of 21
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
1/21
Draft Paper
1
Strengthening Indian Agriculture- Need for Reforms
Surabhi Mittal1
Introduction
In the past few decades India has seen a sustainable growth in food production and
incomes along with growing diversification both in consumption and production. Food
security and sustainability our major goals to keep agriculture sector out of a danger zone
seems to be have been fulfilled. But this feel good factor seems to be a myth as we see
new and bigger challenges emerging in this most vulnerable sector. Share of agriculture
in countrys GDP has declined from 48.7% in 1950 to 24.4 % in 1996-97 and further
18.7% in 2007. Agriculture sector is the backbone of countrys development and lifeline
for 65 per cent of the population based in rural areas and approximately more than 58
percent of the population still dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. Besides this
to achieve an ambitious rate of growth for the country of as high as 9-10% in the eleventh
five year plan, the country needs a strong pull-up support to agriculture sector which
should grow at least at the rate of 4 per cent per annum, all the more since in 2005-06 the
growth in agriculture was merely 2.2% which is expected to go even negative next year.
Besides basic food grain production, other agricultural activities like livestock, fisheries,
horticulture, organic farming commercial crops, agro processing are the new avenues in
the agricultural sector which will lead us in the next phase of agricultural development.
Along with this what is needed most important is to efficiently use the existing
agriculture setup and upgrade it to reap the best results. The prevailing policy instruments
need to be re-looked, re-defined, re-written and efficiently implemented to take care of
the prevailing loopholes. One such important factor is the linking of the markets-
domestic and international through efficient supply chain. The must need for today is the
public private partnership, not only in investment but also in the research, extension and
policy implementation. Agriculture sector reforms should be initiated at war-footing, to
1 Fellow, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India
Contact: [email protected]
Paper prepared for presentation at the Seminar on US-India Agricultural Knowledge Initiative organizedby ICRIER and Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India on 30, April, 2007 held at India Habitat
Centre, New Delhi.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
2/21
Draft Paper
2
bring together all the best thats available and make agriculture an organised unit to give
farmers the maximum benefits. Turning agriculture into an organised business with the
farmer as the entrepreneur should be the key to the second green revolution and for the
much desired evergreen revolution in India. Farming should be taken up with the motive
of profit making rather than just making a subsistence living. With huge diversity in the
number and variety of crops that we produce, variations in agro-climatic conditions, soil
type, prevailing inequalities in the state growth levels, it is utter most essential to
implements the plans through micro level initiatives and proper coordination between all
the stake holders. These issues need to be considered to meet the targets laid out in the
eleventh plan strategy to raise agricultural output. The strategy paper have laid out the
targets of doubling the rate of growth of irrigated area, improving rain water harvesting
and watershed development, bridging the knowledge gap through effective extension,
diversifying to high value output, along with ensured food security, access to affordable
credit, improving incentive structure and functioning of markets and refocus on the land
reform issues and promote animal husbandry and fisheries, to meet out next five year
plan targets.
Issues and Challenges
Since the first green revolution in 1960s the foodgrain production has increased
significantly from 82 million tonnes in 1960-61 to 129 million tonnes in 1980-81 and 213
million tonnes in 2003-04, to meet out food security and attain self sufficiency specially
in the production of our stable food rice and wheat. Green revolution introduced use of
improved inputs- fertilisers, pesticides, seeds and irrigation facility. But the impact of
green revolution was mostly evident in areas with irrigation facilities. In late 1980s the
country saw another set of reforms initiated by broad trade liberalisation and depreciation
of exchange rate which made the terms of trade in favour of agriculture. Reforms focused
on liberalisation of export trade mainly due to some surpluses created in rice and wheat.
But overall in recent years economy has seen a decline in the rate of growth of
agricultural sector and also its share in GDP. At 1999-2000 prices (Table 1) the share of
agricultural sector in GDP has declined from 26.2 per cent in 2000-01 to 21.7 Per cent in
2005-06. The rate of growth of the sector has also been fluctuating from 0% in 2000-01
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
3/21
Draft Paper
3
to -5.9 per cent in 2002-03 and as high as 9.3 per cent in 2003-04 which again dipped to
0.6 per cent in next year. This is primarily because of shift in area and declining yields,
thus resulting in slow down in production. Table 2 show that area under rice, wheat,
coarse cereals has been declining. The decline in production is even of a higher tune than
the area decline, and this is due to low yields. Whereas we see area shift towards pulses,
oilseeds, cotton and other non foodgrains.
Table 1: Annual growth rate and share of agriculture and allied sector in GDP at
1999-2000 prices.
(Unit: In per cent)
Year Annual Growth rate Share in GDP
2000-01 0.0 26.2
2001-02 5.9 26.2
2002-03 -5.9 23.82003-04 9.3 23.9
2004-05 0.6 22.4
2005-06 (quick estimates) 5.8 21.7
Source: Economic Survey, 2006-07
Table 2: Growth rate of area and production of principal crops in India.
(Unit: In Per cent)
Area Production
Crop 2000-01 2004-05 2000-01 2004-05
Rice -1.00 -0.89 -5.25 -3.37
Wheat -6.39 -0.33 -8.76 -0.15
Coarse Cereals 3.13 -5.58 2.48 -11.71
Total Cereals -1.26 -2.19 -5.57 -3.52
Total Pulses -3.64 16.79 -18.20 -3.13
Total Foodgrains -1.67 0.87 -7.16 -3.47
Total Oilseeds -4.69 14.10 -7.99 3.31
Cotton -2.01 16.91 -17.40 22.61
Sugarcane 2.28 0.00 -1.13 0.00
Non-Foodgrains -2.74 8.06 -4.53 3.68
Base: TE 1993-94
Source: Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, 2005
In this backdrop the various issues and challenges identified, that Indian agriculture face
are declining productivity, poor irrigation and water management, declining agricultural
research and extension activities, distorting markets due to government intervention,
declining public and private investment, unorganized agricultural credit and insurance,
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
4/21
Draft Paper
4
poor infrastructure development, inefficient supply chain and marketing strategies, slow
development of agro-processing units. These issues are linked to each other, and are
discussed in details in the subsequent sections. The paper highlights the present status of
Indian Agriculture, and presents some initiatives that are required to strengthen the
agriculture sector in India. The paper intends not only bring forward the issues that are
most crucial for Indian agriculture but also lay out the plan for revival of agriculture
sector in India.
Productivity
Agriculture being constrained by availability of land, the productivity remains the most
crucial factor based on which is the future of Indias food security. Long term food
security goal can only be attained if there is sustainable agriculture. At the farmers level,
sustainability concerns are being expressed that the input levels have to be continuously
increased in order to maintain the yield at the old level. This poses a threat to the
economic viability and sustainability of crop production. A sustainable farming system is
a system in which natural resources are managed so that potential yield and the stock of
natural resources do not decline over time (Kumar and Mittal, 2006).
Table 3: Annual growth rate (%) in input, output, TFP of crops grown in India,
1971-2000
Crop Period Input Output TFP Share of TFP in
output
Paddy (rice) 1971-86 1.82 2.46 0.64 25.87
1986-00 1.88 2.96 1.08 36.43
Wheat 1971-86 2.64 3.93 1.28 32.64
1986-00 2.91 3.59 0.68 18.98
Coarse cereals 1971-86 2.14 3.49 1.36 38.82
1986-00 -0.09 0.03 0.12 440.58
Pulses 1971-86 1.96 2.47 0.52 20.83 1986-00 1.65 1.25 -0.39 Negative
Oilseeds 1971-86 4.5 4.64 0.14 2.98
1986-00 5.22 5.55 0.33 5.9
Fibres 1971-86 3.38 4.41 1.03 23.3
1986-00 3.09 3.04 -0.05 Negative
Sugarcane 1971-86 1.24 2.02 0.79 38.92
1986-00 4.36 4.26 -0.1 Negative
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
5/21
Draft Paper
5
Vegetables 1971-86 0.97 3.56 2.59 72.7
1986-00 6.64 6.45 -0.19 Negative
Source: Kumar and Mittal (2006)
Examining the total factor productive (TFP) growth of major crops in India it is seen thatthe technological gains of early years of green revolution have exhausted their potential.
The changes in output, input and in TFP for major crops based on micro-farm level data
covering 1971-72 to 1999-002
period is presented in table 3. Agriculture has been
experiencing diminishing returns to input use and a significant proportion of the gross
cropped area has been facing stagnation or negative growth in TFP. The table show the
decline in productivity between the two time periods in almost all the major crops and
some have even negative TFP growth. The share of TFP in total output has also been
declining and negative in some cases, which implies that the growth in output is more
because of the increased use of inputs rather than the technology factor. This has
concerns for the sustainability issue.
Even at state level the states with positive and accelerating TFP growth in 1971-1986 has
shown a stagnant or decelerating rate of growth in TFP in the period of 1987-2000
(Kumar and Mittal, 2006). Research, extension, literacy and infrastructure have been
identified as the most important sources of growth in TFP. Development of markets
improves input-output market interface and it is of crucial importance for growth in
productivity. Human resource development is central to adoption of technology and
promotion of sustainable development. In agriculture, education creates conditions that
enable farmers to acquire and use knowledge for decision making regarding allocative
and technical matters effectively. A study (Mittal and Kumar, 2000) show that the
improvement in standards of rural literacy, leads to growth in adoption of technology, use
of modern inputs like machine, fertilisers, and yield. In case of rice and wheat in India,
literacy is found to have a positive and significant relation with crop productivity and a
strong link with farm modernisation. Rural education contribute to improvement in
adoption of high yield variety seeds by about 25-47 percent, fertilizer use by 18-22 per
2 1999-2000 was the latest data available at the time of analysis. Only one more year information is added
at present.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
6/21
Draft Paper
6
cent, about 6-8 per cent in modernisation and 5-8 per cent to improvement in yields for
rice and wheat.
Along with productivity is the concern of increasing yield gaps. Table 4 show that,
existing huge gap between the average yield achieved in India at TE 2003-04 and the
yield that have been achieved by other countries in the World. This can be an indicator
of the yield potential that is achievable through technological enhancement (Mittal,
2006a). If we strive to achieve these potential yield levels, then the increasing demand
requirements of the country can be met in future.
Table 4: Average yield and yield potential at TE 2003-04
(Unit: tonnes per hectare)
Food Items
Yield
(India)
Potential Yield
(Highest in World)
Rice 3.03 9.71
(Egypt)Wheat 2.69 8.89
(Namibia)
Total Cereals 2.39 10.41
(Ireland)Pulses 0.60 5.14
(Barbados)Edible Oilseed 0.25 4.29(Peru)
Sugarcane 60.70 122.70
(Malaysia)Source: Mittal, 2006a. Computed from FAO Statistics. http://faostat.fao.org/
Countries in parenthesis are the ones which have the highest yield for the specified food item
The foodgrain productivity is on a decline even in among the major foodgrain surplus
states. Decomposition of the impact of various factors on TFP growth show that
extension accounted for about 45 per cent of the TFP growth, followed by public research
(36 per cent), literacy (10 per cent), infrastructure (8 per cent), and urbanization (1.5 per
cent) (Kumar and Mittal, 2006). Similar results are also observed by several other studies
for India (Kumar and Rosegrant, 1994; Evenson et al., 1999; Fan, et al; 1999; Mittal and
Kumar, 2000). Modern Biotechnology tools, genetic engineering as well as conventional
breeding methods will also play an effective role in improving yields (Singh, 2002).
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
7/21
Draft Paper
7
Collaborations with the domestic and international research institutes and private research
centres will help in reducing knowledge and yield gaps. More than half of the required
growth in yield to meet the target of demand must be achieved from research efforts by
developing location-specific and low input-use technologies with emphasis on the
region/sub-regions/districts where the current yields are below the potential national
average yield (Kumar and Mittal, 2006).
The sharp fall in the total investment, more so in the public sector investment, in
agriculture has been the main cause for the deceleration of agricultural growth and
development (Kumar 2001). Moreover, the ratio of amount spent on extension to that on
research has been falling. A vast untapped yield potential still exists. This coupled with
the second-generation technologies and heterogeneity in production environment
warrants much more intensive extension efforts. The slowing-down of emphasis on
extension will further widen the gap in the adoption of technology. Extension services
need to be strengthened by scaling-up investment levels and improving the quality of
extension. The first step in this direction should be to increase the availability of
operating funds. This will result in accelerating TFP growth, improving the sustainability
of the crop sector and in minimising the yield gap in the region. Yield growth and TFP
growth together would help in increasing production along with emphasis on
development of factors that help in achieving this goal.
Water Management, Irrigation and Dry land farming
The next most contagious issue that the agricultural system in India is development of
irrigation facility and water management with special emphasis on development of dry
land farming techniques. During the green revolution era, large investments were made
on research and development for irrigated agriculture. The promotion of High yielding
variety (HYV) seed, fertilizer, and irrigation technology had a high pay-off and rapid
strides of progress were made in food production. But still Indian agriculture is largely
dependent on monsoon, the conventional ponds and tanks are not longer in use, the
increased demand of water for non agricultural purposes, over exploitation of the
groundwater has resulted in lowering of the water table. The irrigation potential of the
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
8/21
Draft Paper
8
country is 140 million hectares of which only 70 per cent has been exploited (Braun et.al,
2005). The slow pace of exploitation of irrigation potential is due to lack of resources in
state government and the tendency to spread available resources over few projects
(Ahluwalia, 2005). Efficiency in water use is as important as increasing the cultivable
area under irrigation. The problems of water logging and soil salinity may develop sooner
or later in many irrigation project areas due to over-irrigation and deep percolation and
seepage losses in the absence of suitable drainage. The problem is likely to aggravate
further in future if proper soil management practices including provision of suitable field
irrigation channels and drainage system are not undertaken. Due to degradation problems,
growth in TFP has not made headway across a substantial area of the country for major
food crops (Singh et al, 2000).
Many programmes have been initiated by the government which requires less investment
for water management- rain water harvesting, waters shed programmes. But the irony is
that the large scale canal irrigation systems are in poor condition, the cost of new
schemes are huge and lot of backlog of incomplete schemes are adding to the problems of
our irrigation system (Gulati et.al. 2005). The actual performance of the irrigation system
in India is much below the required level. Besides propagating the wide use of sprinklers
and drip irrigation, the most crucial need is irrigation management. Government agencies
and farmers need to work together in this direction. Gulati et.al. (2005) propose incentive
based irrigation management system along with pricing of water based on actual
consumption to keep the costs low. Low water charges encourage highly water-intensive
crops at upper end of the canal network leaving the tail end portions starved of water
(Ahluwalia, 2005). Efficient irrigation supply through an autonomous body can be
initiated as part of the reforms. Along with structural changes, it is necessary to achieve
adequate reforms that will be the key for long term sustainability of the irrigation system
(Gulati et.al, 2005).
Dryland area is nearly 70 per cent of the total cultivable land. Special programmes for the
dry land farming in the arid and semi arid regions of the country are essential. Crop
cultivation should be planned according to water needs. Increased research initiatives for
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
9/21
Draft Paper
9
dry land farming will also help to ease the pressure on the increased demand for water
and irrigation facilities. Pulses a most important dry land crop, needs the utter most
attention. Huge public and private investment is required to meet the cost of treating
rainfed area to ensure optimal use of water.
Public and Private Investment in Agriculture
Another major hurdle that the Indian agricultural sector is lack of investment.
Agricultural investment is needed to meet the expenses on irrigation, research and
extension and building up rural infrastructure-roads and electricity, to further increase the
productivity and strengthening the agricultural sector in India. Since mid 1990s the share
of private investments has been declining and that of public investment is stagnant. As
seen in the table 5 the share of investment in agriculture by the public sector was about
82 per cent in 1999-00 which declined to 76 per cent in next 6-7 years. On the other hand
the public investment share in total agricultural investment is stagnant around 17-20 per
cent only.
Table 5: Gross capital formation in Agriculture at 1999-00 prices
Investment in Agriculture
(Rs. Crores)
Year
Public Private Total
Investment in
Agriculture as per
cent of GDP
1999-00 7716(17.7)
35757(82.3)
43473 2.2
2000-01 7155
(18.5)
31580
(81.5)
38735 1.9
2001-02 8746
(18.6)
38297
(81.4)
47043 2.2
2002-03 7962
(17.0)
38861
(83.0)
46823 2.1
2003-04 9376(20.8)
35756(79.2)
45132 1.9
2004-05 10267
(21.1)
38309
(78.9)
48576 1.9
2005-06* 13219
(24.2)
41320
(75.8)
54539 1.9
Source: Economic Survey, 2006-07; *: Quick estimatesFigures in parenthesis are per cent share in agriculture gross investment
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
10/21
Draft Paper
10
There is a need to motivate more private investment into the agriculture sector and
incentives like tax concessions or benefits can be proposed to them. There is also a strong
need of private public partnership, not only to start new projects but also to support and
maintain the existing public structure. This initiative is quite relevant for development of
agricultural research and extension system. A huge research and development
infrastructure is in place by government of India in the form of institutions of Indian
Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), State Agricultural Universities (SAUs) and
Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs). The role of this setup in research and extension
activity is of great importance for the agricultural system. The products produced in the
research centres can be marketed commercially to generate additional earnings. In this
area the private sector research centres can collaborate for the benefit of farmers and the
country. Besides this programmes of farmers participation in respect of using the
traditional technical knowledge and innovative and experimental capability of the farmer
for laboratory and field experimental farms need to be taken up. On farm research
benefits should be given to such farmers.
Agricultural Credit and Insurance
The cost of production of agricultural commodities is increasing with the increasing risk
of climate change and diversification to high value commodities. This further invokes the
need to strengthen our credit and insurance policies for the farmers and most importantly
for the small and marginal farmers. Their have been incidences of increase in farm debts,
primarily due to lack of availability of credit in time and lack of an organised credit
structure. The small farmers are still largely dependent on the informal credit supplies,
which usually make them pay a higher rate of interest. A problem is that the organised
credit structure through commercial banks has not been able to reach to the most needy
farmers and landless poor. Lot of studies have emphasised that it is the lack of credit
availability that adoption of improved seeds, fertilisers and modernisation could not be
taken up by the farmers, which has a long term impact on out agricultural production and
food security. This even further necessitates the demand of an efficient and organised
credit system.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
11/21
Draft Paper
11
Rate of interest on the credits to the farmers should be reduced to 4%. Special provisions
should be given if loans are taken and there are crop failures. In this case agricultural
insurance can act as a cover on their losses. These policies should be implemented
uniformly across the country and especially for small and marginal farmers in the initial
phase. The agricultural insurance schemes need to be effectively implemented across the
country. It scope of the schemes should be widened and based on practical problems
faced by the farmers in a particular region. Since the agriculture is still largely dependent
on monsoon the weather as a parameter to insurance facility need to be strongly
considered. The prevailing crop insurance covers only 5 per cent of the farmers and thus
the schemes on insurance need to be expanded.
Horticulture and Agro-processing
The demand for cereals, pulses and high-value commodities is increasing due to
population growth, changing tastes and consumption patterns. Changes in cropping
patterns are responsive to the change in the demand. The agriculture sector is shifting
from a supply driven economy to a demand driven economy. The agricultural sector has
outgrown the policies that contributed to the past success and is facing the new pressure
as consumers incomes are rising and pattern of expenditure in consumers budget is
shifting to more of non cereals (Landes, 2004; Mittal, 2006b). Transition from traditional
foodgrain production to high value horticulture leads to increase in cost of production and
risk involved. Farmers allocate their land among alternative crops in order to maximize
their expected return. Regional pattern in crop specialisation is increasing. Small farms
practise multi-diversified farming and grow a number of crops even on fragmented plots,
involving allocation of area under seasonal fruits, vegetables and dairy etc. for
maximising their household income and employment in almost all regions of the country
(Kumar and Mittal, 2003). Thus for the small and marginal farmers who are opting for
diversification, provision for availability of credit and insurance can be provide. This
initiative will motivate the farmers to diversify with a low risk. Government policies
should also be motivated towards helping in the exports of the surplus production or even
producing for exports from these farm units. At present some of the exports initiates are
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
12/21
Draft Paper
12
also taken up by big corporate houses, private exporters and some small farmers
cooperatives. For example in grapes MAHA Grapes, Fresh fruits and vegetables-
Namdhari.
From production to processing the economy has been seeing a wide technology gap.
Inspite of increase in production in pulses, oilseeds and fruits and vegetables, the net
produce is less due to huge losses and inefficiency in the production units. Thus
investments in setting up of the agro processing units near the production places are the
need of the hour. The agro processing units need to be made in the rural areas, near to the
farming area so that the cost of transportation is minimised. Tax benefits to small agro
processing units should be applicable. Farmers should be encouraged to own and run
some of such small units to help them to improve their income levels. This will also help
them to move out of the farm directly, thus increasing their productivity levels, rather
than being under employed and create rural non farm employment. The food processing
industries need to have government policies to have a single window entry and
simplifying the registration process to enter into the business. The requirement of the
trained manpower to be supervisors in these units can be met from the educated youths
still employed in the farm sector, due to lack of job opportunities or might be migrating
to the urban sector otherwise.
New Models in Marketing and Supply Chain Management
Improvement in the agriculture sector needs an improvement and strengthening at all the
levels of the supply chain- inputs delivery, credit, irrigation facility, farmers diversifying,
improve procurement, minimising post harvest loses, cold storage chains, better and
efficient processing and marketing techniques, efficient storage, ware houses and also
efficient and competitive retailing. Timely availability of inputs is the one the key factor
to efficient farming system. The development of organised input market and
infrastructure for its storage and distribution will add to the productivity of the
agricultural sector. Development of cold chain network will help in particular with the
perishable commodities and reduce their post harvest losses. Improving the post harvest
management means an overall improvement in the per unit productivity.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
13/21
Draft Paper
13
In last one decade various marketing models have been initiated, Mother Dairy
cooperatives in fresh fruits and vegetables under the name of SAFAL, further their
alternative whole sale market- SAFAL Market. The traditional Indian markets have a
non-existent infrastructure of packing, grading, sorting and cold storages. The
commission agents and traders dominate the supply chain and are the major price setters,
thus most of the times farmers are dependent on them for credit. Farmers are not aware of
the price setting mechanisms as the system is not transparent and thus dont have any
incentive to produce efficiently. In this direction SAFAL market in Bangalore has tried to
remove these constrains and build up an efficient supply chain with strong backward
linkages with the farmers and forward linkages with wholesale purchasers. ITC- with its
e chaupal, mahagrapes farmers co-operative and many other private initiative in this
direction are trying to remove the inefficiencies in the existing supply chains and reduce
post harvest losses, increasing the incentive to the farmer that motivate them to produce
efficiently. Post harvest loses generally range from 5-10% for the non-perishable
commodities and about 30% for the perishable commodities (Singh, 2002). Thus there is
a need to invest in post harvest management, efficient post-harvest handling,
development of infrastructure, ware houses to prevent huge losses due to inefficiency. A
cost effective in this area is must to make our agricultural produce affordable. The
reforms in this direction have been initiated by private bodies with support from state
government in some states. This process needs to be further strengthened by a common
central policy in this direction. Since in India on an average operational land holding is
less than 2 hectares, thus the new farming models like contract farming which is highly
successful in mobilising small farmers bringing them for commercial production, mainly
of high value commodities.
Setting up of the futures market is another step in the direction of stabilising prices and
creating a continuous supply of agricultural produce. Through the futures trading the
farmers can become a part of the trading system getting maximum benefits from trading
directly and creating further awareness among his community. This also encourage
creating a single market for agricultural produce. Market integration is most relevant for
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
14/21
Draft Paper
14
the policy of price stabilization. In the food market local seasonality may affect the price
of agricultural commodities. Spatial integration of markets will ensure price stability
between food deficit and food surplus markets (Virmani and Mittal, 2006). To have the
whole country as a single unrestricted market there is a need to abolish octroi3
and all
sorts of other indirect taxes and levies on food articles. Indias National Agricultural
Policy also aims at dismantling restrictions on movement of agricultural commodities
across the country and reviewing the structure of taxes on food grains and other
commercial crops. Revival of agricultural commodity futures market in India in early
2000 after the ban in 1960s has helped in integrating the food grains and other
agricultural goods markets through price discovery and price risk management. Under the
National Agricultural Policy, Government of India aims at enlarging the coverage of
futures markets to minimize wide fluctuations in commodity prices as also for hedging
risks.
The freight carried by road transport is increasing at a rapid pace. Good roads and lower
transportation cost help in reducing the cost of transfer of products from the market
where the product is produced to other markets. This will help in integration of product
markets. Development of better and cheaper railway network for freight will help in
integrating markets. The most important policy distortion is the skewed tariff policy
which overcharges freight movement in order to subsidize passenger traffic. Thus there is
need to re-balance the rail tariff to improve the fare freight ratio (Virmani and Mittal,
2006). Foreign direct investment in retailing could lead to lowering of prices and
movement towards market integration. Food retailers would be free to sell other agro-
based and rural industrial products. Through competition, economies of scale and
improved efficiency in the supply chain, product prices would lower, especially in food
and grocery sector (Mukherjee and Patel 2005). There is a need for tariff rationalization
in the power sector. The policy initiatives should focus on to provide universal access of
commercial fuel at affordable prices. This will help in bring down the transportation cost.
Real estate prices affect the price structure in retail market. Rentals are a major cost to
retailers and thus play a major role in determining the retail margins. Thus, even
3 Octroi tax is a tax on entry of goods for use or consumption within areas of the local bodies.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
15/21
Draft Paper
15
competitive real estate prices would help in market integration and strengthen the
agriculture structure.
Government Intervention Policies- Need to be reformed
Government intervenes into the markets to stabilise food prices, for public distribution
programmes, dealing with the issues of food security etc. Government role in providing
infrastructure, credit and investment ahs also been discussed earlier in this paper. But
there is a need to bring reforms in some of the government interventions to make the
agricultural sector grow effectively in the light of changing structure of production,
consumption and marketing but with definitely keeping in view the food security of the
most vulnerable group of the society. Lot of reforms have been initiated in the agriculture
sector, which further requires continuous support of the state and central government,
farmers, consumers and private players in strengthening it further.
Minimum Support Price
Government announce the minimum support price (MSP) for 24 major crops keeping in
view the interest of the farmers and this price support policy act as an insurance to
farmers against any sharp fall in the farm prices (Table 6). The MSP is determined based
on the recommendations given by the commission on cost and pricing (CACP) that
recommends the price annually taking into account factors like cost of production,
Table 6: Minimum support price/ Procurement price
(Unit: Rs./quintal)
Crop 1990-91 2000-01 2006-07
Paddy 205 510 580
Wheat 225 620 750
Coarse Cereals 180 445 540
Sugarcane 23 59.5 80.25
Cotton 620 1625 1770Groundnut 580 1220 1520
Rapeseed/
Mustard
810 1200 1715
Note: Statutory Minimum price for sugarcane.
Source: Economic Survey, 2006-07
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
16/21
Draft Paper
16
change in inputs prices, trends in market prices, demand and supply situation etc. MSP is
done for the objective of procurement of these basic agricultural food and non food
products for the public distribution scheme (PDS).
Issues with this price support system is first the determination of the MSP through the
method of cost evaluation need to be revised also taking into account the profit margin
that the farmer should get to move away from just a subsistence earning to an earning of
profit. The evaluation criterion needs to be more detrimental. To preserve the interest of
the consumers whose food requirements are subsidised through PDS, the farmers face
lower MSP in the time of bumper harvest and given marginally better price in times of
shortage. Higher procurement price in late 1990s lead to increase government
procurement and created surplus stocks and initiating exports. In this case the private
procurement agencies exploit the farmers buying their surplus produce at even lower
prices during surplus production and in time of shortage even hoard the produce adding
to the crisis situation. Food Corporation of India (FCI), act as a body procuring only for
the food security concerns of the underprivileged, who are supplied rice, wheat, sugar and
few other commodities at subsidised prices through the public distribution system. At
present when diversification in production away from foodgrains is evident and many
farmers are even quitting agriculture, there is a need to motivate incentive to produce,
thus FCI should procure the minimum possible and not the maximum available, and
should act as competitor to the private procuring agencies. This will help in getting the
farmers the best price for their produce. State food corporations should be allowed and
encouraged to operate in all states. States should be free to set up public or joint venture
companies for food procurement, transport and distribution if it is commercially viable
(Virmani 2004). The role of private agencies in food procurement activities should be
gradually enhanced.
Agricultural Produce Marketing Committees (APMC)
APMC act prohibits transaction outside the regulated mandis, do not allow direct
marketing and direct procurement of agricultural produce from farmers fields. This act is
coming in the way of new private initiatives in the modern retailing and upgrading of the
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
17/21
Draft Paper
17
supply chain especially in the field of fruits and vegetables. In the case of SAFAL market
set up in Bangalore, Karnataka government had amended its APMC act in favour of both
farmers and consumers. Thus initiatives should also be taken up by other state
governments and adopt the model APMC act which proposes to remove the controls on
the movement, storage and marketing of agricultural commodities, and enables setting up
of commodity exchanges to enable futures trading. This will provide farmers with the
freedom to sell their produce where its more profitable to them rather than in the existing
market administered by the APMCs. This will also strengthen the contract farming that
will create the provision for direct sales of farm produce through contract farming.
Essential Commodities Act, 19554
is another such intervention by Government of India
to guard the interests of the poor against the vagaries of the market. Some notifications
under this act restrict the movement of certain essential goods5
from the surplus states to
deficit states. In order to facilitate free trade and movement of foodgrains, government
issued a control order in 2002, which allows flexibility to dealers. The states have to
procure prior permission from centres, before issuing any regulations on storage,
transport and distribution. But still some products in certain states are being practiced
under the Essential Commodities Act. A combination of policies reforms will be of
benefit to both farmers and consumers. This Act should be amended for enforcement only
as an emergency provision. A central act should be made to ban control on movement
within and between states.
Agricultural Trade Liberalisation
After the Indian economy liberalisation was initiated in 1990s, the terms of trade was
moved in favour of agriculture by real devaluation of rupee. An agricultural trade surplus
would have seen the upliftment of the agricultural sector with a positive impact on the
economic conditions of the farmers dependent on this sector. Under the policy of trade
liberalisation and complying the WTO rules by 2001, all quantitative restrictions to
imports of agricultural produce was reduced in India. Tariffs were also reduced for
4 This act is being implemented by the state governments and gives them powers to control production,
supply and distribution of essential commodities for maintaining or increasing supplies and for securingtheir equitable distribution and availability at fair prices.
5 Food grains, edible oils, pulses, kerosene and sugar are some of these essential commodities.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
18/21
Draft Paper
18
number of commodities like edible oil, pulses and cotton (Landes, 2004). The imports of
pulses and edible oil was huge in India, which was not only because of reduction in
tariffs but also because of increased domestic demand and inability to meet it due to low
productivity in these two commodities and also poor performance of processing units,
due to which there are huge post harvest losses too. The liberalisation of agricultural
exports also led to an increase in exports in initial period of liberalisation but in recent
years the export performance of the agricultural sector has not been that good. For wheat
and rice fluctuating in exports and in recent past even imports of wheat has created an
uncertainty in the agricultural trade position of India. On the other hand for fresh and
processed fruits and vegetables high tariffs are been imposed thus protecting the domestic
sector from imports (Mattoo et.al, 2007). Fall in the world agricultural prices further
made some of our agricultural exports non-competitive. The per cent share of agricultural
exports to national exports has declined from 18.5 per cent in 1990-91 to 11.2 per cent in
2004-05 whereas the import share has increased from 2.8 per cent in 1990-91 to 4.6 per
cent in 2004-05.
On the domestic policy front we need to have steps to protect the small farmers against
undue fall in prices as a result of imports but should also initiate policies that create
positive environment for producers to export. Agricultural trade liberalisation can bring
in gains for Indian farmers through an aggressive trade policy that takes into account our
production pattern, marketed surplus and reforming the constraints that we have in our
domestic economy (As discussed in detail above). Irregular exports and untimely ban of
exports due to crisis in domestic economy affects our credibility in the world market.
Large scale export oriented production activity in identified competitive commodities
will help to increase out trade volumes as well as add to the incomes of the farmers
engaged in such activities. Domestic reforms and initiatives motivating small farmers to
become a part of continuous supply chain for exports will be a step in this direction. In
future much of the gains from the Doha commitments may not come across to Indian
farmers due to lack of domestic reforms, which lowers down our ability to compete in the
world trade through exports and competition
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
19/21
Draft Paper
19
Conclusion
Strengthening of agriculture will help in upliftment of the farmers but also benefit the
larger section of the rural poor who are directly engaged in agriculture or indirectly
linked with agriculture as consumers. Efficient way of production, stabilized prices,
higher income from agriculture would create a more conjugative environment in the
country for the development of the economy as a whole and of rural population in
particular. One of the most important component of the much needed reforms is not only
implementation of the policy in time but also simultaneous review and evaluations of the
impact of the policies and taking immediate steps to rectify the negative impacts if caused
by any of the policies. Inter sectoral linkages and organisation of the agricultural sector
needs to be taken up. Sustainability is another key issue. In the present context
sustainability with natural resource management has become more relevant. The visible
institutional changes with new models of marketing and cultivation should be supported
by government policies too. Priority investment areas identified need to be worked on
without loss of time. Risk management and incentive based system will motivate farmers
to efficient agriculture. Empowerment of the small and marginal farmers through
education, reforms and development will ensure a better, efficient and strengthened
Indian agriculture. Motivation new models in production and marketing along with
creating awareness and imparting education to small farmers will help in development of
the sector and more importantly improving the economic status of poor farmers. The
action plan to strengthen agriculture in India needs to be on domestic reforms through
reduction of government intervention in the market economy but playing major role as
evaluator and implementation of the policies, increased investment and prioritising the
area to invest, parallel action plans in this direction are needed in research to increase
productivity and irrigation and water management.
References
Ahluwalia, Montek S. (2005). Reducing Poverty and Hunger in India: The Role of
Agriculture. IFPRI 2004-2005 Annual Report Essay.
Braun, Joachim von, Ashok Gulati, Peter Hazell, Mark W. Rosegrant and Marie Ruel
(2005). Indian Agriculture and Rural Development- Strategic Issues and Reform
Options. IFPRI. http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/ib/ib35.pdf
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
20/21
Draft Paper
20
Evenson, R.E.; Pray, C. and M.W. Rosegrant. (1999), Agricultural Research andproductivity Growth in India. Research Report No 109. International Food Policy
Research Institute, Washington, D.C
Fan, S., Hazell, P.B.R. and S. Thorat. (1999), Linkages between Government Spending,Growth, and Poverty in Rural India. Research Report No 110. International Food
Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Gulati, Ashok, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, and K.V. Raju (2005) Institutional Reforms in Indian
Irrigation, Sage Publication.
Kumar, Praduman and Surabhi Mittal (2006). Agricultural Productivity Trends in India:
Sustainability Issues Agricultural Economic Research Review. Volume 19, Pp 71-
88.
Kumar, Praduman and Surabhi Mittal (2003). Crop Diversification in India: Analysis byState and Farm Size Group. Agricultural Situation in India, Special Number,
August, 2003. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture,Government of India. Pp 273-280.
Kumar, Praduman. and Mark W. Rosegrant (1994): Productivity and Sources of Growthfor Rice in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 29 (52): A183-A188.
Landes, R. Maurice (2004). The Elephant is Jogging: New Pressures for agriculturalreforms in India. Article in Amber Waves February, 2004.
www.ers.usda.gov/amberwaves/february04/features/elephantjogs.htm
Mattoo, Aaditya, Deepak Mishra and Ashish Narain (2007). From competition at home to
competition abroad- A case study of Indias horticulture. World Bank and Oxford
University Press.
Mittal, Surabhi (2006a). Past Trend and Projections of Demand and Supply for Major
Food Crops in India. Background paper prepared for Planning Commission,Government of India. June, 2006.
Mittal, Surabhi (2006b). Structural Shift in Demand for Food: projections for 2020.ICRIER Working Paper No 184. August 2006.
Mittal, Surabhi and Praduman Kumar, (2000). Literacy, Technology Adoption, FactorDemand and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural
Economics. Vol. 55 No. 3: Pp: 490-499.
Mukherjee, Arpita and Nitisha Patel, (2005). FDI in Retail Sector: India. ICRIER andDepartment of Consumer Affairs, GOI. Published by Academic Foundation, New
Delhi.
7/28/2019 2[1]. Strengthening Indian Agriculture Surabhi ICRIER
21/21
Draft Paper
Singh, Panjab (2002), Agricultural Policy-Vision 2020. Planning Commission.http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/bkpap2020/24_bg2020.pdf
Virmani, Arvind, (2004). Accelerating growth and Poverty Reduction: A Policy
Framework for Indias Development. Academic Foundation, New Delhi.
Virmani Arvind and Surabhi Mittal (2006). Domestic Market Integration". ICRIER
Working Paper No. 183, July 2006.