Date post: | 12-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mark-nwani |
View: | 263 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
De Montfort University
Topic:
The Impact of Total Quality Management
(TQM) on Employee Productivity: A Case Study
of Onne Oil & Gas Free Zone Authority (OGFZA),
Rivers State, Nigeria
Nwani, Mark Kido b.sc (hons)
Being a dissertation submitted a part of the criteria for the award of:
Masters of Business Administration (MBA)
September 2012
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Abstract
Most organisations are driven by an increased market share and performance as a result of
a sustainable enhancement in the productivity levels of employees which the management
strive to continuously maintain through the effective usage of identified and selected
management working tools and techniques. Companies such as Oil and Gas Free Zone
Authority (OGFZA), Onne have an in-depth knowledge of this and have sought to form a
synergy between Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation and an improved
productivity of employees with the view to being an industry leader in its sector and also
enhancing the value of its turnover on a year-on-year basis.
This project work covers elements related to TQM and employee productivity, and how they
help in ensuring an organisation is able to efficiently integrate them to actualise its goals and
objectives in a way that continuously carries the interests of all parties involved . The
literature review gives an in-depth overview of the formation of these two factors and their
roles the corporate working structure and culture of the organisation. The research
methodology used was quantitative-inclined and made use of web-based questionnaires for
the data analysis through the snow-balling sampling technique so as to ensure a substantial
amount of the chosen respondents filled the questionnaires Denscombe (2007).
The conclusions drawn from the analysis point to the fact that management need to ensure
employees have an in-depth understanding of how the process of TQM works to aid in the
realisation of an increased level of employee productivity as a result of the effective
implementation of TQM. As a lack of detailed understanding of this technique has a great
tendency to adversely affect the productivity level of employees, and this is extensively dwelt
upon in the final recommendations made on how the implementation of TQM can boost the
rate of employee performance to a great extent.
3
Acknowledgement I would firstly like to thank Jesus Christ my Lord and Personal Saviour without whom I
wouldn’t be alive. Then comes my immediate family and four aunties to whom I owe a lot of
my existence to. They have been my rock through stormy weathers and proved that you can
be miles apart and yet still feel so close through the unity ties they devised to cushion
communication gaps that were ever so glaring. I would also seize this opportunity to express
a profound sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Hulya Oztel who unconsciously acted as a
mentor, guiding me through each stage of this project work as a progressed with it.
The efforts put in by my primary contact in OGFZA, Mr. Adamu Kontagora would never go
unnoticed as he is the very reason why a significant part of the subjects filled the
questionnaires the submitted in time for analysis. I remain entirely grateful for this sir. On a
final note I would also like to say a big THANK YOU to my classmates, flatmates (The
Wolfpacks) and friends who were there in times when they didn’t even need to. You are all
the reason I was able to come this far and continuously have a positive outlook to life
Thank you.
4
Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7
1.1. Aim of the Research ............................................................................................................ 8
1.2. Research Questions ............................................................................................................ 8
1.3. Framework of the Dissertation ........................................................................................... 9
Chapter 2: Literature Review ............................................................................................................ 10
2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 10
2.2. Overview of Total Quality Management (TQM) ................................................................. 10
2.3. What is TQM? ......................................................................................................................... 12
2.4. TQM as an Organisational Corporate Culture ................................................................... 12
2.5. The Concept of Employee Productivity ............................................................................... 13
2.6. Relationship Between TQM and Employee Productivity .................................................. 16
2.7. Case Study Overview ............................................................................................................ 22
2.8. Previous Studies on the Impact of Total Quality Management on Productivity ............ 24
Chapter 3: Research Methodology and Model Formulation ........................................................ 28
Chapter Four: Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 30
4.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 30
4.2. Research Questionnaire Preparation and the Sample ..................................................... 30
4.3. Response Rate ....................................................................................................................... 31
4.4. Validation of the Response Rates ....................................................................................... 31
4.5. Analysis of Response Rate Factors .................................................................................... 32
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendation ............................................................................. 42
5.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 42
5.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 42
5.2. Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 45
Chapter 6: Personal Reflection ........................................................................................................ 47
References .......................................................................................................................................... 49
5
Appendices
Appendix 1 Topic Agreement Form………………………………………….……………………60
Appendix 2 Web- Questionnaire Overview……………………………………………………….62
Appendix 3 Questionnaire Results………………………………………………………………..65
Appendix 4 Ethics Form…………………………………………………………………………….67
Appendix 5 Meeting with Supervisor Record Forms…………………………………………….70
Diagrams
Diagram 1…………………………………………………………………………………………….7
Diagram 2……………………………...………………………………………………………….....15
6
Tables
Table 1……………………………………………..…………………………………………………24
Table 2………………………………………………..………………………………………………24
Table 3……………………………………………………..…………………………………………25
Table 4………………………………………………………..………………………………………25
Table 5…………………………………………………………..……………………………………25
Table 6………………………………………………………………..………………………………26
Table 7……………………………………………………………………..…………………………26
Table 8…………………………………………………………………………..……………………27
Table 9………………………………………………………………………………..………………31
Table 10………………………...……………………………………………………………...........32
Table 11………………………………………………………………………………………….…..33
Table 12……………………………………………………………………………………………...34
Table 13……………………………………………………………………………………………...34
Table 14……………………………………………………………………………………………...36
Table 15……………………………………………………………………………………………...36
Table 16……………………………………………………………………………………………...38
Table 17……………………………………………………………………………………….……..38
Table 18……………………………………………………………………………………………...39
Table 19………………………………………………………………………………………….…..40
Table 20……………………………………………………………………………………………...44
7
Chapter 1: Introduction Total Quality Management (TQM) has received a reasonable degree of attention and
implementation in various sectors of economies of several countries in the last few years
due to its focus on not just quality improvement, but also the increase in the productivity of
employees so as to ensure a maximised customer satisfaction level and an increased
turnover are achieved. TQM is a set of techniques, as well as a philosophy of management
which involves a total systems approach to productivity. It has been a crucial adoption
strategy for achieving success in an organisation in terms of quality and productivity due to
the fact that it is an improvement business performance tool which aids an organisation in
meeting the satisfaction expectations of customers and integrating the working relationships
between management and employees with the view to forming a synergy in the corporate
culture of the organisation as whole.
The relationship between TQM and employee productivity can be traced to as far back as
the early 1980s’ when Professor E. W. Deming introduced it to the Japanese industry which
changed the management thinking at the time into understanding that for customer
satisfaction and a competitive advantage to be achieved, there was the growing need to
adopt the TQM organisational tool to improve the productivity level of employees (Stainer,
1993). Ugboro and Obeng (2000) built on the views held by Stainer (1993) in their article
when they argued that for an improved employee productivity to be actualised, an
organisation needs to focus on the effective sustenance five key factors that emanates as a
result of implementing the TQM concept which are; top management commitment,
continuous improvement, communication, training and employee involvement. In addition to
this, Sumanth (1984) gave an overview of four productivity management phases in the
employee productivity cycle which he identified as being a key measurement of productivity
improvement.
Diagram 1
Productivity measurement Productivity evaluation
Productivity planning
Productivity improvement
8
Elements in the diagram above need to be constantly assessed to inquire their level of
progress so as to ascertain the effectiveness of TQM in improving them.
A review of previous approaches to the implementation of TQM will be done in chapter two
to gain an extensive insight on results gotten from studies on aspects of TQM
implementation. This research work is based on a case study company, Oil and Gas Free
Zone Authority (OGFZA), Onne, Rivers State which is a leading Free Trade Zone in Nigeria
providing variety of service facilities and infrastructure to organisations in various sectors of
the Nigerian economy ranging from ports and terminal operators to airline management
companies and financial institutions among others.
In a bid to ensure it continuously provides unmatched quality of service delivery, the firm
adopted the concept of TQM into its working process which has led to a significant increase
in its rate of financial turnover and quality techniques, as well as customer satisfaction.
Employee productivity, which is a key research topic in this project would be explored to
inquire the extent to which the implementation of TQM impacts on it.
1.1. Aim of the Research
1. To study the relationship existing between Total Quality Management (TQM)
initiatives and policies and Employee Productivity within organisations and the impact
its impact in the overall performance of the organisation
2. To make appropriate requisition on the need to adopt Total Quality Management as
an organisation’s management tool in order to enhance employee productivity
3. To develop measures of Total Quality Management and employee productivity, and
also a research framework for doing an in-depth findings on the relationship that
exists between the two factors.
1.2. Research Questions
1. What factors play a crucial role in the relationship that exists between TQM and
employee productivity?
2. How can employee productivity be enhanced through the implementation of TQM
initiatives?
9
1.3. Framework of the Dissertation
This dissertation has an overview of five chapters which cover areas outlined below:
Chapter One: Introduction to TQM and employee productivity: This gives a brief background on the two
elements, link with the case study company (OGFZA), as well as the aim of the research and
research questions to be explored.
Chapter Two: Literature review: This chapter provides a wide range in-depth view on the two topic areas
(i.e. TQM and employee productivity) from articles ranging from journals to textbooks on
several authors views and opinions. A constructive argument for the against the
implementation of TQM is portrayed, and ends with an overview of the case study company
and an outline of previous research done on the adoption of TQM and results gotten.
Chapter Three: Research methodology: This gives details of research technique used for the data analysis
and gives a full description of how the data is going to be presented
Chapter Four: Data analysis: This chapter considers factors ranging from the effectiveness of the research
tool used, response rate gotten and an analysis of the responses in form of tables.
Chapter Five: Recommendations and conclusion: This chapter summarises results gotten from the data
analysis by making recommendations to the case study company.
10
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1. Introduction The main objective of this study is to highlight and explore the impact of effectively
implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) on the productivity level of employees in an
organisation, and as such would focus extensively on the views of past researchers who
argued for and against it. The literature review for Quality Management (QM) studies
previously under-taken by authors such as; Ahire et. al (1996) and Barazit and Kapak (2007)
revealed that the adoption of Total Quality Management (TQM) into an organisation’s
process potentially has the tendency to boost its level of competitiveness and productivity
among employees, while other authors such as Kelly (1992), Szwergold (1992) have
indicated in their various works that TQM is effective enough to positively impact on the
productivity level of employees.
The articles to be used in this chapter range from academic journals to textbooks, with
minimal emphasis on using internet sites about TQM due to the fact that it is believed that
the content of journals and textbooks are a more reliable source of information in covering
elements of the chapter which are; overview of TQM, TQM definition, argument for and
against TQM, TQM as a corporate culture within an organisation, employee productivity
definition, its link with TQM, as well as TQM practice within Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority,
Onne (OGFZA)
2.2. Overview of Total Quality Management (TQM) The Total Quality Management (TQM) movement started in 1950 when Edward W. Deming
introduced it to the Japanese industry by stating the fact that for quality to be improved upon
and continuously sustained in an organisation, emphasis should be placed on re-strategizing
the process through a joint systematic thinking of employees and management rather than
blaming employees for problems or failures encountered while achieving a stated task
(Gabbai, 2000). Deming (1986) went on to state that once the Japanese implemented the
TQM concept by creating a flow diagram in which he expressly stated that “quality should be
aimed at the needs of the customer, present and future”, the quality of the products and
services rendered improved and employee output enhanced significantly as a result of
setting up of a workflow framework termed “an organisation’s wide unit” which enabled
teams perform cross-functional roles, identify problems and device avenues of solving it,
11
thereby increasing their productivity level and involvement in the organization’s work
structure process.
The views of Deming was upheld by several authors ranging from Crosby (1989) who
advocated the zero defects programs adopted by the United States Federal Government,
defining quality as “conformance to requirements”, which can be applied to service industries
in order to enhance the productivity level of employees and ensure customer satisfaction is
achieved. He was of the perception that “Quality is free” and went on the emphasize that any
level of defect is too high and companies should put programs in place to propel them
continuously work towards the goal of zero defects which on the long-run implies total
quality.
The findings by Hendricks and Singhal (1997) and Arawati (2009) highlighted that if Total
Quality Management (TQM) policies and practices are effectively implemented it would lead
to a significant improvement in the financial performance of an organisation, as well as the
productivity level of employees. Their studies investigated a number of elements as being
independent variables to Total Quality Management (TQM) practices and initiatives. These
elements include; zero defects, customer focus, supplier relationship sustenance, up-to-date
training and development, employee focus, process improvement and quality measurement.
Their conclusion was that all TQM practices have a positive impact on keys organisational
factors such as profitability and employee productivity.
Oakland (1993) in agreeing with the works of Crosby (1989) views TQM as a way of life for
an organisation which is committed to effective customer satisfaction and an increase of its
performance at all levels through a continuous improvement process and the involvement of
a variety of people in its day-to-day operations, as well as decision making.
Other authors like Wruck and Jesen (1994) have asserted that TQM provides a historically
unique approach, solid conceptual foundation and at that same time offers strategic
improvement of employee performance which also takes into account how people and the
organisation as a whole actually operate under a defined framework. Paul (2002) defined
Total Quality Management (TQM) from the perspective of innovation to mean the effective
management of all activities and procedures involved in the development of know-how
among employees and integrating it, technological advancement tools, the manufacturing
and marketing of a new product or service or the process of manufacturing a plat or
equipment.
12
2.3. What is TQM? In defining the concept of TQM, several authors held similar views on what it entails.
Deleforge (1995) pointed out that TQM is concerned with the management of all aspects of
quality service provided to customers, which includes quality of product and service delivery,
quality of promotion and merchandising, as well as prices of services, and this according to
Pandjiris (2003) can only be attained through his definition of TQM as the continuous
process of striving for improvement involving everyone in an organisation and focusing on
first time quality and continuous enhancement of employee performance.
Ross and Perry (1999) took operational approach in defining TQM by stating that it
encompasses an overview of management systems and processes aimed at ensuring
customer satisfaction through the empowerment of employees to participate in crucial
aspects of the organisation’s decision making process, which leads to minimisation of costs
to be incurred and high returns. In addition to these, authors like Robbins (2001) talked
about accurate measurement, whereby TQM uses statistical techniques to measure every
critical performance variables in an organisation’s operations.
James (1989) put forward the contention that TQM initiatives will not succeed unless rooted
in a Quality of Working Life (QWL) program, which Joseph et al (1999) stated is a key
organisational factor that can be used for the effective implementation of an organisation’s-
wide functions so as to integrate the working relationships that exists between employees.
The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) stressed that Total Quality
Management (TQM) is an approach of management in an organisation which centres on
distinct level of quality based on the joint participation of all staff which the view to
developing a long-term success rate which benefits not just customers who are an essential
part of the organisation’s process, but employees too whose level of competency and
productivity remains a crucial resources to the organisation.
2.4. TQM as an Organisational Corporate Culture Total Quality Management as a management tool that sustains the corporate culture that
exists within an organisation as discussed by Sashkin (1993) encompasses the constant
attainment of satisfaction through an integrated system of tools, techniques and training
schemes all geared towards sustaining the emergence of an increased customer satisfaction
and improvement in the overall performance of the organisation. However in their work,
Sashkin and Kiser (1993) also connoted that Total Quality Management (TQM) as an
13
organisation’s corporate culture is neither a technique nor a program or specific tool, but
rather a shift in an organization’s culture and thinking capability to carry employees along in
key aspects of the organization’s process that require their input and know-how so as to
enhance their motivation level and increase their productivity as a result of their
empowerment through joint co-operative efforts to improve quality.
Irani et. al (2004) contended that Total Quality Management (TQM) is recognised as an
origin of an organisation’s corporate culture, competitive advantage strategies, innovative
capabilities and continuous improvement framework which help in ensuring a synergy in the
working culture of employees to enable a correlation exist between their performance levels
and the organisation’s profitability/turnover. Joseph et al. (1999) also corroborated this views
in their study when they held that TQM is an integrative management philosophy which aims
to constantly improve the quality of products and processes through a holistic approach that
incorporates socio-cultural systems and technical systems that exists within an
organisation’s working structure in other to achieve increased cordial working relationship
among employees and management, which leads to customer satisfaction.
2.5. The Concept of Employee Productivity Employee productivity which is a key element that is enhanced through an efficient adoption
of Total Quality Management (TQM) techniques is defined by Dorgan (1994) to be an
increased level of functional and organisational performance (including its quality
improvement process) which leads to customer satisfaction, increase in an organisation’s
rate of turnover and also an enhanced level of employee know-how/expertise. Supermeister
(1976) also took this perspective by explaining that employee productivity refers to the
consideration of quality improvement and output per employee hours as being the
determinant factors that drive an organisation’s performance capability to always attain a
sustainable leadership position in its sector as a result of these elements.
As such, an increase in the productivity level of employees results to an increase in quality
and quantity of production and ensures employees are in harmony in the work relationships
that exists among them, which leads to the formation of an integrated working culture that is
geared towards a consistent attainment of a common goal. Pritchard (1992) put forward the
contention that employee productivity entails the effectiveness of an organisation’s ability to
adequately utilise the resources at its disposal in order to ensure the performance level of
employees are enhanced to achieve the a maximised customer satisfaction. Several authors
14
including Chee (1997) and Coriat (1992) elaborated on productivity in their works by taking
the perspective that it can be achieved through a systematic division of automations, labour
mechanisations, training techniques and retraining of all these in a production processes that
takes place in the organisation so as to achieve maximum output and efficiency of service
delivery in employees’ capabilities.
Improvement of employee productivity is one of the essential activities organisations embark
upon with the view to creating a distinct competitive advantage between the quality of what
they offer and that of its rivals, as well as ensuring employees’ performance meets the
requirements they are expected to attain. Dorgan (1994) and Curry and Kadasah (2002)
further added to this by stressing that an increased rate of employee productivity is as a
result of an organisation’s drive to continuously involve employees its decision making
process with the view to increasing their level of output, and also developing adequate
training measures to enhance their know-how capability and drive for efficient service
delivery, which on the long-term adds a significant amount of value to the overall
performance of the organisation, as it ensures customers are fulfilled with the quality of
service rendered to them.
Employee involvement which is a key element of employee productivity emerged as a
management tool in the early 1990s’ (Lawler et al., 1995, Dale et al., 1997 & Hyman and
Mason, 1995) and was defined by several authors ranging from; Behnke et al. (1993), Chiu
(1998) and Cotton (1993) to be a process whereby the views and inputs of employees are
acknowledged and collated to form a critical part of the management’s decision making
process. This according to O’Brien (1995) and Chu (1997) leads to higher employee
efficiency and productivity, as it gives them a sense of belonging and identification to the
organisation, and ensures they continually work in harmony to achieve a common that meets
the expectations of the firm’s leadership.
Extensive training initiatives created for employees in an organisation are an essential
element of increasing their level of productivity and competency owing to the fact that it aids
in the acquisition of new skills and techniques which add a beneficial value to the long-term
success of the firm. Evans et al (1996), Jones (1985) and Oakland (2003) give further clarity
to this viewpoint in their description of how the training process works to achieve this desired
goal in their analytical overview of the TQM learning process and how it impacts on
employee productivity which is illustrated below:
15
Diagram 2
Stage 1:
Identification areas of employee skills
improvement so as to explore avenues of
enhancing them.
Nadler (1979) added to this view in his work by stressing that the intention of an
organisational training process is the transformation of employees’ learning abilities into
enhanced job performance due to the attainment of new skills that increases their
productivity. He further went on the point that the training adds a significant amount of value
in an organisation when the learning process results in the creation of a positive level of
attitudinal reactions among employees which then reflects in the overall performance of the
organisation due to the harmony of work structure they develop.
Stage 2:
Developing learning techniques and events
to be adopted.
Stage 3:
Transferring the training techniques into
avenues for building new skills and acquiring
new expertise so as to create the emergence
of improved performance
Stage 4:
Evaluation to inquire progress made in the
impact of the process on employee
productivity.
16
2.6. Relationship Between TQM and Employee Productivity In their work, Satish and Srinivasan (2010) considered Total Quality Management (TQM) to
be the foundation of improvement in an organisation’s level of customer satisfaction
initiatives, profitability, as well as employee productivity which invariably facilitates the
emergence of sustainable competitive advantage, innovativeness on the part of employees
and a consistent level of growth in key areas of the organisation. In addition to this, the
revelations gotten from the research done by Lakhal et al. (2006) showed that a positive
relationship exists between an organisation’s practice of Total Quality Management (TQM)
and the performance that emanated as a result of implementing it. Also the random effect
meta-analysis tool used by Shenawy et al (2007) to systematically study the effect of TQM in
employees’ productivity in an organisation revealed that TQM initiatives possess five key
working components including; team work, education and training, culture, top management
commitment and leadership, as well as process efficiency, which gave the organisation a
sustainable competitive advantage in the sector which it operates in. Sun (1999) added to
this by contending that for an organisation to achieve business excellence, all the enabling
management tools must be pooled together jointly and adopted to areas where their
proficiency can be maximised.
An empirical study undertaken by Daniel and Amrik (2003) gave an in-depth view to the fact
that a correlation exists between Total Quality Management (TQM) and the quality of
products and service delivery, as well as its innovativeness, which translates to increased
employee productivity and overall performance of the organisation. As a sequence to this,
Daniel and Amrik (2004) carried out a further study to analyse the multifunctional nature of
TQM as it relates to the performance of an organisation, but failed to support the notion that
organisations need to structure TQM implementation and practises in different ways to
achieve different types of productivity level for employees and ensure maximum customer
satisfaction levels are attained. In their work, Tanninen et al. (2010) concurred with this
views when they concluded in the research that TQM has a essential impact on the three
types of performance measures used to assess the competency level of an organisation
which are; profitability, employee productivity and customer satisfaction, all of which play a
crucial role in determining the overall performance of an organisation.
However several studies have come up afterwards to counter this claim, arguing that Total
Quality Management (TQM) implementation does not necessarily translate to improved
17
employee productivity and as such are not that effective to enhancing their productivity level.
The conclusion drawn from studies such as; Kelly (1992), Szwergold (1992), Garvin (1985),
LaMantia (1991), Fuchsberg (1992 (1)) and Fuchsberg (1992 (2)) has been that the concept
of Total Quality Management (TQM) is not as efficient as it was previously envisaged to be
in its application to the Japanese industry, and might even contribute to bringing decreasing
employee productivity as no link exists between to two elements.
In addition to these, Phusavat et al. (2009) indicated that an essential hindrance to the
successful implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) is its inability to critically
measure performance of employees to ascertain the extent of their productivity level
improvement. This performance measurement as explained by Wilson, Hagarty and
Gauthier (2003) includes financial or non-financial indicators which enable the organisation
know whether or not employee performance is increasing. Kannan et al (1999) added to this
by disputing the works of authors such as Hendricks and Singhal (1997) in his article where
he argued that the perception of Total Quality Management (TQM) programmes and
initiatives if effectively implemented invariably translates to enhanced financial performance
of an organisation due to an increase in employee turnover, fails to recognise and
acknowledge other essential management tools as equally being vital to adding significant
value to the performance of the organisation.
Ford and Evans (2006) pointed that there has been a lot of conflicting results on the impact
of TQM on the working structure and culture of an organisation and quite a significant
amount of researchers agree with this viewpoint. Typical examples can be seen in the works
of Montes et al. (2003), Zairi et al. (1994) and Terziovski and Samson (1999) who
emphasized that there is not much evidence to conclude that TQM has a great impact in the
operations of an organisation due to its improvement of profitability and productivity, as the
rate of employee turnover according to them can be enhanced through factors such as
offering motivational incentives which is not linked to TQM. Kannan et al (1999) also agreed
with this perspective by arguing that quality initiatives proffered through the implementation
of TQM cannot by itself drive an organisation’s quest to improve itself productivity and
market share value, as other essential factors play a crucial role in increasing employees’
rate of turnover.
In defending the correlation the exists between TQM and employee productivity, and its
positive reflection on the performance of employees and that of the organisation as a whole,
Hides et al (2000) argued that the experience of implementing Total Quality Management
18
(TQM) as a philosophy of management has been of a crucial gain to most organisations as it
significantly adds value to the performance of employee and also the organisations’ level of
profitability by ensuring a consistent level of communication exists between management
and employees either through face-to-face interactions or scheduled meetings to discuss
level of efficient employee productivity attained.
In the same year as Zairi et al. (1994), Pegels (1994, pp. 6.12) offered an opposition to the
claims held by the authors by arguing that TQM is more concerned with productivity of
employees, profitability of the organisation as a whole, timeliness of the organisation’s
working process and overall flexibility of the system than just quality, as these performance
measures play an important role in the TQM programme to be implemented by the
organisation. Thus suggesting the fact that Total Quality Management (TQM) is one of the
key factors that drives the productivity level of employees into ensuring the organisation is
able to continuously increase its performance level and profitability drive.
Going forward, many more practitioners and academics have undertaken studies that had
conclusions which point to the fact that Total Quality Management (TQM) techniques and
practices has a significantly positive impact on employee productivity and aids effectively in
ensuring its continued improvement is sustained. Jamshed (2003, pp. 376-380) studied the
effect of implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) on productivity in Small and
Medium Enterprises (SME) in Pakistan and came to the conclusion that the implementation
of TQM is of essential importance to the continued sustenance and improvement of
industries both locally and internationally. Thamson (2003) while agreeing with the works of
Jamshed (2003) based his works on undertaking a study on several companies that focused
on adopting the TQM concept, and came to the conclusion that the TQM approach has a
crucial impact on the working operations of an organisation, as well as the relationships
between management and employees which extensively contributed to the long-term
viability of the business.
Other advocates of Total Quality Management (TQM) such as; Crosby (1979), Johnson
(1993, pp9-11), King (1992), Senge (1993), Kanji and Asher (1993) Deming (1982) and
Ishikawa (1985) have reacted to these adverse claims on Total Quality Management (TQM)
by revisiting previous works on Total Quality Management (TQM) to restate their viewpoint
on; why there is nothing preventing it from having a positive impact on employee
productivity, what the concept entails and its linkage with employee performance, as well as
19
what organisations need to do to ensure a systematic process is implemented to impact on
employee productivity.
Furthermore, authors such as Haim (1993), Pfau (1989) Easton and Jarrell (1994), Harvey
(1989) and Samson and Terziovski (1999) explained in their articles that Total Quality
Management (TQM) certainly plays a huge role on the performance of employees, as such
is “well and alive” and should be a key element to be adopted by an organisation to
increased their level of quality and productivity of employees, while Khan (2003) took his
perspective the support the claim that Total Quality Management (TQM) has a positive
impact on employee performance based on the practical evidence that emanated from
organisations that have won the prestigious Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, which
further strengthened the claim that the implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM)
enhances productivity.
This claim corroborated with a previous work done by Brah et al. (2002) which clearly stated
the advantages of TQM implementation in an organisation that wants to succeed and always
have a competitive edge over its rivals to include enhanced rate of profitability, increased
productivity know-how and efficient cost saving techniques. In addition to this, other research
studies by authors such as Mann and Kehoe (1994), Terziovski et al. (1999), Joiner (2007),
Pegels (1994) and Handfield et al. (1998) stress the fact that Total Quality Management has
a substantially positive impact on the performance of a company as it ensures waste
reduction is at a minimised rate, efficiency is improved, returns on assets and investments
are high and the performance level of the organisation is on a constant increase.
In addition to this, the Hendrincks and Singhal (1997) empirical study on 463 firms to prove
that the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM) improves the rate of performance of
employees showed that seven out of ten firms in the sample size exhibited a higher
increased in their operating income as a result of an increase in employee performance
when compared with firms that did not implement Total Quality Management (TQM).
However having implemented the TQM concepts and policies, results do not appear
immediately, as it takes a long time to implement and organisation have to undergo the
process of an overhaul in its working structure, culture and employee mindset for its
effectiveness to reflect in the organisational process of the company. This explains why
Hendricks and Singhal (1997) took the view point that TQM benefits are realised on a long-
term basis after which it impacts significantly on employee productivity and the organisation
as a whole.
20
Furthermore, the study by Hendrincks and Singhal (1997) revealed that firms with effective
Total Quality Management (TQM) outperformed firms that did not adopt it, as it improved the
organisation’s operating income, reduced cost of production, increased its revenue
generation capability, improved the level of its profitability and increased the productivity of
employees who constantly aim to improve the quality of service delivery and products of the
company through continuous joint effort.
Deming (1982) gave an extensive insight on the link between Total Quality Management
(TQM) and employee efficiency, stating that it is an improper understanding of the variations
in output and work performance of employees on the part of management that was the
central problem in most organizations. His case was built on the belief that there was
confusion between two factors; common cause and special causes of variation, which
accounts for a separation from the system which employees operate within. The common
cause according the Deming (1982) are a vital part of the system, and as such is the
responsibility of the management operating within those environments to ensure the system
is changed when variation become too large. The special cause on the other hand which
Deming (1982) emphasized can substituted for assignable cause is the responsibility of the
employees to contain as they form a significant amount of the organisation’s workforce who
are charged with the responsibility of day-to-day operation of the organisation’s work
process.
Several studies afterwards have conveyed a literature on the link between Total Quality
Management (TQM) and employee performance, studying quality practices in more than 500
companies cut across various sectors ranging from the banking industry to sectors involved
in health care delivery, automotive design and development, computer manufacturing,
service providing and a host of others in Canada, US, Germany and Japan. Bemowski, K.
(1991) explained that only three management practices related to quality improvement have
a significant impact on employee productivity irrespective of the industry or country, and they
include; strategic plan deployment, process improvement methods and supplier certification
programs. This report nevertheless did not give correlations to actual productivity,
profitability, performance measurement and quality improvement, and can be concluded that
is difficult to replicate.
However answers to these correlations were provided by the US Government Accounting
Office (G.A.O, 1991) which examined the impact of Total Quality Management (TQM)
21
enhancement strategies on the performance of 20 US companies and identified a strong
relationship between a company’s use of TQM initiatives, such as senior management
leadership, customer focus, commitment to employee involvement, training, empowerment,
as well as the application of systems thinking to fact finding measures in key decision
making processes, and employee productivity which are measured by customer satisfaction,
increased organisational turnover, profitability, employee relations, strong communications
network and quality improvement (as can be seen in author’s views discussed earlier).
These findings collaborated with the four arms of the TQM philosophy identified by Khan
(2003) which when adapted and implemented to an organisation’s process leads to the
creation of diverse systems and tools which are integrated to facilitate the emergence of a
corporate culture for the organisation, and as such improves employee productivity. These
units include; employee empowerment, involvement and development, continuous
improvement, use of systematic approach to management and absolute customer focus.
Demirbag et al. (2006) indicted that Total Quality Management (TQM) is a concept
organisations need to adopt in order progress in their quest to increase quality, due to their
perspective that it is a holistic approach that adds value to continuous improvement of key
areas in all organisations. Kumar et al. (2009) agreed with this viewpoint by adding that by
stating that improvement in quality of an organisation’s products and services it renders
leads to the emergence of lower cost of production, decrease in wastes factors and
increases employee productivity by making them work more effectively to improve the
profitability margin of the company, as well as its market share.
Furthermore, Powell (1995, pp. 15-24) study which examined the relationship that exists
between TQM practice and employee performance as a source of giving an organisation a
sustainable competitive advantage and found that most characteristics related to Total
Quality Management (TQM) such as process improvement, benchmarking and quality
training, do not usually provide an edge for an organisation, but rather certain implicit and
imperfectly imitable features such as continuously improving performance at every level
through training and knowledge sharing can bring about an advantage. And he proposed
that this leads to for the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM) to be sustained in an
organisation’s day-to-day activities, management needs to ensure it is integrated with the
working structure of the organisation so as to translate to improved employee productivity.
22
Juran (1992) concurred with Powell’s viewpoint by adding that the concept of TQM
implementation is designed to create awareness of the quality crisis, aid in the re-direction of
existing processes to avoid quality deficiencies, establish new viable approaches to quality
training and planning of employees, as well as to assist in the establishment of a mastery
framework within an organization’s process to guide and direct the activities of employees so
as to avoid the creation of potential chronic problems that may arise as a result of a quality
planning process that does not emphasize the need for continuous awareness of the
customer in all functions.
Part of the functions of the Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority (OGFZA), Onne is the provision
of services to organisations in the area of terminal operations, project management, cement
distribution and shipping/freight services among others. In order to this effectively, the
leadership and management structure in place are expected to adopt TQM policies and
strategies to the organisational process in its day-to-day operations so as to enhance the
quality of service delivery being rendered and increase employee productivity.
Deming (1981) indicted that the advantages deprived from enhanced quality through
improvement of processes go beyond bringing better quality to an organisation, as they lead
to an increase of the capacity of production lines, long-term improvement of the
organisation’s market visibility and share, increased profit margin and improved productivity
as a result of an increase in the morale by management who rather than blame them for
faults encountered while performing their job descriptions, choose to improve supervision
and fear out fear (which are part of the 14 principles he created for top management to
implement). As such in order for the realisation of TQM objectives to be achieved, it is crucial
that top management are committed to implementing it with the utmost view of ensuring
employee involvement and participation are paramount through the creation of training and
developments programmes geared towards continuous improvement of the quality of service
delivery which enhances employee productivity and the overall performance of the
organisation.
2.7. Case Study Overview The case study company being used, Onne Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority (OGFZA)
officially commenced operations in 1997 and has since then expanded its operations to the
point where more than 30 international oil and gas companies, inclusive of some of the
largest corporations in the world are registered to its operational facilities, which has led to a
23
consistent level of increase in its cargo handling and management throughput. Over $300
million has been invested since its inception to-date by the Private Sector in Nigeria towards
ensuring there in a constant upgrade and improvement in its working facilities both in the
Federal Ocean Terminal and Federal Lighter Terminal respectively.
The Free Zone Authority which is managed by DMS International Limited is the only Free
Zone in the world solely dedicated to the oil and gas industry and as such had to explore
management tools to implement with the view of ensuring a consistent level of improved
employee productivity was maintained. The TQM concept was introduced to the organisation
by the management in 2008 to achieve this and has since led to a sustainable industry
leadership position of the organisation as the factors that emanated as a result of the
implementation of TQM include: in-house training, employee involvement in key aspects of
the firm’s decision making process, management commitment to the affairs and activities of
employees, open-line communication window to address the key needs of employees to
ascertain if they are being addressed and measures that can be put in place to address
them (if not), as well as improvement of the quality of service delivery which has seen its
customer base increase in recent times due to the satisfaction of its clients of the level of
operational service rendered.
The key focus areas of the organisation are; enhanced employee productivity, increase in
foreign investments as a result of high turnover, improved communication channels and
avenues so as to boost the management-employee relationship and generation of internal
and external revenue through adopting a developmental strategy of acquiring technological
advancement facilities in order to remain attractive to existing and potential investor
companies that require the products and services it renders. The company’s approach to
business development and continuous improvement lies in its ability to implement
productivity programmes for employees, address health and safety issues (including
environmental constraints), sustain good working relations with companies that makes use
of its services and also device customer satisfaction techniques (like surveys and
questionnaires) that act as a form of checks and balances to inquire that satisfaction or
dissatisfaction level of its consumers. Its definitive aim is the improvement of its level of
competitiveness, profitability, productivity, accessibility and shareholder value towards a
consistent level of high business excellence.
The company currently has staff strength of about 4500, most of whom are based in its Head
Office in Onne, Rivers State, Nigeria and its Head Office Annex in Lagos State, also in
24
Nigeria. In addition to this, it has a branch network of 32 offices all of which are located in
Nigeria. Its clientele base consists mostly of organisations that have business operations in
Nigeria ranging from aircraft handling companies to port and terminal operators and financial
institutions amongst others. Its main facility and operations site is in Onne.
2.8. Previous Studies on the Impact of Total Quality Management on Productivity
Table 1
Researchers: Capon et al. (1995, pp. 9–20)
Aim: To perform an in-depth exploration to the role of Total Quality Management (TQM)
measurement programmes and how it improves the success rate of an organisation when
implemented.
Sample and Data Collection: One company used.
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: National (Within the country where they reside)
Performance Measures: Objective and subjective
Outcome: The measurement and displays of results significantly increases success
avenues in a TQM programme/initiative.
Table 2
Researcher: Sun (1999, pp. 901–914)
Aim: To make a detailed clarification on the key components of Total Quality Management
(TQM) and how they impact on performance/productivity
Sample and Data Collection: Surveys and questionnaires (316 companies used).
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: National (Within the country where they reside)
Performance Measures: Objective and subjective
Outcome: Some TQM concepts and practices aid in the enhancement of business
performance, productivity level of employees as well as the satisfaction of customers to
ensure they stay loyal to the products and services rendered by the company.
25
Table 3
Researchers: Hendricks and Singhal (1997)
Aim: To do an analysis on the impact of Total Quality Management (TQM) on the financial
performance of an organisation.
Sample and Data Collection: About 600 award winning companies, Public organisations.
Type of Study: Longitudinal
Scope of Study: National (Within the country where they reside)
Performance Measures: Objective
Outcome: TQM if effectively implemented substantially improves the financial performance
of an organisation.
Table 4
Researchers: Brah et al. (2002, pp. 358–379)
Aim: To inquire the success factors that are embedded in a quality programme
Sample and Data Collection: Statistical, questionnaires, 185 responses gotten
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: National (Within the country where they reside)
Performance Measures: Objective and subjective
Outcome: Results that emanated propose that a correlation exists between Total Quality
Management (TQM) Implementation and quality performance, which in the long-run
positively affects productivity.
Table 5
Researchers: Montes et al. (2003, pp. 191-209)
Aim: To provide an efficient guide for assessing the level of relationship that exists between
Total Quality Management and the performance of a firm which strives to sustain quality
improvement and productivity
Sample and Data Collection: Conceptual
26
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: N/A
Performance Measures: Subjective
Outcome: Results gotten from this research stress that fact that TQM must be adopted to a
firm’s strategy in order to impact on the productivity of employees
Table 6
Researchers: Lagrosen and Lagrosen (2005, pp. 945-950)
Aim: To analysis the effects of different quality management tools and models
Sample and Data Collection: Questionnaire distribution, with 53% response rate (265)
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: National
Performance Measures: Subjective
Outcome: A statistical correlation exists that proves there is a significant relationship
between the implementation of TQM values and successful quality management techniques.
Table 7
Researchers: Shenawy et al. (2007, pp. 444–468)
Aim: To integrate empirical studies on the effect of Total Quality Management techniques
and concepts on competitive advantage.
Sample and Data Collection: Meta-Analysis (51 studies)
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: International
Performance Measures: Objective
Outcome: TQM components and initiatives lead to the emergence of a competitive
advantage for a firm that adopts it.
27
Table 8
Researcher: Joiner (2007, pp. 619-627)
Aim: To inquire the extent of relationship that exists between the implementation of TQM
and organisational performance (i.e. employee productivity and quality enhancement)
Sample and Data Collection: Questionnaire distribution (84 responses)
Type of Study: Cross-sectional
Scope of Study: National
Performance Measures: Subjective
Outcome: A substantial relationship exists between TQM implementation and practices and
organisational performance.
28
Chapter 3: Research Methodology and Model Formulation Owing to the high level of confidentiality in Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority, Onne as is with
most free zone companies operating in Nigeria, the present study made use of the
quantitative approach to effectively answer the research questions embedded in the study.
The questions of the study were mainly dependent on the extent and impact of implementing
Total Quality Management (TQM) and its corresponding productivity index. An overview of
the four steps used in the methodology are;
I. Research population and sample size collation
II. Usage of convenient constructs to measure the extent to which adopting TQM in an
organisation’s process corresponds with employee productivity index
III. Data collection methods
IV. Presentation of data and its analysis accordingly.
OGFZA currently has an employee size of about 4,500 which cuts across several
departments, branches and positions. In order to ascertain what an ideal number to be
chosen that best gives a good representation of the total population would be, a sample size
calculator would be implored in this regard. It was gotten from the Human Resources
Department that a past research work done in 2010 where the total population in the sample
was 3,200 a response rate of 93% was gotten after 8 weeks of its commencement. However
due to the fact that time and resources constraint exists for this research work, a cross-
sectional sample survey would be conducted making use of a sample size chosen that gives
an essential representation of the total population of staff in the organisation. Results gotten
from the sample calculator depict that a sample size of 105 would give a good
representation of the total population in the sample with a confidence level of 95%.
The sampling technique to be used would be the web-questionnaire which is cost effective,
less time consuming and convenient for the identified sample size (Denscombe, 2007). In a
bid to ensure a substantial amount of responses was gotten, the sampling would be done
through the snowball technique. The e-mail addresses of the respondents in the sample size
would be gotten through the head corporate affairs of the organisation, after which the
prepared questionnaire link would be sent to them via –e-mail, and left open with a timeline
of 2 weeks only to ensure a reasonable amount of time is provided to the respondents to fill
and submit the questionnaires.
29
The research questions identified in Chapter 1 would be analysis in the next chapter with the
use of question that have Likert Scales embedded in them (i.e. rating scale of 1-5), which
provides a substantial level of advantage with better identifying the strengths of factors to be
analysed to inquire if a collation exists between them and the research objectives as
opposed to using the Ye/No answer that provides no scale in its feedback. The research
questions will be answered efficiently through the analysis of key each identified factor in the
questionnaire to inquire how strong it affects the productivity level of employees. This
process will be done on each identified factor through the Likert scales as it is believed that
the obtainable mode productivity score would vary across all respondents.
30
Chapter Four: Data Analysis
4.1. Introduction
An in-depth analysis and evaluation of the data analysis for this research work was done
through questionnaire distributions to employees and management personnel of Oil and Gas
Free Zone Authority (OGFZA), who were asked questions relating to the impact of TQM
implementation in the employee productivity level in the organisation. As such, the purpose
of this section is to scrutinize the data collected for the purpose of evaluation to inquire the
effectiveness of adopting TQM initiatives and policies into the working structure of OGFZA
for the purpose of ensuring a correlation exists between it and increased employee
productivity, which is the end result factor of the analysis.
In the literature review portrayed in chapter three, TQM was extensively stressed on to
reflect its importance in an organisation’s process and also relevance in enhancing the
productivity level of employees if effectively implemented through management’s
commitment to ensuring the job descriptions of employees are constantly integrated to
create a harmony in their working culture that cuts across the various departments that
exists in the organisation.
4.2. Research Questionnaire Preparation and the Sample
The relevant information for this research work was collected through a web-based
questionnaire survey (Denscombe 2007), which made use of closed questions which the
view of ensuring they are easy to complete and analyse (Easterby-Smith et. al, 1991). The
questionnaire was designed to measure the dimensions of Total Quality Management (TQM)
practices and its impact on employee productivity level in an organisation.
The questionnaire was subsequently distributed to a sample size of 120 comprising of 50 top
management staff and 70 employees of Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority, Onne. An
overview of the questionnaire is included in the Appendix section of research work. The
decision to target a sample size of 120 for the questionnaire distribution was based on the
premise that it was provide a reasonable sample to measure.
31
4.3. Response Rate
The questionnaire as indicted earlier was web-based and as such was e-mailed to the
respondents, accompanied by a covering letter which were all designed in form of so as to
make it as accessible and convenient as possible to them. The covering letter gave a
detailed explanation on the purpose of the study and was addressed to each respondent,
giving them a reasonable time line within which to fill the questionnaires and submit
accordingly in order not to interfere with any assignments they had a duration to complete
and also not to limit the pace of completion of this research work.
The number of distributed questionnaires and the response rate got varied across
departments of the organisation but had a significant amount of correlation due to the fact
that the snowball sampling technique was implored Denscombe (2007). The total number of
questionnaires distributed was 120 and the response gotten was 108. Thus, signifying a
response rate of 90%. This in itself can be termed as a positive response rate, especially
given the fact that the time line with which to complete the web-questionnaire was shorter
than the initially scheduled time. The table below further reveals:
Table 9
Number distributed
Number completed Response rate (%)
Management
50 42 84
Employees
70 66 94
TOTAL
120 108 90
4.4. Validation of the Response Rates
A significant number of respondents gave positive responses (i.e. positive and very positive)
to the questions embedded in the questionnaire when compared to respondents who took a
negative viewpoint. 108 responses out of 120 in the sample size gave valid responses to the
questions in the feedback which is a substantial size of the sample. The confidence level of
95% and confidence interval of 10 remain unchanged, which points to the fact that there is a
10% margin of errors in results gotten.
32
4.5. Analysis of Response Rate Factors
The factors embedded in the response rate gotten from the questionnaire will now be given
an in-depth analysis, with the view to drawing a distinct comparism in areas agreement with
the implementation of the TQM concept against its effectiveness on elements related to
employee productivity enhancement. Total Quality Management (TQM) effectiveness would
be measured on the scale of 1-5 in each of the response rate gotten from the questionnaire,
where 1 implies very negative and 5 very positive, with regards its impact on employee
productivity.
Furthermore, two tables would be used to draw the analysis for each of the factors to be
evaluated. The first table gives an overview of the most commonly occurring elements in the
respondents’ agreement with the TQM initiative, while the second table illustrates a break-
down in the percentage rate of responses of the TQM concept against its effectiveness in
each respondent’s agreement level. The full web-questionnaire sent to respondents to fill
can be found in Appendix
First Factor: Important elements of TQM in the organisation that has an impact on
employees’ productivity? (Question 3 and 4)
Table 10: Employee productivity scores from first factor
Factor Mode Productivity Level
Product Quality 4 (Positively)
Continuous Improvement 2 (Negatively)
Employee Involvement 5 (Very Positively)
Management Communication 3 (Neutral)
Customer Satisfaction 4 (Positively)
33
Table 11: Break-down of percentage rates of responses of first factor against the
employee productivity scores
Very
Negatively
Negative Neutral Positive Very
Positively
Product Quality 34.5% 50% 15.5%
Continuous Improvement 18.5% 50% 31.5% - -
Employee Involvement - - - - 100%
Management Communication - 25% 44% 28% 3%
Customer Satisfaction - - 13.5% 50% 36.5%
The results gotten in table 10 indicates that the respondents were in mutual agreement on
the fact that TQM has a significantly positive impact on the level of employee involvement in
the key decision making process of the organisation, as no one disagreed with this
perspective in the feedback gotten from the questionnaire.
The respondents who had a positive rating for the effect TQM has on two elements of
employee productivity, product quality and customer satisfaction varied in their responses as
some felt indifferent (i.e. neutral), while some were of the viewpoint that TQM has a very
positive impact on the both factors in their scores. However, as can be seen in the employee
responses gotten, no one disagreed with these views in terms of rating TQM as having
either a negative or very negative impact on both elements.
As seen in Table 11, respondents with a negative rating to TQM’s effect on the continuous
improvement of the organisational process of the firm varied in their feedback, as some
contended it had a very negative, while the other group which is larger than the previous one
chose to be indifferent (i.e. neutral) in their response. Thus, owing to the fact that the
response rate gotten from both employees and management show that there is an increased
percentage of respondents that are in mutual agreement that TQM has either a positive or
very positive effect on employee productivity factors as can be seen in the diagram
illustrated, it can be considered that TQM has a positive impact on these factors.
The results gotten from the analysis of respondent’s agreement with TQM’s positive impact
on factors of employee productivity correlates with the author’s views such as Lakhal et al.
(2006) and Shenawy et al (2007) on the subject matter in the literature review, and implies
that TQM has a significant effect on employee productivity owing to the fact that it ensures
communication gaps between management and employees are bridged through
34
management’s decision to involve employees are involved in decision making, which leads
to customer satisfaction and enhanced quality of products and services rendered, even
though some employees felt TQM has a negative impact on the organisation’s quest for
continuous improvement.
This factor has the tendency to have a negatively effect on the productivity level of
employees who are in disagreement with the fact as they may feel their productivity level
does not yield a continuous improvement in terms of consistency in an increase in their level
of development and also in the organisational process. However, because substantial
amount of employee are in agreement with other factors of productivity as can be seen in
table 1, the percentage in measuring TQM’s impact on employee productivity reflects
positives as illustrated in table 11.
Second Factor: Has employee involvement enhanced the organisational corporate
culture since the introduction of TQM (Question 5 and 6)
Table 12: Employee productivity scores from second factor
Factor Mode Productivity Level
Strongly disagree 3 (Neutral)
Disagree 2 (Negatively)
Neutral 3 (Neutral)
Agree 4 (Positively)
Strongly agree 4 (Positively)
Table 13: Break-down of percentage rates of responses of second factor against the
employee productivity scores
Very
Negatively
Negative Neutral Positive Very
Positively
Strongly disagree - 14% 54% 32% -
Disagree 13% 58% 29% - -
Neutral - 15% 55% 30% -
Agree - - - 68% 32%
Strongly agree - - - 62% 38%
35
The illustration shown in table 12 depicts the fact that respondents in disagreement with the
factor are likely to have their productivity level adversely affected as only as the range of
responses gotten in the feedback fall between negative to very negative, even though a
substantial amount of respondents felt indifferent in their feedback, as no respondent that
disagreed with the fact saw a positive effective in its ability to affect employee productivity.
Respondents who chose to remain neutral on the factor in their responses as can be seen in
table 13 have variations in the perception of factor. However majority of the respondents
who had neutral associations with the factor saw no changes in the enhancement of the
corporate culture of the organisation through employee involvement as a result of
introducing the concept of TQM. Going forward, respondents who were in agreement with
the factor took the viewpoint that the corporate culture of the organisation has been
positively affected through employee involvement as no one saw any negative effect in this
regard and their agreement level with this factor falls between positive to very positive.
The results gotten from respondents on this factor supports the findings in the Literature
Review which give light to the fact that employee involvement leads to the emergence of an
increased level of efficiency in service delivery (Behnke et al.(1993), Chiu (1998) and Cotton
(1993)), which help them integrate their work structure to form a synergy that has a
significant impact on the outcome of tasks assigned to them, thereby building a corporate
culture that carrys employees along in key decision making process of the organisation,
Sashkin and Kiser (1993) and Irani et. al (2004).
Thus this factor has both a negative and positive impact on the productivity level of
employees, although unlike tables 1 and 2 discussed earlier, no huge extremes exist in table
as the productivity scores range between 2-4.
Third Factor: Has the organisational training program helped enhance the output level
of employee? (Question 7 and 8)
36
Table 14: Employee productivity scores from third factor
Factor Mode Productivity Level
Strongly disagree 2 (Negatively)
Disagree 2 (Negatively)
Neutral 3 (Neutral)
Agree 4 (Positively)
Strongly agree 3 (Neutral)
Table 15: Break-down of percentage rates of responses of third factor against the
employee productivity scores
Very
Negatively
Negative Neutral Positive Very
Positively
Strongly disagree 7.5% 66% 26.5% - -
Disagree 18% 72% - -
Neutral - 16% 61% 23% -
Agree - 18% 63% 19%
Strongly agree - 14% 48% 38% -
Respondents that strongly disagreed and agreed with this factor took the view that it had a
negative effect on employee productivity as can be seen in table 14, but table 15 further
gives a breakdown to these views held by the respondents which clearly highlights that fact
that only a minority of them took a neutral perspective in strongly disagreeing with the fact
that the training initiatives of the organisational has an impact on the output of employees.
Furthermore, majority of the subjects who took a neutral stand on the factor as illustrated in
table 6 chose to be indifferent in their feedback on the increase in employee output as a
result of the training programmes currently being run by the firm, with a minimal difference
between those who felt it had a positive impact on the output level of employees and those
who took a negative stand.
In addition to this, majority of respondents in agreement with the factor had a positive
perspective to its ability to enhance the output of employees, with a minimal difference
existing between those who saw a very positive impact and those who chose to have neutral
association. However, respondents that were in a strong agreement with that factor had
majority of them take a neutral stand, while an almost equal number saw a positive impact
37
and a small percentage of them seeing the training initiatives having a negative effect on
employee output levels.
The response rates gotten from tables 14 and 15 correlate with the discussion on the subject
matter of training in the Literature Review in that if the employees in the organisation are
unaware of how the training models being use translate to increasing their productivity level,
or feel the training durations are not adequate enough to lead to ensure they acquire the
desired amount of new skills and working techniques needed to enhance their know-how on
tasks assigned to them, then this would adversely affect their rate of productivity and hence
the reason for disagreement in the ability of the training process’ ability to enhance their
corporate work culture. But those who were in agreement that the training initiative positively
impacts on their ability to integrate their job descriptions to form a corporate culture
understood the role the factor plays and feel the training timelines are sufficient enough to
enable them add value to their level of expertise. Thus it is paramount employees are in a
full understanding on the role the training process plays in increasing the corporate culture of
the firm and also have a joint agreement on the adequacy of the training duration, as well as
its effectiveness so as to lead to an increased level in the cordial work relationship between
employees and management, and also enhance employee productivity as indicted by
Joseph et al. (1999)
Summarily, this factor has a great tendency to positively impact on the productivity level of
employees even though the mode does not go beyond 4 in the score as there is still a
significantly large percentage of respondents in agreement with the fact that the training
initiatives positively affects their productivity. The thus reveals the need for the organisation
to ensure a comprehensive understanding on what the training process entails to all
employees so as not the adversely affect their productivity level.
Fourth Factor: Consistency of meetings to communicate the drive to efficient service
delivery (Question 9 and 10)
38
Table 16: Employee productivity scores from fourth factor
Factor Mode Productivity Level
Strongly disagree 2 (Negatively)
Disagree 1 (Vey Negatively)
Neutral 3 (Neutral)
Agree 4 (Positively)
Strongly agree 5 (Very Positively)
Table 17: Break-down of percentage rates of responses of fourth factor against the
employee productivity scores
Very
Negatively
Negative Neutral Positive Very
Positively
Strongly disagree 17% 62% 21% - -
Disagree 100% - -
Neutral - 7% 75% 18% -
Agree - - 10% 69% 21%
Strongly agree - - - - 100%
Respondents that were in a strong disagreement with this factor has their productivity level
negatively affected, while respondents that took a joint disagreement association with the
factor saw their productivity level to be very negative as no one saw any positive impact in
this regard among as of this two groups as illustrated in table 16.
Respondents who chose to be indifferent about this factor by taking a neutral stand had
majority of them choosing to have either a negative or positive relations with this factor by
remaining totally indifferent, which a slightly more subject group being on the positive side as
opposed to negative in their perspective of this factor’s ability to impact on the productivity
level of employees.
However, those in agreement with this factor, as can be seen in table 17 had more positive
associations, as well as very positive too with this factor than respondents who chose to be
neutral, while respondents who strongly agreed with this factor as can been seen in table 16
and 17 took a very positive viewpoint, with no one identifying an negative impact this factor
may have on employee productivity levels.
39
Also as is with previous tables discussed earlier, the findings from the tables above
corroborated with the content of the Literature Review which stressed that a significant level
of value is added to the level of employee performance when communication avenues such
as face-to-face interactions and scheduled meetings between management and employees
are constantly in place Hides et al (2000). Thus employees would felt the level of meetings
and communications channels established between them and management was constant
enough to critically address crucial elements related to their performance level, saw positive
changes in their productivity level, while the implication of not holding meetings as regularly
as employees anticipate they should is that it brings about a negative impact on the
productivity level of employees as due to a perceived extended communication gap in the
interaction between them and management to address issues related to their productivity.
Summarily, the strength of both the positive and negative effect of this factor on the
productivity level of employees is largely dependent on their level of agreement with regards
consistency the established communication channels created by management, as the
productivity mode scores at both extremes are in reliance with the respondents’ mutual
agreement with this factor and is strengthen by table 8 where the mode productivity scores
increases in accordance with agreement with the factor.
Fifth Factor: Management commitment in ensuring sustenance of improved employee
productivity (Question 11 and 12)
Table 18: Employee productivity scores from fifth factor
Factor Mode Productivity Level
Strongly disagree 2 (Negatively)
Disagree 2 (Negatively)
Neutral 3 (Neutral)
Agree 4 (Positively)
Strongly agree 5 (Very Positively)
40
Table 19: Break-down of percentage rates of responses of fifth factor against the
employee productivity scores
Very
Negatively
Negative Neutral Positive Very
Positively
Strongly disagree 22% 63% 15% - -
Disagree 10% 71% 19% - -
Neutral - 11% 75% 14% -
Agree - - 12% 65% 23%
Strongly agree - - - - 100%
What can be deduced from the feedback analysis given in tables 18 and 19 point to the fact
that respondents who both strongly disagreed to the factor, as well as disagreed to it,
indicated that their productivity level were negatively affected due to their perceived views
that the management is not committed enough to ensuring the sustenance of employee
productivity levels are achieved.
Respondents who chose to be neutral to the factor held that their productivity level remained
unchanged, however information that can be gotten from the contents in table 19 reflect the
fact that a little percentage of the respondents identified a negative impact of the factor to the
enhancement of employee productivity, while a percentage slightly higher than that took a
positive perspective to the effect the factor has on improving employee productivity.
However, majority of the respondents that were in agreement to the factor as can be seen in
the illustrations in tables 18 and 19 stated the factor had a positive impact on the productivity
of employees, and while a small percentage felt indifferent about the factor by choosing to
be indifferent, a larger percentage identified the factor have a very positive impact on
employee productivity. Furthermore, respondents who strongly agreed to the factor as can
be seen in table 19, had a very positive perception and have no negative view in their
feedback.
The inputs gotten from these two tables are in a significant level of unison with the findings in
the Literature Review where Shenawy et al (2007) gave top management commitment and
leadership to be among the five key components of TQM that affect the productivity of
employees, and as such follow the trends from previous findings where respondents with
strong disagreement (and disagreement) to the factor are likely to have their productivity
41
level adversely affected, while those that strong agreement with the factor’s ability to impact
on the productivity of employee are likely to have their productivity level positively affected.
Summarily, this factor possesses the strength to impact on the productivity levels of
employees in both a very negative and very positive way depending on the commitment
level of the top management in ensuring a maximised exploration of avenues to enhance
their productivity level to bring about an increase in their rate of performance, as well as a
competitive advantage Shenawy et al (2007). The mode productivity score as is with the
previous discussed table (i.e. tables 8) are in the respondents agreement with the factor as
illustrated in table 10.
In conclusion, all the factors related to employee productivity and TQM have been
extensively discussed and analysed, and will be abridged in chapter 5 with details of the
research objectives earlier identified in the Literature Review and recommendations.
42
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendation
5.0 Introduction This research work was based on the effective implementation of TQM initiatives and
techniques on employee productivity, and commence with an overview definition of the
concept of Total Quality Management (TQM), employee productivity and the relationship that
exists between the two elements which was extensively highlighted on in the Literature
Review. The web-questionnaire distribution method was implored using the snowballing
sampling techniques so as to ensure a significant number of respondents gave feedback
with the view to minimising the limitations in carrying out the data analysis.
5.1 Conclusion In conclusion, results gotten from the questionnaire have now been analysed and as such
can be abridged to aid in giving answers to the two research questions identified in the
Literature Review in Chapter 2.
Research Question 1: What factors play a crucial role in the relationship that exists
between TQM and employee productivity?
From the data analysis depicted in Chapter 4 it is evident that Total Quality Management
(TQM) can have either a positive or negative impact on the productivity level of employees
depending on employees’ perception on how the factors that exist in the relationship
between TQM policy formulations and employee understanding of them are sustained and
continuously enhanced.
The results gotten in the analysis of each factor indicates that the relationship in existence
between TQM and the productivity level of employees can either be positively or negatively
impacted upon depending on their joint agreement level with the identified factors.
Furthermore, factors that played a significant role as identified by the respondents are;
consistency in meetings and communications between management and employees which
had two extremes in the feedback gotten from respondents in terms of its perception to
affect productivity either very negatively or very positively, while other factors such as
employee involvement in key activities and affairs of the organisation, as well as
management committee to ensuring an improved level of employee performance is
43
sustained has a very positive impact on the relationship the exists between TQM and
employee productivity.
These factors identified above are in mutual agreement with the factors identified by
Shenawy et al (2007) in their study the key components that play a crucial role in the
relationship that exists between TQM and employee productivity using the random effect
meta-analysis tool where they found factors inclusive of; team work, top management
commitment, training and extensive communication techniques which Hides et al (2000) held
can be in form of either face-to-face interactions or scheduled meetings.
emanates as a result of decisive meetings held to drive the attainment of the organisation’s
quest for efficient service delivery. In addition to this, other authors such as Tanninen et al.
(2010) and Lakhal et al. (2006) identified a positive effect in existence in the factors that play
an important role in the relationship that exists between TQM and employee productivity in
their works.
Summarily, it can be seen that the factors identified to play an essential role in the
relationship between TQM and employee productivity are; management commitment,
consistency of meetings and the level of employee involvement in the organisation, as these
factors as identified by the respondents significantly impacts on the productivity level the
most.
Research Question 2: How can employee productivity be enhanced through the
implementation of TQM initiatives?
TQM initiatives as identified in the Literature Review which an organisation needs to adopt
into its working process include factors such as; corporate culture, integration of the work
structure of employees, customer focus, process improvement, training and quality
measurement, which are aimed at increasing the rate of employee productivity. A key
element identified that led to negative perception of respondents with regards the impact of
factors analysed on employee productivity was the lack of adequate understanding of the
factor.
It was discovered that respondents who found positive effect on the identified factors were
adequately equipped with the relevant understanding of what the factors entail, while
respondents who took the viewpoint that the factors had the tendency to have a negative
impact on employee productivity chose to associate with it in relation to their inadequate
44
understanding of the factor. Going forward, in as much as it is evident in the data analysis
that there is not a single answer to each of the factors, the findings point to the fact that the
ability of all factors to affect the productivity levels of employees in both a positive or
negative way is largely dependent on their agreement to the factor as a result of their
effective understanding of what they entail. This explains the reason why the difference in
productivity levels cuts across all identified factors.
Summarily, an overview of the identified TQM factors and their relationship with responses
gotten from the data analysis are given below based on how the respondents perceive it
affects the productivity of employees
Table 20: TQM factors and their level of strength/weakness
Factor Strength/Weakness Level
1. Important elements of TQM in the
organisation that has an impact on
employees’ productivity?
Negatively to very positive
2. Has employee involvement enhanced
the organisational corporate culture
since the introduction of TQM
Negatively to positively
3. Has the organisational training
program helped enhance the output
level of employee?
Negatively to positively
4. Consistency of meetings to
communicate the drive to efficient
service delivery
Very negatively to very positive
5. Management commitment in ensuring
sustenance of improved employee
productivity
Negatively to very positively
The factors illustrated in table 11 above are all controllable elements due to the fact that they
are internal to the organisation. When a firm is about to undertake the process of adopting
the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM), it is paramount these factors are critically
considered and measures put in place in terms of strategy and policy formulation to control
the factors to a significant extent in a way that ensures an in-depth understanding of their
beneficial impact to the productivity level of employees.
45
When employees understand how the process works, there will be substantially larger
amount of them in agreement with the factor, as those in disagreement will tend to move
towards having either a neutral or agreeable-incline perception of the factor, which in turn
ensure their productivity levels are not adversely affected.
As can be seen in the factor analysis, respondents in agreement to the identified factors are
more likely to see a positive impact in their productivity level, which invariably adds a
significant level of value to the organisation’s continued increase in performance as a result
of the effective implementation of TQM and the in-depth understanding of how the process
aids in enhancing productivity rates by employees.
5.2. Recommendations The recommendations that will ensue after a completion of this research work are that Oil
and Gas Free Zone Authority, Onne (OGFZA) need to ensure all factors identified to have a
direct linkage with the enhancement of employee productivity levels as a result of
implementing the TQM concept need to be adequately understood by the employees so as
not to decrease their rate of productivity.
From the findings embedded in the research analysis, communication channels between
management and employees in OGFZA does not seem to be quite effective as two extremes
exist in the feedback gotten with regards respondents who disagree with the factor and as
such have their productivity level affected in a very negative way, and respondents who
strongly agree with the factor and see their productivity level affected in a very positive way.
It is paramount this communication gaps are bridge as they are a lot more cost effective and
add a significant level of value in addressing the needs of employees better as the
management can ascertain who employees who through either face-to-face interactions or
meetings to put it into context when formulating policies and strategies to be adopted in
order to carry employees who would implement them along.
It was also seen in the data analysis that a substantial amount of respondents felt the
training measures adopted had a negative impact on the productivity level of employees due
to their perception that the trainings are not sufficient enough to address key aspects of their
productivity improvement know-how. As such, rather than dwell solely on undertaking in-
house training currently being used by management of OGFZA as a means of expanding
46
employees’ level of expertise, it is essential the training programmes are out-sourced to
specialised firms so as to enable employees gain more knowledge and skills to a world class
standard which on the long-run translates to an effective implementation of TQM techniques
and concepts.
Summarily, a further research work needs to be developed within OGFZA other than this
research by increasing the sample size in order to enhance the reliability level of the data to
be analysed, and also review the progress made in employee productivity as a result of
implementing TQM.
47
Chapter 6: Personal Reflection
The duration spent in working on this research work has added a beneficial value to my
know-how despite being very challenging and demanding. Due to the fact that I have had
previous experiences in working on projects, the wealth of experience gather in that regard
was brought to this research work and it helped me in assigning a definitive time to each
stage of the project so that I was able to balance my time and complete the project work as
at when due.
As stated earlier, due to previous experiences in managing projects, I knew an effective way
to undertake this study was to read several textbooks and journals on the related topics to
be explored and then draw the linkage that exists between them to give me the required
good start needed to ensure a continuity was a consistent venture. However, a major
challenge aside the short timeline allocation to this project was the choice of research
questions to be explored, as the emphasis was to choose questions that were in-depth
enough to produce findings they help address the questions. Once the research questions
were developed, the next task which proved to be even more challenging was undertaking a
research on articles and topics related to the study which was to form a crucial part of the
Literature Review in Chapter 2. But because I studied the Project Management module as
part of my MBA program, I knew it was paramount to ensure an effective time management
schedule was set up so as not to only ensure this research was completed within a definitive
timeline set for it, but also ensure I acquired the needed researching techniques as result of
reading textbooks and journals on key topic areas.
Furthermore, because I took up employment as a part-time personnel, this know-how formed
a significant aspect of measures taken to strike an efficient balance in time management as I
was also working while writing this research work . I had to develop the zeal of
encouragement to never let work-related activities overlap on a daily basis so as to give me
the needed time to write this project in line with the duration allotted to each chapter. If this
process could be undertake again, I believe I would build an even more effective time
management know-how capability, as the end part of this project required a lot more effort to
be geared towards mental and physical techniques that were quite very strenuous in nature.
With regards the key topic areas discussed and researched on, I believe I have learned in no
small measure what the impact of an effective implementation of TQM has on the
productivity level of employees in an organisation, and this has definitely put me in a good
48
position to advocate for its extensively implementation to companies whose utmost goal
among others is the continuous increase in their performance level above competition as a
result of having an enhanced value of the productivity levels of employees.
In addition to this, a key learning technique I developed was in having an in-depth
understanding that in as much as a management tool as efficient and vital as TQM is, it has
the tendency to reduce the productivity level of employees to a significant extensive if they
do not have sufficient understanding of how important it is to increasing their rate of
performance in the organisation. I would also bear this in mind in advocating for the adoption
of TQM practice in an organisation’s working process. The research findings gotten in this
project will be passed on to the management of Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority (OGFZA)
as the interpretation analysis of the identified factors require a re-assessment of the firm’s
work process and structure to bring about a desired change that has the interests of
employees also put into context.
Summarily, having a “flashback” at the journey of the past ten months, a conclusion can be
drawn in the light of the fact that I believe the progression and delivery techniques implored
to this research project have been of a sound quality, and have contributed immensely to my
professional and academic know-how on the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM)
as a whole. Indeed I am pleased with the fact that I was able to complete this project within
the duration set for it, with no necessity to initiate an extension of time.
I now feel the ultimate aim of acquiring an MBA degree has come to a full circle and for that,
I remain very grateful.
49
References
Ahire, S. L, Golhar, D. Y and Waller,M.A. (1996), Development and Validation of QM
Implementation Constructs , Decision Science, 27(1), pp. 23-55.
Arawati, A., Mohammed, S. A. and Jaafar M. (2009), An Empirical Investigation on Impact of
Quality Management on Productivity and Profitability: Associations and Mediating Effect,
Cotemporary Management Research, 5, pp. 77-92.
Barazit, O. and Kapak, B. (2007), An Analytical Network Process-based Framework for
Successful Total Quality Management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish Manufacturing
Industry Readiness, International Journal of Production Economics, 105, pp. 79-96
Behnke, L.S., Marshall Hamlin, R. and Smoak, B.C. (1993), The Evolution of Employee
Empowerment, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 6, pp. 143-155.
Bemowski, K. (1991), The International Quality Study, Quality Progress, November.
Brah, S.A., Tee, S.S.L., and Rao, B.M. (2002), Relationship between TQM and performance
of Singapore Companies, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19,
pp. 356–379.
Chee, W. T. (1997), Workforce Productivity Enhancement and Technological Upgrading in
Singapore, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 14 (1)
Chu, K.F. (1997), An Organisational Culture for Quality through Empowerment, Proceedings
of the Second International Conference on Quality and Reliability, Hong Kong, 1 September,
pp. 19-23.
Chiu, R.K. (1998), Employee Involvement in a Total Quality Management Programme:
Problem in Chinese Firms in Hong Kong, Quality and Management, 14, June/ July, pp. 8-11.
Coriat, B. (1992), The Revitalisation of Mass Production in the Computer Age, In Pathways
to Industrialisation and Regional Development, edited by Storper, M. and Scott, A. J. , pp.
137-56, London: Routledge
50
Cotton, J.L. (1993), Employee Involvement: Methods for Improving Performance and Work
Attitudes, SAGE Publications, London
Crosby, P. B. (1989), Quality is Free, McGraw-Hill, New York
Curry, A. and Kadasah, N. (2002), Focusing on key Elements of TQM-evaluation for
Sustainability, The TQM Magazine, 14 (4), pp. 207-216
Dale, B., Cooper, C. and Wilkinson, A. (1997), Managing Quality and Human Resources: A
Guide to Continuous Improvement, Second Edition, Oxford, Blackwell.
Daniel I. P. and Amrik S. S. (2003), The Relationship between TQM Practices, Quality
Performance, and Innovation Performance an Empirical Examination, International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management, 20 (8), pp. 901-918.
Daniel I. P. and Amrik S. S. (2004), The Multidimensionality of TQM Practices in determining
Quality, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Examination, Technovation, 24 (6),
pp.443-453.
Deming, E. W. (1981), Improvement of Quality and Productivity through Action by
Management: Management can Increase Productivity by Increasing Quality, National
Productivity Review (pre-1986), December 1, 1 (1)
Deming, E. W. (1982), Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position, MIT Centre for
Advanced Engineering, Cambridge, MA
Deming, E. W. (1986), Out of Crisis: Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinkus, M., and Zaim, S. (2006), An Analysis of the
Relationship between TQM Implementation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from
Turkish SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17 (6), pp. 829-847
Denscombe, M. (2007), The Good Research Guide For Small-scale Research Projects,Third
Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire, England
51
Dorgan, C. E. (1994), Productivity Link to Indoor Environment Estimated Relative to
ASHRAE 62-1989, Proceedings of Health Buildings ’94, Budapest
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., and Lowe, A. (1991), Management Research: An
Introduction, First Edition, Sage Publications Limited, London
Easton, G.S. and Jarrell, S.L. (1994), The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate
Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Indiana University School of Business Working
Paper, Bloomington, IN
Evans, B., Jeffries, D. and Reynolds, P. (1996), Training for Total Quality Management,
Second Edition, Kogan Page Limited, London
Fuchsberg, G. (1992 (1)), Total Quality is Termed only Partial Success, Wall Street Journal,
October 1
Fuchsberg, G. (1992 (2)), Quality Programs Show Shoddy Results, Wall Street Journal, May
14
G.A.O. (1991), Report to the House of Representatives on Management Practices: US
Companies Improve Performance through Quality Efforts, United States General Accounting
Office, National Security and International Affairs Division, Washington, DC
Gabbai, J. (2000), Management Quality vs. Quality Management, June 24, available from
http://gabbai.com/management/management-quality-versus-quality-management, date
accessed 23/03/2012
Garvin, D. A. (1985), Quality Problems, Policies and Attitudes in the United States and
Japan: An Exploratory Study, Academy Management Journal
Gunasekaran, A., Goyal, S. K., Martikainen, T. and Yli-Olli, P. (1998), P. Total Quality
Management: A New Perspective for Improving Quality and Productivity, The International
Journal of Quality & Reliability Management;; 15, 8/9, pg. 947-965
Haifa S. (2000), The Extent of Harmonization of Employees' Values with TQM principles: A
Survey on Saudi Basic Industries (SABIC), King Saud University, pp75-80
52
Haim, A. (1993), Does Quality Work? A Review of Relevant Studies, The Conference Board
Inc., New York
Handfield, R., Ghosh, S., and Fawcett, S. (1998), Quality-driven Change and its Effects on
Financial Performance, Quality Management Journal, 5(3), pp. 13–30.
Harvey, G. (1989), The Strategic Implementation of Total Quality Management, Proceedings
of the Second TQM International Conference, IFS Limited, Bedford, U.K.
Hendrincks, K. B. and Singhal, V. R. (1997), Does Implementing and Effective TQM
Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms that have
Won Quality Awards, Management Science, September, 43 (9), pp. 1258–1284.
Hides, M.T., Irani, Z., Polychronakis, I., & Sharp, J.M. (2000). Facilitating Total Quality
through effective Project Management, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, 17, pp. 407–422.
Hyman, J. and Mason, B. (1995), Managing Employee Involvement and Participation, SAGE
Publications, London
International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2005), ISO 9000:2005 Quality Management Systems: Fundamentals and Vocabulary.
Irani, Z., Beskese, A., and Love, P. E. D. (2004), Total Quality Management and Corporate
Culture: Constructs of Organizational Excellence. Technovation, 24.
Ishikawa, K. (1985), What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way, Prentice Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Jamshed, H. K. (2003, pp. 376-380), Impact of Total Quality Management on Productivity,
The TQM Magazine, 15 (6 ), pp. 374 - 380
Johnson, T.H. (1993), To Achieve Quality, You Must Think Quality, Financial Executive,
May-June, , pp9-11
Joiner, T.A. (2007), Total Quality Management and Performance, International Journal of
Quality and Reliability Management, 24, pp. 617–627.
53
Jones, J.A.G. (1985), Training and Intervention Strategies, Training and Development,
February, pp. 206-210.
Joseph, I. N. Rajendran, C., Kamalanabhan, T. J. and Anantharaman, R. N. (1999),
Organizational Factors and Total Quality Management and Empirical Study, International
Journal of Production Research, 37 (6), pp 1337-1352
Juran, J. (1992), Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into
Goods and Services, Free Press, New York
Kanji, G.K. and Asher, M. (1993), Total Quality Management Process: A Systematic
Approach, Carfax, Oxford
Kannan, V.R., Tan, K.-C., Handfield, R.B., and Ghosh, S. (1999), Tools and Techniques of
Quality Management: An Empirical Investigation of their impact on Performance, Quality
Management Journal, 6 (3), pp. 34–49.
Kelly, K. (1992), Quality: Small and Midsize Companies Seize the Challenge- Not a Moment
too soon, Business Week, November 20
Khan, J. H. (2003), Impact of Total Quality Management on Productivity, TQM Journal, 15
(6), pp. 374-380
King, R. (1992), Using Total Quality Management to Improve Bottom-line Results,
GOAL/QPC 9th Annual Conference, Boston, MA, October 26
Kumar, U., Kumar, V., Grosbois, D. and Choisne, F. (2009). Impact of TQM on Company’s
Performance, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26 (1).
Lakhal, L., Pasin, F., and Limam, M. (2006), Quality Management Practices and their Impact
on Performance, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 23, pp. 625–
646.
LaMantia, C. R. (1991), Viewpoint Arthur D. Little’s Experience with TQM, Issue 1, available
from http://www.adl.com/uploads/tx_extprism/1991_q1_43-45.pdf, date accessed
23/04/2012
54
Lawler, E.E. III, Mohrman, S.A. and Ledford, G.E., Jr (1995) Creative High Performance
Organisation: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality
Management in Fortune 1000 Companies, Jossey-Bass, San Franciso, CA
Mann, R., & Kehoe, D. (1994), An Evaluation of the Effects of Quality Improvement Activities on Business Performance, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(4), pp. 29–44.
Martinez-costa, M. and Martinez-Lorente, A. R. (2004), ISO 9000 As a Tool for TQM: A
Spanish Case Study, Quality Management Journal, 11, pp. 20-30.
Montes, J.L., Jover, A.V., & Ferna´ndez, L.M.M. (2003). Factors affecting the Relationship
between Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance, International Journal
of Quality & Reliability Management, 20, 189–209.
Nadler, L (1979). Developing Human Resources, Learning Concepts, Austin, Texas
O’Brien, R.C. (1995), Employee Involvement in Performance Improvement: A Consideration
of Tacit knowledge, Commitment and Trust, Employee Relations, 17, pp. 112-120.
Oakland, S. J. (2003), Total Quality Management: Text with Cases, Third Edition,
Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Paul, T. (2002), Innovation Management and New Product Development, Second Edition,
FT Prentice Hall
Pegels, C.C. (1994), Total Quality Management defined in terms of Reported Practice,
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11 (5), pp. 6–18.
Pfau, L.D. (1989) Total Quality Management gives Companies a way to Enhance Position in
Global Marketplace, Industrial Engineering, April
Phusavat, K., Anussornnitisarn, P., Helo, P., and Dwight, Richard. (2009), Performance
Measurement: Roles and Challenges, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109 (5), pp.
646-664
55
Powell, T. C. (1995), Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage; A Review and
Empirical Study, Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1), pp. 15-37
Pritchard, R. D. (Ed.). (1995). Productivity Measurement and Improvement: Organizational Case Studies. New York: Praeger.
Pritchard, R. D. (1992), Organizational Productivity, In Dunnette, M. D. and Hough, L. M.
(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Second Edition, 3, pp. 443–
471, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Pun, K.F. and Chin,K.S. (1998), Critical Factors of Employee Empowered Quality
Improvement in Manufacturing Enterprises, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference
on Quality Management, Melbourne, Australia, February, pp. 138-144.
Pun, K.F., Chin, K.S. and Chan, K.M. (1998), Employee Involvement Strategy for
Implementing Quality Management Systems in Chinese Enterprises, Proceedings of the 3rd
Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theories, Applications and
Practice, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, December, PN047,
pp. 1-8.
Rath and Strong (1991), Fall 1991 Survey on Current Trends in Implementing Total Quality:
Summary of Findings, Rath and Strong Management Consultants
Ross, E. J. and Perry, S. (1999), Total Quality Management: Texts, Cases and Reading, St.
Lucie Press, London
Samson, D. and Terziovski (1999), The Relationship between Total Quality Management
Practices and Operational Performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17 (4), pp.
393-409
Sashkin, M., and Kiser, K. J. (1993), Total Quality Management, Berett-Koehler, San
Francisco.
Satish, K. P. and Srinivasan, R. (2010), Total Quality Management and Innovation
Performance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelationships and Effects, South Asian Journal
of Management, 17 (3), pp 8-22
56
Senge, P. (1993), Quality Management: Current State of the Practice, A Keynote Speech at
the Annual American Society For Quality Control Conference,
Shenawy, E.E., Baker, T., and Lemak, D.J. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of TQM on
Competitive Advantage, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24,
pp. 442–471.
Stainer, A. I. (1993), Productivity Management in Japan, Report Submitted to the Trustees
R.M. Currie Travelling Fellowship, Institute of Management Services
Sumanth, D. J. (1984), Productivity Engineering and Management, McGraw-Hill, New York,
pp. 47-8
Sun, H. (1999). Diffusion and Contribution of Total Quality Management: An empirical study
in Norway, Total Quality Management, 10, pp. 901–914.
Sutermeister, R. A. (1976), People and Productivity, Third Edition, New York
Szwergold, J. (1992), Why Most Quality Efforts Fail, Management Review, August, 81 (8),
pp. 5
Tanninen, K., Puumalainen, K., & Sandström, J. (2010), The Power of TQM: Analysis of its
Effects on Profitability, Productivity and Customer Satisfaction, Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence, 21 (2), pp. 171-184
Terziovski, M., and Samson, D. (1999), The link between Total Quality Management
Practice and Organisational Performance, International Journal of Quality and Reliability
Management, 16, pp. 226–237.
Terziovski, M., Sohal, A., and Moss, S. (1999), Longitudinal Analysis of Quality Management
Practices in Australian Organizations, Total Quality Management, 10, pp. 915–926.
Thamson J. F. (2003), The Impact of Implementation of Quality Management on
Productivity, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 9 (3)
57
Ugboro, I.O., and Obeng, K., (2000), Top Management Leadership, Employee
Empowerment, Job Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction in TQM Organization: An
Empirical Study, Journal of Quality Management, 5, pp 247-272.
Wilson, D. D., & Collier, D. A. (2000). An Empirical Investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige
National Quality Award (MBNQA) Causal Model, 31
Zairi, M., Letza, S.R., and Oakland, J. S. (1994), Does TQM impact on Bottom-line Results?,
The TQM Magazine, 6, pp. 38–43.