+ All Categories

2(1)

Date post: 30-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: dent-in-dentist
View: 12 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
47
Direct and Indirect Retainers DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS& IMPLANTOLOGY, SRM KDC & H
Transcript
Page 1: 2(1)

Direct and Indirect Retainers

DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS& IMPLANTOLOGY, 

SRM KDC & H

Page 2: 2(1)

• Direct retainers1. Intracoronal retainers2. Extracoronal retainers

– Structure of clasp assembly– Requirements of clasp assembly– Cast circumferential clasp – Infrabulge clasp

• Indirect retainers

Page 3: 2(1)

Retainers: any type of device used for thestabilization or retention of a prosthesis.(GPT 8)

Page 4: 2(1)

Direct retainer: that component of apartial removable dental prosthesis usedto retain and prevent dislodgment,consisting of a clasp assembly or precisionattachment.

Page 5: 2(1)

Classification of direct retainers

IntracoronalExtracoronal

Clasps• According to construction

– Cast– Wrought wire– Combination

• According to design– Circumferential – Bar type

Page 6: 2(1)

Intracoronal direct retainers

• Introduced by Herman E.S. Chayes in 1906

• Consists of two components- Matrix (slot)- Patrix (flange)

Page 7: 2(1)

Intracoronal direct retainers

Advantages • Elimination of visible

retention and supportsystem

• Better vertical support• Better stimulation of

underlying soft tissues

Disadvantages• Require prepared

abutment and castings• Complicated clinical and

lab procedures• Eventually wear• Difficult to repair and

replace• Least effective on short

tooth

Page 8: 2(1)

Extracoronal direct retainers

Page 9: 2(1)

Retentive clasp assemblies

Mechanics of retainer can be understood with two concepts path of insertion and removal, and height of contour

Page 10: 2(1)

• Prothero’s “cone theory”

• Share common base referred to as greatest diameter of tooth

• Edward kennedy termed as “height of contour”

Page 11: 2(1)
Page 12: 2(1)

M.M. DeVan terms

• Suprabulge direct retainers

• Infrabulge direct retainer

Page 13: 2(1)

Structure of a clasp assembly

Page 14: 2(1)
Page 15: 2(1)

Requirements of a clasp assembly

Retention SupportStability ReciprocationEncirclementPassivity

Page 16: 2(1)

Retention

Page 17: 2(1)

Retention

The flexibility of the retentive clasp arm may be influenced by

• Length• cross-sectional form• cross-sectional diameter• longitudinal taper• clasp curvature, and • metallurgical characteristics of the alloy.

Page 18: 2(1)

Retention

Clasp flexibility increases as clasp length increasesThe mathematical formula for deflection of a uniform cantilever beam. This formula may be expressed as:

D= Ewt34PL3

where D deflection, P = applied force, L = length, E = modulus of elasticity, w =beam width, and t = beam thickness.

Page 19: 2(1)

Retention

Cross-sectional diameter Longitudinal taper

Page 20: 2(1)

Retention

Cross-sectional form

Page 21: 2(1)

Retention

Metallurgical characteristics of the alloy

Page 22: 2(1)

Retention

• Location of each retentive clasp terminus relative to the height of contour may be described in two distinct dimensions: (1) a mediolateral or horizontal dimension and (2) an occlusal or vertical dimension.

Page 23: 2(1)

Support

• Support is the quality of a clasp assembly thatresists displacement of a prosthesis in an apicaldirection.

• Other elements that contact the abutmentocclusal to the height of contour (e.g., areciprocal element or shoulder of retentive clasp)also may contribute to the support function.

Page 24: 2(1)

Stability

• Stability is the quality of a clasp assembly thatresists displacement of prosthesis in a horizontaldirection. All framework components that arerigid and contact vertically oriented hard andsoft tissues may contribute to the stability ofprosthesis.

Page 25: 2(1)

Reciprocation

• Reciprocation is the quality of a clasp assemblythat counteracts lateral displacement of anabutment when the retentive clasp terminuspasses over the height of contour.

Page 26: 2(1)

Encirclement

Page 27: 2(1)

Passivity

Page 28: 2(1)

Location of retentive clasp terminus

Page 29: 2(1)

Cast circumferential clasp

• Introduced by Nesbitt in 1916• Simple and easy to fabricate• Tooth supported RPD• Advantages • Disadvantages

Page 30: 2(1)

Design rules for cast circumferential clasp

• A cast circumferential clasp should originatefrom a portion of the framework that lies abovethe height of contour.

• retentive terminus should be directed occlusally• should terminate at the mesial line angle or

distal line angle of the abutment• The retentive arm should be positioned as far

apically on the abutment as is practical.

Page 31: 2(1)

Simple circlet clasp

Reverse circlet clasp

Page 32: 2(1)

Multiple circlet clasp

Embrasure clasp

Page 33: 2(1)

Ring clasp

C-clasp

Page 34: 2(1)

Onlay clasp

Page 35: 2(1)

Wrought-wire circumferential clasp

• It used as early as 1847, the wrought wirecircumferential clasp

• In 1965, Dr 0. C. Applegate introduced a modifiedwrought wire clasp assembly known as the ‘combinationclasp”.

• consists of an occlusal rest a cast metal reciprocal arm,and a wrought wire retentive arm. The wrought wirecomponent is circular in cross section.

• Kennedy Class I or Class II posterior edentulous areawhen the usable undercut is located at the mesiofacialline angle of the most posterior abutment.

• Increased flexibility hence can be used in the greaterundercut area.

• Minimal tooth surface contact

Page 36: 2(1)

Infrabulge clasp

• clasp approaches the undercut region of anabutment from an apical direction. Therefore aninfrabulge clasp exhibits a “push type” ofretention that is more effective than the “pull”retention associated with a suprabulge clasp.

• Flexibility of the infrabulge clasp is controlled bythe taper and length of the approach arm.

• more esthetic than a suprabulge clasp

Page 37: 2(1)

Design rules for infrabulge clasp

• The approach arm of an infrabulge clasp mustnot impinge on the soft tissues adjacent to theabutment

• The approach arm should cross perpendicular tothe free gingival margin

• The approach arm should never be designed tobridge an area of soft tissue undercut

• uniform tapering• The clasp terminus should be more apically

positioned on the abutment

Page 38: 2(1)

Types of infrabulge calsp

These clasps are described by their geometric shapes. There are four main types of infrabulge clasp.

• T-clasp, • the modified T-clasp, • the Y- clasp, and • the I-clasp or I-bar.

Page 39: 2(1)

T-clasp design

• Kennedy Class I or Class II partially edentulous and undercut is located adjacent to the edentulous area

Page 40: 2(1)

Modified T clasp

• The modified T-clasp is essentially a T-clasp that lacks the nonretentive, horizontal projection.

• improved esthetics in most applications

• used when canines or premolars will serve as abutments.

Page 41: 2(1)

Y-clasp design

• Practically Y clasp is equivalent to a T-clasp

• recontouring of the abutment surface

Page 42: 2(1)

I bar design

Page 43: 2(1)

Indirect Retainer

• The effect achieved by one or more indirectretainers of a partial removable dentureprosthesis that reduces the tendency for adenture base to move in an occlusal direction orrotate about the fulcrum line (GPT-8)

Page 44: 2(1)

Principles of indirect retainer

Page 45: 2(1)

Forms Of Indirect Retainers

• Auxiliary Occlusal Rest• Canine Rests• Canine Extensions from Occlusal Rests• Cingulum Bars (Continuous Bars) and

Linguoplate

Page 46: 2(1)

Reference

• Phoenix, Cagna, DeFreest, Stewart’s Clinical Removable Partial Prosthodontics, 3rdedition, 2003 Quintessence publications Co,Inc. pp 53-126

• Carr A.B, Mc Givney G.P, brown D.T; Mc Crackens Removable PartialProsthodontics; 11th edition 2005; Harcourt brace and company Asia Pte Ltd NewDelhi Pp 271-299.

• Renner and Boucher; Removable Partial dentures; 1987, Quintessence Publicationco., Inc Chicago; Pp 53-117.

• J. C. Davenport et al, Retention, British dental journal, 2000,volume 189, pages646-657

• J. C. Davenport et al, Indirect retention, British dental journal, 2001, volume 190,pages 128-132.

• Removable partial denture an overview pages 51-74

Page 47: 2(1)

Thank You


Recommended