+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not...

2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not...

Date post: 17-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
38
2019/21073/FUL Demolition of existing buildings and re- development of site to accommodate Council Depot building and light industrial units, with access service areas and parking Locomotive Building Engine Shed Lane Skipton BD23 1UP
Transcript
Page 1: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

2019/21073/FUL

Demolition of existing buildings and re-

development of site to accommodate Council

Depot building and light industrial units, with

access service areas and parking

Locomotive Building

Engine Shed Lane

Skipton

BD23 1UP

Page 2: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 3: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Google Earth View

Industrial units

Industrial units

Sport Centre

Page 4: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 5: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 6: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Surrounding Units

Page 7: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Proposed site layout

A

B

C

Page 8: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Unit A

Page 9: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Units B & C

Page 10: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Officer Summary

1. The site is within an established industrial area so the redevelopment of this site to provide

7 industrial units accords with the requirements of the LP.

2. The scale, design and materials of the proposed industrial units would be similar to

adjacent industrial units. Thus would not result in any visual harm to the character of the

area.

3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not

recommended refusal of the application.

4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards to highways safety, parking, flooding,

contamination or the management of surface water.

5. Accordingly, the development is considered to comply with the requirements of LP policies

in respect of industrial development to support the economic growth and expansion of the

district and subsequently complies with the National Planning Policy Framework.

Page 11: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

That members resolve to grant planning

permission subject to the recommended

conditions outlined in the officers report.

Recommendation

Page 12: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

2020/21560/VAR

Application to vary condition no. 2 (Approved Plans) of

Minor Material Amendment to allow Plots 1 and 7 to be

detached on planning application reference number

2019/20416/FUL granted 1st August 2019

Land off Skipton Road, Kildwick,

Keighley BD20 9BB

Page 13: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

N

Page 14: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View from travelling from Skipton to Kildwick

Roundabout

Page 15: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View from Kildwick Roundabout

Page 16: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Existing access into site

Page 17: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View of the hedge from Skipton Road

Page 18: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View from Skipton Road through the hedge into the

site

Page 19: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 20: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Approved Site Layout

Page 21: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Proposed revised site layout

Page 22: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Approved layout

Proposed revised

layout

Page 23: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Approved Elevations

Page 24: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 25: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Detached

dwellingDetached

dwelling (linked by

overhand to next property)

Detached

dwellings

Page 26: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards
Page 27: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Officer Summary

The amendments are considered to not give rise to any

unacceptable adverse impact that would warrant a refusal that

could be defended at appeal.

That members resolve to grant planning permission subject to the

recommended conditions outlined in the officers report.

Page 28: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

2019/20654/REM

Approval of the appearance, landscaping, layout and scale as reserved by condition in outline

consent referenced 26/2015/15886 for 40 dwellings

Land at

Page 29: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Site location

Page 30: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Site Plan

Page 31: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View (South) from Shires Lane

Page 32: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View (South-West) from Shires Lane/Low Lane junction

Page 33: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

View (West) from Low Lane

Page 34: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Elevations (Type A)(E.G. PLOTS 3 & 4 – 2 BED)

FRONT (NORTH)

SIDE (EAST)

SIDE (WEST)

REAR (SOUTH)

Page 35: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Elevations (Type L)(E.G. PLOT 13 –3-BED)

FRONT (NORTH)

SIDE (EAST)

SIDE (WEST)

REAR (SOUTH)

Page 36: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

FRONT (WEST)

SIDE (NORTH)

SIDE (SOUTH)

REAR (EAST)

Elevations (Type M)(E.G. PLOT 24 –3-BED)

Page 37: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Elevations (Type H)(E.G. PLOT 29 –3-BED)

FRONT (SOUTH)

SIDE (EAST) – PLOT 28

SIDE (WEST)

REAR (NORTH)

Page 38: 2019/21073/FUL · 3. NYCC Highways and NYCC LLFA have reviewed the submission and have not recommended refusal of the application. 4. The proposal has raised no concerns with regards

Main ConsiderationsPrinciple of development:• Principle established through extant outline permission (access only) for 7

dwellings – application 26/2015/15886 as varied by 2017/18839/VAR.

Character and appearance:• Two storey scale compatible with other dwellings in the area.• High quality materials proposed. Details reserved by condition 5 of this application.• Landscaping reserved by condition 7 of this application.

Amenity:• Spacing and relationship with neighbouring dwellings ensures no undue effects on

privacy and amenity of surrounding occupiers.• Ball stop netting/fencing – reserved by condition 10 of outline.

Highways:• No objections from NYCC subject to conditions. Highway improvement works

reserved by condition 8 of outline.

Affordable Housing and Open Space Contributions:• Affordable Housing – reserved by condition 6 of outline.• Open Space – reserved by condition 9 of outline.


Recommended