+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

Date post: 26-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: cameron-evans
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
25
June 26, 2022 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev
Transcript
Page 1: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

April 10, 2023

US and UK anticorruption regime

By Dmitry Dementyev

Page 2: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

2

WHAT IS US / UK ANTI-BRIBERY REGIME?

- easy and complex at the same time

Page 3: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

33

US FCPA summary

§78m(а). Reports by issuer of security; contents:- issuers, registered pursuant to 78l- keep information and documents reasonably current- annual and quarterly reports

§78dd-1 [Section 30A of the Securities & Exchange Act of 1934]Prohibited foreign trade practices by issuers

US Code / Title 15. Commerce and Trade / Chapter 2B – Securities Exchanges

Bribery of Foreign Officials

§78m(b). Books, records, and internal accounting- issuers registered (78l), and filing reports (78o(d)) - in reasonable detail / accurately and fairly reflect- system of internal accounting controls

§78m. Periodical and other reports

§78dd-2: Prohibited foreign trade practices by domestic concerns

§78dd-3: Prohibited foreign trade practices by persons other than issuers

§78dd-1(a): general jurisdiction- issuers (78l/78j(d))- use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce

§78ff. Penalties

1 2

§78dd-1(g): alternative jurisdiction- U.S. domestic issuers - use of mails or any means or instrumentalities is unnecessary

Page 4: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

4 | 4

UK BA summary

Section 1: Bribing another person

Section 6: Bribery of foreign public officials

Section 7: Failure of commercial organizations

to prevent bribery

Section 14: Offenses 1, 2 and 6 by bodies corporate

• Separate offense for bribery of foreign officials (drafted to resemble Anti-bribery Convention)• Does not require the showing of improper performance

U.K. Bribery Act 2010

• Offering, promising or giving something before / after the fact• It does not matter if something is not given in return• what matters is improper performance of a relevant function or activity (reasonable expectation test)

• A relevant commercial entity is guilty of an offense in this section if an associated person is guilty of an offense under Section 1 or 6 or would be guilty had the jurisdiction applied

• liability for management if offense has been committed with their consent or connivance

• Books and records under UK Companies Act

Page 5: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

5

WHAT EXACTLY ARE THE THINGS THAT I MUST NOT DO?

- must not bribe public officials

Page 6: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

6

What is a bribe?

- Anything of value

Gifts

Entertainment and hospitality

“Facilitation payments”?

Page 7: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

7

Who are public officials?

Foreign official is any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof”

What is “instrumentality”?

The term is loosely applied by US DoJ

Recently considered by federal district courts ownership / financial control actual control privileges and obligations financing perception is reality

Page 8: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

8

CAN I “STRUCTURE” MYSELF OUT?

- most likely not

Page 9: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

9

UK BA JurisdictionSection 1: Bribing

another personSection 6: Bribery of

foreign public officialsSection 7: Failure of

commercial organizations to prevent bribery

Section 14: Offenses 1, 2 and 6 by bodies

corporate

Section 12: territorial application• act or omission which form part of the offense is committed in the UK• if outside the UK – there must be “close connection”

Section 7: Carrying business or partof business in the UK

Non-executive director with knowledge

Executive director acting illegally

Page 10: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

10

UK BA Jurisdiction: uncertainty

Ministry of justice: common sense approach on a case-by-case basis “having demonstrable business presence” listing +?

Courts: no binding precedent / instructive only “part of a business” under Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

SFO: likely take an expansive view value + competitive disadvantage for UK business

Page 11: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

11

US FCPA Jurisdiction

Issuers (foreign domestic) / director, employee or agent

Domestic concerns / director, employee or agent

While in the territory of the US

- Use of means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce

- Expansive interpretation of prong 3

- Aiding and abetting / conspiracy

Page 12: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

12

WILL THEY EVER KNOW WHAT I DID IN GEORGIA?

- they may

Page 13: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

13

How will they know about a violation?

Requests for legal assistance

Competitors

SARs to UK Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA)

Whistleblowers (US SEC & UK SFO)

Page 14: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

14

CAN I CHOOSE TO STAY QUIET?

- choose wisely

Page 15: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

15

Disclosure Obligations

US: FCPA violations are categorized as a type of fraud and trigger SOX violations The application of SOX can affect a decision regarding disclosure Sec. 302 of SOX (certification of financial statements by CEOs and CFOs)

mandates auditors and the board of directors to disclose any fraud (material or immaterial) involving persons with a significant role in corporate internal control

Sec. 404 of SOX (internal control procedures) requires reporting on internal controls with respect to all consolidated subsidiaries, including minority-owned subsidiaries

The UK: UK Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA)

Page 16: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

16

WILL THEY LET BYGONES BE BYGONES?

- most likely not

Page 17: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

17

Statute of Limitations

FCPA

- Tolling agreements

- MLATS

BA

- no Statute of Limitations

Giving of a bribe – crime is complete[Pendergast v. United States, 317 U.S. 412, 418 (1943)] No criminal prosecution, UNLESS

5 years

5 years

No criminal prosecution

Criminal conspiracy: [United States v. Milstein, 401 F.3d 53, 71 (2d Cir. 2005)]

Page 18: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

18

CAN I PLAY IT SAFE?

- you should try

Page 19: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

19

Compliance Program

UK BA: Adequate procedures (UK BA, Official Guidance) Full defense under Section 7

FCPA: Compliance and internal controls (Sentencing

Guidelines, DPAs, NPAs) Mitigating factor

Page 20: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

20

Compliance: information flow

Are there rules and procedures in place?

Have the rules been properly conveyed?

Has the target audience had a chance to ask questions?

What are the consequences for breaking the rules?

Have the rules been updated?

Page 21: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

21

Compliance: liability pitfalls

Sec 802 of SOX – obstruction of justice

Punishable by a fine and imprisonment of up to 20 years

CCI case:

flushing down stuff during internal investigation

US v Ray: obstruction before any federal investigation

Investigating company counsel are “deputized”

Page 22: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

22

FINAL THOUGHTS

Page 23: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

23

- The laws are relevant for companies that do NOT fall within the jurisdictional reach

- Transition from “compliance-curious” to “compliance-focused”

- Compliance implementation requires effort

- Compliance implementation must take into account local law specifics

Page 24: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

24

QUESTIONS?

Page 25: 3 January 2014 US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev.

25

Contact information

Dmitry DementyevCorporate GroupTel.: +7 495 633 70 17Fax: +7 495 644 05 99Email : [email protected]


Recommended