+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 25-26 April 2018. NIST ...€¦ · Dopant atoms placed with atomic precision into tunable arrays...

25-26 April 2018. NIST ...€¦ · Dopant atoms placed with atomic precision into tunable arrays...

Date post: 08-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Dopant atoms placed with atomic precision into tunable arrays using STM can be made to display electronic and photonic properties across a wide range of structures for 2D quantum metamaterials. The workshop will explore useful commonalities between fabrication, theoretical prediction, and alternative approaches to tunable quantum materials, including cold-atom realizations. Theoretical efforts served by this new simulation platform include Hubbard model systems, design of 2D materials, and other exotic materials. The workshop will be a combination of: i) all-invited talks by leading researchers, ii) breakout sessions for discussions and future plans, iii) a published Workshop Summary Report. Goal: to develop a roadmap for practitioners and funders in this burgeoning field. We invite interested parties and program managers from federal agencies to lend their expertise and insights. Workshop on 2D Quantum MetaMaterials rected pro Atomic Dopant Array 25-26 April 2018. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD. STM Lithography From Prati et al. Nature Nanotech. (2012) doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.94 For more information: www.zyvexlabs.com/2d-workshop/ Contact: [email protected] Organizing Committee Co-Chairs: Richard M. Silver, NIST, Shashank Misra, Sandia National Labs, John N. Randall, Zyvex Labs. Neil Zimmerman, NIST, Joshua Ballard, Zyvex Labs, James Owen, Zyvex Labs, Wiley P. Kirk, UT Arlington, 3DET Ezra Bussmann, Sandia National Labs Clark Highstrete, Sandia National Labs Accepted Speakers Gabriel Aeppli PSI Cheng Chin Univ. Chicago Kaden Hazzard Rice University Subir Sachdev Harvard Philip Phillips Univ. Illinois Alicia Kollar Princeton Jonathan Wyrick NIST Norbert Linke Univ. Maryland Shashank Misra Sandia Nat. Lab Ingmar Swart Univ. Utrecht Enrico Prati IFN CRN, Milan Sjaak van Diepen TU Delft With kind support from
Transcript
Page 1: 25-26 April 2018. NIST ...€¦ · Dopant atoms placed with atomic precision into tunable arrays using STM can be made to display electronic and photonic properties across a wide

Dopant atoms placed with atomic precision into tunable arrays using STM can be made to display electronic and photonic properties across a wide range of structures for 2D quantum metamaterials.  The workshop will explore useful commonalities between fabrication, theoretical prediction, and alternative approaches to tunable quantum materials, including cold-atom realizations.  Theoretical efforts served by this new simulation platform include Hubbard model systems, design of 2D materials, and other exotic materials.The workshop will be a combination of:

i) all-invited talks by leading researchers, ii) breakout sessions for discussions and future plans, iii) a published Workshop Summary Report.

Goal: to develop a roadmap for practitioners and funders in this burgeoning field. We invite interested parties and program managers from federal agencies to lend their expertise and insights.

Workshop on

2D Quantum MetaMaterials

Uncorre

cted proof

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

3Scientific RepoRts | 6:19704 | DOI: 10.1038/srep19704

band left tail so both sequential tunneling processes and hopping processes occur in parallel. The formation of a single quantum state across the device caused by the chain of P atoms makes the dephasing length Lφ sufficiently long to make possible the observation of quantum transport even if the length of the channel L exceeds the lengths typical of interdevice distances of microelecronics. In addition, it is worth to mention that in those voltage

Figure 1. Single ion implanted devices. The experimental devices and calculated potential distributions in the channel regions. (a) An ideal representation of the electron tunneling across the 1 µm device thanks to the collective electronic states created by the donor array. (b) Geometry of the device structure for controlling transport by controlling the dopant position via single-ion implantation. (c) An idealized representation of the potential distributions in the 20 phosphorous donors distributed along the channel of the sample. The red crosses indicate the target positions.

Atomic Dopant Array

25-26 April 2018. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.

STM Lithography

From Prati et al. Nature Nanotech. (2012) doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.94

For more information:www.zyvexlabs.com/2d-workshop/

Contact: [email protected]

Organizing CommitteeCo-Chairs: Richard M. Silver, NIST, Shashank Misra, Sandia National Labs, John N. Randall, Zyvex Labs.

Neil Zimmerman, NIST, Joshua Ballard, Zyvex Labs, James Owen, Zyvex Labs, Wiley P. Kirk, UT Arlington, 3DET Ezra Bussmann, Sandia National Labs Clark Highstrete, Sandia National Labs

Accepted Speakers

Gabriel Aeppli PSI Cheng Chin Univ. Chicago

Kaden Hazzard Rice University Subir Sachdev Harvard

Philip Phillips Univ. Illinois Alicia Kollar Princeton

Jonathan Wyrick NIST Norbert Linke Univ. Maryland

Shashank Misra Sandia Nat. Lab Ingmar Swart Univ. Utrecht

Enrico Prati IFN CRN, Milan Sjaak van Diepen TU Delft

Uncorre

cted proof

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

3Scientific RepoRts | 6:19704 | DOI: 10.1038/srep19704

band left tail so both sequential tunneling processes and hopping processes occur in parallel. The formation of a single quantum state across the device caused by the chain of P atoms makes the dephasing length Lφ sufficiently long to make possible the observation of quantum transport even if the length of the channel L exceeds the lengths typical of interdevice distances of microelecronics. In addition, it is worth to mention that in those voltage

Figure 1. Single ion implanted devices. The experimental devices and calculated potential distributions in the channel regions. (a) An ideal representation of the electron tunneling across the 1 µm device thanks to the collective electronic states created by the donor array. (b) Geometry of the device structure for controlling transport by controlling the dopant position via single-ion implantation. (c) An idealized representation of the potential distributions in the 20 phosphorous donors distributed along the channel of the sample. The red crosses indicate the target positions.

With kind support from

Recommended