2018 STUDENT CLIMATE ASSESSMENT SURVEY REPORT J o s e p h L u d l u m , A s s i s t a n t D i r e c t o r
May 2019
G T C l i m a t e A s s e s s m e n t S u r v e y R e p o r t Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Survey Methodology and Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Data Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Structure of this Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Differences by Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Differences by Race/Ethnicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Differences by Sexual Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Marginalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Disparaging Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Changes 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Disparaging Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Students
G e o r g i a T e c h O f f i c e o f A c a d e m i c E f f e c t i v e n e s s
Acknowledgements The Georgia Tech Climate Assessment Survey report was prepared by the Office of Academic Effectiveness in collaboration with Archie W. Ervin, vice president of Institute Diversity, with support and assistance from Keona Lewis, and Julie Ancis, both of Institute Diversity. The author would like to express appreciation to Shawn Carnley and Sue Woolard for their assistance with research support and design services. A very special thanks to Mary Frank Fox, professor of Public Policy and ADVANCE professor, for her assistance with reviewing and revising the Climate Assessment Survey’s basic questions and research issues explored in this project. The 2018 Climate Assessment Survey replicated the Climate Assessment Survey that was created and conducted in 2013. In Spring 2012, Provost Rafael L. Bras charged a Climate Assessment Task Force (CATF) to develop a survey to help define, measure, and assess Georgia Tech’s progress toward the goals articulated in its Strategic Plan:
We aspire to be an Institute that pursues excellence and embraces and leverages diversity in all of its forms. In the years ahead, we must continue to enhance a culture of collegiality, close collaboration, global perspective, intercultural sensitivity and respect, and thoughtful interaction among a community of scholars that includes all of our students, faculty, and staff...
(Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010, p. 5) The CATF was chaired by Ervin and co-chaired by Jonathan Gordon, director of the Office of Assessment (OOA). The task force was comprised of faculty, staff, and students and was tasked with developing a survey instrument that would assess the lived experiences, perceptions, and knowledge of faculty, staff, and students with respect to the following issue areas:
• a culture of collegiality
• close collaboration
• global perspective
• intercultural sensitivity and respect
• thoughtful interaction among a diverse community of scholars that includes all of our students, faculty, staff…
The 2018 survey questions were reviewed and revised for purposes of clarifying questions and survey question format in order to ensure compliance with the University System of Georgia’s (USG) Alternative Media Access Center (AMAC) accessibility requirements. Through a consultative and iterative process, the 2013 survey questions were reviewed by a small group that consisted of Ervin, Joe Ludlum, Ancis, and Lewis, with technical advisement from Fox. The content of the 2013 survey questions was not modified in order to analyze changes in survey responses from 2013 to 2018, which allows tracking of responses over time. The 2018 survey was administered to faculty and staff in November 2018. In separate sections, this report presents summary findings of the faculty survey, along with detailed appendices containing means and frequencies for colleges and various subgroups of respondents. These results serve as a baseline against which we may measure institutional progress in subsequent years.
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Georgia Tech student body was invited to participate in the student survey. This section summarizes the results of the respondents. Of the 22,831 students contacted, a total of 2,724 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 11.9 percent. Among the highlights:
• Large majorities of responding students view the overall climate of GT positively. Over 80 percent of graduate and undergraduate respondents agreed that GT is a generally comfortable and inclusive environment, and over 85 percent that their academic aspirations are supported by GT. Among respondents, 79 percent of undergraduates and 86 percent of graduates agreed that they feel valued and respected by the GT community.
Differences in the perception of the GT climate among responding men and women are relatively small: over 80 percent of both genders agree that GT is a generally comfortable and inclusive environment. Among undergraduates, women were generally more likely to agree that students at GT were respected regardless of personal characteristics, with the exception of gender and gender identity: 73.3 percent compared to 82.8 percent of men.
Among responding Underrepresented Minority (URM) undergraduates, 78 percent agreed that GT is a generally comfortable and inclusive environment (compared to 86 percent of non-URM respondents). For graduate students, the differences were starker: 77.9 percent of URM respondents agreed versus 91.8 percent of non-URM respondents.
• A large majority of respondents agree that GT is supportive of diversity and inclusion goals: over 85 percent of undergraduate and 90 percent of graduate respondents agree that commitment to diversity is demonstrated by GT.
Among both graduate and undergraduate respondents, women felt diversity is integral to GT’s ability to fulfill its mission was more true than men (93.2 versus 81.4 percent).
Similarly, differences in attitudes arose by ethnicity, with undergraduate URM respondents less likely to agree that GT effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds (75.7 percent) than their non-URM cohorts (86 percent).
• While supportive of diversity, students did not indicate participating in intercultural activities to the same degree. Less than one in five students indicated often participating in student-focused cultural organizations, attending cultural celebrations and holidays, or arts and entertainment.
• Student perceptions and opinions have shifted. Compared to the respondents from 2013, students felt there was less respect based on various characteristics and reported overall less participation in activities outside of your own culture as well as comfort in discussing issues of diversity. Students also felt that language and culture were less of a barrier for interaction between U.S. and international students, and reported lower instances of disparaging remarks in the past year, with a few exceptions.
2
SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE All enrolled students were invited by email to complete the GT Climate Survey in February 2018. Two reminders were sent to increase response rates. Of the 22,831 students who were contacted, a total of 2,724 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 11.9 percent, and a sampling error (95% confidence interval) of 1.8%. Chi Square Goodness of Fit Tests (p < .01) revealed that the respondents were representative of the overall population based on ethnicity, race, and college, but not representative based on gender or citizenship. Measures of effect size on citizenship were relatively small, thus potential bias for this factor in the overall results is minimal. The Institute results in this report are weighted by gender, ethnicity and race, college, and student level to portray the population more accurately.1 Table 1. Student demographics
Respondent Frequency
Valid Respondent Percent 2
Student Population Percent
Gender Men 1324 56.1% 64.0% Women 1007 42.7% 36.0% Transgender / Other 28 1.2% Not specified 364 n/a Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino/a 172 7.4% 7.8% Not Hispanic or Latino/a 2165 92.6% 88.4% Not specified 386 3.8% Race Asian or Asian American 829 35.4% 34.5% Black or African American 136 5.8% 6.9% White or European American 1203 51.4% 50.4% Other 127 5.4% 4.2% Not specified 381 4.1% Student type Undergraduate 1422 60.4% 70.0% Graduate 932 39.6% 30.0% Not specified 369 n/a Citizenship U.S. Citizen 1621 69.0% 73.8% Resident Alien 322 13.7% 4.2% Non-resident Alien 406 17.3% 22.1% Not specified 374 n/a College Design 109 4.6% 4.1% Computing 340 14.5% 15.2% Engineering 1386 59.0% 56.3% Ivan Allen College 114 4.9% 4.6% Scheller College of Business 136 5.8% 7.6% Sciences 263 11.2% 10.8% Not specified 375 1.4%
1 The weighting slightly “overcounts” groups with lower response rates and “undercounts” groups with higher response rates. The specific weighting scheme is available upon request from the Office of Academic Effectiveness. 2 Valid response excludes “not specified” respondents from the overall percentage calculation.
3
Data Limitations A significant proportion (about 13 percent) of respondents elected not to provide any demographic information, including sex, race/ethnicity, and student type (undergraduate/graduate). A close analysis of this group of refusals found that while those who did not provide demographics tended to report lower levels of satisfaction, these differences were slight, with significant differences on only four items. Only one item, “Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech,” had a non-marginal difference. While the differences are borderline trivial, the trend highlights a possible non-response bias in the data—that is, the possibility that survey non-responders might differ in their opinions and perceptions from those who chose to participate in the survey. Consequently, generalizing student responses to the overall GT population of students should be approached with some degree of caution. Structure of this Report The structure of this report generally follows the structure of the survey instrument, and results are separately presented for undergraduates and graduates. Respondents were asked to describe the overall climate at Georgia Tech and the degree to which they feel supported by the GT community. Additionally, students were asked their opinions on the value of diversity and the degree to which the Institute is committed to policies that support the principles of diversity and inclusion. Respondents were also asked to reflect on the ways in which they interact with those who are different from them—both in their study habits and in their co- and extracurricular activities. Students were then asked to reflect on whether or not they experienced instances of marginalization (defined as a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) and were also asked to describe the frequency in which they heard other students make disparaging remarks about various groups of people. Open-ended questions were included after each section of the survey in order for participants to further elaborate on the quantitative items. These results were analyzed separately. Several survey items utilized a four-point Likert scale. The specific response anchors are presented in Table 2. For the purposes of this report, the percentages of those who “agree” are derived from combining responses of 3 and 4 and those who “disagree” are derived from combining responses of 1 and 2. Table 2 Survey response anchors based on a four-point Likert scale
Rating Agreement 4* Strongly Agree
3* Somewhat Agree
2 Somewhat Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
* Sufficient score for percentages rating an item as “agree.” In reporting differences between some groups (such as males and females), large sample sizes make very small differences show up as statistically significant. To address this issue, this report highlights effect size alongside statistical significance between values. Effect size is a measure of “practical significance,” that compares the differences (between groups) or associations (for likelihoods and predictions) against the variance or “noise” in the data.
4
Two measures of effect size are used in this report depending on the nature of the comparisons: Phi and Cramer’s v.3.3 This is interpreted in the same way as correlations, where .1 is considered a small effect, .3 a moderate effect, and .5 to be a large effect (Cohen, 1988, 1992). It should also be noted that for some comparisons—particularly those between races/ethnicities, sample sizes are relatively small. Small samples mean low statistical power, making it difficult to discern significant differences between groups even if they exist in reality.
RESULTS Students were asked about the overall climate at Georgia Tech (see Chart 1). Among responding undergraduate and graduate students, large majorities agreed that GT supports their academic aspirations and is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment. About four in five respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community. Meanwhile, 11.9 percent of responding graduate students and 17.2 percent of responding undergraduates have considered leaving GT because of concerns about collegiality. Chart 1. Student responses on overall climate at Georgia Tech (percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
Students were also asked about the degree to which classroom and social opportunities affected their sense of inclusion on campus. As seen in Chart 2, responding students were generally positive about the contribution classroom and co-curricular activities had on their sense of belonging. For example, nearly 80 percent of responding undergraduates agreed that GT clubs, organizations, and activities had a positive effect on their sense of belonging, and that GT offers an array of programs that meet my social and cultural needs. Over three-quarters of responding undergraduates, and over 80 percent of responding graduate students, agreed that classroom experiences have had a positive effect on their sense of belonging. However, there was less agreement—particularly among responding undergraduates—that adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at GT.
3.3 Both statistics measure the strength of association in Chi-square tests—the extent to which membership in one category (such as being male or female) can predict the responses in another set of categories (i.e., the answer to the question being asked on the survey).
17.2%
79.0%
84.2%
86.0%
11.9%
86.5%
89.3%
89.3%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because ofconcerns about collegiality
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Techcommunity
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusiveenvironment for me
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported atGeorgia Tech.
Graduate Undergraduate
percent
5
Chart 2. Student responses on their sense of belonging at Georgia Tech (percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
Students were asked about the value of diversity and inclusion as well as the degree to which GT demonstrates its commitment to these values. As seen in Chart 3, responding students were substantially in agreement regarding both the value of diversity and GT’s fulfillment of its goals. For example, roughly 90 percent of graduate and 85 percent of undergraduate and graduate respondent agreed that Diversity is integral to GT’s ability to fulfill its mission and GT demonstrates its commitment to diversity. Over 80 percent of respondents agreed that GT effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds, is open to new ideas and traditions, and feel that while at Tech they have learned about different worldviews. However, a number of respondents also felt that language and cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech. Chart 3. Student responses on the value of diversity and inclusion at Georgia Tech (percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
54.4%
78.7%
75.7%
85.7%
85.3%
78.8%
82.5%
86.0%
79.3%
84.1%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Adequate processes are in place to address studentgrievances at Georgia Tech
The campus reputation of my academic major has affectedmy sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on mysense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect onmy sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events thatmeet my social and cultural needs
Graduate Undergraduate
35.3%
37.5%
79.0%
83.7%
85.4%
85.4%
85.9%
38.7%
40.4%
86.5%
87.0%
85.7%
88.8%
90.4%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction betweenU.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interactionbetween U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diversebackgrounds
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about differentworldviews
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Graduate Undergraduate
percent
percent
6
Asked about their comfort level in discussing diversity related issues, undergraduate and graduate respondents provided similar answers. Both groups were largely quite comfortable discussing these issues with personal friends and classmates, but somewhat less comfortable having discussions with GT faculty, administrators, and staff. Results are presented in Chart 4. Chart 4. Student responses on comfort level in discussing issues at Georgia Tech (percent responding “very” or “somewhat comfortable”)
Students were asked to gauge the frequency in which they studied with diverse groups. As seen in Chart 3.5, responding undergraduate and graduate students most frequently studied on their own. However, about 60 percent stated they often or very often studied in groups with students of different races or ethnicities, or in mixed-gender groups. Slightly over half (58.5 percent) of responding graduate students, and 34.5 percent of undergraduates stated they frequently studied in groups with both U.S. and international peers. Chart 5. Student responses on frequency of studying with diverse groups at Georgia Tech (percent responding “often” or “very often”)
48.2%
52.0%
53.9%
67.2%
66.2%
95.9%
62.8%
64.1%
62.7%
70.7%
75.1%
93.2%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Administration
Staff
Instructors/Faculty
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Classmates
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Graduate Undergraduate
35.7%
34.5%
59.4%
62.9%
89.8%
17.3%
58.5%
61.0%
59.9%
82.8%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
On your own
Graduate Undergraduate
percent
percent
7
Students were asked about the amount of time they spent engaged in various activities outside their own culture while at Georgia Tech. For responding undergraduates, less than a quarter indicated they frequently engaged in arts and entertainment and educational forums outside their culture. Engagement by students in cultural celebrations or holidays, student cultural clubs, and religious or spiritual activities was less common. Responding graduate students expressed similar patterns of engagement, although they were more likely to report attending educational forums outside their own culture. Chart 6. Student responses on participation in different types of intercultural engagement (percent responding “often” or “very often”)
Students were asked whether or not various groups on campus were respected by the Georgia Tech community. As can be seen in Table 3, most responding undergraduate and graduate students agreed that these groups were respected. Two groups where opinions were more mixed for both graduates and undergraduates were socioeconomic status, and most extremely for political affiliation and opinions. Table 3. Student responses on respect based on identity
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Undergraduate Respondents
(n ≈ 1,540)
Graduate Respondents
(n ≈ 730) (percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
Age 85.3 79.2 Gender/gender identity 78.2 75.9 Veteran status or military involvement 86.3 86.5 Status as a school athlete 79.8 83.8 National origin 82.6 78.8 Individual disabilities 78.0 78.9 Race or ethnicity 81.6 78.4 Socioeconomic status 73.9 72.1 Sexual orientation 78.0 76.7 Fraternity or sorority affiliation 79.8 79.5 Religion 77.9 77.3 Political affiliation/opinions 64.0 69.3
5.0%
7.5%
12.0%
13.8%
22.7%
23.6%
7.1%
5.1%
15.3%
19.6%
18.4%
45.1%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Other
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Student focused cultural organizations
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Arts and entertainment
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Graduate Undergraduate
percent
8
Differences by Gender Responses were compared on the basis of gender. Few significant differences emerged, and those that did evidenced very small effect sizes. Generally, for both responding undergraduates and graduate students, both genders had high levels of agreement regarding the climate at Georgia Tech. Women, both graduate and undergraduate, were more likely to agree about the importance of diversity to the GT mission. On the other hand, graduate student women were less likely (82.9 percent of responding women, versus 88.3 percent of men) to state that their classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech. Table 4. Student differences by gender
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Men
(n ≈ 925) Women (n ≈ 585) Sig.
Eff. Size
Men (n ≈ 520)
Women (n ≈ 205) Sig.
Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
76.4% 75.2% 88.3% 82.9%
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
84.2% 88.7% * .064 79.3% 80.3%
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
80.1% 77.8% 84.5% 78.6%
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
85.9% 84.1% 91.0% 86.6%
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 80.1% 79.6% 88.4% 84.2%
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
16.2% 17.1% 10.9% 13.1%
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 87.7% 84.3% 90.4% 87.5%
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
81.4% 93.2% *** .165 88.5% 95.5% ** .108
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 86.5% 86.0% 90.2% 86.9%
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 83.5% 85.2% 88.3% 85.4%
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
84.7% 88.0% 84.6% 84.5%
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
56.6% 53.1% 80.6% 76.3%
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 82.8% 89.6% 86.1% 85.6%
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 79.0% 80.9% 89.0% 82.9% * .083
9
Very few differences, and only among undergraduates, were noted for questions regarding the respect for various identities by the GT community. Where significant differences were found, the magnitude of these differences (as measured by effect size) was small. One notable difference: among undergraduate students, 60.9 percent of male respondents agreed that students were respected regardless of political affiliation or opinions, compared to 69 percent of responding women. The results are presented in Table 5. Table 5. Student differences in respect for identity by gender
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Men
(n ≈ 920) Women (n ≈ 587) Sig.
Eff. Size
Men (n ≈ 510)
Women (n ≈ 205) Sig.
Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age 84.4% 86.3% 79.9% 76.6%
Gender/gender identity 82.8% 73.3% *** .113 77.1% 74.0%
Veteran status or military involvement 85.0% 88.3% 86.1% 87.2%
Status as a school athlete 79.7% 79.6% 83.5% 83.9%
National origin 81.5% 84.3% 79.5% 77.8%
Individual disabilities 78.8% 78.3% 80.3% 76.2%
Race or ethnicity 81.2% 83.4% 77.6% 80.6%
Socioeconomic status 74.8% 74.1% 70.8% 75.9%
Sexual orientation 79.5% 77.6% 76.0% 78.7%
Fraternity or sorority affiliation 78.1% 82.3% * .051 77.5% 83.9%
Religion 76.3% 80.6% * .051 76.8% 77.6%
Political affiliation/opinions 60.9% 69.0% ** .082 69.1% 70.8%
Differences by Race/Ethnicity Responses were also compared by race/ethnicity. Because there were low numbers of respondents in certain racial or ethnic groups, responses were combined to create two classifications: Underrepresented Minorities (URM) combined American Indian, Hispanic (regardless of race) and Black/African Americans, and multiracial. The non-URM group was comprised of Asian/Asian American, White/European Americans, and other. In contrast to gender, several differences were found for both graduate and undergraduate students, though these differences were still of limited magnitude, as expressed by effect size. URM respondents, particularly undergraduates, generally had less favorable views of the GT climate compared to Non-URM respondents. For example, URM respondents were slightly less likely to agree that GT effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds, and GT was a comfortable and inclusive environment, though both groups still report positively on these factors. For undergraduate students,
10
URM respondents were more likely to have considered leaving GT because of collegiality (23.3 percent for URM versus 15.5 percent for Non-URM). Among responding graduate students, language was a curious factor, with fewer URM students feeling that language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students (32.4%, compared to 42.2 percent of their Non-URM student colleagues). Selected results are presented in Table 6. Table 6. Student differences by race/ethnicity
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Not URM
(n ≈ 1,195) URM
(n ≈ 340) Sig. Eff. Size
Not URM
(n ≈ 600) URM
(n ≈ 133) Sig. Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
77.6% 69.3% ** .081 87.9% 77.5% ** .116
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
87.0% 81.3% ** .066 79.9% 76.7%
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
81.1% 70.5% *** .106 83.9% 75.8% * .083
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
37.9% 36.2% 42.2% 32.4% * .077
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
86.0% 78.0% *** .092 91.8% 77.9% *** .170
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 80.0% 75.5% 87.7% 81.4%
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
15.5% 23.3% *** .086 12.2% 10.8%
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 87.4% 81.2% ** .075 89.9% 86.2%
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
86.5% 83.9% 91.0% 87.6%
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 87.0% 80.0% ** .084 89.8% 84.3%
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 86.0% 75.7% *** .118 88.4% 81.0% * .085
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
87.4% 77.8% *** .113 86.5% 73.0% *** .142
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
54.7% 53.4% 80.9% 69.0% ** .110
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 86.1% 82.9% *** .094 88.0% 75.0% *** .142
Note: URM = Underrepresented Minorities.
11
Where many significant differences exist in response to questions about the respect for various identities by the GT community, the magnitude of these differences (as measured by effect size) were small. One notable difference was that while there was no difference for responding graduate students, among undergraduates 84.1 percent of non-URM respondents agreed that students were respected regardless of race or ethnicity, compared to 72.8 percent of URM respondents. The results are presented in Table 7.
Table 7. Student differences in respect for identity by Underrepresented Minority status
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Not URM
(n ≈ 1,195) URM
(n ≈ 338) Sig. Eff. Size
Not URM
(n ≈ 590) URM
(n ≈ 130) Sig. Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age 86.3% 81.8% * .054 78.5% 82.1%
Gender/gender identity 78.3% 77.7% 75.3% 78.7% * .091
Veteran status or military involvement 86.5% 85.3% 85.1% 93.0%
Status as a school athlete 80.1% 78.4% 82.5% 89.8% * .078
National origin 83.8% 78.5% * .057 77.2% 85.8% * .077
Individual disabilities 78.8% 75.0% 77.9% 83.4%
Race or ethnicity 84.1% 72.8% *** .122 78.3% 78.7%
Socioeconomic status 75.8% 67.0% ** .084 71.5% 75.0%
Sexual orientation 79.2% 73.9% * .051 74.4% 86.9% ** .115
Fraternity or sorority affiliation 79.4% 81.4% 77.7% 88.2% * .097
Religion 79.2% 73.4% * .057 76.8% 79.6%
Political affiliation/opinions 64.5% 62.1% 68.3% 73.7%
Note: URM = Underrepresented Minorities. Differences by Sexual Orientation Students were asked to categorize their sexual orientation—heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, or other. To facilitate statistical comparisons, respondents were grouped into two categories: heterosexual and LGBTQ (i.e., gay/lesbian, bisexual, or other). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were generally small to moderate, particularly for graduate respondents.
12
At both the undergraduate and graduate levels, both groups agree that diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission, but disagree as to what extent the climate supports this. At all levels, LGBTQ students were less likely than their heterosexual peers to agree that GT is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me, I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community, and that commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech. Similarly, they were more likely to have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality (27.4 percent for undergrads and 24.5 percent for grad respondents, compared to 15.2 percent and 10.6 percent of heterosexual respondents). Results are presented in Table 8. Table 8. Student differences by sexual orientation
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Hetero-sexual
(n ≈ 1,270) LGBTQ (n ≈ 252) Sig.
Eff. Size
Hetero-sexual (n ≈ 655)
LGBTQ (n ≈ 72) Sig.
Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”) My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
76.2% 73.0% 87.7% 73.0% ** .121
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
86.8% 80.6% ** .066 80.2% 71.8%
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
80.1% 72.4% ** .072 83.5% 75.7%
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 86.5% 72.7% *** .140 91.5% 70.1% *** .212
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 80.9% 69.4% *** .106 88.9% 67.2% *** .197
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 15.2% 27.4% *** .120 10.6% 24.5% *** .132
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 87.7% 77.5% *** .110 90.3% 82.5%
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission 86.0% 86.2% 90.6% 88.4%
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
87.9% 73.4% *** .152 90.7% 70.7% *** .190
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 85.2% 77.0% ** .084 89.1% 69.0% *** .178
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
87.1% 77.0% *** .107 86.0% 67.7% *** .150
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
56.0% 47.8% * .061 80.8% 62.4% *** .132
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 85.0% 87.0% 86.8% 77.4% * .077
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 80.7% 72.1% 88.7% 68.4% *** .183
13
This sentiment is consistent to an extent with other items in the survey: among both undergraduates and graduate respondents, LGBTQ students were less likely than their heterosexual peers to agree that students are respected regardless of their gender / gender identity (Undergraduates: 81.1% heterosexuals agreed versus 62.9% LGBTQ; Graduates: 77.8% heterosexuals agreed versus 59.7% LGBTQ). A similar gap is seen in the response to respect accorded to other identities regarding sexual orientation, though not significantly so among graduate respondents. Results are presented in Table 9. Table 9. Student differences in respect for identity by sexual orientation
Undergraduates Graduates *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
Hetero-sexual
(n ≈ 1,270) LGBTQ (n ≈ 252) Sig.
Eff. Size
Hetero-sexual (n ≈ 640)
LGBTQ (n ≈ 72) Sig.
Eff. Size
(percent responding “somewhat” or “strongly agree”)
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age 85.3% 85.9% 79.3% 77.6%
Gender/gender identity 81.1% 62.9% *** .163 77.8% 59.7% *** .123
Veteran status or military involvement 85.7% 89.3% 86.4% 87.1%
Status as a school athlete 80.0% 78.0% 84.0% 81.4%
National origin 81.9% 86.0% 79.6% 72.5%
Individual disabilities 80.0% 67.8% *** .109 79.6% 72.2%
Race or ethnicity 82.0% 79.7% 79.1% 71.1%
Socioeconomic status 75.5% 65.6% ** .082 73.3% 62.0% * .076
Sexual orientation 79.8% 68.9% *** .098 77.3% 71.5%
Fraternity or sorority affiliation 79.5% 81.2% 79.6% 79.2%
Religion 77.4% 80.6% 77.1% 77.7%
Political affiliation/opinions 62.6% 70.5% * .060 70.1% 66.0%
14
Marginalization Students were asked to what extent they had experienced marginalization—a sense of exclusion or feeling left out— in the past three years at Georgia Tech, based on various aspects of their identity and personal characteristics. To account for the small number of responses in some cells, the responses were recoded for statistical tests. Responses were reduced to two categories: Never, and Any (experienced marginalization slightly, somewhat, or greatly). While this does lose some of the details of the responses, the majority of those reporting “any” marginalization reported “slight” marginalization. The actual frequencies for these items can be found in Appendix A. The majority (73.4 percent of responding undergraduate students and 61.2 percent of responding graduate students) stated they had experienced some form of marginalization, based on at least one characteristic. Looking at the individual characteristics, gender, race, and political perspective were the most commonly cited by undergraduates. For graduate students who reported marginalization experiences, gender, race/ethnicity, national origin, and language differences were the most commonly cited attributions. Breaking out by demographics characteristics, differences are found (see Tables 10 and 11). For responding undergraduates, 63.7 percent of women stated they had experienced marginalization based on gender, compared to 18.7 percent of men. Similarly, for responding URM undergraduates, 56.3 percent experienced marginalization based on race or ethnicity, while 25.7 percent of non-URM students had a similar experience. For responding LGBTQ students, 48.9 percent had experienced marginalization based on sexual orientation, and 23.7 percent on gender identity/expression, compared to 7.8 and 7.9 percent of heterosexual respondents, respectively. For responding graduate students, the gender gap was less prevalent, though there was still a gap—43.3 percent of women experienced marginalization based on gender compared to 12.2 percent of men. URM graduate students also reported higher rates of marginalization based on race or ethnicity, 56.3% percent versus 25.7 percent for non-URM students. The difference in the percentage of heterosexual and LGBTQ graduate respondents who experienced marginalization on gender identity or sexual orientation was lower than among undergraduates, but still significant, with over a quarter of LGBTQ graduate respondents indicating they experienced some marginalization.
15
16
17
Disparaging Comments The survey asked students to describe in the past year how frequently they heard disparaging remarks about various groups made by their peers. Tables 12 and 13 provide selected results from these items by gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation. According to respondents, the most common disparaging remarks were directed at people with specific political views. Among responding undergraduates, 62.4 percent of men and 75.7 percent of women heard insensitive remarks with respect to women. Disparaging remarks addressed about race/ethnicity were also relatively common: among responding undergraduates, 57.0 percent stated they overheard such remarks. Among undergraduates, URM respondents were slightly more likely to report overhearing such comments about people’s race or ethnicity, (67.3% of URM respondents reported hearing disparaging remarks frequently versus 54.1 percent of non-URM respondents), as well as comments about immigrants (50.2 percent of URM respondents, compared to 39.5 percent of non-URM respondents). Another common target of disparaging comments was gay/lesbian or bisexual people. Among responding undergraduates, 41.5 percent heard these comments, while 59.1 percent of those who self-identified as gay/lesbian or bisexual reported hearing disparaging remarks. The frequency of disparaging remarks for graduate students was overall lower than that reported by undergraduates (see Table 12), but follows similar patterns. Complete results for further identity groups are available in Appendix A.
18
19
20
2013-2018 COMPARISONS As a continuation of the research started with the 2013 survey, much of the content and format was kept the same, which allows the opportunity to make comparisons between the two survey administrations. This provides an opportunity to look for changes in the attitudes and experiences of students. For this analysis, the 2013 data was reweighted using the same procedures as the 2018 data. This puts both groups of responses at a close approximation to their respective populations. Because of this shift in weights, some of the numbers presented here vary slightly from what presented in the 2013 report. Select comparisons to highlight changes are presented here. Complete results are available in Appendix A.
Overall Climate & Respect Overall, student perspectives of the campus climate and belonging declined slightly from 2013. While undergrad attitudes about the impact of social opportunities and reputation of academic major on their sense of belonging showed marginal declines, there were also significant decreases in the view of language differences (37.5%, compared to 51.3 % in 2013) or cultural differences act as barriers to interactions (35.3%, from 41.3% in 2013). Select results are shown in Table 14.
Table 14. Changes in Overall Climate & Belonging: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
(percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
Undergraduate Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 89.0% 85.7% ** .049
Campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 83.0% 78.7% ** .054
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at GT 51.3%
37.5% *** .137
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at GT 41.3%
35.3% *** .061
GT is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 83.0%
84.2%
Graduate Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 78.2% 79.3%
Campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 85.4%
82.5%
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at GT 47.2% 40.4% ** .068
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at GT 40.7% 38.7%
GT is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 88.1% 89.3%
-3.2
-4.3
-13.8
-6.0
1.3
1.2
-2.0
1.2
-2.9
-6.8
21
Regarding the Institute’s efforts towards diversity, fewer students agreed that GT demonstrated commitment to diversity and efforts to recruit students from diverse backgrounds declined from over 90% in 2013, but remain high. Processes to address grievances remains a low point for undergraduates, while more graduate students feel this is true compared to where they were five years prior (78.8 percent, up from 70.4 in 2013). Compared to five years ago, fewer respondents indicated that students at GT are respected with regard to almost every attribute prompted, with the exception of student athlete and fraternity or sorority affiliation. Interestingly, the changes observed have resulted in student respect being similar for all traits, with the exception of political opinions (see Tables 15a and 15b). Table 15a. Changes in Inclusion and Respect: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
(percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
Undergraduate Diversity is integral to GT’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission 82.4% 85.9% ** .047
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by GT 90.4% 85.4% *** .076
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 57.8% 54.4%
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to: Age 86.1% 85.3%
Gender /Gender identity 80.7%
78.2%
National origin 84.5%
82.6%
Race or ethnicity 85.5%
81.6% ** .052
Sexual orientation 82.7%
78.0% ** .059
Fraternity or sorority affiliation 60.9%
79.8% *** .202
Political affiliation / opinions 81.4%
64.0% *** .196
3.5
-4.9
-3.3
-0.8
-1.9
18.9
-17.4
-3.9
-4.7
-2.6
22
Table 15b. Changes in Inclusion and Respect: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
(percent “strongly” or “somewhat agreed”)
Graduate Diversity is integral to GT’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission 87.8% 90.4%
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by GT 91.2% 88.8%
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 70.4% 78.8% *** .096
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to: Age 89.9% 79.2% *** .150
Gender /Gender identity 88.1%
75.9% *** .161
National origin 86.3%
78.8% *** .100
Race or ethnicity 88.4%
78.4% *** .135
Sexual orientation 86.8%
76.7% *** .132
Fraternity or sorority affiliation 79.6%
79.5%
Political affiliation / opinions 87.9%
69.3% *** .228
Behaviors: Discussion and Participation While relatively stable for graduate students, undergraduate participation in multicultural or diversity-related activities, and comfort in discussing issues of diversity has shown substantial declines from where they were in 2013. Students remained the most comfortable discussing issues with their friends (a marginal shift from 97.5 percent to 95.9 percent in 2018), but had larger declines in other groups, with Administration dropping to below half (48.2, from 60.8 in 2013).
2.6
-2.4
8.4
-10.7
-12.2
-7.5
-10.0
-10.1
0.0
-18.6
23
Table 16. Undergraduate Changes in Discussion and Participation: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with: (percent “somewhat” or “very comfortable”)
Personal friends at Georgia Tech 97.1% 95.9% * .033
Classmates 80.2% 66.2% *** .158
Instructors / Faculty 63.0%
53.9% *** .091
Administration 60.8%
48.2% *** .124
How often do you participate in the following activities (percent “often” or “very often”)
outside your own culture:
Arts and entertainment 29.2%
22.7% *** .073
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 29.8%
23.6% *** .068
Student focused cultural organizations 16.2%
12.0% *** .059
Table 17. Graduate Changes in Discussion and Participation: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with: (percent “somewhat” or “very comfortable”)
Personal friends at Georgia Tech 95.5% 93.2% * .050
Classmates 81.5%
75.1% ** .077
Instructors / Faculty 66.1%
62.7%
Administration 62.3%
62.8%
How often do you participate in the following activities (percent “often” or “very often”)
outside your own culture:
Arts and entertainment 18.1%
18.4%
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 44.0%
45.1%
Student focused cultural organizations 14.2%
15.3%
-1.2
-14.0
-9.1
-12.6
-6.5
-4.3
-6.2
-2.3
-6.4
-3.4
0.5
0.3
1.1
1.2
24
Disparaging Remarks1.5 Compared with the general stability and decline found in other areas of the climate survey, the reports regarding disparaging remarks present some hopeful gains. Compared to the 2013 survey, both graduate and undergraduate students reporting significantly fewer disparaging remarks regarding many groups. The biggest reductions in remarks reported for students of all levels was regarding language differences / accents. Among undergraduates, race/ethnicity also declined markedly, from almost 70 percent in 2013 to 57 percent in 2018. While similar, smaller shifts was found for most other groups, among undergraduates, disparaging remarks about two groups increased from 2013: Transgender people and people with particular political views. Comparisons are presented in Tables 18 and 19.
Table 18. Undergraduate Student Changes in Encountering Disparaging Remarks: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
(percent “sometimes,” “often,” or “very often”)
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark with respect to:
Women 71.0%
67.8% * .034
Men 47.1% 50.3%
People’s race or ethnicity 69.9% 57.0% *** .133
People with less education 62.5%
60.7%
Immigrants 51.1% 41.9% *** .091
People with language differences or accents 76.1% 52.1% *** .250
People with particular political views 66.7% 75.2% *** .091
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 56.6% 44.3% *** .120
Transgender people 37.1%
45.0% *** .079
1.5 Marginalization is not compared between surveys. In 2018, 69.5% of students reported any instance of marginalization, compared to the 22.8% in 2013. Given the results found elsewhere, this tripling of marginalization seems unlikely. It is possible that the more detailed approach used in 2018 may have prompted more introspection on the topic, producing very different numbers than if the 2013 format was used.
-3.2
3.2
-13.0
-1.8
-9.2
-24.1
8.5
-12.3
7.9
25
Table 19. Graduate Student Changes in Encountering Disparaging Remarks: 2013-2018
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001 Effect size: Small .1; Medium .3; Large .5
2013 Percent
Change 2013 to 2018
2018 Percent Sig. Eff
Size.
(percent “sometimes,” “often,” or “very often”)
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark with respect to:
Women 39.2%
34.9%
Men 21.1% 22.7%
People’s race or ethnicity 41.0% 37.5%
People with less education 38.9%
31.4% ** .078
Immigrants 35.2% 28.4% ** .071
People with language differences or accents 57.0% 37.3% *** .193
People with particular political views 42.9% 43.5%
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 29.1% 15.0% *** .165
Transgender people 20.2%
15.9% * .055
CONCLUSION The results of the student climate survey add to the Institute’s understanding of the student experience and the ways in which students interact within the GT community. Generally, student respondents from all walks of life express high degrees of collegiality, support, and inclusion at GT. Substantial majorities believe that Tech offers a variety of activities, experiences, and opportunities to grow and come together as a community. However, it is rather striking that the majority students perceive diversity as highly valued at Georgia Tech, and a positive aspect of the Georgia Tech experience, yet few indicate that they have actively pursued engaging in diversity, either through specific intercultural experiences, or in day-to-day practice, such as discussing with others, or their choices in study groups. While there are some differences in the ways in which various groups on campus perceive the climate, these differences are generally small in magnitude. There are some concerns uncovered by the results regarding the adequacy of the grievance process at GT—and further investigation is likely necessary to more fully understand the specific issues involved in this aspect of student life. Among graduate students, women and URM respondents were more likely to report feelings of marginalization than their male and non-URM counterparts. While the numbers are still relatively high, URM respondents were less likely to agree that Tech is a comfortable and inclusive environment (86 percent for non-URM versus 78 percent for URM undergraduates and 92 percent versus 78 percent for graduates). Looking at the changes from 2013, there is a mix of shifts, with a broad decline in perceptions of respect for students, and for participation, or even comfort with discussing diversity. At the same time, students see a more positive environment for diversity, feeling that there are fewer barriers for interacting with international students, and with fewer respondents reporting disparaging remarks about various groups. As with the faculty and staff surveys, political views or affiliation is a sticking point – with lower respect and more disparaging remarks reported.
-4.3
1.6
-3.6
-7.6
-6.8
-19.7
0.6
-14.1
-4.3
26
The Office of Institute Diversity is expected to utilize data in this report to identify issues that merit additional attention and follow-up, including a report detailing qualitative analytic results in the form of student survey responses to open-ended questions and general comments. Planned focus group research will further complement the quantitative and qualitative analyses and is expected to contribute to the formulation of strategic actions that will enhance our campus climate. It is hoped that those currently engaged in campus initiatives addressing campus climate will use these survey results as a guide to their activities and programming, and that new initiatives might be launched to more deeply explore the issues raised by these data. Future iterations of this survey will assist the Institute in measuring its progress as it pursues its strategic goal of inclusive excellence.
27
References
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Georgia Institute of Technology. (2010). Strategic Plan: Designing the future: Strengths to build on... Retrieved from http://www.gatech.edu/vision/sites/gatech.edu.vision/files/Georgia_Tech_Strategic_Plan.pdf
28
G T 2 0 1 8 S t u d e n t C l i m a t e S u r v e y A s s e s s m e n t R e p o r t
A p p e n d i x A – S t u d e n t D a t a Means Tables Key . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 1 Overall Means . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 2 Means by Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 6 Means by Underrepresented Minorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 14 Means by Sexual Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 22 Overall Frequencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 30 Frequencies by Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 40 Frequencies by Underrepresented Minorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 60 Frequencies by Sexual Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 80 Student 2013 – 2018 Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-100 Student 2013 – 2018 Changes by Gender, URM, & Orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-103 A p p e n d i x B – S u r v e y I n s t r u m e n t 2018 Student Climate Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B- 1 Appendix – Students
O f f i c e o f A c a d e m i c E f f e c t i v e n e s s
Appendix A - Student Data
A - 1
Means Tables Color Key
Below Above
Main Scale Items 2.50 3.20Reverse Scored on scale 2.50 3.20Marginalization & Disparaging Remarks
1.20 1.50
The mean cutoffs are based on the 1st and 3rd Quartiles of scale means for all items.
p is based on alpha of .05 or below. Cohen's d is based on rule of thumb of .2 or greater being at least a "small" effect size.
0.050 0.2000
Color codes for cell meansMean p value at
or belowd at or above
A - 2
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
1563 2.32 0.965 1 4 745 1.83 0.850 1 4
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 1564 2.85 0.945 1 4 746 2.81 1.011 1 4
In groups with U.S. and international students 1564 2.26 0.958 1 4 747 2.78 1.046 1 4
In groups comprised of men and women 1562 2.79 0.986 1 4 746 2.84 1.049 1 4
On your own 1564 3.53 0.688 1 4 745 3.38 0.800 1 4
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1539 2.86 0.769 1 4 736 3.19 0.777 1 4
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1532 3.33 0.833 1 4 725 3.07 0.830 1 4
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1530 3.06 0.846 1 4 731 3.15 0.882 1 4
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1537 2.19 0.901 1 4 734 2.24 0.973 1 4
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1536 2.13 0.936 1 4 736 2.24 0.931 1 4
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 1535 3.22 0.813 1 4 735 3.40 0.768 1 4
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 1522 3.06 0.849 1 4 733 3.29 0.806 1 4
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 1534 1.58 0.894 1 4 731 1.44 0.803 1 4
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 1539 3.28 0.808 1 4 734 3.38 0.781 1 4
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
1534 3.30 0.850 1 4 737 3.42 0.776 1 4
Overall MeansGraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
Undergraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
A - 3
Overall MeansGraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
Undergraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxNCommitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 1532 3.20 0.788 1 4 735 3.33 0.751 1 4
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 1521 3.21 0.805 1 4 731 3.36 0.768 1 4
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 1525 3.19 0.812 1 4 730 3.17 0.808 1 4
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 1521 2.52 0.934 1 4 716 3.02 0.852 1 4
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 1531 3.23 0.764 1 4 731 3.23 0.770 1 4
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 1530 3.04 0.819 1 4 731 3.24 0.774 1 4
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
1544 3.25 0.791 1 4 739 3.11 0.912 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 1544 3.06 0.885 1 4 734 3.06 0.977 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
1511 3.27 0.816 1 4 711 3.27 0.846 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 1521 3.11 0.840 1 4 699 3.15 0.824 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 1536 3.15 0.811 1 4 730 3.07 0.892 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 1530 3.07 0.859 1 4 724 3.12 0.947 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 1536 3.17 0.846 1 4 730 3.08 0.920 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 1528 3.00 0.905 1 4 719 2.94 0.971 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 1535 3.07 0.886 1 4 716 3.02 0.962 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 1522 3.08 0.819 1 4 695 3.03 0.883 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 1536 3.04 0.870 1 4 717 3.02 0.946 1 4
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 1534 2.71 0.909 1 4 713 2.84 0.941 1 4
A - 4
Overall MeansGraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
Undergraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
1538 3.72 0.571 1 4 729 3.59 0.679 1 4
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 1535 2.75 0.825 1 4 731 2.95 0.845 1 4
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 1245 2.86 1.008 1 4 569 2.81 0.920 1 4
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 1534 2.53 0.912 1 4 722 2.70 0.921 1 4
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 1529 2.48 0.925 1 4 715 2.73 0.913 1 4
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 1525 2.41 0.965 1 4 712 2.71 0.947 1 4
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
1519 2.03 0.855 1 4 726 1.97 0.791 1 4
Religious and/or spiritual activities 1515 1.40 0.715 1 4 722 1.38 0.635 1 4Cultural celebrations and holidays 1520 1.82 0.733 1 4 725 1.96 0.761 1 4
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 1516 2.01 0.871 1 4 725 2.42 0.943 1 4
Student focused cultural organizations 1521 1.62 0.832 1 4 722 1.76 0.818 1 4Other (specify below) 799 1.22 0.625 1 4 362 1.30 0.677 1 4
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
1525 1.58 0.866 1 4 716 1.34 0.715 1 4
Marginalization: Age 1523 1.33 0.679 1 4 721 1.29 0.626 1 4Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 1523 1.50 0.825 1 4 716 1.47 0.756 1 4Marginalization: Disability 1496 1.19 0.596 1 4 689 1.15 0.529 1 4Marginalization: National origin 1515 1.23 0.572 1 4 715 1.40 0.733 1 4
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 1513 1.25 0.617 1 4 716 1.50 0.804 1 4
Marginalization: Political perspective 1523 1.62 0.902 1 4 710 1.35 0.735 1 4Marginalization: Religion 1517 1.37 0.721 1 4 710 1.22 0.582 1 4Marginalization: Sexual orientation 1520 1.24 0.653 1 4 709 1.13 0.476 1 4
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 1520 1.19 0.602 1 4 710 1.13 0.480 1 4
Marginalization: Other 879 1.12 0.523 1 4 424 1.09 0.432 1 4
A - 5
Overall MeansGraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxN
Undergraduate
Mean Std. Dev. Min MaxNWithin the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
1524 1.96 0.863 1 4 708 1.44 0.688 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:Men 1517 1.66 0.780 1 4 707 1.28 0.575 1 4Disparaging Remarks:Older People 1516 1.41 0.657 1 4 702 1.24 0.523 1 4Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 1518 1.42 0.669 1 4 703 1.27 0.530 1 4Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 1518 1.75 0.786 1 4 704 1.45 0.659 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 1506 1.41 0.695 1 4 702 1.12 0.409 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 1516 1.95 0.954 1 4 703 1.44 0.749 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 1509 1.52 0.696 1 4 704 1.37 0.670 1 4Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 1518 1.70 0.800 1 4 702 1.47 0.716 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 1516 2.26 0.983 1 4 702 1.63 0.841 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 1516 1.62 0.808 1 4 696 1.32 0.636 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 1516 1.58 0.766 1 4 702 1.20 0.516 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 1512 1.62 0.812 1 4 700 1.22 0.567 1 4
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 777 1.09 0.424 1 4 395 1.06 0.312 1 4
A - 6
Means by Gender
Student Type = Undergraduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
941 2.24 0.987 1 4 595 2.45 0.915 1 4 0.206 4.179 0.000 0.1208
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 941 2.80 0.967 1 4 596 2.94 0.896 1 4 0.138 2.844 0.005 0.0695
In groups with U.S. and international students 941 2.27 0.964 1 4 596 2.27 0.948 1 4 -0.002 -0.037 0.971
In groups comprised of men and women 941 2.69 1.004 1 4 594 2.98 0.920 1 4 0.290 5.817 0.000 0.1441On your own 941 3.52 0.677 1 4 596 3.55 0.691 1 4 0.038 1.060 0.289
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
929 2.88 0.789 1 4 583 2.84 0.739 1 4 -0.043 -1.064 0.287
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
920 3.27 0.871 1 4 584 3.42 0.754 1 4 0.153 3.608 0.000 0.0683
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
921 3.09 0.845 1 4 581 3.02 0.836 1 4 -0.071 -1.588 0.112
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
926 2.21 0.918 1 4 584 2.17 0.874 1 4 -0.040 -0.846 0.397
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
926 2.14 0.965 1 4 582 2.11 0.889 1 4 -0.026 -0.529 0.597
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 925 3.24 0.797 1 4 583 3.23 0.791 1 4 -0.014 -0.333 0.739
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 918 3.09 0.856 1 4 577 3.07 0.816 1 4 -0.019 -0.422 0.673
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 925 1.53 0.863 1 4 583 1.61 0.907 1 4 0.081 1.720 0.086
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 930 3.32 0.795 1 4 582 3.24 0.811 1 4 -0.081 -1.903 0.057
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
922 3.17 0.929 1 4 585 3.51 0.661 1 4 0.333 8.126 0.000 0.1448
t
Man Woman
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
Mean Diff p d
A - 7
Means by Gender
t
Man Woman
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
Mean Diff p d
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 919 3.22 0.795 1 4 585 3.20 0.741 1 4 -0.023 -0.576 0.565
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 913 3.22 0.836 1 4 581 3.21 0.746 1 4 -0.012 -0.295 0.768
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 916 3.17 0.833 1 4 582 3.28 0.744 1 4 0.113 2.725 0.007 0.0525
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 912 2.57 0.936 1 4 582 2.48 0.908 1 4 -0.093 -1.903 0.057
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 923 3.20 0.799 1 4 584 3.30 0.704 1 4 0.103 2.623 0.009 0.0480
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 920 3.05 0.808 1 4 582 3.08 0.802 1 4 0.035 0.811 0.418
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
926 3.23 0.806 1 4 591 3.27 0.775 1 4 0.044 1.073 0.283
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 923 3.15 0.865 1 4 594 2.96 0.870 1 4 -0.185 -4.055 0.000 0.0938
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
904 3.25 0.845 1 4 581 3.30 0.775 1 4 0.055 1.279 0.201
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 909 3.10 0.855 1 4 585 3.11 0.820 1 4 0.012 0.264 0.792
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 923 3.14 0.840 1 4 586 3.18 0.762 1 4 0.045 1.073 0.283
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 915 3.10 0.880 1 4 587 3.05 0.806 1 4 -0.044 -0.990 0.322
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 922 3.17 0.874 1 4 587 3.19 0.795 1 4 0.019 0.444 0.657
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 917 3.02 0.926 1 4 585 2.99 0.850 1 4 -0.030 -0.644 0.519
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 918 3.11 0.898 1 4 589 3.04 0.841 1 4 -0.073 -1.603 0.109
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 916 3.02 0.840 1 4 582 3.16 0.775 1 4 0.135 3.180 0.002 0.0650
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 922 3.01 0.915 1 4 587 3.08 0.802 1 4 0.071 1.582 0.114
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 923 2.65 0.956 1 4 584 2.81 0.815 1 4 0.156 3.375 0.001 0.0819
A - 8
Means by Gender
t
Man Woman
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
Mean Diff p d
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
923 3.69 0.607 1 4 588 3.79 0.479 1 4 0.096 3.430 0.001 0.0400
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 921 2.73 0.847 1 4 589 2.79 0.788 1 4 0.065 1.507 0.132
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 748 2.87 1.025 1 4 480 2.87 0.974 1 4 -0.005 -0.090 0.928
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 920 2.54 0.945 1 4 587 2.51 0.856 1 4 -0.029 -0.609 0.543
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 916 2.49 0.956 1 4 585 2.47 0.868 1 4 -0.027 -0.561 0.575
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 914 2.45 0.988 1 4 584 2.36 0.910 1 4 -0.090 -1.805 0.071
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
909 1.97 0.876 1 4 582 2.12 0.819 1 4 0.155 3.459 0.001 0.1036
Religious and/or spiritual activities 909 1.39 0.722 1 4 578 1.42 0.706 1 4 0.038 0.994 0.320Cultural celebrations and holidays 909 1.79 0.739 1 4 584 1.87 0.718 1 4 0.081 2.101 0.036 0.0621
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 908 2.02 0.901 1 4 580 1.99 0.820 1 4 -0.028 -0.621 0.535
Student focused cultural organizations 911 1.56 0.801 1 4 583 1.71 0.854 1 4 0.151 3.426 0.001 0.1223Other (specify below) 511 1.22 0.621 1 4 274 1.22 0.643 1 4 0.005 0.096 0.923
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
914 1.28 0.649 1 4 583 1.98 0.918 1 4 0.705 16.156 0.000 0.5270
Marginalization: Age 912 1.34 0.694 1 4 583 1.30 0.640 1 4 -0.044 -1.267 0.205Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 913 1.50 0.799 1 4 582 1.51 0.865 1 4 0.009 0.201 0.841Marginalization: Disability 903 1.16 0.541 1 4 571 1.20 0.626 1 4 0.040 1.242 0.214Marginalization: National origin 910 1.24 0.585 1 4 581 1.21 0.541 1 4 -0.031 -1.060 0.289
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 908 1.26 0.639 1 4 581 1.23 0.572 1 4 -0.032 -1.001 0.317
Marginalization: Political perspective 918 1.66 0.941 1 4 578 1.54 0.828 1 4 -0.123 -2.648 0.008 0.1017Marginalization: Religion 910 1.35 0.713 1 4 582 1.40 0.727 1 4 0.049 1.268 0.205Marginalization: Sexual orientation 910 1.22 0.619 1 4 583 1.22 0.625 1 4 -0.006 -0.168 0.867
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 911 1.15 0.521 1 4 582 1.15 0.540 1 4 -0.003 -0.093 0.926
Marginalization: Other 567 1.11 0.514 1 4 299 1.13 0.533 1 4 0.011 0.299 0.765
A - 9
Means by Gender
t
Man Woman
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
Mean Diff p d
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
911 1.84 0.823 1 4 586 2.11 0.880 1 4 0.272 5.994 0.000 0.1851
Disparaging Remarks:Men 909 1.71 0.815 1 4 580 1.57 0.713 1 4 -0.144 -3.594 0.000 0.1234Disparaging Remarks:Older People 907 1.43 0.683 1 4 581 1.36 0.591 1 4 -0.070 -2.104 0.036 0.0702Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 911 1.41 0.677 1 4 580 1.41 0.639 1 4 -0.010 -0.279 0.781Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 909 1.71 0.780 1 4 582 1.79 0.784 1 4 0.078 1.888 0.059
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 903 1.41 0.685 1 4 576 1.39 0.693 1 4 -0.018 -0.493 0.622
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 908 1.88 0.945 1 4 581 2.02 0.934 1 4 0.132 2.654 0.008 0.0906
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 903 1.51 0.684 1 4 579 1.51 0.708 1 4 0.002 0.052 0.958Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 909 1.67 0.798 1 4 581 1.74 0.796 1 4 0.071 1.668 0.096
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 911 2.26 1.023 1 4 578 2.24 0.918 1 4 -0.016 -0.306 0.760
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 910 1.64 0.837 1 4 579 1.59 0.761 1 4 -0.050 -1.187 0.236
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 909 1.56 0.749 1 4 580 1.58 0.755 1 4 0.021 0.520 0.603
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 909 1.58 0.791 1 4 575 1.62 0.787 1 4 0.041 0.975 0.330
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 519 1.09 0.434 1 4 246 1.07 0.318 1 4 -0.020 -0.704 0.481
a. Student Type = Undergraduate
A - 10
Means by Gender
Student Type = Graduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
529 1.84 0.865 1 4 207 1.79 0.786 1 4 -0.052 -0.785 0.433
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 528 2.79 1.010 1 4 209 2.85 1.010 1 4 0.053 0.647 0.518
In groups with U.S. and international students 529 2.76 1.067 1 4 209 2.84 0.987 1 4 0.079 0.954 0.341
In groups comprised of men and women 529 2.75 1.063 1 4 208 3.06 0.981 1 4 0.304 3.697 0.000 0.1637On your own 529 3.37 0.809 1 4 208 3.41 0.784 1 4 0.034 0.528 0.598
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
522 3.25 0.749 1 4 205 3.10 0.805 1 4 -0.144 -2.213 0.027 0.0815
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
514 3.06 0.813 1 4 204 3.10 0.842 1 4 0.032 0.457 0.648
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
517 3.18 0.870 1 4 205 3.11 0.886 1 4 -0.068 -0.935 0.350
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
520 2.23 0.964 1 4 205 2.26 0.994 1 4 0.031 0.380 0.704
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
522 2.23 0.934 1 4 205 2.27 0.912 1 4 0.041 0.539 0.590
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 522 3.45 0.729 1 4 205 3.30 0.817 1 4 -0.150 -2.289 0.022 0.0803
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 522 3.31 0.760 1 4 203 3.27 0.870 1 4 -0.046 -0.656 0.512
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 520 1.41 0.768 1 4 203 1.46 0.846 1 4 0.055 0.811 0.418
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 522 3.39 0.759 1 4 205 3.40 0.809 1 4 0.011 0.162 0.871
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
524 3.36 0.820 1 4 205 3.58 0.625 1 4 0.218 3.860 0.000 0.1078
t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Man Woman
Mean Diff t p dMean Std. Dev. Min MaxNN
A - 11
Means by Gender t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Man Woman
Mean Diff t p dMean Std. Dev. Min MaxNN
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 522 3.35 0.706 1 4 204 3.32 0.824 1 4 -0.028 -0.433 0.665
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 521 3.38 0.739 1 4 202 3.35 0.804 1 4 -0.037 -0.574 0.566
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 518 3.18 0.799 1 4 204 3.20 0.818 1 4 0.023 0.348 0.728
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 508 3.08 0.805 1 4 200 2.91 0.929 1 4 -0.169 -2.258 0.024 0.1000
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 519 3.24 0.756 1 4 203 3.23 0.793 1 4 -0.007 -0.109 0.913
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 518 3.27 0.740 1 4 204 3.19 0.832 1 4 -0.076 -1.144 0.253
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
525 3.12 0.915 1 4 207 3.07 0.916 1 4 -0.046 -0.617 0.538
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 521 3.09 0.989 1 4 206 3.01 0.937 1 4 -0.075 -0.954 0.340
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
507 3.27 0.852 1 4 197 3.24 0.840 1 4 -0.030 -0.416 0.677
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 496 3.14 0.829 1 4 196 3.13 0.817 1 4 -0.017 -0.246 0.806
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 518 3.10 0.898 1 4 204 3.01 0.863 1 4 -0.090 -1.253 0.211
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 513 3.16 0.932 1 4 203 3.01 0.974 1 4 -0.154 -1.928 0.054
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 517 3.08 0.936 1 4 206 3.07 0.881 1 4 -0.011 -0.147 0.883
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 509 2.95 0.991 1 4 202 2.95 0.926 1 4 0.000 0.003 0.997
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 505 3.03 0.982 1 4 203 3.02 0.921 1 4 -0.008 -0.098 0.922
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 495 3.00 0.914 1 4 193 3.11 0.805 1 4 0.113 1.590 0.112
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 509 3.02 0.960 1 4 201 3.00 0.922 1 4 -0.021 -0.264 0.792
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 505 2.86 0.952 1 4 200 2.82 0.922 1 4 -0.033 -0.421 0.674
A - 12
Means by Gender t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Man Woman
Mean Diff t p dMean Std. Dev. Min MaxNN
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
517 3.57 0.681 1 4 205 3.66 0.648 1 4 0.088 1.613 0.107
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 519 2.96 0.825 1 4 205 2.94 0.884 1 4 -0.024 -0.329 0.742
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 413 2.83 0.901 1 4 150 2.78 0.966 1 4 -0.046 -0.503 0.615
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 510 2.74 0.891 1 4 205 2.65 0.975 1 4 -0.089 -1.137 0.256
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 507 2.74 0.911 1 4 202 2.73 0.919 1 4 -0.005 -0.060 0.952
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 505 2.73 0.937 1 4 202 2.67 0.964 1 4 -0.057 -0.720 0.472
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
518 1.93 0.775 1 4 199 2.07 0.804 1 4 0.136 2.044 0.041 0.1065
Religious and/or spiritual activities 516 1.37 0.630 1 4 198 1.38 0.647 1 4 0.014 0.262 0.794Cultural celebrations and holidays 517 1.93 0.768 1 4 199 2.06 0.738 1 4 0.138 2.210 0.027 0.1084
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 518 2.42 0.951 1 4 199 2.41 0.922 1 4 -0.010 -0.127 0.899
Student focused cultural organizations 515 1.76 0.824 1 4 198 1.75 0.812 1 4 -0.009 -0.126 0.900Other (specify below) 276 1.30 0.677 1 4 84 1.28 0.688 1 4 -0.025 -0.286 0.775
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
506 1.18 0.545 1 4 204 1.67 0.895 1 4 0.491 7.293 0.000 0.4860
Marginalization: Age 508 1.25 0.588 1 4 205 1.35 0.679 1 4 0.096 1.768 0.077Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 507 1.46 0.749 1 4 202 1.47 0.750 1 4 0.009 0.149 0.882Marginalization: Disability 491 1.12 0.481 1 4 190 1.20 0.606 1 4 0.073 1.486 0.138Marginalization: National origin 506 1.41 0.746 1 4 203 1.35 0.665 1 4 -0.062 -1.078 0.281
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 506 1.52 0.811 1 4 202 1.46 0.774 1 4 -0.058 -0.892 0.373
Marginalization: Political perspective 505 1.36 0.738 1 4 198 1.33 0.700 1 4 -0.033 -0.556 0.578Marginalization: Religion 501 1.22 0.603 1 4 201 1.20 0.504 1 4 -0.019 -0.415 0.678Marginalization: Sexual orientation 503 1.09 0.408 1 4 199 1.17 0.549 1 4 0.081 1.878 0.061
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 505 1.11 0.435 1 4 199 1.15 0.489 1 4 0.045 1.138 0.255
Marginalization: Other 320 1.08 0.396 1 4 102 1.12 0.534 1 4 0.042 0.735 0.463
A - 13
Means by Gender t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Man Woman
Mean Diff t p dMean Std. Dev. Min MaxNN
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
500 1.37 0.638 1 4 201 1.60 0.751 1 4 0.229 3.801 0.000 0.2261
Disparaging Remarks:Men 499 1.29 0.601 1 4 200 1.24 0.503 1 4 -0.047 -1.057 0.291Disparaging Remarks:Older People 499 1.22 0.510 1 4 195 1.28 0.557 1 4 0.053 1.153 0.249Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 498 1.26 0.529 1 4 197 1.28 0.533 1 4 0.021 0.466 0.642Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 498 1.44 0.661 1 4 198 1.47 0.640 1 4 0.030 0.551 0.582
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 496 1.11 0.368 1 4 198 1.14 0.465 1 4 0.038 1.021 0.308
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 498 1.41 0.723 1 4 197 1.47 0.774 1 4 0.057 0.890 0.374
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 498 1.34 0.639 1 4 198 1.42 0.728 1 4 0.077 1.304 0.193Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 496 1.46 0.700 1 4 199 1.50 0.737 1 4 0.047 0.775 0.438
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 496 1.64 0.861 1 4 198 1.57 0.782 1 4 -0.068 -0.998 0.318
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 493 1.33 0.653 1 4 196 1.26 0.558 1 4 -0.072 -1.457 0.146
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 497 1.16 0.488 1 4 198 1.24 0.500 1 4 0.074 1.769 0.077
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 496 1.18 0.523 1 4 197 1.27 0.592 1 4 0.092 1.899 0.058
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 299 1.05 0.294 1 4 94 1.08 0.369 1 3 0.031 0.754 0.452
A - 14
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Student Type = Undergraduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
1222 2.30 0.966 1 4 341 2.38 0.961 1 4 0.078 1.330 0.184
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 1223 2.85 0.930 1 4 341 2.86 1.001 1 4 0.012 0.198 0.843
In groups with U.S. and international students 1223 2.25 0.965 1 4 341 2.32 0.934 1 4 0.069 1.196 0.232
In groups comprised of men and women 1221 2.80 0.991 1 4 341 2.78 0.965 1 4 -0.014 -0.244 0.808On your own 1224 3.54 0.680 1 4 340 3.49 0.715 1 4 -0.042 -0.976 0.329
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1201 2.89 0.750 1 4 338 2.74 0.825 1 4 -0.146 -2.925 0.003 0.1007
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1193 3.38 0.793 1 4 339 3.14 0.937 1 4 -0.243 -4.356 0.000 0.1490
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1193 3.09 0.817 1 4 337 2.95 0.934 1 4 -0.141 -2.506 0.012 0.0900
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1198 2.20 0.902 1 4 339 2.15 0.898 1 4 -0.048 -0.861 0.389
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1199 2.10 0.945 1 4 338 2.24 0.894 1 4 0.132 2.370 0.018 0.0987
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 1200 3.26 0.784 1 4 335 3.06 0.894 1 4 -0.197 -3.652 0.000 0.1237
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 1189 3.09 0.843 1 4 333 2.95 0.865 1 4 -0.147 -2.756 0.006 0.0938
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 1199 1.54 0.867 1 4 334 1.72 0.973 1 4 0.180 3.067 0.002 0.1626
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 1201 3.31 0.787 1 4 339 3.18 0.872 1 4 -0.127 -2.418 0.016 0.0772
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
1195 3.30 0.838 1 4 340 3.29 0.894 1 4 -0.012 -0.219 0.827
Mean Diff
Non-URM URM
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
t p d
A - 15
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Mean Diff
Non-URM URM
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
t p d
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 1193 3.23 0.759 1 4 338 3.07 0.873 1 4 -0.162 -3.093 0.002 0.1016
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 1182 3.25 0.773 1 4 339 3.04 0.888 1 4 -0.214 -4.023 0.000 0.1346
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 1188 3.25 0.782 1 4 337 2.99 0.881 1 4 -0.264 -4.964 0.000 0.1684
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 1184 2.53 0.930 1 4 338 2.49 0.951 1 4 -0.039 -0.668 0.504
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 1191 3.25 0.744 1 4 340 3.19 0.832 1 4 -0.056 -1.113 0.266
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 1190 3.06 0.810 1 4 340 2.99 0.849 1 4 -0.069 -1.330 0.184
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
1206 3.26 0.783 1 4 338 3.19 0.818 1 4 -0.067 -1.351 0.177
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 1205 3.08 0.896 1 4 338 3.00 0.841 1 4 -0.080 -1.521 0.128
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
1180 3.28 0.808 1 4 331 3.22 0.845 1 4 -0.066 -1.273 0.203
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 1186 3.13 0.828 1 4 335 3.04 0.876 1 4 -0.088 -1.642 0.101
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 1201 3.19 0.795 1 4 335 3.01 0.853 1 4 -0.178 -3.421 0.001 0.1129
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 1192 3.10 0.858 1 4 338 2.97 0.856 1 4 -0.123 -2.336 0.020 0.0776
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 1200 3.23 0.822 1 4 336 2.94 0.892 1 4 -0.291 -5.381 0.000 0.1874
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 1192 3.05 0.893 1 4 336 2.82 0.928 1 4 -0.231 -4.059 0.000 0.1501
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 1199 3.09 0.893 1 4 335 2.97 0.853 1 4 -0.122 -2.286 0.022 0.0762
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 1186 3.08 0.817 1 4 336 3.08 0.826 1 4 -0.007 -0.130 0.897
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 1201 3.08 0.854 1 4 335 2.90 0.911 1 4 -0.174 -3.135 0.002 0.1121
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 1196 2.74 0.909 1 4 338 2.63 0.906 1 4 -0.107 -1.915 0.056
A - 16
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Mean Diff
Non-URM URM
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
t p d
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
1201 3.74 0.535 1 4 337 3.67 0.680 1 4 -0.065 -1.627 0.104
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 1200 2.77 0.808 1 4 336 2.68 0.881 1 4 -0.091 -1.701 0.089
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 975 2.89 0.993 1 4 270 2.76 1.057 1 4 -0.132 -1.838 0.066
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 1198 2.55 0.898 1 4 337 2.44 0.955 1 4 -0.113 -1.951 0.051
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 1192 2.50 0.904 1 4 337 2.41 0.995 1 4 -0.087 -1.447 0.148
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 1189 2.43 0.948 1 4 336 2.32 1.018 1 4 -0.116 -1.867 0.062
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
1184 2.01 0.860 1 4 334 2.09 0.837 1 4 0.079 1.516 0.130
Religious and/or spiritual activities 1182 1.39 0.708 1 4 332 1.45 0.738 1 4 0.064 1.406 0.160Cultural celebrations and holidays 1186 1.81 0.722 1 4 334 1.84 0.771 1 4 0.028 0.591 0.555
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 1184 1.98 0.861 1 4 332 2.13 0.896 1 4 0.156 2.818 0.005 0.1239
Student focused cultural organizations 1187 1.57 0.782 1 4 334 1.80 0.968 1 4 0.224 3.890 0.000 0.2057Other (specify below) 626 1.19 0.590 1 4 174 1.32 0.729 1 4 0.128 2.122 0.034 0.1581
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
1192 1.57 0.855 1 4 333 1.61 0.902 1 4 0.040 0.727 0.467
Marginalization: Age 1191 1.30 0.645 1 4 332 1.45 0.778 1 4 0.149 3.196 0.001 0.1685Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 1189 1.36 0.688 1 4 334 2.01 1.046 1 4 0.646 10.664 0.000 0.5772Marginalization: Disability 1175 1.17 0.564 1 4 321 1.27 0.698 1 4 0.101 2.393 0.017 0.1309Marginalization: National origin 1187 1.19 0.511 1 4 328 1.38 0.732 1 4 0.191 4.421 0.000 0.2426
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 1185 1.20 0.524 1 4 328 1.43 0.851 1 4 0.227 4.593 0.000 0.2798
Marginalization: Political perspective 1190 1.61 0.891 1 4 333 1.65 0.942 1 4 0.035 0.602 0.547Marginalization: Religion 1188 1.36 0.695 1 4 329 1.41 0.809 1 4 0.047 0.959 0.338Marginalization: Sexual orientation 1189 1.23 0.622 1 4 332 1.30 0.751 1 4 0.075 1.666 0.096
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 1188 1.19 0.599 1 4 332 1.18 0.613 1 4 -0.011 -0.286 0.775
Marginalization: Other 697 1.11 0.496 1 4 182 1.17 0.614 1 4 0.061 1.240 0.215
A - 17
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Mean Diff
Non-URM URM
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max MeanN N Std. Dev. Min Max
t -test
t p d
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
1190 1.98 0.856 1 4 334 1.90 0.883 1 4 -0.080 -1.472 0.141
Disparaging Remarks:Men 1184 1.67 0.768 1 4 332 1.61 0.820 1 4 -0.058 -1.157 0.247Disparaging Remarks:Older People 1183 1.41 0.654 1 4 332 1.42 0.667 1 4 0.016 0.380 0.704Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 1186 1.42 0.680 1 4 332 1.40 0.632 1 4 -0.025 -0.628 0.530Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 1186 1.69 0.751 1 4 333 1.96 0.868 1 4 0.271 5.168 0.000 0.2391
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 1175 1.42 0.687 1 4 331 1.40 0.725 1 4 -0.016 -0.355 0.722
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 1187 1.92 0.933 1 4 329 2.03 1.022 1 4 0.111 1.768 0.077
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 1179 1.47 0.654 1 4 330 1.68 0.810 1 4 0.205 4.238 0.000 0.2107Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 1186 1.67 0.777 1 4 332 1.81 0.871 1 4 0.137 2.595 0.010 0.1260
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 1183 2.24 0.958 1 4 333 2.33 1.065 1 4 0.092 1.419 0.156
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 1184 1.60 0.782 1 4 331 1.68 0.894 1 4 0.083 1.540 0.124
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 1184 1.56 0.741 1 4 332 1.64 0.848 1 4 0.084 1.634 0.102
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 1181 1.59 0.783 1 4 331 1.72 0.899 1 4 0.138 2.537 0.011 0.1298
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 606 1.08 0.407 1 4 171 1.13 0.481 1 4 0.049 1.225 0.221
a. Student Type = Undergraduate
A - 18
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Student Type = Graduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
612 1.85 0.839 1 4 133 1.77 0.900 1 4 -0.083 -0.976 0.329
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 611 2.78 0.983 1 4 134 2.91 1.129 1 4 0.122 1.161 0.246
In groups with U.S. and international students 613 2.79 1.018 1 4 134 2.71 1.167 1 4 -0.080 -0.740 0.460
In groups comprised of men and women 611 2.84 1.020 1 4 134 2.82 1.176 1 4 -0.026 -0.241 0.810On your own 611 3.36 0.807 1 4 134 3.48 0.761 1 4 0.118 1.615 0.107
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
602 3.23 0.751 1 4 133 3.02 0.865 1 4 -0.216 -2.671 0.008 0.1485
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
596 3.07 0.830 1 4 129 3.04 0.836 1 4 -0.031 -0.385 0.700
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
601 3.17 0.856 1 4 130 3.05 0.992 1 4 -0.118 -1.255 0.210
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
601 2.28 0.985 1 4 133 2.02 0.890 1 4 -0.261 -2.995 0.003 0.2105
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
603 2.27 0.911 1 4 133 2.10 1.010 1 4 -0.165 -1.733 0.083
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 603 3.44 0.731 1 4 132 3.23 0.903 1 4 -0.213 -2.526 0.012 0.1399
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 599 3.30 0.778 1 4 133 3.23 0.919 1 4 -0.066 -0.769 0.442
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 599 1.44 0.817 1 4 132 1.42 0.738 1 4 -0.013 -0.176 0.860
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 601 3.38 0.761 1 4 132 3.42 0.869 1 4 0.041 0.498 0.619
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
604 3.42 0.756 1 4 133 3.42 0.861 1 4 -0.006 -0.072 0.943
Max
t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Non-URM URM
Mean Diff t p dMinN N Mean Std. Dev.
A - 19
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Max
t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Non-URM URM
Mean Diff t p dMinN N Mean Std. Dev.
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 601 3.35 0.705 1 4 133 3.24 0.926 1 4 -0.112 -1.320 0.187
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 600 3.39 0.738 1 4 131 3.22 0.883 1 4 -0.171 -2.058 0.040 0.1122
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 598 3.21 0.772 1 4 133 3.01 0.940 1 4 -0.205 -2.347 0.019 0.1407
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 585 3.06 0.815 1 4 131 2.83 0.983 1 4 -0.227 -2.459 0.014 0.1602
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 599 3.26 0.726 1 4 132 3.12 0.938 1 4 -0.143 -1.643 0.101
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 597 3.25 0.765 1 4 133 3.18 0.813 1 4 -0.077 -0.995 0.320
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
607 3.09 0.926 1 4 133 3.17 0.844 1 4 0.076 0.923 0.356
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 601 3.03 0.981 1 4 134 3.18 0.957 1 4 0.147 1.596 0.111
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
580 3.21 0.869 1 4 131 3.52 0.683 1 4 0.303 4.335 0.000 0.1781
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 578 3.10 0.826 1 4 121 3.37 0.781 1 4 0.268 3.398 0.001 0.1684
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 599 3.04 0.905 1 4 131 3.22 0.816 1 4 0.183 2.275 0.023 0.1148
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 591 3.09 0.962 1 4 132 3.26 0.862 1 4 0.174 2.054 0.040 0.1059
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 597 3.06 0.925 1 4 133 3.15 0.896 1 4 0.083 0.958 0.338
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 587 2.92 0.974 1 4 132 3.05 0.952 1 4 0.125 1.353 0.177
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 584 2.98 0.980 1 4 131 3.23 0.854 1 4 0.252 2.967 0.003 0.1533
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 571 2.98 0.897 1 4 123 3.28 0.774 1 4 0.306 3.862 0.000 0.1902
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 585 3.00 0.942 1 4 132 3.11 0.961 1 4 0.108 1.175 0.240
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 581 2.81 0.951 1 4 132 3.00 0.883 1 4 0.197 2.276 0.023 0.1267
A - 20
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Max
t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Non-URM URM
Mean Diff t p dMinN N Mean Std. Dev.
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
597 3.61 0.645 1 4 132 3.47 0.808 1 4 -0.145 -1.937 0.053
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 599 2.98 0.820 1 4 132 2.82 0.945 1 4 -0.158 -1.772 0.077
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 463 2.83 0.913 1 4 106 2.71 0.947 1 4 -0.121 -1.198 0.232
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 590 2.74 0.894 1 4 132 2.52 1.015 1 4 -0.224 -2.336 0.020 0.1662
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 585 2.73 0.910 1 4 130 2.74 0.931 1 4 0.014 0.161 0.872
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 583 2.71 0.941 1 4 129 2.69 0.980 1 4 -0.026 -0.272 0.786
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
595 1.95 0.762 1 4 131 2.10 0.906 1 4 0.150 1.760 0.079
Religious and/or spiritual activities 592 1.38 0.632 1 4 130 1.36 0.653 1 4 -0.027 -0.430 0.668Cultural celebrations and holidays 596 1.95 0.733 1 4 129 2.01 0.883 1 4 0.059 0.713 0.476
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 594 2.40 0.936 1 4 131 2.53 0.974 1 4 0.134 1.433 0.152
Student focused cultural organizations 594 1.76 0.844 1 4 128 1.72 0.686 1 4 -0.048 -0.692 0.489Other (specify below) 306 1.26 0.606 1 4 56 1.50 0.957 1 4 0.240 1.817 0.070
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
589 1.33 0.712 1 4 127 1.34 0.729 1 4 0.008 0.107 0.915
Marginalization: Age 593 1.28 0.622 1 4 128 1.29 0.646 1 4 0.008 0.125 0.901Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 589 1.46 0.747 1 4 127 1.54 0.798 1 4 0.079 1.027 0.305Marginalization: Disability 564 1.15 0.525 1 4 124 1.14 0.549 1 4 -0.018 -0.326 0.744Marginalization: National origin 589 1.41 0.742 1 4 127 1.36 0.693 1 4 -0.048 -0.696 0.487
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 588 1.54 0.828 1 4 128 1.35 0.663 1 4 -0.183 -2.697 0.007 0.1940
Marginalization: Political perspective 583 1.35 0.730 1 4 128 1.36 0.759 1 4 0.005 0.074 0.941Marginalization: Religion 582 1.21 0.551 1 4 128 1.26 0.704 1 4 0.055 0.826 0.409Marginalization: Sexual orientation 584 1.14 0.494 1 4 125 1.07 0.381 1 4 -0.063 -1.595 0.111
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 586 1.14 0.489 1 4 125 1.10 0.431 1 4 -0.034 -0.790 0.430
Marginalization: Other 358 1.09 0.429 1 4 66 1.08 0.448 1 4 -0.009 -0.144 0.886
A - 21
Means by Race / Ethnicity
Max
t -test
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max
Non-URM URM
Mean Diff t p dMinN N Mean Std. Dev.
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
584 1.44 0.681 1 4 124 1.45 0.726 1 4 0.009 0.128 0.898
Disparaging Remarks:Men 583 1.28 0.579 1 4 124 1.27 0.559 1 4 -0.015 -0.262 0.793Disparaging Remarks:Older People 580 1.24 0.530 1 4 122 1.24 0.489 1 4 0.003 0.062 0.951Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 579 1.26 0.517 1 4 124 1.30 0.587 1 4 0.047 0.822 0.411Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 579 1.45 0.670 1 4 124 1.45 0.610 1 4 0.005 0.088 0.930
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 579 1.13 0.420 1 4 123 1.07 0.352 1 4 -0.060 -1.660 0.097
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 579 1.44 0.757 1 4 124 1.46 0.712 1 4 0.020 0.285 0.775
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 580 1.37 0.676 1 4 124 1.34 0.643 1 4 -0.036 -0.556 0.579Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 579 1.49 0.738 1 4 123 1.38 0.594 1 4 -0.108 -1.754 0.080
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 578 1.63 0.846 1 4 124 1.62 0.818 1 4 -0.011 -0.131 0.896
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 572 1.31 0.634 1 4 124 1.34 0.649 1 4 0.033 0.511 0.610
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 578 1.20 0.518 1 4 124 1.17 0.507 1 4 -0.027 -0.546 0.585
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 576 1.23 0.584 1 4 124 1.17 0.476 1 4 -0.060 -1.220 0.223
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 338 1.05 0.281 1 3 57 1.08 0.459 1 4 0.031 0.493 0.622
A - 22
Means by Sexual Orientation
Student Type = Undergraduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
1299 2.30 0.958 1 4 254 2.41 1.006 1 4 0.111 1.623 0.105
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 1300 2.85 0.928 1 4 254 2.86 1.017 1 4 0.006 0.086 0.931
In groups with U.S. and international students 1300 2.28 0.961 1 4 254 2.20 0.948 1 4 -0.080 -1.221 0.222
In groups comprised of men and women 1299 2.81 0.977 1 4 253 2.73 1.023 1 4 -0.075 -1.078 0.281On your own 1300 3.55 0.659 1 4 254 3.43 0.804 1 4 -0.122 -2.280 0.023 0.0810
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1276 2.86 0.759 1 4 252 2.84 0.832 1 4 -0.017 -0.297 0.766
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1268 3.34 0.815 1 4 253 3.25 0.906 1 4 -0.098 -1.589 0.112
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
1267 3.08 0.838 1 4 253 2.95 0.876 1 4 -0.130 -2.165 0.031 0.0909
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1274 2.19 0.904 1 4 252 2.16 0.872 1 4 -0.031 -0.516 0.606
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
1275 2.15 0.945 1 4 251 2.03 0.886 1 4 -0.116 -1.867 0.062
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 1271 3.27 0.781 1 4 253 2.99 0.924 1 4 -0.278 -4.477 0.000 0.1970
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 1261 3.10 0.835 1 4 250 2.86 0.895 1 4 -0.242 -3.950 0.000 0.1739
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 1271 1.52 0.854 1 4 252 1.83 1.040 1 4 0.305 4.373 0.000 0.2832
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 1278 3.32 0.782 1 4 251 3.07 0.897 1 4 -0.253 -4.173 0.000 0.1766
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
1271 3.29 0.842 1 4 253 3.39 0.869 1 4 0.106 1.781 0.075
dMin Max Mean Diff t p
t -test
Std. Dev.N N
Hetero LGBTQ
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Mean
A - 23
Means by Sexual Orientation
dMin Max Mean Diff t p
t -test
Std. Dev.N N
Hetero LGBTQ
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Mean
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 1269 3.25 0.755 1 4 253 2.96 0.892 1 4 -0.291 -4.851 0.000 0.2095
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 1259 3.24 0.800 1 4 251 3.06 0.802 1 4 -0.174 -3.142 0.002 0.1204
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 1262 3.24 0.792 1 4 252 2.98 0.864 1 4 -0.253 -4.302 0.000 0.1787
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 1259 2.55 0.926 1 4 252 2.34 0.961 1 4 -0.213 -3.235 0.001 0.1673
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 1271 3.22 0.755 1 4 249 3.30 0.811 1 4 0.078 1.411 0.159
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 1267 3.08 0.792 1 4 252 2.89 0.918 1 4 -0.192 -3.097 0.002 0.1389
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
1281 3.23 0.795 1 4 254 3.34 0.760 1 4 0.110 2.086 0.037 0.0713
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 1281 3.11 0.853 1 4 254 2.80 0.992 1 4 -0.315 -4.722 0.000 0.2281
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
1254 3.26 0.834 1 4 248 3.32 0.721 1 4 0.068 1.318 0.188
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 1262 3.11 0.845 1 4 250 3.11 0.824 1 4 0.002 0.031 0.975
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 1275 3.14 0.827 1 4 251 3.22 0.726 1 4 0.078 1.527 0.127
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 1268 3.10 0.844 1 4 252 2.90 0.919 1 4 -0.194 -3.108 0.002 0.1376
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 1274 3.18 0.858 1 4 254 3.10 0.786 1 4 -0.075 -1.370 0.171
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 1267 3.03 0.902 1 4 252 2.84 0.908 1 4 -0.183 -2.919 0.004 0.1286
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 1273 3.10 0.869 1 4 253 2.90 0.949 1 4 -0.206 -3.193 0.001 0.1446
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 1266 3.06 0.820 1 4 247 3.19 0.811 1 4 0.135 2.394 0.017 0.0907
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 1275 3.03 0.888 1 4 252 3.08 0.772 1 4 0.054 0.991 0.322
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 1272 2.69 0.920 1 4 253 2.85 0.841 1 4 0.168 2.850 0.004 0.1170
A - 24
Means by Sexual Orientation
dMin Max Mean Diff t p
t -test
Std. Dev.N N
Hetero LGBTQ
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Mean
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
1277 3.72 0.572 1 4 252 3.75 0.556 1 4 0.032 0.825 0.409
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 1275 2.75 0.812 1 4 251 2.74 0.897 1 4 -0.016 -0.263 0.792
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 1042 2.90 1.010 1 4 194 2.69 0.989 1 4 -0.207 -2.671 0.008 0.1467
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 1273 2.53 0.917 1 4 252 2.55 0.892 1 4 0.019 0.311 0.756
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 1268 2.49 0.926 1 4 251 2.46 0.928 1 4 -0.030 -0.476 0.634
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 1264 2.43 0.948 1 4 252 2.29 1.043 1 4 -0.136 -1.918 0.055
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
1258 1.98 0.842 1 4 252 2.27 0.887 1 4 0.291 4.796 0.000 0.2420
Religious and/or spiritual activities 1254 1.43 0.736 1 4 251 1.27 0.580 1 4 -0.162 -3.838 0.000 0.1904Cultural celebrations and holidays 1259 1.81 0.733 1 4 252 1.86 0.733 1 4 0.054 1.057 0.291
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 1255 2.02 0.878 1 4 251 1.97 0.835 1 4 -0.054 -0.925 0.355
Student focused cultural organizations 1260 1.60 0.814 1 4 252 1.72 0.906 1 4 0.114 1.859 0.063Other (specify below) 681 1.24 0.652 1 4 114 1.12 0.436 1 4 -0.113 -2.356 0.019 0.1528
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
1269 1.51 0.818 1 4 247 1.92 1.013 1 4 0.401 5.860 0.000 0.3725
Marginalization: Age 1266 1.33 0.689 1 4 247 1.30 0.624 1 4 -0.033 -0.746 0.456Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 1267 1.48 0.798 1 4 246 1.61 0.944 1 4 0.135 2.094 0.036 0.1376Marginalization: Disability 1254 1.16 0.529 1 4 234 1.40 0.851 1 4 0.239 4.158 0.000 0.3251Marginalization: National origin 1263 1.24 0.577 1 4 243 1.18 0.534 1 4 -0.061 -1.619 0.106
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 1263 1.25 0.608 1 4 242 1.27 0.635 1 4 0.019 0.431 0.667
Marginalization: Political perspective 1268 1.62 0.920 1 4 245 1.62 0.805 1 4 0.008 0.132 0.895Marginalization: Religion 1264 1.38 0.717 1 4 243 1.36 0.738 1 4 -0.015 -0.288 0.773Marginalization: Sexual orientation 1264 1.12 0.448 1 4 246 1.89 1.049 1 4 0.774 11.382 0.000 0.8926
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 1265 1.13 0.488 1 4 246 1.48 0.953 1 4 0.352 5.644 0.000 0.4714
Marginalization: Other 757 1.11 0.492 1 4 117 1.21 0.698 1 4 0.101 1.512 0.131
A - 25
Means by Sexual Orientation
dMin Max Mean Diff t p
t -test
Std. Dev.N N
Hetero LGBTQ
Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Mean
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
1268 1.91 0.826 1 4 247 2.21 1.001 1 4 0.297 4.373 0.000 0.2536
Disparaging Remarks:Men 1261 1.67 0.780 1 4 246 1.55 0.766 1 4 -0.125 -2.329 0.020 0.1313Disparaging Remarks:Older People 1260 1.39 0.625 1 4 246 1.49 0.779 1 4 0.101 1.916 0.055Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 1263 1.42 0.658 1 4 246 1.42 0.726 1 4 0.004 0.078 0.938Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 1263 1.73 0.761 1 4 245 1.85 0.904 1 4 0.128 2.076 0.038 0.1249
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 1256 1.38 0.667 1 4 241 1.57 0.814 1 4 0.186 3.335 0.001 0.2114
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 1262 1.92 0.930 1 4 246 2.09 1.064 1 4 0.169 2.323 0.020 0.1410
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 1256 1.51 0.685 1 4 244 1.57 0.758 1 4 0.065 1.239 0.215Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 1264 1.69 0.789 1 4 245 1.73 0.862 1 4 0.030 0.513 0.608
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 1261 2.26 0.988 1 4 246 2.26 0.961 1 4 0.003 0.039 0.969
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 1261 1.61 0.805 1 4 246 1.64 0.832 1 4 0.030 0.517 0.605
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 1262 1.52 0.706 1 4 244 1.90 0.971 1 4 0.379 5.805 0.000 0.3787
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 1258 1.54 0.729 1 4 245 2.03 1.060 1 4 0.495 6.995 0.000 0.4683
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 667 1.08 0.395 1 4 103 1.16 0.579 1 4 0.078 1.323 0.186
a. Student Type = Undergraduate
A - 26
Means by Sexual Orientation
Student Type = Graduate
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments: In groups with students of different majors
662 1.82 0.844 1 4 72 1.92 0.906 1 4 0.094 0.846 0.398
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 662 2.80 1.002 1 4 73 2.87 1.090 1 4 0.065 0.489 0.625
In groups with U.S. and international students 663 2.77 1.038 1 4 73 2.90 1.128 1 4 0.129 0.934 0.350
In groups comprised of men and women 661 2.82 1.039 1 4 73 3.05 1.078 1 4 0.225 1.702 0.089On your own 661 3.38 0.813 1 4 73 3.44 0.676 1 4 0.066 0.777 0.438
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
654 3.23 0.744 1 4 72 2.97 0.995 1 4 -0.258 -2.137 0.033 0.2201
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
646 3.08 0.808 1 4 71 2.98 0.987 1 4 -0.100 -0.824 0.410
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
650 3.17 0.867 1 4 72 3.03 0.974 1 4 -0.144 -1.200 0.230
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
652 2.21 0.964 1 4 72 2.47 1.027 1 4 0.259 2.046 0.041 0.2157
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
653 2.23 0.928 1 4 72 2.35 0.970 1 4 0.124 1.037 0.300
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 654 3.46 0.708 1 4 72 2.97 1.053 1 4 -0.489 -3.848 0.000 0.4245
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 653 3.34 0.752 1 4 72 2.90 1.055 1 4 -0.441 -3.454 0.001 0.3800
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 650 1.39 0.758 1 4 72 1.78 1.062 1 4 0.389 3.025 0.003 0.4255
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 654 3.42 0.749 1 4 71 3.18 0.922 1 4 -0.238 -2.104 0.036 0.1937
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
655 3.42 0.770 1 4 72 3.51 0.826 1 4 0.093 0.915 0.360
t -testHetero LGBTQ
Min MaxStd. Dev. Min Mean Diff t p dStd. Dev.MeanMax NMeanN
A - 27
Means by Sexual Orientation t -testHetero LGBTQ
Min MaxStd. Dev. Min Mean Diff t p dStd. Dev.MeanMax NMeanN
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 652 3.38 0.697 1 4 72 2.87 1.018 1 4 -0.516 -4.197 0.000 0.4602
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 650 3.41 0.728 1 4 71 2.97 0.973 1 4 -0.449 -3.779 0.000 0.3868
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 649 3.22 0.782 1 4 71 2.81 0.945 1 4 -0.411 -3.540 0.000 0.3561
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 636 3.06 0.814 1 4 70 2.68 1.050 1 4 -0.386 -2.986 0.003 0.3377
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 649 3.25 0.749 1 4 72 3.09 0.911 1 4 -0.163 -1.467 0.143
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 649 3.28 0.732 1 4 71 2.92 1.024 1 4 -0.358 -2.876 0.004 0.3105
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following: Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
657 3.12 0.915 1 4 73 3.01 0.916 1 4 -0.109 -0.965 0.335
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 652 3.09 0.962 1 4 73 2.77 1.080 1 4 -0.327 -2.482 0.013 0.2578
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement
632 3.26 0.844 1 4 71 3.33 0.874 1 4 0.068 0.618 0.537
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 622 3.15 0.811 1 4 70 3.10 0.934 1 4 -0.048 -0.409 0.683
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 648 3.10 0.881 1 4 72 2.90 0.990 1 4 -0.196 -1.613 0.107
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 643 3.14 0.934 1 4 71 2.93 1.042 1 4 -0.211 -1.640 0.101
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 649 3.10 0.916 1 4 72 2.88 0.957 1 4 -0.219 -1.846 0.065
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 639 2.97 0.970 1 4 71 2.71 0.973 1 4 -0.262 -2.152 0.032 0.2078
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 636 3.04 0.961 1 4 72 2.92 0.990 1 4 -0.120 -0.975 0.330
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 617 3.03 0.881 1 4 69 3.13 0.917 1 4 0.105 0.908 0.364
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 638 3.02 0.953 1 4 71 3.02 0.899 1 4 0.000 0.001 0.999
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 633 2.86 0.938 1 4 71 2.75 0.956 1 4 -0.108 -0.900 0.368
A - 28
Means by Sexual Orientation t -testHetero LGBTQ
Min MaxStd. Dev. Min Mean Diff t p dStd. Dev.MeanMax NMeanN
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups: Personal friends at Georgia Tech
648 3.61 0.656 1 4 72 3.37 0.810 1 4 -0.243 -2.471 0.014 0.1967
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 649 2.97 0.825 1 4 73 2.74 1.007 1 4 -0.230 -1.888 0.059
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 505 2.85 0.910 1 4 58 2.56 0.950 1 4 -0.292 -2.227 0.026 0.2454
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 641 2.73 0.894 1 4 73 2.47 1.122 1 4 -0.264 -1.944 0.052
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 636 2.74 0.895 1 4 72 2.67 1.078 1 4 -0.076 -0.578 0.563
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 634 2.72 0.933 1 4 70 2.59 1.089 1 4 -0.125 -0.923 0.356
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture: Arts and entertainment
644 1.97 0.771 1 4 71 2.07 0.964 1 4 0.108 0.915 0.361
Religious and/or spiritual activities 642 1.36 0.612 1 4 71 1.52 0.807 1 4 0.163 1.655 0.098Cultural celebrations and holidays 644 1.94 0.734 1 4 71 2.11 0.941 1 4 0.163 1.417 0.157
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 643 2.42 0.939 1 4 72 2.49 0.969 1 4 0.069 0.574 0.566
Student focused cultural organizations 643 1.75 0.810 1 4 69 1.81 0.870 1 4 0.063 0.580 0.562Other (specify below) 326 1.30 0.674 1 4 33 1.28 0.739 1 4 -0.016 -0.117 0.907
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics: Gender
635 1.29 0.668 1 4 73 1.74 0.965 1 4 0.450 3.884 0.000 0.5333
Marginalization: Age 638 1.25 0.575 1 4 73 1.56 0.905 1 4 0.317 2.922 0.004 0.4277Marginalization: Race/ethnicity 636 1.43 0.714 1 4 72 1.79 0.978 1 4 0.356 3.002 0.003 0.4023Marginalization: Disability 611 1.12 0.475 1 4 69 1.37 0.850 1 4 0.243 2.328 0.020 0.3877Marginalization: National origin 635 1.38 0.701 1 4 72 1.56 0.949 1 4 0.178 1.546 0.123
Marginalization: Language difference/accent 636 1.47 0.780 1 4 71 1.73 0.925 1 4 0.262 2.291 0.022 0.2840
Marginalization: Political perspective 630 1.32 0.694 1 4 71 1.60 0.999 1 4 0.281 2.304 0.022 0.3367Marginalization: Religion 630 1.20 0.566 1 4 71 1.27 0.674 1 4 0.071 0.861 0.390Marginalization: Sexual orientation 629 1.08 0.374 1 4 71 1.52 0.920 1 4 0.437 3.976 0.000 0.7280
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression 631 1.10 0.412 1 4 71 1.41 0.800 1 4 0.316 3.290 0.001 0.5299
Marginalization: Other 381 1.07 0.392 1 4 38 1.22 0.727 1 4 0.143 1.201 0.230
A - 29
Means by Sexual Orientation t -testHetero LGBTQ
Min MaxStd. Dev. Min Mean Diff t p dStd. Dev.MeanMax NMeanN
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups: Women
627 1.42 0.666 1 4 72 1.63 0.843 1 4 0.203 1.978 0.048 0.2476
Disparaging Remarks:Men 625 1.28 0.577 1 4 72 1.27 0.571 1 4 -0.011 -0.157 0.875Disparaging Remarks:Older People 620 1.23 0.515 1 4 72 1.29 0.602 1 4 0.060 0.807 0.420Disparaging Remarks:Younger People 621 1.26 0.533 1 4 72 1.30 0.515 1 4 0.040 0.623 0.534Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity 622 1.44 0.650 1 4 72 1.56 0.745 1 4 0.123 1.347 0.179
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities 620 1.10 0.363 1 4 72 1.30 0.676 1 4 0.199 2.457 0.014 0.3664
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education 623 1.41 0.713 1 4 72 1.69 0.984 1 4 0.277 2.313 0.021 0.3198
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants 623 1.35 0.657 1 4 72 1.52 0.783 1 4 0.167 1.735 0.083Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents 620 1.46 0.703 1 4 72 1.61 0.832 1 4 0.150 1.468 0.142
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views 623 1.61 0.839 1 4 71 1.75 0.871 1 4 0.141 1.299 0.194
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations 616 1.31 0.636 1 4 71 1.35 0.638 1 4 0.034 0.423 0.672
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 621 1.16 0.450 1 4 72 1.52 0.854 1 4 0.361 3.526 0.000 0.5569
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people 620 1.18 0.499 1 4 72 1.60 0.909 1 4 0.420 3.840 0.000 0.6011
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below) 363 1.05 0.306 1 4 28 1.10 0.408 1 3 0.042 0.530 0.596
A - 30
Overall Frequencies
Never 310 19.8% 297 39.9%
Sometimes 695 44.4% 319 42.7%
Often 310 19.8% 85 11.4%
Very Often 248 15.9% 44 5.9%
Total 1563 745Never 127 8.1% 84 11.2%
Sometimes 454 29.0% 216 28.9%
Often 512 32.7% 208 27.8%
Very Often 471 30.1% 239 32.0%
Total 1564 746Never 347 22.2% 100 13.3%
Sometimes 676 43.2% 211 28.2%
Often 322 20.6% 192 25.7%
Very Often 219 14.0% 244 32.7%
Total 1564 747Never 159 10.2% 95 12.7%
Sometimes 476 30.5% 196 26.2%
Often 456 29.2% 191 25.6%
Very Often 471 30.2% 264 35.5%
Total 1562 746Never 8 0.5% 11 1.5%
Sometimes 152 9.7% 117 15.7%
Often 414 26.4% 193 25.9%
Very Often 991 63.4% 424 57.0%
Total 1564 745
Strongly disagree 103 6.7% 31 4.2%
Somewhat disagree 270 17.6% 72 9.8%
Somewhat agree 907 58.9% 357 48.5%
Strongly agree 259 16.8% 277 37.6%
Total 1539 736Strongly disagree 72 4.7% 39 5.3%
Somewhat disagree 147 9.6% 111 15.3%
Somewhat agree 520 34.0% 339 46.7%
Strongly agree 793 51.7% 237 32.7%
Total 1532 725Strongly disagree 90 5.8% 55 7.5%
Somewhat disagree 236 15.4% 73 10.1%
Somewhat agree 699 45.7% 310 42.4%
Strongly agree 506 33.1% 293 40.1%
Total 1530 731
Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
On your own
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
A - 31
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Strongly disagree 395 25.7% 202 27.5%
Somewhat disagree 566 36.8% 235 32.0%
Somewhat agree 466 30.3% 218 29.7%
Strongly agree 110 7.2% 79 10.7%
Total 1537 734Strongly disagree 461 30.0% 181 24.6%
Somewhat disagree 534 34.8% 270 36.7%
Somewhat agree 419 27.3% 214 29.1%
Strongly agree 123 8.0% 71 9.6%
Total 1536 736Strongly disagree 67 4.4% 25 3.4%
Somewhat disagree 175 11.4% 54 7.4%
Somewhat agree 650 42.3% 256 34.9%
Strongly agree 643 41.9% 399 54.4%
Total 1535 735Strongly disagree 93 6.1% 32 4.3%
Somewhat disagree 227 14.9% 67 9.1%
Somewhat agree 697 45.8% 293 39.9%
Strongly agree 506 33.2% 342 46.6%
Total 1522 733Strongly disagree 996 64.9% 529 72.4%
Somewhat disagree 275 17.9% 114 15.7%
Somewhat agree 182 11.9% 58 8.0%
Strongly agree 81 5.3% 29 4.0%
Total 1534 731Strongly disagree 66 4.3% 29 4.0%
Somewhat disagree 149 9.7% 50 6.8%
Somewhat agree 615 39.9% 265 36.1%
Strongly agree 710 46.1% 390 53.1%
Total 1539 734
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
A - 32
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Strongly disagree 88 5.8% 30 4.1%
Somewhat disagree 128 8.3% 40 5.4%
Somewhat agree 551 35.9% 253 34.4%
Strongly agree 768 50.0% 413 56.1%
Total 1534 737Strongly disagree 65 4.3% 22 3.0%
Somewhat disagree 158 10.3% 61 8.2%
Somewhat agree 718 46.9% 306 41.7%
Strongly agree 590 38.6% 346 47.1%
Total 1532 735Strongly disagree 60 3.9% 18 2.5%
Somewhat disagree 188 12.4% 77 10.5%
Somewhat agree 652 42.9% 258 35.3%
Strongly agree 621 40.8% 378 51.7%
Total 1521 731Strongly disagree 80 5.2% 34 4.7%
Somewhat disagree 145 9.5% 82 11.2%
Somewhat agree 702 46.0% 335 45.9%
Strongly agree 599 39.2% 279 38.2%
Total 1525 730Strongly disagree 257 16.9% 51 7.1%
Somewhat disagree 436 28.6% 101 14.1%
Somewhat agree 612 40.2% 350 48.9%
Strongly agree 217 14.2% 214 29.9%
Total 1521 716Strongly disagree 43 2.8% 23 3.1%
Somewhat disagree 181 11.8% 82 11.2%
Somewhat agree 681 44.5% 327 44.7%
Strongly agree 626 40.9% 299 40.9%
Total 1531 731Strongly disagree 80 5.2% 27 3.7%
Somewhat disagree 241 15.8% 71 9.7%
Somewhat agree 741 48.4% 333 45.6%
Strongly agree 468 30.6% 299 41.0%
Total 1530 731
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
A - 33
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Strongly disagree 56 3.7% 59 8.0%
Somewhat disagree 171 11.1% 95 12.9%
Somewhat agree 654 42.4% 294 39.7%
Strongly agree 663 42.9% 291 39.4%
Total 1544 739Strongly disagree 111 7.2% 77 10.4%
Somewhat disagree 226 14.6% 100 13.7%
Somewhat agree 665 43.0% 262 35.6%
Strongly agree 542 35.1% 296 40.3%
Total 1544 734Strongly disagree 74 4.9% 44 6.2%
Somewhat disagree 134 8.9% 52 7.2%
Somewhat agree 619 40.9% 284 39.9%
Strongly agree 685 45.3% 331 46.6%
Total 1511 711Strongly disagree 77 5.1% 40 5.7%
Somewhat disagree 231 15.2% 73 10.5%
Somewhat agree 662 43.5% 331 47.3%
Strongly agree 551 36.2% 255 36.5%
Total 1521 699Strongly disagree 69 4.5% 55 7.6%
Somewhat disagree 198 12.9% 100 13.7%
Somewhat agree 697 45.4% 311 42.7%
Strongly agree 572 37.2% 264 36.1%
Total 1536 730Strongly disagree 89 5.8% 67 9.3%
Somewhat disagree 247 16.2% 85 11.8%
Somewhat agree 663 43.3% 267 36.9%
Strongly agree 530 34.7% 304 42.0%
Total 1530 724Strongly disagree 80 5.2% 62 8.5%
Somewhat disagree 202 13.1% 96 13.1%
Somewhat agree 635 41.3% 295 40.5%
Strongly agree 619 40.3% 277 37.9%
Total 1536 730
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Status as a school athlete
National origin
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
A - 34
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Strongly disagree 115 7.5% 79 11.1%
Somewhat disagree 284 18.6% 121 16.8%
Somewhat agree 622 40.7% 279 38.8%
Strongly agree 507 33.2% 240 33.3%
Total 1528 719Strongly disagree 108 7.1% 78 10.9%
Somewhat disagree 229 14.9% 88 12.4%
Somewhat agree 650 42.3% 288 40.2%
Strongly agree 548 35.7% 261 36.5%
Total 1535 716Strongly disagree 73 4.8% 59 8.4%
Somewhat disagree 234 15.4% 83 12.0%
Somewhat agree 712 46.8% 329 47.3%
Strongly agree 503 33.1% 224 32.2%
Total 1522 695Strongly disagree 106 6.9% 76 10.5%
Somewhat disagree 233 15.2% 87 12.2%
Somewhat agree 692 45.0% 303 42.2%
Strongly agree 505 32.9% 251 35.1%
Total 1536 717Strongly disagree 183 11.9% 80 11.3%
Somewhat disagree 370 24.1% 138 19.4%
Somewhat agree 688 44.9% 306 42.9%
Strongly agree 293 19.1% 188 26.4%
Total 1534 713
Very uncomfortable 16 1.1% 15 2.1%
Somewhat uncomfortable 47 3.1% 35 4.8%
Somewhat comfortable 282 18.3% 187 25.6%
Very comfortable 1193 77.5% 493 67.5%
Total 1538 729Very uncomfortable 121 7.9% 49 6.8%
Somewhat uncomfortable 399 26.0% 132 18.1%
Somewhat comfortable 758 49.3% 356 48.7%
Very comfortable 258 16.8% 193 26.5%
Total 1535 731
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Classmates
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Socioeconomic status
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
A - 35
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Very uncomfortable 161 12.9% 69 12.1%
Somewhat uncomfortable 248 19.9% 98 17.3%
Somewhat comfortable 439 35.3% 274 48.1%
Very comfortable 397 31.9% 128 22.5%
Total 1245 569Very uncomfortable 230 15.0% 87 12.1%
Somewhat uncomfortable 477 31.1% 182 25.2%
Somewhat comfortable 611 39.8% 310 42.9%
Very comfortable 216 14.1% 143 19.8%
Total 1534 722Very uncomfortable 261 17.1% 81 11.3%
Somewhat uncomfortable 472 30.9% 176 24.6%
Somewhat comfortable 593 38.8% 312 43.6%
Very comfortable 201 13.2% 147 20.5%
Total 1529 715Very uncomfortable 320 21.0% 95 13.3%
Somewhat uncomfortable 470 30.8% 170 23.8%
Somewhat comfortable 530 34.7% 297 41.7%
Very comfortable 205 13.5% 150 21.1%
Total 1525 712
Never 420 27.6% 194 26.7%
Sometimes 755 49.7% 398 54.9%
Often 228 15.0% 91 12.6%
Very Often 116 7.6% 42 5.8%
Total 1519 726Never 1065 70.3% 498 69.0%
Sometimes 336 22.2% 187 25.9%
Often 69 4.6% 25 3.5%
Very Often 45 3.0% 12 1.6%
Total 1515 722Never 531 35.0% 197 27.2%
Sometimes 779 51.2% 386 53.2%
Often 168 11.0% 115 15.8%
Very Often 42 2.8% 27 3.7%
Total 1520 725
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Instructors/Faculty
Staff
Administration
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
A - 36
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Never 455 30.0% 126 17.4%
Sometimes 703 46.4% 271 37.4%
Often 246 16.2% 220 30.4%
Very Often 112 7.4% 107 14.8%
Total 1516 725Never 837 55.0% 318 44.1%
Sometimes 502 33.0% 293 40.6%
Often 100 6.5% 78 10.9%
Very Often 82 5.4% 32 4.4%
Total 1521 722Never 688 86.1% 291 80.3%
Sometimes 71 8.9% 46 12.6%
Often 16 2.0% 16 4.5%
Very Often 24 3.0% 10 2.6%
Total 799 362
Not at all 958 62.8% 562 78.4%
Slightly 317 20.8% 86 12.0%
Somewhat 182 11.9% 51 7.1%
Greatly 68 4.5% 17 2.4%
Total 1525 716Not at all 1176 77.2% 573 79.5%
Slightly 223 14.6% 99 13.7%
Somewhat 96 6.3% 40 5.5%
Greatly 29 1.9% 9 1.3%
Total 1523 721Not at all 1029 67.6% 480 67.1%
Slightly 277 18.2% 148 20.7%
Somewhat 160 10.5% 74 10.4%
Greatly 56 3.6% 14 1.9%
Total 1523 716Not at all 1325 88.5% 628 91.1%
Slightly 87 5.8% 29 4.2%
Somewhat 53 3.6% 22 3.2%
Greatly 32 2.1% 10 1.5%
Total 1496 689
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Marginalization: Gender
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
Marginalization: Age
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
A - 37
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not at all 1262 83.3% 520 72.7%
Slightly 176 11.6% 118 16.5%
Somewhat 59 3.9% 64 8.9%
Greatly 18 1.2% 14 2.0%
Total 1515 715Not at all 1256 83.0% 474 66.3%
Slightly 159 10.5% 146 20.4%
Somewhat 75 5.0% 73 10.2%
Greatly 23 1.5% 23 3.2%
Total 1513 716Not at all 942 61.9% 548 77.2%
Slightly 300 19.7% 93 13.0%
Somewhat 202 13.3% 49 6.9%
Greatly 79 5.2% 20 2.9%
Total 1523 710Not at all 1132 74.6% 607 85.5%
Slightly 236 15.6% 64 9.0%
Somewhat 115 7.6% 29 4.1%
Greatly 34 2.2% 10 1.5%
Total 1517 710Not at all 1300 85.5% 653 92.1%
Slightly 103 6.8% 31 4.4%
Somewhat 83 5.4% 16 2.3%
Greatly 34 2.2% 8 1.2%
Total 1520 709Not at all 1361 89.6% 652 91.8%
Slightly 68 4.4% 32 4.5%
Somewhat 57 3.7% 19 2.7%
Greatly 34 2.3% 8 1.1%
Total 1520 710Not at all 828 94.1% 405 95.6%
Slightly 16 1.8% 6 1.5%
Somewhat 16 1.8% 7 1.7%
Greatly 19 2.2% 5 1.2%
Total 879 424
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
A - 38
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Never 490 32.2% 461 65.1%
Sometimes 714 46.8% 193 27.3%
Often 212 13.9% 40 5.7%
Very Often 108 7.1% 13 1.9%
Total 1524 708Never 754 49.7% 546 77.3%
Sometimes 588 38.8% 135 19.1%
Often 117 7.7% 15 2.2%
Very Often 58 3.8% 10 1.4%
Total 1517 707Never 1014 66.9% 561 80.0%
Sometimes 410 27.1% 118 16.9%
Often 65 4.3% 17 2.4%
Very Often 26 1.7% 5 0.7%
Total 1516 702Never 1013 66.7% 543 77.2%
Sometimes 406 26.7% 138 19.7%
Often 71 4.7% 18 2.6%
Very Often 28 1.9% 4 0.6%
Total 1518 703Never 653 43.0% 440 62.5%
Sometimes 655 43.1% 224 31.9%
Often 153 10.1% 26 3.7%
Very Often 57 3.8% 13 1.9%
Total 1518 704Never 1028 68.2% 635 90.5%
Sometimes 368 24.4% 53 7.6%
Often 76 5.0% 10 1.4%
Very Often 35 2.3% 4 0.6%
Total 1506 702Never 596 39.3% 483 68.6%
Sometimes 541 35.6% 152 21.6%
Often 243 16.1% 47 6.8%
Very Often 136 21Total 1516 703Never 878 58.1% 504 71.6%
Sometimes 515 34.1% 158 22.4%
Often 87 5.8% 25 3.5%
Very Often 30 2.0% 17 2.4%
Total 1509 704
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 39
Overall Frequencies Undergraduate Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Never 728 47.9% 440 62.7%
Sometimes 577 38.0% 211 30.1%
Often 157 10.3% 29 4.2%
Very Often 56 3.7% 21 3.0%
Total 1518 702Never 377 24.8% 397 56.5%
Sometimes 587 38.7% 202 28.8%
Often 342 22.5% 72 10.2%
Very Often 211 13.9% 31 4.5%
Total 1516 702Never 831 54.8% 527 75.7%
Sometimes 494 32.6% 129 18.5%
Often 128 8.4% 27 3.9%
Very Often 63 4.1% 13 1.8%
Total 1516 696Never 844 55.7% 597 85.0%
Sometimes 521 34.4% 80 11.4%
Often 96 6.3% 19 2.7%
Very Often 55 3.6% 6 0.9%
Total 1516 702Never 831 55.0% 589 84.1%
Sometimes 499 33.0% 81 11.5%
Often 114 7.5% 19 2.8%
Very Often 68 4.5% 11 1.6%
Total 1512 700Never 729 93.8% 380 96.3%
Sometimes 33 4.2% 8 2.0%
Often 4 0.6% 6 1.5%
Very Often 11 1.4% 1 0.2%
Total 777 395
Disparaging Remarks:Others
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 40
Frequencies by Gender
Never 225 23.9% 77 12.9%
Sometimes 411 43.6% 272 45.7%
Often 159 16.9% 148 24.9%
Very Often 147 15.6% 98 16.5%
Total 941 595Never 94 10.0% 28 4.6%
Sometimes 270 28.7% 176 29.5%
Often 307 32.6% 199 33.4%
Very Often 270 28.7% 194 32.5%
Total 941 596Never 214 22.8% 124 20.9%
Sometimes 390 41.4% 273 45.8%
Often 207 22.0% 114 19.1%
Very Often 130 13.8% 85 14.2%
Total 941 596Never 120 12.8% 32 5.4%
Sometimes 303 32.2% 161 27.0%
Often 265 28.2% 188 31.7%
Very Often 253 26.9% 214 35.9%
Total 941 594Never 4 0.4% 2 0.3%
Sometimes 86 9.1% 62 10.5%
Often 271 28.8% 135 22.6%
Very Often 580 61.6% 397 66.5%
Total 941 596
Strongly disagree 67 7.2% 35 6.0%
Somewhat disagree 152 16.4% 110 18.8%
Somewhat agree 538 57.9% 354 60.7%
Strongly agree 173 18.6% 84 14.4%
Total 929 583Strongly disagree 56 6.1% 14 2.5%
Somewhat disagree 89 9.7% 52 8.8%
Somewhat agree 324 35.2% 191 32.6%
Strongly agree 451 49.0% 328 56.1%
Total 920 584
Undergraduate
In groups comprised of men and women
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Percent
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
Man Woman
On your own
Count Percent Count
A - 41
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Strongly disagree 53 5.7% 34 5.8%
Somewhat disagree 131 14.2% 95 16.4%
Somewhat agree 415 45.0% 277 47.6%
Strongly agree 323 35.0% 176 30.2%
Total 921 581Strongly disagree 238 25.7% 149 25.6%
Somewhat disagree 337 36.4% 221 37.9%
Somewhat agree 275 29.7% 180 30.8%
Strongly agree 76 8.2% 33 5.7%
Total 926 584Strongly disagree 293 31.6% 160 27.5%
Somewhat disagree 292 31.5% 235 40.3%
Somewhat agree 260 28.0% 147 25.3%
Strongly agree 82 8.8% 40 6.9%
Total 926 582Strongly disagree 38 4.2% 19 3.2%
Somewhat disagree 92 10.0% 74 12.6%
Somewhat agree 399 43.1% 245 42.0%
Strongly agree 395 42.7% 246 42.2%
Total 925 583Strongly disagree 59 6.4% 28 4.8%
Somewhat disagree 124 13.5% 90 15.6%
Somewhat agree 414 45.1% 274 47.5%
Strongly agree 321 35.0% 185 32.1%
Total 918 577Strongly disagree 627 67.8% 363 62.3%
Somewhat disagree 149 16.1% 120 20.5%
Somewhat agree 110 11.9% 65 11.1%
Strongly agree 40 4.3% 35 6.0%
Total 925 583Strongly disagree 39 4.2% 23 4.0%
Somewhat disagree 75 8.1% 68 11.7%
Somewhat agree 367 39.4% 238 40.8%
Strongly agree 449 48.3% 253 43.4%
Total 930 582
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
A - 42
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Strongly disagree 80 8.7% 7 1.3%
Somewhat disagree 92 9.9% 32 5.5%
Somewhat agree 340 36.9% 202 34.6%
Strongly agree 410 44.5% 343 58.6%
Total 922 585Strongly disagree 43 4.7% 16 2.7%
Somewhat disagree 81 8.8% 66 11.2%
Somewhat agree 423 46.0% 289 49.4%
Strongly agree 372 40.5% 214 36.6%
Total 919 585Strongly disagree 45 4.9% 14 2.4%
Somewhat disagree 106 11.6% 72 12.3%
Somewhat agree 367 40.2% 276 47.5%
Strongly agree 395 43.3% 220 37.8%
Total 913 581Strongly disagree 57 6.2% 16 2.8%
Somewhat disagree 83 9.0% 54 9.2%
Somewhat agree 427 46.7% 264 45.4%
Strongly agree 348 38.0% 248 42.6%
Total 916 582Strongly disagree 140 15.3% 98 16.8%
Somewhat disagree 256 28.1% 175 30.1%
Somewhat agree 368 40.4% 240 41.2%
Strongly agree 147 16.2% 69 11.9%
Total 912 582Strongly disagree 31 3.4% 11 1.9%
Somewhat disagree 127 13.8% 49 8.5%
Somewhat agree 393 42.6% 276 47.4%
Strongly agree 371 40.2% 246 42.2%
Total 923 584Strongly disagree 44 4.7% 27 4.7%
Somewhat disagree 149 16.2% 84 14.5%
Somewhat agree 448 48.7% 286 49.0%
Strongly agree 279 30.3% 185 31.8%
Total 920 582
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
A - 43
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Strongly disagree 38 4.1% 19 3.2%
Somewhat disagree 106 11.5% 62 10.5%
Somewhat agree 389 42.0% 249 42.2%
Strongly agree 392 42.4% 261 44.1%
Total 926 591Strongly disagree 64 6.9% 38 6.5%
Somewhat disagree 95 10.3% 120 20.2%
Somewhat agree 403 43.7% 259 43.7%
Strongly agree 361 39.1% 176 29.6%
Total 923 594Strongly disagree 51 5.7% 22 3.9%
Somewhat disagree 85 9.4% 46 7.9%
Somewhat agree 359 39.7% 248 42.7%
Strongly agree 409 45.2% 265 45.6%
Total 904 581Strongly disagree 53 5.8% 24 4.1%
Somewhat disagree 131 14.4% 95 16.3%
Somewhat agree 395 43.4% 257 43.8%
Strongly agree 330 36.3% 210 35.8%
Total 909 585Strongly disagree 50 5.4% 17 2.9%
Somewhat disagree 120 13.0% 75 12.8%
Somewhat agree 406 44.0% 279 47.6%
Strongly agree 347 37.5% 215 36.7%
Total 923 586Strongly disagree 60 6.6% 24 4.1%
Somewhat disagree 134 14.6% 103 17.6%
Somewhat agree 378 41.3% 277 47.1%
Strongly agree 343 37.5% 183 31.2%
Total 915 587Strongly disagree 57 6.2% 22 3.7%
Somewhat disagree 116 12.6% 76 12.9%
Somewhat agree 365 39.6% 262 44.6%
Strongly agree 383 41.6% 228 38.8%
Total 922 587Strongly disagree 77 8.3% 31 5.4%
Somewhat disagree 155 16.9% 120 20.5%
Somewhat agree 360 39.3% 257 44.0%
Strongly agree 325 35.4% 176 30.1%
Total 917 585
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
National origin
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Status as a school athlete
A - 44
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Strongly disagree 68 7.4% 33 5.6%
Somewhat disagree 120 13.1% 99 16.9%
Somewhat agree 373 40.6% 271 45.9%
Strongly agree 357 38.9% 186 31.6%
Total 918 589Strongly disagree 56 6.1% 16 2.8%
Somewhat disagree 145 15.8% 87 15.0%
Somewhat agree 436 47.6% 267 45.8%
Strongly agree 279 30.4% 212 36.5%
Total 916 582Strongly disagree 80 8.7% 26 4.4%
Somewhat disagree 139 15.0% 88 15.0%
Somewhat agree 392 42.5% 284 48.3%
Strongly agree 311 33.8% 189 32.3%
Total 922 587Strongly disagree 139 15.1% 40 6.9%
Somewhat disagree 221 24.0% 141 24.1%
Somewhat agree 385 41.7% 296 50.6%
Strongly agree 177 19.2% 107 18.4%
Total 923 584
Very uncomfortable 10 1.1% 4 0.7%
Somewhat uncomfortable 40 4.4% 6 1.0%
Somewhat comfortable 174 18.9% 101 17.3%
Very comfortable 698 75.6% 477 81.1%
Total 923 588Very uncomfortable 85 9.3% 32 5.4%
Somewhat uncomfortable 233 25.3% 159 27.1%
Somewhat comfortable 449 48.7% 295 50.1%
Very comfortable 154 16.7% 102 17.3%
Total 921 589Very uncomfortable 102 13.6% 55 11.4%
Somewhat uncomfortable 142 19.0% 99 20.7%
Somewhat comfortable 255 34.1% 181 37.7%
Very comfortable 249 33.3% 145 30.2%
Total 748 480Very uncomfortable 151 16.5% 75 12.8%
Somewhat uncomfortable 263 28.5% 201 34.3%
Somewhat comfortable 361 39.2% 244 41.6%
Very comfortable 145 15.8% 66 11.3%
Total 920 587
Instructors/Faculty
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
A - 45
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Very uncomfortable 165 18.0% 90 15.3%
Somewhat uncomfortable 274 29.9% 191 32.6%
Somewhat comfortable 338 36.9% 247 42.2%
Very comfortable 139 15.2% 58 9.9%
Total 916 585Very uncomfortable 187 20.5% 117 20.0%
Somewhat uncomfortable 269 29.5% 195 33.4%
Somewhat comfortable 312 34.1% 216 36.9%
Very comfortable 145 15.9% 57 9.7%
Total 914 584
Never 298 32.8% 114 19.6%
Sometimes 410 45.1% 333 57.3%
Often 136 14.9% 85 14.6%
Very Often 66 7.3% 50 8.6%
Total 909 582Never 654 71.9% 395 68.4%
Sometimes 193 21.2% 133 23.1%
Often 29 3.2% 38 6.5%
Very Often 33 3.7% 12 2.0%
Total 909 578Never 341 37.5% 175 30.0%
Sometimes 444 48.8% 328 56.1%
Often 101 11.1% 63 10.7%
Very Often 24 2.6% 18 3.1%
Total 909 584Never 282 31.1% 165 28.4%
Sometimes 404 44.5% 288 49.7%
Often 144 15.9% 95 16.3%
Very Often 78 8.6% 33 5.6%
Total 908 580Never 539 59.2% 285 48.8%
Sometimes 277 30.4% 219 37.5%
Often 52 5.8% 44 7.5%
Very Often 42 4.7% 36 6.2%
Total 911 583Never 440 86.1% 236 86.2%
Sometimes 45 8.9% 24 8.7%
Often 12 2.3% 5 1.7%
Very Often 14 2.8% 9 3.4%
Total 511 274
Staff
Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
A - 46
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Not at all 744 81.3% 212 36.3%
Slightly 104 11.4% 208 35.7%
Somewhat 50 5.4% 125 21.4%
Greatly 17 1.9% 39 6.6%
Total 914 583Not at all 700 76.7% 459 78.7%
Slightly 134 14.7% 86 14.7%
Somewhat 60 6.6% 29 4.9%
Greatly 19 2.1% 10 1.7%
Total 912 583Not at all 604 66.2% 408 70.2%
Slightly 195 21.4% 77 13.2%
Somewhat 82 9.0% 73 12.5%
Greatly 32 3.5% 24 4.1%
Total 913 582Not at all 810 89.8% 506 88.7%
Slightly 53 5.9% 28 5.0%
Somewhat 23 2.5% 21 3.7%
Greatly 16 1.8% 15 2.6%
Total 903 571Not at all 749 82.3% 493 84.8%
Slightly 117 12.9% 57 9.8%
Somewhat 31 3.4% 28 4.8%
Greatly 14 1.5% 3 0.5%
Total 910 581Not at all 751 82.7% 486 83.7%
Slightly 93 10.3% 61 10.6%
Somewhat 47 5.1% 29 4.9%
Greatly 17 1.9% 5 0.9%
Total 908 581Not at all 557 60.7% 373 64.5%
Slightly 173 18.8% 119 20.7%
Somewhat 131 14.3% 66 11.4%
Greatly 57 6.2% 20 3.5%
Total 918 578Not at all 696 76.5% 419 72.0%
Slightly 127 13.9% 106 18.2%
Somewhat 67 7.3% 44 7.6%
Greatly 20 2.2% 13 2.2%
Total 910 582
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Age
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
A - 47
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Not at all 786 86.4% 509 87.3%
Slightly 62 6.8% 32 5.6%
Somewhat 45 5.0% 30 5.2%
Greatly 17 1.8% 11 1.9%
Total 910 583Not at all 824 90.5% 534 91.7%
Slightly 46 5.0% 18 3.2%
Somewhat 28 3.1% 21 3.6%
Greatly 12 1.3% 9 1.5%
Total 911 582Not at all 536 94.5% 282 94.0%
Slightly 11 1.9% 5 1.5%
Somewhat 8 1.4% 7 2.3%
Greatly 13 2.3% 6 2.1%
Total 567 299
Never 342 37.6% 143 24.3%
Sometimes 418 45.9% 288 49.1%
Often 101 11.1% 102 17.3%
Very Often 49 5.4% 54 9.2%
Total 911 586Never 429 47.2% 312 53.9%
Sometimes 354 39.0% 222 38.2%
Often 84 9.2% 31 5.3%
Very Often 41 4.6% 15 2.6%
Total 909 580Never 600 66.2% 403 69.5%
Sometimes 247 27.2% 153 26.4%
Often 40 4.4% 19 3.3%
Very Often 20 2.2% 5 0.9%
Total 907 581Never 611 67.1% 387 66.6%
Sometimes 241 26.4% 159 27.5%
Often 39 4.3% 27 4.7%
Very Often 20 2.2% 7 1.2%
Total 911 580
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
A - 48
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Never 415 45.6% 229 39.3%
Sometimes 373 41.0% 271 46.6%
Often 90 9.9% 58 10.0%
Very Often 31 3.4% 24 4.1%
Total 909 582Never 614 68.0% 404 70.1%
Sometimes 225 24.9% 132 22.9%
Often 45 4.9% 25 4.4%
Very Often 19 2.1% 15 2.5%
Total 903 576Never 393 43.2% 195 33.6%
Sometimes 301 33.1% 235 40.5%
Often 143 15.7% 98 16.8%
Very Often 72 53Total 908 581Never 526 58.2% 341 58.9%
Sometimes 309 34.2% 194 33.6%
Often 54 5.9% 29 5.1%
Very Often 15 1.6% 14 2.5%
Total 903 579Never 461 50.7% 253 43.6%
Sometimes 315 34.7% 252 43.3%
Often 104 11.5% 50 8.7%
Very Often 28 3.1% 26 4.4%
Total 909 581Never 249 27.3% 123 21.3%
Sometimes 320 35.1% 259 44.8%
Often 202 22.2% 129 22.3%
Very Often 140 15.4% 67 11.6%
Total 911 578Never 500 54.9% 319 55.0%
Sometimes 286 31.4% 199 34.4%
Often 80 8.8% 43 7.4%
Very Often 44 4.9% 18 3.1%
Total 910 579Never 518 56.9% 319 55.0%
Sometimes 305 33.5% 207 35.7%
Often 59 6.5% 34 5.8%
Very Often 28 3.1% 20 3.5%
Total 909 580
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 49
Frequencies by Gender Undergraduate
Percent
Man Woman
Count Percent Count
Never 518 56.9% 307 53.4%
Sometimes 295 32.4% 200 34.8%
Often 59 6.5% 46 8.0%
Very Often 38 4.2% 21 3.7%
Total 909 575Never 490 94.4% 230 93.8%
Sometimes 18 3.5% 14 5.7%
Often 3 0.6% 0 0.0%
Very Often 8 1.5% 1 0.5%
Total
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 50
Frequencies by Gender
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
In groups comprised of men and women
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
On your own
212 40.1% 82 39.5%
222 41.9% 95 45.7%
61 11.6% 23 11.0%
34 6.4% 8 3.8%
529 20759 11.2% 23 10.8%
156 29.6% 57 27.3%
146 27.6% 59 28.4%
166 31.5% 70 33.5%
528 20978 14.7% 19 9.3%
146 27.6% 63 30.1%
131 24.8% 59 28.3%
174 32.9% 68 32.4%
529 20978 14.8% 16 7.5%
146 27.6% 48 22.9%
134 25.3% 55 26.2%
171 32.3% 90 43.4%
529 2089 1.6% 2 1.1%
85 16.2% 31 15.1%
136 25.7% 54 25.8%
299 56.5% 120 57.9%
529 208
18 3.5% 11 5.3%
43 8.3% 24 11.9%
253 48.4% 103 50.2%
208 39.9% 67 32.7%
522 20524 4.6% 11 5.6%
83 16.1% 29 14.0%
244 47.5% 93 45.4%
164 31.8% 71 34.9%
514 204
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
A - 51
Frequencies by Gender
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
39 7.5% 13 6.4%
42 8.1% 31 15.0%
227 43.8% 82 40.0%
210 40.6% 79 38.6%
517 205140 27.0% 58 28.4%
176 33.9% 58 28.2%
149 28.6% 66 32.3%
55 10.6% 23 11.1%
520 205129 24.7% 49 23.7%
199 38.1% 69 33.6%
142 27.2% 71 34.8%
53 10.1% 16 7.9%
522 20513 2.6% 9 4.6%
34 6.4% 18 8.8%
177 34.0% 78 38.1%
298 57.0% 100 48.5%
522 20517 3.2% 12 6.0%
43 8.3% 20 9.9%
220 42.3% 72 35.5%
241 46.2% 99 48.6%
522 203381 73.2% 146 71.7%
83 15.9% 31 15.1%
40 7.6% 17 8.1%
17 3.2% 10 5.0%
520 20319 3.6% 8 4.0%
31 6.0% 17 8.5%
199 38.1% 63 30.9%
273 52.3% 116 56.6%
522 205
A - 52
Frequencies by Gender
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
28 5.3% 3 1.4%
32 6.2% 6 3.2%
186 35.5% 64 31.5%
278 53.0% 131 64.0%
524 20510 1.9% 10 4.9%
42 7.9% 17 8.2%
229 43.8% 75 37.0%
242 46.4% 102 49.9%
522 20410 1.9% 6 3.1%
51 9.8% 23 11.5%
189 36.4% 67 33.1%
271 51.9% 106 52.3%
521 20224 4.6% 10 4.9%
56 10.8% 22 10.6%
242 46.8% 90 43.9%
196 37.8% 83 40.6%
518 20424 4.7% 24 12.2%
75 14.7% 23 11.5%
248 48.9% 99 49.8%
161 31.7% 53 26.6%
508 20014 2.7% 8 4.0%
58 11.2% 21 10.4%
235 45.2% 89 43.8%
212 40.8% 85 41.8%
519 20317 3.2% 10 4.7%
41 7.8% 25 12.4%
247 47.7% 85 41.6%
214 41.3% 84 41.3%
518 204
A - 53
Frequencies by Gender
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
National origin
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Status as a school athlete
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
43 8.3% 16 7.5%
62 11.9% 33 15.8%
208 39.7% 80 38.5%
211 40.2% 79 38.1%
525 20757 11.0% 18 8.6%
62 12.0% 36 17.4%
179 34.5% 79 38.3%
222 42.6% 74 35.8%
521 20631 6.2% 13 6.5%
39 7.7% 12 6.3%
195 38.5% 85 43.4%
241 47.5% 86 43.8%
507 19729 5.8% 11 5.8%
53 10.6% 20 10.4%
232 46.8% 96 49.3%
182 36.7% 68 34.6%
496 19639 7.5% 14 7.1%
68 13.1% 31 15.2%
212 40.9% 96 47.0%
200 38.5% 63 30.7%
518 20443 8.4% 23 11.4%
58 11.4% 25 12.4%
183 35.6% 81 39.9%
229 44.6% 74 36.3%
513 20345 8.7% 16 7.9%
71 13.7% 24 11.5%
196 38.0% 95 46.0%
204 39.5% 71 34.6%
517 20657 11.2% 21 10.6%
92 18.0% 27 13.4%
181 35.5% 93 46.3%
180 35.3% 60 29.6%
509 202
A - 54
Frequencies by Gender
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Very uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotal
Instructors/Faculty
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
57 11.3% 20 9.9%
64 12.7% 23 11.5%
190 37.7% 92 45.3%
193 38.3% 68 33.4%
505 20348 9.7% 11 5.6%
63 12.8% 20 10.4%
226 45.7% 99 51.2%
158 31.9% 63 32.7%
495 19356 10.9% 20 10.0%
62 12.3% 25 12.4%
207 40.7% 91 45.4%
184 36.1% 65 32.3%
509 20157 11.3% 24 11.7%
99 19.6% 35 17.4%
208 41.3% 95 47.5%
140 27.8% 47 23.3%
505 200
11 2.1% 3 1.4%
24 4.6% 11 5.3%
143 27.7% 40 19.4%
340 65.6% 151 73.8%
517 20531 5.9% 17 8.0%
95 18.3% 37 18.2%
258 49.7% 94 45.9%
135 26.1% 57 27.9%
519 20547 11.5% 20 13.2%
67 16.2% 30 19.9%
208 50.4% 63 42.3%
91 21.9% 37 24.6%
413 15056 11.0% 28 13.7%
119 23.3% 62 30.2%
239 46.8% 70 33.9%
96 18.9% 46 22.2%
510 205
A - 55
Frequencies by Gender
Very uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotal
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Staff
Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
58 11.3% 22 11.0%
122 24.1% 53 26.0%
224 44.2% 84 41.8%
103 20.4% 43 21.2%
507 20263 12.5% 30 14.7%
120 23.8% 49 24.1%
214 42.3% 82 40.7%
108 21.4% 41 20.5%
505 202
150 28.9% 42 21.1%
278 53.7% 117 58.8%
66 12.7% 24 12.2%
24 4.7% 16 7.8%
518 199359 69.7% 137 68.8%
130 25.3% 51 25.9%
18 3.5% 7 3.4%
8 1.6% 4 1.9%
516 198154 29.7% 41 20.4%
268 51.9% 113 56.8%
76 14.6% 38 19.1%
20 3.8% 7 3.8%
517 19993 18.0% 32 16.1%
189 36.5% 81 40.4%
159 30.6% 59 29.4%
77 14.9% 28 14.1%
518 199229 44.4% 87 44.1%
206 40.0% 82 41.3%
57 11.1% 20 10.1%
23 4.5% 9 4.4%
515 198221 79.8% 68 81.3%
34 12.3% 12 13.9%
16 5.7% 0 0.6%
6 2.2% 4 4.3%
276 84
A - 56
Frequencies by Gender
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Age
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
444 87.8% 115 56.7%
36 7.1% 49 23.8%
20 4.0% 30 14.7%
6 1.1% 10 4.7%
506 204415 81.7% 155 75.6%
64 12.6% 32 15.5%
23 4.6% 15 7.5%
6 1.1% 3 1.4%
508 205344 67.7% 134 66.4%
102 20.1% 45 22.1%
53 10.4% 19 9.4%
9 1.7% 4 2.0%
507 202455 92.7% 169 88.8%
17 3.4% 9 4.9%
14 2.8% 8 4.3%
5 1.1% 4 2.0%
491 190366 72.3% 151 74.2%
81 16.0% 36 17.6%
49 9.8% 14 7.0%
10 2.0% 2 1.2%
506 203331 65.4% 138 68.5%
104 20.6% 40 20.0%
55 10.8% 17 8.6%
16 3.2% 6 2.9%
506 202389 77.0% 155 78.2%
65 12.9% 27 13.9%
37 7.3% 10 5.2%
14 2.8% 5 2.7%
505 198431 86.0% 170 84.3%
39 7.8% 24 11.8%
22 4.4% 7 3.5%
9 1.7% 1 0.4%
501 201
A - 57
Frequencies by Gender
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
472 93.9% 177 89.0%
18 3.7% 12 5.9%
9 1.7% 7 3.7%
4 0.8% 3 1.4%
503 199471 93.4% 179 89.6%
18 3.5% 13 6.5%
12 2.3% 6 3.0%
4 0.8% 2 0.8%
505 199307 95.9% 96 94.6%
5 1.5% 2 1.6%
6 1.8% 1 1.4%
3 0.8% 3 2.5%
320 102
353 70.6% 107 53.3%
116 23.2% 74 36.9%
24 4.9% 14 6.8%
6 1.3% 6 3.1%
500 201385 77.1% 158 79.1%
94 18.9% 36 18.1%
10 2.1% 5 2.5%
10 1.9% 1 0.3%
499 200406 81.4% 150 76.6%
76 15.3% 40 20.4%
14 2.7% 4 1.8%
3 0.5% 2 1.2%
499 195389 78.2% 150 76.0%
93 18.7% 41 20.7%
12 2.5% 6 2.9%
3 0.7% 1 0.4%
498 197
A - 58
Frequencies by Gender
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
319 64.0% 119 60.0%
151 30.3% 69 34.8%
19 3.8% 8 3.9%
10 1.9% 3 1.4%
498 198453 91.2% 176 89.3%
36 7.3% 16 8.1%
7 1.3% 3 1.7%
1 0.2% 2 1.0%
496 198351 70.5% 130 66.1%
99 19.9% 50 25.1%
38 7.5% 9 4.6%
11 8498 197365 73.2% 136 68.6%
105 21.2% 49 24.7%
19 3.8% 6 2.9%
9 1.8% 7 3.8%
498 198316 63.7% 120 60.4%
146 29.4% 64 32.4%
21 4.3% 7 3.6%
13 2.6% 7 3.6%
496 199281 56.6% 115 57.8%
137 27.7% 60 30.3%
54 10.8% 17 8.7%
24 4.9% 6 3.2%
496 198369 75.0% 156 79.4%
94 19.1% 32 16.1%
18 3.7% 8 3.8%
11 2.2% 1 0.7%
493 196436 87.7% 157 79.2%
44 8.9% 36 18.1%
13 2.6% 5 2.4%
4 0.8% 1 0.3%
497 198
A - 59
Frequencies by Gender
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Graduate
Woman
Count Percent
Man
Count Percent
431 86.8% 155 78.9%
47 9.6% 32 16.3%
11 2.3% 7 3.4%
7 1.3% 3 1.4%
496 197289 96.7% 89 94.9%
6 2.0% 2 2.1%
3 1.0% 3 3.0%
1 0.3% 0.0%
A - 60
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Never 252 20.6% 58 16.9%
Sometimes 539 44.1% 155 45.6%
Often 241 19.8% 69 20.2%
Very Often 189 15.5% 59 17.3%
Total 1222 341Never 94 7.7% 32 9.5%
Sometimes 354 28.9% 100 29.5%
Often 421 34.4% 91 26.7%
Very Often 354 29.0% 117 34.3%
Total 1223 341Never 283 23.2% 64 18.8%
Sometimes 524 42.9% 152 44.6%
Often 244 20.0% 78 22.8%
Very Often 171 14.0% 47 13.8%
Total 1223 341Never 124 10.2% 35 10.3%
Sometimes 377 30.9% 99 29.0%
Often 344 28.1% 113 33.1%
Very Often 377 30.8% 94 27.7%
Total 1221 341Never 4 0.3% 3 1.0%
Sometimes 118 9.6% 34 10.1%
Often 320 26.1% 94 27.6%
Very Often 782 63.9% 209 61.4%
Total 1224 340
Strongly disagree 70 5.9% 32 9.6%
Somewhat disagree 199 16.6% 71 21.1%
Somewhat agree 723 60.2% 184 54.4%
Strongly agree 209 17.4% 50 14.8%
Total 1201 338Strongly disagree 39 3.3% 32 9.6%
Somewhat disagree 116 9.8% 31 9.5%
Somewhat agree 388 32.5% 133 39.2%
Strongly agree 650 54.5% 143 42.7%
Total 1193 339Strongly disagree 62 5.2% 28 8.3%
Somewhat disagree 164 13.8% 71 21.2%
Somewhat agree 572 47.9% 127 37.7%
Strongly agree 396 33.1% 110 32.8%
Total 1193 337
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
On your own
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
A - 61
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Strongly disagree 302 25.2% 93 27.4%
Somewhat disagree 443 36.9% 123 36.4%
Somewhat agree 365 30.5% 101 29.8%
Strongly agree 89 7.4% 22 6.4%
Total 1198 339Strongly disagree 379 31.6% 82 24.2%
Somewhat disagree 417 34.8% 116 34.5%
Somewhat agree 302 25.2% 117 34.7%
Strongly agree 101 8.4% 22 6.6%
Total 1199 338Strongly disagree 42 3.5% 25 7.4%
Somewhat disagree 126 10.5% 49 14.6%
Somewhat agree 509 42.4% 141 42.1%
Strongly agree 524 43.6% 120 35.8%
Total 1200 335Strongly disagree 67 5.6% 26 7.8%
Somewhat disagree 171 14.4% 56 16.7%
Somewhat agree 535 45.0% 162 48.6%
Strongly agree 416 35.0% 90 27.0%
Total 1189 333Strongly disagree 800 66.7% 196 58.5%
Somewhat disagree 214 17.8% 61 18.2%
Somewhat agree 128 10.6% 55 16.4%
Strongly agree 58 4.8% 23 6.9%
Total 1199 334Strongly disagree 46 3.8% 20 5.8%
Somewhat disagree 105 8.7% 44 13.0%
Somewhat agree 484 40.3% 131 38.6%
Strongly agree 565 47.1% 144 42.6%
Total 1201 339
Strongly disagree 66 5.5% 23 6.7%
Somewhat disagree 96 8.0% 32 9.4%
Somewhat agree 442 37.0% 108 31.9%
Strongly agree 591 49.5% 177 52.0%
Total 1195 340Strongly disagree 40 3.4% 25 7.3%
Somewhat disagree 115 9.6% 43 12.7%
Somewhat agree 564 47.3% 154 45.5%
Strongly agree 474 39.7% 117 34.5%
Total 1193 338
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
A - 62
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Strongly disagree 38 3.2% 22 6.5%
Somewhat disagree 128 10.8% 60 17.8%
Somewhat agree 513 43.4% 139 40.8%
Strongly agree 503 42.6% 118 34.8%
Total 1182 339Strongly disagree 51 4.3% 29 8.5%
Somewhat disagree 99 8.3% 46 13.7%
Somewhat agree 540 45.4% 162 48.2%
Strongly agree 499 42.0% 100 29.6%
Total 1188 337Strongly disagree 195 16.4% 63 18.6%
Somewhat disagree 341 28.8% 94 28.0%
Somewhat agree 479 40.4% 133 39.5%
Strongly agree 170 14.3% 47 13.9%
Total 1184 338Strongly disagree 26 2.2% 16 4.8%
Somewhat disagree 140 11.7% 42 12.3%
Somewhat agree 539 45.3% 142 41.8%
Strongly agree 486 40.8% 140 41.1%
Total 1191 340Strongly disagree 60 5.0% 20 5.9%
Somewhat disagree 177 14.9% 64 18.8%
Somewhat agree 586 49.2% 155 45.6%
Strongly agree 368 30.9% 101 29.6%
Total 1190 340
Strongly disagree 44 3.6% 12 3.7%
Somewhat disagree 121 10.1% 49 14.6%
Somewhat agree 517 42.9% 137 40.5%
Strongly agree 524 43.4% 139 41.2%
Total 1206 338Strongly disagree 89 7.4% 22 6.5%
Somewhat disagree 172 14.3% 53 15.8%
Somewhat agree 499 41.4% 166 49.0%
Strongly agree 445 36.9% 97 28.7%
Total 1205 338Strongly disagree 53 4.5% 21 6.2%
Somewhat disagree 106 9.0% 28 8.5%
Somewhat agree 477 40.4% 142 42.8%
Strongly agree 544 46.1% 141 42.4%
Total 1180 331
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
A - 63
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Strongly disagree 52 4.4% 25 7.3%
Somewhat disagree 183 15.4% 48 14.3%
Somewhat agree 510 43.0% 152 45.3%
Strongly agree 440 37.1% 111 33.0%
Total 1186 335Strongly disagree 45 3.8% 23 7.0%
Somewhat disagree 150 12.5% 49 14.5%
Somewhat agree 534 44.5% 162 48.5%
Strongly agree 472 39.3% 100 30.0%
Total 1201 335Strongly disagree 68 5.7% 22 6.5%
Somewhat disagree 185 15.5% 63 18.6%
Somewhat agree 506 42.5% 156 46.3%
Strongly agree 433 36.4% 97 28.7%
Total 1192 338Strongly disagree 54 4.5% 26 7.8%
Somewhat disagree 137 11.4% 65 19.4%
Somewhat agree 488 40.7% 147 43.7%
Strongly agree 522 43.5% 97 29.0%
Total 1200 336Strongly disagree 80 6.7% 35 10.4%
Somewhat disagree 208 17.5% 76 22.6%
Somewhat agree 480 40.3% 141 42.0%
Strongly agree 423 35.5% 84 25.0%
Total 1192 336Strongly disagree 89 7.4% 20 5.9%
Somewhat disagree 161 13.4% 68 20.2%
Somewhat agree 499 41.6% 150 44.9%
Strongly agree 450 37.5% 97 29.1%
Total 1199 335Strongly disagree 53 4.5% 20 5.9%
Somewhat disagree 191 16.1% 43 12.7%
Somewhat agree 546 46.0% 166 49.2%
Strongly agree 395 33.3% 108 32.1%
Total 1186 336Strongly disagree 72 6.0% 34 10.1%
Somewhat disagree 178 14.8% 55 16.5%
Somewhat agree 536 44.6% 156 46.5%
Strongly agree 415 34.5% 90 26.9%
Total 1201 335
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
National origin
Status as a school athlete
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
A - 64
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Strongly disagree 135 11.3% 48 14.2%
Somewhat disagree 290 24.2% 80 23.6%
Somewhat agree 529 44.2% 160 47.1%
Strongly agree 243 20.3% 51 15.0%
Total 1196 338
Very uncomfortable 10 0.9% 6 1.8%
Somewhat uncomfortable 25 2.0% 23 6.7%
Somewhat comfortable 235 19.6% 47 14.0%
Very comfortable 931 77.5% 262 77.5%
Total 1201 337Very uncomfortable 82 6.8% 39 11.5%
Somewhat uncomfortable 314 26.2% 85 25.3%
Somewhat comfortable 600 50.0% 157 46.8%
Very comfortable 203 17.0% 55 16.3%
Total 1200 336Very uncomfortable 118 12.1% 43 16.1%
Somewhat uncomfortable 187 19.2% 60 22.3%
Somewhat comfortable 355 36.4% 84 31.2%
Very comfortable 315 32.3% 82 30.4%
Total 975 270Very uncomfortable 164 13.7% 66 19.6%
Somewhat uncomfortable 376 31.4% 102 30.1%
Somewhat comfortable 487 40.7% 124 36.7%
Very comfortable 171 14.2% 45 13.5%
Total 1198 337Very uncomfortable 185 15.6% 76 22.6%
Somewhat uncomfortable 377 31.7% 95 28.3%
Somewhat comfortable 477 40.0% 116 34.5%
Very comfortable 152 12.7% 49 14.7%
Total 1192 337Very uncomfortable 232 19.5% 89 26.4%
Somewhat uncomfortable 369 31.0% 101 30.0%
Somewhat comfortable 432 36.3% 98 29.1%
Very comfortable 157 13.2% 49 14.5%
Total 1189 336
Staff
Administration
Instructors/Faculty
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
A - 65
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Never 336 28.4% 83 25.0%
Sometimes 597 50.4% 158 47.2%
Often 155 13.1% 73 21.9%
Very Often 96 8.1% 20 5.9%
Total 1184 334Never 842 71.2% 223 67.0%
Sometimes 257 21.8% 78 23.5%
Often 46 3.9% 23 6.9%
Very Often 36 3.1% 9 2.6%
Total 1182 332Never 413 34.9% 118 35.3%
Sometimes 614 51.8% 165 49.4%
Often 129 10.9% 39 11.6%
Very Often 30 2.5% 13 3.7%
Total 1186 334Never 371 31.3% 84 25.3%
Sometimes 553 46.7% 150 45.2%
Often 178 15.0% 68 20.5%
Very Often 82 7.0% 30 9.0%
Total 1184 332Never 675 56.8% 162 48.6%
Sometimes 392 33.0% 110 33.1%
Often 73 6.1% 27 8.1%
Very Often 48 4.1% 34 10.2%
Total 1187 334Never 550 88.0% 137 79.1%
Sometimes 46 7.4% 25 14.5%
Often 13 2.1% 3 1.8%
Very Often 16 2.5% 8 4.6%
Total 626 174
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
A - 66
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Not at all 751 63.0% 207 62.1%
Slightly 250 21.0% 67 20.2%
Somewhat 141 11.8% 41 12.3%
Greatly 50 4.2% 18 5.5%
Total 1192 333Not at all 943 79.2% 232 70.0%
Slightly 160 13.4% 63 18.9%
Somewhat 70 5.8% 26 7.8%
Greatly 18 1.5% 11 3.3%
Total 1191 332Not at all 884 74.3% 146 43.7%
Slightly 202 17.0% 75 22.5%
Somewhat 83 6.9% 78 23.3%
Greatly 20 1.7% 35 10.5%
Total 1189 334Not at all 1052 89.6% 272 84.7%
Slightly 68 5.8% 19 5.8%
Somewhat 30 2.6% 23 7.1%
Greatly 24 2.1% 8 2.4%
Total 1175 321Not at all 1020 85.9% 242 73.7%
Slightly 117 9.9% 59 18.0%
Somewhat 42 3.6% 16 4.9%
Greatly 7 0.6% 11 3.3%
Total 1187 328Not at all 1009 85.1% 247 75.4%
Slightly 120 10.1% 39 12.0%
Somewhat 52 4.4% 23 7.0%
Greatly 5 0.4% 18 5.6%
Total 1185 328Not at all 738 62.0% 204 61.3%
Slightly 233 19.6% 67 20.0%
Somewhat 163 13.7% 39 11.7%
Greatly 56 4.7% 23 7.0%
Total 1190 333Not at all 886 74.6% 246 74.7%
Slightly 190 16.0% 46 14.1%
Somewhat 93 7.8% 21 6.5%
Greatly 19 1.6% 15 4.7%
Total 1188 329
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Age
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
A - 67
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Not at all 1023 86.0% 278 83.8%
Slightly 84 7.1% 19 5.9%
Somewhat 60 5.1% 22 6.8%
Greatly 22 1.8% 12 3.6%
Total 1189 332Not at all 1060 89.2% 301 90.9%
Slightly 57 4.8% 10 3.1%
Somewhat 46 3.8% 11 3.3%
Greatly 25 2.1% 9 2.7%
Total 1188 332Not at all 660 94.7% 168 92.2%
Slightly 14 2.0% 2 1.3%
Somewhat 9 1.3% 7 3.9%
Greatly 14 2.1% 5 2.6%
Total 697 182
Never 364 30.6% 126 37.9%
Sometimes 576 48.4% 138 41.2%
Often 164 13.8% 48 14.3%
Very Often 86 7.2% 22 6.6%
Total 1190 334Never 568 48.0% 186 55.9%
Sometimes 482 40.7% 106 31.9%
Often 92 7.8% 25 7.6%
Very Often 42 3.5% 16 4.7%
Total 1184 332Never 793 67.0% 221 66.6%
Sometimes 324 27.4% 87 26.1%
Often 45 3.8% 20 6.0%
Very Often 22 1.8% 4 1.3%
Total 1183 332Never 790 66.6% 223 67.1%
Sometimes 315 26.6% 91 27.3%
Often 56 4.7% 15 4.4%
Very Often 24 2.0% 4 1.2%
Total 1186 332
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
A - 68
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Never 544 45.9% 109 32.7%
Sometimes 502 42.3% 153 46.0%
Often 106 8.9% 47 14.2%
Very Often 33 2.8% 24 7.1%
Total 1186 333Never 791 67.4% 236 71.3%
Sometimes 302 25.7% 66 19.9%
Often 55 4.7% 20 6.1%
Very Often 26 2.2% 9 2.7%
Total 1175 331Never 470 39.6% 126 38.4%
Sometimes 436 36.7% 105 31.9%
Often 186 15.6% 58 17.6%
Very Often 96 40Total 1187 329Never 713 60.5% 165 49.8%
Sometimes 393 33.3% 122 36.9%
Often 57 4.8% 30 9.0%
Very Often 16 1.4% 14 4.2%
Total 1179 330Never 585 49.3% 142 42.9%
Sometimes 444 37.4% 133 40.1%
Often 122 10.3% 35 10.5%
Very Often 35 2.9% 22 6.5%
Total 1186 332Never 292 24.7% 84 25.4%
Sometimes 464 39.3% 122 36.7%
Often 283 23.9% 59 17.8%
Very Often 144 12.2% 67 20.2%
Total 1183 333Never 654 55.2% 176 53.2%
Sometimes 387 32.7% 108 32.5%
Often 105 8.9% 23 6.9%
Very Often 38 3.2% 24 7.4%
Total 1184 331Never 664 56.1% 179 54.1%
Sometimes 411 34.7% 110 33.3%
Often 73 6.2% 22 6.7%
Very Often 35 3.0% 20 5.9%
Total 1184 332
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 69
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
Never 662 56.1% 169 51.0%
Sometimes 392 33.2% 107 32.4%
Often 81 6.9% 32 9.8%
Very Often 46 3.9% 23 6.8%
Total 1181 331Never 574 94.8% 155 90.6%
Sometimes 20 3.3% 13 7.3%
Often 4 0.6% 0 0.3%
Very Often 8 1.3% 3 1.8%
Total 606 171
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 70
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
On your own
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
233 38.1% 64 48.2%
274 44.8% 45 33.5%
69 11.3% 16 11.8%
35 5.8% 9 6.5%
612 13362 10.2% 21 15.9%
188 30.7% 28 20.6%
180 29.5% 27 20.3%
181 29.6% 58 43.1%
611 13472 11.7% 28 20.6%
178 29.1% 33 24.2%
167 27.3% 25 18.5%
195 31.8% 49 36.7%
613 13470 11.4% 25 18.6%
164 26.8% 32 23.7%
171 27.9% 20 15.1%
207 33.9% 57 42.6%
611 13410 1.6% 1 0.7%
98 16.0% 19 14.2%
164 26.9% 29 21.4%
339 55.5% 86 63.6%
611 134
22 3.6% 9 6.9%
51 8.5% 21 15.7%
295 48.9% 62 46.3%
235 39.0% 42 31.1%
602 13333 5.5% 6 4.7%
87 14.6% 24 18.6%
281 47.1% 58 44.6%
195 32.8% 41 32.1%
596 12940 6.7% 14 11.0%
56 9.4% 17 13.2%
264 44.0% 46 35.2%
240 39.9% 53 40.6%
601 130
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
A - 71
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
157 26.1% 45 34.2%
191 31.7% 44 33.4%
180 30.0% 38 28.4%
73 12.2% 5 4.0%
601 133136 22.6% 45 33.8%
224 37.2% 46 34.4%
188 31.2% 26 19.5%
55 9.0% 16 12.2%
603 13318 3.0% 6 4.8%
31 5.2% 23 17.3%
219 36.4% 37 28.2%
334 55.4% 65 49.7%
603 13222 3.7% 10 7.2%
52 8.6% 15 11.3%
249 41.6% 43 32.3%
276 46.0% 66 49.2%
599 133436 72.9% 93 70.3%
89 14.9% 25 18.9%
47 7.8% 12 8.8%
26 4.4% 3 2.0%
599 13221 3.6% 8 5.8%
39 6.5% 11 8.0%
232 38.6% 33 24.9%
309 51.3% 81 61.3%
601 132
22 3.7% 8 6.1%
32 5.3% 8 6.3%
217 36.0% 36 27.2%
333 55.1% 81 60.4%
604 13310 1.6% 12 8.9%
51 8.6% 9 6.8%
258 42.9% 48 36.0%
282 46.9% 65 48.4%
601 133
A - 72
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
11 1.8% 7 5.5%
59 9.8% 18 13.4%
213 35.6% 45 34.3%
317 52.8% 61 46.8%
600 13124 3.9% 11 8.3%
57 9.6% 25 18.7%
286 47.9% 49 37.1%
231 38.6% 48 35.9%
598 13333 5.7% 18 13.5%
78 13.4% 23 17.5%
295 50.5% 54 41.6%
178 30.5% 36 27.4%
585 13114 2.4% 9 6.7%
58 9.6% 24 18.2%
286 47.7% 42 31.5%
242 40.4% 57 43.5%
599 13222 3.7% 5 3.9%
53 8.9% 18 13.8%
276 46.1% 57 43.1%
247 41.4% 52 39.2%
597 133
52 8.6% 7 5.2%
78 12.9% 17 12.7%
238 39.2% 56 42.0%
238 39.3% 53 40.0%
607 13365 10.9% 11 8.4%
83 13.9% 17 12.9%
220 36.6% 42 31.3%
232 38.7% 63 47.4%
601 13442 7.2% 2 1.9%
45 7.7% 7 5.1%
241 41.6% 43 32.6%
252 43.5% 79 60.4%
580 131
A - 73
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
National origin
Status as a school athlete
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
35 6.1% 5 4.2%
66 11.4% 7 6.0%
284 49.1% 47 38.7%
193 33.4% 62 51.1%
578 12149 8.1% 7 5.1%
88 14.7% 12 9.1%
254 42.3% 58 44.2%
209 34.9% 54 41.6%
599 13160 10.1% 7 5.3%
71 11.9% 15 11.3%
220 37.2% 47 35.6%
241 40.7% 63 47.8%
591 13254 9.0% 8 6.2%
76 12.7% 20 15.1%
247 41.3% 49 36.7%
221 37.0% 56 42.0%
597 13368 11.5% 12 8.9%
100 17.0% 21 16.1%
230 39.3% 48 36.5%
189 32.2% 51 38.5%
587 13269 11.8% 9 7.1%
81 13.8% 8 6.0%
230 39.4% 57 43.8%
205 35.0% 56 43.1%
584 13154 9.4% 5 3.9%
74 12.9% 10 7.9%
274 48.0% 54 44.2%
169 29.7% 54 44.1%
571 12362 10.6% 14 10.3%
74 12.7% 13 10.0%
252 43.1% 51 38.3%
197 33.7% 55 41.4%
585 132
A - 74
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Very uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotal
Staff
Administration
Instructors/Faculty
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
72 12.5% 8 6.1%
111 19.2% 27 20.3%
252 43.4% 54 40.8%
145 24.9% 43 32.9%
581 132
11 1.8% 4 3.0%
20 3.4% 14 10.9%
157 26.4% 30 22.4%
408 68.4% 84 63.7%
597 13236 6.0% 13 10.1%
100 16.7% 33 24.7%
305 50.9% 50 38.4%
158 26.4% 35 26.8%
599 13254 11.8% 14 13.3%
74 16.0% 24 23.0%
228 49.3% 45 42.8%
106 22.9% 22 20.9%
463 10663 10.7% 24 18.6%
141 24.0% 40 30.7%
269 45.6% 40 30.7%
117 19.7% 26 20.0%
590 13267 11.5% 14 10.4%
140 23.9% 36 27.8%
261 44.7% 50 38.7%
117 20.0% 30 23.0%
585 13077 13.2% 18 13.8%
135 23.2% 35 26.8%
250 42.9% 47 36.4%
121 20.7% 30 23.0%
583 129
A - 75
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
159 26.8% 35 26.5%
337 56.6% 62 47.2%
70 11.7% 22 16.5%
29 4.9% 13 9.8%
595 131404 68.2% 94 72.6%
160 27.0% 27 20.8%
19 3.2% 7 5.1%
10 1.6% 2 1.5%
592 130156 26.2% 41 31.8%
332 55.7% 54 41.7%
89 14.9% 26 20.1%
19 3.2% 8 6.4%
596 129109 18.3% 18 13.5%
218 36.7% 53 40.7%
188 31.6% 32 24.7%
80 13.4% 28 21.1%
594 131267 44.9% 52 40.5%
231 38.9% 62 48.2%
65 11.0% 13 10.2%
31 5.2% 1 1.0%
594 128248 81.1% 43 75.9%
43 14.0% 3 5.0%
9 3.1% 7 12.4%
6 1.9% 4 6.7%
306 56
A - 76
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Age
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
463 78.5% 99 78.0%
70 11.8% 16 12.7%
43 7.3% 8 6.3%
14 2.3% 4 2.9%
589 127471 79.5% 102 79.4%
81 13.7% 17 13.6%
33 5.6% 7 5.2%
7 1.2% 2 1.7%
593 128399 67.8% 81 63.8%
122 20.7% 26 20.4%
56 9.6% 18 14.1%
11 2.0% 2 1.7%
589 127512 90.7% 116 93.0%
25 4.5% 4 3.1%
20 3.6% 2 1.4%
7 1.2% 3 2.5%
564 124425 72.1% 95 75.1%
99 16.9% 18 14.5%
52 8.8% 12 9.5%
13 2.2% 1 0.9%
589 127380 64.6% 94 73.9%
123 20.8% 23 18.2%
64 11.0% 9 6.7%
21 3.6% 2 1.2%
588 128448 76.9% 100 78.3%
79 13.6% 13 10.3%
38 6.6% 11 8.5%
17 2.9% 4 2.9%
583 128498 85.5% 109 85.1%
54 9.3% 10 7.7%
25 4.2% 4 3.4%
5 0.9% 5 3.9%
582 128
A - 77
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
534 91.4% 119 95.5%
28 4.8% 3 2.6%
15 2.5% 1 0.9%
7 1.2% 1 1.0%
584 125536 91.4% 117 93.6%
27 4.7% 5 3.7%
17 2.9% 2 1.8%
6 1.1% 1 1.0%
586 125341 95.3% 64 96.8%
6 1.8% 0.0%
6 1.7% 1 1.6%
4 1.2% 1 1.6%
358 66
379 64.8% 83 66.6%
164 28.0% 30 24.0%
31 5.3% 9 7.3%
11 1.8% 3 2.2%
584 124450 77.2% 96 77.7%
111 19.0% 24 19.5%
14 2.3% 2 1.3%
8 1.4% 2 1.5%
583 124466 80.3% 96 78.3%
94 16.3% 24 19.6%
15 2.6% 2 1.8%
5 0.8% 0 0.3%
580 122450 77.7% 93 74.6%
111 19.2% 27 22.0%
16 2.7% 2 1.9%
2 0.4% 2 1.5%
579 124
A - 78
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
366 63.1% 74 59.7%
179 31.0% 45 36.1%
22 3.9% 4 3.2%
12 2.1% 1 1.0%
579 124518 89.6% 117 94.8%
48 8.3% 5 4.2%
10 1.7% 0.0%
3 0.5% 1 1.0%
579 123402 69.5% 80 64.8%
119 20.5% 33 26.9%
40 6.9% 8 6.1%
18 3579 124413 71.2% 92 73.8%
133 22.9% 25 20.4%
20 3.4% 5 4.1%
15 2.6% 2 1.7%
580 124359 62.0% 81 66.2%
174 30.1% 37 30.2%
26 4.5% 3 2.6%
20 3.4% 1 1.0%
579 123330 57.0% 67 54.3%
158 27.4% 44 35.1%
65 11.3% 6 5.2%
25 4.3% 7 5.4%
578 124437 76.4% 90 72.9%
102 17.8% 27 21.9%
23 4.1% 4 3.0%
10 1.8% 3 2.2%
572 124488 84.5% 108 87.4%
69 11.9% 11 8.9%
15 2.7% 3 2.7%
5 0.9% 1 1.0%
578 124
A - 79
Frequencies by Race / Ethnicity
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Not URM URM
482 83.6% 107 86.4%
67 11.6% 14 11.2%
18 3.1% 2 1.4%
10 1.7% 1 1.0%
576 124326 96.2% 55 96.6%
8 2.4% 1 1.8%
5 1.4% 1 1.6%
0 0.0% 0 0.0%
338 57
A - 80
Frequencies by Orientation
Never 260 20.0% 48 18.8%
Sometimes 585 45.1% 103 40.6%
Often 255 19.7% 54 21.1%
Very Often 198 15.3% 50 19.5%
Total 1299 254Never 99 7.6% 24 9.5%
Sometimes 372 28.6% 79 31.1%
Often 450 34.6% 59 23.4%
Very Often 380 29.2% 91 36.0%
Total 1300 254Never 284 21.8% 60 23.6%
Sometimes 554 42.6% 117 46.0%
Often 277 21.3% 44 17.3%
Very Often 185 14.2% 33 13.2%
Total 1300 254Never 130 10.0% 27 10.7%
Sometimes 377 29.0% 94 37.0%
Often 403 31.0% 52 20.7%
Very Often 389 29.9% 80 31.7%
Total 1299 253Never 5 0.4% 3 1.1%
Sometimes 107 8.3% 42 16.6%
Often 358 27.6% 53 20.8%
Very Often 830 63.8% 156 61.5%
Total 1300 254
Strongly disagree 82 6.4% 21 8.2%
Somewhat disagree 222 17.4% 47 18.8%
Somewhat agree 763 59.8% 134 53.3%
Strongly agree 209 16.4% 50 19.7%
Total 1276 252Strongly disagree 55 4.4% 15 6.1%
Somewhat disagree 112 8.8% 34 13.4%
Somewhat agree 441 34.8% 77 30.3%
Strongly agree 660 52.0% 127 50.2%
Total 1268 253
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
On your own
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
A - 81
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Strongly disagree 72 5.7% 16 6.5%
Somewhat disagree 179 14.2% 53 21.1%
Somewhat agree 586 46.3% 108 42.9%
Strongly agree 429 33.9% 75 29.5%
Total 1267 253Strongly disagree 328 25.7% 66 26.2%
Somewhat disagree 471 37.0% 92 36.6%
Somewhat agree 381 29.9% 81 32.2%
Strongly agree 95 7.4% 12 4.9%
Total 1274 252Strongly disagree 378 29.7% 81 32.3%
Somewhat disagree 437 34.3% 93 37.2%
Somewhat agree 349 27.4% 64 25.3%
Strongly agree 110 8.6% 13 5.2%
Total 1275 251Strongly disagree 46 3.6% 20 7.9%
Somewhat disagree 126 9.9% 49 19.5%
Somewhat agree 545 42.9% 98 38.7%
Strongly agree 555 43.6% 86 34.0%
Total 1271 253Strongly disagree 71 5.6% 22 8.6%
Somewhat disagree 169 13.4% 55 22.0%
Somewhat agree 582 46.1% 111 44.2%
Strongly agree 439 34.8% 63 25.2%
Total 1261 250Strongly disagree 854 67.2% 136 54.2%
Somewhat disagree 223 17.6% 46 18.4%
Somewhat agree 138 10.8% 45 17.7%
Strongly agree 56 4.4% 24 9.7%
Total 1271 252Strongly disagree 47 3.7% 18 7.2%
Somewhat disagree 111 8.7% 39 15.3%
Somewhat agree 507 39.7% 103 41.0%
Strongly agree 613 48.0% 91 36.4%
Total 1278 251
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
A - 82
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Strongly disagree 71 5.6% 15 5.9%
Somewhat disagree 107 8.4% 20 7.8%
Somewhat agree 479 37.7% 69 27.2%
Strongly agree 614 48.3% 149 59.1%
Total 1271 253Strongly disagree 45 3.5% 19 7.6%
Somewhat disagree 109 8.6% 48 19.0%
Somewhat agree 602 47.5% 110 43.5%
Strongly agree 513 40.4% 76 29.9%
Total 1269 253Strongly disagree 51 4.1% 8 3.0%
Somewhat disagree 135 10.7% 50 19.9%
Somewhat agree 536 42.5% 112 44.6%
Strongly agree 538 42.7% 81 32.4%
Total 1259 251Strongly disagree 59 4.7% 19 7.5%
Somewhat disagree 103 8.2% 39 15.5%
Somewhat agree 577 45.7% 121 48.1%
Strongly agree 522 41.4% 73 28.9%
Total 1262 252Strongly disagree 195 15.5% 61 24.2%
Somewhat disagree 359 28.5% 70 28.0%
Somewhat agree 517 41.1% 94 37.2%
Strongly agree 188 14.9% 27 10.6%
Total 1259 252Strongly disagree 31 2.5% 11 4.6%
Somewhat disagree 159 12.5% 21 8.4%
Somewhat agree 578 45.4% 98 39.3%
Strongly agree 503 39.6% 119 47.6%
Total 1271 249Strongly disagree 53 4.2% 26 10.1%
Somewhat disagree 192 15.1% 45 17.8%
Somewhat agree 624 49.2% 114 45.2%
Strongly agree 399 31.5% 68 26.8%
Total 1267 252
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
A - 83
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Strongly disagree 51 4.0% 4 1.8%
Somewhat disagree 137 10.7% 31 12.3%
Somewhat agree 559 43.6% 92 36.2%
Strongly agree 534 41.7% 126 49.7%
Total 1281 254Strongly disagree 80 6.2% 30 12.0%
Somewhat disagree 162 12.6% 64 25.2%
Somewhat agree 572 44.7% 86 33.9%
Strongly agree 467 36.4% 74 29.0%
Total 1281 254Strongly disagree 69 5.5% 5 2.1%
Somewhat disagree 110 8.8% 21 8.6%
Somewhat agree 507 40.4% 109 44.1%
Strongly agree 568 45.3% 112 45.2%
Total 1254 248Strongly disagree 68 5.4% 9 3.5%
Somewhat disagree 184 14.6% 46 18.5%
Somewhat agree 552 43.7% 104 41.5%
Strongly agree 458 36.3% 91 36.5%
Total 1262 250Strongly disagree 64 5.0% 5 1.8%
Somewhat disagree 166 13.0% 31 12.2%
Somewhat agree 570 44.7% 121 48.2%
Strongly agree 475 37.2% 95 37.8%
Total 1275 251Strongly disagree 71 5.6% 19 7.5%
Somewhat disagree 183 14.4% 62 24.7%
Somewhat agree 565 44.6% 95 37.6%
Strongly agree 450 35.4% 76 30.2%
Total 1268 252Strongly disagree 73 5.7% 7 2.9%
Somewhat disagree 156 12.3% 44 17.5%
Somewhat agree 514 40.3% 117 45.9%
Strongly agree 531 41.7% 86 33.7%
Total 1274 254Strongly disagree 94 7.4% 20 7.9%
Somewhat disagree 217 17.1% 67 26.5%
Somewhat agree 518 40.9% 98 39.0%
Strongly agree 438 34.6% 67 26.6%
Total 1267 252
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
National origin
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Status as a school athlete
A - 84
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Strongly disagree 83 6.5% 25 9.8%
Somewhat disagree 174 13.6% 54 21.3%
Somewhat agree 548 43.0% 98 38.6%
Strongly agree 469 36.8% 77 30.4%
Total 1273 253Strongly disagree 66 5.2% 7 3.0%
Somewhat disagree 194 15.3% 39 15.8%
Somewhat agree 608 48.0% 98 39.9%
Strongly agree 399 31.5% 102 41.3%
Total 1266 247Strongly disagree 97 7.6% 8 3.2%
Somewhat disagree 191 15.0% 41 16.2%
Somewhat agree 562 44.1% 125 49.5%
Strongly agree 424 33.3% 78 31.1%
Total 1275 252Strongly disagree 163 12.8% 18 7.1%
Somewhat disagree 312 24.5% 57 22.4%
Somewhat agree 559 43.9% 123 48.6%
Strongly agree 238 18.7% 55 21.9%
Total 1272 253
Very uncomfortable 13 1.0% 4 1.5%
Somewhat uncomfortable 42 3.3% 4 1.5%
Somewhat comfortable 235 18.4% 43 17.2%
Very comfortable 987 77.3% 201 79.7%
Total 1277 252Very uncomfortable 92 7.2% 29 11.4%
Somewhat uncomfortable 339 26.6% 56 22.4%
Somewhat comfortable 633 49.7% 118 47.2%
Very comfortable 210 16.5% 48 19.0%
Total 1275 251
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
A - 85
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Very uncomfortable 133 12.7% 27 14.2%
Somewhat uncomfortable 194 18.6% 52 26.6%
Somewhat comfortable 366 35.1% 69 35.5%
Very comfortable 350 33.6% 46 23.7%
Total 1042 194Very uncomfortable 199 15.6% 31 12.1%
Somewhat uncomfortable 381 30.0% 91 36.1%
Somewhat comfortable 515 40.5% 93 36.7%
Very comfortable 178 14.0% 38 15.1%
Total 1273 252Very uncomfortable 215 17.0% 45 18.0%
Somewhat uncomfortable 391 30.9% 77 30.9%
Somewhat comfortable 492 38.8% 97 38.6%
Very comfortable 170 13.4% 31 12.5%
Total 1268 251Very uncomfortable 246 19.5% 71 28.4%
Somewhat uncomfortable 393 31.1% 74 29.3%
Somewhat comfortable 458 36.2% 68 27.0%
Very comfortable 166 13.2% 39 15.4%
Total 1264 252
Never 369 29.3% 48 19.1%
Sometimes 637 50.6% 113 45.0%
Often 163 12.9% 65 25.6%
Very Often 90 7.2% 26 10.3%
Total 1258 252Never 860 68.6% 198 79.1%
Sometimes 293 23.4% 40 16.1%
Often 59 4.7% 9 3.7%
Very Often 42 3.4% 3 1.1%
Total 1254 251Never 444 35.3% 83 32.9%
Sometimes 649 51.6% 125 49.9%
Often 128 10.2% 39 15.5%
Very Often 38 3.0% 4 1.8%
Total 1259 252Never 375 29.8% 76 30.5%
Sometimes 577 46.0% 122 48.4%
Often 207 16.5% 38 15.1%
Very Often 96 7.7% 15 6.0%
Total 1255 251
Staff
Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Instructors/Faculty
Members of my fraternity/sorority
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
A - 86
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Never 707 56.1% 126 50.0%
Sometimes 404 32.1% 94 37.2%
Often 90 7.1% 10 3.8%
Very Often 59 4.7% 23 9.0%
Total 1260 252Never 580 85.2% 103 90.5%
Sometimes 63 9.2% 9 7.8%
Often 16 2.3% 1 0.5%
Very Often 22 3.3% 1 1.1%
Total 681 114
Not at all 839 66.2% 113 45.9%
Slightly 249 19.6% 65 26.4%
Somewhat 137 10.8% 44 17.8%
Greatly 43 3.4% 24 9.8%
Total 1269 247Not at all 975 77.0% 193 78.2%
Slightly 188 14.8% 35 14.1%
Somewhat 76 6.0% 18 7.2%
Greatly 28 2.2% 1 0.5%
Total 1266 247Not at all 864 68.2% 160 65.2%
Slightly 240 19.0% 35 14.1%
Somewhat 122 9.6% 36 14.7%
Greatly 41 3.2% 15 5.9%
Total 1267 246Not at all 1132 90.2% 185 79.2%
Slightly 68 5.5% 17 7.4%
Somewhat 34 2.7% 19 8.1%
Greatly 19 1.6% 13 5.3%
Total 1254 234Not at all 1041 82.4% 214 87.9%
Slightly 157 12.4% 19 7.7%
Somewhat 50 3.9% 8 3.2%
Greatly 15 1.2% 3 1.2%
Total 1263 243
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Age
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
A - 87
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Not at all 1050 83.2% 199 82.2%
Slightly 132 10.5% 26 10.7%
Somewhat 62 4.9% 13 5.5%
Greatly 18 1.4% 4 1.6%
Total 1263 242Not at all 800 63.1% 137 56.0%
Slightly 228 18.0% 68 27.9%
Somewhat 167 13.2% 34 13.9%
Greatly 73 5.7% 5 2.2%
Total 1268 245Not at all 938 74.2% 186 76.4%
Slightly 201 15.9% 34 14.0%
Somewhat 98 7.8% 16 6.6%
Greatly 26 2.0% 7 3.0%
Total 1264 243Not at all 1166 92.2% 126 51.1%
Slightly 57 4.5% 45 18.4%
Somewhat 31 2.5% 51 20.8%
Greatly 10 0.8% 24 9.7%
Total 1264 246Not at all 1165 92.1% 188 76.3%
Slightly 49 3.8% 18 7.3%
Somewhat 37 2.9% 20 8.1%
Greatly 14 1.1% 20 8.2%
Total 1265 246Not at all 716 94.6% 106 90.8%
Slightly 14 1.9% 2 1.7%
Somewhat 12 1.6% 4 3.3%
Greatly 14 1.9% 5 4.2%
Total 757 117
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
A - 88
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Never 421 33.2% 66 26.6%
Sometimes 607 47.9% 101 41.0%
Often 168 13.2% 43 17.3%
Very Often 71 5.6% 37 15.1%
Total 1268 247Never 609 48.3% 142 57.7%
Sometimes 499 39.6% 83 33.9%
Often 106 8.4% 10 4.3%
Very Often 46 3.7% 10 4.2%
Total 1261 246Never 851 67.5% 161 65.2%
Sometimes 346 27.4% 59 24.2%
Often 47 3.7% 17 7.1%
Very Often 17 1.3% 9 3.5%
Total 1260 246Never 838 66.4% 170 68.9%
Sometimes 345 27.3% 58 23.5%
Often 59 4.7% 11 4.3%
Very Often 20 1.6% 8 3.2%
Total 1263 246Never 547 43.3% 102 41.6%
Sometimes 555 43.9% 95 38.8%
Often 123 9.7% 30 12.1%
Very Often 39 3.1% 18 7.4%
Total 1263 245Never 876 69.8% 146 60.5%
Sometimes 304 24.2% 61 25.2%
Often 49 3.9% 27 11.2%
Very Often 27 2.2% 8 3.2%
Total 1256 241Never 499 39.5% 93 38.0%
Sometimes 464 36.8% 72 29.3%
Often 198 15.7% 45 18.4%
Very Often 100 35Total 1262 246Never 734 58.5% 138 56.4%
Sometimes 430 34.2% 81 33.1%
Often 68 5.4% 19 7.6%
Very Often 23 1.8% 7 2.9%
Total 1256 244
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
A - 89
Frequencies by Orientation Undergraduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
Never 602 47.6% 121 49.3%
Sometimes 489 38.7% 83 34.0%
Often 129 10.2% 28 11.4%
Very Often 43 3.4% 13 5.2%
Total 1264 245Never 317 25.2% 57 23.3%
Sometimes 483 38.3% 100 40.8%
Often 283 22.4% 56 22.7%
Very Often 178 14.1% 32 13.2%
Total 1261 246Never 696 55.2% 130 52.9%
Sometimes 403 32.0% 87 35.4%
Often 112 8.9% 15 6.0%
Very Often 49 3.9% 14 5.7%
Total 1261 246Never 738 58.5% 100 40.9%
Sometimes 420 33.3% 98 40.1%
Often 78 6.2% 18 7.3%
Very Often 26 2.1% 28 11.7%
Total 1262 244Never 730 58.0% 96 39.2%
Sometimes 413 32.8% 83 33.8%
Often 84 6.7% 29 11.8%
Very Often 31 2.5% 37 15.3%
Total 1258 245Never 630 94.4% 93 91.0%
Sometimes 27 4.1% 5 4.5%
Often 2 0.4% 2 1.9%
Very Often 8 1.2% 3 2.6%
Total 667 103
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
A - 90
Frequencies by Orientation
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
On your own
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
268 40.5% 26 35.7%
280 42.3% 34 46.4%
77 11.6% 6 8.5%
37 5.5% 7 9.4%
662 7273 11.1% 9 12.4%
191 28.9% 21 29.1%
192 28.9% 13 18.1%
206 31.1% 30 40.5%
662 7388 13.3% 10 13.1%
186 28.1% 21 29.2%
179 27.0% 9 12.7%
209 31.5% 33 45.0%
663 7383 12.6% 8 10.6%
177 26.7% 17 23.3%
177 26.7% 13 17.1%
225 34.0% 36 49.0%
661 7310 1.5% 0 0.2%
110 16.6% 7 9.5%
161 24.4% 26 35.9%
380 57.5% 40 54.4%
661 73
22 3.3% 8 11.8%
59 9.0% 11 15.2%
323 49.4% 27 37.5%
250 38.2% 26 35.5%
654 7229 4.6% 7 10.4%
99 15.3% 12 17.7%
309 47.8% 25 35.3%
209 32.3% 26 36.5%
646 71
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
A - 91
Frequencies by Orientation
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
45 7.0% 8 10.6%
62 9.5% 10 13.7%
280 43.0% 27 38.1%
263 40.5% 27 37.6%
650 72182 27.9% 16 22.5%
215 33.0% 18 25.0%
189 29.0% 26 35.4%
66 10.1% 12 17.1%
652 72164 25.0% 15 20.2%
238 36.5% 28 39.3%
191 29.3% 19 25.7%
60 9.2% 11 14.8%
653 7213 2.1% 9 13.2%
42 6.4% 12 16.7%
230 35.2% 22 30.1%
369 56.3% 29 40.0%
654 7219 2.9% 10 13.8%
53 8.1% 14 19.1%
266 40.8% 22 30.6%
314 48.1% 26 36.6%
653 72483 74.3% 41 57.5%
98 15.1% 13 18.0%
49 7.5% 9 13.2%
20 3.1% 8 11.3%
650 7220 3.1% 6 8.5%
43 6.6% 6 9.0%
234 35.7% 27 38.5%
357 54.6% 31 44.0%
654 71
A - 92
Frequencies by Orientation
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
26 4.0% 3 4.8%
35 5.4% 5 6.8%
233 35.6% 15 21.2%
360 55.0% 48 67.3%
655 7210 1.6% 11 14.6%
50 7.7% 11 14.6%
271 41.5% 29 40.0%
321 49.3% 22 30.7%
652 7211 1.7% 6 8.7%
60 9.2% 16 22.2%
228 35.0% 23 32.8%
352 54.1% 26 36.3%
650 7126 3.9% 8 11.5%
65 10.1% 15 20.8%
297 45.8% 30 42.9%
261 40.2% 18 24.9%
649 7135 5.5% 13 19.0%
87 13.7% 13 18.6%
318 49.9% 27 38.0%
197 30.9% 17 24.3%
636 7017 2.6% 5 7.1%
69 10.6% 11 15.4%
295 45.5% 28 38.7%
268 41.3% 28 38.8%
649 7218 2.7% 9 12.1%
55 8.5% 14 19.5%
304 46.8% 23 32.4%
272 42.0% 26 36.0%
649 71
A - 93
Frequencies by Orientation
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Individual disabilities
Race or ethnicity
Socioeconomic status
National origin
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Age
Gender/gender identity
Veteran status or military involvement
Status as a school athlete
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
52 7.9% 7 9.2%
84 12.8% 10 13.2%
255 38.8% 33 44.9%
266 40.5% 24 32.6%
657 7364 9.9% 12 15.8%
80 12.3% 18 24.4%
238 36.5% 20 27.1%
269 41.3% 24 32.7%
652 7339 6.1% 5 6.8%
47 7.4% 4 6.1%
255 40.3% 24 34.1%
292 46.2% 37 53.0%
632 7133 5.2% 7 9.9%
67 10.8% 6 8.6%
297 47.8% 30 42.8%
225 36.2% 27 38.7%
622 7045 6.9% 9 13.1%
87 13.4% 10 14.4%
275 42.4% 30 41.6%
241 37.2% 22 30.9%
648 7256 8.6% 11 14.9%
75 11.7% 9 12.9%
238 37.0% 26 37.0%
274 42.7% 25 35.2%
643 7153 8.2% 8 11.4%
82 12.7% 12 17.5%
259 39.8% 30 42.5%
255 39.3% 20 28.6%
649 7269 10.8% 10 13.6%
101 15.9% 17 24.4%
245 38.4% 28 39.2%
223 35.0% 16 22.8%
639 71
A - 94
Frequencies by Orientation
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotalStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeTotal
Very uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotal
Sexual orientation
Fraternity or sorority affiliation
Religion
Political affiliation/opinions
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Based on my experiences, I feel that students at Georgia Tech are respected regardless of their:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
69 10.8% 9 12.2%
76 11.9% 12 16.4%
255 40.2% 28 39.2%
236 37.1% 23 32.3%
636 7253 8.5% 5 7.5%
73 11.8% 9 13.3%
297 48.2% 26 37.9%
194 31.5% 29 41.3%
617 6969 10.8% 6 8.3%
77 12.1% 10 13.9%
266 41.6% 32 45.4%
226 35.5% 23 32.4%
638 7169 10.9% 9 13.2%
120 19.0% 15 20.8%
273 43.1% 31 43.4%
171 27.1% 16 22.6%
633 71
10 1.5% 4 5.8%
33 5.0% 2 3.1%
155 24.0% 28 39.2%
450 69.5% 38 51.8%
648 7237 5.7% 12 16.4%
119 18.3% 12 16.8%
318 48.9% 31 42.7%
176 27.1% 18 24.0%
649 73
A - 95
Frequencies by Orientation
Very uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotalVery uncomfortableSomewhat uncomfortableSomewhat comfortableVery comfortableTotal
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Staff
Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Instructors/Faculty
Members of my fraternity/sorority
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
55 11.0% 11 19.5%
87 17.1% 10 17.9%
242 48.0% 29 50.1%
121 23.9% 7 12.5%
505 5867 10.4% 20 27.3%
164 25.6% 15 21.0%
284 44.2% 22 29.4%
126 19.7% 16 22.4%
641 7365 10.2% 15 21.5%
163 25.6% 11 15.1%
279 43.9% 28 38.8%
129 20.3% 18 24.7%
636 7278 12.3% 16 23.0%
155 24.5% 13 17.9%
267 42.2% 25 35.7%
133 21.0% 16 23.4%
634 70
169 26.2% 22 30.4%
363 56.3% 31 43.9%
79 12.3% 10 13.7%
34 5.2% 9 12.0%
644 71448 69.8% 45 62.6%
165 25.7% 19 27.1%
21 3.2% 4 5.6%
8 1.3% 3 4.7%
642 71175 27.1% 20 28.3%
350 54.4% 31 43.5%
101 15.6% 13 17.5%
18 2.9% 8 10.7%
644 71113 17.6% 11 15.1%
240 37.3% 29 39.8%
199 30.9% 19 26.4%
92 14.3% 13 18.7%
643 72
A - 96
Frequencies by Orientation
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
Marginalization: Race/ethnicity
Marginalization: Disability
Marginalization: National origin
Marginalization: Age
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Marginalization: Gender
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
282 43.9% 31 45.2%
268 41.7% 22 31.5%
64 10.0% 14 20.2%
29 4.5% 2 3.2%
643 69260 79.7% 28 84.1%
43 13.2% 2 7.3%
15 4.5% 2 4.7%
8 2.5% 1 3.9%
326 33
516 81.4% 40 55.0%
66 10.4% 17 23.4%
41 6.4% 10 14.2%
12 1.9% 5 7.4%
635 73521 81.7% 49 66.4%
82 12.8% 12 16.1%
30 4.7% 9 12.1%
5 0.8% 4 5.3%
638 73436 68.6% 39 54.3%
133 20.9% 13 18.2%
58 9.2% 16 21.9%
9 1.3% 4 5.6%
636 72565 92.6% 56 81.2%
21 3.5% 5 7.2%
18 3.0% 4 5.5%
6 1.0% 4 6.2%
611 69465 73.2% 51 70.5%
109 17.2% 7 9.1%
51 8.0% 10 14.5%
10 1.6% 4 5.8%
635 72
A - 97
Frequencies by Orientation
Not at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotalNot at allSlightlySomewhatGreatlyTotal
Marginalization: Language difference/accent
Marginalization: Political perspective
Marginalization: Religion
Marginalization: Sexual orientation
Marginalization: Gender identity/expression
Marginalization: Other
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
433 68.1% 37 52.8%
123 19.4% 19 27.6%
62 9.8% 9 13.3%
17 2.7% 5 6.4%
636 71494 78.5% 49 69.2%
83 13.2% 6 9.1%
38 6.0% 10 14.0%
15 2.4% 5 7.7%
630 71543 86.2% 59 83.4%
55 8.7% 5 7.5%
23 3.6% 5 7.4%
9 1.4% 1 1.7%
630 71595 94.6% 50 70.8%
21 3.3% 10 13.4%
10 1.5% 6 9.0%
4 0.6% 5 6.7%
629 71592 93.9% 53 73.9%
21 3.3% 11 15.5%
13 2.1% 4 6.3%
4 0.7% 3 4.4%
631 71366 96.0% 35 90.7%
6 1.5% 1 1.7%
6 1.6% 1 2.9%
3 0.9% 2 4.8%
381 38
A - 98
Frequencies by Orientation
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Older People
Disparaging Remarks:Younger People
Disparaging Remarks:People’s race or ethnicity
Disparaging Remarks:People with disabilities
Disparaging Remarks:People with less education
Disparaging Remarks:Immigrants
Disparaging Remarks:Men
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Disparaging Remarks: Women
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
414 66.1% 41 56.1%
170 27.1% 22 29.8%
32 5.2% 7 9.5%
10 1.6% 3 4.6%
627 72483 77.4% 57 78.2%
119 19.0% 13 18.3%
14 2.2% 2 2.1%
9 1.5% 1 1.4%
625 72499 80.5% 55 75.8%
101 16.2% 16 21.7%
17 2.8% 0.0%
3 0.5% 2 2.5%
620 72484 77.9% 52 72.0%
116 18.7% 19 26.5%
17 2.8% 1 1.0%
4 0.6% 0 0.5%
621 72394 63.4% 40 55.8%
194 31.2% 26 35.7%
23 3.6% 4 5.2%
11 1.7% 2 3.3%
622 72569 91.8% 57 78.6%
40 6.5% 12 16.6%
9 1.5% 1 1.2%
1 0.2% 3 3.6%
620 72436 70.0% 41 57.9%
132 21.1% 18 25.7%
42 6.8% 4 6.2%
14 7623 72453 72.7% 45 62.7%
136 21.8% 19 26.2%
19 3.1% 6 7.8%
15 2.3% 2 3.3%
623 72
A - 99
Frequencies by Orientation
NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotalNeverSometimesOftenVery OftenTotal
Disparaging Remarks:Others (please specify below)
Disparaging Remarks:People with language differences/accents
Disparaging Remarks:People with specific political views
Disparaging Remarks:People with particular religious affiliations
Disparaging Remarks:Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Disparaging Remarks:Transgender people
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Graduate
Count Percent Count Percent
Hetero LGBTQ
391 63.1% 41 56.1%
187 30.2% 23 31.4%
24 3.8% 6 7.6%
17 2.8% 4 4.9%
620 72359 57.7% 32 45.5%
171 27.4% 29 40.9%
66 10.7% 5 6.4%
26 4.2% 5 7.3%
623 71470 76.3% 51 72.4%
111 18.1% 16 22.2%
23 3.8% 3 3.8%
12 1.9% 1 1.7%
616 71541 87.1% 48 66.8%
65 10.5% 14 19.0%
12 1.9% 7 9.6%
3 0.5% 3 4.6%
621 72536 86.5% 45 63.1%
65 10.5% 15 20.3%
12 1.9% 8 10.6%
7 1.1% 4 6.0%
620 72350 96.4% 26 94.0%
7 2.0% 1 2.3%
5 1.4% 1 3.7%
1 0.2% 0 0.0%
363 28
A - 100
N Mean Std. Dev. N Mean Std.
Dev.Mean
Difft p d N Mean Std.
Dev. N Mean Std. Dev.
Mean Diff
t p d
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors 2259 2.23 0.97 1563 2.32 0.97 0.08 2.64 0.008 0.051 1031 1.77 0.899 745 1.83 0.850 0.06 1.52 0.128
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 2261 2.76 0.95 1564 2.85 0.95 0.09 2.76 0.006 0.044 1037 2.74 1.030 746 2.81 1.011 0.07 1.37 0.171
In groups with U.S. and international students 2256 2.31 0.97 1564 2.26 0.96 -0.04 -1.39 0.163 1035 2.65 1.049 747 2.78 1.046 0.13 2.54 0.011 0.065
In groups comprised of men and women 2255 2.72 0.99 1562 2.79 0.99 0.07 2.22 0.026 0.037 1033 2.56 1.067 746 2.84 1.049 0.28 5.55 0.000 0.140
On your own 2253 3.51 0.70 1564 3.53 0.69 0.02 0.71 0.475 1033 3.38 0.832 745 3.38 0.800 0.01 0.14 0.885
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 2262 2.75 0.94 1539 2.86 0.77 0.11 3.95 0.000 0.056 1040 2.89 1.083 736 3.19 0.777 0.30 6.79 0.000 0.135
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 2265 3.12 1.20 1532 3.33 0.83 0.21 6.43 0.000 0.092 1038 2.25 1.492 725 3.07 0.830 0.81 14.62 0.000 0.357
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 2258 2.95 1.13 1530 3.06 0.85 0.11 3.54 0.000 0.053 1033 2.81 1.310 731 3.15 0.882 0.34 6.48 0.000 0.150
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
2254 2.35 1.09 1537 2.19 0.90 -0.16 -4.88 0.000 0.097 1035 2.23 1.079 734 2.24 0.973 0.00 0.08 0.939
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
2257 2.16 1.08 1536 2.13 0.94 -0.03 -0.86 0.390 1038 2.12 1.063 736 2.24 0.931 0.12 2.57 0.010 0.074
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 2256 3.10 0.87 1535 3.22 0.81 0.12 4.25 0.000 0.055 1034 3.17 0.952 735 3.40 0.768 0.23 5.57 0.000 0.099
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 2251 2.91 1.04 1522 3.06 0.85 0.16 5.03 0.000 0.074 1038 3.02 1.034 733 3.29 0.806 0.27 6.18 0.000 0.120
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 2255 1.37 0.95 1534 1.58 0.89 0.20 6.70 0.000 0.164 1036 1.22 0.832 731 1.44 0.803 0.21 5.45 0.000 0.191
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 2263 3.20 0.91 1539 3.28 0.81 0.08 2.93 0.003 0.037 1037 3.27 0.872 734 3.38 0.781 0.11 2.83 0.005 0.049
Means: 2013 - 2018 t -test2013 2018Undergraduate Graduate
t -test2013 2018
A - 101
N Mean Std. Dev. N Mean Std.
Dev.Mean
Difft p d N Mean Std.
Dev. N Mean Std. Dev.
Mean Diff
t p d
Means: 2013 - 2018 t -test2013 2018Undergraduate Graduate
t -test2013 2018
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission 2263 2.94 1.17 1534 3.30 0.85 0.36 10.98 0.000 0.158 1038 3.03 1.200 737 3.42 0.776 0.40 8.45 0.000 0.166
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 2254 3.20 0.97 1532 3.20 0.79 -0.01 -0.19 0.847 1035 3.08 1.106 735 3.33 0.751 0.25 5.56 0.000 0.106
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 2246 3.18 1.09 1521 3.21 0.80 0.02 0.72 0.473 1034 3.03 1.205 731 3.36 0.768 0.33 7.06 0.000 0.141
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 2255 2.95 1.11 1525 3.19 0.81 0.24 7.76 0.000 0.110 1034 2.55 1.311 730 3.17 0.808 0.63 12.42 0.000 0.276
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 2257 1.93 1.39 1521 2.52 0.93 0.58 15.47 0.000 0.304 1036 1.73 1.549 716 3.02 0.852 1.29 22.32 0.000 0.568
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 2259 3.05 1.01 1531 3.23 0.76 0.19 6.43 0.000 0.085 1034 2.95 1.127 731 3.23 0.770 0.29 6.37 0.000 0.128
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 2255 2.86 1.13 1530 3.04 0.82 0.19 5.98 0.000 0.089 1035 2.62 1.376 731 3.24 0.774 0.62 11.95 0.000 0.263
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following:
Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age 2262 3.20 0.99 1544 3.25 0.79 0.04 1.52 0.129 1036 3.14 1.158 739 3.11 0.912 -0.03 -0.61 0.540
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 2259 3.09 1.01 1544 3.06 0.88 -0.03 -0.98 0.325 1032 3.16 1.140 734 3.06 0.977 -0.10 -2.04 0.041 0.048
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement 2259 2.63 1.67 1511 3.27 0.82 0.64 15.61 0.000 0.262 1032 2.35 1.767 711 3.27 0.846 0.92 14.54 0.000 0.371
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 2252 2.56 1.32 1521 3.11 0.84 0.55 15.70 0.000 0.248 1030 1.96 1.742 699 3.15 0.824 1.19 18.96 0.000 0.492
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 2261 3.10 1.03 1536 3.15 0.81 0.06 1.92 0.055 1034 3.02 1.156 730 3.07 0.892 0.05 1.03 0.304
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 2261 2.85 1.34 1530 3.07 0.86 0.22 6.11 0.000 0.099 1035 2.54 1.641 724 3.12 0.947 0.58 9.33 0.000 0.245
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 2261 3.18 0.99 1536 3.17 0.85 -0.01 -0.45 0.653 1034 3.13 1.113 730 3.08 0.920 -0.05 -1.04 0.298
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 2257 3.07 1.16 1528 3.00 0.91 -0.08 -2.36 0.019 0.038 1027 2.81 1.451 719 2.94 0.971 0.13 2.31 0.021 0.061
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 2255 2.61 1.45 1535 3.07 0.89 0.45 11.95 0.000 0.202 1034 2.17 1.712 716 3.02 0.962 0.86 13.32 0.000 0.366
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 2248 2.49 1.22 1522 3.08 0.82 0.59 17.90 0.000 0.273 1031 1.78 1.695 695 3.03 0.883 1.26 20.11 0.000 0.540
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 2257 2.96 1.17 1536 3.04 0.87 0.08 2.51 0.012 0.039 1034 2.65 1.543 717 3.02 0.946 0.36 6.11 0.000 0.161
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 2253 2.81 1.26 1534 2.71 0.91 -0.10 -2.82 0.005 0.050 1032 2.40 1.618 713 2.84 0.941 0.44 7.21 0.000 0.201
A - 102
N Mean Std. Dev. N Mean Std.
Dev.Mean
Difft p d N Mean Std.
Dev. N Mean Std. Dev.
Mean Diff
t p d
Means: 2013 - 2018 t -test2013 2018Undergraduate Graduate
t -test2013 2018
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech 2258 3.77 0.52 1538 3.72 0.57 -0.04 -2.28 0.023 0.017 1032 3.67 0.594 729 3.59 0.679 -0.08 -2.58 0.010 0.034
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 2251 3.09 0.78 1535 2.75 0.83 -0.34 -12.61 0.000 0.182 1029 3.12 0.797 731 2.95 0.845 -0.17 -4.36 0.000 0.087
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 2037 3.12 0.96 1245 2.86 1.01 -0.25 -7.14 0.000 0.133 864 2.92 0.958 569 2.81 0.920 -0.11 -2.17 0.030 0.057
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 2248 2.77 0.91 1534 2.53 0.91 -0.24 -8.01 0.000 0.138 1026 2.81 0.931 722 2.70 0.921 -0.11 -2.35 0.019 0.056
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 2246 2.73 0.92 1529 2.48 0.93 -0.25 -8.27 0.000 0.146 1018 2.74 0.926 715 2.73 0.913 -0.01 -0.20 0.845Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 2244 2.71 0.95 1525 2.41 0.96 -0.31 -9.68 0.000 0.181 1021 2.74 0.948 712 2.71 0.947 -0.03 -0.67 0.501
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:Arts and entertainment 2258 2.14 0.91 1519 2.03 0.86 -0.12 -4.02 0.000 0.080 1032 1.95 0.788 726 1.97 0.791 0.02 0.58 0.562
Religious and/or spiritual activities 2256 1.58 0.87 1515 1.40 0.71 -0.17 -6.72 0.000 0.156 1028 1.46 0.769 722 1.38 0.635 -0.08 -2.41 0.016 0.076
Cultural celebrations and holidays 2249 1.99 0.86 1520 1.82 0.73 -0.17 -6.63 0.000 0.130 1026 1.91 0.788 725 1.96 0.761 0.05 1.40 0.162
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 2256 2.14 0.92 1516 2.01 0.87 -0.13 -4.41 0.000 0.089 1029 2.41 0.943 725 2.42 0.943 0.01 0.29 0.775
Student focused cultural organizations 2261 1.66 0.89 1521 1.62 0.83 -0.03 -1.11 0.267 1032 1.66 0.816 722 1.76 0.818 0.10 2.53 0.012 0.078
Other (specify below) 1718 1.33 0.80 799 1.22 0.62 -0.11 -3.67 0.000 0.113 735 1.26 0.684 362 1.30 0.677 0.04 0.84 0.403
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Women 2248 2.11 0.94 1524 1.96 0.86 -0.15 -4.95 0.000 0.102 1030 1.50 0.729 708 1.44 0.688 -0.06 -1.75 0.080
Men 2242 1.62 0.77 1517 1.66 0.78 0.04 1.40 0.160 1023 1.26 0.551 707 1.28 0.575 0.02 0.77 0.441
Older People 2245 1.46 0.70 1516 1.41 0.66 -0.05 -2.29 0.022 0.049 1025 1.28 0.535 702 1.24 0.523 -0.04 -1.61 0.107
Younger People 2241 1.43 0.70 1518 1.42 0.67 -0.02 -0.72 0.469 1026 1.28 0.564 703 1.27 0.530 -0.02 -0.58 0.559
People’s race or ethnicity 2248 2.02 0.88 1518 1.75 0.79 -0.28 -10.08 0.000 0.213 1027 1.52 0.725 704 1.45 0.659 -0.07 -2.23 0.026 0.069
People with disabilities 2243 1.37 0.66 1506 1.41 0.70 0.04 1.81 0.071 1028 1.15 0.462 702 1.12 0.409 -0.03 -1.59 0.113
People with less education 2246 2.05 1.02 1516 1.95 0.95 -0.11 -3.31 0.001 0.074 1027 1.56 0.820 703 1.44 0.749 -0.12 -3.11 0.002 0.106
Immigrants 2240 1.71 0.83 1509 1.52 0.70 -0.19 -7.66 0.000 0.166 1027 1.44 0.671 704 1.37 0.670 -0.07 -2.16 0.031 0.070
People with language differences/accents 2250 2.20 0.93 1518 1.70 0.80 -0.50 -17.73 0.000 0.389 1023 1.76 0.804 702 1.47 0.716 -0.29 -7.79 0.000 0.255
People with specific political views 2248 2.00 0.91 1516 2.26 0.98 0.26 8.15 0.000 0.162 1027 1.59 0.797 702 1.63 0.841 0.04 0.92 0.358
People with particular religious affiliations 2248 1.76 0.86 1516 1.62 0.81 -0.14 -5.12 0.000 0.115 1024 1.39 0.650 696 1.32 0.636 -0.08 -2.41 0.016 0.078
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 2245 1.83 0.90 1516 1.58 0.77 -0.25 -9.26 0.000 0.208 1022 1.36 0.636 702 1.20 0.516 -0.17 -5.98 0.000 0.184
Transgender people 2243 1.53 0.82 1512 1.62 0.81 0.08 3.00 0.003 0.067 1023 1.25 0.568 700 1.22 0.567 -0.04 -1.33 0.183
Others (please specify below) 1619 1.08 0.40 777 1.09 0.42 0.01 0.67 0.503 736 1.05 0.263 395 1.06 0.312 0.01 0.47 0.640
A - 103
2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors 35.3 0.4 35.8
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities 60.5 2.4 62.9
In groups with U.S. and international students 39.1 -4.6 34.5 ** 0.047
In groups comprised of men and women 56.5 2.9 59.4
On your own 89.3 0.5 89.8
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 74.8 1.0 75.7
Campus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 89.0 -3.2 85.7 ** 0.049
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech 83.0 -4.3 78.7 ** 0.054
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech 51.3 -13.8 37.5 *** 0.137
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech 41.3 -6.0 35.3 *** 0.061
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me 83.0 1.3 84.2
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community 78.7 0.4 79.0
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality 16.9 0.3 17.2
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech 85.7 0.4 86.0
Undergraduate
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
A - 104
2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
Undergraduate
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission 82.4 3.5 85.9 ** 0.047
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech 90.4 -4.9 85.4 *** 0.076
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds 91.5 -7.8 83.7 *** 0.119
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs 82.6 2.7 85.3 * 0.036
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech 57.8 -3.3 54.4
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews 86.1 -0.7 85.4
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions 80.8 -1.8 79.0
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following:
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age 86.1 -0.8 85.3
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identity 80.7 -2.6 78.2
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvement 94.0 -7.8 86.3 *** 0.132
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athlete 67.9 11.8 79.8 *** 0.132
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national origin 84.5 -1.9 82.6
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilities 85.7 -7.7 78.0 *** 0.100
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicity 85.5 -3.9 81.6 ** 0.052
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic status 86.1 -12.2 73.9 *** 0.153
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientation 82.7 -4.7 78.0 ** 0.059
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation 60.9 18.9 79.8 *** 0.202
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion 84.3 -6.4 77.9 *** 0.082
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions 81.4 -17.4 64.0 *** 0.196
A - 105
2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
Undergraduate
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech 97.1 -1.2 95.9 * 0.033
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates 80.2 -14.0 66.2 *** 0.158
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority 79.3 -12.1 67.2 *** 0.135
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty 63.0 -9.1 53.9 *** 0.091
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff 60.9 -8.9 52.0 *** 0.088
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration 60.8 -12.6 48.2 *** 0.124
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment 29.2 -6.5 22.7 *** 0.073
Religious and/or spiritual activities 13.1 -5.6 7.5 *** 0.088
Cultural celebrations and holidays 23.4 -9.6 13.8 *** 0.119
Educational forums (lectures, presentations) 29.8 -6.2 23.6 *** 0.068
Student focused cultural organizations 16.2 -4.3 12.0 *** 0.059
Other (specify below) 10.4 -5.4 5.0 *** 0.089
A - 106
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments:
In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
On your own
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia TechCampus social opportunities have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia TechThe campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia TechLanguage differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018 2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
19.0 -1.6 17.3
59.2 0.6 59.9
55.7 2.7 58.5
50.3 10.7 61.0 *** 0.106
84.0 -1.1 82.8
83.7 2.4 86.0
78.2 1.2 79.3
85.4 -2.9 82.5
47.2 -6.8 40.4 ** 0.068
40.7 -2.0 38.7
88.1 1.2 89.3
85.3 1.3 86.5
11.1 0.8 11.9
88.9 0.4 89.3
Graduate
A - 107
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgroundsGeorgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needsAdequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following:
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to age
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to gender/gender identityStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to veteran status or military involvementStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to status as a school athleteStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to national originStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to individual disabilitiesStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to race or ethnicityStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to socioeconomic statusStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to sexual orientationStudents at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to fraternity or sorority affiliation
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to religion
Students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to political affiliation/opinions
2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
Graduate
87.8 2.6 90.4
91.2 -2.4 88.8
90.4 -3.4 87.0 * 0.055
79.2 4.9 84.1 * 0.063
70.4 8.4 78.8 *** 0.096
85.2 0.5 85.7
85.8 0.8 86.5
89.9 -10.7 79.2 *** 0.150
88.1 -12.2 75.9 *** 0.161
93.7 -7.1 86.5 *** 0.120
81.4 2.4 83.8
86.3 -7.5 78.8 *** 0.100
91.5 -12.6 78.9 *** 0.179
88.4 -10.0 78.4 *** 0.135
88.5 -16.4 72.1 *** 0.208
86.8 -10.1 76.7 *** 0.132
79.6 0.0 79.5
89.8 -12.5 77.3 *** 0.171
87.9 -18.6 69.3 *** 0.228
A - 108
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups:
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Classmates
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Members of my fraternity/sorority
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Instructors/Faculty
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Staff
Comfortable discussing diversity with: Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture:
Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual activities
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations
Other (specify below)
2013: Percent Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Change2018: Percent
Somewhat (3) or Strong (4) Agree
Chi Sq SigEffect Size
Graduate
95.5 -2.3 93.2 * 0.050
81.5 -6.4 75.1 ** 0.077
73.5 -2.9 70.7
66.1 -3.4 62.7
62.4 1.7 64.1
62.3 0.5 62.8
18.1 0.3 18.4
9.4 -4.2 5.1 ** 0.080
19.0 0.6 19.6
44.0 1.2 45.1
14.2 1.1 15.3
6.6 0.5 7.1
A - 109
2013: Percent Any (2-4)
Change2018: Percent Any
(2-4)Chi Sq
SigEffect Size
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Women 71.0 -3.2 67.8 * 0.034
Men 47.1 3.2 50.3
Older People 36.2 -3.1 33.1
Younger People 33.4 -0.1 33.3
People’s race or ethnicity 69.9 -13.0 57.0 *** 0.133
People with disabilities 29.2 2.6 31.8
People with less education 62.5 -1.8 60.7
Immigrants 51.1 -9.2 41.9 *** 0.091
People with language differences/accents 76.1 -24.1 52.1 *** 0.250
People with specific political views 66.7 8.5 75.2 *** 0.091
People with particular religious affiliations 53.5 -8.3 45.2 *** 0.082
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people 56.6 -12.3 44.3 *** 0.120
Transgender people 37.1 7.9 45.0 *** 0.079
Others (please specify below) 5.0 1.2 6.2
UndergraduateFrequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018
A - 110
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups:
Women
Men
Older People
Younger People
People’s race or ethnicity
People with disabilities
People with less education
Immigrants
People with language differences/accents
People with specific political views
People with particular religious affiliations
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Transgender people
Others (please specify below)
Frequency Comparisons: 2013 - 2018 2013: Percent Any (2-4)
Change2018: Percent Any
(2-4)Chi Sq
SigEffect Size
39.2 -4.3 34.9
21.1 1.6 22.7
24.5 -4.5 20.0 * 0.053
23.2 -0.4 22.8
41.0 -3.6 37.5
12.1 -2.6 9.5
38.9 -7.6 31.4 ** 0.078
35.2 -6.8 28.4 ** 0.071
57.0 -19.7 37.3 *** 0.193
42.9 0.6 43.5
31.9 -7.6 24.3 ** 0.082
29.1 -14.1 15.0 *** 0.165
20.2 -4.3 15.9 * 0.055
3.8 -0.1 3.7
Graduate
Appendix B – Student Climate Survey
B-1
Georgia Tech Climate Survey [[student]] In 2010, Georgia Tech adopted a twenty-five year strategic vision that guides our efforts in becoming a leading technological university in the twenty-first century. Central to this vision is the creation of an inclusive campus community characterized by collaboration, appreciation of diversity, and personal integrity.
The questions in this survey are designed to allow you to share with us about your perceptions and experiences with the Georgia Tech campus community. Your responses will enable the Institute’s leadership to understand the progress we are making towards achieving our goal of an inclusive, supportive, and welcoming environment for everyone at Georgia Tech.
If you complete the survey, you will be entered into a drawing for one of forty $50 gift cards. If you choose not to complete the survey, you can still enter the drawing by sending an email request (including your name) to [email protected].
Your participation in this research study is completely voluntary. The data that is collected about you will be kept private to the extent allowed by law. The survey has an identification number so we can check your name off the list when your response is received; this list is not associated with your actual survey responses. The list of respondents (and non-respondents) will be destroyed as soon as data collection activities have been completed (no later than February 28, 2018).The survey should take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete. For more information about this study, click here: (Survey Consent Form). If you have any questions about the survey itself, please call (404-385-1292) or e-mail the Georgia Tech Office of Academic Effectiveness at [email protected].
B-2
Page 1 of 4
This semester, how often have you studied in the following groups or environments?
Never Sometimes Often Very Often In groups with students of different majors
In groups with students of different races or ethnicities
In groups with U.S. and international students
In groups comprised of men and women
On your own
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
My classroom experiences have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Campus social opportunities (clubs, organizations, activities) have had a positive effect on my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
The campus reputation of my academic major has affected my sense of belonging at Georgia Tech
Language differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Cultural differences act as a barrier to interaction between U.S. and international students at Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech is generally a comfortable and inclusive environment for me
I feel valued and respected by the Georgia Tech community
I have considered leaving Georgia Tech because of concerns about collegiality
I feel that my academic aspirations are supported at Georgia Tech.
Please use the space below if you wish to elaborate on your responses to any of the above questions.
B-3
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
Diversity is integral to Georgia Tech’s ability to successfully fulfill its mission
Commitment to diversity is demonstrated by Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech effectively recruits students from diverse backgrounds
Georgia Tech offers an array of programs and events that meet my social and cultural needs
Adequate processes are in place to address student grievances at Georgia Tech
While at Georgia Tech, I have learned about different worldviews
Georgia Tech is open to new ideas and new traditions
Please use the space below if you wish to elaborate on your responses to any of the above questions.
Page 2 of 4
Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Based on my experiences, students at Georgia Tech are respected with regard to their:
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
age
gender/gender identity
veteran status or military involvement
status as a school athlete
national origin
individual disabilities
race or ethnicity
socioeconomic status
sexual orientation
fraternity or sorority affiliation
religion
political affiliation/opinions
B-4
Please use the space below if you wish to elaborate on your responses to any of the above questions.
How comfortable are you discussing issues of diversity with the following people or groups?
Very uncomfortable
Somewhat uncomfortable
Somewhat comfortable
Very comfortable
Personal friends at Georgia Tech
Classmates
Members of my fraternity/sorority
Instructors/Faculty
Staff
Administration
In your time at Georgia Tech, how often do you participate in the following types of activities outside of your own culture?
Never Sometimes Often Very Often Arts and entertainment
Religious and/or spiritual
Cultural celebrations and holidays
Educational forums (lectures, presentations)
Student focused cultural organizations (e.g. Chinese Student Assoc., Culture Tech, India Club, etc.)
Other (specify below)
Other activities:
B-5
Page 3 of 4
Within the last three years, to what extent have you experienced instances of marginalization (a sense of exclusion or feeling left out) at Georgia Tech based on the following personal identity or characteristics?
Not at all Slightly Somewhat Greatly Gender
Age
Race/ethnicity
Disability
National origin
Language difference/accent
Political perspective
Religion
Sexual orientation
Gender identity/expression
Other
Other attribute(s):
If you are willing to elaborate on instances of the marginalization you experienced, please use the space below:
Within the past year, how often have you heard a student make an insensitive or disparaging remark about any of these groups?
Never Sometimes Often Very Often Women
Men
Older People
Younger People
People’s race or ethnicity
People with disabilities
People with less education
Immigrants
People with language differences/accents
People with specific political views
People with particular religious affiliations
B-6
Never Sometimes Often Very Often Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people
Transgender people
Others (please specify below)
Others:
If you are willing to elaborate on any of your responses above, please use the space below.
Page 4 - Demographic Questions
We are asking the following questions so that we may better understand the responses provided by the Georgia Tech community. We will use the information you provide for statistical purposes only and will hold the information in confidence to the full extent permitted by law. Your responses will not be disclosed in identifiable form.
What is your gender? • Man • Woman • Transgender • Other __________________
Ethnicity
• Hispanic or Latino/a • Not Hispanic or Latino/a
Race
• American Indian or Alaskan Native • Asian or Asian American • Black or African American • Hawaiian or Pacific Islander • Multiracial • White or European American • Other __________________________
Sexual Orientation • Heterosexual • Gay/Lesbian • Bisexual • Other
B-7
Do you have a disability?
• Yes • No
Citizenship
• U.S. citizen * • Resident citizen of another country • Non-resident citizen of another country
* Are you a Georgia resident? • Yes • No
Where do you live?
• University-owned housing • Fraternity/Sorority houses • Off campus
Student Type
• Undergraduate * • Graduate **
* Year • Freshman • Sophomore • Junior • Senior * Are you: • Part-time student (less than 12 hours per semester) • Full-time student (12 or more hours per semester)
**Are you: • Part-time graduate student (less than 9 hours per semester) • Full-time graduate student (9 or more hours per semester)
What year did you begin your studies at Georgia Tech? _______
College • Architecture • Computing • Engineering • Ivan Allen College • Scheller College of Business • Sciences
B-8
Please use the space below for any additional comments about the climate at Georgia Tech or suggestions for improving this survey:
Thank you for your participation. Your responses have been recorded.