of 15
8/13/2019 26 Pores
1/15
aggregated
porous
fibrousmembrane
catalyst
scale of
heterogeneity
scale of
the phase
8/13/2019 26 Pores
2/15
Species: 1 a small one (water)
2 a large one (protein)
The matrix M is solid phase that
can resist stresses, and
can transmit support forces
membrane support
Our Species
8/13/2019 26 Pores
3/15
Driving Forces
dz
dp
Vdz
d
dz
ad
RTF 222
2
ln
Fz
dz
dpV
dz
dFxFxF Fz2211
dz
dpV
dz
d
dz
adRTF
111
1
ln
Fz
on the components separately
on the mixture as a whole
internal forces cancel
N
mol of i
N
mol of mixture
2211 zzz xx with 2211 VxVxV
8/13/2019 26 Pores
4/15
ui
vi
ui
vi
w u vi i i
diffusive velocity
slipping past the matrix
viscous velocity
transport by convection
whole (overall) velocity
1
2
3
Three Velocities
8/13/2019 26 Pores
5/15
F vV
viscous friction coefficient
VcB
hydraulic permeability
B dpore
2
32
B
dsphere
2 2
2170 1
B
dfibre
2 2
280 1
Viscous Flow and Friction
void fraction
8/13/2019 26 Pores
6/15
complications in channels of colloidal dimensions:
surface adsorption
changes diameters
particles cause
increased friction
Complications
8/13/2019 26 Pores
7/15
Viscous Selectivity
viscous velocity of a centerline
species higher than average
v
v
vi
vi
i 1
viscous velocity of adsorbing
species lower than average i 1
v vi i
v v vi i i i i i 1volume balance
viscous selectivity
8/13/2019 26 Pores
8/15
Transport Equations
1,1212,121 uuuxF M
2,2122,112 uuuxF M
F vV v v1 1 v v2 2
Structuredmodel
w u v1 1 1
w u v2 2 2
diffusive
viscous
whole
Non-structuredmodel
1,1212,121
wwwxFM
2,2121,212 wwwxF M
whole velocities in one go
(ksi)
(zeta)
8/13/2019 26 Pores
9/15
Mason Equations
MMV
MMM
xx
x
,222,111
21,22,12,2,11
2,12,1
MMV
MMM
xxx
,222,111
12,12,11,2,122,11,2
MMV
MMMV
MMxx
xxxx
.222,111
21,112,121,2,12,1
2
1
,2,2
MMV
MMMV
MMxx
xxxx
,222,111
12,222,121,1,22,1
2
2
,1,1
Approaches identical when:
Non-structured Structured
8/13/2019 26 Pores
10/15
w1
dp
v1
u1 Structured Non-structured
Vdp
dzuM1 1,
Vdpdz
vV 1
Vdp
dzwM1 1,
w u v1 1 1 11
1
1 1
, ,M V M
Single Liquid Permeant
8/13/2019 26 Pores
11/15
Permeant - Matrix Coefficient
a rough estimate
d1 dp
u1
u d
at wall
11
2
d dp
dz
pore
4
Vdp
dz
V
d du
pore
at wall4 2
1
1
pore
wallat
pore
wallat
Md
d
dd
V 21
1
,1 48
8/13/2019 26 Pores
12/15
Friction Coefficients vs Pore Diameter
permeant-permeant
permeant-matrix
viscous V pored 2
1
,1
poreM d0
2,1 pored 2,1
M,1
Vln
lndp
8/13/2019 26 Pores
13/15
Wide Pores
write N- equations per mol of mixture:
vxvvxxFx M,112,12111
vxvvxxFx M,221,22122
summing the equations:
vvxxF VMM ,22,11
identical to viscous flow through a tube
Wide pores: w vw v
1
2
8/13/2019 26 Pores
14/15
Two similar Permeants
1 2 1
MMM ,2,1
MV
M
2
2,12,1
MV
VMM
,1
MV
VMM
,2
2,12,1
viscous flow makes the N-coefficientlarger than the S-coefficient
MM ,1,1
Permeants similar, with slipping
MV
M
2
1,21,2
viscous flow makes the N-coefficientsmaller than the S-coefficient
8/13/2019 26 Pores
15/15
Dilute Solute, no Slipping
M,1M,22,12,1
M,221,21,2
1,M V
22,1,2,2 1 MM
Protein (2) dilute, no slipping of water (1)
w v v1 1