+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Date post: 23-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: kita
View: 40 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
2D Analyses Mesh Refinement. Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations. But first …. MARC output for beam elements … They make physical sense to me!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
16
2D Analyses Mesh Refinement Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations
Transcript
Page 1: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

2D AnalysesMesh Refinement

Structural MechanicsDisplacement-based Formulations

Page 2: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

But first …• MARC output for beam elements …

• They make physical sense to me!

For conventional (non-numerically integrated) elastic beams (types 31, 52, 98), there are no layers - so only the generalized strains and stresses are reported for these elements. Refer to Marc Volume B: Element Library for a definition of the generalized strain and stress output for each element type. Equivalent quantities are not computed for these element types since they do not make physical numerical analysis sense. The thermal strain tensor (post code 371) or its associated components (post codes 71-76) are available.

(marc_2010_doc_volume_c.pdf, pg. 419, footnote to Table 3-4 “Element Post Codes”)

Page 3: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Physical/Mathematical/Numerical

• Be ever-vigilant when using FEA software

• What is Physically simple (e.g. s = My/I) may not appear in a mathematical formulation– Obviously important, but an optional post-processing step

• What appears in a mathematical formulation may be obscure in a numerical implementation– Continuous quantities evaluated at discrete points

Page 4: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

MARC Beam Elements• MARC has nine different beam elements:

– 13 – 14 – 25 - 52 – 76 – 77 – 78 – 79 – 98

• Element Type is selected through Description and Options

• Pay attention to the Patran forms and look at the .dat file …

Page 5: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

ELEMENTS , 52,BEAM SECTBEAM 0, 4.0000E-4, 1.3333E-8, 1.3333E-8, 2.2533E-8, 4.0000E-4, 4.0000E-4,LAST

Page 6: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Post Codes• See marc_2010_doc_volume_c.pdf• Table 3-4 “Element Post Codes”)

• Patran offers this option in the Load Step specification

264 Axial Force (for beam elements)265 Moment Mxx (for beam elements)266 Moment Myy (for beam elements)267 Shear Force Vxz (for beam elements)268 Shear Force Vyz (for beam elements)269 Torque (for beam elements)

Page 7: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Load Step Creation (Modification)

Page 8: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Beam Elements, Refined Mesh• Create Mesh with Global Edge Length set to 0.5 (equivalence!)

Page 9: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Deformed Shape x 100• Tension, compression, and bending effects mixed

Page 10: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Axial Forces (Post Code 264)• Magnitudes are very similar to the Truss version• You must calculate axial stress (F/A) on your own if you want it!

Page 11: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Bending Moments• Small magnitudes overall, but could be significant locally

Page 12: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Getting to Know Elements• “Experiment” with simple situations …

Page 13: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

To Refine, or Not To Refine …

• It depends on the purpose of the analysis, the types of elements involved, and what your FEA code does

• For bar (truss) and beam elements:– Am I after displacements, or strain/stress?– Does my FEA code include analytical strain/stress?– What results does my FEA code produce?– Can I just do my own post-processing?

• Always refine other element types

Page 14: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

2D Idealizations

• There are no 1D problems, but we have 1D elements• There are no 2D problems, but we have 2D elements

• These situations idealize to 2D:– Plane strain– Plane stress– Axisymmetry– Plates and Shells

Page 15: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

2D Elements

• The most commonly used element types• Always use a 2D element if it is appropriate• Never use a 2D element if it is not• Appropriate use can depend on loading and material

properties as well as geometry

• You know it is a 2D element if:– The third dimension is not part of the finite element mesh– Thickness and other element properties are specified

Page 16: 2D Analyses Mesh Refinement

Plane Stress*

• Geometry is flat but not slender (occupies x,y plane)• Loading within the plane of the large dimensions– Stretch, compression, shear, etc. all OK– No transverse loading

• All z-containing stress components zero• Assume stresses constant through thickness– A consequence of “thinness” and lack of bending

* We are skipping plane strain, it’s just not that common


Recommended