2019 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 Company size & sector This sample structure was set up in order to be...

2019 FLEET BAROMETERThe Netherlands

April 2019 / Survey n°1800954

Table of content

2

I FLEET PROFILE

II ENERGY MIX EXPECTED

III FINANCING

IV TELEMATICS, DIGITAL TOOLS AND ROAD SAFETY

p.14

p.33

p.50

p.62

V PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY p.78

PERIMETER OF THE STUDY – FOCUS EUROPE

3

METHODOLOGY

DATA COLLECTION

METHODFIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET QUOTAS SAMPLE

DURATION OF

INTERVIEW

CATI System

(Computer Assisted

Telephone Interviewing)

Fleet managers in

companies of all industries

using at least

1 corporate vehicle

Company size

& sector

3 930 interviews including

3 613 through Europe

317 out of Europe

10 minutes

on average

4

MAR

06

MAR

29

Companies with 10 to 99 employees

74 interviews

Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

85 interviews

Companies with 250 / 500 / 1 000 employees and more

57 interviews

1 to 99

employees

161 interviews

100 employees

and more

142 interviews

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 vehicle

Companies with less than 10 employees

87 interviews

5

NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN THE NETHERLANDS

6

Company size

& sector

This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each

company size segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.

In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments.

Total

Construction 31 (31%) 21 (35%) 10 (12%) 9 (15%) 71 (24%)

Industry 11 (11%) 12 (20%) 22 (27%) 9 (15%) 54 (18%)

Services 23 (23%) 10 (17%) 9 (11%) 17 (28%) 59 (20%)

Trade 35 (35%) 17 (28%) 39 (49%) 25 (42%) 116 (39%)

TOTAL 100 (100%) 60 (100%) 80 (100%) 60 (100%) 300 (100%)

Weight of each

company size

segment

33% 20% 27% 20% 100%

SAMPLE STRUCTURE FOR THE NETHERLANDS

SAMPLE

Less than 10 employees

10 to 99 employees

100 to 249 employees



250 employees and

more

500 employees and

more

1000 employees and

more

FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH TR

7

LU

PICTOGRAMS

10 – 99 employees

100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

250 / 500 / 1000 employees

and more

Less than 10 employees

Company size

8

MAIN RESULTS

#1 COMPANIES ARE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THEIRFLEET SIZE GROWTH POTENTIAL

#2 DUTCH COMPANIES HAVE LARGELYINTEGRATED ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES SUCH ASELECTRIC, HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID INTOTHEIR FLEETS

#3 CAR SHARING, RIDE SHARING, PRIVATE LEASEAND MOBILITY BUDGET: ALTERNATIVEMOBILITY SOLUTIONS OF INTEREST TO DUTCHCOMPANIES, ESPECIALLY THE LARGEST ONES

#4 THE SMARTPHONE AT THE WHEEL:COMPANIES CHOOSE TO REGULATE ITS USEBUT REJECT BLOCKING TOOLS

MAIN RESULTS – THE NETHERLANDS

DUTCH COMPANIES HAVE LARGELYINTEGRATED ALTERNATIVE ENERGIESSUCH AS ELECTRIC, HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID INTO THEIR FLEETS

To date, nearly half of Dutch companies

(44%) report that they have already

integrated an electric, hybrid or plug-inhybrid vehicle into their fleet. This rate places

the Netherlands in the lead of the 13

countries studied.

Overall, the proportion of companies that

have integrated a vehicle running on

alternative energy into their fleet is twice as

high in the Netherlands as in all the European

countries studied. In the Netherlands, this

score even rises to 77% for companies with

more than 500 employees.

This score is part of a growth dynamic over

the years and should continue to increase in

the coming years.

Professionals anticipate that within 3 years,

this rate should increase from 44% to 58% (an

increase of 14 points).

Many Dutch companies report that they

have been impacted by the implementation

of the new WLTP measurement system:

59% say that the introduction of the new

WLTP test has an impact on their car

policy, 12 points more than in Europe, 13

points more than the situation in early

2018,

The largest companies claim to be

particularly impacted: 89% of them, i.e. 30

points higher than the national average.

This situation therefore raises questions in terms

of fleet management for the largest

companies (i.e. the largest fleets).

The drop in the proportion of diesel is a fact:

when asked what they would do if car

makers were to offer diesel vehicles that do

not pollute more than petrol vehicles,

respondents say that they would continue to

reduce the share of diesel vehicles or even

no longer buy them at all (48% versus only 5%

who tell us that they would increase the

proportion of diesel in this situation).

The first strategy in vehicle purchasing is to

increase the proportion of electric vehicles

over petrol vehicles (favour a mix with electric

vehicles rather than petrol vehicles).

#1 - COMPANIES ARE

OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THEIR FLEET SIZE GROWTH POTENTIAL

The monitoring over time of our fleet growth

potential indicator (proportion of companies

that anticipate a growth in their fleet size

minus the proportion of companies that

anticipate a decrease) shows that Dutch

companies anticipate a growth in their fleetsize.

Compared to 2018, our indicator is up by 3

points

This way, the score of the Netherlands is

very close to the European average

Nevertheless, the position of the largest

companies (more than 500 employees)

should be monitored. They still anticipate an

increase, but the proportion of pessimists

tends to increase compared to previous

years. In this segment, our fleet growth

potential indicator fell by 7 points compared

to 2018, placing the Netherlands 11 points

below the European average.

#1 #2


CAR SHARING, RIDESHARING, PRIVATE LEASE ANDMOBILITY BUDGET: ALTERNATIVEMOBILITY SOLUTIONS OF INTEREST TODUTCH COMPANIES, ESPECIALLY THELARGEST ONES

This year's results confirm the strong interest of

Dutch companies in alternative mobility

solutions.

Both car sharing and ride sharing solutions

are used by 18% of Dutch companies.

The largest companies (more than 500

employees) are the most interested in

deploying this type of solution: more than

half of them (58%, up by 12 points

compared to 2018) say they already have

or plan to set up a car sharing offer. 28% of

large companies (+10 points versus 2018)

even think that car sharing would be able

to reduce their vehicle fleet size by

replacing vehicles previously assigned to a

single person.

Private lease (defined as follows: the fact that

an employee rents or leases a car on his own

behalf for his professional activity. Rentals

Lease cost could be paid by the company or

the employee) potentially interests 18% of the

Dutch companies surveyed (6 points more

than the average of the countries surveyed),

this rate even rises to 35% among companies

with more than 500 employees. The

Netherlands is one of the mature countries

with the highest potential for private leasing,

behind the UK and ahead of France.

The mobility budget (defined as follows: `With

a mobility budget, you give employees the

choice and financial responsibility of the

mobility forms you provide') attracts the

interest of companies with more than 100

employees:

20% of companies with between 100 and

499 employees expressed an interest in the

mobility budget; 9% very interested.

40% of companies with 500 or more

employees expressed an interest in the

mobility budget; 18% very interested.

The attractiveness of the mobility budget is up

compared to the 2018 results.

Note: the respondents' interpretation of what

alternative mobility solutions such as car

sharing, ride sharing, mobility budget or

private lease mean differs significantly

depending on the degree of maturity of the

country in which the interviews are

conducted. For example, the notion of

private lease in Turkey is often understood by

companies as the possibility for employees to

use a private vehicle acquired in Long Term

Leasing as part of their professional activity

rather than as a service packaged by a

service provider specialised in providing

mobility solutions (such as a leaser). When

reading the results, only countries with a

similar level of maturity in terms of mobility

can be compared.

#3


#4 - THE SMARTPHONE ATTHE WHEEL: COMPANIES CHOOSE TOREGULATE ITS USE BUT REJECTBLOCKING TOOLS

Companies have clearly understood the

danger of the smartphone while driving.

When referring to the different measures to

be implemented in order to increase road

safety, the first thing that comes to mind is the

implementation of a policy in order to

regulate the use of mobile phone in the car

with regards to make or receive phone calls

(already implemented by 48% of companies

+ 6% who plan to implement it over the next 3

years). This 54% score also is the proportion of

companies reporting that when purchasing a

new private company vehicle, they include

native devices relating to road safety on it.

On the other hand, companies are much

more reluctant to implement measures to

impede the use of smartphones while driving.

#4


I FLEET PROFILE

I FLEET PROFILE

A FLEET CHARACTERISTICS

5% 3% 1%

23% 15%15%

9% 20%11%

51%

30%27%

30%

2%

31% 29%

62%

57%

22%

43%53% 58%

100% 98%

69% 71%

19%31%

4%12%

NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN FLEET

16

A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet?

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 499 vehicles

500 vehicles and more

1 to 9 vehicles

Total

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES WITH AT LEAST ONE CAR OR ONE LCV (among companies with at least one vehicle in fleet)

17

A5f. And can you please tell me the total number of LCVs or Vans in your fleet?


New question 2019

PASSENGER

CARS

LIGHT COMMERCIAL

VEHICLES

83%

85%

64%

67%

64%

71%

60%

59%

84%

84%

74%

72%

96%

94%

62%

71%

98%

96%

64%

71%

Total

NUMBER OF PASSENGER CARS IN FLEET

18

A5f_1. And can you please tell me the total number of cars in your fleet?


New question 2019

4% 3%

21% 13%13%

7% 14%5%

47%

26%24%26%

1%11% 15%

60%

53%

26%

43%42% 50%

64%70%

73% 69%

22%

36%

4%15%17% 15%

36%29%

16% 16%4% 6% 3% 4%

Total

10 to 99 cars

100 to 499 cars

500 cars and more

1 to 9 cars

0 car

NUMBER OF LCVs IN FLEET

19

A5f_2. And can you please tell me the total number of LCVs or Vans in your fleet?


New question 2019

1% 1%5% 4%3% 3% 2%

15% 13%13% 13%

1%16% 11%

24% 23%

18% 24%

47% 50%

60% 59%

58%61% 38%

46% 26%31%

36% 33%40% 41%

26% 28%38%

29%36%

29%

Total

10 to 99 LCVs

100 to 499 LCVs

500 LCVs and more

1 to 9 LCVs

0 LCV

FLEET GROWTH POTENTIAL

20

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will increase or decrease

Balance 2018 Balance 2015

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Balance 2017Balance 2019

+10 +7 +8 +1

+11 +13 +11 +10

+5 -1 +5 -6

+6 +8 +8 +4

+6 +6 +12 +13

+11 +12 +9 +9

+22 +16 +9 +3

+13 +16 +14 +10

+4 +11 +8 -4

+15 +17 +15 +20

19%

18%

11%

11%

13%

15%

26%

21%

27%

26%

9%

7%

7%

5%

6%

4%

4%

8%

22%

11%

IncreaseDecrease

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will?


Total

AVERAGE IN YEARS

HOW LONG DO COMPANIES KEEP THEIR VEHICLES?

21

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles (before being sold or giving back to the leasing company)?


Total

All vehicles (cars + LCVs)

5.0 5.5 5.6 4.4 4.5

6.0 6.9 6.2 5.4 5.1

A25b. And how long do you keep your LCV, light commercial vehicles or vans (before being sold or giving back to the leasing company)?

Basis: companies with LCVs= 100%

HOW LONG DO COMPANIES KEEP THEIR LCVs?

22

AVERAGE IN YEARS

Total

5.9 5.8 6.9 5.5 5.3

7.1 8.0 7.3 6.7 6.1

PROPORTION OF

COMPANIES HAVING AT

LEAST A PASSENGER CAR

AMONG COMPANIES

WITH FLEET

84%

84%

96%

94%

98%

96%

64%

71%

PROPORTION OF

COMPANIES HAVING AT

LEAST A LCV AMONG

COMPANIES WITH FLEET

74%

72%

62%

71%

64%

71%

60%

59%

FLEET PROFILE – CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS VEHICLES

5.0 6.0

5.5 6.9

5.6 6.2

4.4 5.4

4.5 5.1

HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS LCVs

5.9 7.1

5.8 8.0

6.9 7.3

5.5 6.7

5.3 6.1

FLEET GROWTH POTENTIAL

BALANCE

+10 (Balance = % which think that the total number of vehicles of

their company fleet will increase – decrease)

+6

+11

+22

+13

+4

+15

+5

+6

FLEET PROFILE – CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

I FLEET PROFILE

B CURRENT ENERGIES

USE OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES

26

At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

Full electric Vehicle

Already implemented

44%

21%

32%

14%

30%

11%

33%

12%

13%

8%

7%

5%

7%

4%

3%

3%

35%

13%

24%

9%

21%

6%

24%

6%

63%

27%

48%

17%

43%

13%

47%

15%

77%

42%

60%

29%

60%

25%

72%

30%

E28. Amongst the following alternative fuel technologies, which ones do you use or are you considering using? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,

considered but later, not considered.


Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet

Total


27

E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years, considered but later, not considered.


% Already implemented


8%

11%

15%13%

6%

16%

12% 12%

6% 7%

10% 11%

2015 2017 2018 2019

+

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

CNG (Compressed Natural

Gas)

LPG (Liquefied Petroleum

Gas)

Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric /

Hydrogen

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen


28





43% 57% 46%53%

33%

58%

51%

50%

31%

39%45%

57%

2015 2017 2018 2019

+

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

USE OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID TECHNOLOGIESAT LEAST ELECTRIC - HYBRID OR PLUG-IN HYBRID

29



Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet (hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicle)


21%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

44%NL34%

UK FR

28%

#4 CH 23%

#5 BE 23%

#6 DE 22%

#7 PT 20%

#8 ES 20%

#9 LU 19%

#10 IT 8%

#11 PL 6%

#12 CZ 4%

#13 TR 4%

USE OF HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES

30

16%



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement hybrid and plug-in hybrid technology

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

37%NL30%

UK

20%

FR


#4 BE 20%

#5 ES 17%

#6 LU 16%

#7 DE 13%

#8 CH 13%

#9 PT 13%

#10 PL 6%

#11 IT 5%

#12 CZ 3%

#13 TR 3%

USE OF PLUG-IN HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES

31

11%



Proportion of companies having already implemented plug-in hybrid technology

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

30%NL22%

UK

14%

FR

% Already implemented#4 BE 13%

#5 DE 12%

#6 LU 10%

#7 PT 8%

#8 ES 8%

#9 CH 6%

#10 IT 3%

#11 PL 3%

#12 TR 2%

#13 CZ 0%

USE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLEFULL ELECTRIC

32



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years electric vehicle (excluding hybrid and plug-in hybrid technologies) in their fleet

12%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

33%NL17%

FR

16%

UK

% Already implemented #4 DE 16%

#5 CH 16%

#6 PT 13%

#7 LU 11%

#8 BE 9%

#9 ES 9%

#10 IT 5%

#11 TR 2%

#12 CZ 2%

#13 PL 1%

II ENERGY MIX EXPECTED

DIESEL PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR IN CASE OF EQUIVALENT LEVELS OF EMISSIONS BETWEEN DIESEL AND PETROL CARS

34

NL20a. If car makers were to produce diesel vehicles with equivalent levels of emissions as petrol cars in terms of NOx and fine particles, what would your company do in the coming years?


Don’t buy diesel vehicle and

will continue not to buy diesel

car in the future

Will increase the share of

diesel cars

Will continue to buy new

diesel cars

Will reduce significantly or

slightly the share of diesel cars

Don’t know

34% 34%24% 30%

40% 35%47%

38%27%

36%

28%42%

31%

41%28% 41% 22% 41%

30%

42%5%

4%

3%

4% 5%

4%6%

5%

8%

5%14%

7%

18%

12% 11%5% 10%

4%

15%

4%19% 13%

24%13% 17% 15% 15% 12%

19% 14%

New question 2019

Total

Europe except Portugal and Italy

DIESEL PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR IN CASE OF EQUIVALENT LEVELS OF EMISSIONS BETWEEN DIESEL AND PETROL CARS

35

NL20a. If car makers were to produce diesel vehicles with equivalent levels of emissions as petrol cars in terms of NOx and fine particles, what would your company do in the coming years?

NL20b. And in this case, do you think your company will replace diesel cars with…


34%

34%

10%

10%

20%

21%

33%

46%

14%

7%

19%

13%

24%

30%

7%

10%

15%

18%

34%

45%

18%

12%

24%

13%

40%

35%

7%

11%

28%

22%

33%

45%

11%

5%

17%

15%

47%

38%

12%

11%

27%

24%

28%

46%

10%

4%

15%

12%

27%

36%

13%

11%

13%

22%

38%

47%

15%

4%

19%

14%

Total

New question 2019

Will still reduce diesel

share

… and replace it with

petrol cars

… and replace it with

alternative energies

Won’t change or

increase its purchase

behaviour

Don’t know

Will continue not to buy

diesel car

Europe except Portugal and Italy

Total

27%

26%

16%

20%

13%

15%

15%

14%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID ENERGIES

36

50%

31%

34%

24%

38%

18%

42%

19%

Already implemented

+ considered

58%

40%

43%

31%

42%

26%

49%

27%

82%

50%

64%

39%

62%

33%

69%

33%

Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet

(in at least one of their fleet vehicles)

Considered in the next 3 years

Already implemented

88%

62%

71%

48%

67%

43%

86%

50%

E28. Amongst the following alternative fuel technologies, which ones do you use or are you considering using? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,

considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

Full electric Vehicle

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF HYBRID AND ELECTRIC ENERGIES

37




% Already implemented + considered in the next 3 years

22%24%

23%23%

18%

27%

22% 22%

14%

19%

27% 25%

2015 2017 2018 2019

+

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF HYBRID AND ELECTRIC ENERGIES

38





52%

72%

54%

67%

43%

70%62% 64%

39%

56%

67%

76%

2015 2017 2018 2019

+

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

25% 25%

21%

29%

8%

13%14%

26%

2%4%

1%

4%

2% 1% 1%

4%

16%16%

22%

32%

0% 0%

1% 1%

2015 2017 2018 2019

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid


Gas)


Gas)

Electric Vehicle


Hydrogen

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF ELECTRIC AND HYBRID ENERGIES AT LEAST ELECTRIC - HYBRID OR PLUG-IN HYBRID

39

40%



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet (hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicle)

TOP 3

#4 FR 51%

#5 DE 47%

#6 CH 45%

#7 PT 43%

#8 ES 41%

#9 LU 31%

#10 TR 25%

#11 IT 23%

#12 PL 19%

#13 CZ 10%

#1

#2 #3

61%UK58%

NL

55%

BE


DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID

40



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years hybrid or plug-in hybrid technology in their fleet

35%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

57%UK51%

BE

49%

NL


40

#4 FR 44%

#5 DE 39%

#6 ES 37%

#7 PT 35%

#8 CH 34%

#9 LU 27%

#10 TR 21%

#11 IT 19%

#12 PL 17%

#13 CZ 7%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF PLUG-IN HYBRID

41



26%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

46%UK42%

BE

42%

NL


Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years Plug-in hybrid technology in their fleet

#4 DE 31%

#5 FR 29%

#6 PT 27%

#7 ES 25%

#8 LU 20%

#9 CH 19%

#10 TR 15%

#11 PL 11%

#12 IT 10%

#13 CZ 3%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF ELECTRIC VEHICLEFULL ELECTRIC

42



Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years electric vehicle (excluding hybrid and plug-in hybrid technologies) in their fleet

27%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

49%NL41%

UK

37%

BE


#4 DE 35%

#5 FR 34%

#6 CH 32%

#7 ES 28%

#8 PT 27%

#9 LU 19%

#10 TR 16%

#11 IT 13%

#12 PL 8%

#13 CZ 7%

IMPACT OF THE WLTP TEST INTRODUCTION

43

Already or

expected

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

expected

Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test

NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or

will the new higher and more realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy?


Total

59% 43% 43% 68% 89%

30% 15% 15% 39% 59%

47% 36% 42% 51% 67%

21% 13% 12% 22% 40%

IMPACT OF THE WLTP TEST INTRODUCTION

44

Already or

expected

% Yes, already

% Yes, already

Already or

expected

Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test

NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or

will the new higher and more realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy?


(Reminder of 2018 results)

Total

59% 43% 43% 68% 89%

30% 15% 15% 39% 59%

47% 36% 42% 51% 67%

21% 13% 12% 22% 40%

(46%) (33%) (44%) (48%) (69%)

(25%) (12%) (13%) (34%) (46%)

(44%) (36%) (36%) (46%) (62%)

(18%) (11%) (11%) (20%) (31%)

Yes, will adjust the

level of cars

provided

IMPACT OF THE WLTP TEST INTRODUCTIONPROPORTION OF COMPANIES EXPECTING TO ADJUST CARS LEVEL

45

Yes, will adjust

the level of cars

provided

% Yes, certainly

Proportion of companies expecting to adjust the level of cars to compensate the impact of the WLTP test

NL17b. Because of these new constraints resulting from the introducing of the new WLTP test, will you adjust the level of cars provided to your employees to compensate?


% Yes, certainly

Total

New question 2019

34% 18% 22% 41% 63%

18% 8% 4% 26% 37%

26% 17% 20% 29% 43%

11% 6% 5% 12% 23%

IMPACT OF THE WLTP TEST INTRODUCTIONCOMPENSATIONS EXPECTING BY COMPANIES DUE TO WLTP TEST

46

NL17c. What kinds of compensations are you likely to implement?


Total

New question 2019

To lower the level or the

category of the cars

To choose different models

or makes with lower

emissions level

To choose different models

or makes with lower fiscal

impact

To choose different energies

Do not expect to adjust car

level

7%

6%

15%

17%

3%

11%

15%

14%

66%

74%

-

3%

9%

10%

-

7%

9%

8%

82%

83%

5%

4%

9%

12%

5%

7%

12%

10%

78%

80%

15%

8%

17%

19%

2%

13%

14%

18%

59%

71%

13%

13%

25%

31%

10%

18%

32%

24%

37%

57%

Take actions in order to

reduce emissions of its

car fleet

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES TAKEN ACTIONS TO REDUCE FLEET EMISSIONS

47

NL19a. In its fleet vehicle purchasing strategy or Car Policy, does your company take actions in order to reduce emissions of its car fleet?

Basis: Companies with corporate vehicles

Take actions in order to

reduce emissions of its

car fleet 35% 16% 27% 42% 68%

50% 40% 43% 54% 68%

Total

New question 2019

EMISSIONS CONSIDERED IN THE CAR POLICY

48

NL19b. Which of the following emissions do you take into account in your company car policy?

Basis : Companies with corporate vehicles, without “don’t know”

NOx (nitrogen oxide)

Fine particles

CO2 (Carbon dioxide)

Other polluting emissions

Proportion of companies taking into account the following pollutant emission in their fleet policy

Total

5%

18%

9%

22%

28%

39%

1%

1%

4%

14%

9%

19%

12%

27%

0%

0%

4%

13%

4%

17%

13%

31%

1%

1%

3%

19%

7%

23%

32%

42%

3%

2%

11%

25%

19%

29%

64%

61%

0%

2%

Potential development

of hybrid and electric

energies

36% 28%

84% 55%

At least Hybrid or Plug-in-Hybridor Electric

Already implemented + considered in the next 3 years

Compensations expected by companies due to WLTP

test introduction

#1 To choose different

energies

#2 To choose different

models or makes withlower emissions level

9% 12% 14% 32%

9% 9% 17% 25%

Companies taken actions to reduce fleet emission

16% 27% 42% 68%

40% 43% 54% 68%Incl. Large companies

Incl. Small and medium

companies

+

ENERGIES AT STAKE – ENERGY MIX

III FINANCING

MAIN FINANCING METHOD

51

Operating leasingFinance leasingCar creditSelf purchase*

Proportion of companies using the following solutions as their main financing method for their fleet vehicles

B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today?


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

Data have been consolidated: 3 years average

Total46%

40%

73%

48%

54%

43%

29%

34%

17%

29%

1%

7%

14%

2%

6%

3%

1%

1%

8%

24%

13%

25%

7%

28%

4%

22%

5%

18%

45%

30%

14%

13%

36%

22%

67%

41%

77%

52%

EVOLUTION OF THE MAIN FINANCING METHODFOCUS ON 1 TO 9

52



Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*


*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

Data have been consolidated: 3 years average

Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.

5% 5% 7% 10% 11% 14%

11% 11% 12% 13% 13% 13%

3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0%

81% 82% 79% 76% 75% 73%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019


53





*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)Data have been consolidated: 3 years averageResults provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.

12% 12%

20%28%

31%

36%

22% 21%

17%13%

9%7%

0% 1%

1% 1%2%

2%

66% 66%62%

58% 58%54%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*


54






36% 37%

47%

56% 59%67%

22%19%

14%9% 6% 4%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

42% 43%

39%

35% 34%29%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*

EVOLUTION OF THE MAIN FINANCING METHODFOCUS ON 500 AND MORE

55





45%46%

56%

66%71%

77%

36% 34%25%

16%9%

5%

0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

19%

19% 18%

17% 19% 17%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*


56





8% 8%13%

17% 19%23%

16% 15% 14%

13% 11% 11%2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%

74% 75% 72% 69% 68% 66%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

+

Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*

EVOLUTION OF THE MAIN FINANCING METHODFOCUS ON 100 AND MORE

57





36% 37%

47%

56%

64%71%

22% 19%14% 9% 8%

4%

0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1%

42% 44%

39%

35%

27%23%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

+

Operating leasing

Car credit

Finance leasing

Self purchase*

MAIN FINANCING METHOD – FOCUS OPERATING LEASING

58Data have been consolidated: 3 years average




45% 14% 36% 67% 77%

30% 13% 22% 41% 52%

Total

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASING

59

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes

Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing

B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?


Yes

Total

24% 8% 25% 32% 38%

17% 5% 16% 25% 28%

26% 18% 24% 32% 37%

12% 5% 9% 16% 22%

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASING

60

Yes

% Yes, certainly

% Yes, certainly

Yes


B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?


Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing

Total

24% 8% 25% 32% 38%

17% 5% 16% 25% 28%

26% 18% 24% 32% 37%

12% 5% 9% 16% 22%

(20%) (4%) (15%) (32%) (36%)

(12%) (1%) (6%) (22%) (21%)

(23%) (18%) (19%) (25%) (31%)

(9%) (5%) (6%) (11%) (15%)

OPERATIONG LEASING AS

MAIN FINANCING METHOD 14%

13%

36%

22%

67%

41%

77%

52%

INTENTION TO DEVELOP

OPERATING LEASING 8%

18%

25%

24%

32%

32%

38%

37%

FINANCING METHOD

VTELEMATICS, DIGITALTOOLS AND ROAD SAFETY

V

A TELEMATICS

TELEMATICS, DIGITALTOOLS AND ROAD SAFETY

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES USING TELEMATICS

64

E23c. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location, driver’s impact on environment...

from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the

users’ smartphones..


Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet


Total

27% 18% 27% 34% 33%

21% 11% 19% 26% 32%

YES, FOR PART

OR ALL THE FLEET


65(Reminder of 2018 results)







YES, FOR PART

OR ALL THE FLEET

Total

27% 18% 27% 34% 33%

21% 11% 19% 26% 32%(19%) (8%) (17%) (26%) (30%)

(28%) (7%) (24%) (38%) (56%)


66

With regards

to cars

With regards

to LCVs




Total

Basis: companies

with at least one car

in fleet = 100%

Basis: companies

with at least one LCV

in fleet = 100%

21% 14% 19% 28% 22%

18% 11% 15% 21% 27%

30% 19% 29% 37% 41%

23% 12% 21% 28% 31%

YES, FOR PART

OR ALL THE FLEET


67






21%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

53%TR33%

CZ

30%

UK

#4 NL 27%

#5 PL 27%

#6 ES 27%

#7 PT 20%

#8 LU 19%

#9 BE 15%

#10 IT 15%

#11 CH 13%

#12 FR 12%

#13 DE 11%

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES USING TELEMATICSWith regards to cars

68

Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their cars

E23c_1. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location, driver’s impact on

environment... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the

mean of the users’ smartphones.. with regards to cars

Basis: Companies with cars.

18%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

33%CZ

ES

25%

UK

#4 PL 23%

#5 NL 21%

#6 IT 16%

#7 LU 14%

#8 CH 12%

#9 BE 12%

#10 FR 9%

#11 DE 8%

28%

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES USING TELEMATICSWith regards to LCVs

69

Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their LCVs

E23c_2. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location, driver’s impact on

environment... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the

mean of the users’ smartphones.. with regards to cars

Basis: Companies with LCVs

23%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

42%CZ34%

UK

30%

NL

#4 PL 26%

#5 ES 24%

#6 LU 21%

#7 BE 18%

#8 IT 15%

#9 CH 15%

#10 DE 12%

#11 FR 11%

PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICS

70

E25ab. What are the two main reasons you use telematics in your company fleet?

Basis: companies which has implemented telematics

Locate vehicles

Reduce fleet costs

Improve drivers safety

Optimize journeys

Improve drivers behaviours

Make drivers actors of the

change *

Other:


Total

37%49%

20%33%

19%32%

17%31%

30%30%

5%8%

22% 19% 24%

9% 9% 10%

WARNING : Only 2 answers allowed in 2019 while no restrictriction applied previously * New item 2019

+ +

42%57%

24%26%

7%22%

21%29%

25%24%

8%7%

35%44%

17%37%

28%37%

14%31%

34%34%

2%9%


71


Basis: companies with cars which has implemented telematics

Locate vehicles


Reduce fleet costs

Optimize journeys


Make your drivers actors of

the change*

Other:

Total

29%41%

26%30%

19%27%

13%25%

27%25%

2%6%


CARS

24% 19% 27%

10% 11% 10%

+ +

34%54%

6%19%

18%20%

21%24%

14%19%

6%5%

26%34%

36%35%

20%30%

9%26%

34%27%

0%6%

Europe except Portugal


72


Basis: companies with LCVs which has implemented telematics

Locate vehicles


Reduce fleet costs

Optimize journeys


Make your drivers actors of

the change*

Other:

Total

42%44%

35%29%

23%27%

22%25%

15%25%

5%9%


16% 16% 17%

9% 8% 9%

+ +

42%52%

24%21%

27%22%

27%25%

7%18%

8%7%

42%40%

44%33%

20%29%

19%25%

21%29%

3%10%

Europe except Portugal

LCV

Use of the telematics:

18% 27% 34% 33%

11% 19% 26% 32%

For all or part of the fleet

With regards

to cars

With regards

to LCVs

21%

18%

30%

23%

Main reasons to use telematics:Among users

#1 To locate vehicles

(37%)

#2 To improve drivers

behaviours (30%)#3 To reduce fleet

costs (20%)

TELEMATICS

V

B ROAD SAFETY

TELEMATICS, DIGITALTOOLS AND ROAD SAFETY

ACTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETY

75

Buying vehicles with native

device relating to road safety on

it

Aftermarket / Adding an

additional equipment in order to

alert the driver*

Real world driving style analysis

E-learning

Smartphone blocking

NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?


Already implemented

New question 2019

Total

48%

25%

10%

7%

6%

44%

25%

4%

1%

1%

49%

26%

10%

7%

12%

43%

25%

9%

4%

5%

58%

22%

22%

21%

11%

ACTIONS TAKEN OR CONSIDERED IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETY

76

Already implemented

+ considered

54%

29%

13%

10%

14%


Already implemented

NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?


Buying vehicles with native device

relating to road safety on it

Adding an additional equipment in

order to alert the driver*

Real world driving style analysis

E-learning

Smartphone blocking

New question 2019New question 2019

Total

50%

29%

6%

4%

7%

55%

30%

14%

8%

16%

52%

30%

11%

7%

13%

61%

27%

25%

26%

21%

POLICY ON THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES WHILE DRIVING

77

NL15. Do you consider to have a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car… / NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions? Smartphone

blocking. Yes, already implemented / No, but considered in the next 3 years / No, but considered later/ Not considered / (Do not read out) Don’t know


At least one

Make or receive phone calls

The use of navigation apps

The use of apps except for

navigation

Smartphone blocking

Already implemented

+ considered

62%

48%

48%

31%

6%

67%

54%

53%

41%

14%


Already implemented

% of companies having or considering to have in the next 3 years a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car with regards to the following topics (NL15 + NL16)

New question 2019

Total

53%

42%

40%

34%

1%

56%

44%

42%

36%

7%

55%

44%

43%

22%

12%

58%

51%

49%

31%

16%

72%

60%

58%

39%

5%

80%

67%

66%

55%

13%

69%

46%

54%

27%

11%

75%

55%

55%

41%

21%

VIPERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY

USE OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES

79

Already usingALREADY USING

* New item 2019

Proportion of companies already using the following mobility alternatives

MM9. in the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?


Total

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Private lease*

18%

17%

18%

24%

9%

7%

2%

7%

8%

14%

4%

3%

11%

11%

21%

22%

6%

4%

30%

24%

25%

28%

15%

9%

36%

32%

23%

37%

11%

13%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES

80


Already using

Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives

MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested


* New item 2019

ALREADY USING +

CONSIDERED

Total

26%

23%

22%

29%

18%

12%

3%

11%

10%

18%

8%

8%

17%

16%

24%

26%

12%

10%

35%

29%

28%

33%

22%

14%

58%

43%

34%

45%

35%

18%

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Private lease*


81


Already using




ALREADY USING +

CONSIDERED

8%

4%

15%

17%

13%

13%

21%

19%

2019

2018

+

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

Car sharing

Ride sharing


82


Already using




ALREADY USING +

CONSIDERED

+

45%

36%

31%

36%

35%

35%

38%

38%

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

Car sharing

Ride sharing

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES CAR SHARING

83


MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?



23%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

TR34%

CH UK

#4 FR 29%

#5 PL 28%

#6 CZ 27%

#7 NL 26%

#8 DE 24%

#9 BE 22%

#10 ES 18%

#11 LU 17%

#12 PT 16%

#13 IT 8%

31%

38%

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES RIDE SHARING

84





#4 CH 36%

#5 BE 36%

#6 PL 35%

#7 FR 31%

#8 DE 27%

#9 LU 25%

#10 NL 22%

#11 ES 22%

#12 PT 11%

#13 IT 10%

29%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

50%TR46%

CZ

45%

UK

DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES PRIVATE LEASE

85





12%

TOP 3

#1

#2 #3

38%TR23%

UK

18%

NL

#4 FR 14%

#5 CH 12%

#6 BE 12%

#7 LU 12%

#8 ES 11%

#9 DE 10%

#10 IT 9%

#11 CZ 9%

#12 PL 7%

#13 PT 6%

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS

86

YES

Yes probably

Yes certainly

MM10. Would you anticipate that your company would give up all or part of the company car fleet for such alternatives?


Total

12%

6%

12%

7%

8%

4%

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Private Lease

1%

3%

5%

4%

3%

3%

7%

4%

12%

6%

3%

2%

18%

7%

17%

8%

11%

5%

28%

12%

15%

11%

16%

6%


88

YESYes probably

Yes certainly

MM10b. Would you anticipate that your company car drivers would give up their company car for such alternatives?


+

3%

2%

8%

7%

3%

3%

5%

4%

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

Car sharing

Ride sharing


89

YES

MM10b. Would you anticipate that your company car drivers would give up their company car for such alternatives?


Yes probably

Yes certainly

+

22%

12%

16%

12%

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

Car sharing

Ride sharing

9%

10%

10%

9%

INTEREST IN MOBILITY PLATFORM

90

Yes

% Yes, certrainly

Already in place in the company:

10% 1% 1% 17% 26%

6% 1% 1% 12% 12%

4% 1% 6% 5% 7%

NL12. With a mobility platform you have insight into all the costs related to the mobility of your employees. Are you interested in such a platform?


Total

ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORM

92

NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform?

Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company

Employee satisfaction

Optimisation of mobility costs

Corporate Social Responsibility

Reduce administrative work

Other

42%

41%

32%

22%

6%

Total

ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORM

93

NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform?

Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company

Employee satisfaction

Optimisation of mobility costs

Corporate Social Responsibility

Reduce administrative work

Other:

42%

41%

32%

22%

6%


Total

(31%)

(55%)

(55%)

(38%)

(3%)

INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGET

94

NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in mobility budget?


Yes

% Yes, certrainly


14% 1% 3% 20% 40%

6% 1% 0% 9% 18%

7% 3% 5% 10% 11%

Proportion of companies considering a mobility platform


Total

(7%) (3%) (6%) (10%) (11%)

INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGET

95

NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in mobility budget?


Yes

% Yes, certrainly


14% 1% 3% 20% 40%

6% 1% 0% 9% 18%

7% 3% 5% 10% 11%

Proportion of companies considering a mobility platform


Total

(12%) (4%) (13%) (18%) (18%)

(5%) (0%) (2%) (8%) (15%)

ROLE OF A MOBILITY BUDGET

96

NL9. Which role takes a mobility budget in your working conditions?

Basis: companies interested in mobility budget

Only usable for mobility costs

Only usable for a lease

vehicle

We have a cafeteria model

None

31%

24%

9%

22%

Other: 5% 8% -

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed


Total

40%

25%

0%

22%

30%

23%

19%

15%

ROLE OF A MOBILITY BUDGET

97

NL9. Which role takes a mobility budget in your working conditions?

Basis: companies interested in mobility budget

Only usable for mobility costs

Only usable for a lease

vehicle

We have a cafeteria model

None

31%

24%

9%

22%

Other: 5% 8% -

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed

Very low

basis (<20)

No results

displayed


Total

40%

25%

0%

22%

30%

23%

19%

15%

(26%) (25%) (25%)

(21%) (15%) (25%)

(13%) (15%) (15%)

(19%) (20%) (15%)

(15%) (20%) (10%)

Perspective in terms of corporate mobility

Potential development of mobility

alternatives

Car sharing 8%

15%

Mobility budget 10%

At least one alternative

Already implemented +

considered in the next

3 years

24%

Ride sharing

Private Lease 9%

+Incl. Large companies

45%

31%

47%

74%

28%

Car sharing

Mobility budget

At least one alternative

Yes certainly

Ride sharing

Private Lease

Proportion of companies ready to give

up all or part of their company cars for

such alternatives

+Incl. Small and medium

companies

+Incl. Large companies

+Incl. Small and medium

companies

1%

5%

2%

6%

1%

13%

12%

12%

26%

4%

99

T H A N K Y O U

99

Date post:	23-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

2019 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 Company size & sector This sample structure was set up in order to be...

Documents