences)Next Steps: Goal get to below 15%
PES - 16.9 % (17.4%)* Personal Calls; Chronic Early Absenteeism and Truancy Reduction Initiative (CEATRI); Using the new Nudge System from RIDE; Tracking Students, Encourage teachers to make personal connections about attendance, Post attendance daily on the app and at school. Monthly Common Planning Time (CPT) focus on attendance.
TMS - 19.4% (17.7%)* Personal calls; CEATRI; Truancy Court
RHS - 38.5% (34.6%)* Crew to increase personal connection with school; Follow up phone calls for students who are absent; Tracking students who have large numbers of absences; Collaborative approach with Guidance, The Dean, Administration and Attendance Support (Orlando Peace/CEATRI)
* School Year 2019 as of 28 February 2019
3/7/2019 33
Graduation Rates
3/7/2019 34
Year District Rogers High School
2014 69.5% 72.7%
2015 78.9% 82.9%
2016 83.7% 89.6%
2017 80.3% 83.2%
2018 84.3% 87.1%
2019* 87.0% 90.0%
2021* 90.0% 93.0%
2023* 93.0% 96.0%* Goals
Graduation Rate
Next Steps: Goal Increase graduation rate to 90%• Early identification and support with the Newport Community School and through
Common Planning Time (CPT)
• Rolling credit recovery
• Increased use of technology
• Blended Learning approaches
• Earlier start time provides time for students to meet with staff
• Math Lab & Learning Centers
• Crew
3/7/2019 35