27735830 Kepler s Reply to Newton and Einstein There Are No Physicists After Me Only Idiots

8/3/2019 27735830 Kepler s Reply to Newton and Einstein There Are No Physicists After Me Only Idiots

1/57

Real Time 3D Universal MechanicsAnnexing quantum mechanics to classical mechanics

And deleting make believe relativistic and quantum mechanicsAnd all other non 3D confusions of physics

Professor Joe Nahhas July 4th [email protected]

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen. Wecan only see and measure something that had happened. What we measurein not what happened. We measure in present time an event that happenedin past time. That is we measure past events in present time

Present time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delays

Real time physics =Event time physics + real time relativistic delays physicsWhat one sees is relativistic =What happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays

What happened in an event is absolute =Real time physics - real time relativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delays

Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics

Page 1


2/57

If a bicycle is ridden in a circle of radius r making an angle from a fixedstarting point and going at a circular speed v then the angular speed of thebicycle is the angle change d the bicycle traces from the fixed pointstarting point divided by time interval d t it travels or the angular speed is:

The angular speed is ' = d / d t = orbital velocity/ radius = v/r

Physicists deduce and not measure planetary motion around the sunwhich includes distance speed angular speeds among other things fromdata collected from planets motion seen through telescopes on Earth.Physicists deduce the average distance r between the planets and the Sun.Also, deduce planets orbital speed v around the Sun and they deduce theangular speed ' = orbital velocity/ radius = v/r.

Physicists can not measure planets motion angular speed around the Sundirectly.In day time there is Sun and they can not see the planets

At night time there is no Sun see or measure and they can see the planets

So, astronomers measure planets motion around Earth using an imaginaryastronomical sphere attached to moving Earth axes and fixed stars.

After astronomers measure planets motion seen from Earth they deducethe planets motion around the Sun through adding or Subtracting Earthmotion around the Sun.

Earth- Sun motion is a very well known path.

Physicists transfer their measurements data of planetary motion around the Sunfrom Earth telescopes data to conclude planetary motion around the sun data.

During this mathematical data transfer process of Earth telescopes measurementsto conclude planetary motion around the Sun a 400 years old mistake was/is madefor all of past 400 years

With r = planet average distance from the SunAnd v = planet average speed around the sunAnd = the angle traced by a planet from a fixed point on thecircumference of the planet orbit around the Sun when moving around theSun. And = angular speed of a planet moving around the Sun

Page 2


3/57

The angular speed is ' = v/rFor Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec

The accumulation value in arc sec /century W", thenAnd W" = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] = angular velocity in arc sec per century

If it is measured for planet Mercury then

W" (event time) = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88)W" (event time) = 70.29 arc second per century

Physicists in 1859 found that there are 43 arc sec per century more than they expected.How did that happen?

400,000 of wrong physicists and 400 years of wrong physics said it is due to time travel!Time travel is not physics and all 400,000 space time physicists are wrong because I canprove them wrong. Here it is


W" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays)W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]; R = Earth - Sun Distance

For Mercury

W" (time delay) = (47.9/149,600,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /centuryW" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays)

W" (event time) = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]

Page 3

Planet Distance r X 106km

PlanetOrbit T

Orbit speedv in km/sec

LessEarthspeed

Spinspeedkm/sec

Angularvelocity; v/rarc sec/ century

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74


4/57

W" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays)

W" (real time) = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] + (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]

The 400 years old mistake was/is

W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]

Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics

And this mistake: time delay Mechanics = Relativistic time travel

The difference is a time delay which means that it results in visual effects and notreal physics

Yes I am saying that modern physics is wrong to say the least

Yes I am saying that modern physics is stupid to say the leastYes I am adding that modern physics is stupidity itself

In 1969 I was 12 and in 5th grade going to 6th grade and I studied the circle inclassrooms that year. In kinder garden and elementary school early years, young kidsare taught to waste time and color and scribble all kinds of shapes and figures. Iattempted to draw nature including humans and my drawings of human faces andnature came out as pieces of geometrical figures. I drew faces and my drawingscame out with a triangular jaw and circular eyes and oval lips and I realized that Iwould be better if my drawings were geometrical figures.

From third grade and to 5th grade I had a set of rulers and a compass and plenty ofpapers and learned how to draw geometrical figures and after scribbling with rulerscompass and got beyond drawing a circle I learned how to draw concentric circles andother geometric shapes and make complex shape made out of lines and circles.

When I studied circles I learned about circumference ( x d = 3.14 x diameter) andlearned about speed v ( x d/t; t = time) and learned about angular speed bydividing the speed by the radius r of the circle, or, angle traveled () per time (t) orthe angular speed /t = v/r; r = radius.

I practiced these formulas that summer of 1969 Hippie days and Wood stocks andmusic and a man on the moon. In summer of 1969 I drew three concentric circles:One with radius r (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet MercuryTwo with radius r (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet VenusThree with radius r (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth

Page 4


5/57

And assigned three speeds dreaming of space travel watching the space race

One with speed v (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet MercuryTwo with speed v (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet VenusThree with speed v (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet EarthThen I made the division and got the angular speedsOr velocity/radius /t = v/r; with units of radians/secondOne angular speed v (m)/r (m) for bicycle one or first planet MercuryTwo angular speed v (v)/ r (v) for bicycle two or second planet Venus

Three angular speed v (e)/ r (e) for bicycle three or third planet EarthWhat is the angular velocity of mercury around the sun?It is v (m)/ r (m)

The question is how the angular speed of Mercury around the sun was measured?

Page 5


6/57

Answer: It was measured from the moving Earth because I do not believe that thereare people on the Sun?

How did astronomers measure the angular speed of planet Mercury and planet Venusaround the Sun?

A - At day time Astronomers can not measure planet Mercury's speed because theycan not see the planets in day time.

B- At night time Astronomers can not see the Sun but they can see Mercury andVenus.

C- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were not measured directlyThey were deduced.

D- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were deduced from directmeasurements from the Astronomical Sphere with respect to fixed stars from movingearth.

Earth motion around the sun was taken into consideration. Planets motion around theEarth was taken into consideration planetary motion around the Sun was deducedand in this deduction is 400 years wrong and correcting this deduction account forthe apparent precession of perihelion motion of planets Mercury and Venus and thiscorrection ends the validity of using the virus of stupidity of four dimensionalrelativity theory and quantum mechanics or quantum relativistic mechanics and endsthe new strings of stupidity viruses of which string theory is one of many of stupid

ideas.

What was not taken into consideration is Earth - Planets visual effect or lightaberrations visual effects along the line of sight.

Measuring a quantity and deducing a quantity is not the same thing


We measure in real timeWhat we deduce is in event timeThe difference between theory and measurement is time delaysThe difference deduced answer and measurement is time delays

Page 6


7/57

Planets motion was deduced from the celestial sphere calculations that is attachedPlanet Earth.


Planetary distance around the Sun measured from Earth = planetary distance aroundthe Sun deduced from Earth + [Planetary distance around the Sun measured fromEarth - planetary distance around the Sun deduced from Earth]

Dividing by time

Planetary speed around the Sun measured from Earth = planetary speed around theSun deduced from Earth + [Planetary speed around the Sun measured from Earth -planetary speed around the Sun deduced from Earth]

Then, v* (orbital velocity of mercury measured from Earth)/r (Mercury distancefrom the sun) = v*(orbital velocity of mercury deduced from Earth)/r (Mercurydistance from Sun) + [v* (orbital velocity of Earth measured from Earth) +/- v(spin velocity of Earth measured from Earth]/r (Mercury distance from the Sun)With v* meaning orbital speed and v meaning spin speedActual value is ' = v/r = [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/rUsed value: ' = v/r = v (m)/rMissing Value ' = [v* (e) + v (e)]/r; radian per second

The Mistake in arc second per centuryIs: '(e) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (180/) (3600) (36526/T)

Where v* (e) = Earth orbital speed around the Sun; v = Earth spin speed

For Mercury: the angular time delay is measured from Earth is calculated:

And v* (e) = Earth orbital velocity = 29.8 km/secAnd v (e) = Earth rotational velocity = 0.465And v* - v = 29.335km/secAnd r (Mercury) = (58.2 x 106 km)

And r = Mercury's (planet) mean distanceAnd ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km) radians/second= [(29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km)] [(180/) (3600) (36526/88)]

arc sec /century= 43.1" arc-sec/100 years

Page 7


8/57

Actual value is ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v (e)]/rReal time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics

Or, [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r = [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r

This mistake is due to French mathematician Le Verrier in his calculations of

Mercury's orbit and his claim that Newtonian mechanics can not explain Mercury'sangular velocity or Venus angular velocity

The mistake for Planet Mercury is v (e)/r (m) = Earth speeds/Mercury - Sun distanceWhen v (m)/r (m) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (m) added to itAnd when v (m)/r (m) measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ r (m) added to it

Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m); T (Mercury) = 88daysIn degrees

W = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/)In minutesW '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60)In secondsW" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60) (60)

= 43.0 "per century.With v (e) {Earth speed - Earth spin speed} = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec]

And r (m) = 58.2 x 10 9m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun.

For planet Mercury

W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (m)] [36528/T (m)] (180/) (3600) = 43.0"/centuryW"(m) = [29.335/ 58.2 x 10 9] [36528/88] (180/) (3600) = 43.0"/century

The mistake for Planet Venus v (v)/r (m) = Earth speeds/Venus distance from SunWhen v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (v) added to itAnd when v (v)/r (v) measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ r (v) added to it

Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (m); T (Venus) = 224.7days

In degrees/centuryW = 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/)

In minutes/centuryW '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/) (60)

Page 8


9/57

In seconds/centuryW" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/) (60) (60)

= 9.0 "per century.

With v (e) {Earth speed - Earth spin speed} = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec]And r (v) = 108.2 x 10 9m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun.

For planet VenusW"(v) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/century

The mistake is for Planet Venus is v (e)/r (v) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (Venus)When v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always hadAn Extra v (e)/r (v) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)] /r (Venus)

With T (v) = 224.7, v (e) = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec]; r (v) = 108.2 x 10 9m

For Planet Venus

W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/centuryW"(v) = [29.335/ 108.2 x 10 9] [36528/224.7] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/century

The concentric circles games I played in 5th grade drawings and multiplying anddividing numbers gave me a hint and an idea in summer of 1972 when I read aboutplanetary motion around the sun from a book about astronomers titled CopernicusGalileo Kepler's and Newton

These numbers 43.0"/centuy and 9.0"/century were/are used as the First experimentalproofs of space time confusions of modern physics and they were/are the first proof ofEinstein's general relativity theory.This mistake that was made by the French mathematician of 43 seconds of an arc percentury in deducing the orbital speed of planet mercury had led to the make believeor apparent advance of perihelion of planet Mercury. This mistake was/isgeneralized to planetary systems around their mother Sun and the wrong deductionmistake is applied to binary stars systems and to any two body systems. This mistakeopened the door for 20th century mistake called modern physics and is taken as

planet Mercurys play of hide and seek disappearing from space to imaginary time back to space modern physics stupidity called lost in space and found in time andfound lost in space again. Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space to imaginary time back to space as a visual Illusion at age 14 made me realizethat not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics and physicists are wrong for past400 years.

Page 9


10/57

But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972

Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered another onethat gave me the same results

But the Actual value is ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a]And v (M) = [GM/ (m + M) a]And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a] + v (M) = [Gm/ (m + M) a]

= [G (m + M)/ a]And ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

= [G (m + M)/ a] Radians per secondsIn degree per century

Then ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T)

Advance of Perihelion

Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solution

With m = 0.23 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 mAnd M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 88 days

With ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/century

Then ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)= 43.0 arc sec per century

Venus Advance of perihelion motion solution

With m = 4.868 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 108.2 x 109 mAnd M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 224.7 days

With ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/century

Then ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)= 9.0 arc sec per century

Page 10


11/57

These Arithmetic mistakes are the stupid things called experimental proofs of modernspace - to imaginary time - back to space claims of modern physics coming out of the"magic sock" of University Professors physics. The 43 seconds of an arc per century ispresented by "University" physicists proudly as the first experimental proof of timetravel taught by Nobel Prize winners to their PHD's students in four years!

This data transfer problem has a formula

Real time = Event time + time delays

The mistake is

Real time = Event time

The difference is time delays and all of modern physics is an attempt to explain thistime delay in this equation


The make - believe relativity theory came to explain the time delays puzzles throughmaking up stuff like space - to imaginary time - back to space Hollywood studiosmake - believe time travel physics.

Quantum mechanics came to explain the visual illusion seen in the lab one time youfind things in event time and one time you find things in real time and you dig your

face again? What?

Building modern physics on space- to imaginary time made physics a stupidity taughtin classrooms and used in scientific calculations. I am not saying that modern physicsis stupid but what I am saying is that I can prove modern stupid to say the least.

Time travel is not physics and when time travel came to classrooms physicistsbecame as good as gypsy fortune tellers and all the Nobel Prizes that was won basedon space time physics I can prove it as wrong physics and wrong physics is space-time confusion of physics because it is all a made out visual illusions and nothing

more than PHD idiots and Nobel PHD Idiots taking time dependent measurementswrong for 350 years and bullying humanity for funds.

Space - Time continuum is not physics because I can prove it as visual illusion and avisual illusion only. It is time for change; regime change.

Page 11


12/57

It is not just about 110 years of Nobel Prize winner wrong physics but it is about 400years of bullying physicists.

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen. Wecan only see and measure something that had happened. What we

measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event thathappened in past time. That is we measure past events in present timePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delaysReal time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delaysphysicsWhat one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event +relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real timerelativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delays

= t + ( - t)


= t + (x) + (y)

= t (/t) = t e t;/t = e t; t = arc tan (v/c)

= t [cosine t + sine t] = (x) + (y) = t cosine t + t sine t

(x) = t cosine t = t {1 - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = (x) - t = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

(y) = sine t = sine arc tan (v/c)

This is time delays and this formula explain modern physics as stupidityitself

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Page 12


13/57

This high school math formula

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Is the greatest one mistake physicists make every day and it is the one

formula that has to be accounted for in every day physics work and inevery time, time dependent measurements are made and every timesignals and not measuring tape is used as means of measurements. Thisone mistake is the mother of all mistakes in human history of science andit is as old as physics itself. This one mistake not new and it goes back tothe start of science because light had been studied for all of past centuriesand this one mistake is a rule of nature and a mistake that never beenaccounted for and outlasted all physicists of past centuries and it is onethat nature has and was missed and in the process creepy physics calledModern physics called relativistic quantum mechanics and all physics thatwas based on relativistic quantum mechanics and was made to explain theconsequences of this one mistake when this one mistake is a beautiful anda simple rule of nature.

For example, this equation explains the first experimental proof of space -time travel and the first experimental of experimental proof generalrelativity theory dearest to Einstein applied to planet mercury.

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Where t = 100 years = 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 seconds

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 23.9345 x 3600)

And using the 1/2 cycle measurements

(x) /2 = - t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] seconds

And v = v (m) [Mercury] - v (e) [Earth]= 47.9 km/sec - 29.8 km/sec = 18.1 km/sec

Or W" = (15/2) (x) = (7.5) t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] arc seconds

W" = 7.5 x 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 x sine [(1/2) arc tan (18.1/300,000)]= 43.0" arc seconds per 100 years

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] in seconds

Page 13


14/57

A century t = 100 (years) x 365.26 (days) x 24 (hours) x 3600 (seconds)

In second per century (x) = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

In arc second per century (x) = - 30 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

In arc per century using cycle (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

And v = v (mercury) [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)]

For Mercury v (Mercury) = 47.9 km/sec (orbit)And [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.8 0.465

Or, [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.335 km/sec

And v = 47.9 29.335 = 18.435 km/secWith c = 300,000 km/sec

(x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

(x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (18.435/300,000)] x(100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

= 43.0 arc sec per century

For Venus v (Mercury) = 35.1 km/sec

And [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.8 - 0.465Or, [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.335 km/sec

And v = 35.1 29.335 = 5.765 km/secWith c = 300,000 km/sec

(x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

(x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (5.765 /300,000)] x

(100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)= 4.37 arc sec per centuryUsing full cycle

(x) = - 2 x 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (5.765 /300,000)] x(100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600)

= 8.74 arc sec per century

Page 14


15/57

It published literature both numbers, 4.37 arc sec per century for cycleand 8.74 arc sec per century for full cycle are given without an explanation

= (x) + (y) = t e

(x) = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}}(x) - t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}Astronomers use 1/2 cycleThen ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v


16/57

Visual Illusions deceptions are modern physics. Visual effects arevery deceptive but not for lucid physics and physicists and to know thatmost of Modern Physics is made out of visual Illusion make it problematicand telling it 400 years of physics and 400,000 physicists make people

walk away to say the least not only because they would be skeptical but itis frightening to them spending their entire life on playing science in thedark and suddenly there was light and in clear visions and all there is andwas is Nobel stupidity.

Such shocks I gave during long years to PHD physicists and "university"professors and researchers made me the one and lonely greatest physicistof all time and both fingers raised.

The thing about modern physics is that it I can proven that most of modernphysics is made out of visual deceptions and Modern physics and physicistsof relativity and quantum mechanics and other theories came out as anattempt to explain these visual deceptions and most of quantum relativisticphysics and all sciences based on quantum relativistic are mostly a makebelieve made up world of science.

Taking visual effects as real and calling it modern physics and give it Nobelprizes does not make it real physics. For almost forty years of mynightmare not because I can not prove that modern Physics is mostly madeout of visual deceptions but it is because I can prove it a visual deceptionand every time I proved that Modern Physics is made out of visual

deceptions I give people shocks they did not want or wanted to believethat they spent their entire professional life with a moron halo above theirheads.

I can prove that most of modern physics lab work is made out of visualillusion and I am writing this book to change modern physics and thestupid history of modern Physics.

Wrong arithmetic and fortune hunters who pushed wrong arithmetic led tomodern physics that people call science and that made science a fiction

and this one real time formula


This one formula uncovers 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physics aswrong arithmetic and 400 years of physics as wrong physics.

Page 16


17/57


Wrong physics is Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics

This 400 years mistake can be found in every physics law

Kepler's speed laws told us about this mistake

Or, r (1) ' (1) = r (2) '(2) = location x speed = constant= Areal velocity

Or, ' (1) = {[r (2)/ r (1)]} ' (2)

And ' (1) - ' (2) = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2)

' = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2)

This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion

The angular speed is ' = v/rFor Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843radians/sec

If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", thenAnd W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec percentury

If it is measured for planet Mercury then

W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88)W"= 70.29 arc second per century

Or, W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seenwhen measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106

And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

And W" (2) = - 70.29 arc sec /century

W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) W" = {{ [149.6/ 58.2]} - 1} [-70.29] = 43.0" arc per century

Page 17


18/57

For Planet VenusWhat is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen

when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106

The angular speed is ' = v/rFor Venus: ' = v/r = (35.1km/sec)/108,200,000 km = 0.000000324radians/sec

If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", thenAnd W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec percentury

If it is measured for planet Venus then

W" = (35.1/108,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88)W"= - 10.87687234 arc second per century

Or, W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Venus that would be seenwhen measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106

And r (2) = Venus = 108.2x 106

And W" (2) = 10.87687234 arc sec /century

W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) W" = {{ [149.6/108.2]} - 1} [-10.87687234] = 2 arc per century

Page 18

Planet Distance r X 106km

PlanetOrbit T

Orbit speedv in km/sec

LessEarthspeed

Spinspeedkm/sec

Angularvelocity; v/rarc sec/ century

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74


19/57

Kepler's modified law told us about this mistake:

T/a = 4 /GMTo T/a = 4 /G (M + m)

That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data are centeredat the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this:

T (1)/a = 4 /GM and

T (2) /a = 4 /G (M + m)

When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as shown:

The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton

T (1) = T (2) [M/ (M + m)]And 2/ T (1) = [2 / T (2)] (1 + m/M)

And ' (1) = ' (2) (1 + m/M)

And ' (2) = ' (1) / [1 + (m/M)] [1 - m/ (2M)]

This approximation was not on the original work

And ' (2) - ' (1) = ' (1) [1 / [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

And ' (2) - ' (1) - ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 /T] [m/2M) = - m/MT radians/T

W " (calculated) = [- m/MT] (180/ degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days

With m = 0.32 x1024 kgAnd M = 2.0 x1030 kgT = 88 days

W' (calculated) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years

There are many more ways to get to prove that the 43 seconds of an arc of Planet Mercury axistilt in 100 years is just an arithmetic mistake

One of the ways that can be used to explain it is making up stuff like Einstein did and that ismaking up stuff. For example making up another gravitational force

Page 19


20/57

Einstein added k/ r4 to Newton's - Kepler's Gravitational force laws F = - GmM/rOr, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/rBecame Einstein's Gravitational law to explain the 43 arc sec per centuryOr, F = - GmM/r + k/ r4; Einstein law

Einstein has no proof of the existence of this extra force + k/ r4

He used and dwelled on the arithmetic mistake to claim that this is due to time travel

This make - up physics or rigging made by Einstein is fraud

Let us make - up a force and prove the same thing Einstein proved!How about a force of inverse cube law - k/r

Let us use this make - up and beat Alfred Nobel Physicists

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Acceleration = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

And

S = m r; State = mass x distance

P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rVelocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)

P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in massF =d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

= m d r/d t + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rF = m d r/d t + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rForce = Change of momentumF = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r

F = - GmM/rOr, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/rThenWith d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)

With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

Page 20


21/57

Abstract:Inverse Cube equations F = m = - k/r r (1), then in polar coordinatesWith m [d r/dt - 'r] = - k /r Inverse Cube made - up Gravitational law (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)These two equations give an axial rotation rate:

One: = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years= 43.0344 seconds of arc / century for Mercury

Two: ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) arc second/100 years= 43.0" seconds of arc /century for Mercury

Solution:All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a locationr = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment= change of location + change of mass= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = dS/dt = Total force= m (dr/dt) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (dm/dt) r= m + 2m'v +m" r; = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = rr (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r ' (1) ; = (r" - r')r(1) + (2r'' + r ")(1)

r = location; v = velocity; = accelerationF = m + 2m'v +m" rF = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)]+2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1)= [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1)= [-GmM/r] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:First r = r[cosine + sine ] = rr (1)Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r'[- sine + cosine ]

= r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Define (1) = -sine +cosine ;And with r (1) = cosine + sine Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1)And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1)

Page 21


22/57

Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t= r" r(1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t

= (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = - k/ r; Inverse Cube Gravitational Equation (1)

And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's law (2)With m = constant

Then d r/dt - 'r = - k/ r (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 (2)

From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = hFrom (1), ' d r/ d - 'r = - k/ mr

And ' [d r/ d - r] = - k/ mr

And d r/ d - r = - (k/mh) rAnd d r/ d - r [1 - (k/mh)] = 0

And r (, 0) = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]} From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = h

Then 2rr'' + r'' = 0Dividing by r'

We get 2 (r'/r) + (''/') = 0

And 2 (r'/r) = - ''/' = 2 tAnd r = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]} Exp tAnd ' = ' (, 0) Exp - 2 tOrr = r (0, 0) Exp [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]

And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t]And ' = (' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t] - sine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t]}And ' - ' (0, 0) = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]And ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]

If k = Gm M ; h = 2 a b/TThen ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (GMT/4ab)]} + t]Taking Kepler's: T/4a = 1/GM = 1/G MAnd GM = 4a/ T; GM T = 4a And (GMT/4ab) = a /bThen ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ (1 - a /b)} + t]If = mb/aM

Page 22


23/57

Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (m/ M)]} + t]If = 0Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine tAnd ' (0, 0) = h/r = 2ab/Ta (1 - )

= 2a (1 - )/Ta (1 - ) = 2 (1 - )/T (1 - )

And ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) sine tWith T = arc tan v/c


24/57

Or and extra Newton's = m/(m+ M)[180/] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 yearsEither one of the three formulas works and gives 43 seconds of an arc for planet Mercury.Let me make another make - up force and let us make it nuclear force

Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r) Exp (m /M r): One stone two birdsVs Newton's Gravity (-GmM/r) And Vs Einstein's Gravity (-GmM/r) + k/ (r)

Abstract: Nahhas' force (-GmM/r)Exp(m /M r) or the nuclear gravity force is the crudelyapproximated Newtonian gravity force (-GmM/r) explains planetary motion around the sun asa rotating ellipse with a rotation rate = [ m/(m + M)](180/)(36526/T)(3600) = 43.03seconds of an arc per century for the most talked about planet of mercury; m = 3.2 x 10^24 kg;M = 2x10^30 kg; T = 88daysFor 400 years and a million Physicists Astrophysicists Mathematicians Engineers and all otherssolved the Newton's-Kepler's Equations wrong

With d (m r)/dt (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravity Force (1)

And d (Wimr')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)With a solution: r = [a (1 )/(1 + cosine )] Newton's Equation solutionAnd ' = h/r Kepler's Equation SolutionThe correct solution:Nahhas' solution: r(, t) = [a(1 )/(1 + cosine )] Exp [ (r) + (r)] tAnd rotation rate ofW (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) ]} [(v + v*)/c] degrees/100 yearsT = period; = eccentricity; v = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effectIn general v* = v* (p) + v*(s) and v = v (p) + v (s); p = primary; s= secondaryAnd v* + v = 48.2 km/sec; = 0.206; T = 88 days; c = 300,000 km/secW (ob) = 43.11''/century; W (observed) = 43.11''

The new correct solution contains Newton's-Kepler's particle mechanics and Quantum wavemechanics in one equation and Einstein's relativity deleted.

However; planetary motion and its most talked about planet orbit of mercury's rotating ellipseand its rate of advance of perihelion can be explained as a nuclear gravitation force and not as aNewton's gravitational force or Einstein's space-time confusion of force or any other force andthis new gravitation equation is:With d (m r)/dt (m r) ' = [-GmM/r]Exp(m / M r) Nuclear gravity Equation (1)And (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)

Solution:

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a locationr = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

Page 24


25/57

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment= change of location + change of mass= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = dS/dt = Total force

= m (dr/dt) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (dm/dt) r= m + 2m'v +m" r; = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = rr (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r ' (1) ; = (r" - r')r(1) + (2r'' + r ")(1)r = location; v = velocity; = accelerationF = m + 2m'v +m" rF = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)]+2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1)= [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1)= [-GmM/r] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:First r = r[cosine + sine ] = rr (1)Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r'[- sine + cosine ]

= r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Define (1) = -sine +cosine ;And with r (1) = cosine + sine

Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1)Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t

= r" r(1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

(2): d (mr')/d t = 0

Then mr' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r' = hAnd (1): d r/dt - r ' = -GmM/r

Let m r =1/uThen d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r/dt = -h'du/d = - hu [du/d]

Page 25


26/57

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Nuclear Gravity (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

-hu [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = -GMu [1 ( m/M) u]; m/M r


27/57

With r (, 0) = a (1 )/[1 + cosine ( )]

And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T)(3600) = 43.03''

Newton's force -GmM/r if corrected to [ GmM/r] Exp (m /M r) gives exact solution

without make-believe 20th

century confusion of physics unless you have been to time travelbuss station of a 1956 live Elvis show! Then I will bow

Then (Venus) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Venus)] = 8.426826168''

And (Earth) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Earth)] = 5.184''

The advance of perihelion of Venus and Earth never been measured but badly approximatedand deduced and the reason for that is the very small value and Venus looks like a star and nota planet. For centuries Astronomers are yet to have reliable data of Venus like its rotation

velocity. In recent years astronomers gave 6.5 km/sec for its rotational speed from its lightspectrum; however, V= 2r/p; r = Venus radius and p = Venus rotational period comes to fewmeters per seconds and not few kilometers per second indicating 400 years of astronomy thatclaims to know how the Universe was born and how it will end when the have no clue thespeed of a planet that can been seen 24/7 from satellites.

Einstein equation is

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/ (r) Einstein's Space-time (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

With r (, 0) = a (1 )/ [1 + cosine ( )]

And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''

There is nothing unique about itIt is a made up physicsIt works on plant MercuryIt does not work anywhere else

In 1959 there was an article in science magazine that said if Relativity is to be tested properlythen it should be applied to binary stars or two stars systems.

Relativity theory failed the test with two star systems and this equation failed and it failed itvery bad and yes this formula:

Or, = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''Does not work anywhere else

Page 27


28/57

Why Nobel Prize winners insist on teaching this formula and teaching relativity theory whenEinstein's relativity theory is proven wrong is a signature of the scientific character:Nobel Prize winner physicists are representative of the big institutions Mafia and a Nobel prizewinner physicist will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestigeand a cut in the hundreds of millions of dollars the institution that backed him up and received

massive funding for their research boats dogs and mistresses.We went to the Lab andIn the Lab the force between two balls was measured: F = -GmM/rAnd Newton F = m And got this equation

Then he solved his equation like this

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)


And

S = m r; State = mass x distanceP = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rVelocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in massF =d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

= m d r/d t + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r

F = m d r/d t + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rForce = Change of momentumF = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r

F = - GmM/rOr, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r

Then

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)


Page 28


29/57

From 2: With m = constant; then d (mr')/d t = 0And m d (r')/d t = 0And d (r')/d t = 0And r' = h

With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/rWith m = constantThen m [d r/ d t - r '] = - Gm M/ rAnd [d r/ d t - r '] = - G M/ rLet r =1/uThen d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r /d t = - h 'du/d = - h u [du/d]

And - h u [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = - G Mu

Or, [du/ d] + u = G M/ h u = G M/ h + A cosine And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h + A cosine ]

= (h/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah/ GM) cosine ]= (h/GM)/ (1 + cosine )

Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )

This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this equationand we got the motion equation: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Which is the equation of anellipse with eccentricity and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis b = a [1 - ] and

two foci one equals to c = a, and the other foci location equals to - c = - a. Or the motion ofone ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with the other ball at one of the foci +/- a,of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a) on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis andfoci (- c, c) on x- axis again with angle of rotation . If this law to work on two planets insteadof two balls like planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion ofa planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.

When astronomers turned their telescopes to confirm the force law F = -GmM/r and see ifplanetary motion around the Sun abide by this law and attempt to see a planet moves in anellipse around the sun with the sun at one of the foci of that ellipse, they saw an ellipse withrotating axes instead.

Solution of-GmM/r: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] they did not see this

But insteadthey saw thisThat is they saw r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] tThis is the equation of an ellipse with rotating axes.

Page 29


30/57

The difference is /t= [(r)+ (r)] tAnd (r) = 0Are Newton's - Kepler's laws wrong?

Einstein and 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physicists said Hell Ya they are wrong

Relativity theory in its entirety said Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

Quantum mechanics Physicists had been saying Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrongStrings morons brag about their stupidity and say Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

Modern Physics is based on Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

100,000 PHD living physicists said Newton's laws are wrong

100,000 PHD dead physicists said Newton's laws are wrong100,000 PHD Physicists web pages said Newton's laws are wrongModern physicists brag about the assumption that Newton's equations were wrong and thatrelativity theory and quantum mechanics and other theories are needed to explain newexperimental results

Now who is wrong the experimenter in the Lab who measured F = -GmM/r

Or, Einstein is wrong?And Einstein added k/r4

And made F = -GmM/r + k/r4

And made new equations and deleted Newton's equationWith d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/r4; Einstein's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

And the New solution became: r (, t) = a (1-)/ [(1+ cosine ( - w)]Where w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/centuryG = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 mM = 2 x 1030 kgAnd T = 88 days for planet Mercury to giveWhere w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century

= 43.0" arc sec/centuryAnd this was experimentally correct?The world sided with Einstein because the theory fits with the experimentWhen Einstein formulas were used on binary stars motion it failed!

Page 30


31/57

Binary stars is a two stars system and should behave like a planet and a sun or one star movingaround the other star in the same manner a planet moves around the Sun

Why Physicists and Astrophysicists insist on Einstein's formula when there is dozens ofdocumented cases where Einstein's formulas fail?

Scientists added rotational distortions term to rescue relativity theory and quantum mechanics because both are based on space time stupidity beside + k/r4 term to come closer toexperimental results and for every hit it missed a thousand times. It is not only Einstein iswrong but all physicists and astrophysicists are yet to know how to use atelescope!

There is nothing wrong with the experimenter in the Lab or F = -GmM/rAnd there is nothing wrong with Newton's - Kepler's equations

These equations are correctWith d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

Real time = Event time + time delaysThe old solution is an event time orbit solutionOr, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )]The real time orbit solution is: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] t

The difference between the two solutions is time delays visual effects thatexplains planet Mercury's motion or any motion for that matter correctlyevery time without space - time relativistic confusions or stupidity physics

"Apparent advance of perihelion is given by this formula"

Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of:W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/secAnd v = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/secAnd c = light velocity of 300,000 km/secAnd = 0.206And (1-)/ (1-) = 1.552And v+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/sec

Page 31


32/57

Giving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0"

This formulaW" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 yearsW" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) arc seconds/100 years

= 43.0" arc sec /century

Said that Physicists are idiots and Astro physicists have no clue how to use

the telescope. Why? Because it works on every planetary system or satellitesystem without any exception

For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved wrong.For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved in event timeI have had known about this for almost four decades

100,000 PHD living physicists are wrong100,000 PHD dead physicists are wrong100,000 PHD Physicists web pages are wrong

Newtons Keplers equations were solved wrong for 350 yearsThe correct solution of Newtons Keplers equations is real timeUniversal Mechanics that wipes out 350 years of wrong physics

and 400,000 physicists stupidity along with it

Newton's Kepler's solution in real time

Real time two body problemIn Polar coordinates

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

(2): d (mr')/d t = 0

Then mr' = constant= H (0, 0)= m (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r (0, 0) '(0, 0)

= m (0, 0) r (0, 0) '(0, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, 0)] h (, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, 0)] [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, t)] [r (, t)] [' (, t)]= [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, t)]= [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, 0) ' (0, t)]

Page 32


33/57

With mr' = constantDifferentiate with respect to timeThen 2mm'r' + 2mrr'' + mr" = 0Divide by mr'Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + "/' = 0

This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[ (m) + (m)]And 2(r'/r) = 2[ (r) + (r)]And "/' = -2{ (m) + (r) + [ (m) + (r)]}

Then (m'/m) = [ (m) + (m)]Or d m/m d t = [ (m) + (m)]And dm/m = [ (m) + (m)] d tThen m = m (0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t

m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) Exp [ (m) + (m)] tWith initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (, 0)And m = m (, 0) m (0, t) = m (, 0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t; Exp = Exponential

And m (0, t) = Exp [ (m) + (m)] tSimilarly we can getAlso, r = r (, 0) r (0, t) = r (, 0) Exp [ (r) + (r)] tWith r (0, t) = Exp [ (r) + (r)] t

Then '(, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m(,0)r(,0)]}Exp{-2{[(m) + (r)]t + [(m) + (r)]t}} -----IAnd '(, t) = ' (, 0)]} Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t}} --------------------IAnd, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t)And ' (0, t) = Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t}Also '(, 0) = H (0, 0)/ m (, 0) r (, 0)And '(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (0, 0)r (0, 0)]}

With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r = -GmM/mrAnd d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ (mr)Let m r =1/uThen d (m r)/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = -H d u/d And d (m r)/dt = -H'du/d = - Hu [du/d]

-Hu [du/d] - (1/u) (Hu) = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) Mu[du/ d] + u = Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ H

t = 0; m (0, 0) = 1u = Gm (, 0) M/ H + A cosine =Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0)

And m r = 1/u = 1/ [Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) + A cosine ]= [h/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ {1 + [Ah/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)] [cosine ]}= [h/Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ (1 + cosine )

Page 33


34/57

Then m (, 0) r (, 0) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] m (, 0)Dividing by m (, 0)Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+cos)This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem which is the equation of anellipse of semi-major axis of length a and semi minor axis b = a (1 - ) and focus length c =

aAnd m r = m (, t) r (, t) = m (, 0) m (0, t) r (, 0) r (0, t)Then, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] {Exp [(r) + (r)] t} ---------------------------------- IIThis is Newton's time dependent equation that is missed for 350 yearsIf (m) 0 fixed mass and (r) 0 fixed orbit; thenThen r (, t) = r (, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Exp i (r) tAnd m = m (, 0) Exp [i (m) t] = m (, 0) Exp (m) t

We Have '(0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r (0, 0) = 2ab/ Ta (1-) = 2a [ (1-)]/T a (1-) = 2 [ (1-)]/T (1-)

Then '(0, t) = {2 [ (1-)]/ T (1-) } Exp {-2[ (m) + (r)] t= {2 [ (1-)]/ (1-) } {cosine 2[ (m) + (r)] t - sin 2[ (m) + (r)] t}

And '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1- 2sin [ (m) + (r)] t}- 2i '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t

Then '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2sine [ (m) t + (r) t]}- 2 '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t

' (0, t) = Real ' (0, t) + Imaginary (0, t)

Real (0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2 sine [ (m) t (r) t]}Let W (calculated) = ' (0, t) (observed) = Real (0, t) - '(0, 0)

= -2'(0, 0) sine [ (m) t + (r) t]= -2[2 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [ (m) t + (r) t]

W (Cal) = -4 {[ (1-)]/T (1-) ]} sine [ (m) t + (r) t]

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, thenWith, v = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v/c = tan (m) T; v*/c = tan (r) T*Where T = spin period; T* = orbital period

And (m) T = Inverse tan v/c; (r) T*= Inverse tan v*/cW (ob) = -4 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [Inverse tan v/c + Inverse tan v*/c] radiansMultiplication by 180/

Page 34


35/57

W (ob) = (-720/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } sine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degreesand multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

W (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } xsine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degrees/100 years

Approximations I

With v


36/57

These equations are correct


What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

Real time = Event time + time delaysThe old solution is an event time orbit solutionOr, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )]

Nahhas' Equations: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] tW" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

Did Newton's need this solution to determine the advance of perihelion of Planetmercury?


Hell NO: In his days the telescopes were very small and the advance ofperihelion was not an issue

At Perihelion: d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r = - r '; d r/d t = 0Then r ' = GM/rA quick answer by Newton would be

And First ' = [GM/r] Kepler's findingsFrames are related by the quotient of their velocities = arc tan (v m/ v n) and the advanceof perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or thequantity tan = (v m/ v n)= [(v* +/- v)/ (v**)] = Earth speed and spin/Mercury speed and spinAdvance of perihelion Period is given by:Kepler's equation: = [GM/r] [(v* +/- v)/ (v**)]In arc sec / century

Then = {[GM/r]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v)/ (v**)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T) = 43"/centuryG = gravitational constant

M = sun massr = Mercury - Sun distance

Where v* = orbital speed of earth; v = spin speed of earthAnd v** = orbital speed of observed Planet

Page 36


37/57

Is there any more?

Then = {[G (m + M)/r]} 1/2{[(v* +/- v)/ (v**)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T)]

One of the beautiful things I remember about old city of Beirut before the start of thecivil war in June 1973 and exploded in April 1975 is the abundance of entertainment.Reading as a cheap entertainment was/is available to people of Lebanon where I wasborn and on Sundays during summer time the old Martyr square and surroundingareas side walks that changed to a flea market of used and new books and openpublishing houses beside restaurants and movie theatres. There on the streets of oldBeirut from 1968 - 1974 I walked through the greatest library I knew. Scientists aremade in JR High. College is an opportunity to become one. On those summers Ibought books and magazines in many subjects and in two languages that I can readwrite and speak that is English and Arabic. I started with Cartoon magazines thenshort stories then long stories then Lyrics of western music to novels or crafts tophilosophy or science and everything that was there and I can afford and lookedinteresting. One of the books I bought was how to make a reel of cartoon movies.

In summer of 1973 at age 15 I made a reel of the progress of light Points to see howthis space - time in the frame work of Michelson and Morley experiment work andafter few weeks and piles of drawings I realized the theory behind the experiment isfraud and could never work. I realized that the theory is in stationary time and whatis measured is in real time proving my earlier finding which is if someone to measureothers motion like measuring planets motion around the sun from earth and not fromthe sun then there will be errors from planets to earth and these were not being

accounted for.

Newton's equations should be wrong too because Newton did the same mistake.

In summer of 1974 I figured that all of physics is wrong and Modern physics isstupidity itself.

Abstract: Ending relativity from classrooms and scientific calculations starts withending Nobel Prize winner Physicists wrong physics and it starts with the grandmistake called relativity theory. Relativity theory is based on the fact that lightmeasurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light projectionsto our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r cosinearc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring timT we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof ofit.

Page 37


38/57

Your eyes

A000 00000 0

0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 (2) 0 0 00 (1) 0 0 (3) 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 01 2 3

The projections of light is what we measure and the projectionof 1 and 2 and 3 is ABIf the angle between ray 1 and AB is (1)If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (2)If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (3)Then C (1) cosine (1) = C (2) cosine (2) = C (3) cosine (3) = c = AB

You want experimental proof?Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the lightprojections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion andstars to solve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars betterthan all isIf an object at location A sends light signals in all directions at time at t = 0where B1 is;And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured.

AB1 is theorized and AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine ; = arc tan(v/c)B1B2 /AB1 = sine ; AB2/AB1 = cosine ; B1B2/AB2 = tan

Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time = t

cosine


39/57

Page 38

A Light V E L O C I T Y B2O O O O O O O O O O

O C O

O OO OO V O

O OO O

O OO O

OB1

= t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}}

- t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}Astronomers use 1/2 cycleThen ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v


40/57

1- Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.We can only see and measure something that had happened. What wemeasure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event that

happened in past time. That is we measure past events in present timePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delaysReal time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physicsWhat one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delays

= t + ( - t) Equation 1- a = t + Equation 1- b

2 - Real time location

An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factor of[(r)] t and a rotation motion factor of[ (r)] t is introduced to a total factor of[(r)+ (r)]t and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as:

S = r[(r)+ (r)] t

Equations 23 - A - Real time location along the line of measurement and

B - Real time location Perpendicular to the line of measurement.

S = r[(r)+ (r)] t = r [(r)] t (r) t

S = S x + S y = r [(r)] t [cosine t+ sine t]

Real time location along the line of measurement isS x = r [(r)] tcosine t Equations 3- a

S x = r [(r)] t

[1 - sine t]

Real time location perpendicular to the line of measurement isS y = r [

(r)] tsine t Equations 3 - b

4 - Real time location in rectangular coordinatesLocation r = x+ y + z k


41/57

Page 40Velocity v = (d x/d t)(d y/d t) + (d z/d t) k

Acceleration = (dx/dt)(dy/dt) + (dz/dt) k

S = r [(r)

+ (r)] t

S = [x+ y + z k] [(r)+ (r)] t Equations 4

5 - Real time location in Polar Coordinates

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)


S = rr (1)[(r)+ (r)] t Equations 5

6 - Real time location in Cylindrical coordinates system

Location r = (1) + z

Velocity v = ' (1) + r ' (1) + z';

Acceleration = ( " - ') (1) + (2 '' + ") (1) + z''

S = r [(r)+ (r)] t

S = [ (1) + z][(r)+ (r)] t Equations 6

7 - Real time location in Spherical coordinates system

Location r = r [r, , ] = rr (1)Velocity v = r' r (1)+ r ' sine (1)+ r '(1)Acceleration = [r" - r ('sine + ')] r (1)+ [1/rsine ] [d (r ' sine )/d t] (1) + {(1/r) [d (r')/d t] - r ' sine cosine } (1)S = rr (1)

[(r)+ (r)] t Equations 7

8 - Real time VelocityLet S = r [(r)+ (r)] t

Then Velocity = P = d S /d t = {[(d r/ d t) + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] tP = {[v + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] t Equation 8


42/57

Page 419 - Real time AccelerationF =d P/ d t = d S/ d tF = { + 2 [ (r) + (r)] v - [ (r) + (r)] r} [(r)+ (r)] t Equation 9

10 - A - Real time location rotational aberration along the line of measurement andB-Real time location rotational aberration perpendicular to the line of measurement

Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocityVelocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line ofmeasurement velocityAlong the line of measurementThen S x = r [(r)] t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] Equation 10 - aPerpendicular to line of measurements

And S y = r [(r)] t

sine arc tan (v/c) Equation 10 - b

11 - Real time location motion rotational aberrations Visual effects:A - Along the line of measurementB - Perpendicular to the line of measurementS x = r [(r)] t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)]With (r) = 0ThenS x = r [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] Equation 11 - a

With (v/c)


43/57

Page 42With (r) 0; v = 0Then perpendicular to the line of measurementS y = r [(r)] t Equation 12 - bAnd

S x = S y = r [(r)] t Equation 12- c

13 - Real timeA - Along the line of measurementB - Perpendicular to the line of measurement

S = r[(r)+ (r)] tS = c And r = c t = t [(r)+ (r)] t

S = r[(r)+ (r)] tP = {[v + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] t

F = { + 2 [ (r) + (r)] v - [ (r) + (r)] r} [(r)+ (r)] t

14 - Time delays conceptsA - Along the line of measurementB - Perpendicular to the line of measurementC - Real time delaysS = r[(r)+ (r)] tS = c And r = c t = t [(r)+ (r)] t = t {cosine [ (r) + (r)] t + sine [ (r) + (r)] t}With (r) = 0Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocityVelocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line ofmeasurement velocityWith = 0; = t [ (r)] tAnd = t [cosine t + sine t]And (x) = t cosine t = t [1 - 2 sine ( t/2)]

= (x) - t = - 2 t sine ( t/2) (x) = t cosine (r) t = t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c)With (v/c)


44/57

Page 43[Villanova University Relativity Stupidity] = t [(r)+ (r)] t = - 2 t sine ( t/2) /2 = - t sine ( t/2)

= t + [ - t]This addition operation can be a multiplicationOr, = t [/t]The definition of a visual Illusion time delay is/t = cosine + sine = ; = arc tan (v/c)With v = relative velocity and c = velocity of light. = t this formula is the magic sock of Physics or the Bully equationReal time = event time x Visual effects

= (x) + (y) = t = t [cosine + sine ] (x) = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] (x) - t = - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

= - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

= - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c] sec/century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/-v*)/c] arc sec/century

Since idiots are idiots and some times 1/2 period scientists use instead of a full period you

would find many cases that two Astrophysicists give an answer and one double the other'sanswer like in the most famous case in astronomy and that would be Dr Guinan of VillanovaUniversity with DI Herculis apsidal motion of 0.65 1985 and DR Martynov of 1.3 in 2008.

Earth velocity is 29.8 km/secVenus velocity is 35.1km/sec

Mars velocity is 47.9 km/secDI Herculis is 103.5 km/secIn case of mercury they use 1/2 cycle or use Venus orbit to calculate Mercury because Mercury

is closer to the sun and disappears more than Venus and Venus is a bright planet that looks likea star.

In the original calculation of 1859 the used 1/2 cycle because of theproximity of Mercury to the SUN

And = - 15x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century


45/57

With v = 47.9 km/sec and v* = 29.8

Page 44

= - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(47.9 - 29.8)/c] arcsec/century= 43.0 arc second per century

Then they later came and used Venus as reference for measuring and usedfull cycle because Venus look like a morning star and can be seen better

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Mercury - Orbital velocity ofVenus = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 - 35.1/300,000)sec

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 -35.1/300,000) = 43.0 arc per century for mercury.Venus is bright like a star and it is used to calculate Mercury's orbit.

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Venus - Orbital velocity of Earth = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (35.1 -29.8/300,000) = 8.3 arc sec per century for Venus

Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit.

This same formula applies to stars = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

DI HerculisIt all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

V* (p) = [GM/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/secV* (s) = [Gm/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec

With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2 =103.5887398km/secAnd v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c] arcsec/century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(133.39)/300,000]

= 1.3 arc sec/century


46/57

In the 1/2 period method = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

= 1.3 /2 = 0.65

Go to NASA Website SAO/NASA see how their PHD'S are more like of GED'S and type:Apsidal motion 1985 and pick up the article written by Villanova 5th grades

And then type: Apsidal motion 2010 and pick up the article written by the same KinderGardeners Dr Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney

Page 4516 - Time delays and the creation of elementary particles

Looting DOE and other USA government institutions is a common place because corporate

academia of western nations will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobsmoney prestige Nobel Prizes and no physics and because western politician are corporatecorrupt and shallow science educated politicians and will give a bucket of money for a bucketfull of nothing because money is not coming out from their pockets and they have no clue whatthey are paying except they are told it is good! It is stinking well and they are paying nothingand nothing is dark energy. To prove dark energy exists for a scientifically ignorantgovernment and looting scientists, scientists took a bucket with a phototube registering flashes between two elevations. The difference in count is taken as proof of the existence ofelementary nuclear particles and dark energy. I Joe Nahhas have had accused western scientistsof fraud since July 4th, 1973 and this article is part of the proof that at least 88.88 % of westernphysicists published work is fraud and fraud is dark energy.

Introduction: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter ofscience. The death of E = mc in inevitable because it was based on visual illusion. VisualIllusions is a characteristic of the nuclear world and they are a result of bad measurements.Measurements are done wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.Want to see how E = mc trick? It is shown below but for now read this

Time dilations tricks are scatter experiments. I taught in colleges for few years and I canexplain it and it is called Scatter and not time dilations.

Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays Physics

T is real time = t is event time + [T - t; real time - event time]T = t + [T- t]T = TT = t [T/t]T/t = e ; = arc tan (v/c) this is the magic sock equation for lootingT = t e = t [cosine + sine ]T = T (x) + T (y) = t [cosine + sine ]


47/57

T (x) = = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine (/2) = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

With (v/c) = 1/n = 1/1.0003 = n = index of refraction of air = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]} /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]}

/t = - 0.292787177

Page 46N = N (0) e /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e- 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e /t = - 0.292787177

N = N (0) e- 0.292787177

In an MIT 1962 video that is sold and distributed around the world two gentlemen had a Bucketwith a photo sensor inside it registering flashes between two elevations at a mountain top and atsea level

The vertical showers of - Meson were counted through a horizontal counter:On a mountain top of 1.943 km height ....... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hourAt sea Level.......................................... 412 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hourThis count is given as experimental proof of the existence of - Mesons and time dilations.

Is this time dilation?Absolutely not!

1943 meters height * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *1500 meters height * *** * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * * * *1500 meters height * *** ** * *** * *** * ** * *** * ** * ** * *** * ** * *1000 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** *** ** * ***0500 meters height *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** ***

I say this is not time dilations but diffraction due to an increase of air density between the twodifferent locations and here is the proof

N = N (0) e- 0.292787177N = 564 e- 0.292787177 = 420.8640 --------------------------------- OneFrom this equation

/t = - 0.292787177= 0.292787177And = = 0.292787177 t = 0.292787177 (y/c) = 0.292787177 (1.943km/300,000km)

= 1.896 micro seconds 2 x 10 - 6 sec --------------------------------------- two


48/57

With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time nowmass become an easier made -up. When the mass of - Muon were to be measured cloudchambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393, frompublished data and if we take n as 1.393, /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]}

/t = - 0.187647831 /t = 0.187647831= 0.187647831With m = m (0)e /t = m (e)e 1/0.187647931

And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- ThreeThis is the mass of the - Meson; or, - Muon

Page 47This can be done with more accurate results and can be seen from a totally different new

view pointAnd use (v/c) = 1/d; d = density of air at 1 km half distance = 1/1.07; engineering tables.Then, T = t e ; = arc tan (v/c)

Means N = N (0)e

; = arc tan (v/c)And m = m (0)e ; = arc tan (v/c)T = t e = t [cosine + sine ]T = T (x) + T (y) = t [cosine + sine ]T (x) = = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine (/2) = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

T (x) = = t cosine = t cosine arc tan (v/c)

Then N (x) = = N (0) cosine = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)And m (x) = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)

A- N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (1/d)

N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan (1/1.07)N (x) = 412.089522

B - T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)T (x) = (1.943/300,000) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)

T (x) = 2.054368496 x 10-6 sec

C - We should have m = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)

If you use T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07) = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}And / t = 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}


49/57

And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/n)]}And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]}And / t = 0.187647931

And m = m (0)e t/ = m (0)e 1/0.187647931And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three

With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time nowmass become an easier made -up. When the mass of - Muon were to be measured cloudchambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393, frompublished data and if we take n as 1.393,And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three

Page 48What happened is the amount of diffracted electrons was considered as the mass of a newparticle when it is an average of 206.79 electrons. What I am saying is that the "Atom" is whiteman trash and thanks to: or (564 - 412) x [564/4l2] 206.7917 - Real time Straight lineS = r[(r)+ (r)] tWith (r) = 0Then S = r[ (r)] t = r [cosine t+ sine t]Let r = r = v t Then S = v t [cosine t+ sine t]

S x + S y = v t [cosine t] + v t [ sine t]

Along the line of measurementSx = v tcosine tPerpendicular to the line of measurementS y= v t sine t

At time of measurement w t = arc tan (v/c)

Sx = v tcosine arc tan (v/c)S y= v t sine arc tan (v/c)

If v = cThen Sx = v tcosine arc tan (v/c) = c tcosine arc tan (c/c) = c t cosine (/4) = c t / 2S y= v t sine arc tan (v/c) = c tsine arc tan (c/c) = c t sine (/4) = c t / 2S = c tIf r = r(0)Sx = r(0)cosine arc tan (v/c) = r(0) [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]S y= r(0) sine arc tan (v/c)

If v


50/57

S = r [(r)] t+ [ + (r) t]With (r) = 0S = r [ + (r) t]

19 - Real time clock wise circular motionS = r [(r)+ (r)] t

And r = r- r (1)S = r- [(r)+ (r)] tr (1)

Page 49S = r [(r)] t- [ - (r) t] r (1)S = r [(r)] t- [ - (r) t]With (r) = 0S = r- [ - (r) t]

20 - Real time angular velocityIs ' = v/r = v (m)/rAnd = + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r

21 - Real time Areal velocityA = r x d r/2Areal velocity: d A/d t = r x (d r/2d t)= r x v/2And S x (d S/2d t) = S x P/2

= r [(r)+ (r)] t x {[v + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] t}/2=r x v/22[(r)+ (r)] t

S x P/2 =r x v/22[(r)+ (r)] t

22 - Real time Areal velocity in polar coordinatesS x P/2 =r x v/22[(r)+ (r)] t

= [rr (1)] x[r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2= (r '/2) [2[(r)+ (r)] t]

23 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects in polar coordinatesS x P/2 =r x v/22[(r)+ (r)] t

= [rr (1)] x[r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2= (r '/2) [2[(r)+ (r)] t]

With (r) = 0S x P/2 = (r '/2) [2 (r) t]

24 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects delay factor in polar coordinates


51/57

S x P/2 =r x v/22[(r)+ (r)] t= [rr (1)] x[r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2= (r '/2) [2[(r)+ (r)] t]

With (r) = 0

S x P/2 = (r '/2) [2 (r) t

]= (r '/2) [cosine 2 t + sine 2 t]S x P/2 (x) = (r '/2) cosine 2 t

= (r '/2) [1 - sine t]S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine t

Page 50Approximation

S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine tWith T = arc tan (v/c)

S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine arc tan (v/c)With (v/c)


52/57

{(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) With = .206, T = 244.7; v = v* + v; v* = orbital velocity = 35.12 km/sec v = spin speed ofobserver on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. And v (Mercury) = 6.52km/secv = v* + v = 41.94 km/secAnd W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c)

= [-720x36526x3600/244.7] (1.00761) (41.94/300,000) = 8.17 Arc sec /century

30 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc sec/centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

Page 5131 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/ centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36526/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

32 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/year

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century33 - Binary stars apsidal motion delays in arc degree/cycleW" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

34 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per century:W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

35 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36528/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

36 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per year:W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

37 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree per year:W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

38 - Global Positioning Systems delays in arc degree per cycle:W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

39- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per cycle:W" (calculated) = [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

40- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per day:W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

41- Global Positioning Systems delays in second per cycle:W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

42 - Global Positioning Systems delays in second per day:


53/57

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) sec/day

43 - Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/dayU (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) sec/day

44- Application of Global positioning systemGPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period ; = 0And v = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed;And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/secondThen v* +/- v = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second

Page 52We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are oppositeGPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc

W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) ]} [(v +/- v*)/c] seconds/day

W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] seconds of arc /1 dayW" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by24hours/360degress = 15

U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/dayU = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day

45 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays = [16 G M/c] [1 +/- (v/v*)]

46- Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays Nahhas

constant (0) = 16 G M/c = 247.597 s

48 - Mars telecommunications around the sun time delays Shapiro's historical mistake = [16 G M/c] [1 + (v/v*)] = 250 s

46 - Circular motion Advance of starting point visual effectsW" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] (v/c) arc sec/ century; = 0

49- Time FactorS x= r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]S x = r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]If (v/c) = (1/n) = (1/ refractive index) and the velocity is constant in absolute valueOr S x = c (x) and r = c t; then (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]Along the line of measurement (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]Perpendicular to the line of measurementS y = r sine arc tan (v/c)


54/57

S y = r sine arc tan (v/c)And (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c) = t sine arc tan (1/n)

50 - Reines and Cowans: 1953 Savannah River Neutrino experiment historical mistakeAlong the line of measurement

(x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]With t = 25 sAnd n of water = 1.33 < n < 1.44 = n of tri ethyl benzene (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]4.67 s < (x) < 5 s

Page 53

Newton's equations solved wrong for 350 years

Abstract: This is the real time solution to the problem of planetary system motion around their

motion sun and the solution to the 350 years advance of perihelion/apsidal motion puzzle. Thisis the proof that the motion of planets around their mother sun is an ellipse and a real time"apparent" visual effect advance of perihelion/ apsidal motion.


Real time solution is:Real time orbit: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] t

Real time mass m = m (, 0) [(m)+ (m)] t"Apparent advance of perihelion"

W" (ca

Date post:	06-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	jimwauters
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

27735830 Kepler s Reply to Newton and Einstein There Are No Physicists After Me Only Idiots

Documents