+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: rhacq-kho
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 27

Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    1/27

    DIRECT

    PARTICIPATIONIN HOSTILITIES

    The CIVILIAN'S

    LOSS OF

    PROTECTION

    And

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    2/27

    Contents

    1. Legal Setting and Problem

    2. The ICRC InterpretiveGuidance Document

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    3/27

    Lawful Practice of Warfare:

    NECESSITY

    DISTINCTION

    PRECAUTION

    BASIC RULECivilians are PROTECTED against directattack unless and for such time as theydirectly participate in hostilities.

    AP I, Art. 51(3)

    AP II,Art. 13 (3)GC I-IV Common Art. 3 (1)Rule 6 CLS

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    4/27

    Basic Targeting Rules

    Civilian objects"all objects which are not military objectives."

    AP I, Art. 52 (1)

    Military objects

    " objects which by their nature, location, purpose or usemake an effective contribution to military action and whosetotal or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in thecircumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite militaryadvantage."

    AP I, Art. 52 (2)

    D

    IS

    T

    I

    NC

    T

    I

    O

    N

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    5/27

    The Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between

    the civilian population and combatants and between civilian

    objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their

    operations only against military objectives.

    AP I, Art 48

    In case of doubt whether a person is a civilian, that person shall

    be considered to be a civilian.AP I, Art. 50 (1)

    D

    I

    S

    T

    I

    N

    CT

    I

    O

    N

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    6/27

    Each party to the

    conflict must do

    everything feasible toverify that targets are

    military objectives

    P

    R

    EC

    A

    U

    T

    IO

    N

    S

    All feasibleprecautions must be

    taken to avoid, and in

    any event to

    minimise, incidentalloss of civilian life,

    injury to civilians and

    damage to civilian

    objects.

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    7/27

    Parties must do

    everythingfeasible to cancel

    or suspend an

    attack if it

    becomesapparent that the

    target is not a

    military objective

    P

    R

    E

    C

    A

    U

    T

    IO

    N

    S

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    8/27

    THE PROBLEMS:

    Who may be directly attacked?

    When does a civilian lose protection

    against direct attack?

    Which actions lead to this?

    How long does it last?

    What are the consequences?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    9/27

    ICRC Clarification Process

    Interpretive Guidance Document

    (2003 2008)

    Aims to enhance protection of civilians

    from arbitrary targeting

    Not a law-making exercise:

    Gives ICRC Opinion

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    10/27

    Who may be directly attacked?

    State Armed Forces

    Organised Armed Groups(Continuous Combat Function)

    Civilians Directly Participating in

    Hostilities

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    11/27

    Organised Armed Group?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    12/27

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    13/27

    The "armed military wing" of non-

    State party to the conflict

    Not the same as "party to the conflict" itself:

    Not the political wing

    Not the administrative branch

    Not the humanitarian branch

    Not based on abstract or arbitrary affiliation:

    Same ethnic group

    Family ties to fighters

    Geographic proximity

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    14/27

    Organised Armed Group?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    15/27

    WHO in an Organised Armed Group

    may be targeted directly ?

    ONLY those members who have assumed a

    "continuous combat function"

    This DOES NOT equal "combatant privilege"

    Problems with this?

    Example: People running a training camp?

    Sleeper cells?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    16/27

    Who may be directly attacked?

    State Armed Forces

    Organised Armed Groups(Continuous Combat Function)

    Civilians Directly Participating inHostilities

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    17/27

    Which Acts Constitute DPH

    Threshold of Harm

    Direct Causation

    Belligerent Nexus

    (cumulative)

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    18/27

    Threshold of Harm

    A specific act must be likely "to adversely

    affect the military operations or capacity

    of the enemy"

    or

    "to inflict death, injury, or destruction onpersons or objects protected against

    direct attack"

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    19/27

    Directly participating civilians?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    20/27

    Direct Causation

    There must be a direct causal link between

    a specific act and the harm likely to result

    from it.

    Not "war effort" or "moral support".

    Not "indirect" causation

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    21/27

    Belligerent Nexus

    The hostile act must be "specifically

    designed to directly cause the required

    threshold of harm in support of a party to

    the conflict and to the detriment ofanother".

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    22/27

    Directly participating civilians?

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    23/27

    When does a civilian lose protection?

    Preparation

    Deployment

    Return

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    24/27

    How long does it last?

    CIVILIANS lose protection against directattack for the duration of each specific act

    amounting to direct participation inhostilities.

    MEMBERS of ARMED FORCES orgroups of a party to the conflict lose civilian

    protection for the duration of their

    membership.

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    25/27

    Can Civilians regain their Protection?

    CIVILIANS who have stopped directlyparticipating

    MEMBERS of ARMED FORCES whohave abandoned or disengaged from the

    Combat Function.

    1. May no longer be attacked

    2. May be arrested and prosecuted

    3. Direct Participation not by itself prohibited in

    IHL

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    26/27

    \

  • 8/14/2019 3 - Direct Participation in Hostilities - David Maizlish

    27/27

    Thank You


Recommended